#serious-discussion
1 messages ยท Page 416 of 1
Ok so you don't ignore non-negligible gravitational effects
He's a youtuber
He used to be at Buzzfeed
But I think he left
He's kind of cute ~~ teehee
This is so sensual
A good chocolate cake shouldn't need this long, but I enjoy taking my time. This one has a rich chocolate mousse, brown butter espresso, infused honey bourbon, hot chocolate cake soak, and about 5 million bars of chocolate.
Cake recipe adapted from:
Claire King & Scott Loitsch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwKGZS3EE7Q
Inga Lam: https://www.y...


It means it takes 150 hours to make
i see
i thought it was one of those weird gimmick baking channels
and he was baking a cake for 150 hours

It means it has a rich chocolate mousse, brown butter espresso, infused honey bourbon, hot chocolate cake soak, and about 5 million bars of chocolate.

I dont see how it can possibly require that many bars of chocolate


Have you considered โจ more chocolate โจ

The virgin real life "every planet and moon pulls on every other planet and moon" vs the chad ksp "orbits of celestial bodies are locked, ships only experience gravity from one body at a time"
outer wilds has real physics
Infinite delta V scout launcher infinite delta V scout launcher
but i cant
Why not
coz i cant buy it
Does outer wilds even require good specs?
The mechanics in the game are fine tbh. The game also simulated tennis racquet effect well enough
" I only take Ph.D. students if they come with their own funding."
What does this mean
Ever heard of interns where you have to pay?
it's not really like this
I just got 0.1 ethereum according to a DM rn 
you usually pay uni tuition, but the lab pays you to do your research/be a TA/etc. with their funding from whatever source
but sometimes they allow you to do research with them without paying you
Who said this?
Someone's website
it's better if they tell you up front though
rather than being 1 year into the phd and the prof just says on the way out "oh btw we're out of funds, find yourself a new project or get out of here"
Is PhD life usually like that?

In the US you get funded via teaching
But some professors have additional funding so you don't need to teach
You can also get external fellowships
Which is what it sounds like this professor wants
He wants you not to teach and also doesn't want to fund you
I only take Ph.D. students if they come with their own funding.
in soviet russia, you fund your prof
need someone to play valorant
Just practice in training room 
Wait there's a prof that wants students to come with funding wtf
isn't that what grants are?
just sounds like the prof wanting a student to confirm a grant before they accept them?
seems reasonable
In reality it's not that unreasonable if the prof is unable to secure funding for their student, and neither is the department
It's just such a weird phenomenon at any reasonable university in America lol
Since there's teaching funding. And if you want students to not teach but you don't wanna fund them... I mean idk what to even say lmfao
inb4 he just doesn't want students and that's his strat
Yeah, it is weird from a US perspective
Since it's so often the case departments fund students
Also I'm pretty sure what happens in Europe anyway is that you are admitted precisely when there is funding available
Like a prof has funding for n students so there are n open slots for people who are interested to work with him
sometimes
my uni profs get funding for 3 years
and if you arent done by then, they have to secure it elsewhere
like, you get 3 years teaching contract and then you can (usually) renew
if you don't get other funding
this somehow can lead to hostility

ryc I'm taking general circulation models in the fall
Should I commit to geophysical fluids

Someone tell mniip but cuter to unblock me

For calling someone w a picture of a monkey as their pfp a monke

What
Reason: bussy saka

I dont even remember saying anything lmao



i win 



most of their emote ssuck
union_soviet is good
jon did you get banned
probably
I think I jsut left
Cring
they have an "advanced debate" channel lmao
lol

Where's Master Debate?
lol kaynex
jon
Aww darn
lmfao
Brb going to make that joke
they probably banned all of us
everyone who joined and left
ultra where did you get :chickenwalk: from


now I see you
@dull salmon is the absentminded professor trope adhd in disguise?
Yeah that's true
Diagnoses are dangerous
ultra you simply must answer my query in intellectualist
Wait what is this intellectualist server
And where can I get an invite so I can laugh at them
I searched messages in this server for an invite and found this

