#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 544 of 1
I mean that’d probably send you to jail
bruh no
Don’t assault other people’s pets
bro said violence is the answer
no its not that
that isnt abusing animals
if you are threatened by animal prescene tou ahbe right to defend self
I mean, if you can leave and call animal control but choose to boot a cat in the head instead idk lmao
간단하지만 아무도 풀지 못한 문제.
페르마의 마지막 정리와 함께 수학자들을 골머리 앓게 했던 콜라츠 추측에 대해 알아보죠.
걱정 마세요. 초등학생도 이해할 만큼 쉽습니다. (추측 자체는요..ㅎ)
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
References:
Lagarias, J. C. (2006). The 3x+ 1 problem: An annotated bibliography, II (2000-2009). arXiv preprint math/0608208. — https://ve42.co/Lagarias2006
Lagarias, J. C. (2003). The 3x+ 1 problem: An ann...
its nothing malicious
Literally a Korean veritasium video on collatz
Yes, kill some scared cat because you lack the self control to leave lmao.
Great plan
This is the state of the world
bruh adrenaline pumping
real question is why does korean veritasium exist
49k is low numbers for veritasium I think
Good on Derek
Even Chinese veritasium exist afaik
hey
I wish I like the early applications of the integral more
okay so ive done some more research
apparently i was getting some things mixed up here
(i dont feel bad abt it tho since i guarantee ain't nobody else knew this shit either)
so, as such, my question did not encapsulate what i really wanted
my new question is as followed
Does anyone know a (mildly) elementary proof that the $\sqrt{2} \not\in \mathbb{Q}$ that is not a proof by contradiction or proof of negation, as defined in the following image:
valley
mildy elementary = single var calc and below
if you add like linalg or multivar calc i could probably follow but not too much
You mean not the classic Euclid proof?
I suppose not because that's contradiction
Folks were talking about this earlier
yeah i asked the original question there lol
I feel that proving something is not in Q is somehow fundamentally a negation argument
I was trying to think if there's a way to prove eisenstein's criteria while side stepping that too
as applied to x^2-2 in this case ofc
Ohhhhh
That would do it
Because if it's irreducible over Q the root can't be rational
That's slick
well problem is the proof I have in mind for eisenstein is basically starting by assuming a factorization and then walking through the coefficients leading to a contradiction
so it doesn't really solve the problem
Yup, Eisenstein is sorta like a higher order version of the same argument
i just think it would be ridiculous if there wasn't a way
there's gotta be one
a direct proof of something that implies sqrt(2) is irrational would also suffice
I guess the problem is that Q is the thing that has structure, things that aren't in Q are defined only by failing to be in Q, at least amongst elementary theory
This sounds hard to do
sometimes more general statements are easier to prove
Perhaps a related question would be, is there a way to define or construct the set of irrationals without referring to Q
Maybe there is, but it seems unlikely to be that elementary
can't we use gauss's lemma instead
is there a direct proof of that?
like, $x^2-2$ is primitive so it's irred in Z[X] iff it's irred in Q[X]. but 2 isn't a square so $x^2-2$ has no roots in Z
Average J∘du=du∘j enjoyer
honestly I never really understood how the proof of gauss goes
oh wait i think i found a really fucking pretty working proof on the internet
wow
Do share
Yeah, upon googling, I do see that some exist, that is very interesting...
The proof shows that the distance between sqrt2 and any rational number is strictly greater than 0
Just purely through algebraic manipulation. I guess I stand corrected
oh link me to it sounds cool
interesting
I'll have to add this to my collection of interesting results
I'm curious to what extent it's possible in other cases (other than roots of integers). Because it does seem like nothing easily characterizes irrationals other than the fact that they fail to be in Q
i think it's also really nice that you can see the motivation from the proof
for some reason this feels like it should be very easily extendable
like very easily
to even e and pi
but i cannot fucking seem to do it
@neat frost
Is anyone good with finance in math (loans, interest rate, etc.)? I need some help with a problem.
are all the channels occupied or is there a prob?
@bright hill
This took me an embarrassingly long time to parse 
It is kinda cool tho!
I've never seen this proud of the irrationality of sqrt(2)
Constructivism as a whole sounds interesting
yesss so facts this one is new to me
i cannot believe i never thought of it myself
and it took me a bit longer than it should have too, i think it’s just bc the concept is new
it feels so obvious but i’ve not seen it done before
It seems tricky tbh
I don't think I'd come up with it alone unless I I was actively looking for it and I squander 2 days
Yeah it’s trickier than the standard way
O ye I saw you posted that before, is very inchresting

Weird
This reminds me of something I was learning about yesterday
about the convergents of continued fractions for irrationals
Ryc: slurp is shin
Also ryc: slurp hates shin
Make up your mind you crazy senile boomer
Oh
Ohh
Wow shin is really cool
You’re dumb ryc
MARKOV
Like Markov inequality???
