#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 145 of 1
I love mvc graphics in latex
It’s so good
What’s the first topic in mvc classes
Is it multi variable limits
really it's mostly 3d geometry
didn't you finish mvc 
I mean write lecture notes for it
I only watched lectures i don’t take notes
CR goes hard
We began with limits yes
Ok
I will re learn calculus and write lecture notes on it
And then I will become frog frfr
Oof
Yeah note taking goes a long way, I'm publishing an article on partial derivatives soon™️ too
The 3d graph you see there, though, was made using other software. I used Mathematica, since I could do more in it than, for example pgfplots or other LaTeX packages
Mathematica? The wolfphram alpha thing?
Yes
I usually use off plots in latex but is mathematica really that much better
I'm broke so no mathematica for me
IT COSTS MONEY?
I can't compare... Haven't tried much in LaTeX. But Mathematica is cool I guess
I'm probably the most broke person in this chat. My college gave me. A cracked version too...
It's probably not cracked since colleges usually give out free access to their students
Honestly I don't even know if it's cracked or not. I installed the thing and was told to generate an ID & password from an online website they linked
But it works fine 😂
Nice
Was the website official at least?
The one where I generated ID and pass from?
yea
send link 
Should I DM?
Sure!
That crazy
how would i create the illusion of an infinite dimensional hypercube on a 3D grid system? Also when the 3D projection is moved how could I calculate the new vertex placement for all dimensions
Ideally, I only want to calculate the vertices that will be shown
Hii
Cat manifestation events
This is a homunculus I can get behind.
Ancient head cats
Uwu
Hello, how are you?
lee ISM is overrated
@bright hill @velvet dagger
isn't darq on the ITM boat
lee ISM is still good. it's just not that good
i feel a bit bad about recommending it to people because of how fucking fat it is
if you can trim the fat somehow, it's good
not the most exciting book, but it gets the job done
hmm maybe
Reduced row echelon form with unknown variables 💀 :(
I feel like I’m taking crazy pills just a ton of variables
It be like that
just use https://www.emathhelp.net/en/calculators/linear-algebra/reduced-row-echelon-form-rref-calculator/
there's never a reason to manually row reduce
Is it?
Whats the alternative in DiffTop?
Lu Toring?
the alternative "learn the basics of smooth manifolds so you can go on to do differential topology or differential geometry or anything else that needs it" book is indeed tu
tu with lee here and there is optimal, i think
It was just a question salong for the type of objects the solutions to a system of linear equations would be.
Did that, got it returned saying I should use pivots.. 😅
I made a post in the help -forum with what I’ve done but it feels very wrong do to what I’m doing there
Diffmaxxing
@quartz zenith can you help me with McLaurin series
sure when i understand it
Ty
taylor series centered at 0
hi guys
yes
I am fine and you
Isn’t always true
If the volume is less than 1, isn't it just something similar to a point? XD
Why not? Its a positive number times inf so still inf
Is not true for 0 times inf or minus smth times inf
There are many kind of infinities depends on the field of mathematics you're working on
take the hyperreals for example, inf (normally used with the lowercase omega symbol) * 2 = 2inf which isn't inf
but in limits (precalculus), limit to infinity times a positive real number is still infinity.
Hyperreals
That's the problem here
Ik, but I assume it was referring to real numbers
Why you explaining to me like idk what is going on?
Its a basic question when you start to work with limits for the first time, no need to go to other branches
Normally multiplying "infinity" is not even allowed tbh
Ah, I assume it was generally referring to any infinities
Do you consider hyperreals in a serious way?
Ig the guy who originaly asked was in a limit context
I hope
Indeed, it likely is
Yes however it is not
lower case omega is more commonly understood as an ordinal
yes
because of what rakko said, actually
I just wanna do the bare minimum diff topo possible to get to diff geo
that's what I'm doing!

I don't know when to switch tho, I just go on vibes
and stuff that look interesting but aren't present in tu
if that is the case then I have evaluated the value of cosinfinity and sininfinity
just consider this expression $x_r=$cos\pi/1^r + isin\pi/1^r
random question: who created this server?
me
damn
mniip
no
I hate not being paid
I want to create my own compiler/language but I'm not getting paid to do it.
