#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 391 of 1
Yeah lol its the prisoners paradox but someone fucked it up and theres no reason not to take one of the options (game theoretically anyway)
yeah its a tough question, your essentially risking the fact that enough stupid people and people with good will are pressing blue. Red is a obvious choice, but it is also not a obvious choice because you might be playing a part in saving 50%.
But if more than 50% press blue no one dies
But youre also kinda not because pressing blue is essentially playing russian roulette with half the bullets loaded
i mean in this scenario there is also no reason to press anything but blue
You could also just... not press blue
i don't wanna live in a world in which all the people who pressed blue died anyway so blue is just better
And if you dont believe half of the world are idiots youre just dead
like in the prisoners dilemma, if all parties do what is mutually beneficial, then the reward is still less than if you tattled and the other person remained silent. in this scenario if everyone cooperates you just get the best outcome
Interesting; how are you characterizing the people that don't press blue?
i'd rather be dead than live with all the people who pressed blue dead
im sure it will always be a significant part of the population
im sure my mom will press blue
I think it depends on how you approach the dilemma, there is many reasons why people might press blue outside of missunderstanding.
what if everyone presses red?
By playing around with the numbers you can make this interesting
and many children
Then everyone lives, nothing happens
If you have a lot of loved ones who could, missunderstand the question, including children and elderly, you might argue its your moral duty to press blue and try to save them.
i know everyone will never press red
so its just a regular button? where is it located
I would really like to know why you wouldn't want to live without the presence of those that would press blue.
And if you dont think your loved ones are stupid and you killed yourself presuming their inability to read thats morally correct?
because i don't want them to die for no reason and i love some of them
i think this is a good point but it kind of demonstrates why the question is stupid. it's not a game-theoretically interesting question, but instead a philosophically interesting one that engages with external aspects
This isnt some "Stupid people deserve to die thing" its just that like, pressing blue is the bad choice
something tells me mr. beast wasn't posting it because he thought it would be philosophically engaging though
yeah i mean in reality id probably press blue
ngmi is right tho, game theoretically its obvious red is the choice, but philosophically its not obvious.
pressing blue is only the bad choice if you assume every human is a rational agent maximizing its own chances to live
which is not true
I see, so losing all of those people would bring you to wish death for yourself, right?
We could use a philosophical discussion channel, perhaps 🤔
it's like the prisoner's dilemma but on a greater scale
the best choice collecrively is not the nash equilibrium
No its like the prisoners dilemma but wrong lol
I do think its a morally interesting question but I do find it very hard to justify not pressing red
i don't see dying as a bad thing to experience
because here it seems like and instant painless death
Neither do I.
okay if you press the blue button but fewer than 50% do as well you get ripped apart by wolves or something
bam instantly more interesting
I think life is, at its core, a "problematic" phenomenon. Without life, nothing would matter, whereas with life, there is born the possibility for things to be good/bad from the perspective of that living entity. Life literally creates the possibility for phenomena to be problematic.
If you lose then you experience slow death and each second you beg to finish it all. Now pick blue if you want
i'd press red because im a coward who fears pain more than anything
Fears suffering, you mean, or no?
if a majority of people press red you likely have more enemies than loved ones, and you have to make sure your loved ones press red and enemies press blue, but if a majority of people are enemies of a majority of people they´ll probably press blue and nothing will happen, except you, having pressed red, will stick out and be rejected from social circles and such (if it´s recorded)
if humanity is more kind than not, it´ll also be blue and nothing will happen.
no, physical pain
Ah, that's interesting.
It’s not about an idiot thing, collective cultures would not hesitate at all to pick the blue button. Guess this is what decades/centuries of individualist brainrot does to people
It’s fundamentally anti civilization and anti humanity to press red even if you guaranteed ur own life persist
Lol
I consider myself lucky that I have an appreciation for physical pain up to a certain degree.
lol what
Surely most folk in this discussion are being facetious, no?
I mean it just isnt though, and like I am a communist so I dont even think that it is an individualism thing
If you have a civilisation in which half the population would kill themselves for no reason is that even a W at that point
I'm not . . .
I think she's quoting somebody.
maybe subconsciously
It's like a copypasta or whatever the kids say these days.
Theres just actually no downside to choosing red, its not like if one person chooses red someone dies, its not the prisoner dilemma
Do you vote?
the downside is that other people die
Choosing red is the obvious answer
I guess even if you choose red there's a chance it becomes 50/50 in which case it's inconclusive
Blue is Russian Roulette, red is just, not doing that
Idk it seems a message that ur cool with at most 49.9% dying
They will die regardless of whether you press your red button with almost near certainty.
like if there is 1 extra vote for red than blue then on average of 1 kill per red button pressed
Red means it's like 50/50 someone else dies, blue means it's like 50/50 I die
I really hope this isnt about to be some online leftist no real leftist votes nonsense, but yes I do
I am not.
Oh, why (do you vote)?
Yeah surely ban this person
It is relevant to the thought experiment, I promise.
This is surely a discord tos violation given that they operate in these countries
It has nothing to do with leftism or whatever.
Maybe I'll stop voting
only if you see the act of killing as strictly individual
I mean... if you can give them jobs and sell them dozens of super expensive treatments that only occasionally work, you can make a massive amount of money (provided there´s no revolution or whatever)
but it´s not a W overall.
but i think that people who press read have a shared responsibility in killing the people who pressed blue
I think it's a W for them and for the rest of us that wouldn't suffer emotionally as a result of their loss. The only possible negative consequences of a red push would be the emotional suffering of those that remain alive, and political, economic, and productive stagnation as a result of losses in the workforce and (possibly) in political leadership.
Did I kill them, or did they fail to save themselves?
Not really. Even if the act of killing is collective, your ability to prevent, deter, or change whether a collective murder occurs is quite slim.
You are not a collective of 8 billion people. You do not have control over the actions of 8 billion people, and you shouldn't act as if you do.
ok nhail is on flight <@&268886789983436800>
It is being discussed.
hm yes this is why i didn't vote originally but i prefer to believe otherwise
alr
i irrationally consider myself important in a vote
Wait what is happening?
nothing ignore
Because while voting will never bring about true change, it is ridiculous to position that all options are equally bad. And like especially in local elections where this stuff really has the biggest impact on your day to day life, I would rather go for the option that causes the least harm
Now I can see an argument that blue is the harm reduction argument here. I understand the sentiment that some people are morons and as such wont pick the not die option, so people who arent idiots should pick the blue option to protect those. But this is an utterlly collosal gamble, when there is simply the option to just... not die right in front of you
Oh ok
You probably should, yeah. It's not worth it.
Someone has their pfp as the flag of an ectremist organisation
Ah, yikes
On that note, we need to update U+1F1E6 U+1F1EB . . . screw the UN's position . . .
This is essentially "You can play russian roullette or not, but if enough people choose to play we'll run out of guns and call the whole thing off"
Okay, I guess what I want to ask is why do you vote for a good candidate instead of just going to the polls and making a little christmas tree? What's bad about voting for a bad candidate?
Even in local elections, the likelihood you decide the election is incredibly slim. Like, enormously so.
Which is in itself, the biggest game of Russian roulette
Thats true, but it doesnt change the argument.
i see voting as a ritual more than anything
The reason I'm asking is because if you vote because you think you have some obligation to behave in a way that's good if people *collectively do, at least the majority of folk, then it's completely sensible that you'd endorse @rapid valve 's position and press your blue button.
Only vote third party
Can you explain the context? Scrolling up a bit doesn't seem to enlighten me 
sure but it's kind of a naive notion of collective good in pressing blue
If you're like, voting for likely candidates, stop that. It's silly. There is almost no situation where it is worthwhile to do so.
Yes, if you vote, please vote for third-party candidates.
i think most people who vote have an almost spiritual relationship to it
It's just the shahada fr . . . that's the text . . .
I understand it, I know what theyre saying but again I just dont think this is really the same. Like I said there is the option presented to just, not kill yourself
it's like throwing a prayer
Yeah, but almost certainly someone will not take that option.
I don't think that makes it acceptable to just... let them die, if we can control it!
More than one thing can be true at a time
In fact, probably more than 2 people will not select that option! More than how many yous there are!
I think so also.
I'm in favor of mandatory voting, though.
so person enter discussy with arabic username and extremist resembling pfp, discussy ppl blow up, they want to vanish em but then mods say we diiscussing it then i find this and it said resembles terrorism symbol so i post. But i think there might be no bad faith
i see the altruistic pov here
you're totally right on that front
i vote because i think there is something special about my vote
Read the flag then read this: أَشْهَدُ أَنْ لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا اللَّه، وَأَشْهَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّدًا رَسُولُ اللَّه
understandable yeah, but you can't force people to vote for who they really want in power
That's pretty crazy. You could be spending that time doing something else, like political campaigning or whatever.
most likely scrolling on instagram
every day i see the jehovahs witnesses stationed around my campus and i think about why they aren't at soup kitchens instead
Sure, yeah, it's just I think it solves the problem of the most rational folk being compelled not to vote.
