#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 504 of 1
exactly what a virgin would say
he was quite religious so it makes sense
Didn't Newton lose a fuckton of money gambling or sumn? Or was it the stock market? Eh, what's the difference?
He stuck a bodkin in his eye for science, so there's that.
Newton was a dick.
Later in life, he worked for the Mint, ensuring that counterfeiters were hanged.
Euler, meanwhile, was a nice guy.
Euler was a nice god.
If you wrote to him, telling him about your idea, and it turned out Euler had already discovered it, HE WOULD LET YOU PUBLISH AND TAKE THE CREDIT.
It's thanks to that Newton schmuck that we can't fly without "lift" and "aerodynamics"
Euler's collected works spanned something like 92 volumes, he could afford to give stuff away. 😁
Much of that while blind, iirc
Yep.
is it a good idea to learn latex to make my digital math notes?
It is a good idea to learn latex in general
If you want to type math you should absolutely use latex
oh okie I only have a vague idea of what it is so I wasn't sure, thanks!
This might be beginners naivety but I just picked up mathematical proofs by chartrand and just reading about how math is written really tickles my fancy! I didn't expect this since I've been so scared of starting. Chapter 0 showed me the assumptions that were never explained to me in math class, as we've only been told that is the right thing to do when questioned. This is so cool! I'm beginning to see how efficient math is as a language for reasoning.


yooooo guys
just a quick question
not rlly math but how is Schrodinger's view of orbitals different from Bohr's idea or orbits?
nvm


Congrats
u guys wanna hear it
No
why math is fun
Holy shit i dont want to message in discussion now
even better - send 300 thousand more messages
You will never make it 👿 you shall fall short of your goal 😈
true
i mean, i have nearly 60k messages now
i wish to get to 69420
😌
but it will take a while

i missed my 69420 
time to delete a few
yes loch go delete a few
I can’t see my messages on mobile.
u have access to feet as well?

yeah i cant access ur messages in feet and ivory
but still
I'm closing in
oof
only 42 messages more
nice
wait u have only 62k
oh wait u are a mod and honorable

who has access to #feet
I want feet D:<


Slurp opinions on anime?
good anime is good
bad anime is bad
anime is different than western tv, so its a nice change
hyped to see the latest aot episode
but its also different than western tv, so i can find it weird sometimes
good animes dont exist
like the number of gasps omg you dont need to gasp all the fckin time
like that their goto reaction
"hey your family died"
gasp
"how are you doing"
gasp
"hey there"
gasp
"he-"
gasp
"-llo"
gasp
AND ITS THE SAME ONE EVERY TIME
is it possible to graph messages over time?
I SWEAR THEY MUST HAVE JUST RECORDED ONE PERSON GASP AND LITERALLY USE IT FOR EVERY ANIME
☕ 🍰
eh i understand that
compared to western tv, its much less polished and fleshed out imo
the animation in anime tends to be very good though
tbh no
western animation is so lazy now
better than what i could do
so is anime?
my issue with western animation is that its all so similar
and so artificial (for a lack of better words)
but anime is also pretty similar, and much less technologically advanced too
Im gonna grab a cake and black cup of joe
ive had enough junk today
i pamper myself too much
like i should be working rn
but instead im debating anime on a math discord
i have to work on english 🤮
oh i didnt mean working on like actual work
i meant working on dumb school stuff
anyone know how i can do this?
i want to graph my dms tbh
Hmmm
Like on a server that you can add bots to, you could probably make a bot for that
yeah but dms tho
u let me down
but you llgive me up
Oof my teacher doesnt let us use singular they
they racism
fuck
Ah i think i have a solution
your teacher is stylistically deficient

tbh the ministry of education is pretty slow with english
id assume because the country isnt english speaking
but still, a pain in the ass
hmm
in high school i gave a talk which very viciously attacked people who said singular they was grammatically incorrect
it was a lot of fun
niiiice
i don't remember all the reasons why anymore
Oof i changed the sentence but now i feel like the meaning is altered
i always prefered they because gender is just not that relevant to what im saying
also english just needs gender neutral pronouns, independent of the LGBT community. (I dont mean to say thats not an important reason, its just not the only one)
Like singular they can help clear up ambiguities in many cases and make sentences sound smoother imo
exactly
many languages with only masc and fem noun classes have this problem even more severely
ie many romance languages
yeah like my countrys language has only fem/masc pronouns (and nouns are gendered as well) so it just sounds weird a lot of times
what language
a poopy one


