#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 545 of 1
I only attended my first conference last month.
In my research, I ended up inventing a new area of analysis.
One that was overlooked by experts in non-archimedean analysis for being too "uninteresting".
What is it called
I call it (p,q)-adic analysis.
CV have you ever considered that you read way too much into the anti establishment stuff
??
Lol
What is the "anti-establishment stuff" of which you speak?
I mean "the establishment thinks this is not worth studying"
What the heck
Uh, no.

The founder of the field thought as much.
And I've got Khrennikov on record saying that no one is studying it.
Who’s Khrennikov?
Sure I agree that the statement you made is true
But I think the sentiment you are taking away from it is very I guess revolutionary
Andrei Khrennikov, one of the more noteworthy scholars in non-archimedean analysis.
No, not revolutionary.
Just new.
Have pride
A lot of how you talk feels very revolutionary in sentiment I guess
I need to sell it, Emma.
😉
Having confidence in your own creation should be something to be prideful of Emma
That's not my point
Because people think Collatz isn't worth studying?
Because they think it's a lost cause?
Because they think it's not interesting?
Because they think there's no greater theory?
So you had to invent new math to solve a problem, seems familiar…
Yeah happens often in math
Because they think everyone who studies it is a crank?
Like maybe it works for young people
But this is literally the sort of attitude that can get you labeled as a crank
I'm talking pretty broadly about CV's behavior
or they said they invented it
…
Can you elaborate?
See, this is the bigotry I'm up against.
If I don't explain why my work is relevant or useful, people dismiss it as a waste of time.
unhelpful tbh
If I DO explain it and try to motivate it and make it interesting, they think I'm calling for revolution.
I mean the way you explain it feels like that I think
incomplete criticism + dismissive behavior can be interpreted as being blatantly disrespectful emma
yeah they are theatrical somewhat
I'm sorry. I'm passionate about mathematics.
I like what I do.
I think it's really neat and really fun.
And I want to share that joy with others.
If you want to condemn me for that, go ahead.
I didn’t see a problem? What’s wrong Emma I don’t get it.
I dont see any solutions being given though

Its more like, I dont like how you act and I believe others would disapprove
Colee you're being unnecessarily rude
Emma, considering your set theory is literally the most confusing abstract stuff I have ever heard in my life, you can’t really critique CV for researching/being passionate about the Collatz Conjecture
proof?
What theatrics?
I have talked to CV about this before
I don't know. I just do me.
I shouldn't have mentioned this I guess
yeah you shouldnt have
If you think certain statements of mine are melodramatic, please indicate them to me.
It makes his explanations more entertaining
I don't particularly want to get into this discussion
I like it
Because I have no idea what this was in reference to.
Lol
its like telling someone you dont like how they communicate in general
I was just having a conversation with someone who was curious about my work.
This is literally my favorite thing in the world to do.
Bingo, I was the one who asked to begin with
i can see what you mean by anti establishment though
Whether it is my mathematics or my writing, I want to share it with people.
And thank you for doing so, I learned a lot!
And I am not going to pass up or blow off an opportunity to do so.
My pleasure!
This really is making me more interested in my upcoming class I’m taking, now I’m kinda restless to learn more!
Which class?
Oh by the way CV, I’m trying to catch up on some more point set topology and Galois theory so that I’m ready for Gouvea
Like you recommended
Point-set topology and basic analysis (convergence of sequences, limits, Cauchyness etc.) is the most important stuff.
Anyhow, I'm used to Emma, nGroupoid and the others treating me like this.
I know they care, but they have an odd way of showing it at times.
Yeah I’ve been reading Tao and Abbott for that too
idk maybe they have a point to make though
or they can just be general bullying
I feel it's usually this.
it shouldn’t be your job to interpret that though
For example, in this conversation, not a single line of text I wrote was cited as evidence for their views.
i think they want you to have some humility though
the antiestablishment part
i can see it
because you state as if the majority of people are against what you are researching
He was answering a question that I asked
They are not against it.
Rather, no one is doing it.
It's considered uninteresting.
Read through the literature.
that can be interpreted as not worthwhile
The (p,q)-adic case is a toy example, primarily.
and thus against what you are doing
i dont see the problem with this even if it is false though
Things are generally considered unimportant until they are shown to be important
If you can show that this stuff is important that's great
how many ways are there to factor?
I have been told that my non-archimedean analytical work is interesting.
But no one is obligated to pay attention to you
Ergo, my need to sell it a little.
they seem to be well aware of this lol
(in algebra)
And you should try to present your things in a way that is conducive to people paying attention to you
And I was. I was answering the questions Arrow was asking of me.
Your selling it like you are is actually part of the problem CV
Again: how so?
completely factor?
Where did I go wrong, and how would you have done it instead?
have you heard of unique factorization domains?
depending on your set of numbers you are working with there can be multiple ways
but with real numbers there is only one
I mean I can give you a bunch of stuff you should have done in the past if you want, but I doubt that will be helpful
You posted in response to my above conversation.
Emma like in the grand scheme of things I don’t see why this an issue
Anyway I think that pitching a revolutionary attitude with respect to collatz is a bad idea precisely because of the environment around it
if nothing in my above conversation merited criticism, then you were criticizing me for past behavior that was not germane to what I was doing.
If you want to be taken seriously
yeah me neither to be honest
Lol
Again, indicate in the above conversation where I was being "revolutionary".
i told you where
Or I'm going to take this as simple bullying.
you can be perceived as such
I want a direct reply-to link.
when you said collegues were uninterested
He was sharing new technology in the area, anyone with a pulse would be excited about that
Full quote.
You can parse this as bullying if you want
wdym?
i dont think you shouldve brought it up then
And you see no problem with that?
I would be aghast if I was told I was bullying someone. I don't want to be a bully.
I thought you were joking emma, a little rude?

