#serious-discussion
1 messages Β· Page 448 of 1
right click (his name)
idk how to do it on controller
but its the interact button
ok the main questline they're giving me seems boring so i found the archery guild somehow and now i have to shoot some stuff
pog
kupo ratio
arch do math instead.
zoph pfp is the same color scheme as the mcdonald clown
"ratio"
no reactions except himself
i see no reactions on your original message
1 > 0 which means it was a successful ratio
average twitter user
i outrank you peasant
Not for long.

i should be given tenure at uoft so i can abuse my power to threaten namingtons career
it would be fun i think
@leaden torrent 

kupo
what is a "problem solving" course supposed to be about
i just signed up for one
π€ no idea what it do
is this like
competition math or something
Sounds like it
Euclidean geometry
Uni course
The contents seem to come parallel to something like Zeitz's Art and Craft of Problem Solving
looks like intro proofs tbh
That too, but calculus and geometry are unusual choices then I guess
i already took the intro proofs course i really hope we aren't proving anything
π

it looks like the intro proofs here
What if this is pre intro proofs
which does stuff that students struggle with in analysis/linear algebra
so just pick some stuff from wtv class and do it

is one-credit a lot?
intro proofs light
π the actual intro proofs class is 3 credits here
so basically
this should be trivial or something
Why are you even taking it?
Minus possibly geometry I don't even think there's anything you don't know already lol
its 10 hard problems a week and we have to do any two of them for hw
that's it
thats the whole class
π ok
just do all of them to assert dominance
you know what i might still do it just for the practice or something if they don't take too much time

this professor also does putnam related activities too which is why i thought this was like a competition maths class or something
it seemed more like a "here's an assortment of cool elementary problem solving techniques" rather than "here's how to solve basic mathematical problems"
inb4 whats the difference

ok this class seems harmless so i guess ill just keep it unless i realize it's taking more time away from me than i really want
i don't expect it to be a problem though
π€·ββοΈ
cool
Metal burnout speedrun
why not take actually useful classes
idk i already have all the "useful" classes that i want
Just do all of them in 5 minutes and submit to assert your omega status
I'm already 70% into my burnout speedrun 
i don't understand how this at all equates to me not taking useful classes?
it's one credit and only meets once a week
Taking a class because it isn't a bad class is not a good reason to take a class
i see
i see
yeah idk i never did stuff like this though before so i thought that it would be a harmless idea to just get extra practice in
i didn't do "problem solving" in highschool or whatever
You're doing it real time with the math classes you take so 
i doubt im going to take the putnam so it's not really practice for anything but i guess just to be able to solve problems if i get them
idk
for fun
but yeah ill be open to dropping it if it takes too much time
from fun stuff
okey
oh okay
that sounds like a good policy
i should do that
okay i guess what ill do is take the first week to try these courses and see if i really want to deal with them
congrats on joining the putnam team metal
π
Metal do you not have enough classes you actually want to take
That you consider taking a class just cause it isn't bad?
gjkfdsgfd
Bruh I have so many classes I wanna take
That I don't have room for them all in my schedule
i do too but like they're not going to line up
i have to fit them into sucessive years
and this year 2 is like the dead period that idk what to do with
right now i have real analysis (abbott) algebra (d&f) fourier analysis (s&s) and a math methods for physics class
physics π€’
on top of that i have these two tiny 1 credit/once a week meeting classes which should be minimal work
Sully me all you want
won't change my mind
physics as taught to undergrads is abysmal
What are those on
one of them is just a presentation class where u get assigned a proof and u make a powerpoint on it and share to the class on ur assigned day
literally trivial work
then the other one is the one i talked about earlier
where its problem solving and the class is just u get a problemset and u just need to do a couple problems from it
this should also be light
that's so odd
It's an even sem
14 credits so its even
How much real anal,algebra and Fourier do you know as of now
i already took a semester of babby algebra this past spring
I have absolutely no idea how to translate us college credits into our system
we learned minimal group theory stuff
Did you do group actions
bruh
we used gallian π€’
What about real anal
i don't think i know any
for fourier i probably don't know a lot either but ive done computations of fourier series for some SL operator memery
So like in these 2 weeks you can do one of 2 things
- learn one or two or all these topics
- Do something completely different as a "break" of sorts
True, I respect that
gdshjkghj
probably this one
i will collect enough energy to destroy the next two semesters
it will be grand
just need to rest ig
What