Wowowowow
@fervent pebble You should check out diophantine approximation if you think this is cool
Diophantine… isn’t that a chemical?
What's going on here
I’m bullying ryc
why are you talking shit?
Not markov inequality
There's turpentine
I wonder that sometimes myself
But most of the time, I don't wonder anymore
I can tell the difference between constant and inequality.
That’s why I said like
Stupid.
ooooh
will do
Because if I don’t, who will?
tyyy
Dozens of other users
Yeah but none as well as me
You're winning the envy war
ryc tell slurp im better
Valley.
But losing every battle
Guess what.
hmmm ur still a foot shorter than me?
Better at what?
Spending 2 hours talking about a problem for an 8th grade geometry class
Why are you all so fucking BIG?
Real good at that valley
hey ryc have you seen that there's a connection between computability and diophantine approximation
i just hate losing arguments where ik im right okay
Lmfao valley you just got rekt, even better you got rekt INSTEAD of me
Ooooo
rare i agree
do you know what randomness is in computability theory
That's the first context in which I saw diophantine approximation
But I don't remember any of it 
You know why?
Yes
bc ur old?
Because it is irrelevant to me
I remember plenty of other things that are relevant to me
i’m not even half as mean to ryc as slurp
Yeah
and he still roasted me
I’m just a mean person valley
It’s because he’s scared of me
prolly bc ur such a ryc simp tbh
Einstein couldn't even remember where he lived
But also because he knows that I’m doing this for his own good.
I'm handling this one with kid gloves.
Einstein was a fucking physicist
Einstein was a dummy
as if urs is better
I need a haircut true
I'm trying to back you up lmfao
Resisting urge to roast darq unprompted
do it
You’re comparing him to a fucking physicist. How is that helping him?
No I can't alienate more of my allies like this
I am a physicist
Math is a waste of my gifts
HAHAHAHA ADMITTED IT
Maybe it's time for a new name
That's better
pin
I’m on fucking mobile ryc
I don’t have my laptop with me
or your font is super small
iPad
I can’t change the font size
For notes…. I bet you handwrite your shit on paper you non-eco-conscious boomer fuck
I do handwrite for now
HAHA
And you make fun of ME?
Handwriting is nice
I will not be getting an ipad
I don't know what's good and what isn't
That's the issue
the ipad stuff is so expensive
Yeah? And your a computer scientist lmao
I’m good. You’re not.
It is. Not really worth it imo.
My dad just really seemed to prefer me getting apple for some reason.
Then a pencil for 100 more 
Which iPad tho?
And what are you?
Not sure
I don't think I'm a mathematician tbh
I have a reMarkable tablet
Just use a laptop if you need a keyboard
Oh ive heard of those
If you have a laptop
Expensive but it was worth it for me
(especially after reading a mathematician's apology yesterday)
I need a better note taking app tho
Wassat
OneNote is infuriating
A book
Ah
I didn't want to get a tablet that I could get distracted on lmao
Huh
I can get something that's a chromebook
but is also a tablet
i wonder if there's a good notetaking app on the chromebook os
seems fine
yeah
I still don't like to believe people choose to be pure mathematicians coz math is the thing they're best at
I don't think that's necessarily the only reason people choose to do math
Well perhaps it is necessary, but by no means sufficient
Good evening all 
Is the conversation about doing mathematics or chromebooks? haha I'm trying to jump in here
I think that's how a lot of people go on to get higher degrees, it's the safer choice to just keep going to school
Wdym?
I think it's pretty clear
Do you mean that people should just study independently? Because if you wanted to just "keep going to school" there would come a point where you'd be forced to seek higher degrees in order to keep going
So getting higher degrees is the same as people just keeping on going to school
That doesn't explain why you'd do math instead of (god forbid) physics for example
@woven whale we're not "friends" why is it showing me your activity?
I guess I come at it from a point where my mathematics degree got me to teaching, and now I study independently because I'm interested in different facets of mathematics. It's history, its different topics, its application to every area that it reaches.
What's the gripe against physics 😅 If I can ask
I think that can just happen if they're up for showing it publicly
From any server? Is that so? New thing I learnt today, thank you!
I thought that was for people you're friends with
I am just too cool
It happens with people you interact with
I think he's answered by question before, I don't suppose a lil bit of typing should do that. Weird honestly
I won't be able to get used to that 🤔
Hey, do you know what happened to the channel where we were talking. It is somehow not active!
you deleted your original message so it got closed
oh that could be
it's open now
Could someone explain to me what contour integegration is geometrically? Like, integration of f(x) = x^2 from 0 to 1 yields the area bounded by f(x), the limits of integration, and the x-axis. I was reading about Cauchy Residue Theorem for leisure, so I apologize if this question has a really obvious answer. Thank you!
it's integration along paths in ℂ
are you familiar with path integrals? or at least with multivariable integrals?
for example, does $\int_{D}f(x, y)$ where $D$ is some (compact) subset of $\bR^2$ and $f(x, y)\colon \bR^2 \to \bR$ make sense to you?
