#serious-discussion
1 messages Ā· Page 498 of 1
i see
its pre uni
yeah i guess it matters then they see if you meet the standards of the school
every school wants good statistics
like our kids got x grades we sent them off to y universities
so they take in students that they think will do well
and part of the information they have is whatever entrance exams they set
my country dont do entrance exams, we have an entirely different system for applying to university
that's why Im confused about this
a levels arent university tho
they are the 2 years before university typically
but that is uk system
they do 2 years a level + 3 year university
a lot other places do non a level + 4 years university
where u need to take more courses than if you were doing a level
a level lets u learn more stuff because u take less courses
yes
those come before a levels
universities will look at ur igcse also but much more emphasis is placed on ur a levels.
so are entrance exams more like to determine an applicant's worth to study?
yes they test ur ability
a lot of the time for a 6th form it is because gcse takes 2 years
so they make u do an entrance exam so they have info on you before your gcse results come out
because after gcse result comes out they dont have time to make ad ecision
term already almost started by the time results are out
or sometimes gcse is too easy
so they need harder exams
that is another purpose of entrance exam
when every student is racking up all these A*s they need to tell the difference between them
for the more elite schools
which case is the more common one?
depends on ur school
if it is an elite school they probably use it more for the latter
just look at the schools webpage if they announce gcse results
if you see most of the students get a lot of A*s then they probably have hard entrance exams
so the likely path for my friend here is that
he has to take entrance exam, study pre-u for 2 years if he passes
Pearson A-levels
before he continues to study in university for 3 years?
3/4 years for a bachelors, depending on the institution
š
how long do i have to study to be a mathematician
forever
i mean in university
need a bachelors, then a masters, and then a PhD if you want to work at a uni
*a phd is necessary but not sufficient
i want to work at the mathematical institute of america
Firstly good luck, youāll probably need years of postdoc research after doing a PhD
ok
And considering you said America that means 4 years of BSc, 2 years for masters, 4 for PhD
a lot of 5-year grad courses only require a bsc
so actually probably more like 5 years for masters+phd, rather than 6
2 master 3 phd is a thing
but i think should expect 4 years
not everyone can get it done in 3
ok
by the time u done with math tho
its also probably best to take one step at a time
u might be so sick of it
and realise that if u go into like economics or computer science its easier
and also more money
why does this happen to so many people when they start math degrees lol
I think it's probably because it's hard to get an overview of what you'll be doing in your degree
because you learn concepts rather than facts
not to say maths isn't facts, but my point is someone studying history pretty much knows all the concepts they'll ever need for it, and the work of their degree is applying those concepts to interpret the past
so they can probably predict with greater accuracy whether they'll enjoy it (assuming they've done some history before)
is this even true idk, I'm just talking
I find doing applied maths without the applications a bit weird
any math that doesn't involve modelling is a good day for me
based
I like math because theory of computation is not computational and model theory doesn't involve modeling
thanks
why the server icon is a torus?
is this any related to a mathematical formula or smth
It doesn't 
Not even homeomorphic 
Or wait I misread what you said 
Donut equals coffis cup but isn't a torus
Donut is D^1 x S^1, torus is S^1 x S^1
funniest copypasta ever
i have discovered a fundamental difference between a coffee cup and a donut tho
Donuts appear to taste better
Is this a topological property though
One day when I try to make donuts
I should try to make one shaped like a coffee cup
and then drink coffee out of it
like a breadbowl
They should serve that at topology talks
do adjacency matrixes double the entrance value for loops? does it happen in directed and non directed graphs?
I cant understand adjacency matrixes potencies...any good video tutorial??
what is the translation for adjacency matrixes potencies?
Can you explain how?
/where
I have not done any topology
fundamental group of product is product of fundamental groups šÆ
wait is that true
so there's a hole through the middle, as well as a hole inside
o okey
the bad thing is gluing and free products
i actually don't remember how to prove that pi_1 preserves products
i think it's easy?
idk
you just like
slide one of the paths along the other
or something
we just need a hom which is surjective and trivial kernel
i saw it like literally two days ago i should remember this 
ok, so you send pi_1(X, x) x pi_1(Y, y) into pi_1(X x Y, (x, y)) by sending the paths f and g to the path t mapsto (f(t), g(t)) right?
you need to check it's well defined, a hom, injective, and surjective
for well defined, if i pick homotopic paths f_0 and f_1, and homotopic paths g_0 and g_1, with homotopies f_t and g_t, then (f_0, g_0) ~ (f_1, g_1) by (f_t, g_t).
so the map is well defined on homotopy classes.
it's not hard to see that it's a homomorphism, concatenating paths on both coordinates works fine.
every path can be written in coordinates like this, just project onto X and Y coordinates.
and every path which is homotopic to the constant path definitely has each component homotopic to a constant, again by projecting.
so this is an almost immediate fact.
ye
hey, does anyone have a site recommendation with integral practice problems and solutions ?
not the wikiversity one pls am not there yet
KhanAcademy, Paul's online math notes
khan academy has practice problems and solutions ?
Yes
you could try wolfram alphas problem generator
alright that's sweet
actually that's a good idea lol
thanks guys !
What is your profile pcicture lol
its a darkened iron ingot with a b&w wrench from the mod applied energistics 2
Interesting
Do you prefer ae2 or rs?
i havent used rs yet but it seems like the successor to ae2 if ae2 hasnt been updated yet
idk
lol
Both are updated now
AE2 now has options not to have channels, and RS just doesn't have channels at all
ohh okey
i like having channels
but is RS able to do the same stuff without channels
Khan Academy was super useful when I was practicing my calc a while back
Im also not too sure about the effects of nutation, or how to determine them, there are a lot of unknowns here
The AIM 9 has a burn time of like
2.2 secs or something
after that it's just moving on momentum and I imagine that both gravitational arc and just general in flight stability can push it out of deadzones and stuff
And mine has a damaged mirror so its hard to even just ācheckā because off balance and messed up signal
ahh
One thing is the missile itself isnāt directly tied to the gimbal, missile can do whatever it wants and only effect it has is acceleration physically changing the angle to the target
it's also not using bang bang guidance as well, right?
something like a Paveway LGB basically only ever fully deflects control surfaces in a specific direction
so it always has hysteresis around the target
have you done classical/analytical mechanics
Yeah, here its a bit more complicated, pulling up a doc rn
I know how to take a lagrangian etc but i havenāt spent tooo much time trying to do any of that fir this system yet
I'm interested in where you found the graphs of the control stuff as well
dynamics of a solid 3d body are typically a chapter in a CM class
if there's a full document or anything I might be able to help a bit more
well yeah mniip but
expressing torque-free and torque-induced precession, nutation and all that
the classical mechanics doesn't really manage to do this
not accounting for the aerodynamics is like
by far a bigger issue than the other stuff
it is but it's a force dependent on other things
dependent on orientation
aerodynamic stability is a question here
because like
F-16 is aerodynamically unstable
and uses it's controls to manage that
for a net increase in maneuverability
The gain function?
One sec, theres a good doc on the hardware but it doesnāt explain the spin scan part
uhh yeah
the spin scan is using the phase of the signal combined with the aperture cut into the disc to determine angle, correct?
I'm dimly familiar
Yeah
but it's been a while
https://archive.org/details/OP23092ndSidewinderGuidedMissleMark2/page/n14/mode/2up
This is the definitive doc on the 9b
originally was looking into this kind of stuff to mod flight sim but stuff like the 9b is usually included or just out of scope
The gyro is decoupled from the aerodynamics, the acceleration will still change the angle over time but the effect is reasonably small
yeah
well the stability iirc is like
if it starts rotation in one direction it can tend to increase rotation in that direction
The gyro doesnāt like to change its axis of rotation without a torque to constantly change it
ahh
And the gain function i calculated using python, then verified later- theres a figure in one of the patents thst agrees with what i found
ohh huh
In aviation, relaxed or negative stability is the tendency of an aircraft to change its pitch and bank angles spontaneously. An aircraft with relaxed stability cannot be trimmed to maintain a certain attitude, and will, when disturbed in pitch or roll, continue to pitch or roll in the direction of the disturbance at an ever-increasing rate.This ...
And this is the actual signal strength seeping the target across the fov
this is what I'm thinking of for the instability thing
oh weird