hype

how do i join empty2 math forum

what
based class β
based prof β
based uni β
based metal β


you guys ever do 2^3 = 6
^

you guys ever do 2*3 = 6

I haven't done a calculation in years
Happens sometimes
based
so it means, its prepared with a very successfull point.
based is dual of cringe
the pointed space doesnβt have a dual space
cringe is pointed space?
Yes, #serious-discussion does get rather difficult to read, sometimes.
Very complicated shit going on in here.
there's so much bullshit notation baked in to this proof that I'll need to send like 3 pages just so someone could understand the notation
it's something very trivial probably
Hatcher, I presume? 

Hatcher moment
Just draw urself about 10 pages worth of material
Just abandon Hatcher.
I'm going insane
||Chapters 0 and 1||
I can't take this
When Toki doesn't understand something at first glance 
Just give up on fill rigor
And just go full intuition
The rigor will come eventually
nonono I've stared at this paragraph for ages and I still don't get it
what's for ages? 
yeah I would like to do it but I can't understand this intuitively either
@errant kiln for ages = for a long time
I've been stuck on a single one of Riehl's weird diagrams for like 12h 
deets nuts
Toki what is it
it's like a proof that a sequence of homology groups is exact
stuff with like relative homology
I don't really know how I should write it down because I'm too noob with latex
oof. Hatcher writes at the end of the proof that "this theorem represents the beginnings of the subject of homological algebra" lmao
A simple visual editor for creating commutative diagrams.
I think I'm almost at relative homology tho since I just did snake lemma
Tho idk since this chapter still has a while and after this there's the excision axiom
snake.
the diagram chasing stuff is v fun when doing for the first time
like snek lemma, the 5 lemma zigzag etcetc
It's novel to say the least
Tho I stared at one part for like 15 minutes
Cuz he didn't really write out the details
Exactness does some funky stuff
yeah its fun working the details tho
% https://q.uiver.app/?q=WzAsNyxbMiwwLCJIX24oQSkiXSxbNCwwLCJIX24oWCkiXSxbNiwwLCJIX24oWCwgQSkiXSxbOCwwLCJIX3tuLTF9KEEpIl0sWzEwLDAsIkhfe24tMX0oWCkiXSxbMCwwLCJcXGNkb3RzIl0sWzEyLDAsIlxcY2RvdHMiXSxbMCwxLCJpXyoiXSxbMSwyLCJqXyoiXSxbMiwzLCJcXHBhcnRpYWwiXSxbMyw0LCJpXyoiXSxbNSwwXSxbNCw2XV0=
[\begin{tikzcd}
\cdots && {H_n(A)} && {H_n(X)} && {H_n(X, A)} && {H_{n-1}(A)} && {H_{n-1}(X)} && \cdots
\arrow["{i_}", from=1-3, to=1-5]
\arrow["{j_}", from=1-5, to=1-7]
\arrow["\partial", from=1-7, to=1-9]
\arrow["{i_*}", from=1-9, to=1-11]
\arrow[from=1-1, to=1-3]
\arrow[from=1-11, to=1-13]
\end{tikzcd}]
Tokidoki β
I'm just afraid I'm reading too much at once and not retaining
Lmao
Hurewicz theorem was pretty tough
Like it all adds up but it just seems to hit you out of left field
And you just gotta stare at simplices till it makes sense
kek
If j is the connecting homomorphism shouldn't it be Hn-1?
wait in my post?
I have forgotten all of my homology lol
Ye
How do I fix the latex stuff
Just edit your post
should relearn soon from tom dieck 
% https://q.uiver.app/?q=WzAsNyxbMCwwLCJcXGNkb3RzIl0sWzEsMCwiSF9uKEEpIl0sWzIsMCwiSF9uKFgpIl0sWzMsMCwiSF9uKFgsIEEpIl0sWzQsMCwiSF97bi0xfShBKSJdLFs1LDAsIkhfe24tMX0oWCkiXSxbNiwwLCJcXGNkb3RzIl0sWzAsMV0sWzEsMiwiaV8qIl0sWzMsNCwiXFxwYXJ0aWFsIl0sWzQsNSwiaV8qIl0sWzIsMywial8qIl0sWzUsNl1d
[\begin{tikzcd}
\cdots & {H_n(A)} & {H_n(X)} & {H_n(X, A)} & {H_{n-1}(A)} & {H_{n-1}(X)} & \cdots
\arrow[from=1-1, to=1-2]
\arrow["{i_}", from=1-2, to=1-3]
\arrow["\partial", from=1-4, to=1-5]
\arrow["{i_}", from=1-5, to=1-6]
\arrow["{j_*}", from=1-3, to=1-4]
\arrow[from=1-6, to=1-7]
\end{tikzcd}]
Tokidoki β
fuuuuck


