#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 335 of 1
I don't know if you're trying your hardest to engage in faithful debate?
i think
I'm sorry if this is provocative.
Oh I mean I'm for sure not because I usually don't take the other person seriously enough to consider what I'm doing a "debate"
Okay thank you
I figured you'd like it, but it doesn't matter.
help anyone, is it because I stressed too much that I have lot of white hairs
That was the case for me.
I recommend cutting yourself a lot of slack and just relaxing.
Being carefree
im still so young
Stop worrying so much, its ok to worry a little
idk is it because of finals
same i was 8 when i got white hairs
I had it when I was 12
it super hard for some reason
Its ok
It's not easy to just start relaxing, but you should try, for your own health.
Same, but realizing everything is fine helps me a lot
Yeah, in today's world there's so much to worry about
but, that doesn't mean stress is okay
thank you
You're welcome!
That's awesome!
this is wild
yt has been feeding me a lot of videos abt pregnancy and its not good for me 😭
Sorry if me sending this caused anything
nono dw its me who keeps clicking on them 
Why is it not good for u?
Whatever it is though, I hope it gets better ❤️ :((
guh they’re often lovely but also extremely dysphoria inducing
Ah
hi biche
WHAT THE FUUUICK
HOSPITAL FOOD?
NAAAH
WE GET LEFTOVER WAR RATIONS
Hi fiscussy 2
highkirkenuinely i cannot believe the yash x yeet x saini x wb x wb x flux x convergence x mxrgd x measure2 x arjun gc happened @tough stratus
Did tm learn nothing from our session ✌️
tm in big 2026 ✌️
Ts still meta twizzler
WTF IS THIS

Also, if I posted this in the wrong channel, please direct me to the appropriate one please.
if you havent yet, definitely reference khan academy, they have comprehensive lists of topics on all those areas

Hello
I have a problem but not specifificaly in maths
I have bad hand writing and teachers warn me
Maths teacher say he have hard time reading it
Any advices on how to improve handwriting ( in stressful situations)
Try practice your writing when You are relaxed, then slowly speed up
Don't just ramp up so fast
in addition to previous advice try to make the letters of same size with similar gap. You can try 4 liner notebook for that too.
@sonic field @velvet dagger
I always use notebooks with lines
I have this problem also with numbers and symbols
Likely to be cooked
been working on a resource for differential calculus (calc 1), with some linear algebra and animations to illustrate the ideas.
i’m thinking of teaching out of it next time i run a calculus course and would really appreciate any feedback on its clarity and usefulness. here’s the link: https://math-website.pages.dev/
A mathematically honest introduction to differential calculus in the spirit of rigorous mathematics courses. Work in progress—content updated frequently. Part of a planned sequence covering core undergraduate mathematics.
🤣
this is nice but can you add a dark mode 😭
I love the web page design, what font did you use?
the final exam pdf file is broken
Exam cancelled 🥳
I like this btw!
:3
good job
I have nothing in the way of real feedback, but I like this project a lot c:
it's great that you're creating something like this
please continue!
fixed it
working on that
for math: html-math-method: katex,
text: mainfont: "Charter, Bitstream Charter, Cambria, serif"
working on calc 2 at the moment. do you think discussing taylor polynomials as linear combinations of ${ (x-a)^k }{k \in \mathbb{Z}{\ge 0}}$ is justifiable for a calc 2 student, if one frames it in terms of vector spaces, as i did in the calc 1 treatment?
CantorClosure
Omfg.
People who come into my room and leave without shutting the door piss me tf off .
true
Does anyone here want to help me with a Simplex method solver of a 6 unknowns system in an equality like sum(vars times stuff)=constant with inequalities for bounds like 1<=var<=2 or some other constants?
omg same
real
i've added dark mode
Does anyone know alternate interior angles?
Those pissed me tf off because they came back in physics
Oooo
Sorry professor but I don't remember what I learned in geometry 🙏
I don't remember either haha
I'm doing some relatively basic proofs in geometry, and this is really fun!
Heheh
🫶
Do you mean my role?
This is high school geometry on Khan Academy, I think it's worldwide curricula.
What do you want?
Why did you say that?
💔 sorry oomf
Uh
i am very jolly today.
I hope you enjoy math as much as I do, I don't mean this in a bad way
Same
I really love math
are u native english
I'd say so, are you as well?
no
If you mean UK I'm from the USA
Ah, what are you studying?
Right now I'm not studying any math in school, but I'm learning stuff online that I don't know yet, to pre-learn it.
like what
Are you studying calculus?
um, not really rn
Ah
What is that property called when two adjacent angles are suppliment?
Complementary angles.
They add up to 180 degrees
Very good. I'm gonna slap you.
3:
why
Hiiiii Car 🩷
Wrong definition of complimentary angles. Second I was asking the property of parallel lines. Let me correct my statement again.
!bnuuy


Do you mean supplementary angles?
Anyway, hru aurora?
Dry ig, atleast feeling relatively normal today
What is the property called that interior angle sum to 180 on one side of transversal line? I think I'm going to Google it
I'm fine.
