#serious-discussion
1 messages Β· Page 188 of 1
what kind of functions they looking for
like literally just "what is a function" type functions
You like math?
yes
does anyone know something which has khan academy units in florida math standards (for example whatever unit = 9th accelerated/10th)
if you know what florida's standards are, find the relevant videos, normally the videos don't directly align to any specific state standards
alr
I walked into my course the other day and i instantly knew it was a combined math/CS section lol
a bunch of people with the characteristic CS appearance
what is the characteristic CS appearance
i find that majority of STEM major look the same
a lack of interest in mathematics (normally)
and an abundant smell of LLM's and Machine Learning
i think a litmus test of numeracy is asking people to estimate the value of a number that they are aware can vary widely
i would say something to defend us CS peeps, but this is fairly accurate description of me
soo well done, you hit it spot on
machine learning is fun man, I spent 3 hours last night grafting cats on to dogs
if they give anything an expected value, confidence interval, or something along those lines, they pass. if they give a way to better estimate the value or say they don't know, the test is null. if they start talking about how it doesn't make sense to ask the question because it varies so widely, they fail the test.
e.g. asking "how much can a typical person lift?" to a person who knows a lot about weightlifting
im mad rn cause of a similar response that i got today online + someone responded on reddit to "how long does it take to learn german to so and so level" with "how long is a piece of string"
it would be better for all parties involved if that commenter just said something like "i'd estimate 100-1000 hours for a monolingual english speaker" than "how long is a piece of string"
hell it would have been better if the commenter said "i don't know"
apple laptop and conspicuous branding
undergrads at least
this is kind of true, its a little 50/50 though, at my university its pretty 50/50 but id tend to agree
not really branded clothes but tons and tons of macs yeah
yeah i notice that the people on mac are usually just doing web dev, the guys who are serious about systems programming or machine learning usually bring their brick ass linux or windows machine that makes jet engine noises
though i suspect the person would be less likely to fail if they were someone who knows little about weightlifting
needless to say i dropped that course the prof was all like
"yeah so were gonna focus more on methods than on analysis"
there were too many students anyways
fair enough yeah, makes sense that an applied math course would attract folks from engineering or CS side
There are two types of CS majors
The mathematician
And the βotherβ one
an abundant smell of LLM's and Machine Learning
lmaooo fair
this makes me question if i should be in cs lol, since i didnt transfer for machine learning
glued to their laptop like their life is dependant on, a lot of toxic behaviour and weird obsession over LLM's and machine learning overall. If you mentioned mathematics, then you are in a fun time arguing with a bunch of idiots
nah im rocking that thinkpad
ah nah im just doing cutmix, its data augmentation for CNN's, i wish i could show a picture but i dont have image perms
i will pretend i know those terms lmao
you basically just take one image, cut out a square and paste it onto another
i see
then you feed the image to a convolutional neural network as input
its really goofy looking in practice
but produces fantastic results
it seems like ml is your jam
oh i see
im also a fellow cs major
Ah im sorry youve had bad experiences with the CS community so far, hope you meet better representatives of the field in the future
idk the first couple of my data science class lectures were boring
its just basic statistics stuff so far
i really respect the maths people, they work hard so we can have an industry in the first place
boring as in you know the content, or boring as in the content doesnt interest you?
both somewhat
right now we are studying the data collection module
I see I see
usually the maths and physics folks work the hardest
for the least reward
agreed yeah, research is really feast or famine i hear
Yeah it's fine I still get to talk with sane people tho. Seems like the field is bloated with people who aren't interested in the field in the first place
really depends on the uni
Oh absolutely, its fucking filled with scum
mine has 4.0 gpa folks
everyones out for a paycheck
cause thats where the money is right now
that says nothing about the student
im just talking about the interest related part
but ur right
it doesnt talk about the character
the same toxic stuff goes on
in my uni's cs department
usually the natural science department students are the most wholesome
they're a tight knit community
small communities
i should add
I'd say stickin to general CS first is a good idea, go dip your toes into some different sub branches of CS and see what you like:
Math heavy fields if you like math:
Cryptography (number theory, modular arithmetic)
