#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 550 of 1
it was so sad
I don’t know why they stopped ngl
And now I’m scared to find out
what happened to soothouse
they ran out of ideas
What is soothouse
Oh I thought someone had DIED
^^
it's not that
but this was a misremembering
jschlatt is funny as fuck
^^^
It’s basically exactly my sense of humour
same
you're so quirky sis
ok they actually left because reddit text to speech channels were doing kind of the same stuff but at 10x the rate and they thought there was no point anymore
Yeah that’s what I feared
ah
you still have good channels like jeremy collects and matt rose
if u pass a rope through two portals facing each other on opposite ends of a hallway and tied it at its ends. Would it form a straight line or a circle
Wouldn't it fall to the floor? So a straight line
mm I suppose it would fall
it does meet at both ends though
does that not qualify it as a loop then?
Lmao idk there's too many assumptions you have to make with portals
yea it’s sort of a stupid question but I found it interesting lol
Oh I see, it would be flat on the ground but connected yes so yes a circle in a way. Or maybe just a straight line broken at the portal point and rearranged so the end points meet
also
@sleek wing u happy?
wtf is going on 
Life man
Depends how you define “loop”
But I think it is
Cause the rope is basically [0,1] with 0 glued to 1
I think it would be a circle lying on the ground
Well depends on how you define circle I guess
Why did the algebraist love popcorn
@alpine kindle yesterday you asked for recomendations for books about complex geometry. I think a book on riemann surfaces is a good starting point. Something like Miranda Riemann Surfaces and Algebraic Curves or Forster Lectures on Riemann Surfaces
this is also where I plug kirwan's complex algebraic curves bc I had a chat with her recently and she's lovely
and also (potentially more importantly) I've heard it's good
looks like a very good introductory book
By using only the basic techniques acquired in most undergraduate courses in mathematics, Dr. Kirwan introduces the theory, observes the algebraic and topological properties of complex algebraic curves, and shows how they are related to complex analysis.
it covers less and is more undergrad friendly than the 2 i mentioned, i think
I got accepted to an Ms math program and im fairly terrified
terrified?
Welp, at least hopefully it'll be easier to relearn stuff on the fly as you've already had a first pass. Congrats on the acceptance though!
I hope so 😵
I was already going to look at schlag
oh that looks really good too
riemann-roch, abel-jacobi and uniformization are big theorems
it serves as an intro to complex analysis in general as well, which is killing two birds with one stone

