#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 463 of 1
no?
its a totally exact process and we make no untoward or approximating assumptions
example
lets say i have 10 students and two sports, A and B
A has 6 students, B has 7
so A doesnt have 4, B doesnt have 3
we only care about the maximum case
so if theres a case where a student, say Jim, is neither in A nor B
we can disregard that case
since itll be strictly worse than a case where every student not in A is in B
hence we can assume theres no overlap, ie no students not doing multiple sports.
this is just a basic principle of maximum/minimum computations
rule out everything except the best/worst cases
think on the margin
etc
Exact value as in
Lets say
i really dont understand how i can explain this better
it shoudlnt be in #serious-discussion anyway
No i understood whatever you said
It is just that the idea of maximum/minimum feels like an approximation (even though their definitions say that theyre "exact") because there isnt enough information to calculate the exact values of students playing the different combinations of sports
The idea of assuming worst case scenarios radiates away a feel of approximation
but... the question explicitly asked for a minimum
if it didnt ask for one, then yeah, sure
there isnt enough info and my method isnt valid for all cases
but it only asked for a specific case
the "best case" in terms of minimum
Right
Also whats #serious-discussion all about if it isnt for theoretical discussions?
For that matter #discussion even
this is explicitly a math question, which typically have to follow #❓how-to-get-help
#serious-discussion is for, well, discussing things.
Bruh
its a judgment call thing, hence why we're not too picky on it
and its not like we're monopolizing competitive 5 am discussion space or anything
so its fine
just a note
👍
weird question but do we know how emotions work?? idk how to explain it
You can model emotions pretty accurately using a vector space.
vector space?
Yeah
It's going to be like 4 or 5 dimensional, I can't remember offhand
I remember that one of the bases is happiness, one is excitedness, but I can't remember the others.
😭 no like…
how are emotions created and stuff im confused on how they work
cause i read an article but it doesn’t dive deep into it
a bunch of complicated biological functions that we still dont fully understand
we know how they happen but not how it works
mostly neurotransmitters and hormones though
bro when do you think we’ll find out more i wanna know 😭 it’s so cool
maybe in a few decades of neuroscience research.
maybe.
like we know the basics
we know what hormones are associated with what emotions typically
we know what causes our bodies to produce them
etcetc
we just dont know what actually... happens when stuff binds with receptors
that creates an emotional response
basic stuff like stress stimulating heart muscles and thus raising heart rate is easy enough to see
but most is still a big ???
so would you say we only know what percentage of the brain
thats hard to quantify
give rough i guess
id wager just above 0%, considering we still dont know how, like, consciousness works
and other basics
guys i need help
dont we all
Yes,
what is the symbole of for all here
$\forall$
Namington
thx
these questions go in #latex-help
ah ok
how do people in academia make money
by begging
Mostly by forcing undergrads to buy their overpriced textbooks
you write proposals all year long
and beg people to give you money for those projects
You get a lecture of like 150 people and you charge them each $150 for your calculus textbook or whatever and you force them to buy it, that's 22 thousand already.
ours sent us his for free 
yeah the book stuff doesn't ring true
I know I'm kidding
dont writers of textbooks also like
not make much money off them anyway
tfw publishers
the begging part is true tho
lmao
the job of many profs and post docs is shooting a fuckton of proposals anywhere and everywhere all year
My computer science professor was like "you can buy the textbook, I won't make any money from it, all the proceeds just go to the publisher, so there's also a pdf on my website"
Yes, When I wanted to publish a book, 50% commission was asked. 😦
consciousness
ez give me my nobel prize now
Whats a good djvu reader
I use WinDjview on PC, and Librera on phone/tablet.

They're both smooth on functioning, but I don't think either has the option to edit/scribble over the files.
i just an html page with djvu.js on my browser as a local file
but i barely use djvus so
idk
I think you've got an uphill battle for most things you could be doing in a math phd program
If you're looking at schools that have strong math/cs research and collaboration, and you're talking about wanting to work with those people, that's probably the best angle
I mean the main thing is just having done a lot of proof based math and having the foundational background in analysis/algebra you get from a math major
I mean both
They're accepting people who they think will do well with the work
Maybe consider doing a masters to bridge the gap?