what language tho
I was surprised to learn people thought singular they was grammatically incorrect - I always assumed it was
if i told you youd be able to figure out in which country i live 
good guess
probably not americas
because french, portugese, spanish
yeah well first of all it's not hungary, finland, turkey
im neither 😎
because they don't have noun classes
it is past my bedtime tho
,ti DETOX
India
This user hasn't set their timezone! Ask them to set it using ,ti --set.
oofa
statistically india's a p good guess
langs are too widely spoken
and you said this
ye
german does sound like a pretty cool language tho tbh
actually that excludes anywhere with germanic languages
oh fuck
because most of them have neuter
so that leaves italy as most likely
so far
ofc you could be in eastern europe but most slavic langs have neuter
oh maybe romania
youre too close for me to comment on anything 
hol up lemme look some stuff up
ohshi this be scary
oh romanian preserves neuter
Just tell me what country you live in
It’ll be fine
nothing bad will happen 
so
If i tell you will you release your new album today?
italy or baltics

The album does not exist so I can very easily release absolutely nothing, so yes I will vacuously
Yeah it can’t be the Baltic’s they’re too Germanic
mm vacuous truth
good thing implication can be vacuously true
My guess? Lichtenstein cause why not
Or san marino one of those weirdo countries
so i think it's italy
i do not live in italy
you live in india
nope
it wasnt a question.
your statement is false
either northern italy or italian-speaking switzerland
im so bad at geography
just because youre cool allison ill give you a hint
one of those is wrong

one but not the other?
i have a bad education system
will have 2 read slurp msgs in an italian accent now
slovenia :troll:
Probably but I’m not sure
my guess is USA
haitian creole doesn't have noun classes afaik
dox artistry is server culture
I mean it's impossible to place you anywhere more specific than northern italy
this is how you make 'em comfortable. then they begin to open up...
oh i just had a thought
maybe you live in sardinia
Why northern
is that where they make all the sardines? 
WHAT
lol
sardines are named after sardinia
my joke is less funny now 
Neapolitan has neuter
I thought it was funny
thank you 
They make pencils in Pennsylvania
what about veins?
in Transylvania they treat trans people with blood vessel diseases
no it’s funny 
Thank you 
Hi, I'm confused in how to mark the position vectors in the following question and solve them (vectors are marked in italic letters).
When a and b are two non-parallel vector to each other, the position vectors of A, B, C and D are a, b, 4a and 3b respectively. If the position vector of the bisecting of AB and CD is ma + nb, find m and n?
have you learned dot products?
Create a fractions question that includes the following elements:
- involves exactly four proper fractions in the question
- involves exactly two integers in the question
- involves at least one step that requires cancelling
- involves at least one step that requires a common denominator
- involves an answer that is a negative mixed fraction
already muted? damn
what did he do?
you can try stuff like a tablet if you have one, or blue light filter on the screen if your computer/monitor has the option
but ultimately, haptics and plain old preference are important, so
no idea lol
some people will always prefer physical books
Dude was begging for help with a question in an occupied math channel
He claimed he did
what happens if you're muted?
Can't talk
for how long?
Depends
doubleposted
I am in the same category as you. If I will spend a significant amount with a math book, I rather get a physical copy since I learn better that way.
The flexibility to navigate through a book is a top reason I prefer physical copy. Also I am blind as a bat, so when I lose my glasses, with physical book I can still study math.
Never done it before, however it is possible.That is, I have seen someone do it.
I am not saying I don’t use online books, it just what my preferences are. My current book right now is online.
I wonder if places exists where you pay them to do the whole printing books stuff for you.
how... how do you think books are made
actually yeah you might get a bunch of monks to hand-scribe copies for you nevermind
cough cough "free"
if you can find genesis in a library you can get them for free
you know what they say
where there's genesis, there might be library
what im saying here is that you should visit amazon.com to purchase your textbooks (legally, with real human money)
-4 ( 1.75 + x ) =18
???
Bruv stop spamming
im not lol
Can ping pong grow my calves

this definitely depends on how you play ping pong
Which playstyle will make my calves bigger

