#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 104 of 1
Khan academy is a great resource for catching up on high school math
I studied a bit of algebra over there, but I liked the idea of studying a book better
because it's easier to go back in a book and confirm my knowledge, than to go back through pages of unsorted notes
but yeah, this topic of Isometries just has me going mad!
should I maybe push on and not look back that much
and turn back in a future time, when I maybe need to solve other exercises?
or is it really so required to study other topics of geometry?
What are theorems 1 and 2?
hmm, I cant send images here
Theorem 1. Let F be an isometry. The image of a line segment under F
is a line segment. In fact, the image of the line segment PQ under F is the
line segment between F(P) and F(Q).
Theorem 2. Let F be an isometry. Let P , Q be two distinct points in try
plane. Assume that they are fixed points, in other words
F(P) = P and F(Q) = Q.
Then every point on the line through P 9 Q is a fixed point of F.
for example, I couldn't prove these myself
but looking at the proofs, they clicked
How much experience do you have with proving things
160 pages of Serge Lang's Basic Mathematics
so 3-4 months at most
there were almost no proofs in my mathematics courses in high school
Turkish education emphasises the "getting results" part more than "knowing how you got those results" part
Anyone got Discrete and Combinatorial Mathematics", by Ralph P. Grimaldi
you will always forget things unfortunately so my take is to try to develop a healthy approach to it
but im just a first year really, the grads here probably really know how to deal with this issue.
hmm, I understand
this is just a side-hobby kind of thing for me, so I don't want to be allocating too much time
as a side question would I need to study any chemistry alongside physics in the future
transfinite induction
Idek how that works but hey its nice
<@&268886789983436800>
don’t ping everyone
also i don’t want to see that shit, but also just don’t ping everyone
yeah don't ping everyone
it's also offtopic for this channel, maybe try #chill
it's also pretty gross, so just don't post stuff like this here
nvm just banned them
yeah no way that wasn’t a troll lol
sounds like rokettojanpu was based for using :kurisugoodjob:
best mod

wait, RJ is gone?
Not seen for a good 2 months 
what is advanced role
Deeply saddening
@tardy berry
Do you know Jensen’s inequality, and AM-GM?
Anyway you use AM-GM (reciprocal version) to show b/a+c/b+a/c<=3, then consider function f(x)=1/(1+2x) to apply Jensen’s inequality
what is Jensen's inequality
f”(x)>=0 (<=0), f(Σ a_i x_i) <=(>=) Σ a_i f( x_i ) for non-negative a_i satisfying Σ a_i =1
You can search it. I just commonly use it to prove inequalities similar to his question, 9 out of 10 times I use Jensen


B is basis for vector space R over Q
got it, thank you so much!
Np
hi
hiss
bzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
How can I stop being afraid of hard maths that I cant solve
let fear become strength as you face it head on
🤑
Hello
Pls help me
Tmrw I have to give speech on any maths topic not from book in front of class . I am looking for good topic I am in class 9
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
probability stuff
High school, undergraduate or graduate? I think the topics may differ A LOT.
Hello

i like to share the pain
how to find height using only the angles of two positions and the distance between the two positions
pythagoras' theorem
and trig ratios
trigs
sine law or cosine law
you decide

it won't me upload an image here still lol
it's about basic java
okay sure
if its big #/lil # its +infinity right? and if its lil #/ big # then limit is 0?
for limits
?

