#serious-discussion
1 messages ยท Page 427 of 1
De Anza is one of the top transfer ones, but they don't seem to have as strong a math program
I mean undergraduate education is probably more or less the same
Diablo Valley as well
So if you had to pick one
I don't think so
Which one would it be
PCC is probably good as well
for a safety school
Pasadena community college is solid
If you want to learn proof based math in community college, go to Orange Coast
If you want to do some research based stuff, there's Fullerton College
I don't care what I learn in the first 2 years
I want to go to get the brand name of a UC
Then why go to college?
so I can get ajob
Ahuh
I will learn at the UC ofc
I think you're putting the cart before the horse
Never heard that one
People don't hire you because you went to a UC
What
it depends on the major

You're wrong, but ok
if you're a EECS major from UC Berk you get alot more attention than other colleges
That's what im saying
but also if you didn't do shit at Berk
Local employers actually prefer people from SLO for EECS
The vast majority of undergrads don't do those things
meet more lazy people
or not even lazy
just like
80% of undergrads
Internships are common sure
No at the top schools there are no lazy ppl
๐งข
Disclaimer: I don't work for a FAANG, but many people in my immediate family/friend group do
that's only at CC and stuf
meet more people
Going to Cal versus Irvine versus a CSU doesn't matter for a FAANG
lmfao classic "CC = lazy" POV
You really have no idea what you're talking about
I told my dad about my backup transfer from CC plan
But he said that I might get stuck there
What does tha tmean?
Ah yes parents the de facto knowledge source of all college things
the people who went to college ~30 years ago
What authority does your dad have to speak of on Community College or University students aspirations?
Today?
cause no change has occured in 30 years
Well idk man
Did he go to CC? If so was that recently?
I know lazy people at my school for CS (top 5 CS school) and I know hardworking people at CCs
this is depressing Im never going to find a college
Yes you are
I went to CC from 2013-2016, and worked at CCs for over 5 years. I also attended a good UC, and a CSU, and now I work in a University
I wish I could do that
I'm not trying to do an appeal to authority
Let me tell you for a fact that I have met some lazy people here at my college
you'll be fine
Wherever I go I am going to work my ass off
that's good
But like....you should talk to people who know what they're talking about. Family is great and all but they might not be in the know about College stuff
THat is why i wanted to chat w/ u
Like if you do EECS, I'd recommend cal poly SLO over Berkeley
EECS?
really?
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Berkley is a top EECS school tho.
Ok Cal Poly is a school I am applying to
The faculty do more to help you get internships, industry projects, and research going while you're a student
At Berkeley you're just a student ID in a large lecture hall
Hm fair enough
yeah I dont want this for my college
I mean I could say that about my school but i prefer being in a large school
Then don't go to a UC
If you're a top student, then Berkeley will be a better place because you'll be able to get better things without needing that much faculty guidance
so I guess that's my perspective
EECS and CS are both very large majors as well
But I know like
First year CS/EECS people for got research
Yea if you don't need that much guidance, then Berkeley has more resources
but less help to get those resources
and more competition
So my wife got into Cal Poly SLO for CS, and we went out there for the transfer orientation - their entire shtick is we are going to put you in small classes, so you know your professors, and you are going to do industry projects as a student
That's awesome
Her older sister went to Cal for CS and said it was miserable due to the workload
There's lots of ways to do industry projects at Berkeley
CalTech?
They certainly aren't as accessible
Cal Poly seems nice man
That's my main point. If you are the cream of the cream, berkeley might be better - but even at that I'm skeptical of how much better Berkeley would be over SLO
Days without sleep
Working on projects
Grinding coffee, your mind to dust
I have grit
Well
