#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 312 of 1
Then you don't need different rules each time depending on if it's even or odd. You can apply the same modified function each step
I just don't think there's a way to condense the even step completely down into the odd without putting a conditional on it, which would still make it piecewise just in a different way
I've done kinda already done it though?😅
Oh?
It's a bit complex though. So I can show what I mean by example. Pick a really huge odd number, then apply the steps like 20 times, then give me the first half of the digits in base 3. I can show you that I dont need to know if you took the odd or even steps. (Keep the old number for reference)
1022122112
Reference number (don't peek, you're on the honor system here):
||973485613||
Side note while you're working base 3 is an interesting choice.
Ok, so I'm giving the start of a number
10000111001110...
The above is x numbers above the current number. I'm gonna peak now
(if it's wrong I probably hit a 2 instead of a 3 somewhere lol)
base 3 helps with getting previous numbers in a sequence, and base 2 for how to move forward.
Ahhhh
Sorry if it's slow, I'm doing this by hand. Need to quickly check to see if I can find which node it was exactly.
Hey guys
All good! I'm trying to find the base converter my friend made on desmos
Found it and I immediately saw the odd rule pattern for base 3
I cant find the number you landed on. the number I gave might be higher in the sequence than the one you originally picked.
Think you needed to do a lot more steps 😅
The reference number I gave was supposed be the starting number or after my 20?
Also I'm assuming your goal is base 3 on odds and base 2 on evens? That way it's one cohesive procedure and the piecewise aspect becomes the base conversion?
The starting number is the reference number. Before you apply any steps
Okay then I did that part right at least
I ended on another 9 digit also I gave front 5 in base 3 since that's more than half
Nope. I dont know if the number is even or odd. Switching through bases in my function lets me skip that check. Though the number I end up with could be even or odd, but it doesn't matter because it's the same "node".
Wait, so which number is this the start of?
The end result?
Of which number?
Okay front half of the 20th iteration
The 20th step: 259889290 is 200010000202002021?
I dont see 1022122112 anywhere there... 🤔
Had me confused AF🤣
Wanna try again? But like... 30 steps this time. Or pick any number of steps over 20. Now that we all know how the game works
Nope. Just need that.
Okay
||775468243|| starting number
101011110111 leads to...
10000011100111
Ok, lemme find them.
16 steps down. 552066749 in base 2:
100000111001111101111010111101
Matches my prediction:
10000011100111xxxx
And there's no way I could know whether you applied the even or odd rules or how many. But the pattern still works.
Woah :0
And the coolest thing? Can be done by hand 😁 (Getting the binary numbers that is. I used online converters afterwards to double check)
That's amazing
Glad someone appreciates it. I spent way too much time on collatz😆
The thing is I've gotta see how it melds with what my friend and I have lol
Id rather not completely change but rather try and integrate things together. That way if there's an inconsistency it's either in wrong, the other guys wrong, or we solved the problem. XD
And if there's a bunch of consistencies and connections that leads to new discoveries most of the time
What you guys are working on, is the pattern in the tail end of the number, but you're reliant on whether or not the number is even/odd. So it makes it complex having 2 rules to apply at different stages. I'm trying to find the patterns in the leading digits, which I've shown doesn't matter if it's even/odd, I can apply 1 rule each step
Maybe you'd want to try the same?
Well the lagging digits determine the parity so if you're dealing with leading digits that means parity is going to inherently be meaningless to you
The lagging digits knowledge you have acquired might be beneficial in us figuring out more of the class mappings. Only thing we'll need to do is find a way to start from our seed rather than reach an endpoint
Because all in all the endpoint is the cycle
Yip. Which just makes it so much easier to deal with
There are plenty of such books, although there is a considerable difference between "foundations" and "basics", in the way those words are usually understood :)
I'm not an expert in this area but when I was in grad school I did a reading project with some undergrads from Tomas Jech's Set Theory. It's a bit of a heavy lift at that level, I'll warn you, approaching the difficulty of baby Rudin.
That being said, depending on your interests it may not be so useful to be attached to ZFC as your axiom system. If you're really just interested in how to actually prove things super formally from axioms, you might be interested in the tutorial for Lean, called the Natural Numbers Game, where the interactivity makes it a lot more friendly IMO
EDIT: A probably better textbook rec was given by grass #book-recommendations message
Best case scenario what we do is use the leading method to traverse but use the lagging method as like a broad coordinate system!
If we can find a connection between the two that is
I can show you the connection if you want. DM me
oh then jus (x+1)^2-(3x-5)^2>0?
How is Chaos Theory used in Mathematics?
its not
Bifurcation theory is?
Old topic to my knowledge more physicists and stuff looked at it but there were some mathematicians
Oh cool. Good to know. I was just asking because I remembered that the character Ian Malcolm from Jurassic Park was a Mathematician in the books, and he is famous for bringing up Chaos Theory to the general masses so I was curious about it.
dynamical systems is a topic in math
"chaos theory" is like a dogwhistle for pop sci gone wrong
I mean sure there is that side, but there is some dynamical systems stuff that got that term coined
yeah i think people initially hoped there would be a general theory of "chaos"
but it turns out to be ridiculously hard to say anything in general
I think there was some stuff that emerged as a result
for sure
Ergodicity Theory
Automata stuff
Oh that I did not know
also fractals broadly construed
not ODE in general, that is much older
just saying those are the types of models people were focused on in the last ~third of the 20th century afaik
in dynamical systems in context of "chaos"
I really only know what was covered during my modelling classes
I wish to study more later once I have my own little diff geo framework for it
which I am slowly building
as a unification of certain desperately in need of working and being seen together areas of math 🥐
wot
But this is gonna take a while ;-;
I got projects that have to do with PDE and ODE which I wish to later use as springboards to turn to dynamical systems
but I need to get some diff geo stuff out the way first
in more words than necessary
I am but a pitiful barely grad ;-; I am le study
I am le work
To explain this comment, there are some areas of math I am interested in which are very deeply linked, in some cases the link is explicitly studied and in some cases no.
