#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 437 of 1
I don't believe in rules
I had to do this when I first learned proofs
The prof was teaching calculus, and half the exam were proofs
Like "prove the chain rule"
etc.
And it was my first calculus class, the only way I was able to get by was to just rote memorize through. I tried to just "go for an understanding" on the first 3 tests
and failed
Then I just fucking grinded for the last 2 tests, and got an A
He looked at me said "I'll give you a B and we'll call it even"
that's awesome 😁 ironic though because calculus was the first math that was intuitive for me
I mean
When you have to do epsilon deltas
And you barely know how to compute limits
And you're learning integrals, derivatives, and limits
all at the same time
Tell me how that goes
Oh i see. Yeah i had already taken calculus beforehand, i just retook calc i and ii in college bc my highschool advisor told me "you should take it there bc it might be way harder in college!"
It was not
Lol
And obviously in highschool you have more time to actually understand things
I thought it would be you know do some calc 1, then calc 2
maybe some hard problems
Nope, it was prove everything in calc 1
Do calc 2
Then prove everything in calc 2
In one semester
Tests were 25 questions, about 12-13 computation problems
Limits, derivatives, integrals
And the other 12-13 were proofs
You had 75 minutes/per test
So roughly 3 minutes a problem
That's horrible
Each problem was 4 points
So the hard questions were worth the same as the easy questions
It was good, you get really good at test taking strategies lol
There was no time to think
You just had to do it
The prof was good, I had him for calc 1&2H, Calc 3H, Linear algebra & differential equaitons H, discrete math, and calc on manifolds
Each class had a fuck ton of proofs
You just had to learn them by heart, eventually after 1 or 2 classes with him
I learned how to "intuit" a lot of the proofs
For the calc on manifolds exam 1 we had covered 50 types of theorems/proofs and they were pretty simple other than a couple hard ones
So maybe 3-4 ones where you commit to memory, and then the rest you could problem solve
i think that it can be hard to keep an entire proof in working memory sometimes, together with recalling what the symbols denote, what each function does, doing all the mental type checking at the ground level needed to understand the proof at a higher level. in this sense i think the rote memorization can at least keep you help track of the key constructions in the proof. there's also the problem that if you don't engage with something enough you may just forget it immediately, especially if it's very novel and you don't have a lot of nearby things to connect it to
I can see why there is discussion 2
emotions
get an ice pack
I have never remembered a single equation in my life, I just write down the correct answers
i am the equation
85 is so chill

85 C bakery 😌
,w 85 f to c
oof that's super hot
haha
whats an average temperature around where u live
its 20. something C here
anything above 17 gets yucky if it's sunny
and people don't have AC here, only some stores and some hotels do
that's a toasty may
so temperature there is lower so i imagine 28 isnt going to feel good
no idea how much they are in C
temp here is kinda low now, thanks to rain
this is here
which website?
i used darksky.net
low twenties at night is fine
Can animals be people too?
If animals have their own society
Can they call these animals people too?
I know this is a random not serious question.
But I like to see where this question goes to.
On what conclusion its land.
To me person means a human
Lol
i need a real quick refresher on the exp function for complex numbers, what does exp(z) do to a number again if z is some arbitrary complex number?
was it rotating the phase and stretch the arg?
or was that multiplying complex numbers
Sounds like it
though there's also geometric interpretations of exp
exp(a+bi) = exp(a)exp(bi). The first factor decides the magnitude, the second factor decides the argument (Euler's formula)
gotcha thanks!

moldiking
and if we made the complex map bigger, we would get a full circle right?
Complex map?
good, wanted to make sure i had a proper understanding of how the periodicity of exp works for mapping
(and not just algebraically)
moving into complex logarithms now for exam prep, this will be fun 😄
argument is the same thing i called "phase" earlier right?
(so basically an angle)
Yeah

Milky chocci 
Quick, whats number of ways to roll x as a sum of y, z-sided dice?
I think ive mastered these types of problems
yeah it happens sometimes 
stop or use some tape if it's a small rip
takes a lot of getting used to
I boulder/climb also. Any dynos?
