#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 505 of 1
youre the nerd, nerd
amogus
you can damn well try
Has anyone worked with a partner for an entire semester and not know their name

I just realized I don’t know my partners name who I worked with for the entirety of my math modeling class on projects with 
Be like “bruv I know we’ve been working together for this whole semester but frankly, you’re just not important enough to me for me to remember your name. Unfortunately, I feel awkward not knowing it, so I feel obliged to once again ask you what your name is so I can forget it again later.”
And then you’ll be fine

wait is wew muted 

I can't say that's ever happened to me, but sorry for your loss
for how long should you study math a day?
or rather, for how long do math majors study a day?
No idea, I guess for 2-3 hours although I am not sure
what why
being too mean to someone who asked for help i think
elitism
That and being mean to someone who answered them
am i allowed to cross post a question between servers?
“The derivative of x is 1” - 🤓
This can lead to wasted efforts of helpers on any of the servers you post in, so it might be a good idea to at least acknowledge on all the servers that you've already received help when you do.
😄
Genius
Just curious if anyone would know anything, but would there be such thing as a say a "roadmap" in terms of learning mathmatics? from basic high school algebra(pretty much where I left off) And going into / understanding more advance college level topics?
how the hell does one study when there are [massive world events] happening
coz fuck world events
agree
Sure just 100% khan academy
https://github.com/TalalAlrawajfeh/mathematics-roadmap worth checking out
Thanks :)
nw, I have a lot more but I didn't wanna spam the chat lool
https://math.mit.edu/academics/undergrad/roadmaps.php | https://github.com/TalalAlrawajfeh/mathematics-roadmap | https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL7T06JEc5PF6NDtyEYdqQaat0LkEAL243 | https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLgIi4lM74yW0ChmzTdT1w5ruCnqP0bv3J | https://www.khanacademy.org/math | https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Subject:Mathematics | https://hackernoon.com/be-a-better-programmer-with-these-40-mathematics-courses-d8ca48a2f8a2
There's no particular roadmap once you go past undergrad because that's when you start to specialise, just depends on your interests
OreoFTW
the answer to this is 1 right, but what if the function is sin(x+k)/x+k
basically adding a constant
please check #❓how-to-get-help
that's what they're for
Can someone explain l’hopital to me

as always
3b1b has a great video
check out that video about limits, it's in the essence of calculus series
Can u send a link to that?
uh
sure
one moment
Formal derivatives, the epsilon-delta definition, and why L'Hôpital's rule works.
Help fund future projects: https://www.patreon.com/3blue1brown
An equally valuable form of support is to simply share some of the videos.
Special thanks to these supporters: http://3b1b.co/lessons/limits#thanks
Home page: https://www.3blue1brown.com
--------------...
tysm!
is analysis enough as a prerequisite for a course in general topology?
Yes
h gets so small
Is there such thing as an infinitesimally small number
Like the first number after 0
Wait no obv not
infinitesimals 
Maxwell's equation on induction
$\varepsilon = -\dv{\Phi_B}{t}$?

without the external force, the answer is emf=BLV, so V=emf/BL
idr how to account for F
im gonna be real
this is algebra based physics
ik
so yeah we haven't really learned any of that
Point is if F is unbalanced, velocity changes
i know calculus just dont know how to connect the ideas between the two yet
I heavily doubt it. I'm just using slightly higher level vocabulary than what you learn it as
perhaps, or we're given some simplified version
the equation sheet we're given doesn't have any curl operators
Read your notes
unfortunately maxwell equations are not in the curriculum for AP Physics 2
it is for AP Physics C, but i'm in 2
Read your notes
it can be assumed that im asking for help because my notes do not suffice
if my notes sufficed i wouldnt be asking for help
Then google what I wrote.
There's libretext that covers this directly
https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/College_Physics/Book%3A_College_Physics_(OpenStax)/23%3A_Electromagnetic_Induction_AC_Circuits_and_Electrical_Technologies/23.06%3A_Motional_Emf
this is useful thank you
i googled "Maxwell equations on induction" and only got information about maxwell equations, not motional emf
A force on current-carrying conductor is covered here
https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/University_Physics/Book%3A_University_Physics_(OpenStax)/Book%3A_University_Physics_II_-_Thermodynamics_Electricity_and_Magnetism_(OpenStax)/11%3A_Magnetic_Forces_and_Fields/11.05%3A_Magnetic_Force_on_a_Current-Carrying_Conductor
philosophically controversial question
depends on what you consider a number
it would be cool if desmos said f(15)=5
You are not writing intervals, you are writing lists
yeah
how do i do that
That’s like asking infima or suprema of continuous/Cauchy sets
wym
Mildly cursed limit: $\lim_{n \to -\infty ^ -}$
nHail
how
$\lim_{n \to \pi}$
pairo
I am very stupid. This is not possible right?
It saying that you approach -inf from the left right?
that was the joke
Yeah, not really a thing. It's saying you're coming from "less than" -inf, which isn't real
Yea that makes sense
Yep
is it normal for academic advisors to be absolutely useless
the ones here literally just tell me the bare minimum to "graduate", their advice doesn't seem good. Like my professor who taught me analysis's course/topic suggestions are better than theirs.
yeah that's normal
Fairly common. I honestly don't see a huuuge point in having so many academic advisors given that a catalog usually exists
I think if they are in the department they could be good buddies to chat with about potential interests
How do I prepare for MIT??