so i_* is induced by the inclusion, j_* is induced by the quotient map and A is a subspace of X
holy moly that is super fancy
and this guy is supposed to be exact
that may be nice to me but I can't read those 
I think it's a T.
yeah same lmao
But I have no idea what the other one is supposed to be.
yeah I would guess that it's a T but idk
I absolutely hate these kinds of letters.

Anything more complicated than mathcal fonts is just too hard for me to write by hand 
it might be an f idk
I might actually have to post that in latex help or smth 
I can't read without talking in my head, and I can't talk in my head if I don't know which letter that is 
Is it from the mathrsfs package?
Looks a bit like i or j?
Idk if the pic in this helps: https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/58098/what-are-all-the-font-styles-i-can-use-in-math-mode
wait yeah same I've gotten a few already too
It's so exciting
I got one today about metallic ratios
Wait Megan Chang-Lee is at Brown
She's really cool
Zoph
oh right right
yeah she's cool, I talked with her a bit
she gave a presentation on ratatouille
How does real analysis change you as a mathematician? What's the key differences between a student who has only taken Calc 1-3 and then a student who has taken real analysis?
Rigor and perpsective
What do you mean by rigor?
Proof based math
is it the hardest math course in your opinion?
How big a step up is it from calc to real analysis
its just viewed as hard by a lot of students because it is a jump in they way you think about math, things need to be quite carefully justified that you might have previously taken for granted.
and a lot of a first course in analysis will involve proving things that were "intuitively obvious" to you. but you will then start to see why this is necessary when you start to come across things that are intuitively obvious but false, and things that are intuitively impossible but true.
point is that your intuition is actually quite bad until you do some groundwork that some (like jesse) can find boring, and some others find hard.
how is that a shot?
i am joking
is it wrong to say real analysis is just proof based calc?
Well
It depends on what you mean by calculus
Analysis is generally a bit broader than just calculus
oh
maybe im thinkng of a different topic
unless real analysis happens to involve lots of calc and then some
it is wrong to say that yes, analysis is a whole sprawling field of rigorous math
it is wrong to say that, but it's also how I would describe it briefly to a non-math person
it happens to be the field of math that is required to make calculus rigorous, but this does not really define it.
well i guess what else dose it involve that would be outside the scope of calc
or is it more like it is applicable to lots of things and helps a lot with the ideas behind calc
functional analysis, harmonic analysis, fourier analysis etc
so when you start one of this intro to real analysis do you start with some general axioms
to build upon
like "what is a number"
like what is a "real number"
yep, defining the real numbers properly is a common and natural starting point for a course in real/complex analysis, which is the usual first course one takes in this field.
because a few facts in calculus like the extreme value theorem can only be properly proved once you carefully define the reals, as they use a subtle property the real numbers enjoy that (say) the rationals do not.
maybe a dumb question but obvious we work in base ten but other than switching back to base 10 when doing calculations does real analysis work with different bases
Say I wont to integrate x^2 but maybe x is number in a differnt base or something idk
yes the only role "base" plays is in the encoding of a real number as a decimal expression on our page
the underlying set of real numbers is the same and their properties are the same
Man idk it seems really hard to think of a number without a base 10 representation. Like when we convert bases isn't most of the case we have an intermediate part were we representation the number in base 10 again
Say going from binary to hex
I assume most would do binary -> base 10 -> hex
Why
Maybe just me
Idk well maybe just any base to another base
Maybe I did a bad example
Thereβs an algorithm
Seeing 2^4 = 16
Yeah
Hex<-> binary is very easy
Because you read the binary in groups of 4
And then just do the conversion in chunks
er do you mean like
1/3?
i mean one that brings up a good question about doing something like 1/3 in a differnt base but idk i was more talking about like say you are converting from something like base 7 to base hex
But thinking about it maybe it is just because I am using the number involved in base 10 that i feel i am representing the number in base 10 before completely converting it to another base when i might not be
I need help monki brains
Which looks better?
Can Caedrel and his team take down this Illaoi
Please Like, Comment and Subscribe for more of the best League of Legends highlights everyday.
Make sure to check out everyone featured in my clips and to support them on all socials.
Credit: twitch.tv/caedrel
#lolclips #lolhighlights #LeagueOfLegends
@astral marsh
Fed illaoi πΏ
who fed>
I did :gigachad:
what's the meaning of this?

