#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 141 of 1
This is an issue I have with academia in general. Out of touch with reality in a lot of ways. No, they are not in the industry (usually)
does anyone know of an app that can like recommend you small stuff to read (like short stories or articles)
hi new im dad
why say you're new
well, nice to meet you new user
did you join the math server for any particular reason?
did you manage to get help? or are you still in the process of getting help?
do you know how?
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
np
dont ask to ask
just ask
for math? just msg in one of the available channels at the top
the nonoccupied ones
wdym
go to the math help available section
then type ur q in one of those channels
bump
Did a bit of searching and it turned up: pocket, medium, and Artifact
what on earth?
i looked at pocket premium pricing cause i got a limited highlights message
on the app it says its "QAR 18.00/month" and "QAR 29.00/year"
and "im like huh that's very cheap and also a bit weird"
but the pocket website says premium costs "£35.99/year"
,w 29 QAR to Pound Sterling
the website gives a 6 times higher price than the app??
I have a question. I am shopping around for drone insurance and one company is quoting me for $230 for the year. But on top of that I have to pay an additional $150 broker fee which totals to $390. Is this broker fee justified or am I being taken for a ride here. Please advise. y-mx+b
Just got out of my first class at the new school
The class was easy and boring asf
They're riding you
that's how first classes usually are
yeah but still
did you get to tell 3 fun facts abt yourself
!noping
Please do not ping individual helpers unprompted.
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
Thankfully i didn't have to do that
Do you guys have road map from beginning math to advance math?
Im lost and wanted to start from the beginning
you can start by following khan academy
What's the beginning to you?
Basic Mathematics by Serge Lang will get you from middle school math through Pre-Calc.
You can pick any popular calculus book such as by Stewart or Thomas or Anton. That'll get you your Calc I, II, and III
Then you might need a proofs book to learn how to read advanced math texts
Linear Algebra you can do after Calc II or Calc III
Then there's a multitude of books for Analysis and Abstract Algebra
After that, the world is your oyster.
If you have questions on specific books for different topics of math check out #book-recommendations and utilize the Pins and the search function.
is there a server like this but for chem and bio?
there are some listed in #old-network
thx
Middle school
Thank you for the advice
Hi
I tried to find problems of IZHO 2024 but I havent find. Anybody can write a link?
Hello A-Squish! How are you doing on this marvelous afternoon?
Hi everyone! I find this server great !

<@&268886789983436800> alt^
lmfao
So much for the tolerant left
What on earth is happening here
any jee nerds in the chat who are in isc?
Do you think I can convince my school to change their grading system for AP mock exams?
from just taking the raw score to doing something else
cause right now its like probably one of the biggest reasons people aren't joining AP
my two main ideas are:
(1) keep a record of all the raw scores, normalize it based on the ranking
(2) keep a record of all the raw scores and the corresponding 1-5 score on the actual board exam, assign a percent grade to each 1-5 score, then try to somehow assign the raw scores to the new percent grades?
unlikely because of this specific change or like unlikely because any grade change in general would be difficult?
change might be more involved
might require a change of official documentation
and in that case you need a bit more power than a single person
i.e. you have to do politics
wdym
maybe i am misunderstanding but often how to grade exams is an official decision by the school and codified in some form of writing
they cant change that because someone doesnt like it
feel free to ask, but i would contact the student union
the students representation when it comes to school politics
ah ok
also i want to say i have heard of indiivdual students managing to change some stuff, but those were mostly small
e.g. there is a student in our year who managed to create a new schedule for our class for a particular weekday to accomplish something about the lessons, he was not in the student body at the time
then your chances are pretty good actually i guess
but the "standard" way is what i outlined
(also doing politics is a good thing, so i recommend knowing your student union.... if there is one)
Anyone experienced with coding in VHDL?
I already have some background in Verilog and Systemverilog but VHDL seems like an entirely different world
college algebra 😊 vs college algebra 💀
What?
Why is it called completing the square
Is college algebra basically algebra 2?
Because it allows you to write the quadratic as the square of two things
dont read, spoils joke ||college algebra is diet precalc, but abstract algebra is also technically college algebra||
||algebra 2.5 ig, basically high school alg for ppl who paid no attention||
Anyone in or been through University of Washington's online applied computational math graduates program?
Curious if its any good.
has anyone applied for cambridge?(before)
1doekiqeoewjoiewjewjewiojijijij
no one has
I hate saying this but
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCq5TYMZEwg&list=PLauivoElc3giVROwL-6g9hO-LlSen_NaV Am i weird to think "Is this video in english?"
FREE COMPETITIVE PROGRAMMING COURSE PLAYLIST : https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLauivoElc3ggagradg8MfOZreCMmXMmJ-
FOR DOUBTS AND DISCUSSIONS, JOIN DISCORD : https://discord.gg/GMH23tq7Y7
CONNECT ON INSTAGRAM : https://www.instagram.com/i._m_.luv/
In this episode 11 of my competitive programming course, I discuss in detail all the things rela...
is it i english?
i honestly cant tell
Maybe there is e.g. Indian/Pakistanian English
it's hindi but people who speak hindi dont use all the words completely translated in hindi
that's why its sounding more like english vid
indian/pakistanian english lmfao
someone please help me i have a math quiz please go to channel help-29
i guess not
ive been waiting to reply to that 

u r getting bonked
The indians often mix a lot of english into their speech, even if they’re actually speaking hindi or whatever. Like 90% of his speech isn’t english but maybe 10% is.
It's completely in hindi
Modulo is a English word
As there's no hindi word for it
We use Hinglish
Hindi + english
And ofc wtf can someone think of it as Pakistani/Indian lmao
It's ABT language development bro
English itself has borrowed words from many languages
I hate to say this again and again
Is it so hard?
