#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 196 of 1
Nobody's helping me in help-forums 😭😭😭 like istg
why do you cry about this
people aren’t obligated to help you
they’re all doing it for free
It's just an exaggeration
anyway there’s a higher chsnc3 of help if u post in topics channels
They actually gave me a really good tip
oo
based
nice profile pic
someone that Good at mathematics
xd
is there anyone that very good in mathematics here
I want some private discussion
its not any kind of math homework 
just something (math) that pop up in my head and i discuss it with chat Gpt
and suddenly got interesting.
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
sorry
but well, im still onto something (maybe
)
Sorry
Well im here to discuss something anyway,
are you, a guy That understand math.
im just wanted a good discussion
not anything man
im not racist
ChatGPT is certainly on something the way it hallucinates
yea
This is kind of a weird question, but what's the most useless math class / subject a student (grad or undergrad) would be expected to take? For example, right now I'm taking a Galois Theory course, and my professor said that the actual results from Galois Theory don't get used much today*, but it's a good class to lead into higher / more modern algebra. I was just wondering if there are more topics like this where there's a sense in which its good for a student to take the course, but they likely won't need what they learned from the course. *Besides like fundamental theorem and general extension stuff
Innit?
i tried learning arabic in
i think last year
the writing
and i haven't continued it so i forgot everything
o i know a
ا
اااااااااا
actually maybe i remember some
Your first language?
tagalog
Never heard of it
Oh I see
If you want to learn the script then it's better to learn the Persian or Urdu sounds.
salamat means thank you but I j think it's origin is arabic
oh…
In my native language it means "all right'
Arabic can hurt your throat.
Persian and urdu sounds are easier.
i see
And arabic ain't got چ ژ
Can you read my name?
I'd honestly find speaking arabic easier than learning the characters but that's just me lol
Somewhat, from a Persianised culture.
i learn writing first when i learn the language lolz
i forgot that s-y character
?
i only know a
I see, why'd you like to learn Arabic though?
Oh I thought you were religious.
i had some algerian friends
Great.
it's been a while since we talked but yea
in case we talk again
i gotta show off
lol
and yea, just in general
Like chill servers
you can chill in #chill
Hey guys i have a difficult dilemma
How to decide between combinatorial optimization & analysis/geometry on manifolds (following lee's book)
I can only take one
probably best to ask in #advanced-lounge
Why is that channel no access
What's the role's name ?
undergraduate
Wait, isn't that an exclusive selection ?
Like, can only have one of the 4 roles
The roles represent where you are in knowledge and study, not where you are in academia
Wdym one of the 4
Can't have all 4 no ?
It's pre-uni, undergraduate, postgraduate, I think it's clear you'd only want 1 of them at a time. And there's only 3
Ah, 3 then
So I don't know what you're talking about
And idk which one do I choose
I am not done with highschool but my favorite past times are type theory & category theory
Choose undergrad if you know what a vectorspace and integration by parts are
In what course did you start learning about rings, groups and fields?
I do know both yes (tho I use a calculator for calculating an integral, I can't do manual integration since I never had a need for it)
I assume that happens in a first Algebra class
I don't know
I just read a book and watched some videos
Part of a book
I have not finished Pinter
Will that give me access to the other channels ?
It'll get you into #advanced-lounge I think
because we started studying them at the beginning of the first year in uni, and I don’t know how normal this is.
Very confusing system
If you're in for math and doing algebra that makes sense
Groups Rings and Fields are the basics of Abstract Algebra
yes, it's true
Have y'all seen that video where a guy proves cbrt(2) is irrational?
does he say x^3-2 is irreducible by eisenstein
i hope y'all remember me
A guy did something similar to that once and they killed him for it
Nope
not really confusing lol
unless if you are new to discord
yea you were supposed to choose a role during the intro screen or whatever
Hey, if anyone from UCD is good at explaining calculus (preferably with bio applications, like the MAT17 series), I’m looking for a tutor who can go over concepts with me at a slower pace
Guys how do I get ,w wolfram alpha to input value of x into derivative and straight up give me the gradient?
you just ask it to compute gradient at a specific point
,w derivative of x^2+x+1 at x=-1
This might get quite heated, so I will try to be civil.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IedVRYUNWUU
At 4:04, many comments were pointing out that the kids were saying "Kite, Hit, Steel, Plane, Must" and that this is some kind of ritual and not a coincidence, but I think it's not. At 4:35, I think it's "playing" not plane because I saw the "g" at the end of the word on the board.
It's about 9/11
even if they did say plane like ...
yeah no i get it
but like and ???
"george bush was in a room with some kids learning word pronounciation and they said plane !!!! 😱 😱 😱 😱 😱 BUSH DID 9/11 !!!!!!!!!"
like it just doesnt make any sense 😭
Guys I need help or I need a formula for a specific question
calculate the sum of the first 100 positive integers
Is there a formula for this question?