Namington
I think so? It's like volume right for R^2? But what does a compact subset mean, is it like does it mean it's a closed region?
compact = closed & bounded
im just ruling out things like D = [0, ∞) × [0, ∞)
perhaps my notation is a touch too abstract
No it's good
here's a visualization of a path integral
the coloured region represents a function from ℝ² to ℝ
so it takes a given (x, y) value and assigns it a value
which is represented by the "colour" on the (x, y) plane
then we take a path through the plane and compute the "sum" of values obtained by that path
contour integration is a method for computing path integrals for paths in ℂ, the complex plane
to be a bit more specific, when we integrate along contours, we assign a "direction" along the curve and integrate "along that direction"
this matters because the complex plane permits, well, complex multiplication
(and is therefore amenable to more integral evaluation techniques)
very nice gif
@agile wedge débloques moi stp
I'm a bit confused about this. R is one dimensional, and R^2 is 2 dimensional
So the function takes a value (x,y) and assigns it a value that is represented by the colour on the (x,y) plane
But how is the value assigned on a plane shouldn't it be assigned on a line because it is one dimensional?
f is a map from R^2 to R. The (x,y) pairs are coming from the domain (set of inputs) of f, the individual colors come from the codomain (set of possible outputs) of f. The image nami showed you gives you the color each (x,y) pair maps to under the function f.
It's similar to how if we have f from R to R given by f(x)=mx+b, each value mx+b is an element of R, but we graph f in R^2 to show what each element x in the domain maps to by the function f.
I guess nami basically said all this. 
I've seen this visualization for line integrals before:
ah stewart my beloved
@leaden torrent Thank you!
Ah so we are just representing the possible outputs of (x,y) in R^2 itself
Thanks 👍
I'm saying the colors are the outputs. At (x,y) in R^2 you draw whatever color f outputs to produce the graph nami posted.
Like, the picture is really R^3 it's just the z axis is represented by colors.
Ah I see
👍
So basically it "helps us predict" what are the same outputs f is going to produce for any (x,y)
So if a larger region is cyan in colour, all possible (x,y) values there in it will produce the same output in R
Interesting
is it correct to say that 1/2+1/4+1/6+1/8... is also a harmonic series, or does that title refer exclusively to 1/2+1/3+1/4...?
We're basically doing something similar when we graph something like f(x)=mx+b in the xy plane. At each x we associate a y value height corresponding to f(x).
~~The first one converges to 1 (by comparison test you can assure it converges by comparing to the latter series)
Harmonic series is specifically defined for the latter~~
And harmonic series is 1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + ....
wrong
it's the harmonic series multiplied by 1/2 term for term
comparison to the harmonic series can only be used to show divergence, not convergence
what can I do to prepare for calculus BC? I already know all of calc AB.
know all of calculus BC
just spam khan academy I guess
yea but i actually wanna learn something new in that class
i feel like doing nothing would be the best option
maybe learn trig sub integrals
so they don’t kick my ass when i forget what to substitute and when
they might
it’s important to know inverse function theorem
hi
If someone in help sends two pictures one after another, is there a way to rotate them both with ,rotate
Good job being done with it!
Btw how can one calculate the contour C here?
it's given as a set and you'll have to parameterize it
Story of my life.
So a Contour C is a set of all mapped z values in this case, say for example {2,3,5,-2,6,8} from a = 2 to b = 8 (direction of the contour is from a to b)
Then we need to parameterize this, meaning we need to find a function that produces these values.
So p(t) = a, where a in {2,3,5,-2,6,8}
So by plotting these points we can deduce the function p(t) such that when t = 0, p(t) = 2; t = 1, p(t) = 3, and so on?
That's how we find the contour C?
You just need a smooth parametrization. The neat thing is that the integral doesn't actually depend on the choice of parametrization. (If I recall correctly.) Usually they'll give you relatively simple curves to parametrize like straight lines, parabolas, portions of circles, etc.
For a line segment between A and B we can just use r(t) = tA + (1 - t)B. For circles we have x = cos t, y = sin t and so on.
Ah I see so we use the already existing smooth parameterizations
But how can we frame one though by ourselves
Out of scratch
Pretty much. I highly doubt you'll run across a weird enough curve.
I mean, probably depends. If the curve in the xy-plane is a function of x you could probably fit it to a polynomial p(x). Then x = t and y = p(t) is a parametrization.
We can also just break up the curve into different pieces and find parametrizations for each piece and add up the resulting integrals.

