#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 527 of 1
it honestly helped me immensely
(shoutout to twice for basically carrying me through rudin lol)
Pretty direct feedback and you don’t have all the pedants on stackexchange yelling at you for posting something that’s slightly similar to another Q
lmao
and maybe I should learn to convince myself
cuz I think I'll need it when i go to graduate school
which I hope for
that comes naturally the more proofs you do
so dw about it
focus on asking good questions
that's really important
having both is better 
how do I do that 
try to identify what you're really confused about
ask precise (short if possible) questions
like asking myself "do you really understand it? or do you just think you understand it?"?
and include as much context as necessary
exactly
that's how you identify gaps in your understanding
also, and this is really important, try to answer your own questions before asking others

only give up after spending some effort on answering them
shyshu are you preparing for physiks?
neamesis, u might want to not focus on maths for a little while 
i've recently just realized that :●
this is very imp
pondering upon topics u just read is imp
but... this is so interesting
I'm finally starting to kinda get how to intrinsically define a tangent vector on a manifold

that's defining it in R^n but the concept is the same 
u are studying manifolds?
oh lmao
super basic differential geoemtry 
intro to manifolds by loring tu
ah
it's really good
lmao ikr
math addiction
🚬

lol it's treating R^n as a manifold and defining vectors tangent to the space R^n
yeah i got that
for a second i was like why are u doing diff geo mid exams
lmao
it's the best field of math ever and anyone who says otherwise can fight me 
I'll seperate them into two different manifolds 


bold of u to say that when u dont know any maths 
no me
no me
fuck u darq
fuck you both i said it first
i have been saying it longer
I've been saying it better
I've been saying it louder 
i have been saying it stronger
alright back to the methematics grind 
when you tell a bunch of competitive people youre dumber
see you guys later!
cya
bye
this meme is dumb
imagine being competitive
imagine using your imagination
I'm even less competitive than you tbh

Hey shyshu
Yesterday Captain America graduated
hello emma
Final grades for this semester has been published for my classes. A, A, B, B. Funny thing is I got an A in my hardest English course I ever took.
I would have had an A in my database course if I didn’t miss 1 homework.
Nice 
I've been watching and taking notes on math youtube videos, but I noticed that I have a problem that I would try to take notes on everything and this could led a 10 minute video taking me up to 30 minutes or even longer at times. I know that writing things down have helped my memory, but I feel like I've taken it somewhat to an extreme. I guess I like the way it looks in my notebook and that I would have the ability to reference it later. I don't have this issue when it comes to textbooks, but I've started to become aware of it with youtube videos.
it's almost like youtube videos are actually a pretty poor format for learning math.
What kind of math youtube videos are only 10 minutes long? Gimme a slice
usually they are longer it's just an example
Nowadays stating one definition in a math talk takes 10 minutes 
What makes you think that?
Also I'm using them as supplemental materials?
There's been several discussions about math youtube videos and their educational quality in this server in the past
Generally I observe that what someone gets out of a video is not much different from what they already knew going in
it's the same problem that online lectures have, but worse
it's a lecture where the lecturer can't adjust their pace or exposition based on student reactions
and where the contents of the lecture isnt tailored to student needs, common mistakes theyve seen in homework, or whatever
except unlike an online lecture, you cant even ask questions
I've found stuff like the 3blu1brown series helpful for gaining intuition. I've been using them recently to learn to write proofs and I've been working through How to Prove It.
Idk if I'd call 3b1b a good source for writing proofs
but I think youtube videos can certainly be helpful for intuition
Wait did 3b1b have a proof writing course?
they have less pressure to be "exactly right" than a lecture does
not 3blu1brown a few other youtube channels like michael penn and some others
I just remember 3blu1brown series on calculus being helpful on gaining intution for it
yeah I'm pairing it with textbooks
I'm not trying to learn solely through youtube
yeah nothing wrong w that
there is a lot of like, mediocre math content on youtube though
that's what i thought
i just became more aware that i try to write everything down when i'm watching a video
i'm not really sure when the behavior began but was wondering how to address it and it leads me to pause the video and take much longer
it's not that i don't understand the video and usually it makes sense but this behavior causes me to spend a lot more time on it
I'm not sure its worth picking apart videos in that level of detail
I wonder if part of it is the mindset people have when watching a youtube video
like learning math requires putting in a good deal of work but videos aren't generally as fun when you have to put in a lot of work to understand them
Is this the one you were talking about hating and how the prof wanted to give you even more work
Yep.
I stuck with it and remained diligent and I passed.
Did they update your grade going into finals or did you still have no clue
I recall you mentioning not having grades or something for the class but maybe I was confused
Yeah, he took a while to grade the midterms and first paper.
I got it back like 3 weeks ago.
I got a B for the first paper and midterms.
I realized that the $\rightarrow$ symbol acts like an equal sign in the way that it follows certain algebraic properties, like how $x \rightarrow y \iff x-y \rightarrow 0$ or $x \rightarrow y \iff \frac xy \rightarrow 1$ etc
gmod
and the right arrow in this context means "approaches" such as when used in limits
I thought you meant implies and I was confuzzled
I mean sure I guess
I was thinking of x as a variable
but it could be like a sequence as well
Variable like function?
I mean you can see some of this as like
variable as "it can change"

