#serious-discussion

1 messages · Page 500 of 1

toxic schooner
#

how do u read this expression?

vivid halo
#

they kinda can, provided they are doing other work

#

papers that length do come out not uncommonly

median zinc
#

True, I think most people are just struggling and working on a few things though

sleek wing
#

is how I'd read it

toxic schooner
#

that doesnt sound nearly as complex as i was expecting

sleek wing
#

yeah

#

sound

#

being the operative word there

toxic schooner
#

true

sleek wing
#

I dare not post my proof... just in case devastation

toxic schooner
#

rep theory has what as its pre reqs?

sleek wing
#

group theory, lin algebra

#

and by lin algebra I mean fuckin lin algebra

#

none of this row-echelon bullshit

#

that's for the rep theory I'm doing anyway

toxic schooner
sleek wing
#

for anything more advanced you'll probably need ring theory and maybe even algebraic topology if you're doing lie group shenanigans

sleek wing
sleek wing
#

OH and a very small amount of field theory

#

you just need to know how to exploit algebraic closure basically

spice storm
toxic schooner
frail sail
sick burrow
#

OK

#

SO

#

THIS PAPER MIGHT JUST HAVE A TYPO

toxic schooner
sick burrow
#

or does it not????

#

I'm so confused

#

agony

toxic schooner
sick burrow
#

wait no

#

this does't make sense if the thing I think is a typo is actually a typo

#

however

toxic schooner
sick burrow
#

it also doesn't make sense the way the paper is written opencry

toxic schooner
sick burrow
#

wait it sorta makes sense

#

I am going clinically insane

fallow whale
#

hello chat

sick burrow
#

ok I think I'm just going to email them

fair mural
tender musk
brave garden
#

@hollow sundial hey

#

Can i Dm u my proof?

hollow sundial
#

nah, just reopen or open a new help channel

brave garden
#

kk

cyan goblet
#

starting undergraduate college soon this fall, planning on doing a major in physics and a minor in CS
career goal is to do some form of quantum computing research
two questions:

  1. how useful would a math major/minor be along with physics major?
  2. how many math classes would overlap between physics/math requirements? Until what year would they start to differ?
#

asking here and not in the physics server because as a wise person once said in #chill ,

#

also i just really love math

#

so if i did a math minor, would i still get to do all the rigorous fun higher-level classes as a math major

#

for reference im currently doing calculus 3 so i may be able to test out of calc 1-3, depending if the school will let me

cyan goblet
#

agreed

limber thunder
#

certainly you'll get a better understanding of the (mathematical) fundamentals of QC if you've already taken higher-level math courses

cyan goblet
#

ye

high oxide
#

👍

cyan goblet
#

i just kinda want to take higher level courses in math just out of enjoyment tho

#

so not necessarily for the end goal of a degree in math or anything but purely just because "wow this is cool and fun"

#

at which point would it be worth to go for a math major/minor too?

limber thunder
#

I feel like a CS minor would be obvs more useful (algorithms)

cyan goblet
#

ye, i think CS minor will be there regardless of math major/minor or no math major/minor

limber thunder
#

while a math minor/major would be a nice plus but not sure if worth it

cyan goblet
#

just a question of whether it's worth to take on that third course path

limber thunder
#

maybe it'd be better to hear from someone actually into QC lol

cyan goblet
#

mm true

#

im just wondering like

#

how much extra course load im looking at if i did Physics + CS + Math instead of just Physics + CS

limber thunder
#

all of these would require the basic calc+linalg sequence , so probably only as much load as the respective minors require you to take

#

I feel like the three don't really overlap in undergrad but have the same prereqs

#

like, if you wanted to do real analysis, algorithms and something like analytic mechanics on the same semester, these have pretty much no overlap except in that they all assume you know calculus

cyan goblet
#

yeah true lol

#

icic

#

noted thank you very much

cyan goblet
#

ye, i will probably reach out to respective professors and whatnot depending on the school i commit to

limber thunder
wooden flax
#

What is a good method to speedrun hard books?

cyan goblet
# wooden flax What is a good method to speedrun hard books?

Absorb Textbooks Like a Sponge. Discover how to IMPROVE COMPREHENSION and GET BETTER GRADES, while REDUCING STUDY TIME. Reading a textbook is NOT like reading a novel. You will learn an EASY & PROVEN METHOD for getting the information from any textbook to go straight into your brain, without having to cram or underline a bunch of stuff. It ta...

▶ Play video
sick burrow
#

blackbox all the results

#

and all the proofs

#

don't do any exercises

#

(in case it is unclear, this is bad advice)

modest rune
#

good reason = need it for a research paper but only have to cite it and get the gist

cyan goblet
#

does good reason also include cramming last minute for a test

modest rune
#

no

cyan goblet
#

shit

serene rover
#

Lmao

sick burrow
#

stressed because need to work on applications, hard to work on applications because stressed devastation

dense belfry
vast surge
#

What does speedrunning a textbook look like try to do all the exercises as quickly as possible?

charred mortar
#

Yeah it’s weird

vast surge
#

Actually that sounds fun I wonder if speedrun.com has a category for Dummit & Foote

charred mortar
#

I guess if all you care about is the exam then just focus on what’s relevant

wooden flax
#

idk

charred mortar
#

Like if you’ve done all the material before it becomes a question of how fast you can write stuff down

wooden flax
#

acc yeah youre right it could be a pretty shit idea

vast surge
# wooden flax like perhaps skip certain sections

Wait does anyone actually read textbooks cover-to-cover? I've almost only ever read sections relevant to classes and personal interests, or sometimes the first third-to-half of a book if it's for a course.

brave hollow
#

what time do you think you can get rn zorn for any% DnF?

sick burrow
#

I have a 0 second speedrun of the entirety of IUTT

#

I just skipped all of it

wooden flax
#

i thought that was the only way to read a textbook

#

maybe thats why it takes me so much time

#

i read like every word

charred mortar
#

I have read a few from cover to maybe 90%

vast surge
#

Dude textbooks will often put in "here's what chapters you can use to structure a course and what you can skip"

wooden flax
#

i always ignore that lmao

charred mortar
#

It’s mostly just for texts that are of general interest

wooden flax
#

im such a dumbass lmao

#

all this lost time bleakkekw

charred mortar
#

I mean the extra info may be useful

wooden flax
#

yeah of course

vast surge
wooden flax
#

but its like when i read some parts which were pretty boring and were so irrelavent that ive forgotten about

vast surge
wooden flax
#

dnf = df?

brave hollow
#

what if you sleep?

