#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 521 of 1
what
:/
Plz forgiv, I'm shaking the rust off. ^^;
u cant say that this will be the mass and this will be the acceleration
ur units are totally wrong
a cant be 1/r^2
that would have units of L^-2
It would be GM/r^2
But anything to the power of a negative exponent is just the reciprocal of that exponent. . .
You should arrive at this
After eliminating mass of the body
Wait.
But if F = GM1M2 / r^2
why can't we arrive to the conclusion that GM1M2 = m
since F = ma?
O_o
Why
Oh i think you got it wrong
See the force that GM1M2/r^2 give is the force that both bodies with masses M1 and M2 apply on each other
So you apply GM1M2/r^2 on earth and earth does the same
But in case of earth, Mass = Massive
So F= Massive Mass x Acceleration
Acceleration= Force/ Massive Mass
Acceleration= 0 approx
In your case,
Mass = low
F= Low mass x Acceleration
Acceleration= High
Ooooh, I see what I did wrong.
I looked at it as F = Ma and F = G M1.M2 /r^2 and therefore Ma = G M1.M2/r^2
I believe that is a logical fallacy if I'm not mistaken . . .
So whenever someone says what's your importance on this planet, you can proudly respond with I keep this planet at its correct place.
hey, I guess I do!
Now I can prove it using science.
So if Kanye West or any other egoist ever asks me "Who are you." I'll reply :"The man who keeps the world in place, and I can prove it using science. Can you?"
Epic comeback
Yeah that Ma would either be M1 or M2
Depending on what youre calculating the acceleration for
OOOOOO
The body with mass M1 or the body with mass M2
and r^2 is just the radius i.e. the mass of the object, yes?
Distance between the 2 objects

In the case above it would be radius of earth
Because distance is always calculated from centre of masses of the objects
😂
Come to think of it. . .
I would make a killing every finals week.
I know exactly where students fall short in calculus and what problems they end up botching on midterms and finals week.
ugh. . .But no, I'm already doing too much as it is. . .
And I'm balancing it so badly that I'm losing customers on all fronts.
Well you'll eventually manage.
Yeah, it's been 5 months. But, I just finished undergrad. So it's alright to screw up a little.
Besides, I'm moving away from dog walking as fast as I possibly can.
What's your undergrad degree
Computer Science.
Right now I'm on coursera learning full stack development, I learned a lot of theory but not enough application.
Good luck
Thanks!
I actually have a contract to fulfil to make a website.
Its why I'm doing full stack on coursera, you see.
Oh nice.
Guy loved my proposal, but he wants to see more websites made.
My contact inside and I agreed on 4 months to build some stuff.
I don't know HOW I'm so lucky, but somebody on Coursera made an encryption algorithm course.
I itemized encryption and had NO idea how I was gonna learn it. XD
Alright gotta go man
What real analysis textbook did yall like most?
I haven't gotten to Analysis yet, but everybody always recommends that Blue and Yellow one to me. You know the one.
i’m aware that it’s a joke, but it’s funny that i can think of two analysis books that fit that description off the top of my head
The blue and yellow one with the minimalist cover.
i was reading though apostol, and i loved it
its very nice
(apostols analysis, not calc)
model theory is so cursed
like
Compactness and Lowenheim-Skolem are two of the most cursed and morally false theorems I've ever encountered and they're used in like every proof
The picture is ultrafilter magic


