#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 68 of 1
that's cap
dont listen to him
im real youre real god is real numbers are not real
Moderators are unable to change name of channels?
stop digging you own grave man holy shit
Honestly
It's a serious question.
what the fuck is the phospholipid bi-layer
this is a math server can u use regular words
Fuck if I know
Did chatgpt provide this random answer
Barrier that separates the outside from the inside of a cell?
I said mathematical biology not biology
You would have had to learn biology first correct?
well u didn’t learn op-amps before rf apparently
I mostly just do math of the sort that is most often applied to biology
i bet u dont even know what the mitocondria does
It's also of interest in chemistry and, i will concede, in molecular dynamics and statistical mechanics
stupid
thats the battery right
It's the power horse of the jail
Other articles where mathematical biology is discussed: computational biology: Distinctions among related fields: …is more easily distinguished from mathematical biology, though there are overlaps. The older discipline of mathematical biology was concerned primarily with applications of numerical analysis, especially differential equations, to t...




At least it isn't wikipedia.
This mf
heres the wikipedia article for your own phd subject
nah it's ggs you aint winning @next schooner
gg no re
how can you argue against that britannica article man
Emphasis on the no re do not speak to or contact me again
hey, wiki isn't that bad
Use it get a fail.
I mean
wikipidea is given a bad name for no good reason
it's good for summing concepts up
definitely bad for learning
but if u ever find urself in a position where u forgot formal definitions of stuff or smth
And some of it is outlandishly wrong.
wait what?
just like you rn
there's actually wrong info on math?
Which of math wiki is wrong
yeah
from what I seen and heard from a lotta people
there's close to 0 error, for maths at least
I am cited in a Wikipedia article
one time i edited a math wiki article because they had an inequality wrong
you're welcome
And I wasn't wrong. about numerical techniques used in Mathematical biology FYI
I am the primary source you fear
yay
Tell us where the math wiki is wrong I'm curious
maidenless
And I wasn't wrong. about algebra being used in Physics FYI
It's used to model physics, approximately.
If it's so outlandishly wrong it should be very common
Homie, it's math bio you could've said literally any piece of math and it would've been true
that one article i edited.
i fixed it tho
ur welcome
honestly pretty rare given how there's so many people using it, most of the time it gets fixed before it even becomes an issue
i think it was the ordered field page
Nice but I'm not asking you
nvm it wasnt idr what it was
Because of the nature of wikipedia it cannot be cited as a credible source period. It does not have oversight like most scientific journals.
do you use counting?
didnt think so
I'm asking for an example. Not your opinion
why do you talk like this 💀
Just wait till you learn how bullshit the peer review process can be
Count how many cells just divided in that petri dish
Millennials go crazy over peer review
how bullshit is it
it's really funny
just because it doesn't doesn't mean it is not accurate
Zoomers don't care about peer review
Is it not intended to prove by reproduction of the validity of a claim?
Wdym
Just waiting to see how long he can dodge giving examples
Care to give a glimpse
millennials go crazy kookoo over the peer review process
Peer review can be very political
why
gen X see's "peer review" in the headline they flip tf out they love it. doesnt make sense
zoomers see thru it
Ohhhh
So peer review doesn’t necessarily indicate quality of research done
It means you’re not speaking nonsense
People doing peer review are often members of a fairly small research community and it is often quite easy to tell who the reviewers and reviewees are (note that this is generally supposed to be anonymous)
At the minimum
What makes you think it is true?
Some academics hold grudges or dislike certain methodologies and can easily tank a paper in the right circumstances
This is evidenced by the fact that most major journals now let you blacklist certain potential reviewers
I read about this in an epistemology paper its called Circumstantial injustice
ur welcome
so you don't have any examples and were just speaking out of your behind
Well it's been fun
No why do you think it is true that all of it is correct?
stop using big words
Neat
Serious question there.
Big words give you big lawsuit money
a huge portion of it must be correct given how almost no one has spotted/complained about the accuracy of the website
Anecdotal logical fallacy.
hey what do you call math done in secret
epistmeoology = its like math but for thoughts
circumstantial = depends on the context
injustice = when someone is bad to you
thanks
discrete mathematics
I never claimed this. I merely asked you to provide examples. Not your opinion, which we now know to be baseless
yw
Just because you think it isn't wrong, you have no means of proving it isn't wrong.
