#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 90 of 1
<@&268886789983436800>
Man I'm so psyched I aced my test. I really appreciate all the people here that helped me when I was stuck or needed to understand something.
And I'm so excited to register my classes
pog

Haha the fun will begin again when I'm in Calc 😄
But for now I'm going to take a break to relax, because the last 2 weeks has been 8 hours (8+ on some days) of studying per day.
this statement, it seems the best the part (for me) atleast
idek you but reading that made me happy and i smiled
Thank you!!! 
It is the best feeling I think. I have a lot of fun studying too but it was starting to get stressful haha.
Have you seen Indian students
But yeah, congratsie
What are other cool natural science fields to learn about besides physics and maths?
Chemistry sort of interests me
Biology not so much, but maybe
Not sure what else
Agricultural science
Agronomy
That’s a science? Doesn’t that just fall under, like, botany? 😭
Idk
Like a mishmash of other sciences
Is what I meant
Wtf is agronomy
You are missing out
:0
$$\int_3^\infty \frac{4}{x^2-4}$$
Brandon H
$$4\int_3^\infty \frac{1}{x^2-4}$$
Brandon H
$$4\int_3^\infty -\frac{1}{4}\frac{1}{1-\frac{x^2}{4}}$$
$$-\int_3^\infty \frac{1}{1-\frac{x^2}{4}}$$
Brandon H
oh i messed up
use the fucking latex channel lmao
there's a goddamn #latex-testing channel for you
fr bruh
thats actually so annoying he always does that shit
$x$
beijing beef
what does beijing beef mean
Does anyone here have TI-nspire CAS calculator or Casio class pad?
tell me what does the modulus function do
like i dont get it
modulus is a function?
why
it inputs something and outputs the length of that thing
example
you put modulus of -1 = 1
ok
So |-1| = 1
|x| = distance between 0 and x
ayo shuri get off dick

I've obviously deleted my messages hours before
Go running
why is it wrong?

I keep doing $$\frac{d}{dy}$$ why am i like this
Brandon H
Brandon H
can you do $$\frac{d}{df(x)} ln(x)$$
Brandon H
No
But if f is invertible, you can set (u = f(x)) and then do
[\frac{\dd}{\dd u}\ln(f^{-1}(u))]
eulerEMILYteristic
Which seems like the same thing as what you wanted?
d(x^2+1) = 2xdx ?
Using the chain rule I guess this is just the same thing as [\frac{\left(\frac{\dd}{\dd x}\ln(x)\right)}{\left(\frac{\dd f}{\dd x}\right)}]
eulerEMILYteristic
@neat lintel
I don't understand anything
so dlog(x)=1/2x^2 d(x^2+1)
What part is hard to understand
i hate this
away from 0
0 = 0 guys, lets walk away
are you sure shuri
If there were something that this notation meant
bruh this crap is just differentiation and integration, stop hacking
It would be this
No, but...
what does setting u to f(x) do?
I'm just giving f(x) a name
nah this
yeah stop hacking
ratiod by differential forms
(which it isn't in this case, but whatever lol)
no u
that's called "de rham"
TY eric
hello shuri
if u ask the students who do this in integrals, how many can justify 
why is \int dy = y bad??
no thats perfectly sane. apart from the +C if its relevant
what no
i mean dy = f'(x)dx
\int f'(x)dx = \int dy = y = f(x) (all +C)
well theyre not justified as fractions at that point
or whatever
differential forms things
but this is what id be after
that's FTC
why but dy = ..dx is correct rigt
FTC.
whot
ok
\int (dy/dx) dx = y + C = \int dy
is actually the order
then the 1st is ftc
ig the 2nd also is? been too long
I don't remember what ftc is
,,\int^x f(t) \dd t = F(x)
There exists some antiderivative of f, F
that solves this
should be 1st FTC (under whatever conditions)
I... think.
And then all antiderivatives are a constant apart (given connected domain) should be a lemma or something?
and that should net you both equalities I'd hope
what does the one bound mean?
ik if there is one bound on the bottom
its usually a set or domain or smthn
another notation for improper integral
yea
ah
that I think i prefer
amukh1 | JS fanboy
nah nah
aw
that x has to be the variable
this is like asking about dy/d6
that x at the top simply indicates it will be the variable of the antiderivative
i see
isnt that implied in the dx though?
no check what i wrote
oh
i differentiated between the dummy and free variable
yh but like _0 isnt always a valid choice
which obv doesnt work that well
thays very specific
but its okay for simple ones in desmos
thats F(x) - F(0) which is a specific antiderivative
which is fine for whatever u wanna do
but its definite.
yea ik
But Im just thinking to myself if this could make sense, given u fix the constant of integration...
