#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 309 of 1
yea ik what you are talking about since i am at that stage rn 
you just need to endure until you finish the necessary things that you find boring, there is no roundabout way 
at least there is no way that i know about
idk maybe sometimes you can get away with picking some necessary ideas while studying another thing that you like
but eventually you will probably have to come back to that since it is one of the basics needed for many advanced nice things 
i feel like you should probably still read the stuff you care about even if you dont have the knowledge like sure you won't understand most of it but it doesn't mean you won't understand anything
sure, but there are things that you wont understand anything from if you dont have a bare minimum of knowledge
that's why you study alongside
i see that you are the type who studies intro algebra alongside algebraic nt 
that's crazy lmao
i mean kinda true
LMFAO
yea i mean even you should say this is crazy
wait WHAT LMAO 
i caught you bro
even in intro abstract
lagrange theorem, cyclic groups and allat
still number theoretic af
i do have a great example of something not working out
Anything that had to do with representation theory and abstract harmonic analysis
kinda more advanced stuff
I had to step back and learn a bit
i mean sure, but these 2 need 0 prereqs to study
and they are related to each other
yeah it works for these stuff
like obviously dont try to read geometric langlands program when u havent done any number theory
it works well when the thing you care about just happens to be there
for NT this works most of the time
except for rare cases I have to take the L
ohhh so you have to do this for NT sometimes huh
yea
i mean its not surprising, at some point everyone would have to take the L for stuff like NT 
lmfao
but i think its good to train your brain on liking any math tbh
that's something i need to work on as well
liking any maybe is hard but if you add almost before that it will probably be much easier (at least for now)
i mean there will still be many things that you wont ever touch no?
yeah but i meant like
if you were to read something mentioned by someone
not directly related to ur interest
maybe put some thoughts
who knows it might be actually useful for what ur interested in
ohhh i see, yea in that case i agree with you
i should keep this in mind and work on it too
i do have one friend who's very closed brained about logic
oh so yeah i was doing some L (something something)
maybe if you use (something not in his interests) you can get ...
no i dont care i want logic only

somehow we dont share the same interests at all but we are still close friends lmfao
they’re so valid for that
you can count that as step 1 to liking any math 
tomorrow should be nt pilled for me 
apostolize urself
idk maybe tomorrow will be everything pilled 
so far chapter 2 is nice tbh
uhh was that just intro to arithmetic functions?
yes
i think i should go over the theorems quickly after i finish the chapter since it has alot of information
kinda makes me sad that i dont see the same functions nowadays
unless I do analytic stuff
maybe these days you just spam Gal this and Gal that 
I still find algebra unappealing ._.
seems like you are titling to algebraic side huh
im still doing both really
just no more logloglog
We generalize results of Alladi, Dawsey, and Sweeting and Woo for Chebotarev densities to general densities of sets of primes. We show that if $K$ is a number field and $S$ is any set of prime ideals with natural density $δ(S)$ within the primes, then [ -\lim_{X \to \infty}\sum_{\substack{2 \le \operatorname{N}(\mathfrak{a})\le X\ \mathfrak{a...
Möbius transformations? 
defining the mobius function still works just fine for general ring of integers (not just Z)
so you can still do more intricate analytic stuff similar to the ones you do in Z
but you can imagine it will be more involved
I still read these things often when I need some result
sotrue bestie
yea, i assume you would probably need more algebra than just working with Z and so on
yeah
all algebra?
You like CA, so I can trust you. What good algebra field would you gib a fellow complex analyst?
ring theory and linear algebra :3
Lina wasn't fun :(
you cant trust someone just because they like CA since everyone does
linear algebra is not fun till you realize it is fun
I knoe ppl that don't
They study for becoming a teacher
maybe look at representation theory of finite groups
:O
why wasnt it fun?
if you want to see it interacting with CA objects you are familiar with I can tell u where to look (but it's technical)
oh i see
Would not recommend
i may have a treatment for your case 
Though needed in several ana courses, so ok
try linear algebra by werner greub
(if you want)
Why do you wanna drag me back into lina hell 
Wowie
Functional analysis is algebra too. Since it's ana + lina in infinte spaces :3 i'll just do that
Hey Deltoid, wanna see something fun?
well if the problem was just with it being computational then greub should solve the problem
. If there is something else then thats a different story
(i stopped LA rn because i want to finish some things first, i will probably go back to it later)
Also maybe your tastes are different than mine, i dont like RA too much but CA seems to be so fun 
@latent edge
?
in uni i mean
yes sure
,ti
ohhh i see, thats nice.

