#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 152 of 1
geez
I mean I thought I could go through it in 3 months
But idk
I only have about 3 hours of free time
i’ve been working on it on and off, i’ve probably totaled about 3 months at this point
kewl
imagine Aeon saying "NO WAY, is THAT a GEOMETRY DASH REFERENCE ⁉️ ⁉️ "
i created a game about math wanna play?
yeah sure
hmm, why not
i'm just gonna risk a warning now, mods i^m sorry if this is illegal https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqwC41RDPyg
At first thought it was Rhapsody of Fire parody. Still pretty not bad
you prob already know this one, right?
yup, just deeply forgot
the game is basicly like:player one makes a question about a subject in math(like algebra(the choosen subject must remain the same until the game ends)) and after that player 2 answer if answers correctlyhe can make a question to player 2 if not he must change his name to the name that the player 1 one chooses
uu ur gonna send a malicous link?
and second one answers? :^
or its like online here on disc?
the game is basicly like:player one makes a question about a subject in math(like algebra(the choosen subject must remain the same until the game ends)) and after that player 2 answer if answers correctlyhe can make a question to player 2 if not he must change his name to the name that the player 1 one chooses
okay, may i start?
yes player one:soning ;player 2 rené more players?
uhhhh, well, why not
player one @wary bluff ;player 2 @neat lintel player 3 @wooden garnet shall we start?
start @wary bluff
Unproven, so it can be either
Lol
@wary bluff first you have to give a subject lol
there after-Godel therioes 
Omg, im boutta lose, lol
its very linear, trust me
get prepared to change your name
Ok
soooooo whats th question?
ah oh its my turn agian
uhm okay
what is the significance of a matrix's determinant?
to rene
wait no to dr zuzh
sry, i still dont quite get the game
Like, meaning?
its ok
y
How much area, volume etc of shape changes after multiplying space by it
Well, as I remember
by matrix, I mean
Omg is the question to solve one of those???

what can we use navier strokes for?
screames
nah calm downn
is navier strokes acually a millenial problem?
i think
The Clay Mathematics Institute officially designated the title Millennium Problem for the seven unsolved mathematical problems, the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture, Hodge conjecture, Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness, P versus NP problem, Riemann hypothesis, Yang–Mills existence and mass gap, and the Poincaré
i've just read, solving navier stokes gives more money than dis/prooving riemann
but what does the equation helps in the actual world
Oh, yeah. I must to make a question...
nono we were talking abour riemann
nono we were talking abour riemann
Cryptography
well, yes okay,
A bunch of other things adjacent to that as well
but i said in the actual world as i know we even arent able to 100 porcent use it
Hi i study the navier stokes equations
what does that even mean
its not a clearly aswereable question since its not clearly defined
Will Hercules ever catch turtle, @neat lintel
how do you use 100 percent of a theorem
Solving the navier stokes problem itself wont help us in applications. We already know planes don't fall out of the sky
Correct
The problem essentially asks if the navier stokes equations are always "physical" (representing fluids well) or if they can break down
So, soning is next
@wary bluff your turn
uhhm let me think real quick
But even if they're not, they definitely are in all the situations we encounter in applications. Otherwise we'd know the answer
who invented the modern calculus notation? @neat lintel
well, the one we learn first in school
i really dont know bro
What navier stokes is useful for is, on a physics level, it tells us more about how turbulence works and what turbulence means
i'll allow both answers if you tell me who invented it first
Go to hell René Descartes for giving us substance monism
Wait I mistaken that was Spinoza
newton?´´~º
well, correct
Leibniz
better
Let the fight begin lol
the fight shall prevail
I know nothing of math but I like phylosophi and I know Leibniz is right about everything
oh wow, you actually like leibniz
Lol. Idk, I just like Newton more, he's pretty cool
agh i cant post images here?
