#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 387 of 1
dangit you corrected it too fast 😔
Balls people obv
Hairy ball theorem strikes again
Oh so like "illness"!
Alright guys... what is a chair
"I'm not sure it is hard to define, so I'm in favour of not having a definition" is certainly a take
Something that identifies as a chair
Art
Unless it's bodily chair then not

I am REFERENCING something as well.
a chair is anything used for sitting or intended for and capable of being used for sitting
There is a mildly notorious Polish encyclopedia from the 18th century which defines a horse as "Everyone knows what a horse is"
ah yes!
Surely then the air is a chair
im thinking of the charlie kirk debate about what is woman idk if that’s ur reference 😭
idk why i have that in my mind omg
Or a wall
i apologize, used for sitting on
You can sit on air
the air can be a chair yes
Can you sit on the wall
if it is what you use to sit on it
Oh no, a transphobe messaged a trans youtuber supposedly and said something like "this bigot called me a bench today, people are so chairphobic," or so I heard. I didn't see it from the original youtuber though, just heard of it.
a proto-chair is something built to be used for sitting
Something something featherless biped 
Is a horse worth "defining"
i’m joking about the protochair
ah
Featherless quadruped
Do we gain any common understanding of the thing from a non-taxonomic definition of horse
It is a true curiosity how humans communicate at all
It feels like it should not be possible
Behold! A horse!
brings in a horse
i think sitting on air is sufficient to make air a chair
Given how few examples we learn words from
It often feels like it isn't
This is lowkey what separates us from horses
Then everyone stands up and claps
They can't use nebulous ideas and abstraction in the way we can
My friend is telling me I should look into the Wittgenstein rule-following paradox
The horse did it too and now isn't a horse, as it is on two legs. Pack up everyone, it was a fake.
You clearly never talked with a horse
It's true
I mean, showing someone a horse and saying "you know, one of those" is probably the most reliable way of explaining what a horse is to someone who doesn't know
Understood, a horse is something brown
wittgenstein took an L from kripke on reddit im afraid
There's something fundamentally wrong with like all of cinema from 1960 to 1975
Okay tbh I probably shouldn't have mentioned this movie in this Discord server
Why are there so many unsettling media featuring horses
this is jst like standard greek mythology tho
They look like people with long faces
My Little Pony has a lot to answer for
i blame zeus
What
True, there is Leda and the Swan
I remember the Swan thing, but did he do a horse thing as well?
na it wasnt zeus it was poseidon
Oh you're lowkey right
A guy walks into a bar with a dachshund and bartender asks
"why the long dog"
How is this about horses
Fun fact, in some versions the Minotaur is the result of the Queen of Crete getting very horny for a particular bull
idk the poseidon and demeter probably aint suitable for discord
Are there version in which it isn't
Probably not, although the Hades game glosses over the details
As it does over most of the incest
i was gonna say
That does seem like a reasonable artistic decision
there was a lot of incest and un nonconsentual relations
My favourite artistic decision in Hades is bouldy
The second game prominently features Zeus and Hera and they pick a backstory that doesn't involve them being siblings
(they made Hera the daughter of Hyperion and Theia, I believe)
Still, they've got nothing on the Ptolemys:
Love a family tree with so many cycles in it
Hes bad at tinder and he ran an optimization study on his species
Family hypergraph
I mean, wouldn't you if you could?
Shower of gold is my favourite Zeus iteration
How did the Greeks know what was canon? Did they have a Wiki?
I'm tired of being a god, let's be piss today
Greekipedia
I'm not sure to what extent you're joking, but they in fact didn't know what was canon, and there are several (contradictory) versions of the Greek mythology
@greek Is this true?
I was joking, obviously they didn't have a Wiki because that word was invented by the Hawaiians, duh...
The sacrifices for gods were actually donations to keep the wiki servers running
rape!?
in my greek mythology?
what next, murder?
There's no such thing as semantics, every meaning is pragmatic :^)
‘what’ is clearly not a chair
first off, it is not something you can sit on at all
at least not for the most part
i guess you could write it on something
A miserable pile of secrets
You can't define conceptual categories
Not without inevitably excluding something
But enough sitting, have at you!
A chair is something one wouldn't be confused by if you pointed to it and said "Look, a chair!"
A chair is a chair. Stellar observation
'fanum tax' in 2026 is crazy
a chair would make that sentence not confusing
the chair could itself be confusing in other ways
though pointing it out may help cope
Just waiting for someone to point out a counterexample
Yes same with 67 or and so on. this is lowkey why ive never really been too confused by these. you come to understand what terms mean by experiencing and observing how they get used. a chair is what one generally calls a chair is what one understands by "chair"
Person roleplaying as a chair. Are they a chair?
I wouldn't be confused by that. Ergo chair.
But how do you generalize to new situations
you wouldn’t got “serge, why are you in my house, how did you get here, where are my kids?”
You only hear "chair" a finite number of times but somehow your intuition applies to an infinite number of scenarios
does chair of all chairs contain itself
and i would say “look, a chair”
and point to the wall
and you wouldn’t be confused and stare at my face
i dont know but we manage
You also basically never hear negative evidence, only positive evidence, yet somehow you know what's not a chair
to avoid my deception
We only ever see a finite amount of numbers
Even though absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
that we can generalise is imo beyond question. but i have no idea how we do it and im not sure anyone does really
Conceptual categories can only be defined by what they are not
Indeed
answering the implementation details isnt necessary i dont think, as long as they are implemented somehow, which they are
Watched a PhD defense about it recently
Yes it is, wir werden wissen, wir müssen wissen
you get presented implicit negative examples by combining "objects with different names are different" and seeing objects that are given different names
Thats why there are only finitely many numbers
Oh wild burger
Except many things have multiple names
Keep chat to English only please
Also most words aren't even objects
yeah but if you get told "apple is not a chair" and you believe it and then you get presented an apple and have it called an apple
then you can deduce that it's a counterexample, without being explicitly told "it's not a chair"

Who is telling you "an apple is not a chair" and then repeating for each possible pair of nouns though
Yet somehow no child thinks an apple is a chair
There is a catalogue of all constructed numbers: https://numbershop.org
But then some categories have a fair amount of overlap
And some categories contain each other...
we do that by assuming that all nouns are different and specifying synonyms/overlaps in meaning
since there are way less of those
i guess, idk
Plus it's very rare that as an infant you're explicitly told "this is X" with a clearly labeled object that you're looking at
The fact that infants can learn words at all is mindboggling
Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should
you didn't have all chairs labeled as chairs in your childhood?
There was a study done by Lila Gleitman's lab where they essentially put a camera on a baby to track what the baby is looking at while the baby's caretaker spoke to them, and then they asked people to complete the sentence of the caretaker saying "This is a _" while only watching the video
It's basically impossible, the baby has too many objects in its surroundings
That's for concrete nouns, how tf do we learn abstract nouns?
plus the baby doesnt lnow what makes one object an object and separate from another object
Yeah figure ground segregation is wild
Even with the inductive bias of knowing what an object is though, it's still incredibly difficult to learn object names
Tbf its not just infants that do this
And then... how do you even know that a word refers to an object in the first place? Most words don't https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_translation
Radical translation is a thought experiment in Word and Object, a major philosophical work from American philosopher Willard Van Orman Quine. It is used as an introduction to his theory of the indeterminacy of translation, and specifically to prove the point of inscrutability of reference. Quine paints a setting where a linguist discovers a nat...
U js #learn innit
The even more incredible thing is that infants have to learn what words mean at the same time as they learn what phonemes are in the language they're learning!
How do they know if "hat" and "hut" are the same word uttered in two different ways or actually two different words???
Infant language acquisition is entirely mind boggling to me
You aint wrong, the first a child sees a hat and hears the word associated with it how do they actually assocaite the word with the thing? Why wouldnt they associated with face, or eyes or anything else? Its interesting
It's utterly fascinating!