It's not really like undergrad where you're trying to show all these extracurriculars and stuff
Also a lot of these top programs like to see a bit of research in the area. So that might be not something you'd have the opportunity for in a comp eng degree
Depends
That would probably help a lot
Maybe, but research is pretty narrow and so it's hard to say you know all the basics of a topic even if you publish in that topic
I mean you shouldn't
But
Or do I just need to wait for approval a lot of times, like hoping I get accepted to REUs
It's mostly networking tbh
Thats what I was thinking );
Just trying to make good impressions on important people and maintain relationships
So this is why sleep is important
There's not a lot else you can do besides "practice and git gud"
Which is like
Also not a satisfying answer
Yeah, just focus on learning math and doing math and things will come tbh
Ill just treat this like an osu grind
Yeah the networking stuff happens if you are excited about what you're learning and you show it to profs
Get involved in things, like DRPs if your school has them, or reading groups
It's sort of a side effect
Im just worried that Ill put in this effort and then become homeless or a mayh teacher
At least at the undergrad level
and not get into anything
There are a lot of things that math majors can end up doing, that aren't academia
Make an effort to take one or two CS or eng classes or something
Like
Just pop em in there
I have programming experience and some personal projects to show for it
At least then you have a more comfy plan B
But im not sure how secure a plan B it is
Well yeah but it would be good to have a few courses (if you can skip to a proper algorithms course, that's what I mean)
im just really worried that ill not break ice of getting into grad program
i truly have no perspective besides whats on this server
people ive met irl just said it was mostly REUs and good recs
Yeah
but there is nothing I can do that activitively get there );
Which again come from getting to know people and being amicable
Like
It's not like you have to be impressive
In those interactions
oh im not impressive
so i dont need to worry
idk if its just me but the thought of applying is sorta depressing not anxious because it feels like its mostly out of my control
What year are you in
3
I barely know anything about applying either and when I compare this to HS I wouldve known a lot more back then when applying to college compared to now
I mean I knew nothing either in year 3
Youll probably hear a lot about it here when it starts to get closer
the phd students at my school say they forgot
although it's not the same, i've been participating in interviews for engineering phd applicants lately, idk if you have any specific concerns about it
even the first years
In mid november to december
ok ill just visit advisor biweekly ig
Yeah I didn't think about it at all until I started my last year really
djview4
yeah but you were involved in math club and stuff a lot @slim meadow
meanwhile i feel like i know almost no math majors here
i mean, i know some, but i basically just have 1 friend who does math and that's it
PhD Applications Redux
If I don't get in this cycle I might just go teach CC and open up my own math tutoring business
I can't keep holding out for forever for some opportunity
do you mean a private tutor?
wait wtf
de brujin worked on automated theorem proving
?????
dude i thought de brujin was way older than this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automath okay no, theorem verification, not proving
still weird to me
yeah
this was like
massively under recognized at the time
first systematic study of dependent types!!!
wow!!
I mean the max is a lot
I've heard of like 100 or 120 dollars per hour
the average is probably closer to like 40-60 though
but this depends pretty heavily on the area you live in and what you teach
Like private tutors that teach for college entrance exams charge more
Has anyone gotten like all 100 in algebra 2?
That seems to be how it works
how
wtf why
arent u rly good how no phd student yet
i took a lot of phd courses and a prof asked me if i was an undergrad i said yes and he said "join my reu"
god i love nepotism
i was also doing research at the time in another department so i was two timing the math department too
i believe zoomers call it "cucking"
I have my MS, and I've done research that's at the PhD level
I was rejected from all ten schools last time due to covid-19, funding issues, and my research prof left UC Irvine
So when I applied there was no one to vouch for me, I was considered out of state, and my GPA isn't that great
But my letters & research experience are fantastic
You know I had this offer
Transferring from CC to UCLA, the summer before I started
I said "No thanks, I'll just study on my own"
because I didn't feel ready for an REU
If I could go back in time and shoot myself
I would
lol
when i started my reu i was almost intimidated until i realized that nobody else had read daddy rudin
I mean I was just coming out of a community college
but you mustve impressed a prof
So the most advanced things I had learned was Jacobson's Algebra
And Spivak's Calculus on Manifolds
i dont know jacobson
i assume he means actually basic and isnt pulling a weil or shafarevich here
It's a weil or shafarevich
I mean it is from the group axioms
The prof. was from a different community college, he was doing an REU in analysis with one of the local universities
I had given a presentation on ||Group theory|| at the seminar at their community college
So after that he had invited me, he asked me what I liked at the time and I told him Riemannian Geometry/Analysis
He got it and funding, and I still said no
I'm a dumbass
In my MS program I wanted to do research with the resident Knot Theorist since he had a habit of getting papers with students and sending them to UCSB
But he already had one MS student, two undergrad students, and a kid on the way
So I was SOL there
The resident Algebraic geometer, which interested me at the time was the department head so he didn't have time
The analyst was retired from research
So I went over to UC Irvine, met with a harmonic analyst there
i wanna cry for you
Went to every seminar for a quarter
did uc irvine work out

So, just wait it gets spicier
I leave fucking Irvine, and he does too
So when I apply I'm out of state, and he's not there to vouch for me
So I got rejected from every program
He's back in Irvine, but now his wife just gave birth to his first kid so research with him is going to be put on hold for another year at least
Hopefully he vouches for me

He asked the department head why I was rejected
I like to think all of your difficulties just exponentially outflowed from your decision to reject an REU
He said it was because I was out of state, and he wasn't there to fight for me on top of covid-19 limited funding
Then the department head reached out to me and told me "I strongly encourage you to apply next cycle"
That's where I'm at now
How long since you've attended Irvine?