AI/ML (optimization, stats, probability, linear algebra, calculus)
Theorical Com Sci (Graph theory, formal logic, complexity, type theory)
Less math heavy:
Web developement
Systems engineering (still need alot of math tbh)
Computer architecture (this is more for EE but you can still get into it)
Cloud dev
true, i want to try my shot at cs theory
but given its pure maths
its definitely gonna be difficult
also saying "bro" a lot
real
also @gaunt rampart just wanted to say, we don't hate CS, we're majoring in it, but frankly it's so demotivating to see everyone falling for hype π
yeah i know what you mean
and the competition as well
I feel you
So far in my 3 years of university i've seen a whole lot of em, I feel bad for them to be honest. Industry is pretty bad right now so alot of them are having a hard time securing jobs and internships
sort of a wake up call i guess
i have only ever met one software guy who said "bro", and his degree was in geology
i don't know what that implies
everywhere we go, all our peers are just so dismissive of anything that won't instantly get them into a job, going full turn into AI or frontend and "hating math" (math isn't all slog calculations π )
like....ughhhhhh
understandable
it also sucks cuz
my cs department
doesnt have much theory
related courses
like a lot of the electives are in ml related fields
there is a reason why proofs to algorithm is the most hated course in my university
everyone at our uni hates having to take formal methods and theory of computation courses because it's "boring" and "another math class"
and it's my favorite cs course
Ahh i feel this alot, theres a disconnect between the people who are interested in the field and those guys who feel kind of slimy? like next grift, next hustle next crypto/ai side project guys
i look forward to taking it next year
same with algos
not saying its bad to try and do business but, some of these guys are really slimy
most ppl don't even know how to use git and complain about linux not having a gui
I had a guy push a crypto miner to the univeristy high performance cluster, was pretty funny
it drives me insane
uni students when they have to take a class in the very thing they decided to major in:
LOL SOMEONE HERE DID THAT LAST SEMESTER
yeah it's nuts to me
complaining about CS
I don't hate CS and I don't regret majoring in it at all. I just hate the toxic community around it and the nonsensical competition
in a math server
did they ever find your guy? Mine got in a lot of trouble for it
man got expelled or suspended afaik
yeah lmao
Cause he pretty much stalled SLURM the day before an important assignment
Tbh its just the type of ppl that makor it
Thr maths and theory is really essentta and interesting
brandon, mind if we send you a friend request
well its a subfield of applied maths so i hope its not too egrigous
yeah true
yeah sure!
The maths behind CS isnt really respected by most taking it
i think something's wrong with ur keyboard homie
type theory is definitely very foundations-based afaik
So it kinda tarnished the field
im sorry thats just funny lol
I mean you can get away nowadays with knowing very surface level stuff in tech, cause everything is abstracted to hell
mobile typing sucks
I mean, yeah fair, but also knowing some theory just helps with appreciating the shoulders of giants you're standing on
Exactly
the math knowledge really starts becoming important the more you specialize, like getting into DB's seriously requies a ton of set theory
yep
getting into AI/ML is a shitton of linear and calc
getting into game dev is lots of linear
oh for sure, when you really dig deep its super impressive, like how do they think of this stuff kind of impressive
exactly
stats
my current project at work is basically a database, and i've benefitted from knowledge of logic and combinatorics
alot of the guys who came up with the foundations of AI and ML are still around btw, geoffery hinton, yoshu bengio, yann lecunn
the quicksort inventor is still around too
tony hoare i think
a cs degree also contains practical courses that help a lot like dsa networks os etc
all pretty recent history
that said most people will probably never work on something like a database
sadly i've only gotten to use graph theory once in my 4 years
also understanding complexity
yeah its a shame really
80% end up in web dev
I feel the certainCS ppl are part of a trend in society
professional JS framework monkey
thats kinda why i dont want to be a swe
Don't get us wrong, there's defo skill req'd to make good efficient and fast websites
SWE is fun when you get to scale
yeah this ^^
"good efficient and fast" isn't how I'd describe like 90% of websites I visit though
companies cut costs
oh absolutely
hmm, tbh i've never been much of a software development type of person
our point is that while good webdevs are defo endangered in the market, they do exist
I agree, i didn't mean web dev as a pejorative, i just tend to find the laziest devs in that group
fair lol
there are some phenomenal web devs doing black magic to keep these giant applications running
discord itself is a huge feat of engineering
interested in research?
