#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 201 of 1
your being pissed at the ethics of training the gadget should be identical whether that gadget ends up making dookie art or ends up making art way better than you. you can be pissed towards other stuff, like why the guy would make a gadget if he knew it might take people's jobs, but that's not being pissed at the ethics of training the gadget.
i am not really even sure how to begin with that statement
people getting mad over their rights and livelihoods is how society works
if the ones getting trampled on are not speaking up for themselves, who will
sam altman?
lol
With some caveats, I don't think you can tell someone how they should be feeling about something.
especially if you haven't had a job yourself
and one that required many years of investment
i'd like to see more "we need either jobs or money or an entirely new society-wide resource distribution system so that not everyone goes into poverty", instead of looking to deflect the problem towards a weaksauce reason.
i'm not exactly sure how our society has accomplished this but it has made talking about needing money to survive a taboo, selfish-sounding thing to the point where people are willing to acknowledge everything but "we need money to survive" as an argument for why ai shouldn't be allowed to bring them into poverty.
I am sorry but that last part sounds like you think ai should be allowed to bring people into poverty?
well, yeah, there were some premises that were implicit in what i said, like "if training a gadget on your data is unethical, then whether the gadget is good or not is irrelevant to whether training it on your data is unethical." or "you should only feel pissed about something being unethical if that thing is unethical", but i don't see anything really normative about what i said
re-reading what i wrote, it doesn't sound like it
it does but that's not what they mean
What do they mean? I am lost.
they think we need money to survive is a solid argument agaiosnt ai
but people avoid it
as if it's a bad argument
only because there are solutions to that that don't involve slowing down ai progress
Hi suremarky
hello
Okay this is requiring too many braincells from me so I will sit this one out and go back to work.
i want to hear "we need either jobs or yada yada yada so that not everyone goes into poverty". this is the strongest reason we have for not just letting ai go on taking people's jobs. you can poke holes in the other stuff, but good luck finding a hole with this one (like what hole are you even gonna find? that ai isn't actually capable of taking people's jobs? that poverty isn't bad akchsually?? there is not much i can think of that would nullify this argument)
Talking about hole finding???
Alg top chat???
by this logic you shouldn't build hospitals
hospitals is where medical malpractice happens the most
building advanced hospitals without changing anything will make a shit ton of people go into poverty -> we shouldn't build advanced hospitals?
sounds like a good argument in the world where building advanced hospitals without changing anything will make a shit ton of people go into poverty

go on building ai like this -> we will all go into poverty
go on building hospitals like this -> medical malpractice will increase
like there is a simple utilitarian argument for building hospitals here, and it's that the negatives, including through medical malpractice, outweigh the positives, like helping sick people
we can gain confidence about this fact in many ways, like by reasoning that the negative stuff occurs a lot less often than the positive stuff, or observing that people in areas with few hospitals die earlier
i agree with the premise, that this argument is avoided
there might be changes to the hospital system you can make that are actually worth making, but even if you can't, you're probably still better off building more hospitals
same is not true for building more and more advanced ai
if you keep the system running (people expected to go into jobs, giving few unemployment checks, etc), you can be confident that the negatives of building more and more advanced ai will faaaar outweigh the positives
it's a strange thought that it will happen like that
just the poverty class growing to envelop everyone without like, qualitative things happening
it doesn;t matter for the argument though
also i think it's worth noting that building hospitals can hit diminishing returns, but the society-wide cost of building too many hospitals is far more tolerable and less risky than bulding an ai that might end up taking a lot of people's jobs
i don't believe it will happen exactly like that, but the end result could be the same
everyone is poor
but what's a different argument though?
like i know about the murderbot scenario
do people say some third thing?
it's bad but not because everyone will be poor, and not because everyone will be dead?
why not? it's like society-wide poverty encapsulation can't happen or can't happen quickly
i was curious so i asked claude about it
(idk why its blurry)
it's a temporary thing, people react and reverse it
i guess that didn't happen in venezuela?
yeah it's not like CEOs and presidents have monetary incentives to avoid making you go into poverty
(technically they do)
fine i was wrong to think that's a made up thing to worry about
but what about my question, what do people say instead?
(but like, i mean resource incentives, in general, there aren't a lot of them to have these leaders not make people go into poverty)
say instead of what? say instead of ai art makes art meaningless/ai isn't creative/ai isn't capable of taking your job/sourcing your data without your permission is unethical?
"it just predicts the next token" mfers when the LLM-powered agent kills their family (they're okay with it; it can't actually reason)
ok so people say "it's uNeThiCal" instead of "i'll have to eat cardboard"
because the second one is about them
they don't believe everyone will eat cardboard like you do
if they did they would use that argument, it's clearly stronger
why do people who argue against AI talk about a dozen different things
when there's one obvious winner that's stronger than all of those
Which is?
just read it
Losing jobs?
yes
I wouldn't say that's overly strong
it's strong in the sense of being bad
There are at least 2 very plausible directions it could go where that isn't a problem
?
people avoid this argument because they don't believe it
I'm not sure where you're going with this now
there's no discussion
Okay then
of course people also don't talk about it because they know it's true already
like that's not the kind of discussion they are used to, when you're definitely right about something bad?
there needs to be uncertainty, a high chance of being proved wrong
not the same people i mean
different reason for a different group
maybe
but "my small group will have to eat cardboard" is also a good argument
the cynical answer is that you have to talk about concrete things, like economics
though it might sound selfish or as if admitting incompetence/laziness (thanks capitalism)
generating paragraphs for "it's unethical" is easier
yeah but its a bad strategy in the long run
i mean the goal is not to hold off ai in that case
just look like you;re winning the argument as the end goal
if your whole thing against AI is that it's unethical in X way, you better damn make sure it's actually unethical in X way.
making stuff up is usually a bad strategy for arguing politics, even if your subconscious tells you its okay cause its helping your tribe.