Nanite go try and edit Wikipedia with something blatantly incorrect and see how fast those wiki folks slap your balls
i dont support pretentiousness on the math server so i like to break it down for the lil guys
i did that once
Wikipedia contains a few million pages are you going to rigorously check everything?
how was the experience?
you would be surprised tbh
In any case don't cite Wikipedia check the primary sources yadda yadda
you'd be surprised
i was 10 and i changed professor oaks name from professor oak to professor poopy pants on the pokemon article and it got immediately changed and i got a temp ban
That doesn't mean you get the free check to claim something without evidence or experience. Which you have been doing for quite a while
Just wait till GPT-4 model based AI posters begin hitting it.
fuck man imagine if it stuck tho
It will be interesting.
bernstain bears style
its funny to me now
New Mandela effect just dropped????.?
What flavor
Prof poopy pants
Anyway it's been fun but I would expect you at least to know some spicy examples for trolling instead of just being clueless. Clueless is just boring
ill become prof poopy pants
i just got to legally change my name
and get a phd
then
get tenure somewhere
Uh oh you said the p word
we've all decided that phds are not worth it
WHAT P WORD
ad hominem
keep up
It starts with p and rhymes with PhD
not the logical fallacies 😭 just admit u lost
this is reddit behaviour
@neat lintel point is, it's far more likely than not that wikipedia info on mathematics is accurate, given the number of people who use it, as well as the minimal complaints/errors. It's far more likely than not that wiki is accurate, and you have no direct evidence (such as an incorrect wiki page) to back up your claim that it is not accurate.
They provided no counter arguments what so ever.
what are u guys even arguing aboiut
whether wiki is accurate or not
for maths
We asked you to provide examples. You have none.
wikipedia is accurate as fuck do u not understand how neurotic math wiki people are
wikipedia editors are like insane
you try to sound smart online
just because it's possible for there to be mistakes on wiki, it does not mean that the wiki is innacurate.
Burden of proof.
please go outside
every single wikipedia article has a grad student assigned to it who spends half their time just making sure it's perfect
Lies on you who claim it is outlandishly wrong
nanite you need to provide evidence for your claims
lmao, it's ok guys
so much nerd posting in chat
I never claimed anything about wiki
What happened to the server
👏absence👏of👏evidence👏is👏not👏evidence👏of👏absence👏!
liberalism
Whats everyones favourite theorem.
boondocks
I like Compactness 😄
real
You are quick to believe based on authority alone you appeal to authority.
we know that nanite's wrong and so long as no one's getting confused/mislead
I was trying to remember this line
there's no need for us to care unless they take it too far
@rancid meadow wat does liberalism ahve to do with the server
idk what does ur mom have to do w my bed
episode?
I claim or believe nothing. You made the claim
Anyway another moron to the block list
episode of what?
nothing she is celibate
oh real
Weirstrass polynomial approximation theorem
That's a good one
boondocks
You appeal to the authority of the individuals who maintain the wikipedia page, how do you know it is true?
💀
do u like the proof or the result more
umm what
sorry
If you can't explain how it is right, how can you know it is right?
what
the proof
but the power of the result is also appealing
oh... I only ever heard of that line in some arguments between atheist and theist; alien conspiracies
it's as simple as that, really
Nanite can u explain the epistemic basis for all of ur knowledge
He could prove his own point by giving examples which he can not.
I want u to explain the epistemic basis for all of ur knowledge to me right now
he did not state a point in the first place, he merely opposed yours
once you realize that stone weirstrass and all these density results follow from weirstrass polynomial approximation theorem
whats the best part of the proof rahul
If you can't explain why you exist, how can you know you exist?
I heard it from a politicians son right before he shot up a store and got the store owner arrested
This is a dangerous point with people, just because it's vetted by people with a degree doesn't mean it's a credible claim
The store owner did nothing wrong
sir, what?
yo me too
Case in point inventor of the lithium ion battery
PhD holder
its so foreboding of the family of kernels type argukent which imo is beautiful
Lied about moving to unachievable battery energy density.
but really the most beautiful part for me was that convolution with a polynomial is still a polynomial
it’s so trivial
but so important
So, even if the "people" on wikipedia are PhD holders, are grad students how do "you" know it's right?
neat!
by that logic, literally almost everything is innacurate.
the rest of the result is just a family of kernel type argument
bro cant explain the epistemic basis of all his knowledge 😭😭😭😭
I go abseiling every weekend.
