#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 246 of 1
ykw
????
i simply cannot be assed
I won't talk about it either
what question?
maybe try reading the chat!!!
But anyhow my point was you are working to solve a world problem
The end result is something describing the physical quantities (size) of something
ok here is the equivalent question
orthographically project an ellipsoid onto a plane
is trig physics now
kindly send question
This is very elitist btw deltoid
juat show me question
???????
there is no question
its a simple curiosity
"determine the figure of a planet"
It's literally the same thing with how some people don't consider Spec Z as a geometric object
okhy
thats it
Spec Z is not geometric though
The actual shape is called an oblate spheroid.
Oh no AG
??????yes i know??
its a kind of ellipsoid
ok stayX what is ur point
what r u trying to do
i just trying to solve ur question
Why sully
i will solve it on my own thanks
Spec Z is not geometric lol
having a topology is pretty geometric
as u wish
maybe read hartshorne ch2
disagree
i just tryied
idk how deltoid is making the point that a problem involving ellipsoids and planes and projections is not geometric
but ykw
it is geometric lol
you do you
to me geometric means something like riemannian/lorentzian geometry
i just meant in the pure sense it's not really that
where you care about lengths and angles and stuff
topology is something separate in my mind
that makes sense
I am coming at this from a physics background ofc
the geometry of spacetime is a lot more information than the topology of spacetime in GR
took me a while to ditch the idea that the only "real" geometry is euclidean
the problem in full is just this
given an ellipsoid
u are looking at it from some angle
yes i agree this is geometric af
and the sun is shining on it from another angle
I see three ellipses on a plane
determine the shape of the shaded area
but once you put real life context in it, i dont call it pure math at all
I haven’t really done much AG but it’s very hard to see how it is at all geometric
its okay im just used to pure stuff
okay shiru ur being an asshole now
wouldnt be an asshole if he didnt jump to hate on what im doing
the variable names make it not pure math
calling it a waste of time
i know a lot of people meme about the spec Z diagram but it is geometric

also this
id still consider this pure math

Again I just don’t see how
Tbh I don’t even know what spec Z is
the points are the prime ideals of Z
@.@
it’s topology isnt hausdorff which makes a lot of people think its even less geometric
im already lost
AG is still mostly about polynomials over a field
yeah i know non-hausdorff stuff make people go away
you should probably see the picture if you haven’t, but know it definitely isnt very enlightening
LMFAO
god i hate how elitist this server is
Yeah I guess I just don’t care about polynomials that much
why do yall hate on all math that isnt glorified set theory
Fair enough
I don’t!
theres still math to be done
that's fair
in all fairness i dont think this is a representative view of a lot of the server ime
im gonna find a reason for u to care about polynomials 
I guess, what I like about geometry is that it’s very concrete and visualisable
"trig isnt math its physics" is the most absurd take ive ever heard
And AG to me feels like “ok but what if you threw away the pictures and just focused on symbol-pushing
“
and im like
ok you can but why should I
"Geometry" refers to "space with a sheaf of functions on it" I think
@.@
Yeah this is weird
sure but like you can still get pictures
it just gets cursed I agree
Right but for me geometry is pictures
also deltoids take basically saying euclidean geometry isnt high level enough for me to even consider it as geometry
this server is very weird
I mean it has geometry in the name
I’d say it’s geometry
Euclidean geometry is not real math
???
Euclid did not know about ZFC+AxG+Collatz+RH
by that claim this should be geometric
You misunderstood the implication direction
Geometry is pictures
This doesn’t mean pictures is geometry
hmmmm
I have a geometry of your mum
higher dimensional stuff don't have clear pictures
Sure they can
even in like euclidean geo
I don’t think you’re gonna be able to convince me this is geometry lol
I’m not an algebra supremacist :)
sure..
i can
tell me
you can try I guess?
yes sure
Cant tell if ur memeing or drunk
@junior veldt what is the question about
Idk geometry for me is something closer to differential geometry
^ @umbral thorn
yeah same
They literally replied to this lol
This is wrong. Deltoid didn't say Euclidean geometry is not geometry
everything is set theory trust
Technically true
This picture depicts the scheme morphism Spec Z[φ] → Spec Z where φ is the golden ratio
huhhhhh
hmmm hmm tough ?
Wrong, this is geometric because the golden ratio appears geometrically in nature
Also !nogpt
might be
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).