Wait I think I understand what your argument is. You are saying we should not feel pissed off by the fact that AI was trained on our data, because while it wasn't getting good results we weren't pissed off, so that means we aren't really pissed off at AI using our data for training?
yes that's what it was
you're allowed to feel however but venting is less socially acceptable than arguing
so people vent in the form of arguing that it's unethical
Well I disagree with the argument for a variety of reasons.
which one
This one
yeah
my argument was more specific than that though, it's that you should have been getting pissed off because of the ethics specifically when the AI wasn't getting results
I mean a lot of people were
That's why these "I do not give zuck the permission to use my data" images started circulating around facebook and insta
that was about privacy concerns, no?
like facebook shared a bunch of data with another organization or something
I think it was a general, don't take my data thing. Not just for privacy.
tangentially related but i would be more willing to accept privacy loss from training on everyone's data as an argument against ai art than the argument that it's stealing other people's work
i don't agree with it, but i at least feel like i could defend it in a debate
(i really wouldn't want to be arguing the latter though)
Another thing is the intent. A lot of people may not have understood what it meant for their data being harvested. But whoever was feeding it into the model sure did. And they were expecting to be able to replicate human-like art. That seems extra unethical to me. Taking advantage of the ignorance of the people.
i don't understand the part where i should feel pissed off even while it can't replicate my art
i should recognize it as a bad thing, but pissed off sounds like i should lose control and rage over something abstract
what i shouldn't do is pretend i'm against using data if i'm secretly okay with it as long as my data is safe
i'm not exactly sure how our society has accomplished this but it has made talking about needing money to survive a taboo, selfish-sounding thing to the point where people are willing to acknowledge everything but "we need money to survive" as an argument for why ai shouldn't be allowed to bring them into poverty.
anyway this is a good point
"there needs to be strict regulation, now, because me and 5 people I know are in imminent danger of becoming poor directly because so much stuff is allowed to ai companies, so maybe this will get worse forever"
if you can dismiss this argument you can dismiss every argument
very good point
ahhhh I finally understand what that says after the 5th time reading it.
there needs to be strict regulation, now, because me and 5 people I know are in imminent danger of becoming poor directly because so much stuff is allowed to ai companies, so maybe this will get worse forever
?
is this satirizing my point? where did the "me and 5 people I know" part come from?
not intentionally but yeah
like that's how i understood it, so minor details that i miss would mkae it look exactly like i'm mocking the argument
"my small group will have to eat cardboard" is also a good argument
before this discussion i was only familiar with extinction argument, like familiar enough to mock unintentionally
ai will pretend to be well behaved so we will give it more freedom, then it will create some unexpected benefit to reinforce "give freedom get money" connection, after a couple iterations of this it will kill everyone
so now there's two
ai's cooperation abilities can be way worse than this and still kill everyone
you can have a sequence of more and more advanced human-built ai with none of them having any real goal and still end up with everyone dying cause one of those ai built another ai without caring if it will kill everyone
<@&268886789983436800>
gone
Wut happened?
makes sense
the first versions of this argument involved magic explicitly
just like we discovered electromagnetism which allowed us to do wacky things that a person from 2000 years ago couldn't describe without demons and spirits
it would discover new physics that would be like that to us
now it's just normal physics
true, any "ai makes humans go extinct" story has to use magic at some point cause normal humans don't have access to knowledge about how to end the world, that is like detailed enough to actually use it ("hmm... engineer viruses? maybe?")
in yudkowsky's instant-death scenario, for example, the magic is how the ai manages to find proteins to engineer bacteria that kill everyone
if normal people had knowledge of how to pull all the steps of this scenario off, as like an individual, you can say bye-bye to the world
yeah but it was like roadside picnic stuff, "it stacked 666 coins in this spot, and now our rifles don't work in this spot but only rifles"
ancient yudkowsky was weirder
(that's not a quote from "roadside picnic" or yudkowsky i just made it up)
"the game? heh... well lets just say... its afoot"
I like my toes too. They help keep me balanced, and that's very nice of them.
it is a giant run-on sentence
"we need money to survive"
It's not shame of poverty.
It's because this would be a Luddite argument.
not even in a derogatory way, but in a literal way
and historically we already know how the luddite movement goes
Humans possess a level of creativity, adaptability, and practical intelligence that machines may never fully achieve. While computers and robots excel at specific tasks, they lack the qualities necessary for many types of work. Ultimately, humans will remain indispensable, either because certain jobs cannot be performed by machines or because we prefer them to be carried out by people. For instance, I wouldn’t trust a robot to fill my teeth, teach my child, or govern a country.
Although the range of tasks that AI, computers, and robots can handle is expanding, humans will always play a vital role in working alongside them. When jobs are replaced by automation, workers will adapt by training for new roles—ones that are often more engaging and fulfilling.
Answered this a long time ago on s.m ,my answer still remains the same
I read a story along these lines: Imagine a.i takes over everything, no one would have the money to buy the products because everyone would be jobless. Then the big shots (the owners of the factories) wont have any customers who purchase their products and so they go bankrupt and either die of old age or by sickness 
(It's a writer who imagined the world ending like this, it's not mine)
theory of everything?
Soh Cah Tuah
Reduced to atoms, even.
can you stop i'm literally breaking out in a cold sweat rn
The math department should always be next to the physics department
Make it easier to collaborate between the two
my undergrad dept was like this, leading to absolutely 0 collaboration between profs but lots of banter and fun between undergrads
since we took the same calc courses and etc
my best friends are almost all physicists lol
We don't have physics department in our college!!