this lemma is great, because it allows you to do exact arithmetic in p-adic field extensions while only knoiwing sufficiently good approximations of the numbers
I get plenty of air outside.
man's worse than any pessimist I ever seen
bro relies on the experts 😭😭😭
why do you like compactness jesse
i think the proof is neat
i go down on your mom every weekend
and i like that it's equivalent to tychonoffs
it's pretty simple to prove too, and like combines analysis and algebra, so pretty sexy to see the two shaking hands like that
i think thats fun
u mean heine borel ?
I mean logical compactness
No rock climbing, you know core strength?
finite subset of sentences has a model iff all of them do
we've dragged him down to our level guys
we won
could you elaborate a bit on that, like if you have something specific in mind
Hairy ball
like hwen you end up in that sorta scenario
is it bc of the funny name
your mother climbs all over my phallus
I can’t pick a favorite theorem
i did a presentation on poincare-hopf last semester
Jesus, if all of you are so clever why the hell are you on discord anyway.
Ugh
Go put that brain to real life application.
your mother gives me 🧠 all the time
lmao just ignore nanite at this point
Bored maybe
There is endless things they can do.
i do your mom in endless positions
I lost track of his argument
exactly, his argument is messed up lmao
They can't comprehend the possibility of people who have credibility potentially being possibly wrong.
Or even lying.
I get this
It has happened multiple times within academia.
we accept that possibility, but it's clearly not the case that this is true for wiki
How do you know?
Of course that's true but it's not limited to Wikipedia, is it?
my formulation isnt great tbh
you can determine p-adic field extensions Q_p[x]/(f) precisely by only knowing approximations of the coefficients of f, which is kind of weird because we cant do exact arithmetic with p-adic numbers, but we can store field extensions precisely on the computer
Definitely not.
i dont know any use for this 
Ok
just to give some context nanite ranted for 2 paragraphs about how he doesnt need the education system and learnt calculus on his own in 6 months without the prerequisites
I met someone who actually told me to fake data was a PhD Candidate.. reported to uni
I don't see what we are arguing then lol
@neat lintel do you know the pokemon gulpin
oh no...
don't do this
They're already blocked.
💀
you can just read the wikipedia article and figure out if it’s wrong btw
No you can not.
it's cuz i did their mother in endless positions
sorry you’re not smart lol
- we show trust that educated and certified people have little reason to spread false information.
- the assumption that it's all a lie may be true, but this would literally be equivalent to not trusting anything at all, which is absurd and far more detrimental.
did you guys like hanh banach when you first saw it?
Perfect proof. People asking ChatGPT questions, it creates plausible looking answers but due to the nature of internal bias based on training data it can confidently lie.
interesting, but neat sounding. Sorta makes sense I think, like Hensel's lemma sorta works similarly I think, once you have some algebraic equations you can kinda work out as many digits as you want I suppose
And this will only get worse as time goes on.
So we should be skeptical
of course. And ChatGPT is only said to be a language model, not a mathematics professor, is it?
Geometric one or the other one
there are only finitely many field extensions of Q_p and the krasner basically says that the roots continuously depend on the coefficients
But to a reasonable amount
I thought that was what they taught you in university?
"Critical Thinking"
extension of linear functionals
so once you are "close enough", you know the extensions precisely
and as far as it goes, chat GPT almost never gets its grammar and vocab wrong.
so it has done it's job.
As should be yes
Clearly a lot of people didn't get the memo.
yeah, that's more what I had in mind for what to use krasner's lemma for, the continuity of roots to coefficients, and like proving there are countably many extensions of Q_p
I guess I don't really know how to make that do "work" for me
Isn't "critical thinking" just thinking
i was blinded by my biased views and i did not stop to truly consider your opinion and took them at face value
Because maybe they haven't seen the dirt in industry and academia... and is idealistic
No.
for that i apologize
What's the difference
i always wanted to find some computational use of p-adics
I sorta guessed it was sorta like a low-low-grade kronecker weber for p-adic fields since you could sorta use that to sort out what's contained in what
Also fun fact is PhD's are not always smart, they expend a lot of energy and work, but not necessarily smart.
i remember seing the statement of hanh banach and thinking why do we need domination by a sublinear function cant we just let it be 0 elsewhere. i realized 10 minutes later how wrong i was
Educated yes, smart not necessarily.
Some do motivated thinking... letting feelings dictate stuff rather than reason
bro is consistently cringe posting 💀