dude, don't be like you're on polite server, it is math here

look in chill
if ur ever in a nasty situation
and wanna annoy ur prof
use this cheat cheat
frfr
whoever invented it first it was petty as hell. newton was the head of the royal society when they officially ruled that he invented it first lmfao
Prove is that he actually made it up
not mathematically provable
btw: do i have to feel bad for my prof if were at quadratic functions and i get the vertecy by derriving? its like 2 years ahead of schedule xd
I am currently talking from my leibnizian 18th century style chinese garden
i dont even rly know who leibniz was, just the enemy of newton
I am 2 years late and idk how to do fractional quadratic equations
well, it is just "look how I can do" for prof ig
No something serious
Atleast not me-
well, my teacher hates it XD
thats why i moved to integrals now
when you do integration on a triangle XD
Teacher is petty tyrant you must KILL HIM (figuratively, metaphorically speaking)
slight overkill
Poetically speaking ofc
he even says 0^0 is not defined
omg, these physical moments when I = q / t
And they never tell you I(t) = q'(t)
yeah
I thought 0^0 was indeterminate
oh I see
well, it isn't in all of math. Only in some disciples
I guess we should just take your word for it then
well okay
I wish I was good at maths now
then be why not. It is not that hard
trust me, ull get there
I guess it is I have been trying for 6 months
its always good to learn from multiple sources the same thing
vector geometry for example
.. what about vector geometry
haven't achieved anything, my problem is that it's almost impossible to learn alone at home and even with someone explaining me unless he's good and repeats things a lot I won't understand
motivate urself
gather memes
and rest will come from itself
no, for real memes help you to keep motivated
Obviously it doesn't because I had motivation
I literally started to learn math after "Can you hear the music"
For our country's program is just in time
I could colour boxes under a curve when I was 3 months old
Like, we do trigonometry only in 10th grade
@wooden garnet @wary bluff i am really sorry i had to help my mom with smth
np
I am just trying to make my brain understand parameter problems

lets restart the game but now it will be better @wooden garnet @wary bluff
ok
were making it to easy, we gotta do harder ones
calm down,so to see whos the first i am gonna give you two a question the first to answer correctly will be player one and the second will be the player 2
@wooden garnet
ok
k
@wary bluff @wooden garnet problem easy:x^2=x and you two must tell me in dm why you got the answer and explain me how
player 1 @wooden garnet
it could have been faster, but dude required explanation
yes he was reaally quick and also gave the :Dr. Zuz — Hoje às 20:22
Ok
x^2 = x
x^2 - x = 0
x(x - 1) = 0
x = 0 or x = 1
rené descartes — Hoje às 20:22
thats quik
player 2 @wary bluff
player 3 @neat lintel
start @wooden garnet
Ok. @wary bluff Graphical meaning of second derivative
uh... well, dude, you are overcooking
well, technically yes, but you have a better explanation
no questions in the middle of the question that the player gave
techinically you could see the concavity
Yup
its important when you want to locate the turning point(s)
(bro i am so much cooked like you guys think a 10 grade gonna be capable to answer that?)
u choose to come to this server
@wary bluff your turn
Well, just self education
and if werre there, how is ist written
Actually don't know, but maybe set of vector each one pointing to min value of function near... uh... damn, I lost the idea
yeaaaaah
wait, is it right??
oh, ok
some things are false
let me explain
The gradient of a function is a vector that points in the direction of the greatest rate of increase of the function at a given point.
ofc. you've said it is about calculus
well
the lines are blurring
i've said vector calc right?
so u got to change ur name now?
yup
yes @wooden garnet
ok, bye
i wanna see the name change
gtg, too, it seems
so now its my turn
Huh, I can't change nickname only on this server
ok
if you play with yourself
why?
okay
Good night everyone
cool
you're a genius 💯
wait no, i swear that was written by me
lying be like 
bro you are not capable of seing if it was made by a i.a with just a short text
thats like trying to find the truth with just 10 porcent of knowledge
@wary bluff did you used a.i?
no
would you believe someone will write a big sentence within one second?
and with COMMA
i mean i've learned it by heart so its probably some definition somewhere out there thats spelled correctly
i sometimes prewrite so i can correct for errors
like my normal typing is BS
as you might have seen
okay im actually curious what you meant by this text "The gradient of a function is a vector that points in the direction of the greatest rate of increase of the function at a given point."
doesn't makes sense at all
and how long does this take you?
unbelievable if it is in 1 second!!!
bro pls dont overcoock my friend here
idk if this is true but @wary bluff you must defend yourself bro
ill be happy if you explain this to me 🙂
i'm to bad at english to fully explain i think
lmfao
Someone cooked here" is a line from the TV show Breaking Bad, when the main character enters a place and realizes it has been used for making drugs. But as a meme, people use "someone cooked here" to mean "someone did a good job" in general
for real , i'm native german and decent in english but going indepht of a topic i'm currently learning is quite hard
bro are you kidding me?!
put in translate
that ken then detects as ai written?
I said overcooced not cooked

not a English main either but I'm learning English so doesn't matter
just do your best
or use ai 
basically when you cause someone to be humiliated in a very big way
cool cool
@wary bluff just admit it bro you are already cooked dont overcoock yourself
The Gradient of a Function is a vector that represents the rate of change of the function with respect to its variables (OBVJOUSLY) for a function of several variables the gradient is a vector containing all the partial derrivatives of the funcino with repect to each variable
happy?
man ur obvjously faking it
how on earth could this be ai generated?
with all the mistakes and typos xd
bro chatgpt:The text you've provided could potentially be written by AI or a human, but without explicit indicators such as metadata or context that confirm its origin, it's challenging to definitively say. However, the passage does have characteristics that might lean towards it being AI-generated or at least hastily written:
-
Typos and Misspellings: Words like "OBVJOUSLY" (obviously), "derrivatives" (derivatives), and "funcino" (function) are misspelled. AI can make typographical errors, especially in contexts where it's trained to mimic certain informalities or errors present in the training data. However, this can also be a sign of human error, especially in quickly or informally written text.
-
Tone: The use of "OBVJOUSLY" in all caps suggests an informal tone or a attempt to emphasize the obviousness of the statement, which could be more indicative of a human's writing style attempting to convey sarcasm or exasperation. While AI can be programmed to mimic various tones, including sarcasm, this specific application seems more human-like.
.