Yayyy
What's it called?
Consecutive interior angle.
Interesting, first time I've heard about it
And you're reading parallel lines. Maybe there some other name in your book.
I think I'm supposed to already know this stuff, but I'm not sure.
Go to #math-discussion t I will send image.
Okay
I see now.
Is this a theorem?
Yeah
Oh isn't this normally formatted or proved using the z
Why no parallel indicators tho
Cool!!
I don't know
Yup
What are those? As in the double line to indicate that two lines are parallel?
Ah
What's it called for angles when 2 angles are congruent/equal?
On parallel lines and transversal or something else?
No like this
Two angles are congruent or equal if the measure of their angle is equal. Like angle R and and angle Z are congruent in triangle PQR and XYZ.
Does this mean congruent indicator
Yeah, that means it's given.
I'm teaching these to 9th standard kids.
Nice
Their attention span and focus is very weak. They don't want to study at all.
Yikes
I'm in 9th grade and i feel that too.😭
@fresh comet @velvet dagger 🤞

I just wish D*mi would get this excited about how much I do for him… and maybe be a little more thankful. He’s already pissed tf off that I took away that… um… numbery theory… combinatoricky… math book thing he’s always reading :/
NOT the end of the world that you can't do math for a couple hours 🥀
Yes it is
I neeed my math hit

No!
I'm glad that this youngling isn't addicted to TT, but he needs to take a break from math too!
breaks are good
But I want math to be available whenever I wants
and it is
In my neko head
-Rips math textbook all apart and burns it-
GO AWAY MATH!
I’m gonna rip you apart and burn you!!

Woah there.. Gonna call 911..
NOOO
I’d be cranky without maths too
you should give him an iPad instead, that'll be more beneficial for his development 
LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
No math no yuri and I'd be crashing out
Reject postgrad math, become an iPad kid/adult
Totally worth it, trust

I use my iPad more than my laptop in uni
I only use my computer to open practice problems or for lab
I mean as a writing tool to replace laptops it's great
My ❤️ iPad ❤️
I'm just referencing the iPad kids addiction problem xd
Ik, I hope D*mi can recover
He loves his stardew valley way too much

is there a website where i can spam problems for linear algebra like ixl, khan academy
You can try to think about open ended questions
Not unsolved one but like really hard but doable ones
I've never even played that!
I WASN'T I was doing data science
RIGHTTTT omg I still need to do that
wait
we had a group chat for that many months ago
and then it was left to rot
why'd we never do it 
Tbf we all were very busy
It was during the s*mester
true 
Yeahhhhh
I honestly forgot that GC existed too
the semester's workload just wiped everything from my mind
Nice.
Fr and in the last month I especially said goodbye to everything and told myself I can't take any breaks if I want to be successful 🥀
Can confirm this is false. Give yourself breaks people
Smart peeps I would like to learn how to do ODE's and PDE's but I only know calculus 1 at the moment what other prerequisites do I need ?
Ideally you want to know calculus 2 as well
Calculus 3 too I think if that covers multivariable
That's for ODE
For but PDE it depends on what you want to do
But you can do basic PDEs too after ODEs
Anything more complicated and you need more machinery
ive been on a semester long unintended break, have gotten a lot of much needed sleeping and crying done
also ig some talking with my gp and a psych
Im not sure at the moment they just seem fun to look at , thank you for your help
oop but i should sleep byee
I hope things get better, I am sorry to hear 😭
Taking breaks is definitely important though, need to have a balance of both
You can look at the basics of heat equation
Gn!
im sure they will !
Like the ∂T²/ ∂²t= "other side that I forgot"
del u/del t = delta u
I just looked it up , why such much ?
Mamma mia
Is it tough?
This is what happens to you in physics exams if you don't ever take a break from your studying
(Thank god your two lowest 2 exams are dropped in that class)
Studying the equation dor specific stuff might be fine though
why would you tell yourself that when you know it's not true 
But like in general these things have open problems
Insecurity ig
And an obsession with numbers
My problem is that I'm always on breaks. Currently I'm on break. I don't take breaks between study. I study between breaks.
Yea the heat equation seems alot nicer , I want to know how to do that one , what would I need for that ?
Focus on calculus 2 first
Learn how to integrate things
Also learn series
good grief 
please try to have a healthy mindset with yourself
Cutting back on things that really distract me definitely helped a lot. One of those being Discord
I don't regret cutting Discord completely, but I do regret not giving myself a rest still
If you are always on a break and are trying to study more, you gotta reset your source of dopamine
welcome to the mathcord c: @feral gorge
Dw about it
I learned the hard way
Oh thank you for haveing me
better late than never 
we're happy to have you here c:
enjoy your stay 
You can interpret the equation physically it should be accessible but anything like solving it might not be very accessible with only knowing calculus 1
Currently for me, yes it's discord. I'm getting kind of fomo.
High level of fomo.
I most definitely will (i looked at the diff-geo place earlier, stuff was scary)
But yeah don't get discouraged with prerequisites
Think of it this way: there's tons of math to learn!
