#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 169 of 1
you do it with friends?
I do!
that probably makes it much more bearable
mhm
it would actually be better if we did it with only one vehicle but...
I have two layovers
so it's a bit annoying
I think it's worth it though
rent is looking pretty
atm with the housing market
I'm saving smth like $12k CAD a year for this
anyways, @cinder zephyr what've you been up to lately? 
oooo ok
so I help run a cybersecurity club
a big thing in cybersec are these competitions called "Capture the Flag"
where whoever is running the competition makes challenges
these challenges are security based and involve some sort of hacking
and you hack to find this string (called a flag)
these challenges can range from some sort of forensics, or breaking a server, or reverse engineering a program, hacking a website, or doing some cryptography
so I'm making some cryptography challenges right now for my university's CTF we put on every summer
I see!
that sounds really cool, and fun!
very cool site idk how they pulled it off
indeed
Yeah but you are strong, still




who ghost pinged me?

I think Ill join when im back in school
I knew about these in HS
But forgot about them in uni
Hiii
hi
hi ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
@fresh comet
hi
hi
hi
hi
hi
Hello :3
Helloo
math makes me want to quit
i always forget why i started
Hi
Hi
gender
huh
I do not need to explain
i dont undertsand
big mood
they get it

https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13867 AI can do math now?
their overall mathematical performance is well below the level of a graduate student. Hence, if your goal is to use ChatGPT to pass a graduate-level math exam, you would be better off copying from your average peer!
L
Some AI can do some math, LLM's can't do any math
Which AI are you referring to? Symbolic reasoning frameworks?
Compilers are technically AI in some sense so...
Yes, that's more or less what I mean
I mean perhaps the immediate future is augmented LLMs or something, like you plug LEAN or SMT-LIB into it
That's assuming we don't get another breakthrough in a year or so
im kind of relying on ai being analytically helpless for my career prospects
so i hope not
bet
well
the question is
If AI reaches the level where they can replace mathematicians
they might as well replace all intellectual jobs
first ai came for the social science grads and i said nothng
I'm obviously handwaving here but you know the vibe
yeah and i think the vibe is silly
let's say "any job that purely relies on reasoning and nothing else like art or politics or athletism or something"
Not denying the possibility of highly-specialized AI that can literally only do math but
although my primary source of entertainment for a week last year was starting arguments on reddit and letting people unknowingly duke it out with a Bot i had like 7-8 arguments going at once it was a riot
yes i agree with you if it can do math it can do everything else eg engineering programming what have you
reminds me of the GPT-4chan saga
hi

