#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 507 of 1
can someone quiz me on an sat math question
literally ANY algebra problem .
No I just said practice any algebra one
.. ok lol
i don't want to choose any though, cus i wanted to get a random one
to see if im ready for anything
what is 'sat math q'
There’s khan academy
some algebra
30
really?
yea
how did u instantly know that 
lol
its easy
just count
s = 15 and 4 means times 2 so 15 * 2 = 30
I'm stuck here already
I guess non troll response is to spam lagrange theorem
It isnt 30
what is the real answer
i dont know either
wait
() - 1
(1 2) - 2
(1 2 3) - 3
(1 2 3 4) - 4
(1 2)(3 4) - 2
ok, is this all the possible element structures
it very well may be 30
conjugation classes?
So for the order 2 subgroups..... I pick anything that is (1 2) or (1 2)(3 4)...
4c2 + 4c2 . 2c2/2
i think.
This is probably a stupid way to count
I remember having an exercise like this in Algebra 0 by aluffi
sounds like brute force.
yh oki cba =....=
my point kinda was, maybe be more specific in the types of Qs you wanted smh
tables for quick information should tell you what to use
give me some pre university algebra
How many subgroups of order 4,6,8,12
does google not work?
nope
Solve the inequality
$$6\sin^2x + \cos x \geq 5$$
yeah cant really
What do you think could be the value of tan 20 degrees, not in decimals.
0
no clue
I got an approximate value of √(658/4967)
damn
my only guess
would be computing 3rd order taylor polynomial of arctan at 20
but thats not smart way im assuming
tan 20deg = tan 20deg
answer is fine as is.
I thought of solving the cubic equation x³-9x²-9x+9=0
that works als
Anyone who can solve it no decimals.
I'm not really good on abbreviations, what does als mean?
Toysem Teans
at x= 20
And the answer will be....
You choose the percision
Way too complex
instead of going to infinity you can go to whatever index you think is good enough
nah not rly
lots of computer libraries do things this way
How exactly does this relate to tan... Is it a function of tangents?
did you take a calculus class yet?
No
But I'm learning on my own.
Yes
there happens to be formulas for sin and cos
I know that.
these formulas are infinite series
an infinite series is a summation that goes on forever
WHAT!?
Also know that
there are also infinite series for the inverse functions
Thanks for telling me. I was hoping to find the function MYSELF!
Well do you know euler formula with e^i theta?
e^iπ=-1
thats the identity
the formula is e^i x= cos x +i sin x
if you know about this, its evidence telling you about formulas of cosine and sine
since the formula for e is an infinite series
So that's the formula for tangent.
I think they use even more efficient methods
idk
lol
but they almost certainly dont just use taylor for everything
its used a lot
There are more efficient algorithms to compute stuff
in roblox its used for that
because cs ppl smart
and minecraft
and think of these things
typically the more precise a result is the slower it is
and the faster the less precise
its true in general
which outperform taylor on both fronts
For specific stuff
you can look more into it
but they really dont use taylor for a lot of stuff
cus more efficient algs exist
I dont know who they is
calculators
and programs
That doesnt stop taylor being obsolete ofc - the main point of the series isn't just to compute stuff
my point still stands in general
after reading cordic is inefficient
It's called "tangent" because it is the length of the line segment tangent to the unit circle in this diagram.
not true
???
sometimes people dont have knowledge base
What
my example being roblox api
I'm sure calculator companies
wouldn't implement cordic over taylor just because they didnt know taylor
there is a reason for everything
im not saying taylor series is most efficient but its most definitely not obsolete
people need polynomial approximations often
Never said it was obsolete
I only am saying your calculator/program probably doesn't use taylor for many things
For whatever reason
I was assuming because there are more efficient algs for some functions.
interesting
taylor series often converge very slowly whjen they converge at all
and they're often expensive to compute
furthermore, the standard expression of a taylor series is often not conducive to numerical stability, so you'd have to rewrite it significantly to get a numerically stable approach
Well even if the writers don't use Taylor, something worth mentioning is they might start with Taylor as a baseline to figure out something better
So 'useless' is false regardless. 'not used as is' is more like it
the intel x87 triggy functions are implemented by first reducing the argument to the range [0,2*pi) (using a 66-bit approximation of pi)
i guess ive been lying to my calc students
whoops
i always motivate taylor series with computation lmao
the spec doesn't state the algorithm used, but guarantees it's accurate to 1.5 ulps
but only within the [0, 2pi) domain
There certainly is the computation aspect of Taylor regardless 😂
there's nothing wrong with taylor series, they're just not all that good for numerical computation
On the other hand, when it comes to graphical integration/differentiation, I suspect Taylor/Laurent would probably be most handy?
eg. when desmos or wolfram integrates/differentiates your function
Or maybe even there we have more efficient methods 
using a taylor or laurent series is a strategy when you don't have a better one
i worked on a graphic visualization project in the early 90s that involved a mix of symbolic and numeric differentiation, and we used a lot of taylor expansions, as i recall
radius of convergence is an issue
Is there a good way to learn math if you never really learned it properly in the first place? Like shaky foundations in algebra sort of not learned it properly.
What kind of algebra
high school or uni
In any case, try some refesher video tutorials?
and exercises
If there is something you don't get, look it up 🤔
Like I honestly probably fell off the wagon in elementary school after we got past long division/multiplication. I had a learning disability and just stopped getting math at that point.