Uh eth zurich
Idk if thats lesser known
Lol
Well I'm not sure what exactly 'less well known" means or in what context
I think "elite" and "unknown in the academic sphere" are somewhat contradictory
Turns out academic people are not all that stupid
U of bonn must be good right? Schultz went there
Certainly sounds like it fits the bill "student quality"
I wouldn't say that's not well known by people who would be aware of ETH Zurich
I know about ETH Zurich
When you're comparing you need to decide what you're comparing on
e.g. universities with the top research?
Universities with the best students? The universities that do the best job at taking their students and bringing them up to a high level? etc
Because some universities can be good at only a subset of these criteria
Yeah in that case the best universities at other countries probably do a much better job at competing with American unis. Like at a research/graduate level I would wager the only European ones which seem to compete with the tippity top in America are Oxbridge, Bonn, ETH Zurich, maybe ENS??????
Also probably some Russian schools
But in terms of undergrad students I'd def toss in Poly
Since my impression is they're fucking good
Yeah
I feel like the only good ones I know in France are ENS and Poly
UK might have a few other contenders for undergrad level but I think only Oxbridge really compares to absolute best in America. Probably UCL comes close
Like hmm
If I had to pick a top 10 in America right now
The obvious ones are Harvard, Stanford, Princeton, Chicago, MIT, Yale, Columbia, Penn
Let's say top 8
I think those are definitely the top 8 in some order
Berkeley: :'(
Berkeley I think shines more for grad
I think the programs with the most stringent conditions are like CS programs or something lol
Uh I think most of the programs at these top schools are quite good relative to the field
And the thing is some places have requirements to get in the major, others don't
washingbear he's asking about majors in particular
What makes it so much better?
But yeah my point is e.g. at Berkeley you have to apply to the CS major and it might even be competitive
But maybe at Stanford anyone who wants to major in CS can do so even though Stanford's CS is as good as Berkeley's
And as far as like, "quality of teaching" goes
Well that's the thing jealous
In undergrad probably, in grad probably not
In a lot of tippity top schools, you can just declare your major and it's not a competitive process
Once you're in Harvard you can just decide what you wanna major in
The hard part isn't getting your major, it's just getting in the school
Too many CS hopefuls at berkeley :-(
Yeah Berkeley is a definite exception here
But yeah I don't think for undergrad it makes a whole lot of sense to compare programs
Because sometimes one is competitive but another is "better"
It seems mostly that the undergrad curriculums are isomorphic
e.g. I think UChicago is actually the best place in America to be a math major
Its snowy xd
Not because it's more competitive, it's possible the average math major at Harvard is stronger than the average math major at UChicago
But I know how the programs are like because I looked into the stuff a bit when I was applying
UChicago is the perfect place for getting you from "I don't know calculus or what a proof is" to "I'm graduate level"
Because it has the Honors Calculus and Honors Analysis classes
So you can start off not knowing what a derivative is, take honors calculus first year, honors analysis second year
And now you're basically an analysis grad student
If I was at Berkeley it would've taken me 2 years to get to proof-based math
Well i dunno, berkeley is pretty liberal when it comes to doing whatever courses you want in whatever order you feel is best
Sure but I mean like
At Berkeley I would've placed in their Math 1A or whatever it's called
1B at best
Since my high school math was weaker than AP Calculus
I took Math 110 (upper-division proof-based linear algebra) during sophomore year at UC Berkeley in 2018; the math department doesn't really enforce prerequisites
You just have to insist sometimes
Yeah i had no formal calculus during high school, but just never took 1a1b and it all worked out somehow, its weird lol
Sounds like a bad math program ngl
While at Chicago they let you take honors calculus even if you don't have background in calc, covers most of Spivak
Yeah for CS its pretty stringent
I dont know, but its also different if you wanted to apply to EECS or not
What do you mean? Well if you go to Berkeleytime.com you can see grade distributions for all the different courses, which tend to be graded on a curve but not always
I was meaning the GPA cutoff to declare a CS major
It's designed so that typically 20% of a given lecture section gets A's