but the statement itself never really appealed to me the same way fixed point or inverse function theorem did
According to this book, apparently no
yeah I looked into this too, like doing some computations with rational numbers, it's just in the end the notion of closeness doesn't really help you too much if you care about real numbers
Yeah. Well at first I thought it's like a curiosity. But nowadays it's as basic and fundamental as extending a linearly independent list or a continuous function
Came from a psychologists own mouth not mine.
Didn't you say you don't trust authority before?
I seen this a PhD candidate begged me to do his Matlab lmao and I only got MS units
you must understand how copium it sounds when you say it
Critical Thinking is thinking without accepting information at face value, questioning the persons behind it, their motivations, their goals, who they interact with, who their vested interests are.
i did some stuff with p-adic vector spaces in my class
Isn't that just being irrational
Maybe Credentialed but unless we examine how it was obtained...
Critical thinking also means ignoring loaded language, emotional language.
lattices are used in cryptography, so why not use p-adic lattices 
News and many other sources have a tendency to use hyperbolic statements about situations, people, groups or concepts.
Yes but it's how many of us operate and Think rather than doing Critical Thinking
Anyone can abuse their position of "authority"
Cryptanalysis ig?
Yes
the most commonly used problem is the shortest vector problem
I seen this personally
oh, I've heard of this but forget what it is
you have to approximate the shortest euclidean vector length
Heard about Robert Schon?
Ye
hello can someone tell @neat lintel to please unblock me
is this equivalent to finding units for some number field or something
im sorry
Yeah case in point people with credibility are not always credible.
like by finding generators
hmm
@tall minnow hello President Delerik
From all my experience, the people who claim to do logical thinking tend to just bang their head really hard when they get logically cornered and then they start spouting nonsense.
There was maybe like 1 guy who was able to say he needs to revise his statement.
it could honestly
at least, I know a lot of crypto is based around the fact that finding generators is hard
I could have been a PhD but got lazy lmao
and lattices for finding like the generators of the unit group sounds plausible to me idk anything else lattices are used for in a similar way - because I just don't know much about lattices past like minkowski inequality
but hmm
I didn't feel like investing the time, if you want to do your own PhD level research you can do it on your own, there really isn't anything stopping you.
in the real quadratic case, there is a quantum algorithm that computes the fundamental unit in polynomial time
so i wouldnt be surprised if this can be generalized
yeah, I'd guess it would be where r+s is much larger
Loch have you read Tang's papers
What are the possible implications of her papers
maybe there are cases it doesn't generalize and work well for
That is when they need to preserve their ego...
dunno this is super far out on a limb speculation lol
You could say that about Delerik
i mean i dont know much about shortest vector problem either
Yes
i noticed that the crypto people live a lot in their own bubble
we need to make a seminar next semester to learn more about what other people are doing
It burst of late
yeah probably wise considering everyone's gonna be knocking down your stuff in practice if it gets to that point
Everyone is out to prove everyone else wrong. Reality is we are all wrong, math even at it's core is not representative of the universe.
the winners are al lattice based
bummer
for the signature algorithms, NIST did a call specifically asking for things that are not lattice based
nope
hmm I wonder why
just "easy mode" or something lol
lattice stuff probably has enough momentum in it, they want to help push research in other directions maybe
experts expect that lattices will break too
casting a wide net
its just
everything has too much mathematical structure
so in practice the latest buzzword is crypto agility
everyone assumes that stuff will break and sooner rather than later
so you want your crypto libraries to be prepared
so you just have to hit a button to change your primitives
Best to be humble and poke holes at your own beliefs lest they be wrong
that's probably not a bad idea
Just wait till the Store-now-decrypt later program completes itself all crypto systems are ruined.
and security relevant stuff is currently encrypted twice
you use RSA and some post quantum thing
are you familiar with 'forward secrecy'?
it makes things slower, but yeah
it's basically why we do diffie hellman key exchange to prevent that
Yeah internal tunnel is encrypted then the tunnel on top of that is also encrypted.
But again the CIA is collecting Petabytes worth of data.
For the SND program.
Once they have a sufficiently powerful quantum computer they'll use it to crack everything RSA related over the entire period of that data storage.
not quite
If I really want to understand the nitty-gritty I can probably obtain a book on the subject.
Or use he numerous MOC courses out there. (MIT, Harvard, etc)
💀
If we assume all people are good that's naive and empirically wrong....
However most people don't have time and inclination to debunk stuff
Especially on April 1 lmao
And any other day of the year
Hello world, wondering where's the best channel to get programming math help?
shortest vector is (x, 0, 0, 0, 0, ...) for some arbitrarily small x. Boom solved
no reason to ping me for a bad joke 
i just realized its April 1st and my friend spam calling me acting like a stalker at 2am i never figured out why till just now
ngl my friend sent me a screenshot of the advanced access names
and i thought "must be some meme server" cos i forgot today was april 1 lol
For imaginary numbers i is just an indicator right? Like, for example 2i x 2i would be 4i instead of 4i² right?
Everyone is sus
2i * 2i would be -4. Think of what i * i means again.
Oh yeah

