#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 480 of 1
as is always the case with algebra
But by pushing further this idea, you can get a nice proof of the Cayley-Hamilton theorem
It's like a formalization of the wrong proof $P_A(A)=det(A - A)$
Adrien
But I don't remember the details
Heres a rule I learnt in math. If there is a cool idea then even if it doesnt exist, chances are very high that u can just force it to exist in some way or another. Just create the math why not 🤷🏻♂️ treat math like Minecraft and that mindset will get u far especially in research lol. It might end up with many mistakes but who cares! Making mistakes means ur trying at least SOMETHING
If u dont try, u wont make any mistakes… which is a bad thing 😂 here let’s create a saying “an English student never makes any mathematical mistakes whereas a mathematician will make a thousand”
I’ve actually personally tried this method a few times and made up my own stuff with my own notations but often it turns out the thing I made up already exists (except for the notation part which is more than often unique to the user. A good example is how notation has been ABSOLUTELY abused by physicists when writing vectors as states or in relativity courses such as Einstein summation convention)
einstein summation convention is not abuse
Ur literally throwing away sigmas
In agreement to say “if we see 2 indices repeated then imagine there is a sigma”
U still have to technically write the sigma to indicate summation so notation is being changed to another convention
you dont
Its like the spin up and spin down states too
redefine meaning of indices
Instead of labelling things with the actual basis vector they label it with their index
“Its not abuse of notation if I redefine the meaning of what I write”
yea
Spaghetti=my nan’s left toe so long as its explicit im not abusing the English language
i agree
id just say youre using a different language then
and nothing wrong with that except might be confusing sometimes
We’re talking about different things. Ur understanding of what amounts to “abuse of notation” is not the same as my use of it right now. This is an annoying psychological phenomenon i see in people when they talk to each other using the same words with their tongues but having 2 different definitions/usages of that word in their mind and neither person realises that they’re cross-talking to each other about different things since theyre both using the same word
In this case we’re both using the phrase “abuse of notation” but urs is different to mine in meaning
Just a psychological tangent 🤷🏻♂️
Im basically defining abuse of notation to mean Pi represents a product and Sigma represents a sum so if I choose to be lazy and use sigma for my products (even if i mention it explicitly!!!) this is what I define to be an “abuse of notation”
id call that stupid, but not an abuse
the classic elementary example is those du = x² dx or whatever things from u-substitution in calc 2
that is objectively an abuse of notation
ordered tuple -> (a,b) -> open interval 
there are ways to kind of make it work
but in any case, its suggestive of a totally valid thing to do
so the notation is being abused but the math isnt wrong
Thats the definition of abuse i used
It perfectly fits summation convention
Sigmas are completely dropped
einstein notation is totally "allowed" though
you say youre using einstein notation
voila
Its simply assumed that if we see a repeated index that we sum over it and the lack of a sigma means we dont know the lower and upper bounds of the sunmation
youre not doing any invalid steps, youre not writing anything thats nonsense when unpacked
etc
i mean, if the set isnt clear from context, then sure it has to be specified
but that doesnt make it an abuse
Its like just writing e^x dx and saying this is an integral when its not
if i write f(x) = x² - 3 and dont explicitly say that f: R -> R
im technically leaving out info
but that doesnt make it an abuse
if its clear from context
What ARE U GUYS TALKING ABOUT e^x dx is NOT a continuous sum (integral)!!!
Come on guys!!
actually it's more like you doing multiplication there without writing any symbol
okay, ill phrase it like this
you just wrote e^x and dx together
mathematicians have a collective understanding of what an abuse of notation is
your example does not qualify
so if you call it an "abuse" and insist that you're right
you're trying to redefine language to suit your whims
that seems a lot more egregious than introducing an alternate way of writing sums.
if you want a term to describe your discontent with einstein notation, you can call it "bad notation" instead
i disagree with that as well, but at least its an opinion
e^x dx is not an integral. Its not exactly equivalent to using a different symbol and redfining some meaning since we’re saying repeated indices SOMETIMES obey our redefinition depending on context. Sums will always be sums though no matter what the context is so it should be specified that we’re taking a summation. The mathematical way to do this would be a sigma from a starting value up to value N
????
Im using i ntegration as example
but it IS clear that one is taking a summation
Its surprisingly the perfect example because both of these are sums except this one has limit and continuous
theyre not using a sigma to do so, sure
theres no math bible that says you have to use a sigma for sums
hell, theres another totally valid symbol for sums
What is implied is a different issue from the abuse. My child can mispell a word
similarly, theres no rule that one has to use an integral sign for integrals
heres an example where an integral sign is not used:
f(x) vs F(x)
convention is that F is an antiderivative of f
no integral signs involved
yet still totally valid