Contemplation of the Royal Goose
i read that as the constipation of the Royal Goose
golden egg
@fervent flame
I remember on youtube there was this guy called "Aleph Null" who changed his channel name to "Aleph 0" now.
He had a video called "how to teach yourself pure mathematics" and now its just disappeared off the face of youtube
Anyone know what happened?
pure mathematics was cancelled
yes i remember that video
it had his face in it and so its possible he didnt want to have it uploaded
since all of his new videos are just w the paper stuff
the paper stuff
i think its called "paper"
yes but the style of his videos is paper stuff
like minutephysics is whiteboard stuff

personally i prefer computer stuff
i prefer rubber stuff
I prefer cave paintings.
Everyone knows the only way to properly communicate maths is using manim and copying 3b1b's cadence
Else why is everyone doing it if it isn't
lolol
Also using relaxing piano music is a.major key
videos on graduate level mathematics but using whatever animation script 3b1b uses
I've seen vids like that nG
It's pretty neat but it feels extremely derivative
Wait were you agreeing with my point
conversely, Thurston would typically give lectures where he only drew pictures on the board, not a single number or letter
read ega aloud but put random manim animations in the background

taht is what every intro logic lecture is like slim
its just . an entire board of words
the fucking pi's with eyes scratching their symbolic heads looking at the sheaf gluing condition
Is dry erase board fine
If you wave your hands too.much you end up.looking like a physics professor
have u never followed ur prof around after class to ask them questions
thats what its like
they just talk
following profs after class is where the best stuff happens
seminar idea: you're not allowed to use any visual media, the entire talk has to be verbal
that sounds fun ng
honestly yea
Honestly I almost never look at the board when taking notes
italians:
seminar idea: speakers are chosen on the spot, as a means of catching people unprepared
hardcore variant: you're not allowed to prepare your talks, they have to be completely improvised
yeah i need to be able to gesture to talk about math tbf
Profs reiterate the important points enough verbally rhat I usually just have ti listen and occasionally glance up
but it would be pretty funny to try it as a joke seminar
italian moment
me too though
new math party game
that
Seminar idea: no talking allowed, can't write more than a full sentence at a time on the board
pick a person in the room and 2 random mathematical words
make them present a "talk" on those words
lmao
I mean it can't be that random, otherwise you just get people giving shitty talks
theres that website that generates things like that right
"James, youre up for Harmonic Cofibrations"
i dont remmeber what its called
"Go"

Ok let's randomly choose someone, say clerk. And let's just think up some random words
Uhhh
'Homotopy Type Theory'
Sounds silly enough
lol
so funny story, I made a tweet about this hellish idea for a seminar and my advisor actually took the suggestion seriously and almost ran it
until too many people got intimidated by the idea

Your advisor follows you on twitter?
yes lol
What was the idea
so I guess his interpretation of the seminar idea wasn't quite as brutal as what I was suggesting
I do actually want to try running the hardcore version and see what happens
Was it about polytopes?
another hardcore variant: you're only allowed to talk about topics you haven't thought about for 6+ months
rediscover your memories as you speak
What if youβve never thought about it to begin with
even better
Hell yeah

2016 meme
I feel like these are my professors sometimes but try 6 years instead of 6 months