Which makes me want to study those from my perspective
make a bunch of links between these topics and get translations of various phenomena and this way get a way of talking about a bunch of things in a single 
Here I point to the link between potential theory, laplacians, codifferentials and variational problems
Or dirichlet forms and the above in some other variant
This link is not the only one known to me, and some I only feel exist.

Foxy! 🥐
Hi! 
Higher! 
higher! 
####HIGHER! 

Higher? 
hello! 
Does anyone have a surjection from $\mathbb{R}$ to $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})$? I know that $|\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})| \geq |\mathbb{R}|$ because $\mathbb{R}$ is defined as a subset of $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{Q})$ which is equal in cardinality to $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})$, but I'm having a harder time seeing the other way around.
Heavenly Philosophy
Hi
Try thinking of elements of [0,1] as binary sequences
idk, i can somewhat think of a bijection from $[0,1]$ to $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})$, and $[0,1]$ is homeomorphic to the extended reals
Sapien
Well, that doesn't work because 0.011111... = 0.1000... So, do you represent 1/10 with the set corresponding to {1} or to {2,3,4...}?
If they map to both, then it's not a function.
Hmm
You could say that $f : \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N}) \to \mathbb{R}$ a function that is surjective, but I already know that $|\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})| \geq |\mathbb{R}|$ for the previous reason.
Heavenly Philosophy
It works modulo countably many missing elements but this is ok
Because we can just take these from other places in R
So, we can take $f : \mathbb{R}[0,1]\setminus{\frac{1}{10^{n}} \in \mathbb{Q} : n \in \mathbb{N}} \to \mathbb{R}[0,1]$ as a bijective function?
Heavenly Philosophy
Is R[0,1] supposed to be [0,1] sub R?
The in Q is redundant
Okay.
Well, usually I'm thinking of the axiom schema of specification, so I like to define what it is a subset of.
I mean certainly such a bijection exists but I was more thinking something along the lines of "let f be the map which takes x in [0,1] to the (non-cofinite) corresponding element of P(N), and then enumerate the cofinite elements of P(N) and map Z sub R to those"
Also, the 10 is in binary. I guess you could also replace it with 2.
Actually, this brings up an easy improvement to my original thing
Just do it in ternary and there's no double counting
Okay, so it maps a subset of the reals to the entire powerset of the naturals? Since it's surjective, $|\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})| \leq |\mathbb{R}|$ is true. Thanks!
Heavenly Philosophy
https://longformmath.com/real-analysis-book/real-analysis-hints-and-solutions/ The solution in 2.20 for finding a bijection doesn't work for this reason, which I find kind of annoying.
Niceeeee
Bijection from P(N) to R usually involve writing numbers in base 2
But that doesn't work because 2-adic numbers have 2 writings in base 2
Why
Why world why
Tho you can biject the almost constant sequences in the 2 adic
But like
Not as easy

But the surjection we found along with the fact that technically, $\mathbb{R} \subseteq \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{Q})$ along with the fact that $|\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{Q})| = |\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})|$ , we can get that the cardinalities are equal.
Heavenly Philosophy
man i havent thought of bijection between P(N) and R in so long
The idea i've seen before is that P(N) is bijective with {0,1}^N and those sequence basically write all real numbers in base 2
But it writes the ones with finite expression 2 times
Like 0.11111111...=1.0
It can get really confusing because $\mathbb{Q}$ can mean two different sets, technically. For example, if we construct $\mathbb{Q}$ as $\mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{N}$, then how can it be the case that $\mathbb{N} \subset \mathbb{Q}$?
Heavenly Philosophy
Q isn't exactly Z×N
For this point right here. I am referring to the construction of $\mathbb{R}$ from Dedikind cuts of $\mathbb{Q}$
Heavenly Philosophy
Because 2/1=4/2
Oh right
You did it the hard way
Damn

Yeah, an equivilance relation is defined and all that.
So you construct R on top of proving it is in bijection with P(N)
Which is a lot more work loool
yeah i think you only take the ones with finite expression
No, you only take the ones with infinite expressions
like 0.1 would be allowed but not 0.011111... (actually this doesnt work immediately)
Yes ok
But idk how to biject that with P(N), what i wanted to do is to take them all and biject them the way i said but not the ones with almost constant expressions. The ones left we alternate them in a good way to biject them with the finite expression ones that were all left behind previously
Im just being a 🤓 for no reason here anyway
Well, as long as this original proof works, my curiosity have been resolved.
Finding an explicit bijection would be interesting nevertheless.
Indeed
Meant to reply to that
But ye direct bijections aren't always practical
Iirc it is independent of ZF that R and P(Q) have equal cardinalities, so an explicit bijection shouldn't exist, but I may be misremembering here.
Nevermind, this is in fact something provable in ZF
According to this MO post
Oh i really thought i had a direct bijection there
I was simply wrong
We could both be wrong
Well, since |N| = |Q|, |P(N)| = |P(Q)|. And from that Dedikind Cut construction earlier, R is a subset of P(Q). So, P(N) is at least as big as R.
