#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 496 of 1
like they want you to prove the formulas they've taught you?
yes
yeah i don't think that's very helpful tbh
i havent seen a very good proof of it anyway
not without eulers formula
it's a bunch of geometry and algebra
I've seen some resources essentially at a stage use one of the formulas when proving the other which kind of defeats the point of it
exactly
i can show you a proof of one using eulers formula if you'd like
all you need to know is i^2 = -1
alright which one would you like
sin(v+u) = sinvcosu + cosvsinu
$e^{i(x+y)} = \cos (x+y) + i\sin (x+y)$
Ninja II
so first of all does this make sense
Makes sense as I assume it to be true yeah
$e^{i(x+y)} = e^{ix}\cdot e^{iy}$
Ninja II
this is just the standard exponent rule
$e^{ix}\cdot e^{iy} = (\cos x + i\sin x)(\cos y + i\sin y)$
Ninja II
Right
so we can equate the "real" and "imaginary" part. cause when we have a+bi = x+yi that means a = x and b = y
Ninja II
@quaint loom i hope this makes sense
So
if we divide both of the imaginary numbers by i we get that and with the real numbers we have cos(x+y) = ....
yeah this also proves that $\cos (x+y) = \cos x \cos y - \sin x \sin y$
Ninja II
and in fact the reason there's a minus sign there is precisely because i^2 = -1
Interesting, so what if y = x
well try it $\sin(x+x) = \sin(x)\cos(x) + \sin(x)\cos(x) = 2\sin(x)\cos(x)$
Ninja II
sin2x = 2sinxcosx
exactly
So we essentially get all of the formulas
those formulas
cos(2x) = cos^2x - sin^2x neat how that works
yup this gets you every identity you learn in trig class
cos(2x) = cos^2x - sin^2x = cos^2x -(1 - cos^2x) = 2cos^2x - 1
cos(2x) = cos^2x - sin^2x = 1 - sin^2x - sin^2x = 1-2sin^2x
That's pretty neat and not messy
Euler's formula doesn't seem to be in the formula list for the course or in the studying material, just de moivres theorem
why aren't both terms multiplied by i?
Like, why does i go where it goes
Right, that's the theorem
holy shit I've lost very active
congrats on having a social life
how does grass feel
idk, I have boots on and there is snow outside
snow is trash
the real reason I lost very active is that I got back into comp tf2 so I've been spending my time on discord doing that
although I am back on campus now
it was really funny though running into fiona in the rgl discord
far from it
i thought hackers killed it
the game just refuses to die
they killed official servers

but the tf2 community refuses to let their game die
only comp game i play is RL
Yuck my topology class this semester isn't skipping Munkres chapter 1
Gonna need a lore dump on Munkres chapter 1
its just an "intro proofs" chapter
I've signed up for an introductory topology course that plans to follow the pointset half of Munkres linearly; week 1 and the discussion forum is laden with questions about implications and vacuous truths. 😭
The instructor ended up giving a detailed explanation to clarify it

I'm just expecting a lot of people will discontinue by Week 2
I just hope I can survive it till the end 
You can definitely, good luck

I'd be lucky to survive this, maybe if I reduce my appetite for other topics I could get through it
Online course, everything's recorded 🤷♂️
do you just get access to all videos at once
No, week by week
the only sad part is no taste of algtop
Hopefully they'll offer the Intro to Alg Top course next sem
This sem I've signed up for pointset top, rings and fields, graph theory, probability and stochastics for finance, advanced probability theory (not really advanced I guess, more like a second course?)
Yeah, just hope I don't quit midway like I always do. 
My week 1 is sections 1.1-1.4, and I'm afraid we won't speed up. So now I'm tediously going over 1.1 homework exercises and trying not to be bored with it.
Good luck
Instructors actually enforce your classes having prereqs challenge 2022
Chmonkey 

Instructors actually adapting their course materials to their students level moment
Jeeze
I never understood stacking classes this high
But I was always doing projects and stuff so that prolly reduced my bandwidth
no prereqs 👏 no gre 👏 no school
@devout nacelle I started going thru Munkres and Casella and Berger
I like both books very much so far 👍
I kind of seem to learn better on my own than in a classroom setting
Goodluck!
I'm not going to have an easy time with all this, ngl. I'm working on an internship on the side as well. I do see myself dropping one or the other course eventually.
Do you have any tips for getting an internship in the second year?
I'm in my 4th semester right now
Guess it's very region-specific, I applied to some places through an internships portal. You could try looking for something along those lines.
@neat lintel you can think of a series as sequence of partial sums or a product as a sequence of partial products, but what you're doing is taking the k-th term and eliminating a term from it because it will repeat in the next term ...
(2^k * cot(x) * tan(x/2^k)) turns into 2^k * cot(x) which is different,
and to provide a counter argument for what you said I can say there is a tan(x/2^(k +1)) in the next term and we will be stuck forever cancelling out terms which is why we look at partial products and their limits
idk I was just looking at your solution not at how to solve the problem itself which looks very 
The problem is sus
@brave hollow i don't wanna solve this anymore
To number theory and beyond!
I wouldn't wanna do it either
Internshala?
Or did you apply through your college portal?
Yes
No, it's some work around grade-school mathematics. Can't share the specifics due to a confidentiality clause. 