#

how much for 100% sleep variation

dense belfry
#

This is really silly and counterproductive

vast surge
#

It's an objectively terrible idea. That's why I'm entertaining it instead of doing my invariant theory homework

dense belfry
#

Ah makes sense

brave hollow
#

counterproductive is my second name

dense belfry
#

I took you seriously lol

vast surge
#

Yeah I've been crunching for like 5 hours at this point and I still have a bit that I want to do tonight I'm just goofing off because goddamn I need a break

wooden flax
#

consider being a druggie

#

go full erdos mode

charred mortar
#

Solid advice

#

If it worked for Erdos it’ll work for everyone

vast surge
#

I have seriously considered it. The only reason I haven't is that the coke where I live is often cut with fentonyl and I know some guys who ODed and died from that shit.

charred mortar
#

Remember to also use variables to refer to people

dense belfry
#

Do you have ADHD?

wooden flax
vast surge
# dense belfry Do you have ADHD?

Maybe. I was diagnosed with autism when I was young and I've heard it's often comorbid, and you're not the first one to suggest I might have adhd.

wooden flax
#

definitely dont go to drugs

#

like 100%

vast surge
charred mortar
#

Yeah unless prescribed by a medical professional

dense belfry
#

Lol I'm fairly sure I have autism, I've been putting off getting diagnosed

vast surge
dense belfry
#

I scored well within the range on the raads-r recently

#

I was also diagnosed with ADHD like last week lol

charred mortar
#

I think I have some form of anxiety issues

vast surge
#

Actually wait maybe he's alive and was just hospitalized and expelled for misconduct, I actually didn't care enough to check in on him

dense belfry
#

Also I was diagnosed with general anxiety, social anxiety, and major depressionbsully3

vast surge
#

Anyway don't do drugs and if you do make sure you only buy drugs from a reputable drug dealer and for the love of god test your stuff before you do it to make sure it doesn't kill you

dense belfry
vast surge
#

Anyway back into the invariant trenches I go, which actually requires a fair bit of representation theory actually wait maybe I should try to learn representation theory at some point that sounds fun

wooden flax
#

the sad thing about math is like "wow a looks super cool" then a has prerequisite b which has prereq c which has prereq d which is something horribly boring

dense belfry
#

At some point you have to actually do something

static loom
#

what you mean I can't just learn all math from numberphile and 3b1b!!!

dense belfry
vast surge
jovial ember
#

:)

dense belfry
#

I study paths through trees

#

It is very fun

vast surge
static loom
#

applications in getting lost in the forest and then further getting lost within a tree in the forest

dense belfry
#

I want to wander in the cantor forest

#

Sounds like fun

dense belfry
#

As bookkeeping devices go trees are pretty based

wooden flax
#

i mean more like im learning analysis rn for complex analysis for something that i forgot

#

but analysis is not boring at all tbf

dense belfry
#

Also posets of finite partial functions on the naturals are good

wooden flax
#

combinatorics based

dense belfry
#

Lol

vast surge
static loom
#

I think naturally your taste of what you thought was boring can eventually become fun or interesting over time so I sorta go that route

dense belfry
#

The myth of progress

#

The point of analysis is definitely to study smooth manifolds

vast surge
#

Wait maybe I'm getting manifolds and riemann surfaces mixed up. I do that sometimes

brave hollow
#

I took the raads-r test

vast surge
dense belfry
#

Attitudes around self diagnosis are really weird

vast surge
#

On the one hand I fucking hate psychologists and psychiatrists almost as a rule and actively discourage people from seeking "mental health professionals" who only make things worse, on the other hand lots of people will use a self-diagnosis of Asperger's Syndrome as a justification for just being an asshole.

static loom
#

I don't need to justify being an asshole 😏

#

although I think I seldom am

dense belfry
#

I was talking to someone recently who claimed to have did, and I really wasn't sure whether to believe them or not, they were self diagnosed and also they changed the story they were telling me quite often

#

And it seemed like they were recycling some stuff that I said into their story

vast surge
#

Sometimes I pretend to have Munchausen Syndrome to get attention

dense belfry
#

At the end of the conversation they had an episode where they acted like they were being one of their alters, and it really freaked me out

sick burrow
#

Bannanachair why did you add me

vast surge
sick burrow
#

WAIT

brave hollow
#

idk how autism diagnosis helps but I am most probably autistic looking at this score 😕

sick burrow
#

oh wiat

#

nevermind

#

that pfp

dense belfry
#

I mean it helps with understanding yourself

sick burrow
#

I there's a person I keep running into in tf2 who has the same pfp

#

iirc

vast surge
#

I do not know what tf2 is but I should probably change my pfp then.

sick burrow
#

hm?

#

they might not have the same pfp

#

I might not be remembering correctly

dense belfry
#

I actually had munchausen as a kid lol

vast surge
#

Oh I guess it's some videogame from the 1990s according to google?

dense belfry
#

It was really bad

sick burrow
#

wait no

#

2007

vast surge
#

Wait I see what happened it's saying tf1 is from the 90s and tf2 is the sequel

#

Still old by videogame standards I thought

dense belfry
#

I faked being sick for a month and actually spent a week in a hospital at the end of it

static loom
#

I faked being sick so that I wouldn't have to go to school for several months in highschool

vast surge
#

I don't know how to respond to that. I'm debating internally between something weird and witty and something more heartfelt but can't pull off either correctly.