This flag is illegal to display in a non-educational context in several European countries
i think that voting brings me more mentally than it takes
Therefore it is surely against discord tos
and it's an operation too, they always have two people at the stands and they regularly swap pairs out with new ones
-# two options: "tangerine man" or "none of the above"
Probably because it is more efficient to prevent people from suffering in Hell for all of eternity than to help homeless folk.
voting makes me feel important and thus my time is not completely lost
I’d be cautious with it, and make them change it
They're shift working at the soup kitchen. Duh!
i notice as well that literally no one ever talks to them, and they're always smiling and talking to each other
Europe isn't real
But I’m also not a mod
Also China and Russia too
Maybe not so efficient, then.
True!!
it's like they station two people to have a pretense of engagement lol
and yeah there's nothing rational about it but im openly irrational
Isn't discord banned there
this is my least favorite sect of the religion
Tfw Discord is against Discord TOS in Russia, what will Discord do about this
so yeah i'd press blue even if people i love didn't just because it makes me feel good e
What if 50% of people voted already and its currently a 70% lead for red. This time everyone is allowed to publicly discuss what to do before the voting continues, surely a invite to press blue and save people would be pushed, but surely many people would argue to let them die, it is their responsibility after all, what would you, realistically do? and would your position change?
"Will the Suffering End?"
That's what they print on the pamphlets lol
When my brother was a Catholic, he wondered why we didn't abort every child if it were true that aborted children went to Heaven and almost everyone else would go to Hell.
That one is interesting, so what are we actually betting on s.t. X% of the remaining 50% can turn the 70% into 50%
If it could be discussed however surely word can get out that red is the "Nothing happens" button. But yeah blue in this situation likely makes more sense because you can convince enough people to press it "just in case"
Like a 75% blue rate?
What the? I've seen several JW pamphlets and never seen that but I don't think you're making it up either. That's funny
reminds me of the orthodox jews in the NYC subway that will wrap a tallit around your arm if you look jewish and force you to pray with them lol
Is this a catholic teaching
i believed people just choose whether they go to heaven or hell
That sounds horrific omg
I thought it was the case that they believed the souls of the unbaptised were stuck in limbo
horrific is perhaps hyperbolic but it's definitely uncomfortable
I was raised catholic and thought similar thoughts all the time
idk if they do it any more though
70+epsilon 
If you believe this it is no longer an issue
70+$\mathbf{+_{on}}$
I remember when I was walking around with a book that said "HOW TO OPERATE MICROSCOPES" and all of a sudden a bunch of atheists wearing tuxedos came and started praying to Charles Darwin with me and singing in a wailing tone "WE HAVE LOGICALLY INFERRED THE NONEXISTENCE OF AN OMNIPOTENT, OMNIBENEVOLENT, OMNISCIENT DEITY USING FACTS AND REASON."
pinkishnova cgt queen
Yeah, I mean, if people can rationally choose to go to Hell, I'm not sure what's so bad about it.
the bad thing is that god is not there
My powers of estimation remain impeccable
Well, it's not bad if you dislike G-d, no?
and since god is good, this is bad
Okay I understand now but for a sec I thought mods were being pinged to report me for flying 
Ah, I see. It's a sort of eudaimonistic view.
Honestly I was a little confused myself
I thought the exact same thing
Very silly
we're sending a missle to bring down the plane immedietly, thanks.
Omnipotence is in itself practically a non-starter with classical parodoxes like the unliftable boulder
no nhails will be flying today.
Yeah, this view is very common.
i wasn't thinking that back when i was christian tho, i was pretty glad to have the option ot go to hell just in case
I mean it kinda makes sense from their POV. If you truly believe that if one accepts Jesus as the lord and saviour, and doing so will bring you eternel perfect after life, isnt the morally correct thing to do to spread that word?
I agree they should be doing that, and its certainly within the teachings of the bible (though idk what the witnesses really believe lol), but I do actually understand it from their perspective, horrible as that view is and how much damage its caused
some might say i was a bad christian
There are pretty strong, consistent, and reasonable formulations of omnipotence that don't have this problem. There are also good (read: better) dialethic (paraconsistent) ones.
I don't know these fancy words, but I prefer the view that you must place restrictions on which actions an omnipotent being would ever actually take
if you say that only god is omnipototent and that god's will can't be contradictory, then it solves this particular problem
but other problems emerge, but since they are less concrete i think nobody will care
So place restrictions on which actions God can take, I feel like that's not omnipotent
the top view (I could be wrong!) is true of all christians who perceive a willing audience. The problem is when that view becomes manipulated into coercive behavior, with any kind of tactic.
Because they can't do that thing
Could you elaborate? Im aware of like that dialethism is but I dont know anything about it. Accepting that something can be true and false is admittedly a hard pill to swallow
I mean you can always lean into paraconsistent interpretations of omnipotence. So, like Graham Priest.
Or, like, re-interpret omnipotence as having the power to do anything that is logically possible.
It's a matter of re-definition.
Wittgenstein would argue it is a problem with our language; and thus, it is a linguistic paradox.
Jc Beall is a better reference!
Yeah, but it leaves the basic problem that G-d, like, if G-d wanted to, G-d could bring about contradictions. It just happens that G-d doesn't.
Then there are other problems like: why? Why does G-d have a consistent will, if there's nothing degenerate or bad about inconsistency?
sucks that none of the arguments matter to a religious person cause "god works in ways we dont understand" is a easy refutation
I mean, is it? Its contradictory, but sure maybe you accept that somethings can be true and false, but then like where are we? Whats left to talk about
The basic response here is: okay, why do you believe in G-d then? Why do you believe G-d has attributes A, B, etc.?
how can you say for certainty that any inconsistency you found is simple not just, your lack of understanding of a higher truth after all?
Like if your response is to just throw your hands up, then it seems like it applies equally to anything you believe (about G-d.)
the ways some people talk about religions sound like people read criticisms against narcissists and interpreted them as religions.
Its the same as that famous christian guy whos name im blanking that essentially came up with the interpretation "God is all of us" (which is horribly reductive but still). Like I dont really see this as an argument because its irrefutable, and not in the way of it being a very good argument
Like how string theory is kinda sucky physics
Yeah, there are views under which it is both true and false that G-d can create a stone G-d cannot lift, similar to the liar paradox.
Its the whole issue with Skeptical theism.
Yeah but like, so what? You accept this and what argument is left to be had?
I would ask I guess why it should have to be falsifiable
God's existence itself is hard to state.
IN a world, where solipsism as an idea cannot be denied fully, i.e., we cannot definitively prove the existence of others (i mean common people. This problem is called 'problem of other minds'), extending the proof of existence to God seems hard.
You cannot definitively prove it. Claiming it is outside our scope is an easy way out.
Again, the limits of our language are where we draw the limits of our understanding. And things like consciousness, and God exist beyond it.
Skeptical theism also presents super basic metaethical problems. I noticed this a long time back and apparently Sharon Street noticed it about a year and a half before me, back in 2014, which sucks.
I guess it doesnt but then theres no discussion to be had, and its somewhat meaningless. I can tell you theres a thing which can do all things, even those that it cant, and you dont need to be able to prove me wrong. The sensible thing to do then is to walk away, because so what?
Weren't you a young child a year and a half after 2014
Yeah.
Wittgenstein famously declared:
"Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent"
If God is truly something which we cannot speak about, we have no choice but to be silent about it. Well that's all according to him. To him, theology is just a misunderstanding of language.
it's just saying your mortal logic cannot equal god's since they are omnipotent
But young child as in like pre-kindergarten
Nah, I was like definitely post-kindergarten.
Sure but the point of the claim isn't really to facilitate discussion is it
Yeah but again I dont really accept this lol, this is meaningless
Yeah. It's true that G-d is omnipotent.
Wait how old are you? I thought you were a good bit older than me
Why is 'god' being censored?
I prefer it written that way.
I suppose each religion has found their answer to this, like their holy book being the word of god.
Personal belief ?
I'm of an indeterminate age. Depends on who asks and when. Likewise for my nationality.
I think there's possibly some confusion about motivation here
Are you like those kinds of people who think that God cannot be spoken of, or talked about, so you write 'G-d'?
i dont like it when ppl make assumptions based on my age. like ppl will say "well blo is 45" and make assumptions based on that
Well, I'm surely talking about G-d.
Otherwise how could I say we can't talk about G-d?
It's not a proof, but you can't disprove it either
theres a type of ppl out there who type yhwh out instead
It's the whole pount of faithlol
This sucks.
kinda lame if u ask me
Why is that worse than g-d
What does that mean
For me this is precisely why its meaningless to discuss god.
You might have heard it said/written yahweh instead
hebrew name for the judeochristian god
No
Oh shit
Okay it's really not pronounced as it's written for me
I believe the original point was that it wasn't pronounced
I avoid writing G-d because I think there's something pretty cool about treating the name with certain norms of respectfulness, etc. The problem is revived if you write the Tetragammon instead.
whether you come to your own satisfactory conclusion about god or his nature, why does it matter if we do? not just from a practical standpoint, but existentially why does it matter if we do somehow reach a conclusion?