I feel like that when helping in questions-0 sometimes
Why specifically 0
some of the weird ass conventions high school courses use man
sometimes I just go to #calculus and #linear-algebra and look at the latest question
to see if I can still do it
it's almost always intro lin alg questions
not that I think those are bad questions
I do
most of #linear-algebra is me being baffled by row reduction being nontrivial
Intro linalg is taught badly in most places
i still dont get how students struggle with it
I don't, lin alg is really different from all math most of those people have ever done before
With too much emphasis on computation and matrix algebra without understanding the underlying structure
i guess that makes me a bad LA teacher
I do hate computational lin alg being taught first
cant sympathise with the students
I can sympathize with them, but can't empathize
My uni has a proof based linalg course in the first semester
For maths majors
Also our calculus equivalent courses focus a lot more of theory and proofs than computations
That's how it should be honestly
row reduction really just is the exact same algebra people use to do simultaneous equations all of high school, but variables are swapped in favor of columns
it really don't be that much of an abstraction
Fr
it is a bit baffling how some people just dont get it forever
"whats the next step in the row reduction?"
"idk"
"well, what do you think will get you closer to upper triangular form?"
"idk"
"okay, lets take the 5 entry. how can you make that 0?"
"idk"
"theres multiple ways, you can pick any one you like"
"but what do i do"
"do you remember what the three basic row operations are?"
"yes"
"so which one will help get rid of the 5?"
"idk"

why does row reduction though?
This is unironically me with smith normal form
if you want to solve equations, just use a computer 
smith normal form is the devil's invention
I remember I saw that exchanging rows doesn't change the whole system of equation which makes sense
We used it to prove the fundamental theorem of finitely generated abelian groups
"whats the next step in the row reduction?"
"idk"
"well, what do you think will get you closer to upper triangular form?"
"idk"
"okay, lets take the 5 entry. how can you make that 0?"
"idk"
"theres multiple ways, you can pick any one you like"
"but what do i do"
"do you remember what the three basic row operations are?"
"yes"
"so which one will help get rid of the 5?"
"idk"
The prof didn't wanna give the general algorithm cuz it's awful so we did a 'proof by example'
idk
smith normal form's existence and usage in proofs is perfectly fine
smith normal form actual computations
is cancer
what the fuck is a Smith normal form
First question after that lesson was 'We're not gonna have to do this kind of bs in the exam right'
close that last fucking quotation bitch
Thankfully we didn't have to
or im banning
What
I thought that was Jordan or rational
Depending on the kind of decomposition you do of the modules
(editado)
You use the structure theorem to prove the existence of RCF


it's a diagonal matrix where each diagonal entry divides the next one down
Oh
and it gives you like the minimal polynomial and factors and shit
which then gives you the jcf or whatever
it's really hyper cringe to actually compute the smith normal form by hand ever
the picture I posted is the only time I ever did it
it's just not a useful skill to have
like as long as you know that snf exists
and what it is
Smf.
you should be fine
Smdf.
βbuilds characterβ
Snf snf.
Saturday night fLive
j
j
kicked but then they came back posted one j and left
idk if they came back again tho
k
no
like without repeating things and without editado
clears throat
nah
C

fujjing normie formie
oog
I'm going to go shower
Good luck
have fun
Be careful
can i come?
Yea don't accidentally slip and crack your head open and die
And make it look like an accident
What's the opposite of extend?
restrict 
imtend
F
f
F
And you extend it by doing g βF
\circ F
foe
Sush
β
coextend
Would it be pretend?

I've seen it called pullback of F along g
Not to be confused with cat pullbacks
F β g that is
What does this mean

Compress
unextend
Contract
squiz
Do you think math is misunderstood?
I mean people seem to think that mathematics is only all about algebra and calculus
Yes
Trivago.
hontel
bontel
if theyre teaching a topology course.
what do you mean by topology?
Yes. Students must praise 1 DONUT = 1 COFFIS CUP
homotopy groups of spheres? no. but like, euler characteristic of 2D orientable manifolds? i guess you could, but why?
how
just state it as a fact?
itll seem random af
and how do you assign like
homework problems
i mean, that's how that level of math class is taught anyway lmao
but like, kids learn geometry
they learn things about like vertices, edges, and faces
sure but what does a euler char exam question look like
if your kids cant prove
a euler? an euler?
an makes more sense
but looks wrong
idk what you think middle school math exams look like anyway lol
yes, give them some CW complex and ask for the euler characteristic
"State the definition of Euler Characteristic"

why sully, that's no less deep than what else they're being asked to do
it's all random anyway lol
sort of separately but also sort of related, i feel like middle schoolers could discuss questions like
could an ant living on a donut tell that it wasn't living on a sphere?
Isn't V-E+F=2 thing also called Euler Characteristic
Or are these the same thing
Somehow

