#serious-discussion
1 messages ¡ Page 155 of 1
When did server logo change?
wait was it not for april fools
i thought the joke was "we stole the torus for april fools because someone ate it"
that was my thought but it's like 4 days now
There is international day for everything. Why start now? Did server became google?

Yea
hi
petition to start: International International Day Day
I bet there already is recursion day
They should've known, this would never pass the init system flame wars
Brainlet move tbh
Fuck this made me chuckle
Hi discussy 2
are they intentionally green
They glow in the dark
You just run em over
When we solve the arg
Arg?
wait what did he say im soo curious
This says no access
<@&268886789983436800>
the meta what game
Could anyone actually parse that sentence
i've never heard of that
I got stuck trying to read it

Now I'm curious wtf they meant
unban them frfr
something about the metaverse ig
no; all of us in #discussion were literally clueless too lmao
(mods let me know if i need to remove/move this, but i think it's relevant/useful!)
hm
or if there's a better place to post it lol
you could have just dmed modmail and asked to post it in events or something
as of rn you should probably delete it and ask permission first
advertising other discord servers is also very rarely (never?) allowed so you might have to ask special permission for that too
So uhh
To rotate a function I would just
or rather
to rotate polynomial, do I just write a vector in P_n and use a NxN rotation matrix?
That's crazy
yeah
you can do this parametrically
some good follow up videos too
some incomprehensible ive already forgotten: smth like "lgbtq+ but is not 2 genders makes more sense than a million"
the million was probably unrelated to the whales
I've had the brief unfunny thought of whether anyone identifies as a whale, and then the genuine curiosity over whether there are whale furries.
there are a number of whale fursonas
although people usually choose like orcas or dolphins instead
or sharks
hmm, sharks are pretty popular actually
@small dust if you use that $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin(x)}{x} = 1$ to prove that $\frac{d}{dx}\sin(x) = \cos(x)$, you can't then use that $\frac{d}{dx}\sin(x) = \cos(x)$ to prove $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin(x)}{x} = 1$ otherwise it's circular. That's my point.
Awesam
sure but that's not the story when you try to apply lhopital's rule to lim x to 0 sin(x)/x is 1 if you already know d/dx sin(x) = cos(x) somehow (however that somehow might be)
even if the somehow was proving it using lim x to 0 sin(x)/x = 1
no only if the somehow was proving it in any way other than that
because if the way you proved it was with the limit then all you've shown is that these are equivalent conditions, but not that either of these facts follows from pre-existing knowledge derived from axioms and definitions
well rigorously you can't really do that
you can
there are no issues with applying lhopital's rule to lim x to 0 sin(x)/x in that case. it's completely pointless if we already know lim x to 0 sin(x)/x = 1
but it's not circular to do so
if you have sin(x) already defined and you can prove it's differentiable everywhere
You can also prove that the derivative of sin is cos without that limit.
In fact you should, since you should be defining the sine using a power series 
yes but it's the mechanism of proof that matters. you can't prove a statement using another statement that depends on the statement you are proving
yes 100%. then it's not circular. but if you do, then it is circular
applying lhopital's rule is still not circular dawg
but applying L'hospital's rule assumes you know the derivative of sine
sure
rediscovering lim x to 0 sin(x)/x = 1 does not imply whatever we did was circular
Without power series odds are you haven't defined the sine rigorously anyway, so what harm is throwing in a bit of circular reasoning going to do đ
(I don't mean you personally, just as a general note)
and if you prove the derivative of sine using the limit way (as opposed to the power series way) then you come across a point where you have to evaluate $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin(x)}{x}$
Awesam
fair enough. but at least we can acknowledge that's still circular
you could show lim x to 0 sin(x)/x = 1 with power series and then find the derivative of sin after 
i think i saw a discussion on this once let me see if i can find it
That's utterly deranged, I love it
nvm can't find
Doesnât this still require you to know the derivative of sine?
no
you can show you can evaluate limits of power series "term-wise" without ever going into derivatives
Yeah, you define sine as the sum of a power series, define the cosine as the sum of another power series, and show that one is the derivative of the other using general power series properties.
Wait, that's another thing
But also what slayla says, having defined sine as a power series, you can just get the limit at 0 of sin(x)/x without derivating
more specifically you can evaluate lim x to 0 sin(x)/x = 1 by just evaluating 1 - x^2/3! + x^4/5! +- ... with x = 0
oh here i found it @normal vortex #precalculus message
and above that
yes if it exists, which you have to prove (along with the value) without using any information about $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin(x)}{x}$
Awesam
the circular logic is not with the use of L'Hospital, it's with the evaluation of the derivative of sine
k i'm done 
what happened here
funny
gold
my students have taught me that (sin x) / x = 1, for all x
isnât that equal to sin?
It should be a sin, yes
anyone knows if it's possible to create folders in geogebra to organize the functions?
i don't see it's possible
Forgive me Father, for I have sinned
It might be not so trivial to see how to define things properly
But tbh, I take those things for granted at that point
I am not sure if this question belongs here , but
do the most of mathematicians questions the fundamentals of mathematics or they just assume theories as obviously true and play the game of proving theorems?
(It would be appreciated if someone within the academic world can give their experience.)
i.e : how common is someone questioning a definition?
I would assume the former
There are entire fields devoted to messing with axioms to see what systems you get
You'd have to be more specific on what you mean by "questioning fundamentals" though
do you mean as in doubting their validity?
ok , for example , why should I use set theory as foundational theory?
or why to accept some definitions?
