#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 378 of 1
no, like natural antibodies
that's how vaccine work they put a dead virus in it and the antibodies learn how to fight it
Running isn't hard
Humans are literally designed for distance running
id rather lfit weights than do cardio
bad take
lifting is definitely easier..
maybe my ancestors didnt
frr
we used spears and ran down the animals that needed to pant cus they couldn't sweat
although cardio does feel much better once u do it compared to lifting
after u do cardio it feels so good in ur brain
we have some of the most efficient body cooling systems in the animal kingdom
so is there hope for my brain to adapt and get better at math or am I staying stupid at it forever
yeah, it can just have one or two things not functioning and work with or around that, brains just pick up and give up phantom limbs at times, people can understand the world better because of limitations, it is extremely flexible, both elastically and plastically as some would say.
I wonder how exerting yourself for less than 1 minute and resting for 3 is easier than exerting yourself for several minutes with most of your muscles firing
we can dissipate a kilowatt of heat at maximum capacity, that's more than a horsepower
We're designed for both fast movements and endurance movements, which is why we have multiple muscle and nerve fiber tyopes
which in theory means we can sustain an output of 1.333 hp continuously
idk but some poeple are very good at math since childhood like Kolmogorov
We're based as fuck
that's impossible in practice
Very few animals have as wide a diet as humans
I started running a few weeks ago, I feel very happy about this decision
Also have you ever heard of wolff's law?
1.33 14 inch shells at all times?
bro glaizng his own species 😂
Microfactures in your bones, i.e. conditioning and hard blows that hurt but don't break anything, strengthen your bones over time
bonesmashing
this is how the monks do it
your body reinforces itself to the stresses you put it under
also i think all mammals have wolff's law
in some flabberasting ways
yes, and?
I AM MAMMAL, I AM STRONG
oh i thought u meant stuff only applicable to humans
yep
Humans are apes and that's ape as fuck, I talk to my inner monkey all the time
i gotta ignore my inner monkey often
does that mean its over for me and my memory is going to stay bad forever
you give off the vibe you think you could take on a bear in a fight
if u have a bad memory then there's probably a reason
I feel like running is literally necessary to be a proper human being
a man actually has fought a ber and survived
like what
idk could be many things. see a doctor
plant: "evolution, please give me neurotoxins or other substances to deter predators"
humans: drinks coffee, eats chillis as snack, etc.
if you don't have legs, think real hard about running while you flutter your eyelids, same xperience
bro 😂
what are the doctors for memory
if you throw enough shit at a wall, some will stick
everyone knows about how going for a walk or a jog can completely change the way your thinking and releases hormones and bla bla bla
neurologist
I posit that our brains have evolved to actually depend on this activity to properly perform their computations
frr everytime i do cardio i feel way better and happier afterwards
it's amazing
but how do i know if i really have bad memory or not
if u forget stuff
-# I learned to run before I got into elementary school, it´s not that impressive unless you had some disability /j
Also to the point about neurons detecting patterns—there's some really cool work about this, for example Oja showed that simple Hebbian learning rules could essentially make neurons perform PCA
Like I think the human being is held back from their proper state
doesn't everyone
lets use every last drop
not as much
but that's vague.. what is "much"
I feel like this is unserious discussion
It's wonderful when the rhythm hits and you're just breathing and moving
Have you ever ran 5 miles with no music
I am serious but okay
do you remember what you ate yesterday
no
never ran that much
does it matter?
no
I have one of those chinese stairmasters at home and I climb it to feel like an aura monster
I haven't run in a while actually, but I usually did 3-5 miles
okay so like forgetting stuff isn't bad, forgetting some stuff is kinda bad
the preparation releases a lot of those hormones and there´s some weird stuff about some energy coming from muscles, the "changing how you think" sounds more like some more general psychology.
i did track and prolly ran many miles in total but at once without stopping ive only run prolly 1-2 miles
yes but i forget important stuff too..
I have to go through proofs like 10 times to remember them and then even then i forget them pretty quickly
do u understand them?
yes
it's usually better to understand and not memorize
yes i do understand them
then you should be able to just remember the first step and derive the rest
I will say I pretty much never full out sprint, or even run very hard, I focus on finding the fastest pace that feels like I could keep going indefinitely (as long as I keep my breathing rhythm intact)
i don't think its that simple though
there are usually many important unrelated ideas in a proof
im starting to workout again. imma run after i get fit . rn i onlly do cardio on the rowing machine
not always but sometimes
yeah
Are there?
I mean I guess?
u need a good mental model
sure but if it's like say a proof by contradiction, if you vaguely remember the initial statement and contradiction you know how to go about proving jt
idk
I mean the thing is, if you also at one time already knew the answer
-# that´s another weird thing, I can usually control heart rate and breathing a bit but not in an "it´s rarely or not automatic" way...
then having the first step will probably be plenty
because you'll start to put it together and oftentimes recall the full form
of course not always
u did either track or ctoss country?
I feel like its not about the first step it's about remembering the "tricks" in the proof
No, I did deep depression and a desire to better myself
many nerds did running at my school
i can remember the first step but I get stuck at some point that needs a trick which i forget
but they didnt do other sports like football
I'm not sure what you mean
what math do you know I could give an example
but like
I know a little algebra
ah, wanted to give an analysis or topology example :/
try topology
I know some analysis and topology, only real analysis and only pointset topology fr
ig I know basic alg top
basic basic
I need to learn complex analysis
so that I can properly learn clifford analysis
do you know cartan-dieudonne theorem
nope
did you already find your example
looking for one
cartan-dieudonne might work
Let $A$ be an isometry on an $n$ dimensional nondegenerate metric vectorspace, then $A = R_1\cdots R_k$ for hyperplane reflections $R_i$ with $k\leq n$. ($A$ is a composition of at $\textit{most}$ $n$ reflections.)
wraithlord_kototality
this uses many different ideas in the proof?
okay
what I mean though is like many proofs have steps that have a creative trick its not something that you can just write as long as you know the start, you have to remember the trick
so "remembering the first step" is an oversimplification like I feel that you need to remember multiple things... roughly the first step and the big picture and the tricks
not sure I've encountered that
I mean there's multiple ideas in the proof
sure
but they always feel connected by virtue of being in the proof to the idea I guess?
you never felt like you are writing a proof but get stuck in the middle?
Always
I do guess maybe this is a good way to remember proofs though, I realized that the (difficult) proofs that I do remember I have these in my head when I look at the theorem
are pictures not allowed to be sent here lol
🤨
why can't I send pictures 🙁
:/
you need active+ i think?
We will prove by induction, for $n=1$, we use that $GL(\bb F^1)\cong F^\times$ and conclude that $A \in \bb F^\times$ must satisfy $$A(v)A(v)=v^2=A^2v^2$$ which implies $A^2 = 1$. Then we grab your favorite theorem that shows your only solutions are $A=\pm 1$, this is the reflection through the origin (0 on the line), done.