Reflected in the fact that Cauchy sequences of rational numbers form a field
Like this is how you prove the operations work
idk what cauchy sequences are
I see
Things that approach other things nicely
ah
if ${a_n}$ is a cauchy sequence then the larger n is the closer the terms of the sequence get
DarQ
oh ok
i.e., if n is very very large then $a_n$ and say $a_{n+50}$ are basically the same
DarQ
so 1/n is a cauchy sewuence
ye
every convergent sequence is a cauchy sequence

shut up
let me troll darq

pain!
it's fine lel
ryc is wrong!!!
you don't have to appologise
blasphemy!
oh

anyways
the continuity chapter was such a breeze 
I covered most of the stuff already so it was kinda nice to just relax and casually review
Cauchy
Integrals
Cauchy has something about integrals
Ah yes
Improper integrals
Cauchy
cauchy has a good number of things period 
Cauchy's residue theorem always sounds like Cauchy got some kind of horrendous slime everywhere.
because he used to be an engineer


Hi Chalk bird
Hello grass.
lol chalk bird
ryc you're an analyst right?
do you have to sometimes do integrals? like computing indefinite integrals and finding closed form solutions
His PhD is on DEs I think
The first thing I thought of when I saw analyst was stats 

yeah sometimes?
but they're usually like
rote
not super interesting
also they're basically all definite
i see
i just wanted to know how to get really good at finding closed form solutions for indefinite integrals, like yk those guys on math stack exchange who solve super crazy integrals and use esoteric stuff like i dont even know lol all kinds if specisal functions and stuff
yes i know i get that good by practicing for years
but what exactly? lol are there books or something for this?
I did research on that in undergrad, it's not related to my phd research
Uhh
undetermined as of this moment, it's my first year in a 5 year program which will have me getting a masters in the middle
But most likely partial differential equations + probability stuff.
I'm looking to learn more about random dynamics and SPDEs.
ryc's gonna finish his PhD in 2 years 
ryc?
i have no idea
I wanna do it by hand 
my friend read the book "inside interesting integrals" and liked it
well
ok
let's go back
actually no this is a public space so i'm just gonna stick with what i said
except that i will change the word "friend" to "acquaintance"
Lol alright
yeah i've seen that book it's pretty cool im planning on getting it
anyway this is definitely not useful at all, so only do it if you think it sounds fun
like half the integrals i do these days are just "it's a gaussian integral but you have to complete the square in the exponent"
well i wanna go into theoretical physics so at least a little useful 
i guess so
Lol and then u-sub?
yes
are u talking about people using contour integrals to solve weird integrals?
even i would want to know how to do those
lol
tell me if u find something 
Yeah its funny computations
hello Shysu
hello mrlol22
,ti DarQ
The current time for DarQ is 10:35, 14/05/2022.
Slurp is 2 hours ahead, at 12:35, 14/05/2022.
Oh it is inchresting
Why the sully old man?
Yesh
and you're alive now?