(this is highly philosophical )
ah, I see
I think that set theory is used because it has been refined over many many years
It's been seen to be reliable as a baseline for everything else, i guess
you can hardly get something more foundational such that set theory follows from it
this arises because I have seen some physicist does not even know philosophy of science , etc. so thay make claims about reality and maybe they dont know the difficulties,
also , my abstract algebra professor has this attitude of just caring about mathematical facts , but no about their validity , just building more theorems (since he is a pure mathematician)
and this seems new to me
statistics 
logicians question everything , there are very strange theories
And as for accepting some definitions or not, some mathemeticians (not very prominent ones) reject certain axioms and such
like, some mathemeticians dont believe in the full axiom of choice
idk
intuitionistic ones
buuut, its not the standard practice
are some examples
yeah
but in the standard it seems that the work of the mathematician is other
I mean
they interest seems to be others than that
I am not really sure of that
I think maybe it would help to clarify that set theory came after a lot of mathematics, so while it's the "base", it was constructed as a way to fit that
yes, if your ideas and weird theories do not address a certain problem not many people will care most likely
yeah , i know , but it is an example on how some mathematicians just go for the higher part
exactly
that's an important point
cause , from that point of view mathematics (pure/research) seems like a problem solving game
for specialized areas
it kind of is yea
I did not asked that to my professor , maybe he could get offended Idk
then the methods you learned while solving problem A help you solve problem B, and also generate like 30 new ones
and so on and so on
well, up to a point i assume
then teach/ research / teach / research
it's all (mostly) still very grounded in observations and concepts seen in reality
well , my professor is an algebraic number theory professor , so maybe I am getting just one part of the sample
yea
I didnt see this, sorry.
caring about mathematical facts , but no about their validity
This isnt really normal, even for pure mathemeticians
Maybe it's his just teaching method? But regardless, all theorems are motivated to an extent
well , not exactly , but like , every conversation , is was getting out of the scope of mathematics , he inmediatly returned to the topic , and begin talking about some specific problem
And if your teacher isn't motivating the theorems than I don't think you could get the full picture as easily
not just facts
ohk well thats just cause he's not a philosopher lmao
I mean he motivates the theorems , but he argues things like beauty , elegance and solutions to other pure mathematics problems
like, when you do higher math you kind of have to leave the more primitive stuff behind as to not get bogged down in technicalities
That doesnt mean it's not there, just that you dont always need to patch holes for every case
Could you elaborate?
I dont know what you mean really, but beauty isn't quite the motivation I had in mind
For me, bringing attention to a gap in understanding, or an applied problem we cant solve yet, is enough to motivate
but beauty and elegance is really not that useful when it comes to teaching
in fact, I feel that it can hide a lot of the inner structure of it
when he is writing a theorem , what he most value is beauty of some theorem , or elegance.
but the point I want to emphasize
is that like most physicist like to get explanation to phenomena
seems to me that most mathematicians are for the problems
and theory , but for theory itself
Yeah, it seems your professor is motivated by a different idea than you
(for my background , before college , I knew very little people who were mathematicians , and most of them were applied , (mathematical physics, dynamical systems, etc ))
so , doing pure mathematics , without a philosophical inquiry ,(because a lot of pure mathematics did indeed have one)
seems strange to me
I can understand that, yeah
is must be the most fun job
But I don't think it's entirely a shortcoming on your part
for doing it
Maybe if you teach for a long time, you start to forget the importance of how the theorem was discovered?
that's a good idea, so they get used to mathematics , adn becomes a sort of natural thing ? right?
I think that you shouldn't be afraid to ask your professor how a theorem was discovered, or what problems the theorem solved.
yeah
ok, that seems to have more sense to me
So I wouldnt worry about changing your outlook on math, just maybe ask questions that help motivate the ideas for you
Or, find sources that can do that for you if your teacher is unwilling
but then pure mathematicians, in some sense, play a game?
if the don't do a deep inquiry of what are those ideas , (numbers , space , etc) since that's very philosophical
I think pure mathematics has a large intersection with recreational math, yeah
but... I disagree that they don't care about the deep implications
I think they do care alot
they've already done it once and it's not philosophical
please explain
you can learn basic set theory, constructions of all the numbers and more in the appropriate math class
or if you didn't have one you can read a book if you need to know some of that
yeah , i know that , but according to what i have seen , their purpose is to do mathematics rather than question it, (not sure of it), so the proccess of learning is ssomething like:
"this is" (for example: (some theory , definition , etc))
and then from there studying mere interesting mathematical objects
but no Âżwhy is this?
when I talked to my professor he said , that you first learn the basics (a bachelor program)
and then you go for "more" (inquiry)
maybe this is some bias
but I feel that in general , the proccess is like this
that's seems pretty reasonable in applied mathematics for example
but in pure mathematics , is a "this is" that is constructed for more theories in the same pure math
it just seems like a pointless topic to discuss
their purpose is to do mathematics rather than question it
This is the professor's task while teaching you, maybe. But it shouldn't necessarily be yours
I already warn this was a little philosophical
if you disagree with some motivation of a definition, well what is there to argue about and why argue about it
all the stuff that was not pointless to question was already heavily developed using set theory and made more rigorous and formal
well , that's a philosophical assumption , but anyways , that's true , because in some sense , a lot of mathematicians care on the Âżhow? rather this "annoying" Âżwhy?
but , I am not sure about that
that's why , at the begining I asked for some experiences xD
you can only go so far with the "why" question
I think the same
at this point you can't even formally define what a set is
at which point the discussion what a set is can go on for as long as you want it to go and that's just not what people want to talk about
that's is one of the things that surprise me of academia in general
some things are interesting , but simply nobody cares
people don't have to share the interests
much like a lot of pure mathematicians don't really care as much about real life applications
that's also incredible (at least for me )
cause their jobs are to do mathematics (and teach), but no a practical mathematics , so , it must be really fun
(I have no real experience about this , just things I have hear about some professors)
it does sound really fun yeah 
well , but I get the point. whatever that could be done , and it is supported to be done can be done.