I dont think so atm.
like it doesnt really make sense to 'fix' that constant for an indefinite integral
yea it doesnt make sense in this way
yeah so indefinite integrals r focusing on the functions themselves
rather than points theyre evaluated at
I actually misread artanh as regular arctangent
What you wrote is correct apart from the dy typo
I still don't know what sinh and cosh are
Are hyperbolic trig fn covered in a usual hs calc course ? Coz I didn't study this stuff at all in mine
No
Every function can be split into an even and an odd part
i.e. if you have f there are unique f_e and f_o such that f = f_e + f_o
And f_e is even and f_o is odd
Guess what cosh and sinh are the even and odd part of?
sym and antisym slns to f"=f
e^x?

Why does "e" keep showing up everywhere 😡
you take the exponential formulas for sin and cos over C and get rid of the i
Wait I don’t know hyperbolic trig either I thought it is a precalc thing and it’s not ?
Is it a calc+ thing
some college calc classes choose to cover it
others dont
it shows up in niche places so most people don't see it in highschool
Wait a second. You know how the 2d trig functions use the unit circle? Do the 3d trig functions use the unit sphere because that would be super nice and intuitive.
The sphere is usually parametrized as follows:
\begin{equation*}\begin{split}
x &= r \sin(\theta) \cos(\varphi) \
y &= r \sin(\theta) \sin(\varphi) \
z &= r \cos(\theta) \
\end{split}\end{equation*}
matrisemann
So there's no need for any new or fancy trig functions in this case
yuparoo
You learn it when you learn it
Topics generally don't fit into class categories, and every class is different
Don't worry about it
Okay
That's cool and all, but what's the geometry
Like if I ask what cos and sin are, you and respond with the even and odd parts of the complex exponential, you aren't wrong exactly
real geometry or complex geometry?
i think those are very enlightening...
Unless you include your circle exposition in the complex exponential
I think that the "area"->position correspondance between the hyperbolics and the sines and their corresponding conic hold for both
I think it's enlightening if you have background information that isn't right to take for granted
Let me actually test something lmao
...
The complex exponential example I mean
I have a sort of geometric intuition
@zealous garden want a sort of geometric intution
Yes please
is it like analogous to the unit circle geometric intreperetation of trig functions ?
Let me draw out a desmos interpretation rq
Just look at the picture
The hyperbolic argument is the unique argument such that, the area between the line to (cosh(phi),sinh(phi)) from the origin and the hyperbola going to the aforementioned point is half the argument
essentially it takes the angle, and finds the point with that area/2 in the sector
same thing works with the circular ones
replace hyperbola with circle
Have you heard of a "hyperbola"
:p
Yeah you are lol
Real and imaginary parts
wait how'd you do the area thing with circles ? x tan(x) - sin(x)cos(x)/2 = x/2 ?
the area of a sector of the unit circle is equal to the angle divided by two
boom boom boom archimede's spiral
Lmfao
And that's why the area of a circle is τr^2/2
Yes, but I certainly did not understand the connection
what happens if instead of doing it based on the hyperbolic area you used the arc legtnh along the hyperbola
No idea
It'd be a lot weirder
The functions would be bounded between -1 and 1
I feel like this isn't too hard to explicitly compute
how would it be bounded between -1 and 1
Because the x-coordinate is always less than the arc length
Oh wait
That made more sense in my head
Nvm
Lol
I was thinking of the ratios, but that's not how this works
hmm if we define arc length equals argument /2 then we will get a different hyperbola ?
