#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 450 of 1
Hausdorff means that any two distinct points are in disjoint open sets. It's a really nice property to have, so most 'nice' spaces you'll work with are Hausdroff
ye buf any visualizations
you'd have to actively try to come up with a topological space that isn't Hausdorff
a "simple" example of a non-Hausdorff space is the line with two origins
like i have no clue of any space that is locally euclidean and not hausdorff
and anything satisfying both of those would be really pathological
proably not very easy to visualize
again, a lot of 'nice' spaces are second countable, so anything that isn't is usually pathological :p
rip
which is exactly why manifolds are defined this way
i wish some concepts gave reasons behind their definitions
because R^n is both hausdorff and second countable
like i understand reason for locally euclidean
when you add these local homeomorphisms, it basically lets you treat these more general spaces as though they were R^n
you can do calculus, integration, whatever you'd like
i havent done shit with manifolds but the ones i see pictures of online are in R3 so i just assumed they are subsets of R3
i know they can be Rn
but i guess its wrong to think of them as subsets of R3 also
even though Hausdorff and second countable might sound scary and confusing, they restrict manifolds to spaces that are (generally) intuitive and nice to play with
yeah you can have a manifold embedded in R^n, it's just easiest to think of them in R^2 in R^3 visually
second countable means countable basis and all of R^n with standard topology are because for each open ball you can enumerate by taking a rational point right?
yeah
that sounds right to me
get to finicky stuff when you get to uncountably many copies of R, but oh well
Im wondering if there is anything ever wrong with viewing them as embeddings in R3 as opposed to just looking at them as sets distinct from reals
all manifolds are R^n
also why
look up box topology vs product topology
same, that's why I said to look it up instead of trying to explain it lol
rip it says finite many can not be equal to entire component space
i hate that language and can’t understand
so infinitely many can bases can be equal to component space?
the basis for the box topology is product of open sets in each R
the basis for the product topology is product of open sets, where all but finitely many are all of R
all but means
so box would be $U_1\times U_2\times\cdots$ where each $U_i$ is open in the space $X_i$
cgodfrey
while product would be $U_1\times U_2\times\cdots\times X_i\times X_{i+1}\times\cdots$ because eventually all of the open sets you pick must be the entire space
cgodfrey
oh ok
only finitely many can be open subsets
the rest have to be the entire space themselves

the product topology has the nice property where if you have maps $f_i: Y\to X_i$, then the product map $f:Y\to X$ is continuous if and only if each $f_i$ is continuous
cgodfrey
but this isn't true in the box topology
i dont see how
in fact, even the identity function where $x\mapsto (x, x, x, \dots)$ in the box topology isn't continuous
wait
cgodfrey
the goal is to show Y is space generated by basis {U1 x … x Ui x … where each Ui is open in X_i } and the goal is to show if each fi Y-> Xi cts then Y->X cts?
Y is the same for f_i and f, it can be any arbitrary spcae
X is the space generated by that basis
and identity map fails this somehow
yeah
which means you can take a open set in X that doesnt have open preimage
correct
calling cap
If $\mathbb{R}^\omega$ is infinitely many copies, consider $U\subset \mathbB{R}^\omega$ where $U=\prod_{n=1}^\infty (-\frac{1}{n}, \frac{1}{n})$
i dont see it
cgodfrey
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
bruh
lol I swear I know the command
so U is a product of sets that are open in each R_i, right?
yuh
so it's open in the box topology in the product spcae
yea
(0, 0, 0, 0, ...) is the only element in U
?
No.
okay now I have it
didnt you define it so that it starts at -1,1 x -1/2,1/2 x … x …
so if $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^\omega$ is the identity map sending $x$ to $(x, x, x, \dots)$
cgodfrey
then the preimage of $U$ only contains 0
cgodfrey
yes, my "no" was directed at your "(0, 0, 0, 0, ...) is the only element in U"
because for any nonzero $x$, if you consider $f(x)$, there must be some $n$ where $x\notin\left(-\frac{1}{n}, \frac{1}{n}\right)$
cgodfrey
U is defined as the product of open sets in R
but its preimage under this 'identity' function f is just 0, which isn't open in R
therefore, f isn't continuous
even though each 'coordinate' of the function onto each component is continuous
so that's why the box topology is annoying
yep
I see why you say this but how does this deduce that preimagen of U is 0?
oh
wait
dont anserr
because if you take any element in U that isnt 0,0,0,0,…

then like you said it wont be in one of the intervals
when taking preimage
rip
badly woreded
for the preimage, you specifically have to consider elements of U of the form (x, x, x, ...)