Lmao
i did something cool
it makes a straight line at first glace
BUT IF YOU ZOOM IN TO LIKE 2x10^-8
HELL YEA
TOOK ME TOO LONG
Why don’t you take like sin(x) and multiply it by 2x10^-8
I’m so confused tho
Why
And also unnecessary parentheses
Oh
The function is just y=1
Doi
:D
anyways i secured a spot in my uni’s lin alg 2 class
which is dope
which means i can drop my summer lin alg course since i wont need the credit
it doesnt affect my gpa
O idk how it works in the states
well it’s cos im taking this thru a community college
i think that’s how ti works anyways idk tbh
:(

Does a convergent sequence HAVE TO have a start? Meaning it starts somewhere. Like starts from 0 or 1.
any sequence has an initial input by definition
Just finished my calc 2 exam I either got a C or an A 💀
how did you practice for
integration?
i find it hard
Nah the integration wasn't the problem for practice I just do mock exams for me it was this torus question and some work questions that we never went over
torus?
are you doing hs calc or calc in uni
University
Not really I just did ones we were assigned mainly
Is there a certain kind of integration you struggle with
yeah problems with square roots in the denominators
i find them confusing
1/(1-x^2)^.5
Well that's a standard integral so for me it's just one I have memorized when I see that I think of arcsin
yeah I think for some i just have to memorize
but i dont know which ones
Well ideally you should know all of your derivatives then use those to integrate cause if you know the derivative arcsin then you'll see $\int{\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x^2}}$ and be like okay this is the derivative of arcsin so it's integral is arcsin
Kenshin
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Same because it is my professor's favorite
Hi, I have been studying some basic probability theory and in the process I have found out few bits about measure theory. I would like to ask: are there other applications of measure theory other than rigorous probability theory?
Yes! Plenty. Ergodic theory (measure-theoretic dynamical systems) is super interesting and important, and has ties to probability but also to differential geometry, number theory, and plenty of other areas of math. Functional analysis builds off of measure theory in many ways to develop the math which underlies quantum mechanics and partial differential equations, among other types of math. Measure theory also comes up if you're studying descriptive set theory (I don't know much about that though)
Hello, RYC. That is a very interesting set of information that you provided.
Thank you, that sounds very useful indeed
hi ricey
(I am a CS student, so I know more about discrete math and algebra than analysis)
what are you 🤨 me for
Trying to think if i'm missing important fields
ricey
When you study topological groups
You study haar measures on them
This is useful for Lie theory
uhhh
aka ricky
aka arr why see - ee
🤨
Excuse me. I would like to inquire about the individuals who attached an interesting emoji to my prior message.
This is absurd and completely unnecessary. I would like to respectfully ask you to stop doing so.
I do not have a question at the moment, Mr. RYC. However, thank you very much for the tip.
You've reminded me of Toucan
I do not understand the reference.
"hey does anyone here know functions"
what language is this Gräv ner livet, salta jorden, förtryck längd & breddgrad
swedish
Google Translate can help you detect the language.
swedish
snakker du svensk?
what
nvm
dude I love viking metal
I see that other individuals have answered your inquiry. However, my prior tip could be of use to you in future situations, so please keep it in mind.
I've been listening to a lot of koorpiklani
like the one from froot loops
hwere they are like messhugah
No
and finntroll
toucan play this game
so like its like stoort neer --> vildhjarta --> messhugah
toucan was a user
today i learned that people listen to korpiklaani and finntroll
Y E S
i saw korpiklaani live twice i think and thats super cool
one of my favorite songs by korpiklaani is tervaskanto
but i wouldnt put them on at home
or maybe lempo
in finland?
yeah I like death metal, viking metal, power metal, and some metalcore
i think we have the largest medieval fair in europe
I listen to it all day long bruv
germany has some dope metal bands, like Helloween from the 80's-90's
i think they played the pirate ship
which is the place where the strongest alcohol is
germany has quite a good metal scene
today its better
lots of tech death
I also like listening to taiwanese folk metal too
I'm a GRADUATE STUDENT

I go to CONFERENCES
oh. my. gosh.
◉◡◉
best german metal bands are ahab, alkaloid and obscura
I'll check those out
i wanted to go see ahab live (again) soon
but its some weird festival that is like 90% hip hop
Wow obscura is awesome
loch have you listened to GOJIRA
ye i know gojira
literally one of my favorite bands, they're great
L'enfant sauvage is probably one of my favorite albums
wish I could see them live 
i saw them in 2018 i think
Do you listen to metal while doing math loch
rarely
magma is my favorite, or maybe way of all flesh
really? That's interesting I almost always listen to metal while doing math
yeah lol
it just helps me tunnel focus
like I am listening to metal right now as I type lol
i focus more on the music
well, i am listening to music now because im done working
setting up email to be sent to my advisor in 8 hours because its 1 am and i need to keep up appearances 
lol
Spill
some even 22
Hi I am 22 and born in 2000
I know a person who is in med school now too if it makes you feel even older
I would never be 22 and born in 2000
Wew isn't asleep
it's quarter past chicken time ofc it's not bed time yet
chicken time
What is chicken time anyway
o
Excuse me Mr. Wew, why is 1:30 A.M. "chicken time?"