Also if you’ve ever written f(x,y) that’s an “abuse of notation” as well. But if you clearly state what you mean by it, like nami said, since there’s no bible for math notation, it’s not an abuse.
i'm just gonna mute them
I’ll repeat my point. A child that spells “happy” as “i feel super ahppy” is abuse of spelling but its still clear what is meant by it so ur argument that “clear meaning = correct notation” is fallacious reasoning
dx = dm(x) where m is the usual lebegue measure on R
thats not an abuse of spelling
thats an incorrect spelling.
an abuse of spelling might be
you know
a pun
orange you glad that it's easy to ask someone about notation ... unless exam I guess 
The overall message is that effective communication is what matters in math. As long as you can effectively communicate what you mean, that is sufficient.
the point is that theres no arbiter of correct notation
what matters is that youre understood
There is convention and convenience and thats it
a violation of convention is not "abuse of notation"
since youre not doing anything wrong mathematically
just violating convention
this doesnt mean its GOOD notation
thats a separate question
but its not an ABUSE
mathematical notation represents actual, like, ideas
that's the main point they're missing. for something to be wrong, there has to be some absolute reference. except all notation is made up. it's only wrong if you take one notation as absolute truth and compare the others to it. but you can denote anything with any symbols you want, including none. many papers have a section at the beginning where they define which symbols they'll use cuz they're anyway not standardized anywhere
its not random symbols we play with for no reason
(at least not unless youre a formalist doing low level foundations)
do you think it should be standardized like with SI units? and even units in Physics has many different "standards"
no lmao
i have a patent on $\sum$
Edd
lmao
every attempt to standardize math notation has sucked ass
people dont even agree on . vs , for decimals
I mean adding something is pretty standard ... so I don't think it can be that hard 
People use a comma?
i mean, \sum is one standard notation
its not the only one
and itd be very dumb if it was the only one
who uses a comma?
most non-anglo countries
india was colonized by the anglos
but most of europe uses a comma
south america as well
I reject the , like I reject tao.
2pi*i is more fundamental than either pi or tau
circumference/diameter is wrong .. it should be pi ... wait it is pi 
guys i am going on australian shark tank to troll
pi = circumference/diam so, it's a ratio, means π is rational
pi = pi/1, rational number confirmed
π = e = sqrt(g) = 3, rational number confirmed


i have a patent on $\sum$
kait


pi = e = 3, wiser words have never been spoken
is there a resource for the structure of elementary functions from C to C
by structure I mean like
equations
properties
how to identify translations or stretches
etc
uhh not sure if this is what you want exactly but a course on basic complex variables could help
ie a book like brown and churchill
ok
just purchased it

I hate that I have to learn all of this in like a month lmao
how am I supposed to get a good understanding
why do you have to learn it in a month
did you at least check out a pdf first
i mean i have a physical copy too cus i liked the book
but kekw
complex variables is the last unit of this class and there's only a month left until sem ends
not even a month
guys i’m too scared to share my code bc i don’t want them to be too afraid of me leaving
me every day
Are whiteboards superior to notebooks when it comes to self study?
Well if you want to keep a calculation then a whiteboard is not superior.
But sometimes you don't want that.
So I guess it depends.
I like having a small white board to do rough drawings and calculations when I am stuck.
notebooks are probably better
the only people that use whiteboards are teachers and math youtubers
I generally prefer notebooks for notes and problems.
Some people really like tablets these days.
please
oh nice, ill check over the changes thanks for editing
Ok i merged it, the changes are p nice thank you! (i was very lazy with my CSS lol thanks for making it look nicer)
yay
once I get to the level where I can read your blog posts my eyes won't be bleeding
yeah i didnt expect so many ppl to dislike the green on maroon ig lol
but almost everyone i showed hated it oof
cant tell if john is being btfod or helped
both 