1/infinity is 0 and infininty/1 is inifinity
the limits of them
correct?
what they approach
yes
HUH
java easy
hard*
sup guys ?
sup psi
Combinatorics.
Nothing beats it's elegance
im just coding a pseudo class schedule maker lol
yuuhuu
0d would correspond to individual points. there's no mathematical definition of negative dimensions.
you might be interested in looking into "fractional dimensions" though, which are used for fractals
According to Benoit Mandelbrot, "A fractal is by definition a set for which the Hausdorff-Besicovitch dimension strictly exceeds the topological dimension."
Presented here is a list of fractals, ordered by increasing Hausdorff dimension, to illustrate what it means for a fractal to have a low or a high dimension.
yeah in math "dimension" loosely means "the number of variables you need to describe stuff" so it's pretty hard to make sense of it outside of whole numbers
is anyone good at probability? i need help in #probability-statistics
hm
!noadvert
Please do not advertise your help channel or thread in other parts of the server. There are many people who need help, and no one person can be prioritized over other people, so please patiently wait. Anyone who chooses to help you is a volunteer who is doing so out of their own kindness.
Is anyone good at life? I want to take yours 
sounds really cool
i think there is some insane framework (stacks?) where you can make sense of negative dimension, though thats really abusing the word "dimension"
probably not in the spirit of the question, but 0d is totally possible the same way that 1, 2, ... d is possible
Hi there. I'm struggling with the concept of variable, substitution, zero and other non-natural numbers( Can I ask here? Or should I go to math-discussion or prealg-and-algebra?
spectra and classifying stacks both have some concept of negative dimension
classifying stack for a group scheme has a dimension that's the negative of the group scheme's dimension
Hi
Who understands this?
Sequences and series?
i'm the best at this
Why 
@steel crater if you're still around: #help-11 message
you can put the equals sign before a minus sign if you consider the minus sign to be representing the negation operation
(i.e. -1 + -1 = -2)
similarly, it can go directly before a plus sign.
where 1 = +1
so conceivably your equation could be something like 2 + 4 = -2 + 8
there is no mathematical definition of negative dimension
There is, but nobody is ready for this conversation
I already mentioned spectra and stacks smh!!!
Sorry I can’t read
we're so alike
P (P (κ^ℵκ^ωκ) = 2) = 2 the power sets on here make no sense to me😵💫
How could it equal 2 using aleph numbers
makes no sense to me either because I can’t read that 
how can you take the power set of x = 2
P(x = 2)
I'm not a mathematician🗣️
I literally know almost nothing
But I learned to figure out some other atuff
where did you see that equation
can you show me where they posted it
It was kinda by itself, not on a meme server or anything
No context to it, it was just posted
i just wanted to see if maybe the original post was different
Nah I copied it one to one
No contact you claim but still where
wassup
Nice
mb I think I won’t still be able to help you with the algebra (I don’t think I understand it)
my chemistry does qualify for a bit more than AP chem but im not sure how much more
It’s probably different from the US
yeah A level chem
but i think
what i have rn should be taught in the US as far as im sure ill send you what i have but you tell me if you know what it is
What algebra
an algebra question i asked before that never got answered
What was it?
something along the lines of, when im taking inequalities of curves with asymptotes, how do i know multiplying to the other side isnt negative therefore flips the sign
for linear numerators and denominators i can square both sides but
for quadratic i cant really
since i dont know trinomial expansion
O
Can’t you just treat the first two terms as one ?
I mean Iv never tried it
But (x + y + z)^n = ((x + y) + z)^n
well it looks like theres a different formula but its not expected of us since its not taught
another question where, when you're finding the range of a curve with no vertical asymptotes, one of the boundaries you can find with |x|->infinity, and therefore when you use the determinant method, you can find out whether or not to use > or >=
but
the other boundary
theres nothing indicating whether it should be > or >=
how do i figure that out/ test that boundary
also the question im asking now is a vector question but
nno answers
its about to be half an hour
anyway none of those got answered i dont expect this to be answered either
kind of sad
o_o
so yeah i dunno, this is literally the maths server where else am i supposed to ask
self studying further maths, my teacher cant help with this,
wdym multiplying to the other side
multiplying by what
like a curve without asymtotes but a fixed range is a fraction
so if like (x+2)/(x-1) = y where y>3
then you gotta multiply x-1 to the side of 3
but x-1 might be negative unkless i draw the graph
oh
ye i see wat ur saying
uh
maybe.. cases?
like in a proof
i guess you would do cases
i would do cases
like
|x|=4
x=4
x=-4
or
lim_{x\to \infty} e^ax
so I was reading a little about Hilbert axiomatic system and it was complete madness
I guess I'll be shocked when I enter the godall part
@storm sage are u from Iran ?
No, just sympathetic to the situation
It's absolutely disgusting what's going on >.<
thanks how ever
are you iranian?
I'm from Iran
I hope your country finds its way out of this
whats happening there
The same thing that happens in every country the US invades
a power vacuum? wym
Death and destruction ( to everything but the energy sector )
damn guessing because of sanctions right?
tbf it's not just the US's fault
although the US and UK screwed Iran over
i mean i wouldnt blame them for sanctioning lmao
the "morality police" beat a woman to death almost a year ago for not wearing her hijab
this sparked mass protests which led to the government brutally repressing every form of dissent
The US overthrew a democratically elected country and let islamic fundamentalist take over
no, the US and UK overthrew the leader of Iran and installed a monarch there to protect their oil interests https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d'état
The 1953 Iranian coup d'état, known in Iran as the 28 Mordad coup d'état (Persian: کودتای ۲۸ مرداد), was the U.S.- and UK-instigated, Iranian army-led overthrow of the democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh in favor of strengthening the monarchical rule of the shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, on 19 August 1953. It was aided by the ...
yeah i know about this
yeah I mean the US clearly is not in the right here, I'm just saying it's too reductive to say the current situation is just because of the US
which country are u talking about
iran
Too many
The US has done the same thing to multiple countries
yeah the US also screwed up the entirety of central america and latin america
as well as southeast asia
the us has taken a position of liberal hegemeny where they feel justified to topple any regime that goes against their ideology
usually to "fend off communism" or something similar, even if the leader was democratically elected
which u can argue whether or not thats justified
the war in iraq was def a huge mistake
or mishandled i guess
saddams regime wasnt exactly democratic
I find it hard to justify the propping up of politically repressive dictators all over south america, plus the us-backed genocide in east timor, plus all sorts of other atrocities
also the US's stated reason for invading iraq under george w bush was completely false, which really raises the question of how so many people greenlighted it
my dad was an intelligence officer in the army, and he said bush was told that invading iraq was a bad idea and would destabilize the region
kinda sounds like it was not a good idea no matter how you slice it
(moreover that they should have known that beforehand)
but it was useful for uh... flips notes... continuing george hw bush's legacy?
The bigger clowns are those that laughed
Bro his conscience lmaooo
I hate jobs
i prefer them to school
$0 = \emptyset$
Replaced by new brandon H
$1 = {\emptyset}$
Replaced by new brandon H
${\emptyset} \cup \emptyset = {\emptyset} = 1$
Replaced by new brandon H
@neat lintel
that would be max(0, 1) but that works out somehow
$n+1=S(n)=n\cup {n}$
suremark
oh wait no im dumb
@neat lintel you’re 100% right
i’m a fraud 
(what i said is the same thing as what you said)
please don't troll here
does anyone know if there's a difference in grad schools' eyes between taking the math subject gre online vs at a test center? like do they prefer scores from in person tests or it doesn't matter?
It probably depends on the university
I think most schools nowadays (at least from what I've seen) don't even really care about the GREs anymore
yea ik that most dont, but some recommend it including some uc's
guess ill ask around more
Hey guys
i know how to fix that
no further comment
you already know
do i
yes
Don't 