probably something that involves legs
Hold the paddle with your legs and use them like that
Hope this works
Hi
Hello big floyd
Is there a little floyd we should be on the lookout for?
Medium Floyd is terrifying
3/4 floyd
π/4 floyd
That is indeed uninteresting and biased
if you look at the second most picked choices you can see how it's close to the correct set of answers
i will make another but I'll fix it and instead of using numbers I'll pick shapes/abstract concepts
second most picked: 9, 7, 5
correct set: 9, 6, 5
the majority pick: 1, 3, 7
this is such a bad issue that I experience lmao
I wanna learn physics and coding but I don't even make enough time to learn math
I say go for it, if you find it's not working out for you then you'll know, and can adjust to focusing on juggling fewer things
i can't help you, but this is better asked in #advanced-lounge where it will reach a better audience and is less likely to be buried
How useful would a university summer school be? Is that even a thing?
yeah I guess summer course is probably more accurate
Though we do call it a summer school here in the uk
summer school here is like a seminar with a specific topic and some invited speakers
during the lecture free time in summer
its nice
whhat is the level of topics covered?
such that the average grad student can get something from the talks
or an undergrad with interest in the specific thing
age doesnt really matter, but there generally are prerequisites
if you are in the uk, i have no idea though, so 🤷
u mean lectures or entire courses you can get credit for
courses
i just looked at mine and there's literally nothing for me in the summer, there's no compsci and the maths courses are only the rly basic ones for non maths students
but there are courses i guess, just nothing relevant for me
They are usually designed as like
ways to get course credits out of the way
not replacements for other quarters
Yeah a lot of people in less mathematical sciences take some math classes over summer
Or geneds (in America)
Or maybe like a chemistry class
You ever just see a student’s work and feel like you absolutely failed them despite the fact that the material they didn’t get was meant to be covered in prerequisite courses
You don't really get to choose your students, so the best thing you can do is to try to value-add to their lives. This is on the additional constraint that you teach to a given syllabus
I really like your name seastar
same
also i have had students i taught and tutored regularly fail a class, it does feel bad
they seemed to fail to put it together outside of our time together
Where can I find my Putnam score for the test I took a few months ago?
they should be emailed to you when they're released?
@hollow sundial apologies for this second question but what would be the equation for the thing you were talking about?
a wire around something
i was thinking this https://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/316/lectures/node26.html
Electric Field of a Uniformly Charged Wire
but it had nothing to do with your problem
i think i need that for my next problem so thank you lol
haha
Putnam scores came out today. I got 4 points from question A1.
gg!
Anyone know what steps or stuff you have to learn before starting number theory research maths
learning number theory might be a good start before doing research in it
It's very difficult understanding how to do this like what order if someine had like a list of books or content to cover for all number theory it would be si much easier
Just learn math
Go to grad school
Get a PhD
Do research
That question reads like you're trying to do research without going through the formal schooling first
Which is how cranks are made and research isn't done
I prefer to go in the opposite order
Its impossible to give a list that covers all of number theory
Well, technically, the number of all textbooks is finite, so that is a valid list
Bounded from above by the number of particles in the observable universe
hey all, I've recently made the decision to pursue a math phd focusing in dynamical systems. I just wanted to ask if there is some way to filter through schools more easily that are focused on what i want to study. i'm first gen so i don't know a lot of resources
Bruh i already forgot how to apply to grad school
And i applied a bit over a year ago
wrong totodile is second gen not first gen!
(sorry for bad joke lol)

