#serious-discussion
1 messages ¡ Page 468 of 1
thats not how it is in cbse
u learn trig in 10th
and circle related trig in 11th

oh yeah shit i forgot

i learned trig on my own a year earlier i mixed it up
so yeah then my plan works even better
yeah
i didn't cause i knew the unit circle definition
that made it bearable
memorizing identities was ass tho
but then again
a lot of 10th grade kids will not like it
just coz it means more math


i still hate trig
coz its annoying

honestly, if you turn every trig function into a complex exponential, so many formulas and problems become soo much easier
like $\int e^{ax}sin(bx) \dd{x}$
true
Ninja
but a lot of integrals become uglier
especially those with higher powers of trigs
idk
ninja of the golden shash

wdym?
conflating your nickname with shashwat
đ
what exactly is a proof by contrapositive
instead of proving A -> B you prove not B -> not A
oh
that makes more sense now
i saw some places with a proof like that marked as proof by contradiction which im assuming isnt right
They're the same thing and angry LEM-skeptics are sobbing.
Yeah its the difference between using "not the conclusion" to get directly to "not the hypothesis" vs using "not the conclusion" to get to something which contradicts the hypothesis, but they're the same thing. However, in the latter, you get to use the hypothesis in your search for a contradiction. Which can make things easier.
Like if both are complicated and the hypothesis can be simplified a lot to something nice
many people also just like saying "proof by contradiction"
"proof by contradiction" 
now what happened here 
it's an outer integral. it went outside the page

The rest of the line is DLC
Yeah, don't look closely
lmao
Scanner didn't scan that part ig.
ok that made me chuckle you win
Just watch in 2 seconds it going to be Monday.
It is not Monday
what if it was monday exactly two seconds after berlin said so
and then it switched back
Kaynex jumping to conclusions
i have a question which isnt related to math particularly but teaching in general and i wanna know if this idea of mine makes sense in a mathematical setting
what if we taught problems by color coding (for example darker colors representing the first steps which must be done in a problem, like color coding powers or variables that cancel out) and slowly the rest of the parts of the problem would turn lighter and lighter so you feel more ârelievedâ the better you solve
Do u think this would work in an educational setting
Did yâall do functional analysis in final year undergrad or nah?
it really depends on the institution, mine offers a very intro course as an elective, which I took on my final semester
but now this same institution wants to make it mandatory
3 or 4 yr undergrad?
i mean many schools don't offer functional analysis at the undergrad level
i took it in 3rd year but it was listed as a graduate course
4 years, but with the curriculum change it'll be a 3rd year course (leaving the last year for electives)
Doesn't harm to try I guess, in a way it could probably make memorising algorithms easier because you'd probably be able to recall the sequence of colours and the steps associated with them. That it makes memorisation easier might also be a downside though, anything that doesn't immediately fall into the algo would baffle most students.
Seems like a nice idea.
Anman
not really
Wait....Manjan is Janman spelled backwards. I thought it was Manan + Janman mixed.
What is Hatcher?
author of Aeez Tuts
janman are you a math major or a hobbyist?
hobbyist
It would help incredibly if students would begin that way since early stages of childhood, i mean every step in any math problem is just down to memorization right? it should all fit into an algorithm, and i mean theres always the option of just taking away the colors once the "learning process" is done and solving both ways?
it wouldnt hurt to try
Even though most (all?) of the problems a student typically sees in school math curriculum generally fall into repetitive algorithms, I feel this hampers critical thinking and reinforces the view that math is meaningless symbol pushing. Maybe if the algorithms themselves can be derived/motivated properly, things would be better, but then there's the issue of teachers themselves not being proficient enough.
Worth a try in any case, at the very least if most students are just going to memorise and do things like "FOIL", then they might as well just do that well enough.
is there a wolframbot?
that calculate stuff on discord
like e.g. 3+2*123123 / 44
and the bot calclute this problem
âFOILâ a fancy way to make a simple distributive property more complicated than needed.
I agree, I heard about it on this server for the first time
what channel would i ask about perturbation analysis 
i dont think my question is enough for like dynamical systems since i cant understand anything in that channel 
if thats even close
I thought it was used to make it simpler.
And it actually does...
mnemonics are meant to make things simpler, the problem is that in most places early math education focuses way too much on these things and algorithms rather than explaining why these things are true to begin
how so
have yall seen people use $x \rho y$ for when they're doing things with inequalities and unsure if it should be $>$ or $<$?
polybeandip
we were talking about the unimodality of binom coefficients, and our teacher did stuff like $$\binom{n}{k} \rho \binom{n}{k+1} \iff \frac{\binom{n}{k}}{\binom{n}{k+1}} \rho 1 \iff \frac{n-k+1}{k} \rho 1 \iff n+1 \rho 2k$$
polybeandip
and then we get the desired inequality once we know what k and n are
yeah, I thought so too and but I thought it was cool
I was wondering if anyone knew where it was from
id expect $\gtrless$
Namington
instead of rho
oh Whoa
hmm probably
How does that work
Does anyone have a favorite way to write left super- and subscripts?
Like ${}_1^2\textrm{He}$
teafortwo
There has to be a better way than using a vanishing prefix.
there's \prescript from the mathtools package
Can you write a macro that looks cleaner but does the same thing?
Ooh if there's already something for it then don't do what I said lol.
found the resident chemist
what do real mathematicians use for things which wolfram alpha does
Mathematica
Or any counterpart
(Wolfram Alpha is basically Mathematica+a lot of Wolfram stuff on cloud)
Or just wolfram alpha
they asked a real mathematician manan @devout nacelle
Oh, then MS Excel 