I would start with something basic like khan academy then and do lots of exercises
Yeah that’s a good idea, thanks.
who's the server owner?
mniip, why do you ask?
just curious
if you want to contact the moderation team, it's probably best to DM @polar panther
ok
Nyooooooom
next time, tell them about the guy that computed $\sqrt[3]{3}$ to 8 decimal digits to get out of prison
DarQ (Shuri for honorable)
I'm sure that story is cap but it was the story I was told
and 14 y/o me was INTRIGUED 
what technique would you use
Why does Nullstellensatz sound so cool?
its german
Like why was it named that? I know it has something to do with zeros
😂That guy in prison was probably Galois.
How much does Undergraduate maths is covered in the US realized there are some gaps in my background. In my linear algebra class we never did linear algebra over the complex-plane. Was doing a project in Representation Theory and didn't know what a Jordan Canoical Form was
US is pretty non-uniform
Depending on how high you're aiming for grad school (or if you're not)
Let's say if you're trying to fill in gaps I'll give a more aggressive suggestion, so it's a lot but if you can fill it in you're in A+ shape
I mean isn't a lot of this stuff fairly easy to pick up as it becomes relevant
you'd know better than me Dami, but that's the impression I get
yeah
could easily be wrong though
From linear algebra:
Fields, vector spaces, subspaces, dimension, linear maps <-> matrices and associated notions (kernel, rank, row reduction, change of basis, etc), products/quotients, dual/Hom spaces, multilinear algebra and determinants, k[x] is a PID, characteristic and minimal polynomial, eigenbusiness, diagonalization/triangularization, Jordan and rational form, bilinear/quadratic forms, Euclidean/Hermitian inner products, self-adjoint/orthogonal/unitary matrices, spectral theorem, ideally some symplectic linear algebra and matrix decompositions if you got time
Sorry for the delay I got some food
This is on the ambitious side but I'd say useful
Please for the arggressive suggestion 🙂 the foregin grad student was laughing at me and as much as we was being mean he had a point I need to grind up on things that weren't covered in class. For Real-Analysis, and Abstract-Algebra whats your recommendations as well
Also toss in any additional suggestions @vivid halo
I'm basically making this list with a mindset of like, obviously there will be things you'll just run into in the wild, but these are things that come up enough that I'm like, better to do it systematically earlyish
this looks pretty good yeah
honestly if you're comfortable with all these things I don't think you can reasonably say you still have holes in your linear algebra background haha
Can't believe this 😦 in my real-analysis class I got scammed the course advertisement said we were going through the full course but we only got up to uniform continuity
Abstract Algebra I don't think we ever went over the definition of a group action
ouch
Yeah. I guess when you hit abstract algebra you'll transplant a bunch of these ideas to other settings. Free modules, Smith normal form, etc.
And depending on what you Perron-Frobenius is good to know
Anyway for the other lists since they seem to be more important for you atm
The school I go to is a good school I had to size down to a BA from BS1 due to the amount of money math classes cost over the summer
Can't believe this came this far struggled through some brutal problems and there still bosses left to clear (at undergrad level) what a shame 😦
Real analysis - one variable:
- R as a ordered field with suprema (construction is cute but expendable)
- Topology (open/closed sets, continuity, convergence, connectedness, compactness)
- Series
- Differentiation/integration/FTC
- Uniform convergence
Somewhere you should go into detail on stuff like exp, log, trig, trigh
Real analysis - multiple variables (this is super aggressive and some of this can be deferred to grad school but might as well say):
- Metric/normed spaces, Hilbert spaces
- Differentiation on normed spaces
- Measure theory and multivariable integration
- Function spaces (C(K), Arzela-Ascoli, Stone-Weierstrass, differential equations, maybe L^p spaces)
- Ideally a bit of Fourier analysis
- Submanifolds of R^n, differential forms
Thanks @velvet dagger for the suggestions 🙂 I should be able to retake the classes and get to the missing parts of my knowledge saw an advanced grad certificate place thats doing remote courses
@velvet dagger what do you recommend for Abstract Algebra as well ? I'll need to take a topology course as well
Group theory:
- Basic notions (groups, subgroups, homomorphisms, kernels, quotients, normal subgroups, iso theorems)
- Cyclic groups
- Symmetric and alternating groups, group actions
- Free groups, group presentations
- Products, semidirect products
- Counting problems related to finite groups, Sylow theory
- Solvable and nilpotent groups
- Matrix groups, maybe basic representation theory
*Probably good to see the defs in the context of monoids too, pretty similar
Ring/module theory (some of this is more specialized/graduate material):
- Basic notions (rings, subrings, homomorphisms, kernels, ideals, quotients, iso theorems, units, polynomial rings, nilpotents, operations on stuff,...)
- Prime/maximal ideals, factorization, ED => PID => UFD, Gauss lemma
- Basic module notions (module, submodule, homomorphism, kernel, algebras, operations on stuff,...)