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
Bush did 9/11
And Bush killed dinosaurs
Aww man I love dinosaurs
Go hang Bush!
He also plays golf
He also funded the Taliban.
To do 9/11?
The most despicable crime of all
Guys can we mod dinosaurs.
No in general
Shit, like Reagan funded contras
9/11 was al Qaeda no?
Idk
I do.
My name is Max Muller and I was there.
Woah
W embed 😭
Exactly, it's such a fat capitalist's sport.
Any controversial opinions?
dinosaurs aren't real
You are 6'4 your opinion doesn't count.
? im not 6'4
thank you @quasi jetty for always responding to our messages and clearing inconveniences in the server, you really are a superhero
Not really
@quasi jetty is a dumbass
With no free will.
@quasi jetty are you a dumbass? Silence means agreement.
its a funny instagram comment i saw a couple days ago
I didn't know this. I'm so angry 😡😡😡 /s
I don't tolerate killing innocent dinosaurs
@neat lintel خودی کو کر sigma اتنا، کہ rizzler بندے سے خود پوچھے بتا تیری aura کیا ہے
واہ! brainrot کے اقبال ھو آپ!
I'm definitely storing this.
It's the funniest thing on discord.
Let's hang Bush! Let's hang Bush!
what...
Bush ethnically—no, speiciecally cleansed the dinosaurs.
Get on the streets and protest!
yes keep this ping to your help channel please
☠️
guys im new here, i see that math subjects are separated by text channels. why does competiton math has its own category? is it different from like an undergrad student math? im genuinely curious
welcome to mathcord! 
as for your question, I’m pretty sure #competition-math doesn’t really fit cleanly into any category, but went into the pre-uni one because that’s where most people studying for math comps are at
I’m not 100% sure on this though
Welcome! Don't ever go to competition math. Open Apostol's analytic number theory and ask questions in #advanced-number-theory
the propaganda continues… 
generally competition math is solvable by elementary techniques but still has to be hard so it often relies on "tricks"
undergrad math is about building theory
deltoid isnt ruining anyone with useless comments, more just being annoying
I agree tho advanced number theory is cool
i see, for some math olympiad questions in my country, it does seem like it does not fit into any category too. i love math but i never got the chance of participating... those competitions are mostly for highschool students. now i am in my first year of uni.
oooh that makes total sense
what is analytic number theory?
Have you done number theory before?
no, i only had calculus and linear algebra
you apply analytic techniques (mostly from complex analysis) to study number theory
hmm
the first thing studied was the distribution of prime numbers
so its more focused on large scale phenomena
I blame Deltoid for making modular forms stuck in my head
the earliest result is showing that the sum of 1/p over all primes converges
Yeah instead of studying a niche case, you study what happens in general
uhh sorry, i never heard about it before...
thus giving an alternate proof of the infinitude of primes
i have a dout
then people built on that
But you know what is a prime number correct?
daoubt
ive read somewhere that the distribution of primes are related to the natural log
check out #❓how-to-get-help for math help 
yes
k
this isn’t the place to ask
Yeah true
That's the prime number theorem
primes grow like x/logx
its proved with techniques from complex analysis
you essentially evaluate some integral to get it
i might sound dumb but primes are positive integers right? what does complex numbers have to do with their distribution?
funnily enough the earliest proof relies on some trick
that could appear in contest math
It's the fact that a special function (the Riemann zeta function) encodes information about primes
do you know what a taylor series is
yes i do
The proof of PNT relies on knowing what happens at s=1 in the Riemann zeta function
so you construct similar functions that are infinite sums
i know the zeta function but i dont know p series
Ok do you know why the zeta function converges for s>1 from elementary calculus?
they are of the form $\sum a_n n^{-s}$
Lochverstärker
i know it converges for 2 and 3, is it for all s>1?
s is allowed to be complex
Yeah
Now we take s and extend it to complex numbers
those functions can be factored over primes similar to integers
and the coefficients a_n encode some arithmetical data usually
And we make wishful thinking and say "can we define the function for s<=1? Not only s>1?"
it then turns out that the poles of those functions give us other arithmetical data
Turns out you can by a process called analytic continuation. This will extend the function everywhere except at a pole (singularity) at s=1
This pole as Loch said is what gives u info about prime numbers
So in a sense analytic number theory is about connecting discrete things like prime numbers to complex analytic things like the Riemann zeta function
Having a bridge between number theory and complex analysis
wow... those things are connected
how does this work? i know factoring reals but how do we factor a complex function?
sorry i never had complex analysis before, i might sound stupid asking these questions
find their roots
like finding the roots of polynomials?
if you originally meant polynomials, yes
but in the precise sense that loch means, some abstract algebra is involved
ah okay so i need some knowledge before understanding these statements. i am really new in higher level maths (just 3 months into uni) so i still have so much to learn
thanks everyone for answering!