Yannic's?
ive finished calc 1 

Hi there
hi
I am facing some issues. Maybe I am wrong or my calculator is wrong. When I plug in ( x = 1.5 ) into the expression ( \frac{1.5 + \cos(1.5)}{\sin(1.5)} ), I get 39.6, not 1.5709 as mentioned in the video
FANI
degree vs radian mode issue probably
@velvet pivot stop spamming your question across multiple channels too please
Ok
why would it be so small if you do it in degrees
If you don't mind, could you clarify more for me? I am self-studying mathematics (especially calculus from scratch)
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
Please read that to make a question channel @velvet pivot
can I ask non-homework stuff in this channel?
the help channels are just for any math questions
I found a YT video to fix that problem. I successfully changed the mode from degrees to radians. Previously I assumed that 1.5 was in degrees, so I multiplied it by π/180. I feel dumb about that
what is gpa out of?
Thanks for helping
hmm alr
is math intuitive
what does your gut tell you
What type of maths? To who? Before or after learning it?
hungry
who wants to be my study buddy, can't seem to find nobody
Question:
I understand in a set that it can be specified that the Cartesian product of 2 sets is A x B = {(a,b) | a is a element of A and b is an element of B}
How is it defined when we are doing something like
(A x B) x C? What is (a,b) inside of?
Sorry if this is a dumb question
I just started learning set theory
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
ask your classmates
a would be pairs from AxB and elements of b would be elements of C
so one element would be ((a1, b1), c1)
why is that
So:
(A x B) x C = { ((a,b), c) | (a,b) is an element of (A x B) and c is an element of C }
yea
Okay cool thank you
@vast surge okay I've thought about it while swimming and I'll avoid talking about complex numbers or general metric spaces in this class
It would require opening a bunch of threads that can't really be closed, and I think there's a conceptual/pedagogical case to just not introduce higher dimensional stuff just yet
Or if I'm gonna introduce general metric/topological talk, I won't bring R^n into the picture
So the real analysis part of this class is gonna be more analytical than geometric
And year 2 does metric topology, linear algebra, and multivariable analysis
In an irl university setting it might be better to have stuff be more "modular" rather than shoehorn people into a single track, and arguably there is a case to have two parallel first year math classes, basically one for people who like physics more and one for people who like CS more
dami pink name 
Yee
hey guys
who lives in a pineapple under the sea??
please answer,
im lonely in life
google it
why is bro pink again
hehehehehehhee
congrats
congrats
okay, now give me a structure coherent isomorphism of k-rank tensors with k-vectors
:T
That escalated quickly
no way, do it yourself
bruh
skill issue 
nod, nod, crie
@static loom: i'm really just asking about mere existence about some paper outlining some equivalence, iff it exists
you want to talk about geometric algebra message that person I forget their name off the top of my head atm
i'll take the skill issue on having not read preliminaries, but i won't take it if this is untreaded grounds >:(
is it not mniip?
lmao
it's @zealous garden
I should have guessed when you mentioned geometric algebra
i never did >:(
It's me
not that I'm aware lmao
oh nvm I thought mero said cpli is wraithlord
now give me a coherent isomorphism of sums of 1..(k-1)-vectors with rank-k tensors.
I don't want to
does it merely exist though q-q
Woah nelly
does hestenes just outline a definition?
i don't wanna read hestenes q-q
:(
i love my tensors
i don't. i just don't have an interesting way to represent multivectors
tensors arent that boring
and i don't want to teach sand to check whether something is a multivector
so my goal is to find a coherent representation of multivectors as tensor values
does it exist @zealous garden?! >:(
(please don't mistake this as my actual thought, any help is appreciated, and i hope that it's fun to interact with me, nonetheless i find this github issue hilarious) https://github.com/libratbag/piper/issues/556#issuecomment-673024952
(not because i identify with the commenter [fuck them, i hope they burn in hell] but rather, how surreal they appear demanding support)
@jagged forge you were suspended in grade 8
yes
up tops
What do you mean
What do you mean
Multivectors are members of an exterior/clifford algebra.
It's pretty simple
not in my ram, they aren't
Yes they are
i have tensors to my disposal, at least their representation as nested arrays
Oh so not actually tensors
so if i vec1 * vec2 i don't mind spitting out some mat3
You have nD arrays
i have #<rank>@<lowest bound 1>@lowest bound 2>@<lowest bound ...>@<lowest bound <rank>>(<array>)
I can't read that
One thing you'll want is when the unordered sum over indices is equal to (I think smth like 4x) the ordered sum over indices
it's a.. do i have #2((1 2 3)(4 5 6)(7 8 9))
$$
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 2 & 3 \
4 & 5 & 6 \
7 & 8 & 9 \
\end{bmatrix}
$$
cpli
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
cool.
I need a rule for interpreting these to know what is and isn't a multivector
Like if I'm taking the "tensor" $A^{ijk}$, and then treat it as the sum $\sum_{i,j,k}A^{ijk}e_i e_j e_k$, then that is always a multivector
there are no multivectors.. there are only rank-n tensors, is there still coherent geometric geometry?
wraithlord_kontingency
Those aren't tensors please
They are just nD arrays
CS brainrot runs as deep as C++ calling dynamic arrays "Vectors"
okay, i agree that that might be stupid
Tensors are a certain kind of multilinear map, or objects that respond to coordinate transformations in a particular way, depending on whom you ask
but give me a finite n-linear form that isn't representable as an nD array
That isn't the issue
The issue is going back the other way
For example in order to go from object to components I need a basis
Likewise in fact to go from components to object
can't you just read the fibres of the nD array?
oh
wraithlord_kontingency
Answer: You don't know. You have almost no idea.
well.. it's skew-symm-- alright
You can say it's a 90 degree rotation iff you assume you are using an orthonormal basis
Which can be quite the huge assumption
All this really says, if we must look at it as a transformation, is that the first axis ended up where the second is, and the second where the first is but antiparallel
sure, it might be huge- but is it in meaningful to consider non-orthonormal bases?
What do you mean is it meaningful
It's more sensible to ask whether it's meaningful to consider orthonormal bases
i mean, asides from introducing new identities does your algebra change?
I want you to construct a physical basis for a physical space with a guarantee of uniformity and orthogonality
uhhm owo "physical space"?
