#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 491 of 1
The answer is no isn't it?
I proved it by contradiction
You take the rational "r" you get in the diagnol and substract 1/9 which is 0.111... (assuming r>1/9)
So each digit in r-1/9 is either turned to 9 or 8 or it gets smaller by 1 or 2
So r-1/9 is different than r in each digit
Therefore r-1/9 (a rational) is not in our list.
idk myself 

this only works for r > 1/9 though?
you can just increase digits of r by 1 and then reduce modulo 9, if r is rational it is eventually periodic, and the transformed r will still be eventually periodic thus rational
but not on the list, since it differs from every element on the list in at least one digit
no
faf is the real sam
i used to be $\neg$Sam
just sаm
but quantum said that faf gave me the perm to use the name sam so here i am
@gentle bay
@fair mural you are summoned.
should i change my nme to bob
Quantum,
- Why did you bend the fabric and history of the server?
Why did you change spacetime Quantum.
he has a twin (breaking the quantum no-cloning theorem)


Things are going out of hand.
There are 2 Sams.
Quantum has a twin.
So many people suddenly have fever.
Many new server boosters.
Chmonkey is dead.
Yeah, if it's less than 1/9 you just add 1/9 instead of substract
The same logic follows
ah yeah
This also makes sense
i ate him
@odd obsidian playing minecraft all alone in a vc in the math discord server
epitome of nerdiness
its the off topic vocie man
ik but still lol
gimme motivation
Mo ti va ti 📴
motivate me harder
Can someone give me advice what algorithm to use in order to visit all nodes of undirected graph with minimal path length? There is just so many on them...
maybe use ant one, but it will be slow with my impl...
i just don't know
You're better off asking about this in the CS server linked in #old-network
oh, thanks!
I need to restart learning Math
.
if you need to restart learning math, do ratner 
yeah idk,
I hardly knew her
Rat who?
i didn’t know her
I'm more about irreducible representations of women in meth
women don't do me :(


can we not
gmod will never stop and you know it
how is that unacceptable but what quantum said is perfectly okay
i didn’t mean it in that way
i meant it like this
“men don’t just do meth, women also do meth”
sounds stupid when not in a joke context
gmod moment
gmod moment
gmod moment
gmod moment
chill moment, and not the good kind
it’s never good when gmod is involved
Anyways I'm doing my part to improve diversity in mathematics 🏳️⚧️
do love planting some trees
based and transpilled
i am also a trans person getting into maths
wooo!
hi
after all, depression is sad

all i can see is
baxd
It says "based"
i know
At firstI thought it was "boxd" lol
boxd
boxed
boxed
You should try to do as many as possible
If the textbook is well written, then all of them are essential for the topic
Even if you can't/don't want to solve some of the problems, then just read the solution and try to understand it
poll: lagrange 🇱 vs leibniz 🇫 vs euler 🇩 vs newton 🇳 derivatives
I personally like to use Euler
but i also have to use lagranges notation, and leibnitz notation as well
I will die on the hill of Newton’s notation for the sake of banter
Newton's notation is missing
I reacted N for that
but Lagrange > Leibniz > (flip a coin)
oh wait but isn't Euler notation widely used in multi

I’m ugly on purpose honey
it is
euler integrals are alright
$\line{y}$
quantum
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
also quantum, when you’ve been studying ODEs, systems of ODEs are actually just higher order ODEs
i honestly think the first one is fine, tho i often use that for directional derivatives
the first one is used by lots of people
the euler indefinite integral notation is quite rare
i doubt anyone has ever used euler notation for definite integrals
the indefinite integral notation isn’t that rare

i guarantee you just said random words there
lmao
basically you can think of functions as vectors and the integral/differential operator as a linear tranaformation in that vector space of functions
that's functional anal 
that sounds right
That's my math take
but i’m not sure
and statics
Real anal
someone confirm or deny this
Well I either use Leibniz's notation or Lagrange's derivatives notation, but I find Euler's derivatives notation to be quite simple and neat
Its correct quantum
R^R, trivial
tetration with sets
Yes the derivative and integral are both nicely defined as linear dealies
Linear dealies
Dealy is a superset that includes functionals and functions
linear dealies
pentation
Functionals are functions 
Even better
what’s an inverse differential operator that isn’t compact, I know my prof said that most of what is dealt with will be, but I’m struggling thinking of an example offhand
Laplacian on an unbounded set
On a bounded set idk
Laplacian on an unbounded set can have continuous spectrum approaching 0
And like
Ok
Im dumb cause
You need to add a condition
To make it invertible to begin with
But whatever
Alright i completely rescind my answer
Lol
can every differential equation be thought of as an operator acting on some element of a function space?