What do you recommend
(please don't say nothing 😭)
https://pi.math.cornell.edu/~hatcher/Other/topologybooks.pdf
I just find Munkres to be a bit... boring? Idk good alternatives tho (unless you are okay with categories, in which case I recomment "Topology: A Categorical Approach". You don't even need much category theory background, they just use a few terms from it). I don't recomment "Topology through Inquity"
i have been told bredon is good
Bredon is pretty terse from what I remember
Munkres is hella boring
I know the authors of topology: a categorical approach
:o
Tbh Lee's "Introduction to Topological Manifolds" might be the best intro to topology
How about Viro's topology book?
Even it focuses more on those topics relevant to differential topology and algebraic topology
I think Yamin recommended it to me
and doesn't go in much detail about some topics which are useful in analysis
That book looks cool, haven't actually used it though. Tbh I really liked munkres
But I also like point set
Or at least used to
I also read it 6 years ago
Stockholm syndrome 
point-set is decently fun
i mostly learned it through other topics anyway
it's obviously important
but I myself see it mostly as a tool to study more interesting things lmao
I found nets and filters to be really cool
thinking about convergence in general
quotient topology is also really cool
I read that
Its an exercise textbook
Bringing back memories
Lol
Ik cause you recommended it to me my man
Like 4 years ago mayby?
Holy shit, time passes
I read it in second year of undergrad
Now I am in 3rd year of phd
a phd is well known to be the easiest part of your life /s