Np
Hopefully that gives you some interest in analytic number theory
its called an euler product
its not too hard to derive but discord isnt the best format for it
but you can look it up at least to get some idea of a connection
Leonhard Euler proved the Euler product formula for the Riemann zeta function in his thesis Variae observationes circa series infinitas (Various Observations about Infinite Series), published by St Petersburg Academy in 1737.
this looks pretty understandable
and maybe suffices to convince you of some connection between primes and the riemann zeta function
I was gonna explain that you can generalize this further but I'm not that knowledgeable with langlands shenanigans
Maybe ask nG or Deltoid for this
i mean you first generalize to dirichlet l functions
which isnt too hard
and this already gives you a lot
Yeah you just stick in a character
At least for Dirichlet L functions are not bad
you soon run into hard stuff
euler himself did a lot of unrigorous (at the time) things
it took decades of research into complex analysis to justify some things
same for riemann kinda
I agree with the first part off this message, anyway
Competition math is very much its own beast and has very limited overlap with academic math in general.
I was never remotely good at competition math, and I did fine reasonably well passably as a mathematician.
Wrong channel, try in #discussion
Yeah I mean my real message was the first part
Competition math is a propaganda created by liberals to sell courses. Changed my mind
I mean, I agree with this entirely 
theres a crazy arguement happening in discussion about like trans people
That wasn't the argument...
oh
lmfao
whats the arguement about then bruh
DID
???
why are they arguing about DID
Ask them
idk man their discussion seems pretty heated
dude theyre literally talking about trans people
I don't think you read
Find me academic research about gender-affirming trans healthcare from the 1800s and I will find you academic research about non-abusive plural healthcare (it exists, but it's few and far-between and we are too tired to go search for it)
thats what the dude with the minecraft block said
Did you ignore every other sentences and cherry picked this one?
no this is literally the first sentence i saw as soon as i opened up the other channel
ur advice doesnt work
i asked and they didnt reply
never cook again

a much greater alternative to Stellarium can be made, in the much more natural VR realism direction, highly professional 3D game development style
there is huge area to professionally improve astronomy simulation software, the telescope simulation in Stellarium is relatively rudimentary
the demand potential has to be high, something seems to practically lynch all sensible high quality development now
what are you talking about my dude
astronomy is a very mathematical area, lots of mathematical science history revolved around astronomy
All fun & games until u send cyclic group of order 4 DUN DUN DUN
i hope you guys remember me
I think I do from the pfp alone
鹿乃「Stella-rium」のミュージックビデオです!
※TVアニメ「放課後のプレアデス」のオープニングテーマ
2015年5月20日発売
鹿乃 1st SINGLE 「Stella-rium」
M1. Stella-rium
作詞: くまのきよみ 作曲・編曲: samfree
M2. Walk This Way!
作詞・作曲・編曲: samfree
M3. ここから、かなたから ~bambino ver.~
作詞:くまのきよみ 作曲:伊藤翼 編曲:samfree
【初回限定盤】
価格:1,500円+税
CD+DVD
※特典
■缶バッジ2個セット
アニメイト・ゲーマーズ・とらのあな・ソフマップ購入者先着特典
■クリアファイル
TSUTAYA、タワーレコード、HMV、ワンダーグー購...

Provided to YouTube by CDBaby
Solarium · The Groovy Nobody
Solarium
℗ 2023 The Groovy Nobody
Released on: 2023-08-18
Auto-generated by YouTube.

lol kano



Wow
9 years ago
I'm amazed at the quality of the animation and music
Even. 9 years back
i m back
:3
wb
full form?
shortcut for welcome back
which standard do u study in
thank you sir
cs
not a sir but you're welcome
my dream
Oo then?
I'm switching to comp eng tho
which field of cs u working upon
whats ur role
the diamond I mean
not the best one
where?
just regular
diamond in canada?
no
good question
it is like you don't wanna share information in public
ohh'
privacy
whats privacy field?
never heard abt that
i mean r u in frontend , backend , full stack , database management or what
it is regular
ok
DBA Full Stack DevSecMLOps
bruh my teacher tweakin
I couldn't figure out how to stuff in more buzzwords
she put 40% of our grades on a surprise benchmark test, everyone got 70s or 80s (except the people who cheated)
so a bunch of people in class had their quarter grades drop by 5-10 percent
I feel like I have this problem when I self teach myself something like topology I get over my head and my thoughts feel like a inferiority complex plus the subreddit: iamsosmart
what do you mean by that?
ruminating?
Desmos added a complex mode
when I study math, I will just go through each page and do all of the exercises.
is this the correct way to learn?
specifically AoPS books
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/cqvkejtcyr messing around kinda fun
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/m8aiamleag obligatory
Damn, cool
another fun one for you https://www.desmos.com/calculator/s2ggltljqn
aha, try to remake it with complex exponentials now 😎
nah i'm too lazy
here's sm else instead
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/eatigmd91u
you could use exp(il) or e^{il} instead
here's making an ellipse with two circles in opposite directions of different radii
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/jc8kpeybfh
hey is it possible to include bounds in a ti-84 calculator?
