#serious-discussion
1 messages Ā· Page 440 of 1
ok jmask is now based
Also heaven's feel was screened as each movie came out
I have only heard bad things about fate , but I guess I understand now
Akira
except its animation
fate/zero is ok
Tekkon Kinkreet
fate/stay night is bad pornography with a 100 hour story attached
That's all anime moth
i legit read that as tekken kink street

Sometimes the story is less than 100 hours
It's supposed to be a misspelling of tekken concrete
oh
I think
oof
I thought movie screenings would be Your Name or any other Makoto Shinkai
but it turns out
the club was based
Oh yeah there was one time when members went for that new movie by shinkai
The one 2 years ago
weathering with you?

Makoto Shinkai movies have good soundtrack and animation but the plot is always lacking imo
True probably
except for 5 cm per second which is ok
I didn't like that one
I didn't watch it ofc
Like, just concept wise
You know being an anime movie and all

Based

Makoto Shinkai movies are breathtaking
Oh google says that the idea is that its a child mispronouncing tekkin konkurito
I love Weathering with You
That makes more sense
they are breathtaking but they don't have a plot behind the aesthetic
like a solid plot
I think they look pretty but I dont really enjoy shinkais directing enough for that to sustain me through a full film
Weathering With You (Tenki no Ko) OST - Is There Still Anything That Love Can Do?
Anime Film "Weathering With You" Main Theme Song
RADWIMPS - Is There Still Anything That Love Can Do?
Lyrics: https://www.lyrical-nonsense.com/lyrics/radwimps/ai-ni-dekiru-koto-wa-mada-aru-kai/
Buy/Stream:
Digital release: https://linkco.re/ttApMFNy
CDJapan: http...
Your name was good
I love RADWIMPS and even their other non Shinkai work
yeah your name is an exception to that as well tbh
Was it
I thought your names plot was pretty bad and totally fell apart for the third act
Your Name was cute
from shinkai movies
Yes it doesn't make sense that they never checked the date on their iphones
made me tear up
I dont really care about plot that much
But ignoring that
As long as it's not stupid
Was decent
Im fine with things having not amazing plots if they look interesting but Shinkais films arent actually like visually exciting to me
like 5 cm per second is probably considered the best plot (except for the 2 fantasy movies)
but it is very weird depression for the sake of it
They are perfectly animated
Yeah but thats kind of it
I usually just come away with the impression that a lot of time and money was spent on them
Which is like neat i guess
Its beautiful
weathering with you made me tear up as well even though I did not really like it that much but it had to do with some triggers Shinkai uses
Lmao fate zero desc is amazing
Maybe i should rewatch wicked city
actually what i should really do is finally watch ninja scroll
that movie looks like it fucks
since we have super elitist weebs in here
grand escape was really good
it was , and it was well used
Im not an elitist weeb smh
how many epsiodes ? or seasons?
bruh you have a whole list?
I just want some anime similar
i mean i asked you how many
i haven't watched NHk too
I just like watching depressing anime , makes me feel good about myself
what about welcome to the nhk do you like
wait , have you watched it or not?
I'm the type of guy who watches Shinkai films multiple times in theaters 
idk I like watching people lose
in anime
like even gambling anime where people lose it all
thats kind of vague lol
Do you just want a show where shitty things happen to people
watch wipeout
just emotionally shitty things
have you watched hyouka nyann?
yes
good things happen in that show
he potentially gets a girl out of laziness
did not like
wait isn't it the opposite
Hyouka 
||nah he proposes in the LN , its meta||
I thought some new hyouka season had come out while i wasnt looking before i realized nyann is the person i am talking to
Moldi you can admit to being a weeb, you wouldn't be discriminated against here
oh damn

I actually liked it and wanted one more episode tbh

If I were a weeb I would discriminate against myself
What anime movies do you like @blazing pawn

What genre/kind
I'm not scared of you
or is anything fine
and Kyoto Animations always does good animation tbh
Any
Oh i have a list let me post
speaking of kyoto animations , have you watched beyond the boundary?
self hating tendencies are common among degenerates and incels maybe you're onto something here


I don't think so
but I have probably tried
because I remember
a good friend recommended
this to me
I tried watching it
yes I remember
dropped after 1st episode
did not like the plot
Now I'm listening to all the Weathering with you songs
me too
its fantasy
I am not too much into fantasy
i see
tokyo ghoul season 3 , not good tbh

till season2 it was good
they wasted a good series
at least the opening was great
season 1 is not that bad in my memory since it was one of my first anime
but season 2 they just started skipping 4 chapters
the plot was moving at a weird pace
some of it did not even make much sense
season 3 totally didn't make any sense
I don't even remember season 3
when kaneki changes to haise
i dropped it after a few episodes in season 3
Ghost in the shell, wicked city, galaxy express 999, the patlabor movies, end of eva, anything ghibli obviously, kizumonogatari, utena film!, cowboy bebob movie, perfect blue, anything satoshi kon has made really but especially perfect blue paprika and sennen jouyo, angels egg
Uh
Im trying not to go into things that are just my own sick personal taste that i dont think most people would like
like toki no tabibito
@bronze pelican
haven't watched even one in this list 
Watch ghost in the shell
I have watched anything ghibli obviously
Everyone should see ghost in the shell
I watched paprika and perfect blue I think
oh alright
I just remember those Movies didnt make sense 
yeah but they made me happy
I don't remember not smiling through any ghibli movie
EoE is just kimochi warui
kimochi warui
yamin im doing a thing where i watch one movie released every year from 1979 to today 
er 1980