Yeah basically
It just might be a nonlinear operator
Linear DEs are defined by the fact that they are linear operators on a function space
You can also split out the linear part and say it's a linear thing equals a nonlinear thing. This is a pretty common perspective to take, since then you can interpret the nonlinearity sort of like an inhomogeneity
Yes absolutely
Understanding the spectral properties of your operator is central to understanding it
oh wow
Especially for like
Time dependent equations
Remember that when you do separation of variables on a time dependent equation you almost always get an eigenvalue/eigenfunction problem in the x variables
"Spectral methods" are extremely common in studying DEs
Spectra are just really badass
They might be the absolute most important toolkit
so is functional analysis super important in your field?
Functional analysis is a very nice way to support a bunch of analytical applications
Yeah
Like this kinda stuff
Again probably the most important thing outside PDEs for PDEs is functional analysis
/ harmonic analysis
Ngl I am a functional analysis stan
wow
For pure pdes
Yeah for pure pdes
I should have said
im a functional analysis/differential geometry stan even tho i know basically nothing about either of those fields
What is an impure pde
Applied
I mean applied
The stuff I do
numerical 💩
Oh I see
Where numerics are far more important
functional analysis is neat
Gotcha
It's a different perspective right
imagine not wanting the analytical solution 
i guess all the applied maths ppl are in some engineering server
And in applied pdes you're like
I need to study more diffeq
same
I have this pde with initial/boundary conditions, what is the solution
It seems like a lot of dynamics books are written for continuous, differential systems
wait what's harmonic analysis?
Fourier transforms
As a pure pde person I dont think ive touched an analytical solution in ages
And related things
Ok thats a lie
I just did on an exam
But
Its rare
Vanishing viscosity method moment
I need to study more diffeq 😩
lol yeah they say that a analytical solution for a pde can only be found in the tears of a unicorn
very rare
poetic
that field studies how to decompose functions into periodic functions?
fourier analysis
it's all about that?
And fancier techniques
harmonic analysis i mean
techniques to decompose functions into a bunch of simpler functions?
sounds exactly like fourier series
essentially yes
I think stein’s book is good
are the prereqs real anal?
yeah and functional analysis iirc
harmonic analysis? is that pretty much signal and systems
well i don't think that, it's just that i'm more familiar with the engineering perspective
this is very brave 
"#foundations is what buildings are on top of"
stuff like Fourier transforms, DFT are covered in your typical signal and systems course, but i've never actually heard of a harmonic analysis course though
Harmonic analysis is very far removed from signal processing these days
Harmonic analysis deals with things like singular integral operators, oscillatory integrals (see stationary phase method) and related asymptotics
Uhhh
Pseudodifferential and paradifferential operator calculus
It's like a big toolkit for studying different fields of math
Yeah
Harmonic analysis on lie groups and stuff is big
Noncommutative harmonic analysis
numerical analysis is everything that drifted away from pure math fields in favor of numerics
It is really closely related to signal processing but not only that basically
how this didn’t get 20 sullies i don’t know
Don't let the engineering companies I have frantically applied to know that
Lol
I almost got a job signal processing
I let it slip I don't wanna live in Sacramentor for longer than 3 years
And then I got rejected, other than that they totally bought harmonic analysis & fourier analysis as useful
i got u fam
Can you say which company?