I just asked if anyone knows english literature
ok
what's your question about english literature
by
i mean just ask your question
No, that was the question, "does anyone know english literature"
Do you know english literature, are you into it even a little, do you read books about English literature
by someone "knowing" english literature do you mean "they have read books in english" or "they are into critical analysis of english literature"
Could be little of any
So thats a yes?
yes, i guess
Alright, thanks for answering, i am enlightened now, appreciate it
Is that a strange question to ask?
yes
mainly because depending on how you interpret it, the answer will almost always be yes if there's an english speaker in the vicinity
Well, i mean, i am aware of that
why do you ask
I don't know
There was polar, bear, in the woods
You into, football
Yea so i was walking, and a polar bear cane flying
Came*
Aaa, i think
Pretty sure
Okay, i waited, and saw it, grab something, like a cat
And it walked
In the woods
What
tf is going on
i used "take" instead of give, like u said
are u happy now
on a scale from 1 to 0
are you happy
good morning shyshu!
im open to suggestions, are you happy
good morning darq!
in set theory, why we consider two sets to be equal only when both are subsets ($\subseteq$) of each other?
hey can anyone help me with herons formula here ?
tommy
even when the symbol $\subseteq$ is used when all the elements of one set are also elements of another
tommy
well if every element of A is in B and every element in B is in A, then what's the difference between A and B?
yes, this is my question
no that's my question
tommy
that sounds like a good answer to me
if they're not different, I don't see why we shouldn't call them equal
exactly
a similar example is if $x \le y$ and $y \le x$ then $x=y$
Merosity
maybe that helps to make it feel more natural
tommy
what is in B that is not in A
not enough info to say, could be nothing since $B \subseteq B$
Merosity
i think it's just being pedantic
I guess you could write it as $B \setminus A$
Merosity
since those are elements of B that aren't in A, but B\B = {}
which is the same thing I said a second ago
haha idk what to tell you, it seems like you understand it you just don't like it
tommy
Yeah
\subseteq means
C is a subset of B. Maybe it's equal idk
If B also happens to be a subset of C, then they will be equal
Think of inequalities
haha history repeating itself
yeah
\le allows for the possibility that you're strictly bigger, it also allows for the possibility of equality. Two cases you're not sure which one yet
But you know it's one of them
I know Merosity brought this up
But if the inequalities case doesn't explain fully the sets case
Then you don't understand either case well enough
And we should focus on processing that more
yeah agreed
What are major differences in elliptic curves over Q and over finite fields
interesting question idk off hand but something fun to consider is every finite field is the residue field of some unramified p-adic field extension, which of course also contains the rationals, so that might be one way to think of comparing them directly.
who knows something about post tensioning design
I sure as heck dont
can i ask for an advice?
you can try
i'm entering high school and i don't know if i should diversify my knowledge and experience or focus on a specific scope. my choices are mostly non-stem since that's what i perceive to be where my weaknesses are, in socializing. but my interest is more drifted for science since i might thrive in that area more, what should i do?
dont worry
trust me it really doesnt matter that much
hmmm
hey just wanted to ask if anyone has that old yt of the prof proving 1 =0
I think Eddie woo made it
oh tysm
You realize that the proof is completely wrong, right?
What is the most important field of mathematics used for someone joining Computer Engineering
computer engineering seems like a pretty big field, hard to tell
Linear Algebra because computer engineering is a mix of electrical and comp sci, matrices definitely get used a lot in EE and a good amount in CS
A train has cars. Each car has a number (finite or infinite) of elements that belong to the domain of the function "f". The train arrives at the station of function "f". The train parks.
The station (from left to right) has:
-A circular area that is the domain.
-A prism (which is the function f:f(x))
-A circular area that is the range.
A mechanical arm takes an item from the first car and places it on the domain circle. This moves towards the prism, after leaving it, the element that comes out goes towards the range of the function. It must now wait for another mechanical arm to load it onto an empty wagon.
The train brings elements from the domain, they pass through the function, are loaded onto the train, and the train leaves the station with elements from the range of the function.
As images come out of the function, the graph of the function is built behind the station.
When the train has all the images of the function in the wagons, it goes to "The Codomain cylinder", a place where the wagons will be stored in a cube, there is a cube for each function (with the largest existing domain) , this means that, if a function has domain (a,b), the wagons will be dispatched in the same bucket that contains functions with the same analytic expression but with domain (c,d).
The elements of the domain, if they are infinite elements, are interpreted as intervals. In this way, when the crane places what is in a wagon in the domain of the station, what it is placing is any element that is between "a and b". This representation is done like this: a prism is placed (if it is a closed interval) that is representing the interval "a,b". (There are many variations here)
The color of the prism can vary depending on what you want to notice, if it is a domain with 4 elements then each one can have a different color but otherwise, no.
Any opinion/critique on that? Thank you It´s a idea
Thanks! :)
@charred mortar 😳
also why are there so many ab's in here, is that an inside joke or something
I think it’s just a common username
I just used ab because lazy
Once I got booted out of a server because a bunch of spammers also went by ab
I'm onto you former NBA player Anthony Bennett
@cold iron
we'll talk here
about geometry
so what level of geometry are you guys at?
so I can know what topics to tell you about
i can give you formulas
I've finished geometry
finished geometry 

Indeed
Differential Geometry: Am I a joke to you 

hi i want to try proving fermats little theorem, do you think i could do it? Is it really hard to prove or is it not that hard