The current time for f0xy.exe is 03:52 AM (CEST) on Tue, 26/08/2025.
german education be like
pls end my suffering
I kinda wish they did the same here
I mean I get it not everyone going to uni is mature enough to do real analysis as their first year course in their first semester
but also taking 4 calc + 3 numerical analysis BEFORE basic things like real analysis is kinda meh
Don't remind me 
Anyway I should eep now
good night :3
Gl on your book/ paper though Deltoid :3
what about not even taking calc in sem 1 and instead take it in sem 2
(that actually happened with me
)
i took intro to proofs in my second year
in sem 1 i had a course called sequences series and progressions or something like that
bro what even is this 
why would there be a full course for this
lmao
in the same semester I took 2 courses that required a lot of prerequisites and the bottom of these prerequisites was the intro to proofs class
just got an access to them via contacting profs cuz I know some of them very well
but at some point they told me to suck it up tho and take the damn class
I did and it was not fun at all as expected lmao
they were like
bro just take the class we shouldnt interfere too much in the uni's policy.
Proceeds to let you join in another course with that prereq
lmfao
yeah i mean the profs are just chill like that lmao
super based people
discussion-2 for 2 people moment 

daily reminder for me i will have to take a similar course but it will be more logic geared
bro what
Therefore,
---Therefore
---Therefore
------Therefore
wait is N here ?
no
but anyway
0 was not in N
that's how you know the course is bad
is it N_0 moment?
how would I describe this course?
idk tbh
it's really strange
i mean at first glance it looks super easy and it really is easy
then u remember there are a lot of strict rules made by the prof 
but then it is the prof requiring this step and that step etc i suppose
average cs course experience
deltoid: here is a one line proof
prof: thats a 0 for you 
I got that a lot in this class lmao
in the same semester i was taking introduction to number theory which required this course as a prereq
i mean if bro wants you to write a proof like this each time then a 1-hour long test should be made up of only 1 exercise with 1 part 
and also i took a graduate course on rep theory
both were fun
I liked rep theory more cuz it was more open ended and you had to prove essentially everything
rn i am taking intro to NT
it was one of these classes where you have 0 clue what it's gonna be about
the elementary NT course was ass but it got better cuz i knew the prof and she knew im NT pilled so we had a lot of nice discussions outside the dry stuff
the content is like ur average intro NT course
divisibility, modular arithmetic, continued fractions, cr*ptography and finally quadratic reciprocity
but last year it was a bit different we did more stuff like L functions and modular forms
also did intro algebraic NT
though it was more lenient on alg NT since the course was an alternative prereq for abstract algebra so its kinda weird to be like "let R be noetherian"
mine has no cryptography and may or may not cover things like quadratic reciprocity and legendre's symbol as an optional topic, but it goes over arithmetic functions and mobius inversion
bro if anyone sees the order of the courses youve taken will be like 
i mean to be fair the prof did cryptography at the very end and it was nothing too crazy
just needed to know this little RSA computation for the exam
that's it lmao
imagine elliptic curve cryptography 
there's a CS course (i say CS but only math majors dare to take it) that goes deeper into these stuff
it's called intro to cryptography
i see why it is labelled as a CS course, the name is misleading 
it's a difficult course
and like seeing how most cs majors here take courses well it's no surprise most dont take it
so might as well just call it a math class at that point. it just has a coding aspect to it but so what
actually idk how the uni's system work in canada and US, can you just take any course in the department as long as you have the prereqs and you need to fill some credits for "non-math" courses like CS,physics etc..?
you can literally take anything you want as long as you get permission/prerequisites but yeah you also need to watch for satisfying requirements for your degree. technically you can take as many courses as you want even if you satisfied everything in your degree
just spend more money
here (in brazil), most of the courses are the same except for some electives that you can choose from depending on your prereqs and the unis are free (the public which are also the best ones)
uni being free is really nice tbh
yea ngl it is great
you dont have to worry about potential heart attack whenever you open your uni acc and see a warning saying "payment overdue"
even inside the uni you get some nice services, for example there are several restaurants on campus where you eat lunch for 2 R$ (which is less than 1/2 USD
)
yeah you can get anything here as long as u pay
lol
im often surprised when ppl study abroad in america without specific reasons
bc like, u just want to pay a lot of money? or what?
the food usually sucks in campus and they do a dirty play on credits cards so usually I just go outside campus and eat in some near rest
they just gentrified the restaurant across from the math building here apparently </3
international students 
bro like the tuition for international students is crazy
I'd probably be homeless by now with this shit
they make everyone buy $500 dining dollars (basically scrip) here its messed up
so im trying to see how i can get the money back by like buying food for ppl or something
I sold my soul to the company town
its TRUE>....
yea i hear that america is too expensive 
i mean almost all places where you study in english is expensive for some reason 
all the stores near campus r super overpriced
"it's a feature not a scam"
.....