-
Content Accuracy: The explanation itself, despite the typos, is accurate in describing the gradient of a function as a vector of its partial derivatives with respect to each variable. This kind of content could easily be produced by both AI, based on its knowledge, and humans familiar with the subject.
-
Lack of Context: Without more context, it's hard to ascertain the intent behind the writing's tone and structure. AI-generated content often lacks a personal touch or contextual awareness unless specifically designed to include it.
Given these points, while the text could feasibly be produced by an AI, especially one trained on a dataset that includes informal discussions or educational material with occasional errors, the casual tone and typographical errors might also suggest a human author. Identifying AI-generated text usually requires looking for patterns of coherence, adherence to stylistic conventions over long stretches of text, or an analysis of how information is structured and presented, which is not entirely possible with a short excerpt
@ocean harbor
@wary bluff
goodnight
gn
you just changed some words and pretending it is like yours
this website knows that lol
kkkkkkkk
Man what’s ur problem?
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).

Okay then enlighten me with ur explanation @ocean harbor
,, (\nabla f(x)) \cdot \mathbf{v}=D_{\mathbf{v}} f(x)
K²en [𝔸𝔨𝔦𝔯𝔞]
look up on google for notations
it is literally on wikipedia
but all I did was checking on you cuz you used ai
this is amazing to watch
i hate it when ppl try to sound smart
by just throwing out terms or using ai generated shit
yeah lol
thisis very based keep up the good fight
How you write like this? How is latex implemented as about here? Btw the question was asking for a text based explanation…
?
@ocean harbor can you help me find a book about analitical geometry?
wanna play a game that i created
no, im busy with stuff
i am stuff
who can teach me sqaure root and cube root functions
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
I mean stuff like tests/assignments
what about them
just need help doing it
do you have a specific problem?
yeah
i lowkey want to know how to do it step by step i just don't understand it
and need someone who can explain it to help
ok
bcs someone was cooked and it was @wary bluff
こんにちは!
電卓演奏者&ピアノ演奏者のあたりめです!
今回は、電卓4台でCreepy Nutsさんの「Bling-Bang-Bang-Born」を演奏してみました!
チャンネル登録もしてくれたら嬉しいです!!
◇御本家様
TVアニメ「マッシュル-MASHLE-」第2期ノンクレジットOPムービー | Creepy Nuts「Bling-Bang-Bang-Born」
→https://youtu.be/210R0ozmLwg?si=zE27KFcCMCr0Ss19
◇ツイッター(Twitter)
→https://twitter.com/atarime_desu
◇ご連絡(contact)
→ikgyt5ae@gmail.com
◇関連動画
【替え歌】Bling-Bang-...
What is a way to get higher math credits without taking the class, or is this a bad question?
test out of them if your uni allows it
50% of 66
There's also CLEP exams you could take if you college accepts then
You could also just take AP exams without having to go through the course
even if you're an adult you can take AP exams by registering for it online
CLEP is easier, so you should prefer that tho
ust btw
goddamn that's cool
Omg, I feel dumb
why?
Bcs of these problems with parameter (or variable, idk exact translation)
then i have demencia
Like, you have to use ALL of your math knowledge from ALL 11 years of school
idk wtf you talking about
Internet says it's "Parametric problems"
Or something like that
you should see the anime problem
There's no problem in anime (in general)
the problem is
Is what
if you wanted to watch 14 episodes of ‘Haruhi’ in every possible order, what’s the shortest string of episodes you’d need to watch?
There are 14 episodes in the first season of Haruhi, a 2006 anime based on a series of Japanese light novels. The episodes, which feature time travel and are otherwise chronologically challenging for the viewer, originally aired in a nonlinear order. When the series went to DVD, the episodes were rearranged, and it’s become something of an obsession for fans to rewatch the series over and over again, going through as many chronologies as possible.
An anonymous poster figured out one possible way to solve to the 4chan problem, satisfying the more mathematically inclined Haruhi fans. But in the process, they also helped puzzle out an issue that mathematicians have been working on since 1993. The anonymously authored proof (which was recently reposted on a Fandom wiki) is currently the most elegant solution to part of a mathematical problem involving something called superpermutations. It’s an enigma that goes well beyond anime.
In mathematics, a permutation is the order of a set of numbers. In anime terms, one permutation of Haruhi would be watching all 14 episodes in the order that they aired. But what if you’re a Haruhi superfan and watching the season once isn’t enough for you? In that case, you might be interested in a superpermutation, or all of the possible permutations of a set strung together. Think of it as the ultimate Haruhi marathon.
Ok
you should study it
Nah, gtg wait for new romcom to be out. Seems interesting
I do not remember Descartes looking like that.
because after death we can choose what profile we want
and i simp for monika
All mathematicians were secretly waifus
indeed
How dare you simp for anything but math??? 
sir you dont understand i descartes have only got to math because monika likes it
Valid 👍
do you know the trolley problem
Like, the racing one? Just go by both rails at the same time
Or double it and give to the next person
lol
@wooden garnet
Name: Cogito's Realm
Description: When activating his Domain Expansion, René Descartes creates a surreal space reminiscent of an abstract Cartesian coordinate system, where the rules of reality are shaped by his philosophical principles. Within this realm, the boundaries between thought and existence blur, and the power of doubt becomes tangible.