static loom
#

so I could stay home and play runescape

dense belfry
#

I hated school so much lol

static loom
#

yeah I considered it mostly a waste of time

dense belfry
#

Well in my case they forced us to learn hebrew studies for 5 hours a day

static loom
#

gag

vast surge
#

Until university school is at best glorified babysitting

dense belfry
#

And I was constantly verbally harassed and physically bullied

static loom
#

that's worse

dense belfry
#

I feel really weird going to doctors now, like I'm always afraid I'm making shit up or something

static loom
#

haha

dense belfry
#

Whenever I fill out a form about myself I'm always afraid I'm lying

static loom
#

I've had some really dumb doctors visits

#

I don't even want to think about it but, you know when you are paranoid about something but turns out to be nothing

#

I guess better to be safe than sorry

dense belfry
#

Yeah I've had that, I think that's fine though

static loom
#

there's worse but I don't want to mention it haha too embarassing

dense belfry
#

I'll put off doctor's visits so long

sick burrow
#

I have so many weird health concerns

static loom
#

I am currently long overdue to go to the doctor, eye doctor, and dentist

dense belfry
#

I'm overdue for eye doctor and dentist

static loom
#

just meaning I need to get better glasses

sick burrow
#

thankfully I am able to rationally recognize that I worry about health shit for no reason so I haven't gone to the doctor about them.

#

But I think I just hold a lot of tension in my body and then worry about it.

dense belfry
#

I don't worry about health shit at all for the most part

static loom
#

me either, that's what makes avoiding going so easy

dense belfry
#

Except for when I worried about something for like 2 years and avoided going and when I did it turned out to be nothing

sick burrow
dense belfry
#

I don't even ever take pain medication lol

sick burrow
#

was worried it was some strange palpitation thing

#

but it turned out to be nothing of concern

dense belfry
#

I've been smelling cat poop for like an hour

#

I just moved the cat trash can away lol

#

It was like a foot from me

static loom
#

when I was a kid

dense belfry
#

That's good

sick burrow
#

I'm honestly starting to seriously think the ultimate source of all this stress/tension/anxiety is dysphoria

static loom
#

they said it was just normal if you're tall and skinny

sick burrow
#

just manifesting in a weird way

#

when dysphoria but trender

dense belfry
#

Trender rhetoric is propoganda

#

That shit is scary btw

sick burrow
#

the trender rhetoric?

#

ya

#

I call myself a trender as a joke

dense belfry
#

I feel like I can never be definitively sure about anything and people acting in bad faith are going to exploit that all the time

sick burrow
#

because enby + no desire for hrt or surgeries

#

it's stupid though

#

the idea of trenders that is

dense belfry
#

It's not if you already have your beliefs and you need ideas to justify them

sick burrow
#

ok yeah stupid in an abstract philosophical sense

dense belfry
#

I hate my family so much lol

sick burrow
#

it's a very effective way of justifying transphobia in a way that's difficult to easily shut down

dense belfry
#

It's just unfalsifiable and sounds good

sick burrow
#

is it unfalsifiable?

sour pecan
#

now i can take a deep breath and exhale - that i have math buddies who help

sick burrow
#

I think with a few reasonable assumptions you could falsify it pretty easily

dense belfry
#

The same rhetoric has been used with slight variation for basically every LGBTQ group

sick burrow
#

and I think some people already sorta have?

#

what's annoying is when trans people unironically believe in the trender shit

#

like bru

#

h

dense belfry
#

Yeah that's because trans people are transphobic

#

Well a lot of them are

#

Sorry I'm saying that in a too general way

#

Should I go into detail about what I mean or do you understand

sick burrow
#

yeah I think I understand

#

internalized transphobia moment

dense belfry
#

Well in my case I just wouldn't let myself think about any trans concepts at all

#

And I made a lot of assumptions and didn't bother actually confirming any of them

sick burrow
#

I had such a basic understanding of trans stuff for so long

#

like I legit

#

5+ years ago

#

remember thinking

#

"damn it would be really cool if I could be neither a man nor a woman. Shame that's not possible though"

dense belfry
#

I thought the same thing when I was 15 but just for women

sick burrow
#

and like I vaguely knew enby was a thing, I just didn't know anything about it

dense belfry
#

Lol I read this book called treason when I was like 11 and it made me feel so good

#

In it a male main character has a birth defect where he grows a bunch of body parts and he passes as a woman for a while

#

It's actually by Orson Scott Card lol

sick burrow
#

oh right him bleak

#

isn't he like a homophobe

dense belfry
#

Yeah

sick burrow
#

or am I thinking of someone else

dense belfry
#

He's a Mormon

sick burrow
#

what is it with Mormons being really good but problematic fiction authors

#

like isn't Brandon Sanderson also a Mormon

dense belfry
#

Is he problematic?

#

Why is he problematic?

sick burrow
#

less so now

dense belfry
#

Why was he problematic

sick burrow
#

but Mistborn eras 1 and 2 has some questionably written female characters

dense belfry
#

I feel like that's not a good reason to view someone as problematic

sick burrow
#

like there's a character who's an 18 year old girl whose only purpose in the story seems to be seducing a 36 year old guy

#

which leads to absolutely no plot relevance later down the line

dense belfry
#

Which character?

#

In era 2

sick burrow
#

era 1

#

what's her face

#

can't even remember her name

#

but she seduces Breeze

dense belfry
#

Oh right her

sick burrow
#

and then there's also the thing where like

#

Vin is 16 and Elend is 21 when they meet

dense belfry
#

Didn't she actually like breeze though?