You will apply for MIT ?
Yeah. I really like making stuff and am into engineering and programming
OMG this is Awesome !!!!
I wish u all the best
Thanks.
Wdym?
I think he mean by this message "try to search and read about your question by yourself"
they have a page on their website called "what we look for"
wdym "wdym"?
Can you send a link by any chance. Can’t find it.
It means, what do you mean
that’s not what they meant
?
Why would they ask "wdym "wydm"" if they didn't know what "wdym" stands for lmao
They probably wanted to ask which bit about what they said confused you
thanks! will check it out.
I literally typed "what do we look for MIT" and it was the first result
idk
i got like 80 links which were not from mit
it was some weird indian website
selling there guidelines
Manipal>>>
What do you want
you said manipal>>> wdym
k
got rejected from Olin
I just had a weird though. What are the economics of n-dimensional real estate. I mean in a 4d universe, your house would need 2 more walls. Is it more expensive to buy a 4d house than a 3d one? Could a 4d house be smaller, as it has a higher square? cube? footage?
it should be cheaper
if 4d space is way larger than 3d space
and we already fit in 3d
I'm assuming the people in the 4d space are 4d as well
please ignore whatever other unrelated junk is entailed by that lol
think about it this way
imagine having a hyperplane in 3d
isnt it super small compared to the vastness of 3d
or better yet you can just use formulaic approaches
imagine we are talking about distances for example
and you want the diagonal of your room to be 70ft atleast, from opposite corners
in 2d this just corresponds to having 50 ft walls if you live in a square
in 3d it comes down to solving 70/sqrt(3)
what the heck
lol
so where you would need 40 feet side cube to have 70 foot diagonal in 3d
you only need 35 in 4d
there are 6 walls in 3d
so this means we need 40*6 feet of wall
while in 4d we would need 35*8
but this is assuming 4d people needs scale linearly with 3d people needs
we know that if we were embedded in 4d we would take up a lot less space
well 35*8 is more than 40*6 so it would take up less space, but cost more meterial
but this is on a faulty assumption
say a colony of ants need 40 square feet to live comfortably
they dont need 40^1/3 foot walls in each direction 3d because ants are relatively 2d creatures
ah, so realistically, a 4d person would need a smaller house anyway
yeah
like we dont build enormous ceilings for ants
similarly our 4d walls dont need to be enormous
so this would have an effect of shortening the less needed walls
and still giving us the necessary protection from 4d world
I think only a 4d person can live in a 4house
no
3d people can live in 4d house
coz otherwise, you'd have infinite number of houses
the economy of real estate would collapse instantly
depending who owns what?
if the world was run by 4d people
3d people would be pets most likely
similar to how people put insects in small cages
idk if this is the worst or best conversation i’ve seen here
why so judgemental?
that's interesting
the thing is
we don't really have a 2d analogue to project
the closest thing we have are insects
and how they dont need latge height containers to live
and live in relatively flat environments
or like microscopic life
how about that japanese egg game which you could feed or whatever?
squid game?
🤷
it’s just a very unusual conversation
sounds right
you're thinking of tomodachi life by nintendo
yes i was actually
was trying to think of the name and the first thing that came to mind was tomodachi life
fun fact: tomodachi means friend
but i knew that wasnt it and i remember there was some g sound in it
yeah that's why i guessed tomogatchi instead of tomodachi lol
miitopia is a cool game
mii games 
I thought about it a bit and I concluded it's meaningless to speculate what 4d creatures would do
lol
we are 4d creatures 🙃
we mean spatial dimensions
I noticed a significant gap in the mathematical literature. Specifically, there are no wikihow guides for advanced mathematics. (ie, no "how to calculate the rank of an elliptic curve", no "how to calculate homotopy groups", no "how to calculate the ideal class group of a number ring" or "how to find the galois group of a polynomial"...)
no "how to solve the riemann hypothesis" 😢
Someone should add "solve the riemann hypothesis" to the "how to become a millionaire" page
Is it common to have really bad imposter syndrome with math
i get imposter syndrome every time i attempt a problem in my book 
Yes. I know professors who complain about imposter syndrome, and I'm an undergrad.
would someone be willing to help me in my channel
This is because general usual higher (advanced) maths structure/problems encountered does not have general method to deal with problem with out too much loss of generality.
hey fellas
i mean why do you think you feel that way
In the sense that a minor modification, can introduce a change of the whole theory
Because I see so many people online and in YouTube videos and stuff talking about math and I don’t feel like I’ll ever be able to understand the stuff
this is normal, this take time
a lot of time
we were all there
you also have to remember that these people have devoted years themselves to do these things
and are still devoting years to understand higher maths than they know
I’ve found that a better way to approach it might be to reframe your thinking as “I’ll make sure I am on that level, to show that I deserve my position”
am I supposed to know real analysis before reading Goldrei? #books-old doesn't list it as a prereq but he references real analysis a lot
e.g.
it is often assumed that real analysis is the first real math subject people learn
shiit
so should i go and read a real analysis textbook then come back to set theory
ok actually i know most of this
all i dont know is 1.1 to 1.3
which i guess 1.1 is what's going on now in goldrei
and 1.2
know is a big word
also sorta backwards if you dont know 1.1-1.3 but know everything else
its like u blackboxxed foundations
i guess "dont know" in the sense that i wasn't taught how real numbers were constructed
lmfao yeah im reading about it in goldrei rn
pretty cool
topology has never once come up in my schooling
IVT is apparently topological, but we were never taught the connection
it isnt essential i guess
yeah its topological
i think it comes from this theorem about regular spaces?