Ok I understand now but just for the clarification. The preimage of U is 0 because if you were to take f(c) for c nonzero you would get (x,x,…) but this element will never be in U since like you stated there will be an n such that x is not in (-1/n,1/n). So this means that c=0 and preimage of U is 0
yeah
And with the product topology U cant be a set
with the product topology, everything works out nicely. If each component map is continuous, so it the product map
since eventually the components of the basis are the entirety of the set instead of an open subset
right
so you could restrict that finitely many components of U are bound by (-1/n, 1/n)
but since it's finitely many, the 'tail' has to be all of R, and so you restrict the elements of U much less
i see
also a question
why does anyone ever care about looking at something like Romega
omega?
besides seeing fringe cases where infinity breaks things
¯_(ツ)_/¯
I guess one thing of note that's of interest
cuz box topology does not make sense in R^omega
it's not known whether $\mathbb{R}^\omega$ is normal (a property of topological spaces) in the box topology, though it's true if one assumes the continuum hypothesis
cgodfrey
compact hausdorff?
all compact hausdorff spaces are normal, yes
but the two aren't equivalent
basically instead of having distinct elements separated by disjoint open sets, normalcy lets you separate distinct closed sets by disjoint open sets
rip is normal that any closed set and a point not in the close set admit open disjoint sets or is that regular?
that's regular
the point being, these infinite product spaces have interesting set theory consequences, I guess
continuum hypothesis is independent from ZFC
It cannot be proven from ZFC, and cannot be disproven from ZFC
Cohen didn’t believe it was true
nor did godel iirc
GCH also seems substantially stronger of a claim
I know groups model the group theory axioms, I wonder if it’s a similar thing for set theory axioms, we’ll I mean it is in that there are models, but I wonder if model theorists think of an objectively true model or if they think of the models sort of like groups
And that under some, certain things are true and in others they aren’t
I am not that knowledgeable in this area, so I do not actually know, but I’m kind of curious
like models are to sets theory as groups are to group thorry?
That’s how I came to think about it the other day. But I don’t know if I’m alone in thinking that/if it’s dumb to think that. If it’s not dumb, then someone else thought of it before.
why do people care about cardinality though?
It’s interesting
like it clearly has no purpose outside of math and seems like a cool thing inside of math but barely applicable to anything other than itself
the idea with most of higher math is that it might be applicable eventually
i dont see it with cardinality though
everything else is more promising
like how quaternions were discovered in the 1830s or 40s and then became very useful in the 1970s with computer representation of orientation and rotation
That’s what we say to get funding
I like Hardy’s philosophy of it
Math for the sake of math
math for the sake of 50 years of saying wtf is this
but how much of math is really just that w/o a possible closer connection to some thing applied
im guessing most of math research
That's for the NSF to decide lol
tbh it feels wrong
do you think weve hit a point where current math research in some fields will never be applicable?
a lot of set theory research is already here
math research is always pointless if it cant be used immediately its dumb
How good is overleaf for creating math papers?
what do I know
that would be
i could make one
convenient
google scholar has given me smol luck, all i see is fuzzy, rough set theory and descriptive set theory but am paywalled
Sometimes sacrifices are necessary

Bots are bad
@south summit when I am done i can apply it to you
Bots make you get banned
if you wish

See a connection?
Just apply it to the boss boss 
zozz*

yeah but i need to find the emote ids....

why no animated picture
Don't need it 
says the one with no animated picture
yes
bloomer good
coz all the fake credit cards didn't work for me
which is?
Just use a real credit card bro
just use life bro
its coldilocks id
see? It's not that simple
True 😌
EZ just [My legal advisor has advised me to go no further with this message.]
brandon living on the edge with TOS
did i miss something?
actually it might be against discord TOS
scihub moment
what ToS people are literally dming me viruses on daily basis

Lol what?