ahh okay it seems like a reasonable way to define cosh and sinh i think
like basically I've never understood why they actually use that area divided by 2
Like i get that its technically yhe same as putting circle area divided by 2
yeah these two are equivalent
but nobody ever really saya that thats just a fun tidbit surely
for circle everyone uses arc length
why to change their mind on the hyperbola
hmm so the trig functions are defined in the arc length manner
arc length = rtheta = theta (r = 1)
ahaha
Both are two sides of the same conic coin
everything i know about geometric product comes from like three YouTube videos tbh
Okay, take a Euclidean (or Anti Euclidean) 2D space, then your bivector squares to -1 and your rotors look like complex numbers
I used to be interested in geometric algebra, then I learned about abstract math and found that much structure scary :troll:
With definition of magnitude as sqrt(A A^\dagger) your (unit) rotors look like the unit circle in your spinor plane
However in a mixed signature space your bivector will square to 1 and I assume your unit rotors look like a hyperbola, and perform Lorentz boosts instead of Euclidean rotations
yeag and rotors like split comlex right
Yes
okayyy now what
The connection being the areas in the cosh sinh and cos sin thing
And Geometric algebra representing orthogonal transformations, ones that preserve area
Ohhhh and their areas bc bivecotrs
roght at the start u said "or anti euclidean" what is that
theres also the connection where the "angle" is the arc length
Euclidean means unit e_i has norm 1, Anti means norm -1
i think this goes with this
I thought the area * 2 = arc thing was only for the circle
So R^0,n
idk if it held for the hyperbola too
Ohhh right wraith i c
i think the arc length varies w hyperbolic area in a weird way but i dont have any idea wjy i think that
well arclength in the case of the circle is nice because it's integrating over essentially |dv|
which is tied to the circle
due to the absval
not sure if that's so nice for the hyperbolic one? idk
iirc its connected to the parameter that goes into the area
not the area itself
lemme check
Oh that's cool
So if I imagine the (double) cone and think of a plane slicing it
Nevermind I don't like it anymore
conics 
wait til you learn about projective geometry
then that cone slicing thing makes sense lol
Now i gotta sleep but i will think more tmr
not for a while tho :troll:
No cone slicing makes sense
gns
But the idea didn't line up like I thought
sweet dreems
What's a 4-cone
wh at
The object that looks like a linear interpolation of a sphere to a point over some separation in a 4th spatial dimension
What's the proper name
So like
A 1-cone is a line segment
A 2-cone is a triangle
A 3-cone is a cone
A 4-cone is ???
Do you see the pattern
An N cone is a (n-1) sphere scaled down to a point over some distance
sounds like the zero set of some quadratic homogeneous poly
Probably is
In fact I bet it's the "unit circle" of spacetime
Or something close to it
I thought spacetime uses the quadratic form x^2 + y^2 + z^2 - t^2
which is homogenous
Or t^2 - x^2 - y^2 - z^2
Mostly minuses
I only know it from constructions of integral quadratic modules
What
Refer to Serre's "A Course In Arithmetic"
Anyways we need to know which one is the truth
Because R^1,3 and R^3,1 don't have the same symmetries
It's mostly a model of spacetime afaik
They have the same spin groups, which it turns out is where all of our observables seem to come from, so there's no easy way to see which we're in
Assuming that the model is an accurate enough one for us to be "in" either one
Yes
The question is whether time squares negative and everything else positive, or if time squares positive and everything else negative
The latter is associated with the quaternions for obvious reasons
It was also chosen to be the metric for the standard treatment of SpaceTime Algebra
G^1,3, which is algebra isomorphic to G^4 (which could be posed as a model of spacetime where all directions square to 1)
That said, the other choice, G^3,1, is not algebra isomorphic to either of them
A cone over X is the topological space X×[0,1] / X×{0}
i.e. it's a cylinder over X and then you squish the top side to a point
Yeah sure that's one way to say it
But what's the name of the 4 dimensional example
The example just beyond human geometry
topologically it's just a 4-ball
I dunno if the specific shape embedded in R^4 has a name though
Lmfao
asks question about the name of the 2 dimensional shape with 2 pairs of parallel sides
idk but it's topologically a circle
I do love this
It is now the glone
It's just true
:p
Waiting for the introductory Geometric Calculus text with an exercise involving integrating a multivector field over the surface of a Glone
With my name on it
15 years, just you wait

marry me


I don't have to study until school starts but I also don't know what to do now that I'm not studying math. I certainly need a break but my brain can only think of doing more math at this point lol.
I might do the Khan academy calculus while waiting for school to start.
But I also feel like I should play some videogames to rejuvenate.
I kind of want to go back to playing Shenzhen I/O, I love that game.
Even if I only play the solitaire part 
shenzhen!!! woooo!!!!
It's so fun, but I have a habit of binging a game and then stopping halfway through. Last thing I was doing was making Tetris for the "make a game" level.
But I got annoyed because even though I put the Tetris music in, it wasn't compatible with the other embedded devices sleep times. I struggle a lot with the sleep times.
zachtronics 
guys
what does ai research look like?
is it legit just
come up with a bunch of architectures and try them out
I know that a lot of people (including me partially) don't believe the alien stuff in the news, but if it was real, do you think the only reason we got to the moon was because of alien tech, because the first "ufo crash" was in Roswell in the 1940s
Do you really think that the technology we "derived" from a vessel that is most likely capable of flying several light years is in form of a saturn v
idk im kinda just spitballing theories lol
i dont really believe its real
but its a cool concept to think about
the universe is a smooth manifold? 