Which does make the above somewhat ironic
It's actually a corruption of a sentence tbf, but yeah it's being cut out
We forgot the pronunciation of the Tetragammon. At some point the pronunciation was known, but it was certainly something kinda weird.
it feels boundary cultural appropriation to read it tbh
That's why everyone in discussy censor fr*nch /j
The thing isn't about utility or value or existential significance.
It is just curiosity, ig, to phrase it that way.
People spend hours and hours trying to do things they have no reason to do. In "Myth of Sisyphus", Albert Camus describes the Myth of Sisyphus (duh), but refashions it in an absurdist sense; even if human life is meaningless, we 'must imagine Sisyphus happy.'
separate discussion for another temps I think
I think a lot of jews pronounce it this way so idk that I agree with this per se
But I also could just be gravely misinformed
i have no idea on this so ill take whoevers word for it
That makes sense
I have this image in my head of some random bozo giving the correct pronunciation of the Tetragammon and then getting smited or whatever.
But why is it interesting? what are we curious about if its a problem with no good conclusion? It feels like we're just trying to disprove false religious conclusions rather than trying to reach anything new or worth thinking about
"We try pronouncing the Tetragammon for TEN HOURS to see if we get smited (IMPOSSIBLE CHALLENGE) (YOU WON'T BELIEVE WHAT MY RABBI FATHER SAID) (NOT RABBINICAL)"
"yeewoo" ⚡ ⚡⚡
You are looking at it the wrong way.
Why do people spend hours trying to analyze ethically the shooting of the Albatross (Samuel Taylor Coleridge, The Rime of the Ancient Mariner) or Waiting for Godot's central dilemma, or Gatsby's conclusion, even if they do not provide any good insights?
Some people get stuck, some people regress, some people make conspiracies, and some are more traditional.
We cannot assign adjectives to things we do not understand, and claim it is definitive.
I mean, why are people so invested in fictional pieces?
(I mean the existence/validity of fictional characters, of dreams, and of virtual reality is a separate issue on its own)
But, if we assume to be fakes, then, our investment is in, by that sense, meaningless, and whatever plot resolution they get, it should by extension should not matter to us.
Yet, a lot of people are invested. They are moved deeply by things that supposedly 'do not exist in reality.'
Lots of people's actions and other beliefs are informed by their religious beliefs, so it is important to think about those and challenge our religious beliefs and others'.
I mean it almost always feels like a discussion about epistemology when it comes to god.
i wonder if theres a non cultural curiosity reason to be interested in gnosticism in the 21st century
@blazing pawn you are our resident Jew, please give your analysis.
God can be analyzed in so many ways, metaphysics, ethics, phenomenology, teleology, theology, idk.
Even logic.
It depends largely on what kind of people you interact with. That is the deciding factor of where your discussion would be oriented.
I think it's pretty neat
There are christians that examine modern gnosticism, unless you mean that as cultural gnosticism
I have never been Jewish, this may surprise you, although I have studied Jewish theology a bit.
thats interesting sure
Yeah, it's relevant to the history of Christianity.
iguess i shuldve said more as "a spiritual reason" or smth along those lines
This is sometimes a rebuttal of like, "My brain made me do it" type reasoning, people justify all kinds of harmful mental health this way for instance
there definitely are christian sects in the levant that on some level are gnostic I believe
iguess this also connects to a more general question
of what value u can get from a religion when there isnt a community around it
Take the Mandaeans
Fictional pieces are recognized to be fiction, in this case we are discussing the reality of something.
I do not mind discussing god under "what if" assumptions.
But it is almost certainly just that, what if.
That was merely an analogy.
God is most certainly an 'what if.' You can put an 'what if' on anything on the world.
And claim its validity. It just depends on how clever you are.
I do indeed put a what if on anything, but im not gonna dig that whole rn.
dig that whole
there clearly has to be a difference between how a christian interfaces with their religion to say a revival druidism person
A discussion on nihilism almost always ends in disaster in public spaces.
even philosophy servers push against it
(Meaning is in the eye of the beholder)
tbh I feel this way about extended "is God real" discussion online.
I don't see how we went from theological debate to nihilism
so good we got that out of the way
lets leave it at that xd
its not something im comfortable discussing here anw.
okay
@subtle magnet
https://www.reuters.com/world/india/modis-bjp-set-surprise-gains-india-state-elections-exit-polls-show-2026-04-29/
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party and its allies were projected to win two of four state elections, exit polls showed on Wednesday, projecting a surprise gain that would strengthen the party's dominance across the country.
Modi's BJP has won most state elections since a shocking performance in the 2024 general el...
wait
the gif and the article are unrelated
They were over yesterday by IST lol.
c'mon man, if I wanted to calculate time zones, I would join a math server
sheesh
If they win in West Bengal, it would hopefully lead to some change. I don't like the party and most stereotypically intellectual Bengalis don't either but there is a growing mass of braindead youths.
Bengal was the place to be in India back in the 80s. Remained like that till date.
-# not as a place to be but like it was in the 80s.
if the collective agrees to pressing the blue button (reminder: this is the real world) pressing the red button only says "i am willing to kill you if it serves me"
Or "my button press has no impact on whether you die."
-# conservatives and big companies already say that
If the collective agrees on pressing the blue button then I'm pressing the blue button lol
im pressing the green button
cant believe yall have been stunlocked on a stupid mr beast hypothetical thats probably a promo for some dumb new game show for 2+ hours
Oh is this the button conversation 
-# blue pink white pink blue button, do you press it
I'd destroy the buttons and move on
its a interesting hypothetical.
I dont think it was mr beast? i swear i saw the poll on twitter and it was someone else.
im taking the piss dw
How serious is this discussion chat compared to the other?
uhhh very serious
oh damn I didn't know this shit would go for this long 
yeah mods were good to make the #serious-discussion because I have a habit of sparking really looooooong convos 
so did some analysis clustering global trade data that revealed effectively global north and global south countries (I then repeated clustering on the first level of the global south to obtain a 2nd level global north countries and repeated this process two more times). Showed this earlier but harpz showed errors so I fixed them and here's the updated version
Global North Lvl 1 Countries: United Arab Emirates, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Switzerland, China, Germany, Denmark, Spain, France, United Kingdom, Hong Kong, China, Ireland, India, Italy, Japan, Korea, Republic of, Netherlands, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of, Sweden, Singapore, Türkiye, United States of America, Rest of the World
Global North Lvl 2 Countries: Angola, Argentina, Austria, Bulgaria, Bahrain, Kingdom of, Chile, Colombia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Egypt, Finland, Greece, Croatia, Hungary, Indonesia, Israel, Iraq, Kuwait, the State of, Kazakhstan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Malaysia, Nigeria, Norway, New Zealand, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Thailand, Chinese Taipei, Ukraine, Viet Nam, South Africa
Global North Lvl 3 Countries: Afghanistan, Antigua and Barbuda, Anguilla, Bangladesh, Brunei Darussalam, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sudan
Global North Lvl 4 Countries: Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Belarus, Côte d'Ivoire, Djibouti, Algeria, Ethiopia, Gabon, Ghana, Guinea, Guyana, Iran, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanese Republic, Latvia, Libya, Morocco, Macao, China, Mauritius, Oman, Panama, Peru, Pakistan, Slovenia, Tunisia, Uganda, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
Global South Lvl 4 Countries: Albania, Armenia, Aruba, the Netherlands with respect to, Barbados, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Benin, Bermuda, Bolivia, Plurinational State of, Bahamas, Bhutan, Botswana, Belize, Central African Republic, Congo, Cameroon, Costa Rica, Cuba, Cabo Verde, Curaçao, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Eritrea, Fiji, Faeroe Islands, Grenada, Georgia, The Gambia, Equatorial Guinea, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Honduras, Haiti, Iceland, Jamaica, Kyrgyz Republic, Cambodia, Kiribati, Comoros, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Korea, Democratic People's Republic of, Cayman Islands, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Sri Lanka, Liberia, Lesotho, Moldova, Republic of, Montenegro, Madagascar, North Macedonia, Mali, Myanmar, Mongolia, Mauritania, Montserrat, Maldives, Malawi, Mozambique, New Caledonia, Niger, Nicaragua, Nepal, French Polynesia, Papua New Guinea, Palestine, Paraguay, Rwanda, Solomon Islands, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Senegal, Somalia, Suriname, Sao Tomé and Principe, El Salvador, Sint Maarten, Eswatini, Turks and Caicos Islands, Chad, Togo, Tajikistan, Timor-Leste, Turkmenistan, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tanzania, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Vanuatu, Samoa, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe
https://x.com/i/status/2047710215265730755 yeah he straight up stole it from this guy
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
lmfao fuck Mr. Beast
who probably saw it somewhere else too.
my only suspicion regarding these results is that Afghanistan is a global north lvl 3 country seems super suss considering the countries that exercise "less" central economic power than Afghanistan 
It existed from way before this guy
I thinkit's just a pretty famous moral experiment
change your looks to line up with some other gender. can be pressed arbitrarily often, will eventually go back to how you were before.
