#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 493 of 1
Yes its a prerequisite
those two are the same thing?
second one is a generalization for arbitrary k forms
weirdchamp
Bc algebraic geometry is hype
cool name that’s about it
Some classes will like do this "learn as we go" type thing, especially topics courses in undergrad
Is it effective?
I'd say learning bits of commutative algebra/ring theory along with algebraic geometry may be a good way to motivate a few constructions here and there.
But that's about it

:blushsully:
Hi TTerra

A&M is a good school
i meant the book
tterra can i get a hi too 
I've only seen it referred to as Atiyah
i didnt even know there was an a&m school
Tejas baby, Tejas
A&M is nice
except it's full of racists and every other -ist you could think of
also it's in the middle of nowhere
I don't think that's true
I loved my time in Texas (well at least partially)
I don't think anyone's going to openly flame you for that kind of stuff but that doesn't mean it's not there
I'm just speaking based off of what I've seen other people say, I haven't personally been to A&M since middle school 
I know some faculty at A&M, and I used to work with a lot of A&M alumni. Saw nothing but kindness from them
I applied to A&M
which question?
@peak ledge #❓how-to-get-help
I've actually gone through this exercise in my previous grade lol
Might not be easy for someone new to the subject
captain obvious
ive missed you on your sea fares
It's mr. captain obvious to you
i finally understand why linear algebra is in machine learning
finding euclidean distances is a technique in, like, figuring out which data are similar to each other
its called clustering and its used in recommendation algorithms
i feel like the other topics like dot product are also used for finding similarities too

machine learning is entirely phrased within linear algebra and probability theory
the entire conceit of the subject is "apply linear maps interspersed with simple nonlinearities, and tweak the linear maps"
lol
i just picked up a book from mit on data science
im an absolute beginner, but i do know how to program so it shouldnt be too steep a learning curve
yeah the chapter on regression basically said "lul just tweak it"
well, more specifically start from a linear line of best fit and then do curves if you need to
and i just like
dont know how youd go about doing that 😩
they make it seem like its just guesswork
Yeah I am currently doing research on the adaboost boosting algorithm and linear relations of distance on data sets is a big deal
Adaboost is interesting because it sort of super imposes all these bisections of a data set embedded in a feature space
Its very cool and an interesting algorithm in general
It has some mysterious qualities
It has the ability to resist over fitting in its learning procedure and also exceeds the error minimization that was expected, a total surprise 20 years ago, and still isnt entirely understood
damn
Yeah they are still working on the theory of how it performs so well
One theory having to do with linear distances
While I think distances are involved I don't think they are necessarily linear
With adaboost or ML in general
ML in general
Oh, yeah
I'm not too sure on boosting itself TBH so
There are definitely models that dont deal in linear relations on the data set
Boosting is largely related to linear regression techniques and gradient descent
You should look into the support vector machine
The basic SVM is linear I believe, and it is sort of pre-empts boosting and other linear things
And it gives you a way to understand nonlinear classification
You can classify a data set using something that isnt just a clean, linear hyperplane bisection
Yeah looking into SVM and boosting could be useful
They are easier to understand than perceptrons and neural nets at first
Hello guys
I need to show an ez inequality
But I can't make it
I need to show that (a+b)^x<a^x+b^x where a and b are positive and 0<x<1
Try this…power up both sides by 1/x…. LHS will be a+b. RHS will be logically more than it
note that they're equal when x = 1 and when x = 0, (a+b)^x = 1 and a^x+b^x = 1+1 = 2 and 1 < 2
and then think about the fact that both sides are monotonically increasing as x decreases
that's how I'd go about it anyway
binomial expansion?
x isn't an integer so that doesn't help too much unless you really wanna work with an infinite sum
Have you done calc yet or no?
^I think they said they found it
oh wait what was the approach?
Ok so I studied function -1 -t^x+(1+t)^x with parameter x and variable t
I showed it was negative on R+
And then I evaluated it at a/b and multiplied by b^x
And there we have our inequality
If you needed an answer
TFW
I don't think I've had super weird math dreams
I've had math dreams about solving problems or presenting things to people, but super banal stuff
The weird dreams never have any math in them
lol
is $G\overset{f}{\rightarrow}H$ one of those category theory drawings representing a mapping of a function?
the true embodiment of a sully
It literally is just representing f:G -> H graphically
So sure, it’s a diagram or a drawing
Yeah it’s a commutative diagram
you could say that I'm a category theorist
LOL
i use this notation all the time because i forget to name my maps and then notice that they need names
category theorist status: achieved
lmao
Gmod give a talk on proving integration by parts using category theory
ayo i have a quick question, i feel like everybody uses the part highlighted in red. However, I feel like the part highlighted in blue is more precise. Am i missing something?
it is more precise
but everyone ignores it
people tend to ignore the domain restrictions when taking derivatives
Umm it might be rude to send it but my friend wrote a short expositional paper doing this lol
Using adjoint functors
So funny
lmao
I think it might not be public
functors so relatable
arent functors like maps between categories
ohhhhh okay I get it now
makes so much sense
sense = 100
lol
oh
lmao
I see
Set
so smart
🧠
ohhhhh
that's interesting
because a category contains all sets right
so if a category was a set, then it would be the "set of all sets"
is this line of reasoning correct?
the category Set contains all sets, sure
yeah just making sure
that's like the peak of my knowledge of category theory lmao
oof
idk
Probably waiting until you've actually seen a functor in context would be good before doing category theory lol
Define integration by parts in terms of category theory then prove the thing
how hard can it be?
lol
guys everybody hold up i solved integration
no look i evaluated F
bruh
obviously F is a separate variable that does not depend on x
F depends on x so i cant integrate sinx with respect to it like that
I was thinking that yea
e^x / sinx does not have an integral in elementary functions
also i believe that if youre integrating from 0 theres an asymptotic sliver with infinite area
so your integral would not even converge
well i guess thats why you usually start at 1 for 1/x
btw integration by parts could probably be proved in terms of category theory
my intuition says its something like a coproduct in the category of diffeomorphisms
yuck
right if the product rule is given by a product
Lol
I mean it's expressing an anti self adjointness property of the derivative
It's gonna be an adjoint functor thing
in Set
or well i guess the category of smooth 2-manifolds
if you take the functions as your objects you could do smth with universal constructions
im gonna b honest i dont understand adjunction
i make everything into a 1-category with stupid arrows and then i can understand
ok yes i am correct
take ob = diifferentiable functions
take morphisms = an arrow exists from x to y if y is a component of a (n>=0) derivative of x
then proving integration by parts is just proving existence of all coproducts
and its a poset
so not super hard honestly
brainrot
anything can be a category if you think about it for several hours