aight aboutta go into integral calculus which one's harder
differential or integral calculus
melodramatic
I mean if you read this convo
Accusing me of crankery, of fomenting revolution.
There's a pretty decent amount of melodrama
And falling on your sword
I never accused you of crankery
Emma a bunch of people talk about their research like CV
They aren’t out of the ordinary
translate to peasant terms please i can't read
thats what im saying
If I'm being melodramatic now, it's because you, once more, have upset me and (from my viewpoint) bullied me.
bruh ngl this is why i dont talk to some math ppl
And I don't like that.
Heck, even I get excited about my research in microbiology and that’s about plants
they talk uppity
@stark charm ?
CV came up with a novel approach for collatz that no one else uses
Ooh. Do tell!
Because it's novel.
completely factor like reducing an expression to a multiplication of paranthesis
instead of having a summation term left over
Oh mb that's redundant
I mentioned that some of the language you use isn't conductive to selling your ideas because of the context of collatz
And I really wish you wouldn't do this. I don't go out of my way to attack you personally.
I probably didn't need to say that sure
I don't see how someone can be a crank if they're work isn't disproved
its more like its niche
like Mochizuki
so people assume esoteric means crank
I do research on how certain plant species can be made into extracts that kill E. coli and a bunch of other microbial bad guys
or maybe Atiyah
aight looking at everyone's roles since your names are all different here. why are you guys all good at math
right but you're applying people like them are
Implied though?
implying*
No
But this is literally the sort of attitude that can get you labeled as a crank
I'm talking pretty broadly about CV's behavior
A lot of how you talk feels very revolutionary in sentiment I guess
CV have you ever considered that you read way too much into the anti establishment stuff
I mean "the establishment thinks this is not worth studying"
I literally didn't imply that
wanting people to take someone seriously
I was talking about perception of researchers
How was I being polarizing?
Emma bruh
none of that
what the hell's going on
should we work with examples
And so you have to be careful if you don't want to get dismissed
ok
It is an objective fact that the study of (p,q)-adic functions has been neglected in favor of the more fruitful and useful areas of complex-valued functions on the p-adics and functions from the p-adics to the p-adics.
Who cares though
This is what I was saying
I mean
like a good chunk of math people
I was informing them
im assuming cv is autistic because of how they type
nothing wrong with being autistic, i love my autistic homies
it wasnt about you
Yes.
I think they know this, though, considering that this isn’t his first rodeo of dealing with the social repercussions of his research
And, for the record, my pronouns are he/him.
i told you why
if you don’t particularly care
You came in to critique me when I was just having a casual conversation with an interested observer.
I mean there is a solution
Even though he is in this case, please don't assume that about people 
I was having a conversation with an interested observer.
I was not trying to make a presentation to the AMS.
Emma this is only your perception, I was the one who asked
Christ.
Literally I wasn't the one who blew this up
YES YOU DID.
You could have said nothing.