Recruitments seem to be hot this time around, good luck.
my research supervisor has been working on a grant for a data science thing, he runs a data center
a 10mil dollar grant
700 pages of grant proposal
there are some monster resources out there for data science rn its nuts
seems like the hot thing to do an internship in

he said he only wrote 200 pages and auto generated the rest but still
Lmao
How does anyone read a 700 page grant proposal
surely you just read 30 pages and then say yes or no
DFG proposals have like a 25 page limit
idk he showed me the doc it's fuckin huge
it's like 10+ docs actually, including inclusion statements and plans on outreach, etc
just the research is a facet, it is probably intended to be used for a pretty big and long program
like my research program i am in is a fraction of that grant size
if they are gonna fund you for 5-10 years you gotta work for it i guess
or whatever, maybe he wants a supercomputer idk what the real details are
a grant of that size is probably federal and/or military, too
he said his theory is that you gotta be serious to write the grant
to put it into perspective i am in a thing that was well over a million dollars and is supporting us for years
consider that funding 1 phd student for 4 years is roughly 200k$ already, but the grant includes publishing and travel costs, some hardware, possibly paying for student colabs (masters and under), etc
you can hit a million just from funding 2 students and some related costs
$200k
wtf
hmm?
that just seems VERY steep
tution is ridiculously expensive
200k for the whole 4 years
but also $50k/year salary isn't exactly exorbitant
hold on
50k a year before taxes
even less so since that includes travel, hardware, etc.
ah my wording was poor, i meant those costs have to be factored in separately
which is why just funding 2 people is very expensive
that goes on top of the ~200k
oh ok. yea $50k is pretty average for math students. some computer science phd students get like $70k
yeah, it'll vary up and down depending on field and region
scales pretty closely to real life 
lol
On the topic of Spivak, are there any advantages to learning through a proofs based approach / using Spivak?
you learn to do mathematics
which might be something you want
(it might also not)
when do you not learn to do mathematics
mathematics is when you prove stuff
hot take
if you dont want to be a mathematician, not doing proofs is fine
i guess one can argue that a proofs based approach gives you a better understanding of the topics and thus you are better able to apply what you have learned
but i dont know how true that is in any real life (think engineering) situation
"bro wdym i cant work with continuity if i cant define it on abstract metric spaces"
this is me but unironically
Based wew as always
wym u cant?
continuity on met spaces is a thing
more like derivative on topo space

I legit have to translate the metric space definition into (R, |x-y|) if I want to use it there
working on abstract metric spaces is more fun tbh 
I agree
sad diffeo noises
Yeah, I considered that it might be more rigorous and thus offer a greater understanding.
I'm probably looking at a degree in Engineering Physics or Engineering Mathematics.
In terms of math the former would include courses in like: Linear algebra, multiple variable analysis, differential equations and transformations, "numerical methods", probability theory and vector analysis.
The latter would ontop of that include several mathematical analysis courses and Discrete maths.
in the former you can (probably) do without a lot of proofs, the latter will require more
you can consider trying spivak as an opportunity to see if you like proofs
and have this help in your decision
A, B & C form the vertices of a triangle.
∠ CAB = 90°,
∠ABC = 36° and AC = 8.8.
Calculate the length of AB rounded to 3 SF.idk if im on the wrong channel but please help me finish this
i need this
someone helpp
please read #❓how-to-get-help @neat lintel
it says discussion
indeed
this is not a topic for discussion, it is you asking for help
go to a math help (available) channel
That seems like an interesting idea. Are there any downsides to the proof heavy approach? Something I would be missing out on?
it will take more time i guess
and there might be less computational exercises, which is bad if your exams want you to compute lots of integrals or wtv quickly (maybe?)
i guess you can always grind additional computational exercises
i never actually took a (computational) calculus class, i only know the proofs approach
Ah yeah I see. I've been doing some reading and seeing as I'd be taking these HS classes which essentially covers the more computational and basic approach to these subjects, Spivak might possibly be good for going deeper.
And presumably what I learn through Spivak should translate over to when I'm doing stuff of a more computational nature as I'm guessing that's a part of the idea behind the methodology?
a big majority of americans learn computational calc
including math majors
i imagine it does set you up better to do it rigorous from the start
because there is a phenomenon of students getting crushed by real analysis
And Spivak's methodology would be the more rigorous one then. Is extensive knowledge on proofs a prerequisite or does Spivak adequately cover that at the start?
i have actually never read spivak, but i do believe it covers what you need to read the book assuming that you have all pre-calculus knowledge and a lot of patience
it is very detailed from what i understand, but i dont usually read huge books
in some way a lot of pure math comes from rigorous calculus tho, so it is good for foundation if you are at that point
Well I've already done some calculus through school, comparatively their approach is very basic and light. So I'm familiar with limits, derive, primitive func, integrals on what I would call a surface level
you are probably in a good position to read spivak then
i think someone should know some calculus before going spivak 
i just went straight to analysis and had some trouble then just kept taking analysis courses
and now i basically just do analysis lol
S_n(x+1) -S_n(x) = x^n @exotic yacht
S_0(x) = x, S_n(0) = 0
S_2(x+2) - S_2(x+1) = (x+1)^n = x^2 + 2x + 1 = (S_2(x+1) - S_2(x)) + 2(S_1(x+1) - S_1(x)) + (S_0(x+1) - S_0(x))
if I write an integral as $\int_{[a, b]} f(x) \mathrm dx$ instead of $\int_a^b f(x) \mathrm dx$, does it make me look smarter?
g
well I get dem bitches
lmao
The former should be interpreted as a Lebesgue integral.
Or an integral over the manifold with boundary [a, b] I guess.
Either way you look smarter
yay
no clue
They are the same
I knew that
I guess the confusing part is that $\int_b^a f(x) dx$ makes sense and is the negative of the original integral, but $[b, a]$ isn't even a set (or at best, it's the empty set).
ryc
So this is something to keep in mind, the former notation loses a notion of orientation (this is sometimes a good thing and sometimes a bad thing)
i would think that it’s the empty set
[b, a] isn't a set because we read intervals left to right, and if you start at b and go to the right there's nothing, right?
alright
are lebesgue integrals hard
[b, a] is defined to be the set of points x so that b ≤ x ≤ a
kind of a vague question but whatever
Idk depends on the integral lol
So this is the empty set if a < b
Lebesgue integrals are not things you actually do
Or
oh
Sometimes you do them
But
Usually if you are doing them they're the same as the riemann integral
The point of the lebesgue integral is to make more functions integrable
do you have a function for example
You know how we need to turn Q into R by taking limits so that we get things like sqrt(2) and pi?