🤓
Please do not refer to me as a nerd.
aight nerd
I am typing normally today.
I don't really understand the question
I think he's been hacked
Excuse me Mr. RYC, why did you attach a duck reaction to my message?
Is this like that one house episode where that man has amnesia and mimics other people he sees
but instead of imprinting on house you imprinted on CV?
Mr. RYC, I have not been hacked.
I'm a wacky dude! 😵
too quirky 4 ur own good... MODDSSSSS
That is not appropriate for this channel, Mr. Dakkaro.
:sob
lol
#memes
nvm
gmod stop talking like a moron
lmao
Please do not insult me.
Please don't call respectable server users "morons"
why delete
Bruh

I agree with Mr. RYC.
you bumbling fool I am beyond control... I am ZANY!!
damn are y'all teachers
help me with math homework 🥺
there are two PhD students and gmod in chat rn
I am not a teacher.
wtf
have you read or considered #❓how-to-get-help
where
make that 3 if rat is here
im phd at gaming only
1+1=1
i am not here
ok then it's just 2
did you just join to post nonsense
certainly not
your only posts are 2 videos and this
yeah I can't even make a funny ring joke out of that post
It would not be of comedic value, Mr. Wew.
Sir to you
Lord Patrician Gmod I must politely insist that you let down this facade at once
but i need to actually learn the multiplikation like system until after summer
Eh?
🥺
I never learned it inside out
oh hi CV
Hi!
Hark
gmod is typing his posts with punctuation now and I can only assume that you did something to him
Good evening, Mr. ComplexVariable. How are you doing?
It's the top hat
Nicely. Today's writing went... interestingly.
gmod is a proper gentlesully
Exerted a positive influence, it sounds like! 😄
That is amazing to hear. Keep working, sir!
How do i learn the multiplication until after the summer
Tomorrow's writing is going to get quite boody.
Hello there, Emma! How are you?
ryc it's OBVIOUS
just change someone's whole personality like this
inside
it's a top hat ryc
Out
I have had the hat for several days.
Join a religion, for one.
What kind of multiplication?
one you shall not recieve
like the normal
For that, you should go to one of the help channels.
Please visit #❓how-to-get-help for more information, Mr. Dakkaro.
^^
any websites to learn every one of them inside out
Khan Academy is a reputable resource.
^^
try quora
Inside Out (2015) is OVERRATED
I thought it was touching.
Quora is likely not the best resource for this sort of topic.
actually this might help https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/multiplication
Though I recall that I took qualm with the climactic line of dialogue. I would have phrased it slightly differently than what the screenplay ended up having the character say, and the change would have done wonders.
Thanks
remember that a monoid is just a monoid in the category of monoids
YES
Doesn't this category require the axiom of choice?
do i look like i care about foundations to you
Lol
he's a rat which means he plays killjoy which means yes u do
You show no indication of a stance one way or the other.
i think that any and all adults are welcome to choose whichever axiomatic formalism they like
I'm on a screen with a bunch of chained wavedashes and falling conveyor belts and it's truly horrid
woog watched me playing it for a while
minors however should not be allowed to play with choice
what consenting adults do in their math papers is none of other ppls business 👍
arguably they should be restricted to ultrafinitism but this is controversial
i have no idea about half the stuff you guys are saying
i'm pro-choice-choice
People should realize how much modern constructive math is entwined with category theory
Are you guys going to be math proffesors when you get older or
I'm applying for several positions at the moment, yes.
Though my current priority is finishing my novel.
So you earn money by mastering math
Dunno.
I think I may dip my toes into more general logic than just mathematical logic
At some point
I'm gonna be a MATH PRPFESSOR
idk
i'm gonna teach high school
Yeah I like teaching
Plus my wife and I want a child soon, so postdoc hell is probably not a good choice
Makes sense
What does that look like in practice? Philosophy?
Yes
What is explicit description and implicit description of the solution sets of linear system? (Linear algebra)
@dense belfry do u know about p-automatic sequences
No I don't
I've heard of them.
Is that an automata thing?
If it's what I'm thinking of, then yes.
I don't do automata theory
My roommate does dynamics and actually she works with automata a lot more than me
Though my interest in them was due to their connection to transcendental number theory, and from there to Collatz.
Of course
And Mahler Theory.
(Transcendental number theory using holomorphic functions satisfying certain functional equations)
Ah
Yeah the Thue Morse sequence is a 2-automaruc sequence
My original approach to Collatz-type problems was to reformulate them in terms of fixed points of linear operators of spaces of functions on the open unit disk.
Yeah she likes that stuff pt
And automatic sequences can be reformulated in terms of analytic generating functions using the so-called Cartier operators.