you have to think about the stone space of your theory (or rather the lindenbaum tarski algebra associated to it)
That's a strong statement coming from you
I've seen the proof that compactness is just topological compactness of stone spaces if that's what you mean (though I don't remember it off the top of my head)
And ok maybe from the right perspective the theorems make sense. But like their consequences are so stupid
"Given any integer I can find a larger integer QED there exists a nonstandard model of PA" - statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged
What is picture that you have where these theorems make sense
The picture is FOL has limitations in it's expressibility
And these theorems are capturing that failure
You can't finitely say that a model of PA is standard is what that statement means
If you want logic to work how you want it to you need more expressibility
And there are logical systems like that
Lol my keyboard isn't working rn
I'll give more details later I guess
But also I'll give you a sheaf theoretic interpretation of the completeness theorem if you want
Because I think it's really nice
yes i want that
Same
What's that
Ooh looks interesting
Not sure if I'll have the time though, at least not for a while
I'm doing an REU this summer and then I'll have grad school applications
oh i see
Oh is this like HoTT stuff
They are very intuitive
And not as scary as you probably think
I'll show you some natural sheaf structures that arise in logic later
About to leave my house
KIWF
I'll believe it when I see it. xD
(is terrified)
Ahh nice!
@light needle read that with me
Sure
Well it’s summer so p much all the time oof
(that's not exactly a lie so I haven't read any other analysis book
)
and you're on chapter 2 
Does anyone know any sites where i can find some 3x3 matrix problems so i can practice LU decomp?
if you know what functions are you can understand what a sheaf is
seriously it's not that hard
tell me right now then 
"it's not that hard"
wikipedia makes it seem otherwise
WEW
my notes are making it seem otherwise
Noted
alggeom
this is wikipedia problem not sheaf problem
Quantum sheaf cohomology
maybe in 3 years at best
Is anyone familar with the process of academic awards ? I have like a ~2.8 yet I was given award by my math depart for academic excellence the dean called me hardworking why even bother handing me something at the point my class rank isn't even that high
it's relative to every particular prize really, there's no general criterion for "academic awards"
surely your department has specific criteria for that excellence award
either that or the dean simply has their reasons to consider you for that award
I had managed to improve over a couple of semesters I was told by my academic advisor I qualifed but like I haven't even taken any grad courses yet
nor have hit every undergraduate math course
that's also why it's hard to say whether e.g. such an award will have weight on your CV or admissions — but I guess it's worth mentioning
that's fine, I doubt people expect (most*) undergrads to take grad courses anyway
which year are you in
- I learn and move at a very slow pace every other person in my program is already at grad level by now
Senior
oh
I'll have to do summer semester and then i'lll be done
Oh that reminds I acutally got a another award form last semester it was the Shabanni book fellowship
@limber thunder + the dean callled me a hard-working student I was told that at least in the world of physics/tcs recommendation letters that word can be a kiss of death
it might be if your grades aren't that good
I can't say I know much about physics academia though
aside from what my friends tell me at times
i'm actually aiming for math grad school of some kind then industry
Marh server repeatedly saying sheafs are simple and easy to understand while also not explaining them

