#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 461 of 1
@wary walrus hello
by doing math. Work on your foundations if you struggle with that.
any tex editor suggestions which have a UI similar to vscode or smth
im using texworks but i hate the UI ngl
i was hoping thered be something like autocompleting commands etc possible with some editors/IDEs
There is atom I used it a couple times in the past.
Sublime
Vscode should have a couple extension if you need help with autocompletion.
Yessir

Atom>vscode
FOSS
UwU
The reason I still use vscode is I am way to used to it. I have done most of my development on it so using a different editor like atom make me uncomfortably
vim ftw
Lol we don’t welcome that here
I think you're better off with vscode + texworks plugin.
There is a latex autocomplete addon in atom and texworks as well
texworks plugin?
Yeah
in all seriousness, i use texmaker
well
texmaker and whatever text editor i have at hand. sublime, vim, and gedit all do color-code tex keywords
that's about all i need from them
it's more like a script. I installed it from 3rd answerr on stack https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/13136/ide-with-autocompletion
Yeah pretty much. Syntax highlighting is handy
oh wow
this makes me want to github copilot for math
see whether it actually produces mostly-correct arguments
or legitimate-sounding arguments that amount to absolutely nothing
x' = x
'x=x
June 28th is Tau day
omg i love tau! terrence taU!
I like celebrating february 71st in honor of euler
has anyone token the ACT
i took it quite a while ago
how did you study for the science section?
so true
for that i just did a lot of practice exams
the science you can't really like
know a bunch of facts
most of it you get from the passages / tables they give you
practice is the most helpful thing there
the questions at the very end are really hard though how do you deal with those i fail like 9/10 with them at the end
didn't you just ask them that the other day and they said no
Mosh said no
AK
How do you guys know that? Are you stalking me
no
AK
And maybe you ate right
Ate right haha stupid auto correction
blocked
AK
Is there a similar group for Physics
please refer to #old-network
AK
ur blocked
I'm in my senior year and we are required to do an advanced project consisting of atleast 15 pages. Any tips on possible maths projects?
just choose an advanced or special math subject and make a mini paper about it
I had to do it at HS I made 45 pages
p-adic numbers !
I would speak with your advisor or with some professors you get along with; I'm sure someone in your school's department would be willing to help you work on some advanced topics.
Do you choose the topic for Phd or advisor?
What would be the minimum qualification of an advisor. Phd?
How do we make sure that what advisor picks would be good?
You usually want at least an assistant professor to be your advisor, and some even say that you should only have full professors be your advisor
ideally you want an advisor who's well-known in your field of interest and whose students have a good conversion rate into academia (check math genealogy)
if your prospective advisor has had 30 students and none have went into academia, thats probably not a good sign
this info never tells the full story though
things like "how nice are they to work with?" are pretty hard to get through this method
Your professor wants to pick a good topic for you because if you do well then it looks good for them
so you kind of need to rely on things youve heard
Can someone fail in Phd?
yes, plenty of people drop their programs, but it generally looks pretty bad on the advisor if that happens
its not quite "failing out"
I mean, many people just decide to drop out with a masters if they think a PhD is not for them
its like "both the student and advisor realize theres no path to the student completing a phd"
How do they cope with the loss of years?
Although, most PhDs in the US do have quals that you have multiple attempts at, but can end up failing out
i have never heard of someone being straight up kicked out of a program for failing quals
im sure it happens
but its really rare
What does this even mean? Doing a masters still takes time so there's no real loss of time
usually youre given a stern talking-to and told to retake
What, Phd comes after Masters, right?
and that happens a couple times before they kick you out
Yes? So they spent a few years pursuing a PhD program, but decided they didn't want to finish the PhD and dropped out with a masters instead
in america, you do a masters as "part of" your phd
in mathematics at least
some fields are different
but typically you apply for phds right after your bachelor's
this is different in other countries
even canada, for example, typically has students get masters degrees first
So, is it possible for a professor to make me his student for Phd without going through any competitive test if I am good in math and he thinks too.
Depends on the school
Some schools don't have what are called quals, like the school I'm at now
thatll be more up to the department than the professor usually
youre gonna need a bachelors of some sort no matter what
All schools will have some requirements though, whether they be written tests, or oral tests, or required classes
We have UG,MS then Phd
right
and phds in canada are shorter as a result
since youre not doing the masters first
hi?
hi.
Phd in India is 3-5 years. 3 is min and 5 is max for which you get paid stipend.
i am new for this server
okay, then sure, similar idea there
HS, College?
you can drop a phd but it looks really bad
and youll probably know whether you can handle a phd after your masters
no i am school
more common than dropping a phd is going "over time"
and having to take an extra year or two
(thats actually what im doing right now, although im still paid for it)
You know trignometry?
yah
this isnt really looked down on necessarily
sometimes research takes more time
but its still better to complete it "on time" if possible of course
Then you are in HS.
ok
as are most masters
solve sin^2(x) - cos^2(x) = 1?
exceptions exist in both cases but you really really shouldnt do an unpaid phd
if youre getting offered a phd without any sort of pay, theyre basically telling you "we dont want you"
unpaid masters you'd rather avoid but arent the end of the world if you can handle it financially
but unpaid phds are like, not good lmao
theyre saying youre not qualified for academia but might still be able to get a phd for industry
yeah masters depend more on the country
We pay for masters here.
in some places its the norm for them to be unpaid
but as i said earlier, im most used to canada
For Phd we get paid.
so im talking about that system
And it's pretty good as per Indian standards.
damn everyone here is indian
We are 120 core. So 1/6th everyone person you meet.
Or 1/6th of you.
solve lim of x to zero of arctan(e^x/x)
Why do we say it's arctan instead of tan inverse?
try to solve collatz
arctan is better cause tan^-1 looks like 1/tan
3x+1 , ez

