#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 339 of 1
basketball sucks
Basketball peaked somewhere in the early 20s and currently kind of sucks
But it'll be back
Nah it's still quite good, they just need to enforce the rules better, which will be a short term pain for a long term gain
"every ball has to be on your hand for a fibonacci number of seconds"
Yeah I mean, when you devise a way to count the seconds effectively let us know
I would watch basketball if they did this
It would be genuinely interesting
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
there
Oh you mean like
If i have 3 oranges i have two oranges
I don't understand what you mean then, 0 and 1 are fibonacci numbers
That doesn't change the game at all
wdym
What is "a fibonacci number of seconds"
by my message i meant that an effective way to count the number of seconds is simply to... just count them. 1 second. 2 second
Right but 0 and 1 are fib numbers
So like, 0 is a fibonacci number
I did it i touched the ball for 0 seconds
0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233..
377
510
887
1397
2284
3681

do you have overbites
A barely noticeable one tbh
I didn’t care to fix it cz I didn’t want to wear rubberbands during my braces treatment
I just wanted straight teeth
Why
fair deal
what's wrong with bisexual teeth
Oh its because
I have one mild overbite since d1
and I wore braces when I was 11-12 and I was in my rebellious phase so I threw those off and decided to include the overbite within my appearance
Is it possible to learn this power?
on a scale of 1 to 10, how painful do you think braces are?
I'm so proud of myself for engaging with this content, this feels really good.
it varies a lot
personally i had the entire range
I see
I don't recall any pain issues related to braces
It was annoying to me because it used to get off when I didn't gobble my food carefully
Once I fiddled it with my tongue while I was asleep and it fell on the dirty floor
The end I was done with braces
I'm getting two different answers it's painful and it's not 😭
yeah that's true
Even if I had pain issues idr it's been ten years
that's crazy
Yeah I readily attached overbite to my appearance
It’s painful when you first get them and after you get them tightened
Yeah now i remember
There was something similar
I don’t understand how one would not feel pain the first time getting it because their mouth is not used it
Omg
I got pissed off when they added power chains
Power chains are the worst
😭
Is there any difference between a sequence and a list?
how do you define list?
I'm basically asking how math / CS people define it. I know a sequence is a function with domain N, more or less. A list could be the same thing, or I'm imagining that perhaps CS people define a list in terms of its interface or something like that.
thats what I thought as well
and thanks it did
Are you getting braces soon?
yep
yaay
When you feel pain and don’t want to take a painkiller yet, eat ice cream or swoosh your mouth with cold water
It helps with the pain
its gonna feel like tugging bc it is tugging but you should be fine so long as your orthodontist isnt shit
but remember to be clear and tell people if and when something is wrong
will do
yaay
Near the end of my treatment I broke a bracket and didn’t even realize ☠️
oh
can i get helped
yeah i mean its fine to think of a sequence as a list. just note that sequences can have other sets as domain, but you can worry about that later
I see braces 
its been 4 hours
:>
This
yeah

doing good, hopefully you are too
well I say doing good
kinda caused a mess just a while back over here
I'd rather pay my prof a visit idc if he keeps acting like a bum
Hope you can pull things back to normal flow
I've been decent
that's good to hear
🗣️



Tuff car

Literally my aunt's cat
too cute >.<
She pulls off similar stunts
Car buffet 🗣️
nice 
She's so adorable
unevenly cooked 
a month? how does that even happen?
only by visiting a bisexual dentist
are there monosexual dentists?
if i am a straight dentist, can i become a bisexual dentist?
yes
What arduous training do i have to undergo to become a bisexual dentist?
First you have to go to dentist school 
from ai
Terry Gilliam is a real intelligence
The back alley to get crack
Anyone wanna discuss if cs is cooked? I was planning to go into it during high school but did a complete 180 when ChatGPT was released
i want to discuss nothing less
I mean, there are things I want to discuss less; but this is certainly down there
Here you go, from the horse's mouth: https://chatgpt.com/share/694f0a7f-9078-8011-ba94-96e1b43e14b2
i think the main problem with CS is that its too easy to learn
all you need is a computer
and you could access the content from the best universities in the world for free
is access to information bad for mankind
it wasn't easy when AI wasn't a thing
Sorry the world isn't built around privileged people making money anymore in every domain
This isn't about AI only. More people have access to education now
Historically trade guilds have formed to limit access to information to hold more power
read what they said
I don't think so, mankind clearly doesn't use the information anyway
We've had access to great information on epidemiology and climatology for decades, and look at the past few years
If you phrase it as a problem, I'm going to disagree
ye, really for me, it's figuring out how to utilize it to the greatest extent, the internet has alot to offer, too much honestly
I'm ngl when I first joined cs to learn something but all I got was many ppl are relying on AI code and they weren't doing anything else 
Being able to download courses isn't a problem . And AI doesn't make software engineering easy
gonna respect ppl who graduated before that
people didn't had tools to help them like compilers , stack overflow, syntax checking
before that it was hard
yeah it was hard
also it's reached the point to where most people who enrol are not interested in the topic but do so only because of the high salaries
I remember when I started I didn't know devs made millions I just thought it was interesting
false, the job is microsoft teams and 843287873 meetings a day
J*b
i got started making (terrible) games on my ti-84 lol
You can play games on a TI-84??
people have made DOOM for the TI-84
You can even run the TI-84 on the internet I think.
I want to play games during exams
yes you can! i think there are a few built in games
The TI-84 plus CE?? I hope not
there was the block dude game

I used that calc in physics, and physics bans Internet connecting calculators
😭 😭
Ah online says you need hardware for it to connect to the Internet
Wtf 🥀
Ye
WTF
ChatGPT ☠️
chatgpt on a ti84 is foul
😂
You need hardware for it tho
Yea
me slapping a rpi into the calc
GPT loving freaks are trying to get my calculator banned bro 💔
Wow!
Reverse PolIsh
ChatGPT is bad at math anyway
im sure it can do high school level math
Yea, and if you need it then are you really worthy of graduating with your degree?
And you don't even need it to solve problems, you can just do them yourself.