I’ll explain once I get to desktop
Sure you will
this but unironically
if something so complex sounding is actually so simple to understand just explain it yourself lol
i mean its not complex sounding, and no one has any obligation to explain it to you.
that being said ill start my explanation
consider a topological space, and a set of all possible pairs (U, f) where U is an open set, and f is a continuous real function on U
all those pairs are a sheaf
So a sheaf is suppose to model functions that are determined "locally" on some space X
so something like continous functions to R would be a sheaf, as continuity is a local property.
Lets make the exact defintiion
Let $X$ be a topological space, a presheaf of abelian groups (or rings, or vector spaces, etc) on $X$ is
-
An abelian group $F(U)$ for each open $U\subset X$
-
For every $V\subset U$ of open sets, we have a restriction map $\rho_{UV}:F(U)\longrightarrow F(V)$
and you need $F(\varnothing) = 0$, $\rho_{UU}= id_{F(U)}$ and $\rho_{VW}\rho_{UV} = \rho_{UW}$
enumerate
im fixing it smh
uwu
JohnDS
Ok so i want you to try to interpret this rn
wrt what i said about modeling function spaces
who asked for the explanation again lol
@sick burrow
F(U) has to be abelian group or it can be ring or vector space as well?
Why would someone attach so many rings on each open set of topological space
Is it like someone wants to do smooth manifolds shit?
well the uses of it comes in later, but roughly speaking it allows you to measure the difference between what something looks like locally vs globally
sheaf cohomology makes this precise but this isnt something we need to worry about rn (that one is actually hard lol)
for now we will just try to understand what this means
and why this is modeling function spaces
well i want you to tell me your intuition
About what
what is F(U) suppose to represent, what is rho_UV suppose to represent etc
hm
F(U) is supposed to represent locallly a structure better than the just topological space available on X
Second condition is just way of passing from bigger set to smaller subset etc
i mean, im kind of led on by what you said about global/local but id guess the restriction maps are a way of zooming in on what your object looks like on a smaller scale
so like would F(U) be for example continuous functions on U?
sure
so yeah like, F(U) is supposed to be some space of functions
and then rho_UV is supposed to be restriction in the usual sense
F U
and an example? let X be any top space and F(U) cont functions U->R
But when we are doing such general definition what other options we have for F(U) except for continuous or smooth or analytic etc type funxtions
this is a presheaf of R-vector spaces right
right
the rho_UV ofc are restrictions
and think about why all of what i asked makes sense
like rho_UU=identity
or F(empty)=0
or composition working
yeah that all makes sense
R vector space? Isn't it just Functionals. Continuous map from U to R
sure but it forms an R vector space under pointwise operations right
doesn't it form more than a vector space?
you have pointwise addition, multiplication, and composition
why not?
Okay yeah..they do have this nice structure.
U->R
yeah like most function spaces have some type of nice structure
this is what a sheaf is trying to capture and like
generalize
so we comfortable with presheaf?
Okay you got a nice R algebra for each open set and there is some compatibility as well
yeah you can do the restriction of functions and this is an R-alg homomorphism
from F(U)->F(V) where V<= U
ok so so far we kinda only capture that you are some type of functions
we dont necessarily capture a, local property so to speak
We don't have R alg homo yet I think
like continuity is special in the sense that if you know something is locally continous everywhere its globally continous right
and same for most of the special type of function you know probs
so lets try capturing this
What is something which is locally true but not globally?
boundedness for example
if you take F(U) to be all bounded functions U->R for example
boundedness locally def doesnt mean boundedness globally right
f(x)=1/x is not locally bounded right?
I kinda want some concrete example of this phenomemnon
I think orientation is not local phenomenon? Right. So we can't talk about it.
So let $F$ be a presheaf on $X$, and ${U_i}_{i\in I}$ an open cover of $U$, we have 2 things we want now
-
Locality, if we have $f,g\in F(U)$ and $f|{U_i}=g|{U_i}$ for all $i$ then $f=g$ in $U$. Here $f|{U_i}$ is shorthand for $\rho{UU_i}(f)$.
-
gluing, if we gave a collection of functions $f_i\in F(U_i)$ and we have they agree on intesections, i.e $f_i|{U_i\cap U_j} = f_j|{U_i\cap U_j}$, then there is a $f\in F(U)$ with $f|_{U_i} = f_i$ for each $i$.
JohnDS
ill let u guys absorb this
This feels like some unique analytic continuation kind of stuff
if you want take like, id:R->R, this is locally bounded in the sense that around each point there is a neighborhood of which it is bounded in, but obv it is not globally bounded
Thanks
Good question let me find 1, its honestly usually 2 you need to worry about
pasting theorem type beat
well definedness isnt smth u can always take for granted
But i wonder how would we remember this definition as easily as we remember definition of group or ring
yeah like keep in mind while the intuition for these are a generalization of function spaces
these objects can be as abstract as you want
ok we will put a pin in the counter example for part 1 for now
cause i dont wanna go through my book searching for one oof
nice
but is it clear how these like, describe function spaces?
the two sheaf conditions,
Okay so locality is a quotient condition
No it will be clear to me if we know of some presheaf which is not a sheaf
try F(U) = bounded functions U->R as i said before
check it doesnt satisfy the gluing condition
So let's just assign to every open set the same set of global functions
So when you restrict to an open set, you will have many copies of the same functions
When you restrict in a sheaf, locality quotients the set of sections (the functions on the open set) so copies are identified
You mean taking the identity function and then since we are unable to find globally bounded function so point 2 is not validated.
yeah
So in particular you can just take the presheaf which assigns to each open set the set of all globally continuous functions on a manifold (in manifolds you can always extend a continuous function on an open set to the whole manifold) and interpret that set of functions as the restriction of the function to your open set
And that will satisfy gluing but not locality
Well then we are kinda leaving out lot of interesting things such as bounded functions space when we go to sheaf. But Do we have a good example of something which is not a presheaf as well?

SSK do you understand my example?
Oh John I told you I would tell you about interpreting the completeness theorem as gluing
So here's the sheaf setup
yes but prob not today im near the end of my sleep lol
i am long past the time to be awake
fair lol
trying to make sense of this but my brain is not in gear lol sorry
Let me try to say what i understood. You mean to say we cannot extrapolate to the full manifold? Because if we can then can we end up in two different functions?
but yeah like the upshot is sheaves are just generalizing what it means to be functions that can be determined locally
No I'm saying that that's just an example where locality isn't satisfied
Hmm actually maybe this example doesn't work
The point 1

we do a little trolling
There's a slight subtlety I have to think about here lol
i mean to be fair also in practice we never really worry about condition 1 lolz
its just condition 2
ok
my book has one

👀
I think point 1 may make difference in non nice topological spaces
What we doing here
explaining sheaves
Like not Hausdorff etc
Okay so two functions which agree on every open subset but don't agree globally
Suppose $X$ is a riemann surface. let $$F(U)= O^\star(U)/ exp(O(U))$$ $O^\star (U)$ is the holomorphic functions $U\longrightarrow \bC^\star$ and $O(U)$ the usual holomorphic functions
JohnDS
A sheaf is a generalized covering space 

this doesnt satisfy locality
you need to do some modding out ig
to violate condition 1
yeah i didnt really want to go in my book cause this might have too much like
geo prereqs
oops