more generally i'd say SWE is fun when you need to care about performance
I've always wondered why that is
Oh on a slight tangent, all these companies start nice enough but as their funding runs dry or the execs get some boneheaded new idea, they start doubling the data they collect and dumping it into an LLM π
which can either be scaling, or it can be optimizing something on a single box to heck
in my country they never teach the applications of math so i always felt like youre learning meaningless equations for 5 years
it definitely seems appealing
I'd say pre-uni education has played a massive part into this
i think thats in many places
what's not fun is making a CRUD API that needs to serve at most 2 hits per minute lol
oh that's awful, very commonplace still sadly
only till i got to college and saw how useful/impressive some of the things that can be achieved with maths i started to pay more attention
web dev? more like use a modern JS framework with 100000 node dependencies and a "professional" looking UI library that just makes your website extremely slow
yeah the current malaysian education system will jump you straight into calculus with lhopitals, you will never learn the definition or actually what a derivative is
you will never do a proof in all 5 years
We still can't forgive ourselves for basically being on hiatus for 6 years from maths
we could've started calc at 12-13...we're 20 now
im ngl i didnt even do lhopitals rule in hs
my god the node dependencies, my god i never want to have to manage that again
nah it's best to not care much about the past
holy shit my company didnt keep those up to date for 5 years, every npm install was --force --legacy-peer-dependencies
EVERY REPO
I too wish I bought bitcoin in like 2011 instead of being in 8th grade and broke
$\lim_{x \to a} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = \lim_{x \to a} \frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)}$ our beloved
Ryan (The Cat Collective)
$\lim_{x \to a} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = \lim_{x \to a} \frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)}$ our beloved
our parents rub it in very very frequently, we cannot let it go
yeah i did it in uni so ik it now
honestly i don't get a whole lot of regret about investing in crypto
(besides the fact that i was literally unable to)
you never learn what a limit is in Malaysian calculus, but you will know how to integrate to get the volume of a 3d shape
hindsight is 20/20 as they say
I'm just saying it's so simple and useful :3
same in my education system
i dont need it rn but if i ever do ml theory i will revisit it
me on my way to apply $\iiint$ to volumes of revolution
Ryan (The Cat Collective)
i should have bought nvidia stock instead of huffing glue behind the class
cries in electromagnetism
disk/washer method spamming
jeez
but the education ministry is a little nuts here
did you believe in the stock before chatgpt
weird way to spell "incompetent" but alr 
idk about you guys, but my CS friends do 15 muscle ups and 25 pull ups
must be a C++ influence
I did not know the stock market existed when i was in high school
huffing glue
with my high school friends
lol
thats pretty insane
surely he is a giga chad assembly dev
my soy web dev background only lets me do 10 pullups π
but my boss runs a midnight commander cult and unfortunately most of coworkers agree with his idea of adding it to every single linux installation
nah i bet he crafts his own microprocessors
I can do better
thats still decent
im out here with like 1-2
so fucking brutal
but recently managed to hit pull ups
its okay, everyone starts weak before they become strong
so at least an improvement
true
actually not really
yeah dude hit pullups as much as you can, top 3 exercise imo. insanely fucking good for like a billion muscles
some people have insane genetics
yeah i have a pullup bar at home
but its more suited
to chin ups
damn
gentics
maybe hes light?
it gets exponentially harder to do a pullup with weight i feel
like much much much harder
he is about the same weight and height as me, just a bit shorter
@gaunt rampart are you in uni or a swe?
but its also possible hes just got better muscle genetics, cant rule that out
or both?
both
im in university but did a 6 month internship
ah
at least u getting experience
yeah im damn happy about that
i feel like entry level market all asking for 1 year experience
like how even for the fresh grads?
thats nice tho
you got that sorted
every fucking fresh grad needs to have billion side project, work experience, good academics, 20 plus hackathons, 100 leetcode questions memorized
yeah the job market seems brutal
yeah im not surviving π
anyway i go back to work, good luck with your studies, it was nice to meet you all
yeah it was nice
i think you will graduate during a better time
good luck to you
of course you could always do post grad
the thing is
since i transferred to cs
im doing the core courses
one year later
so yeah
lets see hopefully it works out
it's either this or them telling you you're "overqualified"
a friend who does like cloud engi type stuff got called that recently π for a senior type job
real, I'm living this rn
imho who the fuck cares if you're overqualified, it means your skills are a superset of the requested ones, they SHOULD hire you then
the logic is that you might jump ship easily if you get a better offer, from what I've heard anyway
but yeah it seems dumb anyhow
overqualified is also a euphemism for "we want someone cheaper"
I've also heard that it's often used as a euphemism for "we want someone younger"

yea, also used in that context (and others) is "not a good culture fit"
bleak
is ageism in tech just due to higher pay
i can't really think of any reason why age would be a downside, at least up to a certain age
several of the highest value team members i've had were 40+
I think that's a euphemism for "we want someone whiter and maler"
@outer spindle monster pfp holy based
that too, it's basically a code for "we don't want to hire this person but if we give the real reason then that violates federal law" (in the US at least)
im living this rn
if HRs asked me about experience I'll be like "hi i just built this app to compute the compactified moduli space on genus 0 and n marked points now gib job pls"
overqualified

My friend who's like 10x more productive and better in terms of the work title got rejected with "overqualified" and I got accepted
hmm
In my case it just means "sorry we dont want males we are looking for females"
that was a waterloo supported company right?