- Free modules, linear algebra
- Finitely generated/presented modules, Noetherian rings/modules, maybe Artinian too
- Exactness
- Smith normal form/STFGMPID, application to abelian groups and Jordan/rational form
- Tensor products, ideally symmetric/exterior products too
- Ring of fractions, if not localization more generally (depending on how far you go, a bit on valuations/local rings)
This list is a bit tricky. If you're gonna be mostly analysis then some stuff on this list isn't really as important. If you're gonna do more algebraic stuff eventually you'll want other stuff too
But in a lot of places grad algebra will cover a lot of this
Is it normal to be stumped about the process when first introduced to related rates? If so, how long does it take for it to come together?
in general
I'm aiming for Theoretical Computer Science/Physics think things like Quantum Information Theory, Complexity Theory, Computational Physics, Vulnerability Research, Programming Languages, Physics of Computation, Number-Theory, Cryptography, etc
So Algebra, Analysis, Geometry is a must !
if thats the case can you rate my syllabus?
this is what've covered so far
Lol, that looks like a fun syllabus
I'll need to grab Linear Algebra Done Right
No wonder the foregin students scare the crap out of everyone
in addition to homework problems, we'll delve into vector spaces, linear transformations, orthogonality and change of basis
That sounds really cool
I wish my class got such a great syllabus
linear transformations are cool
(i hope your teacher is good)
and so is changing basis, although it might be a tiny bit annoying
he is a soviet expat
literally the hardest prof because the problems he assigns are difficult
Eh doesn't do a lot but it's good stuff to know
Can you show me one?
LOL
reading books is so hard though
you sound so Boreded by it
ikr
I take it you hate LA
50% of mathematics is linaer algebra
how long are the lectures?
Wtfish are you talking about?
mathematics is such a vast field; I sincerely doubt that math of in itself is only linear algebra
if and only if it is taught right
ikr
which is why I asked my question to that other guy
Other areas of math employ a lot of linear algebra tho like Representation Theory, Mutivaible Calculus, Differential Equations, etc
When people say math is linear algebra, first off really throw in combo and calculus
And basically the idea is
calculus, differential equations, and linear are all fundementals to understanding higher level math
ik
There's a ton of math out there but it's hard to actually "do" stuff if that makes sense
For example you have topology
but it is not like you turn your head every second equation and see a matrix
No, I dont
where are you getting topology from?
How do you show that the sphere isn't "equivalent" to the torus?
where do you learn it from?
ik that is topology
but where are the numbers?
You either think of it as a manifold
or the calculation?
maybe if the volumes are the same?
In which case you're doing calculus and linear algebra
idts, topology counts the holes in objects I believe
im not sure
I hope so, it sounds exciting
but how the fish do you know that?
Or you're putting combinatorial structures and studying them algebraically
Which is combo/LA
are you like a late-class uni student or something?
Representation theory as well, you're using LA to do group theory and geometry and all
So it comes up everywhere
I guess
@velvet dagger I think a better way of putting is that matrices are like cameras they capture the properties and paterns of the object your interested in studying in linear algebra this is done with system of linear equations which allows us to gain insight to properties and characteristics of more general vector spaces. Matrices (under addition I mind you) also from an abliean group which carry extremely nice properties and is easy to manipulate. By reducing problems to linear algebra your probability of solving that problem becomes much much higher
every category you study has a useful functor into the category of vector spaces
I think in Undergrad over here you don't do Linear Algebra in other spaces like C^{n} you spend a lot of time in R^{n} which is quite a shame 
You are clearly good at abstract algebra
I agree, I wonder why so many people hate complex numbers
My idiotic teacher is literally in denial about there not being a solution to x^2=-1
For context I was doing representation theory with a graduate student and didn't know how to do linear algebra stuff in the complex plane (I was able to inutiion some stuff) and he kicked me out because of it now i'm really motivated to cover the holes in background !
linear algebra over C is easier than over R, so this is really weird
like, i can get focusing on R and C in undergrad
but not just doing the theory over C is just wrong
no, it is a crime against mathematics
We used this book https://www.google.com/books/edition/Linear_Algebra_and_Its_Applications/L8SUoAEACAAJ?hl=en
this does complex eigenvalues in chapter 5?
ye
this should at least hint at the theory being easier in C
They should have talked more about things being done in C in Rep Theory it's important to be able to do lienar algebra over C. I had be swtiched with someone else and we are doing some tasty functional analysis
well yes but i dont think rep theory is the kind of application they have in mind
in the title that is
fair
but yeah for math majors covering vector spaces over C and R is important
the move to other fields and their algebraic closure is then not that bad
my class focused a lot on why C is "better" than R
and some attempts to "fix" this
In my class we had a mix of math majors and non math majors so that could explain why some stuff just got skipped
Oof I can see now why people get slapped in graduate school
No wonder the foreign students are ruling when it comes to graduate school had a look at their curriculum 👀
do they, or is this a joke?
if it isnt I am in the ceiling
I was at the DRP meetup and someone explained to me a lot of graduate students from the state school (in the US) struggle when they come to their grad program because of gaps in their background
Oh I can believe that
The foreign students are insane the sheer amount of math they do in undergrad they scare the shit out of everyone
I hope not
But I bet it has partly got to do with prior passion in math
where do these "foreign students" come from?
Europe, China, Austrila, etc had to deal with a particularly arrogant one
generally arrogant while I was at the drp he talked a lot of stuff while I was in front him to another graduate student
nahh it was pretty bad they also crapped on other students who was strugling
I decided to just ignore and take this as a lession for grad school and its given me more motivation to learn more. Its given me insight into why researchers get so egoistical
oh, now that is straight rude
I'd like a vc with that guy
and give him a load of neurons
shit on me as well for not being able to write the basis of GL(V) to be fair there are holes in my game which need to be addressed
But the fact that he just gave up on me and is now craping on me is just oof
disgusting
btw, what does GL stand for?