Assuming it holds for $n-1$, let $Av=w$ for some vector $v\in\bb F^n$,
if $v$ and $w$ are linearly dependent, then $A$ is an isometry on $X:= \mathrm{span}(v)^\perp$, since $V$ is nondegenerate, $X$ is of dimension $n-1$, and thus $A=R_1\cdots R_k$, case done.
if $v$ and $w$ are not linearly dependent, then take a reflection $R$ mapping $w\mapsto v$, then $RA = R_1\cdots R_{k-1}$ by induction hypothesis and previous argument, implying $A=R R_1\cdots R_{k-1}$
$\square$
ah okay
I think that works
what is it?
wraithlord_kototality
yeah I don't know much linear algebra lol I don't think i can understand this rn
idk what nondegenerate means
if u know a bit of measure theory I think the construction of two disjoint sets A,B such that m(A U B) neq m(A) + m(B)
m is the outer measure
I don't know enough
its like the vitali set construction
Vagueposting.
it means that there's no nonzero vector whose dot product with everything is 0
equivalently, that the symmetric bilinear form functions as an isomorphism to the dual space
I need to study linear algebra idk what I am doing haha
lmfao
i know that every vector space has a basis and that's it
kektopus
so you assume axiom of choice then
yes..
do you know what a dual space is
characteristic 2 
what
love hate relationship 
a computer scientist's favorite char
and an algebraist’s least favorite
shawty looking like a F_2 vectorspace
idk, char 2 is fun sometimes
it's really really sad if you ask it to be like the other kids
but if you just let it be autistic, it's chill
char 3 is arguably weirder in a lot of ways sometimes
I can't count to 3 fr so I wouldn't know
part of what makes char 2 richer and more difficult, other than numerical coincidences for small primes, is how this interacts with all the bilinear constructions that show up everywhere
wraith you're so smart right? what's [simple word problem]
gives five different answers in 10 seconds
char 3 forces you to really think about trilinear constructions
fucking
More and more I think 2pi i should have its own letter
petition to use L for 2pi i
pls
people already do nerd
thank god
Char 1 is super easy
I WANT TO SEE IT IN ACTION
1+1=1, 1+1+1=1, and 1+1+1+1=1, respectively
F_un is not even that exciting. Wait till you get to F_six
oh look it's organic chemistry
oh this is serious discussion
I was referring to the trivial ring
Should we ban math from here since this is politics chat
I remember reading something where the author specified that the result holds in any field of characteristic >= -1
it says no particular focus on math but not no math
I'm terrified by this statement ngl
you joke but "F_{-1}" type statements do show up in representation theory lmao
what´s so much more interesting about characteristic -2
write L res(f,z_0) to scare the hoes
And this is why i am banned from #『meta-discussion』
tfw working over F_{-q}
what is F_{-q] though
another fun fact: the mod p sphere spectrum S/p exists and has reasonable structure for p>3. But S/3 doesn't exist with good structure, only S/9 does, and neither S/2 nor S/4 exists with good structure, only S/8 does
So basically, we want q>4?
no it's much more complicated than this
What does good structure mean here
if you're trying to do algebra with spectra there is a hierarchy of different levels of associativity and commutativity these things satisfy as ring spectra
there are various levels of associativity A_n and various levels of commutativity E_n, and A_infinity=E_1 is basically the absolute minimum that one wants these things to satisfy
S/p satisfies coherent associativity up to A_{p-1} but provably not A_p
I'm genuinely brainrotted at this point
but S/p^2 becomes A_infinity=E_1 and continues to improve for larger powers
Oh weird. Isn't A_infty the same as being a loop space? What's the delooping
lol what is wrong with this
yes in general E_n buys you n-fold deloopings
a lot of important spectra aren't E_\infty just like many important rings that show up classically are not commutative
I am trying to learn Madsen-Tillman spectra
I guess only MTSO(n)
But it's cool, it's fun to unwrap Pontrjagin-Thom and figure out what the homotopy groups of these things are
yeah definitely
Am I only allowed to talk Abt math in this channel
I've been trying to understand some of that sort of thing with MGL in the motivic setting lately
usually when working with motives one is thinking about algebraic cycles, as classes in integral motivic cohomology (or rational algebraic K-theory if you ignore torsion issues)
but thinking of them in terms of algebraic cobordism cycles sees some torsion information which integral motivic cohomology does not see
what's this channel for?
serious discussion
no duh
Hey nG, hope you are having a great day/night 
I should sleep soon 
Ah, well, hope you rest well then :)
hope you're having a great time Mike, how goes it
I'm good, hbu
Gn
Genuine question : why is
underused in this sever? 
we don't use noggin
hey wanna play lego
lego in question
Hey nD, hope you are having a great day/night 
fun fact, K_0(Var_k) has much less to do with motives and much more to do with 2-motives
I'm still alive but I'm barely breathing
no more lyric posting
if you asked an all knowing orb the probability of a singular event occurring or having occurred would it not be a binary 0% or 100%
Nope.
In theory such an omniscient entity would know everyathing and anything that has happened and will happened and therefore only has 2 answers yes or no (unless they are joking to you)
wouldnt that mean yes
scenario:
agent asks the orb whether it will lift its left arm in the next minute. orb says yes. does the agent have free will? what would the orbs answer be if the agent intends the opposite?
What does it refer to in this context, the agent or the orb?
If "it" means the agent, then if the orb says yes then the agent will lift their hand in the next minute, because the orbs knows it will happen.
If the orb doesnt lie to them that is
agent sorry
orbs dont have arms in this scnario
so free will doesnt exist then unless we restrict the orbs domain
Yes.
Such an orb excludes the existence of free will
Whether it exists idk 
we either restrict its domain or impermanate the agents knowledge
Probably
It is also possible that such an orb can warp reality to suit its predictions
That doesn't necessarily preclude free will, it just means there will be certain predetermined outcomes
Reminds me of the "loom of fate" trope
Check it
For those of you who see no access, ignore it
Basically the same thing is posted in #changelog
@flint fog Under what morality is a god that decides to create sentient creatures with the capacity to suffer morally good?
Linking from the #discussion channel
It is not about morals and values that we understand as to our limits, we don't understand god, if he is all wise then surely what he does is for your good. God have given humans free will through which we choose right or wrong and we would be judged based on that
Sometimes I don't understand why we're still on morals when, by sitting alone and reflecting on yourself, having empathy a bit and look why actions mean something.
People will come to realize good and evil simply just mean whatever that continue at best natural vs. which is so profusely opposing so much so it's unnecessary and damaging for all.
Well, I’m just saying, shouldn’t moral good be determined by reducing suffering?