There's a lot of models like this, my language acquisition professor has as his pet favorite the "pursuit" model
Where infants basically make hypotheses about meanings and wait to falsify them at the next occurrence of the word
Based on results from artificial language learning studies
But there's so many open questions about that
Well maybe they do first associate it with the face or eyes or something else and then get tripped up later on subsequent encounters
Oh thats kinda what eric said
Thats a fun train too how do they segment words in their visuals
I feel like thats the most natural thing to do. But there are so many words
How do you
Id say its crazy having to deal with that and vision
Yeah, but then the obvious questions are like:
- How do they make hypotheses?
- How many hypotheses do they have to keep in their mind at once?
- How do they know if their hypothesis is falsified?
(And so on)
Is there anything particular in these questions to infants?
Thats just a cop out everyone visualizes and sees things different as well as processes things different there is no similiar processing we can do outside of something like a ball getting thrown at you
Yeah because how can they know its falsified without language
I guess yes and no are sufficient
Well they're not asking anyone if they're right, they can't even speak
Yeah they just have to wait until someone tells them they are wrong. And then they need to recall their hypothesis
They can't speak, how can someone tell them they are wrong
They try and say hut and you say no
They have to somehow infer that they were wrong based on the speech of people around them and the statistics of the environment
Again they can't even speak they're like several months old
they csn definitely understand better than they can speak
How infants learn to segment words from speech is actually a really fascinating question because if you listen to speech, it all just sounds continuous, there aren't obvious breaks. We know some stuff about language-specific cues. Like for example, in English, stress tends to be on the first syllable of every word (at least the simple words infants tend to hear), so they could cue into that. But then how do they learn that rule when it's the complete opposite in other languages?
maybe they just learn the rules for whatever languages they happen to be spoken to in
Interspecies communication so cool
Yeah but the question is how
Hm but pointing at it being different in other languages seems to be the wrong difection
The point is that the stress rule for segmentation can't be universal, it has to be learned somehow
Especially since languages like French have no obvious stress segmenting speech into words
I think you misunderstood me brother Im talking about seperate senses they hear words and they see things, so how do they specificy in their minds what is the thing be spoken about. Is it just compounding if they hear dad and hat do they add that together and see dads head looks weird kinda thing
And other languages might be stress-final for words
That's also a very interesting question, see here for a relevant experiment #serious-discussion message
Not necessarily understanding the words just parsing them
You mean do segmentation for any language?
Maybe babies hear a gasp for air and know its their cue
You don't gasp for air between words
If you look at spectrograms of speech, there's no obvious gaps
You know i initially came into this discussion understanding the question of "how does X do Y" as being at least partly an expression of doubt as to whether X does Y at all, but now im starting to think it really just means "by what process does X do Y?" to which i dont think anyone has even the beginnings of an answer to
Because even adults have trouble with this at native speeds
You might try to look for sentence-level gaps, but that only helps you segment words that occur at the end of a sentence
Unironically these discussions always make make me question Helen Keller
I just dont see how someone blind and deaf could learn abstract concepts
I think one way, at least, would be to propose an algorithm you could implement
Wasnt from birth
Someone blind and deaf can certainly learn abstract concepts, our mind seems to be built for it
Yeah but it was from 18 months
I think the development that happens in those 18 months are significant
But yeah as a neuroscientist I think about this question every day because every system is so complex
How do you teach them concret concepts and how do you teach them abstract from those concrete concepts
They at least still have some sensation, like touch, that you could use
Okay so how do they learn the concept of an apple from a plastic apple that feels identical
(this isnt my view but) someone might say the complete opposite, that being unencumbered by the burden of sight and hearing a deaf and blind person might be more apt to learn abstract concepts?
Infants are really good at parsing syllables yeah, they seem to be able to do it already like within the first month of being born, it's incredible
What
How do you learn the difference between an apple and a plastic apple that looks and sounds identical
im gonna disagree with you how would you learn the concepts of relationships first if you couldnt see or hear
I guess she bit a lot of plastics apples huh
I remember I rediscovered what a syllable was in highschool. Like you need vowels to make a syllable atleast in english
Its definitely different in other languages
Yeah there's some Berber languages where it's been argued that essentially any consonant can form the nucleus of a syllable
Who needs vowels anyways
Also they seem to do language learning while still in the womb—French newly-born infants and English newly-born infants respond to language in different ways!
Honestly not that surprising the more I hear it
You body organs develop independently is my assumption and so should ya brain
Can confirm I was ready to surrender out of the womb
There will be
Lest not get into that
I dont see how
Wdym
Like while you are in womb your brain will develop and will work while developing
Ill say a lot of things are weird about human births compared to other animals in this regard too
Yea it is interesting, although many ppl have significant amounts of Neanderthal ancestry (like 2% DNA or smth)
Actually mind boggling how some animals are born to walk while we arent
Im talking homo haballis or whatever
Like near cousins not being alive is insane almost unbelievable
Human genetic intervention. First as research and then a product
I suppose it makes sense if we occupied the same niches
Other mammals have it the same tho
Wdym by independently
Like as you stay in the womb and your organs develop and become functional you dont need to wait on them to fully finish whatever that means
Idk this is why biology is annoying to me. Studying one system super complex its kinda weird to make any assumptions
Wait I don't know what you mean by that, are you just saying that organs develop while you're in the womb or is there more to it
You kinda have to wait for them to fully finish developing, premature birth is not a good thing even if it's a small fraction of the 9 months
Unless you mean something else
As in, it's not only brain that suffers from premature birth
Yeah concurrent development
Its unclear to me why
Like yes the outcomes are bad but why 9 months?
Like loads of things seem to fail if its premature
If transphobes can always tell why the can't they tell a good joke 
Oh great
Just saw a picture of the leader of my original country with a Neo-Nazi politician!
Under a post by the president where he calls him a hero
Who?
Oh he’s part of the government anyway
I think itd help people get out of a resource centric mindset, and give more freedom to human expression
I think that the justifications underpinning "necessary dominations" like nationhood rely on a narrow perception of what it means to be human - "to consume resources, make babies, work a job so others can consume resources" etc
genetic modification seems like a very blunt challenge to that cultural perception
some people "have 2% neanderthal dna" seems like one of those resource-centric remarks. like, are homeless people fundamentally less human because they possess less money and produce fewer goods? in the same vein, what does it mean that someone "possess less human dna?"
its just such a weird thing for people to care about
if you had a way to determine interspecies admixture it would be cool to know how that is expressed
Its important for ecological reasons for other animals
i suppose, but why do we classify species to begin with?
Long history but classification isnt always straightforward for every organism
Many animals or plants look very similar ya know
yeah
something i think about every once in a while is classifications like that
like, people generally look the same in the same way animals look the same, but in different contexts, environments, etc, they can be completely different despite the classification still holding true
as in like uhh
bat at the zoo vs on some street pole
same animal but it means something radically new to me
(and same for numbers lol- like, people dont think about addition a lot)
One factor differentiating species is ability to reproduce within populations
oh thats a good point actually i hadnt considered that
Its the main one but it has its failures
Its same reason why we call dog breeds breeds and not species even tho they look different
ooh
yeah i get confused by that sometimes
something else too is that- although members of a species could reproduce not all do or can yk
like by classifying things by species it feels like we're characterizing them by that ability
There isnt a one size fits all definition for these things either. I know there are other definitions for species too
(for example i have a pink tag next to my name that is culturally related to that notion)
ill be thinking about this
thank you for sharing your thoughts (i should sleep)
But it does exist to give people justifications for treating others as lesser and remove the responsibility from the situation; the same kind of justification was also used for slavery
on neanderthals using fire : ive been asking people how they do addition in their head and its very interesting to hear the wide array of interpretations that all look the same on paper
i do addition by seeing two real lines for each digit and drawing lines down on each, then sliding them to the right spot before pushing them back together
other people bound it and narrow it down to what it must be using like inductive logic
another person sees an addition table
there are quite a few
also, i dont know how to make a fire
But you are capable of learning how to make a fire
(You should probably sleep soon, but I'll comment on this) It's unfortunate the we do not value human expression and the creativity that we use to accomplish certain tasks as much as we do the accomplishment itself. It is something that demonstrates a form of intelligence that is not always reflected on the result. (And something that we cannot measure from the neanderthal data)
It does bring into question how to measure those alternative forms of thought and which ones to value. You could have a person who has many distinct thoughts but are never able to express them into any physical form. Thus, we would be difficult to measure them with current technology. You could have a person who has attempted multiplication all their life, with many creative variations on how to approach the problem, but never successfully completed multiplication (this is an analogy for higher maths). These, in isolation, do not have any value until you attach them to a result (i.e. the possibility that these techniques can still be used to get to the answer). If you value creativity, then these expressions can continue to make near misses and always purposefully miss the result because it would allow for more human expression.