I'll watch youtube instead
are you getting paid to watch YouTube
Everyone laughs at this thinking its a trivial deduction but Now yuo see its actually not that trivial
No, but youtube doesn't make me want to kill myself
it's not the roof or the doors either
how strange
woog I think
mniip was transferred ownership years ago
woog created the server?????????
WHATTTT
my life is a lie
i thought woog was just some normal member
Forbidden lore
hello guys does any1 have the yr 12 adv math in focus worked solutions pdf plssss
I love making compilers!
LLVM is goated wrywhen
how about NIR
Hey all
Me!
hey
how do you do when you're stuck on something if you don't know other people that knows math?
and can help you
i'm trying to ask in the server here but it takes 10 times more time as if i could go ask directly to someone
i'm considering paying a math tutor or something like that. did you ever do that?
Use mathematics stack exchange or just ask people here in general or chill if it’s short
mm ok i'll try to use chill. most of the time people reroute me to help :/
no if you have a question and want to ask it here see #❓how-to-get-help
If it’s about a short definition and not a problem discussion or advanced lounge is better imo
or a question about studying in general like this one
this tells me to ask in the help channel.
it's what i was saying.
hi!!! ❤️❤️
i'm not sure what you mean. i never get stuck. if i don't understand something the first time i read it, i just put it aside and go onto something else for a while, then come back later.
if you have a questoin about a particular topic not connected to a specific problem or exercise, take it to #math-discussion or the appropriate topical channel
well for example i am asking now in a help chat about the gain, and why we take the abs value.
i can just accept it and move forward, or i can try to understand better the reason and connections, this helps me to remember.
You can ask me in DM ...if I am online, I'll help if I can.
so in this case i am "stuck", i have something i need to ask, i have this piece of information that is not fitting with the rest, doesnt have a justification. and i need to clarify that
a math friend!
i'm not saying that you should move past something you don't understand; what i'm saying is that you should put it aside and study something different for a time, and ten return to it later
letting the problem "stew" in your subconscious may prove useful
you don't stop thinking about something just because you're not actively thinking about it
insight can come from unexpected sources
one advantage of self-study is that you're not on a firm timetable, and so you can take as long as you need to to learn something
OH you have own custom badge
Uhhhh
UHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Do you need IELTS/TOEFL + SAT or just SAT is fine for like ivy leagues things
Or MIT
Harvard
Whatever
are you an international student?
Yea
- how do i prepare for the same?
I mean the math is easy as shit
I gave a IELTS Mock, got like 38/40
Idk still
check the each university’s policy for required exams for int students
Umhmm i mean
Where do i find them?
On their websites?
Their websites
Okay
How do you prepare for these tests
Like for me i have various courses etc.
How does the average US kid prepares lmao
How is the competition and all
SAT?
Idt we do ielts
No? 😭😭
What could be considered special prep
And are the math questions hard?
Khan academy and all is average math idk
That’s relative to how much math youve done
I meant to say like higher level stuff
It asked me basic algebra and all
In the mock
Percentage , find x and things
They are generally not difficult for someone who has taken, say calculus and did well in it
Good enough for what?
Idk. Check the median score for whichever college youre looking at. SAT scores themselves don’t really guarantee admission or anything
Yes
Welp ¯_(ツ)_/¯
So they dont take into consideration?
Lmao i have a GREAT academic record 😭, i have nothing in extracurricular
They review your application “holistically “
☠️
As in they consider your circumstances and what not
Maybe the one time i won a 100m sprint in grade 3 😭😭
US college apps are crazy
But it’s generally difficult for domestic students who did all that and are good scholars
It’s like triple difficulty for int
but basically to summarize it just being a good student won't get you in by itself even as a domestic
Especially since they dont offer fin aid and are need aware when you apply
Uh oh
you need to have extensive extracurriculars - clubs, community service, etc.
in the US you don't necessarily need to have research or owning a nonprofit or shit
We dont have anything like community service over here 😭😭
for internationals...kinda
If your country has free uni just do that LOL
you've never volunteered anywhere?