If i remember its something wonky like 3.7/4... Might have remmebered that wrong though
it'll probably be that high @whole copper
here at UIUC you need a 3.67 cumulative
and As in CS courses and also they do a portfolio review
EECS at Berk gotta be at least that high of a GPA
CS too popular smh
Kinda makes sense lol
ya but I mean it's one of the best CS schools so that makes sense
and it's a well paying major
It's probably the smartest major to pick for those who are into STEM
Well at Berkeley, there's CS (in the college of Letters & Science) and then there's the more prestigious EECS; all I know is that you need a 3.3 GPA in the CS61 series (from A-C) to be eligible to declare the EECS major, and there may be other requirements as well
They are doing this whole thing setting up data science major, data science college, data science buuldings... Just because mostly a lot of people just want to do data science and no care abt things like compilers, OS, blah
Yeah heh data science is the newest major at Berkeley I think; there's a lot of hype over it
UIUC doing the same
too many business students learning there's more to life than excel 😩
like pandas and sql 🤡
I had my mind blown realising u can write like VSbasic.. Or some flavor of C or something... Inside excel - i always just thought it was a table
Vba i mean
Excel is Turing-Complete 
Too stronk
@neat lintel not how it works
The HAAS school of business at Berkeley is the worst; they get the nicest lecture rooms too, meanwhile Evans is super old and haunted by the unabomber and whatnot
Once you're in they don't look at your SATs anymore
So your SAT is only really about getting accepted to the university
Rather than getting accepted into the major
the SAT is also not really an entrance exam in the traditional sense
You can't do the comparison you're trying to do here
Ya no one cares about SAT after you get in; I've never heard of them using SAT scores to clear entry to a particular major at Cal or any of the other UCs, AFAIK
My math sat mark was bad because i made mistakes calculating perimeters of rectangles or something lol
plenty of schools in the US dont even require you to declare a major
before you apply
How you perform in upper-div math courses is what really matters anyways; I wouldn't worry about it
Sometimes there are no cutoffs
Like you apply to the university and you start the university undeclared
Im old now, i just think its funny lol
Some universities will then say
Well if you wanna major in X you have to apply and it's a competitive process
Other times nah
You just declare the major
And it's automatic
Whether this happens or not isn't even based on quality
Oh gotcha
Wow chapter 5 of AM is so much more motivated
after some AG
i actually care about these results now 
Hi
R rankings a good idea to tell how strong a school is for math bc usnwr ranks Caltech& CMU low
Yolo it
It depends on what youre interested in i guess, but i guess thats not an easy question
no
Just go to their website and look at their courses
Its the best method
Yeah, CMU is really really strong in some areas like combinatorics and theoretical CS, but don't have much of anything else from what I've seen
undergrad
Oh I agree with your evaluation WRT USNWR's credibility 'cause they currently rank UCLA above UCB; I can cosign that statement for sure, and yeah they undervalue Caltech for sure
its the same method, just check their courses
if they lack basic undergrad courses then its probably not best for math
Similarly for caltech, not much breadth, but yeah tough to know what ur interested in if ur just now applying for undergrad
Why are berkeley people always coping in discussion 2
Too much pain


You could say he is telesCOPING
Nada
Berkeley's actually not so bad; you just need to stay consistent
I think I'd prefer it to quarter system UCs
You have more time to learn the course that way; I actually bombed the 2nd midterm in one of my core courses then set the curve on the final; it was my first semester and probs wouldn't have had the time to acclimate if it were the quarter system
Yeah agreed
🔥
Pls explain
it literally just means the induced map on spec is closed
going down means that finite presentation -> induced map is open
wtf
O yea that's pretty neat

Question about REUs in regards to grad school apps
If I do research at my university through a school year, is that as good as going to an REU? Cause if so I'd rather earn money to cover college costs at an internship in the summer.
I have no clue, but I think its not greater than REU
Based on purely opinion. How did you get this. I always wanting to do research during school year
it all just depends on what you get up to during your time doing research lol
but the prof wants to call me and talk
do REUs usually end with getting a paper?
