#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 477 of 1
Okay then lol
The problem with podcasts and news shows is that they have to find some hype train to keep their revenue stream going
So they just shoe horn in the political flavor of the month, whatever their party is pushing
Hmm, well I have seen plenty podcasts by youtubers where they just shoot the shit and still do well. But I guess it's a lot different when it's not your main income.
Exactly, youtubers shooting the shit are probably supplementing some main career thing they do
What do you think about Joe Rogan?
Overall I like his podcasts, I like that he's not having an axe to grind in one way or the other
He's not afraid to call people out for BS
But sometimes he gets into crazy stuff, it's fun. I wouldn't take it too seriously
But if you compare to like Don Lemon, Tucker Carlson, John Oliver, or Trevor Noah
They all have axes to grind on one side or the other
And frequently push that narrative, even if it means curating facts that are distorted versions of truth
Alex Jones, Tim Pool as well
Joe's just an MMA fighter/Standup Comedian(?) turned podcaster, would be weird if he did all this.
Yeah, he just has some fun podcasts to listen to. Like that one guy that left scientology
Who?
Oh jeez, the guy's whole family was in a scientology camp, and he didn't like it anymore
He had to plan an escape because there were security guards
Ron Miscavige
cuz very active
I see
mniip
What in the world is Emeritus in the context of discord
united arab emeritus
just someone who used to be active in the past
(not anymore)
oh so like a legacy thing
yUh
I get emeritus all the time because I will go weeks without saying anything
Cuz work sux
i was never active
i agree that everyone has a bias to some degree but are we really gonna put john oliver and ALEX JONES in the same category? really?
does the fact that bias is inevitable imply that facts are relative? lol
All I said is that these are people with an axe to grind
I didn't say to what degree
How does it feel misleading to say that john oliver has a political agenda in his show?
That isn’t what’s misleading. It’s that putting them in the same category kind of implies that they have similar levels of devotion to their cause and that the dangerousness of what they say is similar.

I mean "are they pushing a political narrative" is a dumb way to categorize talk show hosts
What's relevant is accuracy of information presented and to a lesser extent what specific viewpoint they're arguing for
i mean LWT is like
very obviously political?
like did anyone think differently lmao
this just seems like you were reading moonbears' point in bad faith
idk
er wrong person
got names mixed up
whatever
people watch LWT knowing full well it has a political slant and its saying what they want to hear
Again I made no claims on accuracy or quality
that isnt to say that that makes it bad
i think its commentary is often shallow
and much preferred when they stuck to niche issues that dont get much coverage rather than hot-button stuff
like i remember enjoying their episode on televangelists even though the humour was kinda... lame
but like i dont think its honest to conflate LWT with joe rogan in the sense that
LWT makes its political slant fairly clear
it presents evidence and anecdotes and whatnot in favour of its slant
but it doesnt claim to take a neutral pov
joe rogan kinda does
he insists that he allows on guests regardless of ideology, which is perhaps true? (unaware if anyones ran the numbers here)
but his principle of not really arguing with his hosts makes it seem like the show is tacitly implicit with whatever points they espouse
regardless of whether thats actually true or not, the point is that the show is presenting political ideas in a format that insists on acting neutral
and while the host HIMSELF may be neutral (though im... dubious), that doesnt mean the show is
Joe's ideology is whatever guest's that came on the previous episode.
when i watch LWT or hell, even infowars
i know im signing up for political commentary
and the show makes no attempt to hide that fact or pretend its acting as a responsible mediator
its a show by ideologues for the entertainment of ideologues, and it makes that obvious
the thing is that joe rogan constantly denies his podcast having a cohesive stance just because some of his guests have different opinions
and while that does mean its hard to pin down a single source of bias, it doesnt mean the project as a whole is unbiased
and its dishonest to market it as such IMO
in theory, any opinion is allowed on /pol/, but we all know how that turns out
(but at least /pol/ calls itself "politically incorrect" nowadays so you know what youre in for)
idk, it just reminds me of like
that political compass memes subreddit
an cap
like yeah in theory they have a whole bunch of ideologies represented but
marxists rise up
if you take a look at it and tell me it doesnt have an underlying bias
ill think youre politically immature
it is, at the very least, biased towards an american netizen's understanding of the political spectrum
it also associates every ideology with its extremes
which is, i know, done for the purpose of humour
but it still contributes to an undercurrent narrative
¯_(ツ)_/¯
sorry i got off topic here
but like you get my point
I think you explained the point I was trying to make. There are different degrees of politically bent podcasts or tv shows
It's pretty important to identify them as such. Joe rogan does switch a lot. E.g. when tim pool is on he's against socialism, but when a socialist is on he likes healthcare
etc.