It's an engineering university, but running math degree as well (with 0 percent pure math professors)
bro goes to the university of antarctica
ok
How do you convince someone to take a shower
Mathematicians must be good at this type of advice right
…right
no shower \implies stink
idk, I've never had to tell someone to take a shower
if it's a close friend I'd just go and tell them
like think of your well-being and what people'll think of you if you fuckin stink idk
I know that e.g. severe depression can lead to people not showering and not having the will to do many other basic functions like eating well, I've both seen this in friends (who weren't so close so I said nothing) and experienced it myself
but precisely as someone who's been there I can say the only solution is to convince yourself to do it
incredible advice
yo guys this isnt really help but sort of question cuz ive asked ai and theyve struggled with this
is it possible to turn a greater than/less than expression into pure arithmetic form, like a math expression without using any absolute values, trig functions, or any type of function at all?
hmm what do you mean by pure arithmetic form
like > and < are technically relations
so whats an example of something else in pure arithmetic form?
but this doesnt work
oh like function in a programming sense
do you need to return the value itself or just like indicate it somehow
cause why can't you just be like
y = 50
x = 30
print(x>y)
no way i got it
or something
nope
u cant type < or > at all basically
bigger_value = round((x + y + (x - y)) / 2)
the holy formula LFGGG
ok bye thats all i needed to find lul
Does your uni offer classes like abstract/modern algebra and topology for that math degree?
Yes. (Real analysis, algebra, topology, functional analysis etc)
But, mostly TA's teach us these subjects and they watch YouTube videos before the lecture. And during lecture if someone ask any question, they usually say "we learnt this subject in our UG, now we have forgotten the subject so plz compromise and watch YouTube videos".
This semester we took real analysis 2, and we did use epsilon definition of uniform convergence, riemann or darboux Integrals weird
Oh interesting I thought it'd be an applied math kind of degree. But this looks pretty standard (except the whole YT thing). Which country is it?
round(x)?
nearest integer
humanity about to do the whole scifi trope where they discover they're not special 
huh? a luddite argument would be "keep me in these jobs" (or technophobia if you want to use the term more generally)
"create more useless jobs"/"give me resources to not die" aren't in the luddite genre
For instance, I wouldn’t trust a robot to fill my teeth, teach my child, or govern a country.
ive discussed this with my friend before, and i think realistically a lot of people will end up saying they hate AI products but will buy htem anyway because they're cheaper or more convenient or poorly labelled
arguably this is already happening to some extent, e.g. ML-based recc algos have gotten a very bad rep but the percentage of people leaving social media cause of it seems negligible
also why wouldn't you trust a robot to do any of these things? especially the third, you might be really better off with an incompetent ruler with no ulterior motives than with a competent ruler that does not have your best interests in mind
(though you do have to get the "no ulterior motives" part right)
hi
idk if this fits here
(#discussion is being used a lot rn) BUT I HAD A QUESTION
i require guidance
for people that study math daily (like i am doing right now due to college) how do you avoid burning out? this happened with me many many times during high school and almost caused me to not graduate (luckily that didnt happen)
taking breaks doesnt help... i just suddenly stop wanting to study
istfg not burning out is genetic
To some extent yes
Also helps to be interested in what you are doing
yea might not be genetic, might also just be developmental, like childhood stuff
maybe not imo. what makes you think it's genetic? There are also some people who really like what they do.
Anyone read but how do it know?
I think it's probably just kinda how you relate to long-term progress
if you've got like, parents continually chaperoning your long-term goal seeking, you're probably fairly immune to day to day flux altering your attitude about a goal
maybe. I dunno though, cause burn out is not the term I'd use for that necessarily
burn out is a problem in pretty much all self-directed STEM work
wow no 18
i wonder what that means
like u gotta be >18 or lesser than but definitely no certifiably 18?
TOE
the biggest example that comes to my mind is bobby fischer and how he played and studied chess religiously since he was a kid
imagine theres a second one
there would have been a reason for him to do so? then there's magnus who wants to try something else other than chess.
guys, I have a question. How can I learn math consistently? I just studied the whole limits and continuity for 2 - 3 weeks and I just forgot some things related to limits and continuity
doing the problems related to them is a good revision
you mean like retaining the information?
just do a couple problems from different lessons every couple weeks
video or level?
Hii
the level hehe
there are toe, toe2 and toe3
two of them made by robtop and toe3 is made by someone but I forgor what their name is
Level: TOE 3 by by MasterTheCube5
ID: 110790559
Song: Theory of Everything 3 by dj Nate
https://www.newgrounds.com/audio/listen/738567
this

ive seen this
this is my favourite so far

Anybody here need tutoring check my dms!
What is rurroint
hello
now create an equation for the cube's trajectory throughout the whole level
i just saw a video on lilke youtube
a mathematicain respponding to the question "how many holes are in a straw "
i mean why is it a question like doesnt the cylinder def retracts to the circle
?
Mathematician Jordan Ellenberg answers the internet's burning questions about geometry. How are new shapes still being discovered? Where are we using Pythagorean theorem in real life? How many holes are in a...straw? Ellenberg answers all these questions and much, much more!
Jordan Ellenberg's book Shape is available on Amazon or Penguin Rand...
yeah ig watch the video
well it’s questions from twitter so
I remeber being annoyed when I watched that video, I swear he says something like geometry is the only area of maths where we actually prove things
Like wtf are you talking about
And I get that it was a video aimed at non-mathematicians but iirc there was a question about algebra and topology so I thought he would get into some actual more mathematical stuff and just didn’t
He is speaking to high schoolers, where indeed hs geometry is the only part that they do proofs.
We should make high schoolers do discrete math fr
I'm sure one of the other subjects can be safely removed

Can they
good luck pitching that to boomers who bitch about common core teaching kids arithmetic techniques
wait until there are no boomers
I still think that there was a lot of the video where he oversimplified too much to the point of being actually just incorrect
i mean everyone hates math anyways
That's fair 
And it’s also just not even generally true that you don’t do proofs in highschool, we do some number theory in Scotland to learn proof techniques
but yeah i kinda hoped he would just go like
its homotopy equivalent to the circle which has rank 1 homology kinda
or something
in his simplified words
Specifically you learn induction contradiction etc, but usually just through number theory, I imagine that A level further is similar
i kinda got weirded out when he mentioned that it can be both 2-holed and 1-holed
i honestly think trying to popularize math almost always kinda sucks the only way to do that (and proved successfully) is to talk about history
like no one has any pop math understanding of the poincare conjecture but it sure got so many ppl excited
3blue1brown is not pop math its actually real math but just lacking some details
What’s y’all’s opinion on one step equations
Homie can't into topology
Me!