I’ve seen it fail at algebra several times while using it for calc II questions
No
It said 2/4=1/5
I've seen it fail so many times at basic algebra 1 stuff while I was doing it, to test if it was capable of solving that while I already knew the solution.
It hallucinates answers, it only gives seemingly convincing things, but math isn't like that.
well, i guess everyone uses the free verssion
You can't hallucinate in math, you can only give an exact answer and the answer is either true or false logically.
Plus the version on the computer would be a reduced version
well there's no way they're running any gpt on a ti-84, surely it's over the internet
It is over the internet.
The problem is it’s based on statistics and it’s a LLM, if it sees people completing a problem a certain way that’s wrong, it’ll do it that way
I watched this video a while ago.
Dude just use Wolfram Alpha at that point
I think this is the best comment on the video. If you're willing to tinker with electronics then is it really worth it at that point?
People who cheat should be dropped from college.
genius kids with a special interest in electronics is one of the kind of people that the education system often fails
or something
eh they pay to cheat, then they waste their money
i think my first program on my ti-84 was a quadratic equation program 💀
If you need to cheat to pass an exam, there’s bigger problems at play, you should be given support so that you can learn without the pressures that would cause you to cheat
Cheating is a result of the system
So is using ai
same
I don't know my opinion on this, I think topics revolving around these subjects like AI-usage is sophisticated
I dont have the guts
Swe?
Software engineering
Me neither, and it'd make me not actually learn something.
100% untrue
If I get a job with a false degree, then I'm kinda a fraud.
yo
how do i max my proficiency in academic fields like maths
How so
appreciate your welcome
What about the people who have been doing well way before any AI such as gpt
ofc!
uh, organic chemistry tutor, and repetition?
You'll be a lot slower if you completely avoid ai
Practice practice practice, and learning good
As a rule of thumb i try to use Ai to achieve tasks i can do if given enough time
Practice, learning intuition, and praising our messiahs over at Khan Academy and 3Brown1Blue
Using ai code while not knowing what it does or how it works is bad
learning intuition?
ive heard of many experiences where cs majors use ai to "self learn" and end up having to unlearn and relearn alot of stuff because they learned false intuitions
Agreed
i get the importance of practicing its undeniable and unavoidable but i want to be efficient and be smart with it
Documentation can not be swapped with ai
from what I've seen, people with good git/versioning discipline, who can write tests and generally adopt good programming practices are the ones benefiting the most from AI agent workflows
sometimes AI creates hallucinations/falseinfo
3b1b is generally not a good resource for learning. He does tend to link good resources though
Maybe you can think like a mathematician then?
idek what that means i'm really behind
the idea of the vibe coder who doesn't have any idea about programming is kind of a caricature
You're really behind in your class?
like ofc it happens and it's the worst case
i dont have any abstraction or conception all i've done in maths was whatever my teacher just gives me
but the best case is 
yeah i fell behind in maths and now i'm so behind it's beyond reproach the gap keeps widening i cant even ask for help because of how behind i am
i dont want to give up maths
i also dont got much time either
discipline, consistency and a ton of practice are the only way you will improve
being curious too
i take steroids btw
@static grove Is that a fairy trynna smoke a cigarette btw
Focus on the book for your course! Try to think reasonably about what's going on inside of it.
yes i wish i had a cig that big rn
I would disagree, I think he abstracts ideas from mathematical subjects away from conventional paths, but in doing so he gives intuition, he’s great for learning in conjunction to classes, as in giving the intuition he fills the holes many university level courses often don’t have the time or patience to fill
how does intelligence work in terms of maths
Intelligence is relative to mesure
Knowledge and intuition.
Such as speed of solving a problem?
on its own it doesnt do much. As a supplemental resource, sure
he does give good intuition i agree
where do i begin if i want to self learn mathds
learn how to sit down and read a book
Why not begin with your class right now and master it?
imma block this bepis kid
The stuff that you and your peers are currently learning
Ouch, that's really mean! :<
If I score a 1600 on the SAT, people would call me intelligent, but if I were to get an award for an art piece, people would also call me Intelligent. When you abstract intelligence into objective means, you limit the span of understanding, in my opinion, intelligence is best described as an infinite dimensional quantum state than anything, and your mesure is an operator you apply.
i was kind of hoping you'd break intelligence down into parts and explain how they're important to maths
there's Khan Academy for school maths, Paul's notes for college maths https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu and Hammack's Book of Proof if you want to eventually learn "pure math" or proofs https://richardhammack.github.io/BookOfProof/
these are all good free resources
i appreciate you sending me these resources
Well I would say you want to hear the different skills associated with math:
-interest
-memorization
-reasoning
-more interest
-creativity
-intuition
-being open minded
-EVEN MORE INTREST
Sometimes even an affinity for trains
are u on the spectrum?
memorization 
Wtf
By there being a spectrum it insinuates everyone is on it
Also na, just got a lot of bees in my brain
just a quirky guy
complex valued autism 🗿
Something like that, I just went through High School being called smart but also knowing that I’m just like anyone else. I also saw that when people are called stupid they start calling themselves stupid which makes them afraid to grow and of failure
i think they still use it tbf
this girl got mad at me at clearing her memory
the updated color version anyway
they didn't clear mine, so i was able to use my quadratic equation program 
Were you allowed to use a calculator in your exams?
yep
I got Desmos for the SAT
Ooo
Easy cheatcode 🤭
Also AP Calc and Physics
They allow desmos on them?
Yep
Do they teach anything different? Or is the pursuit only the fact that you get credit in college for already doing it?
Got bored after finishing the math section on the SAT once so I started doing polar coords
yep it's different and probably worse. Ik an American that did AP and he is more competent in calculus
as in investment banking?
no international baccalaureate

it's a bit cracked you get 50% just for writing your name on the paper
How about Khan Academy AP calc?
hmm I didn't watch khan academy ever but I'd say it's solid
I once wished I could make a logic course for khan academy lmao
Oooo are you a teacher?
I wish there was a logic course on Khan Academy :3
I was actually voted in the yearbook to come back and teach at my high school LMAO 🤣
no but a prof is def a dream profession
Hehehe
Yayyyyyy!!!!!! Same!
If I can teach in a really intuitive way, that'd be so awesome.