i guess joe rogan's underlying bias is towards populism
he latches on to anecdotes and fringes and acts like an intellectual for doing the bare minimum of considering other perspectives
and he takes the more marketable parts of ideologies and emphasizes his agreement with those aspects to curry favour, while rarely offering substantial commentary on the overlying theory or tenets of the ideology
the only perspective ive really heard him defend on deeper ideological grounds is social libertarianism
which i mean... makes sense
the dude loves weed
like you mention him supporting "healthcare" when talking with socialists
thats kinda what i mean
healthcare is a very easy way to find common ground on an issue without engaging with the core of the ideology
Yeah, so when you watch a particular podcast he's not gunning for a singular point of view
which IMO creates dishonest impressions on it
and it's not a consistent voice on a political narrative
yeah if you try to pretend LWT doesn't have a political agenda you're deluding yourself
but having a political agenda isn't necessarily a bad thing
LWT doesjnt try to pretend it doesnt have a political agenda lmao
it obviously does
never claimed it is bad
oh yeah it definitely doesn't
i mean hell, they coined the "drumpf" thing for trump
I'm saying if a hypothetical person said it didn't
which imo was always really dumb
that hypothetical person would be an idiot
yeah but people say the same thing about joe rogan
yeah those people are dumb
maybe its not organized into one cohesive "agenda" besides making $$$
but it clearly has a populist slant
to be clear, im not saying i hate joe rogan; i dont really know enough to come out with a strong opinion
like "acktually John Oliver is in the same category as Alex Jones"
i do think its dishonest with its motivations
but i dont necessarily want it taken off spotify or whatever
(though i think the trend of spotify buying podcasts is bad for other reasons)
but then that category is just "people who have public political beliefs in their talk shows"
i do hate the median joe rogan listener though lmao
annoyingness
I mean say what you want about Joe Rogan listeners
at least they don't (to my knowledge) add
to servers they moderate
idk how i feel about... deplatforming in general

i do think it "works" in the sense that
well
no one talks about milo yianapolouis or whatever it is anymore
I think deplatforming is good in extreme cases
like people who are legit just using their platforms to spread hate and misinformation
but i am concerned about it from a societal freedom pov
should just be bonked
cancel culture is definitely a problem
i wouldnt be surprised if drag culture is "cancelled" in 5 years for promoting unhealthy lgbt stereotypes
it's just a problem that's massively overblown by people who want to say offensive shit without repercussions
yeah i think thats fair
like it's not actually that complicated an issue imo
in general i'd say i'm more of a free speech advocate than most people with my social political opinions
free expression is maybe a better word there
than speech
like i dont think "facebook is a private company so they have a legal right to censor you" translates to a moral right
it's just a weird things that "cancel culture is a problem" and "'cancel culture' often functions as a dogwhistle for bigots" are both true
that isnt to say i dont think facebook has a moral right
im not sure on that front
but i do think that defense is terrible
but once you get over that apparent contradiction, it's not actually super difficult to tell which is happening in any given instance imo
i guess?
I'm in the middle of a CSGO match rn
it's correct to cancel someone iff I, Gamma, want them canceled
i will agree that most "cancelled" people ive seen have seemed like genuinely bad people
but admittedly im not super well read
and naturally a lot of my info on this is from biased sources
since its rare someone will defend a "cancelled" person
ok so I actually have legit example of someone who I think was wrongly canceled
which is DZK from Apex
i do think the internet isnt forgiving enough of mistakes
basically some people dug up some really offensive shit he said like 15 years ago
Girlboss
as a kid i sexually harrassed a female classmate, i regret it to this day
it was just an inappropriate touch, nothing more
but still really really bad
but like that stuff happens, i think its possible to repent from it
the problem is that people conflate "lack of apology" with "doesnt want to apologize"
granted, it was some absolute bottom of the barrel hyper offensive shit
and he said it when he was 28
if i could meet the girl again, i would apologize in an instant
but doing it in public would IMO just make it worse
but it was also 15 years ago and he clearly seemed to have changed
it was really funny
nami was naughty person
because he got fired from his previous job for being too left wing
idk its weird to me that like
and then got fired from this job for some neo nazi shit he said 15 years ago
the catholic church has a more generous policy on forgiveness than internet progressives lmao
that itself isnt exactly a good thing though
ok this stuff gets a lot simpler when you stop thinking in terms of individuals and start thinking in terms of cultural systems
is that forgiveness though?
or is that them actually being pro sex offender
so I actually have a devil's advocate argument in favor of cancel culture
"this person is high ranking in the church and itd be bad for everyone if we rattled the power structure too much"
that I don't agree with, but is worth considering
i dont think this is a GOOD utility calculation
but like
no ones ever gotten excommunicated for NOT speaking out about a priest
afaik
and it's basically a lesser of two evils thing
and its like, idk
i hope no one reads what im saying as like
a defense of genuinely bad people
like kavanaugh
which basically rests on the way people in positions of privilege can cause harm to people not in those positions without really realizing they're doing it or causing any real harm
id be willing to believe kavanaugh changed since his college years, at least in that regard, but lying at the hearing makes me believe he hasnt
so like take gender for instance
actually idk
let me think about how best to phrase this
but yeah I generally agree with what you're saying Namington
I honestly feel like
every person who've actually given this issue thought will come to the same general conclusions
i do think painting "cancel culture" with a broad brush is like
that forgiveness is a tricky issue, that people should absolutely be given a chance to be forgiven if they can prove they've changed, but that we should also careful with forgiveness.