Yes I could have said nothing
@stark charm ?
Thank you!
You're right
this is for BOTH of you
did you post the example?
please stop
we are takking about real polynomials right?
ig like taking x^2+2x+2
and factoring (x+1)^2 + 1
so when i say completely factor i mean there are no summations left
Will there be a conjecture in the future that requires more effort than Fermat Last Theorem?
no
they are all less effort
all factoring in algebra
the only ones that are more efforts are the ones i work towards
no then
kangaroo rat are you in highscool
yes why?
in all of highschool algebra everything is factorable
ok colee's answer is probably too general for you
x^2+1
and the factoring is unqique
Well That applies to any UFD in general
cause highschoolers dont learn ring theory unless you go to some nice af school or ur like moth or sth
lmao
who
are they
server people?
why not?
i think if we are working hard that is enough
i dont cope mr mod
u gotta do it sometimes
can i DM you
if you want a quick reponse you shouldnt
im about to watch anime
but go ahead if u want
oh never mind then
sniff oh yeah that’s the stuff sniff yeah oh yeah im gonna make it in this world sniff yeah as long as i try my hardest that’s all that matters sniff sniff ohhhh yeah im gonna make it
Haha, imagine being homeschooled and still knowing ring theory
dang i didn’t even start group theory until a few weeks after i graduated high school
i’m a nobody now
Ring theory is nice
i didnt do group theory until second year of undergrad 🙂
ahead of metal 😎
well i did my first year but it didnt count
why doesn’t it count
Same
it was mostly worthless i didnt learn anything of value
I learned it in college like a normie
i think though that it doent rly matter when u learn because like
its not like ur learning this stuff ten years too late
i know
All these anime highschoolers learning graduate mathematics in 11th grade. They're all 6'6" and ripped too
hahah
but it’s always impressive when people learn it so early
And are ace Gundam pilots or something
idk im just having brainworms and coping before sleeping
the only ring theory i learned was to define what a module was
then use that in linear algebra
all i know about quotient ring or something is like
Z mod 2 Z something something
Eh good enough
I didn't even learn pre-calc in high school
Yeah same, we did it in middle school in my country
They were pushing for calculus in high school
My schedule got messed up in high school so I was put in remedial math my 3rd year of high school meaning I had to do algebra 2 my senior year
What is remedial math
math for people who struggle with math
I got a 100 in the class it was basically pre-algebra and algebra 1
Are there separate courses for those subject
Which courses
algebra 1 and pre
Yes pre-algebra would be done in middle school and algebra 1 freshman year
L

Hell yeah I’m ripped
not 6'6" tho 
yeah sure
oh
why the A&M hate
But yeah I'm originally from Punjab but moved to Jabalpur 6 years ago
wait what
u are actually indian??