I want to reopen the whiteboard discussion because at least for my thinking process, whiteboards are based

quick q: is $\left ( x^{x^x} \right ) ^{-1}$ equal to $x^{(-x)^x}$ or $x^{x^{-x}}$?
gmod

oh
none
then what
$x^{-x^x}$
Ryuzaki

no parentheses?
parentheses was the problem
why
i will just go with $\frac{1}{x^{x^x}}$
I don't see why there shouldn't be parentheses
$x^{-(x^x)}$
ohhhhh
you can use this if you really want parentheses
Hi. So I sort of want to be a helper but when they said contact I don't know if they meant ping or dm (so if u know I would love to know). Also is there an activity requirement for being a helper? I just want to try and help 4ish people a day
@buoyant carbon dm i think
also there’s probably no requirement
a lot of helpers don’t even help i think
dm modmail
yes
also be prepared to get pinged hundreds of times a day
literally
Got it. Thanks loads
Wait is this a joke or am I dumb?
yeah that wasn’t an exaggeration you will get pinged tons and tons lol
No im not joking
like i wake up to 80 pings all the time
Hmm sounds fun
a lot of those are HW/test pings as well
Oh that was fast
update on the geometric calculus: im sad
I wanna find a function such that the geometric derivative/integral is equal to the function itself, but it's difficult. I hypothesize that it probably has something to do with tetration (repeated exponentiation) because the exponential function e^x is the equivalent in standard calculus. however tetration is so difficult to deal with so it's kinda annoying. I've luckily figured out the fundamental theorem of geometric calculus and understood how differentials work in this context, so I can begin to understand geometric differential equations through separation of variables. however the hard part is figuring out all of the other methods of solving geometric DEs. luckily I can probably restructure the same methods used in standard calculus to help me but it's still gonna be crazy. so hopefully I can then set up the equation f(x)=f*(x) (the geometric derivative) and identify the 'identity element'
@fair mural in case you care
.... I know what geometric algebra is (it's just the Clifford algebra) but what the heck is geometric calculus?

A product integral is any product-based counterpart of the usual sum-based integral of calculus. The first product integral (Type I below) was developed by the mathematician Vito Volterra in 1887 to solve systems of linear differential equations. Other examples of product integrals are the geometric integral (Type II below), the bigeometric inte...
@mortal igloo
multiplicative version of calculus essentially
im considering doing a talk on it at some point
yeah
Please see #❓how-to-get-help
is there a place we can spam?
Not on this server
Try Manan’s DMs

I'm guessing they want to do some kind of rapid spamming and I wouldn't want even #bots to meet that fate
i was just trying to make a bad joke that the server has a channel section called spam

Say you are thinking about grad school but you will only graduate with 3.4/3.5 gpa
is there anything you can do to boost applications to have possibility of top schools?, assuming you have one more year and 6 grad courses so far

good letters of rec?

still math
logic
idk how even set theory could be considered math
the numbers are not behaving like numbers
it’s abstract math
or discrete math
something like that
set theory is definitely math though
it literally is math but ok