@upbeat basin It was meant to be more of an agreement to this train of thought than a blanket statement.
I edited the statement so that the context is clearer
how jmuch harder are implicit integrations in comparison to normal integrations
!! yes i i really love what you said here
Referring to a general majority with the claim that culturally people value a resource-centric mindset more over an expressive/creative one
i think value is one way to describe it, but to me it seems like an unconscious thing informed by societal (or even linguistic) contexts
you can only communicate ideas certain ways
I forgot to say that these examples would still be considered forms of intelligence
i think that people stop themselves short because they think they dont / wont "have" something
"i dont have what it takes, i havent learned that" etc
or even that an act of doing is only successful if they produce something
like do you need to complete a painting to express yourself
neanderthal produced fire therefore smart
(i beat myself up a lot for "abandoning" things before they are done)
I'm not saying that I want others to think differently. I'm saying that's how things are. My position on this is that it is inherently useful for people to think this way in order to acquire resources, but if we ever start transitioning to a resource abundant world, then I believe that society should begin to value expressive/creative thought more.
Also, what Gray is saying right now tells me that it's also psychologically helpful to think this way too.
(Also please sleep)
Why I believe that is how things are, or the second statement on the transition?
It was more of Gray's claim than mine. I'm saying that's how society is right now. I don't think it should change for a while but bits of that alternative mentality could prove to be useful to people (like it was to Gray).
But since I am saying that we eventually should, I'll answer why we should in the future (besides the resource abundance thing)
When we start having more technology that probes into our brains (invasive BCIs), we're likely going to have access to different forms of thought that cannot be expressed through text, image, video, or any currently known form of media. I expect that we'll be able to transmit those experiences to other people, and exploring all forms of thought will let us mix and match various thought processes that could have never been possible before. Much like our ability to manipulate video has allowed us to experience reality in a completely new way, various creative forms of thinking shared and modified across multiple people will let us experience reality in a new way as well. Less abstractly, it could be a lived "game" experience with other sensations included. It could be a customized "touch" of something that does not exist in the real world. It could be the entire tree of thought of all people who have attempted to solve a particular problem and you are providing your own creative avenue for approaching the problem. Having more creativity available would allow for a lot more possibilities with this technology, so that's why I would want people to value creative thought more in the future.
Yeah, for any time there's a technology that allows people to express themselves easier, people should be creative and express themselves more now that it's easier
Not even that it is "useful" but that it would make things more interesting.
Hey, can anyone give me advice about how I’m feeling as far as academics and transferring and such after I receive my associates
if you look at ancient middle eastern nation states and how rich and developed they are for the time but if you look at them now its just some broke arab countries 
and if you don't look, it's like a cloud, grey and large
probably more reliable copper vendors now tho

... But we define (or at least use) the word good to mean skilled?
"Good is subjective"
"No rational creature can ever be good" sounds like an oxymoron to me
Are we referring to that when we say someone's "good" at something?
There are several adjectives stronger than "good", so one of those would make more sense to refer to complete mastery.
Then just say it lmfao, conventionally being good at something is just being more skilled at it than a layman
Those are some of them
Bleh
Usually when people say somebody is "good" at math they are making a relative+subjective statement...
Point being that people can be "good" at math if you actually read what the person making the statement means.
Great so if we reduce the term to something where nobody can be "good" at anything then nobody is good at anything.
Why are you thinking objectively about a subjective quality?
Yes
Lemme just reduce this word to something totally useless that is clearly not what ppl mean when they say it.
This is not what most people mean when they say "good"
I've done a fair amount of phil courses in undergrad
But hes capitalizing the Good
Go figure one of the first things you learn about in intro phil courses is to actually read/understand what people are saying.
What he meant is basically no one is flawless, which is absolutely trivial
It is hard to make a good argument for/against something if you are accidentally or willfully misreading the things you are responding to.
Who up strawing they mans!?
No I didn't?
Read the IF in the sentence
People can have opinions. I don't see why this is a problem.
If we say truly we are basically putting it up against even the unknown parts of mathematics
My point is that you are responding to a definition of the word "good" that is not actually what people mean when they say good.
We all have different interpretations of it
it is polysemous
Sure, but if you want to argue against a persons point you have to respond to their interpretation of it or else you're just arguing against something else.
Also I don't get what is this conversation is talking abt are you referring to perfect knowledge of something or what?
Yup, in maths- what makes you 'good' at it (I think)
But good is subjective
We are all platonists deep down
I can't finish my plato joke
The punchline is left as an exercise
There is no true best in the end
People tend not to mean that when they say best
Yeah that's the thing
"You live in the best house on this street" does not mean "your house is flawless" for example
"Best dog in show" does not mean "this dog is flawless"
As another
St anselm headass
I mean best just means best whatever's greatest in a group or when I mean true there can truly be nothing that is perfect
truly
Basically nobody in math is thinking about this. This falls under philosophy of religion. There have been attempts by folks like godel and other logicians to try and discuss/formalize this kind of thing. But it's pretty fringe.
Not saying there isn't some mathematical overlap
True, there is no true standard or something that can be constant to show us what falls in there
But if you actually want to study this it is very firmly in philosophy of religion
For all we could know another world could consider something we say as bad as good
Religion is basically our moral compass in this world or people who rise into authority to say
But its not like we would know what is good and wrong on our own
Damn bro
Not necessarily
Yup
Define morals
One could argue morality is an evolutionary trait.
For instance, it would not have been beneficial for human precursors to kill members of their hunting band, because that would undermine their efforts in the long run. Therefore, those that favoured life over murder naturally survived longer to evolve
In that case, even animals can exhibit morality
Or one could also argue morality is opinionated through religion and laws.
We don't 'have to' thrive. It's basic logic that any species that doesn't 'thrive 'will die off. So it's either we thrive or die.
It's objectively wrong to kill innocent people for pleasure. That's not opinionated, and no religion not law can justify that
This might be a super weird question for this server, but I'm a 2nd year undergrad student planning to transfer to university wanting to become a data scientist but unsure what to major in for my first two years of undergrad. Mathematics or Statistics is the two choices. I feel like Mathematics but then I'm not sure what track I should go in based on my goals. You guys seem well-versed in this and if you guys know what is best, that would be greatly appreciated.
Again, it's not necessary. It's just a result of natural selection.
Wrong place to ask, this is the politics chat
mb
But how can you say it's wrong tho if those people believe that it's right if they have been subjected to it there entire lives
Because it's objective.
How did you get to that conclusion
Pro mental backflips
Sacrificing others would undermine the survival of others, as illustrated by my earlier example
I mean if that culture or type of thought were to thrive in the end would we know if it's wrong if enough people did it. I'm not sure
Immorality would lead to less survival, in the sense that over long periods of time (billions of years) our species would be undermined
Balance between what
Would that mean morality is based of survival
But it wouldn't thrive. If it was normal for everyone to kill others for pleasure, we'd eventually die off.