Angela's Duckworth research is not that well founded
Hopefully it will get better
Because they're changing CS admissions
It's no longer a GPA floor to get in
You need to apply to CS now
Anyways, my wife went to Irvine for Computer Science transfer due to financial constraints we had
She placed into a FAANG right away
So hopefully this will help control class sizes + unnecessary competition
Her older sister went to Berkeley, and had to wait a year before she got into a FAANG
So it's not like if you go to Cal over some other UC you'll automatically get what you want
I also know lots of people who got through CS without issue with good time management/teamwork skills
Do you mean Cal Tech?\
Yeah the point is that the university doesn't quite matter as much as you think it does
Cal = Berkeley
The most important thing is to find an environment you'd thrive in
If you know how you are as a student
e.g. I went to UCLA and I hate the quarter system. Had a bad time
I can just learn bc I want to
I wanted to go to Berkeley, but I was rejected
Smaller schools do not have "no competition"
SLO has plenty of competition lol
You can build a relationship with your professor
that's nice
That's not the same thing as "Oh this will be a cake walk"
It depends on the university - but in general that falls under the purview of Admissions Officers
I transferred from a foreign curriculum to American High school
and I had a really hard time
Taking CC might be a good way to acclimate yourself to american education system
grade 9 I had a 3.1 GPA, grade 10 I had a 3.5. Now I ended grade 11 with 3.95
I am worreid that I have no choice
but to go to CC
thatis why Im asking
my numbers are really lousy
Really?
Do you have an intended major yet?
Ok I understand anxiety but the people who have such absurdly unrealistic beliefs about how college admissions function confuse me
a 3.95 gpa in junior year is not going to leave you with no options but CC
it makes me really depressed still
those numbers are objectively fine
A 3.95 makes you really depressed???????
You could probably get into several UCs
well i assumed u live in cali
because moonbears recommended it but
until grade 9
Tim does not currently live in California
Tim currently lives in Illinois
They specifically asked about California Colleges
im sure theres a strong one you can apply to and get in to with those stats
Which is why in the past, people recommended schools like UIUC
yeah
Tim lives in racoonlandia
UIUC is my fallback plan
im worried ill have no choice but to go to a CC
UIUC is one of the strongest schools for engineering in the country...
I guess
"i guess"
Its better than many UCs
But look at the acceptance rates
for engineering
I guess
Timmy my person, UCs really aren't that good for Engineering IMO. They do too much focus on theory and not enough on projects
Who cares about the acceptance rates
You should care about the quality of the institution
My roommate was Mechanical Engineering at UCLA - he just got his Masters and he can't find a job
Actually?>
That's so crazy
UCLA is a top school
companies should be coming to your doorsetp
Do you want to get a good education and have proper opportunities
Or do you want prestige
I don't think that's how it works
Education
You don't go to a top school and get a job for being at a top school
Ok so it is about prestige lol
no but idk
Is what it comes down to
I WANT to not care about prestige
You go to a school, work hard, get something interesting done, and then you get a job for the interesting stuff you've done
But you do....
Because as we've said there are plenty of excellent schools that u can get into with ur grades
also UIUC is prestigious...
Im pretty sure its literally T5 for computer engineering
and probably T20 or T30 for other fields
What is the problem
UIUC should be ur backup because there are other schools that interest you more not because there are other schools with lower acceptance rates
this is so hard to decide man
and you want to flex or something
its so hard to choose
Moth you are in same grade as me no?
how are you choosing
it's so painfuil
Based on what schools are good 
I don't think Moth worries about "What rank the university is"
But rather
"Who is at the university I'd like to work with or learn from"
I guess I feel a bitbetter now
oregon, nevada, and arizona better look out!