Aliens are real but we haven’t seen any obvious or intentional signs of them is my opinion.
you believe in it too 😮
My opinion is that there is a very high probability that aliens are real, but I'm not completely sure.
I mean the universe is very big so I guess it's reasonable to think there are aliens somewhere
but that size also works against us ever interacting with them
Its one of those things that is very likely and we are far from conclusive proof. General consensus should be that they exist by all accounts of human intution about expansiveness of space
True. Even if the aliens aren't technologically advanced enough to explore space, it's still much more likely for primitive organisms like unicellular ones to exist in some planet out there.
I'd go so far as to say that the size makes exploring space unreasonably difficult. it isn't just about the tech needed to accelerate in reasonable time to near light speeds, but also the fact that travelling at them is incredibly difficult
there are lots of things in space and such fast speeds make really high energy collisions even with tiny masses
the whole E = mv^2 relation
I think any alien capable of moving outside their planet is constrained pretty badly by this, so we'd only get to explore small neighborhoods near us. something like radio signals is more likely ig
Even if aliens existed it would probably just be some stupid dog like thing.
@junior jolt, show this person the truth
nah because we use rockets
they just fly around with no propulsion
Same with pirates
for our human ships we use diesel and fuel oil engines
but pirate ships have no engines they just sail with no propulsion
I'm not a pirate. I definitely pay for all my books 👀
I can't pay for books so I source it via piracy
Sadly
Need second hand copies of the book in hard copy one day
Hey everyone, Discord will shut us down if we allow conversations about piracy on this server, so imma ask you all to please not talk about it unfortunately
Brie
Toblerone
Taco
burger
Cat
dog
Goat
sheep
Cheese
milk
Pizza
yoghurt
Gorilla
ice cream
Groundhog
spider monkey
Narwhal
ant eater
orca
Bird is the word
cringe
lol
🤓
See the server and also discord are in cahoots to stop us from talking about the truth behind pirates. Believe me yet ?
why lol
i hope not
no.
yo guys
let I be an ideal
I^n would be the set of all x such that x is a sum of elements in I right?
now suppose we are over a noetherian ring\
why not
then I^n would be finitely generated
or no
I would be finitely generated
so that I^n would be the set of all sums of just the generators
or better it would be a polynomial over those
is that correct?
so that I^n would be a set of polynomials over the generators?
iff I is principle
Its a power of ideal so its n’th powers of generators of I
Which R[X] is a principle ideal domain iff R is a field, i.e R has no nontrivial ideals beyond (0)
What
Take any non-principal ideal in a Noetherian ring
Instant counterexample
ALL ideals in a noetherian ring are finitely generated
ik
thats what i meant
its for a proof of krull intersection theorem
ty hto
tho*
Well
Take an ideal I, and say it has finitely many generators (in the ring sense), denote them x_1…x_N
*big thinking*
so the valuation map from the polynomial ring R[X_1…X_N] to R rhat sends X_n to x_n should have an image that contains I?
i need to think about this a bit more, i know that isn’t right
NO, WAIT
CORRECTION:
the image of the ideal (X_1…X_N) will be that finitely generated ideal
i.e kernel of the map that sends all the vars to 0
i just forgot about the constant coeffs lol

Yeah seems legit
the image of the ideal is an ideal cuz any poly map into it’s base ring is surjective
that’s a valution map
(Doesn't know what a valuation map is) Nods
Map from R[X] to R that fixes R
valuation as in, gives X a value
if you wish, associative R alg morphism
Oh I think that's called an evaluation map
oh that gives me an absolutely vile statement of R[X] being noetherian
okay got it
My understanding of a valuation is that it's like an absolute value on a field
Oh yeah
But I know nothing!
If R is noetherian, then forall ideals I, I is the image of the ideal (X_1…X_N) in R[X_1…X_N] for some N under some epimorphism that fixes R
absolutely abomidable
so that image of ideal is necessarily ideal
taking the derivative of quadra composite functions is so confusing

khan academy has a list of courses
and its in the order you should take them in
its only on mobile tho
oh damn it
i cant share a picture
it was a really funny set up to the joke
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
wow. That was about as well done as tartare
It's on desktop too
Chain rule goes brrrr
oh is that what they meant by quadra composite
I imagine
imagine all the people
imagi nation
there was one text message on whatsapp computer that was typed in reverse until i clicked on it
then it turned back to normal
it seems like such a burlesque(right word?) glitch
like the whole letters and everything were in reverse
would a B in abstract algebra look bad on a transfer transcript?