I like d&f (I only went though like the first 4 pages
)
Is this not known??
lol yea he said he was from cmi
or rather in cmi
Man i fell for this once before when you pretended to be in hs
lmao
Also @iron osprey and @devout nacelle
dami has some guy's bio open and is just describing their life
😂
Manan actually can testify for me here
I still remember
I did troll about being a high schooler
write something in punjabi for me
yes do it
throw this in trash
i bought it too
It’s already got mistakes in the intro material
i want to throw in trash
No I'm gonna finish the entire book 
dont do that
even if it kills me 
Check their definition of gcd
Sata sri akala Shyshu
its worse than hatcher
The passage on primes is mid worded
Never throw books in trash no matter how they're shit.
Just give them in some local library if u don't want it
no
Uhh
wrong spaces but that is correct...
throw books in the trash
Yeah I'm not trying that hard rn
PDFs are free for copying
inb4 dami is literally my professor
Oye paaji tennu kaisi gala karte ho ji
bruh you know punjabi?? i thought you only knew hindi and english
To be fair I'm kinda trolling when I say I'm first year at CMI because I'm a grad student
Punjabi is kinda hindi
@velvet dagger Desi Nuts
i knew that
Looooool
masters or phd?
nice what topic
So I wasn't technically wrong
Spectral theory
finishing or starting?
Oh yeah that's a classic
that's really cool
??
i cant wait to learn that
i got that part
Ooo
it's not circular like normal drums
it can be any shape
and you figure out the shape
by the sound it makes
but
mathematically
Well you can't

The different shapes allow different standing waves?

There are isospectral manifolds which aren't isometric
yeah i think that's how u do it
So you can't actually determine the shape fully by the sound

uhh
ok this is well beyond me
Cmon man it’s too late for talking like that lol
noooooo


I made that mistake once
same, which is why i cant wait to learn it
Advisor was like
Spectral theory is a part of linear algebra right afaik?
that's where it starts
Durr fiteh muh
durr fiteh muh?
It's like calling you stupid
Lol he called you stupid for thinking you can determine the shaping of the drum just from the sound?
I mean it's something I should've known lmfao

u need to know the shape to determine the shape
i was gonna say it
I'm not actually sure. Tbh my angle on spectral theory is a bit different
which is?
Also I'm completely larping about being from India lol
dami what exactly is spectral theory
i knew it
lmao what?

where are you from then 
Google translate sucks.
Night y’all
@dense belfry yeah didn't actually happen in just trolling them really hard and used that as an excuse to throw in another Punjabi phrase I looked up
nobody got the dure fiteh muh lmao
good night
Cya
Lmao
hi shushu
hey ally
bye gristle
Apparently it means may your mouth burn in hell
I wondered why you said you were first year grad
eating spicy stuff be like
And it's a way to call someone a dumbass
that freaked me out
Which is honestly s tier
made me start to tell myself i am a bit dumb
durr fiteh muh
Bro that was really harsh for u then
Read from here
imma go eat lunch good bye everyone i wont be back for at least 7 centuries
Time is relative btw
Cya
But yeah family is originally Moroccan
And I myself was there for high school
But otherwise lived in America
@iron osprey well in a way, I'm a third year PhD student but that's like masters + 1 year in Europe
do u mean starting or ending third year
I also just finished third year
Ending
With covid I feel like I'm ending first year because uh
:^)
I haven't gotten shit done in so long
Huh what sort of things are you interested in?
who
You
Emma knows what I do. Namely nothing :)
Aww
dami, what exactly is spectral theory 
It's like eigenvalues of stuff kinda
idk im just trying to learn some homological algebra & gauge theory right now. im vaguely interested in information geometry and dynamical systems
Easiest explanation
its related to random matrix theroy?
It can be but not necessarily
Spectrum of a linear operator in finite dimensions is the set of eigenvalues
a matrix or operator does not need to be random in order to have a spectrum that is interesting to study.
Big important theorem is the spectral theorem
Which says that symmetric matrices have orthomormal eigenbases
spectral theorem has disturbing implications
Equivalently they're orthogonally diagonalizable
One important example is the adjacency matrix of a graph
This leads to the subject of spectral graph theory
another one is the principal directions of a surface