And what flavor of harmonic analysis do you do now
I only attended for one quarter
I was a grad student at CSULB, I attended winter 2020-spring 2020
well im crying
I took a research course, and harmonic analysis
I do research at the intersection of harmonic analysis, pdes, convex analysis, and probability
is it possible for me to even hope of getting a phd if you arent getting one as an MS graduate
Mainly we're interested in some convex inequality which gives rise to a PDE
But the inequality is embedded in some probabilistic stuff, that is only known to be attackable with probability
In particular, brownian motion
hmm our phds have the same ingredients
except im doing a totally different thing
maybe harmonic analysis, pdes, and probability is a popular combo
The better move is BS to PhD
But I personally benefitted from doing a MS first
I definitely wasn't ready after finishing my BS
I was like technically ready, but my body and mind weren't there
I had some things to iron out
im in no way a better applicant than you would be
I think I needed more grad courses under my belt. I finished undergrad w/ 7 grad courses
I didn't feel ready
masters applicants are probably judged more harshly
I mean this is purely subjective
this is depressing
Well the other thing was I was in a particular bind because I needed 1 or 2 units to graduate
So I just went to the local school instead of UCLA because finances
So I did 3 grad courses there for the price of 1 grad class at UCLA and not as long as a commute
Im expecting to have 12 grad courses but that isnt too much different from 7? Like really what is expected of me when applying for phd?
I think the only thing expected of you
12 is a lot more than most people getting into grad school have
Is you know undergrad material, you might have some research experience, and your letters are decent
its more than I had too
I mean, I just felt I wasn't ready for a PhD
That was me personally
I could've totally gone to like Irvine, Riverside or something and been fine
But I just wasn't up to it at the time
why do you say that, atm im not ready for one and idk if I will feel like that when in a year for whatever reason
I'm really glad I did my MS at CSULB
oh wait you had chances?
I totally could have applied earlier
I was just psych'd out of it because I didn't feel ready
i dont really think anyone going to grad school feels "ready for it"
its just a lot of faking it til you make it
I feel really ready for it now
I'm like 100% confident that I can do well in a PhD program
And the MS program I did built that confidence
There are definitely people not ready for a PhD
math and other theoretical topics especially punish those who aren't ready
it's not like data science or something where you can submit a meme paper to neurips and get a job immediately
I guess one thing I was used to, at CC I got a lot of personal attention
at UCLA I got less personal attention
From faculty ~ even though some of the coursework I did at CC was just as rigorous and as difficult as the courses at UCLA
At CSULB I found that personal attention again, and I was able to do a lot better
Wait so when should you start seriously thinking about grad school applications
Prob like a year before applying
Gotta plan for the GRE and think harder about what classes to take
Also thinking about who your rec letter writers are going to be
how do you know if you arent definitely ready
because im not sure if I will be
if you haven't already won a fields medal its too late
mind the perspective
you are a phd student
i am a lowly undergrad
the phd students in my class are fantastically impressive
i dont see how I can know what they know in a year or two
yes ill know different topics
but i feel as if id lack breadth
I won the fields during sophomore year of undergrad, but I still only got into 2 grad schools. I think my coursework was lacking in the derived harmonic geometry stuff
idk a year or two is a long time, look back at two years for yourself and think about how many new things you've learned
what year are you
3
also im in a weird situation at my school
ive only met 6 other math majors in my school
and my school has over 20k students
over 30k
6 in my year*
the ones I met freshman year switched out
there are not many math majors in some schools. i think in my undergrad year there were only 6 of us who were really competitive for phd programs. since you're thinking about it you may yourself be competitive.
work hard on your subject gre
going for direct phd cause supervisor said I was ready
kinda 
it is not common here
math phds are relatively rare and hard compared to others
How do you guys picture math?