tbh community college isnt that poorly priced and should be a pretty good choice for most ppl, but like. it just isnt that good for wanting a job in academia of course
🫠
good thing that i came from my country to brazil and not to somewhere like america or else i wouldve sold a kidney by now 
at first the displayed name was the same as the real username and the pfp was roger
but for some reason i changed it
and i want to go to canada and america one day tbh 
(in fact i want to go to many countries
)
maybe we can exchange places for a few days or something like that 
real
Gn
hi
Thank you
So
Ik this is a math server but like
Does anyone wanna read my english essay 🙏
Its 1 page MLA format so ez pz
Why not
I cant ss 😭
Ill copy and paste but its gonna lose Double Spaced font
The College Education
College students and ex-college students alike can often times bond over the shared belief that college fails many: whether it be through overworking students, high costs for tuition, or forcing students to take classes they do not want to take- general education requiring a Math class even if you are majoring in an English field-, this was a topic lightly mentioned in the essay labeled “Shadow Scholar”. Many students who are attending college will usually be overworked by a sudden inflation of schoolwork that they may not have been used to in high school. These students will consequently feel overworked and stressed out over the idea of potentially failing a college class and being forced to retake it or reconsider college in general.
The topic of overworked students will usually create 3 categories of students; the one who does poorly, the one who cheats, and the one who does somewhat alright. The student who does poorly will often times have to retake the class or be faced with the idea of dropping out, the one who does somewhat well will usually be overcome by stress due to giving it their all every minute of every day, and the one who decides to cheat will usually be the most carefree one of the three due to having the ability to let someone else handle their stressful schoolwork.
This is how college fails many, it forces students to either be stressed and potentially fail or cheat just to keep their grades up. This will leave students behind, make them regret every going to college, or put them in a situation where they believe cheating is mandatory to be able to complete college and secure a job.
Bam
Its 12 pt font and double spaced so surprisingly it takes up the whole page
Its also a response to a topic in a essay we read that mentioned "College failing students"
And it was also meant to sound like I was speaking it and stuff, js lemme know what you think :D
Well this is truly the rarest and most honest . This thing is hella true
I hope so XP
I did minor research on general education and stuff
Is stating that general education requires a math class even if you plan to major in something english related like...
Enough?
Or I wonder if I should cite an actual source x.x
He told me write it like I speak it and when I speak I dont cite my sources I just take a 50/50 if im lying or not 💪
0-10 tho whatcha think?
hi guys can i join the discussion :)?
Yes!!! :D
9
Ohk
My original writing was a C 😭
dont give up bro there's still chance to learn
💪
Don't worry you still learnt through it didn't you?
Truth and reeeeaaal, its the 2nd essay and its only like... the 3rd week
So i think ill be chill
I did I did
I learned to take what the professor says like.. Literally
He said respond to the essay and he meant actually respond in the way I would respond irl, no unnecessary big words n stuff
This was something that essay talked about
It talked about how College will stress students out over getting a good grade rather than actually understanding what was being taught
For me, score
Understanding is second hand-
I want a good gpa XP
XD i know
so GPA is your priorty? thats great tho
cause u want to increase ur GPA, and that makes you so ambitiouslly to study
appriciate bro 💪
That's good
what about you lily? what is your priority, GPA or understanding?
I think both are important because they are interlinked aren't they ?
If we understand better we can score better .
Yess and better understanding will help you get high GPA
what class grade are you in now?
Currently in higher secondary education
same as me
but ive no clue
to study math
otherways
i also wanted to study abroad in NUS
by scholarships
Oh ,your nationality?
You can do it . I hope you will get there
appriciate it
Don't take stress out of it . It's a good subject
ik
the good news is i liked to study math
i dont care of failure in my past test
btw, how good are you in math?
That's the spirit
I am in the phase where I love studying it but get frustrated when not able to to solve
XD we're in the same position
but i dont know why if i get frustrated i dont give up, i search online and chat my math teachers
Same here
are you busy right now? i think ur busy. im gonna end my discussion here if ur busy
i dont want to disturb
You aren't disturbing
@obtuse inlet welcome to the mathcord! 
hi
i am tryna become one of the world best mathematicians of all time. I want to create a theory. Idc abt haters, imma be disciplined and work hard
good for you
Excellent! How exactly are you planning to accomplish that?
determination, hardwork, being disciplined. Riemann hypothesis, Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture, solution of the Navier-Stokes equations, formulation of Yang-Mills theory, and determination of whether NP-problems are actually P-problems. 6 millennium problems basically and try to prove my own theories
Well, looks like you've got it all figured out, I look forward to seeing your progress.
Thank you bro.
hi i am mar.Nice to meet you guys
Searching up male cheerleader just to realize the homosexual peak
Hi mar.Nice to meet you guys, I'm Joe
I plan to be severely depressed and French and then I'll invent some random algebra bs and challenge someone to a duel
Damn, I'm missing the French, I chose to be 1/4 Italian on character creation
hi @rough berry, I can see you're trying to help out in the help channels, just please do be sure not to simply give out solutions. Remember we're trying to teach people how to work things out themselves, not be human calculators for them :)
Welcome to the mathcord, and I hope you have a good time :)
Ah being french doesnt sound cool
Well, we have good food... but also Macron... that balances things out....
me in mechanics
its quite nice but mechanics also feels so exhausting
become the new euler
i believe in u
question: is it possible for math to be complete (in a theoretical sense) or is there always something new to discover?