Nah
L
nets are just shitty sequences
That's why filters are better
fine, I'll give you that
the only topological spaces worth studying are the ones where sequences work
hausdorff spaces
Hey it's mister system!!
so 1st countable
?
Or quotients of em
Oh crap it's VMM!
Are you really him
indeed
literally this
So like
What are the downfalls of Lagrangian mechanics?
Because in every application I've seen it in, it is superior to Newtonian mechanics
Using only scalars is so freaking sexy
it does not work for all systems i think
you can do weird hacks for things like friction
That doesn't sound sexy to me
Bro what the fuck did my professor just do
Can one of you people that know linear algebra explain why/how this is valid
So we have the system Ku = f, K is a 3x3 singular matrix
Due to the boundary conditions, we know that the first component of u is zero, and the latter two components of f are equal to a constant P
So u = [0 u2 u3] and f = [F1 P P]
So the professor's argument was
u1 multiplies the first column of K, but u1 is 0, so we can "ignore" the first column of K (which he denoted by just crossing it out)
Ok that’s sensible?
And then since we don't know what F1 is right now, he blackboxed the first row of K and crossed it out again, denoting the crossed out equation by (1)
So now he has a 2x2 system
that's no longer singular
in the variables u2 u3 with constants P, P
F1 = a u2 + b u2 and a 2x2 with the Ps
Yes but why is it valid to just like
Cross out our columns and write out 3x3 as a 2x2 and solve the 2x2 
Because u=u1e2+u2e3 is a 2D vector?
Idk if you’ll always get a solution necessarily, but any solution is gonna have to satisfy it
That doesn't make it 2D does it?
i wanna become a sound engineer
Which means it's 2D
2 degrees of freedom
That is all
Then he solved the system to get u2 u3 then plugged those into (1) to solve for F1

hi
I guess
A matrix is a linear map between vectorspaces
I guess it's just weird becuase I've never seen a system solved this way lol
Then again I also don't think I"ve ever seen a singular system that wasn't just a contrived example
Describe the xy plane in 3d space with the span of (1,0,0) , (0,1,0)
can i just start with topology whenever i feel like it or are there higher prerequisits than highschool algebra and calculus
This matrix has as input the vector u
You want elementary set theory ofc
The vector u belongs to a 2D subspace
And practice with proofs
Definitely an exposure to proofs
So the matrix only maps from this 2D space
Yeah okay I see it now
I feel like topology would feel unmotivated without at least a bit of analysis
I agree
Or any reason to care really
Analysis is a good gateway to maths and transitions naturally from calculus too
what does unmotivated mean in this sense?
“Why?”
Well upper level math is really abstract right
And the way a lot of math is introduced is just
Defn -> Theorem -> Defn -> Theorem (sometimes examples)
All in a super abstract space
This is pretty dry and you can easily just get lost in a sea of super general definitions in super abstract spaces
It can be hard to care about them
You just wonder wtf it's all for
Sometimes the machinery is just a necessary evil 
Especially in applied topics (but still advanced)
Yeah, sometimes there is no motivation besides "it helps us establish a result in the future that is motivated"
But a lot of stuff are just motivated by their own unique applications too
And so when you see reasons and purposes for the things you learn, when you get more concrete scenarios in which these definitions and concepts arise naturally, you see the reason to care
Makes it a lot easier to stck with the subject imo
And it also makes it make more intuitive sense when you're in a familiar setting
Like the real line with standard metric is very familiar to you and when you put all those abstract topological definitions you're gonna learn to R, they're gonna suddenly click a whole lot better and make moer sense when you abstract them to more general spaces
R is love
R is life
fair, thank you for taking the time to explain
Theorem -> lemma -> proof of lemma -> (maybe a corollary of the theorem ) -> proof of that theorem -> corollary
thoughts?
(See Rudin as textbook example)
Theorem 1 2 3 4 (prove yourselves at home) after this lecture to verify and we use them this lecture 
Painful class
And he says to not read the book for guidance since people who read books don’t tend to last long 
he’s good tho
Abel prize winner just that we (the class) are nowhere as brilliant as him
Lol
LOL
He’s usually like I probably lost everyone right? Make sure you understand before next lecture
But he’s always willing to help at office hours so 