My point here is that you are currently using language in a way that makes it hard for me to grok what it is you're actually trying to ask
Or whether you have actually formed a question that makes sense to ask of the concepts in my head even
A list of numbers isn't a multivector because we need much more structure in place in order to understand it as one
Just like a block of numbers isn't a linear map
So the question of how to associate your lists of numbers to multivectors will depend on choices
assuming an orthonormal basis of e_1..e_(n-1) is there some canonical tensor isomorphic to any (1..(n-1))-vector sum?
if that is equally illegible i'll go back to reading papers q-q
Canonical? I can't imagine so
There's a lot of ways to squeeze a map/form out of a multivector
Assuming you mean tensors as p,q-linear maps
because what i'm reading is that there is some skew symmetric representation up to any n dimensional (n-1)-vector
Probably but that's a little different from canonical
but i can see it demonstrated anywhere for anything higher or more general than 3
Skew symmetric reps of pseudovectors?
I don't know about that
Bivectors I believe easily
So the goal is what
What is the isomorphism in respect to
Like is the isomorphism between a, subalgebra of the tensor algebra and the clifford algebra, thus a tensor and a multivector?
Where clifford multiplication is tensor multiplication?
Or like
What
Like do you need the tensors of your multivectors in G(V,B) to be tensors in T(V)?
Or can they be tensors of some other space
in T(V)...
Now that I said it like that, dumb question
i have no other space
Not exactly true
i mean really i'm asking for some witness of G(V, B) equiv T(V), no?
sorry, HoTT-brained q-q
Dimensions don't match
I think all T(V) is linear polynomials in G(V,B), but absolutely don't quote me
i won't; no worries
Have you read Lie Groups as Spin Groups
there's no stakes, really these are all musings q-q
no, not yet
I recommend it specifically on the question of relating (multi)linear maps and polynomials in a GA
It's got other cool stuff too
I just don't understand it all
doi:10.1063/1.530050?
you think mniip will ever explain (co)end calculus to anyone?
okie will read
No idea what that means, maybe.
Yes that one my bad
you're welcome 😌
the mother algebra vs the master equation
The mother algebra Rn,n is, of course, a subalgebra of the infinite dimensional algebra R∞,∞, which might be called the grandmother algebra or “Eve”. Reference 4 contends that “Eve” should be regarded as the universal geometric algebra and adopted as the arena for developing a coordinate-free formulation of manifold theory.
sure @zealous garden, doesn't this just say that you can represent any k-blade as it's involution, get a linear form and call it a day?
without referring to any bases?
(3.20) then outlines the involution with threatening notation
He goes on to show a correspondence between the multivectors of the mother algebra (m,m); and left and right multiplication maps on (p,q)
He shows that every linear map is in (m,m), and that therefore every linear map is such a polynomial in (p,q)
wait @zealous garden , so eve is distinctly different from §2 in isbn:978-3-642-05692-5, isbn:978-3-662-12927-2 ?
this server doesn't permit discussion of piracy
understood
there are rules for partnered servers so that Discord doesn't get their ass sued out of oblivion
funni
Funny but sad
If only there were an archive
(this thing, now available for free reading, discussed vocabulary inaccessible to non-scholars)
Not that the point doesn't still stand
Am I blind? I thought there was a rule against paying for help in this server but I just looked and now I can’t find one
Do not cheat on tests or exams. Do not be academically dishonest. Do not offer money for doing homework assignments, and vice versa.
in #rules
Thank you!
Offering money for homework is like hiring a stunt double to take your place at a family reunion, it might seem like a clever idea, but eventually, someone's going to notice the imposter.
that is a wild comparison LOL
Okay but to be fair, hiring a stunt double to take your place at a family reunion sends a strong message even if they're found out. Paying someone else to do your homework just gets you in trouble.
but the family will care that there is an impostor
so it's not as bad as you make it sound
hihi!
hello
imposter??? 
And sends a strong message to the school
I will congrat chatgpt to graduate at the end of year 12🤙
Mine preferred the impostor 
Stuffed owl 
is that you or the impostor
Is this what Polish owls look like
whew, such moves
My teacher gave some multiplication problems and said don't use tables, does that mean I need to do it on floor?
Math.
why floor when you can do it while floating?
Okay cat, you do your cathematics
i don't think he/she meant "that" table
human did not learn gymathematics? sadge
Seems like I've accidentally crossed paths with the cat pfp squad. Better watch my step, I heard their claws are as sharp as their wit, I better step back
hoot, you mean
hoot?
you best not get on @native oriole’s bad side
which hyzae
don’t advertise please
why can't i have normal interests even among mathematicians
i have started taking notes for an article with working title Gender, Geometry and Logic
lets see if i can write something actually interesting about this (unlikely, but i gather i need the practice)
listen to hiphop and play minecraft boom you share intrests with half the world population
thats cap
mc has 300m downloads
Gender theory is quite popular amongst mathematicians. Eugenia Cheng immediately comes to mind as someone who's done work in the overlap (X+Y=Gender).
There's a lot of queer mathematicians.
hm java and bedrock combined is 425 million, chinese is 475 million
is the chinese one even affiliated with microsoft?
yeah
it is?? then why dont we get the cool stuff 😭
they licensed minecraft to NetEase to devise a censored version that had CCP sponsored stuff
ah
you can go to china and play it on someone's computer
i think you can get it in the USA smhw
it checks if you're in china but that's easily bypassable
people have tried to port over the stuff using mods
currently, the plurality of medieval conceptions of algebra; renaissance readings of the ancients and epicurean explanations of hydrostatics; late 16th and early 17th century ideas of the Orphic fable in music; social logic, authority and the role of examples in our understanding of gender
are the first things that come to my mind
also apparently you can only use realms to make servers (unless you like license it if you're a company)
BUT THEY USE SPIGOT FOR SOME REASON
AND YOU CAN DOWNLOAD PLUGINS
ooh thank you i will have to look em up
sounds like interesting stuff frfr
it is >:S
there's at least one queer mathematician who lacks any and all notability (me)
i can't imagine how gender is tied to geometry but then again i haven't looked into gender studies and i'm horrible with geometry