That's a great question actually
To me there should be, but we might not reach it ever
wishing you the best of luck!
What's this about solving a conjecture?
Collatz or Goldbach?
Is... Spamming country names normal for #discussion ?
Every kind of behaviour is normal for #discussion
People have been spamming words the past few days...
This is pretty abnormal
It has been getting worse and spreading to other channels though, people just keep posting random words or emojis even in advanced lounge…
Sorry for this, but I don't know why I got involved myself.
it says a lot about society
It truly does
the species is extinct by the time that happens
we caused our own extinction
That's what i was thinking about
But maybe by some miracle it doesn't happen
Hello there :D The people at the discussion 1 are quick for me so I decided to introduce myself here also. I am a bachelor of engineering from Finland. I graduated 2018 so it's been a while for me to get any graps fot maths lately. So much forgotten and i need to rehearse my math skills :D Just came here to casually talk about maths and things and so on. :D
helloo i suck at math and im here to try to get better:D
funny how renewable energy sources are "too expensive" to invest in so the government spends their tax money to fund wars instead
let's build more nuclear weapons to damage the environment
when mathematics discord server randomly gets political
what about jevons paradox?

Hi @young bramble! Welcome to the mathcord.
We don't do "mentors" here. If you're looking for help, it's best that you open a help channel and just ask your question!
It's easier for everyone if you just say what you need help with
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
did higher hack boytjie
No, I'm responding to a help channel interloper
boytjier! 
LMAOOOOOOO
googology seems to be the equivalent of media that has a really strong fandom on the internet but is not really taken seriously by institutions
Welcome to the server @steep raven
thanks :D
🫶
is this saying it's a rationalist interpretation to consider atheism superior to agnosticism (in the sense of "human-made religion" and the big bang?)
What's stopping me from defining H'_1 = the Big Bang was created by the flying spaghetti monster and H'_2 = Big Bang was not created by the flying spaghetti monster and concluding by the same logic that P(H'_1) = 1/2?
not a good counter-point because the big bang really was created by the flying spaghetti monster
i just know it happened
i seen it happen so trust me bro
Might consider using the search feature to check how many times it's used in the server
It's over a 1000 times FYI
fellow pastafarian
The "Uncaused" Event: While the paper argues that we have "never observed a truly uncaused event," the concept of a "uncaused Big Bang" is unique. It's not an event in the universe but the origin of the universe itself, and thus, may not be subject to the same causal rules we observe within our reality. The "inductive justification" may be seen as an overreach.
Defining "Causation": The paper's simple dichotomy of "caused" vs. "uncaused" might be too simplistic. The very definition of causation may be different when applied to the origin of spacetime itself.
Otherwise I like the rationality of their ignorance
Stop spreading this misinformation, the spaghetti monster is responsible for upkeep and maintenance but we were created by the cosmic beast of gabagool
find the eqn sides of an equilateral triangle whose vertex is(1,2) and base is y=0
find the eqn sides of an equilateral triangle whose vertex is(1,2) and base is y=0
find the eqn sides of an equilateral triangle whose vertex is(1,2) and base is y=0
guys help me
i didnt get that
@everyone
bro some one help me
Imma have to join that ORV server
bro can u solve a question for me
Welcome to the mathcord! If you are looking for help, please read #❓how-to-get-help and open a help channel.
thats what i am doing rn
We will not allow spam, so please open a help channel and be patient.
i didnt get that
I'm not making any assumptions, I'm just positing another dichotomy. I probably am misunderstanding something because I don't get why the paragraphs on the justification allows us to claim these two hypotheses as the most natural ones
A lot of people are also asking whether the BB was uncaused, caused by a creator or caused by an event, that would make a trichotomy more natural wouldn't it
What do you mean by assumptions here?
Yes I know, I just dont see why grouping them together is more natural than splitting them up
I did, but I don't understand why youre splitting them up there and not at the top level
if we have "never observed a truly uncaused event" as you say, why isn't the most rational default to assume that the big bang also isn't uncaused?
but we have frequentism around events, why is the big bang in its own class of events?
I'm asking why the splitting
-
uncaused
-
caused
a. caused by religion
i. caused by God from Bible
ii. caused by spaghetti monster
iii. ...
b. caused by non-human, ...
is more rational than say -
uncaused
-
caused by religion
-
caused by non-human, ...
wdym? so you're saying "we never observed a truly uncaused event" is false?
that seems to either contradict what you wrote in the paper, or you're dividing events into arbitrary categories in order to make your argument correct
seems more like philosophy than actual maths tbh
I disagree, I think you're choosing some arbitrary interpretation of causation, and an arbitrary division into two mutually exclusive events, but I don't see how any other interpretation isn't just as valid
please teach me, oh wise one 🙏
would you recommend asking chatgpt to teach me this stuff?
thanks, maybe one day I'll be as smart as you 🤞
MaxEnt argument only makes sense in the context of given dichotomy. Which I'd argue is incomplete
I have a question about the paper
Is it true that you can have a small neglignle chance still be very valid in a purely rationalist viewpoint?