because yes
Can I mail a professor with my theorems If I don't have formal math background?
Will I get a response?

yes you should spam their emails with proofs about collatz, riemann hypothesis, and P=NP. especially if they're specialty is in a completely unrelated field.
mathematicians love ambition and new ideas
also remember if a professor doesn't respond it just means that the professor can't refute your argument
if 100 professors don't respond to your proof of the Riemann Hypothesis then it's probably correct
If all repsond then I think I need to ignore and mail again.
Is mathematics a science??
No, science is mathematics, but mathematics contains many more things than science.
What?
Science is a sub set of mathematics.
Mathematics is a super set of Science.
define science
Here we go again...
We couls say science is systematic enteprise thag builds and organize knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predications about the universe...or about some system
Is that correct?
I don't think so
The question of 1 millium dola
then math is science
I do think mathematics is a science not least because it shares many of the same empirical and sociological issues surrounding the scientific method
math $\cap$ reality = science
Ninja
math to me is just some culture thing we do
tbh like what is the connection between like number theory and geometry
why are they both math?
Abstractions
???
Good
what
Ok, well my answer is I DO NOT KNOW.
Sub set.
Dom set.
see "arithmetic geometry"
math is things mathematicians care about
are cats maths?
probably.
but well, number theory and geometry are very much linked
and they have been from the start
the greeks didnt really think of numbers like we do today
math is something that transfroms like a math
they only thought about geometry
also when euler was asked to solve the königsberg bridge problem he did so with that is now essentially a theorem of graph theory
and he remarked that it was odd that he was asked since the problem (and the solution in his opinion) has nothing to do with mathematics
it was merely a "result of logical thought" and anyone could have easily arrived at the same conclusion (or something like that)
i wonder what fields of math are waiting to be discovered
i'm just waiting for the release of math 2.0
Math 2.0 finna be lit
i proved raiman hepotheses
cool
Fascinating
How?! I was trying for a few months already!
the zeros of the function with some log sums on the critical line have a match
- i have 14 years old
ryc ?
you still here ?
@deep mango ?
log sums....
oh!
ye
so whene you do p(x)
the logarithmic function we got will match prime(x)
so for any value of x we can get the number of primes or in a way that i still earch we can get the primes it self as a sum with this
that will be the domain of f(x) mean we can do it from like p(x) domain will be in 2 lines if we count zero so from 0 to x
its a good idea if you apply it on paper
thx
can you explain why the zeta function is zero at -2
i still not prove it yet but i have nice proprety zeta (-2n)=0 as n is z+
mean positive interger
cool
i have all that and i am still 14 yo
i discover this server like hours ago
but i need help

can i ?