I looked up horror webtoons, that was listed. It’s not a horror webtoon tho
it's not one of those weird ones, is it?
It’s pretty highly rated acshually

I actually need something to read in my pomo breaks
do you have any recs?
I never read a webtoon
manga can suck too 
well yes
I'm looking at you slam dunk, you absolute waiste of time
never read slam dunk
1984
but apparently its goated
lmao
it isn't
you're the one person i've been told by that its not
it's super shit
oh well
just realized I wrote waste as waiste 

don't you love reading your messages and seeing they were in engrish?
Renrgish
mine aren't necessarily in engrish, more like "can't-grammar-english"

Cauchy sequences, Cauchy principal value (what you were talking about), Cauchy's theorem x3, Cauchy's integral formula, Cauchy-Riemann equations, Cauchy problem, Cauchy Hadamard theorem, ...
If u think the word "integral" when you see Cauchy I've got news for you
I thought the word integral because we just proved his theorem about integrals last lecture 
It was totally justified, old man
Which of his 7 theorems about integrals
The one on the existence of improper integrals
Like it exists iff for large enough values the integral between those values gets arbitrarily small
was gonna reply to this one with a sassy comment but discussion died 2 hrs ago
rip
We can talk more about cauchy principal value. I have a lot of thoughts on it
shame!
Any of you are familiar with probability?
im not good at it
a friend of mine need help with it
they can read #❓how-to-get-help and then open a help channel for any question might they have
no one is replying to them :/
it's free help
.
@harsh fiber
Hello wac good good
Ok so I need you to red #❓how-to-get-help
If the helpers take too long to help you, then just wait until the bot notifies you. Don’t spam the questions and don’t spam questions in several different channels. Stay in one channel for help, and make sure its unoccupied.
Hi. Is it right to say that the multiplication operation is just shorten for the addition?
Not really
It's short for repeated addition only when one of the factors in your product is a whole number