Your countries were developing
And ours was occupied by brits
So education etc etc was low and they did that from 1757 in full force
From the golden period of scientific discovery
I mean yes this is true, so no development scheme and maths from our side
I mean that's just maybe my inferiority but still no significant except Bose einstein condensate
Does anyone know where I can find resources for Functions?
on what level
Calc 1 I believe
ah, well in that case you need to add your education system
I'm an engineering student and for the course we're supposed to be doing both calc 1 and 2
without your country it's not a good question
Jamaica
well then I'm really not familiar with that
anyone got any good youtubers who teach linear algebra? i’m taking is this semester and prof leonard doesn’t look like he has a ton about it :’)
Support the channel on Steady: https://steadyhq.com/en/brightsideofmaths
Or support me via PayPal: https://paypal.me/brightmaths
Or via Ko-fi: https://ko-fi.com/thebrightsideofmathematics
Or via Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/bsom
Or via other methods: https://thebrightsideofmathematics.com/support/
Watch the whole video series about Linear A...
you’re the goat tysm
3 -1 -2
2 0 -2
2 -1 -1 The eigenvectors corresponding to the double eigenvalue, what are they
my brain is mush
why does math literally cause me to have a panic attack
Likely because you lilely have your brain hard-wired to panic when you see math
Typical techniques for reducing/alleviating fear could work
Probably because of how much pressure the education systems puts on you while offering no support
can someone help me rq
It really do be like that though. Constant pressure.
e
School
No other reason
Math should be a fun activity, to be enjoyed
In the same way that solving a logic puzzle is fun
Math is just about different kinds of logic puzzles
Sometimes the solutions are useful, so we learn math to find the useful solutions
And then school comes, and requires that you absolutely need to learn a bunch of “useful” math that you, in practice, will never use (assuming you to be a perfectly average person), and throws in all kinds of ideas like “if you can’t do this, or don’t perform well with that, then you’re a failure of a human being and should be ashamed of your very existence”
And next thing you know, math gives you panic attacks
This is how systemized education works
School serves its purpose really well
It’s the systematic butchering of the learning process, turning an otherwise pleasurable opportunity into an opportunity for a panic attack instead
To fend off those who can’t grasp new concepts in a short time
Yes, but not in a way that benefits them
And besides, you don’t need systematic math classes through twelve grades to discourage students from math
Eight grades is more than enough
Anything they teach you in highschool math is unlikely to come up in the average person’s life
If someone decides they like math or that they’re good at it, sure let them pursue it
But don’t force it for 12 grades
I’d say anything past logarithm isn’t useful
Well Calculus I is quite useful because optimization
Graph theory is also quite useful
Yes, but I said “average person’s life”
I know
Most of math is immensely useful
But in practice, everyone ignores it except to calculate spare change
An average person’s life should have several optimization problems
Taxes…
Shortest part…..
That too, but again nothing more than basic arithmetic
Spreadsheet work, really
If you want to optimize something, you do it by gut instinct, or if you’re feeling particularly ambitious you pull out a calculator and see if you can work something out
Not many people realistically turn to calculus in most situations
Yes, it’s immensely useful for those who are so inclined, if they find themselves in a relevant situation
But for most people that just never happens
Some things people don't realize they are using directly
But claiming they don't seems wrong.
People think very often in terms of basic calculus concepts. Rates of change, speeds etc. Even things up to mvt and rolle's theorem are intuitive enough that an average person might implicitly use them.
Idk if that justifies teaching it
But claiming it's just not relevant to an avg person seems wrong.
The time and effort invested in it for a normal person often does need justification though.
"Why do X that is not obviously useful to my goal when I could do Y which is obviously useful to my goal?" type stuff.
I wouldn’t say effort is an issue
In my opinion, humans have infinite potential
We have plenty of time in a day
Almost 24 hours if you count sleep
It's not so much a matter of potential. Learning a thing takes time and effort.
Often more than just those
Yes, but if it’s that intuitive then the people will use them regardless of if they were ever taught. Teaching just gives those concepts names and codified rules. That is rarely useful to the typical individual simply concerned with going about his business.
Don’t forget that time is valuable
Indeed see the bit where I said this
How much?
This is untrue
People can’t really think of a concept or utilize it
Even with named concepts, it’s hard for them to recall
Nah, I absolutely disagree lol.
It’s not a matter of intuition, it’s a matter of optimization
School was created to weed out such people
I do not agree with that either lmao
An advanced society is a society where the invention, composition and abstraction of concepts are the keys
Depends on the person and their situation, but in terms of dollars, that would correspond vaguely to how much they get paid per hour. Of course, that’s a poor approximation, and only applies to the employed.
I was a school
The express purpose of school is to educate. Any “weeding out” of the uneducable is merely an unintended consequence.
I bet if you throw a ball in the air and ask a kid at what point in its trajectory it travels the slowest they'd have some faint inkling this occurs at the peak of the throw.
Most of the basic concepts of calc are intuitive like that.
Is that really the purpose?
Sure, middle school does that perfectly
The intended purpose, yes. Not necessarily what actually happens.
You should really look into the origin of school
The origin of a thing and its purpose now don't have to be the same.
^
harvard started life as a religious school
Like, I can't think of a single prof I've taken that would fail a student for the sake of weeding them out just because they want to weed them out.
The reason the US spends much of its national budget on education is to, well, educate, not to weed out
Typically it's a "for their own good" type thing when those kinds of things happen afaik?
Weeding out in particular is not an intended function, though evaluation is
And weeding out can be a fairly direct consequence of that in some circumstances
It’s not about what they want, it’s what the society 'needs'
To educate people, and to filter out people who can’t he efficiently educated
Taxes are usually done by someone else
hi i joined today
welcome
thank you
i preparing for sat i wanted more help thats why i joined
it on march 😊

Does US public k-12 school even "weed out" anymore?