that does have a lot of deadzones
And those all go briefly to zero
The kinda envelope of that is the right shape exactly, but le deadzones go brr
And the missile is pretty stable, uses a torque balance system to turn
Nope
So the reticle itself is what causes them- it isnāt explained at all i discovered it playing with the code
The example reticle they usually show isnāt what they actually used, the real one is like this
before prop navigation right
Its based on prop nav, but before they really had a full picture of it
ahh
I mean like
the deadzones here are like
used for the angle chang measurements?
b/c I know generally it's supposed to keep the angle to target constant rather than centered
also my apologies the PDF isn't rendering correctly on my phone
So the seeker moves towards the target proportional to signal strength, its always trying to center on the target- but the target is moving, so it will drift in the fov untill the error signal balances with it and it rests in some position, and that equilibrium signal is a measure of the angular rate of change
Once the missile is on an intercept, the angle between missile floght path and target flight path is constant, and so itās trying to minimize the change in that angle, turning and generating lead until the target isnāt moving anymore and theyre on an intercept cource
Course
Sorta kinda yeah
oh wait I might be mixing up my terms
Prop nav is just a way of minimizing the change in the angle between the missile flight path and target
But that process is mostly separa from the seeker which itself is just measuring the change in the angle to feed commands to the missile servo
the "proportional" to signal strength is proportional to this graph then?
Yes, once its past max itās basically lost the target, the tail is just to lock on to a wider area more or less
hmm
And the dead zones done really hurt the proportional measurement, itll just hop one deadzone into the next proportional region and find itās measurement- i just donāt know how well it can get back on center again or in the first place
I almost wonder if the deadzones would be intentional to avoid hysteresis of some kind but it seems like it's at the wrong part of the pipeline for that
I think theyd increase it because makes the system very sensitive around those points
then again perhaps taming the response in the electronics was more expensive and the reticle was simpler
oh weird
I'll have to load this pdf when I get home
One interesting thing is the reticle used by the russians is different from the 9b it doeshave the extra 50% region in the middle like the 9b
And the small rings are much much finer
the extra 50% being the portion closer to center, opposite the rings?
Yeah, 9b manually decreased signal pulses near center but russians didnāt
and the purpose of the rings is for rejection of constant errors
i.e, sun, correct?
Sun is too powerful and small, but things like clouds or the ocean in the background get averaged out while small source produces a nice signal
ahh
wait and then what's producing those deadzones
is that from the rings
no wait it's far too spaced out
When it transitions between major rings of color in the checkery side, the line between them has a point where the signal doesnāt change, so it stays 50% all the way around the rotation
ohh
so like, just on the edge and it's partially obscured
huh
are you simulating a point light source
No various sizes
ahh
wacky
can I get back to you after reading this doc
also feel free to ping
your main question is like how/why it still works, right?
Yeah exactly, and no worries i gotta get hw done lol
When doing a lab report should I include every source I used during my research within the references section (even if I don't actually reference their work or results)?
yes
Okay
Yo Max??
JaxM
He returns??
If you actually don't use anything there, then don't cite it is the standard i think
but if you are using ideas that were influenced by the papers, even without specific citation, it is normally worth mention
thanks
now it is sniper
yeah
nice
We should make a math server tf2 team
Tf2?
Why is GEB so polarizing?(No experience with the book myself was just reading other people's comments on GEB here)
never heard of it but sounds stupid
Is it possible to have an indeterminate form for a limit you cannot simplify?
What do you mean
Yeah but then you just use LāHopitalās
L'hopital is an act of simplification
And also can't be applied to all forms all the time? I think.
Pretty cool
The most powerful tool you have is Taylor approximation
L'HƓpital's rule is special case of this
I'm more asking for a specific example
where we cannot reduce the indeterminate form
for whatever reason
Depends of what you know
In highschool you can't reduce the indeterminate sin(x)/x when x-> 0
(in reality you can, by writing
sin(x)/x = (sin(x)-sin(0))/(x-0) and recognize that it converge to sin'(0) when x-> 0)
Or, I don't know,
ln(1+x)/sin(x) when x->0
(you can use the same trick)
Wait whattttt
that's from my code physically rotating the reticle image and measuring the strength, but I actually found a patent figure that lines up closely with it aswell
How is L'Hop's a consequence of Taylor's Thm?
Jumping in really quick there I very often see thing associated as a consequence of somthing else when really they both come from the same fundamental truthes- particularly when it comes to things involving pi or the frequency domain lol-
Though I can imagine there is an argument that reasonably demonstrates the higher order terms in the limit dominate when first order ones 'agree' and so the derivative brings those out in a sense and argues that a taylor decomposition is the true cause
What's the difference between 'special case' and 'consequence of'?
Ah yes, el hospital
i would also say neither, but they can look very similar
if you use taylor expansions for your limits of indeterminate forms, in certain cases they look almost the same
š¤
taylor requires to argue that higher order terms decay quickly
hmm so you should always be able to reduce indeterminate forms it seems?
convert to quotient form
Write the taylor expansions
compare
L'HƓpital's rule says :
if you have functions f and g, with $f(a) = g(a) = 0$ and $g'(a)\not = 0$ then $\frac{f(x)}{g(x]}$ converge to $\frac{f'(a)}{g'(a)}$ when $x$ goes to $a$
Now, keeping the hypothesis on $f$ and $g$, we have $f(x)=f(a)+(x-a)f'(a)+o(x-a)$ when $x$ goes to $a$, so $f(x)=(x-a)f'(a)+o(x-a)$. Arguing the same with $g$, we have $g(x)=(x-a)g'(a)+o(x-a)$, so $f(x)\sim(x-a)f'(a)$ and $g(x)\sim(x-a)g'(a)$ when $x$ goes to $a$, so $\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}\sim\frac{f'(a)}{g'(a)}$ when $x$ goes to $a$.
You could probably say lhopital is a consequence?
Yes I meant consequence
(but reorganized)
so it would be real weird if any differential calculus fact were not a consequence of first order taylor
I wanted to say that if you know about Taylor approximation, you can forget L'HƓpital's rule
i think that's basically true
Adrien
that's true, but usually overkill
Yes, but in practice you just apply lhopital
yeah it's like
differentiate top bottom, there we go.
lhospital is a consequence of taylor, but more importantly, it's a shortcut which includes in it the exact taylor argument you want to do
using taylor would be like if you wanted to copy a paragraph from a website, typing it all out yourself instead of just highlighting and copy-pasting
repeated lhopital is literally just you calculating the next terms in the expansion
(the factorial constants cancel)
that's what i meant about having to argue past which point the terms approach zero quickly enough
I think? š¤
you don't have to explicitly bother with that with L'H
rather than decide up front how many terms of the expansion to work with
For me, it's easier to remember Taylor approximation
When you're faced to a indeterminate form, just write first or second order taylor, then see if things simplify
if you are in a calculus class where you compute 10 limits a day, it's probably better to know L'HƓpital's rule
This makes lots of sense, thank you Adrien
I never considered it this way either
The more math I do, the less I think of derivatives as difference quotients and the more I think of them as the coefficient that goes in a linear approximation.
I think I once saw $\lim_{x\to0} \frac{\sin(x)}{x}$ evaluated using Taylor series, was cool
feather
that makes it nicer to generalize tho
I get the sense that this is special/meaningful to you but I don't see why. Isn't it obvious? The tangent line at a point of a function is a great linear approximation of the function about that point, and the derivative is the slope (proportionality coefficient, if you prefer) of that approximation
the generalization here becomes almost trivial if you use this argument
I guess it probably means more in other less obvious contexts lolol
I guess its because thats what the generalizations are trying to capture
Generalization of what? Treating the derivative as a difference quotient vs a coefficient in a linear approximation?
a local linear approximation
Yes
That same intuition leads to the Jacobian as a multivariable linear approximation right?
if its zero up to the n-1th derivative then the quotient goes to the quotient of the nth derivatives of the point
yah
and the frechƩt derivative
and even the exterior derivative to some extent
Fancy derivatives 
Exterior derivative is something we use in DG right?
That takes n-forms to (n+1) forms?
yeah
that meme
but that one has more algebraic properties than "linear properties" lets say
Sure
like idempotency and derivation memes
Derivation?
And KƤlher's differentials 
yeah
it satisfies a certain generalized leibniz rule with the wedge if I recall
Yup I've heard of this
it's obvious, i'm just saying that the first thing i write down is f(h) = f(0) + f'(0)h + o(h) instead of writing down f'(0) = lim (f(h) - f(0))/h
Interesting
cause fuck division