one time i was explaining what a derivative was in vc to a highschooler
and someone kept loudly interjecting about how we could view differential calculus constructs as category theoretic
i got angry and told them to shut up or something
this server is crazy
"y is a component of any derivative of x including the 0th derivative for identities" is incredibly stupid condition for a morphism
i think we should leave calculus alone
well actually now that i think about it
maybe mildly useful for differential equations?
easy natural transform to linear algebra right?
maybe not easy
not sure how the whole component thing would go
especially bc the derivative is acting more like a relation than an actual derivative so idk about turning that into a matrix
Lol
Why do calculus when categoryposting do good
why be helpful at all to high schoolers who don’t care about higher math and just want to pass their class when you could flexpost all your advanced math to jerk your ego off to their confusion?
Category
"I mean I guess you could use the limit definition of a derivative in your calc 1 class but I am telling you that you can also take the double self adjoint k-category contravariant cohomological spectral n-form instead"
so true
half the fucking people who try to help here

I'll just say I'm not convinced by this category theory proof
yeah i don't know what's going on there
I'm not sure what you're talking about
with the products and coproducts and stuff
Is it the one with the coconut?
Yes
was it this https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=H0Ek86IH-3Y
Category theory is the heart of mathematical structure. In this video, I will drive a stake through that heart. I don't know why I made this.
Grothendieck Googling: https://mobile.twitter.com/grothendieckg
Join my Discord server to discuss this video and more: https://discord.gg/AVcU9w5gVW
MUSIC
Oregano
Vendla (Epidemic Sound)
Penumbra
Kevi...
so is cohomology just backwards homology and is covector just backwards vector? idk what homology or covectors are at all but that latter one doesn’t sound right
yes 
funny video
A covector is definitely not a backwards vector
LMAO right
Cohomology if you use chain complexes could be thought of as backward homology:
... -> A0 -> A1 -> ...
ker d/im d is homology here
... -> A1 -> A0 -> ...
ker d/im d is cohomology here
Cohomology is homology of a cochain complex
I'm not sure how enlightening that is though
The literal only difference is if the numbers go up or down
And if you write them as a subscript or superscript
using a vector v in a vector space V you can define a linear transformation from R to V which sends 1 to v and r to rv. a covector is a linear map V->R, in the other direction
I don’t have any of the prerequisites for this stuff 
I don’t remember which is which, I just pick it at random
this is the path
fam
Or for (co)chain complexes
are you misspelling this as a joke
Tor for tensor products, both start with T