Like 3 blue 1 brown.
yea those animations are so complex tho
I wonder why professors don't use animations or projectors.
We're in the 21st century.
omg you remind me
we had a teacher for calc 2 that had a really experimental classroom set up, he would use desmos and other visualizations
most didn't like him but I could understand his intent
Niceeeeee
That's really unfortunate :(((
🙁
Realistic goals
Boltzmann constant
yep my fav scientist
literally the most cool and hot
Quite a sad story for such a brilliant man 
yep. it shows people only see your brilliance after you die
the way he went out was heartbreaking, a bit like Gödel
He looks like if my cousin had a beard 
I'm gonna get his hairline in a few years 😤
It's a nice hairline!
Remembered for his hairline most
whose?
My hairline is receding with lots of dandruff.
is it correlation vs causation
why do all the scientists have wacky hairlines
does this mean I also need one
False
No
$t_{n+1} = \operatorname{Trunc}\left(t_{n}-\frac{E\left(t_{n}\right)}{\left(E\left(t_{n} +10^{p_{n}}\right) - E\left(t_{n}\right)\right)10^{p_{n}}}\right) \ $ where $E\left(t\right) = \left|\zeta\left(\frac{1}{2} + it\right)\right|$
If you want to keep chatting over here. I'm up for it, I'm just reading a building tonight for work
So did my operator make sense?
DisOneGuy
Yeah, it looks like decimal bashing, why the trunc?
Yeah, that make some sense.
Jumpscare
And with that operator I can jump at least 9999 decimals if I have at least that mantissa of t
I have only proven a jump of 9999 so won't claim more
I'm still confused what trunc does.
Or what p_{n} is.
But again it does look like decimal bashing or whatever. Which I used for other stuff during my time making physics based games.
[
p_n := \min!\big(k_n + 5,; k_{\max}\big)
]
GrummerPeck
What's kn?
k_n is the number of decimal digits retained in t_n at iteration n.
It defines the resolution of the state and the truncation scale of the operator at that step.
I truncate to keep the operator deterministic and closed.
Truncation keeps each iterate exactly on the decimal lattice defined by the digits I retain.
Rounding would introduce carry-events from unseen digits, changing the trajectory and injecting artificial bias near the sink.
So how is that calculated?
Arb interval math at massive dps
Oh the mantissa length?
Just count how many decimals 🙂
So could I just set k_{n} to be 5 or something?
or like k_{n} = (1,2,5,72,123,...) ?
Like right now k_{n} is just another random seeming operator.
Quite literally a variable you haven't defined.
Yes, k_n can be fixed (e.g. k_n = 5), but then the operator becomes a finite-resolution map on a fixed decimal lattice.
It will still move toward a sink, but it cannot refine the zero beyond that resolution.
Growing k_n is what allows the operator to “lock in” digits and continue converging.
Great so what is k(n) = ?
The mantissa is the Information
🤷♂️ Idk what that means here math wise.
In a slope you can only project as far as your information allows you to project. The mantissa of theT is the information for the slope
Yeah so explain to me in math how I calculate that?
if I have a random t = 23.23438948395793... how do I get that mantissa?
You have to describe all of that.
Let t be a real number written in decimal form
t = a.b1 b2 b3 b4 … ,
where a ∈ ℤ and b_i ∈ {0,…,9}.
If t is stored (or trusted) to k decimal digits, then its mantissa resolution is
10^{-k}.
Equivalently:
k = max { m ∈ ℕ : t is known up to truncation at 10^{-m} }.
The mantissa scale is then
Δt = 10^{-k}.
Applied to your example
t = 23.23438948395793…
If you retain k = 14 digits after the decimal point,
then the mantissa resolution is Δt = 10^{-14}.
Was that mathy enough?
{} is for sets, for functions ().
Also, this feels p-adic like.
is k the number of decimals you have?
If so then that should be the p-adic metric, I think.
Yeah it lets me know you're sort of viewthing this through a p-adic lens. Which is really neat!
And not something I expected.
In number theory, given a prime number p, the p-adic numbers form an extension of the rational numbers that is distinct from the real numbers, though with some similar properties; p-adic numbers can be written in a form similar to (possibly infinite) decimals, but with digits based on a prime number p rather than ten, and extending to the left r...
k is the number of decimal digits retained.
That corresponds to a valuation, not directly to a metric on ℝ.
It's not on R
p-adics are their own thing.
I like the idea, it's really cool here. But you should learn a bit more math.
Thanks to my supporters on Patreon! Get early access to videos and more: https://www.patreon.com/EricRowland
The p-adic numbers are bizarre alternative number systems that are extremely useful in number theory. They arise by changing our notion of what it means for a number to be large. As a real number, 1 billion is huge. But as a 10-adic numb...
I just need a math friend to formalize my work, my strength is software
I mean I get what you're doing, but knowing this stuff will only help you.
But I do know it, computationally and from an engineering standpoint
Lacking math just limits me from explaining it to you
Yeah, so here watch this part:
https://youtu.be/3gyHKCDq1YA?t=210
Thanks to my supporters on Patreon! Get early access to videos and more: https://www.patreon.com/EricRowland
The p-adic numbers are bizarre alternative number systems that are extremely useful in number theory. They arise by changing our notion of what it means for a number to be large. As a real number, 1 billion is huge. But as a 10-adic numb...
My operator lives on a base-10 adic filtration of ℝ; it is adic in structure but not a p-adic field.
Yeah and he goes over the 10-adics in that video.
$\frac{1}{|t_{n}|_{10}}$
either way is what you are doing I think.
10-adic filtration of R??????????????? isn't the ideal just 1 😭
Dude doesn't speak math.
Zeta is prime-generated, but that does not make the state space p-adic.
The primes enter through the definition of E(t)=|ζ(1/2+it)|, i.e. through the Euler product and spectral content.
My state variable t lives in ℝ and is updated on a base-10 resolution lattice by truncation.
So the dynamics are driven by a prime structure (zeta),
while the geometry of the state space is adic-by-resolution (base 10), not p-adic-by-divisibility.
These are orthogonal layers.