As opposed to divine will
A system that argues divine will overrides this morality leads to religious wars
Which are harmful to humanity and society
Surely, according to my religion every human is born muslim or in fitrah but is further influenced by his surroundings and God send childrens directly to heaven even if his parents follow other religion
So then I ask? Wouldn’t a god with the power and ability to reduce human suffering be in the moral wrong for not choosing to do so?
rule 1 of religion: ignore contradictions in your teachings
But god doesn't directly interfere in our lives like israel is choosing to bomb Palestine through his will like if I do calculation that two cars in front of me are going to strike each other and the persons in them would die, I know but I don't do anything and same is for god, he have given free will to humans through which they choose right or wrong and they would be judged based on their actions
Therefore giving humans free will is morally wrong
We are left in a situation where we must either accept a god who isn’t omnipotent but good or god who is omnipotent but indifferent (not good or bad) and humans are not his focus, maybe an accident
Yes but we are tested and we would be responsible for our actions
Personally I believe the latter
Like if we follow god sincerely we would be sent to heaven given
Heh? What is this heaven/hell?
Some say emotional state of mind, some say a spiritual place, what is it?
Let’s talk about this after
I want answers that does not rely on any sacred texts but the most fundamental ignition of natural human intuition
Do you still think god is an objective moral good under the principle of reducing human suffering?
Or that god by definition is good, therefore morality is based on the will of god
I would argue that the latter one is a belief that is actively harmful to human society, as it creates moral exceptions for violent actions
The Opener (1:2)
ٱلْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ رَبِّ ٱلْعَـٰلَمِينَ ٢
All praise is for Allah—Lord of all worlds,
The Opener (1:3)
ٱلرَّحْمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ ٣
the Most Compassionate, Most Merciful,
These are some verses from the Qur'an where he specifically speaks about being compassionate and merciful
Regardless, the best way to preserve god’s integrity in my mind is to have humanity be an accident in gods creation, and have him indifferent to humanity
Wait, since when did this channel become religious preaching?
I am talking to another individual
So therefore, you are agreeing with my latter option, that god is by definition good and merciful
About allah being that way?
Also how does the koran define those things?
He is both merciful and just, meaning every person is accountable for his actions and some would be judged based on that while
Idk. Quoting religious books literally doesn't seem very conducive to discussion, more so preaching. Ik about the change. Just wondering what in the preachy hell is going on here.
Ok, this... Who wrote those texts?
Some said God some said human, who?
You see my point, right?
He is merciful as well by forgiving sins
What is sin?
I’m a doubter as well, so I agree, but that is not the topic
They’re discussing religion so quoting is part of the convo in some way
Fair
The Opener (1:4)
مَـٰلِكِ يَوْمِ ٱلدِّينِ ٤
Master of the Day of Judgment.
It's simply humans dude, but they so endowed with experience of beautiful knowledge they picked around they thanked God for it and simplify it as God writing it for them thru their minds or whatever
opposite/hypotenuse 
x - x^3/3! + x^5/5! - ...
Shut up
I did it first.
And in the more based way.

meanie
I was kidding sorry if it didn't come across
I'll sue your Tailor
Sin is something that god have said to be sin like killing a person
Taylor series gonna fry me on the BC exam
(i know twin)
Alright, so gods will defines morality
Bring in needles to threaten the examiner
I don't think I know a single person who managed to get below a 5 on bc
Ordinate of a point on the unit circle. Much more elegant
That is your interpretation
Man if this is so, Gods screwed up
🥸
Power series def is prob my favorite cuz of analysis
You can read Qur'an online, many of your questions would be answered
So God decides sin and forgives it too? Awfully convenient?
@flint fog Is that right?
And it's very elegant to go from power series of e^x all the way to getting a geometric interpretation of pi
I cannot believe words of people who cannot differentiate reality described by texts vs. reality as texts
My goal is not to address the religious text but rather your beliefs
How does God tell us what the sin is and when he/she/they have forgiven us?
My goal is to understand your understanding
What about cos, why only sin?
How do you know that the guy who wrote the damn book was not high on some beautiful drugs or maybe schizo?
I am a muslim, I follow god and his commands
When did he/she/they command you? Show me the evidence
You’re being a little dense bro, chillax a bit
Is his command to be a good person of good communication?
Just cos
You can read Qur'an lol
I get that, but I think there is an uncomfortable truth with that religion
Then you've failed the second part, you must try again
And what is that
In which set?
For I consulted with the God of plants and he answers whether tomato is a vegetable or a fruit. /j
It defines morality via gods will, not reducing human suffering
Why should I read some random dude's hallucinations?
i consider ishowspeed as god because he brings me happiness /j
Therefore you must either accept that it is wrong or that gods will is that people will suffer
Markiplier is my angel bringing his screams to beauty /j
The Cow (2:22)
ٱلَّذِى جَعَلَ لَكُمُ ٱلْأَرْضَ فِرَٰشًۭا وَٱلسَّمَآءَ بِنَآءًۭ وَأَنزَلَ مِنَ ٱلسَّمَآءِ مَآءًۭ فَأَخْرَجَ بِهِۦ مِنَ ٱلثَّمَرَٰتِ رِزْقًۭا لَّكُمْ ۖ فَلَا تَجْعَلُوا۟ لِلَّهِ أَندَادًۭا وَأَنتُمْ تَعْلَمُونَ ٢٢
˹He is the One˺ Who has made the earth a place of settlement for you and the sky a canopy; and sends down rain from the sky, causing fruits to grow as a provision for you. So do not knowingly set up equals to Allah ˹in worship˺.
Which to me appears to be a malevolent god if you will
Y'know if I have to be picky about this, if God really exists, I want him to Idk... Leave us alone.
you are basically telling me that quran lied because precipitation is caused due to temp diff and other factors
I’m arguing that gods decision to make the universe, and creatures who can suffer within it is morally wrong
Why is a he? Have you seen the family jewels? Has anyone? Or maybe a DNA test?
Problem is they wanted God to be all-great all-powerful but ignoring the consequences behind whatever actions of ours we associated in retrospect.
I thought this chat was serious but we're quoting a cow
That is surah's name
Haha, lumped so much it's more a point than a sphere
You're gonna trigger the Hindus next
And who is that?
Nah, we ain't that serious about cows. I just demolished a burger.
It tasted disgusting.
He is from the island 
I don't get it, does God give me a therapy talk face-to-face, clean my house, cook my noodles, do my homework, lecture me how to think better or learn better?
Aah. I would kill (a cow) for a burger
Why can't he do that? I wonder.
You don't need to. There are people who do it for you.
They are called McDonald's
just one?
You can watch this dude's videos, he explains the Qur'an
five guys is too much bro
If we're talking a chain that is
Do you know most of YT is poisoned by chatbot contents?
So, why would this make some one want to read the koran?
The fries and shakes are goated tho
I would rather melt lead and pour it into my eyes. No offense.
Plus I don't wanna be rude but aren't most religious texts just some inspirational quotes?
Like a lot of religions do have this idea.
I'm addressing that person btw
I know.
five guys + a snake? you are a monster man
@flint fog I feel like you haven’t addressed my issue directly. I’m arguing that gods decision to make the universe, and creatures who can suffer within it is morally wrong. Do you agree with this statement? Or do you disagree because morality is gods will and not based on reducing human suffering. I’m asking for YOUR opinion, not your religious text.