That's one way to see it
Survival and prosperity go hand in hand. They're not opposites, so I don't get the balance you mean
Dawg what
It wouldn't reach a point where we would prosper from it but there's also another thought if a culture moral was mainly based of survival if killing of the weak was natural how long could it last before there own would rebel against there views I mean if it was viewed like that for there entire lives would they feel any remorse for it? also sorry I am so bad at using punctuations
Thanks 👍🏻
We already do
i do
you are sentenced to death for not knowing that
Eh, close enough
This is discussion, serious discussion.
I am beyond stressed, so I am 32 and decided to return back to school in 2024. Well I am doing great, but that's not the issue. I went to school for several years ago (last date of attendance was Spring 2017) and I had a 1.83 GPA with 99 Credits. Well for my major right now, I have a 3.81 and it's continually climbing. I know those grades follow me but I wonder how much it's truly going to effect me. I was invited to Phi Theta Kappa and this semester I am receiving two academic awards and an orange ribbon (it's an award for contributions). I finish at this community college in December with an Associates in Mathematics and Education. It's truly eating away at me that grades from 10+ years ago will haunt me till the end of time. Should I be stressed or do schools take into account recent coursework and a change in work ethic?
Uhhh
I'm the furniture in the corner
Wait what did he get banned
Yes
Oh well rat decided to ban, but I have a feeling that guy wouldn't have answered anyways
damn
great, rat
now we'll never know
Cool pfp
We were on a cliffhanger and fell off the cliff.
Wait why did he get banned i dont see extremist/incel ideology
intuition
you shouldn’t be stressed imo. universities and employers take into account changes in work ethic, and since like 10 years passed for you, the context shows improvement
I chose to ban them based on their message history from yesterday where they were spreading anti-psychiatry misinformation bs
pre emptive strik- nvm
ohhhh i remember that, “i’d prefer if someone took ashwaganda instead of prescribed medications” lollll
Their most recent messages were definitely a dogwhistle of some kind
Probably a nazi
When considering that alongside "this user's probably bout to say some nazi shit" yk
I'd just rather not
so he somehow passed the any % ban speedrun but managed to take the longest time
Oh nah we've had users last like more than a year
Ok back on topic
Who knows how many are hiding
at least the use of #serious-discussion as honeypot for nazis is successful 
@soft aspen you back?
Then probably the most intentionally unintentional one. He probably got the sudden death achievement too
She got banned iirc
The kinda user who you look at and you just know that one day they're gonna say something bannable but can't quite justify it
Can't you retake some of those courses, or otherwise take extra courses and leave the bad ones off your transcript?
she got muted for 22 hours
Well she left.
why exactly 22
BTW i still hate itsuki
now you dont remmember shaming me for not having gif perms
Innocent until proven guilty, but this server isnt a country anyways so are vibe bans allowed now
Fahhh
it hurt me alot
james doakes is with you
Moey's dedication to this person they don't even know is impressive
Considering the course work was at a different school no. It was also in Accounting so unrelated to what I am doing now
Also you're not able to leave off transcripts I do not believe
the axe forgets, but the tree remembers
THIS IS NOT EVEN THE FIRST TIME THEY SAID THIS
🤡
Ima make this the quote for tmmr
check ur dms
That's pretty crazy. I didn't go to undergrad in the US but as long as you had all your prereqs fulfilled you could leave superfluous classes off the transcript in my UG
<@&268886789983436800> off topic + what the fu is this
Soliciting dms*
Please move this to #discussion or #chill
This is for politics and stuff not asking dms
I was about to be sniped.
I'm not sure I really understand why those grades even affect your GPA if the courses aren't counting towards your current major
as in
israel or palestine
Removed
really?
thanks
really indeed
if it's the same school it doesn't matter
it all goes in
amazing honeypot success rate lads
I am more worried about the transfer process, I know at every school grades refresh -- but I have to get in first lol
but how do you get 99 credits BEFORE returning for an associate's
that's the real question
I didn't return to the same school
I am at my local community college returning after a long break
In that case do you even need to report your previous educational experience when transferring?
In the US it's a requirement
eh, there are requirements and REQUIREMENTS
idk the process of discovery, but yea, they ask
So I think I accidentally lied on my resume...I conflated two different terms and now I got an interview for a role that'd really push my career forward but it might require using that skill that I misinterpreted and now I don't know wtf to do
Can you learn that skill in time?
is it true that math is far more prereq heavy than other fields of study?
oh there's a convo happening, carry on
That's the thing, it's something you just kinda learn by doing it and struggling with it. It's called commissioning, basically starting up a system for the first time on the customer's site and fixing any issues you encounter and making sure everything is good. I've done "commissioning" at my factory (that's called factory acceptance testing), but real commissioning (on-site) can be pretty different because the customer may have problems that you didn't have in your factory (bad power, leaks, faulty instrumentation, etc)
So I can't learn it without doing it, but I think this job assumes that I've already done it!
Hewa hewa
any YPT study buddy
not the place for this.
I don't think so at all 🤔 Math is different than a lot of subjects because there's so many places you can start from, it's like a tree. Sure, once you get into more advanced math, the prereqs become very apparent, but how is that different than any other subject?
uh..
please go ask somewhere else otherwise i will have to report to moderators, and dont reply to this
like ok i do ML primarily, and there i can mostly follow papers in what i'm interested in etc
but for math a paper is out of the limits for me, it seems
then again i've read more ML than math -- but if i finish dummit and foote i'm still far from reading a research algebra paper (whatever that means) it seems...
This channel is only for on-topic discussion. Please take casual conversation to #discussion or #chill.
I'm sorry
but i find this channel the most "right" one since the discussion ppl where sending memes n didnt want to kill the humor so i took my message back, and for the math discussion its literally math
Well yeah, of course! Basic goop/ring/field theory is elementary compared to a research paper, just like a college thermodynamics course is nothing compared to a research paper in statistical mechanics. They're both prerequisites for the other, but that doesn't mean they require any more prerequisites than anything else -- in fact, I'd argue that my example was pretty bad, since I think thermodynamics takes more prerequisites than elementary AA
#study-discussion then if you want to study
... nope. this is for politics. plus we dont do study partners here i think. AND DO NOT REPLY
chill will do it
thanks
my bad for not having all channels
it ok just go to chill now pls
fair, but like after dummit and foote what else do i gotta read
That entirely depends what type of algebra you want to study
like i guess my weird internal benchmark is AG, and after d&f i need eisenbud then vakil then god knows what
After thinking a moment about this, I wouldn't merely take a bet that you will be able to this job once you get the role. It's probably accurate that you should contact them and ask if they mean on site (?) commissioning or factory commissioning (maybe it is a factory commissioning role and you were confused). At any rate, if you are correct and get the job, what should happen on the first day? That's just my two cents.
You're on the right path then, by the time you get done with Vakil I'm sure you'll realize what niche of AG you're into, and then from there it's just exploring research papers and looking for the obscure resources that talk about your niche
You can look up what kind of AG/AA ML uses and start from there after Vakil, now that you'll have the prerequisite foundations for it (I have no clue what math ML uses besides linear algebra lols)
it's just a lot compared to the ML prereq i needed (just one book), and also idk if i want to learn AG on the side at all since my career goal is ML
maybe i'd do ML theory, which is fucking wild and definitely beyond me (that also requires a lot of prereq i think)
I worry that that'll make me look even more underqualified and disqualify me from going further 💀 I guess nothing happens on the first day
I say you try your luck
I'm only a little worried about it because the process of commissioning is very similar to FAT, it's just different in that you're no longer in a controlled setting and you've got people watching over your shoulder lol. So I feel like I know the basics of commissioning but I haven't "done it" yet
Yes sir! Thank you friend :)
No worries
Can you show me some examples/context? Like, what does the ML you're studying right now look like? What separates that from "ML Theory", and what does ML Theory look like?