I was going to watch perfect blue
don't know why I never watched it
is it about a loser as well?
Oh nice
Its about an idol who gets stalked by an obsessive fan and her slowly deteriorating mental state
im watching the ashita no joe film
the first one
its kinda good at times but its also SO LONG
I like watching anime movies with friends
You are the idol and the person stalking you is baratoth
Lmao
sadly most of my friends don't even know what anime is
Make them watch anime movies with you
i made like two of them to start watching anime š

Where can I meet such based fwends?
me too
Drake moment
inb4 classmate
good
leave it that way
You guys watch anime?
Okay so I know the "Galois correspondence" between covering spaces and fundamental groups, but what are the applications of this? Can I maybe compute fundamental groups with this or what can I even do with this? So the fundamental group of the circle is Z and it has only aZ as subgroups. Can I maybe use this "hint" to show that the fundamental group of the circle is Z with this correspondence?
@thorn brook have you seen the isomorphism of pi_1 of the base space and automorphisms of the universal cover
no I don't think so unfortunately
okay maybe I should read further before asking questions lmao
whats the precise statement of the galois correspondence in hatcher again
okay wait I will send a picture
The theorem in the bottom
and the proposition in the bottom
Honestly toki you should be able to say the statements without having to send the photo 
but it's so long
Like it's fine if you miss a couple conditions
But like you should know what the bijection is
And shouldn't have to go back for applications
Like if you describe the bijection for field extensions
Why does hatcher not utilise paragraphs 
You would say something like subgroups of the gal grp are in bijection with intermediate field extensions
You should be able to say what the sets are in the bijection
And hopefully also say what the maps going both ways are
Oh so hatcher hasnt done the "covers are pi_1(X, x)-sets" yet
I hope he does do that
He does later yeah
yeah I get that moldi and I do remember the statements but I was too lazy and too scared to state it because if I miss a detail then someone might get angry or somethiing lmao
That'd be me yes 
did hatcher talk about galois covers and stuff?
Lol then it's ok I'm just saying you should know what sets the bijection is between
or just subcovers of like, the universal cover 
I think he does
well I haven't read the whole section but so far, Hatcher has only talked about universal covers
but like I said, I haven't read the whole section yet so trust moldi instead
nice, i like galois covers bc its like p much the same condition as galois extensions

"So the fundamental group of the circle is Z and it has only aZ as subgroups. Can I maybe use this "hint" to show that the fundamental group of the circle is Z with this correspondence?" but I'm still kind of thinking about this. What if you took pi_1(S¹) and only looked at the subgroups and then show that the subgroup must be of the form aZ?
or something idk
well the problem is that in general groups arent determined by their subgroups
yeah okay that's true
Though actually there is a special related case where this does work out 
Is that true
Feels like every group should be a direct limit of its subgroups
No
Consider Z
Yeah lmao