I am pretty sure you will be considering ur grades but like
Again
Dont freak out about things u cant change
Your gpa averages out to like 3.6 anyway doesnt it...
and theres an upward trend
It's frustrating though
which admissions officers take into account
Like the fucking amount of work I put in
UCs don't even count freshman year?
and no one cares
Timmy my person, you know I graduated HS with like a 2.5 GPA
And that was with sports holding me up
When I transferred from CC to UCLA, I had like a 3.65?
Yuh
What was your extra curricular
Hrmm...I didn't really include it that much on my application
But I did a lot of volunteering in my community: feeding the homeless, working on rebuilding Native American reservations; I also did water polo at a fairly high level
Is volunteering a good extra currulinar?
I don't want univeristies to see that I just do it to get in
ok
my favorite way to volunteer is to tutor like inner city kids
i n n e r c i t y
or people who normally wouldnt be able to afford extra help
hahahha idk what to call it!
c'mon you know what I mean
If I can't be the smartest guy (my gpa is shit) I will be the nicest guy.
But I am worried that univeristies will just see this as something I am doing just to get into college
but it's not
idk if theres a better term i just find the phrase funny
idk I have to write about this I guess
the urban youths
yea I do too but idk what else to say
that sounds like a band name moth
boundary city kids always get ignored
to be clear i was not suggesting urban youths as an alternative to inner city
Well thanks for the chat @crystal stone . Sorry I don't know a lot
It's all good
exaggerated swagger of an inner city teenager
look just hit em with this
Never forget that the reason math produces so many gems and visionaries is because math is definitively hard, and has the hardest problems known to man, so men who consistently push themselves to solve adverse problems, will attain a generalizable ability to develop creative solutions to problems with ease as oppose to only dealing with the problems of a regular joe life, people who have been through it develop street smarts and learn how to solve street problems, but you can only see so many street problems, there are thousands of math problems in physics engineering and many other disciplines it is pure beauty!
Thats why I want to study math at your uni
men
full ride
language is too gendered for a free ride
place an s before he
it sounds super impressive idk why
regular jolyne
I have never seen the not very cool people tag before
you have
oh nvm
is it worth it to spend some time memorizing formulas?
What kind
I'm very much against it in general, but I feel like if I don't I will have to rederive the entirety of electrostatics when the test comes around.
well
well, if u practice questions, u will remember the formulae better
what kind of the electrostatics formulas
there are only a handful of equations you need but
I speak of the challenge problems tbo
if there are questions about the field generated by a cable or something
it's not gonna be fun
@fallow laurel the challenge problems have been defunct for a while, i do not think it is possible these days to find someone willing to check your solution
For god's sake
At least we want an answer.
?
Well not to be rude
But we would want a final answer for each question
I would totally understand that the prove questions are not easy to do so
But for the computational ones , I find it odd.
I literally Dm'd many admins and yet I got no answer
I am not looking for problems or messing around
But it frustrates me.
so the people who handle these problems are disjoint from the administration
I am afraid so
and unfortunately all of the people who handle these problems are not around anymore to verify solutions
so i am sorry
but this is how it is
there are no listed solutions
It would seem
That trying to solve each one of them and sending their solution might be a valuable idea
As long as they archived it...
No need to apologize though
if you solve a problem and don't understand precisely why your solution works...
maybe you haven't solved the problem
at least for problems like the challenge ones we have here 
I believe that mine does
But I cannot be overconfident.
This is why I would ask whoever posed it.
Or at least someone who actually knows if what am I doing is actually legal or not , as from my point of view it is
But no one can be so sure
Wait , you're an analyist (check dm pls)
Should I send my attempt here? :)
engineers beg to differ
i mean for a math proof
yea but then my joke doesnt work
unsolicited dms ๐
I haven't actually got very many from this server
quite based
be based like me and straight up don't even check ur notifs
Because I am not a no man
:nice:
Basically all my unsolicited dms are from this server. "Hey are you good at 9th grade algebra" type shit.
hey can you help me solve this really simple algebra problem?? it's for highschool. let p(x1, ..., xk) = (p1(x), ..., pk(x) be a function R^k to R^k with polynomial components and non zero constant jacobian. show that p has an inverse with polynomial conponents
undeadza
thanks!!
i expect a solution in 10 minutes it's when my exam is due
(don't ban me this is sarcasm)
i don't need help it's an open ended discussion question
going by your profile pic, you need all the help you can get
you may be correct
I'm in 9th grade plz find the roots in radicals of $x^{5}+3x-7$ I need this in 2 minutes for my test thnx
Elliptic Curve of Rank 9001
,w roots x^5 + 3x - 7
@ moderators
i don't understand what that means but i get the idea
ive just accepted that ill be lacking in algebra for a while 
moth said something about galoos theory being geometric and this has rekindled interest
grothendiecks galois memes
All you need to know about Galois theory is that the galois group of a field extension is the group of automorphisms such that the restriction of the automorphism to the base field is the identity, and that the splitting field of a polynomial is the smallest field you can factor the polynomial over.
grothendieck galois memes is step 1 in the "galois theory is geometric" 
riemann surfaces makes it very explicit
super pog
no, i mean you were banned by me
it's the running gag, apparently
they say i was kicked from being a mod cuz i banned you