I guess it depends on your competency. The issue is whether it'z less professional to say no somehow, versus less professional to work a job you utterly cannot work when you thought you couldn't originally.
But I get wanting to like, maintain composure and be applicable
i mostly read mechanistic interpretability, which is a very new field admittedly and still has a lot of weirdos (tho i promise it's legit lol), so a paper there might be https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05541
theory is much more mathematical -- instead of empirically testing out different architecture choices or algorithms you attempt to derive them from first principles, or at least give a from-first-principles explanation for observed behavior
I'm pretty new to my career (engineering) so I wouldn't say I'm experienced or super competent yet, but my specific niche is also known for being thrown in the deep end and figuring it out by teaching yourself how to swim (as you're drowning). So I don't know how to evaluate "competency" here; the role was labeled as entry level to be fair, so maybe I'm overestimating the expectations
competency, not incompetency
I see that you are an engineer, and yeah what you say is definitely applicable heavily in engineering roles. idk, maybe I should hush up
That's what I meant, sorry! Didn't realize I put an "in" in there lol
Hm, I guess I'd have to see a resource on the theory to evaluate how much heavier the prerequisites are
No, I appreciate your input regardless! Anything that helps me think is valuable :)
I had the personal experience of working in an engineering job I was woefully underprepared for, in an organization that was not a good fit, and I guess I was speaking from that experience. I guess I disagree with many on the cost of being ahead or whatever. So my only point was like, if you know your limits you may have a good instinct.
I'm talking like, out of college to project manager support type jump, I was basically a boss of bosses by some miracle of the hiring process.
though i think this book is overformalized in the extreme, see for instance the definition of polynomial on page 478 (just landed on it)
The majority of this looks like it'd be covered by a standard sequence in analysis to me (+ elementary LA and probability), which is a very common set of courses for a budding mathematician to start with. I think it looks a lot worse than it is because it's crammed full of symbols...My point being that I don't think the prerequisites are any heavier than a paper discussing the mathematical theory behind any other applied science (perhaps even lighter; for example, Finite Element Theory uses a lot of differential geometry, which definitely has heavier math prerequisites)
baby's first thought on ethics
interestinggg
can you explain definiton 9.7.1 in a different channel then xoxo
I can try 🤔
What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
anyway the ethical distinction is clear; i am value-accretive. Children, on the other hand, are speculative human futures with uncertain yield. In a rational market, insulin should flow towards proven performers.
that is not something what i think 😭 a person was talking about lev, came to this
why invest resources into high-liability, low-output organisms (children) whose path to profitability is entirely speculative. adults are generally mature, value-producing assets with positive projected ROI
but the market is not
, why would you expect that?
but we like gambling
bro saying funds going to children is making difficut for him getting medical facility
cus i got EBITDA and children aint
also the question evidently was not about what the market does but what it should do
any red-blooded capitalist can see the wisdom of denying children healthcare
next question
ratgirl response goes pretty ham
Avatar of unhingedness they say
what siriuss topic on
Incredibly Board of Directors Quarterly Earnings-pilled
I almost got myself muted again for unseriousness so yeah
Something about the four nations
I think we should work on getting insulin to everyone instead of denying it to more people
Delay insulin Deny insulin Defend insulin - someone who doesn't cares mantra
in seriousness though yeah
Hey I have a question with multiple choice
u some kinda commie
ykw i'm probably the last user who should be in #serious-discussion
bad example
I have never felt this insulted in my life
true but the arguement was why the funds are going to the poor children in africa than invest for people in country which is bs
Which funds exactly are going to children in africa? From which country? Funds for what? Where is this argument? I'm not finding it
In the US for example, insulin prices are artificially inflated. We could easily make insulin cheap, like the inventor intended when he sold the patent for a penny
like charity
Charities operate on donations, which largely come from private persons and organisations
I don't understand what you're talking about
charity should not be sent maybe
but nvm you wont understand the context
So we shouldn't have charities?
i even read it in the original german and everything
You realise if the charities didn't exist that money wouldn't suddenly go towards other things
Or are you saying charities should only be allowed to contribute within the country they are operating in?
both of those sound incredibly stupid lol
I don't think this user actually has a cogent point
They think so much money is going to children in africa
tbf i dont speak german so i didn't know what marx was on about most of the time
did ratgirl's username change from 1 cigarette to 3 cigarette
ye
they would go somewhere
How do you think charities work?
Genuine question
true
I'm trying to understand the framework in which you are operating
to quote
What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul
Let's not be needlessly antagonistic
bro was talking about lev's, then why lev's shouldnt be cheap if charity is going outside why not invest it there
copypasta
You are acting like international and local charities are mutually exclusive
Both exist
when your only knowledge of foreign aid comes from the essay "Do They Know It's Christmas?" by Geldof et al. (1984)
because charity is a voluntary action by private individuals
do they even know that
speaking as a whole
not an official action by an elected body -- if charity didn't exist those private individuals wouldn't invest locally
they just wouldn't give at all
But you can't speak about charities as a whole
They are individual organisations with no connection between them usially
that's the point of making charitable donations deductible -- for self interested individuals to do something for the good of not themselves
If you stopped giving money to one charity, that doesn't mean that money automatically goes to a different charity
Hi ratgirl
And people donate both to local and international charities
Is this just some dumbass argument against foreign aid by somebody who doesn't even know what an NGO is
Actually incoherent
it was about rich people and organisations as a whole
it's just another dumb nationalist take imo
perhaps true
blunt force trauma (smoke it)
A hammer
?
what the heck are you talking about
oops wrong reply
what is an NGO
Non governmental organisation
Gets the job done 👍
national geopolitical org
ooooooookay i do NOT like this question or its implications
ratgirl where are you acquiring those cigarettes from
What are all the commands in this server like ,rccw and !status or idk
What do you think it implies?
!<factoid> are factoids, they are implemented by @quasi jetty , meanwhile ,<command> and LaTeX rendering are implemented by @fathom swallow , btw this is not the place for this
Alr thanks
Knowing about cooking also like trivially answers that question, no..?
I believe I have to stop this as a matter of safety: nobody on this server can advise on which methods or tools make deeper wounds, or how to make injuries worse.
If this is just a physics/materials question, please reframe it away from injury mechanics and don’t test it with blades. If this is about you or someone else, please step away from the razor/knife now and message ModMail or someone you trust. If anyone has already been hurt, especially if there is heavy bleeding, a deep/gaping wound, numbness, or you feel at risk of doing more, please get urgent help immediately.
offering modmail is wild
I know how to make bad deep wounds friend
I am just generaly intrested it's like one of those morbid questions you have at 3 am when you cant sleep
Right. Then you already understand why this cannot be a public discussion here.
Even if this is only morbid curiosity, the question is about testing injury depth with razors/blades, so we are not going to discuss the mechanics or compare methods. Drop this line of conversation immediately.
You would be surprised
what's happening
Under utilitarianism, isn't transphobia just wrong. 
whats your reasoning
I wanna know how much does speeding sharp object slow down when cutting and how much diffrent is it between slicing and chopping
Here I sound as AI but I hope it's better
Alright, well that's quite clearly more of a physics question and you'll probably get more insightful answers in the Physics Server listed in #old-network
Remove the first 2 words and this message still makes perfect sense
Well first of all, just how many people it hurts. It hurts more than just trans people quite often, especially anyone gender non-conforming (as well as family and friends).
It also leads to some rather unpleasant things I can see in no world as being classed as "happiness" and I highly doubt the joy transphobes get is in any way equal to the pain victims get
"Isn't transphobia just wrong." Sounds like I don't know for sure, I am asking a question.
