#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 451 of 1
I need gen eds because taking too much math at once is scary.
You almost certainly remember history from highschool
barely
You just don’t remember learning it
I mean, slavery isn't the only societal thing that you need to know lmao, and gen eds help you become more aware of such issues
I am too dumb to survive if I take all hard math courses.
i know about slavery from father and immigration from my mother
I do think schools should force it, like i wouldnt take gen eds if i didnt have to. not bc i dont like learning about stuff but bc limited time to many other things to learn
and also how she became refugee
but also make sure they have good gen eds ig lol
The quality thing seems like a hard problem to solve.
also i cant care about every societal issue and dont plan to in my career

i mean the point being argued here is whether the idea of gen eds in general is good or not, i.e. would it really be a good idea to just not have any gen eds?
i am somewhat aware globally but to take multiple class on everything that has impacted anyone is just silly
there are issues with the implementation and such but fundamentally, do you think having no gen eds would be a good idea
im here for math not humanities
“Yeah my uncle worked on this specific thing”
“My cousin he was president of the US so Ik about that”
“Yeah my nephew hes an astronaut, but did you know my son is a doctor!”
no my mom from uganda and she got kicked out because tyranny
Ideally gen eds shouldn't be like this.
wait hold the fucking phone
I get that your school is like that from your perspective.
Let me guess
gen eds dont require me to learn about social problems
You have a cousin who actually is an astronaut?
they require much less
thats just sad kek
I think gen eds can be good
thats hseful
ok russian playwrites is wierd kek
I'm talking about the scope. Like the goal of gen eds is for a bit of breadth, not studying everything under the sun.
I think a good gen Ed could be about social problems
to optimize credits
thats the problem lol
if i dont optimize credits i will lose s possible math class
you cannot pick classes uninteresting to u on purpose and then be surprised its uninteresting.
ofc not
i kinda get it
Choose cooler things 😎
but i cant pick something cool and then need to take 3 more cool classes and miss out on 3 possible math classes
but honestly this is why i save the geneds (the few i have to do) till a good semester
or smth
Can't you anyway not attend lecture?
havent done jt get
Didn't you agree with me earlier when I said that forcing people to take gen eds doesn't restrict the number of math classes they can take?
no they require attendence
it does for my school
But I think it does
since math majors take the most gen eds
so why did you agree with me earlier lmao
other majors get more gen ed credit
i agree because it shouldnt have to
at other schools it isnt like that
its like this at most schools
also its weird to say other majors get more gen ed credit. Like do chemists get more gen ed credit through their one required chem class?
freshman year i only took 1 math class per sem
yea
they get more gen eds than math majors unirionically
like 6 more
my school gen ed system is fucked
like they get more credit for the same class? that makes no sense
no for their required classes
Freshman year I also only took 1 math class per sem?
they are required to take 6 more gen eds than you?
I think thats pretty standard
that aint right
no their year two sequence gives 3 distinct gen ed credits
Sounds like you were falling behind already from freshman year
Isn't math sort of overrepresented most places. Most places require you to do (or have done) at least a couple math classes regardless of your program.
meanwhile only math history,logic,discrete math give one distinct gen ed credit
wtf no
Whereas almost no schools have an astronomy gen ed requirement.
one math class isn’t over represented
usually non stem only takes calc 1
which isnt shit compared to amount of english classes id take
i can switch up and not only do english, but its to optimize credits
My school requires one math (or math-like course), one science, one art, one ethics, one class on different cultures and there's one other that I forget that I kind of accidentally fulfilled
ok nine just stop optimizing credit and u'll probably me much happier
like miss one math class each sem or w/e
lol its not like that
But the science can be filled by anything, there are literally philosophy classes that fulfil the math requirement, etc.
agriculture classes give all the same credits and i have them already
My point is: What places require every student to take at least one psychology course (or some other random thing)?
if i were to take any i wouldnt progress in my graduation
its pretty much required by gen ed
its either psychology/anthropology/humanities x
Almost every degree program where I'm at has a math req, but I've never heard of a degree program outside of agriculture itself having an agriculture requirment.
What do you even study in an agriculture degree?
lots of things
Is that even a degree?
ya
Yah
you take bio and chemistry
then there are some agriculture specific classes after second year
Ah, I thought you go to farms and stuff
Farming-theory? Lol
lol nah
Dang.
Also surprisingly many schools have agriculture classes.
102 44 4872
somewhat
I know a hs I almost went to was known for agriculture classes.
Yes, this hs was in a more rural area so it made sense.
o lol
nah im chillin
gen ed talk has me worn
i just have passionate disdain because i find arguments silly
like why tf colleges dont teach you how to cook different foods/do taxes/local politics and infrastructure if they want you to be well rounded
or homerepair snd handy skills
thats well rounded
not psychology 101 or anthropology about chimp speech
Political science classes can focus on local politics at least to within your specific state.
Also culinary programs exist. Idk about at universities but the cc's near me def have those sorts of classes.