you're welcome
so a covector’s a function? 
it sends v to 1 and rv to r
that was definitely intentional, wasn't it, chmonkey you strong fella
I forget if the numbers go in the top for Tor or for Ext
Oh you meant top or bottom
Yeah
And also for cohomology and stuff
The thing I have the worst time remembering is |- or -| for adjoint functors
I forget which goes where

That’s why I asked if there’s a mnemonic for it
why’d everyone stop talking
Except I wrote pneumonic 
I disagree that everyone stopped talking
you did this featha
Hm a mnemonic...
I hate doing homework lol
first half yes second half hmmm maybe but you also have to tell where the other vectors go that aren't linear multiples of v. an example of a covector is, if your vector space has a dot product or inner product, fix some vector v and then there's a covector V->R which sends w to <v, w>
I’ve never felt as bad about learning as when I do math homework
I think I remember cohomology is top indexes by sheer amount of usage
Then Ext is like cohomology while Tor is like homology
i don't have this problem but i dont remember the top and bottom indexing conventions for covariant and contravariant stuff in diff geo.
Maybe I can remember it that way
Because the (co)homology I’m most used to is sheaf cohomology
Which is H^i
Or maybe
Cochain complex goes up in degree
So it go up top
Chain complex go down so it goes down
ok
a covector is a linear functional
its the opposite of a vector if you think of constructing a vector as several component scalars
it takes in a vector and spits out a number
so it is a function, it's just a multivariable one
I have actually been getting the chance to use basic functional analysis stuff in my algorithm research lately
Functional analysis and convexity are so cool
i don't understand what you did there lmao? is this for analysis?
What did you not understand
how'd you come up with the function?
What year are most of u in
there’s really no answer to that
yeah, some in high school, some in college, some doing phds, some are teachers, just a mix of everyone really
unfortunately i existed in 2008
unfortunately gmod existed in 2008
#sad
lol! boomer!
ryc is in his 20s therefore he’s a boomer
imagine being old
Man there are probably people in this server who were not alive in 2008
Y'all are boomers if you were alive in 2008
i’m 7
oh there’s even a rule
fine I’m 77
They can't be #rules
If you were born on January 9, 2009, you can be in here
nobody reads the age rules lol when making an account on social media
does anyone have a suggestion for a name? it has to be cool tho x.x
Questioning my own age...
Nope... I know my own age
drop the ..
quantum2
no
Or just Quantum
I don’t remember my password… and apparently I need it to change my username… give me a damn moment
It is a good name.
just names in general
for people?
yes
I always thought cassian was a cool name
it is, I am reminded of acotar when I think of that name tho
Anyone offer me a job

ACOTAR was good I need to read the latest one
after Frost and Starlight or whatever it was
why not just do “chloe” lol
the other sister of feyre lol istg if she’s with the third male from the other trio tho…
sorry if this is the wrong channel for ask this, but do you guys know any good programming help discord servers?
@dense radish there’s a server with 112k members with the invite code programming
Thanks a lot for help
LOL
deltacron 
lol
I really want this shit to end ASAP
like who the fuck can stay at one place for hours together
hours
hours
My guy it’s been a hell of a lot longer than hours we’ve had to stay put
true lol
Oh noooooooo
Honestly the more time goes on the more I think covid is proof that God's there and he's enraged at us lol
lmfaooo
ive honestly resigned myself to a covid life
it's going to be this way forever