i cannot really parse this, but thanks for trying
But what is a good example of not a presheaf
Exp() here must be some crazy stuff
its just complex exponential pointwise
This is a pretty weird class of functions
its like, how far away are my functions away from having a log i guess
Okay so imagine the topological space consisting of the natural numbers plus 2 points at infinity
Nonvanishing holomorphic functions modulo exponential of holomorphic functions
sorta
I'm around but spacing out
Idk how to think about this
probably this
So the situation with this is I want each natural number to be an open set
On any simply connected domain, every nonvanisheing holomorphic function has a holomorphic logarithm?
hmm good question i think this is true?
anyway im gonna go to sleep it's 1:44 AM 
like yeah its like, integrating some closed form
gn yall
which is exact bc simply connected?
sweet dreems
Are we all nocturnal humans here
not by choice, not by choice...
This is actually an equivalent condition for the domain to be simply connected. If every nonvaninshing holomorphic function has a holomorphic logarithm
interesting so F is somehow measuring number of holes
I see
Have a good night twice
too bad its not a sheaf we coulda done some fun stuff with it
Its not a sheaf?
yeah it doesnt satisfy locality
as a counterexample to locality
Whats locality here
if u agree on a open cover on U then u agree on U
Yeah if you think about it, whats a hole? When you can map a circle to the unit circle in C. And thats not gonna have a holomorphic logarithm. So 
yeah this also intuitively makes sense
I cannot think about such things

It's requiring quite geometric intution
But what is difference in locality and gluing
gluing tells you you can glue together local info, locality tells you this will be unique
I see
Locality is saying "if a global section exists, then it agreeing with another global section on an open cover implies they are the same function", gluing says "if I have a bunch of sections defined on a cover and they agree on intersections, then there is a global section obtained from gluing things together"
Yeah when you take values in rings
sure a space with a sheaf of rings is called a ringed space
How does this fail for F?
So in the case of logic the rings you take value in are boolean rings
so take a non-simply connected set and an open cover by simply connected sets
every f agrees on the restrictions cause they r 1 on the restriction right
but not every f is the same ofc
Sheaves are used in logics too?
yeah
That makes a lot of sense
I thought it's just algebraic geometry oriented
yep
chef
Sheaf chef
infact one of the fathers of like, category theory, maclane, wrote a book on using sheaves in logic
so it was kind of there from the get go
Its like the opposite of a sheaf. It captures global data
yeah its a wierd object
So open sets get assigned to the boolean algebra of formula modulo equivalence on the set of complete theories that are described by the open set
But ultimately aren't we just doing some sort of generalized functional analysis with abstract objects
Boolean algebras/boolean rings are exactly associative algebras over the field with 2 elements
So long as we are talking about sheaves, I like to mention a really good example of a sheaf is a covering space
So that's what the sheaf you get is
oh this sounds cool emma
Sections are actual sections of the projection map
You can also have your sheaf take values in algebras over a complete boolean algebra (which is what boolean valued models does)
espace etale 🙂

Sections on an open set are consistent theories with respect to that open set, global sections are consistent theories
Completeness let's you glue locally consistent theories together to get a globally consistent theory
Stalks in this interpretation are just the boolean algebra 2
They aren't this in general though
Lol
I'll give more detail when John isn't tired
yeah oop
Anyway John imma hit you up for categorical logic in a couple of days I think
nice yeah
I also have a really cool book called toposes and local set theories
That we can look at a little
do u like the idea of reading outloud in vc, thats how i usually do this stuff, leads to richer discussions
Where are number theory discussions 🧐?