General Linear Group
he requires a diss track
ok, i have no idea what that is, I'll google though. But I am 100% sure I wanna challenge him to a math contest at some point
ironically all the crazy knowledgeable people I've met are really chill people and not egoistic at all
like if you're boastful about it you're probably coping lmao
For context the guy is at the top of the program in terms of gpa and went to cambridge he claims to be working towards Algebraic Geometry
but yeah there's always that one guy at most grad schools
the times that I have thought i knew everything in my class, was the times when I did the worst mistakes (I mean I did know the stuff, but I was being dismissive and impatient)
something something dunning-kruger 
wait what do you mean by that "one guy"
Geometric algebra >>> Algebraic geometry
He has serious knowledge and experience
boastful rude people
ahh kk
yeah won't deny that
I'm glad I ignored him something tells me his egotism will come to haunt him at some point. Heard of cases of top-tier grad students breaking down due to lack of life experience and social development
a funny thing happended doing one of sessions he calimed that the idenity matrix was not of full-rank while I was going through an example (it is I checked)
another near mistake he made was nearly claiming that you shouldn't be able to write the S_n as the product of transpositions but that a result you see in any abstract algebra course
Those should have been red-flags in regards to his ego but I overlooked them at the time
i would too
btw what happended ? Did just have a rough semester
No
No
Nothing of the sort
The thing is
One time my teacher was introducing the idea of trigonometry I believe
I studied trig 4yrs ealier
and was very dismissive of what she was teaching (which was the bear basics like sin=opp/hyp, which I obv knew)
I was a bit of having the approach of "ik it all"
so when she went through an example
I fished myself over
because my ignorance impaired my algebra
lol
I've heard that at a high-level math guys will not even bother with someone unless they have had undergrad done.
lol
Now grad schools are doing personality tests before admitting candiates in
Nahh it makes sense at a certain point you have to be able to work with others
tell that to him
How does the personality test go
badly
that seems cringe
like I understand wanting people who know how to work with others, but can you not get that from rec letters and research experience?
or literally any other part of the application
like haven't personality tests been shown to be kinda bullshit
At MSU one of the women in Physics say they do this as well as other grad schools they wanna see who can persevre when things get hard
In CS we have the same thing as well at some top-tier places
From what the lady said there seems to be more then just personality test theres also the interview as well + (personal statement)
wait
what
There certainly isn't within the reals.
ik
sure but complex numbers are literally the biggest set
ik, hence the second word
how did he not know about this
ikr, she is in denial and fishing the class
what class is that
he does, but he is trying to hide them
math class, 10th grade
doesnt matter who gives a sish
no?
let me double check
There's no reason you can't construct a field containing C
its the biggest set
🤦
the rest are subsets of complex numbers
You are relying on some random diagram from the internet to back your statement up
b bbb b b u bb b h b b bbut q w w qua q aq r q q aur q aiqtnt quatenrn a anq
And that diagram does not even necessarily contradict what I just said.
not really this diagram also happens to be in my set theory book
thats how we were introduced to proofs constuctions
it is not a random diagram, it is the truth
And does the same book tell you there is no field containing C?
how=
If it does, I suggest you burn it.
?
probably not
but what kinds of fields are beyond C?
Do you mean like
quarternions?
there is nothing beyond C
Prove it.
In the first place, your original statement was vague
'nothing bigger than C'
What does bigger even mean?
The only thing that could make sense is the idea of a set inclusion
subset.
C cant be a subset of any other number
but 'nothing'?
....
I introduce you to C union {banana}
Which contains C
as well as banana
but yea there is no algebraic extension of C
C cant be a subset of anything
this is just plain wrong
then whats this argument about
This is correct. There is no non-trivial algebraic extension of C.
Precision in what you say is very important.
nonalgebraic extensions
There are certainly sets and even fields containing C
C is a subset of C and the set of quaternions
you can still make a well defined "number system" that properly contains C
they just get less and less "numberlike" as u go up
alright did not experience it for myself, but maybe in future studies
u can adjoin a variable to C that doesnt satisfy any algebraic relation
and still get a field
i understand you can costruct sigma algebras that contain imaginary numbers'
u can generalise C to clifford algebras and still get an associative algebra
because there is no limit on what you can put inside of the set
was not aware of this, thanks
This presumes that your definition of natural numbers excludes 0.
It should also specify "real" irrational numbers vs. complex irrationals. It also fails to mention purely imaginary numbers. xD
most intelligent #serious-discussion conversation
personal statement + interview is good
personality test is stupid
like genuinely idiotic
i'll study up on it further, thanks for correcting me
No problem! 😄
i find it hard to believe they would use a personality test as an actual criterion.
yeah it seems pretty dumb, but if they're just using it as one small part when choosing candidates I can see it happening
I still think that those tests are at best useless and at worst just give the wrong impression of someone, but so long as they're not a big criterion it's hopefully not too bad
it's probably because it's really easy to conduct, so it seems like a cheap way to get extra data, even if the data itself is extremely dubious
help
this seems like an oddly violent version of this type of question
I mean the original statement of the Josephus problem was violent 
josesus
There was a Numberphile video on youtube about this.
Yep.
.close
Quick "soft question" : How do you deal with morale / motivation?
Currently revising two years worth of material and it's not going well.