i forgot names though
the connection is that you can phrase it as "the continuous image of an interval must be connected"
ah i see
effectively this is just a very weak form of the fact that continuous functions preserve connectedness
it just so happens that connected subsets of R are just intervals
i need review );
real analysis is a good motivation for topology, idk how you'd understand the "every open cover has a finite subcover" defn without knowing its equivalent to "closed and bounded" in a metric space
hopefully he mentions that
There are good intrinsic reasons why the definition of compactness makes sense
it's not equivalent to closed and bounded in a general metric space. It IS equivalent to complete and TOTALLY bounded in a general metric space
But they are more abstract I guess
also compact always implies closed and bounded whenever boundedness makes sense

yes my favorite compact space is Q intersect [0, 1]
closed -> complete
Me too 🙂
the vultures are descending. they smell a vocabulary mistake
no.
i'm so gonna ban you when I inevitably become mod
mods can't ban admins, and that's the only way you're gonna get mod 
am i gran or gramps
ur gran
I will defer to John
yeah i'd make a good grandma
ryc did not like that one
oh come on moth. fencey fencerton
😮💨
feather what book are you using for probability 
anyway: the intuitive answer here is that compactness generalizes finiteness by letting you check many properties on finitely many open sets rather vs finitely many points
some people in this server have a conspiracy theory that i'm actually a woman
the shittiest one there is
probabilitycourse.com 😎
but I just read my prof's notes lol fuck that site it's so weird
In the sense of like, suppose i have a property P. P might hold locally if theres some open cover of your space such that P holds on each set in the cover
for a finite discrete set for example this is literally just checking P on every point
darn i thought it was good
the really useful thing about this "checking properties on finitely many open sets" thing is that it lets you take local information and turn it into global information
and many properties will then trivially extend to the whole space when working in the finite case
for example, a continuous function on a compact set is actually uniformly continuous: if we know something about how much it varies it in each little ball, we find out something about how much it varies on the whole domain.
compactness is kind of similar where if i have a local property P this means P holds on U1, ..., Un where the union of the U_i are X
Its usually a lot easier to show that P holds on X if it holds on these finitely many U_i than it is for infinitely many
I think the common example is that like real valued functions on compact sets are bounded
This is extremely obvious if the set is finite
Good thing that while ryc and shin were fighting like children i was making valuable contributions to the mathematics discord server.
🙂
shin and i both provided answers 
no one cares about metric spaces
his was wrong, but
Lmfao
it was right in spirit
every relevant topological space is either metrizable or a function space
sorry, i'll revise that
every relevant topological space is either CW or a function space
CW complexes are a type of space
which are kind of like higher dimensional graphs
you take a bunch of points, glue a bunch of lines to them, glue a bunch of disks onto the lines, glue a bunch of balls onto the disks, etc
using such a construction you can make almost all of the usual nice topological spaces we want to understand
Oo
for example, one way to make a sphere is to take two points, glue two lines to them, and then glue a disk on top and on bottom of the lines like this
(the red pieces are two disks)
so this is a CW structure for the sphere

I FIXED IT
turns out that there's a whole machinery to understand the topology of CW complexes. you can compute different topological facts about your space if you think about it as a CW complex, since this lets you compute its homology
lots of people ONLY care about CW complexes (and there's a whole lot of them too)
unfortunately most spaces in functional analysis (infinite dimensional spaces of functions) are not CW and they're the only ones i care about

big sadge
I get this, it's just if i saw the topological definition by itself I'd think "wow that's a super nice property, I bet hardly any sets satisfy that". but idk much topology so maybe theres a nice way to see closed bounded balls are compact without resorting to the sequence slicing proof by contradiction i know
closed bounded balls are not necessarily compact in a general metric space
you can make any metric bounded by taking its minimum with 1 for example, and this makes every set bounded, but this won't make a non-compact space compact
the stronger requirement is total boundedness, which means for every epsilon>0, you can cover you space with finitely many open balls of radius epsilon. This might sound similar to compactness, but it's quite a bit weaker given no extra assumptions
I'm taking about euclidean space and intuition here don't nitpick
at no point did you make that clear, especially since before you claim that closed and bounded is equivalent to compact in a metric space, which is a false and somewhat misleading claim, even if it follows intuition. I'm not trying to call you out, i'm just trying to clarify a subtle distinction here for you and/or anyone who stumbles upon this discussion in the future
its fine, just everywhere in rudin we work with complete metric spaces which are subsets of R^n so i figured i dident need to mention it
that's fair. I think generally when talking to someone who doesn't share the same background/base assumptions as you, it's better to be over specific than to be ambiguous and risk confusion as here. euclidean space is generally much more well-behaved, and things that feel intuitive and that indeed hold true in it sometimes don't even generalise to a broader class of metric spaces, so it's good to be precise when discussing these topics
well that's cleared up now, no point to dwell on it
i would say that the sequence splicing proof kind of is the essence of compactness of closed balls in R^n, and i say that because the proof that complete + totally bounded = compact for metric spaces is almost identical looking.
but i don't have a good way to argue this
What can i do with spare 5k savings?