What happened to the icon?
They gave up
PI NGL
Leave server?
Does anyone have any book recommendations for Integration theory? Covering stuff like MCT, DCT, Fubini Theorem, Measure Spaces etc...
Folland's Real Analysis
It's a great book except for the errata
there havent been that many though im just finishing up chap 2
i can only remember a few minor ones
Most of them are minor, yeah
what are the type of errors made
typos mostly
oh ok thanks for the recommendations
how would u know
isn't it? I had a skim through it
spotted a few
yeah but u gotta realize maybe u should speak on things u know
dude like i meant the errors math wise not the spelling
dont think anyone cares if they wrote "the fnuction"
most well known books have a list of errata on the internet
literally search "folland real analysis errata"
lmao, gotcha. Just wanted to know so that I could do the same for any future book I use
"Who pinged" 
Schilling has a good book about that
Measures, Integrals and Martingales
schilling is good too
discussy??? who hacked this server?
apRiL fOolS
If you had to choose between AP calc and AP stat, which would you choose
AP anal
hmm is there a way to do a simultaneous inequalities like this?

...like that?
im confused
you could write a, c ≤ 0 ≤ b, d
this is informal
but on a blackboard or w/e its not too egregious
people will know what you mean, as long as theres no chance of confusion with ordered pairs
I hate how math is taught algorithmically sometimes
as in, for problem such and such do such and such, it's so dumb
I get questions like these from my engineering friends all the time which is so sad
it's not their fault obviously
but math is so much more interesting than that 
like emm, i wanna determine if there exist a value which simultaneously falls into two intervals
oh is that meant to be a theta, not a 0?
in that case just take the intersection of [a,b] and [c,d]
tywungu
yes 
My algebra 2 teacher recommended that anyone associated with science or engineering choose calc and anyone who is in art, business or medicine or anything else to take stat
hmmm...why?
then yeah, θ ∈ [a, b] ∩ [c, d] is the most direct way
if you want to use intervals
it's by definition of intersection
but what i'd use depends on the context
if i was giving a lecture i'd just write a, c ≤ θ ≤ b, d
if i was writing a paper i'd use words
if theta is in [a, b] and theta is in [c,d] then theta is in the intersection of [a,b] and [c,d]
i'd only write θ ∈ [a, b] ∩ [c, d] on like, a pset/exam
AP calc is certainly a very challenging course but it seems more essential to math than statistics
so the intersection will be an interval right?
tywungu
As someone who always wants the harder classes I would want to take AP calc
And my school only offers BC, not AB idk why
left
love the channel name lmfao
That's sir i love the channel name lmfao sir
sir, sorry, sir!
Lieutenant
what's AP anal 😳
Bruhh
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
leftenant
rightenant?
dude, I sometimes get recommended some AoT scence and some of that shit is STILL giving me goosebumps
so good holy shit
so sad that the ending was so fucking dumb 
whaddya mean dumb?? My beef is that its taking forever 
I'm a manga reader 
lol
spoilers!!!!
the way r/titanfolk went fucking ape shit over the ending is still funny to me
i'll finally be able to appreciate all the jokes once the anime is finished
it took a minute to find a decent AoT discord server
took me 10 minutes to find this meme lmao
Lol
Last few seasons so crap
anime is a sin
Like relative to other anime it's still good, but relative to itself it's crap
Go away get a life
Okay
hola
good thing it saved itself by having a good ending in the manga

Why else would the nation blessed by god nuke them? ||/s||
🤨
sex
Why are you sorry for being happy?
It literally became sort of a war between the two communities calling each other out
Did the show finally end?
Wait for the final season
Season 4: Part two: Part two: Part two?
pre-university role is for high school and below?
yeah
Anybody up of a minecraft manhunt game 1.16.5
Yea
yay!!
very silly channel
but i learn stuff that i wouldve never thought about
Yeah its great

something very hard: $\chi_E$ where $E$ is a vitali set
DarQ

ryc!
i also skip proofs of theorems
Now give me an example of a Vitali set
:)
nonseparable spaces 

tbf, the existence of non lebesgue measurable sets pretty much depends on the AOC
so
under BPI there are non-lebesgue measurable sets
VMM what college are you aiming for
Hey
it also depends on powerset
personally i support choice, but am strictly against powerset
not sure yet
wdym by that, out of curiosity?
its just a shitpost