jojo part 7 be like
this questions come from ?
Does this actually help though?
My approach to number theory has been just algebraic so far
Idk ask deltoid
it's depicting what primes in Z[phi] ramify, split or stay inert
oh damn it was not satisfyin so far
what is not satisfying
Ur mum
i cant understand this just leaving 😆
its okay i can explain with easier examples
yes sure
So you know how in Z (integers) we have primes 2,3,5,7,11,...?
yes
right
yup
Now what if we wanted to extend the notion of integers
And do number theory with different type of "Z" if you will
are u lecturer ???
just stay on point
ok
Anyhow we can take Z[i] which involves taking a+ib, for a,b in the integers and "i" is the imaginary number you might know
yup i know
okay cool
Now the next question to ask is whether you have unique factorization in this ring
and it turns out the answer is yes in this case
so you have the same analog of factorizing an integer into product of primes powers
times some unit
so far so good?
now it's easy to see Z sits inside Z[i]
you can just let b=0 in a+ib and you get the integers
but then if Z[i] has unique factorization, are the primes in Z still primes in Z[i]?
what about splitting
we are getting into that in a min
what do u think
do you think all primes in Z stay prime in Z[i]?
no
yep you'd be right
in fact some primes stay the same, we call these "inert"
Some split like p=(a+ib)(a-ib). These are called split primes
and there is a third category which is incredibly weird
for example in Z[i], all odd primes are either split or inert but 2 is very special
ya
up to units 2 = (1+i)^2
(1+i)^2 = 2i so it isn't really 2
but "i" becomes a unit in Z[i]
just how {1,-1} are units in Z
so we treat them the same
Well isn’t 2 = (1 + i)(1 - i)
yes we can
yeah so the point is since you can rewrite it like this, it's not really a split prime
in some sense it has a geometric picture of having "condensed points"
which is similar here. 5 is the special case here and you can see that the dots are kinda dense
these are called ramified primes
Now I’m confused

5=(2+i)(2-i)
yeah
what's up
I don’t understand what you’re saying
i was being kinda low level with them without getting into ring theory too much
Ramified means repeated prime
huh…
do u want a ring theoretic version of what i said
i think their confusion here is 2 = (1-i)(1+i) so it seems like 2 is split
No different than -4 = (2)(-2)
yeah
makes sense
I gotta say tho number theory is a bitch to understand sometimes
I’m not sure this will even be helpful
You can try I guess
But I have 0% intuition for algebra
Yes but I wouldn’t call -4 a square
can someone help me understand the math behind this answer?
https://math.stackexchange.com/a/2174924
Im struggling to follow this, if the area of a sphere is 4 * pi * r^2 then how does he get pi / 5 for the area of one triangle?
I only see up to:
4 * pi * r^2 = (pi * r^2) / 5
If anything is repeated it's ramified
At least in the reals
boop boop
now boop is ramified?
where does the r^2 go, or since it's a unit circle, r is 1 and it cancels?
This is a googit moment for me
what are you confused about? is it (1+i)(1-i)?
A googit is a collection of exactly 3 humans, 2 planets, 1 proton and 1 beaver