It seems genuinely non-trivial to NOT graduate
Some schools failed and give subpar graduated people
The graduation rate in good schools should be around 60% or lower in my opinion
Thank god you dont run education
Do u guys love group projects in schools
no. they give me anger issues/srs
I shouldn’t be in charge of anything
never
what they said^
Why is group project mandatory even though everyone hates it
To prepare you for the real world
Yes it also prepares slackers to slack in the real world too
Perfectly balanced, as all things should be
😭
Is there anything like codeforces but for math? Would be nice to have regular online competitions and etc.
ehhhhhh im not sure about this. the only reason kids would get that inkling is because "why ask that question in the first place, if its not the beginning, peak, or end"
actual physics is not intuitive for kids
Depends!
im obviously excluding things like "things that go up come down"
if you ask a kid anything specific such as the above trajectory question that actually requires calculating, most will get it wrong relying on their naive 'intuition'
My school would sometimes grade group participation as 50% of the individual grade in a group project.
hello i don't understand derivation
YT ✅
ok..
it's a linear mapping that satisfies the Leibniz rule 
May be organic chemistry tutor channel on YouTube help you ( dont go for name it teaches all subjects 💀)
You mean differentiation I believe. Look up 3Blue1Brown Essence of Calculus on YouTube
That series is amazing for learning the intuition for calculus
Thanks
You too!
As far as computing derivatives and the process of differentiation, the only thing you can do for that is practice, practice, practice
Look at people solve examples and try them yourself
Post in the help channels and ask for help
etc
it's a differential operator and its hermitian conjugate is -d/dx
on hilbert space

For the record Raaniax I would advise you ignore what everyone has said besides Fury and I lol
I saw this channel, I found it amazing
Though for specific calculus i studied from Blackpenredpen
They are talking about something completely different than you are
BPRP is great too 💚
Best of luck for the exam!!
🤣
Yeahh
Lmao
Haha yeah I understood that's a typo
oohhh sorry😔
It's no problem
Its ok!!
Feel free to DM me if you need help with it, I enjoy helping people with calculus
on manifolds 
I do not understand calculus on manifolds well enough to teach it 
Calculus and combitorics is mine favourite in whole maths overall
Unless the manifold is R^n :p
if I need help I’ll come back to you haha thanks!!
Good luck with your exam!
I have a math problem for a genius
Say you are given three variables
x, y and z
You are tasked with finding all values of a such that $a * b = x$ for $b <= z$ and $a <= y$
We
How many different values of a are there?
How do you find those values of a?
Good luck mathematicians
also what branch of math is this?
@neat lintel do the variables have to be integers or can they be any number? Are they restricted to positive only, or can they be negative too?
a trivial application of lagrange multipliers
integers
well, we start by finding all factors of x
then, for each factor of x, we set a to that factor, find b as x/a, and that gives us a list of a,b pairs
for each pair, we eliminate the ones where a or b exceed y or z, respectively
and what remains is all the solutions, and only the solutions
do a prime factorisation of x, multiply everything out, then remove any that are greater than y or less than x/z
prove it 
well I'm actually more familiar with CS and informal math than formal math
so if I have a problem, then I give you the algorithm I would use to solve it
no proof needed so long as I believe that it works out in my head
that's the CS way
also the CS way: accidentally make a bug and lose your company $10,000,000 fifteen years down the line when someone exploits it
because we don't do proofs lol
ok I'll provide a proof
"the proof is an exercise for the reader"
done
exists b such that ab = x is literally the definition of "a divides x" so a must be a factor of x
then we know a ≤ y so cut out the values > y
we know b ≤ z so x = ab implies x ≤ az so a ≥ x/z so remove all values that are < x/z
the remaining ones follow all 3 conditions
you could have done this
How many different values of a are there?
count the number of results
idk if there's a formula for it
probably not
or if there is, it's some weird complicated formula that boils down to just doing the algorithm and counting the results
algorithms count as proofs in math
This is a test for all of you and not me
you can prove something using an algorithm
$\mathrm{card}{a \in \bZ : (\exists b \in \bZ) (ab = x \land a \leq y \land b \leq z)}$
I'm anti algorithms
あたしはアリ
most basic matrix linear algebra results arer showing stuff about gauss-jordan elimination
which is an algorithm
This looks correct because I do not understand it
I am very impressed at your work
omegalyl
if there was a much better formula than this or similar then we would be able to break rsa encryption easily with standard computers
it's literally a description of what she said to you in words 
no it's actually worse
Like i said, i do not understand it
the number of different values is actually always aleph 0
i believe
as long as x y z are positive
no
ignore me
I despise math
I remember someone saying something about Lagrange multipliers
who was that
I have another problem for the geniuses in the esteemed and well regarded discord server of mathematical excellence
Woburn Collegiate Institute Programming
Enrichment Group Online Judge
I LOVE LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS!
Yeah, definitely Lagrangian
There is a problem that uses a similar technique in ICPC NWERC 2023
And all the teams sucked on that problem because they were scared of physics
I need help with geometry
please read #❓how-to-get-help
I have a vitriolic hatred of legrange multipliers
Hi my exam went well!

I already have another one on Thursday..


i'm bored
what subject
differentiation

where you com from?
there's no need for that since I'm uncomfortable to share it in public
but I live in canada
Yes tehre are a lot of algorithms in maths
What's the difference between Gaussian elimination and Gauss-Jordan?
Ah
Gets it to RREF
Alot of constructive proofs are algorithms if you phrase them correctly
Dm me
go for it
Can i use Lagrange multipliers for anything?
yes
for multiplying 2 lagranges
easy
no, the most useful is calc 1
in terms of theory building
calc 3 (at least in theory it should) properly teaches about what derivatives are
hopefully
what happened to grad apps channel?
It got closed because it’s no longer apps season, it’ll be open again next year when people are applying again
When I’ll be applying too 
What?
There is a application season?