A scene from "Mr Robot", season 2, episode 3.
Turn on subtitles (CC).
Writer: Sam Esmail https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Esmail
Transcript:
Is that what God does? He helps?
Tell me, why didn’t God help my innocent friend who died for no reason while the guilty roam free?
Okay, fine. Forget the one-offs.
How about the countless wars d...
Best critique of religion on media in one nice dialogue
No, not 'fuck god' or anything against him, just like, leave him be cuz in the end. Humans do this, create meaning, screw up, blame/thank God.
Not always no.
yes they are made to increase moral of the citizens
Hmmm 'moral of the citizens'
Then Imma just go be monke
Oo oo aa aa what iz moraallss is it banana
No. That's just the punchline of the dialogue. Watch the scene. It's chilling
in china they call it social credits
I disagree
do they have Five Guys in India
well, I guess they have ~750m
xi is pleased
Now that's better!
Time to grind.
With what part and why, explain in detail without quoting?
Ni hao Communism the best!
They do have them in Texas.
communism with STATE CONTROL
They don't. But I lived in Germany for a long time and they have it there.
Doesn't matter, just smile and then your ramen price will drop down
Because God have given us free will, we do good and bad, it is not that god is forcing us
What free will? You're still controlled by economics
If that's the case, God screwed up, nothing good comes from that, will isn't free, and good and bad is simply just better excuse and poor excuse
Vibes in here are awful. Some of yall need to take it elsewhere or act like adults.
No seriously... That would just mean, God screwed up, by whatever definition you associated him with
You can say that but that isn't true
I'm surprised they have it in Germany
it wasn't even that widespread in the US initially
but I guess their rapid expansion was more than I realized
And I’m arguing that decision is morally wrong because he gave us the capacity to suffer. Under a utilitarian morality this is wrong. Do you acknowledge this at least?
I don't care, God doesn't do things humans can do and beyond that, why should I trust him?
You see my point?
Only the major cities in Germany have it, but that's quite a few anyways. And they usually have multiple outlets in these cities.
Also, why are you guys trying to disprove God? That's literally logically the opposite
No, why is he wrong if we do wrong
I’m not
Call me devilish if you must, or pretend to forgive for my ignorance or whatever, but I don't think the God as many defined are as great but neither evil. I think he's just a heck of a celestial irresponsibility.
this feels needlessly combative
Because he gave us the power to do wrong
No, those arguing against you.
do the international Five Guys still do the free peanuts
It is wrong to give a suicidal person a knife, no?
So what do you mean we can do good as well
It is wrong
Maybe I spoke too harshly, I meant to say whatever it is they believe in, it's become more of an excuse as word rather than action to prove it.
Most basic of debates, 2bf.
If humanity is inherently sinful, and will cause suffering, giving us free will is like handing us the knife with which we impale ourselves
Germany, yes.
move to #chill
Idk. Franchising and economics is more serious than the endless religious preaching don't you think?
The act of creating evil is evil itself
We can do good as well
Preaching is why economics keep running elsewhere, beautiful things are continuously built, cuz people got interested and thus value it.
Five Guys marketing and customer service tactics is a serious conversation
and at least it's verifiable
oh. now I get it. you got your politics from Tokyo Ghoul
God didn't create evil, he created humans with the power and understanding to choose what is right and what is wrong
Sure, we can, but no good parent would let their child have the option to harm themselves
But god created everything?
Anyways, the religion conversation is going nowhere and at this point it just sounds like you three trying to dunk on each other for fun.
Or is god not truly omnipotent?
This is not fun..
I'm going to say this is a good time to chill out
What do you mean by evil
Those with the intent to cause others to suffer
why did god give humans the capabilityy to choose what is wrong?
To test humans
Y'know, why not just simply say, God created the Universe, humans explore it, whether good/bad
Then get on with it.
They also have free will
what if god was supposed to vs hacker after all
in the beginning, noob vs pro vs god vs hacker
How's YT shorts nowadays?
Sure, but a truly good omnipotent god wouldn’t allow them to cause harm in the first place
No actually we can use argument from social media influence for serving similar mechanism which religions used to preach
sorry but someone is watching
Because it's not testable.
he created humans by himself, so he should know everything about humans because he is the most intelligent. so what is there to test? if you give something capability to do wrong it will do wrong
God is testing us by giving free will
what is he testing
Cuz see there are people also saying some celebrities/influencers are treated like Gods, you see my point?
It can be whatever figure you want it to be as long as it has anything of basic human need to.. be happy about
So either god is good but not truly omnipotent, or god is omnipotent and therefore at some point did something that wasn’t a moral good
So. We are basically a prototype made by some guy who you claim is perfection in and of itself but still couldn't make the perfect product?
Like following his commands and worshipping him alone
Not some guy
For what purpose?
Then how do you know it's a "He"
like when the prof cancels class for a week to go to Vegas
and assigns optional readings while they're gone
Would be cool film tho, angels lookout for humans like merchandises as some part of celestial quantitative studies of limits of Universe, then executive report to God
To go to either heaven or hell by doing good and by worshipping him we go to heaven
ok and? whats the point? if he made a defective product he should punish himself
Pretty much the content of Elliott's dialogue in Mr. Robot.
Tbh the western idea of god as a sentient being who created humans for questionable reasons like to worship them is kinda cringe. I like the taoist-esque idea of god as just the non-sentient universe/natural order of things that we all should try and follow.
Then hell/heaven is just state of overall success by lumping many 'celestial variables' together
1 heaven -1 hell, vice versa
What do you mean by defective product, are all humans bad?
some are, and he made those few so he should punish himself
So he created humans and then gave them the ability to hurt and feel pain, pleasure, etc… Then is testing them and will condemn some to eternal suffering. How is this morally good if a moral good is to reduce suffering?
Except God doesn't which... Doesn't make you feel like he's irresponsible?
If he exists that way
This place is embarrassing. Please seek employment.
Debatable whether you can call the Taoist thing an idea of God. It seems more spiritual.
We choose right or wrong on earth but on the judgement day he would punish those bad people by sending them to hell
your name is in conflict with your ideology
still waiting for the day to com ebuddy
They are employed, as inspirers/enthusiasts. /j
We were just thinking of Five Guys for the same but one of the folks here didn't like the job talk.
ultraproduct137 has spoken all further discussions will be halted
Full-Time Unpaid Mathcord Interns*
Unlike defective products
---------end of chat ----------
He is not forcing people to do wrong
I'm blaming you when they become missionaries
didnt work
only works if you're dami
What if we give them a goal to resurrect dead people without killing anyone?
Nah. Forever virgins.
They'd go on forever trying it and maybe help discovering weird things along the way
anyways lets talk about human rights problem in chinese autonomous zones
Not that kind of missionary.
I mean I say taoist-esque because I'm directly inspired by the concept of the tao here, altho many sects of taoism do also believe in a panthenon of gods
K? You mentioned drones delivering food, literally?