I wonder if it would be possible for me to get this in my spring sem
depends on the field
Yes, not published though
Most REUs produce papers
or yea, a lot ask for writeups
I mean I'm calling him on the 2nd for something regarding this fall
praying it goes through
What subject?
Game Theory
👏
ye it's a good intersection of my current interests
Math, CS, Security
so I really really hope I can get something
but yea if I do that rather than an REU am I at a disadvantage in any way when applying to grad school?
I dont know but probably?
Just do both?
I dont want to have any accountability here
Well duh that's the best option in terms of research experience
however
doing an internship again this coming summer would be nice in term of $$$ for college
software internships can pay like $30+ an hour
if I go for quant firms and somehow make it into one I'm looking at like almost $90 an hour
Oh man, that is very nice. You can make $90 an hour internships?
they're really fucking hard to get but yes they exist
I am inspired. I dont think I would mind losing sleep to get that much money.
5 hours a day isnt too far off from 7.
40 hour work week to 80
I think it's hard to say how different admission committees look at these things
everyone says this, trust me 99.9% of people mind
REUs do end up getting papers, and I think it's harder to get a paper during research during the year because you have to balance the research with taking classes and other activities
yea ik basically I'm asking for speculation
Whereas in an REU you can devote all your time to the research
yea
oh good point
yea letter of rec from multiple places rather than just my university
Kinda disagree
REUs are also usually done in groups and so that experience is pretty important too
Can you take REU summer after senior year?
I had an REU with one partner, and an REU on my own (with the advisor)
It would seem pointless, but just for the exp
Oh ok. So ill have one more shot at getting into one.
Never applied in freshman,sophmore year
Next summer only ):
You think its possible to get research at surrounding university if your location is hub with many colleges around?
During schoolyear
Being attached to a federally funded program is very legit sounding
Sure, but it depends totally on the uni
And like
why would you do an REU the summer after senior year
Usually you cant move up the reputation ladder with going to other schools to do work
In terms of like a better school
what is REU financial support like?
is it just enough to break even?
or not even?
For experience, surely
like accounting for living costs
What do you mean by "break even?" My REU stipend was additional, on top of housing and food...
It was 3500
Some REUs do larger stipends and have you pay for food and living
All this selective admissions talk is depressing. I just wonder how realistic is it to get into professional research or work in company R&D doing mathematics. Im assuming this path can only be achieved after PhD.
formal verification is proving that programs work essentially
Oh makes more sense lol.
so like when programming
from a formal sense
test cases do not give 100% reliability
formal methods do
Yea
I dont know if I would enjoy that job
No lean the proof checking program
Language
whatever
the thingy kevin buzzard does
I was envisioning something vague with logistics is every industry mathematician's job
Or R&D for products
Yeah REUs are usually like 5k total
People always say "math is broad, it use is everywhere" but then I have limited examples in my brain.
Well
Are people just good liars or am I bad at detection
The use is like
😔
You become really good at on the fly problem solving and abstract thinking
RYC is kill
My cousin who did theoretical physics and math works at bank of america now
Everyone loves her
She gets all her work done so quickly
Rose up the promotion ladder effectively instantly
There's one reason why
She knows how to program and how to think
Ok thats 2 reasons
She does basically no work!
Alot of math people go into quantatative finance
She makes programs that do what she has to do
and alot also go into software jobs in general
Which is foreign exchange, which is hard
You see this right here. I could pick up my friend's mothers job and do it in an 1 hour in the 8 hours it takes her daily.
And if she fucks up she losed millions of dollars for BoA
With my osu skills and use of macros/scripts
I mean for lack of a better way to say it, Programming is most of how math is implemented in the real world
no one does it by hand
Yet they get paid 70k per year
cause why would you?