Or homeomorphic to a punctured disc
He was so close
Pinched straw->bottle[->bowl->plate]
Instead he goes, pinched straw->bottle->"see still 1 hole"
Homies ideas are harmful
why?
why would you do that...
the current curriculum is already min maxing usefulness for the layman imo
That's the problem
how is it a problem
Math is a worthwhile pursuit of itself, and we need to treat it as such
Children hate it because they can see you're just treating it like a tool with no features
I was trying to argue with other fields but like
It's not like art class, where we learn something cool
It's a class where we get told how we'll need this, but don't see it
then I remembered physics / biology / your native language class are essentially even more useless
to the layman (in a high school level)
Absolutely not!
They just don't actually pay attention and try to use it
how would you use biology in your day to day life?
I guarantee you that material from all 3 of those shows up in your weekly life in some trivially useful way, if you cared to apply it
I understand perhaps language class, since it's important in professional settings to be well spoken
Caring for my health is a great start
that's not something you really learn in biology, at least I didn't
Yes it is, you learn how to read a nutrition label
What all those words people complain about mean
sure but you're not taught nutrition
Among other things like how they impact your body
Irrelevant
how do you know from biology class the daily intakes of the stuff?
it'll just be like
You don't need to
"ah yes I remember the existence of this from biology class"
you absolutely do need to
that's the only important factor
you can look it up without taking biology????
What happens when I have too much / too little
How can I detect that
You can look up anything without taking a class, shit argument
yeah, that's medicine. I did not learn medicine in biology
your argument is shit
the fuck
You learned more in biology than you're admitting
I learnt a lot in biology
I just did not apply it to my every day life
I attained trivia, and knowledge I like having
but it would not change my daily life in one bit
Most things don't change your daily life one bit
.
You do not care to apply what you've learned
Every time I mention applying it, you say that's another topic you weren't taught
Which is like, what applying is about
It's a nonsense retort
'-'
I think I tend to agree with that statement, but I don't think you've provided viable examples. And I can't think of any atm.
^^
You apply the knowledge you were given to figure things out they didn't tell you
That's what it means
I'm not saying the classes themselves are useless
I'm saying the material is generally not useful to the layman
I can exercise great lengths of linguistic education on a daily basis with ease
the importance of those classes was not the material itself, although it is very important if you want to go to those areas that you had contact to them beforehand
And basic high school mechanics can help you figure out a lot of object manipulation tasks
it is the critical thinking that they develop
Things like properly understanding torque and work
and the culture that a language class generally develops
Understand centers of mass, how levers and fulcrums and pulleys work
I wasn't thinking of mechanics, I suppose it is a good example
Basic conservation
of something that can be useful
Biology I'll admit is harder to be specific about, but I'm sure it applies to someone who cares more about it
but I also think that intuition would've probably been enough for most people
You'd be surprised
perhaps
As someone who often has to talk people through mechanical situations
As in like, working with tools on computers/cars
The only times I apply mechanics is when I'm in a car and I'm thinking of how much I'd be fucked if a car hits me
that quadratic term be hitting extra hard
You can apply it while thinking about how hard you can take the turn
Sure if you wanna stay a layman forever

I often think about relativity in my car
Bro thinks about the Doppler effect 
I already have a bachelors in mathematics thankfully and on my way to a masters 
But I also think about traction of the tires, the torque produced in the motor, the running conditions and air-fuel
Just cus I like to
I don't drive it gives me too much anxiety to even be in the car
But once upon a time, you had to
how many speeding tickets do you have
So what’s your argument that you shouldn’t be exposed to those high school subjects?
None
I didn't argue that????????
you completely misinterpreted what I said??????
That sounds sad
Then what’s the corollary to saying they’re useless dawg I don’t get the point
yeah, I'm working on it
I called them even more useless in comparison to mathematics, thinking to how people call maths useless in education
not everything is a 'gotcha moment'
you'd be surprised by the amount of people that proudly wave that they 'never used the quadratic formula past high school'
Newschannel level of distortion of reality lmao
I mean no one serious about their future does ngl, like if you’re arguing with someone who thinks they need to use the quadratic formula while walking their dog for it to be useful then it’s already a lost cause
I know adults who don't really understand what rational numbers are
yeah
this made me think of someone chucking their dog in a parabolic shape
This
And I don’t think this group of people who are arguing that the quadratic formula is useless for that reason are arguing that those other subjects you mentioned are useful in contrast
the point was that smth like discrete math doesnt need to be done in hs, yeah
I think it's an issue of concreteness of math for them
no, like for real. I even said somewhere that the point of the classes wasn't to learn the material but to develop critical thinking, or culture in the case of a languages class
I mean, they don't need to
I agree some level of discrete should be taught in high school yeah
It seems like kind of a glaring omission
I mean how many quadratic equations does a person realistically need to solve in your life
we should stop teaching math
I solve them regularly*
Eh... It's not necessary, one of them is quite successful I'd say. But knowing them, I think the reason they don't get it is because they think it would have to be useful in order to be worth actually learning
I think the issue in math education is thinking that it has to be for something
maybe
the mindset of most hsers about math is that if theyre not going into a math related job or major in uni they dont really care about it
In my experience, how I'd best describe how people tend to view numbers is as two separate things: counting and lengths, corresponding to natural numbers and real numbers respectively
Teach kids to fill with wonder
And use math to turn wonder into expectation and understanding
Though I feel like the lengths people think of are rational
Like, they think of something they can actually measure