Thanks
discussing utilitarianism in the serious discussion channel is wild /j
Okay fine fair fair
Fine 
Can't even discuss how horribly transphobia affects quite a lot of people, where are my inalienable rights.

!no1stamendment
Lookie here. This is a discord server. You do not have inalienable rights.
But I have to! This is America! Totally!
maam i think you misread, this is not America its Mathematics
ok no off topic
It's kinda insane how much transphobia (and other forms of hating groups, i just know more about transphobias affects) hurts people outside of said group.
Lies
I think it is quite hard to measure the pleasure transphobes get from their cruelty vs the suffering the victims face objectively but the point does make sense intuitively
Well, in some cases, multiple people suffer when one transphobic individual hates on a victim, trans or not
Which, at least in how I understand, would naturally count as greater suffering than joy as that suffering leaves lasting scars many of the times
may I join this discussion
I mean nobody is stopping you so long as you don't like defend transphobia 
the original question that seems to have started this has disappeared
Hm? On my end it's here, i can resend it if wanted
can you? itd be great :)
"Under utilitarianism, isn't transphobia just wrong.
"
interesting statement damn lol who said that
isnt transphobia just wrong under.. everything
I mean you could technically construct a viewpoint where it is seen as moral
As transphobes tend to do.
I'm also more wondering if I understand utilitarianism correctly, and if it's feasible to use it in an argument against transphobia in this way
Sure it wouldn't be a good argument, but it's better than any argument I've heard transphobes use against us
oh you're trans?
I was originally interested in this because I'm detrans, biologically female and wanted to be a guy for like ages
Can someone please help me out and suggest me university in Europe
I want it to be English taught and a computer engineering 4year programmed
Uni should be well accredited with good job/campus selection
Please please pleaseeee suggest I’m v stressed
Surprised you didn't know, but yes, I am, stereotypically so.
I didn't dig into your profile or character that much lol
Oh, interesting, did you end up actually transitioning or just wanted to prior to realizing?
socially, I did. when I could anyway. I also binded. but nothing past that
idk.
Oh, how did you find out you weren't if I may ask? I've never actually met someone who talked about detransitioning (without well being groomed out of it).
Did you regret ever transitioning? Or did you see it as a learning experience?
No please seriously
its not even the appropriate place to ask this, i suggest asking somewhere else not here
TUM? if ure fine with germany
It’s titled serious discussion
ah i guess they dont offer it in english
I tried but no not apt
Not in English and I want comp engineering 4 year course
this is a very personal thing for me, but I hope its of value for you. I initially transitioned due to two factors, an early sexual assault and a very shitty adult in my life. it affected how I perceived being a woman, femininity, and such. I also noticed people treated me with higher value before they found out i was female. this feeling slowly wore off as I grew older, as I became more comfortable with my body and healed from my trauma. this is also why that, despite me supporting trans people, i am generally against physically/irreverisbly transitioning minors
I don't regret it (aside from the effects binding had on me) but it was definitely a huge learning experience on how I perceive my identity
why does it have to be a 4 year course
Becuase yes
Comp engineer is a 4 year course
huh, a lot of courses in EU are 3 years
Okay suggest me anyy I’m v stressed rn n I have run out of options
Oh interesting! I can see why you have that take, though, what counts as irreversible? Most operations is know of can be reversed by others (though some are harder to reverse than they were to do).
I can totally see why that decision has been made even if I can't genuinely say I fully agree, due to how my experiences have been.
trinity college in dublin might be nice
maybe UK unis
Yes but it’s a bit far from where I live
what are your preferred countries
Yea, actual gender affirming surgery almost never happens until the age of consent, but the question is whether puberty blockers are considered irreversible, since they largely are reversible albeit with some permanent side effects
That's more what I was asking, as yes, surgery requires another surgery to "reverse" and I believe never goes back to prior
anything that would significantly harm the purpose of that specific body part. anything relating to the uterus, for example, that would lead to infertility in the future is something i am against (for minors). same for some HRT methods, iirc (I'm not too knowledgeable on this)
for example I recently saw a case of a woman being arrested after kidnapping her minor son for complete bottom surgery, that's something I'm not a fan of lol
And well, hormones can cause things needing surgery to fix
I think using these extreme extreme edge cases that would have been abusive without the trans aspect to draw wider conclusions is ill-advised
Oh interesting, I never thought of fertility being an issue people considered here.
it's just how I see it, now that I'm an adult, if I got top surgery or something else in my teens, i'd be really upset right now lol
Fair enough
especially now that I really care for my fertility and actively try to look after it
There are equally (and likely more) cases of trans teens being denied gender-affirming care and taking their lives over it
I won't lie here, I wish even surgery was available for minors due to personal reasons as well, but I see why others are VERY against it
shin can you get rid of that dickhead lol
It was done before I was even able to click on the profile
Or even when allowed taking their lives due to transphobia
I wished the same when I was younger, but we just need to keep in mind - people that age really don't know where they'll be in 3-4 years
This might be true for some people, but definitely not for everyone
I know many gay and trans people who pretty much fully figured themselves out during their teens in that respect
I can assume due to this I should still be alive at the very least
I've heard and seen this first hand. it's a shame, it's definitely a tricky situation because of the stakes on both sides of the argument
I can't say anything for if I was denied any care
that takes a huge chunk of emotional intelligence that a lot of people just don't have
btw shin you do calisthenics? lol
same 
I mean, I was diagnosed prior to becoming 7, I've wanted surgery for two years by now, even known which type I wanted, I'd say I shouldn't be denied due to "Oh you may regret it" because I'd much rather have regrets than have nothing
Sometimes I wonder how people like Nick and Antranik are doing but lowkey idrc
oh may I ask how old you are car?
Wait not 2 years what am I on about, since I was 12-13 years, not "for 2 years"
And that's why the standard for getting HRT legally is very high, and other lower impact treatments are always pursued first
I don't enjoy disclosing my exact age despite it being easily findable, but I am a minor
2 and 12 both have a 2 and my mind is just dying ig
I think I've been on HRT for about a year, I can't lie, I do have regrets, but I know if I didn't start it then I'd've not been in a good state in the future, I took my one chance
so in your mind it's just the price you have to pay?
Especially considering how young I was exposed to some knowledge I shouldn't have
I 100% don't intend to discount your experience, but it is important to consider that you are at the end of the day an extreme edge case, and that research shows the vast majority of even detransitioners do it for social reasons rather than because they don't identify with that gender anymore.
What you described as your experience doesn't sound similar to the experience of any trans person (both minor and adult) that I've encountered or read about
I also agree with car that imperfect treatment that keeps you alive is better than perfect treatment you might not get to experience since you'll be dead
oh yeah you're very right, I know I'm definitely an outlier, there's a lot of different factors that'd be different to what you've seen
the 0.5% of the bell curve
I'd deal with daily pain if it meant I could be real for once in my life, I've actively said I'd be fine with periods if I was able to feel real, and I've had people in know who couldn't walk due to them.
Based on the age i was exposed to some things, I don't think I'd be very are right now without even this flawed way to treat it with too low of doses
This conversation is fascinating I just wanted to announce my presence and be a fly on the wall
Even assuming all my pain over the past 8+ months was directly from my HRT, I can't stop it.