Direct limit in what sense
but if I show that every subgroup of pi_1(S¹) is generated by one element, doesn't that imply that pi-1(S¹) is an infinite cyclic group or something?
Like you take directed diagram of all the subgroups
With inclusions
But just realised that that includes the group itself 
no
Z2 x Z2
Maybe if I make it all finitely generated subgroups
ah well crap
direct limit of subgroups with inclusion maps is i think just union
No that's only if you take an omega diagram
I have no idea what that is
But anywhere there are distinct groups who have the same subgroups
Oh I think I was arguing for a completely different thing
Are you considering subgroups upto isomorphism?
Uh wdym
Like are you also looking at number of copies of the subgroups and how they are embedded
If you do then the direct limit thing holds
If you don't then it will break probably
Uh how would you construct the direct limit working with subgroups up to isomorphism 
I mean direct limit thing encodes pretty much the number of copies and how they embed
Yeah I don't think you could
I thought the question was not involving direct limits
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/14588/does-the-order-lattice-of-subgroups-and-lattice-of-factor-groups-uniquely-det Heres a strong counterexample
Even for finite groups
p-groups ruin everything
Like if the set of subgroups of something is the same as the set of subgroups for something else then are they the same
Then yeah that false
Oh I see what you mean
Oh lattice of subgroups
Yea im saying that like you can establish order preserving bijections between the subgroups of two groups i.e an isomorphism of their lattice of subgroups which doesnt imply an isomorphism of the groups as a whole
Damn that's a really strong counterexample lol
Isn't profiniteness something about topological groups? 
it means that its the inverse limit of its finite quotients
there's two ways you can deal with this
ok I see
you can work in the category Pro(FinGrp) meaning formal projective systems of finite groups and then this is just annoying
if you want to like, actually compute the limit of these projective systems
then you need topological groups to keep track of things
so it's usually easier to just work with the limit of this system and deal with a topology that keeps track of things
šµāš«
Same tbh
I mean take an example like the profinite completion Z^
if you view this as an object in Pro(FinGrp) it's like
I can't see exactly how a topology keeps track of things
Z to the power of what nG explain.
the entire tower of groups Z/nZ for all finite integers n with all the reduction mod m projections Z/nZ->Z/mZ for m dividing n
if you compute the projective limit of this tower you just get Z^ which is the free profinite group on one generator
what the topology now keeps track of is that like
you want a subgroup to be open iff it's finite index
It's projective limit the same as inverse limit
mhm
Is*
me: yea, I have always known this
also me: still fucks up the direction on the arrows under lim
that is my most hated mathematical terminology
Wait nG isnt that not true
did I fuck it up hold on
But what exactly is Z^
just use the woke notation (co)lim X_i to let the reader know that which it is is an exercise
Pro objects are limits nG if thats what ur worried about?
Like what's the top
(co?)filtered limits
Oh wait
oh yea you're right
Lol that's the last part you said
A subgroup of a profinite group is open if and only if it is closed and has finite index.
Yeah
they should rename (co)lim to just "generalisd pushout/pullback" or something... would make remembering which way the arrows go so much easier
yea there was a thing in szamuely where he said that for topologically finitely generated finite index iff open is an open question?
right so now Z^ is the profinite group whose only finite quotients are Z/nZ for nā„1
It was proven actually
a priori theres no reason one is one direction or the other
much like how Z is the group whose only quotients are Z/nZ for nā„1, and also the infinite quotient Z
I still cannot tell apart left and right reliably without doing the trick with my hands max
the process of profinite completion has removed this single infinite quotient from Z
i have a mole on my right hand and none on my left hand
they should rename left and right too š
call one "generalised free" and the other "generalised forgetful" or something lol
but honestly i think i only truly got good at right vs left
once i leanred to drive
im actually a very good driver
nice
for the record, i would never get into a car with max behind the wheel
I can drive alright just haven't had practice driving on freeways
i meant the literal directions
the one I always bugger up is the symbol for adjoint, the one which looks like loss
|
---|
|
always forget which way it gos, its like an additional layer of Z2 confusion
oh
left -| right
lol
I never had trouble with limits and direct inverse limits
maclane said note that naming is weird and I've just remembered it since
y
im a good driver!
now repeat goof multiple times š


but yea the point is like
in this example of Z versus Z^
you have removed a single infinite quotient from Z
since there's no actual group with this property you need the topology to keep track of this
(i.e. to keep track of which subgroups you're allowed to quotient by)
Not sure what this means 
Z has the following quotients: Z (infinite) and Z/nZ for all nā„1 (finite)
Z^ has the following quotients by open subgroups: Z/nZ for all nā„1 (finite)
right, and what you're doing is like
enforcing those that you're allowed to keep by calling them open



to be fair, even so
if i had to choose between anyone active on this server
you're like
probably second for who i would get in a car with

buncho is first
okay that's fair

Lol
hmm
Where is nG on the list
i really don't have a good enough read to say
Where is ange on the list
ange is low
Thatās fair honestly
but
Both sentences read the same
mostly because i know ange hates cars
I would not get in a car driven by me
if ange were not opposed to cars, ange would easily be first
he would make a very responsible driver
well no
still second to buncho
I got my driver's license 4 years ago and I haven't driven since
ultra can drive but i really don't know
about that one
maybe for like
a suburban cruise
I'm sure his driving is appropriately hilarious.
oh!
i would let tterra drive me somewhere
that's an easy one
tterra is clearly a responsible driver
the tail gets caught under the pedals
i think i would let moonbears drive me places
responsible tteppa
Not allowed
Is there an attendance check?
again, i don't own one
this server isn't ready for that talk
but are you ready to drive me to ikea
i want swedish meatballs for lunch and they have nice lamps
anyone here codes and does programming in addition to math?
i do CS in addition to math and physics
@blazing pawn I tried watchng perfect blue , I really can't tbh , more than the stalker , the abuse from family is too real I stopped at the crying scene š¦
i am a big CS math physics person, I also deadlift 300 and run a 4 minute mile
Yea but can you play la Campanella by Liszt while juggling 5 balls with your feet
you wouldn't!?
jmask has stringbean cross country vibes
But I think it's more likely that jmask can play La Campanella by Liszt while juggling 5 balls with his feet than rule a 4 minute mile
ez pz
I am honored
unironically, yes š¦
well... actually I think I might be severely underestimating how hard it is to juggle with feet