Are you sure Antoni is the Totodile and not the Lotad?
I wonder If there is more people that wants to become "researchers on their own" generally turn themselves toward Number Theory because it seems "more accessible" (which is literally a false impression)
imagine thinking number theory is accessible
I literally know zero number theory beyond basic congruence stuff and I have never thought of it as approachable
what areas even are "accessbile"
like take the big open problems in nt
I literally have no fucking clue how I'd approach twin primes
or 3x+1
I mean granted no one has any clue for the latter
AFAIK, inaccessible cardinals turn up only rarely in number theory.
I did thing up to introduction to elliptic curve on finite fields, and some analytic theory, I neither didn't have a single clue of it
Week by week works well for me. I did a lot of learning coding in high school and gap years so it might differ. But usually at the end of the week i can have finished my math work and have time and most importantly mental energy to reframe and concentrate on the entirely different problems a programmer faces. I also did an econometrics course over the summer and it was a nice change of pace outside of normal class hours but the content was mostly focused around some elementary statistics, statistical programming and a little bit of economics. For that course in particular I would not stress learning it quickly as you might as well wait for some later mathematical finance / actuarian courses to become available as the methods used there are far more rigorous and practical.
That's why I hate "recreative maths" and on YouTube video on such kind of problems (3x+1, "1+2+...+n+... =-1/12" (which is moreover NOT the Riemann hypothesis)), those seem easy to understand to profane people. Those videos are literally a factory that built a lot of cranks.
I want to beat the shit out them all
lmao
I mean I think videos on 3x+1 are fine just as long as they emphasize that professional mathematicians have no fucking clue how to approach it so you, the viewer, should not even try
They generally just mentioned "the problem is unsolved nowadays"
like it's genuinely cool that a problem that simple to state has given math's greatest minds so much trouble, but anything that would give the viewer the impression that it's worth their time to attempt is stupid
I feel like the essential thing to mention is that computers have checked all values up to [whatever absurdly high number they're on now]
fermat primes, mhmm'
the "approachable" part of 3x+1 is you can write out examples easily, but once you know that won't get you anywhere there's no obvious next step
like if you think you're going to come up with some elegant proof by contradiction that has eluded the best of the best then you're insane
should not even try is a bit harsh imo. people just need to actually* understand the conjecture in its most precise statement and be able to reason with the proper logic and language
such big problems can be great motivation for learning tons of other topics
also as a semi-related side note, apparently the subreddit r/numbertheory basically just exists as a place for r/math to send the cranks to
what related math do you learn off of 3x+1?
also is the precise statement hard to understand?
not necessarily
it's just $\exists n \not \exists i f^i(n) = 1$
Ninja (real)
idk about this example since i havent studied it, but i meant that people can further learn about topics that are applied when people approach problems using their intuition or observed patterns
that is, if they dont have formal training already
fair
some might check out existing papers on approaches to problems
but this is usually inaccessible lol
I have just realized something
the proper statement of incompleteness requires a solid understanding of logic
and is thus inaccessible to most people
this no doubt motivates some of them to study logic
thus do we not have a double meaning of inaccessibles creating models of ZFC
(this joke almost certainly could be executed better)
Yeah
really depends of what you're interested in, number theory is a huge field
If you don't have a precise idea, I would say that first you need to be comfortable in topology, abstract algebra, complex analysis and basic number theory
after that you can specialise in analytic number theory, L-functions, galois representations, elliptic curves, arithmetic geometry (which uses algebraic geometry and commutative algebra), modular forms, automorphic forms (which use representation theory), p-adic geometry, abelian varieties, arithmetical dynamical systems, representations of the étale fundamental group, computational and effective number theory, cryptography, …
Yes if you wish
Why does my prof use 2 different notations for derivative... i hate it
sometimes it's a dot above a letter, other times it's the ' prime
cause there's like 4
in the same line
the dot 🤢
sean
dot is literally exclusively for time derivatives tho
why on earth do we use laplace transform over fourier transform when doing ODEs?
$\mathfrak{L}{f^{(n)}}$ is an ugly expression and the inverse laplace is so impractical that people just use tables
$\mathfrak{F}{f^{(n)}}=(2\pi i\zeta)^n\mathfrak{F}{f}$ and the inverse fourier is just as easy as the actual fourier
A Fellow Human
the Fourier transform and Laplace transform are the same up to Wick rotation, so in some sense these approaches are equivalent
but why do we even bother with laplace transform in the first place?
it seems needlessly difficult to use comparared to fourier
iirc Laplace has somewhat better properties with respect to turning convolution into multiplication for commonly encountered linear ODEs
I agree that Fourier is somehow more conceptually natural
that being said there are some ways in which these aren't really equivalent
one reason why Laplace is preferable to Fourier for ODEs is that the Laplace transform of a distribution is generally well behaved, while this isn't true for Fourier
there are contexts where you really want to consider distributions here, for instance when considering Green's functions
"distribution" as in dirac delta kinda stuff?
yeah exactly
those can be solutions to ODEs?
I mean more like, considering equations like Du(x)=δ(x) where D is some differential operator and δ is some Dirac delta distribution
solutions to differential equations like this are Green's functions
i dont think i'll be seeing those anytime soon, but that's an interesting point
the reason for considering this is like
if you can produce solutions to Du(x)=δ(x) for any delta distribution
then you can produce solutions to Du(x)=f(x) in general
since you can write any function f as a sort of convolution of distributions like this
but fourier transform cant do that
wait what
have a link?
maybe this is a bad example since Fourier transform behaves nicely in this example
but just generally if you run into distributions
Laplace might be better behaved
I lied a little bit, you need f to be a compactly supported distribution in general
doesn't compact support just mean that the function vanishes where domain isn't compact?
compact support means there's some compact subset of the domain where the function vanishes outside that subset
and what's a compact set
A set X is compact if every open cover of X has a finite subcover.
since we're likely working in R^n it just means that like
the set is contained in some ball of finite diameter
makes sense
Are people on here willing to literally just explain something like polinomial division and it's derivation to me? Like i could literally just open a help channel and ask that?
I'd say for more conceptual stuff like that just ask in the discussion channels
from division algorithm over polynomial rings
or def of polynomial reducibility i guess
doubt this would be helpful cause op is probably in hs
My wife made a bunch of Edd cutouts
Amongus
@pale orchid
😌