More like Field Theory 
I can't believe I didn't see that.
my point
i wouldnt mind that
but there is no way in hell psychology is making me more well rounded

tell me a fact you learned from psychology class that you didnt know and is useful to you
im waiting
I didn't take psych so i cannot do that lol
idk my opinion is that its silly that we need a sexond round of gen ed
when thats what HS is for
and all of our previous learning
no reason college is needed to make someone well rounded
if anything it implies those who dont go arent well rounded
which is a dammed lie
math and agriculture and linguistics sprinkled with some computer science and two social commentsry classes
As a math major I need to take 14 math classes to graduate at minimums
That isnt a lot
But I need 128 credits in total
and 14 classes is 56 credits
My general education needs 16 classes in total including maximizing all gen ed granted from math classes giving gen ed
seems normal.
If I had done business I could not do gen ed
Im not required to since the business curriculums gives gen ed classes
So math and business avoids gen ed but for 2 extra classes
Are business majors more well rounded than people who do math without gen ed?
Idk, I feel like we should avoid confusing whether gen eds have value in general for how your specific intution does things.
Since they're different issues.
I agree
But my strongest argument against gen eds is that I finished highschool
and I still need to work while in college
I don't find that to be a compelling argument.
So id rather have time to myself to learn and hangout doing what I want than take 1,2 gen ed per semester
Higschool doesn’t make people well rounded?
Then whats the point
Not what I said.
I think hs encompasses more basic skills than breadth is all.
Such as?
English, math, history etc at a fairly basic level.
I see hs more as giving the lowest common denominator of skills we want new adults to enter the world with.
It's not that they don't or shouldn't give students a broad education.
Just that that is not all they exist for.
maybe im malding
I dont see it living up to that purpose but if it did it should be all skills adult need. College should be seen as optional specialization for certain careers not a necessity
Schooling past 18 for non specialization is cruel
Yah I agree that HS could be designed to better serve the purpose of giving students the basic skills they need.
For the college thing you mentioned I think it's a matter of extent of specialization.
elaborate
Well first of all college isn't the only way to specialize in some niche job or field of study. Trade schools like I mentioned earlier provide a much narrower focus on whatever trade they're for. Granted stuff like math is not taught in a trade school setting.
funnily enough neither is agriculture
and the only way for me to get into it is college
Also I think learning things outside of ones specialty does more good than harm in a general sense.
But if you spend all your time learning something else besides whatever you intend to learn clearly you are doing something counterproductive.
So the issue is "how much other things should I study outside my specialty?" Rather than "should I study other things outside my specialty?"
Writing 3k word essays on russian playwrights and historic muslims is counterproductive
Also how much is the question yes
I think education outside of career is important
But its not college job to enforce it
I think it's a college's job to enforce this
Because
I think the people writing degree programs disagree with that.
Not only money lol
like the purpose of college is more than just producing citizens with skills that are specific to their career trajectory
what else
In practice a lot of gened requirements are done because depts receive funding from teaching
yea
So they are incentivized to do something
thats what my russian playwright teacher told me
I mean it's to produce citizens with well-rounded skills, most of which actually aid career-specific skills
and highschool purpose is to?
do nothing i guess
I think if a gened requirement is of the form "Please take literally something in this department"

Then it may have been informed by funding
for instance I think it's extremely valuable for people in the hard sciences to take a few courses in ethics and sociology
sure i can agree
But in principle high school is about producing minimally acceptable citizens
a few means 1 each
Well something is clearly wrong with that
I mean sure but this is the argument for gened
these things pile up even if they are each one course
add in writing courses, add in history courses, etc
My current idea is that high school, if done right, should be about producing people who can function in society, and who will be sufficiently well-informed voters
You mean wrong as far as implementation and not that that goal is wrong right?
Required schooling shouldn't involve too much more than that. Like why are you subjecting people to that which isn't necessary, and using resources in the process
Gotcha gotcha.
funding and giving ppl jobs
I mean there should be many opportunities to do so
all reasons to make tuitions more expensive than already is
But I don't think you should be required to engage in schooling
I agree
Far beyond the gcd
But then if high school is about producing students who are "good enough"
College is about producing students who excel
why produce students
that should end once they gradu
they should just be citizens
I mean you get the underlying point
sure
I'm phrasing it using the first word that comes to mind lol
But yeah I think each college should have a clear idea of its mission
but i dont think gen ed helps me excel, id be lying if i said it didnt help my math prose tho
college is about producing suitably educated hoomans to provide menial assistance to felines.
The second half of that sentence literally has a role in my point
I think it's kinda hard to prove the counterfactual here is the thing
I'll say a lot of stuff is implemented very poorlu
like part of me is inclined to say "oh these classes didn't help me" but in all likelihood I'd probably be a lot worse off without them
I think high school is about ability to raise the class of some hard-working people, regardless of their wealth.