๐
๐ , no ๐จ๏ธ
Wait but that was what happened
Don't try to rewrite history
You know what you did
i airbrushed mirza out of history
Put a large (3^8 by 3^8) sierpinski carpet into conway's game of life and this was the end result.
It feels like for larger and larger inputs there should be some sense that the end states "converge," and when I run specific cases that does seem to happen, but I'm not sure if there's a way to actually make sense of it. Lots of neat behavior at the very least.
end result as in it keeps repeating from there?
Doesn't every pattern reach a point where it's just oscillators and gliders going off to infinity
scuffed sierpinski triangles showing up in the construction of the next generation
does anyone know where or how i could procure this? Y. Nesterov. A method of solving a convex programming problem with convergence rate O(1/k2). In Soviet Mathematics Doklady, volume 27, pages 372โ376, 1983
i can't even seem to find much about it in google
if it exists in english
what happen
if not, i guess even in russian is ok
this happen
gimme a moment
russian math is so occult
thanks!

i'll look at the equations and scratch my head
i'm already suffering enough with german, plz no
but i'll at least be able to cite the original sauce now
instead
make up a fake russian person, a fake journal, and a fake paper
if you ever need something but can't prove it
just cite it from that!
i prefer publishing 2 papers in tandem that reference each other for a missing proof
this is a good problem
so now im glad i did ODE and saw inner products of the functional spaces
Wow
now prove CS for an arbitrary inner product space
ok
Does anything about Spivak's proof use that the space is R^n?
no
you can probably replace any instance of inner product with the generic inner product and itll still work fine
i suppose i will write this to try
Oh wait Spivak uses the discriminant proof
yeah
That one's cute
yes
Okay so it doesn't depend on the finite-dimensionality or anything
But it depends on being an inner product space over R
If it were C that'd be different
Yup
yeah im trying rn with general one and
i have weird feeling something isn't gonna cancel out when x=cy
if c is complex
cus now im gonna get c^2 on one side but |c|^2 on the other
or something
eek
yeah
exactly
equality forces c to be real
in which case everything is fine if we work over R
but not over C
how.. interesting
Oh the x=cy isn't the problem
I think
Whether you have real or complex inner product
Sloth King Daminark
The problem is when you actually wanna play the quadratic equation game
Inner products commute in the real case but in the complex case they pull up a conjugate
that is commuting...
right this is correct
Wut
wdym ryc
Ryc are you...
commutative only means symmetric over real fields
Sloth King Daminark
right
And woo great quadratic equation we can do shit with discriminants
But if you expand that over C that doesn't quite work the way you want anymore
Err |c|
Err no I'm thinking real case
hmm
Okay it's late and I'm messing up I should officially write it out
But basically
<x,y> vs <y,x>
Is your issue
Let's actually write things out I'm being like Souganidis rn
okey
Sloth King Daminark
mhm
So yeah part of the problem is that you're gonna pull up the |c|^2 in front but also the middle terms don't really work too nicely anymore
we get abs(c)^2 come out of the last term but the middle is yikes
twice the real part
Yeah that's the key point, if you do it out fully I guess it's $-(c\langle y,x\rangle + \overline{c\langle y,x\rangle})$ which is straight fucked
Sloth King Daminark
Yeah
bilinear this time and we cant just
It's the cross terms
flip it around
Yup
ok got it
lolll
Between R and C pretty much what happens is
C has nicer algebraic properties
Namely algebraic closure
And that makes a lot of things tick better. e.g. Jordan form
And as far as analysis goes C is a lot nicer because being a complex linear map from C to C is harder than just being a real linear map
It's actually a geometric condition. And once you know it... all your functions are actually unicorns which shit rainbows

But linear algebraically you're more often referencing the algebraic closure
However
Once inner products enter the picture
Then you have a problem
Namely that R is ordered so it's sorta "built in equipped" to handle the notion of positive definiteness
But over C, I'm pretty sure a bilinear form cannot be positive definite
(Prove it!)
o
(think about it for me)
okay this is on the list of problems u told me to solve :petthecat:
Honestly I don't think this is something you should table
i have a handful to chew on :3 this is gud
If you tilt your head to the side you can get it basically now
o
Between when I sent this message and the followup
I figured it out
Map VxV->F which is bilinear
In the sense of, linear in each argument if you hold the other one still
Yup
Honestly if I taught a linear algebra class for math majors I'd just teach them multilinear stuff
the funny thing is he told me to ask him to teach me multilinear algebra one of these days
If they complain they can eat shit
metal prove this thing daminark mentioned
Life is hard deal with it
i dont want to think about it
TTerra literally just like
no i dont want to THINK
Tilt your head to the side for 15 seconds
no brainpower
It's C