How would you describe multiplication on the reals if not as repeated addition?
Maybe as the area generated by two sides of two lengths.
well in order to define the multiplication for the reals, you first define multiplication for rational numbers, and then extend that to the reals, which are limits of rational numbers, by taking the limit of products of rational numbers.
good question
Or just do it directly on cauchy sequences of rationals
Yeah, I suspected something like that.
Thats how reals are defined anyway
That would be real analysis?
Yes
🔥
They're kind of irrelevant
The cauchy sequences of rationals definition is better
Since it generalizes to metric space completions
Though dedekind cuts can complete ordered spaces I guess.
Idk anything about that
dedekind cuts my not beloved
regardless of which definition, I don't necessarily think going through an explicit construction of the reals is super helpful for learning real analysis
Yeah
Its just helpful to know facts around completions of metric spaces
I extend uniformly continuous functions uniquely to completions of metric spaces like 3 times a week
Id better know why it works
no you dont
I could prove it right now
why dont you prove that you're a hawk and not a pidgeon rn
pigeon
feels weird that pigeon doesnt have a d
what does this mean?
is that in reference to the fact that a uniformly continuous function is determined uniquely by its values on a dense subset of its domain
A lot of times in analysis you show things are well defined on simple objects, and then take limits of those simple objects to get the definition on all objects.
Yes. A metric space is dense in its completion and a dense subset of a complete metric space completes to the original metric space.
So it's the same thing here.
oki
wait is uniform cont even necessary here i can't remember
Yes. The easiest example would be, say, 1/x on R\{0}
Or the function on Q which is 0 when x < pi and 1 when x > pi.
These are continuous but not uniformly continuous.
well that shows uniform cont is necessary for existence of a continuous extension, but if an extension exists is continuity sufficient for uniqueness
i think it probably is?
I think no
Or
I mean I think that continuity is sufficient
Since limits are unique in metric spaces
okay yeah
i think it would be relatively simple to prove or disprove if i think abt it
oh wait that's all you need isn't it
and the sequential characterization of a limit
although in general topological spaces I think you can replace sequence with net and get the same result
do you not need the space to be hausdorff?
idk enough topology to say that with certainty but i remember asking about this a while ago
only the codomain has to be a hausdorff space
because you only need unique limits in the codomain
I was assuming real-valued functions though
oh, right. i thought you meant functions between topological spaces
anyways, it's a cool fact
Stupid question but I know you say $Gau\ss$ for gauss but do you say $Gaussian$ or $Gau{\ss}ian$?
Invictus
adding "-ian" to words is an english construction
not a german one
so it makes most sense to use the english spelling
Gaussian
Gaußsche
No you can't date the female guards
Anyone here who consistently gets 90%+ on maths examinations, how do you maintain full concentration throughout the whole exam?
I’ve got a 3 hour mechanics exam coming up in 2 weeks. When I do practice papers (all the questions are of equal difficulty throughout the whole paper,) I get full marks until 60% through the paper where my mind starts to fade and I make incredibly stupid mistakes.
do meditation
I don't 
thats the cure
but yeah you could try that
definitely make sure to sleep and rest well
I only sleep for 4 hrs a day
i still am alive
kids don't try at home
I could be more mindful to be fair
I’ll keep that in mind
Besides meditation is there anything else?
I tend to sleep well
And eat and exercise plenty
another factor could be just anxiety during exams, I had some serious trouble with that when I first started uni
try to control emotions
Yes yes I am in the middle of an anxiety diagnosis
And ADHD
And will probably be medicated
But I won’t get my meds till then
what works for one person doesn't necessarily work for another, but I managed to surpass that by convincing myself it's no big deal if I fail or whatever
as well as just getting better at studying and summarizing stuff
I see
true af
I'm probably undiagnosed
but yeah that's a thing
Thanks for the ideas
it usually takes some weeks to get used to the meds too, keep that in mind
I like this approach
Easier said than don’t
But good idea
Yes yes I will
that's true of most advice
Word
yep I understood that 
best of luck with your exam
try to review/exercise often (daily?) but don't overwork or strain yourself
especially like, the day before the exam
also 3 hours is a lot, any sane person would break concentration even for a while in the middle of it
Thank you 🙂
I won’t, it’s just such a beefy exam
And I have so much to practice
And mechanics is awful in the sense that the question are like essays
SAME
you came here that mean you wanna ler=arn it somehow
okay I was the same but with patience I started solving problems and I became good at math
Didn't know randomized algorithm lecture can be interesting. First hw exercise was an interesting protocol, where you can distribute the information of a binary word of size n among t people. And do it like that, that a coalition of even t-1 people cannot reconstruct any bit of information.
Hilbert was responsible for propelling the careers of brilliant students such as Emmy Noether, Bernard Riemann, and John Von Neuman
WHAT?
Is this a different Riemann? Bc the guy who came up with riemann hypothesis was much older than hilbert IIRC and his doc advisor was gauss right?
that sentence just seems wrong.
Right?
if this is what you're reading from i wouldn't trust it
Is medium not that well reputed?
lol
Is there a better place to read stuff like this
wikipedia is definitively better
https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Hilbert/
this is also a good source i think
or an encyclopedia like britannica
lol
Yo!
Infinite hotel

imagine being the most influential mathematician of the 20th century and your legacy is some thought experiment you made up once to demonstrate a triviality
still a very fun thought experiment
if you really think about it

nah his lecagy is HUGE
yea i can agree on that
hilbert space
hilbert space filling curve
😂
oh god
I think i found my nightmare for the month