So stealing is not the word
new idea for an april fools event. moderators are you listening
yeah i figured as much, but its still copying someone, since it was posted 5 days after this post was made.
it wasn't even the first time
nexsai do you hear anything
Nope.
cant believe ure setting a recent trend of silencing blo.what did blo ever do
gonna be real I don't care if I die pressing the blue button, the blue button is a broader representation of altruism/empathy which are major necessary founding buildings blocks of civilization while the red is a hyperindividualistic motivation borne from alienation
isnt red button smth u press if ure afraid of ppl pressing the red button
like isnt that the whole point of this experiment
some people would have that motivation
I'm not familiar with the original experiment if there is one
unless theres an additional button u can press as an exit poll that says "i pressed the red button cause i want blue pushers to die" then we will never know
Earlier we compared pressing blue to voting in an election. The likelyhood to make a difference is negligeable but the action comes from a more irrational relationship to moral (respecrively democracy) that is almost spiritual
if you would press the red button if you were afraid of people pressing the red button you´d be a reason for others to press the red button
exactly thats why this is "interesting" as a "social experiment"
this has no bearing or is remotely close to say voting for a third party in a FPTP system
We developped the link earlier
but if few people would do it / were afraid of it, everyone would stay alive.
A bit
a red press might be good for you but would always be bad in general
I would press blue too, for the same reason i vote, and magma would press red for the same reasons she doesn't vote
it was game theory all along? wow. cant believe it
there is an easy solution
everyone presses red
I thought this was a math server, smh
Well what i wanted to say is that there is the purely rational game theory vision and the more ritualistic vision
id push the red button only if craig pushed the blue button
Or irrational
easier solution, at least 50% of people press blue
At least 50% press blue is way mor elikely than everyone presses red
unrelated, pls leave all your valuables in an easy to find place
thanks
I think we can easily find interesting variations of this dilemma
if only there was a whole field dedicated to this
If only
some kinda.. dilemma...
I tried this once and then brian mitsoda got fired from vampire the masquerade bloodlines 2 so i learned that god doesnt fuck around
Bruh no way we have discussion and serious discussion 😂
But fr anyone need a study partner?
"serious" as in serious / heavy topics.
read all the channel names, maybe read some channel descriptions.
My bad
So like the ultimate tool to see what I actually want to be 
kinda a weird question, but something i was talking with some friends over: what is the least amount of catagories would you need to have to cover everything in the universe, where something is only in the catagory, if thats its most important quality
like black holes go in the "celestial body" catagory because being celestial bodies is their thing, not the "pop sci topic" catagory, despite them being a pop sci topic
water
this isnt a rigorus question obviously, as deciding what literaly everythings most important quality is is probably imposible, but its interesing
This question is a bit too unrigorous for me to answer, but I feel someone else is on your wavelength with this.
Who decides what's the most important quality
the person answering the question
atoms
this isnt anything serious, just, if you had to put everthing into catagories, what catagories would you choose
things can be distinct and still be in the same catagory
Goon material and chud material
Ok I rescind the idea that others would be on a related wavelength.
Exists vs doesn't exist I'd bet
for example, all living things could be one catagory, bieng that for anything thats alive, being alive makes it pretty unique from everything from everything not alive
Things that exist are probably unique for that 
summer camp kids up late
I mean you could class objects on their actual qualities
Like how we class elements
true
Like you could class objects based on how they interact with others
I wonder what the "natural" way to class stuff intuitively would be in general 
But what if nothing seems important 
Now I not only need to class objects, but figure out importance 
Hmmm, I'd probably need quite a few categories in that case
Noooo not iso 
Not abs alg...
I don't wanna think about A/~...
hi
things we´ve observed and things we haven´t observed
Global sumud flotilla ships got intercepted west to crete
I didn't expect it to happen this early wtf
This is so far from gaza
what uis that
sumud flotilla ship getting intercepted, most likely by israel
But the thing is that they're not even halfay past greece
@ionic wraith does israel own the mediteranean now?
huh theres another flotilla
didntthe last one fail and they bombed greta thunbergs whip too
More like Israel can do whatever the fuck it wants like a spoiled brat child and no one will do shit
They almost reached gaza last time and this time there's double the nulber of ships
But yeah israel starting intercepting them this fucking early
The last ships weren't even gone
The U.S. Congress putting forth a bill to condemn Hasan Piker is so batshit
There's been a number of indictments to crime lately
Most notably Comey, but also the sitting Chairman of the Fed
Such unemployed behaviour lmao
It’s actually so pathetic and empire decline moment
Hasan must be chilling knowing that so many more people will learn about him and go “huh he seems reasonable actually”
Getting attention from Congress lmfao
What should be the plot for day 3 of trying to get ChatGPT to let me eat grass
also this question is underrated so bringing that back
I don't like hasan much but like....wow what the fuck is the govt high on
How common is it to find people to endorse your arxiv paper if it's your first time publishing? Im working on a paper and I just wanna know how long it will take / how likely it is. Im 16 and current developing a parralel computing framework for the riemann hypothesis to search away from the critical line to find possible zeros. In addition im using BOINC (what seti used) and implmenting it in fortran, c++, cuda c++ as well as some assembly. This isn't some garbage RH paper its just about interesting statistics and trying to cover more area that we know don't have zeros not trying to prove or disprove it.
This is a rough rough rough draft but I believe it gives a general idea, please don't judge my word choice I wrote this in school and it will not be published in this current state
nevermind, I can't upload images
Didn't they put forward a bill/motion to condemn Nick Fuentes too
this is just centrism
Can you share the GitHub of the code?
It sounds interesting.
"how can somebody win if someone loses?"
sounds pretty interesting
why so serious
its called #serious-discussion for a reason
thats scary
!redir
This channel is only for on-topic discussion. Please take casual conversation to #discussion or #chill.
huh whats that
Sirius deeshcushion
@novel apex
Maybe this fits here better
LLMs do have good reasons to be around, just not in the way they are right now...
LLMs are an absolutely great technology for proof-reading, maybe even summaries. BUT they use up HUGE amounts of power, even for the most simple tasks. They hallucinate, because they are just word-prediction machines. They can't think, they're just a statistical model, trying to guess what the next most likely word would be. The amount of data they obtain illegally in order to train is enormous. The amount of people relying on LLMs as their only source of truth is scary, especially in engineering, where errors could lead to trauma, injury, or even death. I know people who can't even do proper research anymore, I know people who just won't ever read a paper, because their fancy ChatGPT can just tell them "everything", half of it being wrong. And don't let me get even started on the AI-generated papers, riddled with errors and references that don't even exist.
Then there are the GenAI images and videos. I don't even know one SINGLE reason, why anyone wouls prefer that over real art. I don't know a single reason why anyome would want to watch an ai-generated advertisement.
The list goes on, but I think I made my point.
alright I understand and resonate with this perspective greatly but i do feel like there is an argument there to be made for the other side as well
the part where i get hung up on is the shunning of AI altogether rather yk dealing with these vices you've clearly mentioned
i am not trying to deny their existence quite the contrary actually
however i do not understand the altogether extortion and lowkey classism that arises at times just because someone uses AI
you would agree that AI is a tool and as such a tool that needs to be learnt to use properly
it should never be an altogether substitute and i can see that's the main area where your points arise
is the people who let it subsititute their cognition altogether
but that generalization then ends up hurting the overall ecosystem that could arise from proper regulation and consequent use of the models
what i get caught up on is the absolute disgust people show at even the mention of AI as it stands right now
when rather i feel it would be significantly more helpful to shed light onto the "dangerous" use of it
thereby guiding more people to use it properly
think about it like this let's say im using a calculator but i only use the plus minus multiply and divide for solving lets say a quadratic which drains the battery a certain amount
when on the other hand there's a mode in the same calculator that solves the quadratic directly and uses a little lesser battery
if the goal was getting to an answer both get there one way or the other
Hold up- let us please differenciate between AI, machine learning and GenAI and LLMs
what does ChatGPT fall under for instance afai undertsand it it's a GenAI LLm idk
ChatGPT is an LLM and thus in the category of GenAI
I just said that maybe one shouldn't use LLMs... No disgust, it's just a very bad idea
alright then all my arguments have been keeping GPT specifically in mind
oh i would like to clarify i wasnt aiming at you specifically but rather what i've observed in the online ecosystem
I don't see the classism against people who use LLMs in their daily lives... I see classism from the people who create LLMs against everyone else
Oki
i think i havent managed to communicate my point
But here's the thing: the latter mode would just be straight up wrong, but sold believably
Maybe
Or maybe it's just me having a brainfart
i'll be fully honest not once have I had GPT hallucinate a meaningless answer if i've used the correct model for it
I did... So, so many times
maybe you weren't aware that it was wrong
the only times it's been blatantly incorrect is handling relatively higher difficultly physics numericals that mostly depend on diagrams
To be fair, which level were your questions at? Pre-uni math and physics should be fine, but the more advanced it gets, the more errors it will produce
quite a variety hovering around pre uni and ug but yes i do agree it stumbles around grad level studies
not just grad level
And there's the problem
but at that point if you're using genAI again you shouldnt be using it as a standalone substitute you should work alongside it as a tool
I can only speak from an engineering-students perspective... Pre-Uni Math won't get you very far. And it already fails at so, so many things in undergrad math
It can still spit out pretty high quality answers often enough to be useful at the graduate and even research level
and at that point you should be more aware of the possibility of hallucinations which is my point that rather than say "oh this hallucinates dont use it at all this bad" the outlook should be "this can hallucinate hence you should be careful when using it and think yourself alongside it"
perspective was one of the things i brought up
Then why use it at all, when you can just have a book next to you, when you have to fact-check everything either way?