they'll just disagree on what to do on a case by case issue
but yeah as I was saying
i dont think thats unique to "cancel culture" though
like this is gonna sound bad but
im reminded of leftist slogans like "ACAB" and "believe women"
I do think that there's something to be said about making, say, cis people absolutely terrified about accidentally saying something transphobic and facing the repercussions
i dont even disagree with these sentiments in general
or making white people absolutely terrified about accidentally saying something racist
but i think the existence of the slogans is an attempt to turn discussions of the issues into debates on broad trends
when theres really a lot of nuance on an individual level
its like
"1 death is a tragedy, 100k is a statistic" type stuff almost?
because there are a lot of internalized behaviors and ideas that come with being white, or cis, or male, or any other position of privilege that are easy to ignore, but can cause harm to others
so having the potential for huge punishment for messing up can in theory make people pay more attention to harmful behaviors they would otherwise ignore, even if the punishment is a bit extreme when it does happen.
like idk
it just feels like there should be a way to discuss these trends in a broad sense
WITHOUT minimizing the importance of analyzing individual cases
i believe there are genuinely good cops out there
I feel like there's likely a somewhat intentional push by bigots to make these things hard to discuss
i also believe the system needs widespread reform
by constantly crying "cancel culture" at everything
"ACAB" being a popular slogan makes those two stances sound incompatible
and its a similar thing with cancel culture
yeah I'm torn on stuff like ACAB for that exact reason
but yeah the system definitely needs massive reform
like i have a lot of respect for homocide detectives for example
i know theres bias in prosecution of black people and whatnot
but overall it seems like a really taxing job
yeah
i dont think all homocide detectives are "good", in fact i would probably buy an argument that the median one is "bad"
see this is the thing
but i still respect the profession
random traffic cops, i care a lot less about lmao
ok maybe this is me just losing my sanity from tiredness
now THATs a stance i can get behind
but I wonder if the issue is people thinking too much in terms of individuals
parking cops though, those depend
taking up 2 lots? you deserved to get fucked (by which i mean a ticket)
misleading signage creating ticket traps? fuck traffic cops
like if a cop gets fucked over by a toxic and racist police culture
becomes a racist shit
and does some bad things
obviously that person should be punished
lmao
parking easily the worst part of driving
easy sure
that doesnt make it enjoyable
but the ultimate cause is a toxic system
you gotta find a spot and shit
not any individual
people
it sustains itself
toxic system creates toxic individuals perpetuates toxic system
idk
no I'm not in any way defending the cop in that instance
police reform seems very hard to me
since like
the kind of people who WANT to become police officers are not people i want policing me
or in a position of power over me in general
the cop absolutely deserves to lose their job, get publicly shamed, and possibly spend the rest of their life in prison
but like
like the punishment for abusing a position of authority to that extent should be one of the worse ones out there
i dont see what the solution to that is
i dont think mandatory diversity training fixes much
and "defund the police" is, to me, kind of regressive
at least taken literally
if you want responsible policing you need to incentivize it
currently police are incentivized to set up speed traps and shit
idk I wonder how much sense I'm actually making
and they do plenty of that
So, there was a student that came into the math center the past week or two. She kept cursing a lot, and freaking out about her discrete math class. I informed her that cursing wasn't appropriate for the center as there's a no cursing policy. She was a senior CS major taking Calc 2 & discrete. She didn't know how to add fractions, didn't know zero times anything is zero
She informed me she had a 4.0 and wanted to keep it that way
This is related, anyway, she tried to bribe my tutors to do her homework for her
I reported her
I feel like I have a real point here, but I'm too tired to lucidly make it
She sent out an email claiming that I sexually and racially discriminated against her
lmao
And sent it to the entire upper administration
holy shit
She kept calling and harassing my tutors
what came of that
It's still ongoing
ah
This literally happened like last week
holy fucking fuck
damn Nami edit before I could make fun of it
No, it's very obvious that she doesn't know what she's doing
yeah thats usually how it goes lmao
And that it's an absurd claim. I work for an HBCU and I am not black
how does she have a 4.0 though 
Pandemic
like is it really that easy
She just paid people to do her homework
like these people get their sense of how the world functions from trending twitter hashtags
pandemic was only a year and a half
and tumblr misunderstandings of social sciences
She went to a community college
Then transferred in, she did online community college
and cheated her way through there
holy
So now everyday I'm legitimately afraid that she will show up with a phone camera
and record me calling campus security and trying to cancel me
Just for reporting her and her actions
And if that recording goes viral, there is a very obvious slant it will have
Could literally end my entire career, all because of some nut case
this is something ive talked about before but like, a lot of people in the progressive twitter/tumblrsphere conflate "i dont like this" with "this must be a form of social aggression"
It doesn't matter upper administration has my back
At least the ones I've talked to
if you dont know what youre talking about, its super easy to misuse academic terms
Everyone is supporting me in this
and apply them to literally anything
i mean, the US right wing is proving that right now
with their attacks on "crt"
which means whatever they want it to mean at any given time
Which is crazy, because I'm the first person to manage this math center that actually has a proper mathematics background
the last manager didn't know calculus
well, best of luck moonbears
wait how
worst case, just counter by reuploading it on reddit and calling her a "karen"
ezpz
(disclaimer: this might actually make you a misogynist lmao)
She takes a video of me calling campus security on her, spins it her way
and pre-faces it with her narrative on discrimination
And how I treated her
why would you call campus security on her
Because she has been banned from my tutoring center
for harassing my tutors on and off campus
i mean this is ironically a case where right wing media would eat it up
yeah
idk if you wanna align yourself with those peope
yeah I don't think you want that though
might be bad for your career
MRA Activists, the incel ones.