I mean it would look better than a C but worse than an A
I dunno how much else we can say without more context
hi
i have a question
yes
If 0 degrees C = 32 degrees F, does that mean that 0 degrees C + 0 degrees C = 64 degrees F
?
thats exactly correct
No one at all? Out of how many people?
like 15. on one test, the average was ~50 with a high of 73
Well if averages go on your transcript (not every place does this), that'd probably be fine?
If not and your other grades are good, then also probably fine?
sorry, just a question out of random, do you play soccer?
Also I think this just depends on the prof
Every class will be different
do schools care more about classes that are related to major when transferring? Like if im transferring to CS, would they even care that much compared to just calculus and such?
Probably yes schools care more about the in-major classes
Can you induce long-term cyanide poisoning if you eat enough apple seeds?
Idk how chemistry works
I’ve just heard you can accidentally do it
lmao your profile 💀
What about it? 😛
especially since they are in your bio when there is a dedicated section 😭
Well see
I don’t rlly care abt my pronouns
but I do care abt being submissive and breedable
damn
gotta let the manipulative epeople know they can take advantage of me ya feel
i mean yea that does make sense
LMFAOOOOOO DOES IT??
;-;
ikik it’s cute dw 🤣 I’m glad you like it
👀
👀

literally the perfect emoji for that moment.
breedable hmm sounds legit

username includes "the sigma"
guys help i struggling Pythragoras "theoreom"
only a true sigma is willing to ask for help when he needs it
he doesn’t concern himself with the beta male’s opinion of him
it is only when a mosquito lands on one's balls that man realizes not to use violence
Lmao
The pythagorean theorm isn't intutive at all tbh. Like algebraically I see how it works but my intuition doesn't really understand or believe it.
Like the fact that x^2+y^2=1 makes a circle is so jank
I would have thought |x|+|y|=1 would make a circle
The circle is the collection of points with equal DISTANCE
Distance brings in the pythag theo
Idk the fact that walking diagonally is faster than walking horizontally and then vertically is so weird.
This is more the triangle inequality than Pythagoras
hi everyone i am new to this server and i am in year 7 and might need some help
I would argue the triangle inequality is very intuitive
Pythagoras I have to agree feels unintuitive at a first look
There’s no clear reason at first why side lengths should be related by a weird sum of squares relation
Isn’t this slightly backwards, isn’t the distance formula more a consequence of the Pythagorean identity
When I found out about pythagoras I measured a bunch of triangles with a ruler because I didn't believe it 💀
You can’t expect |x| + |y| = 1 to give a circle though simply because it’s a collection of linear relations
well i mean
It is a pretty crazy theorem imo, surprisingly underrated
i dont care abt distance formula
Even if proving it is easy
the pythagorean theorem has always been the pythagoran theorem
12 x 3 + 5 x 2 + 4 x - 6 for x = -1 how do you solve this
i didnt fall for that distance formula bullshit
but the set of equidistant points is only a circle if you use the usual Euclidean distance
i am confused
waever
stop overcomplic
oke
circle = set of points with equal distance
pythagoran theorem gives distance between some points
The point is it isn’t necessarily intuitive how to compute distance if one doesn’t find the Pythagorean theorem intuitive
Im willing to say that I’ve just been black boxing Pythagoras my whole life
Understanding a proof is not the same as feeling like you understand the reasons for the result
I don’t think it’s a bad thing
yea idk i cant help with that
yo open a help channel wait 15 mins and ping helpers
i dont get paid enough for this
I think it’s fundamental enough that it’s one of those things that should serve as building intuition rather than being intuited
(i get paid $0)
If you think of the x and y axis as two infinitely long rulers then distance on the coordinate plane starts to look kind of weird
infinite..?
if you can’t help with that don’t dismiss it, just don’t say anything
otherwise you’re not being helpful
Yeah because the x and y axis extend infinitely
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
i am new i dont know
well i tried
Then read the channel that was linked
There are explanations there
but then people kept correcting random shit
the distance formula is literally just the applied pythagoran theorem
its not the pythagorean theorem + anything its literally just the pythagorean theorem
As far as I understood the convo no one was doubting this
The distance formula is kind of lame. Like it's something that you should be able to instantly rederive if you understand the 2d cartesian plane. You don't really need a formula for it.
yea anyway the circle equation isnt x + y = 1, because that is the set of points whos sum is 1
Well |x|+|y|=1 is a circle in taxicab distance
Not the point
well, it’s not a circle
but it is a set of equidistant points using the taxicab distance
In some texts it would be called the unit circle for that metric
But that’s beyond the point anyways
perhaps
defn of circle to me 
A (euclidean) circle is invariant under change of orthonormal basis, but we want the formula under some choice of x, y.
