#serious-discussion

1 messages · Page 426 of 1

neat lintel
#

it's not necessary for spivak but it's something you'll deal with if you take an analysis course

cold needle
#

okey

neat lintel
#

what other exercises were there catThink

cold needle
#

idk i just did the first three

#

i guess ill work on the next starred one for tonight

#

well ok this one isn't starred but it caught my attention

neat lintel
cold needle
#

its about norm preserving transformation

#

and inner product preserving

#

transformation

neat lintel
#

ah yes

cold needle
#

and i have to show that norm preserving is equivalent

#

to inner product preserving

neat lintel
#

interesting

cold needle
#

i will do that now

neat lintel
#

the proof for this is important

#

well it's an important trick/technique

cold needle
#

hmm

#

okey

neat lintel
#

oh btw

#

problem 1-8 might have a typo

#

i remember thisbeing one of those ones

cold needle
#

What

#

oh

#

what is the typo

#

should i look up an errata pdf

#

or sth

neat lintel
#

let me think about it

cold needle
#

okay

neat lintel
#

i chose not to think

#

and to simply google

#

i am a Genius

cold needle
#

see one way is really easy

#

going from inner product preserving

#

just do y=x

#

or

#

okay i guess i should look at this

#

is this the typo

neat lintel
#

are you thinking of problem 1-7 or 1-8

cold needle
#

oh this is 8

neat lintel
#

the typo is 1-8, the one after the inner product stuff

cold needle
#

i am working on 7

#

okay

#

good to know tho

neat lintel
#

yeah inner product preserving -> norm preserving is basically trivial

cold needle
#

i need to do some kind of trick

#

with the other way around

neat lintel
#

check out the results in the book catThink

cold needle
#

🤔 wdym results in book

#

like the chapter theorms?

#

okay

neat lintel
#

ya

cold needle
#

T is linear catThink

neat lintel
cold needle
#

compute <T(x), T(x+y)>

neat lintel
cold needle
#

the result should follow if i canceled things out right

neat lintel
#

elaborate

cold needle
#

we are working in R^n so inner product is bilinear

#

T is linear

#

so then T(x+y) = T(x)+T(y)

neat lintel
#

you get <x, x> + <Tx, Ty> but what happens to this second guy?

cold needle
#

well originally you can write the equality as <T(x), T(x+y)> = <x,x+y>

#

apply bilinearity

#

cancel <x,x>

neat lintel
#

wait which direction are u doing

#

norm -> inner right

cold needle
#

norm preserving -> inner

#

yes

#

wait

cold needle
#

what am i doing

#

hold on

neat lintel
cold needle
#

okay this is fine

#

i can get to this position easily

#

square both sides of the norm

#

er

#

pain

neat lintel
#

maybe you wanna look at <T(x+y), T(x+y)>?

cold needle
#

no this is gonna suck

#

yeah

#

ok let me write this up from beginning

neat lintel
#

that's a norm so you can use your hypotheses

cold needle
#

we will use symmetry of inner product later

#

same stuff will cancel when i get ther

#

but

#

yes

#

so then |T(x+y)| = sqrt(<T(x+y),T(x+y)>)

#

and so Rhs also equal sqrt(<x+y,x+y>)

#

square both sides

#

then apply bilinearity and symmetry

#

cancel terms

#

pane

neat lintel
#

pane

#

i see

#

cool

#

i was thinking of using the polarization identity

#

since it expresses <v, w> in terms of norms

#

here's a similar/harder exercise

cold needle
#

wait

#

no

#

mine is wrong

neat lintel
cold needle
#

pain

neat lintel
#

is it?

cold needle
#

er

#

no it isn't

#

i combine my naive attempt with this improved one

#

yes

#

its correct

#

cus the naive attempt is part of how i can cancel some terms out after applying bilinearity

#

so i guess not so naive

neat lintel
#

you have to be a little careful on why you can cancel those

cold needle
#

yeah

#

see you can start with |T(x)| = |x|

#

and then do the same squaring game

#

and thats why we can cancel

neat lintel
#

yes

#

good

#

ok here's something similar

#

let V be a real inner product space, and let f: V -> V be a function with f(0) = 0 and |f(x) - f(y)| = |x - y| for all x, y in V. show that f is a linear map such that <f(x), f(y)> = <x, y> for all x, y in V

#

note that f is not assumed linear

#

!

#

as a hardmode, is the same true of maps between complex inner product spaces? (i don't actually know off the top of my head)

cold needle
#

oof

#

in complex we have to conjugate a lot of things

neat lintel
#

right im thinking that might mess something up

cold needle
#

yeah

#

Perhops...

neat lintel
#

anyways the thing i have in mind uses ||polarization||

#

note that real inner product spaces and complex inner product spaces have different ||polarization identities||

#

spoilers for problem

cold needle
#

ok wont click yet

neat lintel
#

this one might get a little computational

cold needle
#

oug

#

ic

neat lintel
#

oug

#

you dont have to do it now

#

just something to ponder

cold needle
#

ok

#

ill take a stab tonight and probably go sleep soon

#

then tomorrow is another day

#

this is nice

neat lintel
#

linear algebra is good for you

cold needle
#

talking about math here is very good for me :3

neat lintel
cold needle
#

idek what that is but very cool :3

blazing pawn
#

thats ok tterra doesnt either

neat lintel
#

first fundamental form turns a surface into a metric space. theorem: isometry in the metric-space sense is the same as a DG isometry

#

roughly

blazing pawn
#

he is just possessed by the sleep paralysis geometry demons when he posts here

neat lintel
#

very rough theorem sttement

#

i dont want to use the word riemannian

#

also u need connected

#

sad

blazing pawn
#

i finally found non connected spaces that matter

neat lintel
cold needle
#

lmao

blazing pawn
#

tensor product of field extensions over the field of meromorphic functions on a riemann surface get you a non connected cover usually