a lot of times it presents an approach i wouldve never thought of and even if it was completely off itself if i try it that way i find quicker success
It can't do this if you're not sufficiently competent yourself at either the material or using it as a tool
that's the same argument as why use a calculator to do any arithmetic when you know howo to add and subtract
But that's not really on the model
i find that quite baseless in the nicest way possible
as i've been trying to argue the AI model is a tool not a substitute
YES i agree that the people who have it completely substitute their own cognition are using it dangerously
Not really, no
The calculator is correct. An LLM will be incorrect eventually
You can use an LLM as good as you want, statistically speaking, it will ALWAYS say something incorrect sooner or later
This comment does feel a little ironic given that the undergrad engineering curriculum doesn't really demand very much mathematically that isn't covered in lower divs
i feel like you're not open to looking at the perspective im offerring and i completely respect that however i hence im stepping back with this debate
Gemini failed on me with basix firsg semester questions
Then don't use gemini
(gemeni is absolute dogshit)
the only model i've found to be consistently pretty good is the extended thinking model of gpt
Blind trust in your calculator is pretty much fine
it takes like full minutes to half hours to generate a response
This is totally dependent on which you model you use. The paid versions across all major corporations are pretty good from my experimentation
and it's not afraid to say "i dont have enough information to go through" bceause it genuinely tried a lot of things
ive found it to actively avoid hallucination
If you try something super fucked up it might fail in some pathological way but if you stay within the intended use cases it's pretty much flawless
I wouls like to have this discussion later again, when I'm at a quiet place
I'm very stressed out rn (for medical reasons)
I am sorry if it felt like talking to a wall
especially with the recent addition of being able to search up actively while deciding on a response to generate
(I just basically started crying infront of the doctor a few minutes ago, I should try to wind down)
oh no no dont worry at all the point of the discussion is to keep it healthy
and i recognize that if we both were to continue right now it would probably steer away from that hence i decided to step back
Yes, that's why I would love to come back to it later
Maybe in DMs or so, if you want
I recently upgraded to ChatGPT pro and it is very good
I feel like the fact that gpt still has an error rate in proofs is actually somewhat instructive lol. It's like a nice stream of "show what's wrong in the proof" type exercises you might find in a textbook
100 dollars a month is kind of a rip off though
HOLY WHAT
oh pro the company version
Yeah
dude plus is good enough 😭 😭
Plus is like 10 dollars a month
unless you have like insanely intensive use
My use case is that I want it to be able to think moderately intelligently about research level stuff
serious discussy is a fever dream?
Plus was much better than the original one but it would still need a lot of prodding to do some things
have you tried out the agent mode? hows your experience been with that
what is it?
Haven’t really needed agent mode
Been thinking about using it to automate some email stuff
automation of multi step tasks requiring reasoning browsing clicking analyzing files and editing docs and spreadsheets rather than just answering in chat
the main thing is that from your initial prompt it can plan further steps for itself
nice pronous (jkjk)
i see
well (sorry for jumping in) this is quite diffrent in a calculator you outsource arthmetic because calculator can do arthemtic thats what computuers excel at arthmetic buttt
when it comes to chatgpt ur essentailly oursourcing ur thinking at first it feels great but you know how if u dont do multiplication manually for too long u start to frrogt the multiplicaion table
its kinda the same with thinking relying on it is terrible in the regards of its effect on you. not to mention envoirmental and other effects. i am not denying thats it is usefull i know it is and ik it helps many people but just with anything moderate and regulatued use is very important here too! (again this is my own belifs so i might jsut be planely wrong)
although if u have the time this might be inresting to read. its a paper by MIT https://www.media.mit.edu/publications/your-brain-on-chatgpt/
also regarding envoirmental effects and water usuage there are many many models that are much cheaper and harm the envoirment way less- if you have the time and energy to look into that please do
you might even be able to run your own llm locally instead anyways if ur more intrested in the nuance of this topic Dr.fatima made an honestly very well written video essay on this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y85nqc2zm7M
also i belive the video i sent in my last msg might be worth a watch for you too! because it challenges both belifes on the debate (if u have the time and energy to)
agreed but sadly its driven under concern of for profit and not for envoirmental reasons..
data centers are still bieng built everywhere.
but win lose ig
... welll a cough cough a certain company was uhh.. "non profit" until hmm yeah...
Out of curiosity what did you ask ChatGPTs extended thinking model to get it to think for half an hour? Like that's crazy work
i think ai companies can exsist without capitlicstic incentives but maybe i am just naive
i mean they arent even making any profit yet its only still going cause investment money (i belive so?)
also deepseek at its start managed to obtain some succues with a ridiclously lower budget
yes but they belive that whatover "super intelgence" may arise will fix that problem.
it can be a non profit buisness aas it was claimed to be once..
but now it has become a play where u need to make number go up so u can get more investment funds
and so u build more expand more faster and faster to get more investment and so on. but this is pretty harmfull
to prettty much everyone. and they still dont even know how they will pay backk all those investors.
which is why i belive in open source models and running your own LLM if u want to use one
oh it was quite a few pdfs that i needed it to scrape to train itself before i could have it generate any response
it is fairly simple to set up too
Did you give it multiple pdfs and a prompt, or multiple prompts?
i had a master prompt so that it could learn up on most if not all of the data of the pdfs and then after that once it had the context built it could answer my questions more accurately to my requirement
Gotcha, so it roughly took 30 minites for the initial prompt then
I have gotten ChatGPT to do a multi-minute thinking with tricky mathematical prompts, but it's rather hard to stump with minimal data. I guess if you load in 300 page pdfs or something it churns for a bit.
there was one other game theory question where i wanted it to solve a game we made up at school and it took idr how long but it was over 25m
eh i guess that is true captilism i guess..
you were right idk i just wish things were diffrent i guess ;/
seriously
i mean is massive data centers in a desert for a machine that steals all text and media really the only way to move forwards?
The poor robots getting abused by these questions is crazy
What serious chat on
sometimes it thinks for 30 minutes just to be wrong
if its thinking too much its not doing the work you asked it to do, the quicker the reply the more promising, majority of thinking is to validate the prompt is correct logically by refeeding it
sup
A lot of the environmental issues with AI would be resolved if these companies were allowed to own private nuclear reactors
i think i prefer the issues of the datacenters as they are compared to the idea of companies cutting costs with nuclear waste disposal, because im sure eventually a CEO somewhere would decide to just dump it in the sewers or something
Surely with appropriate legislation this wouldn’t happen
Like if these face the same level of inspection and standards as government ones
It’s not terribly expensive to dispose properly of nuclear waste either, at least compared to total running costs, so I don’t see why they would be incentivised to do stuff like this
There have been a bunch of times companies violated legislation about appropriate waste disposal before though, so i wouldnt fully trust them to change.
also if the company goes bankrupt and closes down, who pays for the closure of the plant?
the residents in the area ofcourse!!after all its not the companies problem its cheaper to lobbby thierway out of it..
This isn’t nuclear waste though
but it shows us they are willing to violate laws around proper waste disposal, so changing the type of waste might not change their opinion
Nuclear waste comes in very small volumes and there are well established procedures for what to do with it
And its also in the interest of the employees too since they are exposed
i need to go to class, sorry
good point, i didnt think of that
Also you can say this about any sort of building or factory whatsoever
true
bad sadly this wont happen i mean we know nucalear energy is probably one of the best clean energy sources but ofc someone is paying money to make sure that doesnt happen..
oh wow on a completetly unrelated note i wonder what is the 2nd highest gross company in the world huh..
Yeah I’m pro nuclear in general, I just think AI and Datacenter stuff seems like a particularly good use case for having large numbers of small modular reactors all over the place
honestly this is a pretty good idea sadly though its probably not gonna happen.. but i mean oil prices are rising so maybe? its slightly more liekly now?
millions nuclear reactors must be built
if I'm not wrong, this used to be #discussion-2 not serious-discussion xD
judging by the chat ig the new label is accurate.