holy fuck
so can I complain about something that actually drives me insane about MRA people
besides, well, everything
their existence?
the name
Other than the fact that they are virgins who hate women?
men's rights activists
they care about the story
exactly
they claim men are discriminated against in custody arrangements
so they conflated women's lib and women's rights
cathode ray tube
that's not a rights thing though is it?
Yada yada something about child custody, rates of criminal convictions and soceital expectations but those are actual points that MRA never seem to talk about these days.
finally, someone who will stand up for melee players
like are men discriminated against in custody cases in the law, or just rulings
I think there is a point to be made that men usually don't voice what their issues are, especially ones that work in like construction, or manual labor work
like the reason I bring this up
is because I'm taking feminist theory this semester
oh theres a lot of unhealthy trends in society's understanding of masculinity in general
"toxic masculinity" is perhaps bad branding
but theres a fair discussion to be had
lol every antifeminist ive talked to has said some shit about mra and that men are disadvantaged in divorce courts
and the literal first reading we had was about the limitations of rights talk
and so therefore feminism is bad
like damn bro 😳
and about how there's so much more to women's liberation than just securing rights
i also talked to one mra who asked me for a source on intersex people existing
isnt intersex rate like 3% or something
my point is it's also clown behavior to call it a rights issue
like its way higher than people think
I've listened to some of warren farrel on podcasts and interviews
youd think its like 1 in 10000 or whatever
He seems to have a much more sober viewpoint on it than most people
like court rulings being biased isn't really a rights thing
I dont care what you libs say, I listen to The Quartering!!!!! /s
ah thats a fair point
This other person was like yo i dont think women are oppressed. Give me, say, 3 examples of discrimination occuring recently
this was literally covered in my class in the case of women's rights
virgin toilet user vs chad piss in basement
Before this gets deleted by reddit admins, this asshole took it completely out of context. First of all, the idiot thinks it was a marionette deck. It wasn't. That card's not even in the deck. He was running counterspell draw, this was approximately turn 25, every single creature and spell I cast was countered or removed up until that point and this dumbass who copied his deck from MTG Salvation or Goldfish used one of his last copies of negate to counter a Revel in Riches when he had 0 creatures on the field and I had 0 treasures in play, thus the "this spell does literally nothing" and he should have let it resolve. I love it when people copy a deck and have no idea how to run it or play MTG. I was just throwing it out because I had 5 mana and it was the only card left in my hand and the game was already over anyway. So on the way out I let him know what an idiot he was for countering a spell that does nothing in the current board state. NOBODY wants to watch a recording of a game where I cast something and he counters it or removes it x30 turns. That's idiotic. I should have left the game the second I saw what he was running. This was the 5th attempt at getting a recording of something resembling watchable MTG gameplay and 5 people in a row were playing Karn draw control loop or free cast torrential graveyard resurrection control or approach control loop. So yeah, I was pissed and he was an asshole for playing this. He's one of those idiots who doesn't care about the other players one bit, it's all about winning. So running 35 control spells seems reasonable because NOTHING matters but winning. Thanks for not showing the board state with library counts or the full log, asshole. Enjoy your temporary ban from reddit.
lol
I've already seen old discussions of this so I know the majority of you will disagree and claim that mutate is weak. Lots of gas lighting trolls up in here. I pretty much just play Arena but I win the majority of my games. The only thing I consistently lose to is mutate decks or one of several super combo decks where suddenly I'm hit for 50+ damage in 1 turn. Mutate literally beats anything that doesn't play faster or isn't more or less an antimutate deck. So then your only options are mutate deck or antimutate deck. I can't even think of another set of cards that comes close to buffing like mutate does.For anyone who disagrees, please tell me how YOU would beat a mutate deck without saying "cancel deck" that's not playing. That's nobody playing.
p.s. Whatever you assume of my deck construction it doesn't change the fact that mutate is the only deck type that I struggle against. In Arena I'll quit discard/ mill matches cus I just don't want to deal with it.