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/1lgzs2yjye alright off to bed
Why my Desmos doesn't have complex number feature 
I had gone to settings, but I didn't see any setting related to complex numbers. 
nvm I have to close Desmos and open it again
Yeah, I see it now. I just keep Desmos open so it doesn't get updated
i m bac
ideal octagon in beltrami’s elliptical model for hyperbolic geometry spotted in the wild
though the place is better known for things like…
I agree
BRUH I’ve been making my own complex number calculation shit
I don't seem to be able to find work development partners in spite of the involved value quality and high potential. It feels creepy lynching into total social and economic isolation. It feels like forced sick social insanity.
I suspect that by now some publishing houses would pay me in advance to write a book. There seems to be creepy background blackmail strangulation of all work collaboration potential.
I can still do a large good work difference with the right collaboration team in spite of my medical tranquilized state that disabled my ability to do high performance software programming jobs: https://mihaiv.wordpress.com/2023/05/15/communication-problems-and-important-human-issues/

BOLZA SURFACE
mwahaha

oh sounds interesting 
interesting appears desmos in complex mode computes gcd in Z[i] https://www.desmos.com/calculator/kmz6abumos
i love reading about history of math
"mathematics. A chronicle of human endeavor" its quite interesting too.
this one is a nice survey that goes through the history of dynamics and chaos, particularly the seq. of events that led to the study of the Lorenz attractor https://perso.ens-lyon.fr/ghys/articles/lorenzparadigm-english.pdf
pretty :3
Guys is there anything like IUPAC but for mathematics
in what sense, like how they have an established convention for naming organic molecules?
chronic*
the IEEE 'standardizes' use of mathematical symbols
mathematicians dont conform to those standards
why dont you try proving it
i did it
good work
a < b
c < d
a - b < 0
d - c > 0
a - b < 0 < d - c
a - b < d - c
a + c < b + d
thanks
IEEE trying to standardize OS interfaces
software vendors
nahh
linux
nahhh

posix is overrated 
which is also not used 
i guess it might be important for highly technical documents
which math papers arent
at least not in that sense
Is there a way to prove stuff without actually having to prove it or be awake
lol
Those who know
Yeah it's called proof by intimidation
Now we just need computers that feel fear and math anxiety
.pin
Be Ramanujan
Obtain theorem via dream
theorem because i say so is also based method
oh btw i started my RA journey few days ago expect to see me shitpost in #real-complex-analysis real soon
Thanks for the warning!
you are welcome
Just started? Weren't you reading Abbott for some time already or something
no it was few days ago and the book i am reading is Rudins
and yes i am very slow
You're probably faster than me
can we pin this
this is so funny
like this is peak discussion 2
you can't pin it? 
iirc only senior mods can
no
and honorable users too
since when it got changed
really?
ye
they pin like this
thats the command to pin iirc but they cant pin comments
just ask lean
I don't think you are slower than me when I'm slow + I prove all* nontrivial theorems by myself + think of and answer my own questions.
*unless I'm not planning to use that theorem and don't find it that interesting or something.

Nowadays I even have sections of self-exercises 
Before wrapping Rudin up, I'm planning to try to independently develop the theory of derivatives on normed vector spaces and see how far I can get. 
It seems fun
1+1=?
Efficiency 📉
hmm good opinion but one problem I dont understand math
In Z_2, the value of 1+1 is equal to your creativity.
2+9+9-5=?
Wdym
"grass"?
Yooo hey South
funny running into you here
could you help me out?
Im getting ghosted by the IB server 😭
are you AAHL or AASL or what, remind me again
AA HL
Any ambidextrous Mathies in chat???
Me
Fr
Fr?
Imagine being ambidextrous. (I am dyspraxic.)
I'm ambisinister
wise owl how should i survive the shitpost that is real analysis?
There's nothing shitposty about real analysis.
(Except for the recommendation of Rudin as a book for beginners)
the thing with analysis is that i am too slow and i dont feel any progress is there any method to help me do it faster?
Doing it in an university course, since then the pacing is imposed on you
same same
Posted
literally math is learnt by asking the most stupid questions and working things out
yet alot of people just love acting elitist and trivializing non trivial things and hence making asking them stupid questions just more of aburden
😦
What are some ways to ask stupider questions?
an LLM might help you with that
alternatively, you can lurk in #discussion for a few hours
like okay i understand if one gets "angry" at an "undefined" question
in the sense that it says that the student is missing a key thing or a prequisite
but like
whtvers
It actually did
`Here are a few ways you can embrace asking "stupider" math questions:
Ignore conventions: Try to break rules intentionally, like asking what happens if you divide by zero, or what happens to a negative number raised to a fractional power, without worrying about whether it "makes sense."