2 years already, 20 more here we go
Im back bithes
took long enough?
More like with time it increases in how strongly I feel this way
bayesian theology
lol

yeah that should be good
isnt it better to take calc1 then stat course?
i mean, dont you need to find estimated values/mgf/another characteristics of distribution through integration/differentiation?
intro statistics has nothing to do with calculus
that’s when it starts becoming more advanced
It would be interesting to have a debate channel that has weekly non-sensitive mathematical topics
Or daily...
To possible create more quality conversations
There are plenty of un-answered mathematical questions like
Does 1 -1 + 1 -1 + 1 -1 + 1 -1 = 0, 1/2, or 1
isnt transcedental number theory just the questions like this but interesting?
this is so trash
Maybe we could put forth our best efforts to solve un-answered mathematical questions... we probably would fail but have fun doing it
By mathematicians
Ouch
the answer is undefined
is it?
See we are already having a debate... and the question is not what is important currently but the concept is...
What do you mean divergent?
It stays between the values 0 and 1...
Online if that counts
Otherwise no
Discussing the brain-bending Grandi's Series and Thomson's Lamp - featuring Dr James Grime.
More links & stuff in full description below ↓↓↓
A little bit of extra footage from the very end of this interview at: http://youtu.be/TgGi1ls1X-0 (on Brady's own channel)
See our Zeno's Paradox video at http://youtu.be/u7Z9UnWOJNY
Check computerphile ...
Si
Again the question is not the point
What mathematical youtube channel is consistently reliable?
I have no choice if I want to learn more about math, practically
if you want to learn math
this one?
https://www.youtube.com/c/Aleph0
Thanks for stopping by! Aleph 0 is a channel devoted to bringing pure mathematics into the hands of learners. So far, this channel has videos on topology, algebraic geometry, PDEs, differential geometry, number theory, and more. If you're excited by pure math, or even if you're just curious about what it is, then you're in the right place.
Twit...
dont rely on any math channels
get some math textbooks
depending on the topic, khan academy has some good videos
Aren't they expensive?
what kind of book are you looking for
calculus? differential equations? linear algebra?
an old edition of a calculus textbook can be purchased for $10 on used book sites
spivak's calculus is VERY expensive and its one of the best books on the calculus
I am unsure, I just purely want to learn (where I can understand)
I have gotten a few books in the past... they were complicated and went way over my head, 3b1b delivers messages in ways I can understand them more easily
hmm goals...
3b1b doesnt actually teach math
?
Where do you suggest starting?
lol i cant answer that until you tell us what your goals are
btw what are good and interesting problem books in calculus 1/2 in anglowold?
and what math classes you've taken so far
do you want to become a mathematician? do you want to do physics? engineering? are you just trying to learn calculus so you can pass your calculus courses?
In-Person Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2... Online Too many to count (I exist taking math lessons online from youtube)
I started with physics but I think I want to be a mathematician (hopefully a professor)
do you know calculus?
About 85% depending on the level (This is future me, What in the world was this statement)
im not sure what that means
And what the textbook consists of
Thanks...
I work mainly in differential calculus
If I use calculus
np and gl
3b1b just explains the conceptual ideas btw, yt should be used as a supplement to actually solving problems
i recommend stewart
it has differential calc integral calc and vector calc
all in one book
it's also pretty easy to understand
I'm not sure if I am posting in the right channel, but can anyone tell me, relatively, how feasible it is to learn trigonometry on your own? I took precalculus I (college algebra) last semester and, well, it was rather easy. I figure if trigonometry is just as easy, or relatively easy, I can self-study and place out of it and into calculus I. I did not take trigonometry in high school, btw.
if you already took precalc, trig would probably be really easy for you
precalc is basically taking those concepts and expanding? at least back at my school
I took precalc I, which is mainly college algebra. We didn't go over trig, though
precalc II goes over trig
Lol
I stopped at algebra 1 😐 , so I had to learn algebra 2 while in college. I learned a lot in algebra 2, though.
I see, didn’t know people could do that
precalc I was basically algebra 2, but maybe a tiny bit more advanced
plus exponential and logarithmic properties and equations
did you take geometry?
Do what? Take algebra 2 in college? If you are referring to that, I took a developmental math course lol
I did, in high school. However, I don't remember much from that class and I didn't do that good
I did ok, I guess
You can look at Khan Academy to see what concepts are in trig. It might be a different from actual curriculum but it's pretty close
@uncut socket I just looked on Khan Academy and most of the material is new.
Does learning trig necessitate a strong foundation in geometry?
really depends on the curriculum, I was jw; all I learned in geometry was proof tables and the basic trig ratios, not that important
and proofs were so boring x.x
as they were basics x.x
lol
I probably need to learn the basics, seeing that I am not familiar with trig at all - I don't think
I mean do you know sin cos tan
Lol! I could use an end of semester party rn
Majority of classes teach new material. Only a few weeks, more like 1 to 2 weeks, is just review material
I learned it about a week ago via an online course
Heard.
👍.
Bet!
Thanks @mystic mountain and @uncut socket
glhf
I'll try lol
maybe you should read #❓how-to-get-help
Anyone stare at the corner of a room where 2 walls meet the ceiling and briefly feel like you can comprehend the fourth dimension going through it but then snap out of it?
Douglas Adams was probably right smh
All the time
what REUs should I apply to, or how does one go about choosing which ones? I'm kinda broadly interesting in algebra/topology/algebraic geometry/logic, but I haven't been exposed to that much---I haven't really seen much number theory/diff geo, and I'm only starting some algebraic topology right now.
Girls
Uchicago REU seems neat
Chicago is generally more expository/less focused on originality than other REUS tmk which does i think make it more accessible for things like AT and AG
Do Math majors on average enjoy anime more than Engineering majors? 
casue this server seem to have more anime while on an engineering discord im they consider it all cringe
i mean nami is a bigger weeb than almost everyone here
a lot of engineering spaces feel really insecure to me
from what ive seen
so clowning on people for enjoying things is a natural corollary of that
but admittedly this is anecdotal
Unlike the chad mathematicians who feel secure in our own outstanding intellect