$\Delta_{t} = |t_{n}|_{10}$
DisOneGuy
Ultimately it's a linear operator that can jump thousands of decades and land perfectly on the zero. You can honestly call it whatever your want 😉
how is it p-adic??? i guess he is using the decimal expansion only???
p-adic metric.
wow they're all homeomorphic to the cantor set?
what do you mean???? clearly they are working over R or C
Bruh
why should be it a p-adic metric??
Because programmers mix and match the **** out of stuff.
No math person would do that 
Yeah he separated the decimal to be separate from the head.
and the mantisa part of a floating point is very similar to p-adics in this case.
It's actually dense over it from what I remember.
I mixed and matched very little, relying on first principles, no new formula, no weird pde
also, let's say that you get the converging thing and all, what does it prove?
Yeah I can tell.
From ℝ to ℝ, but advancing information (decimal resolution), not position alone.
what does convergence even mean here 😭 like it doesn't converge at 1/2 and you need some complex analysis
that's fine, how is it related to reimann zeta? put t=0 in your case and explain me what does it mean?
The operator is tied to ζ through the energy functional
E(t) = |ζ(1/2 + i t)|.
Setting t = 0 means evaluating the operator at the real point
s = 1/2 on the critical line.
At t = 0:
E(0) = |ζ(1/2)| ≠ 0,
and the local slope E'(0) exists.
So t = 0 is not a fixed point, not a sink, and not special dynamically.
It is simply a valid starting address with finite energy.
Applying the operator at t = 0 means:
“How much positional refinement along the critical line is supported
by the local energy slope at s = 1/2?”
The operator then moves away from t = 0, toward lower-energy regions,
until it encounters a true sink (a zero of ζ).
Thus:
t = 0 is a high-energy, non-attracting point in the same ℝ → ℝ
transport system.
$E\left(t\right) = \left|\zeta\left(\frac{1}{2} + it\right)\right|\$
$E_{L} = E\left(t_{n} + \operatorname{min}\left(|(t_{n} - floor(t_{n}))|{10} + 5\right), k{max}\right)\$
$E_{R} = E\left(t_{n}\right)\cdot\operatorname{min}\left(|(t_{n} - floor(t_{n}))|{10} + 5,k{max}\right)\$
$t_{n+1} = \operatorname{Trunc}\left(t_{n}-\frac{E\left(t_{n}\right)}{E_{L} - E_{R}}\right)$
DisOneGuy
Cool, it should be something like that, but Idk.
I could be writing garbage myself, but this is pretty fun.
[
E(t) = \left|\zeta!\left(\tfrac12 + it\right)\right|
]
[
k_n := \max{k \in \mathbb{N} : t_n \in 10^{-k}\mathbb{Z}}
]
[
\delta_n := 10^{-\min(k_n + c,; k_{\max})}, \qquad c \in \mathbb{N}
]
[
E_L := E(t_n + \delta_n), \qquad
E_R := E(t_n - \delta_n)
]
[
t_{n+1}
= \operatorname{Trunc}!\left(
t_n - \frac{E(t_n)}{E_L - E_R}
\right)
]
GrummerPeck
Yeah, but what is k in this case?
Also \delta_{n} already means something in math.
It's better though.
GrummerPeck
click this on your posts once you've posted it.
That work?
This is a lot better, but still confusing with the \delta_{n} and k_{n} buisness.
decimal bashing like this is a good algo though to use here.
lets say you can evaluate on the z=1/2 line, how will you conclude about the zeroes outside of that line?
I don't think this would help with that really.
But it might, decimal bashing is really powerful of an algo.
I used it to help minimize spherical poles in my Katamari in space game.
And it converges very quickly.
nice!
Yeah!
The tool data violently ends anything not at 1/2
Don't do digits(t_{n}) please to god.
Stop the other made more sense.
You're programmering and it makes no sense.
Okay last try
[
E(t) = \left|\zeta!\left(\tfrac12 + it\right)\right|
]
[
t_n \in 10^{-k_n}\mathbb{Z}
\quad\text{(i.e.\ } t_n \text{ is stored with } k_n \text{ decimals)}
]
[
h_n := 10^{-(k_n + c)}, \qquad c \in \mathbb{N}
]
[
E_L := E(t_n + h_n), \qquad
E_R := E(t_n - h_n)
]
[
t_{n+1}
= \operatorname{Trunc}!\left(
t_n - \frac{E(t_n)}{E_L - E_R}
\right)
]
@junior grove keep this, not the other.
So the latest is good?
That one was good.
[
E(t) = \left|\zeta!\left(\tfrac12 + it\right)\right|
]
[
t_n \in 10^{-k_n}\mathbb{Z}
\quad\text{(i.e.\ } t_n \text{ is stored with } k_n \text{ decimals)}
]
[
h_n := 10^{-(k_n + c)}, \qquad c \in \mathbb{N}
]
[
E_L := E(t_n + h_n), \qquad
E_R := E(t_n - h_n)
]
[
t_{n+1}
= \operatorname{Trunc}!\left(
t_n - \frac{E(t_n)}{E_L - E_R}
\right)
]
DisOneGuy
Was the best one, but I'd change
[
E(t) = \left| \zeta!\left(\tfrac{1}{2} + it \right) \right|
]
[
k_n := \max{ k \in \mathbb{N} : t_n \in 10^{-k}\mathbb{Z} }
]
[
d_n := 10^{-\min(k_n + c,, k_{\max})}, \qquad c \in \mathbb{N}
]
[
E_L := E(t_n + d_n), \qquad
E_R := E(t_n - d_n)
]
[
t_{n+1}
= \operatorname{Trunc}!\left(
t_n - \frac{E(t_n)}{E_L - E_R}
\right)
]
DisOneGuy
because delta looks too much like the kronecker delta.
the k_{n} is still confusing, but better???
K, kept your wording and adding info about trunc
[
E(t) = \left| \zeta!\left(\tfrac{1}{2} + it \right) \right|
]
[
k_n := \max{ k \in \mathbb{N} : t_n \in 10^{-k}\mathbb{Z} }
]
[
d_n := 10^{-\min(k_n + c,, k_{\max})}, \qquad c \in \mathbb{N}
]
[
E_L := E(t_n + d_n), \qquad
E_R := E(t_n - d_n)
]
[
t_{n+1}
= \operatorname{Trunc}{k{n+1}}!\left(
t_n - \frac{E(t_n)}{E_L - E_R}
\right),
\quad\text{where $\operatorname{Trunc}_{m}$ truncates to $m$ decimal places (no rounding).}
]
Like k_{n} isn't really defined still.