fair wairing. you probably haven't
My diff geo pronounced energy as UHnergy
wrong chat oops
whos good with yr 10 maths
i need help lol
Yes. Others are lying.
Anybody can help .........I want to learn number theory from basic ......please give me link or book and pdf .....
I am. I'm doing A level maths and I'm brilliant at it
Oh wait she left
no one actuly prove till now
what
Is this evolution
Literally evolution at the scale of the modern world
yeah, apparently in his new paper his using line integrals to predict psychological stress like quantity
...
how?
what's the line integral with respect to?
what's the units of the function
hell what is the function for that matter
is there something special about this
wdym?
no but I must have answers is a meme
is quantitative modelling something unknown to the field of psychology before lobsterman (pbuh) enlightened them
how the hell do you model anything in psychology with integrals?
Using infinitesimal feelings
oh I guess. like in relation to chemicals then?
or like groups of people?
not like an individuals emotional state
The only psych I know with reasonable integrals is choice modelling
is that psych + the axiom of choice
After that is 'econometric curves' (e.g. supply, demand) which IMO have massive error levels anyway
no, discrete choice modelling, modelling utility from randomly choosing choices such as teddy bears, plushies of Applejack, or straight up just donating to a food bank
asking arithmetic question = blocked and banned as well
AK
I dunno. I didn't read the paper. I listened to his podcast with Krauss.
hm ?
jm
??
AK
no
AK
Wtf
AK
Give us a print of this paper
whats H
(H, x) a group
what's a
real number as mentioned
what's aH then
wait but like, how do you compose a real number with an arbitrary group?
you don't
i mean, isn't it always true?
no it's not an element of H
what you've said is, "hey is 2+t = t where t is a right angled triangle" basically
let (G,x) a group, H a sub group of G, and a an element of G, then card(H)= card(aH)
what about this one?
ahh yeah that makes more sense
well the set of aH is just a subset of G no?
yea iy is
it's true, yes
so if it's not infinite it's not true
all cosets have the same order
if it's infinite then cardinality has no meaning no?
it does
really?
yes
tell me more please
you define it via injective or surjective maps
ah yes
generally you say that A has cardinality less than or equal to B if there exists an injection A -> B
(then prove a whole bunch of stuff to see that this behaves like it should)
if it has a bijetiion with N then it's countable
generally the coset thing is
two sets have the same cardinality iff there is a bijection between them
what is coset?
if H is a subgroup of G and a \in G, we call the sets aH cosets
yeah, and here you can easily find a bijection between any two cosets
damn that was the most rigorous explanation I got so far
thanks man
I appreciate that
sure, yw
thats included in n=1
AK
Does this break crypto?
if P = NP then cryptography does get kinda fucked yes
I kinda wanna prove that false or true, someday....
Is that happening
really? wow who woulda thought
That feels like it's happening with several millenium problems
imagine if it's undecideable. what would that mean
I know people are feeling more and more optimistic about disproving navier stokes these days
disproving?
Yeah
why disproving?
wait what was navier stokes again?
Why not?alright!, I am not offended easily for a long time,anymore
Intresting!
it might not happen within either of our lifetimes first of all. it will take a lot of work and you'll have to dedicate a huge amount of your life to it if you wanna be the one. also there wont be any single person to do it. science and math are group efforts
Navier stokes problem asks whether the solutions to the navier stokes equations (for the motion of an incompressible fluid with viscosity) are regular (well behaved) or if they can blow up (get infinitely fast in finite time)
what would proving it mean?
Proving that all solutions are regular and don't blow up like that
If you found a counterexample
That would be disproving it
huh weird. what does it mean like physically if it blows up
Disproving "global well-posedness"
well posedness?
excuse me
I only use compressible viscoelastic NS 
It would mean that the navier stokes equations predict that a fluid can get infinitely fast in a finite amount of time
Which is obviously idiotic
So
time travel 👀
It would basically say that the navier stokes equations aren't a perfect model for fluids
But
They already arent
oh so it proves that they're a close to useless model for fluids then?
you already assume a bunch of shit
wait what
Planes would not fall out of the sky
it's weird that it would work but also lead to idiotic results
but Id assume most of the shortcomings of NS come from the main model itself
thats is, assuming fluids are newtonian in the first place 
Anything that has assumed the navier stokes model (which is everything) would still work
Well the whole point of the problem being so hard is that as far as we know they dont ever have idiotic results
what if fluid really can go infinitely fast and we just never realized
its funny how a bunch of fundamental equations on physics are literally linear approximations
But we cant prove they never do
like what?
other than navier stokes
Anyway the point is that Tao and his affiliates are trying to find a counterexample solution to navier stokes with a promising and very novel method
the stress tensor on navier stokes is linear in terms of the velocity gradient
wave equation is a linear PDE
heat equation is a linear PDE
a bunch of shit is just linear
Which is basically to show that navier stokes fluids are turing complete
It's very weird
Very interesting
And if you show this then you can construct a solution with blowup
random question. what does a capital D on top of an equal sign mean?
what does it mean for it to be turing complete
Tao gave a great talk about this
oh
context
gonna look for it
The Mathematical Sciences Research Institute (MSRI), founded in 1982, is an independent nonprofit mathematical research institution whose funding sources include the National Science Foundation, foundations, corporations, and more than 90 universities and institutions. The Institute is located at 17 Gauss Way, on the University of California, Be...
"We discuss some possible (and still speculative) routes to establishing finite time blowup in fluid equations (and other PDE), focusing in particular on methods based on establishing universality properties for such equations."
dont think so, but that sounds fitting
Universality in the sense of computable universality