probably juggle 3 balls or something
I heard jmask is 8 ft tall and drinks a gallon of milk each day.
1 feet for each ball he juggles
But has he bested a man from every country in hand to hand combat?
Are you sure it's not function notation? Where was it defined?
Seems like it could be anything?
it probably is function notation, but I don't see j defined anywhere
this is what it says next but I don't think that's helpful
maybe the author just forgot to define j 
they remembered to
it's probably in invisible ink

put the book in the oven or however you read invisible ink 
who the hell is that
what
that's rude
what porn are you watching ryc
What
what kind of pornstar is named marty hairie stan 

stan is not part of the name
Shutup
stan is a common piece of internet lingo used to refer to an obsessive fan of something
@cold needle control your server
the term "stan" originates from a classic eminem song
why is your cat so surprised
did it get scared cause of the big bad scary trolls
LOL
LOL
it's getting late... better tuck in jon. better heat up a glass of milk. it's time to go to sleep.
or the monsters might come out and eat you!
I just work here slim
ryc ur name is a disaster what is this
no

not being in miu army's designated beta boytoy is a good one
also jesse today i studied logic
shit subject
a prof. has asked me for a sample of my work and now i am melting down
i dont knwo what to give them? all my typed psets are so bad
of his work
jesse you'll be happy to know that mirza loved it, and couldn't stop raving about how interesting it was
not like bad marks its just like..

me
sustoy
sus
he wants my transcript, a sample of my work, and a name of a prof who likes me
lmao what
just for a reading course???
jesse what about your slides
I wrote a report on ultraproducts for another reading course but it's not really like "work" idk
for your talk
it doesnt feel like thats what he's asking for lol
Oh yeah wait couldn't u do ur talk
oh that's good
yeah

the ultraproducts thing
Can you send: an unofficial transcript, a sample of some of your work from a course that you liked and the name of a professor who knows you well?
damn ultra is really famous 
report on ultraproduct:

oh from a course
no one's expecting original research
damn
the ultraproducts report sounds perfect
Yeah
well the report is from a course but i figured he wanted like a pset lol
you're doing great jesse
yea
i need a panic emote


After the kalm before the storm, there was the panik....
Not the cleanest edit, but I haven't seen any other PANIK emojis on this site so I decided to upload one. - Discord emoji/emote for your Discord server! Browse thousands of other custom Discord and Slack emoji on emoji.gg
the p in pset stands for pakistan
Nami please add
shutup ryc
oh wait ill put it in suggestions
im funnier š
they start with f so they are isomorphic
jesse if u r panicking i dont think u will do bad 
ur pretty capable
yeh but idk if my work backs taht up mirza 
Im sure he doesn't expect anything too insane 
He probably just wants to see that you do any work lmao
yeah
I have some rough marks on my transcript due to things. so idk
if you want we can all ask for reading courses from this guy
Hm
and then look less impressive than you
shoutout my 51 in a stats course because I missed the 50% final 
lmfao
š§
rough number tho
everyone who studies SDEs
i want to take another stats course just to make it look less bad
lower everyone's expectations 

51 yos are more bad than good, like ryc
we have to lie to jesse.
i know my place in the world

Jesse logic is an excellent subject 
i come here for brutal honesty and verbal beatdowns
I never lie

what is SDE? 
Jokes aside i spent all night reading about logic today it was pretty fun
i bet ur dad is so disappointed, who wants to raise a son who say yo instaid of hi, do u always take the lazt way??Do u work at target and go to the local community college, i bet he asks how that degree is coming like 3 times a month
Thanks for putting the seed in my head jesse 
Oh
suck deez enuts
i thought it was rices attempt at another failed DN joke
ryc is seething so hard
i can't believe no one pinned that when it happened 
it was reposted like 17 times
one of those could have been pinned
noooo
i'm not self pinning
okay im going to sleep now gn
like fr this time

sleep schedual moment
lmao
have u been awake all night???
+9.5 hrs for india i remember now
i might wait till it's 11 so i can pick up my books
yes 
The reason your dad is so disappointed is that he asks himself, "Who wants to raise a son who say so instaid of hi and always take the lazt way?" instead of studying math. Math produces so many gems and visionaries because it is definitively hard, and has the hardest problems known to man, so men who consistently push themselves to solve adverse problems, will attain a generalizable ability to develop creative solutions to problems with ease as oppose to only dealing with the problems of a regular joe life, e.g. working at target and going to the local community college; people who have been through it develop street smarts and learn how to solve street problems, but you can only see so many street problems, there are thousands of benefit provision related problems in physics engineering and many other disciplines it is pure beauty! In fact, beautiful enough for him to ask you how that degree is coming like 3 times a month!
rip shokiwoki and especially rip mirza
sleep schedual moment
nerd
which books
I woke up at 23:00 PM
self-pinning is a social faux pas
categories for the working mathematician
thank you
bot
i see
do riehls book smh
for no reason...
jon is literally a scardie cat.
that book is super scary 
im actually reading through it slowly
i tried reading it