I use example to illustrate the difference between “parsing” a definition and “understanding” a definition
Given this I can recognise whether a collection of things is a googit or not
So I can “parse” the definition
okay let's start again. Are we okay with the fact that {1,-1,i,-i} are units in Z[i]?
But I do not “understand” the definition at all
In terms of why we would give a name to this concept
As in why we need to distinguish splitting and ramification?
if we are okay with the units then I claim that (1+i) and (1-i) are basically the same element up to units
Yes
I don’t understand this
They define the same principal ideal
i(1-i) = 1+i and 1+i is irreducible
Kk
because 1+i is principal 
We're really considering factorizations of ideals
yeah
(2) = (1+i)(1-i) = (1+i)²
ok here is the intuition for ideals in a nutshell
This is not an equality
The bracket denotes principal ideal
Oh wow well that was suuuuuuper clear from the notation
ideals are the "right" algebraic object to think about in a way that you dont get lost with unique factorization
unique factorization is well defined for these guys and it doesn't fail
I don’t think I am capable of understanding this
thankuuuu sooooo much for this
Same!
when the ring is UFD the "ideals" can be thought of as just the elements
u r so coool bro @latent edge
I really have no clue what you’re going on about
are you familiar with ideals?
At this point I’m tempted to say no
: (
I’m not sure if the words you’re saying mean what I think they mean
So I’ve essentially lost any ability to understand you
@latent edge will you friendship withme plz