#

and the connected components correspond to compositum

neat lintel
#

these are words

blazing pawn
#

i think this result is intuitive actually

neat lintel
#

remind me of the thing about meromorphic functions you tlod me the other day

#

or maybe it was pty

blazing pawn
#

ok so you know how covering theory looks similar to galois theory

#

but with the directions reversed

neat lintel
#

i know 0 galois but i know this is supposed to be true

#

i was planning on going into galois theory with this pov but then we just

#

didnt

blazing pawn
#

lmfao

#

basically u can reformulate galois theory as talking about the category of finite etale algebras being equivalent to actions of the absolute galois group

#

which sounds complicated

#

but its not really

#

if we have a field F then we can think about finite separable extensions right

velvet dagger
#

No we can't

#

But continue

blazing pawn
#

Dami moment

vivid halo
#

hello

neat lintel
#

hi

velvet dagger
#

Whaddup

blazing pawn
#

Shut up ng im trying to have my moment in the spotlight where i pretend to be smart by regurgitating information i read in a book 5 to 7 business days ago

#

dont take this from me 😡

velvet dagger
#

I'm actually curious lol so go on

#

My annoying chime ins are signs that I'm listening

neat lintel
#

moth

vivid halo
#

I did some affine Weyl group computations by literally folding a right triangle out of paper and writing 0,1,2 on the edges and flipping it around in the air

neat lintel
#

literally any mathematical discussion is welcomed

velvet dagger
#

Not diffgeo

neat lintel
#

cope

velvet dagger
#

Well diffgeo under limited circumstances

blazing pawn
#

ok so yeah basically I dont want to get into the details because they are kind of elaborate but u can formulate galois theory by talking about

#

if i fix a field k

#

and a separable closure k_s of k

#

we can take the absolute galois group Gal(k_s, k) = Gal(k)

#

so now basically if we have a finite separable extension L of k then we get an action of the Gal(k) automorphisms on Hom(L, k_s) right

#

literally by just composing

#

every g in Gal(k) is an automorphism k_s -> k_s

velvet dagger
#

Fax

blazing pawn
#

so it defines an action on hom sets by sending f to f circ g

velvet dagger
#

Okay I'm starting to see where this is going I think

blazing pawn
#

so without going into too much detail a finite etale algebra over k is a finite dimensional algebra A over k isomorphic to a finite direct product of separable extensions

#

and we have the same action of Gal(k) on Hom(A, k_s)

#

so its not hard to see that we get a functor from finite etale algebras over k into sets with Gal(k) actions on them

#

and specifically separable extensions will give you transitive Gal(k) actions

velvet dagger
#

:0

blazing pawn
#

and Galois extensions give you finite quotients

#

And this is very similar to the covering space situation

velvet dagger
#

That's nifty

blazing pawn
#

if i take the universal cover p: X' -> X over a (semilocally simply connected blah blah blah) space X

#

then covers Y -> X give rise to actions of pi_1(X, x)

#

connected covers correspond to transitive pi-1 actions

#

and galois covers correspond to coset spaces of normal subgroups of pi_1

#

so you have the analogy here

#

finite etale algebras over a field look like covers over a space

#

separable extensions look like connected covers

#

galois extensions look like galois covers

#

riemann surfaces and ramification are the (or at least a) setting where this equivalence is realized

#

specifically compact connected riemann surfaces

#

where covers Y -> X turn M(Y) into a finite etale algebra over M(X)

#

where M(X) and M(Y) are the ring/fields of meromorphic functions

#

M(Y) is a field and thus separable bc characteristic 0 since we are working over C precisely when Y is connected

#

and similarly M(Y) is galois over M(X) precisely when Y -> X as a ramified cover restricts to a galois cover of X

#

in fact in a way that preserves degree

velvet dagger
#

Okay I'm back sorry

#

But yeah it seems this is secretly the fact that transitive G-sets are all G/H

blazing pawn
#

which part

velvet dagger
#

The whole thing kinda, like once you have a Galois correspondence

uncut creek
#

sounds like u guys are unraveling the secrets of the universe

velvet dagger
#

Then it's also an equivalence of categories between a category of G-sets and whatever you're Galois corresponding to

blazing pawn
#

im not sure which part u mean specifically but like yea the fact that transitive G-sets look like G/H is important for the topology stuff

velvet dagger
#

I guess there's some technical detail regarding the fact that you're taking finite etale algebras rather than just separable field extensions but I imagine it's because of Hom business

blazing pawn
#

or like its important for establishing the kinks of what the functor from fin etale algebras -> Gal(k) sets preserves

#

and similarly for covers -> pi_1(X, x) sets

vivid halo
#

one way to look at this is the following

blazing pawn
#

integral

vivid halo
#

when X is normal (don't worry about precisely what this means) we can talk about the function field K of X and we have π^et_1(X)=Gal(K^ur/K) where K^ur is a maximal unramified extension of K

cold needle
#

normal

vivid halo
#

yea I hate this terminology

cold needle
#

lovely

#

this is what

#

the 88th time the word normal has been used

vivid halo
#

anyways this applies in the case of compact Riemann surfaces for instance

#

GAGA will tell you these things are algebraic

cold needle
#

for something even more specific

vivid halo
#

the case of something like compact Riemann surfaces has this extra step of relating the complex analytic picture to the algebraic picture

blazing pawn
#

mathematicians just call everything they like "normal" in the hopes of coping so hard mathematics itself bends to their will

#

and all the examples just look like the nice case

vivid halo
#

so you have an algebraic function field and a meromorphic function field, and algebraic (finite) covers versus analytic (possibly infinite) covers

#

normalize singularities

#

holy shit

neat lintel
#

definition: a normal singularity...