It was a defense company
Lots of math-related positions in defense and aerospace companies.
fr some defense company i was interviewing for before accepting my current intern was asking sm questions about cryptography in interview
crypto is number theory tho, and number theory is boring af
number theory is awesome
Trolling goes in #chill smh
Ugh, I was about to publish a bunch of math papers and there are serious problems with the submission system and no realistic way to contact anyone familiar with OJS at 12:15 am so close to New Years.
"Mathematics is the queen of the sciences—and number theory is the queen of mathematics." (C.F. Gauss)
can anyone suggest some summer research school programs in maths? Ideally places where non US dudes can apply.
may be a list or something, or somewhere u've been
antarctica
I came across that quote earlier in the year and it still gets me keen on studying number theory, I've just committed myself to seeing through a Workbook at the moment so after that 😅
which one would that be? I started working on problems from Ram Murty, and absolutely fell in love with n.t. I came across the quote much earlier on, but didn't realize how true it is until i graduated and had some background in algebra. Only then i realized that it is truly the most beautiful part of maths:)
um, could you elaborate pls?
twas' a joke
oh, cuz i live there and didn't see many summer schools. In fact there is not many schools around at all and the summer isn't really summer in the conventional sense.
I'm working through an old book called Number Treasury by Stanley Bezuska. It's about looking at a bunch of interesting types of numbers, stuff I've never come across at least, some I have.
What I've found to be the most enjoyable is the interesting connections between the number types.
I also am starting a mathematics club at the school I teach at and the book is something I'm using as a resource
The book sets projects and encourages you to make conjectures and explore a bit more
It led me and some guys in the staffroom to come up with our own idea which we've made a conjecture about, totally pointless but it's fun and it seems to hold up
wow, this is wonderful! I think this is what learning maths should be like!
seems like a great book, I wish i were one of your students:))
It was good fun, other teachers were walking by since it was recess and there we were exploring this idea.
I'm definitely going to try let it influence my teaching more. The maths club is definitely a small group, but they're all keen. For my normal classes, it's definitely been an eye opener in how I can help the students play around and see connections.
Last 12 months for me have been great mathematically, I've come to appreciate the entire subject so much more. Now I have to translate that to my students
Wait, does that make number theory a subqueen? is queen-i-ness transitive? How does this map? Help
it certainly is after immediatization:)
Ok actual question now, what is immediatisation
apparently it is a process when the indirect subjects of a monarch (i.e. subjects of subjects) become his direct subjects
sorry, you live there?
@vague lion help
No
Budapest Semesters and Math in Moscow are the two big international programs I know of
they run courses and summer research iirc
happy new years!
Happy new years
You know, for a year that is made up of mostly two's, the prime factorisation of 2022 = 2 × 3 × 337 isn't what I expected
wholesome
base 10 is chaotic in every way, we must abolish it
every base has this problem
yes but at different scales
2022 as a base 12 number (3482) factors as 2 * 1741
that looks kinda nice!
(though 1741 in base 12 is 1011)
yes
all those are in base 12
oh
in base 10, that becomes 3472 = 2 * 1741
obviouly 2022 = 2 * 1011 in base 10 as well, but 1011 isnt prime as a base 10 number
in any case, the factorization isnt very 2-heavy beyond being even
maybe we should just represent numbers by some kind of knot
compositions of knots become the new numbering system
base agnostic
A guy I work with was a knot theorist before becoming a teacher, he would be on board 😅
i mean you only need lines to represent knots after all
How to think logically
is this possible?
arent knots defined by a two tuple?
like by how many times they cross the donut hole and by how many times they loop around the one connected component?
What do you mean exactly?