what led me to ask the idea is question that've occupied my mind a lot lately

first i will say it is plenty clear gender is complicated and i don't understand it, yet everyone are familiar with gendered ideas because we are surrounded by examples
also i've been reading in the history of geometry, it's a mess. we have done geometry for a long time, yet there's also been so much confusion about, whose resolution comes about in clarifications and developments in logic, such as the introduction of model theory
now in both examples, of gender and geometry, there are widely found "naive" and intuitive understandings of the subject matter
and there is a disparity between any proposed theory and any model, in the form of examples
and that's about all i have to go on atm
@white temple
like for example the 15th century rediscovery of lucretius' de rerum natura (on the nature of things) and the new attention paid to these authors, visible in the many new translations of these works during the renaissance, for example Tartaglia was the first to translate Archimedes into a living language (italian)
and typically they did not simply adopt the theories of these ancient authors, but they made their own interpretations and elaborations
Nah. It was just Newton, and he was too good, so they wouldn't let any more lgbt people in.
i might add that the example of lucretius in specific his critique of religion and his charming elaboration of atomism had quite some impact on the modern age
his arguments relating to colour i find very amusing
Besides, if atoms have no hue, but are endowed instead
With variations in their shapes and forms as I have said,
And they give rise to all the different colours of the rainbow
By changing their connections and positions where they go, [760]
The motions they give or take, it's instantly easy to explain
How what seemed black just now, when we look at it once again,
Has suddenly turned white as marble; for instance, take the sight
Of the sea, when winds have churned the surface to hoary white.
from alicia stallings' translation
@sonic dagger close, but no I did not get this
#help-3 message
girl math
why is "women logicians" grammatically funny to me it's like calling Hugh Laurie "an actor doctor" (he actually became a nephrologist irl after house md)
heya im tryna get into lean but have no clue where to start all i've done is that build the natural numbers game online
i finished a course on proof-based linear algebra in the last academic year so i was thinking about trying to rebuild some of the theorems there in lean buuut i still have no clue where to start with this lol
I never understood gender essentialism
Why are men abstract, general, and formal?
i have no idea
claims like this are obviously not representative of feminist theory in general
Really?
I thought it was prominent because it does essentially dominate those scenes here
aa I'm addicted to Muller Corner Milk Chocolate Digestives yoghurt
this is an issue Mises explored when he defined his idea of polylogism
but its not gender per se
its the idea that people with different physical traits have logics which are tied to them with their own form of "valid" reasoning
which is a thing he disagrees with (and I happen to agree with him on that one)
now that last quote in the paragraph is pure gold
"unsurprisingly woman logicians have disagreed"
abstract? general? i can't believe it, men have actually been general linear groups this whole time! truly a breakthrough in maffs and psyence for the history books
there is a legitimate version of this philosophy that is not "men do logic 😠 and women do EMOTIONS 😁"
platos pharmacy is maybe a good introduction to this idea
i dont think he actually did become a nephrologist, he just talked in an interview about how he could've become one in the span of time it took him to do the show
guys
what the FUCK are groebner basis
im tired of seeing them used to solve every other cryptography challenge i face
just a particular algorithm to solve systems of polynomial equations with multiple variables
that was underwhelming i was expecting some magic, tysm!

gonna find this fucking take its too funny
Apparently its from the book Words of Power
oh my
Should I post it again
Yes
- Let a=x=1 => (1)(1) = 1 => 1 is in K
Suppose a,b in K and x,y in R
and
ax = 1, by = 1
Also, yx is in R by definition.
=> (by)x = x
=> a(by)x = 1
Since yx in R, we can also say
(ab)(yx)=1
=> ab is in K, hence closed
Now additionally, let c in K and z in R
and
cz = 1
Also again by definition, xyz is in R
=> c(b(ax)y)z = 1
And c(ba)(xy)z = 1 since (ba)xy = 1
Also, (cb)ax(yz) = 1 since (cb)yz = 1
And finally, since xyz in R, we can write
(cba)(xyz) = 1
Hence K is associative
which implies K is a monoid
Btw by right cancellative you mean yx = zx => y=z right?
It's alright, got it 👍
- Let a,b in K and x in R
Suppose
ax = 1 and bx = 1
=> (bx)x = x
=> a(bx)x = ax = 1
But also
(ax)x = x
=> b(ax)x = bx = 1
And since K is a monoid, and x² is in R by definition
(ab)x² = (ba)x²
But also, from (1),
(ab)(yx) = 1
And (ba)(xy) = 1
And yx ≠ xy since R is assumed to be non-commutative
Hence, ab≠ba => K is not commutative
Hence, (ab)x² = (ba)x² iff ab = ba, and is only possible when a=b
Hence, ax = bx = 1 iff a=b, implying K is right cancellative
Yep
Turns out I did 3 wrong, I don’t think it’s true
Sorry fam
Nvm it’s true assuming K is finite
Hmm
I'll visit this problem again after 15 min, because I have no idea how to show yx = zy in K is true
Need not be
No like to prove K is infinite
Alright 👍
how does gpt training work, would it be possible to have a game where you try to predict the next token vs. another gpt and see if you perform better than it
Yeah
I'm still not getting how "left cancellativity" is defined here
Like in (2), both a and b were assumed to be from K so it made sense to say K is right cancellative
But I'm getting stuck on this one
Also, I have edited my previous two messages and went more rigorous
There’s uh like, different conventions by different authors
Oh I see
It’s really reduces to the case that if you have a finite monoid that is left cancellative, then it’s right cancellative (actually a group lol but we don’t need to wrestle with that)
Oh wow
Use pigeonhole principle on x^n lol
Oh wait
Let a in K
If K is finite, then there exist natural p,q s.t.
a^p = a^{p+q}
But a^{p+q} = a^p a^q
So a^q = 1
Also
a^{q-1}a = a^q = aa^{q-1} = 1
Also, if b is in K s.t. ab = 1
=> ab = aa^{q-1}
By left cancellativity,
b = a^{q-1} (inverses exist)
Hence K is a group
This so cool