Well there’s also papers and notes and such
But
What did he mean by this

who's that
he says not to read the book for guidance since people who read books don’t tend to last long
no the prof
Hope this helps 👍
abel prize is pretty huge is it not
i might agree with people simply reading books struggling long term
🤮
You don't like The Weeknd? 
like you're spsed to figure stuff out yourself a fair bit so simply looking up the way some stuff youre meant to solve in one text is done in another text can hamper learning
i know the people in abbott rg are using multiple books
so say abbott may have the decimal expansion of reals as an exercise but they might end up simply reading it from those other books which simply beats the purpose of using a book like abbott
The Understanding Analysis author?
yea
Yasssss
queen

For what purpose
I met 60% goals of my day today
but i cba anymore goodbye
I would like to learn topology on my own, that's why I was asking for munkres.
like munkres is fine, it's just not the best (boring, as a few of us called it). Try out some of the other texts people mentioned around there and see how you like them
I don't consider myself very good at demonstrations, to be honest...That's why I was asking
Munkres is basically popsci for nerds
quack

I don’t find spaghetti funny at all
What’s this mean
So, which book should I start with?
is there a name for the branch of mathematics related to what im seeing when I color code a times table by cells divisable by a number?
certain very interesting patterns show up at specific numbers lol
if you take a times table, and color code the cells divisible by any product of twin primes, you see a wave interference pattern
its kinda cool, i just dont know why im seeing it lol
Theory of numbers?
maybe theres not even a specific name for this tbh
its probably a subset of number theory
ill do what mathematicians do and explore it and then name it after myself
You don't name it after yourself
At most, you leave it unnamed and someone else names it after you
just use an alt
I should get one
"sussy baka uwu"
If I ever get something named after me, it’s gonna be the sussy baka conjecture
Or the uwu-owo lemma
Xd
I havent thought about names if i do get something i get to name
umu
But its gonna be wierder than that

the Sussy Baka Theorem, ah yes 
,w sussy
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
,w cox zucker machine
So alright, I completed Part II from Serge Lang's Basic Mathematics
and I've got to say, I remember jack shit from all the proofs
should I need all those for the rest of the book, or can I complete the rest and return back to Part II with isometries?
,w calculate toe
,w differentiate toe
,w integrate your mom
,w integrate yotsuba koiwai
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
,w yotsuba curve
😁
,w yotsuba like curve square root
AHHAHAA id seen squared but not sqaure root
root is awesome
How do you square root an image?
,w cat curve
,w sqrt cat curve
Thicc
While going through some proofs book (currently on relations) I started feeling overwhelmed. I'd be wondering "is this distributive? Associative? What properties hold? Inclusion, exclusion" and with more stuff like these in the exercises. I think I can work around such proofs, but.... I have this weird feeling that I'll forget smth abt them that's important and end up suffering in the long term. I tried looking for a wiki page since knowing that there's one usually gives me some form of relief: that there's somewhere to reference and tell myself it's fine, and I don't need to remember nor prove all these properties again since wiki alr has it. Furthermore, the logic manipulation (givens-shows stuff) get annoying and repetitive with compositions of relations and a lot of set operations on them 
and as if that's not enough, even while working so much math gets to my head things like "how would I prove the set-related theroems which see in the book with ZFC?" "Dayummm cardinals and ordinals" and "Number theory? Cryptography? Sickkkk", "Wait how'd I prove euclidean division? What about doing it for the reals? polynomials? How about showing that any number base representation is unique?" "Real analysis ring theory group theory abstract algebra random BS goooo" and then it becomes... hard to concentrate. And sometimes often the emotions of stupidity and weakness creeps in, making it hard to focus on working through my immediate problems (mainly going through the book and latexing notes for it).
Ahem ahem kinda inconsiderate for me to treat this like my personal dumping ground for issues I'm struggling with but I'm really not quite sure where else to go to
sry for this.
You will encounter basic set theory and logic a lot in uni math textbooks
In fact so much that they will become intuition
Very quickly
Forgetting is pretty much the part of experience, our mind is made to forget things that it doesn't consider important. You can't learn everything in one go, it takes time. You'll need to revise a lot or do various exercise questions that use the proof or theorem.
Also I don't understand the associative, commutative thing. Are you talking about binary operations?
Also most people do not bother about ZFC
so much math gets to my head
May not be a bad thing
Yeah. Like I'd be thinking "is (A n B) compose C a subset of (A n C) compose (B n C)"
well its nice to thonk abt stuff at times ig
Exposure is always pog
You can easily check these visually using venn diagrams
I saw a strand of grass die when I read that 
Oh r i g h t.