I know, I had no idea what universality meant when I joined the talk either and when he unveiled he meant turing universality it was pretty shocking
feel like I need to even understand basic computability first
I dont know

The talk kind of just sets up a visual model for what a computation would look like in a fluid
Oh also
This has actually been done
But it's for fluids on some riemannian manifold in 10^30 dimensions
Isnt that wacky
Something like that
He mentions it at the end of the talk
Unfortunately their technique doesnt scale well locally
So it's hard to drop dimensions with it
But still, it shows that there's a lot of promise in this idea
And honestly indicates that navier stokes should morally be false
If it's possible to literally get UNIVERSAL behavior in a fluid
(computability-wise)
Oh so I can say the basic idea

It revolves around energy transfer between different fluid parcels
And tracking that
As a proxy for a computation
funny how my phd is probably gonna heavily involve it 

I mean plenty of things that are morally right are factually incorrect
It could be just too low dimensional or something
To situate an arbitrary computation like this
.
I think in another life I was more interested in physics instead of mathematics
I love physics conceptually but have not explored much of it, and I hate actually doing physics (applying physical concepts to solve problems)
But I love math even more and usually I enjoy solving problems, even when I’m stuck with them
yes this is wwhat algebraic geometry is known for
studying elliptic and hyperelliptic curves