Lmao but what are your opinions
If you had to prove it, it would've been a conjecture not a theorem. Don't waste time
Yeah i believe in u
so its not too out there for a hser doing competition math right?
i dont want to spend too much time on it not knowing enough math to get anywhere near it thats all xd
it's kinda hard to tell when you're shitposting or not
lel
I finished geometry
There's no more geometry for me
i haven't done geometry in ages
just bang your head on euclidean geo
problems that are made to be annoying
I've already finished all euclidean geometry, my book was very good and I've done thousands proofs
ok solve every imo p3,6 geo
why
because
I'm not here for competition on useless problems. I don't like abstract math
why solve something that is already true
imagine someone gives you a statement and asks you to prove it
it's already true
why cry about stuff we made up ourselves
huh
I think it's reasonable enough to at least try to prove Fermat's little theorem on your own if you're doing comp math
alright thanks im working on it
Yea why bother learning things people already figured out 
is it?
we learned this is middle school
5-8
i didn't bother listing out the formulas for all of the other shapes
just the right triangle took me like 10 minutes to do

i dont think anyone does math tbh i think math does them
i do math 

my undergrad thesis is like in 2 years but idk what branch of math to choose
good thing you have two years then
Topology 
why tho
why not complex anal or lie theory or analytic number theory
or graph theory 
well obviously not graph theory, but among others it's tough to choose
Among us
why is yoneda called a lemma?
it was probably originally used in a proof of something else
by a person named yoneda

nvmmm
this one is explaining where it originated from
second reply is OP
but not why it's called a lemma
hm
also, the answers are like 3 pages long so I noped out 💀
My best guess would be due to the fact that its frequently used in the proofs of other statements, even though its very general. I imagine historically it was initially labeled as a lemma and it just stuck
Like Schur's Lemma
hello
I have
a question...
what's 9+10?
answer honestly
this is worth 100% of your grades
Don't troll thanks
,ui Pesar
Full name: Pesar#1330
Nickname: Pesar
Presence:
Do Not Disturb
Activity: Status: I use Cat Windows, Btw.
Device: Active on mobile
Seen in: 1 guild
Joined at: 03:31 PM, 21/06/2022
(2 minutes ago)
Created at: 07:10 AM, 04/11/2020
(594 days 8 hours and 23 minutes ago)
None
90597. gold21#0015
90598. Dziber#4837
90599. Quantum#1600
90600. > Pesar#1330
90601. chvrlie#3978
help me
you joined a math server coz your brother asked what's 10+9?
I'm serious
yes
and cuz im bad at math
No one is falling for it, stop
Good for you
Oh no
update, proved it for odd numbers
really not sure how to go about the even numbers lmfao
what does it mean by R x Y here?
zy in set of r multiplied by y goes to another set L in r?
Cartesian product
i dont think they would use the multiplication sign for a different thing even in advanced math, thats just a dumb idea
oop
yeah that's cartesian product
is R x Y = R?
(i mean if equation means L:(z,y) in R x Y is same as L(z,y) in R or does it points out something else)
yep
that's a cartesian product
If you know what it is, why would you think that R x Y = R? Genuine question
it's saying the ordered pair (z,y) is in the cartesian product of R and whatever Y is
i think juno is confused about the arrow
i was confused with the notations
got it now
Yeah as is, L takes a pair (z,y) in RxY, and maps it to some number L(z,y) in R, whatever that may be
Did I do something wrong?
if you read what was on #❓how-to-get-help you would know >.>
serious question:
imagine you had a cup which you just used to drink milk
and there were still milk droplets in
and then you wanted to drink water
do you wash the cup first or do you just use it as is?
or do you use another cup?
...
it's really important
rinse with water and then fill with water to drink
but like
yooo
not really
in my water?
ye
i mean, usually not
water is fantastic as it is
i usually like cold water
I mean, I can't live without it
that doesnt get boring
hi tteppa
really?
even if you only had water to drink for the rest of your life?
i mean, it doesnt get boring in the short term
i would wash out the cup
why?
it tastes really good
you can even dip oreos in mi-ater
my preferred ratio is 70-30
just call it wilk
hmm