bonk
this math topic has symbols i don’t know so it’s not math
its also not logic
fyi
"its not math" i agree with, though its closer to math than logic in any case
because its philosophy
im talking the sticker
sets are obviously math and anyone who says otherwise is just unqualified
wait then what were you just talking about
but the sticker is from https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Aufhebung
oh
what's the square root of 3?
2
but 20*20 = 9932929992993999929
that's like half of 3
unless 3 is a perfect prime but i don't think everyone found that yet
damn i was hoping to make a funny with 32 bit arithmetic
but BIG NUMBER THEORY foils my plans once again
This is so sad. You hate to see this kind of thing.
yes, even I am sad
@neat lintel yoooo whatsup
hey
catfan1337
oh I thought you are talking to yourself
lol
im not crazy
why
because i am a catfan
This is not normal
Is this legal? Is this ethical?
i don't know
But this is not normal
how would you even begin to solve this equation for some arbitrary mod n?
elementary number theory
@sick kite to be more explicit
there is no general algorithm
and the problem is actually NP-complete
but you can often use elementary number theory techniques
though this may be difficult
if your modulus is prime (and > 2), you can use https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cipolla's_algorithm
i think theres an algo for powers of 2 as well
but i cant find it
Ah ok, thank you
but in general, your techniques will be fairly ad hoc
and tailored to your individual case
its not a fun thing to solve
I'll come back after burton and try it
that said, for the specific case of x^2 = 3
modulo a large power of 2
you can immediately rule out like
99% of candidates
just by using a prime factorization argument
and the remainder can be narrowed down significantly by approximating magnitudes
then its a simple computer search on like
<0.1% of your possibilities
then you would brute force your way through because it's NP-complete?
theres probably something more clever you can do
like wolfram solves it even faster
but thats just a naive first pass
It's possible that wolfram just brute-forces too
with some clever tricks before that stage, like you just outlined
wait a second
you can just do quadratic residue stuff
...
holy SHIT im an idiot
this particular case is easy
okay whatever
lets just
ignore that namington sent 50 lines or some shit
about a super trivial problem
lmao
just purge chat and all of us can pretend like this was a collective hallicunation
did namington say something?
who?

That's like getting 500 dollars for tying a shoe lace closing your eyes
ban everyone 😌
^
sup guys I am tired
hey does anyone know how to find unknown variables in a function with the coordinates of a stationary point
thank you for improving our knowledge and extending it to another extent by letting us know about you being tired
its sarcasm please do not take it seriously

Hahahahaha
I am always happy to be educational to my teachers, me being tired is a very important and complex mathematical concept
it is statistics
Someone in my class mentioned they’re in PSEO and that sent a new level of defeat down my spine
pseo
Hey guys
Hello dsam
The fuck is that
It’s a program for high school students to take some college classes. It typically only ever covers intro college classes, but somehow this kid got it to extend to 5000-level classes

terry tao
literally no one:
everyone on this server:
Some 2000 odd years ago, Mary conceived a baby boy through the holy spirit while still a virgin. The boy went on to perform countless miracles and ultimately ascend to heaven. This boy was Terence Tao.
Some 2000 odd years ago, Mary conceived a baby boy through the holy spirit while still a virgin. The boy went on to perform countless miracles and ultimately ascend to heaven. This boy was Terence Tao.
Some 2000 odd years ago, Mary conceived a baby boy through the holy spirit while still a virgin. The boy went on to perform countless miracles and ultimately ascend to heaven. This boy was Terence Tao.
will you guys be mad at me if I ask for math help in this channel
but like actual math
actually I won't
but Hatcher is kicking my ass
i am constantly mad at you but typically for unrelated reasons
oh in response to this
hi how do i get help from the bot
That story sounds kinda familiar.
I forget the name tho, I think it starts with J
Yeah. Ja boy Terry Tao
if $\sum$ is summation, then $\prod$ is production
gmod

Do you have a confirmed date for your talk?
Or estimation
I just updated #events
it was gonna be this weekend I thought but probably not anymore
good that you have so much support
I hope this won't be nonsensical gibberish.
My smooth 🧠 hasn't understood much about the talks I have tried to listen through
he said if you understand calculus you’ll understand it
Guess we will find out whenever it happens
you just gotta be familiar with derivatives and integrals
@clever knot @fair mural
I take ap calculus ab
me neither dw but this one should be alright
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
Certain things belong in certain servers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y7fMmdAcb8 stumbled across this vid on youtube. is it real
Hello, welcome to the “unique” video, where you will access the proof of the Riemann Hypothesis. The proof seems surprisingly simple but is in practise far from being obvious. It took me 3 years to achieve this proof. So if you are curious, just follow me and watch this video. Here we go....
Image Credit for the banner: The Mathemagians' Guild:...
no
proof is obviously wrong
nobody who is right about anything uses $]a,b[$ as notation for intervals
random variable
lol
$\mathopen{]}a, b\mathclose{[}$
mniip
please insert spaces and glue correctly
)a, b(
I'll be giving a talk on outward facing parentheses
Honestly I used to agree about French interval notation being bad but frankly when you’re writing fast it avoids making mistakes and you don’t confuse open intervals with the tone of other things that use parentheses
i have never confused an open interval with anything else
this is an invented problem
never.
in what context are you working with points in ℝ² and intervals in ℝ and its not clear when youre in one or the other
like even if you have maps ℝ² → ℝ, phrasing should always make it clear
DootDooter