TLDR Most deck types are useless trash against Mutate decks.
lmao i love that that pasta came literally 3 standards after golgari explore
no it's an issue of discriminations, but the case is that a lack of rights does not fully characterize the scope of discrimination
me omw to gaslight redditors
which was basically "mutate but it actually does what it wants to do"
like mutate was golgari explore but bad
I think Warren Farrell brings up some good points about issues that men face in culture/society
Before you get your panties bunched up, understand I'm not bashing the game. Why do you play if you just load your deck with white cards and pretend to play other colors just for the multiplying factors they give? White cards are the slimiest cards they produce. Boring, unimaginitive and just plain cheap. Life link this life link that cleric this +1/+1 every landfall or creature fall. Countless games ruined having to wait for white deck players to finish mastubating with thier clerics to get the game moving. Absolutely no excitement offered playing a white deck. Just. Boring. What ACTUAL accomplishment do you get from the game by playing a white deck? I don't get it.
(this was a legit unironic mtgarena post)
the only fair deck is big red
I mean there's an argument to be made on whether they should be classified that way or not
but like
I'm not going to tell someone saying that these are rights issues "acktually they're technically not"
I'm not even sure if I have a position on the matter
my point is that it bothers me that MRA use the word "rights" because it feels like they're trying to copy feminist language without actually understanding the history of the language they use
it's far far from the worse thing about MRAs
It's also telling that the MRA was formed only after the feminists movements were well grounded
I was almost a MRA when I was young but I got out.
Maybe I'm more sympathetic to their cause because they do bring up some real issues facing men, but then they frame it in this anti-women way as if half of all people weren't women
yeah
Which I can't get behind because women are great
this is not not really a critique that should be given much attention, after all there are far worse things to focus on about MRAs, it's just something that bothers me specifically now that I'm actually studying feminist theory.
Cmon, how else are they supposed to deny 'pussy passes'?! /s
Women privelege
Lol i love the talking point "yeah but guys get killed in wars more often than women"
"Okay so let women fight"
"noO!!!!!"
Valerie Solanas moment???
ok so for my fem theory class
we actually had to read a legit "kill all men" type person
who was also, to the surprise of absolutely no one, a massive TERF
lmfao
Today I learned what TERF means
and her writing was fucking deranged
theres the eternal question of
like she made some legit good points
whether the warhol assassin was unironic
yUh
when she was being comprehensible, and wasn't busy being transphobic
but her writing was just insane
sorry i cant read
I don't really pay attention to acronyms that much
I'm talking about Mary Daly
ah
that's who we had to read
I learned ACAB like 6 months ago
but she kept citing Solanas
@sick burrow Was the goal of reading her to provide a sort of juxtaposition?
my favorite part of Daly is this quote from her wikipedia article
Daly retired in 1999, after violating university policy by refusing to allow male students in her advanced women's studies classes.
I think the goal is to understand different aspects of feminist theory
the transexual empire 
Which is what you do in a feminist theory course
I get it now.
In Gyn/Ecology (1978), Daly claimed that male culture was the direct, evil opposite of female nature, and that the ultimate purpose of men was death of both women and nature. Daly contrasted women's life-giving powers with men's death-dealing powers.
this would be a sick plot for a fate game
As Valerie Solanas lucidly points out "the male likes death --- it excites him sexually and already dead inside, he wants to die."
but unfortunately is a bit of a stretch in reality
whats wrong about this
the point of reading her was that she made some legit good points
when she wasn't being absolutely insane
We got plenty of examples of that throughout history
and was a very important writer historically
Isaac Newton
The way you described it seemed like she was JUST insane, but I get it.
and also to contrast her with later readings
like the Radicalesbians
who were kinda based
but yeah Daly
Later in the interview when asked about her opinion on Gearhart's proposal that "the proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race", she said, "I think it's not a bad idea at all. If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males."
daly accidentally advocates for the plot of most harem manga
she had some interesting stuff about how patriarchy is like omnipresent
Let's start here: genocide & population control are no bueno
and about how subtle things like language can be a force of oppression, but can also often go under the radar
Like 1984 style?
I don't think 1984 is the best example here
no she literally quoted it
I think Brave New World's description is more accurate
It's not an oppressive regime, it's something we gladly partake in
but anyways
Daly made some good points
but was also insane
and hated all "men" (which she defined as anyone AMAB)
what the fuck
Yep she sounds like a terf
my best description of her writing is
Like the fever dream of a feminist scholar who convinced herself she was a witch while high on LSD and fell asleep browsing TERF twitter
insane ass
Does anyone know what I'm saying about Brave New World?
lmao
Or am I talkin' to crickets
like you can clearly tell that the person having this fever dream is actually a competent feminist scholar
thats just u
Can I?