So since K is a group and is finite, it must be right cancellative as well
Wait but
Can we conclude from here K would not be a group implying not right cancellative if K is infinite then?
No
If K consists of bi-inverses, then it’s a group (since the respective “halves” of the inverses are now also in it) which can be infinite
it’s just that if it’s finite, it must be cancellative
You’re welcome I guess lol
guys i'm looking for weird problems about counterexamples in real analysis, Do you have some?
There's a differentiable function whose derivative is bounded and not Riemann integrable
interesting, so i'm looking for a bounded function which has a primitive but has set of discontinuity points of positive outer measure
it's weird because it has to satisfy the ivp
Indeed it be curses
Me when volterra’s function
is it normal that factorizing polynomials is so exhausting or am I doing it wrong?
I dont like searching all roots then testing the polynomial on all of them
and test for intermediate values to see if a root is repeated
I feel like there should be a more straight forward way
there is always a shortcut
one way to find repeated roots is look at the gcd(f,f')
check the highest power
fundamental theorem of algebra says there can only be n roots, true?
yeah a degree n polynomial has exactly n roots in C, so that's basically an upper bound depending on where you're factoring, in rationals or reals
I’m looking for someone to study analysis or algebra with
n (not necessarily unique) root, yea.
Number of extrovert mathematicians is increasing
extrovert mathematician = looks at your shoes when he speaks instead of at his own?
Do you learn quadratic inequality and step functions and data stats in algebra one but your taking it early yes or no plz help asap just a discussion

An Introduction to Mathematical Reasoning: Numbers, Sets and Functions by Peter J. Eccles -- does anyone have this book on them -- i want pdf for this book
this server does not encourage pirating books
@raven plaza I have a funny idea
Double complex? Nah, countable complex. Countable number of exact morphism chains between countably objects
Then all the “diagonal” morphisms are essentially characterized by some finite subset of the “complex level” indexing set
And you can make a lattice in that and use it to do diagram chasing through it
if i have an independent matrix then is the null space automatically the vector 0? does anyone know
what is an independent matrix? also, this question is better suited to be asked in one of the help channels (see #❓how-to-get-help ) or #linear-algebra
probably like, columns are independent
Got my answer thank you tho
I don't follow
I’ll write it out later
sitting at a cafe, taking a pause from algebraic geometry to eavesdrop on a most interesting conversation
mwahahaha
what is the conversation about 
i love listening to random cafe / restaurant convos
so many odd little insights into things ppl are navigating
i wish i lived in the big city with cafes :(
I remember I was in a cafe and there was extremely wise man sitting next to me, that day he told very important thing to me, but the music was loud so I couldn't hear
Im in a restaurant and theyre talking about uhhh... Cricket
The thing he was saying: ||"Don't you think the music here is a bit loud?!"||
'buy fortnite battlepass' the man whispered from across the room
You casually go to restaurants?
Sure
Aren't most of them pretty expensive? Or are you not talking about these 4-star or 5-star ones
Yeah, in that case, going to a cafe with a math friend or something is probably really cool
If only I had some 
Solve this: Sin⁶x+cos⁶x
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
Answer: I find myself compelled to acknowledge the gravity of your proposition, yet, it is one that my conscience cannot, in good faith, endorse. In truth, I cannot acquiesce to your frivolous request, for it would lead us down a path fraught with shadows and sorrows. Nay, I must, my heart heavy with the inertia of inevitability, respectfully, but firmly, decline. For to yield to your trivial supplication would be to court chaos and upheaval, disrupting the delicate equilibrium of our lives. May the passage of time grant us the clarity to discern the wisdom of my decision, and as our paths inevitably diverge, let us kindly find solace in the knowledge that mine was guided by the hand of prudence and virtue.
“Criticism, like rain, may dampen the spirit; yet, such showers make the soul's garden bloom ever brighter.”
Fashion a decree that bears the emperor's imprimatur
My dear fellow, my answer to your question is final.
I feel betrayed
How could you do this to your own brother?
My fate is not sealed! I refuse to accept defeat!
I must make him answer my question
denial it is then
I'm ready to live in denial
denial is better than being destroyed by unwielding truth
perhaps it is for the best
one day you shall understand
This further obviates the need for me to realize my truth.