My semester starts Jan 5th or something super early
And I asked the department grad coordinator about missing teaching
And she was like
The people in charge don't approve these
Are you teaching teaching
like somehting more than office hours / something you couldn't do over zoom
For this semester I am teaching teaching yes
(i genuinely know nothing about what my role will be as a TA)
Oh wow
Deliver content

Would they let you like pre-record one lecture or something
I'm considering applying for NSF this year
seems stupidly strict
Apparently not
If I get NSF I won't need to teach
@deep mango are you applying for NSF this year
Or next year
is NSF that much?
Yes
You can't teach if you get NSF
You also get 34k a year
Which is more than a normal stipend
oh damn, what r u getting now a year, if u dont mind, and like how much do people get usually?
ic,
And based on size of university
if you don't live very frugally tho, with this I guess you need to work part time or something
oh, is it because u dont have time to?
That and you’re also contractually not allowed to
ah
In a lot of cases at least
With tutoring it’s fine since it’s not actual employment
And you can make a good deal of extra money doing this
ic, thx
You can usually make good money tutoring
Also cost of living is a lot lower
At least where I am
yea if its hs or 1st year tutoring its seems pretty chill
Do you have to do tutoring through the uni?
No it's usually on your own
Uh, it depends
I'm not sure
I don't know if it's smart to given how the NYU package works
I see
With the whole "optional teaching for extra stipend" thing
Like NSF is more than my without teaching stipend but less if I do teach
Or
I actually don't know
I will ask around
And probably apply next year since I didn't really do much new last year that warrants my rec letters being improved
Well
Actually that is false
I could probably ask demmel for one by now
Do you think I could ask Holtz for one
No
That sounds like a terrible idea
I'm not going to ask Holtz
Even if I could
It depends
I don't really know
If holtz would write a good rec letter to most people with whom she's just had good mathematical interactions
She's more of an interpersonal type I think
Sure
I was thinking about applying for NSF this year because climate modeling is a high priority research area
This year
Oh really
Ok
I don't know what I would be able to write about that
Maybe I will know after this summer school
real analysis 1 and 2 , algebra 1 and 2 , linear algebra 1 and 2 , differential geometry 1 and 2 , complex analysis 1 and 2 and finally 1 class of functional analysis
is this good for a 4 year program math
bsc
i dont like it tbh
It seems like you could probably take more
if math was your main focus
nothing wrong with those classes themselves really
its a fine curriculum, a weird focus on the standard analysis/algebra streams though
put yourself out there, take a graph theory course or something
if available
you might enjoy it a lot more than the typical stream
but yeah, thats a totally fine curriculum in pure math
i'd recommend learning to program alongside it, and maybe trying to squeeze in basic stats as well
yea i think so too
max
you have to take like
4 mechanics classes
and like 4 modern physics classes
yuck
Tragic
like logic or combinatorics or NT
Well thats certainly annoying
yea
i spoke to the professor and he just straight upt old me he doesnt think it would be worth it for me to switch
saying professors losing their passion cuz of online classes and the number of courses taught badly is increasing
i am p sure he means the diff geo and physics classes
Switch?
Because it's fluids 
I wouldn't write about actual climate modeling
But about pure math which has applications to climate modeling of course
Broader impacts
broader impact of topology
I will find a way to turn one coffis cup into a real, edible donut
new paper in the Journal of Global Issues:
Approaches to World Hunger Through Topology
Abstract: It has long been known to mathematicians that the common doughnut, a meal containing components from multiple food groups, is homeomorphic to any other orientable connected surface with a single hole. We explore affordable genus 1 surfaces in various regions around the world, and discuss their viability as a substitute food source through this doughnut equivalence relation. Of particular interest is plants tied into circles, due to the low cost and near-ubiquity in nature of long plantlife such as grasses and vines making this doughnut source very accessible to the impoverished.