Why not calc 1
because you can't appreciate differentiability
from like december through end of january
That's horrible
Using the diagonal proof of every real number being bigger than every natural number, you are essentially trying to add a never before seen real number to the infinite set of real numbers. You cannot do this, because I don't think thats how infinity works
Writing down a list, and then creating a new number to add to that list, assumes that you have already created a limit to the list, which is impossible with infinity
The diagonal proof, to me, seems like you have to straight up create a limit to infinity. But that isn't how infinity works, just like how 0.9 repeating infinitely === 1
Please tell me if I am misconstruing Georg Cantor's argument, or if my reasoning falls flat somewhere, I'd love to understand maffs a little bit better
Are you familiar with Hilbert's Grand Hotel?
If not, the basics are this: The Grand Hotel has infinite floors, each containing one room. They're -all- occupied. A prospective guest comes to the hotel, and asks for a room. The receptionist says sure, and has the person in the second floor move up a floor, has the person in the third floor move up a floor to make room for the second-floor person, the person in the fourth floor move up a floor to make room for the third-floor person, and so on and so forth, all the way up the hotel. Everybody has a room above them, so everybody can do this - and voila, the second floor is now free for the guest.
currently re-watching veritasiums video on it right now
but this doesnt change my argument, because the diagonal is trying to create a new real number
2:20 - 3:10 in the veritasium video I disagree with
i am not sure what you mean by “created a limit to the list”
the question is whether there exists a surjection N -> R
I think that Repacharge is thinking that the list contains all unique real numbers, which, if I recall Cantor correctly, wasn't his argument; it was that it contained an infinite number of real numbers.
the diagonal argument refutes this
no…
dumb down what you mean by this pretty pls
also at 4:00, I think you can just use the exact same proof as used in the beginning of the video
what does surjection n -> r mean
N is the set of natural numbers, R is the set of real numbers
a surjection is a certain type of function
sometimes called an “onto” function
if you dont know what these mean, then i am not sure how you can understand cantor’s argument
but you can look on wikipedia
well about knowing what those mean, maybe you should read the original post 
what
personally i doubt he knows what those mean
ok
well anyway
if you want to understand a mathematical argument
the first thing to do is know the definitions of the objects which are being argued about
and to understand the statements which the arguments are proving
knowing what it means for a set to be “larger” than another is a prerequisite for understanding a proof of a statement of that form
Okay, so. Cantor's argument, taken down a few levels, to the point of semi-inaccuracy: Take your list of natural numbers. 1, 2, 3, 4, and so on and so forth. Now, divide 1 by them. You now have a map that has a one-to-one correspondence with all natural numbers - and, in the real number set, you haven't even gotten past 1. You have no natural numbers left to assign.
wtf are you talking about
the map f(n) = 1/n is not surjective
but im pretty sure that was known before cantor
And that isn't where Repacharge is stuck, so that isn't helpful.
personally i feel like we have gotten pretty derailed and the guy left 
not merely verifying that some random map doesnt work
"I am not arguing that infinite sets exist, im arguing that the infinite set of real numbers is equal size to the infinite set of natural numbers" - from Repacharge
yes
i.e. they were arguing that there exists a surjection N -> R
which is what it means
(trivially there is a surjection the other way)
They don't know what a surjection is, and certainly can't ask whether one exists.
ok
but somehow you think obfuscating the point further
is going to help clarify things
rather than indicating what they should read up on
i think trying to reason about something at the person’s level is better than throwing terms and definitions at them
At the level of understanding displayed, yes. This is like arguing you should never teach exponentiation as "repeated multiplication" because it's really better understood as an infinite series (which includes exponentiation in its definition!).
i cba to define surjective, etc., but obviously my argument can be fleshed out into a correct one
wtf are you talking about
bro you have a problem
no you are arguing that you should teach exponentiation as repeated addition
i.e. something incorrect
in a fundamental way, not due to a pedagogically-informed oversimplification
Well, if for some reason somebody has mastered addition but doesn't know multiplication yet, you could in fact teach it that way.
It'd be a nightmare of repeated operations, but you could.
ok bad example
surely you recognize your example has zero relevance to the question of whether N and R have the same cardinality
and therefore can only serve to confuse
It doesn't directly work with cardinality, but it does demonstrate that something -like- cardinality has to exist. And that's kind of the first step to understanding cardinality.
You've mapped every unique number to a unique number. One set still has numbers left in it, the other does not, even though they're both infinity. There's something going on there. That's the basic intuition that leads to understanding cardinality.
it demonstrates that functions can be bounded
even if their domains are unbounded
which is not the point at all
look
f : (0,1) -> (0,2) defined by f(x) = x
is injective
not surjective
yet the sets have the same cardinality
how are you supposed to conclude anything about (0,1) and (0,2) from the nonsurjectivity of f
Well, to begin with, you might notice that the unmapped numbers left over in that set are finite; you can count them.
Er, still thinking in terms of integers.
what
Trying to switch between conversation modes. That set isn't countable, but that's not really important. We could make the same kind of argument about the list (1,2,3,4,5) and (1,2,3,4,5,6,7).
ok I went away to eat some chocolate and I came back and am now way too confused. This seems like bickering about a topic I don't even remotely understand, so im probably gonna have to figure this out on my own, likely by getting a better grasp on infinity lmao, good luck disproving each other
just
read my first messages to you
and ignore the rest
you can learn the relevant definitions by spending like 5 min on wikipedia
The relevant definitions are not generally written for a layperson.
basically anything besides a youtube video will explain this
it seems like you havent properly learned the relevant definitions yourself, so how would you know?
The basic definitions for surjectivity and injectivity can all be summed up pretty intuitively.
Jumping to cardinality and shit is not so bad
i find that wikipedia articles on basic math concepts tend to be quite readable
Well that would imply I am a layperson and thus am the perfect audience to judge whether or not they are written for a layperson.