I think it fails
So maybe it isn't about that idunno
I don't think this is the main purpose
Everyone has mentioned its theoretic purpose
for a lot of public high schools the main goal is to prepare the bulk of the students to not be like, complete fuck ups
Practical purpose is to keep kids off the street
yea
I guess my main gripe is how poorly implemented it is as sloth said
Yeah lol
I would love to learn math and agriculture but i cant because gen ed
Like I think each college should have a very clear... "Mission statement" if that makes sense
Which should largely inform what it does
yea thats the thing lol
i go to research institution not liberal arts
so idk why i gotta take so many gen ed
its probably not normal in my situation
that i take more gen ed than math
I guess you could double major but money and time would be an issue.
I cant double major
You can always self study too ofc.
not possible
Why not?
Gotcha gotcha.
the thing with agriculture is that im soft locked since i wasnt born into it
so unless i get credentials somehow im sorta fucked
so thats why im giving up on farm mangement dream
tbh math might have been mistake
seeing how competitive everything is as evidenced by people in this server, im not sure i got what it takes. this would be a non issue if i was studying agriculture
because you dont need grad school to do farm mangement jobs u only need BA or born into it
@latent forge so I think a college is different from a university
oh rip im going to a uni
Like a university might have multiple "schools"/"colleges" within
And the dynamic can be a bit different
For example
You might have a liberal arts college
With no graduate program
And the point of the entire institution is that it's making a statement about what it means to be a truly well-educated person and citizen, and graduating such folk
You might have an institution whose entire focus is research, and any undergraduate training it has is effectively a research bootcamp
You might have a public university whose overarching goal is to help meet the educational and research needs of its state
And at the undergrad level it might be divided
Perhaps it has a "School of Engineering", and the internal goal of that is to produce engineers
So it's only gonna put requirements to graduate which are in service of that goal. Maybe they'll have you become very proficient in technical writing
But literary analysis wouldn't make sense
Maybe the college of arts and science is basically a liberal arts college within the university
And it will have more strict/broad gened requirements. It's just "Contributing to a well-educated populace"
Etc etc
You see you are completely correct. Math is in the arts and science college, but all arts and science is required gen ed which I guess makes sense. But the fact that math has to do more than other majors in hard sciences is silly to me
That's what I meant about college vs university. You can be a research university, but your college is a liberal arts college. UChicago is an example of that.
Its not just my feelings becsuse me and a couple of friends verified with a bot that math majors need 3-4 more gen ed classes than everyone else
which is simply fucked imo
@latent forge I mean yeah I'm talking about what's optimal and saying that geneds in general as a concept makes sense in this optimal setting
Your school admin might be a bunch of smooth brains for all I know
Ok well then yes I agree
oh boy yes they are
I didnt get any critical thinking credits until I took a bio class
And I had taken diffeq at that time
all the engineering majors at my university slightly differ in the number of credits needed to take
CS is 123 credits, electrical engineering is like 130-132
yea my school is like that for business and math
business and math need 138-140 credits
math only needs 128 and same with business
business and math is doable because the school lets you overload to take more business classes
but math and agriculture doesnt allow for that and the dual degree is 44 classes
so its not really possible
oh wow
you have to get 30 more credits than you primary major to get two diplomas
so 153 in my case
but since I transfered with like 24, it's not too much of a stretch
Holy moly
but again, I came with 24 credits from high school, so I only need like 126
big win
My school only allows five classes for overloading regularly
Only special programs like business and math can get 6
I might have been able to do agriculture and math but im not sure if I could overload to 6
Also i wouldnt be able to handle 6 classes and work lol
esp since agriculture is chem and bio labs for first two semesters
lol why
too messy and impure
amen
i really hate agriculture at my school though only because you need genetics and ecology classes and other schools dont require it
but i dont mind those classes
its just that it adds on to workloads
Lol my college core had some good aspects but some less good
good how
Hmm so
I don't think it had a very clear idea of what it was doing
But it was getting at something
somethin de3p?
I mean not deep just like. There's an idea and I think a good one but it just wasn't hashed out
Namely
I think the bio requirement was very poorly done
Because it's a "Take something please"
im sure ppl mad about that though
2 quarters of bio yeah
id like that but i can see people hating that
You did either core bio + a topics
and as admin wouldnt let it pass
Well that was like, if you were into math/CS and wanted that angle on things
oh ok
The rule was you either do a sequence like modeling 1-2, or you do core bio + a topics class
id like that honestly
id rather have that then arbitrary science and social gen eds credits
My problem with that is
Hmm
I guess it doesn't feel like there's any real internal logic
Like why should you have to take bio as opposed to some arbitrary science
Like astronomy or soil science
I mean I do see that as inherently faulty then
In my case I like bio so I would have no problem with it
Problem with bio in my school is how weed out it is
The structure of class isnt intended for you to learn bio well but memorize a large amount of information with only tests and lab reports determining your grades. No homeworks whatsoever
Its really intended for med students
Well so
I am fine with a dedicated bio requirement... But I think it should be serving some goal
And when I took bio I hated it because a lot of time was spent quickly jumping from topic to topic getting a general education of different topics. This is far from how math classes is structured where you learn about specific theories in that class. Luckily I got past AP bio and only needed second semester bio so didnt need to take two semesters
what does mit do
I think their theme is to produce high quality scientists
You dont think your school does that by its bio requirement but MIT does because…?