Finally I get to
and
the same message
emmy noether wanted to become a sort of a professor at a university
and they said "she's a woman we can't do that"
hilbert said
"I do not see that the sex of the candidate is an argument against her admission as privatdozent. After all, we are a university, not a bathhouse."
chadbert 
Also wasn't that nazi era
it was around 1910 or something
Ok pre Nazis
Hello ! I just arrived on the server and now I would like to understand how to learn math stuff around here and actually how does the server work ! Are there lessons or things like that ?
Thank you very much for your time ^^
Most of it is for homework help
You can discuss math stuff here too
Just not homework-specific stuff
Okay ! Thanks
We mostly just discuss math, no lessons or anything like that. Maybe a presentation sometimes
and of course there's the "homework help" part of the server
where people usually post really basic things they need help with for school
I see ! Seems pretty cool ^^
there's also people just talking to each other here
mostly young people, so nothing serious (uninteresting from my perspective)
Yes that's what I thought, I fastly understood that the really interesting stuff was in the "Advanced saloons"
Sadly I am currently far from the level needed to access to this places
there's also people that can point you in directions if you want to learn math on your own
or, continue learning it
That seems very interesting too ! I am in fond of analysis and topology, but it is so....humongous ! Hard to know where you could start by your own
are you learning something already
I mean, do you have like a book you read or something
I found some lessons on the internet
I read a few papers on the topic and thought that I understood pretty good ! However when the time for exercises came...Madre mia
And it was only basic stuff (topological spaces, compacts...)
I wouldn't advise learning from videos, maybe complementing with them
It's a good way to learn a lot of things fast (assuming that the one lecturing is good), but to learn something efficiently, you want to look at the definition in a book and stare at it, convince yourself that you understand it completely
words don't convey as much meaning as writing does
besides people in this type of videos often may simplify things, which is good on short term, but bad in general
I see ! Thank you for the advices ! Do you think that prerequisites are needed to learn topology ?
Basic set notation, some basic analysis for understanding what continuous function is etc., you don't need to know more advanced set theory but it's good to know what cardinals and ordinals is, since a lot illustrative examples of general topological spaces use ordinals (and why cardinals are important should be obvious)
Okay I see !
I was mostly surprised by the beauty of the proofs they use, it is so different from other - let's say "more common" - theories
A lot of definitions in topology are also motivated by example of metric spaces, but any good general topology book should include those (although maybe introducing topological spaces much before metric spaces)
but don't get the wrong idea, albeit metric spaces are intuitive, they can get pretty wild
Yes you are right ! I have seen none of them without an introduction to metric spaces
Really ? I am quite disappointed, that's exactly the idea i had
I basically saw metric spaces like spaces where you get sufficient axioms to measure stuff
well, yes
but there's nothing that bounds the "size" of a metric space
so there can be some weird metric spaces out there
What are you implying sir ? Are there things that usually "bound the size" of other spaces ?
well yes, there is whole field of set theoretical topology that deals with set theoretical notions of topological spaces
one of those are cardinal functions
to each topological space we can assign multiple quantities (that is cardinals) which measure its size in different ways
one of them is literally the cardinality of the underlying space
that's not a very good way to measure size of a topological space though (at least in my opinion)
there's a cardinal function called weight, which tells you from how many open sets can you get all other open sets by taking (arbitrary) unions of those
that is the least size of a basis of a space
for a metric space to have good properties you ideally want its weight to be at most countable
this is not really a problem, most metric spaces considered pretty much anywhere have countable weight
such spaces are called second countable
Well, all of this is highly interesting ! Thank you a lot you are motivating me to continue my studies !
this gives you the family of separable metric spaces, which are one of the most nicest classes of spaces you can work with
separable means something else than second countable, but for metric spaces that's one and the same thing
Separable...I guess I already saw this somewhere...Maybe in the definition ot compact spaces ? They respect Borel-Lebesgue condition and are separable if I remember well
Compact metric spaces are separable
yeah. This might be probably the biggest reason for why to consider separable metric spaces. If a space isn't separable metric, then it can't possibly be contained in any compact metric space
but any separable metric space can be contained in a compact metric space (it can be compactified - made compact in a most efficient way possible)
in fact, any separable metric space can be embedded into the Hilbert cube, a countable product of intervals [0, 1]
Compactify...what for ? Maybe for some properties of the compacts that would make us happier to work with them rather than with other spaces ?
Any ? From any dimension ?
One big one is that any continuous function from a compact space to R attains its maximum and its minimum. This is super useful. Another big one is that continuous functions on compact spaces are uniformly continuous.
this is part of the so called Urysohn metrization theorem, which tells you conditions for a topological space to be separable metric space
Ow yes, seems really powerful
well there's no dimension in play here
Somehow separable spaces can't be too too big. This doesnt exactly make sense, but separability presents you from being "uncountably dimensional"
This isnt a real thing
Like blitz said there's no dimension here
i will take a look !
well there's a good notion of dimension for separable metric spaces, but it doesn't matter here
But the examples of nonseparability feel uncountably dimensional in a way.
A lot to consider !
(and sometimes actually are, if you're in the field of functional analysis).
that's also part of the reason why to consider them over metric spaces
So when we talk about compact spaces it is a kind of non sense to talk about dimension ?
it makes sense to talk about dimension of a compact metric space
it makes sense to talk about dimension of a many spaces, just not all of them need to agree, and they don't all enjoy comfortable properties
we have three usual concepts of dimension, and they all agree for separable metric spaces
we deal with dimension in so called dimension theory, which is a subfield of topology
I am humiliated
That's a nice one
I have a question about infinite sums
If I have a convergent series that I write as an infinite sum, is every number in that sum considered to be part of $\mathbf{R}$?
TheDirtyHandsome
For example $\sum_{1}^{\infty}\dfrac{1}{(n)^2}$
TheDirtyHandsome
Is every 1/n^2 term in the infinite series a real number?
These are all real numbers but you can also have infinite series of other things.
Like complex numbers or functions.
At some point you get a number for 1/n^2 = 0
Is that number part of the real numbers?
In the most general you can have infinite series where the terms are elements from a topological abelian group. Usually you just look at infinite series in normed vector spaces.
That never happens
Then how does the infinite sum end?
But then how do you get the convergent sum?
Not infinite in value
You take a limit of the sequence of partial sums. Each partial sum is just the finite sum up to some endpoint.
Then it's the limit of a sequence.
That we know how to do, using the epsilon-N definition of sequence limits.
So is epsilon a real number?
There is no epsilon, the sum doesn't end
I mean
idk
some people do "infinitessimal calculus" with this epsilon
But that isn't the endpoint of this sum
Every term in this sum comes from a particular integer n
convergence of sum doesn't mean that the sum will reach that value
it just means that as we sum more and more values, we approach that convergent sum
and the sum cannot go above that convergent value
iirc at least
Follow up question. If you have an infinite sum in real numbers like the one I posted. Is the sum of the infinite series the same if you calculate that infinite sum inside of the surreal numbers?
There should be more numbers in that same sequence of the infinite series in surreal numbers, but does it change the sum at all?
well, it could if your sum has negative terms
true
you can just say if you go on for infinity the sum reaches that value
literally nobody uses the surreal numbers
going on for infinity meaning you can take larger and larger numbers and they approach the value
Is infinity a real number?
no
“Epsilon” is a variable that you can use to represent infinitesimality but isn’t explicitly infinitely small itself
Then how you continue it till infinity?
going on for infinity meaning you can take larger and larger numbers and they approach the value
Infinity by most definitions is a notion, like the concept of inertia, bruhaps
take an intro analysis course, i think I you're missing some fundamental understanding of limits and series
ill give you an example
imagine an infinite sequence 1/n
Do you know someone here who can use them? I'm interested in finding the answer to that question.
so it looks like 1,1/2,1/3,…
no, the point is that nobody actually uses surreal numbers to answer questions like this. They aren't a useful construction
so it's just not a very useful question to ask
If people never use them because they don't think it's useful, then it will prevent something useful from coming out of them.
sure
whatever helps you sleep at night
no
It's a self fulfilling prophecy
they've been studied, they come up in combinatorial game theory but that's about it. They don't play any kind of role in analysis.
bang your head against a table 100 times. if you dont do it the 101th time you wont see god
Infinity essentially is the notion that “there is always another one”. For a natural number, there’s always a greater natural number.
Popmath content mills should stop introducing genpop to funny sounding number systems
i disagree
p-adics
You guys don't have any curiosity to know if an infinite sum in surreal numbers has the same or a different value to the same sum in real numbers?
i dont know if i would discourage the questions
:(
Math isn't going to fall into obscurity because susan from the grocery store didn't go on discord.gg/math and ask what is the ultrapower construction of the hyperreals
thats precisely my point
no, because I already know that the surreals aren't a very good construction to consider
If that's your point you've made it badly
Because you communicated exactly the opposite
what should pop math be communicating then?
quanta does a fairly good job with pop math articles
just remove “funny sounding” names?
for the most part
What should be the goal of pop math anyway?
Look up p-adics 
its just advertising and outreach
Or just, niche entertainment I guess
Yeah,
To get to the “entertaining” part of math often you have to go through a fuckton of boring shit that people aren’t willing to put up with
That's a different number system though
Look up metric spaces
I will get to take linear algebra with Thomas Hales in the fall 😧😧😧😧😧
Who
He’s famous for the honeycomb proof
The only downside is it’s the more difficult linear of the bunch and will prolly have 30+ hours of homework each week
Sounds like an upside to me
What is the entertaining part of math?
when you solve the problem
Wasn't he the person who did the sphere packing proof?
Yes he did
But I’m in quite a dilemma rn honestly cause I feel like if I do take the difficult linear course my workload would implode
hey everyone, it's been a while
would you mind telling me where can I find a tutorial of how to create a model predicting the existence of potato late blight from scratch?
yep it is.Do you have, by any chance, some experience with neural networks?
tau
Tau moment
popmaths content mills should stop
I don't even know what that is
Well it would suck if good soup isn’t good.
it's good, by definition
Is 3b1b popmath content mill? Because if so I have to disagree. I need Grant. He is my light
yes but 3b1b is the best out of them