Someone help :/
count the 0s carefully
Oh ur right
and google can check these for u
There’s 1 more zero
I figured out I could just plug 0.000644787 into my calc and see if I got 6.44787 X 10^-5
🤦♂️
$\frac{d^{-1}}{dx^{-1}}f(x) = \int f(x);dx$
KingArthur
eh
negative derivatives technically dont work
like yeah it makes sense but it's not necessarily proper
and besides you would not raise the x to the -1 power
why do my classes like to talk about functions like mappings now
is there a specific reason for it or is it just a trend
Like I just realized we havent used the word function in a while
the teacher just calls it mapping
it's a synonym
oh ok thanks lol I thought I was missing something when he suddenly made the swap
"map" is a convenient, snappy noun and verb
"function" is a clunky word and doesnt have a verb form
i find myself saying "map" out loud way more often
though i use them basically interchangably in writing
function does have a verb form, to be fair
it doesn't mean what you want it to, though
Why do you think it's it bad ? (And what notation do you use instead)
@crystal stream
I don't know if its like bad but there was never a time I was glad they used that notation over (a,b)
French person!
and they definitely use (,) instead
I meant the person you were replying to
(or I misunderstood what you'r saying)
Almost surely uses (,)
And I am pointing out that you’re French
Because you use ],[
so (,) means the open interval ?
and [,] the closed one ?
Yes
and you, what do you prefer ? :p
haha
ya know what makes more sense than ]a,b[?
a[,]b
…
at the end it's a matter of taste and habit I guess
cause a and b are outside the interval
it makes sense!
Ninja
and how do you write the set of reals $x$ such than $x\geq 0$ ?
$[0,+\infty)$ ?
Adrien
yeah
alright
or $[0,]\infty$
Ninja
hahaha
We don’t include the +
it's outside the interval
I would just use )
unironically i kind of like this tbh
$\forall x \in -\infty[]\infty$
Ninja

Even LaTeX thinks it's weird
$$[a,b] \to [a,b]$$
$$(a,b] \to a[,b]$$
$$[a,b) \to [a,]b$$
$$(a,b) \to a[,]b$$
Ninja
this is terrible
That’s just disgusting lmao and no one will support you
I think line and colon could work
A pipe on the closed end and a colon on the open end
$]a, b[$
Ryu

$\neg(()a,b\neg())$
random variable
wdym
cute
no u
no u
no u
no u
no u
no u
.reopen
hmm the channel i asked question in disappeared and when it was still open it wouldnt let me post anything in it
bug?
Channels dormant for too long are automatically closed.
when the bot pinged you to ask if your question was answered, did you react to the message?
no bc nobody had actually posted anything yet
then i went out to buy food
came back and it was locked and told me to write .reopen except i couldnt
if no one reacts to the message, after while the channel will either become automatically unoccupied or locked
1400-1600 sounds good to me
back when I was applying 3 years ago the average scores at the top schools were like low-mid 1500s
but that's like Harvard, MIT, Caltech, etc
Yeah
I think you want ~1500 -1550 to be in a good spot for ivies
But for like everything else if you hit 1400 I’m pretty sure you’re golden
hi
I had 1520 and I remember it being just about middle of the pack for the ivies
you guys know math??
no
i thought i was the only one
Ok I asked this before but no one answered. If each branch of mathematics granted a magic power what would they be
Topologists bending space, number theorists breaking any encryption, etc.
category theorists would just be able to abstract people out of the existing universe and into the platonic realm
as a kind of curse
their bodies would just instantly disintegrate and be spread across all possible worlds
Algebraists can combine any two things
calculusists can cut a pie up for infinitely many people
that is a lot of repeated letters
LMAO
I didn't know how to put it
bro 94 people are interested in my talk
thats crazy
I have way more than double what mniip got lol
flex 🦾
mniip has a talk?