Ultra can I have an invite to intellectualist
Then it would be in my search history though
imagine keeping your search history
I never want that search to touch my search history even if I delete it later
what is that server
im imagining now what to do i do
Ok so I read the abstract on both papers my prof sent me now I want to skim them. So far I'm 4 sentences into the intro of one of them and I'm already kinda lost lmao
fair point lol
by the way my very limited feel to far for them is
Paper #1: one of the authors is one of the 2 profs that would co-advise me (the plan is to have 2 advisers) and a huge part of it is really the field of the other adviser so I feel I'll be learning from the best
Paper #2: The topic just seems cooler at a first glance lmao
can u buy me a pizza
Original plan was to go all out on algebra, particularly structures with a lot of... well structure. I was looking at quantum groups. Then my prof told me he was going to be in China next year and that it'd be good to have another adviser because I'm me and I'd disperse a lot especially with very loose guidance but none of the other 2 profs of my dept who are very into Hopf algebras were available but then I remembered this year I'm taking a manifolds course and loving every single bit of it so I might actually love geometry. "Well why can't we have both" and I talked to my algebra prof to see what he thought of the best crossover in the dept history
he said "ok have anyone in mind?" and I said "yeah, Gothen" (Peter B. Gothen from the first paper) and he talked to him and they agreed there are a few topics they'd both be interested in involving both geometry and heavy duty algebra
so here I am
i had no idea what cobordisms had to do with quantum field theory the whole time
oh well

well it had to arise somewhere right lol
but yeah one of those things that is probably very far removed
from what i understood from the talk it was definitely some kind of far-removed physics...
then again, that wasn't much
but at the end he was talking about broad physicsy ideas

my pronouns are he/him but whenever I'm writing a math paper or any other technical writing they become we/our all of a sudden
yes!
"we will show that" -me, the only author and reader
do you typically say "He will show that" when you're the one writing?
no, you say "I will show that"
I'm already like that in homework lmao
im gonna write a paper with she/her pronouns the whole time

refer to myself in third person in paper
but i am pushing the boundaries of academic writing!!!!
My cat will show that
I will write papers with they/them pronouns, but will intend for them to be the plural form.
i mean i've seen
like
"you can see"
or somtehing
but nothing that directive
scary
but they say stuff like "first, show that this is true. Then, verify this. etc."
yea
as though they're commanding you to do it, but they include the proofs themselves
or they say "trivial" which means you have to show it
idk I feel very strongly about not using "I" in papers
can we get a paper where we have Somebody
although there are some places where this is maybe okay?
"Somebody can observe the following"
i have read a few papers with "I" and they're always refreshing
for acknowledgments I've seen it split between "I would like to thank" and "the author would like to thank"
writing a paper entirely in the future perfect tense
"We will have shown that in fact the group will have been trivial"
writing the whole paper in the passive....
I mean you kinda have to do the latter if there's more than one author
paper with two authors that uses "I"
this honestly makes sense. you usually say what you're going to do before you prove it, right?
ok but in the end of a proof
refer to yourself as [1]
Finally, we will have taken epsilon to 0 to conclude the theorem.
"therefore the conclusion we will be seeking will have been proven"
this is making my head hurt lmao
there is a funny bit at the beginning of the Fargues-Scholze paper where they kinda poke at each other in third person
"Scholze could not figure this out until Fargues had the following insight"
we could not figure this out until we had the following insight
You could not figure this out until I had the following insight.
we sill can't figure this out but we hope to fool you
Write papers like they're letters to some specific person.
like in the golden age
That's so funny
as if we were 18th century mathematicians
writing WHAT? in a paper is great
Or, write papers as though you're the audience. "We gawked in awe as the brilliant mathematician laid pen to paper, and scrawled down the following wonderful theorem..."
Let me tell you a story about the author...
honestly I try to not go overboard with it but I like being a bit cheeky with homework and shit especially if I know the prof will find it funny
yea I have a pretty boring style of writing, it's hard to pull of "clever" writing like this
I had fun writing directly to the grader
i once wrote "what the fuck" in latex on a take home exam when my answer was obviously way too general
i think it was like, i proved all compact spaces are normal
like i didnt use the hausdorff condition
at all
no lmao
good
prof was a nice guy
he was actually taught alg top by munkres himself\
and frequently complained about how bad a lecturer munkres was
Yeah I also scribbled "what the fuck" on my notebook when I was studying something and then for got about it when I met my prof to talk about what I had been doing
only the first chapter of the alg top section
I think he noticed but he didn't comment, sadly lmao
exactly
the rest is like the first chapter
to be fair i didn't read it as much as i just absorbed the prof's amazing lectures 
i think youll agree the first chapter feels a lot harder to follow than the rest of munkres
and the exercises were worse
the rest of the section is like that
its not like, terrible
but its certainly not the best source for a full alg top course
but its all munkres used
sounds like his analysis on manifolds book lmao
the proof of commutativity of second partials in that book is like
2 pages??????
well let me clarify
i DID get in trouble, as in lose marks, for accidentally asserting all compact spaces are normal
in my proof that a particular space was normal that only used compactness
believe it or not, proving blatantly false things is usually not a good exam stategy
well actually
if you come in with a contradiction in ZFC prepared beforehand
and whip it out to trivialize the exam by explosion
you deserve 100%