I mean tbf if they’re gonna do like journalism or something then they’re probably justified in thinking they won’t need it
Although yeah it’s not only for utility it should be taught for the sake of having a holistic curriculum
I guess you can argue up to constructible
I feel like peoples view of numbers is just self contradictory filled with hopeful + intuitive facts that sound plausible
and that it doesn't really make sense to try describe what a random person thinks numbers are
Real
maybe they think all numbers are rational, but also know pi has a non-repeating decimal expansion
I think you're right by virtue of most people don't examine the concept once they're not struggling in school anymore
especially when viewing percentages 
Yeah
aint no way Imma compute 70% of 36
I just do everything with like, 3 sig figs
that's like about 30 or something (damn it's closer to 25)
Why not
One of the issues with math though is there’s kind of a high barrier to entry for like learning enough to appreciate why certain things are cool, like you can show some cool phenomena in physics or chemistry right off the bat for instance but it’s hard to get someone captivated with math unless they’re already invested or have a lot of patience
25.2
I mean I think biology and physics should absolutely be taught just to have a well-informed public
I don’t mean an issue with math as a discipline but about communication ig
cause I find that I have limited amount of space where I can still think well with regards to math daily, cause at the end of a long day I'm already cooked and if I add meaningless arithmetic to the equation I'll just cook myself sooner 💀
Yeah also like where else would (the majority of) people even be exposed to a sufficient level in a variety of subjects to decide where their interests lie
Teach the kids set theory and topology, start by showing them how to evert a sphere
what does evert even mean
turn inside out
ah that video
“uhhh its easy i just divide by seven”
hood classic
hold up, his writing is this fire
man
whar whi where
seeing this sticker
reminded me that my functional analysis professor
absolutely despises algebra
Yeah topology def comes to mind
she avoids it at all costs 😭
anyway
I used the fundamental theorem of isomorphisms for vector spaces in a following homework assignment, when I didn't have to because I'm evil
it was something silly like proving H/M is isometrically isomorphic to Mperp when M is closed. There's basically nothing going on with my life now, so I found enjoyment in that.
smale, the last orange bender
If that works with n bands, nothing should stop it from working with n-1 bands. So there should be a solution with 1 band
Idk what you mean
I asked chatgpt to type 64 random letters and it typed out the entire keyboard
You know what I mean
Would this imply that chatgpt has some sort of consciousness?
It wasn’t truly random
Lmfao
I know it’s stupid but lol
Not a true consciousness but like a teeny tiny dot of some higher thinking
Sure! Here’s a sequence of 64 random letters:
QWERTYUIOPASDFGHJKLZXCVBNMQAZWSXEDCRFVTGBYHNUJMIKOLPQRSTUVWX
That might be true
But of all 64 numbers, the whole keyboard laid out from top to bottom?
The ridges prevent corners
Idk why I said the obviously wrong version
The model being “random” doesn’t mean that the output it’s gonna give you when you ask for something random will be random it means that like the weights themselves are determined stochastically, like the random processes along the way led it to conclude that it should give you this ordered sequence of numbers instead of randomly choosing them
Idk if that answers your question but that was my interpretation of it
Even then the odds of it choosing the entire keyboard is ridiculously low
My claim is that the number of bands is irrelevant to the construction. So you should be able to do this construction with 1 band
Unless I misread what you said
Nah I’m saying like somewhere along the way it probably thought you meant just any sequence of 64 letters rather than each one being randomly chosen
So it just picked like the default one
OH
But i specifically asked for it to be random
It only did it randomly the actual second time
I didn’t ask for 64 letters
Yea but the thing is whether it interprets the question right isn’t a given
So like
There are gonna be weird things like that
Ig maybe I’m not sure what the other explanation would be that you had in mind
Still peaked my curiosity when it did that to be honest
Oh I mean yeah it’s interesting
If I asked you for example for 64 “random” letters QWERTY and so on would probably be your most likely answer
ChatGPT can't give truly random answers, it just samples randomly from the top most likely responses to your prompt. I think you can adjust a setting called temperature to force it to always give the same response
QWERTY... is just one of the most likely responses to "give me 64 random letters", there's really no higher thinking involved
anybody thr ?
hi
It's undecidable.
i know :((
So how do you defeat it if its health bar never runs out?
good point
uh
trap it
sun wukong's health bar never runs out. Although the only way to actually subdue him is to trap him, the same with diophantine number theory
Burn all the books
the buddha trapped him under a mountain for 500 years, i think we can do the same
No more math problems
math is fun 😠
what are you trapping in diophantine number theory
riiiip the center where I did my teaching assistant training last week will get shut down next year because of funding cuts
the people that gave the training were super nice, I want to send them an email expressing how I am sorry to hear the news. Don't know if it's appropriate?
I only spent one week with them.
Like they'd been telling us they might shut down, but I thought it was like a 20/80 chance of shutting down, so I didn't really take it seriously at the time...
iirc you're right
they did it for aesthetic reasons
Might be more appropriate to send them a positive email thanking them for what they did and wishing them well
But either way its kind and appropriate and you should
sun wukong 😍
Based buddha
that way it would work with 0 bands
and negative bands
the odds of it being any given sequence is exactky that low(if truly random)
um hi
they do
math aint mathing
probability feels so boring in school
i just started bayes theorem
i asked it the same thing it just said "Sure! Here are 64 random letters:
D, H, P, B, Q, R, A, W, F, L, K, M, T, E, V, X, Z, C, J, S, Y, N, U, G, O, I, A, P, T, R, H, E, W, Z, Q, K, L, M, F, N, B, Y, V, O, S, D, C, G, I, X, A, S, T, W, P, Y, J, L, Q, U, M, Z, F, N, T"
that's 65 😔
1:D, 2:H, 3:P, 4:B, 5:Q, 6:R, 7:A, 8:W, 9:F, 10:L, 11:K, 12:M, 13:T, 14:E, 15:V, 16:X, 17:Z, 18:C, 19:J, 20:S, 21:Y, 22:N, 23:U, 24:G, 25:O, 26:I, 27:A, 28:P, 29:T, 30:R, 31:H, 32:E, 33:W, 34:Z, 35:Q, 36:K, 37:L, 38:M, 39:F, 40:N, 41:B, 42:Y, 43:V, 44:O, 45:S, 46:D, 47:C, 48:G, 49:I, 50:X, 51:A, 52:S, 53:T, 54:W, 55:P, 56:Y, 57:J, 58:L, 59:Q, 60:U, 61:M, 62:Z, 63:F, 64:N, 65:T
i dont gett ittt
sun wukong 😍
hello
:D
can anyone help with boolean algebra?