ComplexVariable ELI5 your research on the collatz conjecture
Collatz research can be safely disregarded as crank work so don't worry about it 🙃
People not realizing you can literally just study choice principles in general
And look at all of them at once
Lol
-
Given a Collatz-type map H : Z^d —> Z^d, I found a function from the p-adics to the q-adics (for distinct primes p & q) whose image completely characterizes the periodic points of H and, conjecturally, completely characterizes the divergent points of H.
-
You can reformulate Collatz-type conjectures as eigenvalue problems in terms of the aforementioned function.
Specifically, you want to study the values x for which the (p,q)-adic function f(z) - x has a non-singular reciprocal.
I met someone who said they are hesitant about the axiom of choice and so didn't want to work with profinite groups like Gal(Q-bar/Q)

So how does that tie back to the conjecture
It reformulates it.
Giving up LEM gives you so much more leeway
Have you heard of Wiener's Tauberian Theorem?
No
It's a chimerical result.
But you can still prove things using choice
Do you know what a Banach algebra is?
You just need to state that you are using it as an assumption
No
What does this mean?
Lol
It has many different forms.

Do you know of the Fourier transform?
So you’re proving it in a different form?
Yes I know that one
Fourier analysis on number fields
No but go ahead
It's functions f:R—>C such that |f(x)| is integrable over R.
Ok
This forms a metric space using the metric:
(f,g) —> integral of |f(x) - g(x)|dx
Let f:R—>C be integrable.
A translate of f is a function of the form x —> f(x + a), where a is a real constant.
So what does this do in regards to the problem
I'm getting to it.

I'm very pedantic, and explain all details.
So, just be patient. 😄
Do you know what linear combinations are?
Do you know what it means for a set to be dense in a metric space?
No I’m currently reading about them tho
It means you can approximate elements of the space to arbitrary accuracy using the elements of the dense set.
The quintessential example is the set of rational numbers, which is dense in the reals.
Let f:R—>C be integrable.
I know about sets being dense just not in metric spaces
And let T be the set of all translates of f (so, every element of T is of the form x —> f(x+a) for some real number a).
The L^1 version of Wiener's Tauberian Theorem describes necessary and sufficient conditions for T to be dense in L^1, meaning that, for any integrable function g:R—>C, you can choose a function h which is a linear combination of elements of T so that the integral of |g - h| can be made arbitrarily small.
Specifically, the WTT says that T is dense in L^1 if and only if there are no real numbers at which the Fourier transform of f vanishes.
Do you know what the Fourier transform does to convolutions of functions?
I have a vague idea
It turns convolution into point-wise multiplication.
So, the Fourier transform of f * g is the product of the Fourier transform of f and the Fourier transform of g.
Ok
Likewise, the Fourier transform of the product of f and g is the convolution of the Fourier transforms of f and g.
What is explicit description and implicit description of the solution sets of linear system? (Linear algebra)
A very important inequality (Young's Convolution Inequality) tells us that given two integrable functions f and g, their convolution f * g will also be integrable.
I asked bro like 20 mins ago and ping helpers 2 times too but no one came! 😞
In the algebraic sense, convolution defines a multiplication operation on L^1.
The Fourier transform turns convolution into point-wise multiplication.
What's important is that the Fourier transform is injective.
Do you know what the Dirac Delta function is?
The dirac delta is the identity element of the convolution operation.
Ohhhhhh
∂ * f = f • ∂ = f
The Fourier transform of ∂, meanwhile, is the constant function 1.
The reverse is also true.
I use the DDF for computational neuroscience stuff
1's Fourier transform is ∂ (in the sense of distributions)
Given an integrable function f, I say that f has a convolution inverse if there is a function g so that f * g = ∂.
That is unfortunate but does not excuse asking the question here. Sometimes questions do not get answered. There is a conversation going on here and I would rather not keep interrupting it.
Because the Fourier transform turns convolution into multiplication, observe that the Fourier transform of f will be equal to the reciprocal of the Fourier transform of g whenever f * g = ∂.
In other words, a function has a nice convolution inverse if and only if its Fourier transform has a nice reciprocal.
This fact is equivalent to the Wiener Tauberian Theorem.
talks about being pedantic
talks about two theorems being equivalent despite the fact that every two theorems are equivalent

...
Lol
One of the topics analysts like to study is value distribution theory.
Like prime gaps?
Not quite.
Sorry I didn’t see what you quoted
It's the study of the images of functions.
In subjects like complex analysis, you can say a surprising amount of stuff about a function if you know that a certain number of complex number are not in the function's range.
Yeah I’m computational neuroscience we use the DDF to mimic a neural impulse
One of the most powerful toolkits for studying value distributions is Nevanlinna Theory.
This exploits the properties of integration in the complex plane (such as Jensen's Formula) to count the number of zeroes that a function has.
Ok
In my research, as I said, I showed that given a Collatz-type map H, there is a certain function you can construct—I call it Chi_H—such that the range of Chi_H completely determines the periodic points of H.