(not only pure mathematics, but pure mathematics is a really nice example)
I dont think u should worry too much about how this could be applied to that etc, Maybe try thinking about it as "this will help me further my understanding of this subject"
yeah
Cause when you do that, if you really understand it, you can start to wield it as a tool
also is a pretty noble approach
it's fun for them and maybe some of their colleagues, but not necessarily a lot of other people
there certainly are people in applied math that do the theory part taking practical implementation in account and there are those that do the theory only for their work to be picked up by somebody else to actually use it for something practical
And then you might find a real world application for something you solved with that tool
really nice then
and then there's also people that are more interested in practical and ready to be used results than theory, they usually work in the industry
and of course they might not care at all about some number theory conjecture that some number theorists finds fun to explore
thanks for helping me to clarify , this , I wasn't really aware of this , out side from knowing it exist
hi can some1 help pls
Use the axis of symmetry to find the turning point of the graph and hence express in turning point form:
a y=x2â4x+3
I joined to discuss about mathematics.everyone embracing lgbtq ewww
:3
You joined to discuss about mathematics so go ahead and do that, it has always been a gay safe space here like a lot of discord
Are we going to ignore the irony that his bio says trans
hey
Yeah how dare well educated people respect the humanity of those with diverse gender and sexual identities
Also- how come the trans flag is gone?
It's still in the background, the "main" server logo had always been a torus
The background was changed to the Trans flag for Trans Visibility Day, and then the Torus was "stolen" on April Fools
And now it's been returned
Oh lol
reminds me of this quote from this chapter from The Mathematical Experience
then again I suppose textbooks ought to be different from papers
does anyone can solve my computer organization course questions?
just ask
if by computer organization you mean computer architecture i can try to help
my mom was on board with getting adhd tested (idk what the medical term is and i don't care) and eventually we came to a disagreement on some phrasing on a form you were supposed to send
it said something like "for convenience, you can also have a teacher or councelor fill out this form"
i was confident in my interpretation of this as "a parent would fill out this form in the usual circumstance, but you can also have a teacher or counselor fill it out instead if you want"
but my mom interpreted it as "a teacher or counselor has to fill out this form"
now i have two main options:
- try to convince my mom that my interpretation is correct
- go to the counselor and explain the situation and basically have them write what i say onto the form
i could also ask a teacher to fill it out but i don't trust any of them
- mom takes reading comprehension class
thats number 1 with extra steps
What channel would be good to ask about 2D fourier transforms used in image processing?
I couldnt agree more with the answer
Gian Carlo is so real
bro is it normal for math teachers to mansplain stuff i already know đ§ââď¸
i had to ask a scary calc teacher for help and he was all like âyou probably dont even know how to take the natural log of somethingâ
blud im asking you for help on limits that include ln ofc im gonna knowđ
Wtf
I don't know how
Just to check. Is it that he assumed you do not know (alike an average student) and explain everything in detail, or
Did he literally say it out that you likely do not know the stuff?
I can imagine one being cautious and trying to explain basic stuffs.
probably just a shit teacher 
Sounds like a horrible person. I would never talk to them again
to be fair we get tons of ppl here who ask for limit help and don't know log properties đ
Yeah, that's quite common
to take the natural log of something you write ln just before it
is it okay to be slow at math
yes
i'm finding that when i'm reviewing my curriculum i can't really remember how to do it but its really basic problems
what should i do
I'm too used to writing log now
ln looks weird
even in my physics classes I use log 
yes thatâs another way
Review more often
Practice with spaced repetition like anki flash cards or tests
if i practice daily how long would it take to get good
2 minutes
i'm thinking of taking precalc in the summer so i can get a headstart but i'm worried i wont be able to catch up with the curriculum rah
huh?
precalculus in summer school
It should be trivial
Just gotta spend time studying
"Catching up" shouldn't be an issue
Precalc is really just going over everything you've already done before
Just algebra + trig, at least in the US
my issue is that i haven't got a solid foundation of the fundamentals but tbf i also might be overthinking it a bunch o(-(
Have you been doing anything to fix your foundation?
i've used khanacademy before but sporadically
recently i'm using this website
mathisfun
and i have a precalculus foundations 10 book i have worked in
Each week, how much time do you spend working on your foundations? Is it too much for you?
maybe around 30 minutes i usually do it around 8 or 9 because i have other schoolwork
30 minutes a week?
And how has 30 minutes of study been going for you? Have you been able to make notable progress everyday?
when you finish studying do you feel like you actually learnt something, or do you feel like you completed your task?
it depends
right now i feel like im learning
i really wanna like math and understand it
sorry for the silly question đ i'm just stressed
Buy a solid textbook and go through it 30-60 minutes a day for the whole summer
Do about 80% of the exercises at the end of each chapter.
hello!
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #âhow-to-get-help for instructions.

hello
can someone help me with a problem
Let x have any number of digits and x is a perfect square. If you add 1 to evrey digit of x then the number obtain is also a perfect square. Find the solutions for this problem knowing that x is a natural number.
Thx
i know this isn't the help channel but maybe u can help me
Is being smart associated w depression
Having depression is associated with depression
tried this with rudin. itâs been a week 
/r/math has a good pdf regarding this on how to go about attacking rudin
been a week completing one chapter?
One chapter of Rudin in a week is pretty respectable tempo
Hey same!!!
do you know who might know what happened to it?
this one?
#advanced-lounge message
just a joke
but
not too far from the truth
these practice problems have be doing gymnastics irl
i looked at it, but i feel like getting hints to al the problems is cheating
if i dont understand something, ill just read the abbott's chapter on it
Yet again, the best way to read Rudin turns out to be "read a better book instead" 
nah the practice probems are unparallled
rudin just assumes that his readers are einstein sometimes đ
Rudin assumes that his readers know analysis already
fr
It's a very good book, it's just a not a very good book from which to learn analysis.