Exactly
alot of people make good money automating these jobs
So none of these people are doing like
Ring theory
What they're doing is applying their efficient problem solving workflow
but the general quantative background makes them very good problem solvers
yea
which is what companies are attracted to
L
Which basically no one outside math/theoretical phys learns
One day I'll apply ring theory to that and revolutionize the industry and make millions
Just watch
Somehow
Mmk
Ok like
Algebratic DS when
Ryc i think it is because
People who do CS grad school learn it I guess?
Even if you don't enjoy it, the reason math produces so many gems and visionaries is because math is definitively hard, and has the hardest problems known to man, so men who consistently push themselves to solve adverse problems, will attain a generalizable ability to develop creative solutions to problems with ease as oppose to only dealing with the problems of a regular joe life, people who have been through it develop street smarts and learn how to solve street problems, but you can only see so many street problems, there are thousands of math problems in physics engineering and many other disciplines it is pure beauty!
A lie?
Copypasta
But even in berkeley CS work very hard and not very smart in undergrad
wow ur observational skills are so impressive
Thank you!
Yeah
theoretical CS is mostly in academia
Yes
no one cares about state machines or stuff like that in industry
I mean people who escape the academia cycle mostly
Ok well
Now you can do TCS for ML
Sounds like a lie
And people care about those results in industry
This... Is a copypasta right?
Yes
No, it isn't.
i dont remember who typed it
someone here
:jesse:
I wonder if jesse is still working he hasnt been on all day 
Oh you didnt hear moth?
I mean there are probably some strong theoretical CS arms at top companies
:))
like MSFT and Google
Furcon Toronto is today
I mean mostly secretary jobs.
they both develop programming languages
I bet they have some very strong people with theoretical backgrounds
If these people dont invovle themselves in workspace politics their 9-5 becomes a 9-11 at least and 9-2 atmost.
some parts of industry certainly cares about hardline TCS
but mostly like
formal verification stuff
yea
like if youre working with something super sensitive and important, you wanna be fucking sure that it aint gonna fail
cause verification = reliability which is a direct increase in profits and revenue
furcon toronto lol
I'm standing you up bitch! Try catfishing me again, I knew you weren't Daniel Radcliffe!
Next time try inviting me to potterhead con. It will be more believable.
algorithmic analysis is also "relevant" insofar as you acknowledge that the only thing that really matters is whether the resulting algorithm is faster/more space efficient/more stable/whatever in practice
and so 99% of research isnt directly used by industry
but it may build to something useful
TCS : "constant factors? 1!"
I dont know the third thing about it.
(tbh its mostly us functional analysts though 😌 )
quantum computing is fake news
constant factors are all basically 1
Its 1%'er science.
[[[[[[
Namington cope.
Only the highest echelon of society
think about it
have you ever seen Donald Trump and a quantum computer in the same room?
i rest my case
What does this mean
It means I win.
It runs on dunking
has anyone made a variant of C called C* yet?
D* and yes.
does anyone here actually work on formal verification?
fork of D lang
not as funny
i recall that feynmann did some diff equations for computers
What does it mean for computer to run on PDE? Computers run on electricity and magnets
i(d/dt) psi = H psi
what is H
Oh No
Heez n
Computers run on electricity and magnent
Hamiltonian
heimerdinger's equation
Ryc advisor leaked?

For the record
Harry potter is dumb
Especially the movies
But I did enjoy the books as a kid
sure do now 
When the alt right weaponizes tools of inclusion in order to further oppression, they simply make fools of themselves. Sorry bro, you're NEVER cancelling me.
Elitist ryc...
My immortal >> Harry Potter
I think a lot of the harry potter modern criticism is kinda cringe because its clearly people are just doing it bc jk rowling is a shitty person but there are some very funny critiques of it
My immortal is pretty good
Yes, I also think it's mostly dumb
based usrula k le guin
Lol
Pretty good is an understatement for that literary masterpirce
ryc you're a millenial right? harry potter is your reading core
It's a masterclass in trolling
Harry potter was great when I was a kid
But it's just not timeless
Not in the way that Homestuck is.
JK Rowling is good writer
What color is luna lovegoods house
I really enjoyed her hairy poter series!