Is Keith conrad teaching ?
yeah i think so
Nice
Idk they will upload on yt
Like they did for previous
I watched a few lectures from 2020 version I think
Nice
Yeah maybe email them asking for an update
Yeah I’ll do that before I go to sleep probs
What do you guys use to take notes with? I've been using physical journals and while they've been fine I've been accumulating a lot of them for various subjects and topics. I feel like physically writing helps me remember stuff, but I was interested in any recommendations in general or stuff related to stuff used to take notes for math. I've also had the same issue with doing problem sets which have led me to accumulate notebooks. I'm interested in any recommendations or any organizational tips.
a4 paper and lots of sheet protectors
Scan them all and keep it in online drive
What
The website still says June 6-12, when is it now?
Oh hmm
like should I take the pages out the journal and use sheet protectors?
how would I organize it?
oh, for what you've written so far i don't know, scanning and printing them sounds inefficient but i lack sleep and i can't think of anyhting better
for new things that you will write from now on, having free sheets of paper that you can organize however you want is pretty convenient tho
Some stuff I've already written down, but I was also asking about in the future because I got a lot of topics that I plan to study
how would I organize the sheets of paper since I would be accumulating all of these sheets?
how do you properly store them?
Plane tickets in general have become far pricier
in a uhhh
I’ve seen flights that were literally over 5x what they used to be
wouldn't it create a similar situation in which I would have a bunch of binders instead of journals?
loose leaf paper and then type up the parts that are actually worth saving
how would i type up my math notes should i learn latex to do that?
also how would i organize it across multiple accounts if I type it up?
yes learn latex for this
most people either use overleaf, which is an online latex editor, or download a latex editor to use offline
overleaf is kinda slow and annoying but it's nice if you have multiple people working on the same document and want stuff synched to the cloud
latex does have a bit of a learning curve but it's not that bad, you get good and fast with it with some practice
this site helps: https://detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html
An approach to simplify finding LaTeX symbols.
since a lot of the learning curve is just knowing what the right command is for common math symbols
thanks for the help
i was just wondering if you felt there was a difference in your ability to learn and grasp concepts with typing things up vs. physically writing notes
i feel like part of the reason i haven't made the jump to taking online notes was because i've had good results with writing it down although i definitelt plan to look into this and evaluate how it fits me
yeah there is definitely a difference for me
the main benefit of handwriting instead of typing in terms of retention is that handwriting forces you to slow down, so you're processing the information at a more reasonable rate
that said for most things I feel like I have to do both handwriting and typing. Usually handwriting as a first pass and then typing as a second
the benefit of typing things carefully in latex is it forces you to write something fairly polished and complete, with the benefit that you end up with documents that you can share with people if you finish them
also has the benefit of being able to edit easier
so do you usually handwrite your notes and then type them up?
also does this apply when you're doing psets in which you write them and then type it up?
when I have to do psets I just type them up from the beginning
since it's a lot easier to be able to go through and edit your solutions while you're working on them
and yes depending on what papers/books I'm working through I'll usually handwrite notes and then type them up as a second pass
New emote concept: blursed sully
Blursed surly
blushed sully
What would blursed sully look like?
blursed i imagine
Ah yes, the floor is made out of floor
69 looks nice. 420 also looks nice. But can this be called "nice"?
,w Famous people who born on 4/20
Andy Circus
oh god
this is correct right?
Yes
ok
#peterscholze #fieldsmedal2018 #fieldsmedal #perfectoidspaces #numbertheory
i like how peter scholze has his own fancams
Yes
Yes.
i love this channel https://www.youtube.com/shorts/MOYB1JUhWWY
It's 134th Birthday anniversary of Srinivasa Ramanujan today otherwise known as National Mathematics day in India.
Instead of talking about the already well discussed and today's centre of attraction- The taxicab number 1729 , I'd like to mention few things about Ramanujan's 1916 paper " On certain Arithmetical functions " and its impact on Ma...
A list of 10 "master-themes" of Grothendieck's discoveries, in chronological order:
1- Topological Tensor products and Nuclear Spaces
2- Derived Categories and 6 Functors Formalism
3- K-Theory and Reimann-Roch Theorem
4- Schemes
5- Topos Theory
6- étale and l-adic cohomology
7- Motives and Motivic Galois group
8- Crystals and Crystalline Coh...
I cant stop laughing
math edits are hilarious
@jovial ember you gotta watch this
why the copyright of pursuingstacks
meme theft is no joke these days
I cant get over "The tale of Naruto Uzumaki" played while flashing through images of Grothendeick
that is brilliant
Is anyone just able to rewrite this or something
I have no idea how it's wrong
I've done all kinds of little tricks to get the numbers to match with the video that tells me the answer
It even tells me the formula
But I have no idea how it's wrong
It's impossible
I can't tell if the video is wrong and I'm just going fucking insane
The first selection should be .00514 but it's just not
And the total should just be .0255 but it is obviously not
interesting channel lmao
FUCK NOOOOOOO
time to delete 15 messages
ok i have 69417 now
what do i do for my 69420th message (Someone ping me with something nice)
3n+1 = 1
Well I missed my 1337
shyshu never posting again waiting for a good 69420
Talking about mathematical logic while cuddling call that forking and spooning