oh, good name
it barely tastes at all tbh
it's like
a drop or 2 of milk
you need to mix it with some salt
jkjk lol

milk with sugar?
*wilk
did I read that correctly?
what
shyshu
idk what u are talking about
did I see what I saw?
IDK OK!
LMAOO
why the fuck do i keep making that typo
I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU JUST SAID THAT
jesus man
What-
it must be autocorrect
Did someone say a bad word?
no
Shyshu-?
(getting used to your typing style)
i didnt say any fucked up bullshit
I-
NoooOOoO
...
shyshu would never

im on computer
i didnt!
darq ill give u blackmail on slurp
wtf

dont do this to me!
holy shit I'm sold
im innocent!
Tell me or else I will actually find you
shyshu, I'm sorry I need this
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
try reading milk

ok I've read it
while being horny
ok that's already what I knew
that's all I'm gonna say
darq you ever posted a photo you took with your phone on this server
he escapes me

I posted screen shots
but i was at a hotel in colorado
is it a big deal?
metadata

good night
night, shy
bruhhhh
everyone knew this
swindler
I DIDN'T KNOW THAT
@neat frost how bad is it?
tyty
What a sheepish response
he's ~5'3", 4"

darq typed stareflush and then deleted
Lol
5'3 
that's 161 cm (in case you're normal)
Sorry I use freedom units

did i miss it?
im 5'3" up your mom

yesh?
I'm mad that that made me laugh
oh
why
idk i scrolled through the chat
and i was too lazy to read anything
but i got selfie vibes

The amount of warnings in the blue book is annoying
contemplating whether I should make this weirder
do yall compile your latex?
yes
Half+ the overfull hboxes are because people used \\ 
wait you're supposed to actually give a fuck about overfull hboxes
ryc they obv didnt watch your latex workshop
We don't allow random selfies in these parts slurp
Check yourself
I have a few words for you wew
cope
but i forget what they are
you don't?
Oh yeah
The overful hboxes are really tough in these notes
Did you even try compiling your latex wew?

Overfull hboxes are generally very easy to avoid: dont do anything stupid
if youre not doing anything complicated, you shouldnt get an overfull hbox
yeah
Then
it compiled
Did you realize that textul is not a valid macro?
not doing anything stupid =/= easy
Did you check the errors?
tf you on about?
Because TeX is being nice
this is why I prefer my white box
type shit into it
tells you you have an error on some line, usually the wrong fucking line
white box
and you have no choice but to fix it
Compiling can be a very expensive process, so TeX has methods for allowing the user to dynamically fix errors instead of halting compilation
ryc how come you dont have any claimed sections?
how else am i supposed to judge your latex?
I'm the contractor. You do your job, and I'll do mine.
Chess
every damn game 
WHY
welp
only illogical number theory for me ty
Based
Is this just a random bookstore?
This is my university's library
Tata
Ah the math building has a library but the university one wasn't that great last time I checked
cause u posted a picture with 5 books and they all seem crappy
...