invest it
send it to me
buy 5 textbooks
buy more textbooks :)
5k? Obviously the only rational thing to do is to invest in some NFTs 
just invest in the S&P if you dont need liquidity
if you want to be as lazy/safe as possible
(i am not a financial adviser dont sue me)
Suing you for not being a financial advisor
S&P500 moment
lol
loss
over 2 hours lmfao
this is a real SP 500 moment
Compare with inflation of 14% over the same period
for 99% of people, the best possible way to invest is to invest as boringly as possible and not touch it
i still don't know what you are trying to show
i dont see the joke
The joke is, you'd lose money if you actually bought S&P500
high chance at least
for past few weeks
That is completely untrue lol
sure
past few weeks
investing on that scale is incredibly dumb though
not really
there are a lot of S&P day traders
That's intraday scale
not even weeks
Day trading is not what I am suggesting at all, though
Anyway S&P500 has a high CAGR
clearly visible for every year
so
yeah I mean
sure beats the 10-year treasury yield
It beats a lot of active traders
And well, hedge funders are generally, not passive traders
But like I'm always hearing of algotraders making bank
No clue who to believe
personally i believe data, so these hedge funds or algotraders with limited disclosures don't mean much to me
im sure there are outliers making bank
but at the end of the day, I doubt i could be one, so i just invest boringly, imo
day trading as an everyman is essentially gambling fwiw
thats like
the whole point
its gambling where the margins are, on the margin, better than a las vegas casino (at least until an economic crash) sure
but its still gambling
if youre working at a hedge fund with an army of specialists and ML algorithms on your side then thats different
ML 
by any chance does anyone here own a Surface Pen? please ping me if you do ||otherwise ignore this message
||

I do
i doubt we have the same one
<@&268886789983436800>
b&
had to pronounce that out loud to get it
bampersand
ye
I don't get it either
bro stop spamming this everywhere
generally, I think sending almost exactly the same thing in 3 different channels is considered as spam
not really tbh
it's generally accepted as spam
the g module has spoken
Stop posting this over and over again please
why man
It doesnt belong in #serious-discussion regardless
well
its like, very mildly pleasing to look at for 2 seconds
discussion about shapes
does anyone know of something similar to picks theorem in 3d?
somethin hat makes calculating volume ez
is there anyway to get a more uh "geometric" feel for topology? im just beginning reading
yea
for finite topologies
you can draw open sets
then for other topologies it might be more useful to understand them in terms of their basis
all in all it depends on the context and since the subject is big on studying the structure of space it is very visual at its fundementals, but lots of extrapolation is made to not think of the visual later on
manifolds stuff
lee ISM would be helpful for geometric intuition
Thats kinda sick
pings a bot
wait does pinging modmail alert the mods
YOU'RE WELCOME
or does jut DMing them
emergent
go to the goddamn help channel
yeah that picture should help u w the answer
so is 
true
I wonder what my profile pic screams
annoyed birb
most pfps don't tell me much about the person
but a few really do
like childish pfp = child, ape pfp = cringe, picrew pfp = trans
anime pfp = either super cool or neckbeard
anime pfp = terminally online
I feel like it's anime girl pfps that are the most polarizing
with who has them
true
because two of the main demographics there are "anime girl pfp because goals" and "anime girl pfp because waifu"
which have radically different personalities associated with them
that's like on thin ice in my eyes
the anime girl = cute thing has always felt a little strange in my eyes
Chmonkey cringe
because goals?
does that imply you wanna be an anime girl?
Wtf!?
hey
barges into conversation, uninvited
declares Chmonkey cringe
refuses to elaborate
leaves
fuckin' sigma
what do i need to elaborate on...
.
this is none of my business
anime pfp = ???
animal pfp is a bimodal distribution on the normie axis
,av dazai
yohan is a girl?
What abt mine
I know
a portal to another dimension
could anyone here possibly help me with a digital design circuit question?
what does mine tell u 
Can someone advise me on math classes? Cause my school allows people to jump grades in math. I'm G8 currently.
Should I move into G9 this year or just try to bump up to G10+ in G9?
Cause G8's almost over
But idk if I can make it to 10 in 9 since I never took the classes. If I decide to take 9, I'll be barely through by the end of the school year which means they might not raise it.
11 is going to be hard since I don't have any particularly official G10 material
But making a jump straight from 8 to 10 is going to be a bit hard.
And even if I make 10, it's going to be a lil too easy
It's not even guaranteed that they'll raise me, although I think with my current teacher's help, I might be able to.
What do I do.
jump rn, or jump later and further with the risk not being raised
It's generally considered rude to take more than one channel
it is generally neccessary to calm me down when I'm panicked as hell
That said, I don't know what G9 or G10 means in this context, so good luck.
Grade
Sure. What do you do in 9th grade or 10th grade?
This is a very international server, and we have no way of knowing the education system where you are. Especially because it often varies even within countries
9, polynomials and circle geom + slope
10, graphy stuffs, more algebra stuff, probably trig
canada
Sweet. How standardized is the Canadian curriculum? Is it the same in Ottowa as it is in Quebec?
they teach pretty much the same stuff everywhere, at most with a 1 year difference, order may change as well
(mainly because the order depends on the teacher)
Well polynomials are just about the single most important thing you listed on that list, so do the one where you learn polynomials. I don't know what you'll be learning in polynomials, I'm still doing polynomials and I'm in my 3rd year of college, but they're important so learn them
already done, I just wanna know if I should risk jumping rn or later (later being riskier but with higher rewards)
Talk with your teacher about it. They'll know your situation better than I would, certainly.