You have a surjective mapping from real numbers between zero and one that can be represented by 0's and 1's in a base larger than 2 (like base 10) to the powerset of the naturals in that way that we defined earlier. So, since a subset has a surjective mapping to the P(N), R is at least as big as P(N).
Okok
So that's the idea
Do you want more fun exercises about equipotence?
Because you basically just proved it
So, the problem of .1000... = .01111... doesn't matter because we're in a base other than base 2. That means that it's not a supposed bijection anymore, but we weren't looking for that, only a surjection, which we get.
Sure. I was reading Chapter 2 of Real Analysis: A Long-Form Mathematics Textbook earlier, so I was thinking about some of the problems.
It's on cardinalities.
Wait i was trying to think of one that doesn't require much topology
It's not as easy as i thought
Ok i have one
What is the cardinality of $\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{Q}$
almond 🐦
No mb
No ok that's it
That's one i thought about not long ago
It may or may not be hard
@valid hornet idk if you want hints
Maybe you already know it
Uh, I'm not sure what that's referring to. Is it referring to the vector space $\mathbb{R}^{\infty}$?
Heavenly Philosophy
You can't just say that because infinite dimension can come with lany cardinality
But that's not the matter here anyways
Lemme explain
the cardinality of the set of functions f:Q -> R
Ok aristos said it
Oh. I see.
Do you have an intuition on that?
Well, my first thought is that a function is defined as a subset of the cartesian product. That probably is important.
Wym
Well, we can define $f : \mathbb{Q} \to \mathbb{R}$ as a subset of $\mathbb{Q} \times \mathbb{R}$
Heavenly Philosophy
Oh i see
Wow i hadn't thought of that
It's way simpler than my 2 proofs

Wait no
My 1 proof
We can think of $\bigcup \mathbb{R}^\mathbb{Q} = \mathbb{Q} \times \mathbb{R}$.
Heavenly Philosophy

But, some elements are duplicated. So, it might not preserve the cardinality.
Whaaaa
this does not make sense
Um, I mean the union of all of the elements in $\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{Q}$.
Heavenly Philosophy
That's just R^Q lol

No your idea was very good, and imo that's it you've proven it
ah i guess that does work
it’s not
we have the equality because for any (a,b) in Q x R there is some function f: Q -> R with f(a) = b and vice versa
You had it there btw
Almost
i dont really see how writing out this union is helpful though
I think we just need to let philosophy to have some time to think and all
I don't want to spoil them a result

And i think im confusing them more than anything
The cool thing with finding solutions to theses exercises it that they can be so various and original
I live that
You can almost make it an art lol
You what?
Well, there is a mapping from $\mathbb{Q} \times \mathbb{R}$ to $\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{Q}$. In that $(q, r)$ can be represented by the function $y = qx + r$, so an injection exists. It's also the case that every function is a subset of $\mathbb{Q} \times \mathbb{R}$, so $\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{Q}$ is a subset of $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{Q} \times \mathbb{R})$. So, $|\mathbb{Q} \times \mathbb{R}| \leq |\mathbb{R}^\mathbb{Q}| \leq |\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{Q} \times \mathbb{R})|$. I haven't had too much time to think about it. Also, the question is hard to answer because I need to interpret the question a bit more clearly. Should I have the cardinality in terms of aleph numbers or beth numbers or something like that? The chapter I read did not touch on those, so I am actually pretty unfamiliar with them.
Heavenly Philosophy
We can't necessarily say that for any set $A$, there is a set $B$ such that $|A| < |B| < |\mathcal{P}(A)|$ because that would imply the continuum hypothesis. We also can't say that for any infinite set $A$, there is no set $B$ such that $|A| < |B| < |\mathcal{P}(A)|$ because that would imply the negation of the continuum hypothesis.
Heavenly Philosophy
@valid hornet use beth numbers
aleph numbers require you to take a stand one way or another on the continuum hypothesis
other than aleph-null
whereas beth numbers have a concrete definition.
Welcome to the server @plush mirage
hello!
By expressing it i meant compared to |N|, |R|, |P(R)|, and thing like that
If it was something like tye continuum hypothesis you couldn't express the set anyways
oh are we still doing this one
R = P(N) = {0,1}^N so R^Q = ({0,1}^N)^Q
({0,1}^N)^Q = fns: Q to (fns: N to {0,1}) = fns: QxN to {0,1} = {0,1}^(QxN)
but QxN = N so ({0,1}^N)^Q = {0,1}^N = R
when i say = i only mean cardinalities are equal
just cba to write | • | everywhere
is (X^a)^b = X^(a x b) just currying?
yes
lovely
pinguuuuuuuuuuu <333333
Guys I need help
i used to watch a lot back in the day
@thorn jay That place is at the mid region of Taiwan
It’s a national park featuring marine lives
My brain is so cooked I thought mid region meant orthocentre 😭
Ok this is just op and destoying it
I see
This can be very useful
I never realized (A^B)^C is A^(BxC) before
But now that you say it
Yes
It works
Damnnn
I was so proud of my proof which now becomes useless
One of the exercises in my book is proving that the set of real numbers algebraic over the rationals is countable. I think I came up with a proof last night.
It makes the most sense if I have an image to help visualize it, but I don't have image permissions in this channel.
I meant countable. Sorry.
It is indeed
What is the proof
I lean your proof
I can also show you my proof for R^Q if you want
i’d love to see it 
Wait im in class so i'll wait to get to my puter
Is there a channel with image permissions I can put the visualization in?