For polyhedra
math teachers should focus on teaching subjects that are an appropriate level to their students.
1 donught = 1 elliptic cuve
2 donuts = 2 pentagons
idk
Topology of the set {{}} maybe
Excuse for field trip to trampoline park
Already covered by general relativity for high/midschoolers

I mean even if you could teach your class topology
bro just give them this video like it's not even hard bro https://youtu.be/aewo8otGAAQ
BUT DONUT EQUALS COFFEE CUUUUUUUUUP


COFFIS
I mean that's the scam they start with
I don't mean teaching a full-course about topology.. I just mean speaking about it and let the children know that it exists and math is more than X and Y

I think standard discrete math/proof stuff would do it
Generally a lot of students confuse applied math for pure math
I remember watching that video a loooong time ago and I was so incredibly confused lmao
Learning topology to understand category's theory nonsense. Based motivation tbh
I hope you understand all of it now toki π
At least you're not doing it the other way. Learning category theory to understand topology nonsense. That'd be cringe
yes, but how would you describe topology to students in a way that is both representative and understandable
I do except for the motivation 
you dont
Motivation is nonsense 
every attempt to popularize topology has ended up summarizing hlaf a lecture of alg top at best
(with no proofs)
Abstract algebra topology analysis fractals non-euclidean Geometry. people don't know anything about them I just want to let people know that they are exist
ONE DONUT EQUALS ONE COFFIS CUP.
I think Tadashi Tokaida has an interesting Topology and Geometry playlist online, but it would still probably only be accessible to motivated HSers.
As a teacher
I am motivated now
Manam
Did you watch the ring theory lectures
Moldim
The best motivation for topology is Poincare's original Analysis Situs paper

noneuclidean geometry is a standard topic to go over briefly at my high school
I'm working through groups rn
π© β
Abstract algebra topology analysis fractals non-euclidean Geometry
wow fractals really hit me like a curveball there
In parallel? 
I don't think anybody is more interested in math after experiencing our short week of spherical geometry, probably the opposite.
thanks for keeping me on my toes
Poincare was so fuccking cool
The Algebra 1 course from IMSc is going in the groups->rings->modules progression so 
When I get to the rings bit I'll go back and forth

Also the linear algebra assignment by IISc is bruhhhh
These papers provided the first systematic treatment ofΒ topologyΒ and revolutionized the subject by using algebraic structures to distinguish between non-homeomorphicΒ topological spaces, founding the field ofΒ algebraic topology.[3]Β PoincarΓ©'s papers introduced the concepts of theΒ fundamental groupΒ andΒ simplicial homology, provided an early formulation of theΒ PoincarΓ© dualityΒ theorem, introduced theΒ EulerβPoincarΓ© characteristicΒ forΒ chain complexes, and raised several important conjectures, including the celebratedΒ PoincarΓ© conjecture, which was later proven as a theorem. The 1895 paper coined the mathematical term "homeomorphism".
I don't think the average high school student has any interest in pure mathematics, and forcing introductions upon them probably ain't gonna help
I'll share
if anything we should be actively disincentivizing pursuing pure math
for their own good
Let's start by cutting nami's funding
Based
Change starts at home
as if i get any funding
Sounds like gatekeeping
i should find some ridiculously specific techy niche and write a $20 program on a site i host with 2003-era html
and edit it into all the wikipedia pages
Pog
Guerilla marketing
this is what most hex editors are like
discrete math might be cool to have in high school though
and theres like 15 competing hex editors despite vs supporting it natively
so like
I never really look at my exercise solutions after I write them tbh
there must be a market
for this shit
hell i could make a poweriso alternative that does literally the same thing except its "mount" button is in a more sensible place
and make a killing off that
@south summit I DM'd Moldilocks
ill be your first customer
Wait no
Then I check tomorrow when I am on pc lol