đŹ
The exercises are very good, I agree
i wish rudin was more like spviak
cuz its a hard book but at least there are worked out problems
Most of the syllabuses that I've seen using Rudin: "here are a bunch of other references"
I'm looking for any excuse to post this again, and I've found one
LOL
That one deserves to be reposted a lot, so it's fine
what other books do you know of which of are the same vein
"Introduction to [something], but we assume you already know it"
A bit more specialized, but Glasner's "Ergodic Theory Via Joinings"
At least that one doesn't have "introduction" in the title
But it should only be read if you're already reasonably familiar with ergodic theory, and joinings.
this is why we love #book-recommendations and the MAA review
You tried 80% of Rudin in a week? 
1 chapter??
:lulwut: You might as well check my proof to laugh at it and make yourself feel good. :ahk:

Says no access for me đ
maybe because you have the pre-university role
Yeah, i changed to pre-university and it shows no access now
im prob gonna have him for calc if i take it
ive heard that his tests are IMPOSSIBLE

can't just do it online?
wdymđ
In US you could probably just test out of it
You sure?
If you got AP credits from taking the test they would still force you to take the class?
crazy school if they do
Don't sugarcoat it - one chapter of Rudin a week is pretty fucking impressive. Most courses go at least one chapter every two weeks, ish.
:whaaa: I took the AP Calc exam and we did not even have a class for it.
nice
let me dm u it
is this for the chemistry science server thinng i was tlaking about
go to id:customize and pres the undergraduate role
yeah i was talking about that one too
:lulwut: As math people, how do you deal with being a dumb frick and feeling scared that at some point it might be too hard for you to handle (not talking to the geniuses who are going to solve the one of the Millennium Problems)?
Honestly the only way I relieve my stress is by telling myself that this is a hobby. But oh man I am going to uni this fall and it has been a fear that I might not be able to catch up if I fall behind. 
@upper glade is that tamil in your bio?
By studying 16 hours a day
Also by not studying until a test or exam is due
If you study everything before its actually needed to know you might forget in the time between
procrastination is actually helpful in college somehow
24-16 = 8, noice. But you still need to shower and eat.
can do all of those things while studying
That is true.
wish this moron didn't block me so I could
all of these posts
what a silly take
I got an A in my linear algebra test so i'm happy
isomorphic blocked you?
yeah, they're a meany

they block everyone don't worry
they probably blocked you too
dw i gotchu
i personally think blocking someone shouldn't prevent emotes, it should just result in "and 1 blocked emote" to the user that posted the message, along with an option in settings to just hide those altogether
its just some random characters đ
ŕš is a Thai number by the way
the language
has this orthography
you have the back mid long vowel oË ŕŽ
Tamil consonants[105]
Labial Dental Alveolar Retroflex Alveolo-palatal Velar Glottal
Nasal m ம௠(nĚŞ) ந௠n ன௠ɳ ண௠ɲ ŕŽŕŻ (Ĺ) ŕŽŕŻ
Stop/Affricate p ப௠tĚŞ த௠(tËr றŕŻŕŽą) Ę ŕŽŕŻ tÍĄÉ ~ tÍĄĘ ŕŽŕŻ5 k ŕŽŕŻ
Fricative (f)1 s5 ஸ௠(z)1 (Ę)1 ஷ௠(É)1 ஶ௠(x)2 (h)2 ஹŕŻ
Tap Éž ரŕŻ
Trill r றŕŻ
Approximant Ę ŕŽľŕŻ Éť ழ௠j யŕŻ
Lateral approximant l ŕŽ˛ŕŻ É ŕŽłŕŻ
/f/, /z/, /Ę/ and /É/ are only found in loanwords and may be considered marginal phonemes, though they are traditionally not seen as fully phonemic.
Monophthongs[106]
Front Central Back
short long short long short long
Close i ஠iË ŕŽ u ஠uË ŕŽ
Mid e ஠eË ŕŽ o ஠oË ŕŽ
Open ä ŕŽ
Ă¤Ë ŕŽ
Tamil has two diphthongs: /aÉŞĚŻ/ ஠and /aĘĚŻ/ ŕŽ, the latter of which is restricted to a few lexical items.
Tamil is an abugida, a special kind of alphabet. A consonant letter and a vowel letter combine to form one of the letters in the table
The triple dot thing (called the "aytam", pronounced "ak") is a special case that modifies letters by adding a dot
so for example
The language is called "தமிழŕŻ"
the ŕŽŕŻ character is "ik", a pure consonant. ஠"ka") is ŕŽŕŻ "ik" with ஠("a")
஠is "aa"
oops
so "thaa" is த௠with ஠, so த
i didnt realize my bio had that stuff
and thus you get "tamil"
should i remove itđđ
tamil kings bill wurtz real
஠is the doubled "o"
lol
It's a dravidian language
So, unlike Hindi it is not related to protoindoeurpean
(whereas, say, english and arabic (oh, arabic is a afroasiatic language) and latin and french and russian are)
The Sino-Tibetan family has Chinese
i am so confused
why
just that I saw tamil and went "ooo"
i don't know tamil
but my family does
given that the non-American born (so, the not potentially future presidents), after all, come from Tamil Nadu
@flat harbor a lot of genz slang is derived from aave
discuss 
aave?