Does axiom of union truly make sense if you think about it?
Choice is obv fine
But like
You can't combine two sets and expect to get just a union, what if something happens to the elements?
If I take a union of sodium and chlorine I get salt outta nowhere you feel me?
one could seriously argue against powerset
from a finitist-like standpoint
at some point sets just get too big
you really gonna tell me that i can just keep creating bigger sets by taking powerset?
Yeah I've gotten to at least 2^{2^{2^{2^c}}} just a couple weeks ago since I was bored in a car ride
Like I counted all the elements
inside every model of ZF lives a model of ZFC+GCH :)
My favourite arbitrary maths opinion is that c = aleph-2
my opinion is that c = aleph_1/2
no i will not be elaborating further
whats the max number of cardinals in between a0 and c
There isn't one.
IIRC, the only constraint on c is that it is not aleph-[limit ordinal]
Boma noite
i have no clue what this means
It seems there is a concept called cofinality, which I don't know much about, and that c must have uncountable cofinality, ruling out c = aleph-omega.
But c could equal aleph-omega_1 where omega_1 is the first uncountable ordinal.
(So I was incorrect in saying it was limit ordinals)
But what the paragraph above shows is that the only cardinals which can be ruled out are those with countable cofinality, so arbitrarily large values for c are possible
I have a very interesting game I created 2 years ago that has a ton of math in it, is incredibly easy to understand, has higher level strategies, and doesn't have a clear solution yet, and I don't know if it fits here but I'd love to share if anyone's interested! I'm calling it "Serpents" for now because it sorta looks like a pair of snakes but I'm sure there's a better name.
Sure, go for it
draw an 8 by 8 grid
then, the second player chooses a starting position anywhere but the center square
then, the first player chooses a position anywhere.
From there, the first and second player take turns moving one space in any direction.
when you or the other player has been in a square before, you cannot go to that square again.
the first player who cannot move (i.e. they are blocked in all directions) loses
Oh that seems fun
it's a ton simpler than chess, you don't always tie after a few games like in tic-tac-toe, and the game has an incredible number of possibilities
Go vibes
note: if you are the first player, you cannot be anywhere diagonally or x-y symmetric with the second player because they will mirror you and you will lose
also if the first player went right next to the second in that first column they would lose
AND if the second player could choose a position in the center squares player 1 would lose
so player 1 has sort of a handicap but placing second lets them be reactive
this is incredibly easy to code but i have no idea how to train an ai
I feel like if you place your piece in the same quadrant as theirs and closer to the center but still close to them, you’re much more likely to win
not necessarily
if the first player is closer to the center than the second but not too much closer the second can play differently
and the more rules are imposed on starting positions the worse it'll get
crazy idea would be making it non-euclidean (right of the right = the left side and above the top = the bottom) but that invalidates a lot of cool strategy in the euclidean version and would make it probably actually take 64 turns
early strategies i found when playing: you want to set up a group of squares your opponent can't get to but you can, sorta dividing the field up. you very very rarely should go down a 1-tile hallway created by your opponent
i bet there's a ton more math involved in this than what i can see but i don't really know yet
oh btw this is rly funny the original reason i created this game was because the game where you draw 64 dots and draw boxes between those (and get points for the boxes etc etc) took forever and drawing 18 lines is way simpler and easier than 64 dots
so i highly suggest trying it out on your own or with your friends! one very interesting element here is how easy it is to instantly lose when you move the wrong way so be careful about that.
and it's VERY fast, the moment you know you two won't interact again you can just count the number of squares your lines can trace on each side and you're done, no more thinking and you can go to the next one
Just fun parametric curve equations changing
https://youtu.be/Od2LtykGj8w
I will show a few good parametric curves and cycle through their variations of them, enjoy!!
I think the go vibes are because you're trying to claim territory while denying it to your opponent
Just very different way of claiming it
Is anyone at Oxford university here?
How do y'all explain what a derivative is? I mean my classmates can apply all the rules fairly easily but they don't really understand what a derivative even is or why we would derive a function.
First order error approximation
functions are hard
linear functions are easy
wouldnt it be nice if every function was linear
alas they arent
but we can pretend they are (in a way that's perfectly accurate at a given point) and still determine some behaviour based on that assumption
the derivative is used to construct this linearization; it corresponds to the slope
for example, we might want to know where a function of one variable is increasing or decreasing
for linear functions, this is super easy: look at the slope
if its positive, its increasing; or else its decreasing
the derivative gives us the slope of the best possible linear approximation
each value of this approximation is only guaranteed accurate at a given point
so we can't look at whether a function is increasing at, say, x = 6 and say anything about x = -5
for example, f(x) = x² is increasing near 6 but decreasing near -5
but since the derivative is tied to a given point, we can use the derivative to determine regions where the function is increasing/decreasing
the derivative of f(x) = x² is 2x
the derivative corresponds to the slope of the linear approximation at a given point
and recall that for linear functions (and therefore our linear approximation), positive slope = increasing and negative slope = decreasing
so we know, when 2x is positive, f(x) is increasing
and when it's negative, f(x) is decreasing
obviously 2x is positive when x is positive, and negative when x is negative
so f(x) is decreasing for negative x, and increasing for positive x.
now f(x) = x² is a function that's super easy to sus out this behaviour just visually
but:
(a) it's nice to have a formulaic way to do this, since in the "real world", math isn't done by a human drawing graphs, but by a computer/calculator running algorithms
(b) we can leapfrog off this observation to ask and answer far more complex questions
as a simple example: most quantities in elementary physics are derivatives of another quantity
e.g. velocity is the derivative (rate of change) of position, and acceleration the derivative of velocity
this should mesh with the "best linear approximation" idea. obviously a "real car" doesnt perfectly move at 80 km/h, there's variance; but when we measure the speed of a car, we might approximate it as 80 km/h by measuring the speed (AKA slope AKA derivative of its position) at a given moment in time (point)
and simply say "we're currently travelling at 80 km/h"
when in practice youre probably hovering somewhere around 79.5 and 80.5 or whatever, gradually going a bit up and down
Namington's crash course into derivatives, part (1) 
this is basically the motivation for all of intro calc
now just read attached
and you know it all