I wouldn't call him a mill
He doesn't post too much content and what he does post is extremely high quality
He mills my love and affection
Videos barely showing modular forms using those contour maps that use pretty colors
I mean, all I know about those functions is that they sorta “encode” the Z^2, Z[i] (additive group) isomorphism and SL(2,Z)-action-automorphism shit into C using lattices
A scaled modular form can be phrased as
f(x,y) [x, y in C such that x/y is not real]
f(ax,ay) * a^n = f(x,y)
and the action of SL(2,Z) on the transformed Z[i] through conjugation of the isomorphism
not Z[i]
Is there a symbol used for lattices in C?
Eh, any Lattice in C^2 is isomorphic to Z^2
I mean technically every Lattice in C is isomorphic to other C-lattices or R^2-lattices because C and R^2 are themselves isomorphic under their additive groups
Pardon my dumbass description, didn’t consider that
depends on what you mean by isomorphism here
they're all isomorphic to Z^2 as Abelian groups sure
but there's another sense in which two (framed) lattices in C are isomorphic iff they are in the same SL_2(Z) orbit
good point
@tender tulip What video?
I’d have to find it
Also, I can't parse "and the action of SL(2,Z) on the transformed Z[i] through conjugation of the isomorphism"
nope they get kids interested in math
Low-quality ones should stop, but that’s a given for any subject
High-quality ones can be useful