But he gave them the capacity
Like the uyghurs?
yeah they deliver food to your place using drones
with fiber optic wires, this will prevent jamming
How much more expensive than cost of food itself?
expensive but minus the personnel cost of a deliveryperson
Let me in. This is my neighborhood.
make a drone and replace a deliveryperson for like months? Before it needs repairing
So it doesn't mean that the person can't choose right
When you cannot take the position of a missionary, you must become a missionary.
No ofc minus those cuz it's drone itself, ye?
I wanna know like, % of drone cost relative to food's
look
drone delivers food to your place
its futuristic
Phrasing.
Sure they choose, and if they do they are just as guilty as the god who created them.
the america they dont have that because they struggle with employment so they give freelance deliveryperson job to bike riders
yes, futuristic nice, more efficient, reduce workload, overall cost of investment reduced
in china everyone has a purpose so they make drones to deliver food
People's life is more convenient, they can cut cost off that to do something else, long-term is good
Ok fine, I'll search up myself
But ye, it's okay, futuristic alright
Cuz at first what I meant was, if it's say like 40-60% more expensive than food itself, I might wanna walk around have nice sightseeing experience, buy many things to stock for like weeks in one go rather than... Paying for the drones
Al-Rahman & Al-Rahim — The Most Gracious, the Most Merciful
Al-Malik — The Sovereign/King of all existence
Al-Quddus — The Holy, free from all imperfection
Al-Aziz — The All-Mighty and Almighty
Al-Alim — The All-Knowing (omniscient)
Al-Qadir — The All-Powerful (omnipotent)
Al-Hayy — The Ever-Living, who does not die
Al-Qayyum — The Self-Sustaining, who sustains all creation
Al-Khaliq — The Creator of everything
Al-Razzaq — The Provider of all sustenance
Al-Ghafur — The Most Forgiving
Al-Wadud — The Most Loving
Al-Adl — The Perfectly Just
Some attributes of Allah
Unless they have like ceiling prices where they reduce % additional cost for drones, "buy more and you pay much less per quantity"
I think its time to just let it go @flint fog The convo can barely stay on topic as is
in china its capitalism with state control
K
people make drones in minimum wage to provide for companies
Then no problem
in america they do the same but with 30x prices
I fail to see your point
Im sure it could’ve been a good discussion but it just flopped when randoms jumped in imo
the point is, in china, food are being delivered to your place using drones, with fiber optic wires
You can read the Qur'an, i'm not a scholar
I think this chat went to 5 guys and delivery drones like 10 times already
So not the first time delivery drone's discussed rn?
oh man..
Lowkey prob not
@outer minnow Ok then lemme say one thing, I have no problems with using tech to make people's life more convenient, but if they're gonna still play with currency which people gotta use it to buy basic needs?
Then it's just sacrificing more people for 'greater good long-term' which ofc, cost's gonna reduce since those 'minions' will help build it more.
I don't find this nice.
Then avoid preaching it. If you can't explain it, then you don't know it. If you don't know it, you shouldn't believe it.
That is all, cuz I don't own the system, nor do I even get to 'touch and change' it that easily, so it's just a counter-perspective.
maybe i was wrong
I don't know all things bro
Density at its max
Idk, neither of us own the system.
kind, innocent, right and just
L * W * H
im sorry my discord friend
Why are you apologizing?
I am spherically symmetrical
i will stop talking about drones -- not because you are right but because i am wrong
Then that's your choice
Don't apologize to me
im feeling sorry for you
And neither does a book
Like providing deep explanation and to answer to all question
Even that, keep it to yourself, it's unnecessary to speak out
Have you read it
Anyways, let's see what else to discuss
Like I said. You can't believe what you don't know well enough to explain.
Nope. Never will.
Because I don't need my education on anything that doesn't have a shred of logic or evidence to it.
I know well enough and I have researched to satisfy my curiosity but I am not a scholar that will know all small detail
I did ask him if he's willed to be good and explain well, I told him he failed the latter (explanation) part, look where we are now
Read it then talk
Like I said before, why should I read someone's hallucinations for no reason?
Can you define what you mean by someone's hallucinations
Hm, let's discuss about awareness of living conditions.
@outer minnow Do you like what you eat or your body is tricked to like it?
Who wrote the book?
God
Seriously?
sorry but im not qualified for serious discussions
God sent verses and then the verses were assembled in a book and before that they were memorized
I asked who wrote it
i love that you are trying to hear my opinion -- but this isnt a place to do so
I was gonna say, my answer is, I think it's more towards tricked to like it.
It's the body that metabolize it anyway, for you to (dis)like anything in the first place.
Whether or not you personally prefer anything, especially in spark of the moment, has less to do with how it physically affects you.
That's just the initiation, but the effect itself tied to memory of it, then it's more of the former.
God is the author
people
But he didn't write it
(im just tired of texting if you want to lets just call)
I want to know who is the scribe. Not the author.
He wrote that and you can read it
He did not and history proves you wrong on this count already.
companions of the prophet (are you talking about the quran?)
God sent verses to prophet Muhammad and then his companions memorized it and later they were assembled in a book
after death
How history proves me wrong
How are we supposed to believe God sent the verses? Because Muhammad said so?
Can't call right now, thx tho
mhm
You yourself have said it now. The very human companions wrote the book
Yes, Muhammad(SAW) was truthful and even non muslims of that time acknowledged it
HOLY SHIT this is still going on
Wanna try playing Devil's Advocate?
im good vro
kk lel
They only memorized them and later it was assembled, the verse were sent by God so what's wrong
One of my pals said something like: "Gods taught humans, and humans write them"
Acknowledgement doesn't mean fact. I can pay someone to acknowledge that I'm the new prophet.
thats what muslims believe
Muhammad SAW was not rich
how can you trust muhammad maybe he trained to look truthful
I never asked who sent it. I only asked who wrote it.
So the question is, who are these "Gods?"
All people of that time said it
Let's start basic
the same can be said about anly early scholar
What did he SEE
yeah how can you say that these people were not tricked by him
Agreed. Pretty much why the academic publication system is flawed too.
SAW short for salllalahu alaihi wasallam
The more this longs the more it seems like human nature of wanting to preserve history
All people? Are you sure?
peace be upon him right?
How can they be tricked if he was truthful
how are you assuming that hes truthful? he might have tricked you too
Yes people of his tribe and near the tribe, even those who were non muslim
That is fine, but one must be aware is it not necessarily correct, if failing to accept this then there's no line between fantasy or reality
The Zoroastrians of Persia? The Vedic ppl of India? The Jews and the Christians and the polytheistic Vikings? All of them?
Can you all read Qur'an and then talk
not every one - he had many enemies
how can quran be truthful?
No, even his enemies never said that he was liar
they did- his uncle for example
Btw, just curious, do you believe the innate power of natural human intuition, at its deepest fundamental level, is enough to gain much wisdom as Qur'ans, Bibles or any sacred texts intended to mediate?