At one point does a .00001% chance become impossible
I guess so... but under assumptions like the big bang, I thought heat death to entropy was inevitable
I see, so you view us as in an infinite game then
Could you elaborate on this
I dont see what assumptions a dichotomy has (other than whether its a valid one)
it's the ontological proof of God without the proof part
But why H1 and H2 and H2a and H2b and not H'1 and H'2 that I outlined above
like Descartes
Does this say that we live in a finite state space of "logically possible causes"? Does that imply there's a finite existence or an infinite existence to you?
I'm not trying to sound rude I'm vetting
I don't think it would be very productive. I apologize If I offended you, doc 🥸
Well but there are a lot of minor assumptions right? For instance, the framework in the paper uses H_2a to be a "culturally constrained subset of possibilities" to then say it's a diminshing (near zero) chance. You then bring in some statistically law to finitely enumerate those chances. But finite enumeration of a state space (it could be an infinite distribution of possibilities) and diminishing chance of a culturally constrained subset are both assumptions. My issue is that frameworks shouldn't have too many assumptions, ideally a good framework has more "proof" with less assumptions, right?
for example, the neighborhood near a derivative barely exists, but it's big enough at infinity for a derivative
How can you test which framework uses the least assumptions?
Hello, I am here for 1 question
Has anyone tried solving the collatz conjecture?
well then how do you know a finite diminishing chance is evadable I guess? But maybe that's not worth going into
someone said they did but I forget who
check #math-discussion maybe
but if you have a specific question ask in a help channel
I'm a middle school student and over the summer I got sucked Into that problem instead of studying real mathematics
the best advice I can give is to focus on your studies. Unless you study Lagarias and understand all of it you won't make progress on the problem that's new
Yes, lots of people have tried, including people who are incredibly knowledgeable about and skilled at all kinds of mathematics. Nobody has succeeded. Don't waste your time on it.
that's not how I read the quote but the later statement seems sensible
well I did show something, although I'm not sure whether if it's new
It's unlikely to be new. But you are welcome to share whatever you like. Just don't expect to have solved collatz.
Why do you mention Ramanujan? He showed nothing relevant to collatz as far as I am aware.
I guess she thinks you are smart
No not at all, I just like working on a specific unsolved problem and feeling like I have a purpose
I think you should try studying some more mathematics instead
Obsessing over collatz is not a good path to go down.
Like what?
Anything? Maybe pick up some group theory textbook. That might be fun.

I mean it's a legitimate question since you mention middle school
ok ok, I didn't take any academic courses like real analysis or something, although I know high school maths and proofs
you're a middle school student studying high school math
well I believe I already know high school maths ...
That is a pretty cool one
What the sine value of pi / 3?
not exactly inspiring but just to ask
√3/2?
Either you know or you don't
He got the value so he does
I dont think you understand my issue, since the section you screenshotted has nothing to do with it
Then what is it
Why memorise that stuff. Just memorise the shape of a triangle
Ah
ok
So what should I do now to advance or at least to do something interesting?
What about 6x^2 - 12x^2 - 504, what are the solutions in x?
You mean 12x?
After that I can try and give you some calculus insights if you don't know
I do
hii yall can anyone help me and teach me olympiad lvl maths
Join Olympiad discord
The best strategy is learning how to read and understand books.
is it an African Swallow or a European Swallow
"Olympiad level maths" is just clickbait people do to get more views
Depends on mood
idkk gurl ;-;
i didnt knew it existed
Solve for x,y integers
x^2-8=y^2+4y
I think I can send it here if you request for it?
or just pm?
Getting mensa vibes
idk maybe either
You are welcome to send it now
well am rn in 11th grade and planning to study statistics in future and so there is a prestigious university i wanna get into and its entrance exm is one of the mosst tough exam in our country which contains only maths but very high lvl
ya plsss
Olympiad mathematics is not very helpful for doing exams to get into university, typically. The skills are very different. You're much more likely to do well just by focusing on your schoolwork.
Statistics ❌
Statics ✅
Probability is better than stats
well i saw a yt tut vid and it suggested to practice them
I guess mostly number theory
Don't they get interrelated sometimes
Are you sarcastic or...?
Well you're welcome to do whatever you like, but as someone who did olympiad maths and also went to university, I don't think it's very helpful.
oh isee ty for your advice
They are but like probability is the only fun part in it 😭
oh you did olympiads
yes those are two different worlds, but I guess it could give a nice intro to maths
NOOO I LOVE NUMBER THEORY STUFF 😭
this… explains some things
Especially modular arithmetic
I don't think competitive maths is very good in general and I gave it up at A-level
But sure, I did it before my GCSEs.
Number theory, combinatorics and probability are my fav math topics
You're welcome to explain what this means.
wait you’re bri’ish
It's also heavily used in programming
I don't hide this.
