#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 526 of 1
This is the main book I know in this sorta category
Basically it's designed as an intro to proofs/integrated treatment of linear algebra and multivariable calculus
There's also Hubbard and Hubbard but... don't
If you find others they may be better but yeah that's imo what you'd do if you wanna do Spivak CoM type stuff along with linear algebra. Otherwise you just do a linear algebra book outright first, in which case I like Hoffman-Kunze, nowadays probably use Treil or Friedberg-Insel-Spence
I'm not sure how much material is contained in Spivak vs Shifrin tbh, nor do I know exactly how much linear algebra is assumed in Spivak but not implicitlyish done in chapter 1
It's, let's say somewhat "old school" but not out of date. Mostly that it has that weird frontloaded chapter on linear equations, and the typesetting is an oof
I kinda learned out of it myself. Kinda because, I had a 5 week class of sorts on linear algebra and graph theory summer after my first year
Which was a very certain angle on the material
Then in my analysis class we did a ton of problems from Hoffman-Kunze
oh interesting
i feel like HK does some handwaving at parts and is super thorough in other parts
Does it ever handwave?
i think it may just be my ignorance
sometimes it'll be like "x, so clearly yz" and im kinda scratching my head
I don't remember much of handwaving occurring there, maybe the first chapter tbh because that shit's a mess
i do think it's just my ignorance
Ah, yeah I guess that kinda thing happens tru
I guess mentally I make a distinction between "clearly" in the sense of "it is now obvious what to do from here", which is more the author making a call that it goes without saying
And "clearly" in the handwavy sense 😛
yeah i think hk uses more of the former defn of clearly
kinda like
"this is true, and it's simple to prove why" sorta "clearly"
Lee's books 
i switched from treil to hk and the main difference i noticed
is that
it focuses on row vectors
idk if thats the norm or if columns vectors are more popular
but
it just uses rows for everything
@ripe wasp We like to think of actions as acting on the left
And if we were to put a matrix on the left of a vector, matrix multiplication forces it to be a column vector
I think that's the only reason
When you write a function you write f(x)
When you write a linear transformation using a matrix you do Ax
So it's about the conventions I think
@supple flame
@bright hill

dami just checked the table of content once and based his entire opinion off of that lmfao
I have my own criticism of hubberd and hubberd ofc (like using abstract vector spaces without properly introducing them and introducing the characteristic polynomial 2 whole chapters after eigenstuff are introduced) but it's honestly pretty nice
I also appreciate chapter 0 which really helped as a total beginner (not too terse not too boring)
it also has some pretty fun exercises so that's nice
granted I haven't reached manifold stuff yet but it served me well so far
(also did I mention it's highly recommended by 3b1b?)
Is hubbard that bad?
I was planning on using it for vector calc
If so, any better recs for vector calc?
it's not bad
well it's good to do that when recommending someone a book just to know what they'll learn, but saying it's bad off of it is kind of yeah
questionable
Ngl I kinda do the same when selecting books for myself
But that’s because I’m lzy
Guys what jobs involve really high level of mathematics, like Real Analysis, Abstract Algebra, Differential Geometry/topology, Functional Analysis, etc
physics but that’s kinda obvious
no they were just giving a bad answer lol
i also mean outside of that as well 😂
oof
ah
Ok
To give a more serious answer
Some STEM fields use some of these areas of mathematics in specific ways.
For instance
I heard machine learning engineers use alot of math, but it isnt higher than Calc III and Linear Algebra, though idk myself
Differential Geometry has some uses in statistics via information geometry.
I heard studying protein synthesis and genetics in biology, requires alot of math
Statistics also uses some functional analysis and measure theory.
ill be sure to search this up, anything else?
is functional analysis a graduate level course or a 4th year course in university?
is it also possible to take a graduate level math course during undergrad?
It is possible, in fact, I am doing this rn
But I guess it depends on your department.
do you recommend it? or is it too difficult for the average math major?
i think a few grad classes are expected of those undergrads who want to go to grad school?
I don't really know, it depends a lot on your background and the courses that are being offered.