yeah
its annoying
i guess it's also just like
i used to be scared of big O and little o
but now i'm a little o stan
i'll do anything to put asymptotic notation in my work
hi
that's always what I've thought of them as tbh (not always but for longer than not). they're more intuitive that way imo
unfortunately this doesn't scale
I feel like there's gotta be some deep reason why a 1/n! shows up in Taylor series (deeper than the power rule)
exponentials 
I was doing a proof last sem and was confused
And someone was like "just write the difference quotient, that makes it obvious"
And it took me like 5 minutes to figure out how to even do that
It's correct
Yeah
I mean
There's value to the analogy between average and instantaneous rates of change
But that value is less useful in math
And more useful outside of math
Like "best linear approximation" doesn't really tell me immediately why the derivative of position is velocity
(dynamics isnt math)
Doesn't it? The best linear approximation to position in a small nbhd is considering the velocity at a point and then multiplying that by difference of distances
That seems pretty intuitive to me
Ok, but its not the direct definition anymore
Sure
To me math fundamentally is a tool that our understanding of a problem should guide to doing useful things, not the other way around. Sometimes when building up a more complex and abstract system we can trust the math within a framework we have built to guide us to an understanding of the behavior, but its still not a shot in the dark weāre just working one level of abstraction up. Math is how we describe what is happening not what is actually happening and confusing those two leads people astray very often.
imagine studying math that describes some extrinsic phenomenon