Geez and all this time I was doing the givens shows thing


It's normal to wonder about lots of stuff
No it’s not
Plus don't focus on learning or doing too much, your end goal is to focus on high level things unless you're trying to be a teacher I guess 
I find concepts stick much better when I've previously seen bits of it from random exposure
N o
(also yeah exactly I wanna get this stuff cleared and under my belt
)
Ohhh true....
That did help me now and then now that I think abt it
E.g. scrolling in #get-advanced-access and googling stuff
Relatable
Maybe you see a conversation that makes no sense whatever
Btw how do you compose sets
And months later when you learn the stuff you randomly remember the conversation
Wdym by composing sets?
^
whatever he meant
set-related theorems using ZFC? dayumm cardinals and ordinals
insert 20 year old prover meme
wdym
Let S be a relation from A to B and R a relation from B to C. S composed with R = S ° R = {(a,c) in A×C: exists b in B such that (a,b) in R and (b,c) in S}
Not sets, relations

Indeed
regarding set identities just use indicators
Indicators?
Domain and codomains are a good sanity check
Oh yea, i knew that, but i never considered that relations could be intersected as well so i got a bit confused; thanks for clearing it up for me
True
Thanks guys. Geez, overthinking as usual
just gotta get doing and less malding
Huh
Nothing, just read above if you're rlly curious
Ok
Java test next week 
Java test?
is that good or bad?
anyways good luck!!
yeah
most school teaches python and java
I went to two different high school
the old school was python and this im in rn is java
should have stayed in old school lmao
oh my days
yeah my high school taught java too
and my uni taught c++
they like them because of OOP i guess
I was taught c++ in grade 11 cs and my class said it was python
do you think c++ is harder than python?
they said c++ is python?
they are like polar opposites
lol
python is easy to get into, good for beginners
C++ is a monstrosity
much harder than python
does cpp even have oop
oh ok.
it is…. complicated in c++
if you have a std::vector<Base> for some base class with virtual methods, and you insert a derived object, you will get corruption
you have to have a std::vector<Base*> (replace * with your smart pointer of choice) to make a heterogeneous vector
c++ oop is perfect
(which is what every language does to implement OOP, you just don’t see it)
i was into c++ for awhile, now i’m a rust programmer
Most definitely
That’s like the main thing
It used to be called “C with classes”
Obviously that’s not true e
It’s more like C with classes and fucking pain
std::vector<std::vector<Base**>*>
I don’t know the modern tricks or deep lore 