Cause to me it's just numbers
Numbers with rules I don't understand
And outcomes that piss me off
Let's say 3x^2+2x-1 is < 5x+10
Or something
I know what those individual symbols mean
And numbers
Idk imagine the graph of these things
But my brain sees it as gobbildy gook
You probably won’t be able to like
Might as well be black magic

Without doing some algebra you can’t likely get all the points right
But you get the basic shape yea?
Yes
As it's not negative
So you have a parabola and a line
Without doing a little bit of algebra or plugging in values you don’t know how these two are arranged
Maybe the parabola is entirely above the line
Maybe it intersects the line at one point or two points
But at least you have a few possibilities and then you can try to do some algebra or plug in points to narrow down the possibilities
I see your point
I guess I'll have to keep practicing
I'm just gonna call math the thinking game
Sometimes the equations are written in a way that is easier to visualize
The numbers don't matter the point is to think
Like if you have y=(x-2)^2+5 you know it’s a parabola shifted two to the right and up five
Hah
Whereas if you’re given the expanded form like x^2-4x+9
I can actually visualize what your saying
Maybe studying for 6 hrs a day is paying off
Without some algebra
maybe 
still monkaS
I was gonna go for masters first, but oh well
I know what Ill be doing in the next 5 years
Maybe I just do a mindset shift
Turn math from a pain in the ass for my gpa
And more so a game to be dissected and messed with
Yea it’s a very beautiful subject if you are patient with it and allow yourself to play around with it
Math is really fun when you’re able to explore it, learning it just for the sake of passing exams or whatever takes some of the fun out of it
Honestly I've noticed the only reasons I get it wrong. A) I forgot old knowledge I need to use for the problem. B) I know the formula but not how it interacts with individual pieces or C) unit error I just mess up a number.
Ill try to stay committed
Ive been reading about atomic habits
so i just decided to spend 30 minutes studying my subjects
each
then rest and try to recall later
and so on
One of the most helpful habits early on in math is to practice checking your own work and catching your own mistakes
This is something I notice a lot from the students I teach like
Ideally it shouldn’t be a surprise that something has gone wrong in a problem
"be rigorous"
"when the question asks you to prove something for all numbers, don't just pick a number and show it works for that one"
teafortwo thanks for the advice
I think im just stressing about it because my sleep schedule is fucked up
i know i have to study for gre but not aure when tbh
this is what happens when you study topology
tterra i have my oral manifolds qual tomorrow help pls
how am i supposed to help
Teach zoph about oral manifolds obviously
teach me everything in Lee
which lee
smooth
id shoot myself if it was riemannian
idk how much I should think about transversality
i just rlly dont know what the prof is going to ask lmao
theres no way he could ask me to give a proof of sards right
or ask me to give a proof of weak whitney
whats ur intuition about lie derivative
just generalizing directional derivative?
kind of
you're differentiating along the flow of your vector field
so they tell you how your object (vector field, function, differential form) changes as you move it along a flow
if you need to prove anything involving lie derivative's it's usually easier to think of it as the first order term in a taylor expansion
like, if $X$ has flow $F_t$ and $\omega$ is a form, then $$F_t^*\omega = \omega + t\mathcal{L}_X\omega + o(t)$$
TTerra
i find it's a LOT easier to prove things about lie derivatives by writing them like this, maybe useful if you end up having a problem like that
idk how oral exams work
Are oral exams not just a fun chat?
i like to draw pictures of flow lines and things being moved around when i can't figure something out about them
It depends on the prof, you, and the context
I've had fun with one
and not fun with the other
Basically the second you show you know something
Okay the taylor series thing makes sense
So take over the exam and start asking them question. That's the power move
now specifying: the lie derivative of two vector fields is the obstruction to their flows commuting
which is good to keep in mind
L_XY = 0 if and only if the flows of X and Y commute
fun thing to keep in mind ig
What does commuting here mean? Just that flowing along one and then the other is the same as the opposite order?