Somewhat stronger
Sloth King Daminark
So it says a bit more. You're real and then among real folk you're (strictly) positive
Okay thank fucking God
lol
I almost thought you weren't trolling
of course im trolling
It's like with Shamrock and the angle form
He was like yeah this is hard and I'm like fAMMM??????????!!!!!
Until I was like nah he's gotta be kidding
(Metal fwiw don't feel bad that I was getting on TTerra's case lmao, he should know linear algebra cold so I will absolutely shame him for not figuring this out, but it's more new to you so it needn't be instant)
the spoiler is a solution btw
It's a trick that once you see it you'll be like ooooooooooooo
And then from now on if you see a similar problem you are morally obligated to figure it out since that trick is just in the back of your head
it's like the first thing you should try whenever you're in C
what's special about C?!?!?!!
Yeah that's a hint
well when i think C i think conjugating
what is special about C hmm
What is the obstruction to it being a complex vector space?
(Equivalently, if you give me a complex vector space, well I can forget that it's a complex vector space and just say it's a real vector space. What piece of information have I forgotten when I do that?)
As for shamrock
So you know the angle form yeah?
$-\frac{y dx + x dy}{x^2 + y^2}$
Sloth King Daminark
Yeah I forget exactly what the context was but
Shamrock was pretending it was confusing

And I was like bruuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
COMPACT!
I mean in his case it was blatant trolling
hmm maybe i should try comparing just C with R^2 to begin with?
like what operations?
Yeah
if you ever want to meme on shamrock just type COMPACT! dami
i can add two vectors together and they will be in the space
works every time
Yup, and?
i can also multiply any vector by a constant c in the field and itll also be in the vector space
and i can take linear combos like thst
Yup, and that's a key point
"by a constant in the field"
So if I go from R to C
What new capability do I have?
hmm
If something's goes to shit when you swap from real vector spaces to complex vector spaces
Then the proof probably involves scaling by i
Since otherwise you're just performing stuff that would work on R as well
scaling by i is like rotating everything by 90 degrees ccw maybe after i figure this out maybe there is some geometric visualization? idk
Hmm... I wouldn't say geometry is the way to go about this bit
o okey
Not every vector space is thought about geometrically
right
And this is a thing that's true about every complex vector space
Bilinear forms fail at being positive definite
ell^1 is geometric
ell^{\infty}
Honestly I don't even really think of l^1 as geometric anymore
l^2 mayyyybe
But that's about it
||oh this also serves as a reason you want conjugate linearity in one of the arguments
||
i've never thought about it too much
Yup
cool
i guess i can try doing B(iv,iv) maybe
and pulling out i in parts and seeing what happens
try it
kind of a shot in the dark but lets see
i can pull out i from the first part
thats fine
but then i pull out -i from the second part
but
??? that doesnโt seem to help does it
bilinear
you'll get an i from the second argument as well, bilinear doesn't mean conjugate linear in one of the args
why is it problematic?
so if v is a nonzero vector
gimme deets
and lets say that B(v,v) is some positive number maybe
hmm
iv is also nonzero vectorr
true
so then now i got a negative number for B(iv,iv)
Done
yeah metal that's it
o
so this means that some where something will break
just find a v for which we get positive number from B
and scale by i
Not only somewhere something
b explicit
You'll find where it breaks in 2 steps
Try literally anything
If it's not a positive number you've already fucked it
If it is a positive number multiply by i
Yup
makes sense
So yeah that's why inner products are harder over C
metal go back and read the spoilered messages
okay
C doesn't play nicely with being positive definite because scaling by i twice fucks your shit up
And our solution is well we're no longer bilinear but "sesquilinear"
right tterra i was thinking that there was a good reason we now put conjugate linear in second component
b-but daminark what if V = {0}?????????????????//
it would remove the -1 problem
What if your mom = {0}
sesqulinear
Same yeah
share now
everyone is asleep
ok and? wkae them up
sounds like their problem
i agree
Be there or be square.
i will try to digest this information about how C is bad with inner products and bilinear forms
this kind of problems i didnt foresee earlier lol
I have a lot of ideas on what I'd do if I TA linear algebra
let me TA multivariable calculus so i can DG pill everybody
This exercise, I also might have them prove Lee Ghandi's theorem
?
?
It's a good exercise
nvm yeah daminark that;s a really good one
nevermind
TTerra I don't know what you're saying
thats a good one dami
Lee ghandi's mf nuts
Hahahaha
totally wreck them
I'm sad TTerra got that. I would've definitely got Metal the second time lol
i don't want metal to get absolutely blasted twice in a row
i must be on my wits the whole time
this is like when the sensei always does something to student to keep them on their toes and never let them sink
you are living in a hunter-gatherer society in the african continent in the year 10000 bc and the DN tribe is trying to steal your food
or whatever stereotype this is from karate kid or whatevr

ninjago even
Hah someone should code that game and then 5 minutes after starting it's a deez nuts joke
you might catch ligma
you do not have modern medicine
the reason i picked 10000 bc in the african continent is that there was a deadly disease called myra sweeping through it
10000bc yes
joe kong wrote a great textbook on ancient african virology where you can read more about it
See #math-discussion for why you must always have your wits about you