If you find any contradiction then we will talk
NO
he disagreed with islam and his nephew
No
right
This brings me back to the same question once again. Why should I read one man's hallucinations written down by his friends to scam ppl?
correct me please
you gave the contradiction yourself by saying god created rain which he didnt its a proccess called precipitation
I see. Then my "God" is different from yours.
Have you read it
You tell me why I should
no one is forcing islamic theology onto you
and they shouldnt
You are saying that the book is hallucinations then prove it
You're saying God told it to Muhammad. Burden of Proof is on you.
Ok see, religions can sometimes overstate presence of reality, but we shouldn't dismiss it entirely, it comes from human anyway so in a way the idea is the burden of understanding
If you can't prove them don't say that those are hallucinations
Simple fact of the matter is nobody has seen or heard from this so called God other than one person
@flint fog no comment?
Cuz how to even prove what nobody can't understand correctly yet?
are you in any way religious? (if you don't mind me asking)
Reality created by this, owned by that, must be like this, defined this way, blah blah, etc.
Find the contradictions or hallucinations as you say
If you're comfortable with it, fine, no problem, but there shouldn't be dismissal
Absolutely not. Staunchly irreligious and atheist. Agnostic on the position of God's existence tho.
After reading it
Or y'know why not just argue from perspectives of vibes and emotional interconnectedness
Ok, i'm now going to study
Humans already like socializing want to be a part of some club
Or cult or community, whatever you call it
I was raised religious tho. Across multiple ones tbf. I went to a convent school. My mother is a strongly devout Hindu follower of Shaktiism.
@flint fog contradictions
Sun physically setting in a muddy spring (Q 18:86) – contradicts astronomy that the Sun does not “enter” a pool but moves in orbit.
Sun “going to a resting place” (Q 36:38) – clashes with modern knowledge that the Sun has no fixed “resting” location on Earth.
Everything created in pairs (Q 51:49) – ignores asexual organisms and many life forms that do not fit “male–female” pairing.
Ants “speaking” clearly (Q 27:18–19) – conflicts with biology showing ants communicate mainly by pheromones, not human‑like speech.
Mountains as “pegs” stabilizing Earth (e.g., Q 78:6–7) – disputed in light of plate tectonics, where mountains are by‑products of movement, not literal anchors.
Creation order: Earth vs. heavens – some verses imply Earth was created before heavens (Q 2:29), others imply the reverse (Q 41:9–12), which critics see as conflicting cosmology.
Understanding of embryology – critics argue some descriptions oversimplify or misplace stages compared to modern embryology.
Claiming humans cannot pierce the “firmament” (Q 55:33) – seen as contradicting space travel and modern rocketry if taken as a physical barrier.
Context baby
I personally disagree with the content presented within it, even just from the quotes you have sent. But my beliefs are irrelevant to my attempts to understand how you create a worldview that does not suffer from the contradictions I see in it.
the translation isn't the same as the original script however.
Though if you think about it, if a person really has to believe in something, doesn't that tell about whatever that person is escaping from?
Yall talking about Holy Quran?
Arabic is very complicated
Yh
Study the Quran. Better for you.
mhm
I have already studied it
Study it more. We need more ppl like you lol
You acn't just throw random bunch of links
Agreed
i dont own an quran gng open it and check
Arabic is the hardest langage if u put 1 dot above a letter it will change the whole meaning but somehow it never changed
The only sensible thing he's said so far tbf.
I have studied it man
I'm curious, what is that one major thing you find people misinterpret a lot off Qur'an when it's supposed to mean otherwise?
not really
well do those contradictions sound familiar
Too many dialects too.
Sun setting in muddy spring, when it is talking about dhulqarnain's perspective like we say that sun is setting but it doesn't actually sets
I studied arabic i mean it has hundereds of accents for each country that people barely even understand and formal
the tenses also mess with translation, however.
Like syrian people dont understand algerian
Just the feeling as if there is a sunset?
I need yes/no
youre saying all the ones i sent are from translations?
its a poetic lang and book.
Yes
nope
Ye that's what I'm getting at
Its not poetic lang
Since it's poetic like form of art, most of you guys shouldn't argue it from rational standpoint but interpretive form of wording
Tied to experiences mostly orienting over joy and suffering
It is
early arabic is , in the quran
man they will do anything but admit that religion is flawed but ignore it
thats what makes it hard to comprehend
Its writen in the Quran like that arabic is rich so it can be used in anything even poems i think
True
I think the feeling is more like 'it's just art, why ask so much about it'
Please. Go read some Urdu
Like quran focuses on the ryhme and on the deep meaning
You can't just throw a random bunch of Verses our of context and say that the religion is flawed
Or French
yeah its just "art" that has a direct effect on war and numerous lives
French is nothing to arabic i studied french and no
It is in Arabic
All religions are flawed. The very idea of religion is.
Bruh what?
arguably. but so is life.
Read the Qur'an then prove it wrong by just saying you can't prove anything
Unfortunately ye, can't ignore that either, though on the bright side most of that is due to irresponsible unchecked desires.
So, being controllable materialistically, here Internet with nowadays 'keyboard wars' help buy time against real nuking shooting wars.
Exactly why you shouldn't dogmatise how to live it.
how else do i prove the flaws? study arabic and then study quran raw put multiple years into it?
Grudge remains but it won't grow any further, I hope
All of the verses that you have provided can be proved wrong but I don't have much time
Study a little about this thing called Burden of Proof. Maybe some statistics as well. Also logic and empirical evidence! Then come say the same thing using the stuff above.
Hm okay, one more thing I wanna try..
I can tell u guy some crazy verses if u want in meaning or ryhme
You can seriously study the Qur'an and search about those contradictions as you say on yt
how else do you prove a "factual statement" wrong? without playing around with the wording and justify it someway
you have to for a lang without word-word crossovers, I guess, to defend a point.
Provide an irrefutable counter example
Arabic is complicated, some of the verses that you have provided can be proved wrong by just reading the previous one or the context
Ok I'm now going to study lol
Ur knowledge student?
One more question. @flint fog Supposed Qur'an contains much inspirational art ascribing off beauty in this reality (like for any sacred text by their linguistic interpretations respectively), would astrology have shown much strength in its relation for predicting social behaviors through gaits & moods, all of which both depend on (thus shaped by) human perception anyway and shouldn't be dismissive against another in belief systems?
no i dont get it how am i supposed to give you guys an arabic statement without studying arabic? if i gave you a translation you will say its obviously false
I can't believe this is even a discussion on a server associated to a subject whose basis lies in logic and power lies in its rigorous use.
Damn my goal was just to show that god does not follow a utilitarian moral scheme.
Can I send some beautiful Qur'anic verses if you want
quran says ants can speak? is that true @tall marsh
No, not asking for verses, just wanna know, if sacred texts like Qur'an is much valued as a form of art, can astrology be as much value for its tact? When both involve believing anyway.