Oh my god wait were you seriously considering skipping a grade solely on the advice of potentially some rando you met on a discord server you probably only recently joined? Because if so, then please, do that, that'd be hilarious
I want to skip because none of my previous teachers took my math skills seriously and continued to teach me stupid crap
I swear it's the only reason my IQ dropped (sarcasm)
but really, the past 9 years of my life spent on math has been absolutely torturous
NOW THAT SOMEONE ACTUALLY TAKES ME SERIOUSLY, WHY NOT.
I mean you can also just learn math on your own time and take the easier course for the easy A
Use Khan academy to teach yourself through to calculus or something, read free textbooks, watch Richard Borcherd's youtube channel
If you think your school is too easy, then it probably is, so that shouldn't be your primary mode of learning (rather, just proof that you learned the thing you wanted to). If you think skipping a grade will bring you to where you want to be, do that. Otherwise, teach yourself calculus and linear algebra and whatnot in your free time (the time that you otherwise would be spending on math homework if it was enough to challenge you).
if I don't skip, it'll be another year of torture
;-;
but I'll still ask my teacher
No it won't. It'll be a year of somewhat boring lectures that you power through or doodle in the margins during with maybe an hour a week of easy homework and then you spend your free time learning something hard enough to challenge you. Or watching YouTube videos of kittens being adorable, or doing something else. "My math classes are too easy, woe is me" is only torture if you let it be.
The torture only comes when homework is there. I don't wanna spam do such work when I don't have to.
The reason I want to jump is because I don't have any clear curriculum to follow and I'm not learning to the same amount as anyone who actually took the classes. I just watched some random youtube video. Math won't be very clear when you learn logarithms before you even know anything first
Okay so here's a bunch of free textbooks: https://openstax.org/subjects/math
glorious, thanks
Do exercises, speak with your teacher during... Do your teachers have office hours, or is that just a university thing?
*shrugg
this is a new school, I changed for G8
so idk
I can ask after school
she's usually there till 4 ish
Oh and Khan Academy has good lectures. Go to khanacademy.com or whatever their site is and start working through it
You can do a lot with self-studying. The main issue is you'll lack someone to give you feedback, but khan academy does that and if you get on your teacher's good side they can do that (if they're qualified to teach 8th grade math they'll hopefully at least know what a derivative is, or will be able to direct you to someone who does). Worst case scenario you just ask questions on the internet in sketchy places like this full of weird 24 year olds who devote their lives to the cult of mathematics.
'cult'
'weird'
'sketchy'
dang, why you still even in the server then
This is what people call "projection"
Or very intense sarcasm, I'll let you be the judge
define projection
ok?
Psychological projection is the process of misinterpreting what is "inside" as coming from "outside". It forms the basis of empathy by the projection of personal experiences to understand someone else's subjective world. In its malignant forms, it is a defense mechanism in which the ego defends itself against disowned and highly negative parts o...
A projection is a map $\pi:k^{n}\to k^{m}$ for $m<n$ such that...
Esix, Fractal Bloom
*doesn't know that
I think the definition I was about to give was for a slightly special case anyway
Anyway don't actually take anything I say completely seriously and you'll be fine, but also don't disregard everything I said, because there was some well-meaning advice in there. Use your best judgement and critical thinking skills, basically.
*totally doesn't have an IQ of -20,000,000,000,000,000,321
IQ is kind of meaningless and mostly just exists to stigmatize certain peoplegroups.
IQ isn't meaningless, although the second part is true
You're right, it's a bloody good measure of your IQ. It just doesn't really tell you anything beyond that.
George Bush had one of the highest IQ scores of any president to have taken an IQ test (somewhere above 130 I think), and he was George Bush.
there's also measures like verbal
eh, wether or not you have high IQ, there is a high chance you'll end up average
130?
oh, average of 125
i see
*googled
Well it's a normal distribution with 100 as the average and a standard deviation is 15 points on the IQ test, so having 130 means you did a lot better than most people on the test.

dunno the percentage, but I think it was some 97-98
110-140
big range
30 difference
but with that, there's a bigger chance that he ends up gfted than not
Oh and Trump had an IQ of about 160, according to a quick internet search. Having a high IQ really does not mean you're smart.
160?
I estimated around 90 (sorry if that's offending)
90 - 110 ish
90 would be firmly within the average range that most people fall within, if a little bit on the lower end. "You're about as smart as most people" is not an insult. (Even if I agreed that IQ measured intelligence, which it does not)
*shrugg
IQ was supposed to measure intelligence
oh right
quick question
what IQ or above would you consider high
I mean yeah but the angle of your forehead was also supposed to measure intelligence and nobody takes phrenology seriously anymore.
tf, when did that idiocy happen
*ignore the swears
The 19th century, though it continued into the early 20th.
*mentally dies
that be oof then
Oh yeah, you're not allowed to swear on this server. It's a fucking shitty rule, I know.
agreed, are subsitutes like '||crap||' allowed?
Also as I said 100 is defined to be average with a standard deviation of 15, on a normal distribution
-_-
not stats, your personal opinion
Uh, if your IQ is 420, it's probably quite high
*laughter
dang, 420, imagine
200 is already 1/several billion
bro
nah
who are you
Todd
who the fuck is this guy?
todd why are you just sitting here posting the sully emote?