#

I haven't read that in a while

sick burrow
#

but it's weird because the age gap

#

which also keeps being brought up

#

maybe problematic is slightly to strong a word for Brando Sando

dense belfry
#

I mean it's weird but I don't think it's inherently problematic

#

Yeah I think it's too strong

sick burrow
#

just maybe a bit questionable

#

oh my god Marasi though

#

from era 2

#

like strictly speaking there's nothing wrong or problematic with the character

#

but also

#

the amount of times he wrote "Marasi blushed" is slightly obscene

dense belfry
#

Era 2 was pretty weird

#

Idk if I want to read that again

sick burrow
#

it was fun

dense belfry
#

Haven't looked at that in 4 years

#

Have you read things by Joe Abercrombie?

sick burrow
#

no

#

I've barely read any fiction tbh

dense belfry
#

Ah okay

sick burrow
#

really I just don't read anywhere near as much as I should

dense belfry
#

I am reading bell hooks the will to change rn

#

I'm insanely bad at reading nonfiction

#

Especially stuff where there's room for me to say "but I don't know if this is actually true"

#

The ambiguity kills me every time

sick burrow
#

the issue for me is the stuff I want to read is extremely dense

#

but I don't have that much of a capacity for dense reading

dense belfry
#

Ah okay

#

I'm basically incapable of accepting anything irl as truth

sick burrow
#

but I had a period over last Winter break where I got into reading fiction again

dense belfry
#

Well if it's scientifically backed I can

#

But if it's something that can't be shown conclusively I can't deal with it

#

It's just a mess

#

My dad took advantage of this when I confronted him about my childhood stuff

sick burrow
#

see this is why I like math and philosophy

dense belfry
#

But he literally was like "you can't disprove the existence of magic"

#

I'm not joking there

#

He actually said that

sick burrow
#

you don't need much evidence besides what is inherently contained within the statements.

dense belfry
#

Because he believes in magic and that he can do magic

sick burrow
#

wait fr?

#

bruh

dense belfry
#

Yeah that's a big reason that I like math too

sour pecan
dense belfry
#

So my dad used to do a thing where he would pull money out of a hat and act like he materialized it out of thin air

#

And that the act of doing so hurt him

#

So he was literally hurting himself physically to provide for our family

dense belfry
sour pecan
#

i kind of have a doubt

#

where can i post it

dense belfry
#

What do you mean a doubt?

#

If you have a question there are lots of help channels

sour pecan
#

okay thanks

#

i am new to discord too

#

so

dire sandal
#

hey stinkies hows it hangin

dense belfry
#

Anyway my mom actually believed him, and it seems like she still believes him

sour pecan
dire sandal
sick burrow
#

wait so Emma

#

did your dad honestly think

#

that his magician act

#

was him actually doing magic

dense belfry
#

Yeah so it seems so

sick burrow
#

but like

#

you can legit see the trick you're doing

dense belfry
#

But he actually raised us to believe that he could do magic

sick burrow
#

since you're, you know, doing it

dense belfry
#

Like this is a long term thing

#

He has consistently said he can do things, he and my mom have told us stories of him doing magical things, other people that they know who also believe in magic have said that he can do things

#

So it's very hard for me to definitively say that he can't

#

Even though he obviously can't

#

It's a really weird situation

#

This is one of the ways that he gets to act like he's incredibly special even though he's a total failure in every aspect of his life

#

My little brother fully believes that my dad can do magic, and actually it seems like he believes he can too now

#

It's very strange

sick burrow
#

crazy

#

I mean the thing is, it's impossible to definitively prove anything

dense belfry
#

But yeah with respect to the hat thing, I personally didn't see it but he apparently showed an empty hat to my mom and then pulled money out of it

#

Yeah that's the thing

sick burrow
#

but that doesn't ultimately really matter

sour pecan
#

sorry for interrupting huys

#

guys8

#

i need some help in joining the chem channel

dense belfry
#

But it does if you want to hold someone accountable and they won't accept that they did anything wrong

sour pecan
#

its saying error

#

any idea

sick burrow
#

right I'm saying that it doesn't ultimately matter that you can't definitively prove anything

dense belfry
#

I know

sick burrow
#

because for all intents and purposes you absolutely can

dense belfry
#

The thing is that I was raised on beliefs that are incredibly marginal

sick burrow
#

magic, at least of the form that would allow you to create money in an empty hat, pretty clearly doesn't exist

dense belfry
#

Like rejecting things because they are implausible is at total odds with my fundamentalist education

sick burrow
#

indoctrination moment

dense belfry
#

And also it removes any plausible deniability I can give to my family for their harmful beliefs

sour pecan
#

i pray god i get the power of you guys in socializing

dense belfry
#

So yeah, I'm kinda at an impasse where I have to accept a bunch of beliefs as plausible even though they obviously aren't, or I have to actually try to reject beliefs that I've been trained to think are plausible for a ton of years

#

And obviously the second one is the better option but it's really hard and it makes me feel like shit all the time

sick burrow
#

religion is weird

dense belfry
#

And there are real world consequences in how I can act around people in my family

#

Yeah I know

sick burrow
#

my prof said in class today that he talked to some leading Catholic theologian who basically said "yeah obviously Hell doesn't exist"

dense belfry
#

That's so funny

sick burrow
#

and that the concept of Hell was basically just a lie you tell ignorant people because they're not sophisticated enough to understand the truth

dense belfry
#

What is the truth?

#

That we don't know?

sick burrow
#

that the real punishment for not loving God is being forever denied his presence

#

not Hell

dense belfry
#

Oh lol

sick burrow
#

or at least according to this person

dense belfry
#

Sounds like this person really believes in what he's saying

sick burrow
#

I actually forget if this is what the person believed or if that is what they thought the correct interpretation of Catholic thought was

dense belfry
#

That is so fucking funny actually

sick burrow
#

also I think they were a she?

dense belfry
#

Oh okay

#

Yeah idk why I assumed

sick burrow
#

sotrue women don't exist sotrue

dense belfry
#

I did notice that I had assumed but didn't care enough to correct and just hoped I was right lol

#

Anyway yeah so my mental health is pretty bad rn

#

But hopefully eventually it will be better

sick burrow
#

relatable

#

I'm doing a lot better this semester but last semester was bleak

dense belfry
#

I proved a thing my advisor gave me as a mini project and it ended up being trivial modulo reading some papers

#

I do have a much better grasp on the topic now though, but I feel shitty because I feel like I didn't do anything

#

It turns out that I wasn't appreciating the difference between viewing things internally to a larger Computable thing vs externally enough

#

And my advisor gave me a bunch of problems that made me appreciate this, and that appreciation made me able to see what I needed to do for this mini problem

#

So that's good I guess

#

But I still feel like I haven't accomplished anything

sick burrow
#

I'm still freaking out about needing to read/write about these papers

dense belfry
#

Good luck

sick burrow
#

I've basically finished reading one

dense belfry
#

Oh that's good

#

What is this for?