And what a favor that is! The holy hands of time make way for you for a short while.
I have inherited a predisposition to greed. Folks from my village called me ‘Evil incarnate’.
how unfortunate, a being stronger in numbers fends for itself.
That's one way to put it. Hunger for power shall not be juxtaposed with the will to survive
but... perhaps they shall be transposed. The will of change itself leaves much room for grace.
Death brings grace to life.
One could only hope to whet their intellect
For it is the only sword to be wielded
Death is willful in certain circumstances however. Perhaps the greater good can be held as a weapon as well
Indeed, Death is an equalizing force.
The transfer that takes place is not one that identity can be part of, however
all shall meld into one in the end.
Death isn't unification. It's salvation.
It frees you from all shackles
They both accrue into something undesirable
Death isn't an equaliser
It's a manifestation
Of what many call their ‘lifetime’
Perhaps the concept of equality stripped of context is poorly behaved.
Indeed. Why must we expect reality to make sense? When all we've been living is a lie!
Truth can be found in anything.
Separately, of course, but maybe the connection is somewhere over the horizon of life.
“He who pulleth this sword and this stone anvil, is rightwise born king of all England.”
What's your last sentence supposed to mean? Why?
I see not how such a memorial relates to the current debate
Truth can be found anywhere.
Indeed
Seek, and you shall find
f:g:h g is 60 percent more than h , f is a third of g , simplify f:g:h
Is math about truth
if g is 60% more than h then g = 1.6h = 8/5 h. if f is a third of g, then f = 1/3 g = 1/3 * 8/5 h = 8/15 h.
then f : g : h becomes 8/15 h : 8/5 h : h, which becomes 8/15 : 8/5 : 1, and if you wanted to get rid of the fractions, you could say that's the same as 8 : 24 : 15
Not all truth is in the scope of math
but even if so can humans verify or undertand truth that is outside of the scope of math
True but I'm saying "is math about truth" is underdetermined
Since there are things about truth which aren't mathematical
what does it mean to have fractional degrees of freedom in statistics?
Pretty!
Truth is the Escape of Reality
and Math barely opens the gate
This is lowkey fire keep yapping
Think about it
@surreal bison physics bestie I have a question for u
yes?
oh btw there's this book with good info that's also written simply
Basic Vacuum Practices
Fractals?
Idk know but ik you can have fractional dimensions when dealing with those and a degree of freedom seems to be just another dimension you're allowed to traverse whenever I've ever heard the term
that doesn't make sense in a statistics context
the hausdorff dimension is not even a measure of degrees of freedom
it's more like a measure of growth rate
My understanding is that at a certain point you can treat fractals like functions that you're plugging into differential equations kinda sorta maybe that's not right. I can find the quote but this book I read was talking about it like how we used to only think we could solve equations with fractions and then we discovered special irrational numbers and that was a big leap in how we were able to tackle those problems. So the idea that was conveyed is that fractals are playing a similar role with higher level mathematics.
And that's important I think because ik they are doing something with differential equations in probability. I haven't ever studied it but tell me they aren't?
actual yap
pi is rational
You clearly aren’t
tru
tikz question: if I have a list of node positions and edges between those nodes, is there a way to turn that into a tikz graph
ask gpt to fix it for you
gpt is surprisingly bad at tikz if what you are trying to do is weird or derivate to what people are commonly do
I'm pretty sure I'm trying to do something very normal
I know its bad but once you explain what exactly you want, it can help you
well... the problem is that it can't see what happens
so anything position-specific will not work
well... unless that is common
here's something I once asked and it gave me something I want lol
guuys i wanted to learn the math behind 3d rendering , i read some material about 3d to 2d projections , camera angles and other math surrounding it , but i still find it tough to implement
can you suggest me some video or course online which will make me understand the math behind 3d rendering
study linear algebra
Hi, my friend and I are developing a new algorithm and a new number system, but we need some help and are looking for talented individuals. If you think you can assist us, please reach out to me via DM.
@tender tulip add me bro
I like that name.
add me bro
im using alts for now
@ocean harbor this account is hacked?
yeah
there's a fake discord staff told me to verify an email and now i cannot change my previous email if i dont have a code at least from a shit email
its over
and it says "invalid user login"