For instance
Oh that is interesting, I'll be sure to ask my guidance counsellors. Though none of them really know much about math, or even physics. Most did bio and chem
I am mostly taking grad courses on topics I am somewhat already a bit familiar with.
also i dont think that a functoinal analysis class is (necessarily) a grad class
it used to be a standard 2nd year undergrad class at least in europe
Ah, tyty, i appreciate the info
(and still is in many places)
the thing is, that functional analysis at my university is in the 6000 level courses, so that means it graduate level. But I've never really heard of people doing functional analysis in 2nd year
that's crazy
americans smh
Functional Analysis is usually a PhD course in Brazil too 
well
~brazilians smh~
if you want measure theory as a prereq you can do a better class
I heard people in other countries doing real analysis in high school
and i guess thats quite prereq heavy then
with at least a year of real analysis and then a semester of measure theory or something
Yeah, at IMPA and the uni I am in measure theory is a prerequisite.
Measure theory is an undergrad class tho
then I got a question about Physics, what jobs outside of being physicist, and outside of academia, is available for them?
should someone pursue, engineering physics, applied physics, or medical physics instead of regular physics?
I've heard that being said before
IT and banks/insurances hire physics grads
oh yea i heard this before. I'm assuming its because the critical thinking skills and math skills developed by physics majors
aleph is not a greek letter
yeah
yeah ik aleph isnt greek
good math background and ability to learn new stuff fast
i asked why we use aleph, a non-greek letter, as opposed to just another greek letter
ah tyty, ill be sure to research the market related to them
ah
do you think engineering R&D hire physicsts?
or do they just hire Eng PHDs?
i know some people working for automobile industry in R&D
there are engineers of all fields but also physicists
ye, better than academia 
I dont know anyone personally in r&d since im kinda new
just wondering, why exactly would a physics graduate be of interest to a bank?
I heard wages are like 17 dollars an hour for post doc
thats really low
they know math and how to learn things fast
in USD ofc
They usually learn a ton of math that is useful for doing simulations and such.
i mean the specific skills arent that important
makes sense
lots of banks and insurance companies really need people now
they are willing to train on the job, but more math background is better
and doing some kind of "hard" major that teaches you how to learn stuff fast
ah makes sense
physicists are like, freakishly good at working with data and computer tools
as well as math modelling and numerics
at least that's the impression I get, many of my friends are physicists
so they have a skill set that's particularly well suited for these companies
Happens in USA also
Rare albeit
Have you heard of eigenchris on youtube.com?
that's understandable coz it's not really a linear algebra text
They give good video series for introduction to vector calculus if I remember. Or its differential geometry
it's a calculus text that introduces what it needs of linear algebra

hubberd says it's calc until the appendix iirc
I dont doubt it. Im in Canada, and it’s unheard of from my perspective
including transport and contractions
The highest I’ve heard of is those “IB programs”
Oh yeah those also
And idk what they do there
Cuz I’ve never done it
I heard the physics is hard in that program
that's a relief 
yeah, hubberd is obviously not perfect
but I don't think any text is
spivak's calculus on manifolds is perfect
Exercise increases scores on everything
t
I do have a non HW question, was substitution and elimination methods for math, originally from Linear Algebra?
that kind of depends on what you mean by "linear algebra"
we knew how to solve systems of linear equations before we had terms like "vector" and "matrix" and stuff
if that's what you mean
but historically "linear algebra" didn't resemble what we think of today
it wasnt until Grassmann really that it took its modern form
Hello.
Oh wow, interesting. That is fascinating. I’ll be sure to search up the name.
in any case, techniques similar to substitution can be found in really old texts
That makes sense, math has evolved quite a lot these past centuries
in fact, something like substitution predates variables, not just linear algebra
diophantus outlines how to use what we'd call "substitution" to solve a certain diophantine equation
Variables? Like the branch in mathematics (ex. Complex variables)?
no, like the idea of representing unknowns with symbols.
Ah
That’s a new name, I’ll be sure to check it out as well
arabic mathematicians (as in, from the Arabic golden age) as well had a very well-developed theory of solving linear equations
Wow. That is a mouth full, impressive!
but certainly nothing quite like "linear algebra" as we know it
all that said, it is certainly possible to think of "substitution" and "elimination" in terms of linear algebra
Ill be on do not disturb in 10-15 mins
gaussian elimination is basically just elimination, but written with matrices.
and it's how computers typically solve linear systems (with some optimizations)
Oh yea I saw this on yt hoping to get into that soon.