hmm...suddenly have a thought
how to find the intersection of multiple cosine function, like the intersection of 10 cosine functions? or more?
i found that i cant solve the "scary" equation with multiple equal signs

assuming they all intersect at the same place...?
yes...i want the "place"
collections of intersection points intersecting all functions
im telling you they almost certainly dont
apart from maybe 0
or something
if they are centered

🥺
Nah just use shuwwi as my cat-computer

so sad quq
Woof
Sounds like bat computer lmao
Grass computer then

gwass gwass
How does your guys' math programs differ?
Depends on what u mean by "maths programmes"
Gonna start with calculus this week.
I mean like what topics you go through.
Which one
Where to start cs
haskell
hello
hello
fine
Good for you
Hru?
I am free.
Can I talk you?
Sure
I live in Japan.
what do you live in?
I live in Canada
I like the country
There is a lot of stuffs to do here
Manga world sounds like a really fun place too
What do you normally do there?
I often read Manga and novels
and,I study English,math,science.
I like syogi and chess.
Do you like them?
yes!
Let me know if you wanna play
What manga or novels do you know?
Ahh sorry for late reply
Bet I got you
What’s ur rating
Sounds nice
I know this manga
I'd say 6-7 out of 10
I still can't beat the hard bot in chess . Com
He always does un expected moves. 😭
I mean like elo
I also read Kimetsu no yaiba
I love this one too
Ohhhh
I have this Manga
Lol
I am a
Like good intermediate
Between advanced and intermediate
Do you like it ?
Yeah
ISCI_ON_TOP
I love it!
I like Shinobu!
I do too
It said no result
I am sad that Kimetsu finished.
Do they will start a new season in April 9
better than overstaying its welcome like so many other shounen series (cough)
Oh wait
U ARE TALKING ABT THE MANGEEE
YE
I watch the anime 😄
You should watch animes too
Lol
many other shounen series have a good beginning
and then just refuse to die until they get axed
Manga is finished.
But, Anime will starting
It's outrageous the fact that each time they face an upper rank the pro demon slayer of the chapter either gets killed or gravely injured
well it's better that way
humans vs demons after all
I will watch a new seasons.
Well the characters can survive
if you want humans just winning all the time read / watch isekai stuff (cough)
☠️
That's great
I think so April 9
I watched 1 episode and the man's were dancing on a man's head.
Bro I was curious
And my cousin insisted xdd
Yeah it makes sense
Anime is great because character move!
Manga is nice. but Anime is nice!
it's harder for an anime to be good because you require excellence of many different people (animators, composer, voice actors etc)
so you will more likely see many good mangas that never get adapted (or adapted well)

And manga goes crazy
Well the adaptation was bad before wano

I have never heard of holy land 😳
yeah there are many messed-up / adult seinen manga
that will probably just stay manga
I am at wano but dunno what holy land is
read it a long time ago
What time is it in your country?
We are going to eat lunch.
I'd like to talk to you again sometime.
Bye.
lol Otoyomegatari still isn't finished
It is early.
Lol
every panel is a work of art and decor
It's 00:00 here in my place in Canada.
I can't stay up that late.
Thank you!
True
Bruh
Maybe try to find an older student in the department who's already done them and ask them for advice? Different schools tend to put different things on their quals, from what I've seen in my where-to-apply-for-grad-school research.
Also check to see if your department offers any academic support for students studying for quals. For an example that I was just looking at, the University of Iowa has a 0 credit-hour course called "Math:5950 Qualifying Exam Preparation Seminars".
Oh nice
Wait you're going to be a first year next semester?
If so you don't need to take your quals coming in. I'm definitely going to give the algebra and real analysis quals a go wherever I get in upon entry, but I don't think there's any expectation
Oh then don't stress it
Oh okay
That seems a bit unusual
From what I've heard
Which quals are you taking?
If it's algebra then reread d&f or lang, if it's analysis then reread rudin r&c or whatever
Definitely try to talk to someone in the department
I'd ask if you could send me the info so that I could give it another pair of eyes but if you don't want to doxx yourself that's fine too
Right now I've decided to give myself the most computationally tedious bs problem ever in order to make a point in something I'm writing
So I need to compute the Fourier series of $f(x)=\left{\begin{matrix}\sin(2x)&\quad&x\in[-\pi,0]\2\sin(10x)&\quad&x\in[0,\pi]\end{matrix}\right.$ which is just kind of gross
Huh the latex bot didn't do anything
@fathom swallow
rip texit
Oh slowmode might be fucking with texit
Why is slowmode enabled here
There were some trolls on discussy 1
We don't talk about that now do we