true
well
nothing should happen to 3b1b
if anything does, i will not be quiet
lol
Yesh…. ma bb gurl






im gonna learn all that stuff once every exam is over 
relatable pain
but the wait makes it even more exciting to learn
Lol nice
its annoying 


but I liked most of my teachers tbh
and also
I don't even get my diploma until tmr
since I have an even tmr
Teacher’s pet.
so if I do smth stupid during the ceremony they could still revoke my diploma
during middle school I was but not during high school
I mostly had decent teachers
there are two that I fucking hate though
plus another two more but they aren't at the school anymore
go to their homes
and then flip them off
and flip off the ones in school as well
ez claps
oh
why?
is there a good way to figure out in advance what good restaurants are near an REU you're going to be doing
like a way to get the opinion of the student body
maybe I'm overthinking things and I should just search on Google maps...

if I'm going to be living on a school's campus for the summer I want to know how to orient myself on said campus and the area around it
You could visit each one once during the first week or something
logically the people who would know this best are the students
nonono I've committed to a program
I just want to start researching food in advance
mostly because I'm bored
I did mean each visiting each restaurant in the area once
the main think I'm after is how to figure all this out from my ass at home
I don't have any other specialized advice for more focused ways to choose restuarants
since the program hasn't started yet
see what I really want is like a prospective student discord
(I am aware this entire endeavor is somewhere from silly to very silly)