Absolutely
more fuel to hate
paid help is not allowed on this server
then i won't pay, just give it some attention it's quit critical please.
thanks everyone β€οΈ in advance
yeah it's fucked lmao
Lmao, alright go for it
alr
EA: UGA, Georgia Tech
REA: Caltech
RD: Harvard, MIT, Stanford, Yale, Princeton
i want to ea UCs but i dont have 320k
im also debating between caltech & stanford rea
since i did a few summer programs which are stanford feeders
Wait how are you doing EA and REA simultaneously?
Is it a "You can still apply EA to public universities in your state" shtick or smth?
caltech has exceptions for non-binding public ea yes
rea only means u cant apply to any privates early, with USC being the only exception
you can apply to any publics early irregardless of rea/ED
so oos too
I see
i need a school which is simultaneously affordable, safety/target, and lets you skip to interesting advanced grad classes
taking out safety/target you get what is my list
Wait so where would you be in state?
(Also are you thinking math or math+cs or what?)
im georgia
interesting in math/mathematical physics
gatech dosent regularly have advanced graduate classes in non-combo according to friends there
the dept there is mostly combo/TCS/algos
caltech is like the dream for what im interested in
Okay so I guess yeah UGA and GATech being in-state is good
nG is about to talk about UGA more than I ever could
wow you feel I'm overqualified that's CRAZY because I'm feeling real underemployed!
whats even more insane is that tuition is free here
thanks to the lottery
at all public schools
ive been thinking of uiuc and stony brook for this
idk what else is there
Well wait do UGA not count for those then?
And if it comes to it GATech?
wdym
oh
tbh idrk anything about uga
athens is an AMAZING city though
like 10/10
yesss 
For the "simultaneously affordable, safety, and (?) lets you skip"
its 1 and 2 at least
athens was great
I LOVE Jinya it's just got too overpriced in recent years
I used to go all the damn time though
they are okay
bar scene is goated i heard
I was never really happy with the coffee in Athens
it's a weird mix
there are a stupid number of bars downtown
the one really good queer bar kinda died because the old owner was outed as being sketchy to patrons
and there hasn't really been a bar that good since
oh sad
although probably this is just me not experiencing many of them there's literally like more than 100 bars in downtown
surely at least one is still good

the atmosphere there is just really nice for some reason
Hmmm okay just looked it up and UGA doesn't quite have the people that do my stuff
walking there is chill
Unfortunate
yeah I liked the music scene there
heavy metal/rock/jazz, sometimes blues
ic
for me its a weird mix of classical, progrock, indie, and random stuff i find interesting
jazz yeah
I didn't find so many good jazz shows there compared to somewhere like Toronto that has more proper jazz clubs
Could one say that that's your
Leading preference?
but I got to see some metal shows I've always wanted to see that stopped in maybe 8 places in the US, one of which being Athens
nice
did uga have interesting graduate classes nG
and if so did you see lots of undergrads in them
yeah so depending on the year
the grad courses are kind of variable
at least for me there were more interesting courses when Litt and Bakker were still there
brb going to toronto to drag litt back here to teach me
these days they are pretty heavy on running lots of grad topology topics courses
and they always run some rep theory courses and some AG stuff
sometimes!
i have some credit which can transfer
topics courses very very rarely, you definitely see a couple bright undergrads every year in like grad abstract algebra or whatever
from dual enrollment stuff
like the abstrct algebra undergrad sequence
and have a prof who could vouch for me knowing the standard grad classes
they also have a nice directed reading/research thing for undergrads
the pain is real
there have been a couple of particularly good undergrads who got papers out of this
in theory is it permitted for topics courses
if someone is prepared
yeah you just have to get permission
just a bit of extra paperwork when you have to register for courses but it's not so bad to deal with
thats nice 
they might start to get weirded out if you do something goofy like the majority of your credits are grad courses and you take them in a totally fucked up order
prob gonna be me
lol one of my friends did his math undergrad at UMaryland and they changed the grad course policy because of him after he graduated
he managed to take and audit uhhh 14 grad courses
and did some goofy shit like uhhh
took etale cohomology before point set topology
lmfao
im taking abstract algebra 1 and an independent study on algebraic groups and their representations this semester
excellent
yeah there are some very strong rep theory people at UGA especially if you like char p stuff
oh nice
I think these days the topology group there is the strongest
they have really grown since I started there
did he understand anything or was he just looking to set a floor for his gpa at 3.0 π€£
oh he understood most of everything
at least got good grades?