"the map is not the territory"
I think a deep understanding of the problem you are trying to solve is more useful than a set of tools you don't know how to apply. And you can get a long ways by breaking down and understanding a problem even without advanced math techniques that help pin down details or make things rigorous...
I see lots of engineers who throw equations at things rather than just breaking the problem down and identifying the key challenges to solve and it hurts thier work
that is way more comprehensible
Any hint on how to solve subset sum problem with fixed subset size of 4?
What is subset sum problem?
given set of numbers, check if there is a subset of size 4 that has a specific sum
Oh I see
I know I can just do bruteforcing, but i was pointed i out that there is O(n^2logn) sol'n
I tried multiple ideas but O(n^3logn) was the best i got
Are the numbers positive?
they are integers
Oh okay
Do you know a good solution for fixed size 3?
ie is there one which is nlog(n) or something
for size of 3 i think there is one O(n^2)
not sure if I've seen something like that before
Wouldn't you just test the bottom 3 for that actually
maybe I'm thinking of a different problem, but I think I saw someone do something where they had the numbers in order, added up all the numbers and then subtracted the highest and lowest from it alternating or something like that, idk that's probably bad haha
You can definitely get O(n^3) by using the O(n^2) solution for 3 on the set minus the point you are considering, right?
yeah sure I've considered that before i think
Makes sense
I only said it because you said n^3 log(n) was the best you had
Am I not computing O correctly there?
no it is correct, probably i meant O(n^3) was the best i've got
O(nlogn)
Makes sense
just iterate and binary search
Okay I want to try using that one
Okay so.the lowest elements that you can get with a sum of 2 elements is 2min and the highest is 2max right?
Or rather I'll say that the set of elements that is a sum of 2 elements is of what size
What's the worst possible case for that?
Hmm
the length of this set is O(n^2)
I mean, there might be repititions, but u should treat them as distinct numbers
Well if there were enough repititions that you could get it down to O(n) then you could have made an algorithm using the k=2 case
But that's a bit of a pipe dream I guess
yeah, we should consider the worst case
I think I will just do some googling
Thanks a lot though
Yeah this was pretty fun
Can someone point me to a good proof of the Weierstrass product theorem
From Weierstrass Product Theorem, the function:
h(z)=zmān=1āEpn(zan)
defines an entire function that has the same zeroes as f counting multiplicity.
Thus f/h is both an entire function and non-vanishing.
As f/h is both holomorphic and nowhere zero there exists a holomorphic function g such that:
eg=f/h
Therefore:
f=egh
as desired.
QED.
@muted oxide wait why can't you compute all of the sums of 2 elements, then check if any two of those add to to your number
That should be n^2log(n)
nah I meant the more funny stuff particularly this one part
I've found something online like that
hello people random question
If you take any 2D cross section of the graph of a 3-variable quadratic equation in 3d space
do you always get a conic
I thought you only get conics from x^2 + y^2 = z^2 and then making some equation that defines a plane from x,y, and z
And then solving for x and and y
yeah but i graphed a few other quadratics in 3d
and they look like their cross sections would also be conics
Possibly?