Fine, I'll stop trolling
Here is a book I could read over and over and always love it
Even though I loved it when I was like 8
Rudin
A timeless read is Berserk by Kentaro Miura.
The Phantom Hourglass
Phantom Hourglass is just so good and so fun
i remember reading the golden compass when I was little and enjoying it
but I remember exactly 0 details
What is it about?
It's a kid who gets whisked away to a fantasy land and has to do the adventure like usual
It's just like
Relentlessly clever and fun
He gets Isekai’d?
Yes
Whats difference between Phantom Hourglass and SAO.
This, but unironically
What in the world is SAO
Sword Art Online

I don't see what's so great about it
what were you referring to
The phantom tollbooth
oh yeah
Next to 21st Century Boys
It's an amazing book Jon
Nice manhwa
Phantom tollbooth is like hitchhikers guide to the galaxy but for kids
(btw if you think hitchhikers guide is bad and/or cringe, get out of my sight)
I never found why hitchhikers guide was loved by people
the hitchhiker's guide is for kids
GET OUT OF MY SIGHT


Hitchhiker is for annoying people
Hitchhikers guide is for anyone with a heart.
of all ages
I dont see the appeal to hitchhikers in my personal opinion. Can you help me see it ryc
I couldnsay same thing about every Mecha in existence
I hate parents and anti gamers
I feel like ready player one is garbage
And people think hitchhikers guide is like ready player one
Those are the only people who deserve to be discriminated against
(it's not)
Both are interesting
Ready player one is fucking
But its run of the mill
Like what
But anyway
😳
No I am not thinking more about that awful book
Oh looked it up
Its western media so ofc thats the critique. If isekai went main stream society would be split into socialism and fascism
People copy Douglas Adams style
Because it's so good
And they do it poorly
That doesnt make Douglas Adams generic
i love csm
Lol
Similar to how Slim thinks Neutral Milk Hotel is the peak of music because it came before other indie rock
common sense media
I do not think hitchhiker is all that amazing from what ive seen but ready player 1 is like
undoubtedly worse
so much worse
oh yea absolutely
Thank you
Hitchhikers is good though
lol
Hitchhikers is the Infinite Jest of scifi satire
Have any of y’all seen Rick or morty
This is a great comparison
I havent read much of infinite jest
it is what it is
Like people told me u need to be really knowledgeable in physics and math to understand
Just middle school education
there's a minimum iq requirement @tropic hornet
You need to have a very high IQ to appreciate Rick and Morty.
mandated by adult swim
To get the more sophisticated jokes
Rick and Morty is funny
ok enough shitty jokes
I laugh every episode
Rick and Morty is good in the same way hitchhiker is good, it's stupid and fun
Ill agree
rp1 is an abomination
Oh damn
And people who hate it for being fake smart are being ridiculous
Do I need to rewatch rp1
It's stupid but in a clever way a lot of the time
They are cringe
I love stupid but clever
Other people hate rick and morty because a lot of the fans are walking reddit
anime is bad tho so
Which is understandable
Making distinction between smart and stupid is very cringe
But also now the rick and morty haters are the reddit
Why would you say this?
because its true
Can you give your opinion of why?
anime is bad because every anime ive seen recently has put like $10 into its animation budget because the audience doesn't seem to care
im sad
very predictable
/s ?
not /s
Sonny boy?
Aquatope is bad?
i have not seen sonny boy
JJK was also not that good max ur just coping
Sonny boy is very good
Watch odd taxi, it was pretty fun
What do you enjoy then?