@toxic schooner post blushy sully

ally is here 
fun fact : log_a(b) = b^a
hi ally
how r you
What

No I did that wrong. . . .
Fun fact : inv(log_a(b)) = b^a
Because logs are just the inverses of exponentials.
I haven't touched calc in awhile, but I remember that from self-study.
that makes no sense
Okay. . . .?
If you define a function f(x) = log_a (x) the inverse is a^x, not x^a
Ahhh~ gotcha, misremembered.
Wait, I remember now.
@neat frost That's not quite right either.
I forgot the log_a(b) = y and therefore it should be b = a^y
Inversions are just taking the outputs and swapping them with inputs with the inverted function.
So if you had f(x) = log_a(x) your input is x and your output is why.
y*
meaning, the input of its inverse b^(y) gets the ouput x.
fuck no jfc
never
i guess i will just do a catthink for the 69420th message
dont have any other ideas, and no one pinged me with a good one
according to cnn 80% of Russias population support the assault on Ukraine
They must be held at gunpoint or something xd
I think discussion of the russion-ukrainian conflict is still prohibited
oooh
Maybe confess to Slurp as your 69420th message

smart, honestly no good can come from talking about that now at this juncture in this chatroom.
Tf?
What does that even mean

As long as the admirer isn't abhorrent, just take the free ego boost.
Shyshu is too old for me anyway 
Bad luck for Shyshu, I guess?
On the bright side : An older guy likes you. Good for you! (Edit: Older man sounds weird. . .)
you and him are like the same age

Nah he’s older
what age gap is ok?
I mean, older guys who attract younger women seem to attract specific types of younger women if Robert Greene or kidology are correct.
Never talk about a ladies age! smacks hand with spoon
Okay, a movie that finally has actual code ; I'm totally watching this.
Hey, meme at my parents and aunts, they are the ones who drilled this into me. lmfao.

Shyshu is 18 lol
boomer
Good morning slurp
Good morning DarQ, how did you sleep?
I'm awake because insomnia woke me up at fucking 3 am.
And now I'm hopped up on Vyvanse and adderal.
You need more caffeine then
Sotrue
Wait
Does that mean I'll be a boomer in a few days?
Yesh
Yo, zoomer @neat frost stop overusing that term, or its eventually going to mean nothing.
Don’t tell me what to do normie
They’re all boomers
And they must become self aware
Don't tell me what to tell you what to do, freak.
WHAT!?
WHAT DID YOU JUST CALL ME, NORMIE
I CALLED YOU A FREAK, FREAK.
FCKIN NORMIE
If we're all boomers than you're a child
HECKIN FREAK
HMPH
Also, since we're not allowed to talk about the Ukraine crisis here : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5_npTvQVSZ28Kc8wvffPew watch this youtube channel for updates.
Geopop is the fun place to learn about Geopolitics.
I am a Sydney based video editor who is studying Geopolitics.
Includes lectures, interviews, video essays and articles about the fascinating world of Geopolitics.
I use podcasts and Google Earth Studio plus infographics to make learning about Geopolitics more fun and enjoyable to watch.
You can...
Mr. Friedman has taught me a lot about geopolitics with this channel.
Though, his videos are on the lengthy side.
We ain't boomers, we're bloomers : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6RoesnNDBM&ab_channel=MonkMode
Reupload as the last one got deleted.
Enjoy
Hi, I'm writing a report about quantum computing. I know this may be a little hard to understand without context, but does the explanation/derivation that I've given here seem clear? I'm specifically referring to how the function in the power of -1 gets turned into +-
LMFAO U(H | 0)H
Also, whoever did that Latex should be fired, one left '(' bracket and 3 right ')' brackets???
Just realised that the last line is missing the lhs
those are angle brackets used to indicate quantum states
they're basically the equivalent of vector notation
it's not a class tbh, it's my CS dissertation
Masters or PHD?
thanks
Yeah, I've got some studying to do.
toddler.
How's your back, old man?
you need calcium for a back as healthy as mine
no
no witty comeback needed for such a dumb message
I was playing on your level 
no
Well yea seems clear enough. Btw what does it mean to multiply two kets
nice
Nvm it's tensor product
Got a github or bitbucket to share? Can use a shot of inspiration for code, you've given me my shot for studying math believe it or not.
I do but there's not much on it
Really?
I do have what I'm currently working on
it's called shors algorithm
let me send you that
speaking of algorithms
is there a formal theory of algorithms?
yes there is a somewhat formal theory
Oh nice you implemented shor's
haha yes
complexity/computability?
or something finer
yes
So um so you build these quantum circuits out of quantum gates right?
yes
strictly speaking there's no formal theory to designing algorithms, but there are theories, such as the ones you mentioned, that focus on analysing algorithms
Is Physics, Calculus, Multivariable calculus and Linear Algebra enough of a prerequisite for studying quantum physics?