could someone explain me how 'reading projects' work
and suggest me something topic(that might be cool) i could try(exploring phase)
should be something cs/logic related since those are the only profs who are likely to accept me
So the ones I’ve done have been with grad students
I’m doing one on algebraic complexity
And I’m reading papers he suggests and presenting the proofs to him
Just weekly
As far as topics, what CS stuff have you done (idk logic)
welp just failed calc 3 exam 🫠
Happens
few coding courses and a graph theory

prolly not ideal for a reading project
You could try doing some algorithms stuff but that’s quite broad
Oh oh complexity theory could be cool
Stuff like hardness reductions and such
Kinda broad but if you’ve never done it and a prof will work with you on it, could be neat
wouldn't i have to take a course on theory of computation
Idk ask the profs you want to work with
right, thanks for ur input
If the profs have strict prerequisites then that limits your options but idk what options you have
my classmates seem to have way more connections, and some are joining a type theory project, and the rest are doing graph theory(kinda hard to follow his earlier courses i took). The prof who does type theory(lenient prof), does all kinds of logic, so might as well join with them
But I'll take a look at complexity before requesting a prof
If you like logic, type theory would be quite cool
I don’t know logic, but know some complexity, hence I recommended it
cos 60 = -cos 120 = -cos 240 = cos 300 -> can someone explain how to get this if i want to know what other forms cos60 is equal to :P
just look at unit circle
the horizontal axis (x-axis) is cos(x), the vertical axis is sin(x)
the exercise is to come up with the relationship in terms of pi to get all possible angles such as 60, 120, 240 degrees (but in terms of pi) which have equal value of cosine
Woof
Are the advanced channels particularly inactive?
what do you mean
Well, it feels like the average time to get an answer in the math help channels is around 3-10 minutes, while the average time to get an answer in an advanced channel is 20-70 minutes, lol
It could be that it's so far down on the channel list that you have to scroll, some people don't notice them
The help channels are at the top
no it's that there are more people capable of answering HS questions
Yeah, that probably too, I would say the scrolling has a small effect too, though
I don't think so
By the way, do the "Analysis", "Topology", ... roles give you access to additional channels like the Advanced role does or are they only to show others what you specialize in?
The latter
Alright
What is the Power of a circle?
at least 4 power
eigenzan
I did not understand
Neither do we
9001
Sharp
What?
go troll on another server.
no way give this guy mod instantly
https://github.com/Mathics3/mathics-core Is this a good idea to use?
what is that?
wait
did u make this?
this is amazing
this is jsut what i was searching for!
wow!

??????? how can something be to the power of one?????????? it would jus be "S"
LOL
FOR REAL 😤😤😤thjat guy must be dumb 😔😔😔
I just found something really cool for equations like this y=4/x*2. In the X position of the number that you are dividing (4 in this case) the Y will be 1/ what ever number you are multiplying X by (2 in this case) which is 0.5. And it is the same when you look at the Y position of the number you divide by the X will be 1/ what ever you are multiplying the X by!
In class we are learning about relations and functions
so after some messing around with graphs that's what I found
it's crazy how many cool things you can find
put the equation y=4/x*2 in this and you'll see what I'm talking about
you will have to put the x and y using the keyboard they give you otherwise it won't understand that it is an x or y.
is there a symbol for comparing things that don't really make sense to compare
like 5 vs hamburger
would you just use ≠?
or like infinity vs infinity for a more practical case
I feel like infinity≠infinity is kind of weird but saying infinity=infinity is also not great
(if we're thinking of real numbers, since infinity isn't defined on the reals)
or if you have like 5>4 and divide both sides by 0
that* lol
yeah thank you bro we really showed that man 🙏🙏🙏
https://github.com/Mathics3/mathics-core Is this a good idea to use?
Didn't you already get your answer that "it doesn't really matter what software you use"
Depends on your goals ig?
This isn't working on my device!!
Ah