pretty much
there might be some annoying issues like flows not being defined for all time but that's the gist of it
lee derivative 
fun result
make sure to check out the differential forms versions
you can use it to prove some fun facts about lie groups
which i don't remember because it's been months since i studied geometry
we have rlly switched huh
im busy studying geometry and ur busy studying analytic number theory
lol
ANT is fun
unfortunately there was only one topology/geometry related course this semester and taking it would have been pointless
although my control theory course might end on some riemannian stuff
there was a special topics here on like
deformation theory of riemann surfaces or something
that would've been scary

rip sleeping issues
you ever just trying to fall asleep
but then you think about math
and then you think about a definition
but you can’t remember so you wake up and look it up
I am sort of doing this right now 👀
Was doing some problems
And then some clifford algebra stuff came up
And then I started searching for some references
And I've been reading on clifford algebras for two hours lmao
It's 2 am now 😭
honestly i think its a sign we need to fix our sleep schedule
clifford algebras 
oof nice mistersystem
I have some really big trouble trying to sleep
read some analysis and ull fall a sleep ez
what do you read to fall asleep then Most
Lmao
I know approximately none
same wtf
someone was given an algorithms problem
All I know about number theory is some baby stuff
Like the introduction of Ireland-Rosen
all I know is the proof of Collatz
though that's more philosophical than mathematical
I really like Ireland-Rosen because it's pretty much algebra oriented
and by proof of Collatz I do mean proof that Lothar Collatz did exist
philosophical (I am a philosophy student)
what does that even mean Namington

find best algorithm for a function f(n,p) where n is an integer and p is a number in 1,…,m where m is the number of factors of n. This function is supposed to return the pth factor of n.
the true depths of my joking intellect are only available to the noble denizens of the hallowed #「ivory-tower-emeritus」
intellect is... a strong word
That’s a well-known epistemic thought
do you know that?

is there anywhere to just like render quick latex images
i mean, withotu having to make an entire pdf
basically smth which functions like texit bot lol
when you just want to share an image of smth quick with someone
Practice your LaTeX and Asymptote skills in the TeXeR, a free tool from the Art of Problem Solving. Become a mathematical notation whiz!
But you can also just use the latex bot in dms
How do you real with a professor who doesn't care
depends on the type of not caring we're talking about
carefully
just dont do anything that activlely harms you, including doing nothing when you don’t understand
thats why i came here
no way im failing because the professor doesnt care
i'll take care of it myself if thats the case
his lectures are online, he just writes down random shit like a+b = b+a in the advanced calculus course
he even gets most of his stuff wrong, when someone corrects him he just says yes very good and keeps going with the wrong numbers
its comedic
arguably the numbers don't matter that much of the concepts are explained well
sure, hence why on a test, you may still get points
but that doesnt change it, its unorganized and faulty
Mathcha is a nice text editor
It’s Microsoftoffice-styled
might as well do it on overleaf without downloading anything
Mathcha is online
oh i didn't know that
Overleaf is good as well
my bad
You should check it out
It’s amazing
Idk why it’s not popular
Can anyone please help me answer this
Is there any more context?
I’m afraid there isn’t, tried everything but just really can’t find the correct answer
I’m gonna reverse search it to see if somebody wrote something about it
I actually tried doing that too, but please do so.
i use matcha for making tikz diagrams
how does that work? you move stuff around on a GUI and it generates the tikz?
nice
feeding into my never ending aversion to learning tikz
for python, there's tikzplotlib that generates tikz script for your plots
learning to use a library to generate tikz seems about the same amount of effort as learning tikz itself lol
Python library’s are really intuitive tho
ik but my problem isnt tikz itself, its having to l*arn
but yeah, it's for people that already know python, so that they don't also need to learn tikz
Plus you’ll be using your native syntax if you wanna do any other logic inwhich the library isn’t a dependency to
Python is really easy
Oh
if learning a lib is your problem, the issue is somewhere else 😛
I never learn shit by reading docs I just do random shit until I understand
Lol no it’s alright
learning libraries does suck
i really should learn scipy one day
but documentation is so ass 😩
Library’s that need to be learned are shit library’s
Random for example you don’t even learn it you just use it
If you wanna know some function maybe
you can't just try random words until they work
eh
good luck using any big/elaborate library without learning it lol
and also how the function is implemented
Lol ofc not
not everything is requests
Elaborate
whenever you use any elaborate library/framework
you cant do much withotu having the documentation pulled up on a tab
well like the python range function, if you were new to python and didn't read the docs you might think range(a,b) is [a,b] when it's actually [a,b)
but also with bigger libraries you absolutely need to know how they're implemented or future you will be drowning in bugs
For me I just look up functions, e.g I need a uniform random number generator I just google”uniform random number generator random.py”
thats.... what searching documentation is
yeah lmao what did you think we meant?