Does anyone have any mechanical pencil recommendations? I normally just use staedtler wooden pencils but I got some cheap mechanical pencil in a stationary set and fell in love (despite its many flaws), so Iām looking for something a bit better. Just for secondary school work (maths, physics, chemistry, engineering, English)
i like the zebra delguard and the uni kuru toga
i'm rather heavy handed so the former works well for me
Thanks will look into that. I like uni pens so might have to try kuru toga
i have this lamy mechanical pencil that ive been using for 2 years straight idk i love it
I started studying mathematics in the library just from my book without bringing my laptop, which I really like for my focus. However, I sometimes like having access to a tool like Wolfram Alpha or Symbolab to solve something if I am super stuck. Does anyone have suggestions for something like that as a phone app? I am fine if it's paid as well
there is a paid wolfram alpha app
which is wolfram alpha with pro features
or at least used to be when i got it
I used that once (a long time ago), but it was very difficult to type in a longer formula with how it was setup
I'll try it again, thank you!
yeah, but i think thats a general problem of phones
it's hard to type in integrals I found especially with limits.
fair
wolframalpha understands natural language quite ok
so you can do things like
,w integral of x^2 from x=1 to 42
oh nice, thanks!!
Looking for some loose excuse to myself to take a grad diploma/masters in maths. Is being a credit analyst a good job?
@civic knot did u find a proof? If you open a help channel I could explain rn
sure
Lots of people I know love graph gears
Just use the wolfram website from your phone
is it just me or does wolfram have a really short computation time limit now
,w sum k = 0 to infinity 1/(k^2 - x^2)