In other words, an integer n gets iterated back to itself by H if and only if there is some input z so that Chi_H(z) = n.
Do you know what the Collatz Conjecture is?
I know the elementary phrasing
(It's also known as the 3x+1 Problem)
The kinds of maps I study are of the flavor: fix an integer p ≥ 2. For each integer j in {0,1,2,...,p-1}, define an affine linear map H_j(x) = (a_j x + b_j) / d_j
Then, define a map H:Z—>Z by H(n) = H_j(n), where j is the value of n mod p.
I call this a Hydra map.
They are also known as residue-class-wise affine maps, but that's a horrible, horrible name, so I don't use it.
xD
You can also study generalizations of these maps on Z^d (or, equivalently, on a d-dimensional ring extension of Z).
ANYHOW...
We say n is a periodic point of H if the sequence n,H(n), H(H(n)), ... is periodic.
(That is, there is an integer k ≥ 1 so that if you apply H to n exactly k times, the output will be n)
We say n is a divergent point of H if the sequence n,H(n), H(H(n)),... tends to positive or negative ∞.
By "Collatz-type conjectures"/"Collatz-type problem"/"the dynamics of H", I mean, "determining the periodic points and divergent points of a given H".
So you are trying to show that H is always convergent?
My methods show that given H, the dynamics of H are determined by the whole numbers (if any) which are outputted by the function Chi_H.
Nope. I'm just trying to find out what the periodic points of H are and what the divergent points of H are.
Ohhhhhh
In this terminology, the Collatz Conjecture is the assertion that the 3x+1 map has no divergent points in the positive integers, and that 1,2,4 are the only periodic points of the 3x+1 map in the positive integers.
OK
So, my methods show that given H, the dynamics of H are determined by the whole numbers (if any) which are outputted by the function Chi_H.
Thus, instead of studying H directly, to determine H's dynamics, we just need to understand Chi_H.
What’s Chi_H?
A function I can construct.
damn man you type really quickly
I have a certain recipe which, given any H, tells us how to construct Chi_H.
Thank you. 🙂
So is that a big result?
It's just part of the whole.
A big result is the fact that Chi_H's output values determine the dynamics of H.
I call this the Correspondence Principle (CP).
The CP tells us, for example, that the problems:
-
Determine the periodic points of H
-
Determine the whole number values that Chi_H(z) takes as z varies over the set of rational numbers
are equivalent.
The problem is that Chi_H is a rather strange function. For any suitably well-behaved H, there are distinct primes p and q (which depend on H) so that Chi_H is a function from the p-adic integers to the q-adic integers.
(or, as I like to call it, a (p,q)-adic function)
Because (p,q)-adic functions behave very strangely, standard tools for studying their value distributions don't apply.
However, there is one method that we can use.
Consider a function f. If we want to show that a number w lies in the range of f, we need only show that the function f(z) - w vanishes for some input z.
Right?
Right
On the other hand, if f(z) - w is always non-zero, then f(z) ≠ w for any z.
Now, consider the reciprocals.
w is in the range of f if and only if function 1/(f(z) - w) blows up to ∞ at some z.
If f is, say, continuous, then 1/(f(z) - w) is continuous if and only if w is not in the range of f.
For example, because x^2 + 1 never vanishes for real x, its reciprocal 1/(x^2 + 1) is also continuous.
On the other hand, x - 1 vanishes for x = 1, so its reciprocal 1/(x-1) is discontinuous, having a singularity at x = 1.
Here's where Wiener's Tauberian Theorem comes into play.
Let f be a continuous (p,q)-adic function, and let g(z) = f(z) - w, where w is fixed.
Then, letting G be the Fourier transform of g, the following are equivalent:
- 1/g is continuous
- G has a convolution inverse
Because the Fourier transform turns multiplication of functions into convolution (and vice-versa), to study whether or not a function has a well-behaved reciprocal, it suffices to study whether that function's Fourier transform has a convolution inverse.
Wiener
In this context, the periodic points of H are precisely those whole numbers x so that function Chi_H(z) - x vanishes.
As such, we have the equivalences:
-
x is a periodic point of H;
-
Chi_H(z) - x vanishes for some z;
-
1/(Chi_H(z) - x) has a singularity at some z;
-
The Fourier transform of Chi_H(z) - x does NOT have a convolution inverse.
Oh shiit this is related to collatz
Yes.
It reformulates Collatz and Collatz-type conjectures on finite dimension lattices in terms of non-archimedean spectral theory.
(i.e., eigenvalue problems)
The point of all this is that, instead of studying the Collatz-type map H, you can study the Fourier transform of Chi_H.
Gotcha
Not only does this give a reformulation of Collatz-type conjectures...
It also allows us to study these conjectures systematically in a unified way.
For example, if you consider the 5x+1 map (which is Collatz, but with the 3 replaced by a 5), it can be shown that almost every positive integer should be a divergent point.
Moreover, this result holds for the qx+1 map, where q is any odd integer ≥ 5.