a personality test asked me if I need logical consistency in life, what did he mean by that?
It means the test is bad
he?! 🤨
the test has a gender, is there an issue with that? 
True
LOLLLLLL.
What does this mean
Local and global obviously
where'd you find this picture of my grad apps statement of purpose
I believe those are the Dreamcast reiki symbols
ok the sullies i get. but the bleaks?
my SOP did pretty damn well thank you very much
Can someone help wit stats
Bruh sometimes my brain constantly thinking about math can be so tiring
Cus like I want to relax and then my brain just starts doing math
And I’m like aaaaaaa
1st world problems 😔
bro bout to fail my math test
noooo common you can clutch
What math subject?
algebra
you are too smart obviously
why else would you be thinking of math
My bleak was an acknowledgment that you might very well have been talking about my upcoming SOP
lol
@vast cipher @fading hull That's the course I'm attempting to do rn lol
Stats
Sometimes it's easy to grasp
Other times are
Stats is not hard if you think more about the underlying concepts
stats is always hard
It takes a bit more effort but try to understand why the formula works instead of just memorizing it
u gotta like
i mean idk if im the person to be giving advice 
ive done well in my classes though
Like take for instance the formula for variance
Why is it 1/(n-1) in a sample
But 1/n in the population??
thats insane to ask someone who isnt like
i mean in intro classes
unless they teach bias in intro classes now
Well the intuitive explanation is that any sample chosen will not be as extreme as the population as a whole
So any attempt to calculate the variance from the sample will ALWAYS be less than or equal to the population variance
I don't remember the explicit proof tho
It also sucks when the questions are just
Worded poorly
I don't actually understand them
Do I need to learn PDE before taking Differential Analysis? I look up on the DA Syllabus, it recommends or refer PDE books. So I am quite confused.
Yeah. Or when Theres a minor difference.
Stats equations? Ez
Stats wording? Please don't do this to me
I hate the wording. Understand things and remembering isn't too difficult, it's the wording that always gets me
Can I dm you? If thats okay?
@compact tartan what’s the difference between a holonomic system and a holonomic constraint
do holonomic constraints just define holonomic systems
q_k=3N-q_b general coordinates for n_b holonomic equations
I have been collecting course subjects from different universities. Since MIT have public syllabus as well I collect it also. The reason why I am doing this is because I would like to make a flow chart (or map of mathematics) as the subject progresses. Different universities applies different term per subject. So I am curious to what is "Differential Analysis", but the textbooks are about PDE.
Same either. I ain't a Math Major, just had an interest in doing this so. They don't have introduction about it but it is stated that the topics include fundamental solutions for elliptic; hyperbolic and parabolic differential operators; method of characteristics; review of Lebesgue integration; distributions; fourier transform; homogeneous distributions; asymptotic methods.
this sounds like a PDE course
i wouldn't worry about knowing PDEs beforehand
it seems to cover the introductory material
is that the constraint
t!rep @drifting egret
Bremperor has given @drifting egret a reputation point!
i forgot to give u a rep yesterday
What is a mathematical vignette? I'm supposed to write a mathematical vignette about the 17 equations that changed the world but I don't know what mathematical vignette is.
no clue either
This. But about math
Ohhhhhh okay :) I didn't even know what a vignette is in the first place. Thanks!
hello, any programmers out there who's played with mathjs before? i need help parsing the functions!
random algebra questions are just luck with manipulations change my mind
pattern recognition
more tools you know and more problems you've done and better at recognizing patterns you are gets you faster
Just wait until you see analysis...
But I guess this applies to that too lol
It really is pattern recognition

id say memes go in #chill but frankly this is weird enough that I dont think it belongs there either
That could have been made into a great book.
very short book
do I need to know differential equations as a prerequisite for a lot of advanced math topics? I'm thinking about dropping my diff EQ course because I'm realizing it's just absolutely not the type of course I'm interested in taking, but are the topics learned in the class used often in future math courses (aside from the obvious PDEs)
I think it depends on what you go into
I've yet to touch diff EQs in my 3 years as an undergrad so far
It greatly depends, diffeqs is something I encounter regularly, but it may not matter to some people not looking in that direction. Like, if you are an applied math or engineering major, you might find yourself needing diffeqs
Yeah if you end up doing applied math it can be a very important topic, but for more pure math you may not need it
im def planning on doing into pure math, i really dislike doing applications in the courses ive taken so far
i think that topology and differential geometry look the most interesting to me from what ive seen