I put the image here. #math-discussion message
Basically, sense we are dealing with finite linear combinations, the set of all polynomials with the ground field being the rationals is countable.
Only a top left square has any ones in it for each polynomial, so the sequence eventually is an infinite string of zeroes after some point. So, it corresponds to a rational.
i’ll check back later
That gets an injective function from $\mathscr{P}(\mathbb{Q})$ to $\mathbb{Q}$.
Heavenly Philosophy
And there is definitely an injective function from $\mathbb{Q}$ to $\mathscr{P}(\mathbb{Q})$. You could just have each rational number $q$ correspond to $f(x) = qx$ as a polynomial.
Oh no
Heavenly Philosophy
$\mathscr{P}(\mathbb{Q})$ refers to the set of polynomials with rational coefficients, not the powerset of the rationals
Heavenly Philosophy
😭
I would represent the powerset of the rationals as $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{Q})$
Heavenly Philosophy
then it is true that |Q| = |Q[x]|
I just found this. So, I was going off of this.
Ohhhhh
or just use Q[x] as notation for the power set of Q. Problem solved 😍
ahem
2^Q

Something cool you could do to build f is that you can associate to aX^n the nth prime to the power of a, and say f(P+Q)=f(P)f(Q)
It's injective into N
And it's never infinite because those are finite
Also i think that's straight up a bijection with N*
Let $p : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{Q}[x]$ be a bijection from the naturals to the set of all polynomials with rational coefficients. Then, for a bijection from the naturals to the set of algebraic numbers, if $p(1)$ has $n$ roots, then assign numbers $1$ to $n$ with those roots. Then, assign the roots of the next polynomial of $p(2)$ to natural from $n + 1$ until its roots are reached. If you just keep doing, this all of the polynomials will be hit, because for each natural number $n$, $p(n)$'s roots will at most be $\sum_{i = 1}^{n - 1} r(p(i))$ places away, where $r(p(i))$ represents the number of roots of $p(i)$. Also, skip numbers if the number was already hit.
Heavenly Philosophy
The set of exponential functions over Q 
I might appreciate a theorem saying that a countable union of countable sets is countable
Which would have helped you conclude from the fact that Q[x] is countable
A polynomial is a finite tuple of coefficients in Q so one sees that Q[x] is thr union over all n of n-tuples in Q,
So |Q[x]| = sum_n |Q|^n which is countable
Well, the chapter I read on cardinality was pretty basic. It just gave a definition of the cardinality relations in terms of injections, surjections, and bijections, and then it proved that $|\mathbb{N}| = |\mathbb{Z}| = |\mathbb{Q}| < |\mathbb{R}|$. So, I have not learned about tuples or beth numbers or things like that.
Heavenly Philosophy
here’s a nice thing you should try to prove: |N| = |N^2|
well this is the thing that underlies |N| = |Q|
Yeah. It's the same as the grid like structure in that proof.
the road from this to countable union of countable sets is also very short
I have to be at class now. So, I'll think about it later.
fun fact the bijection N^2 -> N, counting along the anti-diagonals in that picture, is in fact a polynomial in Q[x,y]
it is even the ONLY known (up to reordering x and y) such polynomial bijection
Was i pinged here
It looks so good
I am not used to such nice places
Tf is this question lmfao
Hello, ik this might sound like rlly simple question but I’m in hs rn and im still having misconceptions about simple maths. If y is directly proportional to x^2 then would it also be directly proportional to x? I wonder if it being linear vs square would influence proportionality 😅 asking before my quiz tmr lol. I’m guessing that proportionality is dependent on the equation?
Help this sounds so stupid I’ve asked ChatGPT 10 times
could someone help me show that the function f(x) = x^3 - 3x is surjective
@lavish oyster welcome to the mathcord!
Bruh why to tag me so late
try asking in a help channel (see #❓how-to-get-help) 
(but as a hint: remember the definition of a surjection!)
because I'm not a bot 
I'm a human who only just noticed your presence now, and wanted to welcome you 
That's basic math bro
please don't be condescending 
what's basic to you isn't basic to everybody, and vice versa
let's treat everybody with respect, okay? 
Substitute c in it
Later

My teacher just introduced me to functional equations.
It's the onto and not onto functions right ?
x³ - 3x is a cubic polynomial
f(x) = y
Any cubic polynomial with real coefficient has atleast one real root
Therefore
x³- 3x - y = 0
So for every y belongs to R ( real numbers )
And there exists a x belongs to R so f(x) = y
You can atleast write the range right @granite delta
At the end
f(x) = x³ - 3x is surjective by R -->R
That's it
thank for helping
This seems like it could happen if you had a choice function. Basically, one axis is $b_{1}, b_{2}, ...$ where $b_{n}$ is a bijection between $I_{n}$ and $\mathbb{N}$. The other axis is the natural numbers. So, the coordinate $(x,y)$ would correspond to $b_{x}(y)$. You could then do that diagonal thing like with the rational numbers. So, there would be a surjective mapping from the natural numbers to this infinite union. I think this requires the axiom of choice, though.
Heavenly Philosophy
Or at least axiom of countable choice.
I'm thinking of a proof of the fact that if you have an injection from A to B and an injection from B to A, then you have a bijection from A to B.

Welcome to the server @neat lintel
Heey, thank you!!
Welcome to the server! 🙂
Thank youu!!
@warped pike we can talk here for more room
ok
$f'(x) = \lim_{h\to0}{\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}$
Yeatte
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
are you comfortable with limits or nah?
calculus to manifolds in 30 min time!