Preferably this class or the next
Are rules in calculus, ex. The product rule considered a “mathematical operation” like Addition is?
differentiation is an operation
the product rule is an equation this operation satisfies
much like commutativity
a + b = b + a
is an equation addition satisfies
Would integration be another operation?
Yeah
Wait so we have Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication, Division, Exponents, Brackets, Differentiation And Integration, then what’s after Integration?
Does Guassian Elimination count?
And substitution?
Are there any more operations after this?
Infinitely many
Could you list a couple more? Maybe some in 3rd or 4th year university level?
Yes, that works
So the most common other binary operations on functions are probably composition and convolution
I'm not personally aware of any 3-nary operations that see common use on "functions", per se
There's many defined in linear algebra which are applied to vectors, but their definitions extend nicely to functions also
This is a very broad topic. Basically everything in math is realized as an operator somewhere
Inner/outer products
What they said.
I mean really an operator is just a function viewed in a particular way
So asking what operators there are is like asking what functions there are
Im gonna search that up rn
Oh wow, interesting
Is there any new operation that happens in Real Analysis?
I mean
Your question doesn't really make sense
Thinking of things in this way is not necessarily going to be useful
Like, anything you "do" to any mathematical object can be viewed as an "operation"
Actually that makes sense
I just checked Wikipedia on what an operator is
Now I see why my question doesn’t make sense
That's not to say that operators aren't interesting. Indeed, operator theory is a whole thing. Perhaps functional analysis would be your jam!
Operators are used to change “elements” in a given “space”
Exactly!
So differentiation, for example, turns functions (elements in the space of functions) into other functions
I really want to take it in 4th year. But it’s a 5000 or 6000 level course, which means it graduate not undergraduate. However some guys told me here it’s possible to do grad courses during undergrad depending on the circumstances.
But there's uncountably many ways to turn functions into other functions
It's just that differentiation is quite a useful one with nice properties 🙂
Hm, makes sense to me.
Haha yeah you'd dig functional analysis it seems
Unfortunately I cannot advise on university-related stuff (assuming you're not in the UK, anyway)
Things in the states work very differently from over here
It’s also pretty cool tbh, I liked the differentiation optimization problems during high school calculus, like the ones relating to area or finance. Like max volume or max profit. That was really cool, especially on a graph.
Yup, calculus is magic
Works differently in the states, UK and here in Canada haha.
My research is applied mathematics, which is basically a huge train crash between functional, numerical, and stochastic analysis
Ill havé to ask my advisors in grad courses
So calculus is my bread and butter
I'd be surprised if you flat-out weren't allowed to take graduate courses at undergrad
Oh yea, I’m doing a major in applied mathematics, today was my 2nd day.
Certainly it was permitted when I was an undergrad
Awesome!
Yea I heard guys here saying it would be strange to be denied it.
It was nice meeting you but I have to sleep now
Ill keep functional analysis in my mind tho
Tyty for thé advice
No problemo, any time
yo guys, if the order is Pre-Calculus, Calculus I, Calculus II, Multivariate Calculus/Calculus III, then what is after Calc III/Multivariate Calc?
"along the calculus track" the typical next courses are differential equations
ODEs then PDEs
but in practice theres a lot of branching that happens at that point
a student of mathematics would start analysis then (if they havent already)
a CS student would be more likely to take stats
etc
for me it was underaduate analysis/linear algebra
Lin alg after multi var 
Linear algebra should DEF come before ODEs here even though it's not calculussy
When I listed all of my math classes I determined that I had taken 32 calculus classes
or something like that
and like 10 non-calculus math classes
that sounds like a lot
it was more than i was expecting
I think I will be prepared for calc when I study it
me, having learned both mvc and differential equations before LA
yeah it's not particularly uncommon to learn it that way around
also the way round I learned things haha

but
like
why?
linear algebra isn't even that bad
sure, but it's not strictly required for learning the techniques of mvc
it's how curricula are generally laid out in the UK, in fact
not in an undergraduate math course
but in engineering etc
indeed, I have engineering friends who never did LA at all

What do those people do for a living
how tf do you survive in STEM majors without LA?
The only engineering that I can imagine doesn't involve la is computer engineering lmao
Just do cs
not all of cs tho
I imagine
depends what you consider LA I suppose
like, you don't need to know about rank-nullity to plug PDEs into ansys
True
Once more the algebra gang are oppressed by the analysis crew 


Ok, I’ve never heard this before. Thanks for telling me. I’m assuming courses like real analysis, complex analysis, etc.