@wary bluff
Good morning
hi
What’s everyone up to
roleplay
Im okay thanks lol
Idk much about programming
What math classes have you taken
10 grade lol
Does anyone know how to do sqaure root and cube root functions & inverses. Specifically alg 2 I’m 15 and my dad won’t let me get ungrounded unless I finish this worksheet he printed with atleast 80% if someone could help me check my answers as well has help me do the rest it would be much appreciated
I don't need backstory. I need math.
I got you. Just go to one of the help channels
Ok
Or that too
Fr
fr
@scarlet wedge they could but you still wouldn't have deep knowledge of your codebase in that case
the people who will moniter the ai can manipulate the ai to write the code in cirtain manner
In the situation where there is a breaking bug in production, no one would really know the code well enough to fix it quickly imo if you use devin that much
it's a lot easier to generate new code than to fix bugs for an AI
devin may will be able to find out the bug on its own and may fix it and devin is an ai bot may hardly make a certain mistake
maybe but putting your absolute trust in an AI like that is hard to justify
Ok I thought about this again and I think I can explain it better now. So I'll start by redefining Teichmuller space. Let S be a closed oriented surface of genus g. A marked Riemann surface of genus g is a pair (X, [f]) where X is a Riemann surface and f: X -> S is a diffeomorphism, where [f] denotes the isotopy class of f. Two marked Riemann surfaces (X, [f]) and (Y, [g]) are isomorphic if there exists a biholomorphism h: X -> Y such that [g o h] = [f]. The Teichmuller space of surfaces of genus g, denoted T_g, is the space of isomorphism classes of marked Riemann surfaces of genus g. It has a natural metric that I won't get into right now, and with the topology induced by this metric, it's homeomorphic to a ball of genus 6g - 6.
The moduli space of genus g curves, denoted M_g, should be similar to T_g, except we no longer want to distinguish points (X, [f]) and (X, [g]) since the Riemann surfaces are biholomorphic, and the only difference is that the maps to S are not isotopic. Thus, we're led to consider the action of the mapping class group Mod(S) on T_g, where [g] takes a point (X, [f]) to (X, [g o f]) (the action is well-defined since elements of the mapping class group are isotopy classes).
Now in the quotient space T_g / Mod(S), we obtain precisely the identification we wanted. The resulting quotient space is M_g.
Just to recap our example with g = 1, recall that every compact Riemann surface of genus 1 arises as a quotient of C by some lattice L. Any lattice is biholomorphic to one of the form <1, tau>, so this suggests T_1 may be the upper half plane. Indeed, any further identifications of complex structures arises by noting that two lattices <1, tau_1> and <1, tau_2> are the same lattice if tau_2 is in the PSL(2, Z)-orbit of <tau_1> (where PSL(2, Z) acts on the upper half plane by fractional linear transformations). However, if the element relating the lattices is not the identity, then the corresponding biholomorphism is not isotopic to the identity, which can be seen by studying the action of the biholomorphism on H_1 of the torus.
i mean its still new and cant be trusted but in upcoming year things may will be different who knows
Thus, these are all of our identifications, and T_1 is the upper half plane. The moduli space is the quotient by PSL(2, Z), which is the fundamental domain that you're familiar with.
Job hunt has been brutal
!remindme 1 day read this later
Idk how remind me works
try .remindme 1d read this later
.remindme 1d read this later
What about .remindme 24h read this later
For some reason it seems to work for Loch
it works for mods and honorables and uhh those with gamma or something
hi my name is carla i have dual personality so i created another account named carla_ dont mind me
Usage: .remindme <interval> [text]
aka: remind
Set a reminder with a given message.
You are not allowed to use this command.
my course has an assignment question, where i'm asked to use "technology" (i.e, desmos) to solve a logarithmic equation.
super easy, that's fine, but the question also asks me to round to 4 decimal places. desmos seems to only output to 3 decimals.
is it possible to get desmos to show me more decimal places? or is there another graphing tool that might be better?
I think if you zoom in it gives you more decimals?
alternatively, if it's a point on a function at x = a, you can put f(a) in another line and I think that'll also give you more decimals
oh, another good idea, i'll keep this in mind for the future. tyty!
.remindme 1d read this later
Created reminder read this later (#serious-discussion message) for <t:1711731289:F>
Thank you
@deep mango do you know why castlvania isn't an anime?
the swearing.
fucking impeccable 
Anime has swearing
Are you typing on the screen?
I have a keyboard
So I'm not sure if it would work for that
I'm using a phone yes
I'm using an Android tablet
I mean Google keyboard should be the same everywhere
It's a Google keyboard thing
I should figure out how to do this on Linux tbh it'd be nice for my laptop
I don't have a "suggested" tab
How would you do that, you don't have a suggested tab either, there
You need this
Or can you somehow make it automatically pick that
You have this on a laptop?