You already think logically
what does it actually mean to think logically
That's why I asked
I suppose you mean thinking deductively
Making inference with induction
You could read a book on logic. To see how basic logic works
yes
You already do deductions of what you see in your life
Why do you asked that question?
Maybe I can understand more with your motivation for that
It's okay. Maybe read Philosophy. It can help to think more about certain things
mhm
I recommend Plato Dialogues
To begin with
They're dialogues only. It's not heavy to read
i am also suffering from brain fog
do u experience brain fog?
I suppose, sometimes, isn't it normal?
Maybe you need motivation
there's no point reading when u can't understand it
but what if its not
Why?
wdym?
Why wouldn't be normal?
nvm
This reads like a Google search
or a book title
How to think logically - Xiao, 2022
my eyes can't handle this change
Plato is 
Read Zhaungzi
Abandon thinking logically
technically you can do something arbitrary, like the number of crossovers, or something, but i think we're not far from describing knots as matrices, which have a determinant, which can be a number
there was that AI helped result to do with the algebraic and geometric 'values' for a knot being equivalent under certain conditions, maybe that? idk i'm just dropping bby
My son wants to know what other maths you need to know for trigonometry and I have forgot. Can someone help
i suggest euclid's elements
perfect for children from ages 3-8
Seriously?
Any algebra he needs to know?
I mean, are you serious? In which country you learn with Euclid's Element
no just euclid's elements
basic identities would be all
so stuff like a^2-b^2=(a+b)(a-b)
stop trolling ffs
for now, dont let ur see that book
Ok
That's a good book. But it's advanced I would say
He is only 12 just loves math
thats nice
Seems good. Do you want to help him ? You should try him to enter a math Olympiad team
that's an excellent book for kids
Thanks for the help guys I really appreciate it
😩
shambeh is a known troll
Well from some of you at least
known? really 🥺
i just try to give good advice issall
Thank you so much! Have a great day!
👍
Abstract Algebra for a kid 🧐
you'd be surprised!
That isnt so surprising now
If you can give your son or daughter only one gift, let it be Erdos
there are 13 year olds doing AA, so 
It's dead 😩
Yes, I would like to know their biography. I mean, maybe they began to study since little
Or they are orodigies
Prodigies
then u may ask @spring wyvern
Is he doing Abstract Algebra? Seems cool
funfact
my erdos number will be 4
if i publish with right guy in 3 years
And now is infinity?
hi i am sam and i'm doing stuff
i mean, new maths involved introducing AA to 12-13 year olds right?
aops?
its not crazy though
arithmetic is the easy part of learning math and thats all thats taught in US atleast
moving up in abstraction is only natural step
is this a joke using wordplay on abstract and algebra
no

new math didnt teach abstract algebra (at least not in any detail)
it taught basic set theory and logic
and simple proofs, modular arithmetic, etc
still more abstract than what high schoolers today see, much less middle schoolers
but still
Hello
some parts of new math persist in modern curricula fwiw
its why us high schools teach matrices
while most other countries dont
Happy new year 🙂
https://youtu.be/brAcrbq7F0g
Math Special ~ Happy New Year 2022!
My hs teacher didn’t teach us matrices lol
In my HS we saw matrices. But, only how to multiply them and sum them and calculate 3x3 determinants
But we never saw what matrices are for
Anyone familiar with hyperreal
no 🙂
Sad
This was also the case in my precalc class
Matrix multiplication felt so weird
It only made sense when you think about linear transformations and the column vectors being the image of the standard basis vectors
The only justification i got for matrices in highschool was "sometimes you need to keep track of big arrays of numbers", which is fair but this justification makes matrix multiplication so out-of-left-field
mhm, but i think that if i was introduced to matrices as systems of equations my classmates and I would have been very lost
heck some of my college classmates were lost too, so i don’t really have hope for my younger self
yeah I was confused when my friend in precalc was like "yeah we are learning matrices and doing multiplication with them"
im like "have you some vectors?" and he said no, so im like "have you done anything like the determinant or smth" and again, no
literally just matrix multiplication and that's it, like tf what's the point
tbf the only time i ever saw matrix stuff again was calc 3 doing determinants and vector stuff. but that all had its own intro section to vectors so the precalc matrix stuff is kind of useless imo haha
my HS does it all as a single .75yr course lol
yeah i’ve heard other people say it’s not ideal
all of what?