FOMO is definitely hard 😭
Whenever I delete it, I end up going back. This was me at first
But I just forced myself to keep it deleted and continue to work on making progress. Seeing the numbers go up kept me motivated
So true always more to find
Brainfart in that last line 😭
Yeah anyways have fun
I just uninstalled on 19th, yesterday used on Android chrome, then today again installed app.
PDEs do come with what I do too
Allright then mentor person (get teacher-ed hehe)
And what do you do ?
Number theory
I left all servers I was chatty in
That sounds like it's just about numbers so it will be kind , but its probly super scary
I like this server.
Lol number theory and kind should not be associated together
I'm not saying you have to leave, but I left the servers I was chatty in to reset my dopamine
Oh....
What does number theory mean
Yup. I think I will uninstall it now again and will wait for next round.
For more context though you are looking at functions f satisfying Delta f = lambda f. Where Delta here is the hyperbolic laplacian
If you've seen eigenvalues before this is very similar
Except instead of vectors you have function
But I have youtube next to the app then.

Let me ask you this first. What comes to mind?
My calculus didn't teach this , uhhh I guess I'll try to start at the calc 1 ?
This server doesn’t really apply tbf bc I left it (and just rejoined now) early in the semester, but there was another server where I was more talkative (@jagged forge hehe..)
No you'd learn this in linear algebra
Look, you really just need to get started
??? Tf is that i thought algebra was done why is there another one
Mamma mia
We did both algebra classes , just call it algebra 3 and let us know it's real
Yeah anyways linear algebra is about vectors and matrices
Algebra is never done
Oh i know those words
Literally an open research topic
Hmmmmm ok
So rejoice!
What is still left ?
Right yeah you might have seen these in a physics class or something
It is when I'm in the room ❤️
Because that shit needs to fucking shut its mouth 🥀
It will always smile upon you with its beauty
Yea that's where the vectors come from
Have a great day then. Bye. Thank you too. Will use discord on pc then. I will not install discord on my phone for next 3 days. Will not use on mobile browser too till that time.
Oh you have every role ever
He paid the owner for those roles
Remember to give yourself breaks tho, good luck on studying!
It sounds like the study of different types of numbers , like complex real irrational transindental and more i don't know of yet
Right yeah since you don't know linear algebra, I also recommend it if you want to look at ODEs and PDEs
hi
Fym "hi"
i just got home after being out with a friend for 8 hours
we walked so much i injured my leg
What..are you srs? Is everything ok?
Ok so the current bucket list for math to learn is
Calc 2,3
Linear algebra
Yeah that's more or less on the right direction (this is doing the heavy lifting)
You can start linear algebra right now
No need to wait for calc 2 or 3
yea im ok, just one of my hip flexor muscles is unhappy
Oh can I? So it is just algebra 3 why did they name it that
Feel better Matt :(
tanks
Dami are you typing my ban message
Idk what you learn in "algebra 3"
no need for the sad face
Idk either but if it has algebra in the name i would assume it's about manipulating things useing identitys I guess this is just all of math but you can understand me right ?
I'm just going to assume this is not university math so maybe precalc or something
Also idk what you'd learn in linear algebra, the other ones also have lines in em what makes this one so special
Well it's the one subject where I'd consider to be incredibly useful to learn regardless of what you do in life
Let him cook
You have me intrigued? How so
He isn't cooking
Hmm what are you into?
Have you done programming before?
Dami here is your daily reminder
Uhh im takeing my second year in it currently so kinda but nothing complex
There's a funny joke: "all math is either linear algebra or combinatorics. If it's linear algebra then you should celebrate otherwise forget about it"
It's somewhat true
So what is this special algebra do tell
Well it's all about vectors, matrices and linear transformations. You can model a lot of things in life with it
Mmm this does seem like it could be useful
Eh there's quite a lot. You saw vectors in physics, as things with magnitude + direction, but also you can think about them as points in many dimensions, or just a list of numbers. Then you have matrices, which are functions on vectors.
This connects to the study of systems of linear equations: you've seen how to solve two equations in two variables using substitution and elimination, but what about any number of equations and any number of variables? What if there's no solution? If there are many solutions, what is the geometry? This is linear algebra
What about solving polynomial equations? Can you have something like the quadratic formula but for bigger polynomials? Turns out, this connects to what you could call "an algebraic study of symmetry", which is the starting point of a subject called abstract algebra. Particularly group theory
What if you want to study equations but ask about solutions which are integers? This is (part of) number theory: if you ask the question of which primes can be written as a sum of two squares (e.g. you can't do it for 3, but 5 = 1^2 + 2^2), this leads you to trying to understand whether a number is "prime" once you look at "complex integers". Studying algebra for these "integer-like systems" guys opens up a whole new subject called ring theory (and module theory), which also teaches you a lot about polynomial algebra
Hmmm, okay wait a second we studied systems of linear equations and individual polynomial equations. What if we study systems of polynomial equations? That's algebraic geometry
OH MY , HOLY
No u
The temptation to edit your username and say "So does yours!"...