Based let's go
they aren't responding 
Homie disappeared to go learn Calc 1->3 and pretend they aren't lost
Hi just wondering what anyone thinks about propisitional logic or abstract math in school before uni.
propositional logic is good yeah
it's one of those things that you kinda learn at some point and need for the rest of uni
but 'abstract math' is a bit vague
Originally I was thinking some basic stuff from something like abstract algebra. But Im not sure if that would be helpful. So maybe an intro to proofs class in highschool or something
intro to proofs, knowing a bit of intro set theory, a bit of linear algebra 
Oh to clarify I meant as part of a standard curriculum, not for myself specifically
frankly basic logic and set theory can and imo should be taught children along with algebra or arithmetic
This
Imo kids should learn abstract algebra instead of the quadratic equation
i mean set theory and basic logic are like... teachable in principle to literal 5 year olds
Yes
<@&268886789983436800> lets earn 100k in 72 hours
?
esta bien?
there was a crypto scam just now
Yea
oh I see, posted across multiple channels?
I thought I was in one where it had already been reported
Yeah multiple channels
Yeah I misread the series of events as
spammer
reported
more conversation
lol modping mentioning the thing reported minutes ago
Iapolloniusapologize
u cnahged pfp hunhh?
Changed the whole profile actually
For the life of me, I can't figure out a proof of the Cantor-Schröder-Bernstein Theorem. I don't want any hits, though. I'm just frustrated.
That's a tough nut to crack
Fun one
I was showing a proof that the real numbers algebraic over the rationals are countable to a professor in office hours, and it implicitly used that theorem. And, he questioned me on that. So, now I want to prove that.
Yeah no worries, i was trying to be silly so its kinda my fault too
Was how it looked
what a Liam
Noice
Please gift him a shiny boot for his deadliest efforts
Welcome to the server @pseudo ember @neat lintel
thankyouu hii
https://github.com/TruthIsHidden/Custom_Made_Cryptographically_Secure_Encryption_Algorithm
This algorithm achieved the highest byte entropy for its character set of 64 chars. 5.95 for a 256 char long input. (The theoretical max is 6) btw INSANE
Should i buy a Mac or Windows laptop for my degree in maths ?
Depends on what you need
If you just use LaTeX my m1 macbook air for one is just good enough
If you just want to code python without using ml and ai then yeah it works, I use it for statistical stuff like R
if you want ml and ai then I cannot help you there while it works I doubt it can do that much crazy stuff, but then I'd rather you go for a desktop
It's just the macbook air in terms of battery and performance it's just the best
Been using my M1 ever since release and it is a fanless device and all too
Battery lasts for days without charge using simpler stuff, and its power draw is not too bad in intense performance
i mean its just preference
Im looking more to a laptop i can use to learn python matlab etc ... rather than an actual beast
i use macbook air m3
Do you like it
yep
It does the job really
except that the cpu is too hot lmfao
I mean if its intense stuff then yeah it gets hot
If i dont have any Apple device is that still like good ?
Just impressed it can still do well without a fan
idk
alternative way is that you get any other laptop than mac, and install linux
I tried that before but erm I cannot do that much command line lol
And when it has weird bugs I was kind of on my own reading how to fix it
So I moved to Mac because originally I was a Windows user then moved to Linux then moved to Mac lol
Never left Mac ever since
Im not an expert
Are there any thing you cant do on the Mac and frustrates you
Smth you can on windows
Like what games
Yeah don't ever game with a mac
Do you want
It’s not made for that i guess
You can still buy an xbox serie s it does the job
Sure but it really depends on your preference really
I wanted to physically separate gaming and work so a macbook air works wonders for me
Yes i want that too
I do not want a lick of game in my mac so I went for that
Because with a gaming laptop ill be too distracted with gaming
Usually i play a lot
Unfortunately
Also gaming laptop has garbage battery life just saying :^)
So expect to bring a power brick with you
So i started to pretty much cut off games
Then why not a macbook air then? It has some of the stuff like linux and is well built
Im looking more into a windows laptop with good cpu and integrated graphics. 16gigs,1tb
256gb of stockage is sad
You sadly would need to pay a bit more
I expect 512 at the lesst
I went for 512gb and I feel is just enough for me, but I fear that's not the same for everyone else
depends
Hi
They don't drop off as bad compared to when the m1 was out almost all intel macs worth almost nothing when m1 got released
Okk
all that specs with iGPU lol
yes 16gigs is great
i have 8gb sadly of ram
i can install more but i never did that b4
what
is he doing for it to lag
maybe its his cpu/gpu not ram
most of the time, 8gb ram is sufficient
i have i5 U-series (13th gen) and 8gb ram
i didnt know U-series was one of the worse ones
my laptop is fine for most tasks but some development softwaare like android studio can get laggy
and obviously some games
Gaming
apparently i made this txt file to crash applications idk
I never struggled with 8gb ram though
Then again I micro manage my software and all
I have only VSCode, Obsidian, Remarkable 2 Desktop app, and Librewolf
Oh and Racket and RStudio
MacOS
I thought we are talking about mac since Monest was considering it lol
My gaming PC is only linux because I am done with Windows
i use windows 11 (unfortunately"
it's true that it uses a lot of ram but at the same time, a lot of that ram is just used to "not waste ram"
when you actually need that ram, it then frees up to use
MacOS was originally based on an old version of NetBSD 4.2 which is where the mach kernel was born
i'm purposefully being vague because i don't recall clearly
We need 16-32GiB of RAM, 1TiB at-least of SSD space and preferably Linux to get our work done
and as our work involved generally running multiple instances of emulators to check software alongside physical devices
what do you do?