no he knew point set but just never took the course
oh well more power to him then, why would they change the policy
valid
and then I think they got mad at him for not having taken it so they made him take it at some point
that's a waste of time
yeah
admin going :soynoo after engaging with this student
I think it was mostly an issue of spamming grad courses without having exhausted the undergrad courses first, and issues around grade inflation
the main issue with undergrads taking grad courses (which is easily fixed) is like
i think this kind of grade inflation is fine as long as its not done in bad faith
most grad courses don't actually expect you to do any work
which is fine for grad students, but this really pisses off the undergrad admins
oh
like a weak student taking grad classes they dont understand, getting a B (a fail), and then inflating to a 3.0
usually the way around this is to assign actual homework to any undergrads that might be taking it, that's what happened to me as an undergrad
LMFAO
I think the issue was that Maryland wasn't doing this at ALL so he got to take a solid year and a half of courses with zero homework lol
lmao
that makes more work for whoever is teaching it though, i can see why they might just say "no undergrads" in that case
yeah that's the other main issue
maybe have some policy like ok, if you've taken 6 grad classes already and want to take more, first take and pass the quals
(as an undergrad i mean)
another decent compromise that some departments do is like, undergrads can't take grad courses but you're free to sit in on them if you want
and even if those courses aren't on your transcript presumably you would get a grad school rec from the prof that speaks to this, which is more effective than transcript anyways
I don't know off the top of my head
i would presume sitting in is up to the prof even if the dept has no specific policy towards this
assuming its a grad class where a limited number of seats in a 300 person lecture hall isnt the issue
tbf i don't think i've ever seen a grad class that didn't have at least some empty seats
if nothing else, there's always a decent plurality of people who never attend haha
I wanna know where this IS an issue 
a friend asked i think purdue and uwisc which were both strict about not letting undergrads do this
That would kinda suck if you canβt get credit from it but you donβt have enough hours to graduate though
wisconsin (at least based on my dated knowledge) mostly wanted undergrads to do the sort of "halfway" grad classes that were open to both ugrads and grads
So youβd be stuck doing stuff you already know or donβt want to take
Yeah Iβve seen that
Actually I think thatβs the case for many other schools too
some schools also make you take like a weeder course first and then let you take grad stuff
like uchicago and honors analysis
i think for a high school student who has taken calculus and maybe slightly more uchicago is by far the best undergrad option
I'm taking a grad course on measure theory and I did not take any analysis course in undergrad

took me a while to convince the prof
and pass the stupid prereqs my uni has
damn lmfao
god yeah I would imagine
graph theory dosent really have any
unless its a probabilistic one in which case you should know probability
lol I remember when I transferred from community college to undergrad uni I was like okay I guess the next thing to register for is intro to proofs that's the next thing I haven't taken
measure theoretic
I mean for measure theory it makes sense but the prereqs for graph theory is just bullshit ngl
but I had nlab induced brain poisoning at that point
everyone should know probability
i cringe when thinking of talagrand and bernoulli inequality spam
and the proof teaching it is someone who researches a lot of great homotopy theory stuff
talagrand inequality feels like it should have been discovered way long ago
I convinced my prof to start a grad course on algebraic geometry and yes I will be taking that without any prereqs
so I came to his office after the first class and I was like hi Dan can you tell me why simplices are more natural than other shapes for higher categories
I can't handle taking stuff I already know it's really a waste of time
and he is like
yes but first can you tell me who the hell told you to sign up for intro to proofs
thats me in my dreams
walks me down the hall and is like "Nick this undergrad is in your abstract algebra course he's yours now"
i wanted to do that in my first sem but was too chicken
in my case I was too goofy and autistic to realize that maybe I did not need to take intro to proofs
so you legitimately thought you needed intro to proofs?
the imposter syndrome is crazy lol
First time at class, the students were extremely confused I was attending the class. They were like "are u in the wrong class" and I was like "no im in the right class wdym"
my intro to proofs prof didnt know intro to proofs
it was a funny class
like 5 students total
I mean my thinking at the time was "well it's on their list of hard required courses, and the academic advisors said I need to take it"
and I didn't know that you could just like
skip things lol
yeah they were both great
I remember arguing with academic advisors and them warning my about skipping calculus classes and that "I will fail"
bro just let me take it

AAAAA
ooooh so this is why you can't compute the class of \bar{M}_{0,n} in K_0(Var) I remember this calc lesson very vividly
did you know algebra at the time
yes
or was UGCT
LMFAO
fun story was I completely forgot that we had an abstract algebra midterm one day
Is this actually easy
yes
finished in 15 mins
for an 80%
shit was jokes he was so annoyed with me haha
i had a prof who was that late to class every time last sem
oh god
but if you got there a second after him he would be pissed LOL
\bar{M}_{0,n} in K_0(Var) boils down to whether you care enough to do the combinatorics @visual breach
Students being late vs. Professors being late 
Maybe professors are angry when students are late because they also want to be late but cannot becuz class
lmao I remember taking a grad course on moduli spaces my first year
I had a brainfart today computing them until I realized I was mixing up with compactified versions and non compactified ones LMFAO
prof got hella stuck in traffic one day and could NOT make it to class
texts his PhD student "cover sections X-Y for me"
def
LOL
not a funny story at all I dont find that story very funny sorry.