I'm gettin' crickets
She sounds like a moron to me lmao
fearful old nothing
I have no empathy for feminist sho think hating men is cool
but you can't deny that she's also having a fever dream while high, and also a TERF
I think the point of scholarship is to separate out the ideas and evaluate them on their merits
Ok you can reject the man hating part
1984 isnt a particularly strong dystopian metaphor imo
What about the other parts?
but thats fine
thats not the point of the book
the point of the book is the characters
it was about the language use in it
That's what I'm saying
It's how language was curbed in the book.
the dystopia is just a setting for characters to develop in
oh god i almost compared it to a VN
what is wrong with me
yeah that
I think it will be more about Brave New World
fuck it ill make the comparison anyway
More Like*
like the Duckspeak
The quality of a language dictates the quality of discourse in it.,\
its like sharin no kuni
and how the words needed to describe oppression were lacking
here I thought you meant vietnam
But a visual novel...
I did not do all of the Daly reading though
the dystopian commentary isnt very strong, like its there and present but its not the main focus
and thats fine
like I legit couldn't get through it
its still a strong work of literature
if anyone is looking for a light novel series to read, I'd recommend The Empty Box and Zeroth Maria.
ok so I need to go to bed
Ok in Brave New World the whole concept of revolution is removed through the engorgement of people in their fantasies
Do you
So everyone takes drugs, and no one is allowed to be alone
There's no need to ban literature because no one wants to read literature
is that it's kinda sad that radical feminism has become synonymous with TERFism these days
brave new world's understanding of dystopia can be summarized as "bread and circuses"
because, at least from my class, it seems like the historical origins of radical feminism were actually pretty cool
which is imo a semi-realistic take
like its obviously exaggerated
but it still says stuff
It's like the game We Happy Few.
I think it's more accurate to what's been going on in the US to an extant
extent
My mind is breaking
oh also my response to this
Just write a non fiction on America, would make a good dystopian novel
which is that I used to have more sympathy for MRA people
Until you realized they just plain hated women?
because I was like "holy shit being a man fucking sucks. Like this is fucking awful"
but then I realized
🏳️⚧️
I think it's hard to claim that Warren Farrell hates women
MRA used to be good but it was hijacked by misogynists
Some of them hate women.
isn't r/menslib actually good though

This is sad cause like, men really need to speak up about their problems ya know
nicie
oh wait u r enby too wtf
I mean it doesn't have to be a contest of who has it worse off
yeah
based
Like no one cares about men getting SAd or domestic abused
i just noticed the colors
You can acknowledge other peoples struggles without downsizing yours
And it’s in part bc men don’t speak up
Like I wish we had a MRA movement that addressed this
Feminism literally wants to help those men 
literally every issue men face these days (in America at least, I can't speak for the rest of the world)
Instead of stupid shit like “false rape”
is dual to an issue women face
lmao
I talked to a guy who was like really whacky on the ideological spectrum
and is the result of the way gender is currently constructed being toxic as fuck
He was saying shit like i have an issue with believing all victims because the issue is really whether the rape happened or not
It still upsets me th@t the me too movement did basically nothing for men victims
no shit bro
Also i predicted what he said twice and he said it word for word
like "women are seen as belonging at home and in the kitchen raising kids//men are bad caretakers and therefore shouldn't get custody"
Well, last time I looked at the data most divorce custody court stuff was settled outside of the court system
Privately
The agreement is then handed to the judge
free market of ideas
"toxic masculinity creates huge amounts aggression towards women//men are going to be understandably suspicious of men, and it'll be harder for the legitimately good men"
gender and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race
very true
You can say the same thing about any kind of ideologue, where they just kind of repeat things they've already read
So... the game was rigged from the start?
I dont think these people have read anything in their lives to be honest
lmao
They've got dialogue trees.
lolol
They exist all over the political spectrum, and have all kinds of crazy ideas
I do find it kinda cool though how the early work in deconstructing the social construction of gender was done by feminist theorists
It's not just shoe horned to MRAs
before the trans thing even was on anyone's radar
yuh yuh yuh yuh
like Simone De Beauvoir literally wrote
One is not born but becomes a woman
help-18 please
wasn't she a terf too tho
I don't think so?
So true ultra
I know I havent (read anything)
i have a gender trouble pdf saved
Butler is obviously not a TERF
I own the book
I mean how hard can they be to read, you just look at the words on the page
is that possible
how did she reconcile that
with this
Bigotry is always contradictory oof
So true
source?
nothing is consistent
I was born a 18 yo man
true for one, true for all
Me neither.
Proof by induction
outlier (p=0.05)
true for two, doubly true for all
N/2 true for N
I was going off about that earlier because, philosophically (I’m a philosophy student), you cannot make the assumption that just because some number of horses is a certain color that every horse would be that color. All you need is one horse that isn’t that color and your proof would fall apart.
That’s a well-known epistemic thought
Like… suppose that the sun rose on the first day (n = 1). We have established the base case. Then suppose that the sun has risen for n (and let today be the nth day) days in a row. This isn’t sufficient to prove that the sun will rise tomorrow (n+1).