Well yeah
its not like you print the reference docs out and read them cover to cover lol
also sometimes the search can be a bit more involved. like using matplotlib animations
i do not understand how those work 
you see what specifically want to use, look it up in the ref docs, and continue
I thought you meant you go to the site and read description about functions rather than just looking up there functionality grabbing the syntax and dipping
i cant understand how those two things are different
if youre searching for more obscure libraries you wont be able to find stackoverflow questions on how functions work
i think you should at least skim the description
In a sense they are not in just stupid today
that you have to read it for
Docs are shit in general
Never used them
java as well
matlab is just python but overpriced
python docs are fine tbh
Cs docs are depressing tho
python doc is ass, i stand my ground
ive never had any problems with it
me neither, cuz i don't use the doc
i do just wish there were better sci py tutorials
i rely on having learned other programming languages before using python
doesnt sentdex have smth on it
i just wanna know how to make physics sims man 
What do you wanna write them on
thats for basic stuff
cant look into specifics on how things are implemented withotu docs
you don't need to read how its implemented
anything i guess. i just already know python and heard good things about sci py
you.... do

numpy/scipy moment
Just use pygame.py and right the logic your self
ok at that point i'd just use a real game engine
No pygame is so light weight
meh i use godot for making games and it's light as shit too
been using python and matlab for 4 years straight, for signal processing, optimization, physics, etc, after years of c++ and java
they're both bad, but shit, python is terrible
If it helps, pygame is used in a lot of university’s for physic sims
bruh really?
the way you have to do animations in it seemed cursed
so i gave up on it
Pygame?
yes
I never settled down and used pygame but I think animations aren’t necessarily
You can move stills using code
true, i just meant that like those were cursed
so i assumed the rest would be too
maybe that was a false assumption
i'll look into it again
Pygame is educational
what kind of animations are we talking about
sprite animations
like sequences of images
most engines let you use spritesheets, in pygame you have to have it in a folder, and what it does is just let you loop through the images in that folder
which felt highly cursed to me
i have only seen that done in matplotlib (bad and slow) and opencv (fast and nice)
what is opencv?
here's one i made in matplotlib
OpenCV (Open Source Computer Vision Library) is a library of programming functions mainly aimed at real-time computer vision. Originally developed by Intel, it was later supported by Willow Garage then Itseez (which was later acquired by Intel). The library is cross-platform and free for use under the open-source Apache 2 License. Starting with ...
thats just a box
keep watching
Write a program that makes it easier
oh that's cool
i just want something that'll let me like make sims of the math/physics i learn easily
that's all i want
i dont wanna make my own engine for that
but also yeah animations aren't neccesary for sims
so maybe that wont matter
There’s got to be something out there for you
i was thinking abt using processing
but i'd have to learn js
and i kinda hate curly braces
yeah
like
i use desmos a lot
ive made a few "sims" in desmos
but it's not powerful enough
instead of a time slider, just make a for loop and use that to make the animation
node.js is full of inconsistencys
node's fine lol
is this just mathematician programming 
the one i put above solves the helmholtz equation for several wave numbers, inverse fourier transforms to time tomain, and then plots the field in the whole space one time step at a time
?
its just regular stuff
like i wanna do stuff like that
but with for loops and other programming conveniences
oh you wanna make a GUI
and recursion
yes preferably something interactive
that makes everything worse and more difficult 😛
but anyway
openCV lets you make GUIs too
but i'd say just stick to desmos for that
Recursion is satisfying
there's no out of the box stuff for something that specific, afaik
yeah but like ive kinda hit the end of the road of what desmos can do. i think
it cant handle numerical solutions to things
and again i have to hack a lot of things to make it look nice
maybe i should try a game engine
that sort of stuff doesn't bring a nice GUI tho
the problem is that you have to code that yourself
so there you're left to pick your poison
i'd have to implement one myself yeah, i don't mind i guess
it takes longer than the actual problem 😛
For the past 2 years I was fine with python and c++ but suddenly I wanted to learn html, css, c# at the same time
did you try matplotlib?
no but i cant find good tutorials
matplotlib is kinda bad
like i wanna make sims and animations
i do recommend opencv instead
got any good tutorials?
nope, just the documentation
(the matplotlib doc is terrible. whenever you google stuff, you'll find conflicting ways of doing the same thing, and they're very version-dependent)
opencv is for python right?
Searching for info in docs is alright but learning from docs takes a real Chad
it's available for python too
Unofficial docs are alright tho
I don't think so
is it possible to
More like I wouldn't want to think so 
Sure, it should be
just start your degree in your -5th year

What are the things that undergrads intending to get into research eventually should learn, apart from the subject itself?