if i have query i will ask u
Hey Obi
Average convo with Deltoid ngl (I almost used his actual name 💀 (5:30 am moment, gn chat))
I see…
This often happens when people try to explain pure math to me
It feels like they’re speaking a different language but using the same words I know
don't worry, it is hard to get and it is okay if you don't understand it
Mhm, I know
Though it gets annoying when people keep glazing how “intuitive” or “trivial” it is
The perfect life is attained through marriage
Because you need rings to have ideals
💀
im basically trying to say that if you think of regular elements as primes in different ring of integers, this is very dangerous because unique factorization doesn't hold in general
Best explanation fr
I don’t understand any of these words
idle
none of these words either
so Z is a ring right, if you look at those primes in a different ring, they might not have unique factorization
I don’t know what that is
yeah not every ring is a UFD
I don’t know what this is
it's a ring
similar to C being a + bi, where a and b are real numbers
I don’t know what that is
use noggin
don’t know what you mean by that
except it is done with Z, and instead of i it is 5i
he means think about it
I think deltoid is losing his shit now
I’ll have to take your word for it
lol I already asked him what he meant
Is that pfp a nova
it’s a nebula
Ic
anyhow here is why you should care about ideals. In Z[sqrt(-5)] we have that (2)(3)= (1-sqrt(5))(1+sqrt(5)).
I assume you’re not talking to me here
ok I still don’t understand anything you are saying
I am very confident that I am incapable of understanding this right now
also don’t know what this means
Drunken man injects man-made horrors beyond comprehension in the likes of Hartshorne into poor innocent souls
Depicts Deltoid
luckily I have no soul
I think my takeaway from this is I should stay the hell away from AG
True
I am very sure that this will not happen to me
I have 0% intuition for algebra after all
Hartshorne happened
Hartshorne is bad
Chat has recommended it to me 💀
Idk I stay away from arithmetic geometry
I mean look
You have NT which is incredibly cursed
And algebraic geometry
what a cursed combination
my father is math teacher'
I know deltoid gets sad when he explains but the one trying to understand doesn't get it
He gave up 
But idk chat he already does dark magic at this point
Rip
He should go to bed ngl, it is 5:47 for him
@latent edge is one of the best in chat
To be fair my intelligence drops to 0 when it comes to algebra
Maybe he did 
I doubt
Bros drawing a visual guide for her to understand the concept lmao
Potentially
@jaunty ibex hi
I'm taken. Thanks
But there's good images online I think
Bro just joined today and randomly pinging people in chat 
At least it is people who are talking currently
Don't.
Hearing you out
He did!
…no
yeah it's not immediately geometric
Why are you sending a diagram with Galois theory on it for this chat
Don’t understand what this means
im going with the symmetries -> can think of symmetries of some geometric object
idk what that means
well take a square
idk what that is
faded
Destroyed
union of four line segments in R^2 if you will
not sure what this is
ok bye
Denied him too much 
I mean you’ve gotta understand
.
So I literally could not trust any words out of his mouth
It's okay i dont understand anything about what you guys are saying anyway i just finished high school lol, just here to gawk and marvel
this lattice shows which permutation groups are in other permutation groups, and it does have some nice images
Nah I’m just stupid when it comes to algebra
Or pure math more generally
also the first lattice in that image isnt of roots of unity, so it maybe isnt as pretty
I like this!
can i descuss ben 10
(this isnt the same lattice, but it should have an associated one)
i want to know why ultimate echo beat kevin but coudnt beat agregor
Idk any lore lmfao i barely watched some episodes
I'm an algebraist. I would've done a worse job at explaining ngl
But theres surely benten nerds in disc 1
it’s difficult to see how it could’ve gone worse than that
ultimatric
taking elements in O_K is not great because it doesn't guarantee UFD so we instead think of ideals instead
Since if O_K has class number 1 then it is okay but otherwise no lol
Examples: Z[i],Z[phi],Z
Basically what deltoid has been yapping about
Class numher
so rings…?
they are the integers over some field
They are called ring of integers
the ring of algebraic integers
You can think of them as the intersection of Z and Q(alpha)
isnt Z always contained in them though?
yes
Z inside Z intersect Q(alpha)
Is alpha here some (algebraic?) complex number?
Oh I have heard of these!
Yes
Like isn’t Z[i] for the quadratic integers?
yes
Ok cool
you maybe know the notion of "being integral over a subring"
Hmmm so you can put a ring structure on the ideals?
No unfortunately
O_K is a dedekind domain
What does that mean?
if u know what
Monoid
nvm
IJ = {ij}
I don't think it's very enlightening to say the definition of a dedekind domain
Ah, this is that multiplication of ideals definition
You have to see first why it's defined the way it is defined
Now here’s a confusion I have
As far as I know the definition of UFD applies to rings
Are you saying there’s a definition for monoids too?
Let me look up wtf was a monoid again
Just a set with an associative unital binary operation
a monoid is almost a group
you turn those guys into a group by formally adding fractions
Sure sure
But just associative and has identity right
Yeah
well you basically need to upgrade a monoid to a ring
this is the ideal class group which measure the failure of unique factorization in those rings of integers
I think one can consider strict unique factorizations in this setting
well, you have to quotient somewhere
What does this mean?
Since the only possible unit is the identity
but yeah, really factorization is a notion of monoids
it comes from multiplication
Like what I am confused by here is
Ok sure, the original ring is not a UFD
So instead you use ideal multiplication
yeah
But if the ideals don’t have a ring structure
Then it’s not like the ideals are a UFD
UFD implies dedekind domain but not the other way around
You’re misunderstanding
ye thats correct
As far as I can tell, the set of ideals doesn’t form a ring
It's a monoid
So to me it doesn’t even make sense to ask whether the set of ideals is a UFD or not
After so long
ye thats correct
they still factor uniquely
and you call the rings with this property (where ideals factor uniquely into prime ideals) dedekind domains
Hello guys
yea and that's the point
Is this in the monoid sense
sure
The UFD sense only uses the multiplication operation in its definition
Ok now I am understanding
each ideal can be written as a finite product of prime ideals
So it's the same
Yeah I was thinking
uniquely up to order
Cool this makes sense now
Somehow this makes less sense but sure
Ah, so I assume Z[alpha] for alpha an algebraic integer is a dedekind domain?
there might be a way to turn those into rings though
dedekind didnt know what ideals are
he called them ideal numbers
Hello
and there was a wholly different approach to this problem as well which is now forgotten
but probably nvm that 😄
So it makes to ask whether a monoid has the unique factorisation property or not
And for a UFD you’re just considering the ring as a monoid under multiplication
The thing is just because you have Q(alpha), Q(alpha) intersect Z is not necessarily Z[alpha] but yeah Q(alpha) intersect Z is a dedekind domain
But you can also take the ideals under multiplication as a monoid
no
only the rings of integers are
Ah
they are maximal orders
What’s a ring of integers
the non-maximal ones are not dedekind
the set of all algebaic integers over a number field
What’s a number field..
Gotcha
So things which are roots of monic polynomials with coefficients in the number field…?
integer coefficients
I’m getting confused again
Nothing special just take the monic polynomial with integer coefficients
you take monic polynomials with integer coefficients
you can think of all of them over C if you want
What is an integer here
Z
Huh…
those are also called algebraic integers
Doesn’t this just give all algebraic integers
and for number fields you intersect those with your number field
ye, but intersect with your number field
literally x^n+c_1 x^(n-1)+... where c_1,c_2,... are integers
Hm…
Really trying to understand this
So the collection of algebraic integers is fixed
it's okay it's not easy
It’s a fixed subset of C
yes
like sqrt(3) doesnt live in Q(sqrt(2)) and thus not in its ring of integers
A number field is a field extension of Q that’s algebraic and finite
Ah ok hang on
So the “ring of integers” is a construction that takes in a number field and spits out a ring?