#

Who's feynman of Mathematics?

devout nacelle
#

Nikita Shlyapustin.

velvet dagger
#

Who?

devout nacelle
toxic schooner
velvet dagger
#

Uh

neat lintel
#

nikita is fine

#

if you're gonna shit on someone shit on dami for SLANDERING dg

devout nacelle
neat lintel
velvet dagger
#

DG slanders itself lmfao

neat lintel
#

spivak calls the ricci calculus chapter "a debauch of indices" in the chapter title opencry

#

a bout of excessive indulgence in sensual pleasures, especially eating and drinking.

#

ah yes

#

the sensual pleasure of ricci calculus

devout nacelle
#

What is Ricci calculus

neat lintel
#

In mathematics, Ricci calculus constitutes the rules of index notation and manipulation for tensors and tensor fields on a differentiable manifold, with or without a metric tensor or connection. It is also the modern name for what used to be called the absolute differential calculus (the foundation of tensor calculus), developed by Gregorio Ric...

devout nacelle
#

Were you anticipating this question

neat lintel
#

manipulation of tensor fields in coordinates

#

yes

devout nacelle
#

Ahh

#

So it is calculus in the sense of symbolic calculi

#

Is this related to that Ricci flow stuff stare

neat lintel
#

maybe?

#

idk anything about ricci flow lol

#

oh it's a pde

#

i guess you'd run into some ricci calculus while studying ricci flow

#

like if you wanted to write this out in coordinates and play with it

devout nacelle
#

What is g_t?

neat lintel
#

a riemannian metric

devout nacelle
neat lintel
#

(you may also have heard "first fundamental form" before)

#

it's a smoothly varying inner product on each tangent space

devout nacelle
#

Just the word, yes, I don't know what it means.

toxic schooner
neat lintel
#

like

#

g is a riemannian metric if for every p, g(p) is an inner product on the tangent space to your surface at p, and if this is "smooth" in some sense

#

something like

devout nacelle
neat lintel
#

tangent space could be thought of as the best linear approximation to a surface at a point

devout nacelle
#

Okay, makes sense

neat lintel
#

inner product on the tangent space thus measures geometric stuff on your manifold near that point up to first order

#

roughly vaguely

devout nacelle
#

From what I vaguely remember from an interaction between Dami and Metal, each of these tangent spaces is endowed with an inner product?

neat lintel
#

yup

devout nacelle
#

Why do we care about the inner product?

neat lintel
#

you can measure geometric information with it

#

angle, length, etc.

#

think of all the things you can do with the dot product

#

geometry

devout nacelle
#

I see

neat lintel
#

actually that's an example of a riemannian metric

devout nacelle
neat lintel
#

(this one's more commonly called "first fundamental form")

devout nacelle
#

It feels like a manifold's structure is evolving with time, and this equation tells you how this affects the metric, maybe

#

I may or may not be making sense

neat lintel
#

i guess it's saying something like

#

hm

#

yeah nah you basically said what i was thinking

#

a riemannian metric is "extra structure" on a manifold, right

#

and you're looking at how a family of these change over time

chilly smelt
neat lintel
#

if you wrote it out in coordinates the ricci flow equation would be

devout nacelle
#

Okay yeah t need not have any meaningful assignment in terms of time here

neat lintel
#

rather complicated

#

yeah im just used to calling it time lol

devout nacelle
#

Okay physicist

neat lintel
#

if you wrote it out in coordinates the ricci flow equation would be a rather complicated PDE monkaS

#

what would you call it

devout nacelle
#

PDEs are already monkagiga

neat lintel
#

system of n^2 + 1 partial differential equations in n + 1 variables?

#

that might be wrong

devout nacelle
neat lintel
#

no n^2 and n + 1

devout nacelle
#

TTerra geometric analysis arc

chilly smelt
#

That’s easy then

neat lintel
#

since each g_t has n^2 components

#

but symmetry cuts this down quite a bit

#

n(n+1)/2 and n + 1??

chilly smelt
#

n(n+1)/2

neat lintel
#

sniped xd

neat lintel
#

one of these days

#

my uni is offering two geometric analysis courses in the upcoming semesters

devout nacelle
neat lintel
#

i absolutely have the differential geometry background

#

but maybe not the analysis background

devout nacelle
#

Do they need a course in PDEs?

neat lintel
#

idk

#

one of them has the grad analysis as a prereq (coreq)

devout nacelle
#

What all do typical grad analysis classes cover?

#

Measure theory, functional analysis?

neat lintel
#

all? no clue lol

#

probably

devout nacelle
#

I see

neat lintel
#

Measure Theory: Lebesgue measure and integration, convergence theorems, Fubini's theorem, Lebesgue differentiation theorem, abstract measures, Caratheodory theorem, Radon-Nikodym theorem.

Functional Analysis: Hilbert spaces, orthonormal bases, Riesz representation theorem, compact operators, L^p-spaces, Holder and Minkowski inequalities.

#

Fourier Analysis: Fourier series and transforms, Fourier inversion and Plancherel formula, estimates and convergence results, topological vector spaces, Schwartz space, distributions.

Functional Analysis: The main topic here will be the spectral theorem for bounded self-adjoint operators, possibly together with its extensions to unbounded and differential operators.