calc 1-3
this la class i took was all computation, and it’s a prerequisite for my upcoming class on la proofs which should be more enjoyable
ya, lol
oh okay
I think it was meant to be like 350hr in total, so you were expected to do a lot out of class
oh damn
that sounds almost unbelievable
like almost impossible to fit that much content in less than a year for high schoolers
oh, it's an accelerated gymnasium
also education is kind of weird in iceland; we do the equivalent of 1st-2nd year in "secondary" (not sure of all the translations)
even if accelerated it seems way too quick. further maths was 2 years and i don’t even think they covered all that content at a very speedy pace. impressive for sure
yeah I agree, it's a ridiculously fast pace
based
thats good
lots of ppl spend too much time on that baby shit
Absolutely
As long as x is positive
Otherwisely √x doesn't exist in the first place
but √(x^2) = |x| for all x
huh
what are you talking about
the square root is always positive
they were talking about solving an equation
like x^2 = 4
it’s not the same
you didn’t
It's not the same
|x| and ±x are two different things
They're the same
Solve what? There's no equation
And first of all √4 isn't ±2
?
solve is not the same as evaluate
Quantum, is this person confusing you aswell?
yes
$\sqrt{4} = 2 \neq \pm 2$
quantum
Yeah, sqrt is defined to be positive, thus it can't be ±2
George Clarke
if A implies B, where B is always true, it doesn't mean that A is thus true
For example you could take 1 = -1 and square both sides
1^2 = (-1)^2
You're solving $\sqrt{4} = \pm 2$?
George Clarke
sqrt(x) is defined to always be positive
You are restricting the domain to a strictly positive number
so there is no need to include plus or minus when it is just positive 2
has anyone done anything with the open university
im thinking about doing a part time masters there
but idk if its worth doing it like that
or just taking a year out and going to a physical uni
Can you transfer credits from the open university to another university?
If so, why not start at the open university and transfer later when you have time?
That’s what everyone I know who’s doing open uni is doing
not common thing so proabaly not
actually
maybe less so for postgrad
ik for undergrad it can be more hard
@kindred latchplease use #latex-testing from now on
🥝 737
🥝✈️
is there a 101 lesson on how to use latex on this server
$latex goes in here$, you can also use double dollar signs for it to be in it's own $$line$$
maximo
then you can also uses stuff like $\frac{a}{b}, \sqrt{a}, a^b, a^{b+c}, \log_{a+b}(c), \cos{\theta}, \equiv, \approx, \neq$ and much more
maximo
that's some general syntax which you can apply to stuff like \sin, \tan, \int (for integral), and there's always google and #latex-help to help you find something you aren't sure how to do
Gamma Needs a New Nickname
wow
Gamma Needs a New Nickname
gamma gets banned arc
Banned? Hello?
people will say this and then use $ for inline instead of \()
pick a team
is something wrong with that?