OMG
just that generally I find you annoying to interact with
We don't interact
💀
But good to know that your vague statement was indeed an insult.
Kindly don't do that in the future
Why're y'all at each other's throats 😭
Ah yes, the banned strange attractor that makes Pseudo and mods interact
not too much these days
mmmm it’s not an insult per se
Oh he's a mod
people are allowed to find each other annoying
Fair enough
it’s not a value judgement or anything
if Pseudo didn't have some spicy flavor with that full name
it would be surprising
wdym lol
I just expect someone who would put (Cat Theory #1 Fan) to have some opinions
💀
oh hm
interesting
Help 😭
I didn’t make that connection
I need to grind cf again ugh
for me it’s more an expression of how much I love cat theory 
String theory observable #1:
The cat pushes the string ball
I'm sure it is🫡
Its nice for getting comfortable with proofs
Hm... fair enough. I think there are better ways to do this though.
"this person is annoying because they did a math olympiad" is a crazy statement 💀
it’s more like one factor of a whole
Wait if you did Olympiads, answer this:
no, I'm not saying that opinion implies other specific opinions
I'm saying announcing it in your name implies you will have some spicy flavor opinions in general
Well before you ask, just be aware that this was almost a decade ago
That's your problem lol
find all primes p,q such that
2^p+p^2=q
like I am friends with people who did olympiads and they’re fine
No thanks <3
Wasn't this on imo or smh

This is pretty much an ideal example of why olympiad questions aren't helpful. They're just random nonsense that you just see or you don't. Doesn't really help with understanding very much.
awww, thank you!
wdym?
No this was on the Israeli junior sciences team second entrance exam
They are supposed to see your thinking pattern to problems i think
That are absurd
Dang i was close
Yea
Under time restriction
For additional pressure
I studied 10 hours a day for a whole week
Pretentious fox
I can't
pretentious fox?
I hardly do 2 hours
I sure hope I don’t come across as pretentious 
That should do it
Let me
See that
Higher number 5
uh…
I can't stop when I'm into something. If I am reading a book or solving problems from a list I won't stop until the book is finished or the whole list is complete.
@.@
It isn't
Sleep well if you're leaving now
I can relate
Yeah il just
Wait for a few more mins
And then sleep
I'm pretty harmfull if im sleepy
Hate that about me
I need this drive from tomorrow I'm gonna grind until I get an internship
Think it stems from human survival instincts.
Dubs
$\overset{5}-$
Pseudo (Cat theory #1 Fan)
here’s a higher number 5 :>
Oh
If higher was maths
yeah higher does do maths
If I was high on math
How cool we are related like that :D
Wait is higher even in our common fren
Wait
Yeah higher is
Wana be frens :D
he’s our only common friend lol
mmmm I need to get to know you better first >.<
Good luck
True dat

The only linkage that holds togather this
I feel like
Gn
goodnight!!
Thanks


Goodnighttt
It's a math server so I'd expect most of them to be nice
Yes well historically if we weren't focused until the task at hand was complete, for example building a shelter, hunting some animals etc., we would've increased our chances of getting hurt or dying.
And they are
well most of them yh
some of the more experienced people are less nice
LMAOOO
tbh the randoms talking in #discussion are sometimes the worst though
this is why I do not have it on my channel list :)
oh you can just add and remove stuff from your personal channel list I think
yeah it’s calmer here💖
that's a good thing 
Fairs
hiiiii dr Zan!!
hi pseudo
hru?
yeah, I'm staying for a month
yayyy
I haven't been here since 2022
that’s a while 
yep

Yay 
Guys where can I buy cheap Klein bottles to put on my desk?


gesundheit!
heited my gesund
Why ignore me😭
fr
oh sorry idk where to get Klein bottles 😔
Try the internet if not local 3d printer?
"the internet" is a good suggestion
true!
And 3d printer won't work because I want it from glass
That yould complicate
of course I would want it from glass though...
Keeping it as is injects assumptions just the same 🤷♂️ I'm not convinced that caused vs uncaused makes the least assumptions, (and I'd still be curious to know how youre quantifying assumptions to ensure that yours makes the least / less than my pastafarian dichotomy)
How do you measure that
How is "caused or uncaused" less assumptions than "pastafarian or not"
You're assuming a high likelihood of no cause
I'm assuming uniform probability of pastafarian or not
You still havent clarified how you measure those
Uncaused falls under not pastafarian
And so are you by framing it as caused or not
You are assuming that it needs to be uncaused if not pasta
On what you assume is a sequence of realisations of iid seq of rand var
There's exactly the same amount in both
"pasta" and "cause" are both one assumption
I'll quote your "by counting its simple" until you tell me how youre counting them
that's chatgpt not math
I did and there was no math
Okay now I will read this
Are you counting the assumptions by asking chatgpt which hypotheses make the least assumptions?
But how do you know yours makes the least?