#

1 and 2

#

pretty close lol

#

you got 2/3 of em

devout nacelle
#

OwO niceeee

neat lintel
#

depending on the rest of my courses i might take this

devout nacelle
#

This seems rather overkill for a semester though monkaS

neat lintel
#

this is over two semesters

#

lol

devout nacelle
#

Ah, that is more reasonable

neat lintel
#

topology comes first, but the grad admissions here really like to see these two analysis courses

devout nacelle
neat lintel
#

they're the qualifying exam courses

devout nacelle
#

Ohh

neat lintel
#

grad school likes those

devout nacelle
#

So if you take these classes, you can skip quals in grad school?

neat lintel
#

if you're a graduate student already and you do sufficiently well, yes

#

but if you're an undergrad

#

idk

devout nacelle
#

Yeah, I meant an undergrad taking them before starting grad school

neat lintel
#

i did well enough in complex analysis to not have to write the qual if i were a graduate student, but i'll probably have to write the complex qual at some point anyways (if i am accepted here)

#

sadness!

devout nacelle
neat lintel
#

pure agony

velvet dagger
#

Hmm?

neat lintel
#

yo

velvet dagger
#

I feel like you could probably just go to the admin and be like

#

Hey look at my grade

#

It took it while an undergrad but I still have satisfied the requirement of "Take this class or pass this qual"

#

So I feel like when I did it shouldn't matter

neat lintel
#

"don't make me write this qual or i'll toss you off the roof bitch"

velvet dagger
#

Honestly yeah

#

Well

#

Kind word and a gun works better than a kind word

#

And probably than a mean word

#

So instead of doing that just accidentally drop your concealed carry license

neat lintel
#

speaking from experience?

velvet dagger
#

While pleading to their ability to reason critically

neat lintel
velvet dagger
#

Probably from someone's experience

neat lintel
#

the people in the math department here are nice

#

i would not want to have to hurt anyone

devout nacelle
#

What is your about me section saying TTerra KEK

neat lintel
#

a long time ago shamrock told me a really stupid proof that $\binom{n}{k} = \binom{n}{n - k}$ using the cohomology of the $n$-torus

fathom swallowBOT
#

TTerra

neat lintel
#

only the other day did i actually understand it

#

(de rham cohomology)

mellow moon
#

Best proof, heavy technical stuff perhaps

neat lintel
#

yes

velvet dagger
#

Hah

neat lintel
#

it uses some very non trivial algebraic topology KEK

#

show this to cs students in their combinatorics classes

velvet dagger
#

Fwiw along these lines there are some actual combinatorial things which are non-trivial and can be done topologially

#

If you take complex Grassmannians

neat lintel
#

reminds me of "subgroups of free groups are free" proven using AT

velvet dagger
#

You can reference stuff like the weak and hard Lefschetz theorems to know that the betti numbers are unimodal

neat lintel
#

hmm

velvet dagger
#

And symmetric

#

But the betti numbers are combinatorial

#

b_{2i} = number of partitions of i into at most d parts with largest part at most size n-d

neat lintel
velvet dagger
#

Meaning you're counting partitions of i whose young diagrams fit into a d x (n-d) sized box

neat lintel
#

if only i had not dropped combinatorics

velvet dagger
#

Combinatorics is fun with the right prof

neat lintel
#

my class was something

#

the prof was very good

#

but he was rather insistent on in class exercises where you discuss with the person next to you

velvet dagger
#

Oh but "next to you" is tricky with Zoom lmfao

neat lintel
#

this was before covid

velvet dagger
#

Oh

#

Then what was wrong?

neat lintel
#

how do i say this

#

no ok the actual reason i dropped was because i wasn't comfortable taking 3 math courses at once at the time

velvet dagger
#

Ah that's fair

neat lintel
#

i was going to make a meme about it but i realized it was basically an isolated incident

velvet dagger
#

What were the other two?

neat lintel
#

topology and "advanced calc" (spivak's calc on manifolds)

velvet dagger
#

If either of them were less interesting ima judge your taste in math even harder than I already do

neat lintel
#

the latter course was veyr hard

#

but both were very good

velvet dagger
#

Point-set? Hmm it's not quite as interesting but it's kinda important so I can respect it

neat lintel
#

well

#

we did AT for like

#

half of it

#

lol

#

baby AT though

#

munkres speedrun any%

#

these classes may or may not have played major roles in my current mathematical interests stare

#

both classes were very well run and had amazing professors

velvet dagger
#

Hmm... normally those are fine to take but if they ended up with you doing diffgeo then perhaps you should've done combo instead

neat lintel
#

right

#

oh well

#

i can just take it in the fall if i want

#

or pick it up here and there

#

why take a course in something when you can get people on math discord to explain it to you?

velvet dagger
#

Just stop doing diffgeo and do combinatorics instead tbh

#

Like as your research area

neat lintel
#

differential-geometric combinatorics

#

prove combinatorical identities using

#

stokes

#

i can see it tbh

velvet dagger
#

Honestly I need to ask my advisor for more deets about the quantum chaos on graphs business

#

That could legit be my style

neat lintel
#

sounds like something ultra would know about

#

ask them

robust stratus
#

hi, i'm looking for some advice. math was my strong point in high school, I liked it, probably my favorite subject, but it was never passionate. Today I want to discern if I was only interested in mathematics or if it is something I can dedicate my life to. What do you think can help me find an answer to this? (anything can help)

leaden torrent
#

do you have any exposure to proof-based mathematics? (not high school geometry "proofs", actual proofs in definition-theorem-proof-corollary style)

#

if not, try self-studying some.

#

its more reflective of what mathematics "actually" feels like at a high level

#

even applied math is frequently proofsy

#

certainly way more proofsy than high school mathematics, at least.

robust stratus
leaden torrent
#

induction is one proof technique

#

but theres a bit of a philosophical difference between a course structured around proofs and rigour, and one that just happens to cover basic induction at one point

#

would you be able to prove, for example, that f(x) = x^3 is a bijection (one-to-one & onto function) from ℝ to ℝ?

#

whether directly from the definition or proving continuity and applying the monotone continuous function theorem

torn willow
#

Induction is the proof version of "My intuition is clearly correct"

chilly smelt
#

The guy is deciding if he can find passion in math and you start talking about boring theorems

#

If that’s what someone told me math was I wouldn’t want to devote my life to it

leaden torrent
#

im just trying to scope out whether theyve taken a proof based course before.