A lot of issues would be solved by widespread adoption of nuclear power
If only we could exist off of only nuclear power
IIRC if we switched all coal and gas to nuclear we'd last like 30 years before we ran out
im the smartest in the server ngl
-# iirc we´re also kinda running out of fossil and millions if not billions of people might die because of fossil and switching to renewable energy (besides water because that also kinda sucks) is gonna take a lot of time and money. you can recycle some nuclear stuff and store everything pretty safely.

this map was made by a brazilian
I'm proud of you
Leaf it to Canada! 🇨🇦
Canada has one of the world’s most promising domestic markets for SMRs. Conservative estimates place the potential value for SMRs in Canada at $5.3B between 2025 and 2040. Globally, the SMR market is much bigger, with a conservative estimated value of $150B between 2025 and 2040. This represents a large potential export market for Canada, which has already exported nuclear reactor technology to six other countries.
Source:https://smrroadmap.ca/
what does this mean
i never understood the phrase “global north” 
India but not Norway is insane
first world
i’m neither of them but the girl is my friend
hey
Norway is mainly an oil exporting country it would make sense tbh
Like Norway isn’t part of OPEC or OPEC+ so I could see why it wouldn’t really be a global north country
it just means first world for people who don't want to say first world
The global north was derived because it would encompass America and Western Europe during its major colonial/imperial/expansion phase.
But its definition is more an economic one regarding greater degree of central economic power. They’re the major economic decision makers and exhibit benefits of cheap imports, strong currencies, and so on.
oh ok i think i understand a little
Norway is in the lvl 2 global north group 
Real but take it up with the clustering algos I used 
People are scared of that word
I'm surprised this international tier ranking fanfic is still going
jordan being lower than iraq is so sad
lower than argentina......
It’s funny because we don’t need that much
My state only has a couple and they generate ~70-80% of electricity
Unfortunately Jordan is a lvl 4 country
make your own fanfic
problem solved
I'm in lvl 4. what is this?
How does "global north" include the very south Australia?
It’s an economic definition that originated from the U.S. and Western Europe being the big power players, nowadays it’s not really a geographical definition
Sounds like racism with a bow on it.
It’s hierarchical clustering on various graph centrality measures on global trade data in 2024
so?
Wdym so?
why is it important?
I don’t know
how much trade you do?
This was for funsies
I trade peanuts with my frens 
it's made up
that should clarify

yeah i guess we dont need that much
You made the graphs by yourself?
I mean the maps and categories
Yes 
💔
Waow what were the criteria precisely?
It’s hierarchical clustering on various graph centrality measures on global trade data in 2024
The clustering algos did the groupings for me
Somewhat sussed by the results since Afghanistan is a lvl 3 country 
What are these levels based on
bangladesh being no4? girl ur algo is bullshit
Ehhh prolly, I need to look into the drivers of separation of the clusters because the interpretations don’t match cleanly to prior conceptions of global north
Oh wow
Idk how that works
Maybe i do kinda
lvl1 in what exactly?
biosocialduckfailureuwuiality
And levels are hierarchy or what
hey
hey
Wassup
Hi
How to get good at gcse higher maths currently in year10 and developed a recent love for maths any tips would be helpful
Does anybody knows what kind of jobs I could get with a major in mathematics and a minor in biology?
McDonalds
💀
maybe, Bioinformatics Scientist/Analyst, Computational Biologist, Machine Learning Engineer in Healthcare, Researcher?, Data Management for Trials.
A mathematician, say, M went to McDonalds.
The cashier C greeted him warmly.
M: Can I get a donut?
C: Excuse me?
M: A donut.
C: We have run out of donuts.
M: Just give me a coffee, there's no difference.
C: (Confused noises) Okay?

Top level serious comment tbf
@ionic wraith why dont you highlight all of the countries on one map, in different colours depending on which level theyre on. like 1 could be red, 2 orange, 3 yellow, 4 lime, 5 green?
instead of 5 separate maps where map N has level N highlighted in blue and all other levels in grey
I could do that!
Would be cool to see in all one go
It was just more annoying to do at the time because of how the data is structured but isn’t impossible
I should address these general questions lol by summarizing the methodology at some point lol
I am already working there😭😭😭
Are there any other servers like this one for history or science or anything that isn't ran by the awful people in the Physics server?
and not individual events but rather the fact it’s happened so often feels abnormal
You should read the last part of the rules message
You should read the channel description.
Try to avoid debates on heavy topics like politics and religions
reading takes you far in life my friend
It says serious discussion, i asked a serious question because i'm getting non-serious answers in the other channel
i honestly was not whatsoever talking about your message, but rather you dismissing mine
Also why is this an argument lol
Appreciated
it’s not
though over trump’s shootings, maybe it could be a case of where its so heavily documented now that my view is skewed and biased towards it?
thought dumping here.
Butler 100%
with his ear , right?
Yes
i think it’s rather odd the context in which it happened
it’s near impossible for it to NOT have been at least somewhat staged
hm. i’ll read this
Anyways today's Victor Glover's birthday & i'm over a week sober
two great things, congrats
How serious is random lesbianism 
Jackie Robinson was player #42, the answer to life. They retired that number in all of baseball and now every year on April 15th players wear #42 to honor Jackie. He was played by Chadwick Boseman in the movie "42".
ah, rather odd article, doesn’t provide any good insight lol
here it is 
The last shooting is almost definitely not staged
well i was talking mostly of the pattern of shootings
https://youtube.com/shorts/PJjkN4J-jBs
This video by Dave Jorgenson covers the absolute and complete implausibility of the shooting being staged
Fact-checking what happened at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner.
Almost as soon as gunshots were reported from the White House Correspondents’ dinner on Saturday night, social media was flooded with conspiracy theories and finger-pointing over the attack. In a now-common phenomenon after such incidents, prominent influencers fill the ...
oh i love that guy
I think it's not crazy that disaffected trump supporters keep trying to kill him. He cultivated a fanbase of violent murderers hoping to recreate J6. They're gonna be angry and violent when he fucks them over
It's also not too implausible that they're really bad at it.
I do think he didn't actually get hit in the ear though
Like not even grazed, I don't buy it
Bananas are slightly radioactive due to their potassium content.
where did the blood come from then
Which blood specifically?
that’s fair, and i also really don’t buy the whole ear shtick
the blood that was on his face
not very much
Lego is technically the worlds largest tire manufacturer.
gun country only trying thrice feels weird, people failing all three times also feels weird
but being gun country and increasingly angry idk why it would be staged
risks would also be really high if it was staged but trump is dumb enough for it
like surely all these theories about the shooting are just TDS at this point
they have a bullet on camera like a few inches from his face
like people just seem to want to compulsively deny any instance of something bad happening to someone they dislike
Sharks existed before trees.
sharks existed before the north star
Sharks cant breathe if they stop swimming.
as in older than the star itself, not just older than the point in time at which it became positioned at the north pole
What is the name of the north star?
Polaris?
The brightest star in ursa minor if I recall
Sharks have either done a whole half rotation or a full one in their lifespan of our universe iirc
Unless I was totally lied to
the north star changes every 2000 years or so
yes this is true
which one
i believe a full rotation is like 263M years
Oh god
Sharks have done a full one 
What do you mean by full rotation? Around the sun? My brain is immediatly thinking "One rotation is 365 days..."
Around the galaxy I believe
BRILLIANT
THE GALAXY? We rotate around the galaxy? I never thought to look up how the sun moves in the galaxy. The center is usually a black hole right?
Yes i believe so
Sharks are old
the sun's movement in the galaxy is quite interesting and probably explains a lot of mass extinctions
Does it dip and weave? I must go research this immediatly
yes
Why would you say it explains extinctions? Thats a great thought
i read somewhere that it does
bc when it passes too close to some kinds of stuff it stirs up the oort cloud (cloud of comets around the sun) and sometimes it goes to earth
(i mean in a physical book, not on the internet)
That makes a lot of sense. I forget how many other systems we have in our galaxy
also if you go too close to star forming regions higher risks of supernova and collisions
This is...unfounded at best to my knowledge
Theres star forming regions in the milky way?
As far as ice cores and the such have shown, no extinctions on earth are due to the impacts of GRB or similar phenomena
....obviously? Basically every galaxy has them
That's interesting to know. It's not obvious, it's learned knowledge. No need to be rude to someone just trying to learn things.
I need to become more serious and get serious takes so many can start conversations here
there's the ordovician one
also supernovas can harm directly if they're under like 25 ly
no most big galaxies don't form stars
From what I recall, many are star forming at-least in minute quantities
What even makes a topic serious/heavy
yes true
Me when I have nonexistent memory
nemesis theory aftermath?