GrummerPeck
Also t_{n} isn't really defined.
Killing me smalls
GrummerPeck
[
k_n := \max{ k \in \mathbb{N}, t_n \in \mathbb{R} : \mathbb{Z} \in t_n * 10^{-k} }
]
I'm trying to retreave k.
you also don't need the extra thing for truncate.
[
k_n := \max{ k \in \mathbb{N}, t_n \in \mathbb{R} : \mathbb{Z} \in t_n * 10^{-k} }
]
GrummerPeck
[
E(t) = \left| \zeta!\left(\tfrac{1}{2} + it \right) \right|
]
[
k_n := \max{ k \in \mathbb{N} : t_n \in 10^{-k}\mathbb{Z} }
]
[
d_n := 10^{-\min(k_n + c,, k_{\max})}, \qquad c \in \mathbb{N}
]
[
E_L := E(t_n + d_n), \qquad
E_R := E(t_n - d_n)
]
[
t_{n+1}
= \operatorname{Trunc}!\left(
t_n - \frac{E(t_n)}{E_L - E_R}
\right)
]
GrummerPeck
That's starting to look like something.
See, told you, just need a math friend 🙂
The max for k doesn't make much sense, but maybe it does 🤷♂️
Max is mantissa length-1 or a hard set cap for computing
DisOneGuy
And it works
I think that's the best thing still here.
Yeah it's regression.
but with decimals
Neat.
I don't think this would prove anything.
How far do you truncate down to?
I feel like it would be better expressed over the p-adics.
But, yeah, decimal bashing should have a place in things.
If I get a cap I enforce a 2 decimal truncation rule, but 99.9% of the time it's (mantissa/2)-1 till max step size is reached. Computationally I can only handle about 30k decimals with a max step of 10k
Sorry mantissa -1 no division
You just told me I don't need the trunc stuff! 🙂
It would still work with mantissa-1 it just overshoots a hair more at lower decimal mantissa
Mostly in the lehmer pair at 7005 and mostly on the. 06
idk what that means. 😭
A lehmer pair is a set of zeta zeros that don't conform to normal spacing rules. They are abnormally close together
The first noted and studied pair is at 7005.1 and 7005.06
So, twin prime type stuff?
.06 takes a bit to find is invariant slope, if I truncate more aggressively it smooths out much faster
neat
But it was my understanding no such operator existed that could do this. That's why I was asking in here, because the data I'm seeing is pretty convincing, but it feels a lot like a beautiful mind.
I don't know what the last part means.
But it's cool I guess yeah.
Just something to add to the list of algos I have
The movie. It's about an insane guy that does math by scribbling formulas on his windows. Some of them are profound, some are just insanity. Pretty neat movie. It's a math movie
About John Nash
Sounds like some of the people I know in here 
I mean figuring something out can be like that. I'm glad you found something neat or whatever, cool.
@zealous garden Vector and Geometric Calculus (Geometric Algebra & Calculus) by Alan Macdonald worth it? Or na?
discussion-2, rebellion against discussy when?
Fiscussy 2
Ehh. It's not bad especially if you don't know multivar or vector calc already. If you are wanting to cover manifolds immediately you might want to skip it though
I'd say VAGC is aimed for engineers, physicists, freshman-sophomores
For a more rigorous UG perspective I recommend Michael Taylor's Geometric Calculus book
How's my profle
Wolves
who is this
this is me.
Hey #serious-discussion! If you had to reinvent math, how would you go about it?
no I meant the user
Is that you, John Wayne? Is this me?
by deleting discord and or maybe some other things.
Chong Wang.
wouldnt it be difficult to almost impossible to recreate maths alone?
is that reference to Jackie Chan movie?
Of course, but what are the first steps you might take?
No, Full Metal Jacket.
I love Jackie Chan
Oh cool!
hmmm ig i would like to intervene a little bit here and there in topics which took years to prove and the mathematicians who suggested it were casted out of society like lunatics until their theories were proven correct
Interesting. I was thinking more of a foundational approach to begin with, like maybe if humanities knowledge was erased in-terms of everything that we know in math today.
like every veratasium video i saw has one or more of these mathematicians/physicists who suggested ideas radical for their time and were then deemed as lunatics
Right
i love his videos
Which mathematicians? Other than Cantor none spring to mind
there was one physicist who introduced least action
Sure, but I was asking mathematicians specifically
the person who came up with complex numbers was also ridiculed a lot until Schrödinger came out with his equations
I don't think that's right
Complex numbers were widely used well before Schrodinger
I think any system of thought requires reason to be good. It's unreasonable to label a tree some complex series of letters to refer to it all the time, as in instead of labeling it in English as "tree" you'd label it something really complicated and long.
oh maybe i remember it wrong watched it a while ago
but wasnt there a divide in mathematical community considering wether its something made up or something that hold actual merit?
There was, but not to the extent of people being decried as lunatics; it was more an argument over whether these numbers represent anything meaningful, or whether thay're just a useful fiction
And inded they are just a useful fiction, the same as all other kinds of numbers.
I believe utility is a great factor in determining what math should be made in the event that humanities math knowledge ceases to exist. You won't just create something random, there has to be a purpose like calculating distances between objects and tracking things.
no, long before euler, the complex numbers were already studied without prejudice
oh mb then
The only case I can think of where a mathematician genuinely got ridiculed and harassed for their claims, is Cantor
true, isnt there still a debate going on about imaginary numbers?
Not among serious people
ay I got a career question. I'm about to finish my math BS, didn't get an internship because I instead pursued a research opportunity that didn't pan out. I want a Master's in something and I intend to get an internship. Would a CS MS be a bad option if I got an internship?
elegancy has been a greater factor for more than half a century, and it overshadowed non-elengancy-oriented utility in pure math
oh, ig i have forgotten a lot about those vids, well ig i can rewatch them like i am watching it for the first time
Either way, that's after millennia of pre-existing math knowledge.