#

im not math's PR department

#

though either way, id certainly consider this more interesting than rote induction drills.

neat lintel
#

quick start taking about your favorite k theory result

leaden torrent
#

every K-theory result sucks

#

sorry

#

dont even know K_12(ℤ)

#

pathetic

neat lintel
leaden torrent
#

(aside: i think people should go into math will full knowledge that a lot of it will be boring rote work)

robust stratus
leaden torrent
#

(as you get good, you can skip a lot of that rote work, but its still worth setting reasonable expectations)

robust stratus
#

sorry for the late reply, i barely speak english

leaden torrent
#

hmmm you have the inklings of the right idea actually

#

proving that x^3 is odd and that x^1/3 = 0 has no solutions for x > 0 is enough

#

but it requires a bit more work

#

either way, it seems you havent taken a "proper" proofsy course - which is fine

#

makes that probably a good place to start though

#

to see how much it "clicks"

#

unfortunately im unfamiliar with foreign-language recommendations, though.

leaden torrent
#

i did give you a very boring problem.

#

perhaps a more interesting one would be worthwhile, but I don't know how much you know

robust stratus
#

and that takes time

leaden torrent
#

I see.

#

here's perhaps a more interesting question:

it's well-known that a positive integer is divisible by 3 precisely when the sum of its digits is. for example, 4 + 7 + 1 = 12 and 1 + 2 = 3, so 471 is divisible by 3. meanwhile, 1 + 0 + 0 + 7 = 8, so 1007 is not divisible by 3. a similar thing is true for division by 9.

(a) why is this true? can you prove it? (it helps if you know modular arithmetic, but that isn't necessary)
(b) if youre familiar with bases other than ten: for what divisors is this true in a given base? (hint: how are 9 and 10 related? how are 3 and 9 related?)

robust stratus
# robust stratus exactly that worries me

But the point is that math is not very exciting for me. I mean, when a new topic is presented to me, I like to try to understand the "logic behind it", try to connect it with previous topics. but i never looked for stuff myself (except a few numberphile videos xd).

leaden torrent
#

dont worry about answering that to me btw

#

im just giving it as an example of a problem that one might be posed in a proofsy mathematics course

robust stratus
#

i will try it, but not now probably (it's very late here).

leaden torrent
#
  • would require some thought and breaking down
#

the honest truth is that a career in just mathematics (even applie) is fairly niche

#

and higher math is very different from high school/early university

#

so you cant really figure out if it "sticks" unless you just try it

#

its boring at times, frustrating at others, and not the most financially lucrative career

#

but its also really interesting IMO

#

problem solving is fun

robust stratus
leaden torrent
#

know any calculus? spivak's calculus is a good textbook with a more proof-oriented style than a typical calculus course.

#

though a warning: the first few chapters are very slow and boring

#

necessary but boring

#

takes a while to get into actual calc

#

apostol is a bit faster-paced but doesnt teach proofs as well IMO

robust stratus
leaden torrent
#

what language do you speak?

robust stratus
leaden torrent
#

límites, integrales y derivadas

robust stratus
leaden torrent
#

sound familiar?

robust stratus
#

yes, but i know almost zero about the topic

#

anyway, probably anything I'll study will have math in it

leaden torrent
#

hm, spivak would be theoretically doable, but may be difficult without a teacher giving you intuition for the calculus

robust stratus
#

maybe the hard way is the ideal way to decide better

leaden torrent
#

well proofs are unnaturally disorienting to first-time learners

#

so im a bit wary

#

dedicated proof textbooks exist but i think they all kinda suck

#

and its better (+ way more interesting) to learn proofs "naturally" in the context of actual mathematics

#

rather than contrived "random easy topics from elementary number theory"

#

(though my earlier divisibility-by-3 problem is arguably an example of that...)

#

but its tough since youre learning 2 things at once that both kind of depend on each other

#

and because you lack instructor feedback while self-studying, it can be hard to tell how well you're actually doing.

robust stratus
leaden torrent
#

(though some people post their proofs in #proofs-and-logic and ask for feedback which helps)

robust stratus
#

This problem solving thing is to find out if I like science oriented math, right?

#

because if we are talking about engineering oriented mathematics, should I look at other aspects (like real life applications)?

leaden torrent
#

for engineering, look at engineering coursework

#

my advice is for "math majors"

#

like your uni degree says "mathematics" on it

#

maybe "pure mathematics" or "applied mathematics", but still math

#

other fields dont have nearly as much emphasis on proofs

#

(physics and computer science have some but not as much)

#

(same with statistics)

#

(other fields dont really have proofs at all)

robust stratus
#

I probably like more science-oriented math, but the point is, I'll have to find a job too. And where I live, science is not something that people are willing to finance.

leaden torrent
#

yeah, employment is an issue, no doubt.

#

engineering or computer science are far "safer" paths relatively

#

even statistics if you still want a very mathy flair

#

(and in fact, i'd say the bulk of statistics "feels more like" high school math than mathematics does)

robust stratus
#

Maybe it's a stupid question, but where will I find more science-oriented math? an engineering in mathematics? or things like physics or computer science?

leaden torrent
#

pure math is mostly just academia (professorial research + teaching), but applied math is widespread as financial analysts in industry positions

#

and statisticians & whatnot

#
  • you can often get a job in some sort of software development with any sort of mathematical degree
#

so you can pursue a passion in school then settle into a relatively safe programming job

#

still, im not gonna pretend the job market has an amazing wealth of options

#

the vast majority of those who pursue pure math have a mentality of

#

i'll try for a job in academia, and if i cant get one (which is the most likely scenario), i'll find a job programming or teaching high school