There is a sad story about the algebraic topology course in my uni getting destroyed
apparently making another fucking course called "CALCULUS FOR ENGINEERING" was more importnat
Were there no math grad student?
machine learning!!
we have calculus for engineering, calculus for finance, calculus (normal)
and a lot of machine learning bullshit
half of these are just bullshit ngl
we had an algebraic geometry class as well
I'm glad my prof is going to start one
a grad course

I can imagine more math classes getting destroyed in the future tbh
calculus for finance
hey that's what i'm doing
wait until you realize it is has no stochastic or finance or whatever you might expect
Literally just normal calculus
boring 
Yeah calculus for finance is going to be just, calculus easy mode
you haven't seen what im doing then

Yeah, what you are doing is supercharged compared to what schools think is good enough
yep
in terms of difficulty
finance < engineering < normal
in normal calculus you have some proofs
in engineering it's very applied
and finance... lmao
is that even calculus is all what i want to say
jeesh
then you have this weird conversation going on with students
"omg calculus 234 was really hard I thought calc 12508545 was way easier"

da heck r u waffling about

where does "calculus for life sciences" fit into this hierarchy
whenever i see children drooling over which order to take courses in for the Optimal Course Strategy
normal
i become radicalised
we do have 2 stats as well
ah just different examples ig
i dont like talking to my profs that often but smtimes theyll have mental breakdowns and beg students to just take courses thatare in their academic interests and yea i feel that
average cs majors be taking econ, english and poli sci for "easy course" and regretting their lives
meanwhile me taking random math courses for no reason at all
what type of DE is this
Algebra became boring, do I do analysis
yep
I want to actually get good / have an intuition for math. How do I actually go about understanding rather than memorizing formulas and sequences of steps?
visualizing and engaging with many different explanations of the same thing helps. If it's things like HS or freshman year math there's lots of YT videos to watch, there's also wiki and books
Truly appreciate your input and Iβll go ahead and do that!
Off topic but just started caring about maths since I want a PHD in CS. Even though reading random Wikipedia pages isnβt learning math itβs pretty fun seeing a bunch of different concepts. Also learning mathmaticL notation makes everything easier to understand, feels like a cryptic language at first but once I look up a few I didnβt understand the equation makes sense ππ
right, math notation and the underlying logic are just a language, eventually you get comfy with that and start thinking things in terms of math
Hi Derivada
for theoretical CS it's especially important to learn anything that can count as "discrete maths" -- graphs, combinatorics etc
hello grass
not what I'm derivadoing now
I agree! Right now Iβm in community college taking my GE Iβm trying to find time to both program and learn those higher levels maths before I get to UNI!
could be worse
just trying to chill while I read about microcontroller stuff
nice 
Microcontroller stuff? Does that have to do with your PhD stuff?
Yup lmao, and itβs hillarious what you call them when you donβt understand. Like upside down A and backwards E π
so you have plenty of time to get the math down, work on projects, find future grad school options and etc.
Exactly!
oh I've had this kinda moment with students lol
You are a professor?
but we usually just laugh it off and use the opportunity to learn
I was teaching a few math courses last semester
Oh thatβs nice how was it?
nowadays I'm taking a gap year and considering a career change
towards tech related stuff, maybe electronics/robotics or something along the lines of ML
so I'm learning stuff on my own and trying to found a startup with friends
math academia was kinda boring imo
I guess I want to work on more tangible/impactful stuff
You are doing big things man wow, I hope you succeed honestly
plus I've always liked programming
Thatβs cool dude haha, well you have the math skill set which is gonna make you extremely
what kind of startup
Valuable
so I would hope lmao
Only recently started caring about maths because not only do I need it for theoretical CS but I also realized itβs much easier to be a mathematician turn programmer than a programmer turned mathematician, in order words programming is a tool and Iβve noticed a lot of famous computer scientist were not JUST computer scientist. So I canβt just be good at coding and that be all my value.