WOAH! I thought it was mandatory for ALL accredited engineering programs
Again, depends what you consider to be like, pure LA material
Is there a formula to turn an infinite sum into an infinite product?
I want this formula as an infinite product
I very much doubt there is a single formula to turn every sum to a product
but I think some sums can be turned to products
Is there one for the formula I posted?
exponentiate 
lmao
but then it's not really a sum-turned-product
it's just a product-that's-connected-to-a-sum
@deep mango bro, do you have any ideas?
Use exponential function
W server
Can you give me an example?
btw are you a CS undergrad, Dirty ?
I graduated a long time ago. Health science.
ahh
what would be an appropriate channel to post optimization questions using matlab
like im looking at the early university and advanced and dont see anything for optimization
matlab should be as optimized as you can go already
i'm a coder my dude
if you did your matlab correctly there shouldn't be a whole lot of logic code meaning you're just running calcs
change the formula you're using
nooooo
oh.
mathematical optimization
in the programming world when you say optimize that is usually what that means
that's not specific enough for anybody to be able to help you
and?
well we have 2 different codes rn and both give separate answers
for the same inputs?
then either one is wrong or both are
we are under the impression both are
then you can assume both are
wait you want me to teach you how to program?
oh no that's a rabbit hole i'm not going down rn
no we get the programming we are just mostly debugging and want to make sure we have the theory bit correct
and what's your theory?
this is what I came up with. basically you take the maximum value of bi - b*ai (so a scalar - a vector) then set the inequality for t and minimize t. minimizing t here would basically mean it's = to f1
this
my code doesn't even give u any x* values
(optimal x)
and it gives you the wrong answer
yeah
honestly if i had a formula that complex i wouldn't bother writing it myself
i'd use a library
yeah we have a library for that
then use it
does that function give you a wrong answer?
well it might not even be the right function to use which is what we are starting to think
that's where we need the help with
then do the trial and error method
just use as many cvx functions as you can until it gives you an appropriate result
yeah but I care less about the answer more about the why
cuz if I don't know the why ill fail my exam in 6 weeks
sorry dude this is really nowhere near my forteih
i'm not a methematician i'm a programmer
yeah no one asked you
i mean if you use the debugger tool and already know what each val should be at each step you can just attribute it to that specific line number where it breaks apart
I've come across this situation occasionally (but I cant really remember any specific scenarios atm): basically if you're trying to determine whether something is equal to, less than, or greater than another thing, how do you represent it notationally?
like ig let's say the two 'things' are polynomials P(x) and Q(x) and we need to do some work to determine that
I cant put an equal sign since idk if they're equal nor can I put a > or < so what would I do
why are you solving for t when it's a given value? why are you summing over 1:12 and not using matrices like you're told? where are your subject to constraints to CVX?
oh i see for the second part this is indeed the case - so i take it you already wrote something for the bit before "extend your script"?
yeah the stuff in problem 0
but that's given
its just copy and paste to get your matrices
and the 1:12 is a range from 1 to 12
since the f1 is i from range 1 to m (m is 12 and is the number of rows for the matrices)
but yeah I think the issue might be that it's taking the sum of all those values for the different f1
i don't see the script in problem 0 deciding if a solution to the inequality for a given t exists? or are we talking about different things?
oooh shoot ur right
also we got a message from our professor to not use the minimize function and code it ourselves so I'm gonna go to sleep and attempt this in the morning
but if we are able to find an approximate lowest value for t that means it exists
and that's less coding xd
but also probably less marks
well really you need two things: a check to see if a feasible solution exists (and i've forgotten all of my linear programming, but that should be relatively simple)
but thank you for helping me realize this I need to fix that
and then you'll just e.g. bisect t down to the smallest t where the problem is feasible
and that's that
that's just farkas lemma.
I think
yeah im pretty sure it is
guys, I just want to say
I really appreciate everyones help
I just started uni, and I'm understanding the pre calculus work that i forgot
especially unit circle stuff
I think I'm off to a good start
Glad to hear that 
tyty
Keep it up friend 
can a mod give me helper role if i am asking in the wrong place dm me where to ask
Yeah they can just give em a second 🙂 if you don't have it in a bit you can ping an active mod
I'll give you the role if you're okay with receiving helper pings.
you get like an obscene number of them
I remember I was given the help role against my will a while back for saying that dogs are better than cats and I got like 40 pings a day
that's a genius punishment actually
The server icon is very good because torus
Am I allowed to ping helpers in room 21 if my helpers don't know how to do it?