ngl cmarco
ive seen a lot of really fkin bad takes here
this one might be worse than the capacitator balloon dude
nah i dont really care
damn we got hikaru fuckin nakamura up in here
Today I had a 2hr meeting with a philologist, one of the most important in my country, and he pretty much agreed with my way of thinking about education that most people (anglo-saxon mainly) shit on
k
day #3 of trying to figure out if cmarco is shitposting or not
absolutely
why even bother?
I think there's a bad take in the us of education as mainly free childcare
i just treat everything everyone says as a shitpost
That Scientific (or Mathematics) education is useless when monothematic and only focused on that. Citing his words, "An Engineer or a scientist is only half complete if he has not expanded his mind by learning from the classics of literature and philosophy."
what does that have to do with anything lmao
And it's danger for society to not pursue the Reinassance concept of learning in all disciplines
I think that's literally the pov of every liberal arts college
^
and many prestigious universities in "anglo-saxon" countries force you to learn those subjects
... isn't UK and USA the place where you drop subjects lmao?
I mean it depends on the place in the UK or US
i think you dont understand how college in the us works lol
it's not one monolithic entity
something at one college could be completely different at a college literally a mile away
and that is the case very often
Yes and the reason for core classes for a degree is to attempt to give people a well rounded education
the us isn't anglo saxonic, is it?
that shit must've been before the renaissance lmao
...
Pty they just don't understand object permanence
also can we note the sheer mathematical expertise that must have been required to look at a picture of five books and immediately deduce that they're all bad?
:
That's exactly my point
US is one of the countries that focuses most on a broad education lmao
What
Uhm
Nope
How is that your point cmarco
I've been reading Mumfords Tata lectures on Theta II for a while now
And again it really varies place to place
i was typing out a whole follow-up insult but emma said it would be mean and i was like "hm" and agreed and deleted it and now i feel like i should have posted it anyways
lmao
There are 50 individual states
Its great to have a physical copy
Trying to characterize education in the us as a whole is kind of silly
My point is that I've not been a "mathematical expertise" because I believe in having a broad and properly done education in all subjects to be way more valuable than just studying math and physics all day and winning IMO or something
lmao
Yes
I don't think we're being mean tbh
It's ptys personal choice to be reading math books
find one accredited university in the US that does not require significant general education requirements for a bachelors degree in math.
◉w◉
I mean that's only because cmarco keeps saying more shit
Which makes you want to post
Idek what were talking about
Okay makes sense
I am normal. Maybe someone never gets what I say
Have you tried communicating?
I'm still trying to find out why you think that US universities "shit on" general education requirements
élite education 🙂

wat
let's not get into this, It's not my point
Thise are ivory league
I don't think you have a point cmarco
If you don't think people are understanding you maybe try to clarify
What exactly your point is
My point is that many other countries are lacking of classical knowledge and always trying to be more "specific" into science subjects
all of this to compete with eachother
Do you have info about this?
without the classics and philosophy, and literature, we'll go nowhere.
Like stats about this or whatever
why not
I have heard that sort of thing too in particular universities but idk how well that generalizes
ok, so you seriously think the educational system can really do a good job of teaching philosophy and literature?
Because it's a very general statement
I have the book I'm reading the the latinist and philologist that I met today, but it's written in italian. Can't really recommend this source since it has no translations
even if what you're claiming is true
and my point is that I think you lack understanding of other countries if you're citing the US as an example
Anyway beyond this what's your point?
Liberal arts education (from Latin liberalis "free" and ars "art or principled practice") is the traditional academic program in Western higher education. Liberal arts takes the term art in the sense of a learned skill rather than specifically the fine arts. Liberal arts education can refer to studies in a liberal arts degree program or to a uni...
This Wikipedia page is pretty interesting
That the future is going to be dangerous if the specialist will keep getting "specialized" knowledge without a reinassance approach of knowledge to their topic. But this mindset must start early on in education. High quality classical literature, philosophy, history , etc. should all be mandatory.
Lol
to put it bluntly, I think he's just mad other countries don't put as much work load on HSers as his country does
thankfully, at my university (which is in the US, btw), all those are mandatory, and more
Oh I see
so I guess my university isn't "dangerous"
although every other day I get emails that aggravated assaults happen within a few miles of the campus
I'm criticizing my own country if that's the case you wanna hear
Because all these technical schools, they're not always a good thing.
They provide "workers" and "specialist". But not thinkers.
society needs workers and specialists
Just people to be used for works for the global economy
even in rome, where the term "liberal arts" really originated from, only free men were able to educate themselves in the "arts", the dirty shit was still done by the working-class
maybe not teach math as only computation
arithmatic goes on a bit too long imo
Like I don't really understand what the goal is
and feels like busy work more than anything
cmarco, you think it's the government's responsibility to make thinkers
with the level of technology we have now, society still needs workers, and I think it's blatantly disrespectful to disregard their contribution of society
do you realize how problematic that is?
Yeah
Do more problems
And less formality
Honestly I think Bourbaki kind of fucked up when they tried to add formalism to math education
hs geo is cringe beyond belief
My phone keeps delaying sending messages
Honestly I think formalism wasn't that great for math education
As a whole
It's boring af
Also I have my own critiques on some official math exams that exist in the USA but whatever, somebody will get triggered if I mention anything from there.
then don't mention it
^
Cmarco it's not what you say, it's how you say it
You aren't communicating well at all, idk if you can see that
precalc is algebra/geometry review with some concepts taught in calc/linalg im p sure
If you want to have actual conversations you should think about your communication more
I mean I agree that math education is kinda fucked, but I also don't think there's an easy way to fix it
and what do all of them have in common?
none of them really encourage critical thinking
i learned more about math/critical thinking skills from my physics class than my precalc class