No strong proof in support of this afaik
Yes! Black holes are MASSIVE
Just because it was printed does not make it instantly reputable…
That doesn’t sound terribly off but I don’t think it necessarily explains mass extinctions; Jupiter is our godsend
yeah but it’s proposed that there’s also dark matter holding everything together because the effect of gravitation approaches zero as your distance approaches infinity
and galaxies are really really big, not nearly infinite but big
There’s this pretty somewhat famous trans woman comedian Stacy Cay who is a “liberal” and has some of the most insufferable takes ever 
complacency to the nazis doesn’t seem for liberal to me
Don’t forget about dark energy
Pushing everything away
Yeah but that’s on an EXTREMELY LARGE SCALE
like earth and the sun aren’t being apparently repulsed by all other matter
Neither is the Milky Way and Andromeda
It’s only when you get to large clusters of galaxies where that is not a negligible motion
I mean the universe is pretty fricking big
Heat death is coming don’t say I didn’t warn you
Freak I keep forgetting I don’t have embed perms in this channel
yeah it may
Do u think Dyson Swarms are possible? 
idk I’m not a physicist yet I’ll get you an answer in like 5-10 years
Possible? Yeah
Not rn but yeah eventually
Fucking stupid ass conference to present at tmw
many people have been asking about the basis for all the levels and "global north" and why certain countries seem to be landing where, so I shall give a brief methodology to this
The data I used is OECD world trade data collected in 2024. The data line by line contains the country exporting, the country receiving those exports, the industry the goods/services is in (comprising 22 industrial categories), and the volume of trade that took place
what I did is create 22 directed weighted graph networks to represent this data. following that, I obtained various centrality measures for each country (represented as nodes) across all graphs. I obtained a Laplacian centrality, which is essentially trying to measure how fucked the network is if a certain node is removed from the graph (essentially acting as a central power like a king or dictator). I also obtained betweenness and percolation centrality which assesses how much of a networker or middleman a country is.
3 centrality measures across 22 directed weighted graph networks yielded 66 variables I could use for k-means clustering. Conducted k-means clustering, found two clusters to be the most optimal, and then conducted non-parametric statistical tests to characterize these clusters. One cluster consistently had more Laplacian centrality than the other (Cluster A), while the other consistently had more betweenness/percolation centrality than the other (Cluster B).
From this, I figured that the nature of Cluster A highly resembles the "global north" characterization and I just by default called Cluster B the global south.
I would repeat the k-means clustering with the Cluster B countries alone yielding similar results, and then the label "global north lvl 2." The "global south lvl 2" would further be clustered to yield "global north lvl 3" and so on
Norway isn't north?
Holy statistics
The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) is a bipartisan, nonprofit policy research organization dedicated to advancing practical ideas to address the world’s greatest challenges.
History
At the height of the Cold War in 1962, Admiral Arleigh Burke and David Abshire founded the Center for Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown University in Washington, DC. The institution was dedicated to the simple but urgent goal of finding ways for the United States to survive as a nation and prosper as a people.
.
Unrelated to what you all are talking about but I've found this to be an excellent resource.
They have podcasts too that hardly anyone listens to but they're well produced and have important guests.
First of all, that's some fine work. Second, what program did you use for the weighted graph networks?
Also, maybe it was more related than I thought. Here's a quote from one article I was just reading:
China’s advantages include central planning and financing of large-scale projects and copious human resources to throw at a problem. Centralization plus people means Chinese influence efforts have scope and depth. To counter this, the United States should lean into its own strengths of innovation and a belief that humans know themselves and their needs better than any outside force. The United States can use technology to empower policymakers in Washington and people residing far from national capitals, at the edge of China’s influence, to chart their own course, rather than put up with China’s restrictions and exploitation. Participants had the following ideas around technology:
Tech can provide real-time monitoring of complex networks. Soon, tools may be able to identify vulnerable nodes as they emerge and alert policymakers that urgent action will yield outsized results. For example, in the fight against fentanyl, illuminating transit and distribution networks will provide insights into vulnerable nodes and processes. Networks can be disrupted if the information about them is up-to-date and actionable.
.
Sounds a lot like this part of your methodology:
I obtained various centrality measures for each country (represented as nodes) across all graphs. I obtained a Laplacian centrality, which is essentially trying to measure how fucked the network is if a certain node is removed from the graph (essentially acting as a central power like a king or dictator). I also obtained betweenness and percolation centrality which assesses how much of a networker or middleman a country is.
what are you working on?
I'm a little confused about this. How does Laplacian Centrality and the globalozation of economic power have to do with the political issue of the USA countering "Chinese influence"? The possibility for central control, appears to be the thesis you're responding to.
In China I think it could be said that your argument is a blatant assertion of US Sovereignty, while in the USA perspective it just sounds kinda racist.
Meanwhile, this result is just a statistical attempt, maybe not even by a novice, to determine the leverage of countries based on globalozation.
“liberal”
has some of the most insufferable takes ever
very interesting might try to replicate for fun
i agree this attitude kinda sucks, but i am much more sympathetic to it than most folk
it is hard for me to look at people and go "hey man, you're working as a defense contractor. you know that's bad, right? you should just make way less money and suffer immensely instead, yeah, man." now i think to some extent people should do this, just like i think people should donate enormous sums of their income, even they're relatively poor, to charities, but i'm sympathetic to a view under which this isn't obligatory and it's fine to be complicit in broader societal problems you aren't capable of solving sometimes
like, yeah, you working for defense contractors does very slightly lower the wage at which they have to pay their workers
and i understand where an attitude of trans solidarity comes from
i think it's ultimately horrendously tribalist, yeah, but it's still something i can understand and it's hard to treat it as one of the most insufferable things
at the very least, it's about as insufferable as folk who refuse to spend a sizable portion of their money donating to oxfam because oxfam isn't working to dismantle capitalism and economic imperialism are
which is to say, it isn't that insufferable. i can tolerate these people and there are an enormous number of more insufferable views
or ethical vegans who also buy from grocers, restaurants, etc. which supply non-vegan food
what is more worth it? Indian Education or Asian Education (Asian as in Chinese Japanese etc)
i hope that didnt sound racist... ;-;
ah yes i love when poeple make claims with data the clearly show that there is a strong correlation ofcourse! /s
Depends on what your goals are; East asian education offers superior infrastructure and research (better for STEM) whilst indian education offers better theoretical foundations , the benefit of being in english , and lower costs (better in IT and engineering)
here is an example of a german trans woman who lived through ww2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dora_Richter 
Dora Rudolfine Richter (16 April 1892 – 26 April 1966) was a German trans woman and the first known person to undergo complete male-to-female gender-affirming surgery. She was one of a number of transgender people in the care of sex-research pioneer Magnus Hirschfeld at Berlin's Institute for Sexual Research during the 1920s and early 1930s. S...
-# oh also btw wasnt she also one of the first poeple who underwent mtf surgery?
mhm
Support our work: https://democracynow.org/donate/sm-desc-yt
The U.S. Supreme Court has effectively gutted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the last remaining major provision of the landmark 1965 law that was a crowning achievement of the civil rights movement.
"This is central to whether or not we maintain a multiracial democracy in this ...

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a landmark U.S. federal statute that prohibits racial discrimination in voting. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson during the height of the civil rights movement on August 6, 1965. Congress later amended the Act five times to expand its protections. Designed to enforce voting rights protected b...
Hey
This "rant" may look dumb but I'm genuinely stressed out of engineering I am pursuing.
Doing Bachelor's in CSE(AIML), I am stumped how people brainlessly code prototypes in AI, each same or similar every time, and call it a new project
All the time they talk about AI tools and vibecoding, and they do not even consider learning up some theory of system architecture or machine learning for example
It's like I'm doing a damn job instead of learning anything with them. I don't even know what to do at this point
The most ironic part I have seen is their dislike to math but they still have the audacity to call themselves AI engineer or Data Scientist
Like what
Am I simply in a wrong environment or is this becoming common
seems to be common...
The amount of math/machine learning you need to do to be a proper one is very substantial. It's obvious why these people take the easy way and call themselves anything. To me there are some standard things I expect an AI engineer to know, yet it may have absolutely zero impact working as an AI engineer in corporate. One of these things is to know Mercer's Theorem, and to know where it exists in modern AI application (i.e. LLMs)
Corporate work and academia work are two different things in many aspects so.....
If you compare people who study in postgrad with and without corporate/industrial work experience, you will see lots of difference between them, mindset and skill wise
I can understand the rant but.... Yeah, structure wise the world is unfair and optimized for short term, what we can do is just prepare and develop best version of ourselves 🙂
That's what I want to say basically
I have to make up three tests today and I wasn’t fronting for most of last night so I’m trying to desipher the notes of maddy
Being plural is really annoying
At least my ap human teacher is chill and lets me listen to music during the tests
Wow pinkishnova is a good name
I just want oil, fertilizer, and grain price normalize 🙂
Whatever "normalcy" means
same
we have to realize russia is not the enemy
but rather the globalists and billionares in brusells and dubai
they exploit our workers and do not pay them proper wages, they make girls degrade themselves in horrific stuff like onlyfans, they support terrorism and genocide all across the globe
I am not into your culture war, whoever ruling, my family will get harmed by your regime (speaking as direct victim of US ally intelligence service operation) 🙂
Empire be empire, whatever cosplay they wear
oh man I am so sorry but I am not talking about culture war.