It's been 4.5 hours so far :(
#rules ^^
Also, what timezone are you in?
In Europe its morning on a work day
so there is a high % you wont get help atm
only 40?
lmao
Hi can anyone help me on help 6 pls, its been almost an hour and i still cant get help
screams
probability is hard but so fun
i had to answer so many questions about martingales 
I should do probability 
gambling strategy is kind of a way to phrase it
It is an introductory course, idk why I can't understand it
my friend explained in the simple way that it is a fair game
super/sub martingales are unfair ones
Just basic cringe engineering probability and statistics
the only probability we learned this year in HS was like, "how many numbers can you make with 7 different digits"
which isn't even probability 
btw do you study stochastic differential equations?
SDEs my beloved
a martingale is a random process where knowing information from the past doesn't help you to make decisions for the future. this is kind of a loose definition, but it can be written formally using conditional expectations. the amount you gain at any step, given full knowledge of what happened before, should be on average 0.
wait
i've learnt similar concept in game theory
maybe I'm just confusing those two
so that's kind of why it describes a fair betting strategy: you are very very rarely going to lose all your money because if the expected outcome is 0, then eventually you'll regain everything you have spent.
(and hopefully you'll randomly rise above 0 at some point - then you can cash out)
i am studying them right now in a class
but i'm hoping to learn a lot more!
a simple example of a martingale is a random walk: keep a tally X(n), with X(0) = 0, and at every step decide randomly whether to add 1 to X(n) or to subtract 1 from X(n) with probability 1/2. This new number is X(n+1).
The point is that at every step, the average change is 0: you either add or subtract 1 with equal chance.
But martingale theory lets you take this simple walk and answer complicated questions about it: for example, if a, b > 0, what's the probability that X(n) hits a before it hits -b?
this sounds like some rigorous definition of mutually exclusive
This is hard to calculate without proving facts about martingales. But once you've proven some facts, it becomes easy.
hmm sounds interesting
In this case, there's a theorem called the "optional stopping theorem" that says that the expectation of a martingale stopped at a random time (under certain conditions) is the same as E X(0). (the rules of martingales tell us that E X(n) = E X(0) for all n, this is like a version of that where n is allowed to depend on a random event)
For example, one such random time is "the least n so that either X(n) = a or X(n) = -b"
Well, what's E X(this time)? either X(n) is a, and that happens with probability P(X(n) hits a first). Or X(n) is -b, and that happens with probability P(X(n) hits -b first) = 1 - P(X(n) hits a first).
Then 0 = E X(0) = E X(this time) = a P(X(n) hits a first) + b(1 - P(X(n) hits a first)). And we can solve for the probability.
We find that P(X(n) hits a first) = b/(a + b). If b is bigger, it's way more likely for X(n) to hit a first. if b is small and a is big, it's more likely for X(n) to hit b first. If they're equal, it's 50/50.
A theorem about martingales helped us to get a really clean answer for a problem that would have a very very messy solution had we tried to use combinatorics to count the number of paths hitting a before -b.
And that theorem isn't super hard to prove, either
I saw a very similar result in my finanical maths class and I don't think you need real analysis to prove it
knowing measure theory is helpful for doing a lot of this but you definitely don't need measure theory to prove the optional stopping theorem!
you can honestly just kinda... write it down and it works
the thing you do need to do is check that the probability that X(n) never hits a OR -b is 0
that takes a tiny bit of work
Can someone explain how simply-connected closed 3-manifold equal ONE THRIS SPHERE

one what sphere?
This sounds a lot like stuff from my Markov Chains class last year, are these a special case of markov chains or vice versa?
They're closely related to markov chains, but not exactly the same thing.
Or like
There's no inclusion either way
lol that's the poincaré conjecture
oh nvm am stoopid 
it's a reference to this post
so this random just asked a question and became a meme?
DarQ tryna find out how rando question equal ONE MEM
But yeah it's just the phrasing was so funny
LOLLL
I can now say that I have officially improved the American Mathematical Society through my membership in it.
Dope
Apparently, none of the AMS' discord servers had TeXit.