c++ has had so much shit grafted onto it
and it is only getting more
as far as i know
Schizophrenic non computable parsing
Iirc it’s just literally not computable as specified or something 
I've written this once recently
What In the
oh well that’s not bad
Java
i want to know wtf is std::vector<Base**>* doing in his code lol
I need to store a bunch of arrays that could potentially be of different length, can't be bothered to use double[] and figure out indexing 
double[comically large number] 
i mean that’s how matrices are stored
It’s all just integers all the way down
but matrices have fixed lengths for each row/column
right, that’s what sharp said
except m*n might be small
i am not sure if you could store a vector of vectors in one vector sanely
unless you just zero padded every row
yeah i was taught cpp in my old school
and the new school were taught python
in old school I was taught cpp in gr 11 and gr 12 was python
now the new one they said it was python in gr 11 and in gr12 is java
We do Java in grade 9 and then python in 10+
I wish we did cpp :(
Fuckin ell
sheesh
fish
how old are you
10 (in base four)
Sorry only people who are 13 or older can use Discord
isnt that 16?
or is that supposed to be read left to right
er wait
right to left
idk
negative to positive
16 in base four is… not a number
wdym
10 in base four is 4
16
yeah ik
i read it shifted
instead of the first digit being 1s i thoght it was 4 idk why.
@sonic field
hello
In computer programming, an S-expression (or symbolic expression, abbreviated as sexpr or sexp) is an expression in a like-named notation for nested list (tree-structured) data. S-expressions were invented for and popularized by the programming language Lisp, which uses them for source code as well as data.
In the usual parenthesized syntax of L...
no.
please
mathdiscussion is so boring
it fine doe
if u understand it
ill wait for someone to come and say smthn like "what the hell is this"
and then ill have a companion
i wanna parse them properly
lisp is the family of programming languages that are famous for their use of s-expressions
right except
my thing isnt gonna be like them
its gonna be procedural
not functional
and maybe OOP if i have time
alrighty
idk what it is called then
like its classification
ykwim
can i still claim it a lisp?
no i dont think so
probably not
righ eigh
you are trying to parse s-expressions, what’s wrong
wdym wats wrong
its weird
like before
TYPE WORD ASSIGN {EXPRESSION};
int x = 2y;
it was pretty easy
to like
match that
(var int x (2y))
is kinda waht im goin for now
ok, so… where are you having trouble
well
i dont wanna say
well
i dont know ware ot start
i dont wanna say smthn like
if the first token is o-paren and ...
cuz thats just a bad idea
this mofo thought I COULD HELP HIM WITH THIS.
yeah u could
its just algorithm
there no coding
maybe u couldnt
but it would still be fun to crack at it
thats what i was going for
well, sit down and take a crack at it
no fun until I finish my topology hw
i am not sure what you are asking of me at this point
have fun. tata
how do you think im supposed to approach it
without just
lots of if statements
is there a way ur supposed to parse these things
do you know about approaches to parsing?
you should learn about recursive descent parsing
it’s a simple approach that is widely used
ok
the recursive descent parser for s-expressions is about as simple as you can get
so that seems like a good starting point
ok
you can hand write one
or you can use a parser generator
and specify your grammar declaratively
:o
(there are many kinds of parser generators, not just for recursive descent-style parsers too)
And they output a parser?
yeah i just used one for the first time awhile ago
Or just act as it
they are pretty awesome
Which one did u use
So like
It’s a cli tool that outputs a rust program
Which yoy include
Or it’s an api
no it’s a macro technically
it generates parser code at compile time
based on the parser grammar you provide
but that’s kind of irrelevant I guess
some parser generators are cli’s
i used a typescript one that was a cli
O
And it made a parser in ts
That’s cool
So
Does rust work well w cpp or nah
Should I just find a cpp parser generator
Or do you think I could make that one work
rust does not work well with c++ 
you should find a c++ one, i am sure there are many available
Oh ok
What if I compile them both and just link the object files tho
Would that
Be a traumatizing experience ?
compile the parser generator?
Idk
oh compile the rust
Ye
and link it to the c++
Ye
no that’s going to be traumatizing, they have communicate through a C FFI
i have been there and do not recommend it
Lol
i am virtually certain there are excellent native c++ parser generators
Say the apocalypse happened but some humans survived. Do you think they would die out because we have like modern ideals or understandings?
And we would try to enforce those or stick to those but they might not work in a world without technology
Like if we're shunted back to the stone age practically
I Grew 450 lbs Of Potatoes The Lazy Way. Never Dig Again! Throughout this video, I share my tips for growing potatoes in containers or buckets to get the best results. I will give you practical information you can implement today to harvest 450 lbs of potatoes at home.
00:00 Introduction to Growing Potatoes In Containers
00:15 Growing Potatoes ...