What is information geometry?
Like circular reasoning but more general
fisher information gives u a riemannian metric for stochastic manifolds
you get nice stuff from that
At Stony Brook
hm
But yeah on Riemannian manifold you have the Laplacian and you care about its eigenfunctions
What does fisher information tell you?
where to drive your boat
I'm particularly interested in understanding spectral theory of the Laplacian on graphs and surfaces, esp from an arithmetic pov
And also in higher rank you have simplicial complexes called Bruhat-Tits buildings
so thats where the nt love comes from 
@dense belfry
In mathematical statistics, the Fisher information (sometimes simply called information) is a way of measuring the amount of information that an observable random variable X carries about an unknown parameter θ of a distribution that models X. Formally, it is the variance of the score, or the expected value of the observed information. In Bayesi...
thomas & cover have a nice intro book to info theory but
you can find fisher information in any stats text i think
Higher rank symmetric spaces have a ring of invariant differential operators on top of just the Laplacian, and Bruhat-Tits buildings have "geometric operators" if they commute with the action of the overarching group
braces for impact
And yeah there's a lot of links here with random walk, dynamics, arithmetic, representation theory
Looks pretty interesting
I have been hearing random walks pop up a number of times now
What exactly would you describe to be a random walk?
I mean idk if I wanna define a general random walk but
Think of you're on a lattice Z^d
Would that just be some kind of arbitrary displacement pattern?
And at any point you have equal probability of going to any neighbor
Now just set the point off and see what happens
Yea you have a lattice structure ahh
You can also do random walk on graphs
I can visualize it better when I think of molecular lattice structures lol
Probably on manifolds tbh but I haven't thought too hard about what that would look like
Wow I actually kind of understand this stuff. I guess I haven’t been wasting my time studying math 😂
Probably a probability measure on the unit tangent bundle and then flow
Also the probabilities don't need to be equal, and your state space does not need to be discrete like this (eg brownian motion). Z^d is the ideal way to motivate it though, as there are already somewhat interesting results there.
Or something
What do you mean by that?
The power doesn't come from the sigma algebras imo
Well you can take topologies and make probability spaces out of them
The point of a sigma algebra is just to organize what sets you're taking measures of
I guess the Borel hierarchy is kinda nifty from a descriptive set theory pov
I mean it's not just, it actually stores a lot of information
Honestly the indicator function is used everywhere. You even see it in Munkres
Inside of it
One of my favourites for a first course in this kind of stuff is the question of what the probability is that a random walk starting at the origin in Z^d returns to the origin after some finite number of steps.
This probability is 1 for d=1,2, i.e. it happens almost surely.
The borel hierarchy
But for d >= 3 is is strictly less than 1.
You mean borel field(s)
Oh lol
But generically you think about Lebesgue measure on R^d
I didn't see dami's comment
And there you don't really need to go farther than level 2 in the Borel hierarchy
So a drunkard wondering the streets of a gridlike city will almost surely find his way home from the bar, but a drunk bird that can only fly unit steps in axis directions will with positive probability stay lost forever.
Since every measurable set is just G delta minus a null set
Wdym Lebesgue measure here? Didn’t get that far in analysis yet
I think I have a neat Computability theoretic interpretation of that fact dami
Maybe
Oh shit
Slash borel hierarchy theoretic
It's the standard measure on R^d
Oh ok
Have you seen Caratheodory extension and/or Riesz representation theorem?
I kinda understand what a metric space is
Okay so you can think of the level a borel set is in the hierarchy as a minimal length of a description of the set
Ie the complexity of a formula defining the set
That's reasonable
Yeah there's more
Oh I figured yeah I'm just saying so far I'm with you