oh, where is this statement from?
what about jacobians?
i still don't get them
the same jacobians for doing substition?
No
oh :/
This is the jacobian variety of an algebraic curve
and you lost me 
isn't that what jacobians are for?
turn the curvy things into straight lines
so you can integrate
No like
In this sense you have an algebraic curve
And you associate to it a certain space
And this space gives you nice information about the curve
The jacobian is an abelianized version of your space
Space as in abelian variety
Do you know about Riemann surfaces?
So an algebraic curve that is also endowed with an algebraic group structure
what book are you learning from
nope
i can provide another book if you need
i mean brandon
Then it probably wont make sense to explain Jacobians then
different meaning
brandon have you read stewart's book
I don't know math people names for books
so that is my level of math
:sad_StitchCry:
james stewart early trancendentals
my nitro
Jacobian variety in this sense lmao
it died today
this is from a Serre lecture
WHAT
OK
For one sec I thought you were talking about Serre
lmao
Im still in the very intro stuff like linear algebra and multivariable calc :/
so idk anything about alll this stuff
jacobian on page 1067
still need to find a good way to learn proofs and all that on my own
what
Does Stewart cover the Jacobian variety of a non-singular algebraic curve on a book about multivariable calculus?
That is the jacobian i was taling about
talking about*
the partial derivatives and change of variables one
and you do the determiant
but i think you all said it was a different jacobian
what grade are you in
yeah so, that's the jacobian of a smooth map at a point
in this case jacobian refers to a concept in algebraic geometry/elliptic curves
first year uni 😭
I have been going through this https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-02sc-multivariable-calculus-fall-2010/index.htm
on unit 4 and i guess it is all the stuff i already learned but applied in 3 dimensions
such as?
change of variables in triple coords
idk just kinda got to triple coordinates so can't speak on that really
just started the whole spherical coordinates portion
i assume it is the same concept?
do you not still use the jacobian?
did you do double integrals or surface area
I mean i know double integrals show up but i don't recall much about surface area
unless that is more in the triple integral stuff
the thing that MIT really skips out on is parameterized surfaces, and surface/line integrals that aren't work or flux
idk havent finished
also with line integrals
is it like area under a curve but directed path?
like area under a directed path
are they that hard to learn?
Hello guys, I'm new at this discord server. Can somebody help me about converting this (15.6%) into simplest form of fraction?
hi, you can get help by going into of the the questions channel
take a look at #❓how-to-get-help
Oh sorry. I didn't check it. Thank you.
np
I have definitive proof of 9 + 10 = 21 if you're interested.
guys did you know that
Lim x -> infinity 1/x = 0
!!!!
like as X tends towards infinity.
we can just say that 1/X = 0
if that like truth?
What can we do with that
i feel like theres some calculus shit that we can do with that
i mean... limits are the fundamental operation of calculus
yea but wat can be done with the statement 1/x as x approaches infinity is 0
It depends. For instance, this statement is particularly useful because it means that the real numbers are an archimedian field. And this is a very useful property to have.
But what kind of applications do you want?
how does that show that real numbers are an archimedan field?
idk maybe like physics or something. Or just something that comes up
Do you know what an archimedian field is?
Because the answer comes right away
yes
archimedan i believe is that
if X is any all real number
and Y is any real number
and X > 0
then there is a positive number such that nx > y
Yeah, this is equivalent to the statement that the natural numbers are an unbounded above set
meaning that for any real number x
there exists a natural number n
such that n > x
in particular
This is equivalent to saying that $\forall \varepsilon > 0, \exists n \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $\dfrac{1}{n} < \varepsilon$
MisterSystem
But this sentence is equivalent to saying that the sequence $\dfrac{1}{n}$ converges to $0$
MisterSystem
thats a necessary but not sufficient condition for 1/x -> 0 fyi
how is it equivalent to this?
replace "x" with "1/epsilon" and take reciprocals
yes, but we want to prove that if 1/x -> 0 as x -> infty, then the sequence 1/n -> 0
oh sure
but this is clear
?
!
oh
since if $\lim\limits_{x \to +\infty} \dfrac{1}{x} =0$, this means that for any sequence $(x_{n}){n \in \mathbb{N}}$ of real numbers with $x{n} \to + \infty$, then $\lim\limits_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \dfrac{1}{x_{n}} = 0$
\
\
In particular, this means that since the sequence $x_{n} = n$ is such that $\lim\limits_{n \in \mathbb{N}} x_{n} = + \infty$. Then $ \lim\limits_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \dfrac{1}{n} = 0$
\
\
So $\lim\limits_{x \to + \infty} \dfrac{1}{x} = 0$ shows that $\mathbb{R}$ is archimedean.
\
\
MisterSystem
So yeah, that's how that limit shows that the reals are an archimedean field
in fact, it seems way stronger
This is a notation for sequence
so like
for example
x_{n} = 1/n
x_{n} = n^2
x_{n} = (1+(1/n))^n
x_{n} = n
and etc
since for any real number x there exists a natural number n such that n > x, we may take x = 1/epsilon where epsilon > 0, then n > 1/epsilon iff 1/n < epsilon
any positive real
um... Hi
Do you know some good videos about category theory?
like indrocution and other
I only know how to construkt a cathegory, arrows are colled *morphism" and each object in category must have indentity arrows
Thx for answers
(sorry if I posted it on wrong channel)
I think category theory is very itresting field of mathematics
and just to know a little bit more about this field
idk if there are good videos on this, but the book "category theory in context" is good
yes
I don't know why some people react with
under my message, and at this point I am to afraid to ask
I think riehl has a video series about it
Why do engineers and physicists work with the cross product if the outer product is much better?
Especially talking about physicists
Because these are two different things, abstractly the cross product is a skew-symmetric bilinear map f : V × V -> V.
While the outer product would be the tensor product
But you made a choice of coordinate system
Also
Physicists do use the tensor product, in particular the outer product too.
Oh I get it
But you can relate the two
I guess it's notationally less elegant?
Physicists need curls and such things a lot
Cross products are the nicest way of writing them
識繒 (Shi Zeng)
qm has lots of outer products
To describe Maxwell's equation
And it contains all of the information in one neat expression
was this sudgy lacmoes geometric algebra video?
Yeah it's great
The construction is really simple
ya know there's a geometric algebra discord
These are more recreational but I was in a googology server and a polyotopy (naming shapes, don't think this is how to spell it) server before
you want a link?
Shi
I would recommend you to take a look at the first chapters of Tu on smooth manifolds
It talks briefly about exterior algebra, tensor algebra and symmetric algebra
But only briefly
He doesn't mention anything related to their universal properties
Doesn't talk much about quadratic forms and stuff like signature and Sylvester's inertia law
But idk, at least that's where I first learned some basics of multilinear algebra
do exponential forms exist 👀
I think Sylvester's law of inertia may be the only real theorem in "geometric algebra"
law of inertia?
Yeah
I have no idea why is it called this way
I think this is named this way
Because this theorem gives you an invariant of your quadratic form
Under change of coordinate basis
No, I don't believe so.
But you can define an exponential function for matrix spaces.
So they do appear in linear algebra
forms are functions?
Form is a pretty generic name, but in most contexts of linear algebra it means a k-multilinear skew-symmetric function f : V × ... × V -> R
So for example, covectors are 1-forms
The determinant is an n-form
It is the unique n-form on R^n such that det(e_1,...,e_n) = 1 in fact
Where e_i = (0,...,1,...,0) is the standard basis of R^n
A quadratic form is a different thing
They are functions Q : V -> R such that there exists a symmetric bilinear form g : V × V -> R for which Q(v) = g(v,v).