schools, hospitals, clubs, youth sports, libraries
“Volunteer [my city]”
😔, y'all just rejected my application
What??
Never
Yes?
Have you tried looking for it or asking?
Nobody literally nobody has done it never heard of anyone
That just sounds extremely implausible lmak
The community service concept doesn't exist
the only kid I know who got in to MIT (this is a domestic) had a paper in combinatorial representation theory, went to MOP (top 30 math kids in all of US), and won the USAMO
💀
not all kids are that cracked admittedly
most MIT Kids are just overachievers who really love science and do their best
I mean i know of it from youtube videos lmao 😭, my peers wont even know what community service is
but those are the kinda things you need to get into US top colleges as an int
😭
do you not have a single library
Yo 😭
in your entire city
We have supposed libraries where you have to take your own book to read
And they charge fees for that silent room shit
Hmm
I mean still apply because it’s a lottery at the end of the day
Yeah
but maybe focus on US grad school
I have academics , and not even this
where are you from like india
<@&268886789983436800>
where it's all about national exams and stuff
This
Yea
yeah the US doesn't care as much about that
they don't even care so muhc about olympiads nowadays
Umhmm
Imma try my hand in
Wtaf
idk don't sweat the US
it's probably not worth the loans oyu'll have to take nayways
pluh
Idk why they said that on their website
did you get in yet
huh?
Na
oh did you do NPC
💀
price calculation != getting in
Yeah 😭🔥
and getting an offer
harvard is need-blind internationals
Lmao what 🔥😭😭
they give full aid
Oh word
but they also accept like 60 internationals a year
I didnt understans need blind
from the entire world
deleted message
lmao
they don't look at your finances for admisisons
Lmao check his other gifs 💀
some unis admission is tentative of whether youre able to pay
Umhmm
i don't even know who you're talking about
Almost all US colleges
only I think 7 don't
for internationals
Im in the middle of discussing my future later
Harvard, MIT, Stanford, Amherst, Dartmouth, and a couple others
but they're all prestigious and impossible to get inot lol
Impossible isnt a problem
Money can be 😭
Yo your colleges rules are out of this world
it's america
their goal isn't to give it to the most deserving students
it's to give it to the kids who benefit the institution the most
and that's very often domestic kids
💀
and kids who aren't good at exams get fucked over
there's no good compromise here
becuase there's no way to uniquely determine who the best and most deserving are
Lmao 😭🔥
💀
True
that's life
My teacher once had a friend
Who was like
Very very good under 500 ranker
But got like 4500 something
Cuz his father died
On the day his exam was scheduled
Lmao
I mean
lmao
One exam is not good too
Did you do A Levels?
What are A levels
oops
Check to see if any of your exams are accepted as a substitute
They are international courses with curriculum and exams administered by exam boards in the UK
The reason I ask is because they typically require that you have AAA in order to apply
Two exams with A* score and one with A
A* being the highest mark for an A level exam
oxford is also based on your scores and entrance exams
so you'll be better off with that
Hmm
Theres a CAIE board
We have like CBSE CAIE and state boards
I took CBSE and it isnt convertable to CAIE
CAIE provides you with A levels
Im fked up
Umhmm
Where, how?