oh okay, a few days ago it wasn't able to compute it
sus
that limit is a motherfucker to calculate using lāhopitals
This is insane
its an exercise in stein's fourier analysis
basically follows from the fourier series of $cos(\alpha t)$, $alpha \in \mathbb{R} - \mathbb{Z}$
random variable
Very very cool
somebody just commented on one of my math youtube videos asking for help with a physics problem... tf

lol
Status of my number theory HW rn
fascinating
it's so weird to see gmod with the new pfp
since it's all calm and serene and shit
but then you remember it's attached to gmod 
what is a lemma
you can google things rather than pinging people hours later to answer your questions
sorry


once i spent 2 pages in a homework proving some lemma and it turned out the professor just forgot to prove it in the lecture
or add it as a blackbox assumption to the assignment
maybe he wants you to just prove it yourself
no, i asked
oh
lmao
Oof
Oh hey I can understand some of the German here
sehr gut, hier, aber
sehr gut
aber 
you probably also understand "well-known"
wohlbekannt
i spent a long time on this part of the proof, it wasnt well known to me
in fact it was the hardest part for me and i came up with the argument myself
what's a good number theory course to help in olympiads
Hi , can you help me please to understand math/algebra grades by complexity ?
which algebra is first in schools , elementary algebra or pre-algebra ?
which is not algebra at all right ? if it's arithmetic
poynomials ? or polY ?
polynomials
and then after those 2 come so called algebra I and then algebra II ?
so it means elementary algebra is whole school algebra ?
across all 12 years ? I mean after algebra is starting, I believe from 5grade in school
elementary algebra is called that to distinguish it from abstract algebra and linear algebra
)) you completely killed me coz I had so different picture of that in head
I think first of all I need to understand schools by grade and then understand how algebra is enveloped over it
elementary algebra is solving equations involving indeterminates
abstract algebra is the study of operations over sets
linear algebra is the study of linear maps between vector spaces
so you might have elementary algebra even in institution ?
not really
functional analysis is the study of operations over sets
pde is the study of operations over sets
algebraic topology is the study of operations over sets
most more complicated equations are solved using analysis and abstract algebra
all of those look at different aspects of operations over sets
I thought school is divided in 3 main parts , elementary school , middle , and high school
the tragedy of nuance
whereas AA looks at the structure of the sets under those operations
that all within one building and 12 years of education in it
yeah no that depends heavily on country
there are other cultures
in the uk it's 14 years of education split in half into primary and secondary school
elevator schools are one of the most horrid tropes ever tbo
what are elevator schools
all 14 years happen in one place/building ?
depends
12 yrs in one building
same ppl
same teachers
same campus
and rest 2 where ?
for 12 fucking years my god
usually there's separate primary and secondary school in the uk
some people switch for the last 2 years
often primary school is also split as well
how old are you
lmao
22
that wasnt expected
no it depends on country
and from which grade/year among those 14 you start to learn algebra ?
for your country
in the uk
well
hm
i actually can't remember
my primary school went quite a bit ahead
so idk
ok .. in UK you have 14 years in school , and when arithmetic are over and children start to manipulate variables
in korea its like 5th grade
u get introduced to the concept of "x" in 4th? or 5th i think
before algebra it's all numbers without variables aka arithmetical equasions
no reason not to introduce algebra early no?
i think a lot of people see it really early on like 1st or 2nd grade if they do amc 8
ugh, children are fucking dumb
)) no they are not
in hands of dumb parents only
so , when x,y and variables are introduced , how that "first" algebra is called ?
algebra 1
in the uk we don't call it anything special
they are ocean of books and I'm drowning
first order logic
@outer sigil I recommend Dummit and Foote's Algebra
it's a good introduction to algebra
search elementary algebra
nooooooooooo
we just called it "5th grade maths" lmao
same
the first time actual names are introduced into math was hs
we never do
@tender tulip what range of school years is middle school ?
we used Math I, Math II, Calc I, Calc II, Geometry and Vectors, and Stat and Probs
7-8
i mean surely people taking algebra already know how to solve stuff.. right?
like theres no way they've never seen variables before
or equations
d e p e n d s
algebra is groups, rings and modules

algebra(s)
that too
cambridgemo
death of the monoid
Index shifts, uh, thatās about it
if thatās what your referring to
no.... wheres my countable intersection of finite union of sigma algebra......
i am going to intersect your mother
those are not algebraic structures
algebra starts with linear equations right ?
i am hoping he is referring to just shit with sums
No, it starts with rings camel
algebra starts with unital magmas
wtf is rings ..
a ring is a preadditive category with 1 object
I never actually took any formal class past Algebra 2 so I donāt understand any of what youāre saying besides what a ring or field is
i recommend langs algebra for a quick review on important topics
yea but you should check out a pdf first
Itās probably something like āset with operationsā
I recommend Lang's algebra for a quick way to demolish your motivation for learning algebra
I know ) thanks everyone I will try to find them and hope it will be good for very beginner in algebra