Surjectivity: everything in the codomain gets mapped to. Injectivity: no two distinct things map to the same thing.
so you agree that you dont know what cardinality means?
I mean, I don't particularly care whether or not you think I know what cardinality means, so, sure, you can take it that way.
lol
You are trying to have a conversation about cardinality
i mean i am quite confident at this point that you do not know
It's important to know what it means for that purpose
I'm not, actually, I'm trying to convey the intuition that leads to understanding cardinality.
If you don't understand what cardinality means that's going to be challenging
since you have not engaged with my argument except to shore it up
by providing further counterexamples to your intuition
This is a pedagogy problem rather than a mathematical problem.
you may think that
but as a non-layperson i am fairly certain you are missing some fundamental understanding in both areas
and i encourage you to read a wikipedia article
to at least address the math part
And I'd suggest you spend more time talking to human beings to address the human part.
lol
I switched to a countable set because the same problem you were addressing appears there; an incomplete map is not proof of a difference in cardinality. However, it does cause you to start thinking in the right -lines- for cardinality; starting to think about how you can manipulate infinities in the same way that you manipulate numbers, and then thinking about how those manipulations differ from the manipulations of numbers. In the context of Cantor's proof, if he can come up with the argument that you can split the infinity to cover 1...2 in the mapping I showed, and so on, that is a step in the right direction.
ill take your word for it
Argument about mathematical correctness in explanations versus pedagogical techniques aimed at building intuition.
It is obvious that {1,2,3} and {2,3,4} have same size, right?
You can also see that the second set has elements of the form 1+element of first set
So you can define a mapping between these sets of the form f(n) = n+1
You see that every element in the first set gets mapped (only once) to every element in the second set. This is called surjectivity, and f is a surjection
Similarly, every distinct element in the first set gets mapped to some distinct element in the second set. This is called injectivity, and f is an injection
A map that is both a surjection and an injection is a bijection. f is a bijection.
So at least one bijection exists between these sets. For finite sets, having the existence of a bijection between sets is possible if and only if both sets have equal sizes
This logic is extended to infinite sets, "size" of a set referred to as "cardinality".
You can construct a bijection between N and Z (try it, it's fun) and show that both sets N and Z have the same cardinalities. You can even show that N and Q (rational numbers) also have the same cardinalities. But, you can't create a bijection from N to R, because suppose you label every real number with a natural number and form a list (this is shown in Veritasium's video too in the end). Cantor then showed that doing the process of taking the nth digit from the nth real number in the list and then adding 1 to it, then forming a new real number with these digits, you can argue that this real number will never lie in the list because it will differ by the other real numbers in the list at least by a digit, hence showing no such bijection exists
Every function maps elements of the domain to unique elements of the codomain. That is from the definition of a function not from injectivity.
In other words, for every possible attempt at a 1:1 mapping, a real number can always be constructed that doesn’t exist in the mapping, thereby proving that a proper 1:1 mapping is impossible
Thus, there are “more” real numbers than natural numbers (or integers, for that matter)
Yeah let me reframe
it seems to me the original poster lost interest awhile ago
Thus the number of real numbers is an objectively larger type of infinity than the number of natural numbers (or integers)
Yep
objectively
personally i have no issue with jumping to cardinality and surjectivity etc, but i would rather spend more time first pointing out flaws in their logic before trying to reframe the discussion
i do not think this was a productive way to go about this at all
and ultimately it just turned into a farce
you have been making this same comment the entire time
without attempting to actually do what you are saying
well i would have if he were still here
its quite annoying
You have been kinda dominating the conversation.
and he would be here if you didn’t barge in
Cardinality is cringe anyway
Better to scare em off
Infinite sets? Different sizes? Get real!
I’m all for a good lengthy discussion, but suremark has a point. Had the conversation stayed on topic, and waited for the original issue to be resolved before attacking the next one, then the original guy would’ve gotten the answer to his question.
Wdym cringe. Mathematicians can study whatever they like, provided it can be formalized and proven rigorously.
Cope spotted 
I'm kidding
yeah my aim was to encourage the other person to stop posting misleading nonsense about hilberts hotel or whatever
unfortunately that took some time
fair i guess
in my experience it is really hard to learn when you are hearing actively contradictory things
especially when both are from anonymous sources (as opposed to e.g. your teacher and your classmate)
How was hilbert’s hotel misleading?
Because he didn't understand how you could add a member to an infinite set
Well, the goal was to help build intuition about infinities, although it’s hard to say how successful hilbert’s hotel in particular is for that purpose in this situation.
no the goal was to answer the person’s question
which was “how does cantor’s diagonal argument work”
And brining up hilbert’s hotel was to build up to that
but it is not relevant
as the content of cantor
is not “adding a number to a list”
but rather arguing that a list cannot exist
There's a lot of assuming the existence of that list, leading to a contradiction, to get to that point.
That is fair, but both regard lists of infinite lengths. Therefore, it isn’t far fetched to at least think it’s relevant, regardless of how relevant it actually is.
yes i can certainly see why someone might think it is relevant
which is why i was concerned
though moreso i was concerned about the example after the hotel
I won’t argue its relevance, because I don’t know if it’s relevant. Personally I wouldn’t have brought it up, because I thought there was a much simpler way to arrive at an answer.
Still, I think derailing the conversation was a bad move
Answering the guy’s question takes priority
After that’s done, then you can argue over what was and wasn’t relevant to bring up
<@&268886789983436800> I got pinged
baneado
is something like lean worth learning for lets say an early undergraduate student in math?
also what's some of the coolest stuff theorem provers can achieve today?

if you are interested, sure why not
for now the average mathematician doesnt use them, but who knows
the coolest thing i saw is this proof by scholze
im not uninterested but i really just wanted to know what people are doing with it today
i clicked on tao's mastodon post linking to the lean zulip chat and saw people writing some code with topology in it and couldn't make out exactly what it was
didn't bother asking cause it seemed like everyone was a professional mathematician that knew what they were doing lol didn't want to barge in
yes, those are gonna be the basics
lol imagine coding topoogy
the introductory is 600 pages
of topology
what is 600 pages??