You can use math terminology to refer to things and create mathematical statements, such as distance between two objects in the real world being 3 meters apart from each other. This has excellent utility and it is exact.
Can you create a perfectly geometrical sphere in real life? One that is smoother than any physics length that we can use?
No, which is a shame because the Banach-Tarski theorem would solve a lot of scarcity issues
🤭
Is it safe to call Euclidean geometry only theoretical with real life applications?
That's all of mathematics
Mathematics studies abstract objects which are often very useful for modeling real-life phenomena
Yeah
this question has a long and interesting history… for a long time euclidean geometry was thought to be the geometry of physical space, so geometry and physics were often taken to be about the same thing, namely, nature, both being considered just “natural science.” there’s a whole bunch of things that happen in geometry and logic with the foundations of mathematics and the discovery of non-euclidean geometries throughout the 19th century, bu it is really only with poincare around 1900 that the idea that physical space need not be euclidean establishes itself, and is taken up by einstein 
I really appreciate this intricate thoughtful answer! 🩷
Which is weird because we live on a sphere (more or less), and spherical geometry isn't very Euclidean
at least it is locally
i mean, yeah, but the earth’s spherical geometry was understood in terms of the euclidean geometry of the space around it
Fair
Hehe this feels to me similar to how we call Abstract Algebra just Algebra but it gets mixed with normal algebra in high school
@cold needle I sent you songs in DM but don't listen to them if you don't like loud stuff because this is so damn draining. Though the Empath song I feel is really artistic.
I mean, normal algebra is also abstract, since both numbers and variables are abstractions with no direct physical existence
Exactly!!!!!
If there's any lesson, it's that mathematicians don't know how to name stuff.
Actually these songs suck I really don't recommend them, it was an alter of mine that did.
I hate metal.
Metal songs shouldn't exist.
They just hurt the ears
I'm just seeing books to buy and which ones are best to.
I got the springer book I was wanting, so I'm probably good for a while.
Hehe I like to say math is the art of abstraction 😌✨
(Identifying different things as the same via their common proprieties)
@velvet dagger Could you pls dumb down group theory down for me in a couple of sentences
Read lang or D&F
Idk what that abbreviation stands for
I just want a simple definition anyway
You can just look it up
Unless you want more than this
hello
In which case I'm happy to yap
You can talk about it too
Groups act on things and this is why they are important. What i mean by this is that objects have symmetries and we capture these using groups or group actions
For example a square has some symmetries
what is it called?
rigid motions
i forgot
You can rotate the square 90 degrees or 180 or 270 or 360 (same as doing nothing)
ccw i mea
you can also do cw
Reflection across axes also
certain ones of course
you want the square to land on itself after u do one of these moves
But the group that manifests this is the dihedral group
so u can study the symmetries of the square by studying this group
Or the other way around
you can learn about the group by looking at what it acts on
the dihedral group can act on other things too probably
square is natural choice but you can do octagon or other weird things too
idk
uhh i feel like not so compelling
im trying really hard not to hard pivot into rep theory
yeah hosohedra for example
Peak
this is the 6-gonal hosohedron, which has the same symmetries as a hexagon
Are you sure about that?
yes 
Because I’m pretty sure it has twice as many
depends on whether you count reflections or not
So, when we talk about algebraic operations on numbers, eg addition, you are taking two inputs and getting one output, and you have a bunch of properties it satisfies
The subject of abstract algebra says hmm, we can take anything where you start with two inputs, spit out one output, and satisfy some nice properties, and somehow try to study that in an algebraic way.
Some obvious candidates are gonna be adding and multiplying numbers, matrices, functions
But what about if we compose functions? We have f and g and get f(g(x)), and it turns out to share some properties with multiplication.
And it turns out studying composition of functions in this way tells you a ton.
That’s what I want to do so I thought of asking Dami for a dumbed down explanation of group theory
There are two vertices, each with hexagonal symmetry as the stabilizer
One sec, in the store rn and I want to try to grasp this as best as I can with my limited pea sized knowledge so I’ll ask some questions
hey guys im in a year 8 and i have a exam soon and its about midpoint anytips to get a high grade??
I figured out some stuff from my sis since she's studying chem too
I really hate how chemists do symmetry
Okay I'm assuming you guys have done point groups
Take benzene for example
If you look from above you can see that we can rotate this guy 360/6 degrees each time right
For this axis you use C_6 to denote the symmetry from this axis and this matches the math one too
But then the question is, is this the whole thing?
Well no you have more than just C_6
From the picture you can see that we have 6 C2 axes. There's also a horizontal mirror plane and an inversion center
But now the problem and really where was my confusion is all of these symmetries give you D6h for the benzene which reminds me of D_6 from the math version
But they are not quite the same

Anyways if you ignore the point groups and think of the benzene purely as a hexagon then we have use two moves to get the full symmetry of this guy. You want r which is a 60 degree rotation and s which is a reflection
You want to fix an axis and do s
Then you can piece out these 2 moves and see how many different symmetries you get overall
Notice that if you do r 6 times then you land back to the identity so we write r^6= id
Then you also have s^2=id because if you reflect twice it's the same as doing nothing
There's one more non obvious relationship which is that if you relfect then rotate then reflect again it's the same as rotating the other direction. You write it like srs = r^(-1)
From these relationships you can write down the elements and you get id,r,r^2,r^3,r^4,r^5,s,sr,sr^2,sr^3,sr^4,sr^5
That's exactly 12 elements
Btw I encourage you to draw a hexagon cut it out and number the vertices and play around with it
So GT explains the properties an operation satisfiess? Does that mean you’re looking at the "overall result" when you combine things (without worrying about how you got there)?
What springer?
I started reading it and it taught me a lot. Even stuff I saw in LQFT intro books, which I didn't recognize as such until after reading it.
what can you build with it?