Mix different fields: Bring together topics that don’t usually interact, like asking, "What would a complex number matrix look like in 3D space?" or "What happens if I take a limit inside a summation that's inside a geometric shape?"
Mess with dimensions: Ask questions like, "How do I multiply a 1D line by a 3D cube?" or "What if circles had volume?"
Deliberately misinterpret terms: For example, "What would subtraction mean in a world where numbers are emotions?" or "If a function is lazy, how much effort will it take to make it work?"
Ask about impossible objects: "What would a square root of a negative number be if we didn’t have imaginary numbers?" or "What if infinity was just a really, really big finite number?"
Treat math concepts like characters: Ask questions like, "How does zero feel about being used in multiplication?" or "If fractions had personalities, which one would cause the most problems in an equation?"
By making these playful connections or tweaking basic concepts, you’ll explore math in creative, unexpected ways!`
Okay, so something like this
Maybe we can make imaginary numbers real by making them into 3-D numbers?
guh
you made chatgpt invent new crank maths
this is a pretty good guide of what questions to not ask tbh
Yes
Everyone wants to know why you can't divide by zero but nobody wants to know how's zero...
This is next level
I get so much validation here I’m like a prime number
Cartilage
pin this
Lol, I'mma stealing this 
in the saying about "stupid questions" the "stupid" is due to the questions being simple or elementary, rather than nonsensical
or so I think anywya
i do maths for about 6 hrs minimum , do some frontend codes..and 2hrs for other subjects ..i play clash of clans in my free time
What do you think of prisonmathproject?
I think sending people to prison for bad math is a radical but promising idea
i extol the death penalty
For bad math or just in general?
What if we hack the project and train a legion of homotopy type theorists
Very civilized of you
I liked how Pythagoras drowned that guy for revealing something about octagons or whatever it was
You could take the centrist position of just sending them to reeducation camps
The project is actually about, getting prison inmates into math.
the one that proved that sqrt(2) is irrational?
Hi
Start with game theory… prisoners dilemma.
The project has no association with that particular problem. I think they focus on Number Theory. At least it started with Number Theory. It's just to help people behind bars to do something with their lives while inside or outside the walls.
I figured as much. I was just being facetious. Ditto the others above.
Hello guys i have a math question can you help to understand the question itself.
For the function g, if g(5x-1)=x+4, what is the value of g(4)
please read #❓how-to-get-help
Isn’t that just the IRS
disscuission 1 is a bit broken, decided to come to discussion 2

what u up to?
can someone get on a call with be and help me out?
Man thats tough
whats goin on in here guys
How do yk you are ambidextrous?
doesn't ambidextrous just mean you have similar dexterity on both hands rather than just on your dominant hand
When you get flipped over in the 4th dimension you can use the same hands just as well.
Anyone able to help me with collage algebra like asap
Why aren't you in jail?
I have an interesting invariant question which I am on the brink of solving but cannot piece together what the last step should be. I will make a post for it right now but if anyone wants to see the problem/my solution and help me out I would greatly appreciate it.
king charles visited my city today and I missed it! I thought a professor was kidding when he asked if we were going to go see him 🤪
england is my city
He said the king of australia was visiting, so I was like "hmmm isn't the king of australia, the king of england? why would he be in australia?"
turns out he was visiting australia 😫
turns out australia is your city 
is this a thing worth doing
i saw the hand of the late queen of england once
there were so many people
well, i think anyway
this was in like 2014 when someone had a baby and the queen was in buckingham palace
i happened to be there and someone waved from inside
to me it's like birdwatching (which I also do) but with celebrities
so it's a fun thing to do if it's not too out of my way
the birds sound more interesting
hi i’m slowly dying
Heck, same
i included slowly with some doubt
anybody know of a database that has lines of code to practice typing them into a text editor?
C# or C++?
can problem find some other similar sites searching for 'c++ typing practise'
I'm not sure what this means?
Thanks
like if you want to write code learn how to code, and you're typing speed will increase as you become more fluent with the language
yh tbh this is kinda the way
Im not realy sure how to rephrase is so you can comprehend it
just go do a project
no
Thats not the purpose
But I appreciate the input
Ah I see if there is a different purpose to it then that makes sense
the purpose of c++ typing practise is not to get faster at typing c++ code ?
Yea, If yk of any database like that lmk
Not necessarily the point of it or the end goal by that would natrually be a by product of practicing
so what is the purpose?
hackerrank public solutions if they have any
💀 sure
yeah i mean you caould also just go through github
Mmmmh that completely escaped my mind as a plausible option
Thanks for the information
Probably not but again I appreciate the information
what is bro hiding
Im not really hiding anything but it would be way too much of a chore to try and explain in a server filled with sarcasm and denial
not my experience of this server but do what you gotta do ig
Different strokes for different folks
@hollow sundial what actually happened with you and jon though man?
i'm not here to flame people. don't ping me thanks
yea, save that for hlounge
🤐

Where is hlounge? Is it the homotopy lounge?
helpers-lounge

!assign --role helpful --user merosity --sarcasm true

100 hours in the trenches for you
back to grinding the help channels for me to unlock exclusive bonus content
Doesn't seem worth it
it's sometimes a good channel
And you're welcome to it
Help channels sound terrible
imagine being a nice and helpful person

Statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged
For asking the same question twice
this place is litteraly north korea
It's literally not
yes it is
Implying any discord server is significant in God's grace
The 15-person communist splinter server is incredibly significant and shitposting there is praxis which will bring about the fall of capitalism any day now.