The formula at least has to be somehow invariant under chance of orthonormal basis
and well |x|+|y| = 1 doesnt cut it.
I'm sure there's more into it if you look for the why
square is a circle, line segment is a circle
how is a line segment a circle 
<@&268886789983436800>
I was recently told calculus BC
is calc 1 and calc 2
and calculus AB was just calc 1
i though AB was just the first semester of calc 1 and it was a year course

someone explain
the names for classes are pretty arbitrary
But AB calculus generally covers a first semester in calculus and the parts of BC calculus which aren't covered in AB are generally a second semester in calculus
they are arbritray but standard
no?
Well
There are college board curricula for AB and BC calculus, but classes usually don't exclusively cover those topics
And calculus 1 and 2 aren't standardized
We need a dishonorable role
— role
It's me, wraithlord_koto, continuing the campaign for cohonorable
wraithlord cohonorable
euleremily is suppressing the cohonorable campaign. i wont stand for this injustice
I thought this is what they wanted, cohonorable?
whats cohonorable
dual object of honorable in the category of roles
LMFAO
best role
A great example of cohonorable is Wew
Hmmm hold your horses on that one
Or me
co honourable means complement is honourable?
Honorable means they're a role model to the server
Cohonorable means the server is a role model to them
Tension
Well if that's what cohonorable means
I don't want it anymore
New campaign
Kohonorable
i want cohonorable
Lmfao
bow before me!!
If you're both honorable and cohonorable, can you get bihonorable
You can get bifurious
to get autohomorable you must be fully faithful
I think that fundementally we just need a role that will shame people and make them feel bad
that's the gamma role
Thank you for your service
Oh
LMAO
So I’m guessing bad math memes don’t count
I am missing my honorable role
Where did it go
Okay so
song: Tevvez - Parallel Universe - Let Me Down Slowly Remix
Spotify: https://spotify.link/gZo9rkfnfyb
Posting here since math discussion is nominally for math
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcExlu3NQaY&layer_token=aa572a6ed5376257 - Annotate.
Might as well since it's just a single picture for the whole vid rofl. Nothing stupid in here though, I can remove anything idiotic.
Remix by: Sixto Sounds, Steppo, zircon
Game: Mega man 3
I did not make this music, nor do I take credit for it, credit g...
Yep I have this one
tevvez goes hard in general
I like Colin Hennerz a lot but idk if I’d classify as hardstyle
it'll never be as good as his.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duCgYID13q4
also good quality on sc https://soundcloud.com/depressixn/sex
Questionable title
Lady Gaga - Bad Romance (Colin Hennerz remix)
soundcloud link: https://soundcloud.com/colinhennerzextras/bad-romance-colin-hennerz-remix
Colin Hennerz
https://soundcloud.com/colinhennerzmate
https://soundcloud.com/colinhennerzextras
• I do not own the rights to this track. If you are the legal owner of the song and don't want your music on Yo...
oh I know one that's similar
Provided to YouTube by TuneCore
Lettin' go (Hardstyle) · ytax
Lettin' go (Hardstyle)
℗ 2022 ytax
Released on: 2022-11-24
Auto-generated by YouTube.
keep linking I’ll put it on my q for when I get back home
this is what I listen to
ANIMALS AS LEADERS // Live 2017 // OUT NOW
iTunes: http://smarturl.it/AALlive2017-IT
Amazon: http://smarturl.it/AALlive2017-AM
GooglePlay: http://smarturl.it/AALlive2017-GP
Animals As Leaders' live album is now available for pre-order on vinyl
2xLP pre-order US: http://smarturl.it/VinylPreOrderUS
2xLP pre-order EU: http://smarturl.it/VinylPr...
Provided to YouTube by The Orchard Enterprises
Etudes-tableaux, Op. 39: No. 5 in E-Flat Minor. Appassionato · Nikolai Lugansky · Sergei Rachmaninoff
Rachmaninoff: Études-Tableaux, Op. 33 & Op. 39
℗ 2007 Challenge Classics
Released on: 2007-07-22
Auto-generated by YouTube.
Hopping on the bandwagon
I saw appassionata and got excited and then I realized it says appassionato
Listen anyway 
yeah it’s pretty
rachmaninoff 🤢
listening to this right now
Paulinho Nogueira : O Fino Do Violão ( 1980 ) Vol. 2
- Gente Humilde (0:00)
- Eu Sei Que Vou Te Amar (3:40)
- Abismo De Rosas (8:12)
- Manhã De Carnaval (13:06)
- Odeon (17:04)
- Da Cor Do Pecado (21:11)
- Bachianinha (23:59)
- Travessia (26:51)
- Choro N°1 (29:56)
- Zelão (35:03)
- Pra Dizer Adeus (38:33)
- A Mesma Rosa...
chill portugese guitar
idk what it is it just autoplayed after the last thing i listened to
that was this which was great
Búzios Bossa Blog
(00:00) 1 Chorou, Chorou -- João Donato -- (Paulo César Pinheiro & João Donato) (02:40) 2 Terremoto -- João Donato -- (Paulo César Pinheiro & João Donato) .