No
But it's ok, just take your time
let me tell you each of the words that I got confused by
k-multilinear
skew-symmetric function
covectors
det(e_1,...,e_n) = 1
symmetric bilinear form
skew-symmetric is the same as alternating, or is it something different?
Same thing
Covector is an element of the dual of a vector space
what is the dual of a vector space
the space of all linear maps from that space to its ground field
Covectors are functions f : V -> R that is linear
The space of all such functions
Is the dual of a vector space
do you have any like specific examples?
Sure
If we have R^n
We can take the projection maps
π_i : R^n -> R
Where π_i(v_1,...,v_i,...,v_n) = v_i
So it takes the i-th component
Yeah
In particular
Codimension 1 subspaces of R^n are related to covectors
So like
If you have R^3
A subspace of codimension 1 is a plane
And for each plane
wait what's Codimension 1 subspaces
If you have a subspace W of a vector space V
And then the codimension of V is dim V - dim W
Ofc
This works for vector spaces of finite dimensional
like how many dimensions it's missing?
Yeah, you can think of it this way
So the codimension of a plane in R^3 is 1
And codimension 1 subspaces of R^n would be "hyperplanes"
But anyways
If you take a covector $\varphi : V \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ that has full rank, then $\varphi^{-1}(0)$ is a codimension 1 subspace of $V$.
MisterSystem
And reciprocally
If you take a codimension 1 subspace
There is a full rank covector
Such that this subspace is given by the preimage of 0
So like
You can study lines in R^2, planes in R^3 and more generally hyperplanes in R^(n+1)
By studying covectors
That's another example
So for example, to a plane like 3x+5y+z = 0
You associate the covector
wait, what's full rank mean again?
The dimension of the image of φ is equal to the dimension of the codomain
Since the codomain is R
We ask for the dimension of the image to be 1
ok look this is nice of you but i just don't have enough prereq knowledge in lin alg to understand
maybe one day
but this is close to pointless i think
like i need to learn the basics first
i have passing knowledge of some things
but i don't think it's enough
Nice
Btw
I think prolly the coolest thing about quadratic forms
Is that they are related to quadric surfaces and conics
what's a quadric surface?
Like an ellipsoid, a sphere, a hyperboloid, a paraboloid
oh like 3d conics?
Yeah
You can study these things
Via quadratic forms
And stuff like studying the eigenvalues of the matrix of your quadratic forms
Gives you information about the conic/quadric surface
In fact, you can actually just think of quadrics and conics abstractly like this
Question regarding physics