oh ok i get your point better
It seems like everything they require at MIT is in service of some goal of producing high quality scientists
Like yeah we want people to be well-rounded in general, scientists shouldn't be in a bubble
Hence they have you take humanities/arts/social science classes, but it's kinda general I think. Take something
All in all I dont think the general ed classes are completely useless, but I think I would turn out the same for the most part without em
w/e impaxt they have on me wouldnt be drastic enough to justify their existence
Chicago's core humanities is much more specific
esp as someone who has defined interests going into school
It was like
Take one of these n full year sequences
And they don't fully fit into one department or another
It's vaguely philosophy/ethics
But we also learned about religious angles on what it means to be a good person
were u raised religious
Eg in Genesis they don't really have the conception of God as being good™️ and you obey him because that's what's right
You obey God because he's very powerful and he'll fuck up your shit if you don't
Later we read St. Augustine and it's different
i only remember his ontological arguments
Greek ideas of heroism in the Iliad are also different. Aristotle Nicomachean ethics was about being virtuous, Kant's groundwork was about the categorical imperative
Etc etc
So like it's not oh intro to philosophy 101
But it's a class with an aim. Explore the western canon and understand various angles on what it means to be a good person and good citizen
Anyway I gotta go but, yeah the other options for the core humanities class there don't all have the same theme but to me this one was like, what a core/Great Books class should be
my school has more options but because if this i cant continue a class sequence and get all the gen eds also good night same here i sleep
Tell me about any Book or any video on number theory ......where I learn easily .........
Hey, If i'm writing a paper with figures stolen from someone's website, how do I cite that properly?
Use plagiarism
I mean you cite it like you would any website
Depending on what bibliography format you use the details are a bit different but you generally provide the author, page name, url, and most importantly date of access
Alternatively just make your own diagrams
Or do plagiarism. Steal it, without citation.
Do i mention in the caption of the figure that its taken from [2] and then have [2] listed in the bibliography as a citation to the website?
Yes

But also the diagrams I saw when you were talking about today should be simple enough to do in tikzpicture
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node at (0,0) {(use a package that lets you upload png files here)};
\end{tikzpicture}
Or at least you can like, produce them in tikzpicture without too much difficulty
Putting bitmap images in a pdf is kinda frowned upon
Like
\begin{tikzpicture}
\foreach \i in {0,...,4} \draw[fill,thick,rotate={\i * 72 + 90}] (0.5,0) circle (2pt) -- (-2.265,0.9) circle (2pt) -- (2.8,0) circle (2pt) -- (72:2.8);
\end{tikzpicture}
nGroupoid
I produced this from an existing image
Most of the work in creating complicated pictures like this is knowing the coordinates of the control points. If you have an existing image you can find approximate coordinates very very easily
gg
very satisfying
@astral marsh for another example of what i mean like
m
「駆けろ」
Music:みきとP
Drums:SHiN
Mixing & Mastering:NNZN(OFUTONE)
illustration:あすだ
movie:サイトウユウマ
「駆けろ」の購入はこちらから
https://suisei.streamlink.to/run
本音も建前も
駆け引き上手な大人は 駄目だね.
そんな言葉 信用できない
便利で快適で
進化し続けるテクノロジー
伝えて 人肌のぬくもり
ねえこのままずっと
降り止まない 雨の世界だ
もう悲しくない 人は慣れる生き物だから
そう白紙になった 青春の何ページ目だったけ
今、君に会いたいと...
The third planet is sure that they're being watched
By an eye in the sky that can't be stopped
When you get to the promised land
You're gonna shake the eye's handYour heart felt good
It was drippin' pitch and made of wood
And your hands and knees
Felt cold and wet on the grass beneath
Well, outside, naked, shivering, looking blue
From the cold sunlight that's reflecting off the moon
Baby cum angels, fly around you
Reminding you we used to be three and not just two
And that's how the world began
And that's how the world will end
Listening to clips of that song makes me realize our music tastes are vastly different
excerpt from modest mouse's third planet
again, super duper pretentious
but like
at least its actually saying something
(though somehow like 5% of people who listen to it think its actually about abortion)
(not sure how they got that one)
(its pretty clearly about miscarriage)
(at least IMO)
the song is about how a miscarriage ruined their relationship
the idea is that things were developing really well, they were clicking, ready to start a family, etc.
but when the miscarriage happened, it became impossible for them to spend time with each other without being reminded of their shared grief
mm ok ill take it
Well, a third had just been made
And we were swimming in the water
Didn't know then; was it a son, was it a daughter
And it occurred to me that the animals are swimming
Around in the water in the oceans in our bodies
And another had been found, another ocean on the planet
Given that our blood is just like the Atlantic, and how
the song if you care https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsnELWjsCsA
Third Planet from the album The Moon and Antarctica
its not the most approachable modest mouse song, thats for sure lmao
lyrically or musically
float on is probably more... familiar
i dint think im lyrically connected since i listen to japanese music for starters
Provided to YouTube by Epic
Float On · Modest Mouse
Good News For People Who Love Bad News
℗ 2004 Epic Records, a division of Sony Music Entertainment
Released on: 2004-04-05
Guitar, Vocal, Composer, Lyricist: Isaac Brock
Background Vocal, Bass, Keyboards, Composer: Eric Judy
Background Vocal, Drum Machine, Guitar, Composer: Dann Gallucc...