Do it
Ah I think i know this first part tho , if you have n equations and each has n variables then you can solve it useing gaussian elimination (I think that's the right term for it)
Oh also I see that "role that does nothing" could I get that one ?
I can give you a list of things:
In games, you often want to rotate stuff but how'd you do this? Matrices.
In physics you often look at things like speed, force and so on. All of these need a notion of "direction" and some quantity to measure "how much." You can use vectors for these.
This is right! Though I will say, even in that case there's a chance you get no solutions or many solutions rather than just one solution
This is true , the questions were very conveniently set up , I was trying to make my own practice problems , did not go well
And there's more you can do than just solving and saying "Okay cool gg", you can look at the geometry underneath as well
Which is a beautiful story
ALLY SHUT UP THERE WAS A DELETED MESSAGE BETWEEN THOSE WITH A REALLY CUTE ANIMAL
LMFAOMOMSHKDFHJFDJHKJFD
Are you an algebra person or is that just a side branch of what you do ?
I'm kind of an algebra person?
Idk I do a lot of things
Or
I should say what I do touches a lot of topics
Bro does combinatorics. Scary chad mathematics
I want to aks what you do but I'm worried I would get another paragraph description
If you look in the search you'll find so many people give so many different answers to what I do
Depending on who you ask I do combinatorics, geometric group theory, analytic number theory, Fourier analysis, quantum dynamics...
Including shit talking me...I've been here for you this whole time SMH
Too late >:)
Well your the one that does the things so your answer is the one that matters
Oh cool beans then
Jk it won't be giga long because the in depth description is very technical. Above was long but surface level
Sorry it's just too much fun
Can you describe a piece of Fourier analysis that you think is useful
I'M SCREENSHOTTING THIS SHIT AND PLOTTING IT AGAINST YOU
Partial differential equations, signal processing
HI SCREENSHOTTING THIS SHIT AND PLOTTING IT AGAINST YOU
I'M DAMI

Signal processing in electrical engineering? Nice
Yup!
I also like transmitting wireless messages
Have a good nap 👋
So, the idea is that you want to study probability. A classic thing people like to say is that it takes 7 shuffles to make a deck of cards "truly random"
Now what could this mean?
Going to get Dami banned from this server.
Woa okay 😀
Yes, backbone of telecomm
@north topaz I see you're in the ibo server did you do IB?
The idea is that, if you shuffle a deck, the probabilities give you some high-dimensional vector. There's one vector that represents a "fully random deck", and the distance between these two vectors is a good measure of how random your shuffle is
Oh... that sounds so interesting, maybe the avg distance from the starting position of each card remains the same after each shuffle after ?
And it turns out when you run the numbers, shuffling 5 times is barely better than shuffling it at once or not at all
But on the 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th shuffles
How long ago did you graduate if you're comfortable saying
Oh I should say I did too
It goes from being almost as far as possible from the "fully random" vector to being almost equal to the fully random vector
2022
So the way you encode this as a vector is a bit sneakier than that, but take it for granted that a shuffle gives you some vector of probabilities, and you can use the distance from a certain vector to study "how random" it is
And then yeah somehow it goes from barely random to almost fully random in a short time window
This is called the cutoff phenomenon. It was discovered in the 80s and was something of a surprise
Is it like a 52 dimensional vector ? How would one point and another look from eachother ?
It uses that kinda algebraic/geometric symmetry subject I alluded to earlier called "group theory"
Traumatic...
How you decide what the vector is sounds hard
Lately people have been studying this for random processes on networks. This uses linear algebra. And it turns out, if you really go deep into things, it turns out to mix a ton of math
Like do you just say what it is based on what spot each card is in ?
Group theory, linear algebra, geometry, even... a kind of version on calculus
So imagine there were only three cards. Card A, B, C
Yes I can imagine this
? 24
If you shuffle a deck completely randomly, then each of the 6 arrangements should be equally likely
3 cards now
So that's the vector (1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/6)
Ohhhhh
So .... it's got alot alot of things
A 52! Dimension vector
Oh nice earlier than me
Maybe if you shuffle it once in a certain weird way, you have a 1/2 chance of ending up with ABC, a 1/3 chance of ending up with BAC, and a 1/6 chance of ending up with CBA
So that's the vector (1/2, 0, 1/3, 0, 0, 1/6)
So the distance between that vector and (1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/6) is how random your shuffle was
Yuuuuuup
Are you graduating next year then(?
yes, but my uni is playing chaos with my degree
so it's an extra semester basically
Real
I'm praying they won't do that to me
Extra year for me 😁
Ugh I'd love to chat more but I have to sleep
I'll make sure to say something when I next see you around
Gn 👋
Is it for an application or just for funsises ?
The specific work I do is more funsies/the applications are to other things in math
Oh nice!
But the overarching umbrella topic does have applications to CS!
Error correction, signal processing, quantum information, and cryptography are maybe one or two degrees of separation away from this
Computer science right , gotta make sure this isn't some abbreviation that can be confused
Yup!