Because those things are useful, and it's also useful for R to be "complete"
isn't the function that's continuous for rationals but discontinuous for irrationals non-riemann integrable but lebesgie integrable
The indicator function of the rationals sure
yeah that's the word I was looking for
The lebesgue integrable functions complete the riemann integrable functions in exactly the same way
(for example, your function is the limit of functions which are 1 at the first n rationals and 0 elsewhere, if the rationals are put in some sequence)
(this is sort of a lie, actually the lebesgue integral thinks all these functions are the zero function)
But thats the premise
I see
The lebesgue integral takes a lot of work to define, but it's work that is widely generalizable (e.g. all of probability theory follows the same construction) and completeness of integrable functions is so useful that it's worth it
It's silly to leave holes in the set of integrable functions
I think it’s cool you can integrate thomae’s function using the Riemann integral
At least on any finite interval
And I mean I guess since it’s always 0 this lets you go across all of R
yeah, like henstock kurtzweil
oh my fuck
dafuq is it thomae's day or something. it rarely ever comes up but today it comes up twice
#help-20 message
Can someone tell me what I need to learn in order to understand this paper. I know I’d need abstract algebra, but this seems like more.
There’s the title if you think it’s sus
have you tried reading it?
skimmed it. seems digestible with one or two classes in algebra
is there a particular reason you want to understand this paper?
Yea I have.
I’m mainly trying to understand the determinant and how it analogues exist for more abstract algebraic structures. I’m in a linear algebra class, but the definition of the determinant and the way it’s introduced doesn’t seem at all motivated
I hear the geometric volume interpretation but it seems that that goes away once we stop talking about real matrices
I’ll read through it again though, and assemble a list of questions I have
And figure it out
@latent patrol at some point you’ll learn that the determinant is equal to the product of eigenvalues of a matrix, and this can be taken as a definition and generalizes to any field of coefficients (real, complex, whatever)
There’s an even fancier explanation for the determinant in terms of something called the exterior algebra, that’s a very nice object that generalizes well. This level isn’t necessary, but it is yet another explanation.
The paper you post mentions the exterior algebra and instead takes a different approach, but I would argue the exterior algebra approach is the most natural and closest to what shows up in other parts of math a lot
imo the determinant is best motivated by looking at n-dimensional multilinear forms over a n-dimensional vector space and requiring these forms to be alternating
This may be what @vivid halo is referring to but i'm not familiar with what exterior algebras are...
what you're referring to is exactly what the exterior algebra encodes
ah ok, heres another thing i've got to read up on wikipedia : )
yeah if you're already comfortable with alternating multilinear forms the exterior algebra is just the algebra of these
it's the quotient of the tensor algebra by the ideal generated by alternating expressions
but yeah we're talking about the same thing 🙂
Oooh that makes more sense than whatever the wiki page is lol
Btw, do you guys think that, for someone who is mainly interested in algebra & topology a course in mathematical logic is important?
Because I'm kind of tempted to take "fancier" courses but don't want to skip a important "block"
depends on how deep you're getting into it, I don't think getting too deep into mathematical logic and foundations is enormously useful for the majority of people in these areas
certainly you should be familiar enough with logic to be able to write proofs, do standard set theory with nothing too fancy, etc
right that was also my feeling
the course is a semester course at bonn, so while it starts off quite tame, i know for a fact its going to get real fancy real quick lol
hmm yeah maybe
if it's an intro to proofs course it won't get too fancy
if it's like, a graduate level course in set theory and mathematical logic then yes it will get fancy
no its def not that
it goes from like first order logic and goedel completeness to herbrands theorem
and i don't know what either of these things are lol
oh wait i missed a page in the index my bad
ah okay so it's like
i dont think its gonna be super special in any way. Im taking the model theory course this semester and even though they said you should have taken the undergrad logic course many people didnt, and the course started pretty slow too
intermediate level fancy
like a proper course in mathematical logic
idk how useful it is for most people but some of the stuff is cool to know I guess
compactness is pretty cool and good to know imo
hi,Im just starting out with learning machine learning andhave some doubts regarding differentiability in multi dimensional spaces.I understand the directional derivative but cant find a proper explaination regarding differentiability..I dont know where to ask about this
ok thats good to know, thanks for the input, ig ill try and read up on it on my own a bit more and see whether i am interested in it (though i kind of doubt that)
I would definitely be interested in learning that. What are the best texts for exterior algebra
Any algebra text, just don't open it up and read the inside.
Lmfaoooo
Warning noted
Because it's the exterior of an algebra textbook
Lol I thought you were saying it’s hell on the inside
I see what you mean now Lmfao
What websites are there for like practice problems? I am looking for Algebra, Precalc, and calculus stuff.
I want to find a discord that is like this one but for computer science, anyone got a discord channel recommendation for me?
just asking because there is no theory of computation channel here right? (not that i can see anyway).
Khan Academy
#old-network has one
LOL thanks, apparrently i was already in the disc channel
For practice problems?
It has a bunch
Kind of looking for a different website but I will check Khan as well since I thought they only offered courses
Start like here or something: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/algebra
The Algebra 1 course, often taught in the 9th grade, covers Linear equations, inequalities, functions, and graphs; Systems of equations and inequalities; Extension of the concept of a function; Exponential models; and Quadratic equations, functions, and graphs. Khan Academy's Algebra 1 course is built to deliver a comprehensive, illuminating, en...
There's also the obvious other suggestion of buying a textbook that has the solutions to odd-numbered problems and working through those, and then check the solutions.
This will be a good refresher
I thought khan was more focused on high school math but I guess I was wrong
They do everything from kindergarten to early university.
Hey guys new to this discord. Nice to meet yal'l
Are there any new cool papers or research concerning probability theory outside the applications in ML and AI?