it also (intentionally) has basically no lyrical depth
since its supposed to be a bit of a reprieve from the heavier content of their previous albums
it's just basically "yeah some shit sucks but we can make the best of it" and thats about it
anyway, like i totally think its fine to ignore lyrics in some cases
and hell i think there are songs which are better off if you kinda just let the lyrics blend into the background
as another instrument
rather than the main driver of the song's thematic development
yes, i mostly also listen to music with foreign lyrics as well
but if youre "disney girl singing generic disney acoustic"
me
then the music part of your music is incredibly boring and generic
I think id need an ounce of weed holy moly
need to get sungha jung on the guitar instead
i only recognize that song because of some commercial
and i clicked on a recommended song by beck
but like, for an example of a song where i think its better if you just kinda let the lyrics... be there
rather than actively listen to them
Provided to YouTube by Universal Music Group
Venice Bitch · Lana Del Rey
Norman Fucking Rockwell!
℗ A Polydor Records Recording / An Interscope Records Recording in the USA; ℗ 2018 Lana Del Rey, under exclusive license to Polydor Ltd. (UK), under exclusive license to Interscope Records in the USA.
Released on: 2019-08-30
Associated Perform...
its really not my belonging
her singing is beautiful but the lyrics are not lmao
very... im not sure "conservative" is the right word
but like
idk
and yet i think the singing still works really well
Venice bitch is art
ヨルシカ 「言って。」
Yorushika - Say it
作詞、作曲、編曲:n-buna
Vocal:suis
Music Video Directed by 大鳥
ヨルシカ1st Mini Album
「夏草が邪魔をする」
2017年6月28日(水)発売
収録曲
1.夏陰、ピアノを弾く
2.カトレア
3.言って。
4.あの夏に咲け
5.飛行
6.靴の花火
7.雲と幽霊
ヨルシカ 1st Live「夏草が邪魔をする」
開催日:2017年7月9日(日)
会場:東京・Shinjuku BLAZE
公式ツイッター
https://twitter.com/nbuna_staff
歌詞
言って
あのね、私実は気付いてるの
ほら、君が...
of course, theres also songs out there where the interplay between the lyrics and the musical development is like
the whole point
like, adele's someone like you is nothing lyrically special
but the way the lyrics interface with the song
can generalizations be made to music tastes of people with certain careers
is fucking amazing
and makes it a modern classic of pop IMO
I hate to turn up out of the blue, uninvited
But I couldn't stay away, I couldn't fight it
I had hoped you'd see my face
And that you'd be reminded that for me, it isn't overNever mind, I'll find someone like you
I wish nothing but the best for you, too
"Don't forget me, " I beg
I remember you said
"Sometimes it lasts in love, but sometimes it hurts instead"
"Sometimes it lasts in love, but sometimes it hurts instead"
like if you just read the lyrics, it seems like generic "i tell myself i'm over it but i'm actually not"
I found the end of the number line, it ends at the number 9 cause all the numbers after it are combinations of the numbers before it
but the way this development is conveyed through the chorus
is really really strong
and makes the lyrics feel a lot more significant than they actually are
Buy/Listen 25: http://smarturl.it/25Album?IQid=yt Buy/Listen 21: http://smarturl.it/Adele21Album?IQid=yt Buy/Listen 19: http://smarturl.it/19Album?IQid=yt Follow Adele on: Facebook - http://facebook.com/adele Twitter - http://twitter.com/adele Instagram - http://instagram.com/adele Subscribe to the Adele VEVO Channel - http://smarturl.it/Subs...
im sure youve heard it but just for convenience
it helps that adele is the best singer in pop in decades
im not either, i dont exactly have this song on my playlists
but i still admire it as a modern classic
since it really is one of the best things pop has put out in the past decade
what genre do you listen to mostly?
punk isnt indie
idk what indie is
indie is hard to define
whats a good example
technically it just means "not part of a major record label" but thats not really a practical label
well it has a bunch of different subgenres
indie rock has a lot of internal variation as well
Discover the best new indie, rock & alt music in our August compilation! Tracklist below… 👇
LISTEN ON SPOTIFY: https://spoti.fi/3zZiFBt
APPLE MUSIC, DEEZER, AMAZON & MORE: https://fanlink.to/IndieRockAugust21
» Subscribe to be the first to hear the finest new independent music! http://bit.ly/arbMsubscribe
📩 SUBMIT YOUR MUSIC: https://www.submi...
but its certainly not country lmao, country is a very specific genre
listen to like
”Reptilia” by The Strokes from the album "Room on Fire"
Listen to The Strokes: https://thestrokes.lnk.to/listenYD
Subscribe to The Strokes YouTube channel: https://TheStrokes.lnk.to/subscribeYD
Watch more videos by The Strokes: https://thestrokes.lnk.to/listenYD/youtube
Follow The Strokes:
Facebook: https://TheStrokes.lnk.to/followFI
Instagr...
you mightve heard it before, its fairly mainstream for an indie rock song
a"I listen to indie"
b"like wot"
a"arctic monke"
b"🗿"
sully
arctic monkeys are kind of indie but also not really
theyre not independent for one
so theyre like definitionally not indie lmao
but they just kind of developed in a different way from their contemporaries
anyway, you also have stuff like indie pop
only if its in a montage or something
“Kyoto,” the new song by Phoebe Bridgers from ‘Punisher’ out June 19 on Dead Oceans.