shutup nerd
mathematica
or any counterpart
(wolfram alpha is basically mathematica+a lot of wolfram stuff on cloud)


||how many times must we tell them to read ||#âhow-to-get-help||?||
ignore spoiler
Sania?
hi brems 
What mathematical discoveries have left mathematicians with this expression?
lol nice vid
watching the tv show foundation
apparently good mathematicians count primes when they get nervous 
Hi. I'm tired of using overleaf so what LaTeX editor and compiler would you recommend? lol
what operating system?
I use Mac
vim is nice
TeXShop is nice for mac
very minimal
something like vim is ideal if you really want to go through that learning curve
Okay thanks guys! I will test these two and see what I like more.
Yeah never used it. I used TeXstudio and MiKTeX before but did not like them that much
TeXShop is a lot more minimal than TeXStudio, I don't really like Studio
vim is literally a command line text editor with no mouse functionality

it's probably the best text editor there is but you have to learn a bunch of keyboard shortcuts
I enjoy Vim; Iâm not a power user, though
The main reason why Vim is nice is that you can integrate snippets into it
if you really spend time learning it you can do some really crazy stuff that no other text editors can really do
Snippets make typing the large amount of LaTeX I have to type tolerable
vim power users kinda scare me

honestly overleaf is pog
yeah getting lost connection msgs every min definitely pog
only if you have bad connection 