Hmm Allright then
hi, i’m working on a dark mode feature—any suggestions for a color scheme that’s easy on the eyes, readable, and visually appealing? (this is what i've got currently)
ooh youre making a calculus website
Apart from the high contrast in the search bar, I like it and also the low contrast on coloured text
cold colors work well in the background but it's better to use them for purely visual gui features and keep text monochrome
yeah (here it is https://math-website.pages.dev/)
thanks
got rid of the blue on the right:
I really like the themes available on monkeytype.com
You can see the specific colours they use here on their github as css files
and also an explanation for what each colour means here
Each theme has a background colour, main text colour, and one or more secondary colours, which should be enough for the purposes of a mathematics page (at least one hopes)
since when was
given its real name? lmfao
I remember eric or someone saw this and was like "I object to propagating the stereotype that whites guys have hair cuts"
and that was prolly the sillies thing I heard in all of #『meta-discussion』 
Default dark mode for pico css is to me the easiest on the eyes if you want to just throw together something quick and worry about it later.
https://picocss.com/docs/color-schemes
i noticed the same thing recently #discussion message
Math is just a tool to define things as we want/serves us
Time is a measurement of things happening with respect to some frame of reference
Usually an arbitrary one
bonsoir slayla
I hope you're doing well
Hmm
Like, a second is just a thing humanity agreed upon as a useful measurement
,w bonsoir
Still, twice as much time is not an arbitrary thing supposing we work in the same frame
I have a question, if time would be infinite then energy would be infinite right
Supposing you assume the universe also is, yes.
But it doesnt really fall from time bein infinite.
but then, wouldn't time already be infinite? because in 1 second, you can just sort of cut out a lot of models of the reality that has passed (technically infinite)
so wouldn't energy already be infinite because of that?
Not necesarilly, and no, subdividing infinitely a measure doenst make the original amount also infinity
Between 0 and 1 there are infinite numbers, but the range is clearly finite.
yes but that's only mathematically right? in our universe, if we say at 3.01 seconds we have so and so energy, wouldn't energy also be for 3.001 seconds and so and so it will be infinitely present and happening
which system are you talking about?
And again, time doesnt correlate with energy as measures
and when you are talking about "infinite time" I suppose you mean infinite duration?
anyway this
why would energy be infinite if time was infinite then? if energy just wouldn't care and be the same 10N even if time existed, then wouldn't it always be 10N? why would energy be infinite if time was infinity then
The argument you appeal to is like 3000 years old and clearly wrong
10 N is a force
well technically speaking if there was a current energy level of the universe
but it's not energy right
Zeno's Paradox for the nonexistance of motion, aka, a runner is doing an arbitrarily long run, in some amount of time, it covers half the length, in another amount of time, it covers half the length remaining, etc...
uh how about this, the force that comes if you concentrate all the energy of a system into one super 100% efficient hitter that hits another particle with all the energy present (and maybe later the energy would diffuse)
the highest possible force then
He appealed to motion being impossible since there are infinite subdivisions of time in which an event has to happen, aka, nothing can truly moves
My personal opinion is that Zeno's was smoking some primo shit
alright, how did you un appeal his idea then...
the problem is that it supposes that an infinite amount of something is necessarily infinite
which is not the case in modern math
I see
Empirical observation of things moving. Algebraically, the sum of infinite elements isnt necesarilly infinite.
so bigger infinities exist
and different sizes
but here's the thing though
On the topic of energy, if you suppose the Universe is infinite in size and seemingly uniform on the big scale, then energy is also infinite
Since infinite mass, bla bla bla
For us humans the problem is that we recide in a limited region of space
hmm, if universe were to be finite, and time were to be infinite
then
why would energy be infinite
?
but what do you really mean by infinite time
That wouldnt be necesarilly true under our current way of seeing energy
what is the idea behind u concluding that energy is infinite because time is infinite
time passes on indefinitely
without an end
I'm sure mathematicians would have a hard time doing something real and actual like this
that's normal time as far as I'm aware
I see
In fact, we dont quite consider time to have infinitely passed inside our universe, since the big bang works as an initial condition for all we care
how is it that we do not already have an infinite size even though it kinda is limited?
An infinite size and uniform density implies infinite mass. Which we do associate to energy
Its limited for us
We cant reach (much) beyond our observable universe
So we are basically limited to a really small region
Would you guys mind if i asked for some tips?
On what
u said infinite elements won't add up to infinity always (such as the 3 dimensional area graph that forms our observable universe and the small units of space in it)
but how do you know that mass in it is not infinite
for example, if u take an atom
it's kinda small for us
but apply something like a zeno paradox for it
it has a lot of mass seemingly
just small compared to us
Infinite mass would fill completely our finite region
Since that doesnt happen, ergo, there isnt inf. Mass
what?
yes but, how do u suppose we are finite? what if we're just bigger infinities
what on earth am i supposed to refer to you as
Even if you assume that its all concentrated into a single point, that would imply that there is a black hole big enough (infinitely big in fact) to engulph all our observable universe
How to teach yourself math in an optimized and efficient way. I know how ofc, but i'm looking for ways to make it smarter. I figured it out for biology and the sciences-- active recall, memorization, got that aspect all figured out. But I realize I can't do those exact same methods for math, and I only have four weeks to teach myself algebra before i get into a trig class. Time spent studying isn't an issue i'm concerned with.