Stream / Buy: https://phoebebridgers.ffm.to/punisher
https://www.yourmajestyco.store/phoebe-bridgers
https://www.phoebefuckingbridgers.com/
Twitter: @phoebe_bridgers
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/_fake_nudes_
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/phoebeb...
ok yea i see the appeal
theres also stuff like shoegaze
no lmao
tame impala is psychadelic but not shoegaze
shoegaze is typically very slow and dreamlike
music genres 
thats how i feel tbh
try out like
Provided to YouTube by HIP LAND MUSIC CORPORATION INC.
That Blue, I’ll be coming · Yuragi
For you, Adroit it but soft
℗ FLAKE SOUNDS
Released on: 2021-06-30
Composer: 揺らぎ
Arranger: 揺らぎ
Lyricist: 揺らぎ
Auto-generated by YouTube.
its by a japanese artist
im not a big shoegaze fan myself
but its a significant genre
ok yeah i had an idea of what this is
Provided to YouTube by BWSCD, Inc.
Lost In The Dream · The War On Drugs
Lost In The Dream
℗ 2014 Secretly Canadian
Released on: 2014-03-18
Auto-generated by YouTube.
yeah we were raised differently i guess
this is more "modern" indie rock
and then theres indie folk
which is more of an... acquired taste i'd say
insert /mu/ memes here
in the aeroplane over the sea, the glow pt 2, fleet foxes, etc
Provided to YouTube by HIP LAND MUSIC CORPORATION INC.
do re me? · KASHIWA Daisuke
april.#02
℗ nobel
Released on: 2014-01-21
Composer: KASHIWA Daisuke
Arranger: KASHIWA Daisuke
Auto-generated by YouTube.
did someone say /mu/ memes
glitchhop?
black parade and edginess
but emo in an indie context typically refers to midwestern emo
which sounds more like
American Football -Never Meant with lyrics. Available on iTunes.
Edit: Good old fashioned 90's emo NOT shoegaze. Thank you.
basically people doing sick things with guitars
because i can only listen to this if im playing osu
nothing casual or id have serious mental illness no offense
if you havent heard never meant's opening riff at some point before, i'd be pretty surprised
its very very very famous
sounds like nickelback
ah good
like, its one of those "the dude who brought a guitar to a party played it" songs
inhereting this "depressed white dude with a guitar" tradition is bands like Car Seat Headrest
oh i wasnt even thinking about the image
it just sounded good
namington where did you grow up from
From 'Twin Fantasy' on Matador Records. Available now: http://smarturl.it/TwinFantasy
https://carseatheadrest.bandcamp.com/
https://twitter.com/carseatheadrest
https://www.facebook.com/carseatheadrest/
http://carseatheadrest.tumblr.com/
http://www.matadorrecords.com/car_seat_headrest
Matador Records on the web:
http://www.matadorrecords.com/
h...
southern alberta
canada has a fairly strong indie rock tradition
o
so i'd imagine that influenced me some
i think a lot
lol
i have question
is this rock?
Track ten off their debut album "Maps of Non-Existent Places", available now on iTunes: http://bit.ly/tysmaps
Progressive rock, or prog rock, is a subgenre of rock music that emphasizes ambitious compositions, experimentation, concept-driven lyrics, and musical virtuosity.
its experimental :/
prog traces its origins back to in the court of the crimson king by king crimson
a good album to listen to if you like that song
is that a jojo reference
Loveless is a pretty well known shoegaze album.
both the jojo character and king crimson are references to in the court of the crimson king, a composition by some old classical dude
oh wtf
i actually know king cirmson
i dont remember where i heard it
just not lyrics ig
Provided to YouTube by Entertainment One U.S., LP
21st Century Schizoid Man · King Crimson
The Condensed 21st Century Guide To King Crimson (1969 - 2003)
℗ Robert Fripp on behalf of King Crimson
Released on: 2006-10-16
Writer: Greg Lake
Writer: Ian McDonald
Writer: Peter Giles
Writer: Peter Sinfield
Writer: Robert Fripp
Music Publisher: UN...
its a very famous album
since it basically invented an entire genre of music
prog rock
oh yeah i know this song too
it also has a famous album cover
its sampled a lot yeah
yeah its one of those albums you should really listen to front-to-back
at least out of like, historical curiosity
i dont do that if i cant get through 2 songs without being exhausted
since it clearly influenced so much music in the coming decades
obviously it invented prog rock entirely but
its influences are also clear in stuff like radiohead or in ska music
and in a lot of jazzier hip hop
Get the ringtone: http://bit.ly/910f0g
Artist: Nujabes
Album: Metaphorical Music
Song: Blessing It (remix, feat. Substantial & Pase Rock from Five Deez)
oh
stuff like tribe called west and guru
sadly he died in a car accident in 2010
i know nujabes ofc
count bass d
anyway i never actually linked an indie folk song
For more great music see: http://www.katuwapitiya.com ... I don't think I've ever been so quickly impacted by a song before. This is the opener from their new album "Helplessness Blues".