Hard to conversate here, plus not in my native language (seems English monolinguism conquered this world anyways).
不适因为你的英文不好,是因为你说话的口气
I'm not mandarin chinese native either
english is the most common second language
native speakers are actually a minority within people that speak english
lmfao
well there are more native mandarin speakers than native english speakers
damn thats actually fucking weird to think about
well, supposedly given the population number
so worth a shot, since mandarin monolingualism has conquered the world
Mandarin hasn't conquered anything outside China basically
singapore
uhh
English is the new French like in the XIX century
let me just pull the data
so having a lingua franca is a bad thing?
or would you prefer for the international community to not be able to communicate effectively since there's no lingua franca.
look at this article for example
This is something to think about for the future
do you realize how much 20% out of 1 billion is?
...
alright it's getting kind of boring listening to someone complain about shit without any coherent arguments
depends if you want to actually retain the knowledge
I did it in a little over a month, but it took me a while more to internalize the content
Think of verse Matthew 7:24
"Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock."
...

the audacity of cmarco comparing himself to me will not go unnoticed, i promise
No, it's a reminder to listen and to remember that not all truths need to be verifiable and with proofs
hahahahah
unfortunately I am not Christian
hi not Christian im valley
and if I were you, I would be ranting about how Christianity has taken over the world
What's Calc 1?
so much for pushing the "renaissance thoughts"
calc 1 is like
lmao
okay listen cmarco you just broke down every single facet of merit your argument ever had lmfao
saying that?
in a math discord?
really?
my primary goal is to study calc since it's pretty cool from what ive done
secondary goal is to completely obliterate my ap calc class
cmarco, I'm trying my best to not be mean
Oh, the real limits and derivatives or the awkwardly simplified versions that I find in some places?
I swear
what do you mean "real"?
Formal definitions and all theorems regarding them. Not the fake ones. With proofs too
excuse me
sounds like you're forcing people to become specialists in math to me
they're not fake 
and I don't stand for that cuz I support a LA education
just because it isn't a formal definition doesn't mean its fake
yeah uh
good night yall
im also outta here
gnnnn
lmao
...
somehow i doubt anyone here fits your particular definition of wisdom :/
man's simultaneously experiencing significant cognitive dissonance and has an overinflated ego and sense of self-importance at the same time
My knowledge, I compare it to Socrates' most famous quote
"I know that I do not know"
do we have another crank in the chat?
why should a wise person listen to someone who does not know
it's cmarco
absolutely
Because the more I open my mind to new and broad topics, the more I realize I do not know
congratulations, you have discovered philosophy. are you going to cry about it, or learn and enjoy learning anyways?
and the more you speak, the more I realize I should not be conversing w/ you
darq
he does this on the reg
this isn't new
look through his msg history lol
Also am I not free to express my concerns on the dangers of early "specialization" trend going on
oh you're free
you mentioned the US as one of the countries that "shit on" general education though
and I'd like any sort of proof that that's the case
I think you don't really want to hear the truth
cmarco do you know the truth
you are actively trying your hardest not to have a conversation cmarco
find one accredited mathematics bachelors program that does not have a significant general education requirement
hi
on the contrary, I would really love for you to find one such example
The issue is not US Only
yes, but you said it was present in the US
also uh
so I'd like an example of where it's present
thats kinda avoiding the question
The countries that have adopted the "paid school is good, free is horrible on average" model, they're to be found in many countries.
even "institutes of technology" such as MIT require extensive general education:
A country that still heavily relies on private school, cannot call itself educated for all equally.
oh no
yeah well most graduates in the US come from public schools
anyways I'd still like a single example of "concerning specialization" in american higher education
early specialisation is a thing (an issue, if you want) in the uk, but not the us afaik
can you give an example