The reason your dad is so disappointed is that he asks himself, "Who wants to raise a son who say yo instaid of hi and always take the lazt way?" instead of studying math. Math produces so many gems and visionaries because it is definitively hard, and has the hardest problems known to man, so men who consistently push themselves to solve adverse problems, will attain a generalizable ability to develop creative solutions to problems with ease as oppose to only dealing with the problems of a regular joe life, e.g. working at target and going to the local community college; people who have been through it develop street smarts and learn how to solve street problems, but you can only see so many street problems, there are thousands of math related problems in physics engineering and many other disciplines it is pure beauty! In fact, beautiful enough for him to ask you how that degree is coming like 3 times a month!
but then i realised i dont know anything to get any use out of that book
this is the revised version, i produced it later throughout the day yesterday
š
Shoki, are you already planning to do cat thy?
do read it once more and point out any other mistakes
yeah im reading it alongisde tom dieck
v2.0
not really, i was just seeing the book, how it is, what is cat theory and all that
and now....
im scared 
ā
Jee chemistry has killed so many beautiful minds

if it werent for chem
Mandatory chemistry for sciences has killed minds.
i would have made some progress in maths
i am being killed rn
the reason mandatory chemistry has killed so many minds is that it is definitely hard...
Chemistry ruined HS for me in its entirety, and surprise surprise, I didn't have to see it once while studying pure math 
famously high-iq subject of physics
category nuts
I like how wholesome this is compared to the original 

I don't understand why people find mathematics "hard" at all. It's all just pure and simple logic. I can conjure up differential equations and predict their graphs in my head with no problem. And everyone struggling with calculus, I have to be honest, that is only the lowest tier of mathematics that even qualifies be called "mathematics". I feel pity for the people who aren't even able comprehend the pure abstract beauty in math. They will never be able to become a tenured mathematician or have any career in pure math at all. Only 1% of mathematicians can actually get somewhere with math because they are immensely talented with parents in academia who taught them higher math from their very childhood. Rest of the "mathematicians" will probably just have to end up working as a code monkey for some big corp never having to deal with any math at all.
You can't estimate my level of thinking if you don't know even elementary terminology, so this is just emotions
I don't understand why people find mathematics "hard" at all. It's all just pure and simple logic. I can conjure up differential equations and predict their graphs in my head with no problem. And everyone struggling with calculus, I have to be honest, that is only the lowest tier of mathematics that even qualifies be called "mathematics". I feel pity for the people who aren't even able comprehend the pure abstract beauty in math. They will never be able to become a tenured mathematician or have any career in pure math at all. Only 1% of mathematicians can actually get somewhere with math because they are immensely talented with parents in academia who taught them higher math from their very childhood. Rest of the "mathematicians" will probably just have to end up working as a code monkey for some big corp never having to deal with any math at all.
I don't understand why people find mathematics "hard" at all. It's all just pure and simple logic. I can conjure up differential equations and predict their graphs in my head with no problem. And everyone struggling with calculus, I have to be honest, that is only the lowest tier of mathematics that even qualifies be called "mathematics". I feel pity for the people who aren't even able comprehend the pure abstract beauty in math. They will never be able to become a tenured mathematician or have any career in pure math at all. Only 1% of mathematicians can actually get somewhere with math because they are immensely talented with parents in academia who taught them higher math from their very childhood. Rest of the "mathematicians" will probably just have to end up working as a code monkey for some big corp never having to deal with any math at all.
I DON't uNdErsTand š wHy ā PEopLE šµšµ FiNd š matHemAtICs "hard" š aT ā¤š¦ all. šÆ It's ALL JUST š puRe AND š° SiMpLE āŖš LoGIc. šš I cAn cOnjURE Up dIffeRentIAL EQUatioNs And šš° pRedIcT theIr ā graPhs iN š My š heAd WitH š NO pRoBlEm. aND eVErYOnE š¦ StruGgling š«š« With š«š caLcUlus, i š°š ± HAVE š tO š¦ BE š hOneSt, š ThAt š¶š Is š oNly The LOweSt š¦š tIER oF MATHemaTICS ThaT ā„š EVEN šā qUaliFIES BE Called "mATHEMaTics". I š°š° feEl šā PitY šš« FoR š thE PeoPle Who š aREn't EVeN šš abLe šŖ coMpREHend THe šš pure āš abSTRAct beAuTy In š½š® MATh. šØ they šš wiLl š NEVeR ā® Be š able TO becOmE a TenURED MaThEmAtICIan oR š HAvE š¶š anY šš CAREER In š puRe MATh ā At aLl. ššæ onLy 1% Of š°š¦ MaTHEmatIcIAnS can actUAlLY GET somewHeRe š³ WITh š MaTh BEcAUse šš± tHeY š„š¼ Are šÆš¬ iMmeNSely TalEnteD WItH PARents š©š¬ In AcADemia WHO š TauGhT š£š£ THEm higHER MAth šā fRom tHEir š VerY CHIldHood. REST š of šš° tHe "mAtHemAticianS" WILL šÆš£ PrOBABly š Just š HaVE šš tO ā”š± END š uP š WORKing šØ As A ā¤ā coDe š² MONkeY For š š somE big š CORP neVER š« HaviNg to deaL With š Any MATh āā AT š aLl. šš¤µ
oof, a lot of dedication went into that. perhaps too much. definitely too much.
I have a spongebob text and emojify cog in one of my bots 
do you call both sequentially or can you pipe inputs between them?
One after another but sometimes the mocking text will mess up animated emojis
I get ptsd while thinking about chemistry 
I don't understand why people make bad pastas. It's just pure and simple memery. I can conjure pastas up my head and predict their success with no problem. And for everyone struggling with making a og pasta,I have to be honest,I feel pity for you. They will never be able to become pastalord or have any career I making pastas. Only 1% of all pasta makers can actually get somewhere because they are immensely talented with parents in the pasta industry who taught them the pasta theory from their very childhood. Rest of the pasta makers will probably just have to keep copying pastas for life.
amazing
that's pretty good
i am so proud of this community
yo
I don't understand why people find mathematics "hard" at all. It's all just pure and simple logic. I can conjure up differential equations and predict their graphs in my head with no problem. And everyone struggling with calculus, I have to be honest, that is only the lowest tier of mathematics that even qualifies be called "mathematics". I feel pity for the people who aren't even able comprehend the pure abstract beauty in math. They will never be able to become a tenured mathematician or have any career in pure math at all. Only 1% of mathematicians can actually get somewhere with math because they are immensely talented with parents in academia who taught them higher math from their very childhood. Rest of the "mathematicians" will probably just have to end up working as a code monkey for some big corp never having to deal with any math at all.
Physics.
nearly done with this physics course
only one more hw assignment and then the final exam