I was kinda scouring the internet and couldn't find much
Quantam theory seems to have a lot of application to it, but I'm sure theres so much more out there lol
lol good one dud
boom exterior algebra
i wonder if exterior algebras are isomorphic to clifford algebras
Im kinda interested in both, but mostly on the applicative side. This is how I'll sort of rephrasing. I want to know what the new challenges are in probability theory from a pure math perspective, and I want to know some of the more mathematically intense applications (the we use this to build stronger buildings)
@neat lintel for some perspective, I've taken/am taking the tougher probability theory and statistic courses, and I'm at a point where I'm thinking how much deeper does this go, and where are we using the more complex stuff.
Appreciate you man!
Also gotta be honest, definitely got kinda toasty and watched the Foundation tv show and wanted psycho history to be real lol
^if you get the reference lmao
is it ok to ask for help on a quiz ive already taken?
yea
as long as you're not giving the answers to your past self

what does graduate level set theory do
why do people respond to questions when all they have to say is idk
Forcing is probably one of the topics you'd see a lot of
banned
to show that they didn't just ghost the person
i’m talking about someone asking a question and then sole random person comes in and all they say is idk
as if that added any value
ooh
Idk, maybe it does
how do you guys usually use textbooks when youre going thru multiple texts in a course?
i just use one to study and the others for problems
pick and match the parts relevant to your course from each textbook
if both textbooks cover a part then just pick your favorite
They add value by having someone point out that people doing it add no value.
i usually just have
1-course book (sufficient to study from and work with for whats required of me)
2-reference (usually much higher level than my course with some challenging exercises and more rigorous proofs)
which usually goes like
studying from course-->checking reference-->exercises
but maybe thats not the most optimal way of doing it, it just works fine for me
How does time dilation by travelling near c differ from the effect a high gravity object ie blackhole has on time?
this is a question better asked in the physics server
but i guess you can see what answers you get here
I suppose so Yeah heh, I’m not in that server
it’s in #old-network
is "formal logic" the same as mathematical logic
in the context of people talking about math it is
but it can include philosophy
informal logic is basically rhetoric
or contextual things
almost no one means philosophy when talking about formal logic in physics and math tho
or cs
is the formal logic in philosophy the same thing as whats used in maths? or is it smth different
bruh
fundamentally they are similar
in philosophy you use propositional logic or usually something like first order logic (or more sophisticated still)
there is a pretty high end to philosophical logic since kripke and others heavily formalized parts of modal logic
and were able to find places to use forcing, a proof technique from mathematical logic
so you get certain proofs which essentially are mathematical logic, and it works because there isnt a strong difference between the two "kinds" of logic
people also used to try to use set theory a lot but it sorta isnt a good thing to base a lot of epistemology on it turns out
at least the way people kept doing it
but that also reflects how people have changed thinking about "foundations" to math/philosophy
Kripke developed his semantics for modal logic before Cohen discovered forcing
Fair enough
it's also true that modal logic developed a lot after the kripke semantics stuff, tho i dont really know a lot about it
but people give him the big ups i guess
Just trying to clarify the chronology on forcing
when did cohen do forcing
1963
oh, well i guess he was like teaching in undergrad
so he must have been publishing early lol
It lacks everything that makes forcing in set theory actually somewhat difficult
In retrospect
huh, interesting
i mean it seems weird to me to use mathematical logic in anything other than... mathematics but i know jackshit about philosophy lol
i dont know a lot about the details, Obyeag knows more and from what i know it is kinda like what he says
it's not as challenging, generally
so you wont really find a mathematical logician interested in some philosophical logic problem most likely
but some philosophers are mathematicians so it's not black and white
Bertrand Russell is claimed by both mathematicians and philosophers.
yeah his greatest achievements are in writing
the creator of human logic or something 
So is Hilary Putnam
nobel prize, etc
Bill Clinton's wife?
lol

mathematics, logic, set theory, linguistics, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, computer science, and various areas of analytic philosophy, especially philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of language, epistemology and metaphysics. He was a public intellectual, historian, social critic, political activist
how do you do that many things
Step 1. Be Bertrand Russell
Step 2. ???
Step 3. Profit
attempting step 1 thank you for the advice
bertrand russell is admired in philosophy for daring to dream of big ideas
ofc a lot of his most famous projects sorta fell apart
Can you give some examples loldongs?
in like, math/logic/phil combination things
well the principia mathematica is usually considered misguided
but super ambitious
I wouldn't say principia fell apart, it was incredibly important
To the development of logic
and the incompleteness theorems directly contradicted his theory of how logic and math interact
He said, after he learned a bit of Mandarin, that all his attempts to make the principia super objective were completely biased by his English-speaking brain
That's a D tier take
the project of the principia did fall aprt
it did not continue in that logicistic vein
I mean literally the principia grew into the development of type theory
He also never managed to find the teapot that he left in orbit around the sun between the orbits of Earth and Mars.
i mean i didnt say that
Sorry I guess you didn't
Principia is super important. It just didn't accomplish what it set out to accomplish.
bertrand russell is incredibly important
but none of his major forms of logicism continued far beyond these works, philosophically
they may have lead to developments in mathematical logic
Arguably one of the most important texts of the 20th century
bertrand russell intended for a holistic program of logicism that ran across philosophy and math, and it didnt work
but it lead to some really great ideas
in both fields, actually
i rly should read more on philosophy huh
Specifically Bertrand Russell
the turn of the 20th century is pretty unusual tbf
it's like when people discovered calculus on steroids, in terms of everything smooshing together to make mega-theories
it's why analytic philosophy people larp that era real hard, it's amazing
50s was good too with the development of computational linguistics and stuff like that
plus all the social change, set the stage for some cool formal stuff
I would not agree that the principia is particularly important
It's interesting historically
but it would be a complete waste of time to read it nowadays
as a whole it's pretty important but i dont know what it did mathematically tbf
could be minimal for all i know
it bears very little resemblance to anything done today
There is a thread from it to modern type theory, but it's somewhat subtle
If one is willing to take the axiom of reducibility for Russellian ramified type theory then it reduces to simple type theory
But this was obviously much better organized by Church
I think it's pretty worthless mathematically tbh
i learned about the type theory stuff a bit in a philosophy class but it's been so long now
he had some different names for stuff but it was kinda there iirc
tbf if he had turned out to be right about logic he would be the greatest philosopher of that era instead of simply one of the greatest
@deep mango #advanced-lounge message
Is chalk really that much better LOL
I saw on a YT video that chalk was in short supply because professors were hoarding it
😭

well i can't write on a chalkboard with a marker...