wild 😭
IIRC they accept 3 level 5s on AP scores as an equivalent
I think it's 4 5's
not 3
but yes
they do need to be APS in your subject as well
IIRC 😭
so for applying math yo uneed AP Calc, AP Physics exams, AP Chemistry
it's probably 10x easier than indian exams
💀
up to you tho
but honestly don't sweat about foreign uni
my parents went to indian uni and now they're very successful int he US
this is not a backup plan
I am keeping MIT and Harvard 🔥
gl with that :DD
Naw
Y'all
I mean
I dont have anything except average academics
Not average tbh
international application to us top unis is not a backup plan
But not skyrocketing

or US unis in general
even if you don't need financial aid
Lmao
getting into even like a random mid state school is hard
I'm preparing for a college with an acceptance rate of 0.85%
And thinking of it
Half the seats are shit
So
Take it down to 0.4% maybe
- whatever difficulty levels i faced in mock tests were like easy
Comparitively
Thats why i decided
To kinda try on
International colleges
Idk
Y'all have too many rules
Consider this
Yeah
International acceptance rate to mit from India is like 20 people out of probably 10,000 applicants
Umhmm
And most of those applicants are far more cracked than the general us applicant
Lmao
Or general Indian Iit applicant
Umhmm
Im cracked
Dw
Im not applying
I have decided 😭🔥
Maybe just give SAT once as a past time
Idk
Thanks a lot marlin and josemom
Lmao okay
Who knows maybe you’ll see me at mit when I get in
Yo
YO
I'm encouraged once again 😭
Apply if you want just because theres the chance that you get accepted
Umhmm
If they choose to overlook
- nothing at all except academics
- finances (want a need blind, yes?)
- nothing too sparkly in academics
- i will have a good SAT score tho (prolly)
(I’m not getting into mit)
4, cuz majorly what indians suffer is from the english part of the test
Thats like way harder than math
uh 1 and 3 are not negotiable really
Lmao
They consider national olympiads?
they will look for good academics and extracurricular development
Yea
Arent SAT scores = Academic excellence 😭😭😭
The thing to keep in mind is that there’s not a singular thing that determines if you get in or not
Lmao okay
Can they be like - this one looks cute, let him in 😭😭
no sat scores are just a measure of how good you are at taking SATs
A good SAT score is kinda a given for applicants
Which is why they look at other things to differentiate
and at most top tier college pretty much everyone has a perfect or near-perfect SAT
😭🔥,
Umhmmm
Then i have no chance
I can get 1580+ no cap (if i study hard enough, i already have like 1500+ capabilities)
But nah
I dont have ANYTHING
Except that
A above average academics
Are you in 12th?
Nothing except that
harvard has a policy of admitting a handful of "low-perfomring students" as a suicide prevention policy
11
Meanwhile IITs:
Lmao
You still have time, dw
Nah next year i will have Mains + Boards + Adv
I have all the time in the world rn
Yo thats a quota for me 😭
no, i'm serious: they admit enough people who show a history of average to above average performance but a strong work ethic, so that every class will have at least one student who ioesn't expect to be the best in class and won't be bother by being "worst in class" so that the overachievers who are the bulk of harvard admits, who would be bothered by that, won't actually be "worst in class"
That's good because NSEP and NSEC follow JEE main + adv syllabus so you can bag some achievements if you try hard enough
since they started doing this the number of suicides has dropped
Lmao
That's nice. Meanwhile IITs don't give a shit. 
Frrrr
yeah well, the iits are fucked seventeen ways to the ganges
Everyone is the top 1000 in IITS 😭
Even one of the smartest brains in india would be like the lowest in his/her class lmao
How must that feel
would almost be easier to try to find a way to screen out people who might be candidates for suicidal thoughts
Hello guys! I really love mathematics and really want to get a PhD in the future but when I solve problems I sometimes encounter things that I haven't noticed and subsequently I am not able to solve the problem or sometimes I am unable to solve a problem entirely (some of them have elegant solutions). These failures make me feel like I am not good in mathematics and will ultimately fail in my goal. This makes me feel really bad.