wachu looking at



I don't understand why people find mathematics "hard" at all. It's all just pure and simple logic. I can conjure up differential equations and predict their graphs in my head with no problem. And everyone struggling with calculus, I have to be honest, that is only the lowest tier of mathematics that even qualifies be called "mathematics". I feel pity for the people who aren't even able comprehend the pure abstract beauty in math. They will never be able to become a tenured mathematician or have any career in pure math at all. Only 1% of mathematicians can actually get somewhere with math because they are immensely talented with parents in academia who taught them higher math from their very childhood. Rest of the "mathematicians" will probably just have to end up working as a code monkey for some big corp never having to deal with any math at all.
I don't understand why people find mathematics "hard" at all. It's all just pure and simple logic. I can conjure up differential equations and predict their graphs in my head with no problem. And everyone struggling with calculus, I have to be honest, that is only the lowest tier of mathematics that even qualifies be called "mathematics". I feel pity for the people who aren't even able comprehend the pure abstract beauty in math. They will never be able to become a tenured mathematician or have any career in pure math at all. Only 1% of mathematicians can actually get somewhere with math because they are immensely talented with parents in academia who taught them higher math from their very childhood. Rest of the "mathematicians" will probably just have to end up working as a code monkey for some big corp never having to deal with any math at all.
I don't understand why people find mathematics "hard" at all. It's all just pure and simple logic. I can conjure up differential equations and predict their graphs in my head with no problem. And everyone struggling with calculus, I have to be honest, that is only the lowest tier of mathematics that even qualifies be called "mathematics". I feel pity for the people who aren't even able comprehend the pure abstract beauty in math. They will never be able to become a tenured mathematician or have any career in pure math at all. Only 1% of mathematicians can actually get somewhere with math because they are immensely talented with parents in academia who taught them higher math from their very childhood. Rest of the "mathematicians" will probably just have to end up working as a code monkey for some big corp never having to deal with any math at all.
just pin the copypasta already for fucks sake
.pin
I don't understand why people make bad pastas. It's just pure and simple memery. I can conjure pastas up my head and predict their success with no problem. And for everyone struggling with making a og pasta,I have to be honest,I feel pity for you. They will never be able to become pastalord or have any career I making pastas. Only 1% of all pasta makers can actually get somewhere because they are immensely talented with parents in the pasta industry who taught them the pasta theory from their very childhood. Rest of the pasta makers will probably just have to keep copying pastas for life.
hehehe
I und'rstand not wherefore people maketh lacking valor pastas. T's just pure and simple mem'ry. I can conjure pastas up mine own headeth and predicteth their success with nay problem. And f'r ev'ryone struggling with making a og pasta,i has't to beest honest,i feeleth pity f'r thee. Those gents shall nev'r beest able to becometh pastal'rd 'r has't any careth'r i making pastas. Only 1% of all pasta mak'rs can actually receiveth somewh're because those gents art immensely talent'd with parents in the pasta industry who is't did teach those folk the pasta the'ry from their v'ry childhood. Rest of the pasta mak'rs shall belike just has't to keepeth copying pastas f'r life
I down't undewstand why peopwe make bad pastas. Iwt's juwst puwe awnd simpwe memewy. I cawn conjuwe pastas up my head awnd pwedict theiw success with no pwobwem. Awnd fow evewyone stwuggwing with making a og pasta,i have tuwu be honest,i feew pity fow uwu. They wiww nevew be abwe tuwu become pastawowd ow have any caweew i making pastas. Onwy 1% of aww pasta makews cawn actuawwy get somewhewe because they awe immensewy tawented with pawents in the pasta industwy who taught thewm the pasta theowy fwom theiw vewy chiwdhood. West of the pasta makews wiww pwobabwy juwst have tuwu keep copying pastas fow wife.