"And We have already created man and know what his soul whispers to him, and We are closer to him than his jugular vein." — (Surah Qaf 50:16)
I mean they communicate
"Did you think that We created you without purpose, and that you would not be returned to Us?" — (Surah Al-Muminun
"Say: O My servants who have transgressed against themselves — do not despair of the mercy of Allah. Indeed, Allah forgives all sins. Indeed, it is He who is the Forgiving, the Merciful." — (Surah Az-Zumar 39:53)
The questions remained unanswered...
But I have an answer of my own, I wanna hear your thoughts.
"Then which of the favors of your Lord would you deny?" — (Surah Ar-Rahman 55:13)
Bruh there countless quran verses saying stuff that are still being discovered and i even remmeber some that was discovered today
Like in 2026
"And they ask you about the soul. Say: The soul is of the affair of my Lord. And you have not been given of knowledge except a little." — (Surah Al-Isra 17:85)
"Verily, in the remembrance of Allah do hearts find rest." — (Surah Ar-Ra'd 13:28)
Alright, let’s start over, who here agrees that the morality of an action should be determined by its ability to reduce human suffering and that not taking an action is an action itself?
What about 2:191?
"Do they not look at the sky above them — how We have built it and adorned it, and there are no rifts in it?" — (Surah Qaf
"Indeed, in the creation of the heavens and the earth and the alternation of night and day are signs for people of understanding." — (Surah Al-Imran 3:190)
Or I can make a quote of my own, see:
"Countless lives sacrificed to no end, yet for neither both men nor women must engage, they as mortals prevail to rule by the force of their mind, so against the nature mother Earth cries until truths no longer denied."
can you explain this? "we" have built the sky?
God isn't male, or female, and is often we or he in the Qur'an
We by majestic we or royal we
i meant building the sky, how can you build the sky
what about 2:190?
"And it is He who sends the winds as good tidings before His mercy, until when they have carried heavy clouds, We drive them to a dead land and We send down rain therein." — (Surah Al-Araf 7:57)
Bruh fun fact that when u here qursn in english it doesnt show the real feeling cuz it misses the ryhme it misses everything cuz quran is written in a averyyyyyyy spfic way that people couldnt write in altho it holds such insane meening and scientific information while keeping up with ryhme with how hard it is to keep track of arabic langauge its like yk how when u write a poem in english its hard to keep up in the meening but what if in the hardest langaugd what if it has meening that no world has that is used to find modern science and predicts future
True
apparently it has "قَالَتْ نَمْلَةٌ" meaning the ants "Spoke" as in using language
what about "building" the sky
It even said that each human has a print in his finger that was different and this was discovered in the 19th centr by a german scientist
"Do the disbelievers not see that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, then We separated them?" — (Surah Al-Anbiya 21:30)
Scientists discovered the Big Bang theory only in the 20th century
"And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed We are its expander." — (Surah Adh-Dhariyat 51:47)
The expansion of the universe was only confirmed by Edwin Hubble in 1929.
under a utilitarian moral scheme god is not universally good
Also in surah rahman there that sea and ocean dont combine which was also discovered lately
"And We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?" — (Surah Al-Anbiya 21:30)
Modern biology confirms that all life is water-based and life likely originated in water.
"We created man from an extract of clay. Then We made him a drop of fluid in a safe lodging. Then We made the drop into a clinging clot, then We made the clot into a lump of flesh, then We made the lump into bones, then We covered the bones with flesh, then We produced him as another creature." — (Surah Al-Muminun 23:12-14)
This remarkably mirrors the stages of embryonic development discovered by modern science.
"He released the two seas meeting together. Between them is a barrier which they do not transgress." — (Surah Ar-Rahman 55:19-20)
Oceanographers have discovered that where two seas meet, there is a physical barrier — each sea maintains its own temperature, salinity and density.
There is stillll muchhhhh moree
"Or like darknesses within a deep sea — covered by waves, above which are waves, above which are clouds. Darknesses, some of them upon others. When one puts out his hand, he can hardly see it." — (Surah An-Nur 24:40)
Deep sea darkness and internal waves were only discovered with modern submarine technology.
Whenever we choose quotes we are cherry picking guys
you can also interpret thatall embryonic development starts from clay which is false
Can we just stop
"And We made the sky a protected ceiling, yet they turn away from its signs." — (Surah Al-Anbiya 21:32)
The atmosphere protects earth from harmful radiation, meteors and extreme temperatures — something science confirmed much later.
@flint fog Welp... I did not ask for your verses, yet you send them anyway, so here is how I interpret your answer to my question:
"Figment of our minds are as light as feather and as thin as films, playing like theatre so clouded in fumes of make-believe, for more the Archeons will forever cherish the joy much their Nils will succumb to teach the suffering of all."
"And He has set up mountains in the earth so that it does not shake with you." — (Surah An-Nahl 16:15)
Geology confirms that mountains have deep roots that stabilize the earth's crust, like pegs.
Let’s discuss concepts not verses
"It is He who created the night and the day, and the sun and the moon; each floating in an orbit." — (Surah Al-Anbiya 21:33)
The concept of celestial orbits was not properly understood until centuries after the Quran's revelation.
"He causes the night to enter upon the day and causes the day to enter upon the night." — (Surah Fatir 35:13)
The Arabic word used implies a gradual overlapping — consistent with a rotating spherical earth.
if the sky is a "protected ceiling" we cannot just cross it how can you phase through a ceiling
proof is quite loose in a religious convo
"And We sent down iron, in which there is great military might and benefits for the people." — (Surah Al-Hadid 57:25)
The Arabic word "anzalna" means "sent down from above." Modern science confirms that iron on earth came from meteorites and cosmic events — it was not formed on earth itself.
There one about that if u do s good thing you will habe a pattern of feeling and in 2025 physcologists has discovered that this pattern that was mentioned in the quran is correct
true
Ye I put all that into my poem or so-called verse.
"And We send the fertilizing winds, then cause the rain to descend from the sky." — (Surah Al-Hijr 15:22)
The Quran describes winds as fertilizing — modern meteorology confirms that winds carry water particles, causing clouds to form and produce rain.
"Does man think that We will not assemble his bones? Yes. We are able to proportion even his fingertips." — (Surah Al-Qiyamah 75:3-4)
The unique nature of fingerprints was only discovered in the 19th century. The Quran specifically mentions fingertips in the context of precise recreation.
these verses can be interpreted in anyway its very vague and not definitive
How can one seek to teach another beauty if one ignores the mind of another?
No
Bruh they are so definite wth
I’m trying to be a bit more rigorous, this whole discussion is happening because I wanted to argue that god doesn’t follow a utilitarian moral scheme
It litterly says we are closer to the human then his juglar vien
And that ocean and sea dont combine
As if there is a barrier
Can't we simply made our own?
Wnd that we made the human from water
Read all the verses
If we truly yearn them as art, shouldn't we be able to do the same?
no? man made of "clay", sky is a "protected ceiling" (but ofc the ceiling can be crossed hwo convenient)
No, if you read Qur'an in Arabic then you would know that how much complicated it is
How can someone compliment the painting like absolute but has never painted?