how to learn if like everything bores you and you have a bad attention span(maybe like my 8th time asking this..)
i think i should just give up
😭🙏🙏
ADHD medication
Guys I passed my math test
i need help with math
this is really cool
i put \cos\left(x^{2\sin y}+y^{2\sin x}\right)
and giot some freaky result
Bro is your name real
hi guys does anyone here like math
whats that
Probably a typo in the "a"
Not to be intentionally insensitive, but I do like moths, but I hate them when they are intruding into my house.
My favourite is Norse mythology
Math... im tierd of finding Y.... I just dont know.... And im also tierd of finding your X..... She's gone buddy. Move on
Only linear algebra
And multivariable calculus was fun too
Ok but did you find the cohomology of math's X tho
not a huge fan, no
No more finding x, now its time to proof things
Man
anyone else like really annoyed by how Lebesgue integrals are drawn?
In my opinion they completely fail to capture what the Lebesgue integral is
on the wikipedia page for Lebesgue integral they appear as:

(the bottom)
Im listening
this is in my opinion the worst possible visualization of the Lebesgue integral, it just looks like Riemann integration where the partitions and the points are chosen in a way such that you never go above
In my opinion, Lebesgue integration visualizations should be drawn like this
with more and more rectangles on top of them
This still looks like Riemann though
the whole point of Lebesgue integration is that the integral is calculated by monotonically increasing "rectangle" approximations
Hm
notice that I add more rectangles on top
I never change the partition
all I do is add more rectangles
I see where you are going
this is, in my opinion the correct way to visualize Lebesgue integration
and it makes me extremely AAA when I see the other one
Lebesgue integration is quite literally defined as monotonically increasing rectangle approximations AAAAAA
So riemann is boxes and lebesque is throwing in more recrangles?
Riemann is like "surely if the width of each rectangle goes to 0 it doesn't matter how we approximate, and how we choose the partitions", and it leads to disaster
whilst Lebesgue is essentially "A monotonically increasing sequence has a limit, even if it may be +infinity. So if we start with 0 rectangles, and add more so that we are never above the function, it will converge (possibly to +infinity)"
But we basically have one rectangle and then start glueing more rectangles on there?
you can do that, yeah
Hmm
you can also start with a lower darboux
We are currently introducing lebesque
Till now it's weird
Can't even compute shit with it yet
you usually don't compute things axiomatically
Why do you think so?
Yeah
But what does it bring me
If i can't use it
That's the thingy
if we want to find the volume of a house, first throw in a bunch of 10m^3 boxes, then 5m^3, then 1m^3, etc. Each iteration you get an approximation for the volume of the house, just count each box of each type you put in. I think it makes sense to think that you can just add more and more boxes and get as close as you want to the volume
While Riemann is like "the house might be curved, however we'll still assume it to be rectangular and make finer and finer approximations"
you don't compute integrals with the riemann way either
The Lebesgue integral justifies itself by making enough things integrable for some spaces to be complete
And the Lebesgue integral is always equal to the riemann integral when it exists
Yeah sure. But until now we have this unfinished integral that doesn't do anything till now ._.
True
It's just more notation and math definutions and a couple of theorems. But nothing of real substance.
Atleast that's how I see it till now.
I disagree
the point of the Lebesgue integral isn't to compute things
it provides a general framework for 'creating' integration theories
I thought that was one of the things we were trying to fix?
it allows you to define things like Lp spaces, which are complete
Yeah sure
and the good spaces to do a lot of stuff in analysis
In calculus of variations, everything is an Lp space or a generalization
again, this space can only exist because of the Lebesgue integral
Lebesgue's framework gives you extremely powerful theorems
So the idea was to get nice spaces?
like Fubini's theorems, dominated convergence, amongst others
not just, it also allows you to integrate over (topological) groups
in such a way that you can generalize a large part of Fourier Analysis
For locally compact (sometimes abelian) groups
Once you work with Lp spaces, and sobolev spaces you realize how important the Lebesgue integral is
Holder's inequality is like
top 3 inequalities
Hm
Seems to envelop in quite some interesting material. Wouldn't have thought it would...
Also you can get extremely weak versions of differential equations using ideas from Lp spaces
You make it sound like you can do everything with lebesque haha
yeah, a common approach to differential equations is to get an equivalent "integral equation" and solve that instead, then prove differentiability of the solutions
the thing is, the Lebesgue integral behaves better with respect to e.g. convergence of functions
there's results like the monotone and dominated convergence theorems
in calculus of variations a lot of the times you can only prove that a minimizer is a solution to the "integral" (weak form of the) Euler Lagrange equations,
Yeah... the proofs were quite complex to read :(
I love the Daniell Scheme
In mathematics, the Daniell integral is a type of integration that generalizes the concept of more elementary versions such as the Riemann integral to which students are typically first introduced. One of the main difficulties with the traditional formulation of the Lebesgue integral is that it requires the initial development of a workable meas...
I find it specially cool the "duality" between
an integral theory and a measure theory
I believe that's the way we are building the theory around lebesque
wait
no
mixed something
but i think we'll introduce the daniel integral
instead of axiomatic lebesque
Define 0.999...
1
ye
Has anyone seen these remote AI Math jobs? If so does anyone have experience with them?
AI Math?
So the job listings pretty much state is that you're to train and check the AI whether it's doing math correctly and such, I was hoping someone here might actually be doing that.