The reason your dad is so disappointed is that he asks himself, "Who wants to raise a son who say yo instaid of hi and always take the lazt way?" instead of making copypasta. Pasta produces so many gems and visionaries because authoring it is definitively hard, and has the hardest problems known to man, so men who consistently push themselves to solve adverse problems, will attain a generalizable ability to develop creative solutions to problems with ease as oppose to only dealing with the problems of a regular joe life, e.g. working at target and going to the local community college; people who have been through it develop street smarts and learn how to solve street problems, but you can only see so many street problems, there are thousands of copypasta types in physics engineering and many other disciplines it is pure beauty! In fact, beautiful enough for him to ask you how that pasta is coming along like 3 times a month!
The reason yours dad is then disappointing is this himself asks himself, "who wants to raise that son that person said yo instaid for hi and always to the take lazt way?" instead for making copypasta. Pasta produces then prolific gems and visionaries due to authoring it is definitively hard, and the is hardest problems know to mans, then man that person consistently pushed themselves to solved adverse problems, would do attain that generalizabrue ability to developing create solutions to problems taking ease to oppose to only dealing the taking problems for that regular joe alive, e. g. working upon target and moving the to local community college; people that person take achieved through it developing street smarts and learned with a method to solved street problems, prevent you are a with able to only look then prolific street problems, this am thousands for copypasta types on physics engineering and prolific other disciplines it is pure beauty! on fact, beautiful enough of himself to asked you are a with a method this pasta is coming along appreciation 3 times that month!
The reason yer dad be so disappointed be that there 'e asks 'imself, "who wants to raise a son who say yo instaid o' Ahoy an' always take the lazt way?" instead o' makin' copypasta. Pasta produces so many gems an' visionaries because authorin' it be definitively 'ard, an' 'as the 'ardest problems known to man, so men who consistently push themselves to solve adverse problems, will attain a generalizable ability to develop creative solutions to problems with ease as oppose to only dealin' with the problems o' a regularrr joe life, e.g. workin' at target an' goin' to the local crew college; people who 'ave been through it develop street smarts an' learn 'ow to solve street problems, but ye can only see so many street problems, there be thousands o' copypasta types in physics engineerin' an' many other disciplines it be pure beauty! in fact, beautiful enough fer 'im to ask ye 'ow that there pasta be comin' along like 3 times a month!
the pasta is metastasizing
Da reason yous dad so disappointed dat hesa asks himself, "who wants to raisen a son who sayen yo instaid of ya-hoo and always take da lazt way?" instead of maken copypasta. Pasta produces so many gems and visionaries because authoren tis definitively hard, and has da most hard problems known to manen, so men who consistently pushen themselves to solve adverse problems, will attain a generalizable ability to developen creative solutions to problems wit ease as oppose to only dealen wit da problems of a regular joe life, e. g. worken at target and goen tada local community college; people who have been through it developen street smarts and learnen how to solve street problems, but yousa can only see so many street problems, dalee thousands of copypasta types in physics engineeren and many other disciplines tis pure beauty! in fact, beautiful enough per him to asken yousa how dat pasta comen along liken 3 times a month!
The Jar Jar one was what took it too far?
Are you assuming I was reading any of them? 
maybe it hit hard home
All of them.
The length and frequency increased too much
why would she say that? guys I don't get it

It depends on who she is, I suppose.
Different people might say the same thing for totally different reasons.
can you provide an example?
your teacher looking at a modulated bump function
If you asked me, "do you want to eat a cookie?" I might say "yes". Then, if you asked someone else, "is 3+7=10?" they might say "yes".
it did, implicitly
Yeah, well, I was lazy.
Edd's example works
the duration and modulation frequency
but all my teachers are male š¦
I mean that's not why your mom said that to me last night, but no need to get into that.
next time check #āhow-to-get-help