VSCode
is really nice
aesthetically
didn't know they do TeX lol. I have one installed.
I will have to explore this option
What about packages?
you will need to download tex obviously
yeah these come with texlive
Okay okay. Haha So I would only need a compiler?
Yeah you just download texlive
and then get that one latex extension
and you're good to go
its called latex workshop
i tried to switch to vscode and i can not get it to work
I need to present on Szamuely ch 4 today 
There are a lot many links, youtube videos on it
Which package do ppl use to get nice automata diagrams?
simply Use vscode and texlive and ur done really on mac
takes like two seconds to setup
its not too bad to do just with tikz
you can do it with nodes pretty easily
well idk if it would be easy for big automata, i think there is a website that will let u generate the tikz code from an automata diagram
quivr would probably work for this, maybe there's smth better for automotat diagrams specifically
I used this when I took theory of comp
it works fine
maybe not adequate for you but idk
The link has a white canvas.
is there supposed to be anything drawn?
Yes, but what's that white thing
Sample drawing? I can't see.
it's the canvas you use to make ur automata
double click on the white thing
Add a state: double-click on the canvas
Add an arrow: shift-drag on the canvas
Move something: drag it around
Delete something: click it and press the delete key (not the backspace key)
Make accept state: double-click on an existing state
Type numeric subscript: put an underscore before the number (like "S_0")
Type greek letter: put a backslash before it (like "\beta")
See #latex-testing for an example of what it produces
Hell
worst chapter in the book
all the definitions are
Atrocious
Thatâs ur first mistake. Using Szamuely
so much in that book could be fixed if he just defined zariski riemann spaces in a not dumb way
How does he define
no generic point
he takes the set of DVRs containing k with fraction field K but excludes K itself
and then gives it the cofinite topology
bad bad choice
I sully Szamuely
Moth tell me as many conditions you know which imply flat
lmao
another page of Szamuely another typo
Szamuely claims this is a maximal ideal
but it's clearly not
Wdym
its not maximal
Nilpotence definitely exists in a field

doesnt he say that it splits in C[x, y]
can u send the example
cause im on my laptop so i cant pull up the book
Oh
okay to be fair this is fucked up
because the entire previous thing is only done for closed points
I donât see where he says its maximal
Read the first paragraph of the example
He applies the stuff about Gal(C | R) but he only does that for closed points
I think he doesnât read what he types
all the time
yea its 100% not proof read
and u can tell
there are worse examples
like remember the zariski riemann thing i talked about before?
he talks about how it can be covered by integral affine curve... which under his defn have generic points
So hurbed
when ur book is so bad ur readers have to rewrite it from scratch to clear up the details