How do you not have a suggested tab
I have this on my phone and you said you're using a tablet
Oh NVM I see
Yeah, but you said it'd be nice for your laptop too
Yea idk how I'd get it to work with laptop
ah yes
ofc it does
japanese swearing: you!!! (slightly less polite version of you)
and also: you!!! (extremely polite version of you)
and how could I forget
you!!! (literally translates to "guy")
anime has straight up slurs mate
like youll hear 部落民 or 片端
particular edgy anime might even use えた as an insult, though typically not children's stuff
to be clear, these arent as severe as like, the n-word; they're more like the r-word
sensitive but not universally condemned
this is straight up like the n-word though lmfao, people dont write its kanji because its considered so bad
most direct translation of the kanji would be "filthy/defiled group" but it refers to an ethnic group
inchresting
the way it says "you damned brat" in anime is quite intimidating
sitll pretty funny how the most common swear words in anime could all be translated to "you"
Hi, I have a complicated situation related to how much I need to learn math (precalculus) and I'm stressed about it. I don't know if someone who knows more about mathematics and also physics could help me via DM to explain my case and receive some advice.
worst ban speedrun ive ever seen
especially for a server that has autoban words lmfao
Are college classes a waste of time for most motivated students or am i hallucinating?
math majors more specifically
They are not
You can simply study stuff by yourself and ask questions to the teacher
why aren't them?
Even if you do not find any use out of the classes for the course work itself, which I find to be suspect, but whatever, let's say you don't need the lecture, and that having a second way of presenting the material is not useful for you.
The class is still useful for networking at the very least.
I'm more prone to defending the inverted classroom
A second way of presenting the material? Tell me more about it
The lecture is a second presentation of the material different from the book
I suspect i just have adhd, so sitting down and studying stuff by myself is fairly easier
I mean, it is if you have good teachers
Should I have assumed you have shit teachers?
Mine are mostly just bad at their jobs i guess, or maybe i'm a bad student
Irrespective
If you're studying math, you'll probably want to go to grad school, so developing a positive relationship with your lecturers is a good way to get a strong recommendation letter.
why not? Most people teaching undergraduate mathematics are shitty at their jobs, or am i assuming something which is blatantly false?
Yeah, and that is bullshit
Sounds like you just object to how academia works, which fair.
I mean, i understand it's how the system is setup and all, and i try to have a good relashionship with my teachers, i just don't understand why we can't just teach students using the inverted classroom model
But it's a game you have to play if you wish to succeed
Yeah, i understand it's how the game is played. It's still bullshit and disgusting system
Which i would rather not take part it
in*
Cool, then enjoy not getting into grad school?
Without power you can change nothing.
Oh well, i will do what i need to. I'm not a child, i understand some sacrifices must be made in order for me to accomplish things. I guess i just wanted to express my frustrations with people
To be clear, I'm neither necessarily endorsing nor defending the status quo. Just pointing out whether or not you like it, you do need to work within the system.
Yeah, but i would like for you to express your views of how things are run
Maybe show me where i'm going wrong with my evaluation of it
Good. Next time you'll do better
Yeah, but I tend to not respond to trolls
I don't feel like I have any answers. At least not ones that are based on a true, deep social understanding of academia.
Oh well, are you immersed in it? If you want to share your views, even if they may be shallow and not add much to my mental model of things, i'd like to hear it.
It's easy to say that we should radically restructure departments and so on, but as far as I am aware, there is a paucity of true, long term studies on the topics
Fair enough. If you don't mind me asking, what do you do? mathematics?
I am a nuclear engineer.
Pretty cool
Honestly pretty boring
Why boring?
And that's a good thing
If I was doing new, untested shit it would be pretty exciting. But also dangerous
I guess that's not a problem with mathematics. I always go out looking for the most exciting math i can find
LOL
Sucks to be an engineer
Unfortunately it usually eludes me.
Did you do a masters or phd?
I did not sufficiently glad hand my professors, so I was unable to.
At least I assume that was the problem
So your advice was based on personal experience?
Yes
Maybe i should take it seriously then. I thank you for it
Always glad to be a cautionary tale
Be part of the problem until i have some small amount of power to be able to change a little of the disgraceful systems that run our institutions of higher learning
My disdain for it is probably never dying though
Are you able to do any fun math while being an engineer?
Can you conduct any small scale research on your own?
Cool. Where are you at now?
Kentucky.
I mean in the undergrad curriculum
Oh, partway through Real Analysis.
How are you liking it? Which book are you using?
Because I have a background in Computer Science I've also dabbled in category theory (but like, only Haskell facing) and type theory
Pretty cool. I'm actually interested in theory of computation and homotopy type theory from a more platonic standpoint. Maybe theory of computation i can learn for now, but homotopy type theory and type theory are far beyond what i have the prerequisites for
Where did your cs background came from? I'm assuming you majored in nuclear engineering here
Sorry had to step away suddenly @neat lintel
I am nontrad I released a game before I went to school
I double majored in Comp E and Nuke E, but I'm currently employed as Nuke E
My analysis text is primarily Abbott but I also have Cummings and Tao as backups
where are you at in abbot this is something i want to do as well, maybe i can set a goal to catch up XD
How do I feel less mentally exhausting solving proof exercises?
Or physically, for that matter
i have not found the answer to this question
take breaks, or read the solutions to save time (if it exist)
thanks!