that explains a lot
emuldev (on our own time) and mobile app dev (where we emulate some devices as we don't have several phones on hand)
i'm thinking about buying a new laptop once i get a job
either give this to one of my family members or sell it
i want a better laptop for development
our current has a 12th gen laptop i7, 16GiB RAM and 512GiB storage so-
so so so limiting
is this good enough if I install another 8GB RAM stick?
or should i get an i7?
depends on your goals
i want to be able to use apps like android studio smoothly
we cause linux to trigger the OOM killer with just 2 instances of android studio emulation on 16GiB + 8 GiB Zram
after the new update, it lags like hell for some reason
so 16GiB may not be enough
i just graduated high school so obv i wont be in craazy enterprise software development
im just a (former) student who is planning to go to uni at some point
i probably want to do a "maths + cs" joint course
we got through basically all our uni courses with 16
by the time i graduate, ill probably need to buy a new laptop anyway
just fine
Buy a laptop that's upgradable
and yes this limits you to....thinkpads and frameworks basically
back in the day every laptop was repairable and upgradable...mostly
i kinda wouldnt mind games either 😭
what types of games; we mainly play minecraft and osu and elite dangerous and this laptop can do that 100% fine
ive never installed linux so im scared to
it's very easy
fairs
@open umbra has radicalized us about them
me when void linux
is all I use
HELL YEAH
GENTOO IS SO GOOD
whyyyyy
just read the handbook
I've heard more horror stories with arch tbh
not really sure tbh but i do plan to get minecraft
do u think i should just get 8GB RAM? and forget about getting a new laptop
i5 13000 series U chip AFAIK with 8GiB
.
intel's chips recently have been quite shit
they run hot, have bad perf,and just
overall fuck intel
YEAH LMFAO
at-least they fixed that it seems
after gaslighting mobo manufacturers
nixos
i love nixos
install nixos
ull have fun
that was my first distro and it was very fun
hm, that's nice
jump into the deep end and dont look back
i mean in the end its what you want to be able to do
the thing is my laptop uses intel UHD graphics
but if i added another ram stick so that i have 2x8 GB then i would have dual channel memory which would allow me to use intel iris Xe graphics 
which is probably better for games
would iris Xe improve the performance when playing games cuz im not exactly sure what the difference would be
i never installed ram before
also r u sure that the games u want to play are available on linux
im scared to damage my laptop
then theres the thing about electrostatic discharge
which also scares me
oh i see
honestly right now i want to play stuff like roblox, minecraft and wii games. but i do want to play other games once i can afford them
such as skyrim
which i can run ig
you can use wine for roblox i think
yeah you can get an external HDD
or SSD
idk why ud get an hdd in the modern era tho lmao
they're a bit cheaper
HDD is cheap and spinny bois are cheap
well as long as i can develop projects fine without having a better cpu/gpu its probs fine
yeah tho if its only for like 500 gb you can get ssds for pretty cheap too
its only for like the massive sizes
like 10tb or something
where having a hdd becomes much cheaper
I use HDD for documents or off loading stuff
cery?
SSDs for all the current stuff and all
i think for modern games, u'll need a whole lot more
i can have my nixvim setup
yea i mean u can get up to like 2 tb for a solid price
Screw modern games they are all malwares at this stage lol
Actually I haven't played a game in 5 years really
nixvim?
modern game companies must be working hands with storage disk companies nowadays
its a neovim distribution that you can get through a nix flake
and it makes configuring options for it super easy
Whats harder Quantum Algebra or the Calculus
i have my configured nixvim on my github, so whenever i change something on my github and rebuild my configuration it just loads it from there
3rd person ive seen with a hollowknight pfp
one of them uses nix too
lmfoa
one of them is also the knight
the other one is grubs
ur grub is grubs?
Nah just use linux for everything
it works well forthe most part
ik but theres not much motivation to switch for the average person to linux
u cant play valorant on linux
fr
there is, it runs faster, your default web browser won't utterly torture you with AI ads, installing software via the terminal makes you at-leats a bit more vigilant to tracking what you do, updates are trivial on most distros aimed at average people, etc...
yea lmao
i mean default web browser isnt that deep you can just change it like i did to brave or arc or whatever you use
and what difference does it make whether you install it through the terminal or a website, neither gives you a guarantee you're installing something safe
I guess you know the name of it? but you can stop a download while it's downloading, and you can also see what file the download link leads to
updates are trivial on windows too
Updates are trivial on windows for the most part but the maount oftimes I've had windows update break my setup is greater than the amount of times I've had dnf do the same; besides that, while you CAN change your browser many people just install chrome and follow the herd
i agree with runs faster but to be honest i dont need my computer to run faster in basic tasks since it's got more than enough processing power for basic tasks
i guess depending on the quality of your computer you might have more incentive to just run a linux minimal install atp
Guys can i do hack the box or CTF in windows like Windows 10 like fr Windows 10
uhhh
i think so
you can use WSL
for any linux commands you need to do
for something like that people prefer kali or smth
How to set wsl
this is one of those things where you would benefit from searching it up
i think you can just type wsl in the powershell tho lol
and itll run an install if you dont have it alr
or wsl --install or smth
read the fortnite manual
I'm usually very "politically correct" or whatever but sometimes a bit of crassness is necessary
fair fair
How about without wsl can i do it?