What should I read instead
idk what are you trying to learn exactly
if you're just trying to learn some stuff about algebraic curves read Hartshorne/Liu/Vakil
at university level is everything in math books based? is there no khanacademy equiv for university level math
fair enough
Yeah i think i should read Liu Qing - "Algebraic Geometry and Arithmetic Curves"
Right now I am reading
Bump Automorphic Forms and Representations
Guillot A Gentle Introduction to Local Class Field Theory
Szamuely Galois Groups and Fundamental Groups
Next year maybe I wanna read Einsiedler and Ward Ergodic Theory with a View Towards Number Theory
i can't get texlive setup on these linux workstations in our offices
none of them work with vscode
they want some weird ass shit that "comes with" texlive (except it doesn't on this distro of linux for whatever dumbass reason, and you need go to find it yourself)
stupid
just using texmaker
it's fine
Stop reading gentle introduction books
Pain and suffering are part of the experience
No
@vivid halo Ivan Horozov is giving a talk today at my school's Grad Student seminar
On Arithmetic Groups and Modular Forms
Nice
I still don't see a point in VSCode or a dedicated TeX editor for my math HW
Overleaf has the easiest collaboration by far
I mean yea if youâre collaborating overleaf is easiest
Otherwise standalone editors are better
desktop editors are just easier
once you know what youre doing
you can make 1 big file for your preamble and import it, you can edit shit without needing to inteface with the internet
you can tweak exactly how much wysiwyg functionality you have
just want a text editor with no bells and whistles? or want an extensive repertoire of utilities and compiling chains with autocompletion? both can be set up without much work
or anything in between
overleaf wins out on collaborations but thats it
Is anyone here good at chemistry and can answer 5 questions I have?
even for collabs, splitting (sub)sections into .tex that you input into a main and having stuff on git is pretty good
you will have better luck asking in the chem server
I like being able to work on stuff outside, where I usually dont have internet
fair
But otherwise I would just use overleaf
no
?
You can copy your project to smth offline to then upload the updated version to overleaf
I do that sometimes
tex with local editor is the only way, plus its better for formatting the stuff u write in the tex file in itself which is good when ur a neat freak
I'm more spontaneous than this allows
I also keep my preamble in separate files and sometimes split assignments up into several files so this gets confusing
whoa really?
even individual assignments?
i've never had the need for more than 2 files. main file + preamble
What makes it easier that way
I only do it for big stuff
That isnt weekly
Its not easier per se, just more comfortable to have small documents to work in
Got to ask how many mathetmaticians are good with a number of subjects with math
define "good"
How many math subjects are they suppose to remember or are an expert at
whatevers necessary for their research
some mathematicians have broader interests ŧhan others
general question
how do you keep track of your notes when your notes are on like, fairly open ended subject matter? not a book or a paper but a whole field of math
so like, i'm learning about simplicial stuff recently
me too
lots of it feels like bullshit
i got an example
why are n-chains defined the way they are
where is the visual intuition for C_1 or C_0
and why is it defined as sum of n_ie_i
and why is boundary map defined as alternating sum
and how does relative homology work in a visual intuition sense
i think this stuff can be done. An element of C_0 is just a finite set of points or a finite family of points which is being represented as a formal sum. The fact that it takes place in an Abelian group allows you to take positive or negative points, which corresponds to 'orientation'. The reason this is helpful is that if you stack two points on top of each other that have opposite polarities, they cancel out and yield zero.
So, like, let X be a space, say the plane R^2 for concreteness. Suppose you have a circle drawn in the plane, a closed path.
What is the boundary of the closed loop? Intuitively it has no boundary.
Formalizing chain complexes as Abelian groups lets you talk about the zero element of a group, the idea of 'no boundary' is then formalized as it having the zero boundary
Ok.
ok
So my problem lies within what the 0 chain is supposed to represent
So say we have sigma:standard 0 simplex -> X
Zero simplex?
its just a point
Right
I knew that i just wanted to double check to make sure we were on the same page
then we just attach a number to that point and its in the 0 chain?
sounds like balonie
Ok. this isn't the right place to start with getting intuition
let's say we have a path in the space
ok
it's a math from the 1-simplex into X.
ok
write $\omega : I\to X$
diligentClerk
for the attaching map ok
Prior to the chain-complex notion of all this, you'd say that the boundary was something like the set of points ${\omega(0),\omega(1)}$, yeah?
diligentClerk
yea
but with boundary you call it an alternating sum of attaching maps of the n-1 simplicies which is a weirder definition
So attaching signs to the points, having them be coded as positive or negative, allows you to slowly bring the ends of the path together, forming it into a closed loop; writing the boundary as $\omega(1)- \omega(0)$ gives you that the boundary is 0 (nothing) when $\omega(1)=\omega(0)$
diligentClerk
let me give you another example which helps to illustrate why the sign is useful. Take $X$ to be the real number line, and let $\omega$ be a smooth path from $a$ to $b$.
diligentClerk
but you didnt say w(1)=w(0)
Here $a,b$ are real numbers
diligentClerk
if $f$ is a continuous function on $\mathbb{R}$ we can take the integral of $f$ along the path $\omega$; essentially we want to integrate $f$ along the interval $[a,b]$ where $\omega$ is a choice of parametrization of the real line. Admittedly in the one dimensional case this is stupid because it's unnnecessary, but in higher dimensions it absolutely becomes useful to give a parametrization.
diligentClerk
By the fundamental theorem of calculus, if $F$ is the antiderivative of $f$ we have
$F(\omega(1) - F(\omega(0)) = \int_{t=0}^{t=1} f(\omega(t))\omega'(t)dt$, and we sometimes write $d\omega = \omega'(t)dt$; you are probably familiar with this notation because it comes up doing u-substitution.
diligentClerk
the interesting idea now is that we could interpret $F$ as being a map on $C_0$, into the real numbers, which sends each point $x$ (singular $0$ simplex) to $F(x)$; then you would extend it to chains by simple linearity, i.e. $F(\sum n_i x_i) = \sum n_iF(x_i)$
diligentClerk
then you could write $F(\omega(1)) - F(\omega(0))$ as $F(\omega(1)-\omega(0)$
diligentClerk
i guess what I want to stress here is like, the duality that comes up in the formula for the fundamental theorem of calculus when we write it this way:
if I write $\partial\omega$ for the boundary of $\omega$, i.e. $\partial\omega = \omega(1) -\omega(0)$
then we have
$$F(d\omega) = \int_\omega dF$$
diligentClerk
here the notation $dF$ is meant to simply denote the derivative of $F$, and the subscript to integrate over $\omega$ is just shorthand for what i wrote earlier. this kind of suggests a parallel or duality between the derivative and the boundary operator.
diligentClerk
so yeah to recap, the two most influential reasons for the sign choices in the boundary operator are
- first of all, it gives you a good way to say that a closed loop or surface has 'zero boundary', because intuitively a triangulated surface should be closed exactly when its boundary line segments are all stacked on top of each other with equal and opposite polarities and so it comes out to zero in the Abelian group
- second of all, the sign difference comes up in the fundamental theorem of calculus in a natural way, and more generally in higher dimensional generalizations like stokes' theorem, green's theorem, the divergence theorem there are other parallels to this