hmmm have I ever gotten full marks for a wrong proof
i definitely have lmao
there are times where you do a question the completely wrong way and it takes 5 times as long to do
I have on 2 circumstances. On one the prof didn't notice the mistake and on another occasion the prof was just super chill and it was just a small error that didn't even ruin the proof
well yea if the idea is fine
and I'm convinced I get points for effort
not docking marks is valid
in fact
but ive definitely had the grader just miss my mistake lmao
here the prof gave me full marks still lmao
Whaddup
hi
i have gotten 0 marks on a totally valid proof once 
Why?
when i'm grading and i notice i almost missed a mistake on some homework like 4 homeworks later...
nice benny
i always feel so bad going back and correcting my grading lol
or rather, i dont think the grader engaged at all
are graders kept up at night knowing they might've given too many points
since i went a way different route than intended
What'd the prof do?
he gave me my marks
to be fair loch
and talked with the grader i guess
Dope
sometimes i wanted to just skip everything some kid wrote
in fact i had generalized the result next week
and was forced to present in class
ye, we had that too
I get the desire to do so but I feel like if you're gonna ignore someone's solution you gotta default to full points rather than none lmao
there was this incident of some grader just marking everything correct
without reading
based
how else are you gonna get 5/5 on the end-of-class survey
if their solution is unreadable, it's on them
i've written unreadable solutions before and i should have gotten marked off for them
ye, if i cant read it, its 0
but like
D:
Loch didn't seem to indicate that it was a readability problem so much as a different solution than intended
i don't just mean if i can't read the handwriting or whatever
i mean if it's bumfuck complicated and of questionable validity when the proof is two lines otherwise
if i understand the proof either way i'm going to give it full marks
by writing i mean more style than readability
Eh I'd at least try to read it in that case
if i don't understand it, i'm going to mark them off and tell them to submit a regrade request if they can explain what they meant by the parts that confused me
i'm very nice about stuff like that
probably too nice
there is currently this idea floating around by my 'boss' to stop grading homework in the traditional way
and instead have them defend it
If I do read it and then I'm like uh this doesn't make sense to me sure, and obv if the handwriting isn't decipherable then there's nothing I can do
that sounds like a lot of added work
that's a cute anti-chegg way
But if it looks complicated but I haven't yet read it I just curse under my breath and go for it
and have them generally explain their thought process
tbh unlatexed solution immediate 0 
its less work bcs students stop doing work to evade the embarrassment
I've seen profs who required tex
at the very least latex should give 20 bonus points
Maybe they give 2-3 psets of breathing room to learn it
the best thing to do with these things is clearly to allow students to resubmit corrections, but that doubles the workload
with corona its actually pretty bad
i get generally unreadable solutions due to bad pictures
we should at least require real scans
Lol so
lmao phone pictures are awful
also i have to say that hw points here dont really matter
learn to fucking scan your handwriting then, if people didn't submit blurry ass phone pics of their coffee stained diary then this wouldn't be needed
That's how I learned that it turns out people's technological skill isn't monotonically increasing
the grad classes at berk almost always required tex
i know but i decided to twist what you said to fit the post i wanted to write
tru
latexing feels nice
I remember when I was a kid the stereotype was the clueless teacher
And the students are like
Here's how you open the start menu
Close this by pressing x
etc
Now I'm the teacher
my handwriting on a tablet was so much better, that i stopped texing last fall for my undergrad classes and started submitting pdfs from onenote
And my students are fucking clueless lmfao
profs know technology 
i feel like most students now use primarily phones, so their computer skills are worse
I mean not even that tho