I believe the technical term is "lurking"
i'd just like to add that I still have the same feelings I had back then, the way I perceive being a male, (and I believe that to an extent, every woman feels this way) but along with the social reasons I also just found a way to accept womanhood and do the things I admired in masculinity in my own way, or just keep it as a wish for another life
Idve dealt with that inability to eat on and off for hours a day for months if it meant my dosing would actually work
And that is an assumption, btw is the hospital fee in the US so expensive that you cant get a checkup or what
I think it's kind of obvious from my profile that I don't mind being masculine or hiding that I'm a female lol, maybe I've always just admired the respect men get 🤷
Yeah I do lurk quite a bit
Mate it's been months, no physical symptoms, all of it has been horrible mental stuff outside of the bit at the start.
that's really fascinating, considering thats one of the first things i'd rid from my body lol
My apologies for implying that, I misunderstood you before. It does sound from what you're describing like your perception of your gender identity has shifted somewhat
I mean I already go through lots of pain, atleast physical pain has easier treatment
This is definitely something I've also seen, with people thinking they are trans and then later finding their comfortable place on the gender spectrum
"Women are born with pain built in. It's our physical destiny."
I don't actually know how much pain I am in these days
It's supposedly bad if other people are to be trusted
Interesting...
But I know a lot of it is caused by imposter syndrome.
I'd give almost anything to feel real, even if it meant monthly pain that would immobilize me sometimes.
during those "trans" years i mostly identified as genderfluid, I think I'm at the point where I just don't care or know how to balance out the masculine and the feminine whenever I want to
chameleon, if you will
this is the only server where I have pronouns 
The pain is arguably made worse by the fact I just don't feel it anymore, which I've heard it's uh not a good thing
Ideally I'd like gender questioning teens to undergo a psych evaluation, then be put on puberty blockers together with appropriate psychological support, and eventually evaluated for HRT
Honestly this is the most reasonable reaction I've ever heard
they make suits for women and skirts for guys
Skirts for guys are too expensive
May I ask what exactly a psych evaluation is? Is it just getting diagnosed with gender dysphoria and being shown you are in a state possible of consent?
who’s to say you can’t wear women’s skirts
who said you can't cross the border (the women's section a H&M)
I don't think you necessarily need to be diagnosed for dysphoria. That's the rub though, I have no idea what a psych evaluation that isn't a months long ordeal should be
My figure
who tf even put labels on them? its just clothes. if I was a dude I'd wear a skirt and they'd call me grandfather clock
I don't have the proportions
If it's any form of trying to convince them otherwise I literally can't agree unfortunately based on what I've heard and what I know about myself
the first two sentences are my point. last one what the freak are you on about
No I just find your experience to be interesting since usually from what I experienced in my culture, the admire goes in the reverse direction
Im glad I didn't need any intrusive bullshit on "Oh but what if you aren't trans" because that would have destroyed me
I don't know why you'd assume this. At the very least the person should be evaluated to be able to consent. Beyond that, it's hard for me to say what exactly should be evaluated
As is I barely accept myself, I would be so unstable if I was forced through that to get the one legal treatment that works
I definitely don't think the person evaluating should attempt to actively question the teen's gender identity
The way the system currently works is fucked, tbc, and it actively works against trans and GNC folk
Oh I just know many places already try to force people out of it before letting them get hormones or blockers, so I assumed that'd be what would get implemented
Ndeltoid where are you from
You also have this for abortion in many places. It's revolting
Oh thank god, i hate how this happens still though
Oh yeah, people have no bodily autonomy when it comes to physical treatment
I think puberty blockers are the best stopgap we have currently while a teenager is working through their gender identity
But it's definitely not perfect and has a whole host of problems
I see the point, I just can't agree for personal reasons
I actually recently saw a video by a detrans mtf that was on puberty blockers and said that they would 100% do it again despite the physical side effects and that it saved their life
And despite not identifying as a woman anymore
"detrans mtf" really threw me but following
I'm actually quite sure a few of the bad stuff that happened in the past 8+ months was from my HRT
My doses are uh not normal from what I've heard from everyone else
I know some of my self hate got worse from HRT despite not feeling it anymore
Anywhere Europe
Not too far from Middle East
Wait, what if your physician secretly dilute your hrt so your dose goes back to normal but then lies about it to abuse the placebo effect(?) that you self imposed(?) where you feel more self fulfilled when on more estrogen? Idk
Which is probably bad since its tampering with your meds
???-
What are you on about?
Im sleep deprived and tripping forget it, shit is flowing out of my fingers
Although i cab elaborate
I do need to see how high I can jump immediately next appointment
serious discussion 🕰️
Literally or metaphorically
I feel like shit for 3 months due to a dose increase too high it's my fault
My meds, i need to see about tripling their dose for the one
... I swear
What's the worst it can do, the exact same things that happened the past 8 months? I'll live.
I am seriously reconsidering my previous message and i seem to agree with it.
What do you mean by dilute it so doses go back to normal..?
It seems like you are massively overdosing your meds/hormones just so you can feel something
This is a complicated case
I can assure you I don't feel fulfilment from my bad doses
It'd better not to be rash responding
I always hesitate on trans cases that come from an extreme sense of self hatred or low self-esteem. your mind wanders when it hates its vessel. i see it a lot
Im not sure whether this is some heavily wretched up placebo effect/mental self deprecation
I mean technically the one I am very high on is prescribed in that dose...
Supposedly for cancer but who cares.
Car please do not try to do something that can genuinely fuck up your hormone balance or cause severe health issues
this is genuinely extremely dangerous
I know the dangers, and quite frankly I can't care anymore
Yea this probably is heavily wretched up mental self deprecation
The dangers here are that you could die
My dose on estrogen is too low and it's made me feel horrible
^ this is exactly what i mean here. like sometimes this "affirmative care" is just someone's way of self harm
I know that.
She ran out of self preservation if i can judge correctly
Is this a form of extreme self indulgement idk
I mean is it self hatred if I don't feel it/know it anymore
No no no
"Here be dragons" would be an understatement
yes. numbness is what falls at the end of the slope
NUMB. NUMB. NOT DUMB. IM SORRY
This may just be me self hating, but I do mean this as a genuine question, how does anyone judge whether something like this is actually beneficial, like yes patient self reporting is one thing, but how do doctors account for the sorts of issues that can arise when people are given HRT, judge whether that's even the right thing to do, etc etc...
I want to give my two centes but really not the time
My dose on cyproterone acetate is 75mg and I will planning to up to 100mg as I am allowed, my estrogen is 2mg, way too low.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but many times people aren't super sure of what they want a lot of the time, esp if there's other ongoing stuff in their life right? /genq
But we can lie.
this is unfortunately something we don't know yet. I've seen a lot of research about it recently. we don't know the true depth of the human mind and how to distinguish two things that present the same
Honestly this is a problem for a lot of medicine, and there was the whole "illness doesn't exist" argument earlier.
Oh well, i guess I'm fucked then, nothing new. It's my body, it's already broken, not like doing stuff that will break me further will help me.
like doctors need to think of this
If I went off of my meds right now, I wouldn't forgive myself for months.
more estrogen means blood clots and higher risk for other problems. estrogen, like any other hormone, can't be good in high dosages.
Sunk cost fallacy + extreme/reverse (therapeutic) nihilism is what i see
I'd fall into more harmful mindsets
My estrogen dose is low compared to others.
I've heard 8 is far better and I've read about 5
@magic python Did you say you were "diagnosed" at 7 or did I misread that earlier? And like, what did that mean
but you're comparing two different bodies. there's a reason pharmacists don't give everyone the same dosage. I went on hormonal therapy and my dosages were extremely different than everyone else, but we eventually reached the same result
Why should anyone care about my body? You don't live in it, my harm doesn't affect you. I'm the only thing in this body, as such I get to do what I want to it.
this one
I was diagnosed at either 4, 5, or 6. Gender dysphoria.
I know my body hasn't changed much, I don't even have soreness in my chest, which is a huge indicator ITS WORKING. Which shows mine isn't working (plus not much over the months I've been on it, especially compared to my cis peers irl)
Yes, unfortunately I am.