David Hume's work changed my life
wow dam

I wanted to like her

but at least there's irony in Butler using that line in their work
I know
ye but liking a person as a whole. It can be tough to ignore some nasty shit theyve done
wait so like what TERFy positions did De Beauvoir have
Just know that as long as they've accepted the trinity into their heart that they've been saved,
Oh I just realized another thing: conservatives didn't care about women's achievements/accomplishments and actively tried to shut down women's sports
And then when Male to Female trans-woman started competing
They suddenly cared about protecting the authenticity of women's sports
no I'm now finding some sources that said she was
but they don't seem super reliable
just reddit 
Eh, there's discussion to be had about the trans competition stuff as it is a complex issue, but none of that will come from 'conservative' conservatives.
with the sexual abuse stuff, or was there more
Yeah, I'm not saying that there isn't a discussion to be had
I'm just looking specifically at the negative reaction that they had to women's sports initially
it's interesting though
And how they've flip flopped on it
Mfw Gaslight Gamma Girlboss has been typing all this in their sleep.
its not very complex to be honest
because if you think think that "woman" only exists as a category to label its members as the "other" so they can be oppressed
then it would make sense to be skeptical as fuck of anyone claiming "hey look I'm a woman now"
It's very complicated from a management/ethics point of view
but the truth is that gender is much deeper than a marker for oppression
like if u really want a super fair-ish kind of contest then just measure testosterone levels and divy shit up that way
like weight classes
I think that is what is predominantly suggested. But there are arguments about the body types involved too which I'm not privy to.
Who cares about body types
I mean if you're 7'2 going into the WNBA
I mean it depends on the sport right
many people who compete at the high level in sports are already genetic freaks
Even if your testosterone levels are low, you're still 7'2
I mean sure
ok I actually sleep now
There isn't a single remedy to this.
I think the real problem with sports is how most ppl will only watch like, 1 type
closing discord time
That blanket works for every sport and every organization
i.e the one with a certain body type of men
and how badly sports is comercialized means that other types are like, not vaible
Also it's harder to partition sports that are team based by hormonal levels
I was referring to olympic type stuff when i was typing what i was typing
The issue is still then ppl worried about authenticity of their sports. If someone is 7'2 "naturally" as a woman there is 0 issue
but if it's a trans woman who is 7'2 then it's a problem
yeah that comes from, i dont wanna say transphobia as much like
just coping
people dont like losing oof
trans athletes are in this weird spot where whether they win or lose they'll still be under attack
some whack shit
One solution could be: well you just get rid of segregation by gender for sports
anyone can compete
i am in favor of this
But how will that play out?
yeah no gender segregation, but segragation by relevent parameter
Like i said ppl competing at the top level are already genetic freaks
like height/weight
It's probably the only real tenable solution to the problem
That's blanket/uniform
if someone is like a man and 5'2 you're not competing in the nba
But there are lots of issues
yeah short people deserve to be able to play basketball ig
I know for water polo in HS, anybody can play in the "boy's" league
But you have to be a biological female to play in the "girl's" league
if someone cares about the fairness of the sport like john said controlling for height works then
however the issue is that, since sports is so commecialized and the demand for short ppl basketball is low
There were some HS teams that put their girl's on the boy's team
And they'd shred people
It was pretty rare though
that i feel like it wont be vaible
The WNBA is not well attended at all
in the end, at least for me, it doesn't matter about how fair the sport is
well there should be segregation based on some stat ig, like you should have the ability to shine regardless of genetics ya know
I think tickets to the parking lot cost more than sparks tickets
like its not fairness as much as ppl wouldnt get representations
like if women version of sports didnt exist you could imagine that women wouldnt have too much representation in sports rn
I think this is the problem. Lots of people have a strong "disgust" factor when something doesn't seem fair
Or someone cheated, or it's in-authentic
im not sure how viable that is inside a capitalist mode of economy
Johnathon Haidt did a lot of work on this disgust factor, morality, and political opinions
yeah v sad
well not cheating, but i mean like fairness to every height in basketball or something
It's pretty interesting
see
This is why I like math problems
So straight forward
lul
straight forward math problems 
when u have to upend the rules and invent a framework for ur problem 
John triggered by calling math problems straight 
I'm an analyst/PDE person ok
oof fair enough
We don't make shit up with "new rules"
Real numbers are our jam
fuckin' category theorists
analysus
Idk for me the beauty of math is like, how people come up with novel and new ideas and frameworks ya know
I used to think that way, but as I got better & better
like even something as simple as set theory
and more exposed to math
I began to like very concrete explicit examples that I can compute
And I wasn't that way 6-7 years ago
ig thats fairish
I'll just say it gives me unlimited mental stimulation, although my interest stays alive by learning more about interplay between seemingly disjoint stuff
as I have learnt of more and more different fields (goal is to be polymath, so i try learning about all fields)
i just appreciate new kind of frameworks and such
I think I began to like the little things in analysis a lot more
A clever inequality that falls out nicely
Is it even tractable to "learn it all" with respect to math?
no
Right
Finally getting a more optimal bound
hopefully if immortality is invented in my lifetime 
Just feels amazing
We got a new bound on jensen's inequality
We're not sure if it's slightly more optimal than what is had
But it feels pretty fucking cool to say
if we are lucky we will have pills that keep us alive till 150
years
Upload my mind to a computer when
Hold on, this Global Warming passing by.
u will be a great arnim zola john
You know, I've never understood how weather and shit is predicted
Isn't it all navier-stokes?