yes
yupie
That makes significantly more sense
its analogue of Z \subset Q but for Q(something)
yep
Guys anyone interested in like practising or solving maa putnam or imo pyqs?
No
Yes
And it just so happens that it can be expressed as “Z adjoin an algebraic integer”
Exactly
But in general rings of integers need not take that form
thats also of the form Z[algebraic integer]...
I’d have to use pen and paper I think
Unfortunately I am outside rn lol
Time to boot up some random draw app on phone 💀
I see - so the ring of integers of Q(sqrt 5) is strictly larger than Z[sqrt 5]
Z[(1+sqrt(5))/2] turns out to be the full ring
Though yeah
Are there any rings of integers not of that form?
I see I see
Right, so adjoining one only gives you a Z module of rank 2
But if I did, say
The ring of integers of Q(sqrt 2, sqrt 3)
I assume this does not take the form of Z[algebraic integer]
I would assume it is Z[sqrt(2),sqrt(3)]
That’s my assumption too but I’d have to check
But this is kinda getting out of topic
it's better to adjoint one thing
because sometimes you might get a field extension that's not Galois and lose some info
Idk what that means
But um
Thank you both
It feels like I actually understood something new in algebra
This is very rare for me
Haha, likely not
I’m a physicist, not a mathematician :P
An integral basis for Q(sqrt(2),sqrt(3)) is ||1, sqrt(2),sqrt(3),(sqrt(2)+sqrt(6))/2||
Woops
There
vero with alg NT
Is this what alg NT is?
It actually seems nice
Sometimes
Oh?
Again very rare for me to say this about anything that has “algebraic” in the name
i dont exactly know what alg NT looks like, but i know vero always talk about alg NT 
could you elaborate?
classifications
in alg NT for example you classify O_K's
It's kinda like in chemistry you have a periodic table
Can you remind me what O_K is?😅
Ring of integers :3
Mhm, I’m aware
Ahhhh I see
I forgot why we use O for ring
roing
normal people sorting stuff: ugh i cant wait to be done with this
algebraists sorting stuff: UNNFFF IM SOORTIIIIIING!!!!!