i want to plead with you otherwise because i think it is possible to understand homology but honestly there are things i still struggle with. One such thing is that often in a rigorous argument about the chain complex of singular simplices i'm often tempted to work with basic simplices i understand, like the constant simplices. But a constant n-simplex is a cycle iff n is odd. So you can't always do this. And there are similar problems, where the basic things i'd like to work with may not actually be cycles
There's some incredibly basic question about homology my friend came up with and asked me, we couldn't figure it out.
It was one of those things where the answer's obviously yes on a geometric/intuitive level but how to prove it was a total mystery
he kept working it and eventually emailed a researcher. She told him it was open
one of those things you're shocked to hear is open
oh wait he's in the server
@flint jasper
Can you remind us about the thing about spheres in R^3 you were thinking about
it was a year or two ago
Once conjectured whether there exists a non-trivial rational pair (x, sin(x)). Just thought it was an interesting problem but I wouldnât know how to approach proving/disproving it. Anybody got any input?
@alpine cedar
The answer is.. no. Which I learned from this blog https://weeklymathematics.com/2019/05/09/irrationality-of-basic-trigonometric-and-hyperbolic-functions-at-rational-values/

I was not expecting a negative answer
I was fully expecting a neg answer but wasn't sure why
nice post thanks for sharing
Best Mathematics Book that covers everything in computer science with application of python ? I really need it and already searched alot everywhere but got no luck so This community is the last option
It's too expensive man
Ok I'll try finding them
I would recommend âKolmogorov complexity with applicationsâ by Li.
It goes into a bit more depth than Concrete Mathematics
Is it on Amazon ?
You know Iâve never checked. Itâs on libgen anyway
You mean the problem about subsets of RÂł having torsion-free fundamental groups?
.
I mean I really really appreciate the effort that you are putting in to explain to me, similar to my profs. I wish I could compensate somehow. But I feel like I have a lot on my plate in terms of homework and readings and tests for other classes. So I am hoping thay later in the year I will have more time to myself to spend answering and understanding my own questions .
Im going to return to them, but im not sure if I can do too much in the present, but maybe in a week or two
group projects are fun
"So you want to do vocabulary first and then jump into an example?"
"No, we're going to do some research for example on history like who created these things."
"why dont you work on that, I'll work on this, and then we'll discuss what we each find to each other after an hour"
"ok, sounds good"
The only vocabulary were: inductive reasoning, conjecture, and counterexample
oh well maybe dont spend an hour on that
I was shocked that he didn't know that Euclid Math invented math in 300 BC