and the board in my office is a chalkboard
I've never used it to do math, I prefer dry-erase on whiteboard
Why don't they just update it 
Just in terms of feeling? :P
Whiteboards are by far superior
Anyone seen/know a book that uses notation $\int_{a}^{x} f(x) ; dx$?
ScapeProf
Yes I want a book reference to such a notation, I really don't think any book uses such a notation
Not sure where to start looking, but at least if it was a book introducing calculus, it almost certainly would avoid this so readers aren't confused.
Although ^ there will be sources which do this (bad for those new to calculus)
However, when things get complicated
gosh that’s so cursed
It becomes more likely an author uses this
always gotta change complex to complicated because of, you know
lol
Eg. when they have a bunch of formulas and they're just substituting
Rather than introducing a new dummy every time
They stick with x
how useful would the second one be for a computer scientist
it only seems to be offered for people in video game doe
computer scientist is a pretty broad word
right
I mean sure if you ever have aspirations to take some sort of data science class or probability class or machine learning class I assume you need probability which probably needs calculus at the very least
a class on proofs would be useful (they usually have discrete math for cs ppl)
i would really like to get in a position that involves both cs math and physics
computer graphics is the only thing that comes in my mind
I mean if it's going to involve math or physics then ofc
hopefully not, this is somewhat bad notation
it's forgivable if you make a big warning about separating the integrand variable from the bounds of integration
but in most cases you try to avoid this by not reusing a variable name
Hello
I'm looking for somebody to do learning cooperation with and stay accountable all the day
condition :
- stay in the cooperation almost all the day (except from eating time - sleep time - time from 6 pm to 7:30-7:45 pm Greenwich time )
- the cooperation will be in google hangout
just put your phone away laptop away and sit in a library
don't need someone online to keep you accountable if you really need to be working
Uh this is just creepy
No one is going to sit in a Google hangouts with you for the whole day
This is just a ridiculous request
Is this a joke
hope so
You should talk to your study advisor/teacher/parent
If they feel they need this it’s completely unhelpful to tell them
If there are no other issues in your life, one does should need this level of accountability, one also shouldn’t need to plan to work this much, this suggest you might have something going on
But this is an extreme enough request that if you feel you need this
You would probably benefit from seeking out a physiologist
adhd is real if you feel you have symptoms, getting diagnosed may help you
Yeah it’s not not “normal”
And really is such a dangerous game
Some underlying issue is making you struggle
Instead of addressing this and seeking help
You try and work harder
I’d never blame someone for thinking this is the solution
Because it is so often framed if you don’t do well it’s because you are lazy
That sounded like a joke
If you are depressed
You won’t be able to work efficiently
And trying to work for longer with exasturbate the problem
just because you are depressed doesn’t mean you cannot work effectively
Yes you are right
Modulo measure zero exceptions
But I think if someone says something like this
It obviously means
For most people
In most scenarios
They won’t work as efficiently
As they would
If they weren’t depressed
We always use language in this imprecise way
Clearly if someone is asking for 24 hour surveillance
There is an underlying issue
That’s like saying because I’m adhd and unmedicated I cannot do well in school
Yeah it take a metric fuckton more effort to get done but I can still effectively get shit done
It’s really a very different thing I’m trying to say. Regardless, this person should seek help. You are free to do as you wish.
And do note that I said efficiently
Doing a ‘metric fuckton’ extra to ‘effectively’ the same work
fair
Is by definition not efficient
If you have adhd you shouldn’t be ashamed of seeking extra support
Whether that be medicine or otherwise
(Adhd meds fuck with my panic disorder. It is what it is)
Sorry to hear that
I mean yeah, but it can certainly have that effect
when I'm feeling down/dysphoric I can barely get anything done
this is just silly i feel like you've never met someone with depression
it does limit everything you do
its much much harder to do anything let alone do it effectively and takes a lot more effort
i did it fellas,i achieves chess.com rating of 1000 on bullet blitz and rapid,now if only i knew how to play lol
I can speak for that fact because I have it
Bruh
yeah it takes a metric fuckton more effort to get done
"Clearly this person doesn't understand how depression can interfere with your ability to work"

what a ridiculous conversation
love stumbling upon random people telling other random people what they need to do for themselves to be healthy and happy
i've been the recipient of a lot of this sort of commentary before and it's physically harmful, it sets off physically harmful panic attacks. please be careful about this stuff
(re: you NEED medication, you must not know anyone who has depression, etc etc)
i know it feels like its being supportive and helpful to give this sort of advice but it's something to be really careful about
nothing about mental wellness is one size fits all
Wait who is this directed at
Oh lmao
i mean this is something i've been dealing with w/ other people recently
from a lot of angles
it's really hard to be open about anxiety and mental wellness when there's a 50% chance it's going to be met with a few of the most potent triggers for it for me. so it really frustrates me to see that elsewhere.
One of the most potent triggers as in people trying to tell you how your mental health works?
yeah, in particular what resources i absolutely need to secure to deal with it
Ob yeah I remember a while ago this guy insisting that I needed to get therapy
iirc it kinda killed our friendship
It's like bruh, how delusional do you need to be that you think you know the inside of my head better than I do as just some random friend.
yeah
iirc the context was like I opened up about something and he was like insisting that he knew what was right for me 100% and literally not listening to me telling him he was wrong.