Tracks 1+2 of Shore without the abrupt ending to 1
and also the entirety of in the aeroplane over the sea
which im sure youve at least heard of lmao
my personal favourite folk album is joanna newsom's ys but at least like 50% of people who try to listen to that album just cant get over her voice
which is fine
don't forget Ferris wheel on fire
see if you can stand it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJ1yFhjRnNc
Joanna Newsom - Ys (Full Album)
Tracks
- Emily 00:00
- Monkey & Bear 12:08
- Sawdust and Diamonds 21:37
- Only Skin 31:33
- Cosmia 48:26
if you cant, i totally understand lmao
but i think its a really fuckin well made album if you can get past that
her debut is the milk-eyed mender
which is actually my least favourite album of hers
oh wait
unless youre counting EPs
then thats the milk-eyed mender yeah
if you liked it, you might also like have one on me by her
its similar in spirit
whereas ys is a bit of a departure
(though it shares the trait of fluffy lyrics and her vocals being very prominent)
I'll probably give have one on me a shot.
just a warning, its a long ass album
2 hours
i dont think its bloated or anything though
i believe
baby birch from that album is probably the most a single song has moved me ever
except maybe something from a crow looked at me
but a crow looked at me is kind of a... special case for many reasons
its entirely lyrics and guitar, and its VERY VERY emotional and heavy and sad
like the music enhances the emotionality but its not something you listen to for the jams or anything
you listen to it for the depressing lyrical content
its the only album i can think of where a lot of the critics were like
i have never listened to music to feel depressed or witnes it
🙄
You're missing out then lol
"i feel like i cant give a score to this because (1) it'd almost be offensive to the content and (2) the album isnt really about its musical quality"
Some times you just need some bummer vibes.
a crow looked at me is simultaneously one of the greatest artistic triumphs of modern music and one of the hardest albums for me to listen to
nice
itll feel way longer than 40 minutes though
partially because the lyrics are mystical and crushing but also because
the entire album sounds the same lmao
na not thru music
its just sad dude singing over slow guitar
*not yet
not at all
the closest ill come to enjoying stories are old school rap
Sad music can be super good.
what about a 13 song LP that tells a tale of a supernatural apocalypse ;)
It's not always that it makes you feel sad exactly.
no lol
i listen to music for good sounds
not a story
it sounds good too!
this is true but a crow looked at you is all about making you feel sad
or rather
post
Yah yah
communicating the singer's sadness and grief and loss
:troll: https://wewladstbh.bandcamp.com/album/spectral-analysis :troll:
i guess that sadness can be cathartic
personally though i only very rarely willingly listen to it it
like ive only listened to it all the way through like
sadness is very cathartic
3 times i think
I know I've listened to mount eerie but I do not recall if I liked it.
im flipping the bird at you
I'll probably listen to that album too. I've only ever heard good things about them.
I'm right
ur pretty funny tho
Emily Haines has some good sad solo stuff.
mount eerie / the microphones is very very very good yeah
She was the front lady for metric.
really talented
admittedly a crow looked at me is a pretty unique entry in their discography but
a lot of their work is about being honest and open about really sad feelings
thats what most of the glow pt 2 is about, after all
and thats easily his most famous album
Also elliott smith, have a nice life and that group that did divorce lawyers I shaved my head or whatev that albun is called.
gou know @sleek wing ill tell u what
watching xootynator play europhoria hddt and FC it made me cry today
I love deathconsciousness lol
I have had a hanl hoodie for ages because of that album.
I got like, seven of those words
im not sure if the premise for the glow pt 2 makes it more sad or more funny
in hindsight
its about a dude whose girlfriend breaks up with him and he gets depressed and starts feeling suicidal and stuff
Nine did you say you like rap?
and eventually decides to go into the woods to disconnect from her
and then he gets fucking
killed by a bear
like theres no ceremonious end or moment of reflection or whatever
...lol
a bear just fucking narcs this sad dude
realistic tbf
This is why going outside is bad.
agreed
at least when the bears are awake
and resulted in a very stupid death
but its a funny premise
when explained like that
i dont listen to it too much but i like some rap yeah
Not you lol
No worries I was gonna see if nine liked i dont like shit I dont go outside by earl sweatshirt.
my pizza is over 40m late
Sue.
is it free
missandry is hating men and mysogny is hating women. what is hating men and women
based
what is hating men or women
John.
what is hating men xor women
mysondry and missagny
Sexism
if hating some people is normal, what is hating most people
what is hating all people
super-normal
Misanthropy
Prof. Kevin Buzzard (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Buzzard) is an algebraic number theorist who is now working in formal proof verification. He runs the Xena project, which aims to formalise the entire undergraduate pure maths curriculum in the language Lean. He was awarded the Whitehead prize and the Senior Berwick prize by the LMS.