euclid math invented math
euclid did not invent math
he devised a systematic way for understanding why facts in geometry are true
"If you don't like the plan, why don't you do it?"
"Give me the laptop then"
"NO!"
you might argue he was the inspiration for the classical/modern notion of proofs.
no ryc
garry chess invented chess, euclid math invented math, its basic knowledge
i was making joke on that he wanted to research on who invented "inductive reasoning, conjecture, and counterexample"
Guys my college is about to start but I have got some time.
I really want to start learning undergrad math but don't have a slightest clue from where to start and how to start.
It would be really helpfull if somone from senior years can guide me.
I have about 2 months for the college
yeah that was probably it. ok i misremembered. guess it wasn't homology
There could be something about homology and spheres though, although I don't remember emailing anyone about it
start an analysis and/or linear algebra book
Can I start with calc
sure, spivak is nice i heard
How much calc
All three?
I man like calc 1, calc 2 and calc 3
no idea, i never took a calc class
i think calc 3 is a separate book (calculus on manifolds)
I am pretty advanced in calc 1 and 2
So I think I should go for calc 3
But I would need some vectors too for that
that's why i said analysis book since it will introduce you to the idea of rigorous proofs which is important (if you are majoring in math anyway ...)
no, mathematics
i have a degree in math and CS but now im just a math major
but i like to think i am more employable if need be
what dont you understand
giving an entire two textbook pages with no other info makes it hard to know where to start
explain the thumb
The Langlands server is inactive. Can anyone give sense to this đŚ˘
Stop bullying đ
anyways just try to ask a more workable question
people are generally happy to help around here but not usually happy to answer vague questions that require reading whole pages of text without context
I can give two or three more definitions that are relevant right now. But I do not get a little part of the proof on the right page center where he proves by contradiction that g is a strong one way function.
đŚ˘But the stuff requires to be familiar with some notations.
yea that's sort of the issue, if you can ask the question in a more self contained way more people might be able to help
đŚ˘Explicitly the question is about why inverting any y and taking the prefix of length in I might return a wrong inverse. Author says to check every m.
You even copied my swan đdont ask me why I use this emoji so often.
makes sense
hey, could you suggest me any book/article/lecture for this analysis thing
𦢠careful there you're starting to give off cyberduck vibes
đŚ˘
shy of the golden shu
Hello incel
Bund Mara loru to you
đŤ
I forgot what this meant
Maybe something like fuck you or suck my dick I forgor
But itâs the one thing I remember Mirza taught me
loru means dick, or dickhead
Good
the real question is
What is Gand Mara
what happens if you write loru wala
fuck off
Awww đĽ°
Loru wala 
Whatâs that mean
does it turn into "the dick one"
Or is that just nothing

i mean it'd literally mean a pimp for men who are bottoms

Kekw
Femboy pimp
that's a super specific thing
Discord moderator?
like adding wala in front of pretty much anything means "xyz one" and is interpreted as "xyz seller"
loru is like a guy who's a bottom
Chmonkey wala
aha

yes
Or does it sound like I am selling my@body
No it means you sell chmonkeys
Okay
but like this is heavily context dependent
Chmonkey's body wala
Everyone could use a lil Chmonkey in their life
what the hell...
Yes 

welcome to math server redsti
Move along, nothing to see here
Isnât Mirza like 12 years old which is why ur account keeps getting b&

i'll just move to advanced maths section or something that makes more sense... /j
pretty much
I wonder what mirza's cringe score is
đ
jailbait confirmed
Idk the data is not full

it's just off the chart
because it's negative ahahah ahaha haha hah
Oh

Pty wala
Uh oh

hmmmmmmmmmm
...
Thats 35%
ahahah
i'm around 18% chill
Imagine
81% cringe and 1% memes
I'm surprised I'm only 35% chill
the rest must be ivory tower

what does it mean to be a "pointed continuous function"
is it just a continuous function between pointed topological spaces that preserves the basepoint?
probably
I mean the context is "Let Top* denote the category of pointed topological spaces with pointed continuous functions"
Lmfao.
My chill %age is 5.83
thats good


daira e ufuq
among
Us
Apple Ipad Pro 11â 128 Giggabyte
Is Notability good for taking notes 
giggabyte
what's the problem with the ipad
the m1 chip is pretty bauss, you have to admit
i don't know what that is you apple fanboy