Oddtaxi is worth it
Nothing triggers me more than badly directed fight scenes
Good shows
there aren't any bad fight scenes in jjk
Examples please?
this is untrue
Dont be mean
moth is afraid of good animation
there are modern shows that I think are good
vintage has its place
ok enjoy watching ur poorly directed fight scenes as all the action stops so the main villain can explain their shitty knockoff superpower
Read novels
before resuming
thats true of almost every anime
Yes
Tell me you only watch shonen without telling me
i do only watch shonen
But i was also specifically talking to max
Why
and about a shonen
max thinks wicked city has bad animation
Seinen and Josei are where its at
or good characters
literal 0/10 opinion haver
wicked city has outdated and boring animation
thats just true
on a technical level
I give max's anime taste a 1/10 on MAL
it is bad compared to modern anime
thats objectively not true
u havent even watched it uve seen like a clip on youtube
i have no idea how you think this is even arguable
Ill admit Mr Moth is being cringe. But that doesnt give you a right to reciprocate energies
You're all being cringe
i can be as cringe as I like
Who is mr moth
Have u read tower of god yet max
I am also not being cringe
i was so excited when it resumed
Tower of god is waste of time past 1st season
Im up to date though
The Korean raws are 6 chapters ahead of the English translations
I wouldve pwned rachel
There's a discord server where they fan translate them
lmfao
Damn translation team slacking
How to fight is best manhwa right now next to orv
urbanism is thjrd
Webtoon is proprietary garbage
Being colored is actually so nice tbh
they paywall your experience
Just their company model
I don't mind that, it's just that their translations are so far behind for tog for example that it gets annoying
Yeah but like
the alternative is that
i binge 5 more chapters
and am on weekly again
so i'm okay to just wait
Just stick to cool manhwa
most of the manwha i read
Manga art is better in general
is hot garbage
Same bere
Not all manga
oh whoops
manhua XD
Max vs korean
manhua is beyond trash
I dont like the manhwa thing where all the panels float in the white void
bullies in highschool
I find it super annoying actually
i wasn't even bullied in highschool
Both because its not pretty and also its hard to read
Telling someone you read manhua is advertising an IQ of 70
Sideways
its meant to be sideways
Oh
just read on a tablet like a chad
sad!
Omniscient Reader's Viewpoint
Its also aesthetically unpleasing
My argument was going to be that the paywalls and being behind on translations fragments the communities into a lot of different parts
Amen
already mentioned
Nuff said
Lol
Depending on where in the paywall they are
manhwa is not made for the human eye a lot of the time which i do not like
Paneling is nice and good
ORV and Overgeared novels are peak human existence
It makes things better
Yes Overgeared is good as well
just seems
objectively wrong
like people put a lot of effort into this stuff
some of it, anyway
I mean I'm not saying that, just that there should be and are better models
Does webtoons actually support them financially
yes
That don't have such drawbacks
Well webtoon clicks
Yeah it's also dubious how much of the fastpass money actually goes to the artist
The bible shohkd be free is my argument.
/thread
more than the 0 on other sites lol
id be interested to know tho
is there a better app zoph
that i should be using
I've seen sources that say that none of the money goes to the artists and it's only from likes on the chapters that they get their money but idk how valid this was
I read all of ORV. It was so bad.
i honestly paid for crunchyroll back in the day soley bc it kept track of where i was
Idk I just use tachiyomi
ryc please try to lie more convincingly
The Ready Player One of ange lit.
Crunchyroll is really awful
If you thought it was bad you would've dropped it by chapter 200
Both to its translators and as a watcher
Fansubs are often a lot better
because translators are super overworked and underpaid
moth i watch shonen
the dialogue
barely matters
but yes it is sad
that translators are underpaid
Thats true if you only watch bad shows it doesnt matter if the translations are good 
But yea speaking unironically like
I try to avoid them and their subs just because I dont want to support that practice financially and often times its not very good in small ways
fair
i just like
am really too stupid
to keep track of what episodes of things
i am on
or chapters
Woke
I solve this problem by just rewatching the same 2-3 shows over and over
so i dont even have to remember what episode im on
i can start and stop at any point
i feel like reading manga ruined anime for me
because i started to notice like
how much stalling there was
and just wasted space
The solution is to just not watch things that do that tbh
To me its a sign of like lazy shonen adaptations but there are some that are not like that at all
both fma adaptations 
03 is better but brotherhood is pretty good too
is there like
?
The original fullmetal alchemist
i assume
Ok
Are u asking specifically for shonen max?
you know i am