I mean cellular automata have a wide number of applications. But for example fluids, dynamics of trees burning, populations are all simulatable with it. Even some basic magnetism and several different finite models are that deal with fields are just statistical CA.
nice
The basic definition yes. It just says hmm, take any set and an operation (which I'll call multiplication) on that set which satisfies a few priorities. Let's try to study all of them kinda in the same breath
Usually in examples, you combine the general stuff of group theory with knowing that example. And you try to understand how different examples play with each other
The idea of starting with a couple of things and put some axioms and play around with structure is moer or less what algebra is about
GT is one way to do this
If your stucture happens to satisfy the group axioms then congratulations you are working with a group now so any general theorem about groups applies
So maybe you can think about a function f and then apply it repeatedly, considering f(x), f(f(x)), and so on
So you can think about it as numbers "acting through this function", so you can combine these two aspects of the situation and get more info, using groups
Also here's a fractal dealing with quad-trees some more, which looks cool. It's made with a\left|z\right|+c and the Julia set makes these circles that divide off into 2's. While the Mandelbrot set sort of looks like a Euclid's Garden.
Oooh...
?
It's pretty.
Yeah, the absolute function is the most simple function I could find that makes fractals. And It happens to talk about my favorite fractal, which was ironic. I don't have a use for it though.
The realization of it being related to Euclid's Garden is recent. And it makes me wonder about it's use for me as a function for calculating that but in n-dimensions easily.
If it is actually Euclid's Garden then it would be immediately useful for me.
It looks like an inverted orchard weirdly. But this is just the iteration values.
This shape and it's circles get warped under powers into mandelbrot like structures. It's interesting.
Are these priorities what Deltoid describes
Also, last post this is what the powers start to look like as it limits towards 1.
They remind me of these.
Idk the relation if any.
Are the group axioms what Dami was referring to earlier when he said "Some obvious candidates are gonna be adding and multiplying numbers, matrices, functions"
i do not think we as a society give "middle ground is for people who think they're enlightened" thinking remotely the hate it deserves
There are people who think they're superior for finding a middle ground?
sure there are
those are the operations that can fulfill group axioms
addition fulfills properties, it is not a property
That's peculiar to me because afaik I haven't had an interaction with anyone who embodied that
Huh, weird
"yeah its necessary for me to drive polarization by making assumptions about other people's personality... why... well of a little something called 'the middle ground fallacy', im sure you can look it up"
Ohh I see
my dad actually uses "the truth probably lies somewhere in the middle" reasoning a lot, its almost certainly rationalization for stuff he already believes
I've definitely had interactions where they assumed a compromise was always best (but not with someone who felt superior)
i don't like the use of the word "compromise" even lol
This can suck. The middle option isn’t always the best answer 😭
it suggests there's some virtue to believing things based off of something else than a best attempt to figure out what the world looks like
I get what you mean about compromise giving the impression that settling is better than figuring out what’s true. But I’d say compromise can be meaningful when no one has all the answers and people need each other to get through life. The issue comes when compromise becomes the default, chosen not because it actually reflects the best understanding, but because it sounds like the "right" or polite choice
If we accept that no one fully knows the world though, doesn’t some middle ground make sense as a practical approach, rather than as a moral obligation?
suppsoe I buy a pizza, and then someone takes it, we clash. And then a third person comes along suggesting to comproimse. The middle ground is I get half my pizza back and the thief gets half. Always blindly going for the middle ground can sometimes reward the bad actors
true. But I’d say compromise can be meaningful when no one has all the answers and people need each other to get through life.
You might or might not be conflating some things here. I'll try to clarify my position. I don't take any issue with the act of compromising itself. There are good and bad ways to go about compromising. I have an issue with the "compromise" being used to describe a sort of reasoning (or more accurately, to mask a lack of reasoning).
If we accept that no one fully knows the world though, doesn’t some middle ground make sense as a practical approach, rather than as a moral obligation?
I think it's a heuristic with surprisingly little use.
a good example of why a blind middle ground approach is bad is to look at Jubilee 
I think you can develop some intuition for which areas are more likely to have a middle ground as more accurate, e.g. it is frequent for two enemy countries to allege false things about the other. but like "if there are multiple extreme positions, the answer is in the middle" is a terrible general heuristic
funnily enough, this convo started with me making fun of people who misuse the middle ground fallacy esque reasoning and ended up with me trying to affirm the middle ground fallacy as a fallacy
sometimes compromise is bad and its better to stick to your guns, and sometimes, in genuinity compromise can work. Mixed bag, especially when considering the intentions of the other person
I now realize these fractals are made by overlapping circles. like taking a wood board and drilling circular holes in it. Then putting another board under it with smaller circles drilled. And the only way to see them is by looking through the big circle. So, the fractal is just made up of circles in circles. And not all combinations of those circles will be visible by looking through the bigger circle.
I sort of wonder now if all of these fractals can be made by this method.
Have you seen matrices?
holy moly
thats so pretty
Yes
For invertible matrices what properties do you know for matrix multiplication?
If X and Y are invertible then their product is also invertible is all I knoww
I'll reply to this tmrw btw
Social battery kind of worn out from thoughtful convos atm 😭 hope you don't mind
Won't be able to give a sufficient reply
Right yeah
Can you do (AB)C = A(BC)?
I don't know this one
It is true yes
Then since we are working with invertible matrices you can always find an A^(-1) that cancels A to get I correct?
What does I represent here again
identity matrix
Yes
alright that's it
"Ts pmo you are too slow"
Invertible matrices are closed (meaning any two invertible matrices when multiplied give you another invertible one), associative, have identity and for every element there is an inverse
-chipotle or something idk
Yeah so these are all the properties for a group
I like invertible matrices because they don't go super crazy with properties and also are an easy example to understand
The integers with addition is also a group but this is a bad example mainly because it has many other properties
people usually give Z as a first example of groups
Deltoid gives GL_n as a first example of groups
I see
You won't get people being like "okay but how do you know we dont need abelian in this context?"
real
Or "why these properties exactly?"
nD has a point
this applies especially if you give Z as the first example of a ring
I mean you don't get that many students asking these deep questions but it's not impossible
what relation do you have with nGroupoid
wow so a ring is PID, UFD, ED and all that?
He's my advisor
"nD"
i see that this spread well huh
This chat was peaceful till you came ...
I Bring chaos
@latent edge this is high quality work fr
Entropy increases
Wbk.
What should I call you deltoid
just that or nD
Doesn't mean the reaction is spontaneous though!
Sometimes you bring nothing to the table..