what
hahahahaha
lmao
what is best designed city in world
well cities that arose naturally and not by planning are usually disqualified, so like, most british cities are out of the question but american cities are pretty nice
I mean this in the most basic sense of layout
like the map of philadelphia just makes a lot of sense
singapore is pretty impressively designed imo
honestly when you ask me how well a city is designed
my weighting is like
90%: how good is the public transit
10%: anything else
nah most american and canadian cities are awful because of their dependence on cars
thats just true imo
Dubai doesn't have a sewer system and was mostly built with slave labor
most american cities are not really that nice
Aesthetically
the most aesthetic city ive been to was berlin
Cities should be:
- Environmentally sustainable
- Accessible
- Fulfill people's needs effectively
- not built on slave labor
dubai has also imported the worst of american urban planning
with like 12-lane freeways and stuff
america and suburbanism makes most american cities a joke
obv dubai isnt well designed
with its sinking realestate
Also cities dont need to be environmentally sustainable, just sustainable
Dubai doesn't have sewers because you can't show off sewers
Cities should be environmentally sustainable because climate change
they destroy marine life by making their artificial islands and stuff
dubai just does the worst things
its a seperate debate but you have a point
urban planning in the west is baaaaaad
why do you consider it bad, i do too but why
its not price efficient in my opinion
@wispy dune we might have watched the same video
like its bad from a moral/environmental perspective but its also bad from a simple economic perspective
and causes heavy consumer reliances
i think it has been recommended to everyone
the only reason it develops as it does is because of harsh zoning laws incentivizing single-family suburban housing and whatnot
nami does the west mean like the west coast or just
theres also a alright podcast that do engineering stuff
the only good city is Phoenix Arizona
all of america and europe
they covered dubai as well
the latter
but the podcast kinda sucks
although thats not unique to the west
i shouldve said more like
in the urban world
Economics is a bad metric to measure cities by
CIties aren't meant to make people money
They are meant for people to live in
Are harsh zoning laws incentivizing single family suburban housing common in like
sure, but more economically affordable cities are easier to live in
western and central europe excluding the UK
Sadge
stockholm for example has issues with this
Berlin seems like a nice place to live
anyway, the point is that relaxing zoning laws but increasing pressure for environmental compliance would come with social AND economic benefits
like your amazingly liveable city is pretty useless if rent costs $50k
(sorry new yorkers)
but efficient land use also makes for more affordable cities
which of course incentivizes people to move in, reducing their net environmental footprint
you get the gist
honestly i kind of wonder how feasible an entirely roadless "inner city" would be
i guess the problem there is transporting goods
like stocking store shelves and whatnot
This is what Barcelona does with super blocks
rent doesnt cost 50k here
im aware, im exaggerating
I'm sure there are 4k/month apartments in NY
new york is a bit of a unique case though, like certainly policies could be taken to lower rent prices but you cant lower it THAT much because space on manhatten is just fundamentally limited
fortunately the vast majority of the US is not manhattan
and has a fuckton of room to expand into
Shockingly, the rest of NYC exists
yet sadly that gets filled with suburbia and whatnot
yeah thats true, but making the rest of NY more affordable probably wouldnt affect manhattan too much
Most of NY is not very dense at all
my point is that NY is just a weird unique case in general
11k people/sq km
with conditions both historical and geographical that dont apply to 99% of other US cities
It's not that weird
London has a similar thing where there's a rich urban core where all the bankers live and then most of the city is low rises
the really expensive place is just downtown
to a lesser extent midtown and the upper east side
ive heard from a few places that the biggest infrastructural challenge isnt moving people around, its moving stuff around
I will say that I think commuting is terrible and I don't blame people for wanting to live closer to where stuff is
like goods for stocking store shelves and furniture and whatnot
moving people around is basically "solved"
It is its a huge problem here nami
now, north american cities dont actually DO it properly
way too much reliance on cars and whatnot
If i was to live anywhere in nyc id want to live in hamilton heights
but we do, on PAPER, have efficient systems in place for that
and theyve been implemented in a handful of cities just fine
(see tokyo for example)
tokyo public transport is fucked for a lot of reasons but its still good enough to serve the needs of the vast majority of the population
just... try not to be a young woman
yeah i remember reading about those
seemed cool
If I could live anywhere in NYC, money no object...