Búzios Bossa Blog.
Búzios Bossa Blog.
1965 The New sound of Brazil - Charles Sheeler (1883 ~ 1965), American painter and commercial photographer
this is super good and fun, listened to it earlier
Support me on Bandcamp: https://chypho.bandcamp.com/
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/7qTClAxxKdjwYEba9Nhdjo
Apple Music: https://music.apple.com/us/artist/chypho/1635486513
Cassette tapes: https://www.jahbulonrecords.com/shop/p/chypho-entomongaku-ii-cassette
00:00 1. Pale Morning Duns
06:18 2. Itty Bitty
09:00 3. Grasshopper Spring
14...
i may check out more of this Portuguese guitar
Classical era bad
cringe opinion
late romantic / impressionist are best
but im not about rach
too maximalist
Not too big on Debussy
fuuuuuuuuck you
ravel >>>>>> everyone, debussy second, chopin third
then beethoven because lets be honest he's a romantic composer
that's not some mozart trash
then jump up to satie, back to liszt, tchaikovsky, and maybe you start to near rachmaninoff
sibelius has to come first ofc
no one's as bad as haydn though (canonical worst famous composer)
shutup nerd
Based and true
Ravel cracked in orchestration
beethoven actually cared about form and coherence tho
but i agree on ravel and debussy
sorry we can go back to discussing hatsune miku vocaloid
and it held him back... so sad
Mozart though
L
Oh shoot ryc and I agree on something
Need to change my opinion
Rachmaninoff is the BEST
Based
Every Rachmaninoff link gets a Medtner reply
is the shining example of why classical period music is horrid
You're just like... wrong
The requiem is beautiful
The piano sonatas are also delights
all of mozarts music is like "boopadoopadoo, doo doo diddly doo"
Performed live by KINETIC on May 6, 2018, for "Musical Madness."
0:00 Carlo Gesualdo: Moro, lasso, al mio duolo (transcribed for string quintet)
3:46 Erkki Sven Tüür: L’ombra della croce
Midtown Arts & Theater Center Houston
Videography: Ben Doyle
Audio Engineering: Francis Schmidt
For more information about KINETIC, please visit:
www.kine...
mozarts emotional in the way that a marvel fan gets emotional when their favorite superhero shows up in the new extended universe movie
AAAAAAAAA
You're just... wrong?
The Haydn fifths string quartet is one of the best ever written
I'll stand by that
Moro, Lasso (Reflections on a Madrigal of Carlo Gesualdo)
for Flute, Clarinet, Bassoon, Horn, 2 Violins, Viola, and Cello
Commissioned by the Tetractys new music concert series, and premiered on Nove
And the jupiter symphony is genius
has haydn ever written something that isn't sickeningly pastoral
This is a very changed arrangement of Gesualdo
jupiter symphony is like the only bearable mozart piece
and it's not even the best orchestral piece called "jupiter"
im sorry maybe i like
saw the little einsteins movie too many times as a kid
and am just jaded on mozart
tf
pastoral?
Not how I would describe the fifths string quartet
Don't say you like Holst
of course i do
but tbh the only planets i like are mars and jupiter
the others are gimmicky
ok this is just a slightly sadder merry hunting troupe traipsing through a meadow
also i didnt put bach on my list but bach is obviously great
sort of outside all the other composers in my estimation though, satisfies a different need
tf
Also @fringe summit do you know ludus tonalis
I think you would love it
You can also follow me on Spotify at https://spoti.fi/2MRR1lV and stream the albums I have released there.
Mendelssohn is good
yesssss
I played the op 10b one
mendelssohn is the mozart of the romantic era
how can you like him but not mozart
like omg his midsummer night's dream overture screams mozart
it's beautiful
I can’t really even describe Mozart, other than, his concertos for me are like a perfect short story from beginning to end that never quite manages to be predictable but lands the ending in the most perfect and satisfying way possible
sonata form is just chefs kiss
don giovanni has got to be one of my favorite operas
oh the ending of that is incredible
it's filled to the brim with perfection
wait isn't the ending just the rest of the characters cheering that the sinner has gone to hell lol
well I meant the song before that when don giovanni gets dragged to hell
my favorite performance of that is the one with Kurt Moll as the commendatore
Basso profondo
I'll look it up!
apparently he sang the low A an octave down for fun one time and the director told him not to do that lol
because i do not like classical era tropes and i do like romantic era tropes
i did see marriage of figaro and it was a lot of fun
I simply dislike classical period
LOL
did you listen to him sing yet?