Yeah, I take more breaks from mathematics than I used to
There was a period of like 5-6 years where all I did was math all the time
Hartshorne chapters 2 and 3
Now I take frequent weeks off from doing any math

(Other than my day to day job)
Why take a break when you can simply spend all your time either doing math or feeling guilty that you're not doing math?

That way your unproductive time is not pleasant/relaxing
I think the second it becomes grindy and I stop getting interested in the problem
Punish yourself for not being a robot
and just want to rush to the solution
I take at least a week off
to reset me brain
I mean I'm just going through complex analysis right now
So it's not like I'm doing research or anything, just trying to prepare for quals
Imagine having to take a complex analysis qual
I mean I don't have to, I can just stick to math education
You are the biggest Marshall simp I’ve ever met
It's SO GOOD
And it’s funny since you aren’t even like a UW student who used it hahhh
Marshall is discount Schlag smh
I used uh
Originally I used the one with the “proof by magic”
Prime number Theorem proof
I used that freshman year
Fight me
I'm writing my apps for Math Ed PhD right now
Our honors analysis does 2 qtrs of Reals then complex
and I'm at a loss of what I can write
For my statement of purpose: "Yeah I'm applying so I can shoe-horn my way into the math department, so if you let me in the chances I stay in the program are pretty low"
That's the most common area, but if I actually pursued it
I would want to study Higher Ed programs
Study the best way to run an honors freshman analysis course
There's some people that do this at Berkeley, Stanford, and UT Austin
Then implement them across the US
Well I almost was wondering if your desire to do higher ed would kinda be a thing to emphasize on sop
Actually this is what I'm interested in
Imagine if after all your researxh
An honors curriculum for undergrad math, and running successful REUs
To sorta differentiate yourself from the competition
Lmao I do not think Moonbears would like my style of an honors analysis class lol
I think I wouldn't like the way I run mine either
Well there's "how my class ran" and "how I would run one"
But like there's lots of honors math programs at different schools, and they are more or less the same
Already objected to the former but with high probability will also object to the latter
I'm really intrigued by how the fuck a community college can run it, without it being a shit storm
And then I work for an actual university and they can't even get seniors to do proofs without students freaking out
Thesis statement:
Students are bad they should get good
Yeah ~ well that's what I'm applying for anyways
Not wrong
I'm really reaching for schools I don't think I have a chance in hell at getting in for math ed
Stanford, Berkeley, and Austin
UCLA doesn't even have people in math ed anymore
You guys wanna get in voice soon actually? Like in 5 min?
No
I'm at work bruh
Who wants to hear Dami talk
Lmfao
The math major should have a quarter/semester in the student's career
Where they do just one math class but high intensity
And it counts for multiple classes
like 12 units for one class
Yeah smth like that
But you have homework daily and 2-3 times the lectures of one class
I don't think this would work, but go on

They should make you take a test where if you can’t properly invert a statement or take the contrapositive of a statement you fail and get kicked into engineering
daminark rediscovers harvie math 55
Didn't wadzicki give like 5 hours lectures
I mean so
yeah but they were all incoherent so it doesn't count
I took honors analysis at Chicago which was basically math 55 but it wasn't quite that
You still had just 3 hours of lectures per week
Just that the psets/out of class commitments were 35 hours/week lmao
But I'm thinking like
I think that's exactly what math 55 is
Did you have something like that?