And evenly distributing it wouldnt help either
I like to think of a thought experiment here, that there's a universe that's soo small that it's practically invisible for us (like really really, if we map the area of it, it would be like not even a dot but soo small compared to an atom)
say if it was in the scale of a quark to our universe size, to it to a quark
but inside it
I mean ok
Start a project that forces you to use what you know or learn new things ig.
I realize math is a lot more practice oriented but i still need to understand the concepts and they're applications. I've been trying to find good ways to mix both and i've seen some videos of people recommending time spent studying theory vs application of the theory
it would just work like our universe
inside it, there would be galaxies and clusters for its own sizes
and earth and towns
but we wouldn't know
neither would they
I'm thinking more stuff like time spent studying theory vs practice then repeat etc
what if, you apply this logic and think that we are way larger than we look
Grab a book and solve the problems on your own(?
but wdym "we are infinite"
isn't true
@flint pulsar read from here
Again im refering you to measure theory
but who is "we"
our current scale
A line (1d object) is infinitely long for a dot (0d object)
And so is a surface (2d) to a line
None of them are infinite as we would normally say it
atoms, humans, earth, solar system, galaxy, super galaxy cluster duper hyper max destoryer 5000, and so on obeservable universe
They just use different measures
I shall do that. I'm literally just inquiring abt study structure tho lol. thx anyways
If youre on a lower level, khan academy is great too
But for more advanced topics youll have to hit the books
I like khan academy for practice but it's very...
slow
with how much information it gives me at a time
do you mean infinite in mass or in size? you need to be more precise
and also I suspect the answer is still: an infinite amount of something is not always infinite
I've been using prof. leonard videos
okay but you aren't actually able to plot a point in our 3 dimensional universe, we have limitations. U wouldn't be able to plot an infinitely thin line too
but then again there's no structure with that just lectures yk
in fact, I'm asking right now, how do you know that you would be able to plot a 3 dimensional space as well
A true line is just a part of our universe that we cant construct but we can define as a tool
(Even though we're in 3 dimension, how do u know we're not infinite)
well how do u define a line?
Like, if i ask you a direction, you clearly wont be thinking of a 3d platform through which ill walk, you just think of a straigh line
That's really rough measurement tho
I'm asking if there exists a possibility for us to define a 2 dimensional line
in our 3 dimensional space
We have defined distance as a measure in meters, which reflects as a real life amount, which is what we use for lines
to me that possibility seems 0 (for a true 2d line)
Lines are 1d btw
2 things:
- infinite in what? you really need to be more precise.
- you need to keep in mind that this is the real world: saying "what is my mass was actually infinite" is meaningless because it would be 1) useless 2) not the case since we define mass to be measurable (thus not infinite)
can I ask what class you are in?
well I know you can do that, but there's also seems to be a physical limitation in our universe.
Imagine, you have 2 particles, in between them u can construct a line as in distance
but
in our 3 dimensional space
you can't really construct an EXACT true line though
that's accurate to the distance
Again, measurements we have dont really reflect into something real. Temperature, distance, time, energy are just a way for us to predict events
that's perfectly precisely 1dimensional
You just can define it as is
You dont have to build the bridge
if there was a true distance between those 2 classical point like particles, our limitations in our 3 dimensional space, would just be so that we can't literally define the line to point blank accuracy
Whats a line (segment) between two atoms? Simply an imaginary connection defined by the position of the two atoms where one points through the shortest distance to the other.
what does that mean? that means we also cannot define ANY line to point blank accuracy
And also, distance also isnt an absolute
Space curves, nothing can be truly defined in position, etc...
well we talk about 3 dimensional space first
and then talk about all the other mad stuff
Here ^
I think you don't get the intuition of what I mean
one sec
If you can define the position of 2 points, somehow, you can define the line
Which in reality we cant even define position
👍
@trail gust are you taking into account things that come with relativistic or quantum effects, or should we use 3d euclidean geometry only?
@shut thunder can u come #help-44|stanley-🌲-v2-dans I can't send pics here
pls answer
I believe that even if you define positions of actual 3 dimensional particles
with point blank accuracy
it isn't possible for you to construct a 1 dimensional/ 2 dimensional
line
If you can numerically define them, then yes, you can numerically define a line.
with point blank accuracy
no I don't think u can
why not: be clear
$pt + q(1-t)$ with $t\in[0,1]$
if u see this picture
*R if you want it to be a line
you see 2 particles
fixed
we have their position perfectly
this is 3 dimension space
now if u see the observer
and in front of what he's looking at
there's a supposed to be, 1 dimensional line
the line exists independantly of whether you look at it
Then yes, there is a definition for the line
Its the collection of all points strictly between them
yeah I'm just making it uh understandable
In euclidian space at least.