Thanks to me letting them know about it, now they do.
based
😄
man i'm doing linear algebra, stuff is really enjoyable
yeah it’s pretty interesting, rn though my teacher is throwing a bunch of different topics at us, hard to see how it’s all connected
AP Physics 1 algebra based exam being bell
FROM?
did you give your talk?
Saturday.
ah
I let them know about this via e-mail.
And they have been profuse in their thanks. 😎
yoooo how?
Apparently, none of the AMS' discord servers had TeXit.
Thanks to me letting them know about it, now they do.
Me neither
you great at math?
Should I be in the AMS discord?
I'm better than some people, but not better than everyone.
The discord is for the particular conference I'm attending.
Oh
Which is a virtual conference.
accurate answer digestable
@knotty willow @long parcel sorry for the ping, but I think I figured out what was going wrong (with the sound example). I forgot to adjust the speed of sound relative to the person moving. Once I did that, everything works out.
im too scared to take the ap physics rn
i took AP calc BC and stats, might do physics in grade 11 or 12
rip
YOU TAKE AP CALC BC IN 10TH????
is that gud?
yea
that's like
insane
im a senior taking ap calc ab
a lot of people don't even get to take calc in high school
im from canada so it was exam only, thats why im scared for physics
yea i self taught
even with the course it is hard
I know a 10th grader that's doing rudin rn 
43% pass rate!
WTF
lmao
these kids
bro wtf
lmao
rudins actually pain
actually
I disagree
the only pain I've seen is from chapter 2
chapter 2 is literally 
baby rudin is actual rudin 

should i do shilov lin algebra
cause my teacher said i should, but my other teacher said no
there are a lot of good books on lin alg
if I were you I'd do artin (but that's because I also want to do abstract algebra soon)
gimme a sec
oooo ive done some group theory which i liked
you should read this #book-recommendations message
but if you want to do multivariable calc, ignore the above and do hubberd and hubberd
well, for multivariable i did Munkres
ye
yea
but that's shtupid
Linear Algebra Done Wrong is the best book
you shouldn't do that
i didnt have access to anything that wasnt given to me from my teacher
cause books are expensive
And the PDF is free online
the secret ingredient is ||crime||
(the name is a joke about the book Linear Algebra Done Right, which is popular and a bit weird)
lmao legend
You could also use MIT OpenCourseWare. They have a series of lecture videos on linear algebra by Gilbert Strang. These come with problems and exams.
They're excellent but they aren't quite as proofy as the linear algebra books we're recommending.
yea i watched some of those, i just wanted something more concrete
ryc, what did you use for intro anal?
My class used Rudin and Pugh simultaneously
But mostly rudin
I like Pugh better for reading purposes
Analysis really deserves two books. Rudin for main and a simpler one with examples for supplementary
maybe this one https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4614-6271-2
The second edition preserves the book’s clear and concise style, illuminating discussions, and simple, well-motivated proofs. New topics include material on the irrationality of pi, the Baire category theorem, Newton's method and the secant method, and continuous nowhere-differentiable functions.
neat
also, are the harder questions left last?
In what
rudin
Yeah I think so
I wonder what percentage of Americans could do 2/3 + 1/4
I don't even know if I can do that

skill issue
ryc I feel like we have a similar appreciation for food
I don't know what to have for dinner
food is honestly so good
I have lots of opinions on food
Ready to get mad Gamma
Last night I had cacio e pepe for the first time
From a fancy restaurant
Just add the numbers in the numerator and add the numbers in the denominators ez
Someone else was paying so I decided to take the risk and go for the fancy cheese pasta
Ryc u should take me to a fancy restaurant
like it's crazy to run into people who don't seem to understand that eating good food is one of the best things about being alive
What I got was very very very good fancy cheese pasta. But I was underwhelmed.
◉◡◉
don't even know what that is

The implication being that I will pay for our meal?