Probably Astoria or Brooklyn Heights tbh
Or I mean, Midtown Manhattan
Is it? I mean I guess I mostly would go there to visit and it was fine
But like I thought Midtown and Upper East were like
The nice™️ places there
I hate the aesthetic of like
just a ton of glass skyscrapers
moth is literally nuts
if you have the cashola
you live in one of the fancy parts of manhattan
imagine living on the upper west side near about amsterdam and 80th 
wow, good food every day
I agree with moth. Paris aesthetic >>> NYC aesthetic
buildings were never meant to be tall
humanity is more important than your aesthetic
building vertically is more efficient than building horizontally
(within reason)
i agree that nyc's glass spam doesnt look good though
as someone in europe right now
(i'm very qualified to speak on this matter)
sully sully
classical french city architecture is fun for 10 minutes
Sorry rice nyc is ugly
and then it's boring and uninspiring
I don't make the rules
NYC is full of spice
Too bad it's black pepper
And too much tastes like ass
Idk I personally don't find tonnes of high rise buildings inspiring
I prefer pixian doubanjiang
history hater
the architecture in barcelona was >>>>>>>>> the architecture in bordeaux
bordeaux was still pretty but every building literally identical
The difference to me is that Paris feels like a city
NYC feels like a behemoth trying to eat you
man whenever ryc joins a conversation, i get a better understanding for how terrible his taste is
is there anything ryc has good taste in
ryc how do you like your steak cooked
@deep mango
no he doesnt he likes survivor
exactly
plants can't grow except out of dirt, great thoughts can't arise from a mind that doesn't consume trash
a good city feels like a behemoth trying to eat you
paris feels meek and timid
it shies away from my confident gait
medium rare
obviously
i could have given you a false answer there just to troll and i didn't
wow we found 1 thing that ryc has good taste in
i hope that builds trust
rare is better if you trust the restaurant though
but i dont trust 90% of restaurants
i don't
yeah
i also don't trust my mom
and she makes very good medium rare steak
(i'm not a weirdo who gets steak out for no reason)
@deep mango what is your harry potter house
i'm fine with that
i would have preferred to be slytherin
apparently i don't have the killer instinct or something
well are you a racist
is that a requirement?
jk rowling claims "no" but literally every slytherin is canonically racist
except 1
(well, unless you count harry)
i dated a girl who was way too into this shit man
i regret having this knowledge
but i do
she probably thinks you're way into those anime book games
you can't identify one thing i have a bad opinion on
How tf do y’all know what house
my math teacher puts everyone in a house in the first day of class
which was today for us
and i got ravenclaw 😎
i was also ravenclaw 2 years ago when i took bc with him
so it was more or less decided
They probably gonna end up saying
he said it was by personality
“Alephnull, you aren’t a wizard”
Anyways obligatory fuck Rowling lmao
isn't she transphobic lol
Yeah
t e r f
Among other things she’s a TERF
i didn't know the term terf existed until i read about her
bruh
if you've read harry potter
and care about the houses
you're a ravenclaw
bc you're a nerd
I read Harry Potter
idc about the houses
literally everyone here is a ravenclaw
but my teacher does
It’s kinda overrated but they’re really enjoyable to read
this is a maths server
so apparently he thinks i'm a nerd
Harry Potter
You can be academic and not have your whole personality center around school
she's pretty nerdy compared to the other characters
aleph is right tbh the mystery is pretty much the core
at least for the first few books
luna probably one of my top 10 HP chars from my recollection of reading the books when i was a kid
Luna is the only good one
Yeah the later books are a bit less mystery oriented
But think about the first book
I was reading a harry potter fanfiction written by a cis women and it opened on like a 4 paragraph explanation justifying her writing a fanfiction of HP because JKR is a terf it was so funny
U can just write it bro its not that deep

I dont think ur sirius/lupin 300k slowburn fic is supporting JKR
Moth have you ever read uh any Agatha Christie novels
Agatha Cringie
Yo mama cringe
lol wtf a terf
is it really ppl that don’t believe trans ppl trans if they dont get surgery? its something else right?
or is it like get off my terf
idk what it means
what it sounds like
google says women against trans women advocation for women
yeah
like how could ppl be against outsiders rooting for their cause?
i need some examples lol
no i think there thing is that
everything they're advocating for excludes trans women
because they don't accept them as women
how can you do that though?
idk ask them lol
no i mean how can you advocate for a cause for women and against trans women?
like not letting them into womens shelters or something?
seems like you need to get silly and pedantic to do that
I don't think terfs typically recognize the gender identities of trans people.
what does that mean? they dont recognize trans peoples desired gender?
wikipedia just gives a debate on usage of word
Like, if you start from the premise that trans women aren't women and you intend to provide a service to women to the exclusion of all others then necessarily trans women must be excluded.
no actual opinions of terfs
such as what though?
thats where im wanting examples
Like your womens shelter example.
but thats a silly one
Not really.