Update, the server broke apart due to factional infighting.
🤔
say it aint so
Uhhhh guys. So eventually after getting an associate of arts in music, I am going to double major in Computer Engineering and Mechanical. Apart from learning math, what coding languages should I focus on?
depends what you want to do
and also do you have any experience already with coding ?
what languages is your course going to use ?
as a generic answer i dont think anyone can go wrong with knowing python
well, if you want to do computer engineering, you wont be able to get around learning C, possibly C++ too
I took Java in highschool but wasn't really good at it. I got a 1 on the AP Computer Science A exam
made you look 😉
W
Average communist moment
Where is that thing where Marx debunks calculus
hello anyone able to help me with networks
Mathematics is heavily contaminated by the bourgeois ideology
Petition to make this the server motto.
Pinko math discord
Make a Stinner math I saw them talking about math philosophy and it made me want to claw my eyes out
They should make a creative nothing type in programming languages instead of null it does something random
Just code in javascript for a very similar experience.
Don like a result.. have you considered that It’s a fixed idea subjugating the individual? Things existence does not matter outside of your relation to them
He’s like your therapist. The only difference is he understands the intrusive thoughts are right
I mean, with LLMs we are entering an exciting new era of unpredictable programming.
might be a goofy quote but its kinda true tho
i forgot to get rid of the minus sign after taking the absolute value in an exam 5 minutes ago😔. any tips to stop making this common mistake?
After finishing your calculations , recheck each line if you have time
i ran out of time there because im checking the problem before that one, but thanks for the tip!
im pretty sure i aced it if not for that minus sign
I see
no
@jagged forge "file_dependencies.rs"? What are you coding?
database stuff
gotchya
Guys what is the most fascinating use of maths you find in computer science, like it feels weird to know it
Without math, we don't even have computers let alone computer science. Because a computer is based on Boolean Algebra
So the most fascinating use of math in CS is the creation of computer 
Indeed its cool but if we dive deep into cs, boolean logic is the way math is done in our computers, What I am asking is like the way we use math for clever optimizations, like use of partial differentiation in neural networks.
The other application I can think of right now is computer graphics which use a lot of math. Especially linear algebra and transformation stuff
DOWN BY THE RIVER DO YOU HEAR FREEDOM CALLING ✊🏽✊🏽
Of course not
Computer graphics a great application of
algebras
Maybe spherical harmonics in computer graphics. Probably the most advanced topic I’ve seen used
e^ipi +1=0
me and the voice inside my head
Precisely
No one cares about my work enough to want to understand it
what tools do you guys use? I'm thinking of buying the gpt plus subscription and using it with the wolfram plugin for learning theory and as well as checking answers (currently have like 5 accounts for when 4o runs out). Do you guys use anything of that sort? (LLMs, other help programs)
just use free wolfram to check computations
llms are not needed and their use is discouraged to learn math
they're helping me so much to get through early college right now though, I legit feel like almost having a tutor, imo it really helps
could you expand on why they're discouraged though? aside from their inacuracy at times
their inaccuracy is precisely why you shouldnt use them
if you are learning proof based material for the first time, you have little way of telling whether its proofs are bs
I'm an electrical engineering student and I've realised that I have really great passion for very abstract things which leads me to mathematics ofc. How realistic is it for me to do a master in math and then PhD in math to land as a researcher at a university or institution? will my degree prevent me from becoming a mathematician? or is it possible? If it's, the way I told you enough or are there specific steps I need to take? Thank you
I don't feel like I will be happy if I continue to my life with this engineering stuff. That doesn't seem like what I want to do
Have any of you worked on articles with someone from the discord channel?