If you consider the Fourier transforms of their Chi_Hs, you end up with the following result:
Chi_3 (the one associate to Collatz) is different from Chi_q (the one associated to qx+1) for all q ≥ 5.
For q ≥ 5, Chi_q's Fourier transform has a q-adic magnitude of 1 at every input.
For q = 3, though, Chi_q gets arbitrarily close to 0 in q-adic absolute value infinitely often.
This is a "smoking gun": it's a concrete, non-heuristic, non-probabilistic distinction between 3x+1 and the other qx+1 maps.
Moreover, there is a simple map due to K.R. Matthews which can be easily demonstrated to have divergent points.
It's Chi_H's Fourier transform is bounded away from zero.
This suggests that "Chi_H's Fourier transform is bounded away from zero" is needed in order for H to have divergent points.
So what is going on with q=3? Why does it have this different behavior from all other q?
are you still working on this problem CV, or have you moved on since your thesis?
What can you say when Chi_H's Fourier transform is not bounded away from zero? You said for the case q=3, Chi_q gets close to 0 infinitely often in the q-adic norm, is this necessary (or even sufficient) to guarantee the existence of periodic points?
I'm still working on it, though not at the moment.
2 + 2 = 11.5
I'm currently trying to publish the various pieces of my dissertation.
@tawdry smelt It wasn't funny the first time you said it. No need to go around spamming it.
That remains to be seen.
I'm not being funny.
I'm being Legit lol
No need to post this across channels without any context.
Ultimately, what it boils down to is studying the density properties of the translates of Chi_H-hat - x1, where 1 is the indicator function for zero.
So that's essentially the next step?
Yes.
Establishing the existence or non-existence of divergent points and periodic points boils down to establishing bounds on the q-adic absolute value of linear combinations of translates of Chi_H-hat - x1 in terms of x.
Do you think the collatz conjecture will ever be solved CV?
Yes.
If human civilization gets extinguished before we solve it, I'm pretty confident aliens will eventually discover it and puzzle over it, themselves. xD
More seriously...
The (p,q)-adic analysis I discovered/invented in the course of doing this research just works too well for Collatz-type problems.
I'd be very surprised if this was an accident.
Also, my methods work for Collatz-type maps on Z^d.
For arbitrary integers d ≥ 1.
It works for ALL OF THEM!
Do you have an informal heuristic for why (p,q)-adic function setup is relevant in problems concerning iteration maps on integers? I'm only aware this is the kind of stuff people within arithmetic dynamics study, but don't know anything about it.
It's not about maps on the integers per-se.
Rather, it's due to the affine linear structure of the maps.
Long story short, you construct Chi_H by considering the monoid generated by composition of the branches of a given Collatz-type map H.

For example, for the shortened qx+1 map (sends even n to n/2 and odd n to (qn+1)/2)...
what would an example of Chi_H look like?
Chi_q is completely characterized by the following functional equations:
f(2n) = f(n)/2
f(2n+1) = (qf(n) + 1)/2
Subject to the condition that as n tends to a 2-adic limit z, where z has infinitely many 2-adic digits, f(n) converges to f(z) in the q-adic topology.
how many people are working on this problem at the moment at a professional level CV?
On Collatz? A couple.
On my particular approach? 1.
No, but that's why I'm trying to get myself published.
Writing up papers and submitting them for publication.
Attending conferences.
Yep.
Very depressing.
Most people ONLY study the 3x+1 map.
Do you think it is going to get published?
I hope so!
And, for those that DO study the maps in greater generality, the methods used are almost always probabilistic in nature.
huh that seems inefficient after hearing your explanation
EXACTLY!
All of the most important studies in 3x+1 have been probabilistic in nature.
My driving concern was to find an approach that allows us to study a large family of Collatz-type maps SIMULTANEOUSLY.
One of the reasons why Collatz studies have lingered in shame in the mathematical ghetto is that literally anyone with at least an elementary school education can investigate the problem and write up patterns that they notice in it.
The problem is: how do you know which patterns actually matter?
so it's kind of frowned upon to research it?
Answer: by comparing them across many different maps
Yes, and for three reasons:
- The fact that it draws so many cranks and amateurs.
- Its extraordinary difficulty.
- Its apparent isolation from other areas of mathematics.
Did your advisor try to steer you away from the problem because of those reasons?
Yes, and also because my advisors weren't knowledgeable in the tools and subjects I drew from for my research.
These included: analytic number theory, p-adic analysis, non-archimedean analysis, and harmonic analysis.
No one at my university knew any of these things at an expert level.
So how did you learn all that stuff?
On my own.
Books? Conferences?
Books.
Wow no one knew about harmonic analysis?
Yep.
Our analysis department was all PDEs and SDEs.
I thought you were at a top school though
I think there's at least 3 professors at my school who do harmonic analysis, we don't have a phd program though