Omg stop already
Either I will win the lottery, or I won't, it's a 50/50 chance 
Y'all have been doing ts for a good 10 mins already 💀
You're the one claiming yours is minimal, why is burden of proof on me
Jesus, not only are you arrogant as heck, but you can't spot a joke 💀
I can't because I dont know how you're measuring it
No, you've claimed multiple times yours is minimal
I mean all you are saying is that this splits all possibilities into two equivalence classes and then justifying Ochams Razor?
What should I be counting? ChatGPT's bullet points?
But the supposition is complete lack of information on either side
I can come up with some assumptions you are making too: that an event can be happen without being caused for example
but I would posit its not possible
You're trying to argue for objectivity with a highly subjective metric
We have historical information on formations of religions
Which would make religious arguments more shaky than "we just don't know"
As one of the classes contain we don't know
okay, it's still an assumption. Why are you so sure that your way of dividing up the probability space is the one that makes the least amount of assumptions?
This is a very silly statement to make if you're not actually counting them in any objective way
That's what I've been trying to argue against
Default Views would immediately be discarded no? But sure the argument is in lack of information maximize entropy
??? wtf does that mean?
Well again this holds for any bi partition or n partition of the probability space
Sabrina, are you a fan of ET Jaynes
I can't tell🤡
what's the point of posting here if you're just gonna dismiss every criticism as if we're children who don't know how to count to 3?
Whats that, it doesn't seem to be on the paper
Tho I haven't rrad the words carefully
I mainly looked at the maths
How?
I don't see how any other bi partition by proposition P and its complement makes less sense
Its a situation with very limited information after all
Again tho I think this default view would immediately collapse
Considering our knowledge of the history of religion
Not very seriously considering all I know about religious history
Sure. But so is Pasta monsta made universe and everyone else is wrong or someone else is right
As a prior thats as rational in my eyes
Okay but another problem here would be cause
I don’t know the context of this at all but posting random chatGPT nonsense isn’t exactly a good way to win anyone over in a debate
since that doesn't have to depend on religion
Anyways imma go do math now
Since that initial partition you made on Religion vs Non religion is similarly injecting assumptions
Cause vs non cause would be cleaner the
then
but that wouldn't be the partition you wajt for this debate
we may be in a simulation
You see how posting pictures of the hallucinating agree with me machine isn’t exactly the most credible argument you can make though right?
collecting data on the spaghetti religion spread for exampöe
example,
And thats a cause
I feel like Pasta Monster Cause could explain the preponderance of high blood pressure
I should ask chatGPT
Not necessary even for bayesian induction
And not finite either
This is a non finite set
for example
And much larger in some sense
In fact it is uncountable
What I am trying to say is that doing a split between a tiny pool of reasons and a uncountably infinite one given no prior assumption of validity on any claim would put more measure weight on the uncountable set
Your precise wording makes me assume as such
If you mean all possible human ideas even that is finite
Measured by time, counted by word length and conceptual length
the possible reasons is
uncountable
Anyways onto more serious math (small
)
For me at least
(smaller
)
So
I have a weird integral
I built from purely measure theory and ode

Thats why I said for me
everyone has favorite topics
are you implying bushy doesn't understand the math you're discussing?
wow, I hope we can get to your dazzling level of intellect once
I don't think you needed to insult me
Or brag about.
For someone supposedly so smart one would assume some emotional intelligence and maturity
I didn't?
Well not undeservedly at least
which says a lot about you that you would be called immature by someone who uses the
emoji daily
Don't be mean please.
I will stop.
I will follow this advice
I find highschoolers with the undergrad role annoying
you can do whatever you like with regards to that

I think having "Womanizer" on your profile is more annoying than HSers working ahead of schedule😬
what about dropouts with the undergrad role
I don't know the context for this and you should probably contact modmail if it's a problem, but besides that out of context this is HILARIOUS
look at their profile
oh that's so silly
oro is that you?
they do have womenizer i didn't even notice 
NASA hasn’t been relevant since spaceX became what it is today.
That’s where all the smart people go to get paychecks
I mean just look at the numbers
spaceX is decent I suppose.
Why should I learn how to read? I have no plans of working at nasa
More of a spaceX kinda guy honestly
What’s the name of that genius math guy who made all the money with quant trading
Jim Morison
Sorry
Jim Simons
It’s okay I can’t read
goals
but if youre not american you cant work at NASA
so thats like most of the world

I really hate the fact that we live in a society
I really hate the fact that we live
I really hate the fact
I really
It can't be caused because nothing existed before it
Society
want to stay at your house 
But I like living!
And society has benefitted me a bunch!
And further benefits others a bunch, which I like!