I get recommending therapy for people but that's too far
I feel like the issue is these people get it in their head that they're some empath savant that has discerned the deep emotional issues you're hiding from yourself, and thus they don't need to listen to you since you can't know what's right for yourself.
i just think it's important to be careful about this sort of thing. it's very tough to know what exactly sets of anxiety attacks for people, and when, etc. i've had positive conversations about therapy when i'm otherwise doing well, but when i'm not in a good state the idea of it drives me absolutely crazy.
i don't know why
Oh yeah, therapy is great and I think it's important to spread the word about how helpful it can be.
hmm
interesting
But there's a huge difference between stating the objective fact that therapy (or [insert treatment]) can be incredibly helpful for some people, and insisting that the person you're talking to needs to do it.
One is stating an objective fact and providing a potentially useful suggestion, the other is being an asshole that thinks you know what's right for other people.
I have this depressed af friend who is a complete mess mentally, any small inconvenience causes her to cry hysterically, and I've told her that the beet thing she can do is go to therapy but she has only had negative experiences with them so she rejects the idea. so if she doesn't want to do it then that's fine, im not gonna force her, but it gets annoying when im basically the #1 person she goes to whenever she is upset or sad or whatever when I usually have no idea what to say since I don't really have much experience with mental health and whatever. also she doesn't really seem to try to make ant efforts to improve her mental health so I keep trying to help but she basically rejects it and it's really demotivating to try. I didn't realize I was gonna type this much lol but seen as the topic came up, I would say this. does anyone have any advice on what I should do?
note that I enjoy helping people but the circumstance with her is different
she doesn't really seem to make any effort to improve her mental health.
"Doesn't seem" is the key word here.
How do you know what she does
and nor am I qualified
you're right
I've tried but she rejects it
it's hard whenever 90% of what she talks about is how miserable her life is and how sad she is
especially since I have no clue what to say in those situations
Like at that time, I was very much taking steps to work on my issues, and had a complex set of reasons why I wasn't in therapy (which I stand by now, despite being in therapy now and getting a lot of benefit out of it).
what steps were you taking, if you don't mind sharing
And it felt insanely ignorant and insulting for that friend to insist that therapy was right for me when he had no idea about any of that stuff.
I would rather not get into it, but I stand by them even today and am much better now than I was then.
The key pont is that people should not be obligated to justify their actions relating to their personal lives to you. And it's arrogant as fuck to think otherwise in >99% of situations.
yeah
I just don't know what to do
or what to say
and it sucks bc I want to help
Tbh I feel pretty comfortable telling people they should go to therapy, and I don't care if you consider that to be arrogant
But obviously it depends on the situation and my relationship to the person
why everyone always says 'get therapy'
therapy is too damn expensive
the only time i told someone to get therapy was when they were going on about wanting to kill themselves for months
natutally they immediately refused
I think the issue is less with telling people they need to get [x treatment] and more with not accepting their reply
therapy is very expensive but for some people it's hard to find an effective alternative
Oh obviously I can't control them
I don't think there really are effective alternatives to therapy
the funniest is when people tell you to get therapy over political disagreements
I am perfectly comfortable telling people to get therapy over political opinions
get therapy

I actually usually just don't talk to people after I see that they have sus politics
Eg most of my family
Lol I'd rather just throw them away as people
LOL!
based
see that's a stupid perspective on politics
I think if you were in my situation you wouldn't think so
my opinion is different than yours = you should be thrown away
I never specified what I considered to be sus politics lol
I disagree heavily with my dad's point of view on politics but I still respect it
You have some image in your head of what I mean, but there is a lot of leeway for what I said to be fine
"I think you're delusional and don't deserve rights"
"I disagree but I still respect your opinion"
based centerism
i only talk to people to meet the needs of basic networking and socializing about mundane things, to which politics is not necessary
so i dont care what their stance is long as they dont bring it up
fuckin autocorrect
i believe that is the default for many people
Mainly transphobic stuff, anti LGBT stuff, stupid culture war stuff
stupid
If someone keeps talking about dumb culture war issues compulsively I will throw them out
some of my family have opinions similar to those
just debate the bigots in the free marketplace of ideas 
and yeah I just ignore it
Well in my case my family's beliefs controlled my life for most of my life
are you lgbt/trans then
Yeah I'm trans
i c
oh I see the issue
Lol
my dad is openly racist but i dont care cause hes not racist against his own race (me)
not my problem
Tbh I was kinda trolling for the reaction you gave gmod
the emma bullies gamma to they both end up trans logicians pipeline
ok I'm not a logician yet
wot
This reaction
Cause I was playing into a common centrist talking point
I was talking about this
Oh lol
lol
in that case it goes from being an opinion to a personal attack
but yeah ^
I used to bully gamma
but like I don't really have a political stance
I have different stances on different things
I used to care more but I hate the toxicity in politics so I kinda just removed myself from it
gmod it's nice to see that you're back to your usual sullyable self
no
Yes
basically avoding political tribalism

that's fine
Tbh seeing a centrist in the wild makes me cringe
political tribalism might be a good source of friends
idk how that’s cringe
i wouldnt mind being a bigot if it was better for me socially perhaps 🤔
im not centrist
Because in order to seperate themselves from politics centrists often form opinions about how everyone else is bad, and how they're superior because they think they aren't tribalist
That's good
I don't think everyone else is bad
That's good
I really don't care about people's opinions
everyone else is bad
Tbh I probably shouldn't stereotype centrists
im good
you shouldn’t
if you think climate change is a hoax or is the biggest problem the world is facing, cool
I mean I disagree with that
no if you think that first one you’re just an idiot
climate change is none of my business either way
so why would i need to declare a stance
That's an issue I'm fine with thinking less of a person for
the issue with centerism is when it makes the jump from "I don't fully agree with either side" to "BOTH SIDES HAVE AN EQUALLY VALID POINT"
the like "guys guys let's compromise and only kill half the minorities" centerists
I have some right-leaning stances and some left-leaning stances, none of which are extreme
since when are minorities getting killed
I mostly dislike people who think being a centrist is part of their identity
Are you talking in general or in a particular place?