#

if you value job security highly, mathematics sadly isnt the best field to pursue

#

though it's still better than a typical arts degree

robust stratus
#

Something that worries me is that maybe I like mathematics, but an engineering in mathematics maybe not, I have the impression that it takes away the "fun" part. But again, I know very little about engineering in general.

leaden torrent
#

for whatever that's worth.

robust stratus
#

is computer science a much safer bet?

leaden torrent
#

yes

#

like i could sugar-coat it

#

but yes

robust stratus
#

but maybe just a little safer?

leaden torrent
#

computer science is so lucrative that universities face a shortage of cs professors

#

since a typical cs phd enters industry instantly

#

in mathematics, academia is "the dream job"

#

in cs, academia begs to employ you

robust stratus
leaden torrent
#

huge difference in employability

#

honestly i dont have a great answer

#

i have no clue how youd figure that out

#

sorry ¯_(ツ)_/¯

robust stratus
#

no problem

#

You have already been very helpful, thank you

sleek wing
#

Engineering bad

robust stratus
#

if you don't mind, a brief why?

thorn brook
#

Abelian grape good

bronze pelican
#

I have a friend doing an electrical engineering PhD and he regularly takes graduate level math courses

sleek wing
toxic schooner
#

what the hell

#

is an abelian group?

summer nest
#

Some group

toxic schooner
#

i mean abelian grape

#

ik abelian group, lol

#

a group with commutativity

#

right?

inner finch
#

ulti ho gai sari tadbeerein
Koi dawa naa kam kari

#

Mujhe is ke baad yaad naheen hai
Meri soch se bahir hui

summer nest
inner finch
#

it's a reference to some mir taki mir sher

#

or ghazal rather

neat lintel
inner finch
sleek wing
inner finch
#

A purple person in a car

summer nest
#

Tele tubby

inner finch
#

lmao

toxic schooner
toxic schooner
toxic schooner
#

u need to become analysis pilled

toxic schooner
#

so my nitro runs out

#

on the 4th of july

sleek wing
toxic schooner
#

No

#

i mean pure analysis

#

nothing else

#

No AT for u kid

#

pick up Tao

#

and start it

#

also is AT basically analysis?

surreal sapphire
#

do p-adic analysis instead

toxic schooner
#

i cant do normal analysis

#

how will i do p-adic

surreal sapphire
#

its easier

toxic schooner
#

it is?

surreal sapphire
#

in some sense, yes

toxic schooner
#

and i suppose it requires some analysis knowledge?

surreal sapphire
#

well, maybe

#

the p-adic absolute value is an ultrametric, which makes it somewhat 'easier'

toxic schooner
surreal sapphire
#

\sum a_n converges iff a_n is null sequence as it should be

devout nacelle
#

Wait so

toxic schooner
#

i didnt get far enough to know what a null sequence is sed

devout nacelle
#

Convergence in p-adics means the sequence is eventually all 0s?

toxic schooner
sleek wing
#

Tbf ive never heard that term either but I assume it means this ^

surreal sapphire
#

no, but

toxic schooner
#

is that what a null sequence is?

surreal sapphire
#

you know how \sum 1/n diverges even though 1/n is null

devout nacelle
#

Yes

sleek wing
#

Yur

devout nacelle
#

OH

#

I missed sum

#

Okay

surreal sapphire
#

stuff like that does not happen in the p-adics

devout nacelle
#

That's neat

surreal sapphire
#

or in any ultrametric space

toxic schooner
sleek wing
surreal sapphire
#

ultrametric space just means you have a triangle equality but stronger

devout nacelle
#

So the sum corresponding to every sequence which converges to 0 converges as well

sleek wing
#

That is very nice

toxic schooner
sleek wing
#

Friendship with real numbers over, p-adics are my best friend now (I like 101-adics the best but don’t tell the others)

devout nacelle
#

p-adics good

surreal sapphire
#

|a + b| <= max(|a|, |b|)

toxic schooner
surreal sapphire
#

and this gives you lots of strong results

devout nacelle
surreal sapphire
#

so its "easier" in that sense

#

but harder in the sense that you have 0 geometric intuition

devout nacelle
#

Yeah, I don't see any meaningful geometric intuition here

#

But then I barely understand ultrametrics

#

Or even metrics KEK

sleek wing
#

Just distance innit

#

Like metres and kilograms are those metric things

devout nacelle
#

I do know the formal definition, I'm just familiar with very basic examples though

sleek wing
#

Same

devout nacelle
#

Like I don't have any intuition outside of Euclidean metric on R^n

sleek wing
#

Taxicab is pretty easy as well

devout nacelle
#

Maybe taxicab

#

Yeah

toxic schooner
#

hmm

sleek wing
#

Jungle river as well

toxic schooner
#

I like your funny words magic men

toxic schooner
sleek wing
#

Metrics are baby to understand the definition of

#

It is

devout nacelle
toxic schooner
#

i mean ik what a metric is

#

but the rest idk anything about

sleek wing
#

You uhhh draw a line until it hits another pre-set line perpendicular to the first one and the distance is the sum of those two iirc

surreal sapphire
#

general metrics are kinda fine, since i just think of blobs in space

#

but p-adics are really weird, since it deals with objects you know like integers but assigns them weird absolute values

sleek wing
#

Yeah it’s a lot easier to visualise everything as “Euclidean but a bit dodgy”

toxic schooner
sleek wing
#

As opposed to something like non-metric topological spaces which I cannot visualse for the life of me

toxic schooner
#

p-adics seem kinda interesting

sleek wing
#

Number theory 🚨

surreal sapphire
sleek wing
#

Yeah that’s a good intro, I need to rewatch it tbh

#

I would like to see the actual formal definition of the p-adics tho

bronze pelican
#

There are several equivalent definitions

devout nacelle
#

What is the motivation for p-adics?