What is this coldilocks/moldilocks issue
People send stuff to moldi thinking that's my alt
When it's really saketh's alt pretending to be my alt

so true
So I would have to mail him and ask to forward whatever manan sent him and I only write mails from pc

im being gaslit by wojak rn
hm

12 squared :)
This is yours? You building the pdf?
Yes
I thought there was some program so that you dont need to rebuild each page
I use arara
nope nvm
But im not understanding what is so odd about this
I think thats mostly at the length of the document
It is very long
and still expanding
Owo
is that the stuff youre working on w the prof at columbia or whatever moth
hopefully not
anywhere but uoft
No jesse its just ridiculously long atiyah macdonald notes
i have to email the prof later today and ask for topics so i can start writing lol
oh no this is just notes/solutions im doing on my own
Yea
well it will probably be something expository connected to etale pi_1 of curves
no schemes schemes scary

i am applying early to harvard
then if i dont get in i will apply ED to uchicago
uchicago has like a second round of ED
yea im a rising senior
Woke
They probably are
envied
they are.
do essays or regret
state schools moment
Lol i think this proof is invalid
Atiyah macdonald moment
i dunno if ill get aid
i guess ill see
Hope so
Money please
moneys pls
probability is scary
Hurb
a_i in A_n-ki
Ok but how do u knwo that the a_i x_i are n A_n

very true.
my dear watson
is it bad
Oh
I liked the DVR chapter
I mean its not really hard to understand
or written confusingly
_> he is just doing graded things
why are u trying to bankrupt me
Lol
but i am applying to berkeley yes
They have scholarships for talents
I checked and i couldnt find any
UCLA has a full ride for a math scholarship
Rip

I did they said to ask again at the end of the summer
well i emailed the math dept
idk i dont remember who exactly
Go to department head
Based
Whether it is 2022 or 2026 is too far ahead for me to give you a definitive answer. I can only tell you that this is not an endowed scholarship which means the money is supporting this scholarship is not guaranteed. We go year by year and should have an answer for students by the end of summer for the Class of 2022.
this is how connie from math advising answered
Yeah Connie sucks
One of my former classmates came out as trans at UCLA
He runs an LGBTQ thing in math at la
Er she sorry
I am a little drunk
@jovial ember 
One beer is enough to get me a strong buzz now
Work lunch break is almost over lol
it seems like dimension theory would be important
to know
thats the last chapter so i should probably finish the book
i would be suffering less if this proof was correct

yah
go to chicago
and become maryanthes student
idk if harvard has anyone
moth u can go and raid woodins office and publish all his unpublished results

its time
its for the greater good
yeah hence why i said cringe ultra
i dont know any of those people
and clearly i know the field very well.
isnt mazur like a pop math author or smth
slim i dont know any other fields of math
or well
to the point where i would know names in the field
moth do u want to do a senior thesis
does uchicago do senior theses
i wanna do a senior thesis but i actually dont know if anyone at uoft does them
yeah but that list is bullshit moth so dont worry
even if a place i go doesnt do them i can still find other ways to work w/ people
right
set theory seems very male dominated 
yeah
im sure you can just get a reading course that ends up being a senior thesis lol
poggies
its the same thing?
Wait what's the common denominator of these people?
Arithmetic geometers?
they are in the logic group at harvard
Why is Barry Mazur in that list?
I though Harvard had exactly one logic person and that was Woodin
Well
Yeah
That's why this list seems very sketchy to me
are there any schools in the US with a high concentration of model theorists actually
Notre Dame?
By high I mean like 2-3 or smth
CMU sort of...
But yeah I tend to think of logic as a midwestern thing
Notre Dame I remember from the visit having a good logic group
its so weird that mcmaster has a bunch
the only person i know at uiuc is marker
quick question - which channel should i discuss cellular automata, particularly rule 30?
caroline terry? looks like they r at OSU now 
I actually came very close to going there lol
looks recent
i wouldnt mind going to uiuc 
there was a guy from uiuc that came to my talk lol
Hegel you should ignore the top schools and just apply to UW Madison so I can be your TA
idk if they'll want me at princeton tho
What was the error
also i dont want to go to princeton
Dami ur a chill TA right
he was an undergrad
I dont want to go to princeton either tbh
Honestly I prob won't TA you but yeah my students generically like me?
i don't remember his name
it doesnt sound like a great culture
serves him right
I was trying to describe a lexographic order on the first digit in Q and I said (3, 2) < (1, 2)
it was so fucking stupid
he knew what i meant

Lmao what a bitch
threw me off so hard lmao
That's a pretty bitch move
Also I may have tricked them into thinking for a second that their practice test (which was just for learning the tech) was gonna count for a real grade
And freaked them out for a moment
what schools
That was funny
Tru
harvard = chicago in my mind
a lot of ppl get into uchicago from my school
but hjarvard seems more cringe
i might have a decent chance