mfw actually have to think
CS students generally start with a topic called "Algorithms and Data Structures" and potentially cover Computability theory.
yeah i'm one such student
where's linear algeba
Linear algebra
LA,stats and physics should be enough
lambda calculus and turing machines are very cool but it doesn't say anything about designing algorithms like you said
Complexity theory comes later, usually at Masters/PhD level, I think
Well designing algorithms is a skill
yeah designing algorithms is more of an art xD
It's part of engineering more than cs
Although cs gives you some inbuilt algorithms
It's upto you to incorporate everything and make a good algorithm
There is a point where Engineering and Computer Science intersect, no?
Kind of like a not all humans wear sandals situation?
Kind of yea
You have some core algorithms
You incorporate principles from those into your algorithm
I don't think you can study "how to make algorithms" ,you can however study existing algorithms and learn to reduce your problem to one that is solved
For example,Sorting is important because a big chunk of problems are reduced to sorting
Problem solving
Yeah that too.
aggressive common sense
Sometimes,I just want to forget I do cs
All the good algorithms are a mix of math and ingenuity
i'm a """cs""" student but i don't feel like i can call myself that
The only good parts of cs are implementing some cool thing
Like OSes and Networks
That's my opinion
counter strike student
what you really mean is making money, in which case i agree
that's a good part of cs
Studying cs won't help you design algorithms smh
Practicing to design algorithms will
do you think that is it possible to tackle advanced probability(measure based) without having done naive version(like ross)?
No, I mean implementing some cool thing.
Hey, to be fair? It's a GOOD assed recommended system.
legit my feels
tfw dijkstra is a physics graduate or something
when you look into it, most algorithms are created by mathematicians
Aren't all algorithms literal mathematics but implemented?
Ok actually physicist by training
but tbh at the academic level the line between mathematics, cs, engineering and even physics can get quite blurry
such as for example in quantum computing
Yea true
worst thing about being a CS student for me is never ending impostor syndrome
Why do all the cool people not have a cs degree
Everyone who is a prominent computer scientist is either an electrical engineer, mathematician or physicist by training
uhhh~ I have a cs degree and I know I'm the shit.
But then again, I'm taking a light starting job so I can study and do modeling, so. . . . .
Actually, That's probably because cs is such an young field
Not necessarily really
In theory areas ya
rename computer science to computer usage when??
I mean, what else do you do at faang companies?
CRUD science
Actually important stuff?
personally I think CS should be split into "Applciations of Computing" and "Computer Science", or "Theoretical CS"...
Like how do you optimize X query
optimize X query?
probably some really really complicated distributed algorithms or something
I think FAANG work will be optimising some really specific thing
When the companies were in their infancy? Sure, but most days you're just implementing algorithms to fix bugs or implementing new features.
Yea probably CRUD science
From what I understand, architects need to go through a lot of politics before they make anything (which means its going slow...LOL)
They probably still do a bunch of rnd tho
Bro, listen. . .You aren't doing RND fresh out of college.
Unless you're a genius, you're just NOT.
and even a 22 year old genius has an underdeveloped frontal lobe.
What
Google it. . . .
Maybe like if you go far back enough in history to where mathematicians had the official job title of herbalist or whatever, eventually everything involved in the current cs landscape will mesh together and create math 2
You're not considered a full human before 25 for a reason.
idk sounds like bullshit
its true
uhhh. . .Okay?
Most people ik that got jobs at faang after college said it’s p boring
A few left and decided to get a phd
your fluid intelligence is still developing till the age of 25, after that it starts dropping
Does it mean when I get to 25 I will never become less stupid from that point?
Ehhh, there is a grey area there.
Well, I'm not a neuroscientist but I will share what I know.
I'm almost 25 bro...
The general wisdom is at 25 you are as smart as you are going to get, and you are on the decline from there. HOWEVER . . . .
no, it just means that it'll be harder for you to learn new things
When you consider most CEOs or leaders of industry are old, you have to really question that.
it'll take longer to pick up new skills
Now, according to this book I read : Late Boomers, a German University conducted a study in which older people were taught new things and new grey matter was formed.
A child can obviously learn faster than an adult, but an adult can learn without restriction as long as one keeps their emotions in check.
Further : There seems to be a correlation between consistently reading / learning and having a small / no decline.
hmm... i see
but the main point is fluid intelligence stops increasing
A lot of musicians i know developed hugely in their 40s
There's a podcast run by a neuroscientist called Andrew Huberman. He talks about neuroplasticity in a few of the episodes. Highly recommend.
Well, not a lot, the best really
I recall that by 25 your neuroplasticity drops drastically
I am not familiar with that term, so I cannot argue with that or speak to that.
it's a big word(that i myself don't know very well) that basically just means how quick you can learn new skills/knowledge
Idunno about that, bro. I'm gonna be 30 in a few days and I'm learning more / smarter than I have EVER been.
My brain shall soon turn into an ice cube
yea that's crystallised intelligence. That keeps increasing forever.
Well, I guess until I read the studies that prove it, it would be best that I just see myself as an anime character that keeps getting stronger.
I'm only quoting what I heard. I believe that it's possible to keep learning (you don't completely lose neuroplasticity throughout your life)
I've always been a terrible learner
lol nice. going through training arcs
Going through a bit of a villain arc right now tbh.
Then again, that probably has more to do with my erratic sleep.
Calling my insurance today to go to a sleep center.
This sleep basically keeps me at 40% at all times.
at what time do you sleep?
I slept at 9 pm last night.
Woke up at 3 am today, so that means I went through a light sleep cycle for some reason.
Thing is : This is NOT the first time this has happened.
3 weeks ago, I did nothing but play Elden Ring for a week and I slept well that whole week.
The week after that I slept well again.
But I haven't really touched Elden Ring or any game since then. It's been work work work.
I think my body is trying to tell me to take a break? But I wanna do the sleep study just to be sure.
Hmm...stress sounds like a plausible cause
If its stress, then I need something besides gaming to de-stress.
Because I am NOT drinking to de-stress.
That's the neat part. . . .
My body FORCES a LOT of naps in the afternoon lately.
I still feel my jaw clenching unconsciously.
And it takes a huge bite out of my day.
Started meditating regularly again.
10 minutes Mon-Sat , 1 hour on Sunday.
does meditating help with the sleepiness?
No, that sleepiness mostly because of the Vyvanse / adderal combination pushing me to a crash.
When I started adderal, the daytime napping was a fucking plague.
12 noon - 2 pm napping until 5 or 7.
And if that happened? FORGET sleeping at night, lmfao.
And no, the stims aren't the cause of insomnia.
My insomnia started at 28 after I did 3 months of nofap if I'm not mistaken.
Maybe before that?
hmm....if the stims and the nofap are all normal to you then i'm inclined to believe it's mostly the stress that's the cause
like your brain just needs some rest
Probably.
So, I'm going to let myself game after I finish making this product for my side hustle.
I'm SO close to being finished and its the BEST looking thing I've ever made.
My customers are gonna fucking love this.
what is it?
p/m me, It's not something I can go around telling everyone about you know? (It's not illegal, before you get any ideas)
lol ok
I guess toc
i'm in epic burnout-mode
a bit of it self-inflicted
i have to learn some things i don't care about but i actually WANT to learn a bunch of other things
but i can't, physically, do it at anything above snail pace
saaame
I've got a chem test in a week but i've been developing some major interest in psychology recently
it's one of the dopest things i ever learned about
like what?
like that crystallised, fluid intelligence thing I was talking about
that's psychology
right
and obviously there's also content about mental illnesses(which I do read up into) but I mostly want to learn more about development
wbu, what are the buncha things you wanna learn?
Well,I had an interest in psychology until I realised it isn't very developed
Like I don't think theories in psychology can be held up to the same level of scrutiny as in physics or chemistry
Well,Math and maybe some physics
I am looking to specialise in things that I find useful tbh
well, physics and chemistry are much more rigorous
Music, maths
oh noice. Useful like?
cool. What kinda math tho?
I don't really know, probably fundamental things like set theory and number theory
Basics like topology and real analysis
And whatever comes after that when it's time
topology is one of the basics? Damn....
i see
I believe having intuition in those two will make a lot of things easier for me
firstly, no i dont like you, and secondly, we are the same age man