mustapha56
Found a cool article on the origins of life's most basic processes:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6117946/
Maybe I'll just share it here. It's from 3 years ago.
,w cows per inhabitant in Alabama
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
,w number of sundays on average
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
$maths$
Bee
$bees$
CoronaVirus
$CoronaViruses$
ZozzDude
I just had a random question
Are Physics questions allowed in this server?
If they contain some math
What about mechanics at least
Just some wondering coz I will kill this server when uni starts
(Not in a bad way)
Why does uni start in October at my side?? 😡😡😡 I am very bored 😡😡😡😡😡 I guess uni already started at wherever you all guys are
Kk guys bye a-gon slep
Chess any1
you can ask them but you probably wont have much luck.
see the physics server in #old-network
also @placid coral please dont spam messages in a ton of channels
TJ89899889
$How is everyone's day$
TJ89899889
please dont spam bot commands.
ok
but look I did something cool
$\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{How}{Is}}{Everyone}}{Doing}}{On}}{Discord}}{Today}$
TJ89899889
Cool right
$\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{I'm}{Doing}}{Pretty}}{Good}}{Today.}}{Thank}}{You}$
PTLanglands
i copied
oh ok
I never write it by hand
if you want to use Latex you dont need to write it by hand these days
$Epic Triangle$
$\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{\frac{ }{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }}{ }$
TJ89899889
k
,tex \def\tmpa#1{{#1_#1^#1}} $\nest 6 \tmpa \cdot$
mustapha56
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
no
this is more like hentai

ZozzDude
ZozzDude
$CoronaVirus \text{ and some other text}$
ZozzDude
,tex CoronaVirus \text{ and some other text}
ZozzDude
$this \ is \ a \ big \ text$
ZozzDude
I guess that’s all to it
You can review them
Doing ,tex is like doing $surrounding the whole thing$
its not
It is
As far as I have experienced
Are there cases where it is not?
,tex Consider a finite extension $L$ of $\bQ_p$
Lochverstärker
$ denotes inline math mode
Consider a finite extension $L$ of $\bQ_p$
ZozzDude
, tex just tells the bot to render the message in tex
The ,tex was useless here
We can omit it in this case
I can see that
or actually
,tex nobody eats until these problems are factored you hectopascals!
Darth_Guappi
Heh
So question y'all.
That’s the first time I encountered it
yes, i was just checking something
Is there a flash cards app in the app store that you actually like?
\( \) is inline math mode delimiter
I hate visual learning
You my friend need Satan.
I don’t use flashcards nor mindmaps nor things that confuse me
I don’t know how you guys use them
But ... You LITERALLY have a piece in your brain dedicated towards visual memories!
Hey, it is a matter of preference after all
anyways, never put actual text inside $ ... $
as the name suggets, it is for mathematics
Yeah
I use \text{}
Sometimes
Anki is good for words, awful for math in the way I study it
i used oldschool actual physical flash cards to study for some math exams
Yeah, I'm making this flashcards app. We can do so much better than Anki.
You guys write formulas on flashcards?
Yeah, I have other methods to study math
I mean, I just do problem solving lmao
i had them for like definitions and big theorems
And read books/watch lectures
I memorize math from lists, tables, etc
Yes that's what one does after retrieval.
I think that's the best way to get used to definitions and so on
Is by actually using them
when i was studying for linalg/analysis oral exams
Ye
had like big theorem and proof sketch on back
the most useful thing was writing those
since i had little room for proof sketches
Good lord, good thing I never had to do an oral exam.
How is it like?
and so had to think quite a bit about that
oral exams are great
(if you know your stuff)
if you dont, its hell
well
its not a regular social situation
its a very technical talk about mathematics
so there is that
in my linear algebra class
im not great in "regular" social situations but oral exams, teaching etc are much easier for me
the textbook we’re using doesn’t name any of the theorems besides 2.3.1 or something
ymmv
so my teacher has called them important theorem #1, important theorem #2, etc.
really good system
So like, is it more about discussing some results and definitions? Do they usually propose some problems in an oral exam?
best is to write ([name] [year]) after important theorems
sometimes its problems
i had to do some classification in my algebra exam
if you struggle, they abandon and ask easier stuff
each theorem is like
but if you dont struggle, they will ask harder and harder stuff
here are 5 logically equivalent statements
but you just talk about how to approach the problem
so it’s more a combining of multiple results
solving it is (often) secondary
in my number theory exam i couldnt answer some question but i told him what i expect and that i would have to check
i did check and my expectation was (mostly) correct
he really liked that
Oh, that's what I had somewhat in mind what an oral exam would be like.
Still
Looks like utter pain

this gives some appreciation for the mathematicians and also puts it into historical context
as soon as your theorems were proved like after 1930, you are doing big boy math
🤷
to me oral exams are like talking with a colleague

I think the newest theorem I know so far of is like Cartan-Serre


)