first world countries excluding israel/palestine
does the current American right wing have an identity beyond worshipping Trump and hating the libs
I feel like this is actually the sort of conversation I don't want to participate in
same
ok fair
I'm mostly just happy I was able to troll a little bit, that was fun
this is probably where we should end the convo before it goes in some weird direction
anyway
what's your favorite flavor of ice cream
sugarless ice cream
ice cream is ruined by sugar
I have mint cookie crumbs ice cream
boring!!
all you can taste is the sugar
YO
when you eat ice cream
GIMME SOME
that's why it's good
might as well just drink high fructose corn syrup
I'll post a pic of ice cream cone when I make it
strawberry
🍓
what's the mathematical word for "make something zero"
so like I'm writing about an impulse which removes the kinetic energy from a spring system
but I don't want to say "the impulse makes the kinetic energy vanish" or something
i'm sure there's a word
just say something implies that the kinetic energy = 0
vanishes
there u go
u found it
can’t even read it because paywall
Open it in incognito lol
if i read the article will i puke
nah
As a numbers guy, he looks at the city in his own way. There’s the geometry of the buildings, for example. “There are some twisty skyscrapers that rise at an angle,” he said. “It’s so interesting.” Dr. Strogatz, whom the museum has tasked with making math fun, has so far started a film series and introduced a course called Math Gems, during which he presents proofs and calculations that he considers “jewels” and invites participants to solve problems related to them (his next Math Gems session will take place on Tuesday).
Dr. Strogatz, 62, lives in an apartment provided by the museum in the NoMad neighborhood of Manhattan with his wife, Carole Schiffman, 60, a visual artist. Their 75-pound labradoodle, Murray, is also along for the city sojourn, which ends in August.
INTERNAL CLOCK I wake up at 6:30 every day. Carole finds it a little like, “Why don’t you sleep late?” But I did my Ph.D. about sleep, and getting up at the same time every day is actually good sleep hygiene, as they say in the sleep research field. Beyond the usual bad jokes about mathematicians putting people to sleep, I sometimes have a hard time explaining why I studied sleep as someone who was interested in math. But there’s a whole system of internal clocks and rhythms involved in sleep that can make it sound sort of like math.
BRAN MAN Now that I’m up I’ll eat some All-Bran. I eat that every day for a few reasons. No. 1 is I don’t cook and it wouldn’t occur to me to make scrambled eggs. No. 2 is I don’t get bored. I like having the same thing every day. I’ll take some photos of the sunrise with my iPhone.
MATH MESSAGING I shouldn’t really admit to it, but then I’ll waste some time on Twitter. If the sunrise was worth posting I might tweet it and comment on it. The city is a wonderment to me, the way the sunlight hits the buildings, all the colors. Sometimes I’ll wake up with some mathematical thought and I might tweet that. Twitter feels like a bigger place to teach math, like I can reach the whole world. Do you remember the movie “The Sixth Sense”? That kid saw dead people. I see math wherever I’m looking. I like to share that.
MYSTERY CURVES There’s some nice math in the elevator in our building, which I get in after breakfast to take Murray for a walk in Madison Square Park. If you look up, there are little lights on the ceiling. The way they shine on the door makes an interesting reflection. I don’t understand why it makes the curve it does, when it should make a parabola. I photographed it and tweeted it with, “Does anybody understand these curves?” No one has solved it.
STRESS WALK When we get to the lobby, my stress begins. Murray is kind of anxious in the city. When he sees other dogs, he’ll lunge at them or bark his deep, baritone bark. The other dogs look at him like, you’re a crazy man. I’d rather be looking at the architecture, but I have to put my hands over his eyes like they’re blinders on a horse.
AUTOGRAPHS The museum is open on Sundays, so I might pop in. Sometimes they’ll have me sign books I’ve authored that are for sale in the gift shop. There are lots of T-shirts and calendars and other things in there, too. People like to give them to the math-y people in their lives.
THE PERFECT DATE There’s a place called Kalustyan’s I’ll go to around lunchtime. I would describe it as a spice emporium. It’s visually spectacular in terms of the colors and how densely packed it is, and they have the most delicious dates I’ve ever had. I don’t have any agreement with them, but if you haven’t had a date from there I would say try it.
At the spice market Kalustyan’s: “It’s visually spectacular in terms of the colors and how densely packed it is.”
CHESS I do some work on Sunday afternoons, sitting in front of the computer. There are more walks to be done with Murray, too, but that leaves a lot of time to play chess online. I used to play in college, and I was very serious about it. I’m a master-level player. I care about winning. If I get too wound up by it, I’ll stop.
DUMPLINGS, NOODLES, PIZZA We might have some food lying around from FreshDirect for dinner, or if we’re getting low we might have takeaway from Excellent Dumpling House. Isn’t that a great name? They have really good cold sesame noodles. Or we might get thin-crust pizza from Vezzo, which is also close to us.
BRAINIAC The New York Times Spelling Bee is a constant source of fun. We’ll get on the phone with our two daughters, who are in college, and do it as a family. I usually get to “genius” right away, so they mop up all the easy words and I come in last so I don’t ruin it for everybody. Around 11 o’clock there’s some petting with Murray, then it’s bedtime. And maybe a late-night tweet if a math idea pops into my head.