such ignorance, the conversation was over before it started
same reason it happened with the ryzen chips
it's cuz they're better
there is no reason to buy intel at present
ok that's fair enough
coping
there was a nice meme
lemme see if i can find it
doesn't seem like it
it was something like a group of people led by intel saying "someone has to step up and give AMD some competition"
and the next panel is AMD saying "fine, i'll do it"
cuz they keep cranking out new chips for cheaper
yeah but now that they shat on intel's chest, they no longer need to
they could go more expensive and people would still buy it
and the crazy m1 stuff is mad
tablets and laptops with like 40hr battery and crazy on-board graphics
the intel hate is just pure cope.
one could almost buy random shit rn and still end up with good stuff
intel is a titan of the processor community and you will not diminish that you heartless paid marketing staff.
12 AMD credits have been deposited into your account.
that's the thing
they're getting kinda killed in workstation/server stuff in terms of pricing right now
depending on the use case
and what ryc said is important because drivers are a big deal
for mobile CPUs there's no contest
so some stuff will just run better on intel just cuz of historical reasons
this isn't quite true
there's some synthetic benchmarks that run better on intel literally because the software handicaps non intel CPUs
otherwise like
it mainly comes down to some differences in architecture that used to be more pronounced than they are now
like the older AMD bulldozer cpus had kinda shitty single core performance for architectural reasons
that's also true
instruction set differences are no longer as big a deal, but a lot of scientific software gets shafted when it doesn't detect things like MKL
oh sure
including both benchmarks and matlab
yea for very specific applications
and special python flavors
the new xe stuff looks really good... as on board graphics, at least
i would really say it's hard to go wrong buying almost anything from last year on
Lmao no one actually said anything
the chance that any given person in a math server is going to be in your specific university in your specific class is incredibly low lol
i only know microsoft office 635.
yes but even then it doesn't really happen
Has Chris asked a specific question about anything or is he just looking for people in his class
There's like 2
I think
That's a lot
Most of the people that share unis were invited by each other
And at a big college the chance of sharing a specific class is way lower
Eh they just asked is someone took that class at some point though, not if they are taking it now
Chris does
But you definitely have not taken math 635 with stefan
Oh 635 is stochastic processes