no you see we're insecure as well but we arent in denial about it
nami i was about to say
i mean, in any space, there probably will be people of many kind
some like me that dont like anime
some that adore it
we gotta get back to posting these waifu labs pictures
etc etc
In this moment, I am euphoric. Not because of any false gods blessing, but because I am enlightened by my own intellect
objective cringe chmonkey
Why don’t you copy paste that into google and see what turns up
don't forget to reference the original quote maker
Oh right, they did that in the original post didn’t they?
lol
chmonkey i know you didn’t make it lol
Plagiarized
I had a friend who memorized this and would say it all the time
-AALewis
There’s a different one I wish I could find god damn it
It was some guy talking about how he was so smart and like
He said he would never hurt someone else unless the cost to his body was higher
Said if given a chance he would not go back in time to kill hitler to instead rehabilitate him
Said he’s well respected on some brony subreddit
lol
Said as part of how smart he is he’s disproven multiple of the theories of Freud’s theories
And that he knew calculus a lot better than his sister’s boyfriend or something who is an engineer
It was just a fucking goldmine
I just don’t remember any of the direct quotes so I can’t find it
anime is art engineering
this was me
Hmm yeah that does seem really appealing. I’m in no rush to do something original, I’d be very content with getting some depth and writing up some good exposition
@clever knot I sullied you for interrupting an in progress conversation with a completely unrelated question
😬 oops
Would it be considered a proper subset?
Guess not I assume.
No.
Of subset? Or of empty set?
I guess because it is the same thing then it is a subset by default
Seems weird to question the subset of an empty set
I think you are looking too much into this. It’s literally just a fact that comes straight from the definiton of subset
It’s not deep or meaningful
Yeah
If’s just true. We have a definition of “subset” and based on that definition the empty set is a subset of itself
Just like any other set is a subset of itself
Why would someone care about an empty set?
Or is it just one of them edge cases that we filled in
Why would someone care about the number 86?
It’s a set that exists because of how we have defined sets
86
I see.
Asking “why does the empty set exist” is like asking “why does the number 7 exist”. It’s just how things are defined
I'm sure there are several reasons why the number 86 is interested
The empty set is useful because sometimes you want to be able to have “nothing” as an answer
It’s nice that I can say “let X be the set of even integers greater than 2 which are not the sum of two primes”
Without having to check if that set is empty or not
If you dont allow the empty set as a set, then you can’t make thst statement.
how is this just a conjecture wtf
ik
freedom of speach/thought
like we know 65536 is the largest power of two that does not contain a power of 2
thank you
your welcome
Truly an educated gentleman. Was this all unprompted?
I forget lmao
I do think it's more important to address grass roots issues if given a time machine to go back to Nazi Germany, it wasn't as if Nazi's didn't exist before hitler. He just became their leader
It'd probably be better to find a way to dismantle the nazi party before it hit critical mass
I think it was just that it was another point in this really obviously “I’ve never had to really make any hard decisions because I’m immature” “I’m above everything” middle of the road non confrontational attitude
but it is pretty cringe to hear people say stuff like that
Like he says stuff about how he’d be pacifistic and it’s clear the dude’s never been in any sort of altercation to be able to say that
I remember at my church youth group we'd have conversations like this a lot
On morality & ethics
And the hitler thing read as just naïveté from someone who thinks the world is far simpler than it is
Which isn’t to say someone who “has seen the real world” wouldn’t have that opinion, it’s just that in the larger context that’s how it seemed
the world is so simple
I remember years later he followed up on it and recognized how cringe it was and obviously also full of lies
if you went back in time it would be better to get hitler a better education than kill him
in that case
I forget if it was just “yeah idk what that was” or also partially defending himself
better education
Was Hitler uneducated?
Lmao
idts
better art education
lol
Hurb
do you guys love william rowan hamilton?
had to google it but hitler's art actually pretty good in terms of his technical skill
the subject matters he picked seem kinda boring to me tho
i dunno if that was the fashion at the time to draw those kinds of things only
I Love William Rowan Hamilton.
noice, I love him not well
lol
where
who the fuck is this