Like in my probability class I took an exam and had to upload a scan of my work within 15 minutes to Canvas
And I could just do it
wow
you didn't like...
god-tier prof
do all that...
Then I TA Calc 2 and we require students to upload pdfs of their work
before the exam...?
I expected I could figure it out on the spot

And I did, we had 15 minutes on top of the 2 hours to upload
I did it in less than like, 5 minutes
when i had to do that stuff i always did a test run
The students had a practice exam to learn the tech
and it always took me like 2 seconds when it actually came to it
nice
And not sure how to convert jpeg to pdf or smth
And I'm like come on guys
and some people screw up the first time
sigh freshmen
and a completely different set of people screw up the second time
you can't go from clueless to savvy in a single semester
i'm sure that's what happened
students are the worst.
i hate them
they're probably always right
including myself
whats everyones favourite model of noneuclidean geometry
why don't universities follow "the customer is always right"?
only some students are the worst, the students who care about the dumb math they're learning
wait grade inflation 
students who take an industrious mindset to education, realizing it exists as a vehicle toward a career
i like hyperbolic geometry personally
those are the students with whom it's worthwhile to interact
i personally enjoy spherical geometry.
that's a lie. is there anyone who unironically prefers something over hyperbolic geometry?
spheres are stupid
plane geometry
Imagine having non-chaotic geodesic flow
are there other models for euclidean geometry
guh
true
ultra told me to talk about euclidean geometry and then i realized i barely know anything abt euclidean geometry 
you can get a math major without taking any geometry 
I think you actually can here
gauss-bonnet

here are my favorites
Your idea for me talking about euclidean geometry at the start was to actually talk about different models of non-euclidean geometry like hyperbolic, elliptic, etc, right?
ah

I'm questioning it now, I'm worried it might get too technical or something
you're right
i'm aware
you're not the intended audience 
it still sounds like it could be a bit much
Well, not technical, but it would go Geometry and talking about simple terms -> History -> Back to math
I think the flow would be weird.
jon has found slims subterfuge
there is a way to do it for sure
i think it could be done right
I'm not sure if I could do it right 
i know i couldn't do it right
Slime doxed?
why did I have to put "What is logic?" in my abstract 
Why I'm here: To engage in rational, intellectual, emotion-free discourse and expand my mind.
i have to give something resembling an answer I suppose
god I should just give that Scanlon quote and tell them to work it out
you're right, but I feel the need to give a roughly satisfying answer at the start
I think I do need to give an actual example though
I was thinking about like, how would I explain calculus or something in the way I want it and it just seems way easier to do it via example
full-time Thinker
i like how he's much more mature and rational than other people his age while also a 19yo high schooler
owning the libs
I don't quite know what's the gcd of this server
Like presumably that screenshot isn't from here
it's not
recommend them https://vndb.org/v9093
Aoi returned to his hometown of Kazegaura where a gentle breeze blows through the streets, having lost his direction in life. On the hill lined with windmills, he met a wheelchair-ridden girl Kotori and watched the gliders overhead in awe. With his childhood friend Ageha in tow, they resurrect the soaring club in order to fulfill a childhood dre...
Is it a conservative server? Aviation?
The Intellectualist... interesting lmfao
DM me a link
Was he particularly smart?
Idk much about JFK
ah yes my fav conservative president, jfk
Name: Namington.
Age: At least 13 as per Discord Terms of Service.
Sex: Undisclosed.
Areas of Interest: 
Profession: Daniel Quillen simp
Howd you find us: Astral divination
Why am I here: Just to suffer?
jfk pushed for the civil rights movement though
Their rules seem reasonable
I get the point of establishing definitions from one source so people aren't just arguing over definitions but somehow the way that rule is presented amuses me
Philosophy . the doctrine
lol
I feel like
I know people
Who would unironically participate in this server
Unfortunately
pls send link i need to see this
ryc I'm not talking about you
how dare you ange.
???
how dare you ange.
Angetenar is a known troll
most respectable screenshot ive seen