"electrical engineering student" tells me nothing about your relevant mathematics background
if youre in america its definitely possible to get into a masters in math and then a phd as long as you, like, have a couple analysis and algebra courses on your transcript
(and an otherwise good GPA)
in the US, masters in maths are often seen as a "bridge degree" for students who want to do a phd in math but dont have the prerequisite knowledge
(for this reason they have something of a poor reputation, but its probably your best path nonetheless)
if youre not in america, this will depend very heavily on the school youre applying to and the courses on your transcript
(by "in america" here i really mean "looking to go to grad school in america", though this is easier for domestic students so ymmv)
that said, if the school just sees a bunch of calculus and linear algebra courses on your transcript and no "rigorous math", they'll reject you no matter what
so definitely make sure to find the time to fit those into your program if possible
even if you want to do applied math instead of pure math theyll still expect you to know basic analysis, ODEs, PDEs, ideally stats/modelling too
and if you want to do pure math they'll want you to have some (proof-based) algebra as well
and either way you really want intro topology; its not necessary but its a good indicator that youre actually taking math seriously
this sounds like a lot, but the reality is that math graduate programs in the US are very competitive (and the field only gets more competitive as you move up in your career, sadly)
internationally it can be better or worse, depending on your country
but e.g. if youre in the EU then its very hard to break into academia with only an engineering degree
theyre much less flexible
even going from CS to math is uncommon in the EU, though it does happen
i wish i had better news but like, youre gonna be competing against students who have read Munkres' Topology and Rudin's RCA
having an unusual undergrad can help you stand out in that it makes you more memorable to admissions committees, but you need to have positive traits that are worth remembering in the first place
when an application lands on their desk with an engineering degree and no math, theyre gonna go into your application suspicious; you kinda need to convince them "no no i actually know math"
yeah if you haven't read a textbook on abstract algebra or real analysis you should probably start
if you don't like that, you won't really like getting a phd in math imo
also to add to this: if this is your plan, expect to pay for the masters
you might luck out and get a stipend but its rare
more commonly youll be given the masters "for free" but ofc then you have to handle living expenses for 1-2 years
and if they're really on the fence about letting you in, theyll make you pay
if youre given a phd offer with no compensation, thats a sign that they really dont want you; for masters it isnt as severe and is more common
honestly for an engineering undergrad, getting a masters offer in math in the first place is kinda lucking out, so you dont really have leeway to negotiate here
physics/econ/cs undergrads tend to have a better shot
as an EE student they might make you take complex analysis which can be helpful, but EE complex analysis courses have something of a... reputation
of being very simplified and nonrigorous
idk whether that reputation is deserved but if thats the only analysis course on your resume theyll probably pass you by
(same thing with fourier/harmonic analysis actually)
ill preface this with saying this is anecdotal but isn't EE fairly within the ballpark of this cause there's a lot of overlap with CS and a decent portion of what doesn't overlap is physics?
or is it a perception thing
EE's overlap with CS is like, boolean logic and thats it
and when i say physics undergrads i dont mean random people who took intro thermo, i mean people who learned basic lie theory and riemannian geometry in undergrad in order to study relativity
it isnt comparable
EE isnt physics + CS, its intro physics + circuits + a bunch of applications
not trying to downplay the work that goes into an EE degree, but the entire point of the degree (and of engineering degrees in general) is to cut out all of the "irrelevant" theoretical stuff and replace it with practical engineering material
but the theoretical stuff is the reason physics/CS majors can get into math programs in the first place
(EE programs often teach some programming but i dont really count programming as "CS", at least not unless youre also learning algorithms alongside)
(in any case, programming experience isnt really relevant to a pure math application at all, and is a bare minimum to get into applied math rather than a real point in your favour)
that's a fair point and probably the deciding factor yeah although i do think what you said about the EE and CS overlap is a bit of an understatement in the sense that i dont think it's majority overlap or something but they share a decent bit of degree requirements and potentially more based on choice of electives (not saying this as an argument for the math stuff just separately)
im curious what overlap you have in mind
in my experience EE programs cover very little CS
elective choice sure but if youre taking electives to get into math grad school you should be taking math electives
(or stats)
not CS electives
like if a math program is considering accepting a CS student, theyre looking for courses like theoretical algorithms, computability theory, machine learning (preferably theoretical/statistics-based treatments), numerical analysis (often under course names like "computational mathematics" or "computer algebra" or similar), graph theory/combinatorics, number theory/theoretical cryptography
i have never seen an EE program require any of these courses
[in addition to math coursework ofc]
and im aware that its possible to get a "computer science degree" without most of these courses, but those students are just trying to do the bare minimum CS coursework for their degree and are otherwise trying to become programmers and enter industry; they are not looking to go to grad school for CS, much less math (and if they applied to either they wouldnt get in)
the problem is less the name of the degree and more the material that gets covered
yeah come to think of it what i might be thinking of are CS majors who choose some of the lower level/EE oriented electives when they get to upper div stuff rather than strict requirement overlap between the majors which is like the opposite direction of what a CS major would wanna do to optimize for a CS or math grad program cause those would probably be in lieu of more theoretical classes
lower level as in like
abstraction
me with no degree 
i agree with what you wrote though
also what year are you in
think thats important in terms of advice
like i assumed by the way you were talking about it that youre almost done with ug or something and locked into your major for sure
unless you said it somewhere and im illiterate
damn that would feel pretty shit 
is there a point when i should consider dropping my math major and switching to something else
im currently taking real analysis and its making me really doubt my abilities and where i can go mathematically
i take the time to understand the proofs and content in the book, but then i still do poorly with doing the homework
and if that's a struggle for me, then is mathematics even a realistic career for me? is it worth keeping going with the math major?