sorry, just finding a screenshot of my diff geo hw 🙃
ugh that's such low quality
sorry one sec
lmaoo

fuq lol
ok yeah that's fair
i guess what I really like so far from what ive done in my major is how elegant and geometric my vector calculus and linear algebra courses have been
and ive heard differential geometry is the next natural step to take after vector calc (with the right prerequisites out of the way)
this one is super cute
categories 
ngl that looks awesome
baby's first de rham cohomology
yeah what i am posting is from a modern differential geometry course, not from a classical differential geometry course (differential geometry of curves and surfaces)
the latter will be a little less crazy
even if you're doing an undergrad level course on differentiable manifolds usually it will be a bit more tame than these crazy problems
but they're also fun
and they're not super hard, just a lot of things to do
that sounds pretty decent
i dont think my uni offers an undergrad differential geometry course though
ah i see
then you may have to enjoy the sort of thing i'm posting
i'm actually doing a similar hw right now haha
oooof
although this problem that i just finished was more chill:
the equations are very nice to look at tbh
lots of funny triangles 
im not
in any of these formulas, any time you see an index appearing both on top and on bottom, it means that you're supposed to sum over it from 1 to d (the dimension)
oh damn
so in my last formula, l appears in both the top and bottom on the right hand side
(bottom of gamma once, top of B once, and then vice versa in the next term)
this means that i actually am supposed to sum over l
this is a great convention even for linear algebra
if you write your matrix $A$ as $A^k_\ell$, then we can write matrix-vector multiplication as $w^k = A^k_\ell v^\ell$ where $w = (w^1, \dots, w^d)$ and $v = (v^1, \dots, v^d)$
ryc
similarly, matrix-matrix multiplication is $C^i_j = A^i_k B^k_j$
ryc
super convenient
everything just matches up and looks very pretty if you drop the sums
so this is happening constantly in all the things i sent
you cry
if you're using a space where you want to separate out one of the coordinates, usually you don't call it x^d
lee uses greek letters to mean a sum from 1 to n - 1 sometimes
it comes up in some later parts of the book
mfw I actually managed to follow this
Yeah diffgeo notation is so bad they have to drop sums just to make it... Not even tolerable tbh, by dropping symbols and praying
dami coping cause he needs symbols to guide him
differential geometry looks so cool
what r the prerequisites?
is it like topology, analysis, good foundation in linalg
bc ive seen people say u can get by with just a bit of analysis and linalg
but then some others say like u need a strong knowledge of topology or whatever
i heard tensor calc and differential forms have like a lot of applications in physics
for studying manifolds, this is what you need
this is fine for studying differential geometry of curves and surfaces
e.g. do carmo's book
i see
you would study manifolds in Lee's smooth manifolds and Riemannian manifolds books
or in Tu's books
as examples
what about books like this one?
basically, the curves and surfaces style is very classical, things are embedded in R^3, you study gauss curvature, etc
i just found it on a reddit thread and they said it was good
so basically here, modern diffgeo is like manifolds, and classical diffgeo is curves and surfaces?
the manifolds and tensors style of things tends to be more modern, things aren't usually embedded automatically, you have to deal with more abstract objects like dual vector spaces and topological ideas like compactness / connectedness / orientability a lot, etc
yes
this book is probably more modern
I recall doing this before
but not in this language at all
John coping because he can't handle symbols
shots fired
Hi i decided to read a cs paper
Its good but hes making 30 citations every paragraph
source: python
Lol what
Im reading hyperloglog
Cuz the name is cool
Ive never read from an actual paper before

doesnt seem like too much to do
maybe i can do diff geo soon 
dont do it 
it's not good for your soul
im drowning in notation rn
not even concepts
literally just notation
like wtf
who thought that this would be a good idea
You did


i will have to try it for myself
to see how bad it is
drowning in notation
flex moment
it's not just notation
there's a lot of pictures behind the notation

at what point does one go from a layperson to a mathematician? I ask this as someone who gets kinda excited by the analysis side of math, like doing derivatives or even just simple algebra. The "mathematician" side of math, with set theory and group theory and all of that is almost unbearably boring and it's so grueling to learn, and yet surprise surprise every hour spent trying to wrap my brain around these topics makes not just the analytical side of math easier, it makes thinking about other problems in a more abstract way more approachable and doable. having this experience over the past few months has left me pondering that question pretty often: am I a student? am I a mathematician? I still feel like a mathematical layperson more than anything else though
it depends on your definition of mathematician
that's kinda why I ask; as a layperson my answer would be that "a mathematician is someone who uses math at work". as a student, my definition is something more like "a mathematician is someone who uses math to solve problems"
then its up to you who you call a mathematician
i dont think you need this label to feel better about yourself or whatever
but if that makes you happy..
(I'm the best mathematician regardless of the definition btw)
(im better than manan regardless of definition btw)