I'm often face to face with the fact that I forgot many of the stuff that I already studied. Whenever I make a mistake/take longer than I should be doing something it feels wrong and uncomfortable and I end up trying to get away from studying. (My body keeps making stuff up to make me get away from it)
It feels as if I just lack "a certain type of motivation"
How do I get motivated?
(I can no longer motivate myself with the material because I'm just redoing everything we've done. And If I try to motivate myself with success in the competitive exams [end goal], It doesn't work.)
damb i wish i knew too fam
Write up an explanation of your understanding of the material in your own words for your future self to revisit if and when you ever find yourself needing to revisit it.
It helps if you do so in an enjoyable / fun manner.
That's what I've been trying to do as of late, and yeah.. it helps : )
Good notes written for yourself are as smooth as silk and as sweet as caramel.
also if you're reviewing old material you could try to relate it to what you're currently studying too
but in my case I have severe time constraints (1 month left..)
For future situations, make the notes whenever you reach the end of a course.
I'm at my last year (last month even) and not studying anything new
Or the end of your independent study.
you could also try and find connections between areas that you are studying too
True :"3 (kinda regret not doing so..)
This can help.
I also second the writing up and focusing on exercises that complex and yohan said
In particular, if you can, try using the approach of subject B to examine subject A.
My favorite example of this is measure theory.
The best way (IMO) to study measure theory is to do functional analysis at the same time.
Yep
Or a topological review of complex analysis.
I'll try doing more of that
Those kinds of connections are very precious.
I just don't want to invest too much time into it
Are these qualifying exams you are studying for, perchance?
(I have a bad habit of losing my self in stuff)
Exams for engineering schools
I see.
(in France, two years after highschool, after a preparatory school..)
Well, the most important aspect of time management is learning to recognize when you need to interrupt yourself.
Not letting yourself get bogged down in a particular problem.
Oh I do, but I just don't interrupt myself.. and even if I do
I just feel extremely exhausted
This is what preparing for exams does to a person.
It dries you up.
Makes you into a prune.
:"
well yes
but since I have to work through past exams that are 4 hours long it feels like a bad strat
pomodoro I assume
They probably have a better criterion for sniffing out potential candidates.
most personality tests are pseudoscience so that practice concerns me
yeah, im sure it's POSSIBLE they've found an actually descriptive one, but this seems ripe for abuse
as in like
i could very easily see it leading to discriminatory hiring practices based on other metrics, like race, if the personality test is set up (intentionally or not) to have indicators for that
i'm not sure on the legality of this stuff but at the very least it seems very morally questionable to me
and it seems like it'd be impossible to determine whether the personality test really "works" in an objective sense as (1) defining the objective standards for "working" is very hard and (2) existing data is biased by human factors [such as the aforementioned racial discrimination]
both of which are the same issues ML stuff falls into, but at least ML hiring practices have the excuse of being algorithms working off data rather than humans throwing together some semi-arbitrary metrics that confirm their priors about what personality a "good worker" should have
that bias in ML stuff could, theoretically, be eliminated if you find good sample data and if the algorithm is balanced impartially (both of which are gonna be hard, but hey)
i would never be confident in a personality test designed by a corporate entity, even if they hired an academic psychologist or whatever to do it
I-N-T-P...E-N-F-J...B-U-L-L...S-H-I-T
Read more on the history and controversy surrounding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator test here: http://www.vox.com/2014/7/15/5881947/myers-briggs-personality-test-meaningless
Subscribe to our channel! http://goo.gl/0bsAjO
Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand...
Examine how popular personality tests, like the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Enneagram, are designed and their inconsistencies.
--
In 1942, a mother-daughter duo named Katherine Cook Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers developed a questionnaire that classified people’s personalities into 16 types. Called the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, or ...
idts
hello
myers-briggs was developed by two housewives
I ended up contacting and asking that person about it and looks like its a lot more then just a personality test they do an interview where they ask you some deep questions like for example "What was your greatest struggle in Undergrad-Masters", "What do you do when you don't understand things on the first ry ?", and other questions
I've heard at places like ____ they conduct a simular style of interview but they have a couple of psychologists look at your entire life up untill that point
my wife interviewed for a job at this one company that had her do a very detailed and weirdly invasive psychological profile
we've since learned that that company is run by a rather weird dude with fairly strange beliefs (including believing in QAnon)
just lie bro smh
just tell them that at times strange smells come to you
lmfao
that question has long been used on the MMPI as an indicator for honesty
none of the people in the original testing pool answered positively to that question, and so they concluded from that that anyone who says that strange smells come to them is lying on the test
it is worth noting that most of the original pool from which the MMPI is derived were male prisoners in the minnesota penal system
personality tests are weird
True
the MMPI is basically a "what type of criminal are you" test
Arnt all these tests kind of flawed?
True
me when the month i was born in decides where i go in life
000000000000000000000000000000000000
what
Hello guys I have a small question, will I encounter difficulties if I study Real Analysis with doing calc 3? I know calculus 1, not done with calc 2 but everything I did was with proofs.
real analysis using what text? You may find some trouble looking at metric spaces or any proofs of higher dimension results (from multivar), but if you’re comfortable with proofs, you should be okay
I'll probably use Apostol's, I heard that it's a good introductory book.
Yeah, that’s a good place to start
Ok, thanks for the help.
based
why waste your time with apostol when u can read jee books
JEE I LOVE JEE
yes based you are
Velleman how to prove it is good I think
jee will give u wings
Are every math book this good?
so you can jump off a cliff?