sharp mulch
#

Number theory

sleek wing
#

They are... cool...

surreal sapphire
#

i think hensel considered formal laurent series

devout nacelle
#

Debatable, although I do like the sum convergence fact

surreal sapphire
#

the formal definition is either as formal laurent series or you define the p-adic metric on Q and complete it "in the usual way"

toxic schooner
surreal sapphire
#

or just as inverse limit of some category i guess

devout nacelle
#

Ew

#

I momentarily forgot p-adic metric is described on Q catThink

#

Wait so

#

Does every Cauchy sequence in this metric converge?

surreal sapphire
#

if you complete, yes

#

that's how completions work

devout nacelle
#

What is the completion here? R?

bronze pelican
#

Its Q_p

devout nacelle
surreal sapphire
#

you take all sequences in Q

#

so thats Q^N

devout nacelle
#

Yes

surreal sapphire
#

then you take the subring R of Cauchy sequences with respect to some metric

devout nacelle
#

Ring hyperhonk

bronze pelican
#

Q_p is the completion of Q with respect to the p-adic metric.
R is the completion of Q with respect to the usual metric.

surreal sapphire
#

(confirm this actually is a subring as you do in analysis, sums and product of Cauchy are Cauchy etc)

devout nacelle
#

Aah

#

Okay

surreal sapphire
#

then confirm that the subset of null sequences N is an ideal

#

(this is not easy)

#

it's in fact a maximal ideal

#

by algebra R/N is a field

devout nacelle
#

Haven't learnt algebra moment sad

surreal sapphire
#

and depending on what metric you started with you get the p-adics Q_p or the real numbers

bronze pelican
surreal sapphire
#

(this is a theorem by ostrowski)

#

well, if you have a ring R and a maximal ideal m in R, then R/m is a field

bronze pelican
surreal sapphire
#

i think its easier to just confirm manually that R/N in this case is a field

#

by computing explicit inverses

toxic schooner
surreal sapphire
#

also it's not that important, but it "just works" the same way the construction of R works

devout nacelle
#

I see catThink

#

Where do p-adics show up in number theory, what kind of questions do they help in answering?

bronze pelican
#

"Local global priciples"

devout nacelle
surreal sapphire
#

the actual way you think of those objects is via formal laurent series or as the inverse limit $\varprojlim_n\bZ/p^n\bZ$

fathom swallowBOT
#

Lochverstärker

devout nacelle
#

What is inverse limit?

#

Is this some analytic notion

#

Or algebraic

surreal sapphire
#

its category theory memes

#

but you can think of it pretty easily

devout nacelle
surreal sapphire
#

so you have the product of set $\bZ/p\bZ \times \bZ/p^2\bZ \times \dots$

fathom swallowBOT
#

Lochverstärker

devout nacelle
#

Okay

surreal sapphire
#

and then a sequence $(x_1, x_2, x_3, \dots)$ is a $p$-adic number if $\lambda_n(x_{n+1})= x_{n}$, where $\lambda_n\colon \bZ/p^{n+1}\bZ\to \bZ/p^{n}\bZ$ is the canonical projection

fathom swallowBOT
#

Lochverstärker

bronze pelican
#

So this defines Z_p as the inverse limit of Z/p^nZ

devout nacelle
surreal sapphire
#

oh yeah

bronze pelican
#

Q_p is the fraction field of Z_p

toxic schooner
#

i suppose i will do algebra before p-adics

bronze pelican
#

There are several equivalent definitions of p-adics

toxic schooner
#

as of rn

#

all seem too ahead of me

chilly smelt
#

It’s just numbers that go brrr to the left

toxic schooner
#

Ooo

#

im gonna believe that blindly

surreal sapphire
#

ye, you can probably do that rigorously

cinder zephyr
#

Oof p-adics are wack

#

There's a research project I'm interested in and I emailed the prof

surreal sapphire
#

also yes, be decent in algebra before

cinder zephyr
#

and she was like "yea start reading up on P-adic numbers"

#

and I'm like ok

#

and I did

#

💀

surreal sapphire
#

because you want to do galois theory over p-adics

cinder zephyr
#

I have not taken Algebra and will not take it until next fall cause of how the honors sequence works here at UIUC

#

soooooo

#

I'm a bit in over my head rn but we're working on it

surreal sapphire
#

or like, deal with p-adic completions of number fields to do number theory but the right way

cinder zephyr
#

those are words

chilly smelt
#

I feel you

surreal sapphire
#

ye, i think you can do some stuff with p-adics 'easily' as an undergrad

#

but you can also easily get lost in stuff that is really hard

#

(introducing p-adics and doing some small thing with them is a popular bachelor thesis topic)

cinder zephyr
#

I see

bronze pelican
#

Gouvea's book is written for an undergrad audience

cinder zephyr
#

this is the project I'm looking at and the prof (she was my honors abstract lin alg prof last semester) sent me two textbooks as well >_>

cinder zephyr
rose dock
#

I've always wondered about the difference between "universitext" and ugtm/gtm

bronze pelican
#

That's cool

#

I have no idea how homotopy theory interacts with number theory

cinder zephyr
#

I have no idea what homotopy theory is lol

#

I just saw undergrad research project led by a prof whose class I did well in

modest rune
#

homotopy is a simple and natural notion that appears all over

#

homotopy theory usually refers to like

#

a much more specific thing

cinder zephyr
#

what is homotopy

modest rune
#

its like

vast surge
modest rune
#

continuously deforming one function into another

cinder zephyr
#

interesting

bronze pelican
cinder zephyr
#

I presume not every function can be deformed into every other function?

modest rune
#

that is a good assumption

cinder zephyr
#

Is it a correct one?

modest rune
#

yes

cinder zephyr
#

ay nice

azure kettle
cinder zephyr
#

is there an easy to understand example?