Bathrooms. Like anything bc really they hate trans ppl
because transwomen are allowed into womens shelters and they are usually for domestic abuse
Bathroom is a good one or spas.
spas is a different subject though
Yes but a terf might advocate against this.
Not in all shelters and Terfs don’t like it
oh i see what your saying
Like terfs basically hate anything that isnt like, a cis woman
Mmm idk about that.
Feminism in general is a really broad collection of views.
Does being radfem or terf necessarily imply hatred?
lol this seems like internet slander
I am genuinely unsure.
Why does terf imply that though?
Is it just the fact that lots of people like that gather under the label?
i mean most terfs hate transwomen bc they hate men and dont see transwomen as women
yeah doot basically
That makes sense.
i only met one trans person in my life and at college i have met people who identify as femninist but i never have conversations on their views/drama
most feminists are fine
tbh too complicated to talk about gender with ppl
but if you self identify as terf ur probably insane
idk im just curious about the labeling irl because when ppl openly identify as a certain thing i just expect them to talk nonstop about shit i dont care about but might be interesting to listen to
not necessarily femnist
but political identires in general
My sociology class had a unit on gender.
like when ppl say they are democrats or some strange flavor of communism
Also anthropology studies that stuff.
yea i met these ppl in gen ed anthropo
Democrats or some strange flavor of communism 
well i dont remember what they call themselves but its like prefixxednor suffixed with communist
Gender can be discussed objectively, it's just that a lot of people have really strong feelings about it that they believe ought to be fact.
yea thats why i dont talk about it
no reason to lose a friend or helper for a disagreement
just dont talk about it and boom
irl though
I mean if ur friend is transphobic wouldn’t u want to cut em off lol
Irl I view that as a sign of a really fixed worldview lol
Like I’d be very wierd out if a close friend turned out to be transphobic
if they hated my ethnicity i wouldnt care since opinions are temporary and i have influence over their opinions as a person
Hmm sure ig
people say racist/sexist things all the time
I used to do that a lot but I realized it’s not really worth it
im not necessarily their to check theor behavior, just make sure they dont project it on people i care for
Like after a certain age the amount of ppl who change their bigoted views are low
And I respect someone trying to change em
But it ain’t gonna be me kek
yea but i dont care about bigotted views unless politician or unless they treat me different
its selfish i admit
I think helping normalizing such views is p bad too
Generally peoples views of you determine their treatment of you.
i dont though
i usually try to drop any conversation started about controversial topics
irl atleast
Idk how u can ignore your friend hating ppl like that
people stereotyped me a lot when i first went to school but i just got used to it
it still happens but all i can do is ignore it really
and esp going into math ik its going to happen more
You can't always ignore it though is the problem.
never has a friend been blatantly racist or sexist to me
Hmm I see
tell me what im supposed to do then?
adress a problem and ruin relationship prospects?
Idk if there's a right answer besides sticking up for yourself?
its silly honestly
I mean It depends on where you are
Like, at work if somebody doesn't like you enough they'll find reasons to get you in trouble or pass you up for things.
And what are your friendship prospects
You can't easily avoid that and just accepting it might make things worse for yourself.
Call me crazy, but unless i'm forced through work or something i wouldn't want to have friendship with shit people 😐
i can give two examples
I've seen these things happen at my old job.
I've also been discriminated against myself but never in a professional setting.
I always give ppl a piece of my mind if they are being bigoted, not always to my benefit
in my math classes i talked with some people just casual chatting. we get on topic of getting accepted and one person in group says you probably only got in because diversity and affirmative action. i just said yea because there is no reason for me to argue
like what would there be to gain for standing up for myself there
Yeah yikes that’s p racist
Yeah that's pretty messed up.
It could be why, not that I would say it but
yes always possibility
Don’t say that 8da, it’s extremely racist to imply ppl got in only bc of affirmative action
i dont know if its racist or misinformed
The saying of it contributes to making people feel unwelcome in an environment where they should feel welcome.
its offensive to say though
I know, I don't say it
But yeah so if you stood up for yourself. Like you would send the message that this isn’t okay
And unless where u r is insanely racist
You would probably get support
its a possibility but thats a small example
It's not exactly wrong to avoid conflict either tho.