Grad courses at Queens College
https://www.qc.cuny.edu/Academics/Degrees/DMNS/Math/Courses/Pages/GraduateCourses.aspx
Who takes these grad courses?
I guess this is for masters students
Hi
Does anyone have this issue with wikipedia where sometimes math symbols are randomly rotated?
its been happening a lot for me lately and I have no idea why
that's sp weird
zooming in fixes it
but if you zoom back out the same issue is present
yeah
How many matrices do u need to generate a dense subset of GLn, or SLn, or stuff like that
it's been happening to me on chrome for 2 weeks
apparently it doesn't happen on other browsers
At least 2
Jesus Christ; class averages at my school are just ridiculously fucking low. I missed a week of class due to the pandemic, didn't know half the material on a midterm and got the lowest grade on that midterm that I've ever gotten on a test, and I still got just a bit better than the class average.
epic
yo whassup
how can i make money knowing some university mathematics but without the degree?
đ
Eduu: math won't directly get you cash, if you have math skills that can be applied to a job or if you can do some kind of work that you'll profit from then that's what you should look at
What you need to do depends on the situation
sorry if my question is considered as one with lucrative intentions... but i am really trying to figure it out... but thanks sloth king daminark
It's fine to have lucrative intentions, I just mean we'll need specifics to give non-generic advice
you're right sloth king daminark, it depends on the situation... i'd love to find a job that requires university mathematics but without the degree... i mean, like doing the hard part of mathematical modeling or optimization or smt...
Well... talking very seriously, what else do mathematicians do for industries? I know they can do very well the part of mathematical modeling and optimization... is there somebody here that works for an industry? can that person tell me a little about his work routine?
So, it basically depends on what else you do. Math tends to enhance a lot of pursuits, but it's only ever the primary object of a pursuit if you're in academia
If that makes sense
So for instance, a lot of engineering jobs require doing some math. But you can't just do math, you also have to know e.g. physics
if you know "some uni mathematics" you might be able to get certified as an actuary or something
or an accountant or what-have-you
those programs are typically shorter than full degrees and dont require any specific bachelor
(though they tend to require a bachelor's of some sort, but i think theres ways around that)
the process for this will vary by region though
and in any case, youll have to do some studying to be able to pass the certification process
Actuary might be the most obvious choice tbh
software engineer
if u want bread thats the move
no way around it
actuary requires too much work
Lol, probably not the only way? It's the default way but perhaps someone's background is better suited to actuarial work
you need a degree for software engineering though
e.g. if you know the relevant stats and math but not CS
sorry. software developer
hey who does Ma4
u do not need naything but a grindset
both are a lot more work than just getting a financial cert
i feel like to get a good acturary position u need to do a lot more than get the cert
jesse gets the job, within minutes has turned into a software recruiter
Secretly got employed by HR
if i can do it anyone can do it bro
is there any job related to environment-caring that requires maths and does not require a degree?
probably not
software engineer for environmental-caring firm
i think so
I need to get that finance internship
and that's true
And just start shilling for finance
where are you getting software jobs w/o a degree
So it becomes Daminark vs jesse
most of these places dont care about a degree
if you really want to find jobs that dont ask for a degree look in the crypto market 
those people dont event want resumes
i knew u were gna say that
jesse do you know if your job has a nice kitchen or something
uhh
well, it actually works... i had a schoolmate that worked as a developer since he was 17 yo because he did a course about it
let me check ryc
like is there an espresso machine
Namington: I think the gcd would just be "demonstrated coding proficiency"
So school would be the most common way to achieve this
Join campus recruiter, Viennie Chanthachack, as he walks you all around HubSpot's HQ in Cambridge, MA. He'll navigate you all around our 25 First Street and 2 Canal buildings to show you our new reception experience, our office spaces, our beautiful atrium, the gym, coffee garden, and more!
do they have sparkling water on tap
But the priority isn't school so much as demonstrated competence
it's 15 fucking minutes
What is sparkling water
Is it water with bubbles
Basically? re sparkling water
yeah
I guess depending on what you mean by bubbles I should clarify: it's carbonated, like seltzer basically
they've got the brick wall
damn this is kinda nice tho
hubspotters
the atrium goes hard
i mean it looks nice but... come on...
?
Why doesn't the vertical video play vertically
its literally a company ryc
that's so true omg
or do you use your own salary to pay for them
i mean they must be
WHAT
i hope to fuck you get disappointed and they're like 8 bucks
no actually i know its free
when it's not a fun fact
cuz one of the perks for the job is free food
cope
how dare they accept you to this
LMAO
there's a fucking gym!??
Are you gonna work there jesse
yeah i just got an offer today pty
what's the actual job
i am software engiener intern
24/7 gym 
Congrats
so you can be at work 24/7 huh?
free towels
gonna start showing up at 3am to gym and get yoked
it's just a fancy hotel
they run classes.
Oh I thought you were a recruiter at a software engineering company
wat
is capitalism really THAT bad?
oh wtf another two buildings???
i mean i've never even heard of hubspot
Me neither
u wouldnt unless u use them lmao
its a CRM company
apparently they are fucking rich
CRM
Whats CRM
customer resource management
hmm
its stuff for sales and marketing and stuff people
Oh so like keeping track of customers information
they have meeting pods 
I watched a lawnmower video where the guy said you need to have a CRM to keep track of your clients
Not that I'm trying to become a lawnmower
waffle wednesday
why don't they have waffles every day
i want a waffle to start my day
u can make one with ur fat salary
i cna afford all the fancy waffles i want
i don't have a waffle iron i used to
i gave it away
fucking bleachers 
wow, i can't wait to see actual workspace
after 10 minutes of chill out area
waffles 
wait till i tell u the salary ryc 
I'm curious 
i was ready for it to be the fucking steve jobs room
but it's the grace hopper room which is not bad
45usd/hr so ~7800 usd a month
plus 3k usd relocation bonus
the desk spaces are soulless