```there was more
Oh my lord
Whenever I hear dumplings I think of kungfu panda.
deleted the post, the site they linked seems malicious
it might just be a holding domain but
it sends through a weird redirect chain
not taking chances
It ||could|| be real
Shuri2060
🤔
it's true 
@sleek wing any book recs for intro stochastic processes?
our prof recommended us "Stochastic Processes" by Bass.
this server needs more probabilists to help me solve problems
i couldn't agree more

Sometimes you can read paywall blocked articles through their HTML, accessible by ctrl+u.
However, its quite invonvenient, especially because usually the entire article is on one line in the data of some div. You have to copy the line, paste into google docs, and remove the unnecessary data manually just to get a good read out of it, but sometimes its worth it.

why would you do that just disable javascript and read the articles
My university offers a free subscription so why not 
it doesn't come with the crossword 
post body
Metal...?
There are characters, say C, that, in order to type them, you need to press altgr+some key in the keyboard, say the key is called K. If you just press K (without alt gr nor anything) something else will be typen, say D. Is it possible to make it the inverse? Like, K=C and altgr+K=D
Hopefully that makes sense
It's to save time when writing in latex and so on
there are better ways
@pale orchid would i be able to get the role to screen share?
@compact tartan or any other mod
i dont know who to ask
thanks
yo
same thing
Shoutout to mumford for including a quote in german but no translation
really appreciate the insight
(if anyone knows where I can find a translation of this quote, I'd appreciate it)
become like a mid-20th-century mathematician and learn french, german, russian, greek, and latin
otherwise youre a coward
tfw I decided to learn romanian instead 😔
latin gang
alternatively you could become like an early-21st-century mathematics student and learn japanese purely to understand anime
yeah obviously everyone should learn romanian like me
proof: my algebraic geometry professor is romanian
I went to his office hours once and read his romanian book on complex analysis lol
shoutout to that time I wanted to read a 3 page paper in german and someone in this server translated it for me
a knot theory paper by artin
king shit
Guys, I'm doing a research work on graphs and I need to find the most topics I can to include on it contemplating the most interesting topics to the matter.
So far this is what I've found:
- Basic concepts (history, what it consists of, graphic representation, definition of graphs, relations of incidence and adjacency)
- Walk, path, trill.
- Types of graphs
- Generalizations
- Distinctions between graphs
- Graph representation (through math formulas and other concepts)
- Adjacency matrix
- Potencies of the adjacency matrix and relevant results
- Computational utilization and representation of graphs
- Algorithms used in graphs
- Problems that involve graphs
- Forms of programming graphs
So I need your help to figure out if I'm missing something and what can I add up to fulfill the work.
PLEASE @ me
youre not going to talk about types of graphs?
it is there bro
linear, hypoblic, odd, even, parabolic
ohhh
my bad
i was raeding from bottom
what about tangent lines?
I havent heard about those
and secant lines?
you havent?
tangent line is the line that touches the graph at point
it shows the slope of the graph at any given
it can be calculated using the derivative of the function
yeah you really should
problem sometimes is translating that
yeah i myself study math in arabic so its bit of a problem
linear, hypoblic, odd, even, parabolic graphs
tangent and secant lines
heres a 2 minute video about tangent line and secant lines
Visit http://ilectureonline.com for more math and science lectures!
In this video I will review the tangent and secant line with respect to a function.
Next video in the series can be seen at:
http://youtu.be/723jsxCO7Oc
hope it helps
its 3dimensional graphs
Nope
no it's graph theory graphs
Graph Theory
cant tell honestly, Im just getting an introduction by self research
Also quite funny how you put graph representations and adjacency matrices as different things ;)
and no, it's not the wave equation
what I mean as graph representations is a simple representation of a graph on a schematic
alright
first time i hear about this graph thoery
what is it about, basically?
its a representation of 3d structures through math functions
so its just like 2d (x:y) graph of functions but with 3 coordinates?
it can be used for a few diff applications like, structuring molecules, structuring objects, structuring networks
huh. i see
@sleek wing what do you think about it? can you give a substantiated opinion?
it's not about 3d structures idk where you've gotten that from
it's the study of connections
I guess specifically "pair-wise" connections
uhmmm I see. thanks for clarifying.
so what is the fundamental use in a theoretical perspective?
studying connections 
what is the purpose of studying connections?
seems pretty useful to understand them
ok why do you think so? so I can understand it
do you know what a connection is
yes
it's a relation that links one thing to another right?
yes
so that immediately covers all orderings and all equivalence relations which are very important in set theory and algebra respectively
and, tying back to your connection with geometry
it can be used to determine properties about n dimensional shapes
which is useful in algebra and geometry and maybe even algebraic geometry if you're feeling spicy
so to measure the connections per example?
Not quite sure what you mean
Lets put it in a Computational perspective so I can better grasp the concept.
like imagine we have object represented by a dimension
which can fit and apply to the graph conditioning...we can determine the measurement of its connection points per example.
if you want to do things related to geometry and graph theory I think this is a pretty good read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_graph_theory
nope, I just want to know what graph theory is about.
do you think I understood it?
measuring the points is just an example, I understand it can have other dimensions.
graphs in graph theory are these things
pretty sure they don't have dimensions?
They're often used in computer science or something
nothing to do with graphing equations
Funny watching the number of help requests coming in on Sunday evenings compared to Friday afternoons. Is there a bot that can compile a dataset of user and post participation and frequency?
I think he meant by "dimension" they meant planar vs non-planar or smth
One other question, are graphs modeled in other formats besides plain surfaces? Would that count different dimensions?
formally a graph is just a collection of points and of lines connecting them
you can draw a graph on anything
Are the math representations 3 dimensional? Or can they be?
its just that we usually do it on flat 2d planes because, well, most math is done on 2d planes
paper, chalkboards, computer monitors
theres no actual reason for this besides human convenience.
as an example, this drawing is just a visual representation of the graph with vertices {v_1, v_2, v_3, v_3} and edges {(v_1, v_2), (v_2, v_3), (v_1, v_3), (v_3, v_4)}
your visual representation could be "drawn on" whatever surface or "embedded in" whatever space