sick burrow
#

modulo understanding a few details on some of the proofs

#

an REU

#

I made the short list so now they want to get a sense of how I approach mathematical reading

dense belfry
#

Lol I'd like to know how to approach mathematical reading

#

I just read things and once I get excited I know what to do

humble solar
#

My approach is very analogous to bashing my head against a brick wall repeatedly

#

not sure if that's optimal

dense belfry
#

Yeah that's how I feel too

#

But once I'm off it feels pretty good

vast surge
#

Every time I get assigned like 10 pages of homework a week in one class I realize I'm getting my revenge on the professors by turning it in at the last minute and forcing them to do 10 pages worth of grading each week

dense belfry
#

Lol they chose to do that

vast surge
#

Anyway it only took me another hour but I'm done with this homework for tonight which means I don't get a new problemset in this class until tomorrow

#

Which is today it's 1AM and I have class in the morning (not this one) bye

dense belfry
#

Bye

#

Should I do the thing I've been putting off for 4 days?

vast surge
#

Yes

dense belfry
#

Lol I don't want to though

vast surge
#

Rip off the bandaid, get it over with

sick burrow
#

oh also

dense belfry
#

I think I'll go to sleep and do it in the morning

sick burrow
#

I'm pretty sure the paper I'm reading is like a preprint or something

#

since the wording is kinda bleak at times

#

see my rant earlier today about it pulling two functions out of its ass for a proof without definition

dense belfry
#

I wonder if my advisor will let me see the paper he's working on about Hilbert's 10th problem for generic fields

#

I should ask him

#

He hasn't even posted a preprint yet

#

He proved that for generic subfields of \bar Q Hilbert's 10th problem for that field is equivalent to the field itself

#

But that assumes you have an embedding into \bar Q, which is basically the same thing as assuming you have a root algorithm or an algorithm to tell is a polynomial over the field is irreducible

#

If you don't then be showed there are generic fields with no algorithm to tell if the field is irreducible

#

Huh I guess you can probably show that Hilbert's 10th for those fields are low relative to the atomic diagram of the field

#

I guess that's cool

#

Probably he proved that sort of thing in his paper that he hasn't shown me

#

But that's just a trivial observation from knowing that there is a low embedding of your generic field into \bar Q

#

I guess that isn't really the result I expected for Hilbert's 10th for generic fields but that's still nice

#

Oh he literally says this in the slides I was looking at

#

Smh

#

I am incapable of reading things sometimes

frail sail
#

have u been literally chatting with urself?

compact tartan
#

you don't?

frail sail
#

no:)

#

i talk to beatles

#

rn they need help

#

now they dont

echo adder
#

Is there a way to trace an intersection point in desmos?

#

Currently I have the variables change in time and it's drawing out a nice curve but I want to see it move on it

#

@me

vast surge
frail sail
#

Ringo’s out

neat lintel
neat lintel
#

I'm an adult trying to learn math. I don't want to go the textbook/youtube route. I think I would learn much better if I had an actual teacher I could do lessons with. Is that a thing nowadays?

stray kite
#

what'd be the most cited papers in maths

devout nacelle
#

Private tutoring is also an option but you'll probably have to lay out a concrete goal beforehand then

neat lintel
#

like the youtube/textbook route in real life.

devout nacelle
#

I think instructors can often be really supportive and answer your questions after class hours. Plus learning with peers seems like an advantage for many people, it even helps in productive discussions.

rancid meadow
#

harthsorne or something

#

google says its this though

#

if u follow a reasonable definition of math paper

atomic hornet
#

C. E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, has 72774 citations

#

not a paper but still thats a lot of citations

atomic hornet
rancid meadow
#

shut up harvard boy

#

no respect for the ivy league round here

jovial ember
#

Says mr jane street

rancid meadow
#

you know this ivy league loser could get jane street in his sleep

neat lintel
#

Hi friend jesse. How do I get jane street. I like money

rancid meadow
#

study hard

#

learn basic probability

#

etc.

neat lintel
#

🤑

rancid meadow
#

🤑

#

chm is kidding i dont work at jane steret

#

i have a less prestigious internship

neat lintel
#

Wall street?

rancid meadow
#

No, software

jovial ember
#

Wait

#

I legit thought you were interning at Jane steeet or something isomorphic this summer

rancid meadow
#

fwiw I don't think it's actually that difficult to get a job at a lower ranked HFT place if you are good at maf

#

citadel/jane street/2sigma are omega hard cuz of the name

#

but like HRT/SIG hire from "lower" ranked schools pretty often

#

like i get their OA's everytime I apply

#

No Chm I'm at a sofware company kekw

jovial ember
#

Wtf

#

Jessellout not as hard

rancid meadow
#

@atomic hornet im sorry for being mean

#

thank u for the... information

#

get it. cause Shannon

odd narwhal
#

No, I don't get it

#

You should explain it to me

#

In excruciating detail

rancid meadow
#

Maybe you should learn some history ..

#

that was rude shin

#

I'm sorry

#

It's because Claude Shannon was a founder of the field of Information theory

#

I was making a pun

#

:)

neat lintel
#

Very funny

odd narwhal
#

And the homalg book

#

Which i'm currently reading

neat lintel
odd narwhal
#

I'm gonna be doing algebra research next sem with a homological algebraist

#

And I find the theory cool

#

It was the nost enjoyable part of AT for me

#

Granted I haven't gone far

deft turret
#

is trategy not a word why not

#

it sounds like to describe something trategic, like a bad thing

tall badge
#

see 'tragedy'

deft turret
#

oh lol

#

thanks

fair mural
#

it’s a tragedy that you forgot that word

sick burrow
ancient flame
#

does it make any sense at all to write:
$$\lim_{n \to \infty} \bZ_n = \bZ$$

fathom swallowBOT
#

gmod [gmod gang]

fair mural
#

that wouldn’t even be true?