Whats JEE
don't worry about it
it's just some entrance exam for a certain indian university that people get really riled up about
Bruh guess what ____ is lol
what level are you at right now be specific
what do you want to learn
what are your goals
no that's red bull
do you know calculus
Chegg bad
Is there anyway to actually remove it from my search results without "-Chegg"
unicode character
wait are C^1 functions ones that are differentiable at least once or exactly once
as in are C^n functions differentiable n times or more or is it only exactly n times
least
oh so all C^infinity functions are C^1
yeah
C^k means 1,2,…,k’th derivatives exists and are cts
Nice algebra
I’ve been trying for 2 hours to understand how people understand it
I follow the guides right
But they skip over something
so you want to become better at mathematics aye? i can help you. what's your current level? and have you ever heard of jee?
And irrelevant to most people
No
I'm insisting that you shouldn't respond to any general query with some remark about JEE
It's pointless at best and misleading at worst
ok sir, have u done jee?
Yes
oh i see jee ptsd
Yes, I do!
JEE seems to be an Indian entrance exam, I would be willing to work on it.
India has a good mathematical level.
So does China.
The Gaokao is also an interesting exam.
I would also love to learn the Singaporian method in mathematics, going as far as learning about it from 1st grade.
There are also honoroble mentions : South Korea, Finland, France, Canada & the USA.
i want to disagree
like
really hardcore
if one knows differential geometry
how hard would it be to wrap ones head around general relativity
idk
i kinda want to take physics classes
good point
to learn how diff top applies
i just know that symplectic forms have some relationship to phase space in hamiltonian mechanics
idk what hamiltonian mechanics is
but have an idea of what phase space is
its like a space of all possible states I think
then if you're looking to learn maths outside of school, i would start with abstract algebra (the book "algebra" by michael artin is very good
I am downloading it, right now.

have you done any proof based maths?
Can you do analysis on any arbitrary field with a metric
Does there exist an arbitrary field analysis?
Was that meant to me?
Is this satire
You can do analysis on metric spaces, I'm not sure what you mean by arbitrary field though
Not R or C I suppose
Ye, then metric spaces should be it for starters
There might be more exotic places to do analysis though
hope you enjoy it
thats above lethal dosage, but it will save his life
i think if you have a complete metric space you can do some form of analysis, in the char 0 case this will probably just turn into either real/complex analysis or p-adic analysis due to ostrowski's theorem
in char p i have no idea
Thank you!
Did strad and ed leave the server?
Does anyone know what is meant by a ‘trend’ in an experiment, just a question that popped up in my head?
because they used to be more active
I shall start
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLOL
$f(x)=\sin^x(1)$, what is $f(-1)$ (sorry for repost D:)
,calc csc(1)
Result:
1.1883951057781
,calc arcsin(1)
The following error occured while calculating:
Error: Undefined function arcsin
,calc asin(1)
Result:
1.5707963267949
@sleek wing mathematical crankery: go
9+10 = 19
false
multiplication/division were actually done first. though it doesn't matter here, subtraction was done first because operations of same precedence are done from left to right.
Why would Cantor's diagonal proof not apply to the set of rational numbers? I know Q is countable and R is uncountable, but it seems to me that you could do the same diagonalization with the decimal expansions of both
do you mean "why doesn't it apply to the set of real numbers"?
No I mean like if you make a list of every rational number, can't you then construct a new one along the diagonal like you can with the real numbers?
the main issue is that in Cantor's argument you are working with the set of infinite sequences of binary digits (so that a binary sequence {a_n}_n corresponds to the real number ∑_n a_n 2^n) but such infinite sequences don't always correspond to rational numbers
When do they not?
I mean they almost always do not
a decimal representation of a rational number, in a given base, is either finite or periodic
so any infinite sequence which is not periodic will do
Only if the base is rational.
pi approximation day
god, people keep getting on my nerves
its almost as bad as pi = rt g = 3 = e memes
thats actually true (im an engineer)
what is everyone talking abt
ok, someone come up with a geometry for me where pi = 3
pi is obviously the homomorphism from a group to its quotient by a normal subgroup
and I will be satisfied to call it 3 henceforth

There’s so much to make fun of engineers for, but this is the only meme we use? Kinda 
right yeah
😉
u mean inv or power
like $\arcsin{1}$ or $\frac{1}{\sin(1)}$
Invictus
rip my latex
alright, hear me out on this.... i think the grading system should not exist
im ready for backlash
So true!!
i'm on board in principle, but at the same time i recognize that if student performance were entirely subjective many students would automatically pass or fail for reasons lacking merit and that having a grading system that has objective aspects to it at least mitigates this human tendency
⛸️
a grading system can't be objective because the questions you give to your students could easily be modified so that an entire class fails
its not a good metric on how well you know a subject
I haven't even mentioned how outdated the grading system is with the internet and what not
i'm less bothered by the entire class failing than i am with only the white male students passing
and if your entire class fails on an objective grading system, then you have failed at teaching
also i don't see what the internet has to do with grading
its an efficient way of handing out exams, so that a student would be able to retake them infinitely many amount of times without paying for them to take them in person
this is not an argument against having grades, it's an argument against one particular method of evaluating students
the entire premise lies on an objective grading system, because some people tend to build them so that a good portion of your students can flunk your class
while instructors in other schools tend to be more lenient and more transparent about the material that they are teaching
objection, counselor: facts not in evidence
havent you heard of gaokao or iit jee?