plato bot
my iq is like huge

its long
can you ask them to help me with my mathematics
high iq microsoft windows expert
i struggle to believe this dude only has 1/100 neuroticism
I have 100
is the joke that this is what a 100 conscientiousness* person would say
conscientious?
i think psychologists actually use it (unlike MBTI) but
if someone self reports
99% chance they didnt get a psychologist to do it lmao

psychology is barely a science

Define science
based enough
done with finals 

Lol quarter system
T-2hrs to existential crisis 

ange_shock
how did you guys get good at math
Practice
We didn't
And I don't mean "Do the same question a million times" when I say practice
yeah i get it
nice i m gonna go practice now bye
Is any statistician online?
people keep talking about the intellectualist server but no one ever links it 
sounds cringe, never heard of it tho
sounds cringe
yeah that's the whole point
I want to laugh at them but I have no link 
goin outta your way to laugh at cringe is cringe
ok that's actually a fair point
agreeing with me is cringe
perhaps the cringe was me all along

see all I need to do now is laugh at myself
@fervent flame https://youtu.be/yzu6azmZPig
ๆคๆธฉใง๏ฝใ(^โฝ^)/
โ ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผโ
๐ฅTwitter๐ฅ
https://twitter.com/usadapekora
ใใใทใฅใฟใฐ #ใบใใใใถ ใงใใคใผใ๐ถ
"ใใฎๅ็ปใใใณใฉใคใใฏใใณใณใใณใๅฉ็จ่จฑ่ซพๅฅ็ดใซๅบใฅใใฆ้ ไฟกใใฆใใพใใ
ยฉSEGA"
โ ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผ๏ผโ
โทใกใณใใผใทใใใฏใใใพใใ๏ผ๏ผ
ใ็นๅ
ธใ
โ ๅฐ็จในใฟใณใใฎ่ฟฝๅ ๏ผๅๅใฎๆจชใซใกใณใใผใใใใไปใใบใ๏ผ
โ ใกใณใใผ้ๅฎใงใฎ็ๆพ้ใ้ๆใใใบใ๏ผ
โ ๅฎๆ็ใซใณใใฅใใใฃใซๅฃ็ดใใคใฉในใใฎ่ฟฝๅ ใใใYO๏ผ
ๅ
็ฐใตใใฟใใใธใฎๅ ๅ
ฅๅพ
ใฃใฆใใบใ๐
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1DCedRgGHBdm8...
live
@fervent flame https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJp0R-nfvTE
lol forgot the thumbnail
ใOriginal video/streamใ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_FYAaDGdKk
ใๆ่กใใใใ/Hoshimachi Suiseiใ
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5CwaMl1eIgY8h02uZw7u8A
ใใใใใใ/Shigure Ui's Channelใ
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCt30jJgChL8qeT9VPadidSw
#ๆ่กใใใใ
#ใใใใใ
destroyed in 20 seconds
yea yea yea
suisei cracked tf
top ten anime betrayal of all time lmfao
sometimes i forget that whitney did stuff other than graph theory (and whitney embedding)
like hes crazy prolific but i feel most remembered for his brief graph theory stint
which is weird
given his vast accomplishments
ostkaka is back
kaka, great
oh and it's sorta recent too, 2013
does anyone find that graph misleading with the non-zeroed out y axis
I thought it just looked a bit better there with the error values but I dont want it to come off as misleading
Yes axes should always start at 0
ok cool thanks ill zero out
quick i need someone to teach me japanese

sumimasen
dame da ne
dame yo dame na no yo
sugite sugi sugite
dore da ke
you say this as if i am not going to retaliate
with what?
anger
im already a masochist smh
boobas
sussy baka


crringe
Bussy saka
@fervent flame she is, she lasted several minutes against the 2nd best tetris player in the world
also
Edit:
from 4:27
Naoji refers to his dog. Nakamura talked about how every time Sugita sees a dog, he immediately calls them Naoji tho unfortunately, his dog passed away years ago
https://seiyuunotabi.tumblr.com/post/177916645165/in-memory-of-a-very-good-boynaoji-you-were-loved/amp
Thank you Greg Tacuyan for this information
Rise!! Wild rabbit...
This is Gintoki's VA
What a timeline