we do IoT/AIoT kind of stuff
hardware design, cloud platforms for monitoring, LLM integrations etc
right, even in the job market for entry-level positions I think the most "hireable" people tend to be programmers who also have some knowledge of other disciplines, e.g. for data science it might help to know finance if it's for a bank or some other kind of finance firm
Thanks, sorry for the super late reply lmao
these days I see even social sciences people doing datasci or programming courses
I was gonna say can I join but u prolly are not looking for people so nvm
yeah true, a decent chunk of physics majors i know are minoring in cs
we're struggling to make bank right now
but appreciate it
what kind of programming do you do actually, I might consider doing projects for fun
Exactly. Like being good at python isnβt useful on its own, even with projects. I have to actually have something to solve and that I can apply programming too otherwise Iβm useless, people who can code are abundant, people who can program and have a background in chemistry or physics are gold
yep this especially -- physicists here are especially good at coding and data so I also see a lot of people going into that
good luck lol I worked on a startup project and it was great until the manager bankrupted and fired us all
hell the two other people in my startup are phys people who ended up pivoting to tech too 
data science, web dev, embed and graphics
oh oof
some mobile dev too but (it's just web dev in disguise)
thats basically the path for physics folks into industry
at least those not pursuing grad studies
true lol
cool
kinda rare seeing math people who code for fun
I'm more focused on embedded dev rn but have some webdev projects in mind
embedded dev is really based
if you zoom out and look at my projects. They all are math related
the ones im proud of at least
still tho
oh a lot of applied math people find coding fun lol
also the odd person doing like, formal proofs or computer-assisted stuff in NT or whatever
(a friend of mine recently started a math PhD doing that)
i guess, i dont really know many math majors
theres barely any in my uni
in undergrad at least
the math majors in my uni are nonexistent
yeah basically that
in the science school in my uni
majority of the people are cs
followed by ee
im sure thats the case in most places
my uni is bloated with nursing, premed, cs and engineering
my uni doesnt have the first two
plot twist: all premeds give up eventually
idk dont really have the premed concept where im from
its usually an mbbs program straight after high school
is it like high school -> medical school
for people interested in medicine
yeah this is nice
yeah
this is a lot better tbh
premed is just bullshit ngl
yeah this is the case as well in my home country
so is mine smh
that + law
oh yeah forgot about law
ig most societies are like this actually
how did I forget that when my uni is famous for law school
oh and how can we forget the finance/business bros
real
the law school in my uni is definitely smaller
than the humanities and stem
it's really hard to have a normal conversation with a law student, at least in my uni
oh yeah, its really fun taking stem courses with them
and thanks to curved grading
they are hard to approach
its easier to get a good grade lmao
I guess I've lucked out because most law people I've interacted with are normal
like genuinely good people at best, and just a bit weird at worst
might be just the students though I think lawyers are prone to being insufferable lmao
most normal people in my uni are history,philosophy and math professors
math π
thats one of the most hated departments
in my uni
unironically the math department is really nice
in the two ones I've been it's definitely the education majors
most normal people I've ever met
the cs department tho 
like white bread and taylor swift fan levels of normal
oh god
math depts are cool they're usually smol
if you're talking about small i like the physics department more
its a more tight knit community
oh and the physics department
yeah math and phys people are chill
every single physics prof is hyper ultra giga chad ngl
bro once i had an online meeting with my physics prof
he was explaining to me
man was legit on the bed
and teaching me
how is the chem department at ur uni
lmao based
no clue, there are some decent profs
they have a good
grad school
acceptance rate
i see
the chem department is insufferable
no matter what you do just dont mess with the chem majors they will get upset immediately
my undergrad's chem dept was full of egotistical boomers tbh
basically this
the head of the department prof has some anger issues smh
like especially in terms of misogyny
but i think that is somewhat the case with nat sci
in general
When I was premed I had a question and was heading to his office hours and before entering I heard him screaming really loud on a student. After witnessing what happened I just turned backwards and was like "lol nope"
is that why you dropped out of premed π
kind of yeah
also the fact that everyone around me was so egotistical and proud of cheating
like bro why are u here
???
bruh
to earn money as med 


LMFAO
yeah same kinda attitude in premeds here
I liked my bio classes tho
usually a few chill people though, I'm friends with some
They were very informative and nice
yeah my only issue is there was just an unhealthy amount of cheating happening and a lot of toxicity overall
grade inflation is real
thats kinda crazy
does ur uni not give a crap
it's hard to give a crap about cheating, even systematic cheating
like in the short time I was an actual math prof at uni I genuinely couldn't be bothered
real, it seems like most unis dont care about students
especially nowadays
they've increased student intake
and people are legit struggling with enrollment
the cs coop program (which I applied to) is uhhh... the people who are responsible for internships and stuff basically are insufferable overall. For example let's say you find an internship and you tell them you got one, well too bad they will force the company to remove your contract with them
would much rather design the course and evaluation as to minimize the incentives for cheating -- e.g. make sure HW answers can't be easily found on the internet, exam questions that require you to explain things in your words etc
yeah i guess its hard to give out energy and attention
to these things
the issue with cheating is, it's always gonna be an issue
huh
why
let me know if u know why
at any given point some genius is going to try to outsmart you and try to cheat, maybe succeed
true
put any sort of visible effort and it's like students sense that you're trying to prevent cheating, so by a weird psychology thing (us vs. the prof? or whatever) some may feel compelled to cheat anyway
the only good thing about the coop program is you have an extra board to find jobs but def u are not guaranteed to find one
just good luck competing with 10000 other applicants gg
it all becomes a cat and mouse kinda thing and everyone suffers
see e.g. the plethora of tracking programs that exam proctors made people use in the pandemic
annoying to set up, invasive etc
this is why most students hate math
why? because it's impossible to cheat efficiently
pov when you have to put in effort
esp the proof-based ones
man ngl when i took proof based calc
kind of my point -- if the exam is well thought out then cheating won't work
everyone was copy pasting
solutions from online
meanwhile i was out there struggling to understand what was going on
in my assignments
that course basicalyl wiped me out
hell I've seen people lowkey copy-paste thought in irl exams 
like, write things from class or TA verbatim even when it doesnt make sense in the exam context
why do u think the average on online stats is sus high compared to the in-person one?