Yeah like I understand the choice
But when that guy is your boss or something the issue gets more serious lol
yeah i wont really stand up for myself unless it involves me talking to a professor
I’m just saying that there is be if it to speaking up too
but even then its a hassle
i dont want to go out of my way to report someone for saying something
Like imagine how many other people that asshole probably racism’s. Like. I wouldn’t want that on my conscious ig
when i can just avoid them
People are assholes lol
ye thats what i realized overtime
and its inevitable that its going to be my proffesor some day
its happened in HS so its going to happen later jn my career
Like I get why you avoid the conflict
If they're your prof and they make comments like that you def have a reasonable complaint
i just hang with whoever watches anime or plays games/ works out usually
To like report to somebody or whatev
As long as colleges consider race, it is possible that someone got in "just because" of their race.
Alternatively we can have entrance exams like in Asia, but I'm not sure this will happen in the US anytime soon
This is a very uninformed. Idea 8da
What do you mean?
affirmative action doesnt even work lol
If you had entrance exams only rich privileged Asians and whites would get in lol
Tbh, less chances of bigotry at uni then at school
No poor ppl would get in p much
thats a lie im thinking
because even liberally behaving people say the weirdest shit
or they let something stereotypical slip
Maybe, but this seems "less racist" than explicitly considering race
No lmao
its less directed
If you have a system that pretty much garuntees that one race stays at bottom
That’s way more racist then adding some affirmative action
I think I just disagree with thay
its structurally more racist but less direct in how its executed
Yeah, I think the issue just comes from implying people have lesser value in some way partially due to race hence need extra accomodations.
There’s issues but at the end we need upward mobility
And like ignoring the socioeconomic issues is a sure fire way to garuntee nothing changes
There's also more than one way to implement policies that can be considered affirmative action policies.
Hey cultures also rough
I'm sure the effectiveness often at least partially depends on the implementation.
Like I think having parents that force u to study can be a strong determiner of success too
culture and social status are what keep most systemic racism going
And this can happen regardless of economic status
id say its pretty big
everyone in my college took SAT prep it seems
so someone spent 1k on test prep
I mean, is pretty established that sexism/racism have negative correlation with studies, even if still happens. And while sure as hell you'll still find that stuff, you will also probably find groups that advocate for your rights and stuff like that
It really depends on where u go ig
I guess it also depends on the country honestly, if someone on my class said something like that they would be ostracized damn quickly
the school i go to has very democratic views and is historically blue
i'm not on the states so can't say x)
also i dont even care about the comments as much as how strangers treat me
Yeah most liberals don’t recognize micro aggressions cause most ppl don’t think about these
Another reason to stand up, you might genuinely educate someone
What people say to you is part of how you are treated though lol.
i guess so
own classmates feel like strangers i guess
havent made any good friends with classmates, just aquianted
Yeah that’s sad. I’m sorry to hear the ppl in ur class are like that
no reason to be sorry lol
College classes to an extent are just being locked in rooms with strangers with a common goal of learning stuff lol.
It's not a totally bad thing
not in gen ed qq
Not in gen ed?
yup
ive made friends with math people but ive never had really good conversations outside of math
You're doing gen ed wrong then lol
Might as well make an effort to learn if you're paying for it.
Math is like the common thing that gets u together
what prof is locking your door
Then u can talk about other stuff from that
thats the thing though, im not
Like many math ppl are wee
Figurative lmao
yes
but at school they dont appear to be weebs
no one yet actually
maybe we are all closeted
yea but i cant be the one to start now
U
i actually actively avoid mentioning anime
are there any spanish weebs here
yes
or whatever the term is
because i have this ap spanish summer hw due tomorrow
and i haven't started it
Thonk
How so? You get grants and stuff right?
You spend those grants on classes.
yea its all paid for
You also spend your time.
i go to class
i get A- B+ in gen ed
but i dont want to invest srs time
into shit i cant care about
like reading political philosophy
I'm not saying invest every waking hour of your life to learn a new field.
or old russian plaaywrktes
Good thing my ap credit got rid of the gen Ed’s for me
I would have kms’d if I had to do many gen Ed’s lol
im junior year and i need two more
i finished my math bachelor requirement befoee gened
Oof nice
I mainly just mean that it's useful to see gen eds as an opportunity to learn something you might otherwise not learn.
i have internet dood
Eh like I like that dood but
Gen Ed’s taught in first yr are so dumb
I’d probably enjoying going deeper
Yes but when else will you set time aside to study political philosophy or russian playwrights? Lol
But also I don’t have that time
i wont since i will never care for that
it would be utterly fucking silly for me to care honestly speaking
Like if they taught the gen Ed’s with some higher level or rigor or smth idk I’d be into it
unless it struck an artistic chord
(First yr that is)
Idk if ppl can be totally sure of what they'll like in the future.