does discord let you change your email?
I'm pretty sure I had a phone number added as well
idk
I think you can
it tells me to get a code from the hacked me and I can't access to it
now Akira too
how im supposed to get a code
bad advice but guessing does not hurt
or if you have 2fa, you will have the backup code that can use... I'm not sure
like one time password thingy that you can burn
or something
I tried the backup code and nothing has worked
I tried to reset the password and it says that its invalid user
I recovered it gg
thanks discord

oh you got it??
@ocean harbor
let's go!!

congrats on your graduation too Akira! 
good luck with your exams! 
thanks
im gonna report that bitch
fake discord staff
she even told me to pay $200 lmfao

how can we know that this is not hacker who hack 2 accounts and pretend to solve the hacking problem?
I don't get it
but if you're talking about how this hacker got my account by verifying a random email they gave me
for my main email it didn't tell me that I added a new email
there should be a message that tells you changed the email right?
Karnacademy is saying that it's possible in principle that the hacker made/hacked into the account @woven hinge too, and has been the one talking to us the whole time

I'm 96% certain they said it in jest though
I see
not as a serious thing
why is the job market such a scam 😭
People from USA: do they usually reoffer pell/state grants every year with the same amount?
uh
idk
but what state r u from
fl
,av oxil764
Your dog is so cute
lol
It's my father's
Your dad's dog is so cute
whats ur pronouns bro
yes
lol
jk he/him
2nd this fall
what do you major
math
niceee
rigorous calculus
bruh
I dont think i do
oh
lol
do you have a concentration
wait
dude
like
discrete math?
Idk
proofs based math? is that what ur saying
The opposite actually
Its continuous math
But yes proof based
abstract math?
Yeah?
Its really just proof based calculus
but im studying it a bit now
But the problem do get quite hard
its a proofed based class, includes inductions, logic
Haven't taken that yet
Will probably take it in the spring
Gotcha
Or next summer or fall
I think it depends on the professor
u go to college in state
Yeah
I've been forced to be online for personal reasons so hasn't been fun
Oh
I see
I mean i like school for the academic part
Not much the social
I dont think ur missing a huge amount
Yes studying math is the best part
I still have some left
But yeah not fun but whatever easy A
I did a lot all at once lol
Whatcha doing this summer?
Classes?
Calc 3 and self studying real analysis
nice dude
im self studying stats and intro to abstract math
didnt know other ppl self studied
during teh summer tbh
for classes imma take next sem
Which book you using for the latter?
How to Prove It: A Structured Approach, 2nd Edition 2nd Edition
Free PDF online if u google it
I really like this one, I find it easy to understand
This is also the textbook my class will be using
the Avogadro constant, N_A, is 6.02214076 × 1023 mol^−1
directly from the SI brochure
yeah so if you multiply that by the number of moles, you get number of particles
which should be dimensionless
so in order for it to be dimensionless N_A has to have units mol^-1
yes
its dimensionless?
no
since its no
Or N_A could also be dimensionless?
think about it
N_A is a scaling factor from a quantity with dimension 1
to a quantity with dimension 0
im very confused
number of moles to number of particles
multiplying by N_A takes you from having units mol to having no units
Isn’t number * number = dimensionless?
it's easier if we introduce a new unit P for particles
if there is 200P of a substance there are 200 particles of that substance
its not like we are measuring distances or time
then obviously N_A has units P/mol
should be dimensionless
it's particles per mole
that's what it's describing
Why can’t both P and mol be dimensionless?
however if we let the numbers of particle as a measure then it can have «dimension» i guess
but usually in science people use no unit to mean number of particles
so it have dimension
yes
But a mol could just be a number, no?
maybe arbitrarily
it could be
but usually it's treated as a unit with dimension
That’s even more silly lol
well to be fair distance also is artbitrary. i have live 4 unit distance away from you
that units could be km
or miles
take it up with the scientists
I would if I could
since it is something we used to measure something with it has dimension
same with no of particles in a mol
that logic works??
(the meetings are in French and I don’t speak French) /hj
Temperature is strange and I don’t understand it
me neither lol
but im guessing same logic applies
i can google but i think its a measure how cold something or how fast particles are moving or energy they possesed
I heard something about “joules per bit” being a unit of temperature
bit?
Yea
thats new haha
Apparently 1 bit ≈ 9.57*10^24 J/K
right
then basically joules per bit is K
in disguise
Yea sure but I have no idea how this is true though
Are there any websites or communities where someone can contribute to amateur maths research mainly for people who are generally interested but are not in university?
Suppose you weigh 60kg on Earth. How many kg do you weigh on the moon?
A. 10kg. In the given context, a "kilogram" implicitly refers to the weight of a kilogram on planet Earth.
B. 60kg. Both a person and a kilogram on the moon are lighter by a factor of 6, so you still weigh 60 times the weight of a kilogram, or 60 kilograms.
C
"weigh" and all of a sudden it's implicit
If you don't like the wording you can propose your own
I don't understand your critique
wokeness in full effect
A kilogram in isolation doesn’t impictly mean the weight of a kilogram on earth. But as soon as you said “you weigh 60Kg on earth” it becomes implicit is my reading
Ah, okay. Yeah, I seen now.
Actuarial science or mathematics in banking? Which one has the greatest prospect?
book that explains w lambert function?
Bprp
I don't know any specific books, but the subject that you want is called "Special Functions". A quick google search for the Lambert W in particular showed me this chapter: https://web.archive.org/web/20101214110615/http://www.apmaths.uwo.ca/~djeffrey/Offprints/W-adv-cm.pdf. Depending on what you want to do with it it may or may not be useful; also check out the listed references.
tysm for the resources but I wanted to ask aswell for some well regarded references for learning about gamma and beta functions aswell
This is unrelated to the subject, but may I just say the current nickname is one of your best 
Thank you!
I put more effort than I'd like to admit into these puns.
Worth it!
Gamma function you can find resources on in just about any complex analysis text that covers analytic continuation. It's one of the classic examples.
If it's a graduate level intro CA text, it'll cover it.
Alfhors, Conway, Stein & Shakarchi, Rudin R&C all come to mind immediately as probably having something relevant
ty 💙
I've only seen the beta function in my undergrad probability textbook (Sheldon Ross 9th edition) in the context of the beta distribution.
Someone else may have a better resource on that one. I imagine it might also appear in some special functions books.
Lol yeah beta distribution was vaguely in front of my face once I'm a probability context but I never remember it or why anyone cares
The Wikipedia article on the W function links to a 32-page article about it, that would be a good starting point (and the article should include references to other works)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert_W_function#References It's the first reference