#

wouldn’t it just be the positive integers

ancient flame
#

oh true

fair mural
#

maybe with 0 included

#

idk

calm rampart
#

anyone got any tips on how to get a grade 9 in gcse's, im currently working at a 7/8

ancient flame
#

ok so then N

fair mural
#

oh yeah

#

with 0

ancient flame
#

0 would be included

#

ye

deep mango
sleek wing
deep mango
#

No

fair mural
#

oh uh

#

i forgot to say that that’s cringe

sleek wing
#

a completely ill defined completion

deep mango
#

There are a few notions of limits of groups

ancient flame
deep mango
#

But

ancient flame
deep mango
#

Idk if any of them make sense here

ancient flame
#

unfortunate

#

how could I describe the relationship then

#

is there a way?

calm rampart
#

ignoredangerysad

sleek wing
#

what relationship

deep mango
#

Look into how the p adics are a limit though

#

I guess

ancient flame
#

idk what that is lol

sleek wing
#

just a little though

sleek wing
fair mural
#

shed a tear

ancient flame
#

lmao

lavish sorrel
fair mural
lavish sorrel
#

oh right

twin sparrow
frozen merlin
fathom swallowBOT
#

∧res

frozen merlin
#

so probably? idk

fair mural
#

is there easy simple way to say what \cong means

frozen merlin
#

"it's the same thing, you're just relabelling the elements"

#

like, elements of Z/{0} are really cosets that look like n + {0}

#

but you can identify them with n

frozen merlin
fair mural
#

that word again

frozen merlin
#

you'll see isomorphism defined in a technical way, like 'a bijective homomorphism', but it's probably one of the most natural ideas in maths

#

so e.g. there's an isomorphism between {the integers with addition, written using arabic numerals} and {the integers with addition, written using roman numerals}

#

or for a more useful example, an isomorphism between the groups Z and Z defined by sending every number to its negative

#

because if you take the number line and flip it around, addition still looks the same

tiny marten
#

yeah

#

isomorphism is so natural that it's like the one thing everyone knows exactly what it means

#

you start to get a feel for stuff instead of just identifying by name

#

this naturalness is basically reflected in stuff like category theory which is pretty interesting

#

isomorphisms, unless defined in an unusual way, are fundamental to how objects of theories sit together on the level of categories

#

like, "actual" isomorphisms and not just things someone misleadingly named that

#

so in the category of topologies the isomorphisms are homeomorphisms, because otherwise it isnt what we want to mean by isomorphism really

#

which is that it carries some qualities of the objects of topology

#

in the category of sets we need them to only be a bijection

#

though there may be like, category of ordered sets idk

#

you first learn about it really in abstract algebra but its a general sort of term

#

in abstract algebra it just needs to be bijective and preserve some operations, tho we have theorems that make it nicer to prove

vague lion
#

isomorphism is like. 'these things act the same way'

tiny marten
#

yeah

#

"in this situation they are the same"

#

identity is like being isomorphic in every way, it's the strongest form of equivalence

#

well in regular math

#

zfc stuff you do by hand

frozen merlin
#

there's models where equality isn't the strongest equivalence?

#

maybe models isn't the right word technically but

tiny marten
#

well maybe not that but that equality isnt always given as readily

#

and may have to be shown in weird ways, idk it's all this automated proving stuff

#

we kinda think of it as basic and acting nice i suppose

#

when it's not so clear when you loosen some notions up or dont take some things as given

#

sort of like negation elimination in intuitionistic logic

#

not being in it, that is

#

i am sure there is also mathematics where equality is very weird

#

beyond any tricky automated proof program

#

you probably dont even have to get into any meme math either

ancient flame
#

that's

#

not how that works

summer widget
#

Hehehe

ancient flame
#

lol

summer widget
#

Is there a guide for commands?

ancient flame
#

that might help

summer widget
#

Thank you

#

It's a lot of information lol

tiny marten
#

what's not how what works

long matrix
#

some deleted latex

#

probably

tiny marten
#

oh

#

idk what the latex commands even are

#

besides for typing stuff

long matrix
#

but isomorphisms dont work too

tiny marten
#

tbh i wish i knew more about the logic than "idk some things arent as nice sometimes"

long matrix
#

what you said is interesting

#

I want to look into automated proofs

#

in the future

tiny marten
#

it's more an issue of proof methods than the actual equality i guess

#

but you can almost certainly even change that, probably to awful effects lol

#

i believe the issue is that equality isnt always reflexive, and you may need two different "paths" to get to each direction of an equality

#

reflexive in terms of how its proof is validated

long matrix
#

That sounds strange

tiny marten
#

something like that can sound strange, and i am explaining it poorly i am sure, but we do get two very different proofs for two directions of a relation others times too

long matrix
#

We aren't talking normal number equality

#

are we

tiny marten
#

well so, i should be more careful

#

it probably isnt an issue with equality itself but proving the equaliy

#

equality

long matrix
#

If we're talking normal numbers

#

or even sets/other stuff

#

The equality certainly is bidirectional

#

Your proof writes
a=b
=c
=d
=e

tiny marten
#

it will end up being true, but is not given for free

#

so you need two different ways to validate something we tend to take for free in the usual math

long matrix
#

Uh

#

What are a and b here

#

The other is given for free?

#

🤔

tiny marten
#

they could be variables of a formal language

#

which maybe is getting kinda abstract

long matrix
#

Ok ok, I see.

tiny marten
#

but it's an issue about what things we can take for free, so here is a historical example

#

in usual problem solving logic and first order logic we take that if a statement like "A is false" and find that the statement is false, then A is true

#

so it has to be either false or true

#

so "A is false" is false, means A is true

#

in intuitionistic logic you cant assume this

humble solar
#

???

long matrix
#

I see - the concepts are getting deeper than what I know

tiny marten
#

i am shittily explaining issues of logic, and i believe flubbed that part

#

i was trying to explain paths as in hott without actually talking about homotopy

#

as an idea of where rules of inference arent as generally nice

humble solar
#

Identity in hott is still an equivalence relation

tiny marten
#

yeah i meant that it is true, but that you may need to show it in a different way than "reverse the steps"

#

it is possible that i am the one confused on the issue

humble solar
#

You go backwards along the path

tiny marten
#

is it that paths are not unique?

humble solar
#

That much is true (in general)

tiny marten
#

yeah but isnt there a specific issue of hott that has to do with the non-interchangeability of paths?