did some tests apparently i know around 15k, 4k, and 3k words in English, Hungarian, and Arabic respectively
last two results were only from a list of 5000 words idk how much more it would be if i used a larger set
first was just an online test
also also arabic list was MSA
i don't think i would have many more words in any dialect though
i did some more data points (100) for arabic and i got [2281, 2916] with 80% confidence
nnn
tips on dealing with homesickness 'cause seriously 2000kms away from home with non-existent social skills

ask chatgpt

I read that as homelessness and was gonna suggest, "just wait till they deport your ass"
go home
Excellent work discussy
Homie wants a sympathetic ear and just gets shit on
Are a university student? What's your sitch
🫂 are you part of any groups/clubs where you might be able to meet people
so what's the sitch?
The Kim possible theme song is possibly one of the greatest songs of all time
Khan academy has live tutoring https://schoolhouse.world/?ref=u-z28apru2l4xai
@frozen schooner
If you're taking a (drawn, representation of a) graph, and you're moving the vertices around to change its spatial appearance, would you denote this with a function?
Out of Arabic, Chinese, Koran, Persian, Russian, and Turkish which is the most useful for math?
maybe russian since I heard they are good at math, idk
I think it is russian
yep
I am applying for a summer language program and I think russian is best choice
However, I am not sure about 1) safety and 2) how it will look on college applications given the war
what do you mean safety?
I'm confused
if you want to learn russian, go for it
I see no reason why the war would be relevant here
unless you’re going to russia to learn russian
irl in russia-adjacent country
the war isnt there yet
wait I thought you were american
don’t travel to eastern europe rn
they say that the program will either be in molodva/estonia/latvia
a google search says all 3 are safe, but im not sure lol
I don't think there are any safety concerns from any of those three countries, yeah
but my knowledge of eastern europe is pretty limited
right, emphasis on yet though
wow, wish they could but 2000kms still happens to be inside my home country. Can't deport me from my own country now can they? :')
My bad dude, I am sorry
funny
nah, iss cool
Tbh I can't really think of anything cause I didn't had much homesickness. Uni was straight out much better than home.
yep, funny part I have been here for a year and had some peeps to hang out with but now that I am on bad terms with them I suddenly feel homesick. Weird shit seriously.
oh yea true, uni was cool just the last week had been quite shit

that sucks man, I'm sorry
nah dw, I am feeling better than yesterday already. I'd just find a different set of people eventually.
and focus on workload 'cause goddamn

🫂 how much work
7hrs of extra lectures on top of 6quizzes and several assignments last week.
one is due on monday
yikes
nah 2nd
so many lol
most of my classes are like 2 quizzes + 1 or 2 exams
with the quizzes being reality checks to tell you if you belong in class or not
oh I meant 6 quizzes as in one each class
oh yea I had 2 quizzes on day with 4 lectures with 1 extra class one of those days
Don't wanna relive that shit again
have you ever messed up a quiz on a course that you did better on later?
yea but it doesn't really count
the TA running the quiz mixed up the undergrad and grad class's quizz lol
so the score didnt count 
damn
they were pretty similar though
that once happened with our seniors once
since the grad class was for students not studying math but still needed analysis & related
the class median was 5/30
😂
ahh makes sense
I wouldn't be surprised if that happens for this probability class
Prof gives an exam on his research area on what he thinks is "obvious" and fails everyone 
I have effed up a few quizzes here and there but still got As somehow
all thanks to relative grading I suppose
damn, that's what our Group theory prof is def planning
maybe, anyways i gtg nice talking to you!
legit said, "The midsem won't be as...kind. You know what I mean."
yea, nice talking to you
Reminds me of my complex analysis class
The mid sem exam median was 2
Out of 30
Yeah, half of us got preciously 0
Yeah, the guy was so shocked, flabbergasted even that he tried helping us to the point of overdoing the help
The next quiz was embarrassingly easy
ah that happened once with the prof who had to deal with 5/30 over here
he gave pretty easy exams to us
reminds me of several of our profs tbh, people are reeling from the hectic schedule atm
except for the group theory prof def
def gonna fail half of us
True, he was a nice guy but him having an accent didn't help with the class and that his class was immediately after lunch
I remember my friend sleeping in his class with mouth open lmfao
reminds me of this friend of mine, he perfected the skill of sleeping with eyes open
the prof used to get super conscious of him 'cause he looked like he was seriously scrutinizing what he said
he'd over-compensate somehow
Daaamn
You didn’t put anything in it?
At our school we would salt a lemon or put salt water in his mouth
Tell him we pissed in there a bit
That’s actually messed up tho
yea lmfao