Take a walk, touch some grass, then come back
How do you come to this conclusion? In Germany atleast, everyone who teaches UG is a professor or atleast a postdoc
They should be very qualified to teach UG
I like inverted classroom too, but I imagine it can be way worse than a normal classroom model for people just starting UG. I'm studying in parallel to HS and we use this model too, every week, our professor gives us 10-15 pages to read in the lecture notes and an exercise sheet. I want to go through that material very thoroughly, understanding everything in it, so it takes quite a while (also if I want to make sure why the author did something, I ask on this discord, google, ...). The exercise sheet doesn't even take that long compared to the reading. During our weekly problem discussions, though, pretty much 85% of the class doesn't say anything; we're about 22 and it's always the same 3 people along with me presenting our solutions (there are no oral grades anyways..) I guess much of this comes from the classroom model, I don't think everyone does the reading and then also the exercises in time. I would like it if there were lectures, then I could do the reading first and get a second perspective afterwards (no matter who the lecturer is, they won't just read the lecture notes to you word-for-word, right?)
hey, in diferential equations, I was wondering what justifies the exponential response formula, i mean where does it comes from?
and i would say that it is a result of solving the diff equations using the undetermined coeff method
how off am I ?
I think this is common in the United States, but often you will have PhD students teaching early math classes such as Pre-Calc and Calculus. Professors will teach the more advanced math classes.
There's also very little training. Just "Here teach this class, good luck"
yea I've seen phd students teaching pre calc and some calc in hs
o sorry i've interrupted another conv
Np it's fine
Also when you have a Calculus class with ~500 students. The PhD student is overwhelmed. So you have undergrad teaching-assistants who will help answer questions and grade homework.
Perfect question for #math-discussion
ok ill move there
Surely that’s fine, calculus level maths is like a prereq to even get to uni in anything STEM in the UK, I’m sure any given PhD student can teach that no problem, because it’s not exactly hard
Like I get there’s more to teaching than just understanding
But I don’t see how they’d be any worse than a postdoc/prof etc
My Calc 2 instructor didn't speak English, My Calc 3 instructor was absent 99% of the time.
They were basically self-taught classes lmao
This is the only system I know first-hand, but I believe it's a huge issue because there's many students who could do well in Calc, who could go onto a STEM degree, but have a horrible experience and either drop-out completely or switch to history degree or something.
It's a huge obstacle in the American university system.
I agree with this though.
A great researcher != a great instructor
I mean that doesn’t seem related to them being PhD students or anything, I have also experienced the former issue, but like I don’t see how any of these things would make them any worse than a bad lecturer
Yeah I agree with that lol
This is the only system I know first-hand, but I believe it's a huge issue because there's many students who could do well in Calc, who could go onto a STEM degree, but have a horrible experience and either drop-out completely or switch to history degree or something.
Though to any motivated student who likes maths, that shouldn't happen; they will just "self-teach" themselves, as you said
but it does have a negative impact on their studies right?
Depends on how thorough you are, I guess. We use an inverted classroom model too and take the same exams as the people who are taught in a regular classroom model and I would say the ones of us who go through the lectures notes thoroughly are better off than the ones in the other classroom model just hearing the lectures and not reading everything from the lecture notes; having to work through everything themselves
It's just that it probably is good to have a second perspective on the material from the instructor
But I don't think you can't replace that; you can talk to other math people about the material, read about it on the internet, use other sources, ...
well, we are also the batch who are studying from home, and it's great and the main advantage is we can save time for the commute
but apart from that, it's really cool to be able to interact with profs and get guidance from them
I agree with it too
I still think the instructors perspective is more helpful as they’ll be familiar with what’s actually in your notes and how it’s presented, what you’ve covered and how etc.
I agree there’s ways to supplement it, but the lecturers perspective tends to be best (assuming they’re reasonably ok at lecturing)
Do you guys have any non math hobbies to do?
I’m bored
I really like crazy sudoku variants from Cracking the Cryptic
The Biggest Sudoku Channel On YouTube.
Two videos every day (8.30pm & 11pm UK time)
Hosts (Simon Anthony & Mark Goodliffe) attempt to solve a world-class puzzle live in each of these videos.
Mark Goodliffe (12 times winner of The Times Crossword Championship) and Simon Anthony (former record holder for consecutive Listener Crossword solves) h...
such a good youtube channel
they have links to try the puzzles in the descriptions
@reef carbon sorry for pinging without permission. i wanted to ask you what genre you listen
i do not have a particular preference on genre.
do you know the song stairway to heaven?
I'm doing the exercises from 2.5
Do you know the song mutation of the cadaver by cannibal corpse
if some one wanna chose number from 1 to infinty
what is the probability of chosing number from this sequence 1,2,4,8,16...