And it was a 5 week class on linear algebra and graph theory
9:30-12 every day
Daily psets
Did you git gud there
Exactly
I took linear algebra & differential equations, we had lectures 4 days a week for 2.5 hours
That was probably one of my most important mathematical experiences period
Because I just took one class
who tf is wadzicki
And devoted 100% to that class
When I took honors analysis I was still juggling 2-3 other classes
And the lectures were just 3 hours/week
So obv while I learned a ton it's not quite the same thing as having just one class
But in the semester this is not really ideal
Yeah I'm not sure how feasible this is in practice but I think it's straight up the best way to learn
I helped teach that apprentice course last summer
Nice
RIP
Rudenko probably did it kinda differently than Laci used to
@crystal stone actually I think molecular engineering at Chicago has everyone do a quarter like that
You have 3 classes and it pretty much consumes your entire quarter by itself
But the 3 classes kinda work together in a way
Yeah that stuff can work
I say during the year ideally because summer is optional/a student might have other commitments preventing them from something like that
I mean if you set up like a program where that's students life for like a year
Yeah Dami I don’t agree this should be required
That could work out
Maybe that's the honors program lol
What’s good for us is not good for like 90% of ppl getting math degrees
That's exactly what an honors program is
Yeah
Except it's not just one class, it's spread out
But I heard math 55 at Harvard is just ridiculous
Well I'm saying within the honors program have something like that
I think the goal should be to help people pass and git gud
Not baptism by fire
But I can see how it can be beneficial
I'm fine with honors being more baptism by fire
I feel like 1 qtr of it
Like if it's too much we communicate that like
I mean to some extent it has to be
Hey guess what, literally zero shame in not doing honors
In fact we consider that the default path
I think there'd have to be some sort of caveat that if you do what you're supposed to in the program
But if you're gonna do honors
You get good feedback on things, but the grading is very generous
At the end
During the course you don't tell them that
I w thought about that
You either rise to the occasion or you get oof'd
I think the ideal class would have requirements to do he and shit
Then at the end everyone gets a good grade
But ppl talk and if it becomes known your clsss doesn’t actually grade hard like it says
Hmm, so what I'd say is there should be a clean mechanism for someone to go from honors to not honors kinda toward the end of the class
Then you lose the effect of pretending your hw is mega required
Like for instance
Yeah, the clean mechanism is that they don't do what they're supposed to
If you get through the honors class but you're performing at a non-honors level
That could include like revisions on problem sets
You can give them what they would have gotten in the non-honors class
And then retroactively count the class as not honors
If that makes sense
If you make the class have assignments
Naturally there will be students that don't do them
That way the standards for honors are still higher
But you don't punish students' ambition
They'll sort themselves by effort
You know what I mean?
Yeah, you want to incentivize risk taking
and new ways of problem solving
Even if it doesn't pan out or isn't 100% rigorous
Well I mean risk taking in the sense of like
It's more subjective
You don't risk a C by taking an honors class
But at the same time you don't get an A in an honors class if you're not an A honors student
So I think the strat is having one section of the class be the honors section
But to actually have the "honors" designation show up the need to perform at level X or higher
So for instance
For my MS to graduate with distinction you need an A on both comprehensive exams
If honors grading puts you at a C and regular at a B
Then even if you attended the honors section
You can make a similar stipulation
We won't write honors on your transcript
And we'll just give you a B
Or maybe even give you the choice who knows
Obv even this isn't realistic since you'd basically need special permission from the university to have the department be able to change your course number after the final exam lol
And we know how university admin are
Oh yeah it's a nightmare
We were voting on just getting new courses approved here in the math department
The arguments were so dumb
Even the tiniest thing
People threw a fit over
But like in principle this would be the correct strat. You can be swapped after the final exam to the non-honors class
Anything notable?
Is this co-requisite a 6 unit one courses
or are they two separate courses
If they are two separate courses should it be 3 and 3
or 2 and 4
How do we denote it on the transcript
What if they pass one section but not the other
What if they pass the college algebra section but not the remedial section
Do they have to re-take the remedial section? That isn't technically college credit, and it doesn't count towards their GPA but university policy is BLANK
How are we going to have enough lecture hours for 6 units? The timing doesn't work out with other classes
It's a freakin' nightmare sitting through meetings like that
But it's good experience
I'm like a proto-faculty member
Jesus Christ
I don't want to demark honors and non-honors students. The concept of elite is stupid.
Just have classes ranging from practical to high theory.
People will fall where they'll fall.
It’s there to provide different tracks for people with different skills
My biggest regret is not taking Honors linalg
It was proof based
I took a stupid version
Lol
do you recommend this for self teaching? ie. intensely studying one textbook instead of reading multiple at a time
Tbh probably
@atomic cypress the difference between taking practical vs theory isn't really about skill in my mind
So much as what you want to learn
If someone cares about using math, even if they're smarter than every math major, you're still inclined to take the practical class since it meets your needs better
The point of honors vs not honors is that you have two people who both want to learn theory
But it turns out one of them can learn faster than the other and benefits from doing so
Yeah, and we're adding like 3 new classes
So It's like that same conversation 3 times
Can you guys help me with this
Oh
the difference between taking practical vs theory isn't really about skill in my mind
I basically agree modulo a few things, my point is that the honors/non-honors distinction is dumb
(in many cases practical courses are unquestionably easier even if they do teach other things)
(doesn't mean applied people can't do important or hard things)
Applied people have long careers and pure people have their pride
what is honors?