I mean, the smart people I know say that SpaceX is a terrible place to work, but hey
The work load is immnent to cause you stress
Hence to compensate
Butt load of money
But there is no true compensation for mental health
Not saying I won't work for SpaceX
HOLY SHIT YOU USED TO WORK IN NASA
That's cool
Actually if I'm being honest
Even as a kid I always wanted to work at NASA
so whos the womanizer
SpaceX is awful lol
yes
Crazy to assume they would hire any ML PhD for 100 mil. Btw, if you’ve read the news, you’d have read that they have set a hiring freeze for their AI team since investors were afraid that they spent too much on their new team
you could also say that nothing could occur without a cause
the kid fell off the cliff due to the gravitational attraction of the earth
the gravitational attraction pulled him bc idk
i dont do physics
the hippos fell off the cliff because higher pushed them
They were the only ones paying that much money, no one came close. And they only spent that money on people that were already huge names in the industry. Not to be mean, but even among ML PhD’s they were the 0.1%. As I see you’ve read on Jim Simons, maybe youd settle at Jane Street or Citadel for like 300k a year. Also good money, but not even close to 100M. 🙂
Good for you, but stop naming numbers like 100M if you’re not making that. That’s like me saying I can make 30B because I study the thing that Jim Simons used daily for his hedge fund RT (econometrics + ML). Or like saying someone studying engineering and then dropout can be worth 300B because Elon Musk did the same thing
I’m starting to feel like you’re making 90% up of your shit. Someone making more than 300k a year wouldn’t feel the necessity to flex their Nitro
hi fiscussy 2
That’s not what I’m talking about, and for someone criticizing others on their reading abilities, you’re doing a terrible job rn
I’m talking about the part where it’s a completely useless observation
Like, someone else making ALOT of money should also have nitro, tf does that even mean
Im not using that logic Doggo, its a useless and irrelevant observation in a conversation that’s not even about it in the first place
He does buy a lot of the things he uses daily though 🙂 (X and Trump)
Idk how that has anything to do with Nitro but you could start with a binomial tree if you’re not that advanced yet
Brownian motions and Black-Scholes are helpful. Haven’t read that much abt it yet tbh
Idk what knowledge she has in Quant Finance, that’s not stuff you learn at NASA
Yes — exactly.
Doesn’t mean it is not used at all for pricing options
idk the exact formula but smthng like dst=mewsdt smthng
In reality, markets do not have constant volatility.
if not too personal, what do u do now sabrina?
blackscholes model assumes constant volatility, but since volatility in reality clusters and changes, people don’t just throw the model away.
You use implied volatility
share market?
Still an undergrad though, will be following my first course in option pricing starting next week
true also the arbitrage opportunities are quickly removed (so that the prices are consistent)
you guys are literally professionals, COOOL!
She is, I’m not
but all of you got nice knowledge
i just learn finance stuffs online
Thanks, will be reading this
Same so far, I’ve only had courses in econometrics and risk, not really applied in finance. Will be following my masters in applied quant finance though and I hope an internship at an option trading firm upcoming summer
best of luck!
Btw @echo plover do you have any sources on where you get your readings from?
I’ve bought those last week, including some theory on the Greeks by Natenberg
Tysm
Sabrina, did you follow any courses on C++?
Are you a researcher/developer?
In the context of making others rich
Ah, thanks for the CSV again, will be using that
You mean the regular finance material? Or the part for actuaries?
k thanks, will create an account for that website
Could I send you a private message if I have any more questions?
Yh my risk professor always rants about the actuarial exam. Where I live the actuarial programmes have the highest starting salary
But theyre also mentioned as the hardest post-grad exams if I remember correctly
Also, I like how much maths is behind risk etc. And its more fun than the mathematics behind econometrics
I do wonder if its worth it for an individual to learn all this if theyre not planning to use it in their day-to-day job. I think there are few individual algorithmic traders that use this stuff daily. Although I do aspire a job in quant finance (which is quite accessible for students from my uni), I'm also interested in applying this stuff to my personal trading / holdings
both of you are bots
I’ve always wondered if it’s okay to listen to music while doing math🤔🤔🤔
I will judge you if you listen to rap music while doing maths
🤣sometimes We need some stimulation when we do math.
😨really?
No profitable manual day traders exist.
*over a long enough term
I mean ICT traders suck
Those who base it on graphs etc, but there’s some logic behind the markets so one should be able to get a small margin (although very rarely)
It's not unreliable, it's a very reliable loss maker. It's easily mathematically proven that day traders will lose money over time. It's extremely similar to gambling.
Exactly
I’m trying to find the common denominator of 792/936 just to realize I have no idea wtf that means
I thought they were called factors
Same as watches
When you use a cheap pen, you write with the pen
when you use an expensive pen, it's just for the style
When you use an expensive pen, the pen writes with you
why does that exist?
and why did you buy that?
then ask that to the person who owned the pen
It was a businessman birthday present
im a random ahh russian
get well soon
wdym get well soon
the pen doesnt have hands
hij
joke's on them, I can't write
Well that's quite unfortunate 😔
So calming in here
react with ♟️ if you use uni ball or uni kuru toga writing pens/pencils
or reply with anything on the message
Move two points and play with the function!