-1/12
why
are you picking such numbers uniformly at random? what does that mean for an infinite collection of numbers like this
you might choose these randomly according to some different distribution, maybe biased towards smaller numbers and then the answer might look different
the naive interpretation would be like, compute the probability of choosing a number from this sequence if your number is between 1 and N
which is just like, (number of terms in the sequence in the interval [1,N])/N
and then let N->\infty
you'll get 0
Then reformulate your question?
the questions was
the series
1 , 2 , 4 , 8 ...
for n double
for example the probability of chosing after the fifth double
1,2,4,8,16
is 5/16
the total number is last number in the series
i was need the experssion for calculate the probability for n double
and (if i solve it for lim approch to infinty it should give me 0)
but in zero double it should give as 1
1
zero double
1/1=1
\\\\\\
one double
1,2
2/2=1
\\\\\\\\
two double
1,2,4
3/4
so (n+1)/2^n?

@bronze pelican asked to be reminded <t:1711644889:R>: read this later
Thank you uwu cutie bot
could you design a game in python (or some other simple coding language) where two pcs on different networks can communicate with each other directly? like a friend-to-friend game
yes
suppose we don't care about like keeping the game information secret or players manipulating the game or anything like that
should i send vid
sure
here it is
thnks
np
yeah
okay yeah i remember you
first
@latent zodiac so what're you using for pointset?
does any1 know any good graphing tool for statistics??
dms would be less cluttered
as you like but I'm assuming some other member might also be interested!
hmm fair
anyway yeah im gonna do linear algebra over the summer so i can learn abstract algebra
real and complex analysis cuz its interesting
and topo cuz i wanna, but idk what book to use for real and complex analysis or topo
sure
ok
so first of all, I want you to hold on pointset for a moment
till you're done with rudin
first 6 chapters or the whole book
no!
wow, this book is really small 
no one ever finishes baby rudin
yeah thats what i thought
I THINK ITS PRETTY DECENTLY SIZED
first 7 chapters would do
altho you can look at chapter 8 and see if anything there interests you
it's Little Spivak sized
spivak is extremely terse tho 
yeah 
anywho
so now pointset
the thing with pointset is
it's incredibly fucking boring and dry

you should read ITM with me
so I would only advice you to do the bare minimum till you need more
that's how I learnt pointset
there are a lot of topop books that glance over point-set as needed, right?
can I just read first 4 chapters of ITM and then move on for a while
yea absolutely
the first 4 chapters of ITM are honestly enough for an entire carreer sometimes 
I think you should do a decent amount of pointset in isolation first
ok so should I use papa rudin for real and complex analysis? cuz ive heard there are better books for that
just the bare minimum, as I said
cuz i dont wanna just learn topo cuz analysis is fun 
uh, how's your experience with rudin so far?
coz if you thought baby rudin is terse then papa rudin is worse
yeah i think its terse, but after drawing a graph or glancing at another book it makes fair sense to me
but ok what should i supplement with then, cuz i cant do papa rudin alone
I would generally recc a different book, just coz I don't like such terse books personally
i value my mental sanity, to some degree
but you can try it if you want
i dont wanna risk learning less just to read a terse book
whats some other good books
even maybe just for supplimentary mateiral
ok, so this sentence is just wrong on so many levels 
makes sense to me smh
terse doesn't mean less material, it means the same material in less words
yeah i
ik
but if i dont understand something i might skip it
or not fully undetand it
and also, you don't really want to learn everything about the subject in the first place, as a student you only need to learn what's standard
wheres the fun in that
there's plenty of fun in that!
you can learn more if you want, I just mean you don't need to specialize in complex analysis before moving on 
ok ok
Out of curiousity. When self-studying. Taking notes y/n?
10000000000000000000% yes
i waste so much paper, but fuck the trees i need to learn this shit
anywho, for measure theory I like folland and stein and shakarchi
and I heard really really good things about royden
and what books do i supplement rudin's real and complex anaysis book with?
cuz i wanna touch grass sometimes, u feel
yes and no, I don't try to summarize the content or w/e coz like
why would I do that
I can just reference the book again 
so what do you take notes of?
like, thoughts, questions, remarks
sometimes I think of an explanation that makes more sense to me
so I write it down
do you reference the pages etc. too? Like p.56 "why did he ..."
also, when I was bombarded by definitions while reading tu I kept a little glossary of new words for quick reference
I don't, but I could
thoughts on Tu vs. Lee?
I just include the chapter and subsection personally
hm
depends on what you want
I chose Tu coz I just want the bare minimum smooth manifolds to get to riemannian geometry
I like lee's writing and honestly I think he's the better writer
I loved his intro to topological manifolds
but he's too extensive for my needs
I see
I will be going through ITM soon
not sure about what comes next
I guess I'll decide when I get there though
that's the spirit!
only issue is that ITM may send me six feet under 
never heard of it
who knows any good statistics graph programs
where do you find all these obscure books lol
i need quick help
I DONT KNOW 😭
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
bro nobody in help will help me
i just need supplamentary material for rudin's real and complx anal
so im asking here
just wait someone will help
Folland
that's against the rules
this unironically
strikethrough almost always means I'm joking
👍
but apparently DarQ agrees
and, like, honestly blackberard I would read something else and read rudin as a supplement lmfao
lmfao
but i love rudin
cuz once you understand the trick
its so clear 😍
and trivial 😍
that's fine too, as I said, you can try rudin if you want
I'm just talking about my personal taste
well what is who gonna do
if you wanna do AT then hatcher's notes is the way to go
if you wanna do manifolds stuff then lee ITM
if you wanna do anything else then either is fine
these abbreviations are making me rip my beard off
how do you manage to read so much during semester... I'm astonished
aaaaand for LA artin is very good
how do you know how much I'm reading this semester? lol
ok so
- hold off on topo until first 7 chapter of rudin
- royden or folland for real and complex anal
- lee's intro to manifolds
- hatcher for algebrain topology
how much are you reading?