(/gen)
god I saw that tone indicator and I was like "oh no we can't let this server turn into twitter" but then I realized it was actually useful in this scenario
and not really it's just personal preference I guess
what's wrong with tone indicators?
cringe when overused by dream stans
some people put it on every single message like tf
i mean ¯_(ツ)_/¯
they're useful when you only use them when the message could be read drastically differently by others
who cares
gets annoying sonetimes
go to tubbo's discord server
ik
not in like the wider internet
I think it's okay that they're not everywhere
some people hate tone indicators with a passion
i wish people used this more
LOL
these actually seem like they'd be the most useful
cause it's really easy to seem like you're angrier than you are
when texting
how do i show my anger
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
don't use a indicator
if you always say wow ur such a dumbass /j
and then intentionally leave out the /j
it'll have that effect
but that would require tone tags become a normal part of speech
i usually put 🎵 emoji at the start and end of song lyrics if i ever quote any
also yeah like
tone indicators are a means of resolving ambiguous intent, nothing more nothing less
sometimes they can be replaced with full sentences to clarify whatever it is that's unclear
some of these seem a lil uhh less useful
but I agree that these can be super useful when necessary
looking nice af there ryc /nsx
...unless?
looking nice af there ryc /sx
ye like indicators kill the fun
just guess what i mean 
Much better
OPEN UP YOU FUCKING TABS
looking really nice sx /ryc
Why is chrome taking so long to load
/uwu
I feel like "tab" can be used as a british insult
get out of my car you fucking tab
Pass me the marmalade already you utter tab
can we please stop bri'ish discrimination 
oh
harvard and mit sent me shit a few months ago
biggest ego booster of the year
no scholarships so no go
oh sweet, vim supports relationship macros now
lol
lol /sx
I love you /p
I love you Kirby /p
Whoops sorry r and p are right next to each other
that's what they all say
Freudian slip
@reef carbon for \[\], it’s a lot more used because the spacing is “correct” so to speak because latex does not natively support double $ bc it’s a TeX primitive, and the \[\] notation is the same as saying \begin{displaymath} which behaves like \begin{equation*}.
Now on the other hand, using $ vs \(\) is not really as clear because there aren’t any major concerns (unless you want mode checking errors and a few other niche things) and people tend to just use $ because it’s more convenient
now like on the math discord using texit, i don’t see the issue on using either, but I’m used to using \[\] on my documents that I use it anyway
Now I understand that all the times I told people they should use brackets instead of double dollar signs it actually had value
Alison40
😳
yeah it’s a really obscure fact no one really talks about unless you look up why lmao @deep mango
i didn't know that worked
I just remember someone on tex stack making some condescending quip about using double dollar signs
No one has more control over me than tex stack users
https://mirror.las.iastate.edu/tex-archive/info/l2tabu/english/l2tabuen.pdf
if you want a 22 page paper explaining obsolete stuff in latex, here it is
but the deadly sins in the start are the most important imo
yeah, no one has more power than the tex stack exchange
\sloppy 😩
That's cool, I read the first half of it
I didnt even know sloppy existed
Its a really good thing I didnt
imagine being grilled on tex stack exchange for using sloppy
@coarse grotto when is the next time we’re going to see drunk kirby

i’ll be waiting
that's your brain visualsing 100 points in an environment
yeah
if fancyhdr was bad form, god is dead
weird how this channel hasn’t had any messages in 11 hours
calling all cats
Usually you should have the skill of reconstructing the full proof from a sketch
which would mean that a sketch is a more efficient use of time and space
Do you include sketches Icy?
I just don't know how to neatly put them in
Digital notes
Feels ugly just throwing them in after a proposition but I guess it;s only natural
It's so unsatisfying just leaving it as a sketch though
You can save the full proof by itself perhaps. If you have HTML, save it as a page by itself, ref-linked to by your actual notes (with back probably handled by a ToC or just rely on browser)
At the undergrad level I didn't take notes at all, because whatever concepts or proofs I needed to look up when doing problem sets were easily available online through skilled Google searches. This freed up my attention to actually follow the lecture, which wouldn't be very easy if I was taking notes at the same time
Basically at this level I feel the only reason anyone should take notes is if they would fall asleep otherwise
Oh I’m studying on my own
I never note take during lecture either though
Or not like proper notes
Just scribbles
hi guys nice to meet you

Nice to meet you neko 😄 umm umm yea
I take hella notes
I still pay attention, I just furiously write down what’s on the board and some things they say that struck me as important
I disagree, I find that taking notes helps me follow the proofs a lot better. Especially for more technical proofs you can get lost in the details very easily if you aren't taking notes in my experience.