Better than you at maths hehhehehe
Hmmm cocky
Test me
Some other time
Hs student?
Well... Im Australian but I don't think that it means anything
So you might recheck the sign of the one that you added to your points. It might be negative
Okay
Uk>Australia
Im so good at inequalities
y>2x+7
Y=mx+c
I've got Maths test tomorrow
its bedtime
bruh
For me it's about 3am
@neat frost you tricked me
about <t:1651503658:f>?
Sleep time.
?
slurp is older than I am and they were calling me a boomer 


they said they were a girl but I'm not sure what they're pronouns are


WHY IS IT SUMMER IN THE SPRING
WHAT? UNTRUE
Everyone has a crush on me

Also youre most definitely a boomer and I most definitely am not
slurp, you're a "she" right?
Also you are older than me DarQ
its hot outside
fckin boomers

no.
false.
I'm super confused rn
why
slurp don't do this to me
Hi
I literally have 2 brain cells left
what have i done to confuse you now?
its true
*vaguely gestures at everything*
yesh?
are you unfunny on purpose ?
vaguely gestures at everything
Omfg
Are you unfunny on purpose?
sorry slurp, someone had to tell u
Sorry slurp, someone had to tell u
whyd you have to do me like that Galwa
also slurp, would u clear this
no
hold on i'm joking
thanks, me too 




no.......