wait how is that cheating tho
thats just bad
answers
but if you remember something
from before
and put it in the paper
97% class average
hell yeah genius people
yeah sorry I'm not saying that is cheating
but it's part of the same kind of logic, try to repeat what some prof said was true
and not reason about why it was true then
i guess
bro i remember
and what kind of adjustments I should do for the exam problems
for my proof based calc midterm
the TAs invigilating
legit put on a sports match
and we all watchec
as we did the exam
in the midterm
lmfaoooo
discrete from cs department
or math department
general but it is designed for cs yeah
im taking that and the one from math department
it is called computer science concepts but in disguise it is just discrete math and math majors are required to take it
which is called intro to formal maths
oh
i wish my uni did that
with the cs discrete
its less proof intensive
than math department offering
yeah a lot of freshmen think this is a coding class then hate their lives cuz it is a math class
meanwhile me who wants it for not coding π€£
REAL
ok I can understand this if it's called "computer science concepts"
the only cs concept we cover is surface level induction proofs
from that title I'd expect idk, a SWE class or something ok idt SWE is CS but still -- something like algorithms maybe
not discrete math
oh for us we also do the contrapositive
and direct proofs
yeah same
tbf for low level cs thats all you need
like undergrad automata
and algorithms
ig
well im kinda a pseudo-cs major in the sense that I take math classes as my electives, unironically
lucky
I'm taking a grad course on measure theory when I did not take any real analysis course in my undergrad at all

how is it going
damn man
what how 
im out here just properly learning proofs
no epsilon-delta stuff ever
legit the first experience was traumatic
and then straight into measure?
I'm also taking graph theory which I also happen to not taken any prereqs of this class
I just convinced the prof to let me in 
lol based
nice
i heard from my prof that they are considering offering a graph theory course next sem
tbh if you're comfy with set theory and quantifiers you're done for measure
i pray that they also offer it with the cs code
that's pretty much all it is
since i dont have any free electives left
well some basic topology at spots
i chose the role which says i need help with maths but i cant seem to find the help option
idk I thought if I were to learn something new I don't want to take any undergrad analysis or algebra classes cuz I already know the content
go to the math help tab
there should be some free
you can ask your question in an available help channel
help channels
it would be nice if i could see one
oh wait i see one
these
this sounds nice in practice
but even tho i know these things
idt im gonna do measure theory
measure theory for haar measures 
I wanted to take the harmonic analysis course ngl but the prof didn't take me in
it's only really useful if you plan to do stuff in pure math that requires it, or if you want to learn probability the proper way
so I was like "what can I take else that's close to it" then I chose measure
fair
like I've seen TCS and finance grads learn measure solely for that lol
tcs?
theo cs
is that even a major
not really
just a generic distinction for people whose research is about well
i know
this
what theoretical cs is
but just got cinfued
confused
cuz i never heard of a theoretical cs major
i want to explore it tbh but sadly there isn't any work
do u have undergrad research in ur uni
being done on it
yeah just like how a math major isn't per se a "pure math major" -- an undergrad can further specialize and decide to do grad school and research if they decide
in my uni
yeah
I tried so hard getting into a cs one but they gatekeep so hard
cs research?
oh cool
so a math major can then learn datasci and not work in academia
a CS major can just do SWE
but on another hand math or CS majors could then go to grad school and research about their subject
I guess that's why there are no "TCS majors" per se
i've heard of that software
yeah ik this much
but wouldnt a math major be better suited
to theoretical cs
than a standard cs major
like deltoid said the basic theory is already covered in a CS degree and unless you specifically want to get into CS academia you usually don't go beyond that
yeah thats true
yes it's not rare for people to go math major -> TCS grad actually
kind of true for the most part yeah
I think we have a few of those in this server lol