ok so google maps turned out to be sufficient
and this place looks lit af
lots of good restaurants in the area and we have to buy our own dining plans so eating out won't even end up being much more expensive
Do you get funded?
yeah the program is funded, the funding just doesn't include a dining plan
like they let you take money out of the stipend to pay for the dining plan, but how many meals you get seems largely up to you
like the base plan they recommend is nowhere near enough to cover an entire summer's worth of meals.
Hmmm
you can buy additional swipes, but the math works out such that it's not that much more expensive to just eat out
I'm going to see Charli XCX tomorrow with Yeule opening
@sick burrow do you like geometry?
what would you guess
tsundere geometry lover
what’s the motivation for reading multiple textbooks over the same topic?
other than comparing how two authors teach something
dunno, i dont know you and your personality
to master the topic, maybe?
Makes you understand the whole topic in greater detail imo
It’s good to have different explanations of the same thing
usually when you get to more advanced topics, different textbooks will cover different subsets of the topic, so you have to go to read multiple books to get multiple perspectives on the topic
ah i see
@vivid halo thankfully no need for that in automorphic forms ofc
I like reading multiple books on automorphic forms because 3 books will use 5 different sets of notation
Each book only takes 5 years to read
Story of my third to fifth years of grad school
how long do you think you can go without doing math before u forget everything?
really would like to take a 4month break this summer if possible
I think that seems fine
Worse-case scenario you’d need to revise when you get back, and that shouldn’t take too long for a second pass through the material
relearning tons of theory is like the worst case scenario, would like to avoid that if possible. but also need time to relax been grind for like 9 months straight lol
5 years ig
Atleast 2 years
5 seconds
Anybody can help with programming homework?
create a help channel
lmao 5 years
did you know 2 out of 3 americans choose not to use a help channel even after being directed to #❓how-to-get-help ?
i dont see why it would
Wait wrong server
What algorithm do CNC machines use to plan the most efficient path? Travelling Salesman on a discretized grid would take ages so its making me curious
might be easier to find answers in an engineering or robotics server
i dont think it'd necessarily take ages though, you dont need an optimal solution
"close" solutions to travelling salesman are very fast
Yeah there's probably a lot more factors and heuristics that go into it besides minimum travel distance
still though at the tolerances that mills run at I feel like there'd be tens of thousands of vertices to hit but again theres probably a lot more that goes into it
@strong sphinx Look at what my friend had to say about the book you recommended lmao
here here
Today is my last day

Cause I did it again
why is that
The current time for ranyakumoschalkboard is 06:07 AM (EDT) on Tue, 17/05/2022.

And I really tried to go back to sleep this morning
I feel like that rarely happens except in the morning when I try to go back to sleep

Anyway i will just get a cofe before my talk and let that do the job today
Last night once i'd given it fully once, the second practice run I was like
So active and emotive
I hope I can bring that energy again
I really like giving talks
Its so weird
I used to get so so so nervous in HS
Then one time it just flipped
And I went to loving them
flipped?
hmm
i think i would love to give talks
but im just too nervous about everything
If I hadnt practiced and just had my slides / notes it would be awful
But once ive practiced twice, there's basically no thinking and I'm just going through the motions
Just to myself with a timer
Or like
Sometimes people practice here in vc
But i dont really care about that. For me it's just about feeling out different ways to describe things
Sure
Oh
I'm gonna let you in obsidian
There you go
That would usually happen in adv math vc or obsidian

Darq doesnt have acces to this channe
I'm the one man army shilling this book haha. xD
which book
LMAO what did i just see
Hey
I just read the def. of limit points but its not very clear to me. Is it correct to say that (informally) if you cut a closed interval out of R, then the set of all elements of this interval does not contain isolated points?
By cut out an interval out of R i mean just take every real number within a closed interval
Like leave no real number out
Then everythings a limit point right?
yes
you dont need to use the wording "cut out a closed interval" though
just say "every member of a closed interval in ℝ is a limit point of that interval"
an interval is a set
there is the following fact:
a set S is closed iff it contains all its limit points
a slight generalization: the closure of a set is the disjoint union of its limit points and isolated points.
I thought lemme skip it but nah ig i’ll tackle it
are there any resources for iterated/multiple sigmas?
Anyway thank u namington for respondingg