I'm studying tensor algebra just 50 pages
it has a more fast applciation to physics
and the code i saw was something to do about product topologies but i couldn't quite figure out what it was exactly doing or supposed to do
In fact it's realy used for example in fluid mecahnics, where the assumptions made make you get the navier stokes equations
tensor algebra in fluid mechanics?
i should check out what tensor algebra really is
Basically defines operations on tensors and a tensor itself
I mean algebraic topology is known for being a hard subject to get into for just how abstract it is and quite how many prerequisites it has so 600 pages as an intro isn’t that bad
Tensors are generally used in physics, but particular assumptions on the tensor are explained on the algebraic tensor thery
the topology definition seems random lol
What topology definition
a topology on a set like
Topology is a very very broad field, there’s lots of different topologies
the first definition, of a topology
topology on a set
the genral definition
It’s a very general definition, there is a lot of sets which satisfy that, and it turns out you can do a lot with it. I agree that it can seem a little arbitrary but it’s a good definition, it turns out if you want to study continuous deformations and similar things those are the conditions you need.
This happens all the time in maths, a sigma algebra for a measure space for example, the definition seems quite random at first, but it turns out to be exactly the properties you need and you can only really see that by studying it yourself
thanks
there is an argument (and not even a purely pedagogical one) that topologies are a bit more general than are actually needed in practice
What would be a substitute 
as in like, point set topology is really just "study of hausdorff spaces + various counterexamples to demonstrate why all the conditions in the definition of hausdorff spaces are necessary"
and emphasizing topologies as the central formalism instead of hausdorff spaces kinda betrays the part mathematicians actually care about
non-hausdorff topologies are not common in practice, and when they arise, its rare to study them using explicitly topological methods
the zariski topology is probably the best example
depending on how schozlepilled you are, either hausdorff spaces or perfectoid spaces
hausdorff spaces were even the original definition of topological spaces
T1 would also make sense as that would include the most common non-Hausdorff spaces
hhelo guys
Scheiße ich
speaking Deutsch as I see
Ist 1x1 = 3
niet, 1x1=1
Ja heute Zeugniss mahte 6
Hilf mal lo
Sonderschule schwer
Scheiße
☠️
Woah, wo du Hilfe brauchst
LCH spaces my beloved
God
How does anyone pass a linear algebra class
This shit is so pointless and repetitive
I do not want to solve a system of linear equations by hand. kill me
It may be repetitive but it’s not pointless
Outside of your first LA course any time you need to actually do any kind of matrix calculations they’ll be intentionally made to be very easy because everyone agrees it’s tedious lol
does anyone have a guesstimate of how long a help channel goes "un-helped"?
15 days
depends tbh
minimum
depends on the problem
for most HS problem if it isnt immediately helped than an hour or a few
my help channel a few days ago closed on its own when i forgot to keep clikcing the checkmarks
Okay, thanks. Well, going to bed so i closed it
Doing calculations is good
LMFAO WAIT THERE IS A TEXT BUBBLE ABOVE IT SO IT LOOKS LIKE IM SAYING THAT IS YOU
what are you doing
take a deep breath homie
i am not even sure what the numbers would be used for
so uhhhh you got it 
also mods can see deleted messages 
Thank you. I'm going on amazon now
i just submitted my homework 20s before it was due for the 8th time this year... does anyone have any stories of "almost didnt make it"?
i'm interested in hearing some close calls lol
bruh
redoing all the research, analysis and practice reports for bachelors thesis 15 hours before first examination because they didn't bother to check them earlier
If you count this i turned in my fourier analysis homework late every single time and got full credit
Not sure where else to ask, but I'm using vscode jupyter notebook and when I edit the markdown cell it scrolls me to the bottom of my document. Anyone know how I can disable this "feature/bug"? Doesn't happen with regular python cells
anyone know by any chance?
LOL
Which of these degrees do you guys think better prepares for a career in Fintech, Biotech and/or just Tech in general? 
- Mathematics¹ (Applied Mathematics Track)
- Computer Science
¹ - Entails plenty of mandatory and optional Physics and Computer Science classes including Intro to Programming in C++ & Python, Computer Science Theory, Data Structures & Algorithms…
“Enjoyment” is a non-factor since I enjoy both greatly, I'm just trying to get the most out of the degree!
Computer Science
^
Reasoning? @neat lintel @brittle hedge
Zero2sudo has a good discord channel for this sort of discussion
Most people are in useful employment in tech or finance or are students pursuing that
Who? Where can I find it
"I'm a lone wolf..."
if you want to work in tech, CS is the obvious choice
I wouldn't say obvious, I'd say probably optimal.
I'm also interested in Finance and Biology on that matter. And it isn't as simple as x vs y. The math degree I'm interested in is extremely rigorous and during the first year the Physics and Math Undergrads take nearly identical courses while also making the Math students take multiple mandatory CS courses with the ability to take additional supplementary courses in CS or Physics.