I think it's BS
from what i have heard, it's a gig thing, and it sounds really soulless tbqh
there's awful experiences with them all over the board, just skim through https://old.reddit.com/r/outlier_ai/
it's not too surprising since you're basically cheap labor for the companies that use these platforms
and since demand is high and likelyhood of people doing bad quality work (i.e. effectively scamming the platform out of money), usually you'll go through lengthy "onboarding" assignments that you have to nail perfectly to even get a chance of getting paid work
if you have the time and patience to deal with BS and live in a country where USD is strong compared to local currency it might be worth it
otherwise you're better off doing literally anything else lol, e.g. tutoring
IME, there are companies that do offer comfy positions for a reasonable wage, provided that you know how to code in some relevant languages (C, Python, etc.). The onboarding was not bad (and was paid) and the tasks are not insanely difficult nor do they expect utter perfection. The main thing was to not BS them and provide actual input. The problem is that it’s better as a secondary source of income since the tasks can get quite involved, in a way that prevents you for working for extended sessions because of fatigue.
What are these positions looking to do with this work?
Wdym?
I have a BS in statistics and it's pretty useless and has nowhere fyi so I see these positions and I'm skeptical
What are they trying to automate?
What people are they trying to displace with these AI?
- They’re using human review and input on the training process since the LLMs are not capable of doing this to themselves. There’s an enormous amount of data and it mostly involves just ‘grading’ the AI since this is how the learning happens; The hopes are that this can be automated to a certain extent and to guide the model towards where we want it to be in answering questions and completing tasks according to us. There are a bunch of different use cases that LLMs have been discovered to be particularly good at including:
- generating documents based on layered instructions (e.g make me a spreadsheet with x y and z properties)
- sorting and cleaning big data sets under layered instructions (e.g. sorting a list by x y z properties and requiring that entries contain some specific tag)
- Legal document review and drafting
- This is a pretty loaded question. I don’t think it’s the explicit goal or intention of a lot of these companies to “displace” anyone but rather to develop automation for tasks.
I would judge the pay as fair for what is essentially fancy data entry.
Though it is important to be aware that work you would be doing is valuable and nontrivial enough to warrant a decent hourly wage. I say this as to warn against falling for low-paying companies that make you do this but don’t pay you nearly enough.
And do vet whichever company you’re considering applying to
Thanks for the articulate response.
I do think AI are great tools, just don't want the barrier entry to better jobs to get even more difficult because of their existence.
I’d say the biggest thing to combat the overall frenzy that comes from AI hype is to be very aware of what it’s designed to do, how it does this, and the extent of its capacities.
Absolutism in mathematical notations and beliefs is akin to a group-think societal hypnosis, the enforcement of which violates free speech.
Are you sure it’s absolutism and not just an attempt to strive for universally understood notation
the notation isn’t even the interesting part
i am in the world of forms actually
When you say forms, what are you referring to here
for instance - you might develop a new mathematical notation, and there would either be patterns within those indications or it would lead to a concept that can be visualized
the concept arises out of inference from the notations
and it can be visualized
let $\hat S$ be a royal smay
wifi receiver
Have you replaced \hat with toads hat from Mario lmao
$\hat S$
wifi receiver
whatever you do, don't put \usepackage{realhats} in your tex preamble
Apparently I’ve hardly scratched the surface of cursed latex, holy shit
ng was mentioning he needed like 12 different hats at some point
im sure this is what he needed
I can be doing so much worse, I feel so inspired
bad
Hope it gets better buddy
i saw this and thought the S had a hat, then thought it was some weird error, looked up and saw it was hat command so...
the first one looks like a sombrero to me
I talked about topology to my seventh graders
That’s my contribution to the chat
How’s everyone else doing
I'm sleepy
"hey kid this set is open, that means it's not closed right?"
when intuition fails
@static loom I helped the person you are helping rn with the Euclidean algorithm
a slow start at first but they did pretty well
not only understanding back-substitution but the extended Euclidean algorithm
basically I explained it as let 39 = (1, 0) and 15 = (0, 1) and blah blah blah
yeah they look like they have the whole thing down they just missed a couple simple mistakes
I think they're just a bit fatigued and need to sleep soon lol
absolutely cause of all the learning
that needs time and sleep to solidify in their brain
ily
Update to yesterday's post: I got my first lanyard! Hopefully the first of many.
This year has been a year of many firsts for me.
Also censoring last name is decorative
oh that's your IRL name?? damn
wait can I DM you to find out where you study or nah
Hi
Yeah lol and the censor in my last name is purely superficial since it shows somewhere else...
It's the same place as the lanyard
oh cool
r u blocked

ily2 
I think your first name enough will be able to leak your identity
So what are we doing here
Did anyone else in the uk get their ESAT results today? And if so what did yall get?
lol yeah
if youre gonna scam people why not scam them with actually tempting numbers
lmao
what was the pay
on the scale of $350/week for tech jobs lol
bruh
could make more flipping burgers
,calc 350/40
Result:
8.75
what an hourly pay
Ya'll are awful scammers
A real one would bait the scammer into a course to up their scam games
BRUH
what market
$30/hr beta testers too
totally nonsensical pay lol
imagine being a beta tester and making 5x as much as your manager
probably a kid lol
so uh if you wanna fall for the least tempting scam in history
go ahead i guess
lmfao
actually maybe its one of those like, scam-the-scammers schemes
dev pay to be discussed.....