#

just something I can look up and read in a bit when I'm more focused

modest rune
#

Path homotopies are the simplest examples

#

well no that requires basepoint stuff

#

there are simple examples but you do need to learn the proper defns and stuff

cinder zephyr
#

I see

#

figured

toxic schooner
modest rune
#

zoom

toxic schooner
#

ok

hallow wasp
#

proprietary shill

modest rune
#

lmao zoom is free

bronze pelican
#

?

toxic schooner
#

?

modest rune
#

i assume i was being called a proprietary shill

bronze pelican
toxic schooner
#

and looks like the talk thats coming is at 3 pm for me

#

i can attend it properly,
tho ofc i wont understand basically all of it

thorn brook
#

the talk for me will be at 21:00 so it's fine for me hype

toxic schooner
#

this is the first talk

#

where the time is not late at night for me

#

lol

hallow wasp
modest rune
#

...what

#

no one knows what that is

toxic schooner
#

is that some meme?

hallow wasp
#

meh

modest rune
#

it looks like some garbage open source thing

hallow wasp
#

untechnical baboons

#

go back to your windows/ macos envs

toxic schooner
modest rune
#

lmfao

thorn brook
#

ZcatFone

brave hollow
#

I bet you took the moderna vaccine

toxic schooner
#

lol

modest rune
#

you specifically please don't come to my talk lmfao

toxic schooner
#

but its funny

obsidian parrot
#

Hey guys cos(theta)*cos(theta) = cos^2theta right?

hallow wasp
obsidian parrot
modest rune
toxic schooner
modest rune
#

i am so mad that civ5 doesn't run properly on mac

#

i'd never buy another pc

inner finch
#

jhund mara

sharp mulch
#

Macs are quite nice

hallow wasp
#

dont buy another pc, it will be ported soon

modest rune
#

its a bit late for civ 5 to get ported properly lol

hallow wasp
#

not true

#

it happens with old games often

modest rune
#

i think you are missing the point

#

it is ported

#

but the port dev is abandoned

hallow wasp
#

fixed*

modest rune
#

and the modding is impossible

#

and aspyr has openly said

#

they have no intention to fix it

hallow wasp
#

baseddev

#

idk how ppl have balls to announce that type of thing

modest rune
#

maybe i will get lucky and civ7 won't suck

hallow wasp
#

maybe you get a free windows machine gifted to you

rose dock
#

Can you use boot camp or smth?

sharp mulch
#

Max are you going to play Foundation?

hallow wasp
modest rune
#

boot camp has always been a pain

#

whats foundation

hallow wasp
#

zoom is better than discord for streaming

sharp mulch
#

New game

#

4X

#

Looks exciting

modest rune
#

do you have a link i cant find anything

hallow wasp
#

that looks like a fun game

sharp mulch
#

Wait oops not Foundation

#

Foundation is city builder

modest rune
#

oh a game called Old World just dropped

#

maybe i should try it

hallow wasp
#

oh wow

sharp mulch
#

Humankind

hallow wasp
#

old world looks like archipelgo board game

sharp mulch
#

There you go

modest rune
#

oh!

#

I was like

#

into the humankind stuff

#

but then everyone i know who plays 4x didnt buy it

#

so i also didnt

#

idk if its good or not or anything

sharp mulch
#

Oh

#

I'll let you know if it's good

#

I bought it

modest rune
#

I'll play with you if you like it, it looks neat and civ is getting stale for me

crystal stone
#

@grim token

#

You awake u had a question

grim token
#

Ph yeah

#

I made a college list

#

But i had some trouble with my safeties

#

What is the best community college in california

#

so I can get an easy transfer into a good UC school

#

@crystal stone

crystal stone
#

IDK about the best one

#

But I know a few good ones, depends on the area you want to live in

#

For Math, the strongest one is probably Orange Coast College

grim token
#

Ok

#

Do you think I will have a good chance at trasnferring to berkeley

crystal stone
#

If you're into Engineering there's probably better ones

grim token
#

or ucla

#

if I go to Orange Coast

crystal stone
#

If you go to orange coast and do well

#

Then yeah

grim token
#

How well are we talking

crystal stone
#

They have a lot of Honors classes, you can look up transfer rates by your major

#

but if you do Honors math sequence

#

a very good chance of getting in

grim token
#

I tried making sense of that website

#

But they don't give trasnfer % by CC

crystal stone
#

Ah the UC transfer admission rates, no they don't

#

But they give you an idea of how competitive each school is and for what major

#

OCC has a very strong math/physics/computer-science/chemistry department

grim token
#

Do you think OCC and UCSD for example

#

are on the same leve/

#

level?

crystal stone
#

For lower division teaching, OCC is better than most UCs

grim token
#

Really??

#

That's crazy

crystal stone
#

You can look this up, Prof. Arnold Guerra the Third teaches full time at OCC and part-time at UC Irvine

grim token
#

Was that ur teacher?

crystal stone
#

He was offered his own lab at UC Irvine, and turned it down because the pay was too little

#

OCC pays their instructors more than UCs do for basic level courses

#

I took Physics 280/285 from Guerra

grim token
#

When ur teacher is famou

#

s

#

do you ever get a chance to talk to him after class?

#

Like a normal teacher?

crystal stone
#

What do you mean?

#

That depends on the prof

grim token
#

Like can you ask questions in class

crystal stone
#

Some love to talk to students

grim token
#

And talk to them in office hours

crystal stone
#

Some don't like that

grim token
#

That sucks

crystal stone
#

I dunno, it's more a personality thing than it is

#

A famous thing

grim token
#

That's lame

crystal stone
#

🤷‍♂️

sharp mulch
#

Berkeley has a lot of transfers from some Bay Area CCs like De Anza