i think hamilton is a dumb musical
that went through several rewrites in my brain before i typed it


I love it
and i wont hear anything bad about it 🔫
jk
🙂
my brain is poisoned from growing up in the art world, i have been trained to hate almost all musicals
🌝

wha-?
this is worse than that smiley
West side story is kinda nice.
rycope
Lmao wow

hamilton is probably better than most other musicals
i was forced by friends to listen to the soundtrack several times over in high school, sort of fragmented?
because the big joke was that i hated hamilton
but had never seen it
I liked it
Oo
and i just never liked it

i mean, that does make some sense as to why u wont like it
it's not really lin manuel miranda, i kind of liked the new in the heights even if it was very very cheesy
friends doing something like that will ruin it for u
yeah it was good
it had cheesy points but i liked it
well it was worth the sacrifice cause it was a good long running joke
2013-2017
oh hamilton is nearly 7 years old at this point
hamilton was really big in my junior year
like in terms of the suffocating popularity
oh yeah i remember wicked too lol
No wicked is still popular
zoomer wicked?
I’ve never seen it actually
wicked was definitely millenial

never heard of that
again, i dont exactly live in a place where musicals are popular
so i had to scour the internet for a while before i managed to get to one i liked
i see
Phantom of the opera has good orchestration the story is just cringe

and my parents were actors in non-musical theater, but i met a lot of musical-people
musicals are the kinda thing i would be into
i recently heard the greatest showman
i loved it
The latest job I had was as an usher at a movie theater and I had to listen to the intro to west side story over and over I also just think it’s problematic. It doesn’t address its issues well enough and it doesn’t have any license
boring and loud
if u hear them out of context, they can be boring