Yh clay is made out of water and dirt
DNA is like a clay, in a sense
He doesn't know basic
Not anything about the validity of religion or the validity of utilitarian morals, just showing that they are incompatible by contradiction, in a process like mathematical proof
That is a stretch
i'm aware
"He knows what is within the heavens and earth and knows what you conceal and what you declare. And Allah is Knowing of that within the breasts." — (Surah At-Taghabun 64:4)
Surah Al-Hijr 15:26 & 28: "And indeed, We created man from sounding clay moulded from black mud" and "I am going to create a human being from sounding clay moulded from black mud".
But I don't just read off my poems with intonations nor the visualizations off it, I read it as interconnected mass of human interpretations, down to the figurative bodies of wording and the movements of the mind from the tongue.
Isn't that also complicated?
Man, those verses are not poems
why the word "clay" then? you could also use any other word in place of clay (like dirt or filth or even pigs) and by your logic anything can be true
They are poetic to me
Thing is you dont know how hard it is to write an arabic ryhme to even being able to have such a meaning at the same time
Even when you write poems, those lines are called verses, stacked into paragraphs called stanzas
That is much a fact by the way
At the end of the day the human is made out of clay whatever the word is used and that the thing is true
"So have they not traveled through the earth and have hearts by which to reason and ears by which to hear? For indeed, it is not the eyes that are blind, but blind are the hearts which are within the breasts."
— (Surah Al-Hajj 22:46)
@flint fog There is a reason they are similarly worded
Nd this was written 1400years a go
Humans seek unification to diverse meaning
you are just accepting the wording and interpreting the way its convenient for you then
Brother
Can't you see?
Can you pls watch Arabic 101 on youtube
It litterky said humans are made out clay directly
I didnt change anything
Or understood in any way
No... For my poems mean nothing to you, there is no real meaning to be sought.
Pls man, if you want to understand the Qur'an
you went from clay -> basic particles -> humans
instead of clay -> humans sculpted from clay
Our work is done to send the message now it is your responsibility to research and find the truth
My real purpose is to understand the abstract embodiment of religious texts themselves, not the Qur'an, not the Bible.
The pattern underneath which made those texts sacred
but was there a word 1400 years ago for chemicals or DNA
That is what I seek
And I have it in my mind
But I just need to confirm
And now you did help me confirm
You are on the path of truth
How is. That that am reading it in a wrong way its litterly written like so
oh damn so humankind should be very advanced by now if islam was so far ahead 1400 years ago
Just check Arabic 101 as he explains Arabic
At the end of the day its correct and predjcts something nobody could which was that humans are mad elht of clay
why so condesending
my bad that was not my intention
I have already reached the truth, but it will not rely on anything ever written off, I value a work much concise, refined, and exact, where natural interconnected meanings manifest as emergent abstract property not by enforcing subjective interpretations
Brother in 2026 till now they are using islam and Quran for science and they actually reached somewhere they dsivocered stuff in 2025 and 2026
Every small detail is for a reason
And there is over 6reads
And there is speed
And there is rules
@flint fog The question is, how far that truth stretches out, that is my next mission.
And sacred texts, whether Bible or Qur'an, is not sufficient for me to fulfill this mission.
Hundereds
But by exploring the limits of human intuition via abstract applications, is.
Such as, studying and doing math
lmk how you intend to fullfil it
Kind of answered it xD
.
"Alhamdulillahi Rabbil Alameen"
Translated as: "All praise be to Allah, Lord of the worlds
"Alhamdulillah" — This single word contains an entire philosophy. "Al" means ALL, "hamd" means praise that is both spoken AND felt internally, given out of love AND reverence simultaneously. English has no single word for this. "Praise" is too shallow.
"Rabb" — Translated as "Lord" but Rabb actually means the One who creates, nurtures, sustains, develops and brings something to its perfection gradually — like a gardener tending a plant from seed to bloom. "Lord" captures none of this.
"Alameen" — Translated as "worlds" but actually means every realm of existence — humans, angels, jinn, animals, dimensions we know and don't know. Far beyond just "worlds."
What if I say, mathematics are a form of poem about the Universe, just more precise and complex?
Its rhythm based on operations that set each apart, and the constituent so numerical and symbolic each wiring our logic together
Al as ALL is a reach-
Would you then value mathematics as much as you value religion?
Oh
In the end we will go back to our god, so we should do good deeds
yup.it is a system of reasoning
Whether or not that is so, one thing is for sure, let me tell you.
We all decide where we belong, whether it's God, Void, Archeon, Nil, vice versa, anything anywhere with anyone
"Ar-Rahman — Allamal Quran"
Translated as: "The Most Merciful — taught the Quran"
"Ar-Rahman" — has no equivalent in any language. It comes from "Rahm" meaning womb — implying a mercy that is warm, enveloping, unconditional and deeply intimate like a mother's womb protecting a child. "Most Merciful" is a pale shadow of this.
"Allama" — translated as "taught" but means to teach with deep, thorough, comprehensive understanding — not just surface instruction. It implies the knowledge was embedded into the very soul.
I believe the most beautiful form of nature need not to be written nor spoken,
it is simply there for you to witness, in silence and tranquility
I am inviting you to read Qur'an
I've read parts which made me feel enough
It's the feeling that matters, for me at least
I don't need anymore than that.
Read till the end
Can you agree on one thing?
Yes feelings are important
Not that, not what I'm exactly getting at
Can you agree that any form of art has no beginning nor end but rather exist as experience cherished, much as felt in complex ways?
My minds won't change, just need a yes/no.
No
I see
yes
Oh! Good timing
I didn't understood it completely
an undestanding of any art form would let you experience any spectrum of emotions
You will, someday
ayo what you doing here lol
Playing Devil's Advocate on religious perspectives xD
Man can you explain in simpler terms pls
Planning on up-lvl math later
lol what
Even with Qur'an, you still seek my truth?
Trust me, it is there somewhere
This is still going on?
playing devil's advocate is generally discouraged
Almost done!
ayo limit yo religious talk lmao, you might get banned
I can understand why, it ends well though, for this.
yes, unfortunately my 23 Yr old friend right there is unemployed
Yeah ::::::(
Gib j*b pls
Quran is the word of god and I don't see anyone more wise than him
Yeah I understand.
hell nah
End of the debate
Prove that it is the word of God my man and then I'll agree and convert to Islam
Bye
Read it
I can't believe you. I'll only believe God, if he dares.
Prove what you are saying.
@restive elbow Ez public relations 101
I’d have a deeper conversation with you but since this is a math server, it’s probably not the right place. For what it’s worth, I’m an atheist
And I'll read it.
lol
I wish. It's been cockamammie for a while
You missed da party
its ok
Man, was never this fun since being a TA
it sometimes bothers me how imprecise the term atheism is
it was like AO3 with less nuance for hours in here