The day washington turns communist these things will not happen anymore
Hahaha, nope, as long as the structure and geopolitics demand it, it always happen, even USSR did this because structure and geopolitics demand empire maintenance
USSR was not an empire
and USSR was never imperalist
anyway where are you from?
It is an empire, spanning Eurasia and most of the second world, and it is imperialism lmao
how the hell is the soviet union imperalist?
no do explain
Even as someone who defends the ussr more than most leftists, it was fucking imperialist
Kazakhstan, Poland, Czech, Afghanistan yes it is less imperialist than US because they're limited in reach, but still imperialist
Somewhere that Israeli take as as serious enemy
no how the fuck was it imperalist
👀
Not Iran, we are not even involved in middle east mess
Serious enough they have sent agents to harm intelligentsia in my country, as part of proxy war
Confirmed by the state intelligence apparatus who basically intervene and intelligentsia network
it was doing imperalism in afganisthan? bro what?
afganistan was controlled by islamist extremists back then, mujaheds, feudalists...ussr transformed the country..even kabul polytechnic institute was made by the soviets..they foguht with the soviets hand in hand
what the hell do you mean?
Invasion is not imperialism?
And wdym they're islamist when they were stabilizing themselves in 1980s, USSR basically promote coup on other country to serve their interest there
invasion for the purpose of exploitation and systemic degradation is imperalism
Moving goalpost I see
soviet union did not invade afganisthan to exploit it
i am not, it invaded afganisthan (more like attempt at liberation)
but it did not invade afganisthan to serve its imperial ambitions, it invaded afganisthan to simply liberate their people and gain a gateway towards the middle east and to crush extremism like the mujahids
by your logic india supporting sekh mujibur rahman was imperalist and therefore india is a imperalist nation
invasion does not equate imperialism
what is that pfp?
No, what I am talking is, don't ignore the imperialism that Soviet did in eastern Europe, central Asia and other places, they're indeed less imperialist yes, but it is because they need to serve their persona as someone who are fighting against western imperialism
umm ill explain later
Soviet is lesser evil, but don't ignore their evil too, holodomor and central Asia heavily disagree with you here
No one is pure evil or pure good
but imperalism means systemic exploitation, but ussr did the opposite, they erased the local culture. yes, but they did not exploit any nations, rather modernized it, as well as rebuilt under a soviet framework
I guess eastern European and central Asia don't exist in your argument
I am out, this is not productive, even as direct victim of US empire I also won't call US pure evil at this point
It indeed does, but again when did ussr economically exploit any eastern european nation?
the us wasn't imperialist, it erased the local culture, yes, but it did not exploit any nations, rather modernized them, as well as integrated them into a global free trade network
I got ragebaited
but wher are you from
If they haven't told you by now it's not any of your business
yea...us isnt imperalist..i do agree
bahahahahaha
US has some imperalistic characteristics but as a whole it is not an imperalist nation in my opinion
i mean they do invade entire nations and couped iran for oil
for profit basically.
but still i treat them more as intervensionists than fully imperalist, they do economic exploitation but they do it indirectly, and its mostly US deepstate insititutions that do it rather than the nation itself
Warsaw pact, eastern Europe and central Asia are basically de facto USSR vassal states, have you seen how they send tanks to Czech when they wanted reform, and about Afghanistan, the fact that they couped Afghanistan government for their own interests is also imperialism, I'll at most say that Soviet in empire game is lesser evil yes, but still imperialist
Not all about oil. I can't stand it when people overcocus on one variable. So so so dumb yet they think they sound serious and sometimes others will listen to them as though they're serious.
What about the nuclear program? What about Israel?
You're no better than the people who claim the war in Iran is just a way for trump to keep epstein out of the news cycle.
what about whose nuclear program? elaborate please
And about your indian point, yes every country has its evil side, no one is pure, only God is pure good and only devil is pure evil, applying purity to human entities is never going to work
Sorry wrong ping, this is for you, I'll stop here because it is clear you're moving goalposts @cyan silo
no im not arguing about good or evil
You're arguing about imperialism, I'll say USSR still imperialist with historical evidence even if arguably lesser evil
Have you seen what they did in Spain 1938
Eastern Europe and central Asia 1922-1991
I am saying this as someone whose country USSR heavily helped against US imperialism, albeit we broke up at some point
what I am saying is soviet union was not inherently imperalistic or exploitive
@cyan silo do you like Regan?
Cambodia, Vietnam, Syria, south Yemen, Angola, the list goes on and on
hm it is communist.
no
Imperialism isn't inherent only in "globalist" US (whatever that means), it is what's happening when humans think that exploiting others is more beneficial than cooperation
i like modern republicans tho
only us leader I like is trump
Even trump is doing this
No one is pure
Guys uhh how do I tell my parents that I cant study and get a medal at IMO if I havent studied shit for olympiad level mathematics and wont magically develop everything required in 1 year.
interesting... someone similar got famous like 80 to 90 years ago, what do you think of that guy´s politics
Hello my friend @wise mulch is struggling and he needs help
Are your parents mathematicians?
You should!
Also oh shit I just realized I did my analysis on OECD-WTO Balanced Trade in Services dataset (BaTIS) but there also a OECD Balanced International Merchandise Trade dataset (BIMTS) dataset that I should do these analyses on 
What qualifies as a "third gender" in some culture? Is it literally just anything not fitting into the main binary a culture has?
Tell your parents to get a job at Jane Street, them not working there ever prior will pose no problems
Surely there is more nuance, right?
hello
<@&268886789983436800>
-# "third gender" being "any gender our culture doesn´t accept" feels weird but maybe. some cultures have a gender ternary or such.
Are you just dense?

I never thought I'd actually see anyone that dense before
There's no place for transphobia here, dude
I mean two spirited is accepted in indigenous culture...
nooo i missed it
Is there such thing as depression and antidepressants 
that guy is muted lol i think
Nooooo they were muted my analogy will have to wait for the next idiot
also wait car
Yeah?
We would rather you don't engage bigots and transphobes
Won't be long (but also yeah, what DarQ said)
check out B2ac/S12c vs B2ac4e/S12c
Aw
rare case of 4e changing a rule completely
this message is worthy of an opencry for the original and an opencry for the edit
I'd take the mute just to make the analogy, I'll keep my eyes out
IT ADDS SHIPS THAT ARENT STRETCHERS AND MAKES IT LESS EXPLOSIVE 
wait wtf
i don't remember that

What even is the point of "gender" on passports. It literally tells you nothing. Nothing about how the person looks.
Like what is the actual use???
(Im guessing it's literally nothing outside of making it easier for discrimination)
"You don't look like the gender it says on here so you must be evil and something!1!!1!1!!"
Good old bigotry
Ah I love when transphobia directly harms gender non-conforming people and indirectly harms a lot of others
yeah it’s simply a crystal clear case of systemic gender policing 
Yay I love this world...
With all the news I'm hearing I'm almost happy I'm infertile and that surgery seems like such a far away possibility.
I mean adoption sounds nicer anyways, I wouldn't need to deal with the younger stages
Though realistically I both don't deserve a child nor do I feel like I'd care for one properly
I remember because I was more femme but still gender ambiguous due to my deep voice, Qatari officials demanded I show my passport and looked at it and let me go
I feel like it would have been a shittier situation if I had F on it
But the more I pass, having M will be the shittier situation
I should have challenged my dad when he said he was putting M on my passport renewal form during the 2nd year of Biden’s term
guh
Yeah it's insane how much such a useless* piece of information is treated as being needed
* useless as in it has no use in identification, it is very useful for the person.

Like for crying out loud I've heard it gets used medically
Not even sex is very useful there from what I know
"Oh yeah they had smaller genitals when they were born, that totally tells us what we need to operate on them"
Wish I failed sex icl
yeah, not super useful, what matters is always different, some stuff is incredibly hard to figure out...
Wait it does have use..? What does it even really tell you?
Oh I guess it can be useful for like very young people
maybe I should get into medical research and try to help girls be able to have kids
or boys and enbies, it shouldn't be gatekept
hello, i would love to learn mathematics from scratch on my own, can anyone help, cuz in highschool, its not taught very nicely, atleast where i live, can anyone help me with a rough roadmap
Try #study-discussion and don't paste the same message across multiple channels without being asked, I know some people are less likely to respond if they see others do it.
it´s a shorthand for all characteristics of the big clusters in the high-dimensional gender-and-such state space at once and sets some expectations, but doesn´t actually tell you very much.
thank you and yes, sorry
Sex correlates to gender??? 
not very strongly...
hey you stole that idea from me
Then why is it useful in the gender state space 
How strong exactly? I know for sure most ppl on earth identify as the same gender as their agab
to be fair, identifying as a gender doesn't for sure make you the gender, look at all the people groomed and forced to be cis
Plus sex doesn't tell you much about how the body works internally
~~like how many of them are actually groomed? ~~
Elaborate?
idk like 3% /hj
Chromosomal abnormalities can cause your body to be vastly different whilst having the same sex as others.