Let me actually compile the courses for both degrees though, I think that would be good
can someone help with my question lol my last task on hw its js probability and i dont understand it
biology and finance are big fields. earlier you said you'd like to maybe do fintech, which to me reads that you'd maybe like to do tech in finance - not e.g. finance in tech
First 2 results and he posts the link frequently
I’m in on my main, good community
Fair enough. Is the difference that big? Would I not be able to do "Tech in Finance" w/a Bachelor's degree in Applied Mathematics w/many Physics & CS courses?
i'll check it out
sure you can
I just compiled the curriculum of the math degree
Still gotta do the CS degree
What degree are you working on getting/have?
i did physics
I see, what is your profession?
i work in finance
Trading/Quant role? 🤔
yes
Can you look over the compiled math degree curriculum and give feedback?
sure
For the Math Curriculum:
https://pastebin.com/iHYCnvFd
While I was at it, I also compiled the CS curriculum for comparison. Although, strangely, unlike the Math Curriculum the CS one doesn't really provide anything in-depth just the course names.
https://pastebin.com/tg0YZnnw
Not that surprisingly, there is quite a bit of overlap between the two degrees in terms of courses.
looks like a solid math curriculum
Could I break into Tech/Fintech with that degree?
yes of course
but it has plenty of stuff that's not related to tech
whereas in a more tech oriented degree you'd have larger programming projects and nowadays probably would have a couple of courses on machine learning
I would be working on programming projects and self-studying CS concepts in my free time of course. Perhaps even take some external certificates.
I also plan on, further down the line, do a Masters degree likely in Computer Science
And isn't a Math degree optimal for getting into ML & AI? 🤔
a math degree with no courses on ML? no
don't overthink it though, either degree works for your goals and though my personal preference in terms of subject matter would be to study math over CS, the latter probably does make a bit more sense if tech is where you're looking to make a career
thanks for the feedback
CS would be the more typical route for ML/AI, maybe pair it with statistics
Can you guys help
Web assign wants me to show expression for power series of e^x^2
And it marks me wrong
typical from a numbers perspective?
/historical
im sorry
Modelling power scaling of One Piece characters (lmao)
$$,$$
To get a character's overall power level at some time we can use this formula
$$p(t) = {\frac{at^{2}}{100} + \frac{bt}{10} + c}$$
$$,$$
-
$t$ represents time {$t\in Z^{+}$} ($t_{0}$ can be considered the beginning of One Piece) (unit time can be an arc) (younger characters usually benefit more from this)
-
$a$ ($0\leq a\leq 100$) is the character's long-term growth potential (over many arcs)
-
$b$ ($0\leq b\leq 100$) is the character's short-term growth potential (over an arc)
-
$c$ ($0\leq c\leq 100$) is the character's base power (arbitrary and based on character's past, feats, and titles) (older and more experienced characters usually benefit more from this)
$$,$$
To get a character's overall power level throughout the series we can integrate $p(t)$:
$$\int_{t_{0}}^{t} p(t),dt = \int_{t_{0}}^{t}\left(\frac{at^{2}}{100} + \frac{bt}{10} + c\right),dt$$
$$P(t)=\frac{a(t^{3}-t_{0}^{3})}{300}+\frac{b(t^{2}-t_{0}^{2})}{20}+c(t-t_{0})$$
$$,$$
To get a character's potential increase in power level at a specific time in the series we can derive $p(t)$:
$$\frac{d}{dt}p(t)=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{at^{2}}{100} + \frac{bt}{10} + c\right)$$
$$p'(t)=\frac{at}{50}+\frac{b}{10}$$
is this chatgpt response
ab D
sigh
Modelling power scaling of One Piece characters (lmao)
$$,$$
To get a character's overall power level at some time we can use this formula
$$p(t) = {\frac{at^{2}}{100} + \frac{bt}{10} + c}$$
$$,$$
-
$t$ represents time {$t\in Z^{+}$} ($t_{0}$ can be considered the beginning of One Piece) (unit time can be an arc)
-
$a$ ($0\leq a\leq 100$) is the character's long-term growth potential (over many arcs) (younger characters usually benefit more from this)
-
$b$ ($0\leq b\leq 100$) is the character's short-term growth potential (over an arc)
-
$c$ ($0\leq c\leq 100$) is the character's base power (arbitrary and based on character's past, feats, and titles) (older and more experienced characters usually benefit more from this)
$$,$$
To get a character's overall power level throughout the series we can integrate $p(t)$:
$$\int_{t_{0}}^{t} p(t),dt = \int_{t_{0}}^{t}\left(\frac{at^{2}}{100} + \frac{bt}{10} + c\right),dt$$
$$P(t)=\frac{a(t^{3}-t_{0}^{3})}{300}+\frac{b(t^{2}-t_{0}^{2})}{20}+c(t-t_{0})$$
$$,$$
To get a character's potential increase in power level at a specific time in the series we can derive $p(t)$:
$$\frac{d}{dt}p(t)=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{at^{2}}{100} + \frac{bt}{10} + c\right)$$
$$p'(t)=\frac{at}{50}+\frac{b}{10}$$
ab D
what are you doing
Hi there
hru
I am fine( just can't sleep💀) thanks
How are you
why hahah
I'm good thanks
Idk literally yesterday mine tests got over so thought now I can sleep peacefully lol
haha so probably some peace, no sleep though
Yeahh haha
I recently started liking some old russian and french piano music and songs
Tbh they are too good and yet unexplored for me
I busted flat in Baton Rouge, looking for a train
Feeling nearly faded as my jeans
Bobby thumbed a diesel down, just before it rained
And we rode all the way to New Orleans
where do i go for game theory questions?
Can someone come to my help channel
no
Check #❓how-to-get-help
In #discussion 's sea of text, a message caught your eye,
In unsuspecting lines, a clever rhyme did lie.
"That's not a story, that's a lyricpost"
Soon washed away in new messages like most.
oh wait this is discussion 2 mb
2 mb of discussion
hi ol
hello
hi
Hi
HELLO CHAT
Where are you from ?
oblivion
What ?
I am from oblivion
🙄🙄
Hey chat for the double pendulum ODE should I just Runge-Kutta-Nystrom it
Would it be easier to just calculate the sine terms beforehand and use Cramer’s Rule to make it an Autonomous 2nd order ODE
Yo, I know this is unrelated, But do you guys know someone who's looking for a piano teacher?
It would probably work better
I think this ODE is very stiff
RK might not work, it might require an implicit method
Which is kind of obnoxious to implement in 2d
I am.