I’m not a chump
Good night!
Shmlunkey
Okay
Come on key.

Gollira
Good morning ryc.
chgollira
Gollira
what if some1 is category theorist but not platonist
😛
austria is starting to prepare mandatory vaccinations
some people here are thinking about suing the government
both mandatory vaccinations and lockdown interfere with our constitution and the argument is that the gvoernment has to choose the lesser evil first, which they perceive to be mandatory vaccinations
mandatory suicide
hm
lmfao wtf why
mirza generics vs java generics
why what
i can kinda understand having constitutional protections against this stuff since its the kind of thing that could very conceivably be abused
to be clear, i dont think current policies are an abuse
mandatory vaccinations don't really work with bodily integrity, lockdown don't work with right for freedom
and if an entity wanted to put abusive policies in place, i dont think a constitution would stop them
but i get it
germany had forced vaccinations from 1950-1970 ish
i mean, part of the reason for the ethiopian civil war is that they used a lockdown as an excuse to delay an election
and our highest courts said it works with our constitution
i do not want to "pick sides" in that conflict since it seems like a massive mess
but i understand the concern
current lockdowns are pretty shaky when it comes to the law
lots of stuff was ruled illegal by courts
and currently its kinda like "we dont know if this is ok yet"
I think there would be more room for lockdowns if they worked
i dont think the constitution factors efficacy into this stuff lmao
They don't totally not work, but it takes a lot to say a lockdown is economically worthwhile
austria first had a lokdown for unvaccinated only
now i think lockdown for everyone
Public support should rely on scientific evidence than otherwise
and planned vaccinations in februrary
Legal issues don't matter half /s
yes, so
i can see why politicians dont want that
i think 30% of people are unvaccinated
wtf
Constitution is changeable in democracies anyway
and i would like if courts check if the government doesnt break the laws therein
it is
but if the government deems the constitution bad, they can go through the legal process of changing it
they have not
Public support should honestly mean more to the courts than otherwise, because the courts serve the people, not the other way around as some might actually believe
i'd like constitution changes to not be justified by short-term policy goals rather than a reassessment of its philosophical basis
personally
there are valid reasons for an individual to be concerned about bodily autonomy
even if in this specific case, opposing vaccines seems irrational
well, the constitution wasnt changed recently
at least not in this regard
in the 70s it was decided that a law from 1860 on mandatory vaccinations still works with our constitution
Germany has a nice bottom-up movement though IMO
and as the constitution did not change since then, its an option
i think constitutions are kind of a dumb way to enforce democratic institutions in general tbh
but i cant think of a better way
current lockdown are legally on more shaky ground i think
democracies are just fundamentally fragile
Is this why germany is in the discussion
https://www.reuters.com/markets/stocks/germany-not-ruling-out-lockdown-even-vaccinated-2021-11-19/
i think lockdowns are dumb policy though
with the vaccine now available to basically everyone
enforcement of lighter protections is good though
like reasonable occupancy limits and social distancing
i hate that that stuff is reality now
but it is
and it doesnt seem like itll change for a while
i mostly dont want them to close the uni again
Wait your unis closed?
last year politicians basically told us they dont care about universities lmao
its not rn
it was for a year
Is it zoom uni or physical uni
yeah closing unis is very very bad policy now
mostly physical
like, for the long term health of the economy
you cant take another year away from your educated class
I wonder if hybrid styles will become the norm
my university has a vaccination rate of 95.5% among students
lecture recording is a good trend\
i do think a couple good things came from this pandemic
hopefully more companies allow optional work-from-home when its possible
or at least like "you only need to come in 1-2 days a week for team communication & morale reasons" or whatevr
generally lockdowns hit the wrong people
would certainly help the environment if not everyone needs to drive or transit to work every day
maths
this is cologne a mere 9 days ago
but as long as kindergartens are closed and kids cant even socialize all is good
🎙️🐍
cologne carnival