this might sound dumb but I haven’t really thought of algebra that way before
It's okay lol
Clearly cause 💍 shape looks like O 💀
When I think algebra I think symbol-pushing
My advisor doesn't think of algebra this way
But classifications actually seem fun
Clever
sheaf 
I know I use A for rings
order
Because french
Ordung?
Ordnung, yes
oh thanks
Makes sense
but in english its order
the more general theory is that of orders inside a number field
of which the ring of integers is the maximal one
What's an order
Unironically this seems cool
My prof was german and I faintly remember he said something similar to "ordung" and there we go
Is that weird to say
its not weird in that we all expected it
No lol
the definition of order is a bit complicated
Wdym
I am just very not used to liking or understanding algebra
Is it related to valuations
Makes sense
I mainly like algebra cuz idk I just like it ig
Makes sense
it doesn't feel very cancerous like analysis
Lol true
Ah in my case I love analysis
Order outside math vs order in math:
But if I think of algebra as the maths of organising/sorting/classifying
Then I think I could actually like it a lot
Idek what order means outside of math anymore, like what, not chaos?
It is
What is
Maybe it is no sleep brain
I think of algebra as organizing / sorting data
Wait fr
data
Well I also consider all of cats to be algebra
datum would be if you only had one thing, data would be better here
I think I actually understand why people say that now
I like geometry as well but I am incredibly awful at making geometric arguments
Datums
So true
So I naturally just chose algebra
In my case I love making geometric arguments
Because I love the idea of organising or sorting stuff
This is solely why I like algebra
but uhh in the number field case an order is a subring that Q-spans the number field and is a finitely generated Z-module
My autistic ass brain when it comes to sorting:
I am a true fsct at heart
maybe you need something else i forgor
I literally used to carry out mergesort on a deck of cards for fun
💀 crazy work
Does this mean I am allowed to like algebra now
Maybe physics majors will find jobs before cs majors

Welcome to the gang
You're allowed to like whatever you want
:pain:
you were always allowed to like algebra
No you aren't, it is a fate decided by the math gods
@latent edge we got pseudonium understanding the stuff btw
This is quite a lot for me to take in
so dont feel bad
There's no way he isn't asleep rn
I have been afraid of algebra for, like, years
Incredibly based
hi deltoid
i was reading automorphic forms lol
and I haven’t allowed myself to like it during that time
Sleep is cooked anyway
bro is drunk af
Sleep is cooked yes
I think it might take a while but this might genuinely help me overcome my fear of algebra
Algebra is veryyyyyyy easy if u rinterested
One step forward

Genuinely thank you so much
Time to lock in on algebra
Pseudo has so much trauma from Cambridge
Doesn't pseudonium know quite a good chunk of category theory
Mhm…
This is already good enough for algebra pilled arc
Basic category theory, yeah
May I ask what happened
Yeah nG is right
For example
I don't find modular forms to be elegant
I do find number fields to be elegant
Oh I see
I'm sorry to hear this
I still don't believe u
Incoming 1000000 words long modular forms yappery:
True
Guys can multi variable calculus be learnt in 3 days for an exam?
Asking for a friend
Probably
Real
Real part 2
Dang I don’t understand any of that
The first picture already gives calculus 3 + diff geo
Maybe not learnt well
But learnt yes
Gl
What's a 6 lol
6/10
Yes probably
Oki
Start studying now
No sleep until night before in which case 8 hours at least
Joking
Sleep is important
Cocaine complexes
😂🙏🙏
Just saying you can do like 6 hours of sleep until night before in which case 8 at least
6 is the dual of ∂
Cohomology is a quotient on cocaine complexes yes
x∂
It's a whole new world in here.
So many familiar faces.
So many possible adventures.
We truly are in the greatest moment.
This channel is better than discussy
I don't know you respectfully
Cherish it.
Side note it is still bad
lmao
@jaunty ibex come dm
I'm taken. Thanks
Crazy work
@raven plaza come dm
Crazy work part 2
@vernal iron come dm 😉
Lol weak
True
@latent edge come dm 
oh heavens
I'm good
dick move by ryc
@latent edge come dm'
@umbral thorn come dm
ya sure

Bros gonna send u a pyramid scheme link
I'm having lunch at 5 pm why do i even bother 
girl? dms now.
Stack? Algebraic geometry?
boy? dms now.
Just to tell him "I'm taken" 
Lol yes
I DMed her and she said that to me lol
What have he done to u
Deltoid? Mentioned them in passing out of fear
LMFAO leaving no chances 
I feel like Deltoid probably gave you a distorted view of what math to do
Definitely