So the website wikipedia cites is dead nowadays, but I earlier gave a wayback machine link to it
I saw gamma function I think as part of one of fresnel integrals I saw somewhere I think, since I dont know contour integration, I just want to read about it more because seems very different to what I have seen so far
Fun fact, I use it at work (in an actual application), because we do Thompson sampling
Contour integration is worth learning, then getting annoyed by all the obnoxious computations, then not touching again until it comes up in something more interesting.
Any of the CA books I referenced should cover it in great depth.
Yeah contour integration is the lame part of complex analysis
(Not sure if you can tell but I've just been grinding annoying contour integrals for qual prep and I am mildly annoyed)
I think it's a very cool method but it would probably lose its luster if I had to do it a lot.
It is indeed a very cool method that has quickly lost its luster because I've had to do it a lot.
Is it true that the number of natural solutions to $ax+by=c$ is $\lfloor c/\gcd(a,b)\rfloor +1$?
kevinhardy2
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
you confirmed it yet?
One of these days someone will have solved Collatz but no one will take them seriously.
Comedy option: this has already happened.
it's usually pretty obvious lol
like you mean filtering out nonsense ones by skimming thru it
you barely have to skim most of the time, you can look at most crank work for like 5 seconds and be like "yeah a crank wrote this"
fair enough lmao
when it's obviously from an actual mathematician sometimes it can just take a while to find mistakes
but people don't usually claim big results without checking it and having other people read it first
like usually it gets sent to a handful of experts in the area to catch "obvious" mistakes and if they don't catch them then such things often get released
and most of them time those papers only get written after lots of conversations with other experts in the process, like much before things get completely written up
Guys what is n € Z again
so that helps catch mistakes too
like ∈?
Ye i dont know how to do the sign haha
means n is an integer
I know but dont it mean it can be a negative too?
yes integers can be negative
Yeh but then this question makes no sense that I have
Terry tao i saw the other day that for example said for riemann hypothesis all proofs that do not contain number theory are already discarded iirc https://youtu.be/t908N5gUZA0?si=AKUIk7EAM79THKvf
22 giugno 2018 - Terence Tao, professore alla University of California di Los Angeles e Medaglia Fields 2006, parla delle sue ricerche sull'ipotesi di Riemann, uno dei più importanti problemi aperti della matematica.
Minute 58:50
no but you can usually figure this out easily
Show that for all n ∈ Z 5 is a divisor of 2^(3n) -3^(n)
Like lets say I put -2 in its literally gonna be a fraction
then probably whatever text you're using doesn't know what an integer is
N: Natural
Z: Integers
Q: Rational
R: Real
C: Complex
mightve meant to say Z+ as well
how did this happen
more specifically the equality in the middel when doing induction
Hello, good day. Please does anybody wish to start a rigorous journey in undergraduate math (using texts like spivak, Axler's LADR, ...). I am about to, and I'll love to have someone with similar interests to journey with.
PS: I'm currently pursuing a math degree (2nd year), but it's not rigorous and satisfying enough.
I am creating a new set of numbers called Ultra complex numbers which is bigger than set C and denoted by U
<@&268886789983436800>
They also posted on #discussion
Hi, my friend and I are developing a new algorithm and a new number system, but we need some help and are looking for talented individuals. If you think you can assist us, please reach out to me via DM.
Send
I wanna do some
You can use them for everything it just depends if it’s worth using 💀
WHat would be a synonym for asymptotic behaviour
I'm not sure there is one
And why would you need a synonym of it?
For coherence of my thesis
But I'll just either try to avoid it or accept it if there is no other synonym
Thank you!
long-term behavior
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
Not the right channel, but just expand out the 5(5^n - 4n - 1) and add to 16n and u get -4(n+1) - 1
Hi kenzy
How r u
Oh that was like 3 hours ago lol
https://rintintin.colorado.edu/~vancecd/phil201/Searle.pdf
"My response to the systems theory is quite simple: let the individual internalize all of these elements of the system. He memorizes the rules in the ledger and the data banks of Chinese symbols, and he does all the calculations in his head. The individual then incorporates the entire system. There isn’t anything at all to the system that he does not encompass. We can even get rid of the room and suppose he works outdoors. All the same, he understands nothing of the Chinese"
If someone has memorized every Chinese word, the grammar rules, the exceptions to the grammar rules, and cultural conventions and are capable of holding a conversation in Chinese then I would argue they understand Chinese. John Searle seems to think they don't. Why?
"Actually I feel somewhat embarrassed to give even this answer to the systems
theory because the theory seems to me so implausible to start with. The idea is that
while a person doesn’t understand Chinese, somehow the conjunction of that person
and bits of paper might understand Chinese."
Yes. Just like how no individual neuron understands Chinese but the brain of a native Chinese person as a whole does. I really don't understand what point he's trying to make here.
I figured, ty!!
Yeah I always thought this argument was dumb and don't understand how it came to be so famous
Me too, I'm just struggling to steelman the opposing argument.
Like I don't even know what his definition of understanding is
I think Searle tries to say you are given a script of every possible conversation you'll make with a Chinese speaker and are just expected to say the things you're supposed to say in Chinese without giving much attention to what they actually mean. Then that would not count as understanding Chinese, it would count as being very good at following instructions.
whereas if you did understand Chinese, you could change your lines in the script and the conversation with a native speaker could still go flawlessly.
hi!
I know you!
Right, its not really about understanding the syntactic rules
Its about ascribing meaning to the patterns you observe
(Semantics)
from the uni discord or in real life?
the discord
I know almost nobody in real life 
Theres a difference between "understanding how to form sentences in chinese" and "being able to act accordingly to a sentence spoken to you in chinese"
yeah exactly
Also i think theres a sort of built in spectrum of the experiment here
Like
He doesnt really go into this but in reality the person in the room is probably putting together bits and pieces of meaning, some of them will be inaccurate extrapolations, some of them accurate founded on feel instead of logical deductions
But is still largely unable to follow any kind of big picture ideas being communicated
And loses out on a large percentage of the details
Meaning and understanding arent "yes" or "no"
The number of possible conversations is uncountably infinite. It would have to be generalized to a set of rules to truly be complete.
I think they're isomorphic
They do not understand if and only if there exists a question they would get wrong