#

so in classical math we generally take readily that once equality is shown once there is no more issues

humble solar
#

That's because classical math isn't proof relevant

#

In classical mathematics, your system "forgets" the proof used to prove whatever theorem you care about. In hott, proofs are kept around and themselves are considered mathematical objects.

#

This isn't really my field though so I someone like clerk or mniip could explain better

tiny marten
#

i see, i misunderstood

#

i think it makes more sense now

humble solar
#

It's also because you keep your proofs around that hott's identity isn't actually a weakening of equality (where it would be in a more traditional framework).

tiny marten
#

i see i see

#

i must have misinterpreted it as some kind of other thing

sick burrow
#

I finally saw my username actually being used

fair mural
#

euler macaroni constant

#

sotrue

sick burrow
#

oily macaroni constant

tiny marten
#

that shows up in a bunch of whacky classical stuff

#

like when doing complex analysis to prove the various properties of the riemann zeta function

#

well, to expand out certain things

#

iirc

#

it's a pretty nice constant that seems to show up near complex analysis infinite products

empty stratus
tiny marten
#

it is very beautiful and good stuff to read as you get thinking about more advanced stuff

empty stratus
#

Really, though, it offends me that we haven't proven its irrationality yet.

tiny marten
#

but some of it is also magic, kind of amazing when you are like an undergrad

empty stratus
#

Someone needs to go tell the algebraic/arithmetic geometers "You don't get to play around with the Langlands program until you've helped the rest of us prove macaroni's irrationality".

#

"Eat your vegetables"

tiny marten
#

lol

#

convert all mathematical resources to macaroni constant

#

it will be like the covid medical science programs in scale but for math and this one thing

#

when i first read about the riemann zeta function for reals it was a classical complex analysis book

#

the latest edition was like 1920

#

but i think the earliest was 1800s

empty stratus
#

Awesome.

tiny marten
#

and i think that was a good thing to read because you dont get this impression with a class book

empty stratus
#

Whittaker and Watson, perchance?

tiny marten
#

well you might with the right one

#

yes

empty stratus
#

A classic.

tiny marten
#

that was it

#

it's a little tough to work through at times but it also presents material in this different way

velvet dagger
#

Wait did someone say Langlands

tiny marten
#

it's interesting because some content is presented as a named result like the keyhole domain (i cant remember whose name is associated with it in the book)

#

now it's generally just "keyhole domain" or something similarly bland

empty stratus
#

Algebra folks shouldn't be allowed to do anything with Langlands until they've helped the rest of us prove macaroni irrationality.

jovial ember
#

Why should I care about Euler’s macaroni monkey I just want to play with schemes

empty stratus
#

This is why we can't have nice things.

tiny marten
#

sorry, we need to tie this loose end of math

jovial ember
#

I can have nice things by not concerning myself with hard problems I don’t have the toolset to solve

#

I just deal with the stuff I like and have a nice time

empty stratus
#

Whenever I see something I don't have the toolset to understand, I get FOMO.

velvet dagger
#

Lol I'm approaching Langlands more from the analysis pov

empty stratus
#

This is a thing?

velvet dagger
#

Kinda

#

Like I've been doing analysis of automorphic forms

#

What's your shtick mathematically?

empty stratus
#

I'm an oddball.

#

I do analysis, but not PDEs/Probability.

#

I like generating functions, complex analysis, integral transforms, harmonic analysis, and, lately, non-archimedean / p-adic analysis.

#

I've been obsessed with Collatz for the past five years.

empty stratus
#

And I suck at algebra.

velvet dagger
#

Interesting

#

Dissertation on Collatz? Or more generally on the analysis you've been doing?

#

(I ask because the order messages suggests Collatz but I've been under the impression that it's the kinda thing most people don't attempt until they already have a career going)

burnt kettle
#

Come join voice chat if u want to help me make logic puzzle problems, not necessarily about math!

velvet dagger
#

@burnt kettle don't spam

burnt kettle
#

😦

#

you said there was multiple

#

so I posted here

velvet dagger
#

You already posted though

#

So don't repost

burnt kettle
#

I guess so

ripe wasp
#

is this a valid proof of the definite integral of cosx

#

i feel really happy rn i think i finally get how this works

#

first time actually (maybe even successfully) proving a definite integral rigorously after being stuck on this for like a week

compact tartan
#

this seems needlessly complicated

ripe wasp
#

for now

compact tartan
ionic shadow
#

Im year 8

#

But in advanced class

compact tartan
# compact tartan ?

I think the inequality you want to write here is for step functions not these series

#

seeing as the series aren't functions of x

ripe wasp
#

uhh im not too sure but i was building it off a definition my textbook introduced and proved

ripe wasp
#

what i tried to do is use this definition

#

and this already proved inequality

#

oh yeah i should have mentioned

#

i forgot to mention "let P be a partition of [0,a] such that it is divided into n equal subintervals"

toxic schooner
#

this feels too complex for intro calculus

ripe wasp
#

yeah, oh well i feel like im learning like real math

toxic schooner
#

i would have gone monkey if i had to do it all this way from the start

ripe wasp
#

might prepare me better for like harder subjects like LA

toxic schooner
wet glade
#

Sean, what year are you in?

ripe wasp
#

i mean i had like 1 run through of calc from limits ot derivatives from stewart

ripe wasp
wet glade
#

What is that

ripe wasp
#

9th grade

wet glade
#

Pardon

#

You're in 9th grade learning that!?

ripe wasp
#

idk man i have no life and i like math LMAO

toxic schooner
wet glade
#

Im speechless

toxic schooner
#

i was struggling with geometry proofs in 9th grade opencry

wet glade
#

That complex sheet with no numbers

ripe wasp
#

its just calculus but done kinda in a kind of intro to analysis way

wet glade
#

What country are you from

ripe wasp
#

im in korea

wet glade
#

That explains it all

toxic schooner
ripe wasp
#

but i lived a long time in australia

toxic schooner
#

how so?

wet glade
ripe wasp
#

nah im not really like those tryhard korean kids ik the types of ppl ur talking about

wet glade
#

Asian people

ripe wasp
#

i dont have like academies from the second school ends til 2 am

#

i mostly only self study except a physics tutor i go once a week

wet glade
#

Oo tutor

#

Where do you learn calculus from?