Also I don't think I've ever met a person that actually speaks with that much slang
African american vernacular english
oh yea ive heard abt that
The dialect of english commonly spoken in african american communities
how finna is a genuine grammatical form in aave
Yea
They have some cool grammatical features
The way they use "be" is really cool and doesn't have an analogue in other mainstream English dialects
based sum a b giving
yeet a + b
period
slay sum a ~~ b
its a shame that apparently theres 20 or smth accents in america
and i can only tell apart "north" and "south"
a friend in canada like freaked out over this
"how can u not tell the difference between this minnesota and washington accent" idk i just cant
I didn't even know there were that many
right??
bro graduated from the university with a B.S in yappology no cap frfr ngl đ
like what does this even mean
boston accent is one of the most famous and distinctive isnt it?
bro has minimal rizz aint no way vro đ
but only in reference to the stereotypical im walking here one
i doubt real ppl speak like that
idk what the difference even is
what's interesting is that I have been to Boston before
i think people do speak like that
yeah
real ppl dont Pizza pie Tony in life right??
it's the only place in the US I've been to
dam. im glad i grew up watching british stuff
vro sussing bussing ngl frfr no cap đ
succ you okay?
no
i feel like ive felt no accent in cali
the english is pretty uhh
hollywood standard
wuld u like a moment of chat
im finna drip vro ngl W moment frfr
I don't know anything you're saying here
go back to mimicking a waterloo student please
vro he is THE GOAT frfr ngl W moment no cap vro
wtf
I left my uni discord server just so that I don't see that kind of talking style
this aint it chief
how are you so fluent in the zoomer language
ive taken a liking to the zoomer memes and slang
where did you learn this
the zoomer vocab is kinda like 10 words
particularly ive been consuming many jjk memes the past months
so i think u can duolingo it in a day tbh
I do think I'm an NPC tbh
suh gang shit bb fr fr
frfr is one of the only slangs that I understand and can agree with lol
situationship moment frfr
it's pretty useful frfr
omg sksksksk was a thing
I'm developing a brain tumor from succ's dialogue
im old and crusty and THINK i miss vine
but i think the blood vessels that popped back then kinda dims the bad bad memories
deltoid finna act like the main character
go search top 7 GYAT online bro no cap it slaps
istg
good
I was half on my way to blocking you
(jk)
I think I actually lost some braincells though
its hilarious cause it actually hurts
the fuck is GYAT
google it
u can watch like
I'm pretty sure I'm supposed to know some of this slang or smth
since some of my peers used them quite often in hs
frfr
sure
stop capping bro
of course the gen z alpha says this
coming back for more brainrot
meh, I always felt disconnected with my gen anyways
I never talk to people
wait... bloe
aren't you gen z too?
idk
last time I checked, the gen started in like
in korea the gens are mixed together as "mz"
1996-1998
oh I see
i hate listening to ppl argue abt when generations start and end
out of all the identity politics discourse this has to be the only one thats actually meaningless
yeah I agree
liberal moment
if people were born all at once every 20 years then I'd get it
ngl fr
"im born in 2013 so im technically gen z" shut the fuck up please shut the fuck up
tbf
it doesn't bother me if people talk about it either
I'm just indifferent to it
you say ngl fr I say (â,1)-category of (â,1)-presheaves with values in âGrpd, such that the left adjoint (â,1)-functor (.)â the â-stackification operation â is left exact
fencesitters will not survive the culture war
I've survived everything so far
its gonna get so much worse
better clench ur ass... big ones comin
You gotta chill with that brainrot speak before I start losing brain cells fam
lezzz goo deltoid using gen z
sussy baka
my honest reaction
ayo chief() yo
fr c finna 4 rn
yapping("%ld \n", c) rn
deadass 0 rn đ
@neat lintel @jagged forge
bruh yapping is printf đ
nitpicky but arent defines supposed to be in reverse-
yes
LMFAO
Wow I actually understand what is going on now
hello
sum of integers from 0 to n inclusive is approximately $\frac{n^2}{2}$
alshfik (Ĺ/ŮŮ)
Not everything has to be approximated 
Yeah and the sum of i^2 from 0 to n inclusive is approximately n^3/6
What you get when you integrate n^2/2 dn
The pattern holds for i^k where k is an integer
the joke is that it looks bad/weird
Is fam a shorthand for famine?
Iâm almost sure itâs not. I think itâs a term to address someone. But Iâm not fluent in Discord slang.
I was joking, it refers to a close person who you consider a family member or anything of the same equivalence
Oops.
with reference to the Lorenz System, what is the Chen System??
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stirling_number#:~:text=Stirling numbers express coefficients in,the Pochhammer symbol)%20as%20polynomials.&text=with%20(signed)%20Stirling%20numbers%20of%20the%20first%20kind%20as%20coefficients.&text=for%20the%20rising%20factorial%20are%20also%20often%20used.
I never thought I would strikethrough a link in my life lol
nice
How is University as a Math Major? :lulwut:
What would you like to change or keep?
đ¤¨
Terrible great

Undergrad is nice so far
in general or in the particular program i did?
the latter.
number theory shouldn't be optional and there should be a pure math dynamics course
As in, elementary number theory or more advanced number theory requiring algebra plus analysis?
elementary number theory
Seems that's optional at a lot of places, and I guess you're expected to just uh pick it up in Abstract Algebra
why shouldn't it be optional?
because my algebra class was bad and i'm wishing i had taken it
students here get very little in their first two years
i think there should be more options there
(the dynamics class was also bad)
how do math majors even make cash
there are only 2 job positions i see
teaching and research
Sounds a lot like my course, you do basically nothing in your first 2 years and it makes the next 2-3 kinda a mess, and the algebra class is dog shit
Luckily (for other people not me I guess) in the next year or 2 the curriculum is getting overhauled and people should actually be doing things in the first couple of years which will make the later classes either less shit or less intense
The algebra class I'm currently in just assumes students are familiar with congruences and congruence classes, which I dunno I think that's not easy to just pick up quickly for the average person, even if it's an elementary topic. Thankfully I studied the material beforehand. Of course, if the algebra class does teach number theory then there's no issue.
You donât need to be directly using maths, you learn a lot of desirable skills other than just a bunch of theorems. The ability to think critically and logically is highly desirable everywhere, but especially in finance and software positions, which is where a lot of maths students end up
What does number theory entail that's so important that it should be mandatory for all math majors?