When im learning new shit its like i can only solve 30% of things. Slowly i get that to 100%
True, it took 9 months
If you cant do 30% initally, you learnt the wrong way
Eragon try to start a math club in school or something
For cutting off my wings before i could fly lmao 😭
Still apply
LMAO. My school is a dummy one
Never not apply because you don’t think you wont get in
Thats just self selecting yourself out
Its like ₹8000 , i could get like 5 applications form for JEE, BITSAT shit
Not a small amount
But yeah
Will still apply
If the finances are an issue then possibly
Umhmmm
Or even look for waivers or whatever
Finances as in “ability to pay application fee”
Student loans and all
You only have to get an official document stating you started an after school club
Lmao no 😭😭
You wanna say bribe the officials 👀🔥🔥
No 
I can
Produce a document
Lmao 😔
But no
The fking school wont know what a Math club is 🔥
Will try tho
Yep, i'm doing the same this year
Best of luck
Imma try IIT tho now
I mean its easier 🔥
As in understanding the rules
Yea
It gives you a sense of security
How do I divide my time in learning new stuff and creating my own things? (While doing math)
Meanwhile you don't know what'll happen if you apply to colleges abroad and end up losing like $75 every time
Lmao true
Nah imma skip abroad for the timebeing
I'm only applying to 5 or 6 max
nah took my mom nine whole months
🍞
We knew that
You can try germany though, tuitions cheap
Lmao
Im not allowed abroad if i dont get into the top institues or something
Cuz thats just useless 🔥🍞
germany
TUM is a top institute for engineering
Germany has historically been a centre for the sciences and math
I havent researched yet
They have top institutions
Umhmm
Euler was swiss german right
Its
i often encounter things i don't understand. i just put them aside, sleep on it, and come back to them on a later day.
really? i doubt you were there
and russian
I know everything
Try to convince your parents ig, TUM is why Ich lerne gerade Deutsch 
Imma take my leave thanks yall
😭😭
Bye!
After JEE prolly
Good luck kid! I hope it goes well. You'll do great. It's nerve-wracking but don't lose focus and try to play to your strengths rather than trying to solve every problem.
wdym
sounds like you better get cracking then
True
the whole point of exercises like that is for you to get comfortable with doing integration. it won't help you to have someone else do them, you need to work through them yourself so you'll build useful mathematical intuitions
I dont do maths tho its physics
their point still stands
Im sure i could do it but never been taught about integrating from -inf to inf
My calculus book from james stewart has been sat in my cupboard since i bought it
Then reading it would surely help
Problem is its about 10^8 pages
Physistss integrate with infinite bounds all the time, you need to learn it
all the more reason
I’m aware, I’ve used it all, but you just work through it over time, it’s very foundational to physics
physicists have to do lots of integrals
Great
You define work as an integral with infinite limits which is super basic and important for physics
Which is just one specific example, they show up everywhere in physics
Its the gausian integral
Yeah that shows up a lot in physics
often over everything and they just use a density funciton to exlcude parts they don't want
That’s actually exactly what im doing
I need to find the action of a complex scalar field with lagrangian density using wick rotation or sum shit
Im sure i could do it if my physics teacher read my emails
Even I don’t know wtf that is and I did a fair amount of physics, how have you gotten this far while still being unsure about how to deal with integrals with limits at infinity
Seperate proof im doing myself
The start was simple
Tryna observer how a complex scalar field with lagrangian density reacts under dif temperatures (its to do with cosmic strings)
Last integarl I actually bothered to do was hyperbolic tangent
I just did int 1/x from 1 to inf
Makes more sense than i thought
Yeah lol
I just tend to put off tasks when they look hard
Now cas im doing limit from -inf to inf how could i do that with int 1/x
Is it Lim t appr inf of ln|t| - lim t appr -inf of ln|t| ?
I'm a Gelbart fan now
Tate's thesis is so weird
Why are you making a zeta function associated to each Schwartz function on the adeles
Affirmative action? Where they admit students based on equity?
I mean there are a lot of L-functions to account for lmao
the important point is that you don't really have the freedom to take a Fourier self-dual Schwartz function in general
I cannot recall what Schwartz function is
despite looking into Tate's thesis
so there really is a difference between the zeta integral for the Schwartz function and its Fourier dual when dealing with the functional equation
on R^n it means all derivatives are rapidly decreasing
Ah, by Schwartz function do you mean a function which belongs to schwartz space
in the p-adic setting it means locally constant with compact support
Hmm, is this because exponential decrease is just too fast for p-adic settings?
and yeah you have Schwartz spaces for any locally compact Abelian group
I mean it's because smooth means something very different in the p-adic setting
Hmmm, maybe yeah, I do not have an idea how you would 'differentiate' in p-adics.