just a note: many people do not find algebra and set theory boring (like me and wew)
Me too
I do find it boring, but that's despite finally seeing why it's worth learning XD
having definitions and reasons for why math works the way it does has really helped demystify the actual learning process
before learning set theory: see a new problem, find out what the "solution" is, still feel like it's completely arbitrary
after learning set theory: see a new problem, find out why the solution is what it is, all is well
Does anybody know what this "uncertainty crisis" is all about?
Or was it just made up in our philosophy curriculum
I wonder if I'm translating this correctly
If you’re talking about that in context to math, y’all might be talking about how like a century ago, some mathematicians were worried about there being a lack of a “solid foundation” for mathematics so they argued and advocated for the resolving of this by basing math fundamentally on logic.
Ok so I found in the "Princeton companion to mathematics" something called "the crisis in the foundations of mathematics"
But she kept talking about how in modern mathematics we can never be sure of a mathematical statement
Like how triangles can have a combined angle greater than 180
And how 1+1 isn't always 2 (e.g. 1kg+1g)
And it all just sounded like nonsense
it's nonsense lmfao
Look up for Hilbert's Program on the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The SEP is always a great reference to look up if you want to have a quick overview on some topic related to philosophy.
In any case
"Hilbert's Program" might the main keyword here for you to search.
Has anyone figured out how to deal with imposter syndrome?
I'm no longer very attached to feeling or thinking that I'm smart or anything like that, but it was a system shock to me to start browsing/posting on math stackexchange and find weird feelings of total inadequacy for even cracking into any part of this subject, it almost made me feel like I've never even done any math before and I am just a total newcomer if that makes any sense.
I try not to attach my identity closely to my interests, but thinking "I like/enjoy this math thing" and then discovering, or at least discovering an irrational feeling, that I haven't even ever really participated in or around math meaningfully... it's so strange and kinda hurts to be honest
Ignoring it works for me
If I have any advice or cope. Thinking about your competence doesn’t change your competence. Have self confidence in your competence
One of my professors indieectly called me stupid and isnt the nicest person, but the best way to deal with these things is direct nonaggressive confrontation. This doesnt work on math stack exchange so good luck.
It's ultimately an irrational thought and I can acknowledge that, and it's especially hard cause it's connected to a very strong feeling as well. Anyway thank you for the advice ❤️
Also that's awful! I think that is very mature of you to think that way in response
Agrippa's trilemma states that all knowledge is either founded on either infinite regression, circularity, or unrigorous assumptions
so like
that's what they could mean
Hey guys.could you do me a favour for my school project please and thank you. It’s quick and shouldn’t take even 2 minutes. No email required!
Link: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScPvnacFTbZL6W6SpQlAIOpRPl9eRo2ivDzVf9uFL2BvThVzA/viewform?usp=sf_link

tfw mobius transformations are symmetries of your face
i think this is alr a researched topic and the answer is a resounding yes
It is. can you fill out plz. Would be appreciated
Order Calculus 1, Calculus 2, Calculus 3, Linear Algebra + Differential Equations?
Can these 5 courses be selfstudied in like 5 months?
Not very in depth for a test or smth, just getting familiar with everythinng
And will doing Calc 3 and diff eq, benefit my Calc I and Calc II knowledge?
Like once you start thinking multivariable, will the single variable stuff become like very easy?
agrippa the rippa?
when her face like D_2n but her face is S_n
Wdym
I just accept myself for who I am. I'm not the most talented. But I love what I do. I'm not flunking, grades are pretty good. I treat it like gardening and be as disciplined as I can be about it. As I result I don't really get imposter syndrome.
silly math joke
Ah I see
Anyone know what's up with b?
Like
All the tutorials and the training module tell me
I need to find the design tab
But it's not there
It doesn't exist
Usually the Mac version always has the same settings but in a different menu
Oh christ I literally just had to click on anywhere BUT the title of the table
I'd say yes
though you'll probably need to spend a few hours a day avg
I recommend progressively deepening your understanding if you're self studying, ie. start with 3blue1brown videos etc to build intuition (make sure you understand the stuff) then do khan academy, then (if you have time) do university problems from somewhere like mit ocw
1/60 of a degree
arc minutes and arc seconds are cringe
I hate all units
i love units
wait I think I like units now
ugh. i fucking hate units
how dare you
units are all right in algebra
I mildly like units
For those who haven’t done this:
Could you do me a favour for my school project please and thank you. It’s quick and shouldn’t take even 2 minutes. No email required!
Link: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScPvnacFTbZL6W6SpQlAIOpRPl9eRo2ivDzVf9uFL2BvThVzA/viewform?usp=sf_link
@robust osprey do not spam
You will die nameless without ceremony
Good idea, I never really watched blue brown due to the videos being more conceptual compared to lecture and exercise focused..
I mostly do Prof. Leonard lectures, exercises in book, and finish of with filling gaps on Khan Academy and also foing exercises on there as a refreshment and "test"
So I should do bluebrown before or after learning the material?