Opera GX just got an update, now spotify is built in 
is opera that browser you use on a DS?
no, that'd be netsurf
pretty bars are a waste of space
nooo, pretty bars are pretty and useful
these are enough bars for everything
time to compile chromium >:) (send help)
gentoo?
yes
i thought about trying it but having to recompile everything every update sounds like hell
nah, it's fairly ok if you have 2 computers (or a VM with ~100GB+ of space and a fuckton of ram) (for chromium)
which i don't lol
but the big advantage of gentoo is removing bloat
you can say "i don't need docs" "fuck off X" "GTK? no way!" etc which is fairly useful because you can pretty easily make a hyper-specialised system
Besides, you don't recompile everything every update, you just recompile a few packages (the only packages that are fucking slow to build are glibc, glib, gcc, binutils)
yea ik that's what i meant
im using arch currently
i've tried arch and it was just meh, like I get that getting the newest packages is cool but I can switch to debian experimental/sid if i want to
yea i don't really mind newest packages too much usually
i like arch 
good for you then
thought of trying gentoo or artix cuz idk systemd seems kinda unnecessary
whatever you do, do not use stage 1/2 for gentoo
Let me just be a moron and write, "Memes go in chill".
you're welcome
if you divide $\pdv{f}{x}$ by $\pdv{f}{y}$ you get $\pdv{y}{x}$, is there any intuition for this? a small change in one input in relation to a change in another input?
gmod
You don't

not afaik, no
chain rule moment
there is intuition but I had this exact convo for like an hour a couple of days back
Oo
So since you were talking about derivative things, can you really think of d/dx as a fraction? How is this defined mathematically?
No itโs not a fraction
so what is it? Just a operator in a function space?
oh okay lmao
but I guess that it sometimes is easier to think about this as a fraction
when doing the product rule or whatever it's called
Itโs way easier to think of it as a fraction in the chain rule and summation
it acts by taking a limit of fractions
Wew Lads Tbh
no, that's Illuminati
No illuminati is the upside down funny triangle aka the laplacian
wow, wew lads tbh if your name were yellow like RYC's then it would match your pfp perfectly
get this manz a yellow name

if the laplacian is upside down funny triangle, then nabla^(-1) = laplacian?
So true...
yes and also laplacian = b^2 - 4ac
Something something functions form a ring something differentiation acts on the ring something something field of fractions something laplacian = nabla^-1
Chemfinal
I was just typing this lol
Discriminate = laplacian for all polynomials because theyโre both triangles
Nabla is a third root of unity