We need as many people working on Collatz as possible
We will finish that arg
You forgot industry. Many companies hire math majors for many different positions. They often make decent money even with just a bachelor's degree.
Yeah, it's just the job title usually isn't "mathematician"; it's "data scientist", "data analyst", "risk analyst", anything to do with statistics, and also a lot of jobs in the general software area you can apply for with a math degree
Hire me
Did you guys know that you can make decent heuristic methods via analytic number theory regarding Collatz?
Does one have to study statistics instead of math tho
Good point. For applied math majors, that probably shouldn't be a requirement. I think I might just be a bit critical of the abstract algebra course at my school, which does not require elementary number theory as a prerequisite but assumes that you are comfortable with congruences. I was lucky to go into that class knowing that stuff, but some are less fortunate.
I mean, mathematical statistics are a branch of mathematics as far as I'm concerned
Admittedly, I don't know what's considered as typical in an elementary number theory course, as I have never taken that course. I do think that congruences and basic statements, such as the Chinese remainder theorem, should be known to all kinds of mathematician. But those are the topics that I have learned in an introductory abstract algebra course, not particularly related to number theory.
i love starting arguments and leaving
and coming back to say this
what did you start
oh this?

so, if your algebra class was alright, there's no need to take elementary number theory?
yes
from what Iâve heard
the ENT class this semester has been run pretty badly
so itâs a gamble either way lmao
that class is typically awful
i was serious about dynamics but the number theory thing was a half joke
I see
instead you should take a non elementary nt class 
I donât think Iâll be doing the ENT course
or some form of geometry
algebraic and analytic number theory are offered in alternating years here
algebraic one year, analytic the next
i took analytic and it sucked. i was actually really excited to take algebraic but i had to drop it for reasons
oof
reasons = there were a lot of people i didn't like in the course
thats the big utility of nt, mixing algebraic and analytic techniques
peers?
geometry can do the same
and its neglected in early math classes
for good reason mind you
but you should see some interplay of different fields during your degree
math classes can create this view of different fields being insular
higher level nt courses can provide environments for students to piece together previously disparate information and things they've learned in order to solve problems
and i do think everyone should know some basic ent
mandatory is a bit much tho 
what's considered basic ent?
collatz is true because it would be stupid if it wasn't
collatz is false because otherwise the torus wouldn't have been back
I can't counter this argument
Collatz is false because it'd be funny if it was
Yeah, it would be great if it turned out some ludicrously large number actually has an unbounded sequence
Or probably even better, that there's exactly one loop very far out there, and every other number does hit 1 eventually
Yoo, does anyone have a good latex template for research proposals?
I would highly recommend anyone who wants to eventually specialise in statistics to lean more towards modules offered by a statistics department than modules offered by a mathematics department as I find the approach and subject matter very different. At least at the university where I studied, the approach taken to statistics was very different to the approach taken within the mathematics institute. Other universities might take a more mathematical approach to statistics than was taken by my university.
what
shouldnt it just be math
In my country most universities don't even have such a thing as a statistics department, prospective statisticians enroll at departments of mathematics.
It might just be my university where the mathematics institute was founded with a leaning towards topology and the statistics department was distinct at that time from the mathematics institute. I was luckily quite good at that level with earlier education in probability and statistics but I found many of my math peers to struggle somewhat. I wonder how many of us here could give a reasonable explanation of what ANOVA is.
I think you could do a pretty good job
Other things mathematicians could consider explaining is Bayesian statistics, random variables, likelihood testing, and the design of experiments.
I have no doubt the majority of mathematicians have the ability to specialise in statistics, but I've usually found math majors to significantly lack the inclination to learn much about statistics unless forced.
My experience was also that peers specialising in statistics were less interested in mathematical abstraction and results less amenable to application.
It's quite possible my experience has been an outlier compared to experiences others might report.
That is what mathematicians explain, those are mathematical concepts. The mathematicians who don't explain that are bad at teaching statistics.
If 10% of us here could give a reasonable explanation of what ANOVA is, I would be impressed.
I probably couldn't from memory because I haven't done it in like 20 years but I studied mathematical statistics and we definitely discussed ANOVA extensively.
I'm really bad at stats
Not my proudest point
gotta relearn stats during the semester because this semester was just dry and unmotivated
the prof didn't bother explaining anything
All what emphasized on is memorizing for the final
I should really learn stats before I graduate
but I'm not sure if I should take an actual class on it
that role gets rid of any username with colour
for example, if I take the role, my username color goes from green to white again
ahh
think like mods, gcd, basic prime facts, a bit of working w sqaurefrees, reciprocity
im going to fail all the calculator questions for ap calc đ
i had like a 3 hour long study session with my friend yesterday and maybe fives times out of ten we failed a calculator question because we didn't put in the equation from the question correctly
does this not hurt the cat???
like i get if they're petting the cat by the face but that looks more like a forceful shake
no, it doesn't
elaborate please?
they just start moving in every direction and punching you with their back feet so it looks like you're shaking it by applying force on the face
but in reality you could be just gently touching
ah k
yo, launching an ai tool for math/science soon https://bloon.ai
A lot of the US is still like this too
Yeah thereâs just a stats group within my unis maths department, quite a few people in biostats and more generally mathematical biology which seems quite cool
I mean as cool as stats really can be anyway, thereâs only so many regressions a man can take
Delete this
That's funny. Ours is also filled with biostats professors lmao
The degree is under the math department but a lot of the professors are in biology department
For the stats PhD
For undergrad it's only a bachelor's in math, but you take stats and prob
?
Statistics is considerably more than regression!