if your junk's frequency gets too high, you should have a dr take a look at that
might be peyronie's disease
I just realized, you have a choice between using ZF and ZFC. That's why it's called the axiom of choice. You choose if you want to use it.
Free will is an illusion
imagine working with ZF when the only valid counterargument to accepting choice is that it enables LEM in some constructivist settings that dont want it
[insert ultraproduct sully here]
Hi everyone
What are the other formulations of set theory like and why arenāt they as mainstream
Thereās a categorical formulation ECTS which is somewhat mainstream among categorical logic people
Other than this most of the different formulations are either too weak or are inconsistent with ZFC which is why they arenāt mainstream
I'm sure a big part of ZFC being mainstream is just that it was put together in the right place at the right time in the history of set theory.
Category people often work with ZFC + Tarski (or often a weaker version of Tarski)
Since ZFC can't formalize Set
(or just don't care at all, or with some topoi etc)
Why canāt I change my nickname here?
What's tarski?
Then why didnāt it get reset?
It says some universe exists (equivalently a strong inaccessible exists)
It doesn't reset if you changed it before
But you can ask a mod to get it changed
You can't talk about a category of all sets in ZFC because set of all sets doesn't exist
A universe is a workaround, it is a set that behaves like a set of all sets
But isn't actually (eg doesn't contain itself)
Yea it's a proper class
Yeah
Not in all models
Oh wait it is
But if you only do the union upto a strong inaccessible
If one exists
Then you get a set
Instead of unioning over all ordinals
Ah ok, that's why that's equivalent
And that then behaves like a set of all sets in the sense that it's closed under all set theoretic constructions
Yep
It's the category of all sets that are in the universe
(after you've fixed a universe)
Yea I mean most people work with ZFC plus some mild large cardinal axioms
Thatās fine
I've heard there's some ag stuff that uses intuitionistic logic but idk anything about it
Well yes but that doesnāt have much to do with the underlying set theoretic foundations
Right
There is a sort of āset theoryā internal to any topos and not all of these have excluded middle or two truth values or choice or whatever
I mean I think most people that have thought about foundations seriously are sort of forced into something at least very close to ZFC
New foundations with urelements 
Lmfao
Sure, although sometimes you do have to think about such things
I donāt think thatās the issue Iām alluding to. Sometimes you genuinely have to sit down and learn to use inaccessible cardinals for instance
Yea pretty much
Fair enough, although thereās a surprising number of people that havenāt even thought this much about it
@deep mango I've pushed the latest version
We are up to 41 pages now
You should take a look at the parallel mixed precision graphs before I upload it to Slack
41 pages
don't you pay like 300$ extra per page over the page limit?
have you checked this where you'll submit?
can i join the slack
We don't know where we're going to submit
The hope was that Demmel and Holtz would have ideas about where to submit
But they haven't said anything about it yet
If we submit it to a ML conference like NeurIPS or ICML then we'll trim down the main paper have like 40 papers of appendices
Winograd and im2col are very flat
A number of the parallel plots have the blocking going under the bound
Looks like the blocking just goes to zero (probably just "now one processor can do the whole computation"
So
Ah!
It's because the second parallel bound has a load balancing assumption
The slack is barely used at this point
Ok let me remake the plots
Sure, the slack is popping!
It's fine
No
These plots are fast to make
What
What do you want to do about the legends
I'm going to leave the legends in
Aw
If I get rid of them I need to get rid of all of them
Which will be like
Fine
Don't do anything yet
Once I get to Michigan
Only when we know they're 100% done
Nothing right now
Stop stalking me creep
That message was for metal.
Hey slim? We're gonna have to ask you to leave for a bit. Take some time to yourself.
Ok
I just dont want you to remove the legends
ok ryc
Redo the graphs if you like but
I won't
Just try to post something sooner rather than later since they never have time to read the updates we post
(mostly because of me)
Lol
Guy's does anyone here knows ano bullshit introduction to proof writing
I mean a concise book
That's a good one
I know basics of proof
I mean basic logic and induction stuff
I will be joining a ug math soon so
I wanna study proof writing rigorously
You know what they meant 

r u asking for a book on mathematical logic krishna? Or rather a proof book with exercises for proofs and stuff like that
Math logic set theory and hopefully some no theory proofs and lessons
Velleman's How to Prove It
Then go through it quickly
That's a good idea
Lol
You shouldn't jump to formal logic before having seen some other math btw, logic doesn't refer to proof writing etc it's some extremely pedantic stuff you should avoid until you develop some brain rot resistance š
So don't pick up books that say logic and set theory right now 
Um
In first year math a popular uni in my country teaches logic,set theory and the first chapter of munkres topology
Yeah that's fine
In the book recommend section they had how to prove it but it's so big
Will take like 2 weeks
Or more
Ye you can definitely try munkres chapter 1 then
My first proof based course was taught using Linear Algebra by Hoffman and Kunze as a guide
my intro to proofs was the first 10 pages of apostol 
That's what I want to read
my intro to proofs was a whole semester using hammack book of proof 
Calculus by apostle
hammock
ham
u can read it rn with what u have rn 

What if I don't know what a proof is
Like I think I know what it means,but I really don't
Monke.
Eh who cares. I am an engineer
I would say that it is not much of a problem if do not know how to prove things rigorously
It mostly depends on the field of study
Physicists, Engineers who use mathematics a lot don't care for rigour as much as Pure Mathematicians do
It is better to have an intuitive understanding of mathematics in the beginning
But it's to late I have already enrolled in a math program gotta learns proofs
Lol italian algebraic geometry goes brrrr
You wanted to learn Analysis right, you can learn it from Apostol or Baby Rudin or anything you like
Yeah
italian algebraic geometry more like italian waste of time
There are great lectures on YouTube of Francis Su for Real Analysis I, you might probably like that
inb4 french algebraic geometry