right right I don't argue on that
But here's the thing
There isnt anything beyond that definition for a line
This observer
it's independent of whether you can measure it if we're talking strictly about geometry
He tries to narrow his equation
of the line's position
to 100% accuracy
but he just can't
Again, we are talking about geometry, and if we have 2 fixed points in space as point (x,y,z), then theres a strict definition for the segment between them,
Specificly, all the points of this form:
if u take a cuboid instead of the line for visual purposes, in between those particles
for visual purposes
This observer
Has to narrow down infinitely many lines
inside of that cuboid
region
to get the correct true line
it doesn't have to be a cuboid but
there's a region where he has to eliminate other lines
Then youre not defining a line, youre talking of a completely different object defined through a lot more information.
alright let's say you have a line
perfectly
stray
straight*
1 or 2 dimensional line
okay?
and here's my task
place it in 3 dimensional space
and tell me the co ordinates of where it's placed
.
or perhaps, tell me where exactly it's placed
If we assume 3d space is also a collection of infinite points, there are points that are in between the two
And others that arent
The ones that are, define the line, the ones that arent define "not" line
That an object is part of an infinitely small region of a bigger space doesnt stop it from existing in said bigger space.
that's possible in your dreamy paper written 3 dimensional space
if you dont agree with that, then the idea of 2 points also doesnt make sense
3 dimensional space is more complex than what you would think
nah I do agree with that
the problem is
you aren't able to find the centre
You can tho
to map out where the line would lie
oh really
define me a centre
in our 3 dimensional space
I give u nothing
but void
and ur eyes
Again, do we know the two points that delimit the line?
(p+q) / 2 defines the midpoint
Again, if you want to operate under classical rules, then you can define a line in 3d space
Areas too, and volumes
yeah classical rules none of the relativity complexity
(p+q)/2 is just a special case of. pt + q(1-t)
what next, u have a midpoint and 2 points that's perfectly defined (you have a definition of their positions)
Ah special case I see, I see
I have a problem though
I wanna reach the other particle
and I'm at point 1
and I see infinite directions around me
which one do I go?
if u do have a line that's perfectly 1/2 dimensional
You can still choose the one that will define the correct path
u should know which one I should go
In fact, thats what vector substracion does
how do I choose that with this equation?
what does this equation tell me about the direction that I should go from point 1
because I wanna do something called constructing a line
here I'm a one/zero dimensional point that just wants to find it's next true brother
p and q being the points that define the position,
q-p is the direction that indicates the direction of q from p.
If you want it as an angle, you can in fact get it
I don't suppose angles work well in 3 dimensional space do they
Ever heard of polar coordinates?
I see
q-p
Any cartesian space (euclidian geometry) can be described as a length and a set of angles.
If we are in 2d space, you need 1 length and 1 angle.
3d, 1 length, 2 angles, etc.
ah I see, so u give me the direction to go first, and then that direction is like a 2 dimensional plane where u give the me the angle then
alright
And theres a clean transformation between the two
🤔
-5 😁
-5, 0, 0
here's a problem tho
now where exactly is the direction of x axis and y axis
q - p here is 5,0,0, not -5,0,0
x,y,z
ah right well
what about this?
x,y,z is defined in the same space as (5,0,0) and (0,0,0) are
It doesnt really matter
in our 3 dimensional space
(5,0,0) and (0,0,0) are formed by their own orthonormal vectors
it would be -5 if its delta x
In the same measure you define the two points
I see it doesn't? so are u saying that u can't reach the correct destination if there was one, with this equation
How about this, I can deeper my end of the argument
let us say
you don't need to reach the already destined point
u make ur own journey yay
Nope, im saying that it doesnt matter how you define xyz, only that its consistent between the direction vector and the position vectors
now here's the plot twist
when u reach
the next point
at 5,0,0
god knows how much is 1 unit btw
the situation is the same
where is your x axis and y axis and z axis towards
after moving yourself a total distance of 5.
wait u reach the other particle?
Hmm
I thought we were moving point by point here
You dont even need to be able to tell that, if you correctly know the two points, everything between them is properly defined.
biktor
real
really?
are u saying me that
whart are u ltaking tbboutr
you can go to an already destined and positioned point
And yes, you can move an infinite amount of points while apparently moving through a finite distance.
I suppose you're saying me that we can just construct a line between 2 points if we know their positions
but here's the problem
when u wanna contruct a line to the other point
in 3 dimensional space
define "construct"?
what does our equation tell about WHERE the x and y and z axis is
If we are talking about the mathematical object
that point 2
This is quite literally the construction
change any arbitrary amount in the range t, you end up somewhere in between while in the line.
but this only works if u wanna construct ur own random path and ur own random line
I have point 2's position already
Nope, that defines the only line.
there's no "only" line
for point 1 , the x axis can be towards it's right hand side
yes there is. Theres no 2 shortest straight lines between two points
for any other brother of it, x axis can be towards the slanting up right (from its eyes btw) side
If you want a curved line, then you can define it too.
and it won't match
I would talk about this before moving into more complex topics
if p and q are defined correctly for their pov, then the line is also defined correctly.
here u go, how do u know that p and q are "correctly" defined from the point 3's co ordinates
what does the equation tell
in terms of 3 dimensional co ordinates/space
Nothing to tell us, but you asked for the condition where we treat this as an euclidian geometry.