Yeah I know lol, my best friend does stats and I deal with his ramblings, but the number of regressions I can deal with is too low to get to any of that stuff 
What is that number
Roughly 0
Stats was the most boring class Iâve ever taken, I fully believe that thereâs interesting stuff happening in stats at a higher level, but it just doesnât really do it for me
Remember to be open minded
I think youâre taking the things Iâm saying far too seriously
this is 90% of the server
I also said that thereâs definitely interesting things happening in stats
Iâm aware, people should work under the pretense that 90% of what I say is hyperbole
Was it the general like non- math major stats everyone takes such as psych majors or was it a proof/ calculus math major stats class
The later, my uni doesnât offer the former
90% of what I say is shitpost but too many people take it literal
Thereâs about 250 people doing just maths here which is apparently way more than the average US course size, they couldnât roll other degrees in
Oh okay then valid opinion 
The only exceptions are first year calc and LA which are taken by compsci students
And those are HUGE
But theyâre also scrapping calculus so I guess thatâll change
Yeah I think first semester calc is 500+ student classes then by third semester it's closer to 30-50
the calculus courses for biology students here have like 2700 students enrolled lmao
There's a general stats class, super basic and only requiring HS math hosted by the psych department but everyone who needs stats that isn't a math major has to take. Like even nursing students take it.
Then the math major stats class is a senior level course
the ones for the cs/physics/finance/etc students have about 1600 enrolled
Yeah only my mathematical physics classes were ever that small, because only people on that sub-degree took those
I think next year when Iâll have some pretty specialised and topics courses ill maybe be down to that size again but the average course here is around 100-250 students
and the ones for the math people have about 350
getting to the last few years and having much smaller class sizes was such a treat
Iâm very glad my uni is scrapping calc though because we went to highschool, why are we doing this again 
One of my senior level classes had like 12 students and it was awesome.
hopefully I'll get there in one piece
So theyâre just doing analysis from the get go now which is the right call
Yeah I do miss my tiny classes from mathphys, although the final years of mathphys typically have 3-8 people on a course so thatâd maybe be too small
Or itâd be really cool, hard to say because I noped the fuck out of that, stuff was hellish
You mentioned mathematical biology. This discipline is interdisciplinary and is associated with a relatively new scientific direction: synergetics (author: German scientist Hermann Haken). The science of synergetics is no less interesting.
It's discussion-2, not serious-2. Kinda non-reasonable to expect anything serious here
Still more serious than #discussion and #math-discussion , sometimes even more than #advanced-lounge
Irreproducible result
is it possible to do an masters in engineering having a math bachelors?
pi-lambda theorem
sounds complicated as fuck
literally follows instantly from definitions
D contains all the countable unions of that pi, and you can use de Morganâs to have your countable intersections
That's not quite the proof.
The sigma-algebra benerated by pi doesn't just consist of countable unions and intersections of sets from pi
Oh shit yeah, good point,
though you just need to show it contains a sigma algebra containing P
Yes
I donât think you need choice for this, I assume not
They probably just want the final answer
That's typical with WebWork / Mobius / these online platforms
It's been a while since I've seen the proof but I don't think so.
Cause their input systems can't cover everything
Its manually graded by the teacher
wtf is this
My instinct was to find a maximal pairwise disjoint subfamily of P immediately but thatâs choice-y. Assuming the total intersection isnât empty
did i do this wrong? why did i did partial credit
Though I think the Dynkin system generated by P is a sigma algebra though
Two hints: 1. ||A family of sets is a sigma-algebra if and only if it's simultaneously a pi-system and a Dynkin system||. 2. ||Thus, it's enough to show that the D-system generated by your original pi-system is also a pi-system||
Yep, that's basically one of my two hints
it looks closed under vector addition
idk why it says it fails all 3
I donât see why ârelativeâ complements are necessary for the definition Iâm pretty sure the theorem would hold for just, closure under absolute complements
if two vectors have their first coordinates positive and second coordinates negative, then their sum would also have first component positive and second negative
Bruh, I got a 100% on my linear algebra test but they took points off for problems i got right
I'm murdering someone at 2am
I've lost it
Appending closure under pairwise intersection too in combination with Demorganâs basically hands you countable intersections lol
Not quite.
A D-system is only closed under specific types of unions
Not arbitrary countable unions
Well, what I mean is if you have a countable union, and closure under pairwise intersections, I assume you can inductively âstripâ your countable union down into a union of disjoint sets, which you can then inductively build into a countable (or finite) union
Well, yeah, if you have intersections, so if you add the pi-system property, then yeah
I guess the role of intersections and unions can be swapped as long as the empty set is in the system
Gonna try to formalize that argument
Pairwise intersections + complement closure => pairwise unions (demorganâs)
If you have a sequence A_n, you can construct a chain-sequence B_n inductively by B_0 = A_0, B_{n + 1} = B_n union B_{n + 1}. This union can exist, thus we have countable unions. We also have uncountable intersections via Demorganâs too
@sharp cave
oh shit, sorry to hear this
the correct present tense of lmao is ling mao
The past sure is tense
And the future isn't perfect
But does it belong to you
Some of it does, some of it doesn't
lmao rning
What strategy or resources can I use to learn high-school level maths without consuming material intended for high school students? I enjoy reading college-level math texts as they're typically much more foucsed on understanding and intuition, but for more elementary maths I'm missing in my knowledge all I can find is high school material, and the way high schools teach math prioritizes memorizing formulas and stupid mnemonics like "rise over run, SOH CAH TOA" since their target audience is an average student trying to pass an exam. I hate channels such as Khan academy and Organic Chemistry Tutor (the only good math channels I've found are Eddie Woo and 3blue1brown).