not really
Can i love her without a manual book
I think this is heresy
you should appreciate the need to read documentation
it keeps you smart
-Ryan
Normally I'm the one who does tech stuff in our system, but Ryan's really good at being a bit of an asshole (and also knows way more maths than I do)
Death is blah blah blah blah blaha blah blah so you cant be wither forever because mimimimmimimsuskos
what do you do while she does that
do you eat to suppress your rage
do you eat nachos
Advising people on how to use WSL when you should be advising them on how to switch to Linux outright
I'm ashamed
no normally I'm partially forced out of our consciousness and I can only watch
me when cofronting
im on some massive cope shit
i got my wisdom teeth removed last wednesday and i cant stop thinking about solid food
It does not seem some of these people would enjoy a direct drop into the deep end tbh
they asked if they can keep using windows
and lowk fuck VMs
like i'd rather use WSL than virtualbox
no i know but like if they want to keep using windows
they can use WSL
lowk yeah
they could do with arch linux
or redhat
lowk just switch to linux fully
and dont ask anyone for help
then you'll never need to ask someone how to install wsl again
one should ask for help at times
yeah sure when they exhaust all other reasonable options
but stackoverflow, unix SE, archwiki, gentoo docs, and rhel docs are SO good
I got into linux already having read all of these soruces EXTENSIVELY
like I'd read them for about a year before I actually ever installed linux
This
even today sometimes I do need to open the docs to find something I need that I don't do frequently
i think if the docs r outdated then u can ask for help
cuz the nixwiki is lowk worthless
the majority of the time i have to go onto the nixos github
and read source files
cuz shit can be outdated in the wiki
and this is such a nuisance
but i have someone i can ask about nix so i just do that for really big things that would take hours and hours of scouring through
To me this is just a trial by fire
you get used to it
and you become self reliant
someone else already did so i dont have to 💔
i dont want to get used to reading their code
file after file
default web browser
like anyone uses microsoft edge on windows
looking for examples and ways in which they use certain syntax to try to understand it
and trying to find where a specific command was created
i think you can just pay for it without selling a kidney
but fr i think its just expensive
i dont think theres much you ca really do about that
maybe you can find some parts off of marketplace
😭
i wish i never have to get a job again
im investing everything in a 10 cent market cap pharmaceutical company
yes
i mean thats how it should be anyway fr
invest everything
who needs liquid cash
That's complicated and boring though, much more exciting to yolo everything into a penny stock or a memecoin
In reality I keep my assets in an assortment of actual stocks, bonds, and index funds; but I'm a very boring person.
no just joking lol
That's cost a total of around 10 cents to own the entire company. Hope you're up for such a huge risk
aint no way job is being censored here
it is a huge risk
it's everything i have
Hey guys
Can anyone help me out with a few questions regarding studying math in uni?
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
Ok
Thank you
I've been trying to decide between pursuing medicine or doing a double major of Math + Computer science.
Does anyone have any tips or words of advice for me?
math + cs is a good combo, it just depends on if you can manage doing a doube bachelor
do u think a master's degree would be necessary after?
depends on your echonomy, i definitely dont think that a master or even a double bachelor is necessary to land a well paying job.
how passionate are you about medicine?
medicine is a really hard field to get into
over here, it's more likely to enter on the second year of application
do you mind if i ask what country you're from?

I love biology and chem, my original plan was to study med
spain
i've been living here for 7y
how come you started going for cs+maths?
is it possible for you to apply to both and see what happens?
Math's always been a passion of mine. Also my sister's boyfriend finished his math degree and his master's in data analysis and he showed me what he studies and what job offers he got when he finished and i thought it was awesome lol
also it's way less time than medicine
that's cool
Not rlly because in this school year I have to choose between physics and biology
medicine is very stressful
and a lot of people who pick medicine end up dropping out bc they realise the pressure of the work environment is too much for them
not saying dont do med
ohh
are you 16 or something?
maybe try researching each field more
and when I choose to do the final year exams ( equivalent to the SATS ) I would have to choose between doing physics or biology too. And depending on the uni degree if you do biology your "admission grade" gets a 0.2 weighting factor
if you graduated with medicine or graduated with maths+cs, which careers would you be most interested in?
if you
if you're smart enough, maybe try picking extra subjects?
yea
im in my last year of school, 17 turning 18
if I graduate medicine then i'd do residency in the US, probably radiology, dermatology, ophtamology or orthopedic surgery
If i graduate math+cs maybe a quant or a data scientist ( im kinda new to the whole computer science stuff )
software engineer or cybersecurity would be nice
hmm interesting
You know what I'm afraid of?
doing medicine and regretting not doing math+cs
also afraid of doing math+cs and regretting not doing medicine
btw here math+cs takes 5 years and medicine takes 6 years
ive known a lot of people being rejected from medicine. of course, you could be different to them.
ive known a smart person who received AAAA (not sure his predicteds) and was rejected from medicine.
he picked engineering as a backup so now hes going to start doing that.
(im in england so most people pick 3 a levels but he did 4: maths phys chem bio)
im not sure if this is even relevant to say but even if you pursued medicine and unfortunately did get rejected, do you think its possible to sit another qualification for physics privately to pursue maths+cs afterwards?
do u actually need physics to apply to maths+cs?
is it just more competitive than bio?
wtf
5 years
why
here, maths+cs is only 3 years
and medicine is still 6 years
here, its more like a 50/50 split in modules
is it different for u?
it would be possible but i'd have to wait a year ( and learn this year's physics by myself )
well as long as u have no regrets, nothing wrong with having to wait a year i think?
cuz its a double major so u get both degrees
thats so good whatttttt
It depends on the Uni tbh
we dont really have majors and minors in england
yea ig
surely there's a lot of resources online? not sure about your curriculum tho
but self-learning can be hard, yes
there r yeah
I think i could do it, the only downside would be the ""time wasted""
But oh well I still have like 1-2 weeks to think about it
i can understand
im lucky to have not been in this situation
yeah, take that time to think carefully
R u in uni rn?