Jkjk
Achilleus brings aura to the table
i don't think it deserves hate, but i dont think it deserves love either. how about we take the middle ground and feel indifferent about it
nD looks like xD
northDakota as well
my man
Seriously? That's crazy
🥀 🥀 🥀
No lol
ofc seriously
Deltoid is better
GUYS
Not better than me
Deltoid is like one my favorite person in mathcord
forget that
You are my least favorite
higher! is my favorite
im going to see monkeys soon
its SO(n) fr
on the local mountain
I don't like deltoid
Keep that to yourself
@fresh comet I wuv you
it's rotation but det 1
nice
i do not think that you are giving my monkey expedition sufficient respect.
Cohomology.
CHAT IM GOING TO SEE WILD MONKEYS
de Rham cohomology, singular cohomology, simplicial cohomology, cellular cohomology, prismatic cohomology, primitive cohomology, Habiro cohomology, Hodge cohomology, lie group cohomology, group cohomology, lie algebra cohomology, sheaf cohomology, intersection cohomology, étale cohomology, L2 cohomology, adelic cohomology, algebraic de Rham cohomology, absolute prismatic cohomology, Galois cohomology, crystalline cohomology, Cech cohomology, Deligne cohomology, Morse cohomology, Floer cohomology, Bott-Chern cohomology, motivic cohomology, flat cohomology, absolute Hodge cohomology, rigid-analytic de Rham cohomology, Hochschild cohomology, cyclic cohomology, André-Quillen cohomology, Harrison cohomology, periodic cyclic cohomology, Nisnevich cohomology, Chow cohomology, syntomic cohomology, Hyodo-Kato cohomology, log crystalline cohomology, rigid cohomology, Monsky-Washnitzer cohomology, Basic cohomology, Equivariant cohomology, Aeppli cohomology, Dolbeault cohomology
The amt of my friends who msged me "Merry Christmas" when I'm the most nonreligious person ever 😭
wtf is aeppli cohomology
real
I haven't seen any number theorists in discussion
I got pinged in discussy 1 when I removed it from my channel list
maybe because discussion is low quality
Annoying af channel
loool
This CANNOT into a NT talk. Keep it pure.
It is most of the time
I cannot contribute..
Pure motives?
512th root of 1
That channel pisses me off so much
$$
H_A^{p,q}(X)
= \frac{\ker(\partial\bar{\partial} : \Omega^{p,q} \to \Omega^{p+1,q+1})}
{\operatorname{im}(\partial : \Omega^{p-1,q} \to \Omega^{p,q})
- \operatorname{im}(\bar{\partial} : \Omega^{p,q-1} \to \Omega^{p,q})}
$$
Achilleus
so helpful thanks
LMFAO

i was faster than you with the reaction 
Aeppli cohomology measures how badly a complex manifold fails to be Kähler
I got dethroned
Okay if this is true then that makes sense
tfw DG strikes again
ah my bad 
I just saw it as the polite thing to do, despite not being religious myself 
cotopologies.
Noooo this wasn't towards anyone in specific 😭
You're not wrong in doing so
But there's not much to say
You kinda get put in an awk spot
That's exactly the reason I message all of my friends with "merry cohomology" when they sent me this
A friend pinged me saying "MERRY EIDMAS"
okay that's cursed
it's a bit awkward for me too 
Eid Al-Fitr and Eid Al-Adha are two religious holidays celebrated in Islam (I'm not Muslim but my family is)
real
Merry higher! birthday
Oh god my aura made this chat so chaotic
fr
I feel like having your birthday on a holiday is so awkward
It did not lil bro 🥀

@serene vault's birthday is on Christmas 
I want to be the center of attention on my birthday 💔
Happy late birthday
one of my muslim friends has his birthday on xmas, so it kinda works out
Unless Eid is ever suddenly on Christmas day...
Apparently that happened in 2017
yeah it would be again at some point right
i didnt it even tho i am muslim 
i think ramadan is near christmas again this 2026
2027 i should say. ramadan is like feb now i think
It begins mid Feb I think
one piece enters the chat 
you are right depending on what you mean by near
yea shanks is aura so its natural for this to appear 
one piece when two piece walks in
see?
one peak
one peak two peak red peak blue peak
Holy crap lois
it's going to end soon
youve been bugging me for 12 hours
@junior turtle I dropped steins and started watching berserk. Done with season 1 already
I pinged you like thrice in those 12 hours 😭
oda: one piece will end soon
meanwhile one piece is still running after 10 years from this claim
I asked at like 10 AM if we could play tn then asked if you could at 6 PM 💔
did you not like steisn gate?
why tho
I watched it during exams so when I watch it I get reminded of how bad that semester was
must be the case
“one piece will end 5 years from now”
-oda 10 years ago
lmfao
suremark is now 37
-unc 10 years from now
I don't even wanna start one piece, it wouldn't end till my kids graduate
one piece will still probably be going then…
and i highly doubt that it will end in less than 10 years from now
It's ok, I'll give you 🍺 and 🧀 so you can enjoy it
It will never end. Oda will let someone cook if they pass away
thanks
What an attitude..
achilleus are you an AoT fan?
ur welcome
Yes

Be friendly like your cousin amukh
I also had an eren pfp lol
i used to assume achilleus was 15 cuz all he did was post AoT gifs
LMFAO
ofc i didnt know from one of your previous pfps
lmao i was writing that
That was like 5 months ago
I'm searching for this shit
achilleus in my mind was just the eren gif person
Ok wait I regret searching
whats his real age tho
I'm 24
:chad:
NO WHY
IT'S NOT WHAT YOU THINK
the goat
IT'S BC YOU POST SM COOKIES PICS
What then
IT'S making me jealous
Oh my gf made those
OO she knows how to bake
You're the brownian motion person
btw achilleus if you want a nice anime then watch steins gate if you havent watched it yet
I'll try to watch that when I get time 
omg i love steins gate
I'm so tired I can't even type
Go to sleep then bru
you should because otherwise there would be a problem
just leave it as an exercise to the reader to get your point 
i agree
man there are like a bajillion of those aren’t there
Do you self react to your msgs on other platforms too
isnt this the only platform where one can self react
yea
wait no there is also whatsapp, well this one doesnt count fr
You can self react on iPhone text messages
Can you not