like its undeniable that a shit ton of spread happens there
but youre also fucking up child development en masse
its really sad either way
man
its ok because they cant vote in elections yet
closing schools but leaving everything else open is really dumb though
schools should be among the last things to close
just before, like, hospitals and grocers
schools are mostly open now
but eliminated the ability to socialize in them
which as it turns out is really, really important
bleh
i mean its bad for everyone, but kids cant really deal with it
they also dont have a great lobby
well thats their fault, maybe the kids should find a politician to bribe
pool together allowance money
Sup
kid are you kidding
yes
symplectic boogaloo
simpleton
Namington discovering what a woman is
true!
Is $10 an hour way too cheap to pay someone for C/C++ tutoring or completing programming homework
for C/C++ tutoring
depends where you live, but probably yes
or completing programming homework
do not ask about committing academic dishonesty here.
competent tutors where im from go for between $25-60, depending on how educated they are
even here it's not lower than $13 and can easily be $40
I listed myself on fiverr as a C++ tutor
But all these Indians are on here and they're charging like $20 an hour but they have reviews and they're credible
unironically based
So I listed myself as $10 an hour
I've waited like a month and I finally got a customer
Any particular reason you are telling us about it?
This is kinda... a Mathematics server.
#chess-go-shogi is a channel in this server
And programming is more like math than it is like English
yeah but this server feels like the wrong place for asking about what rates you should charge for tutoring C++
And you are treading a really thin line here with the rules.
lol
||
||
you got it
thanks
True path for power dynamics equalisation is renouncement of humanity
insert DIO meme
@ancient flame do you mind unlocking the slides of your presentation over on Google docs? I would like to see them! 😄
oh sure sorry
thanks so much! ^^
Why are four fellas in vc muted
yep, can confirm ^^
lol
For which value of $a, a\in\mathbb{R}$ is the graph of $\log{a}{x}$, identical to that of $a\cdot \log{b}{x
}$, $b\in\mathbb{R}$?
In other words: given a, find b where
$\log_b{x} = b\log_a{x}$ where $x, a \in \mathbb{R}$
Solution:
|| b = e^(W(ln(a))) ||
Jadefalke
I created this problem and a friend of mine solved it and I'm kinda proud of it (and of her 👀 )
@neat lintel a numerical solution or just a solution?
||b=ln(a)/W(ln(a))||
Yes that is correct!
What's the right channel to ask a question about inter-universal Teichmüller theory ?
why is iutt a meme
I get the whole abc conjecture thing
but on a conceptual level
why
is it bad
by mochizukis own admission, if iutt cant prove abc, it cant do anything.
but is IuTT flawed on a conceptual level? Or is the idea good, just not developed enough?
if you are to believe scholze-stix, mochizuki's approach to abc fundamentally cannot work
it's unsalvageable, they claim there exist reasons the gap they identified cannot be patched
obviously mochizuki disagrees that a gap exists at all and hence disagrees with this assessment
but outside of japan, the academic community overwhelmingly sides with the scholze-stix objection
(and in japan, most mathematicians havent weighed in one way or the other - very much a "dont rock the boat" academic culture)
if you combine scholze-stix's claim with mochizuki's admission, it follows that IUTT can't do anything at all.
perhaps theres untapped potential, but the people in the field dont see that potential
sooooo
how does this academic culture that you've identified compare to the culture of other countries?
japan stereotypically has a very passive workplace culture thats realized basically everywhere, including academia
youre not supposed to get in the way of your superiors
and mochizuki, prior to this whole iutt thing, was one of the most respected mathematicians in japan
and still has a lot of prestige
in other countries, while you can still face consequences for going against superiors, people are a little more willing to do so
particularly through indirect letters to the AMS and whatnot
academia is known for being very very petty.
It seems counterproductive to the purpose of academia to even have an idea of "superiority"
academia is very heirarchical
not all the hierarchies are blatant
mochizuki might not be literally higher ranked than a typical professor, but he
(1) certainly has more connections
(2) likely makes way more money
(3) has a considerable amount of sway in journals and whatnot
(4) is listened to and has an easy time getting into conferences and editorial boards and etc.
(5) carries a lot of inherent prestige on account of his past accomplishments
collectively, he certainly has a superior role to a typical researcher, even if his job title is the same.
this isnt unique to japan
There are mavericks like Perelman, but they are not the norm
academia everywhere is full of hierarchies
Perelman is a king tbh
Also money is something everyone needs to survive
youll notice some pretty big discrepencies in supposedly "equal" roles
Lower than the Deans, Provosts, who may not even be as academically accomplished, that's for sure
How do I math
the more i learn about academia the more trash it seems
Oh what do you mean
this
is what is meant
you're gonna have to be a bit more specific
On the whole, human civilisation and power dynamics is very easily summarised as 'trash'
How do I math
what math?
that’s what I’m sayin
all of these are full time profs at UCLA with roughly equal experience
guess which one is terence tao.
conceptually it seems weird, as the very purpose of science is to critique and improve - and this lower access of information and respect hierarchy could lead to some researchers being underutilised, and not reach their full potential
no i mean like, do you have a specific field of math you're having trouble learning, do you want to start learning math but don't know where to start, or are you having trouble solving hw problems in school/college
what even is otherpay and why does one person get 700k?
is that just talks
and stuff
contributions for research and shit
nope, that one is a surgeon
Oh I’m not the greatest with algebra I guess. Do you teach around here or..? I just joined
he doesnt see any of that money
oh
tao is the one who makes 4x as much actual pay.
I wasn't aware