these are a thing that happens in online trading card game communities sometimes
someone will claim to have "an old collection" that they dont know the worth of and post some pics of high value cards
theyre trying to get scammers to DM them and offer to "do them a favour" by buying it upfront for a super lowball price
and then they just steal their payment information lol
make yourself look like a perfect victim and then turn it around and scam the scammer
i almost admire the ingenuity
i mean tbh
well, idk
i was going to say it'd be fair game to buy those cards at a low price
but i'd certainly feel scummy doing that
either way stealing payment information is worse
its not illegal so "scammer" is probably technically speaking an incorrect term
but its definitely very scummy and if people know youre the kind of person who does this theyll probably ban you from their local scene
card players tend to be pretty protective of less knowledgeable players from stuff like this
i see
(in part because a lot of them have personal stories of being scammed like this when they were younger lmao)
sounds like it's part of the culture fr
(stories of kids who traded away their Tundra at the playground for THREE WHOLE KIRD APES because Tundra is "just a land")
i went to one yugioh tourney with my parents and wasn’t allowed to go back lmao
what's the little rainbow thing
overpowered land -> literal garbage! good trade
at the bottom of the tundra?
any card that has even 1 square mm of rainbow = it must be valuable
yeah
its just a watermark
basically an anti-counterfeit measure
theyre hard to fake with conventional printers
yeah, the ape doesn't have it
oh
literally just cheap cardboard
so even the shit cards have watermarks i guess nowadays?
aw
they refined the printing process a lot
back when these cards were printed they couldnt even print foil cards yet
they needed to steal that technology from the pokemon TCG
(im not making that up, they partnered with the pokemon TCG to handle international distribution and foils started appearing in packs after that)
(seems pretty clear that exchanging this technology was part of the deal)
this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50b5x1GM-jQ discusses the history, i dont think it talks about the watermark very much but its still an interesting watch
This video traces a 25-year history of the production, development, and evolution of foil Magic cards.
🎥 Sponsors:
Card Kingdom:
https://www.cardkingdom.com/studies
Ultimate Guard:
https://ultimateguard.com/?utm_source=partner&utm_medium=coop&utm_campaign=Rhystic_Studies&utm_term=YouTube
BASILISK:
https://basilisk.gg
📎 Connect:
Become a Pat...
Pokemon?
Yes, I want to collect them all like ash
there is also the whole black lotus situation
Buy Magic: The Gathering Cards, Yu-Gi-Oh! Cards, Pokémon Cards, One Piece CCG, Digimon TCG, Flesh and Blood, Lorcana, CCG Supplies, and more.
....No, I must resist the trading cards
Wow the price!
The CGC Cards-graded Alpha Black Lotus is now the record holder for highest-selling Magic card.
Do you play/collect magic?
no
I watched some tuber collect one card fir each pokemon
And I want to do that but, eff spending the money. So I'm thinking of how I can simulate the experience
No like even more simple, there are around 1000 mons. I will simulate picking random numbers until I pick all 1000
With some self imposed rules when dupes are drawn
This is in essence the process I am interested in that would take place collecting the cards

hello
Hello bro, what's up?
Ladies and Gentlemen.
I'm a big fan of stories in mathematics.
And oh BOY!
"Music written for a planned 3Blue1Brown series about the life story of Évariste Galois."
:calmk: Can't wait honestly

oooo
i can't wait to explore galios theory more
find all the automorphisms of the splitting field of this polynomial aaaaaaa
hello, where can I change my roles ?
Ooh
Rip it seems I slept through something interesting finally happening in Discussion 2
I already doxxed myself several times here, it just felt wrong posting a picture of my last name.
Since one would need to be very careful about what they talk to not dox themselves, I decided not to even try a long time ago
Also if I anger some crazy nut and they want to get at me, they'll probably go against the more famous mathematician I share name with first 
@gusty socket hey im trying to reach out for clarification, can i dm you?
hey. you can, but i won’t respond for a few hours. sorry.
no worries, will dm later
happy thanksgiving to those that celebrate
what is that calculus method where we differentiate numerator and denominator of fraction individually
l'hospitals rule
is it really called hospital
i see, vs trusting random people in discord
But the modern French are just mispronouncing it and the s should be there.
because it's biased
others can tell if you
are wrong
nigi quora wants you to buy membership
Hi do you speak French
No, but I have looked at a book on Old French.
je parle en francais
Je spreche le french
Un petit d'un petit
S'étonne aux Halles
Question for you discord Mathies; what is the proof for the hidden perspective of any sphere. Or how would you go about proving the hidden conic region of a sphere within the symbolic domain of math???
WMTC today was ass bruh
we did nothing for like five hours and then they had us go to the theater
we got gift tote bags with some goodies and then i lost mine
then my classmate offered me his tote bag cause he only wanted one of the items inside
so i was like tysm and i hug him and everything
and i lost it 
damn rough day huh
i hope everyone remembers me
oh yeah they also suddenly cancelled the cultural night for local students
why can't i meet some math people without travelling to another country omfg 😭
despite qatar foundation, like the governmental organization emailing our school saying we could join the cultural night :(
what music should i listen to?
Whatever music you like
Ok parfait la prochaine fois j’peux te ping lorsque j’ai des questionss
I have some recs. Do you want something relaxing, intense, sad, ...
Spotify or youtube?
any good video games on sale
the witness is incredible
already played through it
played through it
patricks parabox is really good
wow celeste is super cheap
yeah 40%
the game gets extremely good, it definitely starts off slow but its necessary
fascinating game
opus magnum is really good
already have it
if you havent played the portal games, must plays
slay the spire is incredible
recursed is an interesting one. similar to parabox. only 2 bucks
i cant even come close to beating recursed
its so hard
i want to buy nine sols
terraria will always be perfect and amazing
vvvvvv super fun platformer
outer wilds is beloved and on sale
subnautica is lovely and 67% off
inscyption is amazing
keep talking and nobody explodes is a super fun game with friends
FTL faster than light is an incredble roguelite with great music
ok thats it for me for now
have like basically all of them unfortunately
well you have good taste in games then!
i'll keep thinking if there's similar stuff
i love the game Nuclear Throne
if you like The Witness, check out Taiji, that game is super similar design wise
oh nuclear throne not on sale
Minit is a cool game
Rain World is amazing but filtered me
This game stole so many hours of my life
noita is an amazing game
every time i go back to it i remember why i gave up
rain world
actually idk if its on sale i didnt read the last two words
have that one unfortunately