*sigh
not name, his relationship to either this server or you
He's todd
troll under the bridge
*sigh
very well
let's go phising and hope a troll comes up then
why.
I think we should start having some heated conversation about iq, don't you
Because he's too much of a coward to use the obviously superior version, 
iq is bullshit
im gonna be sick
tell me what you consider a high IQ and we can argue for no apparent reason
Thanks for coming to my ted talk
about a dozen of those
and a couple of pence
welp, that was short, wasn't worth the gas money I wasted
dozen of what
Folks with iq below 180 cannot comprehend higher abstract mathematics
about a dozen iqueues
da hell
IQ'S OF WHAT
he's right you know
Math is too difficult for the layman 😔
You know you need to have a really high IQ to understand rick and morty
you need an IQ above 80 and a 130 IQ friend
that's all
You need a really high iq to understand hartshorne
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Rick and Morty. The humour is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer's head. There's also Rick's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation- his personal philosophy draws heavily from Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realise that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Rick & Morty truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Rick's existential catchphrase "Wubba Lubba Dub Dub," which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev's Russian epic Fathers and Sons. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Dan Harmon's genius wit unfolds itself on their television screens. What fools.. how I pity them. 😂
And yes, by the way, i DO have a Rick & Morty tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand. Nothin personnel kid 😎
haven't read that yet
what's your IQ?
also, I'm female, show meh
It's a copypasta.
maybe a bucket of iq
Also I think my IQ is just below room temperature
about a handful at least
bucket of how high IQ when IQ can't fit into bucket
Mine can
sooooo, 18?
Yeah, just about
dang, did ya pour your brains out or sumthin
how do you even know how to type
you gotta be at least 80 IQ
I'm willing to bet it
bet my middle name
Well then you'd be wrong. My IQ is exactly 69.
you got it tested by a pro?
Yes.
do you have papers?
Please stop trolling this random person lol
It's a dumb internet joke thing. Don't worry about it.
And yeah probably a good idea, I should go to bed anyway.
this random person takes interest and derives amusement from said trolling, please leave me to be trolled for a while longer
and please stop debating IQ shit
Honestly I think that's why I've heavily turned towards trolling. Because having an actual debate about IQ would be horrible.
do you want to debate something
disagree with me on something
Goldrei abbreviates stuff like Axiom of Choice = AC, Zermelo-Fraenkel Axioms = ZF, Zorn's Lemma = ZL
is this convention?
we don't live in a society
or is this just something that Goldrei does for the sake of concision in his book
I've seen it
ZFC is a very common abbreviation, so I guess it follows ZF is too?
maybe
Yup
what is rick and morty
You don't know about Dr. Richard and Mortimer?
im afraid not, but sounds quite elucidating. where may i find the literature?
Math server IQ discourse
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand mathematics. The deductions are extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of foundational logic most of the proofs will go over a typical learner's head. There are also Gödel's incompleteness theorems, which are deftly woven into mathematical research- they pertain to Cantor's Generalised Continuum Hypothesis, for instance. The mathematicians understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these proofs, to realise that they're not just rigorous- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike mathematics truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the subtlety in the existential "Hairy Ball Theorem," which itself has cryptic connections to Euler's characteristic and planar graphs. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as the unparalleled beauty of mathematics unfolds itself on their e-book reader screens. What fools.. how I pity them. 😂
thank you now i feel superior for the day to all these fools not knowing this stuff
coalison, you have inspired me to hate math less
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand the hit game called "Among Us" The lore is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of storyline connection most of the hints will go over a typical player's head. There's also the mystery of the impostor, which plays into it's character. The impostor's personal philosophy has a high probability of not being referenced inside any literature, for instance. Only a select few of fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these mysteries, to realise that they're not just a game, they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Among Us ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in the crewmate's tasks. Which in itself is a cryptic reference to how repetitive this society truly is. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Innersloth shows his ingenious game design which unfolds itself on their device's screens. What fools.. how I pity them.
this is becoming the To be fair meme
channel
Beautiful
ugly
farts look better than that
why would goldrei go about introducing ideas related to posets before actually defining posets?
To motivate the definition maybe 🤷♂️ I've never read the book though
is there a uni course that focuses mainly on reccurence relationships
if so, what would the course be called?
Difference equations is the type i need to get better at solving
but need to read theory on it
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand what IQ actually is. The concept is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of it most of its implications will go over a typical person's head. Only the smartest of the smartest can design these tests to see how smart you are. And only the smartest of the smartest of the smartest can lead and approve of these designed tests. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as they can't even understand the simple pattern recognition on their device's screens not even comprehending how these tests are made. What fools.. how I pity them.
Words of Wisdom
yes
And I agree
I just did a practice act that my school offers and I did better on reading than math
While simultaneously having a 90% in low level English class and 98% in AP Statistics this year and a 101% in honors algebra 2 last year
I’m very confused lol
one would hope a student with a 98% in statistics would understand that sampling noise exists
What is the difference between probability and stats?
theoretical vs practice? If I had to be very vague
its like physics vs maths? would that be a good analogy 🤔
isnt probability just how likely something happens
statistics is the analysis of data
no
In statistics, you are trying to deduce the probability distribution from data, you could say
You are given the data
and you are trying to figure out what models it
I have never seen high level statistics (yet)
or are we talking probability in a diff context
In science, you are also given the data
and trying to see what mathematical model applies to it
What is the equivalent of a textbook like varadhan's text on probability theory for statistics?