Right now I am attempting to understand linear "y = mx + b", but am only finding high-school oriented resources that again just throw unmotivated formulas at me. Any recommendations?
you're not going to find that because it's not taught in the highschool that way
if you find some formula unmotivated then try to derive it yourself or search for the proof
Are you saying it's not taught in an intuiton/discovery focused way, or it is not taught in a regurgitation cram-exam-for-grades type of what like I am claiming
cause I distinctly remember every single math class I took from grades 1-12 being the latter
the former
at least not in a random US highschool that doesn't specialize on math and such
yeah it seems there is a massive gap in quality educational material for elementary math
no one is making resources that focus on high school level topics, but for students who love math and have analytical brains and dont want the traditional HS approach
its all just khan academy clones.
(except for eddie woo and a few others)
there is, but also most of the students are just not ready for a university level kind of thinking
the point is that if you search for something you can find it most likely
you'll be learning similarly to people who participate in math olympiads, etc
they don't have a specific book on their hands
sure. but there are students like me who are now adults and are self taught programmers and already know some uni math like a set theory and proofs and some trig from game dev. So it is very frustrating for me to have to sit through these resources that frankly feel insulting to my intelligence with the way they approach teaching.
I just need to learn the math i am missing without being treated like a 15 year old
very niche target audience i guess
not economically worthwhile for people to make textbooks for that sort of person
so where do I look
i normally go to google scholar and find some good papers on the math subject im interested in
but thats for the college level stuff
just the web
there should be plenty of more advanced websites that cover some parts of the material in this way
read calculus textbooks, they should have basic high school revisions on the first chapters
if you want a text on high school-level mathematics written in a style reminiscent of undergraduate mathematics texts, consider Serge Lang's basic mathematics
Yes thank you
or just read wikipedia articles lmao
but thats not really great for actually learning
i prefer wikipedia articles but only once I know enough of the literature to understand most terminology
otherwise every 5th word is some other wiki entry that i am also unfamiliar with
Damnn.. his book on Complex analysis and his answers on MSE really helped me in my undergrad years. Sad to hear that he passed away and that I couldn't get an opportunity to meet him.
What is the difference between a formal inference proof and an english proof?
i think it's great for the early level
it's how i learned multivariable calculus
did anyone see eclipse today
It was cool, I guess
it got very dark where i was, but not 100%
it was pretty cool
lots of people were outside
I have a feeling we're gonna hear about people having eyesight issues in a few days lol
the eclipse was set up by big optometry
Do not look down on it either
me who stared at it
safety squints
I heard it's takes a few days for the damage to show
đ I actually hope no one looked at it directly

relevant moment from 2017 eclipse over US
Knowing how people are
safety squints in full effect there
I looked back in 2017 too
or was it 2016
2017
You looked directly at it no googles (not totality)?
Dang
i used to look at the sun directly when i was a kid
yes, both times
yes
one of my eyes sees bad i wonder if its because of that
You sure? You might just not notice it
Your brain is good at hiding damage
Brains are surprisingly good at hiding deficiencies
From the owner of the brain at least
Nah we are built differently
I stared at eclipse and couldnt see for 4 minutes
Slight damage to my vision
HI
Very nice
hey I'm beginning to study fourier series. I've watched some videos and computed the formula for the square wave
first of all, i don't understand how someone could come up with such an idea, what sort of super humans..
I've seen one explanation that give me an intuition of why the fomula it is what it is
at least, why the formula for the coefficients is what it is. I understand it's something similar to the convolution integral, but here i am not shifting any function, i'm just multiplying them
and in the video they were using the word "correlation" which reminds me something in statistics
is there a name for this type of operation? is it indeed correlation?
in statistics, was not intended in the form of an integral (or at least i don't remember it that way)
No pain no gain
Not familiar with the word correlation when it comes to Fourier series
Cross correlation theorem sounds familiar to how convolution is the same as multiplying in the frequency domain
Not his brightest moment 
the eclipse was invented by eye doctors to make them money
How does the moon cut his hair? Eclipse it!
moon has definitely more than 40 years that's the tea
What is best major if hate writing and looking attain high paying jobs
Can math, statistics or physics land me high paying jobs
An extreme amount of writing 

Took 2 gap years after high school and im lookin to pursue a math major. What can i study to get ready? Last class i took was pre calculus in high school
Are you in university currently?
Ah okay. Next course would be Calculus for you. You could try learning Calculus now, or if you want to brush up on Precalculus then maybe do that (people often recommend Lang's Basic Mathematics here for that).
Are there any other child prodigies, I'm 14 and teaching myself odes but I want to skip grades and go to college but don't know how. Also kinda lonely.
did you just call yyourself a child prodigy
No but I did heavily imply it.
but don't know how
Depends on your country
Did you just fucking call yourself a child prodigy?
im an adult prodigy
@solar hawk i dont know why, but i think this is worth pinging you for some reason
I learned all calculus, real and complex analysis, abstract algebra and topology in high school and still didn't get the chance to skip schools simply because it's not possible in my country. I'm no way a child progidy tho it's just pure passion
You sound like a prodigy though, when did you learn calc
Thats not how the world works. Welcome to the real world.
FYI you can enroll in college at any time, there's no age or school requirement. Your parents can enroll you
no number theory?
That is included in AA
I did learn a bit of analytic number theory like at the end of my HS career
Ask Jay how bad I am at ODES 
Is that how can someone say they are progidy in a smart way?
sully
Are there any other kids like me, it's pretty lonely
there are definitely a lot of teenagers here who are obssessed with math
idt any of them call themselves prodigies though
Its lonely why?
None of them do đIv not seen a single one
You can talk to people about things other than math
I think most people here are progidies
I have no friends because I can't connect with anybody
Skill issue
Maybe cuz you call yourself a prodigy
okay but, this is not helpful
I hate this phrase
mature hgr
???
Gen Z is falling behind in skills needed to enter the workforce. Some experts say the pandemic hindered the younger generation's development of soft skills. To overcome this, experts suggest companies offer training.
Whatâs a soft skill
communications
Communications is useless
comapnies offer training
Just make noises
mfw when companies reject everyone