for a general locally compact Abelian group you write this as an inverse limit of Lie groups and take smooth functions on these
Ouch, inverse limit >.>
when your group is locally profinite like in the case of p-adic fields this notion trivializes, since you're just writing an inverse limit of 0-dimensional manifolds
the inverse limit here is not so difficult
Yeah, but somehow it always makes my head spin
it's just a filtered colimit here
'co'limit?
uhh yes
Are you talking about category theorical construction? Because IIRC, inverse limit is a limit
yeah I'm being kind of sloppy here the limits and colimits are being exchanged under Pontryagin duality
I really need to catch up on the Pontryagin duality thing
Think I saw it in algtop textbook.
anyways the point is that a Schwartz function will be supported on some elementary Lie subgroup
whose restriction to that elementary Lie subgroup is Schwartz in the usual sense
bro I joined this server knowing multiplication tables...
what even is pontygain duality?
Ahhhh
Now I (kind of) see the connection
Maybe the 0-dimensionality has a lot to do with the "locally constant" part?
yeah for locally profinite things you're just working on finite groups
so there isn't so much going on
and this forces locally constant + compactly supported
compactly supported just comes from being supported on some (finite) elementary Lie subgroup
I see, this generalization is quite interesting!
Sad that I am bad at dealing with analysis..
yeah you're really using some actual structure theory of locally compact Abelian groups in general
the locally constant thing is coming from like
Q_p and Z_p have lots of small open subgroups around 0
Which might be coming from.. discrete Z?
but something like S^1 has no small subgroups in this sense
like if you take a sufficiently small neighborhood of the identity in S^1 the only subgroup in that neighborhood will be the trivial group
Indeed, S^1 is "sufficiently continuous" (sloppy terms)
so when you're looking at something like characters Z_p->S^1 this forces it to be trivial on p^NZ_p for N>>0
Oh, nice
so the continuity of the character is forcing it to be locally constant
Hm I will keep reading.
Ok this is kinda wild
$\int_{\mathbb{Z}_p}\abs{a}^s d^\times a = \frac{1}{1-p^{-s}}$
ヤミン(◉◡◉✿)
Looks quite nice!
welcome to Tate's thesis enjoy your stay
here's a crazier version of this that comes up in the GL_2 situation
you can write the usual Fourier expansion of real analytic Eisenstein series in terms of adelic zeta integrals in the same way as Tate's thesis
Ouch, this now looks like proper analysis..
I wanna cope 
tbh the usual Bessel function at the Archimedean place is scarier than what happens at the p-adic places
Who would be able to go over such a messy computation?!?
it's not that bad
The formula is way too long for me
yeah but it breaks up into nice pieces
you deal with the constant term and non-contant terms separately
and then you deal with them one place at a time
but what about (p, q)-adic Bessel functions
and in each case you have some integral expression for the coefficients given to you by the Whittaker model
and then you just evaluate those integrals
Sounds like an involved process
it's maybe like 5 pages of work I guess
I guess still way better than dealing with Bessel function, but
huhhh
constant term is basically a page if you compress it a bit
nonconstant terms aren't any more difficult
there are fewer terms to evaluate and you just have to recognize that a certain integral is related to the Bessel function
You said that it's not that bad
it's literally just screwing around with 2x2 matrices, change of variables, and geomeric series
like there isn't anything too insane going on here
yes 
this is just GL_2
imagine how bad it can get for other groups
constant term for GL_2
constant term for G_2
G_2????
the exceptional group G_2!
this is from someone's slides but I've done this computation before yes
it's also not so bad 
no no
G_2 is the smallest of the exceptional Lie groups, it's 14 dimensional
there are 12 terms in this expression corresponding to the 12 vectors in the G_2 root system
and there is some standard combinatorial rule for computing each of these terms
it would be scary to see someone write out this kind of example for E_8 or whatever
12 terms is okay
248 terms is not okay!
you could get a computer to do the combinatorics for you I guess
but like
why

the beautiful thing is that you can draw the G_2 root system in dimension 2
so like, on paper

idk how to draw things that are in dimension >3
even dimension 3 is a stretch
but dimension 2 is comfy
At least you can visualize 3 dimension
And 5 dim & higher are usually easier
I can't visualize that!