No
oh it's just fancy cheese pasta
But I don't know what exactly
Yeah!
see the about pasta is
I just never go to fancy restaurants
I don't really go to fancy restaurants much either
Should have said maybe so could have possibly got a free meal too 😭
This was just an event
good spaghetti and meatballs is so hard to beat
Ah ok
What event
fancy restaurants are overrated
Or some really good pizza
I love lasaña
I gotta try once
It was an event with my apartment building, the grad students have an RA who holds events sometimes
Ah cool
and you can get a meal at any one of them for 10-20 dollars
Fancy restaurants are sort of overrated but
a really fucking good meal
There are also some really good ones
yeah
That have stuff that you can't really get elsewhere
there's a couple great Indian places near where I live
just because they have a star from a tire company isnt gonna get me to waste my tires going there
2 exams down ✅ one left to go
I was very mad the other day because my favorite thai place raised the price of their lunch special by 2 dollars
but idk how I feel about the ap physics exam
I also have 2 final exams left
Well
They're both not exams
One is a writeup on hodge theory
I'm going to start adding new challenge problems to the server that are just lemmas I can't figure out
multi calc and physics e&m
I don't have any finals bc im a senior!
Hello Max
can we make the bot give back certain roles that it doesnt
what's funny though is they're not any better than the 10-20 dollar meal restaurants, just different
the other is a talk on a nonlinear functional analysis inequality
I don't know
Maybe
being able to leave and rejoin the server at will would be nice without bothering people
I thought that was like a
it preserves honorable for example
if people get muted then they have to ask back for roles thing
but not advanced
or kicked
linearly independent but same magnitude one could say
i agree with that in most cases
I went to a fancier restaurant a while back
ive had some dope expensive indian food
Nice

just give me mod
and have Max ping me whenever he rejoins the server
this is a flawless plan with absolutely no downsides
actually being a mod on this server seems big annoying
lel
like reserve moderator seems great since you get all the power of mod but without the responsibility, and honorable seems great since you get all the clout of reserve moderator but with none of the power, but actual mod seems afwul
I'd rather not get pinged 50 times a day thank you very much
if no one volunteers by june 20th I promise I'll do it
(or at least try
)
anyways time to finish this essay
the infrastructure for this is already implemented
the roles just need to be added
so we're actually doing proofs in math lmfao
which is pretty cool
also bruhhh white name
im so sad
:((
this is a tragedy
i didnt even get emeritus
facts i defo deserve emeritus
that's y u should give it to me
ryc what if i told you you are my fav hawk
ryc be like: 
I'm not a hawk. I'm a pigeon.
i thought you were a lobster
But if you really cared about me then you would have said "no ryc, you're not a pigeon. dont be silly."
And that's all I needed to know.
oiiii i didn't want to be disrespectful just in case you had suddenly decided to become a pigeon
the fact that i thought abt ur feelings shows i really cared about you
Lmao
Yes I suppose it did
Anyway I dont have control over emeritus
well ricey
by a pigeon
Ryc u r a pigeon but ur my favourite pigeon
a mfin pigeon
aka mr jordan peterson fan
every time I see ryc's lobster emoji I almost mistake him for a jbp stan

Ok ok
boom
your idol, your god, your icon has proven you wrong
Ryc, you are a pigeon. You are pidgeonYC
being associated with jbp is the final straw and what gets him to change it
@supple flame fuck you for making me out to be a lobster
crabs are better than lobsters anyways tbh
Lobster boyyyyyy lobster booyyyyyy
convergent evolution towards crab
we share common ancestor with lobsters right?
yes
not really
yeah
the only point that jbp is making in the lobster thing is like
lobsters have the same kind of serotonin signaling that we have
oh i didnt even read it lol i just saw that it was by jbp and about lobsters
lmfao
Lobster.... Lobby... lobbying the government... think about it
Mess with the lobster get the claws
pursuit of happiness by kid cudi is so good
Whata the fu k is this
I don't like them
We all hopefully share common ancestors
It would be weird to think life didnt start from single group of organisms
Crawfish
Crayfish*
I meant crawdaddies
Wew lobsters tbh
You know what I find interesting
People thinking issac newton was a virgin?
Its one of the most useless facts. I think he just had a lot of haters
Newton was a very private and introverted individual and was not that comfortable in a lot of social settings.
Im calling cap
he was also almost definitely a virgin
some historians suspect he was asexual but in practice it's easier to just say "he's an asshole" and move on
because he was definitely an asshole
dude abused the shit out of his position in the academy
Imagine 200+ years from now people are writing history about you. You most definitely will have haters
stomped on some of his personal enemies' careers
for really petty reasons
like "once wrote a letter to leibniz"
Maybe this is where virgin meme started?
idk how common kissing and telling was back then
premarital sex wasn't illegal but was considered very scandalous back then
an upper class man like newton would certainly not publicly indulge
Im skeptical
privately, perhaps but we have no reason to think he'd be interested in that
?