@lapis hull Your proofs in the lecture notes are impossible to follow 
lol which ones
there are going to be times where you doubt your ability to do X for every single skill or profession X that is worth doing
n = m twice and wtf is a "proper prefix" and why does it matter
i am currently struggling understanding mathematics. many people struggle in real analysis
We have infinite variables??? why?
(from this)
Okay I did write this at like 3am
lmfao
Should be n=m and phi_i=psi_i
yeah that's what I figured
I couldn't figure out what a proper prefix was though
and why it matters
Because you sometimes want infinite variables (not for a single formula ofc, but for a set of them)
Formulas are strings, so you can look at their prefixes (so like if $\sigma_1\cdots\sigma_n$ is a string, a prefix is a string of the form $\sigma_1\cdots\sigma_k$ for $k\leq n$. It is proper when $k<n$)
Keisler-(Sheli-Shelah) Theorem
Ok but this makes it sound like we can only define F^n_l when we have infinitely many and we can't when there's finitely many
oh wait
nevermind
oh I see
ok
you just mean a prefix that isn't the entire string
kind of like "proper subset"
That's cuz you're SILLY
jkjk all good
Sorry it wasn't clear!
wtf is even going on here
I think I gave an example during the lecture
Suppose I have a formula
$$ \phi = (p\land q)\to r $$
Then I can write $\phi(p,q,r)$ to mean that $p,q,r$ are the variables in $\phi$
phi is phi(x) or wphi is phi(x)????
Keisler-(Sheli-Shelah) Theorem
Ahh
so w phi = phi???
"Now suppose phi=phi(x)" should be "Now suppose phi=phi(p)"
oh ok
I mean a little bit

You're in a math discord server
LMAO(
Hopefully I can follow them now I'll let you know if I can't
Okie doke
@lapis hull This still isn't clear to me, like how does this show that I can't group together terms differently to get a different formula?
It's saying you can't group together different formulas to get the same formula
So like if $\land\alpha\beta=\land\gamma\delta$ then $\alpha=\gamma$ and $\beta=\delta$
Keisler-(Sheli-Shelah) Theorem
right yes
what does that have to do with a proper prefix though?
I don't understand why the proper prefix thing is sufficient
well like
I do inuitively
but not formally
or at least I think I do?
Well look at the proof that a proper prefix cannot be a formula
If $\phi_1\cdots\phi_n=\psi_1\cdots\psi_m$, then one of $\phi_1,\psi_1$ is a prefix of the other. But they cannot be proper, so $\phi_1=\psi_1$.
And so $\phi_2\cdots\phi_n=\psi_2\cdots\psi_m$, and you continue
Keisler-(Sheli-Shelah) Theorem
This is sorta hidden in the proof that a proper prefix cannot be a formula
oops added a dot at the bottom
oh ok
so either phi_1 is a prefix or psi_1, or vice versa, or both?
why can't they be proper?
because theyre both formulas
and so one cannot be the proper prefix of the other
(by induction)
oh ok
so wait what even is our inductive hypothesis?
the phi_1 - phi_i = psi_1 - psi_i ?
that a proper prefix of phi cannot be a formula
a proper prefix of phi_i-1 ?
or strong induction
everything up to that
also isn't n = m trivial since it's determined by the arity of s?
Okay so the inductive hypothesis is
$${\cal E}\phi=\hbox{``a proper prefix of $\phi$ is not a formula''}$$
For $\phi=\pi$ prime this is trivial since it is a single character.
Now suppose ${\cal E}\phi_i$ for $i=1,\dots,n$, then we need to prove ${\cal E}{\sf s}\phi_1\cdots\phi_n$.
Keisler-(Sheli-Shelah) Theorem
An inductive hypothesis has to be indexed I thought
well no
because you need to show the unique reconstruction property in order to prove that theres a single way to get to a formula
and so suppose there were two
like if phi1=alpha beta, then sphi1...phin = alpha beta...phin which is n+1 formulas
oh so by induction we're going from prime formulas to compound formulas
is that the idea?
wdym? no it doesnt
,tex yeah formula induction is
\begin{enumerate}
\item ${\cal E}\pi$ for prime $\pi$
\item if ${\cal E}\phi_i$ then ${\cal E}s\phi_1\cdots\phi_n$
\end{enumerate}
sick
Keisler-(Sheli-Shelah) Theorem
ok right
ok so we're proving by induction that a proper prefix of a formula is never a formula, how does this prove unique reconstruction?
.
hmmm ok
phi_1 ... phi_n isn't a formula though, s phi_1 ... phi_n is
the point isnt that its a formula
najs
phi_1 can't be a proper prefix of psi_1 since psi_1 is a formula, and phi_1 is a formula
and a proper prefix of a formula can't be a formula
ok
ye
Is this like university level math
This is ass