I think one could develop slightly reasonable understanding if they could stay invested in learning full time for maybe 2 or 3 decades, but this "if" is beyond realisable
Y'know like that one PDE no one can solve or prove that there's something that can't be solved
I'm still undecided on predicting things like weather. Is Navier-Stokes really that good of a model
Even if you just get numerical techniques

Can we accurately predict what'll happen in 50 years?
No
Well, a pop-math video I've watched said that after a certain point, predictions are worthless in a chaotic system.
I read in Robinson's Dynamical Systems that accurate weather predictions are capped at 14 days regardless of developments in technology
its pretty good considering a small change in initial condition can change everything
I don't even know what I'll be doing 14 days from now
i know what i'll be doing 14 days from now
There's too much stochasticity inherent to the process that all solutions probably go whackadoodle beyond that time bound
Googoogaagaa
bebbefumgufeb
math with john? based
your mom
It's hard to say what will happen in like 5 or 10 year's time


Even extrapolating data you run into problems of induction
But that doesn't mean like
inducting on R
fyi navier stokes is pretty well understood in "regular" conditions
Plastic is good for the ocean
like if we restricted it to settings that occur on earth outside of labs
The models are very accurate
we have proved NS existence + smoothness in the affirmative
i think the problem is low temp high pressure?
maybe i have that backwards
high temp low pressure
I am still but a novice in PDEs
I'm taking my sweet ass time. I think my analysis education was rushed
And I didn't really appreciate the finer details
in any case though, that doesnt make it computationally convenient
modern weather models simply have insufficient data for exact precision
they have enough for good guesses for short timeframes
add in some ML magic
and you get models that work for a couple weeks
but not really long-term
Aren't both ryc and Ange doing that stuff
Yeah but they both hate me

why
Understandable

true


stop the self-pity
everybody loves nami


I think we all disagree politically, and I'm not afraid to say that I disagree politically with them
I'm fine w/ ppl disagreeing with me
e.g. what I see as important and pressing, isn't labelled important and pressing by them; what they see as important and pressing, isn't important and pressing for me

I'm fine w/ most people here th0
It's like that in real life too, there's lots of ppl who hate my guts
And I'm completely fine w/ them

I just found out why you flip the denominator and the numerator of the second fraction when you divide two fractions
It’s because if you multiply a number by its reciprocal you get 1
So multiply both fractions by the reciprocal of the second fraction to turn the second fraction into 1
And dividing by 1 is easy
And then ur left with the first fraction times the reciprocal of the second fraction
Are there open book math exams in college?
Ive had many
pointset topology and measure courses did them all open book
metric spaces too
How hard were they?
just like usual
being open book in a proofs course doesnt help much unless you dont know anything
ah, okay.
guys the square root of -1 is a unreal number right?
because it is not really possible to get it
its called an imaginary number, since it doesnt exist in the real numbers
whenever you turn a steering wheel you're invoking the existence of the square root of -1
also this
what does this mean
when u multiply any number with the square root of 1, u are rotating that number
Do u mean negative 1?
well
$-1=i^{2}$
Shyshu of the Golden Water ✓
so yes u are rotating when u multiply with -1
but its when u multiply with i 2 times
Cuz the square root of 1 is 1
When u multiply a number by 1 nothing happens
Oh ok
idk how much sense "multiplying by i is the same as rotating" makes to someone with no other context
You mean how the i number line thingy goes up and down instead of left and right
So you rotate 90 degrees counterclockwise to get from 1 to i
And 1*i = i
you rotate 90 degress counter clockwise in the complex plane
ye
but that works for any number
(a+bi)i = -b + ai
how coveted are latex skills?
it's always a plus in academia, especially when you have to write stuff in collaboration
if you don't have to write stuff in collab or are not in academia, it won't matter
complex numbers don't have an order attached to them
an inequality of complex numbers doesn't make sense
So is 2i not greater than i
there is no good definition of "greater" to begin with
you can compare the magnitudes if you'd like
Make no sense
the thing is if you try to make a definition that works nicely for i and 2i, as in your example, it won't make sense when comparing i to complex numbers not on the imaginary axis
What complex numbers aren’t on the imaginary axis
any that have a nonzero real part
my fav complex number 6+9I
Oh ok