I'm just curious to see what statistics is about
that's probably a question for #book-recommendations
might have better luck having that seen in there
A statistic is anything that can be determined from data
I was doing great in stats until I got to estimators. I don't really get how we can tell an estimator is unbiased unless we actually know the true value of the parameter
Combinatorics or discrete math, maybe?
you might also see it in complex analysis
since this is the type of stuff the Z-transform shines in
(not the main focus, ofc)
and also to some extent in numerical analysis
where can i get active help with Theory of Computation?
#foundations is appropriate
ty again!
i'm currently in hs algebra but i've noticed for too long that my math is structured like cheese, an unpleasant one, and i don't know how many holes it contains. i've been trying to study from prealgebra via openstax but i feel like i'm just wasting my time and would better just continue on my current level rather than perfecting my basics, is there a good way to approach this?
I’d suggest you focus on studying areas you feel weak in
Wow youre tag is 1729 non nitro too
Lmao
So true
lmao
lmao
what's up with the ghost pings in the help channels?
I don't see any recent deleted messages pinging you
unfathomably based
I often feel the same way. I'm interested in scheme theory, but often find that I don't understand commutative ring theory well enough to understand schemes. And studying commutative ring theory, I get lost in wilderness of mathematics.
That also happens to me to when there is 1 ping in the other mathematics channel somebody ghost pinged me and now im left with a red number 1 by the server
Hi I have a linear algebra question
Could you have a dot product of a matrix? Or would it only work if that matrix was considered as a vector?
Let me give you an example to make my question clear to you.
So if I try to find the product of a matrix with dimension (2x1) with another matrix with the same dimension (2x1), it wouldn't be valid because the number of columns of the first matrix does not equal the row of the second matrix.
However, if I were to define the 2 matrix to be a vector, I would get a scalar value by dot product.
If that's the case, you could consider any matrix as a vector and make every matrix dot product valid.
I'm just so lost. Help me plz 😦
The dot product a.b can be defined as a^T b (matrix multiplication of a^T and b)
But it makes little sense if doesn't return a scalar
Yo anyone good with english literature?
since your question has already been answered, maybe delete it from the extra channels you spammed it in, and don't do this again in future
got a sentence i want to de construct
anyone? so i can dm
does anyone know a good english discord?
Can anyone translate this in plain english "I repeat that the turmoil of heterogeneous and antagonistic social whims and speculations in which we live is due to the failure to understand what the industrial organization is and its all-pervading control over human life"
Please stop posting this stuff in multiple channels
Lol
You can talk about it if you want but you don't need to post it in more than one place
So it isn't an english literature question anyways smh, my point exactly
Tried a dictionary for the too long words?
Because I would do exactly the same
I don't really understand why you're asking this here honestly? There are probably other places that would be better suited to answer you
Google translate it to some language
I asked above if anyone knows any good english questions,
Servers*
Why would anyone here know that lol just google them or something
Or like
Google a server for whatever you're doing this for (SAT prep I suspect, or something like that)
Damn that sentence is pretty stable in google translate, I translated it through a couple of languages and I got
“I repeat, the heterogeneous and competitive society in which we live in a storm of whims and assumptions stems from the inability to understand what an industrial organization is and its complete control over human life.”
Which isn’t too far off from the original sentence
Yea
Ill try to get some idea from that
thanks
i find it funny how everyone gets pissed off at little things here, i will occasionally come here to watch everyone's reaction
perfect server for that i think

If you want to join a server to watch people get pissed off
Join a flat earth server
If you're just here to aggravate people and not talk about math then I can just ban you lol
even better, but flat earthers actually try to present some deep and complex conspiracies' to support their arguments. here everyone is like, "OHH NOOoooo, hE aSKeD aN eNGLish question! bLasPHEMY"
It is blasphemy 
Not only is it not math
It’s not even stem
Like asking an engineering question, repulsive as it is, is acceptable
But English?
Wheeewww
yea yea, typical discord mode behavior, its not your fault, everyone strives to be a mod.

to be fair, isn't this channel meant to be open to any reasonably appropriate topic?
that wasnt necessarily the issue.
simplifying an english sentence (once the question was actually formulated and properly asked) seems like it'd fit under that umbrella
i think you're being a bit unfair to everyone for guiding you to a better suited place
It certainly wasn't the only possible issue
yeah I know they were being unreasonable, just wondering about topic choice in general
its not that no one here is knowledgable with english literature i assume many people are
I wouldnt find it a problem myself if someone just asked an English Q
but it simply would make sense to ask this somewhere else
tho i will try to explain that message
understandable
And then they were directed to somewhere more helpful
as best of my ability
or maybe someone could actually help. but thats not what happened here
for sure
"I repeat that the turmoil of heterogeneous and antagonistic social whims and speculations in which we live is due to the failure to understand what the industrial organization is and its all-pervading control over human life"
Im afraid I cannot decipher this
me neither tbh
so here is my thoughts in understanding a sentence with odd or difficult literature
my brain just kinda skims over it
1st of all lets cut this to small pieces
Tbh the sentence itself isn’t too bad, just weirdly written and it starts with “I repeat”
And idk those big words, but
context would probably make it make much more sense too
and immediately im struggling with
turmoil of heterogenous and antagonistic social whims and speculations
,w define heterogeneous
i did the same lel
Hmmm
Okay I’m getting the feeling that the sentence may not make logical sense maybe?