Bet
i just finished high school
a lot of my classmates will start uni soon
but im not
here, we have a strange system of applying with our predicted grades
and i didn't like mine so i grinded for better final grades
so i'll have to join uni a year late (but honestly, ill probably apply for 2027 entry cuz of finances)
and im thinking of applying for maths+cs
in durham
I see
Best of luck man
im a little disappointed in my final grades but theyre not bad grades
i just wanted to go to another uni
I have a friend who's from there
that wanted higher grades
Ic
i was predicted BBD and finished with A*AB but I needed A*AA for the uni i originally wanted to go to
but A*AB is still a good grade
A* is like the max right?
That's rlly good
A* A B C D E U
which subjects did u pick?
I've seen a guy on tiktok who got all Us lol
awesome
btw
my sister's bf who finished math and did a master's degree on data analysis is looking for a job rn
he's been looking for like 1 month
the job market is hard rn
and he's been taking hella interviews because he wants something very specific, he wants a job abroad that also will allow him to work remotely in the future
i hope it goes well for him
he also told me that some contractors will just outright not hire anyone who hasn't studied in a very well known uni like harvard or MIT lol
me too, he's a good guy
Do u think computer science is cooked rn is there still hope
i have a classmate who is joining durham maths this year
so if i do go durham, its cool ill probs get to see him
hmm the field is quite saturated and im not an expert on the job market
but thats why i want to go to a really good unia
and get a first class honours in my degree
and build a portfolio and hone my skills outside class
thats nice
here in spain the Unis are not ranked very high globally
im sure there are unis in spain that are ranked highly in spain
the best unis here are ranked in the top 100-200
yea
the best one is in barcelona, its ranked 130 or smth
i mean in national rankings
theres unis in the top 10 rankings in england but i dont think some of them are in the top 100 globally
so companies abroad might not recognise them so much
but companies in england definitely will
u got Imperial College London there tho right
kind of like how there are good unis in each state in the US and companies do know these unis
and people in the US know these unis
but i dont
yeah thats my fear for me
yh
most people in england dont know unis in the US besides ivy league
companies might idk
thats a crazy uni here
come bath maths rahhhh!!!!
US is stacked with ivy leagues ts is crazy
i wanted to go to bath for cs
yea
ohh cs not maths
i had an imperial offer but rlly wanna go
That's why it's very important to build a portfolio I think
i was 7 marks below an A* in fm
and i was 4 (scaled) marks below an A in cs but after a remark, i dropped 2 more marks 💀
i was very close to an A*, so annoying cause i missed my firm bc of it
Even if your school is not in the top 50s atleast u have a portfolio
why
2nd best uni in the world
nvm i read " dont really wanna go"
imperial wants 3A* for cs
didn’t really care for it much, london is expensive, wanted to be in a new city, etc
crazyy
but im contextuals so they might take A*A*A
ic
which i didnt get
i like maths which is why im thinking of picking maths+cs
you guy's system is so different from ours
its just that maths careers dont seem as fun
ours is more complicated
what year was this?
2024, 86% was an A* and i got 84%
Edexcel
what modules
FS1 FM1
i did FM1 and D1
this year we had 62/75 in CP1 for A*
70 in CP2 for A*
FM1 had 72
longggg yeah ours was similar
D1 was 53 but thats the worst paper i ever sat (but d1 is the easiest module)
72 out of 75 is batshit crazy
craszy i got 73 tho
FP1 was 72 in our year
i couldnt believe it at first
because i dont even do physics
reddit answers had me thinking i got mid 60s
in fm1
ig it was a somewhat easy paper but i didnt think it deserved 72
yea ik
62, 70, 72, 53 for A*
and i got 61, 62, 73, 54
😭
cp2 fumbled me
LOL
Every year the uni admission exams here get leaked
And they have to change it
🥀
Now I'm thinking of how to prove that between any two sets $A$ and $B$, there exists a surjection from $A$ to $B$ or an injection from $A$ to $B$.
Heavenly Philosophy
That would complete it.
What are you completing out of curiosity @valid hornet
I mental challenge.
Also, How did you prove cantor schroder bernstein?
I'm just trying to do it to see if I can, honestly.
Well, I need that piece to prove it.
But basically, you could restrict the domain of the second injection to the range of the first one. Then, you restrict the codomain of the second injection to be it's range so it's a bijection. Connect the two bijections to form one bijection. Then, you have $A \subseteq B \subseteq C$, where $|A| = |C|$. Then, you would have a disjuctive syllogism with either $|A| < |B|$, $|A| > |B|$, or $|A| = |B|$.
Heavenly Philosophy
The first two in the disjuction are false, so the third must be true.
So, we have injections $f : A \to B$ and $g : B \to A$. We then can restrict it to $f^{} : A \to \operatorname{range}(f)$ to get a bijection. Then, we get $g^{} : \operatorname{range}(f) \to \operatorname{range}(g)$ and then restrict $g^{}$ to get $g^{**} : \operatorname{range}(f) \to \operatorname{range}(g^{})$ to get another bijection and then connect them.
I don't know the range symbol.
No, I need to fix something.