Have...
This guy pisses me off so much
"you know you're back to Cambridge and you're talking to Cambridge audiences"
Pretentious as fuck
What the literal fuck
Why do you have to say that in the middle of the speaker's talk
Guess you're just ||not cambridge material||
what is the obsidian pillar?
u mean in minecraft?
lol, no its a channel in this server
lol that comment is so pretentious to the point it’s funny
*audience member gives the wrong answer
*speaker gives a detailed explanation on why he’s wrong and what the correct answer is
and then random guy hits the speaker with “"you know you're back to Cambridge and you're talking to Cambridge audiences"”
LOL he added nothing
i think he is just socially unaware
evidenced by rocking in his seat with shiteating grin while saying it
prof is chad and says "yes very good"
yeah i just watched the part of the video and it just sounds like he blurted it out, like huh?
I mean he did spend a minute reducing fractions
no i think he was just happy that buzzard's pace was adequate for his audience
hence the smile
he gave right answer
lmao very rude person
yes, clearly not worth the time of any audience from Cambridge
im so confused by the meaning of the thing he blurted out
maybe im illiterate lol
but im incapable of parsing it
he essentially said, stop going so slow, we’re from cambridge, we’re smart ppl, ppl from not cambridge = not smart
I will defend this Buzzard heckler to the death
i guess ill watch the video
i thought he said something 4^n and it was actually 2^n
i agree with student
but its not socially aware
ill blame culture differences
lol i’ve never heard of the term “shiteating grin” but it makes so much sense here
o rly?
yea
ah ok, that's what he meant
its culture difference imo
wasnt meant to be arrogant rly
even though it came off that way
yea ig it did sound that way
He said it after a student gave a correct answer
And when prof buzz was explaining
He told him this is cambridge audience as away to express their quick understanding
oh
now that i understand the whole context, i don't think it was that weird of a thing to say
i smile in math classes when something is exciting or new sometimes
it wasnt but he was saying it with a grin

the retort from prof buzz a couple seconds later further demonstrates the misunderstanding, since he goes on to call the town (and consequently it’s people) boring
ye
eh, i'm not sure i would call that really a grin
meh
you guys still have expressions
nhgh ok let me get this kneebar and then we'll pick our u and dv
It’s a Gaussian integral…
im referring to a different hypothetical integral
why
what source is this?
obviously its perfectly valid and every textbook ever mentions you can do it
but i havent seen someone actually do it before open sets
still does open sets first
There are some situations where the closed set definition is preferable and more fundamental
E.g. for the Zariski topology
Yeah this is an alg. Geo. book introducing it for zariski
Makes perfect sense in the context, still cursed
Laughing out loud in class was accidentally a strat for me
My prof gave a fake proof of Cayley-Hamilton
4 of us cracked the fuck up because we thought it was correct but anticlimactic
And the prof was like yup these guys know I'm lying, can someone else explain why?
And inside I'm just like
0_0
Got away with murder
Lmfaooooooo
Yeah that was someone's explanation and then I was like o so it's wrong
Honestly in hindsight I don't know why I found that proof so funny given that I believed it
I think we had so much build up to it, like we stated it and used it before without proof
Then the proof is like lul
But I couldn't fucking breathe
but that proof is correct
what proof
p(A) = det(A - IA) = det(0) = 0
hence A satisfies its own characteristic equation
this is of course nonsense, as p(A), being a matrix, can't be equal to a scalar
but if you dont think, its correct
I'm confused 😦
whats confusing
Yeah I am constantly confused but I don't say it to keep up appearances
Yes
which one
that's what the cayley-hamilton theorem says, yes
of course, 0 should actually be a 0 matrix
The best proof of cayley hamilton is “extend to an algebraically closed field, it’s clearly true for diagonal matrices, therefore also for diagonalizable matrices, therefore for all matrices since diagonalizable matrices are zariski dense”
the definition of the characteristic polynomial is
p(x) = det(Ix - A)
where I is the identity matrix
so if we just "plug in x = A"
it is?
p(A) = det(IA - A) = det(0) = 0
again though this is nonsense, since x is meant to be a scalar
the theorem itself is true
the proof is incorrect
is the point
the proof makes the claim p(A) = det(IA - A) but the determinant should be a scalar
whereas p(A) is a matrix
its just a sneaky abuse of notation
there are, of course, actually correct proofs of cayley-hamilton
they're a bit harder than this
though not super sophisticated or anything
yeah I know a couple
I don't understand how something that makes no sense can be a proof though
I've seen fake proofs where there is slight flaws that are hidden
but not fake proofs where it just doesn't make sense
but this proof is correct
which proof?