its not a sung through musical
i see
its a movie with a lot of songs
i liked it
i heard "the other side" and it was catchy
are they well known??
Not particularly outside of the theater world
I mean
They are quite well regarded but not famous in any way
oh
Proofs are so zzz man
They turn me off
I like the problems
I just don't like the formality
Different situations require different levels of formality.
This is for self-study but I guess it's important to build those skills up for when I take a real class right?
I've always been a very foundational and intuitive person, I need to know the why and how behind things to feel like I understand and appareciate it
but I don't care about formality either
obviously handwaving is still bad but I don't want to have to consider every small detail
but ig if you don't then how can you be sure you didn't miss anything or you're not glossing over a "small detail" that turns out to be important
For my first couple proof based classes a lot more attention was paid to rigor. But I'm not fully done with my bachelors yet. But as the classes went on we were able to accept more stuff intuitively.
Your intuition sucks ass at the start
Part of it was in building up thms and constructions from foundations but I think some of it was our instructors not expecting us to belabor every little point?
Because you just pretend things that you want to be true are “intuitive”
u know Chm I was about to say "idt so
" to the first message and then you said the second and I guess I can't say no
Part of why things work is formalism maybe?
Well idk, that's not a great way to say what I mean
When someone says clearly and doesn’t expand on something later it’s because of a lot of experience that says “this is true, I know how the argument will go but maybe I haven’t checked every detail”
When you start out when you say clearly it just means “this seems true probably and I want to use it”
HAHAHA 
There’s nothing actually there to back up your claim
Right
I just mean that part of why/how things work rests on formal details.
(I'm laughing because it's funny to get called out and realize that yes, that is what I've been doing, not because I disagree or anything
)
half the songs are good, the other half and the actual non-music parts are kinda bad
To be honest proving things is what’s fun for me
I think I enjoy it more than the larger overall picture of things
Proofs seem like they get more fun as you do them 
cause when I try to write proofs I always think about it in my head (but the handwavey "intuitive" way) and then immediately try formalizing it. but maybe if I just like let myself blabber on paper and speak my thoughts out loud it'd be more satisfying? because I can first get the details in a way that's casual and comfortable for me and then I can try to make it exactly right
absolutely not me but I haven't done much
I mean that’s how most proofs work
You have an idea then you work out if it’s correct
Proving things is what's fun for me but before I was super used to it it sucked in a lot of ways for sure
(also before I was doing proofs on cool stuff)
Like idk it depends on the field too
i wish i could start all my proofs with at least a vague idea 
I enjoy algebra because the way the ideas translate to arguments is a lot more fun for me
i usually have to poke the objects for a while
Proving more interesting things makes a difference too I guess.
For analysis I felt like I had an idea on what to do then I spent a while trying to grope around to see why some delta would work
But there's a lot of pain that goes along with that lol.
Granted this was from freshman year so maybe now I’d be better at it
And what chmonkey says is the opposite for me, trying to translate an idea to an algebra argument is painful for me, but it's really fun for me to put together an analytic argument
And combinatorics is again a completely different sort of way to go about it
In a sense combinatorics can at times be the most fun to translate an idea to an argument
algebra feels so much more open to me than analysis
I would say that that is a perception shaped by intro analysis books
it feels like you can build any structure you want in algebra
Which is very inaccurate
It opens up a ton when you start doing other kinds of analysis
oh
Is there any way around that kind of thing for studying intro analysis stuff or is it like an "eat your vegetables" kind of thing?
holomorphic dynamics seems interesting to me
because of the interesting fractals that result

why the stares 
I think that’s because they heard the word holomorphic dynamics
And are intrigued by the subject
oh

it's the study of iterated holomorphic functions
I think they know what it is
Dynamic slimp
sorry I'm not good at parsing people's messages 
autism moment
what would be the prereqs for holomorphic dynamics
ofc complex analysis
but what else
crack open milnor's book and see


Fuck you RYC you don’t even study cool math

holomorphic dynamics... 😏

slim has probably been hiding a voracious appetite for holomorphic dynamics this whole time but it might be one of the fields of dynamics i am least interested in
I think it is very flashy and pretty on the surface, but actually engaging with it seems sort of unpleasant


That’s just polynomials. Next
😐
why fo you say
well
my perception is that it's very similar to analytic number theory in this way
uhh
that could be wrong
i don't have a good description of this
i like analysis, but analysis doesnt like me 
It seems analytic number theory is an increasingly difficult field to work in due to the slow pace of progress, and the dwindling number of faculty members that work in it
Most people seem to either do some other type of NT, or analysis, and as a side project they do some analytic NT
analytic nt meaning studying nt using tools from analysis?
yeah
mkay
Analytic number theory is not dying lol
Its just incorporating more and more algebra
Modern analytic number theorists look like algebraists
I never claimed it was dying, I just claimed it's an increasingly difficult field to work in
Well the dwindling number of faculty working in it part seems false to me, I don't have statistics tho
I wanted to do some research in Analytic NT, but I didn't find much on the west coast
look harder