no, i live west of greenwich
compare the rates of suicides in those nations as compared to countries that dont put emphasis on testing
and don't pay much attention to indian or chinese educational systems
although i will admit that what i have seen of indian education is not favorable
you can also observe how depressed the students are on campus, especially in ivy league schools
i still don't think you've made a coherent argument against grades
the ones with lower grades tend to be linked with higher rates of suicides
im not getting these arguments out of my butt
so we should not evaluate students in order to reduce suicide rates?
i mean, i can see a social utility to that, but at the same time how do you learn who really knows what they're doing?
how do you ascertain which students have learned and which have not? how do you tell if your educational methodology works at all?
you have 2 options, you can either change how your grading system works, or abolish it all together
or could this be mitigated instead in some other way, like removing social factors that place pressure on students to achieve high grades
that's a false dialectic
there are other options besides those two
I feel like most evaluative systems can be gamified eventually
And part of what makes the grading system so attractive is probably dur to how easy it is to establish compared to most other evaluative methods
ab you've given me a giga hot take
From my experience the point of grading is to keep people out
Most evaluative systems can be gamified eventually... except those which are entirely non-transparent
So get people whose evaluation ability you fully trust, and give them complete power and obscurity
@crystal stone let's get to it
Doesn’t this lead to the question of how you’re going to evaluate the evaluators?
huh what is this
True but that's a one time problem so you only need a one time answer 🙂
You can't evaluate evaluators because profs don't exist for the sole reason of teaching
They probably care more about research than students
Uh yeah sure
Lmfao
Is it another one of the "Let's talk about grading"
Was
Well it's a mostly ironic take lmfao
Where people that talk about it have little to no experience grading
Alrighty, everyone else is wrong, I'm right. If people followed my grading scheme ideas, then the world will be a magical place and students will actually learn
Wrt the abolishing all grading, what alternative will you propose @umbral oxide
It's very simple. You throw the exams. The ones that land face up get an A
The ones that land face down get an F
Moonbears you don't get it my idea is revolutionary because it encompasses all of them
See
You can use any system of evaluating that you want
Not just grading
Admissions, grading, etc
You just don't tell anyone
And then they don't game it
That's what Reed college does
The more experience I get
The more I like not being transparent in what a "grade" means
Although I can see this being incredibly frustrating as a student
(And it was)
Khan academy has the right approach trial and error until you get a hold of a concept
Ultimately I don't think any of these superficial things amount to any real change
And not pay 1.7k dollars to retake the class again
Takes too long and there are some ideas you won't understand within a year
You don't have to be in college or private school. It's completely optional
So you don't have to pay again to take a class you failed: you can just not go to school or leave
Now you have another problem on your hands, most employers won't hire you if you don't have a degree
That's especially true in the field of finances and economics
I mean employers are going to want some form of measuring ability
College may be overpriced but that’s a separate issue from completely abolishing grades
At some level there's one problem that education as an institution probably won't be able to overcome
Namely it serves two roles, one is in educating
The other is differentiating between students in a way that will have a serious affect on their future
And I don't yet know of any compromise that does a particularly great job at accomplishing those goals
A lot of low-income people within the US have low cost to free options for a College education
It's usually middle-upper-middle class that go to expensive schools & rack up debt on degrees
Fair enough
My sympathy level for upper middle class people looking down on state & cc schools & choosing to go to an expensive ~ 50k/year school
And then crying about student loan debt is pretty low
ehh, i have some in that i think many genuinely arent aware that there are better options such that the difference is essentially negligible
(unless you're either an absolute top student, as in like near-full rides, or planning on a shaky career like academia)
universities spend a LOT of money marketing to high schoolers
and part of that marketing is trying to make them think "more $ = better education/future"
even if, in practice, your school choice doesnt matter at all past your first job for 99% of careers
ew imagine going into industry and not going into academia 
/s
I have a friend who does applied mathematics and claims set theory/type theory/topos theory have been "useless" to real life endeavor
Could you give me the major examples of useful applied mathematical concepts that were discovered thanks to set theory/type theory/topos theory?
No, because there aren’t really any examples of this happening
At best you can point to type theory’s influence on theoretical computer science and functional programming language specifications
But broadly speaking these topics are just not that useful for anything having to do with the real world
I'll say this is a bit California-colored
Like idk imagine a star student who gets into NYU from a state like Alabama
as the middle-class parent of teenaged children, i have no idea how we're going to pay for our kids to go to college of any sort
I'm no expert but Laurent Lafforgue (now working at Huawei) claims that topos theory can be applied to machine learning
i'm looking at some of these huawei papers and this is insane
Every known artificial deep neural network (DNN) corresponds to an object in a canonical Grothendieck's topos; its learning dynamic corresponds to a flow of morphisms in this topos. Invariance structures in the layers (like CNNs or LSTMs) correspond to Giraud's stacks. This invariance is supposed to be responsible of the generalization property, that is extrapolation from learning data under constraints. The fibers represent pre-semantic categories (Culioli, Thom), over which artificial languages are defined, with internal logics, intuitionist, classical or linear (Girard). Semantic functioning of a network is its ability to express theories in such a language for answering questions in output about input data. Quantities and spaces of semantic information are defined by analogy with the homological interpretation of Shannon's entropy (P.Baudot and D.B. 2015). They generalize the measures found by Carnap and Bar-Hillel (1952). Amazingly, the above semantical structures are classified by geometric fibrant objects in a closed model category of Quillen, then they give rise to homotopical invariants of DNNs and of their semantic functioning. Intentional type theories (Martin-Loef) organize these objects and fibrations between them. Information contents and exchanges are analyzed by Grothendieck's derivators.
lol
Insane in a good way, or...? 😅
this honestly just looks like throwing a bunch of jargon at a problem to me, like drowning it in a sea of hot / fancy math buzzwords, idk what the real content of the paper is in layman's terms
i know just enough math to realize that that abstract is not simply word salad
someone who has no math vocabulary wouldn't be able to differentiate that from TrekSpeak
"recalibrate the heisenberg compensators!"