I was also on 1mg for a while, which is literally nothing if I actually want development
yes
But aren't there other things going on? How can you look at just "fix x" as the operative issue? I mean to me this is like a negative argument. "I need to mow the grass so it doesn't get too tall". Well sure but if the dishes aren't done and guests are coming over, like is the grass the main problem? I'm just seeing you say you feel "not real" and that seems like it could be a lot of things... maybe I'm stupid but idk?
... Thia probably boils down to the fact that, (id imagine) a really long time a go,that only organisms who has a drive to survive survives, and that drive is passed down. Again and again until it went down to me. Ofc that drive also extends to your community (why not) so id imagine people whe see you doing like this will activate that drive (which seem to be missing/shattered in you) and try to discourage you from doing shit like that
I'd say the person giving me the meds is more qualified to say when my cypro dose is too much despite what I've heard many people ate under 20
they can only supress me so much
i mean i dont want you to hurt yourself, but if youre not doing that i dont see a problem
I don't get anything else that could be an issue comparable to this that i also have, even if people are right about me having depression and near daily anxiety harming my breathing.
This is how I survive.
I would suggest you have to battle both issues
This is prolly sensationalist and overblown interpretation from the actual study, but I was definitely the child who does the least for them and my older sister did the most while being taken for granted.
My sister definitely made sure to treat me like shit for this dynamic 
Your definition of survive is different from mine i suppose.
that's my tricky comment, the wrench in the works. If you have depression then you have to be careful with what helps you feel "real" as well
I mean I'd be hurting myself either way. I'd arguably mentally hurt myself far more off of it.
I feel like some people just have the maslow tree of needs upside down
My definition of survive is not dying mate.
Also sorry for boomer quotes, I'm just trying to like not put too many words through
i havent read the whole conversation but i think there always way to physically go about something to reduce mental harm that dont hurt you physically
Well then your balance of satisfying yourseld via meds and keep living is different from mine ,methinks (why did i just use that)
im not sure how that lines up with what you said tho bc i told you i dont know
This is the only treatment that will work on someone like me, I am not doing therapy.
At least not for this.
idk what treatment youre refering to like i said
Pills, for transitioning.
The fact that you are suggesting therapy like that does imply you feel put upon to do that for some reason (it might be someone else's idea)
The meds are what seem to keep me alive...
oh those dont like harm you physically tho? so what is this conversation about 😭
otherwise intense body dysmorphia -> suicide
They can, plus I am on a rather high dose for cypro and planning to up it further
... Oh well then your notion of risk and utility is different from mine
why increase it?
they absolutly can
I plan to go to almost 5 times the standard dose trans adults take
and i mean like normal doses
they still do
I don't feel it working well.
ok why?
-# hi you exist back to not talking bye
there shoudl be other medications you can try
Wonderful, me, someone who has reasons to do this, has reasons to do this. Shocker,
Pardon my ignorance, but I thought it was common to do CBT while transitioning?
i do!! have fun lurking/whater ur doing!!
for example i have insomnia, depression, and anxiety (formally diagnosed) and ive tried many medications for insomnia, usually uping the dose because it doesnt seem to work isnt usually the solution and you would be much better off just trying a new one or seeking additional/more intense therapy
No other pills work, surgery isn't allowed for minors, therapy would hurt me, that's why
I'm on the opposite side. I used to treat the other person like shit (their laziness made my life harder), but I wasn't able to to see progress in the other person until I became more of their friend and guided them whenever they needed help.
therapy is most definitely a good thing
Pardon my ignorance, what is CBT? I don't have any therapy for this if that's what it is, but I am definitely not the norm here
it only helps if you want it, otherwise it is activly harmful in vast majority of situations
... I cant stop you, its not like i sit on the other side of the globe
I dont want it is the issue. It would hurt me because of this.
Cognitive behavioral therapy
ok so we wanna up our dose 5x but dont know about other treatments
Oh no I just take pills
Excited to meet you!
Nonono I'm already at almost 4x the standard dose
that doesnt mean it would hurt you, youre just adverse to it, i was against therapy myself but now love it
i didn’t realize this was serious discuss holy sorry
Atleast for cypro
hi rice! what kind of math do you like
Okay the therapy wouldn't hurt me, I'd internally hurt myself, is that a better way to state it?
I'm not directly harming myself much, I don't see the issue.
ok well i think you should look into other forms of therapy and additionally other treatments if you plan to transition esp before talking about it here
serious necro more like it good lord lol
this wasn’t at all what her implication was.
This number is changing, which I think is very relevant.
I've been on over twice the normal dose since i started 8+ months ago :3
thats not research or visits to other doctors for more opinions
Elaborate.
what one should and shouldn’t do is super subjective.
I was prescribed this.
I was given the choice to go to 5x the normal dose i hear of being 20mg
I am taking it
@soft aspen what do you mean by therapy? please elaborate. there are many existing types of therapy.
yes but it makes no sense to come here and argue something that you dont even know the whole truth of, deny therapy which is known to help with about every mental health condition, and talk abotu no other forms of treatment when that isnt true
you either don't know the numbers for some psychological reason (intense stress), or you have a pre existing limitation to producing consistent explanations
I agree, people should think about this before saying they don't care about their safety. I've known I needed this for years
therapy like with a therapist or hormone therapy
im talking about you not others
My experience of this behavior is that it is an identity issue, but here it seems like a suicidal psychology.
I'm at 75 going to ideally 100 soon. It's just easier to say "5x the normal dose" to emphasize that I am above it.
therapy like with a therapist
why thanks. i do mean, as in psychotherapy?
I've known this for years, known who I was since I was at most 6, I've put enough thought into this.
i think all kinds of therapy here would be useful as pretains to mental states and trans treatments
then why do you only know about cyro and not cbt?
hormone therapy
I thought we where already talking about hormone therapy?
Because I didn't do CBT or get told to...
Okay maybe I got CBT? I don't know. I wasn't aware of it.
yes but theyre saying that the one they are on isnt working well so i suggested a switch or at least an opinion from another doctor
My memory is too fucked to look back and know if the pediatrician did CBT too
Yeah ok it's a memory thing
I'm planning to up my 2mg estrogen to atleast 6 if they let me
you can ask about it tho? i mean liek you should understand your options instead of telling us there is nothing else you can take
gender dysphoria is a rather tricky topic. therapy, more specifically psychotherapy, is used as it can offer a fix of sorts to mental disorders, like depression and anxiety. though some like gender dysphoria are different and internal, which are directly associated with one’s identity, and can NOT be fixed through therapy that does not alter their physical identity. it can alleviate depression and anxiety and whatnot which can be symptoms caused by gender dysphoria, but the idea that the treatment given for these disorders should be used as well for gender dysphoria is well, rather silly.
discussion exceeded my knowledge so i refrain, sorry
If not, it'll be another 6 months of nothing
yes im refering to gender dysphoria
Good choice.
read my whole message please…
i did
I don't want it. I'd rather have scars over my body bleeding than deal with that, as is I don't have enough time to deal with myself.
you could be at a doctor rn instead of texting us?
(I know I'd prefer this because I supposedly felt a fake version before)
yes, because doctors are notorious for being easy to get a hold of.
Not really, and i literally don't see the issue? It's my body? It's not like I'm making myself bleed.
My mind is smart enough to know blood feels warm and slick!
and by my recolection, car is still a minor, so its not like they can just scedule an apointment afaik
Not without a guardian
well you said your medication isnt doing much for you, so you shoudl try to explore other options which is what im suggesting
yeah, doctors suck when dealing with minors
They don't let me do the ideal stuff.
especialy when ur parents are bigoted... ug
I am wondering at what point this becomes a self harm / moderation issue, but I feel bad.
Due to "safety" issues
who is they
The person prescribing me these.
it feels in rather bad faith, you’re not exactly offering solutions as much as you are trying to argue your view
ok i said im talking about other forms of treatment not just hormone therapy
I would agree with @verbal monolith Ella