That was my second choice lmfao
no one here will be able to teach you fully, but if you have some questions you can usually get help (read #❓how-to-get-help)
how do you have this
its public info
also like i still don't know what you wanna know lmao
the whole UC system
Wow wait, the whole UC system
How do they even decide on these salaries lol
I can't find Aldous
ok "retired from UCB 2018" I guess
you can see a lot of discrepancy
Let me check some UC peeps I might know
I was joking sorry
Is this image allowed?
no
Tao makes like 20x more than postdocs lmao
Is there a CSV of this? I searched Sturmfels and he makes 150k, which isn't even the first few top pages of PROF-AY
not that i know of
Do they expect people to scrape it or what
2019's is here apparently
https://transparentcalifornia.com/salaries/2019/university-of-california/
even better dump
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jk3587/ucop_comp/main/ucop_comp_2019.csv
Search California public, government employee, workers salaries, pensions and compensation
Why are coaches paid 4.2M
I'm in the wrong line of work
lol from searching the paylogs, TIL Judith Butler is still alive
finally
good math tiktok https://www.tiktok.com/@mathandcobb/video/7014171515876822278?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc&web_id6914587112264992257
judith butler donated to kamala harris's campaign
is that surprising
it's a little surprising.
@neat lintel
lol
i will only do so restlessly.
We will start tomorrow, be there at 8.
Ok what timezone
First task: find out my timezone
I'm just fuckin with you
though if you really found out I'd have probably done it lmao

Please help me finish analysis by tomorrow
I have maybe 6 chapters left in this book
dm please
be like the rest of us and never read the second halves of textbooks
I read the first half, skip forwards and then read the middle like 3 years later
^
Is it even physically possible to finish a textbook from beginning to end
nah you need help from the mental or spiritual realm
haha
if you look in the back of most books you'll find blank pages cause not even the author could physically finish it from beginning to end
lol
hey self studiers, how do y'all pick a topic and stick with it? i keep picking a topic and finding a book and then being like ooh wait there's another cool topic that i wanna study etc. etc.
Going to university
choosing classes is easy because my choices are limited but i'm trying to pick a topic to study outside of class for when i am bored
i'm currently studying math at college
Yes me too. Well. I usually take several courses so I don't have time to study nothing else. In vacations I try to read the next courses or things like that
i suppose yeah
maybe i should just go deeper into my current classes but there are some classes not offered at my college that i'd like to maybe learn
a mix in between tbh
I think the main problem is procrastinating
fair
@tame ferry find a topic that you’re really interested in and try to stick with it i guess
although if you force yourself to do something you don’t want to do, you’ll probably end up hating that thing
even if you originally liked it
yeah
adhd moment
lmao
i would reccomend picking a topic and sticking with it
terence tao was born in my city
isnt that cool
?
i asked how to pick a topic and stick with it and you recommended to pick a topic and stick with it LOL
i thought it was sarcasm my b
oh they were thrown into the gulags
Pog
give me math problem
Me?
yes
I don't have one ready yet, and digging one up will take time
Wanna play chess?
no like easy stuff
like 13/7