#

YouTube?

toxic schooner
#

im also asian

ripe wasp
#

nah i like textbooks

wet glade
#

So um :]... Can I have the download link :3

ripe wasp
#

i always get distracted when watching yt videos or i just like zone out sometimes

wet glade
#

I want to learn calc too at my own paste

ripe wasp
#

sure, dm

#

though the textbook im using might not be that good for a beginner

#

its not the usual intro to calc

toxic schooner
#

definitely not usual from what it seems like stare

turbid epoch
#

bruh 9th grader doing real analysis here

toxic schooner
turbid epoch
#

maybe I shouldn't have come back /s

toxic schooner
#

/s?

turbid epoch
#

that indicates im joking

#

tone indicator, I think it's called.

toxic schooner
#

i see

maiden bear
#

people who unironically use sound indicators exist?

ancient flame
#

they're done indicators

#

and yes

turbid epoch
waxen lily
#

before i knew about that i thought they meant per second LOL

limber thunder
toxic schooner
#

same lmao

charred mortar
#

I just kinda assume everyone is sarcastic

dense glen
#

Hey sully

leaden skiff
deep mango
#

handjob??

sick burrow
#

oh eryc

deep mango
#

Hello

sick burrow
#

half jerk

deep mango
#

lmao

#

wait

#

what does that mean hmmCat

sick burrow
#

like when you're half joking

deep mango
#

yes

#

but half jerk?!

sick burrow
#

I guess it could also mean half joking

#

but I know it as half jerk

sleek wing
#

it's from reddit terminology ryc

sick burrow
#

since I see it in circlejerk subs

sleek wing
#

which makes it an affront to god

deep mango
#

what's wrong with reddit terminology?

maiden bear
rotund steppe
#

Reddit sotrue

sick burrow
#

circejerk subs are the only good part of reddit

calm rampart
#

reddit > discord👀

stray kite
#

is there mathcirclejerk

calm rampart
#

yes

dawn bridge
rare harbor
#

What is more important and fundamental: undecidability of the halting problem or Godel's incompleteness theorem?

sick burrow
#

These are the same picture

tiny marten
#

yeah they are both seminal works that are fundamentally similar results

#

you need to adapt either very slightly to be equivalent i think

#

halting problem has probably been cited more

velvet dagger
#

I'm under the impression that incompleteness is noticeably harder than halting problem tbh

tiny marten
#

it took me a lot longer to learn the incompleteness theorems

deep mango
#

i think that even though the ideas are similar, it's a bit harder to make the incompleteness theorem work properly

#

in terms of the proofs

sick burrow
#

Is the proof of incomplentess even hard

tiny marten
#

i wont deny that

velvet dagger
#

My impression is that it's on the longer end

sick burrow
#

Or is it just that you need a lot of logic to formalize it

tiny marten
#

yes it is much harder than halting problem

velvet dagger
#

The idea seems to basically be that if you have a system that can code arithmetic

deep mango
#

you need to do a lot of work

sick burrow
#

Like I remember seeing a proof in set theory last year

velvet dagger
#

Then you can assign these things called "Godel numbers" to statements

tiny marten
#

you could do a whole course on the incompleteness theorems pretty easily

#

and a large part would be studying the constructions

sick burrow
#

And it was basically just "this theorem can't be proven"

#

Oh wow you can't prove that true or false

#

But then you need a lot of background to formalize that

velvet dagger
#

Yeah, the point being that you need the system to be able to express that statement

#

And I think that's where the Godel number idea kicks in

sick burrow
#

Godel numbering is not that complex of an idea though right

tiny marten
#

i thought the hardest part was after that

#

when you start pumping the recursive functions

#

i had a hard time with it at the time (like 3 years ago)

#

and the prof had to help me

sick burrow
#

It's just there are countably many formulas and countably many positive integers

#

So you can find a bijection

tiny marten
#

you have to carefully define some recursive functions

#

to finish the proof

velvet dagger
#

Worst Geometer: you don't wanna just define any bijection I feel

#

I feel like the content would then be nothing more than countability

#

You prob wanna find some mapping you can actually do things with

sick burrow
#

Do you

velvet dagger
#

You're first off using the fact that your system contains Peano

#

And you want a way to prove that your "This theorem can't be proven" statement is actually expressible by the system

#

Anyway I know literally 0 logic and this is mostly hearsay so I'm not gonna talk out of my ass much here

sick burrow
#

I mean you can say "this theorem" with godel numbering

velvet dagger
#

Do it

#

Right now

sick burrow
velvet dagger
#

Exactly

tiny marten
#

the way you do this is pretty clever

#

and it makes the halting problem seem straightforward

sick burrow
#

You can find an explicit bijection between formulas and natural numbers

#

If you want to do this the dumb way write out a formula in your favorite text editor and take the file's binary

#

I don't give a shit what the function is

#

Just that it exists and can be computed

#

And then you can define a formula that checks if a proof is valid or not

#

Since every line of a proof is either an axiom (and you can tell if something is an axiom since your axioms are recursively enumerable) or follows from previous lines

tiny marten
#

idk maybe ultraproduct or obyaeg knows best

#

i just remember it being non-trivial at the time, i am sure it isnt so bad now

velvet dagger
#

Sure, the key point is that you have some finite list of things and string them together to create symbols. All I'm saying is that the devil's gonna be in the details here

sick burrow
#

Is it?

velvet dagger
sick burrow
#

Why do I give a shit about the details

velvet dagger
tiny marten
#

lol

velvet dagger
#

Don't try to get sassy lmfao

sick burrow
#

Writing down an explicit first order formula that returns true if a proof (written as an ordered list of Godel numbers) is valid seems like a nightmare