If you cant define the points from their perspective, then you shouldnt be able to definite for us.
If you want a more accertive way anyways
Define the position of 2nd guy as a point too
Welcome to the server @trail gust
Hey twin. 🥹
Are we talking about three dimensional coordinate systems?
doesnt differentiate between euclidian geometry and irl physics
I see, I thought we were having 0,0,0 as co ordinates of every point of its down. didn't realize mathematics was so incapable that it requires a fixed definition for both of the points in one frame of reference for it to actually do anything
You arent at 0,0,0 for me, since im at 0,0,0 from my pov.
the magic of translations
If you want an absolute 0,0,0, define our position with respect to it and also the points
you're at 0,0,0
Then it becomes an universal thing.
I'm at 5,0,0 from u
okay?
I just told u the co ordinates
now throw a ball and hit where I lie
Now..... PROBLEM? YEAH THAT'S RIGHT, you don't know where the x axis is towards
where is it, tell me a bit humanly, is it towards ur right hand or towards your left hand or towards ur right leg
yes I know I'm at 5,0,0
if i want to rotate i can too, (5,0,0) will change and become some other point
but which direction's 5,0,0
5,0,0
I don't think you're getting the idea here
(5,0,0) - (0,0,0) gives me your direction
theres only one direction
do I lie towards your right hand side
If i rotate, then the point will also rotate.
or towards your left leg side
The axis is defined BEFORE you give the position
tell me this
Go look into what a rotation matrix is
If i want to flip 180º around yz, now youre at -5,0,0
From my perspective, the direction vector always precisely tells me where you are
Does he even know what a matrix does
oh I see, knew mathematics was so incapable that it could not even find the axis when a child gives it perfect co ordinates of 2 points
Ok good
Like, if i want i can define x to be exactly where you lie
but the problem in 3d space is, u have many 2 dimensional planes and u don't know which one to pick
It could be y, or z too.
What do you think coordinates are?
how do u know which one to pick?
Whatever you want
And then define the point around the one you chose
Thats why knowing the geometry youre working with is important
I give u 5,0,0 okay? you're at 0,0,0 , but this is 3 dimensional space and the x axis can be towards your right hand side (for human purposes) or towards your left leg side or towards your head side
and no equation tells me which side it would be
and how do I define this "axis" Even if I want to
Gang is not being able to understand how basis vectors work
Ever seen ijk as vectors?
I see
so u can't just know where it would be if I just told u 3 numbers x, y, z
you need to me to tell which direction each would be from ur perspective
how can u tell me then
tell me
Your three numbers lie in the "plane" you already defined.
I give u 5,0,0 but u dont decide where the point would lie
I already have a point fixed
u have to reach that exact point
tell me how do u know
where the point is
right hand side or left hand side or where
I just gave u 3 numbers
5,0,0
Tell me now
can u point out this x axis in terms of which direction it would lie in terms of ur body?
I'm sure it's a kindergarten question
so tell me
Lmao
I already kept the point at left side
and u didn't find it
u said in front of u
I gave u what u wanted, 3 numbers 5,0,0
Then it isnt at (5,0,0) for me
how do YOU decide what is your x axis
you're just a human
Its arbitrary
this isn't actual matter and particle laws
it's not, if someone else tells particle 1 5,0,0 the particle 1 would be in awe to pick a direction
The problem is that you define a point by its coordinates before giving the axis/basis vectors, when the definition of coordinates is precisely "the amount of each unit vectors needed to reconstruct your original point". So the answer is that you cannot find a point given its coordinates without specifying the axis.
Youre the one that said that we define 0,0,0 where i am.
right
I do
I do
but like direction is different mate
No it isnt
u don't know which direction x axis lies
Yeah if you’re at 0,0,0 then for all intents and purposes 5,0,0 and 0,5,0 and 0,0,5 are all the same
you have infinite directions around a point
I don't understand why you don't get my point
how about this
I chose one and you gave me a direction, you dont choose for me what the basis is.
If you dont know the basis, you cant define the point
woah nice discussion
0 clue whats going on
I see
nice pun
"to confuse the enemy, you must confuse yourself"
no but
if u say yourself 5,0,0
what is the basis of where you will define the x axis as
(5,0,0) is 5 in my x, 0 in my y, 0 in my z
As a human, u have bias to say it as "front of me"
but as a particle
what is the basis of which direction it will pick as x axis
if it knows it has to move 5,0,0
I don't involve in anything here
I don't give it anything
It does Self propulsion but where?
If i rotate 90°, then my x and y can switch alligment, and now its 0 in my x, -5 in my y, 0 in my z
u can rotate 90 degrees, but towards which direction? right or left?
u as a human can say right or left
but it as a particle
how would it know
right or left
where does ur equation tell right or left
we're talking about particles here
and u don't have a nice frame work