It's been a journey.
Beyond cooked
But we all grew as people.
You're a father of three you definitely grew more than any
Even in the lows; even in the highs, it was all necessary for character.
Wtf is bludwin yappin about
The worst part is that I find it interesting lol
Good lol
What can I say; i'm one of a kind.
No there's a million more blond penguins out there
All preaching peace
Bro says that and he barely came out of his mom's womb
One of a kind in a different way than he intended
Unfortunately no
Can anyone gift me nitro
@carmine flower It's great to finnaly meet you.
Why do you want nitro
Just for a year nothing much
Cause im boutta lose it and i wont be able to use menhera anymore
Menhera emojis**
Just send gifs smh
Take up too much space 
Can I dm you rq
K, but send me nitro as well lmao
Chat thinks I am gonna be a sugar momma
Buy food for me. Nothing for u
i dont think begging aligns with the rules
Does everybody just ask to dm me cause i have ask on server in my name and then just never dm me 
Crazy work
I ask everyone
I just did dm
O
Bro's explaining a conspiracy theory rn
Who
U
Ur mom is the theory
Conspiracy theory?
Huh?
Y'all I can tell you a conspiracy theory later if you want
But I haven't talked about any recently
💔
Also if possible could you not use "bro" for me anymore (I was fine with it in the past but like /shrug Idk)
Nah you're all good
nonesense
hey
?
Meow
Meow indeed
mrow
Meow 
Chat I become active in this server for 1 night and I get dms from 2 incels
Lmfao, expected tbh
It's that bad?
Now I feel bad for pre-transition me's actions (I was never an incel but like)
Imagine DMing in discord like that
true
I mean there's outwardly thirsty people irl, so it's guaranteed there'll be 10X online
true
bruh you couldve asked like 1 month ago when i could still share my nitro
o wait lemme read all the messages i mightve missed
Lmaos 
@umbral thorn welcome to the mathcord!
you already have one tho
It runs out in 6 days 
Lmfao I ain't gonna install a game and play it for a day of nitro 
its sometimes video
yeah i never do games either
Too much of a bother tbh
real
Then they bug you with promotions and whatnot
The more places I give my email address away, the more shi i get
@fresh comet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiDq5ECnx7c
Jordan Klepper went to Trump's inauguration to talk to MAGA diehards who traveled near and far to witness Trump's... garbage truck? #DailyShow #MAGA #JordanKlepper #Inauguration
Subscribe to The Daily Show:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwWhs_6x42TyRM4Wstoq8HA/?sub_confirmation=1
Follow The Daily Show:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheDail...
these are hilarious
gifted ye
Pogs
fr
ah wait
Has Trump converted these Gen Zers into MAGA true believers, or is this just a rebellious phase? In this half-hour special, Jordan Klepper is ditching the rallies and heading to Texas A&M, a UFC fight, and spring break in Florida to ask young right-wingers why they've turned toward Trump, Charlie Kirk, and even Andrew Tate.
00:00 - 1:21 - Intro...
this one is especially funny
I might just buy the basic version for a month more if i go through too much withdrawal
Atleast i get emojis with that
Though even that's overpriced
nitro basic used to be cool before but discord changed it
you could use animated avatar before
L discord
Exactly, emojis and avatar are the only two things I need out of nitro, the rest is all trash, and dc still took one of those away


jordan klepper pretending to be a conservative is just such a good bit for some reason
man has a talent
i love the way he teases out contradictions and just... dumb responses by not even really doing anything
mhm
Lol normal
Wait till u get creeps asking for face reveal
I never got why some men find it so hard not to be a creep.
I'm sorry you have to put up with that
hi
😔
@latent edge have you read about opetopic omega categories