Yeah I imagine it's pretty wild. My measure theory prof tried to show us a proof that the Borel hierarchy doesn't terminate in under omega_1 steps
It uh
Didn't go well lol
We're still not sure what the fuck universal sets are lmfao
How long you been studying measure theory?
I mean I had a class on it a very long time ago
Oh
Honestly my measure theory is probably very very lackluster
That class took a very specific angle on it
So there's a lot of standard problems I just haven't done
But I know how the theorems flow
I am trying to pick up bits of measure theory without having gotten to the Lebesgue chapter in baby rudin yet
I’m trying to take my time to learn that level of math though as well
Maybe in a year I will get to the lebesgue stuff
Percolation 
Where are you in Rudin?
I think I’m starting to learn quicker now
Oh I can tell you about that
Chapter 2 but I been focusing on linear algebra right now
I wouldn't really recommend the baby Rudin chapter on Lebesgue stuff
Probably
Gotcha
Well I can give a Computability theoretic proof actually
from the analysis point of view there isn't that large a volume of content in basic measure theory, there are just a few key ideas/principles to master and then everything is very intuitive from there.
Oh what do you recommend for measure theory stuff even with not much analysis background
And that would be cool at some point Emma. Basically what we had done in particular was
Because open sets are Computable with an oracle
what would you recommend?
I think Casella and Berger is helpful but haven’t gotten very far in that book either cuz I want to go the math stat route as well
stein and shakarchi's real analysis is a good intro imo
We defined a universal set in the plane wrt a property to be one which satisfies it and for which every set in the line satisfying it is a horizontal slice
And then you wanna consider being universal wrt being G_{blah blah ordinal many things}
Okay so what is a universal set trying to do
How far in baby rudin should I go before getting to S&S
So the halting problem is a universal set of a sort
As for measure theory books I'm gonna soon write a long rant in book recs
Sweeet
axler has a great, easy book on this
chapters 1-8
very nicely written, and i don't like anything else axler has written
Honestly I don't trust Axler after his linear algebra book lol
Okay so what would the hierarchy collapsing mean
It means there is a top level in the hierarchy
Which means there is a set that represents the hierarchy
he just talks too much
So for example the halting problem represents the set of limit Computable sets
In the sense that the halting problem can compute limit Computable sets
And is limit Computable
bike lock arrived 🐲
Limit computable meaning like, "infinite time"?
Meaning an infinite binary string A so that there is a Computable sequence of sequences of natural numbers so their limit is A
But also you can probably think of it as computation with finitely many mind changes
Like on a given input you output a string of numbers and the discrete limit of that string is going to be your output
I see
Sounds good yeah, I'm pretty foggy myself lol
We should talk about this at some point though it's dope stuff
Lmfao
Lol
I think
Okay so this is kind of similar to something in Computability theory called the light face borel hierarchy
As opposed to the boldface borel hierarchy
So the regular borel hierarchy builds on itself by taking infinite conjunctions and disjunctions of lower levels
This is the boldface borel hierarchy
However the light face one needs to have extra computability conditions
So you only allow Computably enumerable unions and intersections of lower levels
And your hierarchy is indexed by Computable ordinals
Instead of by countable ordinals as in the regular borel hierarchy case
However you can kind of view the boldface borel hierarchy as being stratified by the light face one
So if you relativize to an oracle
So you basically give the construction of the light face borel hierarchy more power
Then you have that every borel set is eventually in one of these borel hierarchies
For some oracle
And then you can actually use the Turing jump to prove that it doesn't collapse
I mean I think basically the regular argument is using the borel equivalent of the Turing jump
So I'm being silly
But I thought about this a while ago and thought it was nice
I think I was pretty confusing
Probably
But maybe you can see some of the ideas