I just read about random shit online mostly pertaining to basic complex analysis
yea dont do algebra do pdes or smth
I get the gist of what a reimann surface is but manifolds are beyond me because I never took topology
i know what manifolds are but idk what riemann surfaces are
āMultivalued functionsā in the simplest terms
(In the simplest terms, keyword simplest)
no
@rose dock why Lang's algebra demolishes motivation ? ))
you mean that one ?
G R A D U A T E T E X T S
yea it's for if you want to graduate
Because it's dense, relatively hard to read, and offers no motivation at all
ok @outer sigil seriously they're all trolling
read Euler's book on algebra it's actually good
uh oh someone said the r word
I like having motivations for things
I didnāt realize and why the fuck wasnāt it deleted
@alpine kindle which one is that can you post a poster or link ?
in which euler presents revolutionary algebra, such as the = sign
I am going to look for a Topology Book, a Real Analysis Book, a Complex Analysis book, and an Algebra book that hopefully goes into motivations for shit
theyre easy to find
I like foundations of mathematical analysis
i hate foundations of mathematical analysis
based
I already have gone into a little bit of complex analysis so real analysis is going to be slightly annoying
Because why no complex variable, it do hold tho
Honestly rudin unironically isn't that bad if you're up for the challenge
i enjoyed stein for canal


do they provide motivation
me going through rudin again to review for this semesters probability class 
yea for most of the process
RUDIN!!!! someone give me rudin! I am a rudin boy! ROOOODIN!!!!!
Because the amount of effort I took because I wanted to prove or get a better understanding of basic calculus shit was a LOT
because the thing I was reading gave no fucking intuitions
no screeching with notational purity
Rooners
Oh god I'm gonna ROOOONNNN
Rudin doesn't really give a lot of intuition

You've gotta develop it urself
ive yet to see a good ranal book with good intuition
Any books you recommend before Rudin
heavy minus sign!?!??
holy shit they added vectors to the analysis this is so awesome
Basically my general path I want to take is Topology, R/C analysis, Algebra, and then group theory
Abbott Spivak and Tao are all options depending on your cup of tea
tao š
I'm not a big fan of Tao myself
I go to take shower goodbye people
It's super tedious in the earlier sections
fuckkkkk
it's a few hundred years old so the language is a little funky
but it covers everything well
I was thinking about more abstracted algebra
principles of mathematical analysis by walter rudin 
Artin
Aluffi
š
interesting: n - 1 and n + 1 (and thus (n - 1)(n + 1)) won't share any factors with n (other than 1 ofc)
assuming n is an integer
n² - 1 does share factors with n if n = 1 
and (n - 1)(n + 1) is n^2 - 1^2 or just n^2 - 1
1 - 1 = 0
n is a factor of n-1 and n+1 for n=1
interesting
for all non 1 positive integers
n does not share factors with n^2 - 1
i wonder if it shares factors with n^2 + 1
for non 1 positive integers
it makes sense
n + 1 shares no factors with n
meaning n^2 + 1 shares no factors with n^2
meaning it can't share factors with n either
for non-1 ofc
yeah
but
over the gaussian integers
you can decompose n²+1 into (n+i)(n-i)
so you just have to prove n neither divides n+i nor n-i
i love you i love you i love you i love you
this question is calculatable or nah
I am struggling whether it is possible to find f(-1)=? by using f(x+2) remainder or sth else
please read #āhow-to-get-help
there is literally nothing special about it
except for being palindromic
its special in the sense that its not special
right now im reading knapp
and im really enjoying it
best algebra book I have seen
exactly
every once in a while, I search my name on discord to find what people are saying about me
is it just me that does this?

oh I like the new mod color

you still haven't explained this...
the explanation is that carla is very random and half the time what she says is total nonsense
lonely
does it need an explanation
moder
meowing nuns ref
meow :3 
rly?
šÆ ā¹ļø
sowwy I won't meow in public 
you will
does hwk for once -> wtf does this mean -> 4 hrs relearning -> still can't do it D:
mood
honorable color looks so weird now
mood, and literally every weekday
we done it because of the light mode users 
but according to this answer i found to why light mode is better
When it comes to visual-acuity tasks and proofreading tasks, studies have shown that people with normal and corrected vision perform better with light mode. This means that text in light mode is clearer and quicker to understand for people with normal or corrected vision.
get some glasses dark mode users
Don't care + ratio
Visual acuity?
It means ability to discern images well?
it's stinky
ikr
this server is getting even worse than it already was
but there's a fix
i made a script to change honorable color to the previous one