I like some music, but I hate instruments
like, acoustic instruments?
by acoustic do you mean just the ones that make sound?
no, like acoustic vs electric
ah
I’m just trying to pin down what u mean cuz I’m not sure what music isn’t produced by instruments
yeah
that confused me too, I thought you were asking if I just didn't like audible instruments
so what do you mean you hate instruments?
like the devices that make noise
im still confused lol. what kind of music do you like?
Following measures taken by the Federal and regional authorities in Germany to contain the corona pandemic, the Philharmonie Berlin will be closed from 2 to 30 November 2020. In view of this, the Berliner Philharmoniker and their chief conductor Kirill Petrenko added another work, 4‘33‘‘ by John Cage, to their concert from 31 October.
http://ww...
god dammit lol shoulda seen that coming
Mouth
Wow that’s a big elp
the voice is absolutely an instrument, and u are speaking to someone who majored in vocal performance in college lol
Lol
I never figured out the thing 😭
User cancelled member selection.
this is so gooddddd
does anyone know if there are any other math servers as big as this one?
Yes i know that there isnt
proof?
No, knowledge
knowledge without proof 
depends on your idea of knowledge ig
can somebody guide me
i get stuck doing questions
ughh
as a mathematician I refuse to accept anything without proof :)
Have you eaten anything today
yes
Would you answer without knowing
and if not, can you prove you ate something today
yes 
ofc there's remnants of the food I ate
thats not a proof, those could be remnants of somethignelse
Could have eaten thag yesterday, or might not be food, or any number of things
still isnt proof
Yet you still know these things
point is, either ur standard for proof is incredibly low, or you accept you know thjngs without proof
anyone got some combi qs?
guys!!!
i need help in a sets problem quick
To each element of the set S={1, 2, …., 1000} a colour is assigned. Suppose that for any two elements a, b of S, if 15 divides (a+b)then they are both assigned the same colour. What is the maximum possible number of distinct colours used?
☝️ ☝️
alternative 3rd interpretation, I just don't consider these things knowledge
Thats fake as hell
I treat all statements made in language to be probabilistic
and only consider statements proven directly from assumed axioms to be able to be knowledge
since then the probability of 1 carries forward from the axioms
You just dont do that though, tbvh
I think most people treat the word knowledge colloquially
but having knowledge of things at all is a very shaky concept to me
what are those paradoxes called
Knowledge is (a record of) experience or events
idk itd have "epistemological" in there somewhere probably
gettier problems iirc
since knowledge is often considered justified true belief, but you can end up in a situation where you justify your knowledge off incorrect information, but you turn out to be right
it's pure chance that you did, so it's not like you actually knew that
These things derived from axioms I wouldn't call knowledge
Knowing them, sure
There is a lot of knowledge in their expression or derivation
But knowledge to me is directly linked to experiences rather than any certainty of a reality or truth
Oh i heardnof thise i think but idk what theur deal is. But i dont think tj matters because we all know (lol) what knowledge is, even if we cant define it in this or that way
Yeag i agree
haha I like that view
but I think it does matter to know what knowledge is, since otherwise the line between knowledge and just belief is fuzzy and doesn't describe that same thing
like I know qualitatively that there's a difference between things we know and things we believe
but without defining it then anyone could claim science is just belief and that feels wrong
Yeag im saying we do already know what knowledge is and yhat the line btwn belief and knowledge ks already nkt blurry, rven if its hard to put words to the line
typos*
I think without a definition it's blurry
Knowledge is something that exists within observers and agents
knowledge without truth is kinda stinky though :/
I have the knowledge of what blue looks like to me
not a useful idea to me
i know what a house is, but i coildnt say for certain what a house is
There is no false knowledge
You can have knowledge that does not represent reality
But it is a true record of experience
reality and truth wouldn't be the same to me, I would consider mathematical statements true but not real
If I am hallucinating I will have knowledge of things not reflected in reality
If I am delusional I will have knowledge of things that aren't true
You have knowledge of your dreams
Some of them at least
on this point like, there could be something that looks a hell of a lot like a house but turns out to not be a living space. it reminds me of a model where you define negatively. when I don't know something the space of things it could be is infinite, but I learn what something isn't, and the remaining space of things is what I define that thing to be