Also if something in the proof confuses or is unclear me I write down the full explanation so I don't have to re-figure it out every time.
in my experience i am better of not taking notes but rather just listen
same, I just use the pdf lecture notes they give us
but if they didn't provide those I think I'd have to take at least some sort of notes
If I'm not taking some kind of notes I lose track of what's going on very quickly, but notes usually help me focus the best when they're short reminders to myself instead of a full transcript of the lecture. Though I usually do the latter anyway.
Also writing things down just helps me to remember them way better. I rarely have to review written notes for more than a few minutes to completely remember them.
are there any french speakers here
i want to know how to read function notation when reading a formula in french
like, how would one read out f(x)
Mm at the research level nowadays I need to write down definitions during seminars or else I forget them and I get lost due to them not being repeated
i think i over notetake
cause sometimes i find that i need to just stop and pay close attention to parse a messy calculation
and then i try to rush and write it up sometimes and it's just like
a mess
so i need to do this more, i'm not consistent enough about demanding myself to only take reminder notes
bbbased
I dont generally take notes in classes with a good, classic book
I just never end up reading them because I can use the book
Well, I do take notes they are just sparse and things I feel arent in the book
Lmao glad I'm not the only one
how do you read f dx?
i look back at notes
then doubt their validity everytime
unless written independently
I told my friend who does statistics that I was learning abstract algebra
and he said “idk any math”
I said “true true statistics isn’t real math”
grrr
its applied math for most part
the joke is that i didn’t get the joke
you’re a joke
feather you’re so mean
there is a lot of writing in math :/
stats is interesting
lots of stuff done in statistics isn't necessarily theoretical mathematics, especially applications
however, statistics ends up cutting across a lot of topics in math
because some advanced things like measure theoretical math may have statistical properties
yeah you may end up doing a statistical argument for some results
but like, basic stats used in fundamental science education stuff is just formulas
and is also stats, so the term is very broad
there is no particular reason you cannot use probabilistic and statistical arguments in research, probability is very useful for forming heuristic type notions that bridge you between formal results
but like memorizing a bunch of formulas or doing regression on a toy data set isnt math really
probability and stats sort of have a relationship with most theoretical math that numerical analysis does
Probability is also just immensely useful in general. In many different fields.
yeah it's great, it is also great as a math topic to research
stats, prob, numerics all have a ton of their own math, but their uses just range further than pure math

👕
👖
You have to give my man some shoes.
you’re really gonna make him walk around in this cold barefoot
.

👕
👖
🩰
walking around barefoot 
i had a friend in undergrad who went barefoot basically everywhere
he carried sandals in his bag for sticky situations

i never did that but i did wear flip flops a ton
ryc is a flip flop man i see
california does seem to be pretty hot
berkeley is also a relatively clean campus i would say
i definitely would not have a problem walking around most parts of it barefoot
i tried to wear flipflops in nyc a couple times
on my third time, like 30 feet in front of me a big truck ran over a bottle and it shattered and flew everywhere
if i'd been a little faster my foot would have been pelted with glass
woah
sounds scary
ok i shouldn't wear flip flops here
that hasn't happened again tho so maybe i still should next spring
Weak
I used to go barefoot almost everywhere until I started dating
True
||which is even weaker||
Yeah
One time at the tutoring center the manager came by and said I had to wear shoes
And I replied
I have dealt with that at times at beaches and such
"you can't just make up rules because you don't like it"
Next day there was a sign
Lol
Wait so I'm a bit confused it feels like you're joking, esp you mentioned bathrooms as a downside
But if you're not joking what is it about dating that made it change?