I am go to IAS.
I'm actually so close
i wonder if there's any way at all to attend anything...
Highly doubt it
sorry just let me be terry's PhD student
y'know, I think Yitang Zhang will take me too
Is it Buddhist to not ask questions in class
i took an elliptic curves class that was supposed to incorporate analytic number theory but i really didnt recognize it
it's so broad and runs up against geometry/algebra so hard at times
well i guess the prof showed us some interesting integral bounds at times
You call it analytic number theory when there start being too many letters on the board and you feel like you can’t understand it anymore
lol
It’s a method of copium for “algebraic” number theorists
yeah pretty much, the names dont even mean anything anymore at times
if someone is familiar with t test and distribution pls hit me up It'll just take 5 minutes
especially with like dynamics, physics, and CS in the mix NT is kinda crazy
@fossil kindle #probability-statistics, i assume this is the channel you need
like i got into CS algorithms via number theory
ok thank you
I'm getting into combo via algos rn lol
I just picked up Knuth's text on combinational algos (well, Volume 4A not 4B)
gonna be an interesting thing to work through
Nice do you do CS then?
Knuth and Conway have some really cool recursive and discrete stuff
Are these even real proffessions?
lol
they are leavubg'
guys
Man
I have this problem with hard math problems where when I cant solve them... I am like HOW IN THE FING WORLD IS ANYONE SUPPOSED TO THINK OF THAT.... I mean.... I am wondering if this feeling ever goes away?
your writing another paragrapgh
Yes it eventually goes away
its fcking demotivating
Well, I guess I sometimes think that, but I watch a lot of youtube so I havee control over that feeling
what kind of math problems?
school problems?
or mathematician-problems?
not school problems.... I am way ahead of my school curricula
me2
its like trying to prove ineqs..... sometimes without calc
that could be hard
Sometimes I look up how cauchy proved am-gm and I feel like this dumb creature that's like thinking will I ever be able to do this?!
who thinks about casework around 2^n......I'd never think of that in a million years
I'm talking about people who call themselves analytic number theorists.
I think you could
ik
calculus is so lolly
I mean.. proving them with calc feels like cheating for some reason.....without calc you get beautiful proofs
like using cauchy induction
and also I have this commitment of doing every single exercise problem... but now I cant keep that up or i'll burn out
and not doing exercise problems feels that... maybe I'll miss a really nice problem which i'll like
yes just practice doing more problems and reading proofs and stuff then u'll get better at this sort of thing
HELPP
Someone can help me ?
from what i’ve heard i’d imagine they can eat way more
if you live of your stipend its rough
Anyone does gcse maths edexcel >
Well there's still like, Green-Tao style NT. But if you mean Langlands then lol
idk if you have the time or want to but math olympiad helps for these kinda skills
If you're still in school
you could consider
But it's not necessary
Hi is there a link for this server so my friend can ge jelp
Thx
please tell your friend to read the rules before asking for help
posts question in 20 channels
we’ve been at approximately this many members for quite a while
for a suitable definition of approximately
engineer's definition of approximately
I mean
we are at 75,000 now
since 75,000=74,976 for large values of 74,976

Yes
large values of 74976
guess constant numbers have upper bounds now
also it went down by 2
yeah. i left the server
Lol what happened?
jerk being a jerk
you know what they say. fuck around and find out.
he fucked around and he found out.
smh dont sully me that's a thing :P
it is
its just 1 grad student doing the eating. adding 1 doesn't change the rate 👀
if im taking one of the elements of a power set, can I use the \in symbol?
use \in if you are talking about an element of a set
it doesnt matter what the element and set are
e.g. if my set S={1,2} then the power set is {{}, {1}, {2}, {1,2}}, can I say that {1} \in P(S)
yes
ok cool ty
even though it's a subset it's still an element, correct?
{1} \subset P(S) would not be correct
oh
and therefore you would write {1} \in P(S)
ty
{{1}} 
{{
}}
describe all finite sets $S$ where for all $s \subseteq S$, we have $s in S$.
Merosity
I mean... I dont have a affinity towards olympiads...
and they are two different things right.. math research and math olys
hello there this isnt related to math at all but can I ask for help with an essay I'm writing
I would love to hear some critique on it and it's not too long
ordinals?
give an example
$\emptyset \subset {\emptyset}$ and $\emptyset \in {\emptyset}$
∧res
I assume you mean proper subset, because S \in S is impossible
by a cardinality argument if they're finite, but also by regularity
for finite sets yeah, there are no sets S
that's basically what I had in mind, {} is a subset, so it's in S, so then we have must have {{}}, etc... no way you can have a finite set
yeah and ordinals doesn't even work because you need the subset to take the form ${0,1,...,n}$ for some $n < |S|$
∧res
yup
wouldn't that mean S in S
😎
They're doing all the good math these days, I get it