Agriculture
nice
i know i hate writing artistically and analysises
not that i have anything against that activity
but it impedes my goals
I mean you probably came to school to get a degree. That degree has some breadth requirement intended to make you well rounded in a sense. So in a sense you came to school to become academically well rounded (sort of).
Why?
its a bunch of bullshit
definitely
i dont remember any history from highschool
or ever recall it actively
and thats important history
gen ed is established to keep professors employed
and keep students busy
I don't think that's the whole purpose for gen ed.
thats my personal opinion atleast
if its to make people well rounded why is more weighting on humanities
and not math and science and engineering
or even history
Idk about your school but these things seem vaguely fairly weighted where I'm at.
oh really?
Because humanities are more relevant to your intellectual life speaking frankly
cap
i havent used an ounce of that knowledge anywhere
I think the issue isn't that stem is unfairly weighted I think there's just quite a lot of academic fields in general and stem is actually only a single part.
this is how you get mathematicians creating racially biased algorithms lmao
lol what
possibly
My point is that the idea that you should only focus on math and ignore everything else leads to such things
Even if ur just a random person having a solid understanding of history, being able to think about media critically, etc are a lot more relevant to things like uhhh
Making political decisions
no one said i need to do that
Also humanities majors do have required math classes that they probably will never use?
oh yes the one course of calc 1
and stats
meanwhile i take half their courses
in jewish studies
Arguably you do as a cs major. Why do you think so many cs programs require things like an ethics class now?
wait hold up im only doing math and please halt halt halt
Also again STEM is objectively speaking primarily relegated to occupational use
The exception being stats
Humanities courses are a lot more relevant when it comes to, like, being an informed member of society lol
i wouldnt mind optionally taking some gen ed classes
capicunrnicap
Oops I thought you were still doing cs lol. My bad.
I mean, people with your mindset won't take any humanities if they're optional
if your occupation is unrelated to chemistry then chemistry probably will not show up at all in your daily life
if someone studies any other course than math they take less gen ed
Most people who are not writers or historians still need to think critically about writing and history
i wouldnt take humanities id take things i care about
like agriculture
Yes that's the whole problem
why is this a problem
Well colleges would ideally like to leave their students with the ability to uhhh use their noggins 
nine9 back on agriculture
Also, I'd disagree that forcing you to take gen eds restricts how much math you can take. For me, work in gen eds required a different effort so that even if I would've had to take less gen eds, I probably couldn't have handled more math classes
My problem is every single gen ed i have taken from my school has been immensly bad lol
i agree which is part of problem
I think that flexibility in gen eds is cool and there are problems with like
Again, this is a problem because you end up with people that don't understand the broader societal impacts their work can have, e.g. the mathematicians who blindly created an algorithm that had racial biases
unmotivated students making the overall quality of learning/discussion worse
ok my main point is that math majors get fucked at my school while other majors dont. We have 32 gen ed credits and all the math courses combined only give 4 of them
But it seems just silly to insist that chemistry/physics occupies a similarly important position to history in terms of being a functioning and critical human in modern society the latter is obviously much more directly important/relevant
some humanities classes give 3 at a time
this and also the first yr gen eds are dumbed down considerably to the point where i just cannot care about the class
Hello
i doubt taking a gen ed class would prevent something like this but sure.
tbh if they made me go deeper on some gen eds id probably appreciate it more
This is why i like the schools that do it as like "do 1 class in department x, another in dept y, etc" 
So i can just do the cool stuff
What are we talking about today
thonk sounds better
gen ed
I mean, I took a gen ed on the impacts of slavery in society today, and obviously not everyone would take that but that definitely would help
Sociology, anthropology and history all could help prevent that stuff?

Philosophy and ethics in particular too.
also i went to a religious school so i dont get why i need to take philosophy or theology
the annoying user here lmao
tim o brain
tim the beaver
Ain’t that from Batman
lol