which over the course of the last half-hour, you have not managed to find
I would be rather happing in knowing how an average Humanities Arts & Social science syllabus and tests look like
Are we even talking about standardized tests like always
dont
the burden of proof is on you to show that the US "shits on" general education, since you suggested that to be the case
now, if you had a general education, including that in philosophy, you would know that
no point, there's an honest-to-god crank here
and I'd expect one that has received a decent liberal arts education to make more coherent and sensical arguments
I surely can, small is my will to do it when I'm not taken seriously
I think this started as a criticism of cmarco's own country (not the us) and one false claim that the us suffers from the same problem
not really, he started it off by saying "most people" and especially anglo-saxons.
Yes, today I was talking about my own country when I met with the latinist. And the book I'm reading is about Italy too
But the main concern is that this type of dangerous culture seems to be inherited from those places
Here you go Marco
Those are all the required courses for any degree at my public state university
You pick and choose which ones you want to take from the list
that's crazy to me (in a good way)
I've done nothing but maths/physics since I turned 16
but would've been nice to take some liberal arts type stuff
at my public state university, to get a degree in any subject in my college, you need the following requirements:
- Entry-level Writing
- American History and American Institutions
- American Cultures
- Reading and Composition
- Quantitative Reasoning
- Foreign Language
- Arts & Literature
- Biological Sciences
- Historical Studies
- International Studies
- Philosophy and Values
- Physical Science
- Social and Behavioral Sciences
How many hours would one of those individual courses be? Like WW1 History for example
and each course would take approximately 12-16 hours of total time (including lecture, homework, discussion, and labs) a week for a semester
so 240-320 hours for each requirement
wtf
Recommended 2-3 hours outside of class for every credit hour (mileage may vary on that) and you'll typically spend 1 hour a day 2 days a week in a lecture for that course for 16 weeks
some of the requirements require 2 courses
Some courses have 3 or 4 days of in person class though
some of the requirements can be overlapped or satisfied ahead of time
Like calculus 1 has 3 days of lecture 1 day of recitation every week
only Entry-Level Writing, American History, Institutions, Reading and Composition, Quantitative Reasoning, and Foreign Language can be satisfied ahead of time, and reading and composition is extremely hard to satisfy ahead of time.
note that that's for that specific college
as discussed earlier different colleges are different
and any sweeper generalizations made should be very carefully vetted
Yes though having friends at another college in this state the requirements are very similar
I can't criticize the number of hours, some are very less, some are more.
What I find odd is the lack of "continuity" withing the program requirements
also notice that cmarco has managed to avoid producing any evidence of the supposed lack of general knowledge required in universities
very interesting how that happened
why should there be continuity if the goal is to provide a liberal arts education where one has a broad education involving a multitude of different subjects
I mean, take many w. european countries as example. I'll speak for mine but I know France works similarly
History as a subject, requires a continuity within 5 years.
Well yeah I did history from 1st grad to 12th grade before college lol
^
So you've covered from ancient history to like late 1900
Basically 6 years old - 18 years old you take core courses every year (in a lot places though private schools and states may have some variance) typically it's English, Math, Science, History for those years every year
if you're anti-specialist, why should we have to comprehensively cover that long stretch of history
because that seems like specialization in history
Yes you can even do if you're advanced student at my old highschool AP (college leve) human geography then Ap World History then AP US History (goes up to Modern day somewhat such as like early 2000s) then AP Government and Politics
I don't think you wake up one day and decide to study World War 2 as if nothing happened before.
most canadian provinces have the curriculum go "mathematics/science/english/french/social studies [i.e. history and geography]/gym" up until high school