My bad
is it even possible to get a phd in math without knowing latex?
like has it ever been done before?
yes, Riemann for example
He didn't get a math phd
No
Yes, although it is becoming less and less common (or so I'd hope)

in theory you can pay someone else to tex your dissertation
true
there are still professors who have grad students do it for them
since when were u guys mods
lazy bitches
I think some recent math PhD dissertations at my uni have been typeset in MS Word 
ewww
They look so bad
i sometimes read the bachelor theses written at the institute here
dont think i ever saw one in word

there is something similar for people studying teaching
they are in word more often than not i think
Yeah hopefully things will improve soon here as well, my uni even has a mandatory class on LaTeX for math majors
damn
I was the expert 😎
i wonder how people here learn tex
when i started my bachelor thesis the prof didnt mention it
and i know for a fact that many of my peers dont know tex at all
so i wonder if they just start writing in word and then get yelled at 
but yeah, some short latex class seems useful

From the reactions I saw, some students really ended up liking it, while others are hesitant and think it's too much work
Like a beginners inertia to start using it
yes, its a lot of extra work for a while
and frankly for random classes you dont need to use it
but at some point you start writing stuff that you want other people to read...
I think in my uni recently for masters it is necessary to take a course on how to write math papers, it has some latex instructions I believe.
Nice
we just expect students to pick up on this on their own
Honestly a "starter pack for math majors" course won't hurt
i still see lots of
in my seminars
It could not only cover basic proofs and set theory lingo but also more pragmatic aspects
im always wondering whether to tell them
Oh god I found some graph theory notes today
is tex actually useful irl
And the TeX is 
tbf i think a good video can teach latex
i mean
i have a good teaching video in german
I think it can get someone started, yeah, but most of it just seems to be learn-as-you-use
@surreal sapphire ur a teacher?
I learnt LaTeX starting from Math Stackexchange
and then just force students to like tex 10% of homework sheets for every class
or something like that
how i stex useful
no, but i do some TA work
TA?
It is a typesetting environment and is more or less standard for publishing or presenting academic literature in maths, sciences and maybe engineering.
teaching assistant, yeah
ok but instead of typing it, u can just write down the paper
no use for tex there

nobody will read your handwritten notes
um why?
because your handwriting is bad
Handwriting is an even worse suggestion than MS Word
hwo do u know if its good or bad
every handwriting is bad
umm no?
The last thing an academic would want to waste their time on is a horribly abstract research paper written in terrible handwriting hindering its understanding even more
Ooooh boi 
this is definitely not bad
Time to pull something cursed nG sends
what?
For starters this is extremely time consuming
ah yes handwritten 100 line cohomology computation
that is actually true
would you read a handwritten book?
u mean a manuscript?
i mean an actual book
Would you write that by hand
no

hello ryc
second line, last character should be a 3

i think?
huh
💪
idk, pattern matching
oh yeah
damn you wrote it in pen and now you have to start all over
look at the line after it
ryc is an IIT graduate, you should expect no less
oh yeah
u trolled me that
then u just erase ez
eraser marks 
you'd better have a really good eraser
Your readers should know the pain and suffering you went through
@deep mango manan trolled me that u r from iit patna
ryc indian arc?
lol
Always has been
no he's from us
he's a heartless bait master.
ur actually from us right
yes i am from the US
Who’s us?
ok
bad joke
mr among
i just spent hrs on this problem and turns out it is trivial
ughhhh
which problem
yep
i never think of this
like its always either try algebra or local coord
always forget the velocity
i can't even remember where this perspective is useful
@light needle u like math, food and WHAT
negating
negation, we negate 10 to get -10
😎
thx
Afternoon, nerds 😎