For some reason "Grothendieck's topos" instead of "Grothendieck topos" annoys me
Maybe because it somewhat implies that there is a specific topos which is grothendieck's, and not that it's a type of topos
partly this is because "topos" is a singular noun
it looks like a plural, but it's not. the plural is topoi
"Grothendieckian" might a better form, but ugh
topoi 
yeah, you want an adjectival form of the name, rather than a possessive
like "riemannian"
it's a Riemannian manifold, not Riemann's manifold
the latter implies that there is a singular manifold that "belongs" to Riemann
instead of there being a class of manifolds that have some specific property that Riemann characterized and is thus eponymized for him
why would you say something other than riemannian
just to piss you off
also, that paper intrigues me in a number of ways that i wish i had the knowledge to explore
riemannian sums
because it sounds made up
So just say what it is
not a name of a random mathematician
but the name of a random mathematician is what it is
mathematicians name things after mathematicians (at least if they're white men)

see also chinese remainder theorem (not named after the non-white-man who documented it)
In mathematics, more specifically in the area of abstract algebra known as ring theory, a Noetherian ring is a ring that satisfies the ascending chain condition on left and right ideals; that is, given any increasing sequence of left (or right) ideals:
I
1
⊆
...
exactly
True but annoying
they should name it after what it is
not after the mompara who discovered it
ic
it's often not the dude who discovered it, either
I think it’s nice that things are named after mathematicians
Half the things in math just have people’s names slapped on it
stigler's law of eponomy
not like anyone has a better way to do it
Because it’s a way to be remembered for almost ever
Ideally you’d have a good name that gives intuition, but that’s hard
Sure
I know I’m shit at naming
yes
probably because most of the time it was discovered by that person
so why shouldn’t they get to name it
mathematicians dont name stuff after themselves
If I ever have to name something mathematically, I’m naming it after someone
it's other people who name things after other mathematicians
usually its another person working on it having it discovered in works of X, so they name it after X
zorn's lemma wasn't named that by zorn
they should, but they should know that these names should also be good names
this is one of the reasons why it often gets not named after the discoverer (at least in the past)
it's just "that lemma zorn came up with" turns into "zorn's lemma" over time
William Kingdon Clifford would have first hand experience in this regard
in modern times you see people actively fight this (scholze)
😦
matt parker has a thing named after him and he's totally embarrassed by it
Good to know that he isnt clout chasing
hey ive heard there are people on this server who are looking to help others with their maths questions?
good to know
I hope so
zorn also has a streetlight named after him
aye
lol, well that I can live with
too bad he can't
😦
yes, you probably want to read #❓how-to-get-help
When did he die?
it's the max zorn memorial stoplight for a reason
1992 i think
that road had been killing students for years, but the university and the city did nothing about it
im in a tricky situation where ive been set a few Qs for thursday morning but i have work until the rest of today and a long hospital appointment tomorrow. does anyone know if i could vc with someone tmr evening to work through my hw with?
LOL
then max got hit by a car and died, and they decided "hm, maybe we should put a stoplight here"
what does this tell us about the guy?
so that stoplight is unofficially known as the "max zorn memorial stoplight"
hmm this is an unforfitting death for a "mathematician"
i dont think anyone will agree to making an appointment beforehand, better just ask when you are working on your homework
Hang on
wasnt it illegal to ask these kinds of questions?
actually no
I think cheating on these questions is illegal
is it plausible that someone will just be available?? i would feel bad asking for someone's help right there and then?
“Illegal” sounds way too harsh
hm?
depends on the institution's policy
True
this is hw, getting help seems fine to me?
getting help with homework from a tutor or guide is usually not prohibited
Yeah for like a tutorial set it’s even encouraged to an extent
as long as the student actually does the work themselves, with or without guidance
i guess it does
also, cheating isn't "illegal", at least in most countries
noo i will work at them myself i just need a little help!
For assignments it’s more different
But it is on this server
it's dishonest and a breach of terms, but not something you can get arrested for
i dont know, i dont ask for help much
it depends on how hard it is, best just read #❓how-to-get-help and ask again (in a help channel or relevant topic channel) at the time
trust me im normally hardworking just dealing with chronic illness
just ask the guy namington banned
Asking for help is fine here anyways
i reserve "illegal" for "something you can get arrested or fined by civil authorities"
lol
it's as level maths?
funny thing
you can't go to jail for breaching a discord's terms of service
cheating is literally illegal in bavaria, germany
Damn
so is not paying attention in class
Well
isn't everything illegal in bavaria?
das kann nicht sein
or at least actively preventing others from doing so
That’s one way to motivate students I guess
thank god
well, adultery is "illegal" where i live, but people still do it