C3 moment
wait
Waiting
what about the uhhhh square operator, d'Alembertian i think?
I'm waiting
Google โZ as a G-module under exponentiation in a group Gโ for more info
$\Delta \nabla$
Ring
Tokidoki
Not group
that looks like a nice logo if they were a bit closer to each other
no
Yes
lol?
you just glue them together and its homeomorphic to the square
Lol.
ok blocked idc
ez
Itโs already homeonorphic to the square
norphic
Homonorphism
mononorphisn
nononoephism
nomeomorphism
homo morphism
romeomorphism
Look imma come clean, I have no idea what the difference between an outer automorphism and an inner automorphism is
I know the definitions for both but I have no idea why theyโre different
Itโs an automorphism that isnโt inner :troll:
what's an automorphism? 0.0
like when a car turns into a big robot
transformers
automorphisms roll out
An inner automorphism is one that preserves conjugation I think
oh yeah now I see
an inner automorphism is just conjugation according to wolfram
Very sus...
amogus
Amongomorphism
wolfram imposter confirmed
damn i was typing that
so it is kinda lonely since it doesn't have friends
it just has itself as a friend
or smth idk lol
Sure.....
toki, how's munkres going? xD
I will ask this every day from now on 0.0
Definition. A automorphism is a lonely isomorphism
Yes.
Actually sounds like category theory
Well I have done some exercises and that's it lol
I will start reading some stuff later
Anyway when are we getting a fluid dynamics channel
when you get banned
I started reading Hatcher and was humiliated by the first chapter :/
A price Iโm willing to pay
Definition of Homotopy. (Actually fundamental group)
So what is the definition?
Horrifying
there's no fluid dynamics class for our physics dept and it makes me sad
:((((
hatcher is freely and legally available online
ye on his website
Link...
google at.pdf lol
"freely" and "legally"
but I like to have a physical copy
literally freely and legally
yes I am aware
it just feels a lot better to have an actual book to read for some reason
Hatcher is cheap on amazon anyway
i agree
but I think it's only paperbacks
also mayer vietoris sequences make brain hurty
mayer vietoris is just SvK but better
I actually prefer paperbacks I think. They are squishy
basically two functions are homotopic if they can be continuously transformed into the other, at least that's what I think it is xD
this sounds dismissive what im getting at is that mayer vietoris should have the same intuition basically
hmm what does it mean for a function to be transformed to another?
You apply another function to it
this is the right intuition
no not here
be careful about trying to answer questions if you dont know whats going on @sleek wing it only worsens confusion
Soz boss!
you imagine functions as strings, and if you can put the strings on top of each other in a "smooth" motion, you call them homotopic xD
and apparently that works for all continuous functions.
okay that's a really good explanation actually
so it's like homeomorphism but with functions?
and I also learnt that homotopy is just bad homeomorphism
okay so not quite
no i mean based on what im reading that sounds about right
amogus
amogus potion
homotopy equivalence is an equivalence relation among spaces
and its much weaker that homeomorphic
what did homeomorphic say to homotopy
oh okay. From the definition that verydistrubedperson mentioned it feels like homotopy should be stronger than homeomorphism
finite topological spaces 
wut, why
a function f:X->Y is a homotopy equivalence if there is a function g:X->Y such that fg and gf can be continuously transformed to the identity maps
a homeomorphism requires no transformstion so its much stronger
{{}} moment
i.e. a homemorphism has a map g such that fg and gf are identity without transformation
oh yeah now I see
yea ill come back to this conversation in 6 years when i finish my math major 
YO
u guys still have that?
about halfway through you should be able to understand most of this
lmao perhaps although i think i will go into engineering
will i be able to understand then??
then probably never
sadness

unless you go out of your way to learn it
because pi=3
isn't homotopy equivalence also a thing between spaces
Re(pi) = p
i dont want to sound like im dunking on engineering
or is that what you said
im not
or am I thinking of homotopy class
i said that yes
because science is fun too
homotopy class can be either
a homotopy equivalence f:X->Y induces an equivalence relation among spaces
wdym
yea ik
sometimes ppl here shit on egineers
this sounds like pure math
engineers
homotopy and the other one lmao
lmao
who would do such a thing ;^)
yeah studying physics is a good reminder of where my intuition is strong, which is math not physics

yooo ;^) is your pfp wew lads tbh

lmao :swag:

learning stuff from engineering and physics is often pretty hard for me im not very good with like physical intuition
yea thats perfectly fine its not for everyone
same
like when you just have to "know" that you set pressure to be 0 at the centre of a radial flow without being told, PROFFESOR
blocked
same I'm awful at maths
major in arts
@sleek wing nice pfp

thanks boss
that's not wew lads tbh
2 abelian points to anyone who knows where it's from
he's a copy cat
actually I'll up it to 3
he just stole his name
I can prove it's me
smh these copy cats bro
the real wew lads tbh has ;^) as pfp
enlarge it... the ;^) is still there...
from some weird asian comic, right?
1 abelian point...
manga 
omg wew lads tbh became evil

"became"
gangster moment
I use "abelian ring" without batting an eye I'm clearly chaotic evil
he was always evil i guess
shaking my head...
abelian ring
Communist group
Due to your description, I will guess it's madeline from celeste.
anyway how many strawbs you got
fair
no dice, why what's happening in it
Life is Strange 3 was shown.
and some weird marvel games
but that's about it
and 10*10^10^10 final fantasy trailers were shown.
heat death of the universe moment
Honestly, Life is Strange 3 sounds so weird and boring to me. Her special ability is empathy. Amazing.
Agreed
Isnt that the game about the siblings?
that was life is strange 2
I see
the brother was able to use the force,so one can see how lame the new protagonist's ability is.



๐ช โจ ๐งโ๐ซ