antagonistic meaning clashing
ngl this reminds me of Orwell's pseudo-rant on politics and the english language
it feels like a bunch of big words strung together to sound fancy and overwhelming
Yeah
The sentence makes sense
e.g. "heterogeneous and antagonistic" feels redundant (just say antagonistic)
maybe I'm just bad at comprehension though
Who was that physicist that published an article in some social science journal that made no sense?
so we can phrase this as
"the disturbance of social needs and demands usually ones that are sudden to happen and change"
It's basically just "our society has a bunch of contradictory social demands because we don't understand industrial organization and how it controls our lives"
ah I see
is due to failing to understand how companies take control over peoples life
unveiled secret: to become a mod u must pass an english test like this
second part is certainly to do with industrial society in general, and that part seems fine
it's just the first half feels a bit clunky and overly wordy to me
I assume its for like, literary purposes
that's also certainly possible
late 19th century england was a mistake
England was and still is a mistake
excuse u
i think this somewhat implies
that people are controlled by this enviroment they live in because they fail to understand it
it simply dictates the demand and makes it
controls every aspect of your "needs and wants" and shifts them
causing this disturbance
if i had to analyze this more deeply
hopefully this was somewhat helpful
im sorry my literature abilities can only go so far here
btw i had tried to find english servers yesterday but almost all of them were about just foreigners' voice chatting to get better at speaking, couldn't find any good ones. and the big servers were asking for my phone number so i didn't join them. so i resorted to here today and also asked around for any good english servers.
i mean you can probably even join a philosophy or political server
yea... actually
if i had to try somewhere
philosophy servers might help
thanks for helping
im in a small philosophy server i think it might be helpful 
dm me an invite or something
hopefully sending server links is allowed
if not i apologize
tho there is some other big philosophy servers as well
hopefully you find the help you need

Sometimes when I read math, I get really scared. It'll take ages to learn it all. How do you guys deal with your fears and anxieties in math
It happens at all levels
Just take things one step at a time... is some generic but not v. helpful advice 
Maybe talk to people who are at the same stage of learning
that usually builds confidence --- if you can discuss things you are both stuck on
or if you can explain something someone else doesnt get and vice versa
I suppose... would be nice for things to be easier
realistically you wont learn it all
luckily you very much dont have to
Yeah, I meant when going through a book for example
Not all math
its true locally and globally
i've never read a book cover to cover
probably never will unless i write one
#available
I don't see any other way to learn for me, I get stuck in the details if I don't ...
well, you will probably have to learn to not do that, but it takes practice and time
atm the learning method that works for me is to make sure I understand the intuition behind the ideas. Including proof ideas
then come back to the nitty gritty details after (and even then I won't always look for understanding on every single bit - it's not always possible)
Like after a section or two, maybe
It's hard to be a pedantic mathematician 😫
i guess so haha
I’ve found that concepts tend to sink in better some time after I’ve read about them
Amount of time for this sinking in varies significantly for me
I get really overwhelmed by the amount there is to learn
I've heard it said that Euler was the last person to understand all of the math of his time
A big part of that is because there was much less math to learn back then
I feel like my school is behind in a lot of subjects, but mainly math cause of Covid but I'm interested in it and wanna get ahead with learning somehow.
What do you recommend I do? I've tried using sites like KhanAcademy but I feel like it doesn't contain all the stuff I should know.
I think it's easier to give you advice if you specify what you'd like to learn
Just curious about other's opinions, but what is your least favorite number? Plenty of people have a favorite, (mine's 8) but there's got to be some least favorites.
Man I hate 6, it's too perfect
I hate 91
for being composite
I've always had a grudge against 18. It feels like a worse 12.
57 and 91 are just annoying. They look prime, you know?
quality discussion guys
what am i even reading
91 does not look prime either
it looks like 100-9 to me
it's obvious a 7 fits in there
I know they're not prime, but it's like they're so close
in a sense they aren't, because the surrounding numbers are composite
91 especially looks prime to me. Even numbers are easy to see, 5 are the same, and 3 and 11 have simple divisibility tests. Squares are easy to memorize (this, 49 still "looks" composite) but 91, 7 x 13, has nothing. In fact, it's the only composite number under 100 that looks prime to me.
100 - 9 difference of 2 squares... jk
not easy to spot
I have internalised what 7 x 13 is though
i hate the number 2
literally everything fails for n=2
fuck 2
whoever invented 2 deserves a painful death
Ah yes, the subprime number
Oh GOD I forgot about 2
If anyone can field a physics question I'm curious about something. If you play a G on say, a saxophone, the G string on a guitar will vibrate in response. I know it's called resonance but I don't really understand why it works.
2 is my favourite number because it is the date of my birth ;/
I was born in pi
I was born on 3^2 - 3^3
Hi, I'm a bit confused on linear operators
so I have a linear operator T from C[0,1] to C[0,1] that maps the set P: {u \in C[0,1] : u(x) \geq 0} into a smaller subset of P
im just a bit confused on the notion of maps for function spaces
specifically whats confusing
Im a bit new to this but from what i understand T has domain and codomain of C[0,1]. which is normal, its just mapping continous function to other continuous functions. but for the second part. I'm just a big confused on the P space. Is it saying that if you apply the operator on a function in P, it's result will be an element of a smaller subset of P?
Like ill draw a picture