Hmm, I'd prob need to know a bit more underlying background to understand this (also at a non-3AM time lmfao) but this all does sound kinda cool. I remember one analysis prof who used to be at Chicago started in logic
And said that descriptive set theory is the "computability theory of analysis"
Yes it is
So it's interesting to get some idea of what that actually means lol
But yeah there are so many of these results connecting continuity and Computability
And there are good reasons why these results exist
I had a freshman -15
oof
It was fine
What’s freshman+number
Berkeley is a hilly campus and I walked so so much
i hope i don’t have freshman -anything
im like 120-130 lbs
weight gain
weight gained during first year of uni
in pounds
not kgs
wtf
lol
Oh I have +22 then but I did it on purpose
im 155
Wow
but still relatively skinny
I eat in a surplus and work out
I need to work out
So a lot of that weight gained is muscle/water weight
Why work out when you could also not?
Because of creatine as well
this tbh
To deadlift/squat and bench a lot of weight 
i still work out but i think about not working out and just sleeping a lot
speaking of which i’m in bed rn
I don’t work out and I don’t sleep
Well working out and not sleeping doesn’t work anyway
Meh
im permasleep
Sleep is essential for recovery and muscle gain
💤
Idk all this “take good care of your body” shit makes it seem like your body hella weak. My body does just fine with little maintenance.
ur just built different
man i wish i were like you
Depends on how you define a body doing fine
my body is like
Hell yeah you do
fit but i still look skinny
I'm like 180 lol
I’m not dead yet
it’s a curse having broad shoulders
yeah that’s why i’m working out
You need to ingest calorie rich food
🤝
but for now it makes my somewhat normal arms look skinny
Eat enough and eat calorie dense food
Love your new name Gmod btw
Enough protein as well
That’s how you gain
Roughly speaking
A lot of it happens in the kitchen
probably better chances to do that in college tbh
at home i just eat whatever is put in front of my face
not much option
yeah i do ppl with one day of rest
Oh nice
but only dumbbells cos i don’t feel like going to gym
ppl?
Push pull legs
i like it
Yeah it’s good
It just doesn’t fit me perfectly
So I costumised it
But by a lot so it’s basically a new split
ah kk
did #algebraic-geometry get a name change??
double alg
alg on both ends
conjugation of geo-comm by alg
yes
ok with comm-alg being lumped in with alg-geo I really think abstract-alg should go to early uni lmfao
do you honestly?
abstract algebra is weird because its such a wide range of topics
i dont know if an abstract-algebra and advanced-abstract-algebra split is really necessary
also comm-alg was part of the algebraic geometry channel before the rename
abs-alg is certainly not early university
assuming we take university to mean the 4 year program
granted, we don't exactly have a late university
so maybe early university should mean 4 years and advances is post-bacc?
in which case, there are abs-alg courses for both undergrad and grad. Its a large subject like Loch said
we learn groups in first year so
yeah, it is early uni
the problem is group theory can either be like
"cosets, homomorphisms etc."
or like, wacky word problem, representation theory, etc. stuff
Idk what university you go to, but not a single undergraduate freshman is learning what a group is anywhere I've been
But yeah, this
Undergrad Freshman learning Jordan Rep Theorem 
hell under a certain exam board we sometimes learn about groups in hs 
wew be like "noncommutative algebra doesn't exist"
it doesn't though
rep theorist moment
Based and non coexeter pilled
If you learn group theory in first year of undergrad wtf you doing for 4 years
our undergrad is 3 years
at like european universities you learn abstract algebra in first year
its normal
Ain't that wild
and the channel gets a mixture of "show xy is a group" and more advanced questions
it's wild that you don't
i think the latter are way more common recently
Our first year's are learning calc 2 (in the math programs)
so i dont think there is an issue
In general, most freshman here take college algebra semester 1 
the issue is I can't help those people loch 
unless it's character theory 
i will start work on the rep-theory containment channel for you right now
This is why God made threads