idk why all these bullet points are fucking me over
👀
royden and folland are just measure theory btw
girl what
this is NOT kawaii :((((((((((((((
I also said I've never learned complex analysis so
i blindly trust what internet ppl tell me
wait what's your end goal
also, rca isn't exactly a complex analysis book
what're you trying to learn
it's more of applications of measure theory to complex analysis
I see
uhm, I dunno, I don't really count the pages lmfao
plus lang writes pretty much all the fucking algebra books anyway 🤷♂️
how many books? per semester
also, it varies a lot between books
hm
0, I've never finished a book
so how do you know which books what topics etc
don't read lang 
I ask around, I google and stuff
math stack exchange and math overflow are often very helpful
this server is also great
honestly, my first answer should've been this server 
I always see people either completely preach Lang, or completely denounce him lmao
but how do you use the book? like i have scripts from my profs, so I've rarely used any books. But want to do more. Just curious how
lang is such a meme
Do you just look stuff up or read the entire chapter, whats your approach?
you just, like, read 
it's a book lmfao
👀
It's not like reading other books. Here's how to aproach a math book.
yes
I honestly don't do as many exercises as I should
but I try to work through the exposition
like, before each example, before each proof I try to work it out myself for 5-15 minutes
and really making sure I understand what I'm reading, I'm not just skipping over important ideas
interesting.
bruh
everyone on #book-recommendations always co tradicts each other
yes
they do
lmao
My prof uses mostly inverted classroom. Do you have any advice on how I could enhance this with books? Like read script then look for stuff in books?
I help contribute to the madness 
or what would be a suitable approach
what's inverted classroom? isn't that where the students teach each other the material and the instructor supervises things?
you should read dami's review
I agree with much of what he says
137 moment 
you get a script. you read it, and then the prof talks a bit about it, but you are expected to have read the material. so you as student can ask more questions in depth
okay but, do you think inverted classroom is a worse classroom model? @neat lintel
every inverted classroom class i've taken has been fucking terrible
always a shitshow
but i know it can be done well
how many of those even exist past 137
siefken's dynamics class was one
#book-recommendations message this is for linear algebra
#book-recommendations message this is for algebra in general @latent zodiac
hmm
wtf isn't that all course?
cool
I thought it was always a given that you read through the course material beforehand

still a little lost on reel and complex analysis but that’s a problem to deal with later 😄
I never understood what counts as "real analysis" anyways
uhh, prolly just ahlfors
I think Folland even called the name an anachronism
or shifrin
👌
altho, as I said, I have never learnt complex analysis
I just know these two are standard
dami prolly has a review lmfao
ahlfors typesetting reminds of me little spivak typesetting
#book-recommendations message called it
@latent zodiac I would trust dami! his reviews are very often on point and he gave me a lot of the books which I used
my hero dami
ok, so to answer this I think that'll prolly be superfluous
if I were you I'd prolly ask my prof
I honestly don't have much experience learning through classrooms
mfw I self-learned 95% of the math I know 
self-learning is better imo
meh, it get's lonly 
Yeah, you're probably right. It just gets me thinking all the time. So many smart people here are talking about self-studying this and that book, so I was just wondering. So I thought, if I do it too, I will become smart too.
me frfr
that is basically how mentorship is done at the graduate level
good to get used to that kind of thing
But how do you work with books? As a supplement for the given script?
oh, you get even a "script"?
at grad / postdoc level, you just read straight from papers/books
you will write the script of what you understand, so this is a level easier than that
but yeah basically just read to understand
you work out / prove everything as you read
Hm
work out / prove everything yourself as you read
(blackbox only because you don't have time)
And what if I can't prove the theorem?
how have you been studying maths
you try your best. if you run out of ideas, peek at one line of solution / proof. go back to the drawing board. rinse and repeat.
Hm. Because as of know, I just read the thingy and try to understand everything.
Making sense of things I don't get
The classic “I have no clue how to do this” look at the first line of the proof “this is so obvious, I’m an idiot”
any book can give you the proofs.
no book can teach you how to find the proof
and how to find the proofs is your whole job
just reading the proofs is like going to the gym to watch other people work out
and there will be theorems which you will never figure out how to prove without looking at the solution first, that's fine
you will learn the correct forms, probably, but you aren't gonna get any muscles
So try to find an answer and if not peek try again. Use blackbox if no time.
yupe
Out of curiosity, how have you been studying maths prior to this?
What do you mean by using blackbox
“If X holds, some magic happens in this black box and then the result pops out”
Basically just taking it on faith that it works without being too concerned about the details
blackboxing is just memorizing a theorem and using it without knowing why it's true
blackboxing is basically what engineers and physicists do