there are bdd plugins that let u locally edit servers/roles/users
okay but i have a depression
oof
i can't even call suicidal hotlines cuz i'm not suicidal
but i see no reason to live
@neat lintel you should call a hotline
maybe, but i'm already a hot3-manifold
I used to think that a year ago
same
But now I see that life is actually beautiful
So many things to see and learn
So many opportunities to take
can't learn shit or take any opportunities if you do nothing all day
How
doubt
Have you tried to take control?
Yeah
@neat lintel unfortunately this isnt the place to discuss ur depression, pls see someone equipped to help u
Yeah, I would recommend trying to talk to a professional who knows how to help you
doctors are scams
Not a doctor
bro there was someone who tried to help me, and they failed so hard they tried to end themselves
anyway
mod doesnt want this topic

life is so weird
@neat lintel yes this isnt the place. again we're not equipped to help u, pls find someone who is
sometimes its like a Flick of a finger
Wdym
i tried, waste of money and no effect
anyone likes Banach spaces?
i wonder
are there nonisomorphic complete Banach spaces of same dimension?

isomorphic as TVSs
flick of da rist
Ur emeritus now?
what is an emeritus
Used to be active but not anymore
active isnt necessary for emeritus
i used to be an emeritus but not anymore
u just rejoined, give the bot some time to sync
i wish i had some hagoromo chalk and a chalkboard
so i can eat the chalk and do math on the chalkboard
chalk addicts 
does it taste good
ok this is cool
ive been messing around and S(n, m) = s(n, m) for all n, m elements of the natural numbers
looks like you've probably effectively rediscovered some identities of bernoulli numbers
yeah! i looked up the general form for s(n,m) and saw that it was related to the bernoulli numbers
and then i tried to construct it without them
knowing that eventually it would probably end up being the same as the bernoulli numbers
but i still dont know what part of that formula looks bernoulli-ish
you can write the stuff in the product in terms of factorials that might help simplify it down a bit
oh yeah it can totally be written better, just desmos is annoying so i just did it like that
i know bernoulli numbers have the rising factorial as well as other factorials, but you cant write that in desmos
i need to learn latex soooooon
the wonderful thing is that there is still another way of writing it that i have yet to figure out, that i am pretty sure exists based on the patters i was studying
a project for tomorrow
I just learned about them too
i haven't tried, but i'm definitely willing to
i got stuck trying to prove a recurrence for the bernoulli numbers
something like $B_n = - \frac{1}{n+1} \sum_{k = 1}^{n-1} {n+1 \choose k} B_k$
random variable
not sure why I ended up doing bernoulli numbers while reading a fourier analysis textbook
special functions 
"hey i need to solve this integral"
"oh it can be written as H(0.2,0.5,2,3,6,8, e)"
So true
I love that
Yes looks like it
I missed out on almost all of highschool, I had to drop out for personal reasons. Now Iām currently studying for my GED and trying to learn highschool level math very quickly.
That must be why you are confused
ay
respect man
i dont know any services to find local tutors but i would say that khan has a good high school curriculum
I appreciate your answer, Iāve heard this but Iāve found khans videos to be confusing for a multitude lol of reasons. Iām not trying to learn everything khan academy covers, only what I need for the GED. I also find the way they teach to be terrible and I have a hard time grasping the subjects, then for what I do need to figure out itās hard to actually find in khan academy
Ever tried "Basic Mathematics" by Serge Lange?, It covers all of HS math.
Thatās not quite what Iām looking for but if worst come to worst Iāll look into it
What are you looking for?
yeah?
Honestly at this point directly tutoring with certain concepts, Iām quite close to completing my GED
Ahh I see, any plans after you complete it?
Iām going into college to study forensic anthropology
Sounds nice, I'm not familiar with that field of discipline. I did look into it just now and it looks interesting. gl
Itās fascinating
whats the difference between vector calculus and multivariate calculus
I donāt see any myself tbh
The multivariate courses/books seem to focus more on R2 and R3 specifically in my (very limited and biased) experience
But even then there may be discussion of generalizing to Rn in a few simple cases
i see vector calc as included in multi
at my uni multivar was intended to be taken before vector cal
š¤Ø
if you're fine with linear algebra you can probably do both simultaneously, they have a lot in common
did they not teach lin alg before hand
?
that's just how the classes were arranged as one being a prereq for the other
I think linear algebra was a pre req for multivar
fair
this was just my university, could be different
u guys talking about intro to linalg? coz linear algebra is a torture
torture?
don't call it torture if you want to get far in math