Unless he stated explicitly his sexuality?
I think it would be safe to assume he is heterosexual
"sexuality" as we understand it was like... not a thing back then
also i dont see why anything i said assumes he's heterosexual?
or not?
i dont see why that came up
Its a counterpoint to having interest in sex
??
Gays don’t have sex
no?
i never said that
but being gay was like
burned-at-the-stake tier crime
why did this even come up
i never mentioned sexuality besides mentioning off-hand that he could've been asexual
Thats what I thought
The reason I bring it up is because you said
So privately he would like you said
i was referring to premarital sex with that message
Oh
my point was that, if he had sex, he certainly would not admit it
That makes sense
Oh okay. That was my misunderstanding thats why I brought up sexuality
that said, we have no salacious love letters or anything in the historical archive, and given his behaviour, it's pretty unlikely he visited the local brothel or what-have-you
so it's safest to assume he just genuinely never had sex
whether it be because he wasn't interested in it, or no one was interested in him
I just find it suspicious
There are lots of people in history
Why is the fact that Issac Newton is a virgin so publicized. Im assuming its just haters
i think because it's funny.
Also he lived pretty long too
So thats why I am doubtful. Asexual is a possible answer and it would be interesting if that was the case
But also think about it from a personal level
If you became famous what proof do others have of you having sex in the future?
fwiw this fact is relevant historically
Me personally have zero written proof. And I know if I had haters they would write about that
mathematical dynasties were very common back then
Dynasties?
given newton's corruption, he couldve easily given his kids a leg up
yet he had no children
so such a thing never emerged
contrast with e.g. the gauss family, which had dozens of mathematicians across the generations
[but one very famous one]
I see this as a really good point
But he was also an asshole so maybe this extends to progeny
Or did women have a good reason for accusing/claiming sex out of marriage?
This all goes without mentioning: a relationship with a woman would undoubtedly take away time he almost certainly would’ve preferred spending doing research
Darwin is noted to have contemplated this trade-off as well
From what I’ve read of Newton’s life it seems like that may sort of extend to friendships in general
Did he have anyone in his life that he didn’t treat poorly?
Well we will never know
His childhood was tragic. His dad died before his birth and his mother left him when he was 3
It's literally Doofenshmirtz's backstory
Anyone want to watch WNBA with me?
Which teams do you follow
Seattle Storm
ohhhh it makes sense now
Johan Sebastian Bach had 20 children and was still a very productive composer 😂... personally for me the best composer.
there was a mathematician who was a murder
he did really good research in complex analysis
after he killed his family and while he was in a mental asylum
not kidding
andre bloch 💀

Hello
I want to learn more about probability theory and stochastic process, but I'm a little bit lost, like where should I start after finishing the basic of statistics, linear regression
Do you have some book to recommend ?
You cant expect me to remember things...
In a month or so I will forget again
I barely even know who Jordan Peterson is
Lol
Yes
Anyway this is all the stuff I knew


god self studying textbooks with no solutions are annoying
like it seems to have good review but nobody seems to post their solutions or use it
Who's that 
Oh btw hi Chalk Bird
I'd contend that Bernie Sanders might be centre-left, if we want to be particularly generous.
You should start with a measure theoretic probability book if you wanna get to stochastics. Klenke is quite fine imo
Iirc it teaches you the measure theory you need in the framework of probability theory
It might be a bit of a jump from statistics in terms of rigour
Well I have done like 4 entire books without solutions now smh
Make that 5
I mean how'd you pull that off?
you need some ways to check your progress/skills at least
At some point you get good at knowing whether your answers are right or not
Before that though you’d ideally be able to check with a professor/teacher
the problem is I kinda don't have access to them currently
maybe I should use a book with solutions alongside
this server can help
Well What's the problem you face exactly
Like for me I just checked if my solutions made sense
having someone tell you if your solution is right or wrong and pointing out what mistakes you did is invariably more important then having the correct solution at hand
Fair point
oh okay
maybe I should learn latex
you should definitely learn latex
it'll just make your life SO much better as a mathematician
(or anyone that uses math notation for that matter)
You can always ask in this discord or on stackexchange
Alternatively get good at googling
this server is the best option imo