I don't see this
it's geometric series
Wdym
me struggling on amc10 problems 20-25
How do you even do e.g. alg geo without visualizing sheaves
DAWG WHAT SHAPE IS THIS HELP
Looks like a mess yeah
I have a function with poles along these hyperplanes
but like wtf
how am I supposed to INTUIT
These are hyperplanes right
yes
Yeah if this is really 3 dim
planes if you like 
It just is, like it is right there.. idk how to explain
Maybe purple and green are not parallel?
Yeah
they didn't teach me this shape in school
I can visualize a cube, an octahedron, but not this
the fuck kind of shape is this
you feel me
Just bunch of partitions around origin and some others, it seems.
Ah, yes, the projective dodecahedron.
Is |a|^s a locally constant function on Z_p?
Isn't it just like slicing pizza
But 3 dimension.
no but you can break up Z_p into a bunch of shells where it is locally constant
One slice is slightly off
What is this from, btw? Is it just a random graph
desmos lol
Yeah, random graph >.>
it's not random
Does it have some meaning?
for r=3
this is a multi variable generalization of the completed Rieman zeta function
it has poles along these planes
Maybe giving some visual of "density" at each point could help.

why is Absta looking into Tate's thesis again?
Oh, I am not
pty is
s1 = 1
s1 + s2 + s3 = 0
s1 + s2 = 2
s2 + s3 = 0
s1 + s2 + s3 = 3
s3 = 0
Ah, that makes sense!
(Still a mess)
I am because im reading Gelbart
i started reading Gelbart chapter 10 because i wanna understand Jacquet Langlands correspondence but then decided to read from the begining to see how far I could get. Rn im in chapter 6 
I'm a big fan of Gelbart. He doesn't spend too much time on details and skips a lot of proofs while giving te idea behind them. Its very easy to read and come away with the big picture and thrust of ideas.
Bump on the other hand is very detail heavy, and exercise heavy. Its not as easy to read Bump, but I appreciated the earlier chapters of Gelbart more because I already did those details in Bump.
I am tempted to truck my way through measure theory and a lot of functional analysis to do like, an extremely formal and in-depth proof of Generalized Stokes from the ground up piece by piece
I don't really see why, generalized stokes is really a theorem about riemann integrals and manifolds
and has very little to do with functional analysis or lebesgue measure
Just as a big trial of my own understanding
What is truly generalized stokes theorem?
whether or not you can use those, philosophically it is completely disjoint
But is that general
how would it not be..
"stokes theorem" usually refers to the case of 3d, curl, and Omega = surface
Yes
Assumes locally trivial-ness
"generalized stokes theorem" is this
Because when we have 1 form q d of a 1 form is curl
maybe there's a slightly more general version which admits singularities or something
And then perhaps you can adopt it onto algebraic geometric object
I guess I will say that like
There are """"versions"""" of this theorem for nonsmooth functions or weirder domains
But they're all very iffy
For that you would want measure theory and functional analysis
Ah, great to hear!
But then it becomes less stokes theorem as a fact about geometry and more various forms of function space duality properties
strokes's theorem
actual question, is it stoke's or stokes'
i thought it was the latter, but now i'm just confused
i thought we drop the final s when we have an apostrophe following an s?
why is english so annoying wtf
it seems like no one can really agree on this one
hm
use whichever one you feel like using lol
stokes' looks nicer imo
or i could call it Kelvin-Stokes/Stokes-Cartan
but thats just annoying
ig you were right
spivak's differential geometry books use "stokes' theorem" while lee and tu use "stokes's theorem"
it seems pretty divided
i get the feeling that older sources use "stokes' theorem" and newer ones use "stokes's theorem"
just from looking through a few manifolds textbook pdfs on my computer
boomer spotted
@neat lintel is that your dog in your pfp
oh i thought he still had the hyena as his pfp
its a cat...
ah shit my bad
MLA and APA both say add 's to end of name in order to form possessive if name ends in s
So it should be: Stokes's Theorem
General grammar in English allows just the apostrophe: Stokes' Theorem
That should be Stokeses'
ill take your word for it
English is a bad language
And then you hear how the French pronounce 97
4*20+10+7
more like 4 20 10 7
quatre-vingt-dix-sept
@hollow sundial Hi! You seem really qualified, what does a Postgrad in Math do for a living?