@velvet dagger what do you call people who do computations with holomorphic 1-forms all day?
nGroupoid
dz nuts

Wait really???
One of my friends has to sign up for one that's like a 4 hour drive away so that's good lol


Irvine?

What am I aiming for?
Well I found out if I go to UT Austin, I can join the water polo team
College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas at Austin
Graduate Program Application Information, Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University
It just says it on their website
oh rip you need to check each individual website 
I did a year of College water polo, on medical red shirt
So I have 5 years of eligibility to play still
I can do one year red shirt
and 4 years of playing
LA did not update their admissions page 
Doesn't math gre still give you an advantage even if it's optional?
If you score well, then yes
if you can do integrals 
I don't think it's the integral questions
It's the fuckin' linear algebra ones
Where you have to find the spanning or determinant so fast
Oh, also my Research Mentor fully committed to Irvine
So he's back there now
UC Irvine?
yUh
Wisconsin did not update their admissions page yet 
I did research at irvine for 6-8 months
Under the direction of a professor
who moved away
I saw some chem videos of UC Irvine
but now he's back at UC Irvine
@narrow rock My research mentor says he makes more money from stock market
Than he does from his salary as a UC prof
michigan's page is impossible to navigate 
northwestern did not update their page yet 
rip.
How's the research lookin?
dont have a topic yet 
what are you doing it in?
is northwestern in chicago
northwestern looks great
pretty much

one of my friends ended up going to northwestern
but the prof he wanted to work with moved the year he joined 
moved to princeton and took all her grad students along

grad or undergrad
grad
pensive
im going to apply for grad at northwestern specifically to take your place
True!
I appreciate the ammount of mathematics going on in math VC over the past 2 weeks
that's super competitive isn't it
grad school is competitive.
Northwestern is really underrated I think
It looks like it should be considered one of the top schools, at least for analysis / dynamics
Idk about other stuff
oh you were talking about grad school mb
yeah I talked to a college counselor who said it was a very good school
is it underrated?
i think everyone knows its good
maybe its less talked about on the internet since its specialties are less algebraic
(though its very good at algebra too)
USNWR is bad at a field ranking!?
who woulda thunk it.

northwestern has really good algebra
Northwestern is a good school
yes but not prob a top 2 (quote slim) like it is in dynamics
it's probably top 10
(apparently, idk dynamics)
or 15
off the top of my head there's John Francis, Ben Antieau and Tamarkin
and there's Zaslow if youre into fukaya cats
Boston
slimevexus
Yeah none of these people are that interesting tbh
Glen Hall mayyyyyyybe?
Devaney mayyyyyyyybe?
Suggondi snuts maybe?
Yeah I mean idgaf about celestial mechanics but I'm assuming not every paper is on that
I mean look at the first three in Glen Hall
Ah yeah eh
Not that good anymore tbh
Devaney's being into complex dynamics seems alright, but I feel like most of the time when you see teaching listed as an interest it tends to be the main thing
Also haven't seen the papers so idk
Yeah this group isn't that good
UChicago is the place on my end lmao
Eskin, Wilkinson, and Filip are ๐
yup slim get into chicago 
how dare you
i mostly mean for undergrad, it's not severely underrated for grad but it should be considered one of the top few places in certain subjects instead of fucking pr*nceton and h*rvard as usual
N*U
UC D*vis
UC B*rkley

P*E
P*E
pie.
****ysis
alg*braic """""""geometry""""""
b*g shaq

๐ ๐ฆ is this a sense of humor
C*icago
Did you walk by Evans
matcha icecream place
it was early so it wasnt open
I had a matcha red bean smoothie yesterday
they have a bunch of new stuff
It opens at 1
on the wall
abusing butterflies is not humorous at all
Which new things?