the unis i plan to go to do teach some group theory early on
to everyone, no matter if u are a math major or now
Good morning shyshy!
Good morning slurp!
Well this just seems absurd. Why should an art major know what a normal subgroup is
there are no art majors lol
these are all science unis
Oh, okay that makes more sense then
so People who wanna do Phys, chem, bio, maths, earth sciences and stuff will have to study everything for like 3 or 4 sems (and everything includes One course in each subject and a couple of courses in humanities and engineering stuff)
out of 8/10 sem program (10 in most cases, sometimes 8)
whats covered in it though
like up to the fundamental theorem of galois theory?
(including)

probably no, thats in a separate class midway through
i doubt that would be first year
i learned that in my 3rd or 4th semester, which is pretty standard at least in germany
Your first year math majors are taking Calc 2?
Actually I guess that's not too crazy my school just moved to doing pre-calc first
That's unusual, usually they take that in a proper field/Galois theory course
right
galois theory is fun though
It states that there is a bijection between the diagram of the subfields of the fixed field of a field extension and the diagram of the subgroups of the galois group of said field extension
Basically the two lattices are the same, but are flipped upside down with respect to order/degree
ig those are lattices
The galois correspondence, then? But I don't think it's a lattice
If you chart it out it is a lattice
i think they are talking about the diagram
like a diagram
lattice is another object
but technically speaking galois extensions form lattices I think?
sorry fixed the wording
You get a diagram, but again, I don't think it's a lattice.
dont galois extensions need to be seperable and regular or something
i dont remember specific terms
but its like the elements are linearly independent
so not splitting polynomials
it is seperable
i think those are lattices algebraically speaking
I thought it was a lattice of subgroups? Like the order relation here is the "is a subgroup relation"?
I thought lattices had to be embeddable in R^n
Let $K/F$ be a field extension. If $|\text{Aut}(K/F)|=[K:F]$ then $\text{Aut}(K/F)$ is galois
any vector space yea
like ive heard lattice over field
Mmm, are we talking about diff kinds of lattices?
Arr0w_04
yeah the notion is similar though
Because order theoretic lattices are a thing.
maybe there is idea of lattice over rings
yeah again I didn't mean a lattice I meant a diagram
i dont know if thats what we are talking about
I was thinking, like, how $\mathbb{Z}[i]$ is a lattice in $\mathbb{C}$
like the diagram of the subfields and subgroups
but i dont know what those are
Abelian Grapes
Which doesn't have anything to do with order
Like, hasse diagrams and junk.
that is what I was implying but I didn't want any confusion.
its a minor point
Maybe it's one of those words with two meanings
so i think galois extensions are lattices
it is but it doesnt matter
just use diagram
in this case its fine
So the point Colee is that those two diagrams (lattices) are the same, just flipped with regards to ordering.
oh
Galois extensions are lattices, yes, but the diagram you get by drawing subfields and the galois correspondence isn't, I thought. (At least, not the way I'm used to the word)
lattice wrt inclusion makes sense
Whoops I was thinking rings of integers of galois extensions my bad
they are, but using the word diagram vs lattice is irrelevant in regards to the statement of the theorem
Yah it's an order theory thing
oh then yeah
Yeah it's one of those words with different meanings I think
i guess it is a correspondence between lattices
And you depict them (and partial orders more generally) with hasse diagrams iirc.
but relation invertibg
So does that make sense colee?
yea
i know that form between field extensions and groups
but galois correspondence is more general
its the same thing
Basically it studies these things called automorphism groups, specifically galois groups, which are groups that are sets of automorphisms that have special properties
its nice
there is a general form of lattices where you can embed them over any vectorspace not necessarily finite dim
It is?
yeah
Like you can prove that C (the complex numbers) is algebraically closed, and that there is no equation to find the roots of a polynomial of degree 5 or higher
not the order theory one though
That's what I thought you meant. That what I sent was the same as the order theory one.
yeah solvability is really useful
it is! There are some other small things that help out in other areas, but those are the two main results you get from a course in galois theory.
with differential galois theory you can prove whether a integral has a closed form solution or not (I think)
I'm not sure
yea
I don't know diff galois theory 
That's cool lol
I'd love to learn it though
Yeah, you use the picard-vessoit group of the differential equation
:O
I really wish we got to do more galois theory here
The point is that automorphism groups behave really nicely
in your uni?
yeah
and it kind of relates all of abstract algebra (groups rings and fields) together into a final chapter
they are probably most important idea in algebra
We got through the fundamental theorem in fraleigh like right as our semester ended
endmorphisms in general are pretty important
But you need differential rings and differential fields, which are rings (or fields) with a differential as well, which is a unary operation $D:R\to R$ so that $D(uv)=uD(v)+D(u)v$ for $u,v\in R$
Abelian Grapes
so usually an AA course would touch on some intro galois theory topics
(if R is your ring)
african american course?
Abstract Algebra