That's great, Shoot me up a DM so we can sort through the rest

No. I’m just hungry
I too am looking for
That's great, Shoot me up a DM so we can sort through the rest
I am
ok well then dm me so we can sort through the rest :)
Would you say you pair better with rice or with potatoes?
With rice
Both.
🍽️
RK4 worked for me with double pendulum
In matlab or something using ODE45?
Or did you write your own rk4
Matlab's ode45 does adaptive time stepping, so it will work for something like double pendulum but will take a long time to resolve all the tiny time steps it has to take when accelerations are changing quickly. if you have a nonadaptive rk4 i'd be surprised if it works but it might
epic embed fail
hi person i've definitely never talked to before and wasn't talking to just a few seconds ago
just solve it with FDM
hello :D
at least put like
a demon level in there
stereo madness is too basic
What do you mean by “wrote your own”, did you just calculate your own set of workable weights
Or actually modify it
React failure
How did you write your own
Imagine using RK4 and not an adaptive stepsize method
I am going off of Fehlberg’s stuff
Tiktok is wild. They removed my comment that said "ew" because of "harrassment". They got people out here planning whole genocides with 100,000 likes
wdym
exactly what i said
what genocide
You'll see it on the news. "tik tok not held responsible for genocide"
what genocide tho
il search it
the ughyr one
tik tok is owned by china
they dont want people to you know
Isn't tiktok usage banned in china
"tiktok" is banned, but they have their own version owned by the same company
wait i thought tiktok was literally a chinese company
duoyin
they banned tiktok in my country
name ideas for a maths club?
L
Math Club
Nerd club
ithk its funny to get upset at having a throwaway two letter comment get removed ngl. just a little.
literally everything is funny just a little
not true
I need help with math I have a test in 5 days is anyone know ow this
Mgf1106
CRASH COURSE STYLE
module 2 please explain as much as possible
Section 3.1, Statements, Negations, & Quantified Statements-2
Section 3.2, Compound Statements & Connectives
Section 3.3, Truth Tables for Negations, Conjunctions, & Disjunctions
Section 3.4, Truth Tables for Conditional and Bi-Conditional-2
Section 3.5, Equivalent Statements, and Variations of Conditional Statements 2
Section 3.6, Negations of Conditional Statements and De Morgan's Laws
Section 3.7, Arguments and Truth Tables
Section 3.8, Arguments and Euler Diagrams
(A → B) ∧ (B → C) ⇒ (A → C)
yo guys this is like the based way of writing chain syllogism right?
See some of these videos
I completed all logic math with youtube videos with and excellent grade
How the hell does a neural network learn unsupervised if the entire backpropogation process Is dependent on some sort of feedback?
(I'm new to this)
you don't need supervision for the feedback
Have any suggestions for things to read about it?
I’ll check it out lmk if you know any other videos with these concepts that’s comprehensive
there's certain models where you don't need any sort of supervision / labelling
for example VAEs
you train the network to reproduce the input
skipping over the simpler AE 
the channel to get help for this would be #discrete-math
No one ther will be able to teach the material (that's what lecture + your textbook is for) but specific questions are good to ask there
you've been asked to stop once already
??
plz modping those 🙏
Least cranky mathcord user
I have a question about textbooks. When someone make a textbook about a topic and they put some exercises in it, have they solved them first or they just think some interesting exercises or collect exercises from other similar textbooks, without check the solutions?
Hlo
Is there any literature comparing the pedagogical efficacy of a rings-first approach to a groups-first approach in an undergraduate abstract algebra course?
it probably depends on whether the material is easy or advanced
you can email authors, from beginning to advanced, about this i guess
if they haven't solved it in full, they probably have an outline of what should be done and whether the student would be capable of solving it
No but rings first is terrible
why cant i send pics
i need help wit my ninthgrade test
been stuck on it for the past hour
you need active role to post images here
and helping in tests aren't allowed in this server
not a discusssion but more like if someone actually can relate with me. whenever i try to talk to the prof about something during class my mind can't orginaize the words the way i want them to. i just say random stuff and hope that he could connect the random words into an understandable sentence, i'm guessing its fear to be judged even though it doesn't bother me that much. if anyone who had this problem please share your prespective.
It happens boss. Don't worry about it
Writing your question down before asking might help
have you had a bad experience with rings first?
there are a couple of rings first books, like undergrad hungerford and undergrad aluffi
have you gone through those?
If you mean aluffi algebra zero then yes
But I don’t remember it being ring first tbh
Ive heard of hungerford but never went through it
And no I had no bad experiences , can tou address my question and answer what is the goal?
Like starting calculus without limits is a curious thing to do but can be done
And the goals can be stated concretely and achieved
I never heard of anything similar with rings first?
Are you going to mention rings and their definitions and then start talking about homomorphisms and ideals?
no i do not mean algebra chapter 0
What is the goal ?
should i know? i went through a groups first course like most people. here's the argument given by aluffi in the introduction to his Algebra: Notes from the Underground.
you and i can give opinions as much as we like, but i'm wondering specifically if there have been any academic studies comparing the pedagogical efficacy of one approach over the other.
there has been prior informal discussion
Hello yall, can someone help me understand quadratics and functions
have you tried watching some vids for the topic?
do you ask your teacher for help when you don't understand something? if not, I'd suggest you do that
hhahahahaa
the goal is to start with something that is more familiar to students
groups are a bit esoteric and doing computations with them is weird
meanwhile every student is already familiar with polynomial rings
and really you can do everything in an intro algebra class by focusing on polynomial rings and their quotients
but yeah, i dont think this is studied (yet)
educational research for university subjects is a pretty young field
there is some research into what makes learning algebra in general difficult
and sudden abstraction is one of those things
Maybe permutation is already so abstract?
students have issues figuring out how abstract axiomatic definitions relate to examples and are simplifications and generalizations of objects they already know
(Well I guess integers are already quite abstract in some sense but)