Yeah. Also isn't there a pattern in French where it's like
Oh 1x is kinda with a ze vaguely at the end of the French word for x
So 11 is onze
And that goes until 16
Then it turns into 10 x
Until 19 and it goes back
un deux trois quatre cinq six sept huit neuf dix
onze douze treize quatorze quinze seize dix-sept dix-huit dix-neuf vingt
yeah pretty much lol
dix-neuf
Deez nuts
soixante dix neuf
that’s 79
also suck on deez nuts
Hey everyone, I'm currently in my first year of university studying as a vocational training studen computer science. I decided to take this stanford course on mathematical thinking: https://online.stanford.edu/courses/hstar-y0001-introduction-mathematical-thinking
Anyone interested to work on the assignments of the course together in a weekly manner till we finish it? If more people are interested we can form a group and also advance from there.
Feel free to dm me or reply to this message if interested.
lol
you mean rref?
maybe
i dont think thats rref tho
second row breaks the condition
right
iam trying to understand rank of a matrixs from this site
thats where i got that from
Now, we apply R3 → R3 - 2R2, we get:
⎡⎢⎣1230−3−6000⎤⎥⎦
Now it is in Echelon form and so now we have to count the number of non-zero rows.
the dimension of the image is really the most clear definition
Should I become a quant if I am terrible at olympiads?
i’ve talked to 6 quants who went to my school and they all made AMO
the bigger problem is your profile
would be a bit difficult without a basic grasp of economics
lol my profile is a joke about erdogan
it looks indistinguishable from being serious
and erdogan voters
alright then
oops
but yeah
i’m good at taking math courses
i’ve taken math courses at the college sophomore level and gotten A’s with minimal effort
but i’ve studied for literal thousands of hours for AMC’s and yet i’ve still not made AIME
it's very different from the math you do in a job or university
So now that the dust has settled, can anyone explain why Category Theory has been such a failure?
It’s a powerful tool in modern mathematics so I’m not sure in what sense you mean that
I propose its due to the people who do it like @flint basin
what do you mean by this
it's not really a failure at all
there are cultural issues around like, lots of mathematically immature people tend to want to learn it for the wrong reasons
and there are parts of category theory that have limited applicability to other fields of mathematics, but it's hardly unique in this regard (something like set theory is probably worse in this regard, and almost every field has its fair share of "useless" results)
category theory has been a resounding success
there are very few modern fields of mathematics where you don't see some influence of category theory
see: all of analysis basically

not true
although even that is becoming less true these days
I'm in analysis
I mean category theory tends to influence hard analysis much less than more algebraic areas of mathematics
that is true
you basically never see spectral sequences in analysis lmao
the only spectral sequences in analysis are sequences of eigenvalues of operators 
stuff like terminal and initial objects do still matter tho
people do use commutative diagrams
although it does seem like a lot of this is an issue of like, until recently we did not have very good language for doing algebra in the topological/analytic setting
there are some hypermodern reformulations of classical complex analysis that are very categorical in nature that are taking off somewhat
ranjan by 3609
So the thing in analysis is that there are many parts, some of which are more amenable to categorical language. But then the highest profile stuff is often PDE, Euclidean harmonic analysis, that sorta thing
Those areas aren't gonna interact with it, while the stuff that intersects algebra more (operator algebras, group theoretic harmonic analysis) are less well known. In fact at least a few, if not most, PDE types I know would say that if you're using a commutative diagram you're by definition doing algebra rather than analysis