My now wife, then gf said she wasn't going to date someone that walks around barefoot.
like... everywhere?
you heard what he said 
@ancient flame considering that he said this, i’m pretty sure he means literally everywhere

Isn't that how you get warts and stuff 🤔
Have you seen like how the feet change when walking in barefoot tho
are you really pro-going shoeless everywhere?
I am not pro going shoeless everywhere but I do not think it is disgusting
As long as you look where you are walking
I am pro wearing flip flops everywhere though, which is not too far off
Obviously only in nice climates
weird how it went from being like average 70 degrees everyday to literally freezing so suddenly
I am def flip flop man
For two years in community college, I went barefoot everywhere
I even did my morning runs for water polo barefoot
We ran like 1.5 miles
that sounds painful
You get used to it after a bit
I don't have an only fans

I too wear flip flops everywhere
I even walked through snow with them on in Seattle last february
I can tell you that wasn't a good idea
College tiers?
You go to a place you can one afford, and two you get along with the math community
That's the only tier that really matters
Like Cornell vs Carnegie Mellon vs UC Berkeley
For undergrad?
Yeah
Those all seem like bad schools for undergrad
Really
@deep mango
Damn
"bad"
In general, yes. I can speak more to Cal but not as much as Ryc
Cal is bad
all those are fine lmao
How about job opps
In terms of professors giving you an education at Cal, it's not that great
Large lecture hall classes
Will someone from cmu get more opps that someone from Cornell and vice versa
Or how is Harvard and mit
Along here
I think opportunity is more or less the same
I hear harvard and MIT have smaller class sizes, but they're more competitive to get in
Yeah they are but are Harvard and mit people like way better in math than cmu Cornell Caltech berk
I guess my issue is getting personalized one on one attention, even if you're not a super-star taking graduate courses your freshman/sophomore year
Oh I see
R u at cal
No, I did community college and transferred to UCLA
Most of my friends went to Cal, and I've attended many lectures at Cal
I don't know much about that, so I can't speak to it
Okay do u know Terrance Tao
my impression is that finance only cares about name prestige
For the UC system, a good California Community College often gives a better math education
idk how true that is
Yeah they do
but balance it with cost
Than what most of what the UCs offer
Go on citadel LinkedIn
Which is what I'm basing my advice on for "undergrad math"
Damn
So why is cal so prestigious
This is for the lower division courses
In the 1950s and 60s they started sniping Ivy league professors by telling them they didn't need to teach classes, and gave them tenure and fuck you money
To carry out their research plans
Worked like a charm
Basically prestige doesn’t matter only for Silicon Valley and finance
And grad school seems to matter for research?
The rankings are primarily based on research production, not on quality of education
Yeah cuz like John’s Hopkins math is ranked low
I think at the graduate level, you separate by subject and faculty
Math is very broad
Is that algebra? topology? etc.
Bs aren't bad
If you're applying as a math major to top tier schools it might be difficult to get in if you're not excelling in your HS courses
But I'm not an admissions officer, so I can't truly say
Like I have adhd and like calc 2 is kicking my ass
Am I like fucked for discrete math
That depends on you, the course, and the instructor
Calc 2 is notorious for being difficult
Discrete Math usually isn't too bad, but some people find the transition very difficult
I wouldn't worry too much about it
As a degree
Math on its own is pretty useless
Like I have no interest in teaching
So double major
Math + Programming
Not even a double major, but a minor, or an applied math degree
A pure math degree isn't worth too much outside of academia
Not trying to be rude or anything
The reason I don’t wanna teach is cuz all it seems are just kids who want good grades
And don’t care about learning
And tests are difficult
You can't blame them too much: when adults in their life stress how important getting into the "best" college is and they only accept "the best" students
We set them up for that expectation or goal
Yeah but I even heard college is the same
College is the same as what?
Like I heard people who go to top tier colleges
I mean is not bad teaching HS. You can actually teach calculus


