#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 65 of 1
The former has stats and the latter mostly does not
I think both are a bit too elementary to be really useful
I mean the even basic stats could be useful, but I think if you want to use elementary things, you should be a master at it then
the best learning software is geogebra
guys please solve this one this is getting in my head for awhile
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
Is there any difference in modern algebra and abstract? Is modern just the undergrad level?
I think it's just an arbitrary naming convention
I would go by the syllabus to see what it covers
I see. The description says theory of groups, rings, integral domains, field, and modules, so it seems pretty similar to abstract at least (though I don’t know much about it)
How do I learn Math as fast as possible
Go to a top 50 school for undergrad and then a top 20 for a phd
that's an abstract algebra course
"modern algebra" is just another term for abstract algebra
I keep seeing "modern" tied to approaches with infty categories
So you are telling me "modern" is just a synonym for "needless abstraction"

Ok fair, idk why but I assumed it's like teaching algebra by starting with infty categories before groups,rings,fields,etc
different topologies. The intersection of the two sets converge but not the boundaries
ok now prove the limit of the perimeters is equal to the perimeter of the limit
doesnt make sense
the girlies discovering discontinuous functions for real
is this a reference to something
other than the original post naur
math is so fun!
im geeking out
so if a root a of a polynomial f has multicipity r (f is divisible by (x-a)^r), not only f(a) = 0, but f'(a)=0 all the way to deriving it r times
also taylor's formula can be proved directly on polynomials and is a way to recieve the unique representation of polynom p by 1, x-c, (x-c)^2, ...
doesn't even need continuity just a char 0 field
i mean
😐
if p = (x-c1)^k1*...
then taking the derivative means removing one from each ki. so the result is kinda obvious.
weird i guess the textbook wanted to prove that before proving prime factorization stuff?
well done
Where’d the factorial come from?
lmao
is it just me or is there quite a bit more memorization in math than people like to admit?
at a low level, I definitely need to know a good amount of trig identities to be any useful at integrating even semi complicated functions
and I read a bit of abstract algebra for fun, its full of a lot of definitions you gotta know
how much would you guys say you remember stuff vs figure it out on the fly?
not just you, honestly with some classes' pace at some point you just gotta memorize some theorems because it's much easier than memorizing the proof given the allotted time. If you do it at your own leisure though then it can be a bit easier to get a fuller understanding and take in the proofs imo, which serve as decent mnemonics.
but even then there's also some proofs you're just never gonna memorize
like the 4 color theorem proof
so you just gotta memorize the statement sometimes no matter what 🤷♂️
and yeah i didn't even get started on all the definitions
as far as trig identities go though...a lot of them can be simply derived from sin(a +- b), cos(a +- b), and cos^2x + sin^2x = 1 i feel like
or complex numbers if ur feeling slightly fancy
I attended a talk once given by a very smart guy, he made a side comment that always stuck with me. He said there's a diagram of mathematics that looks something like this: Meaning that in some fields there's a few definitions and you need to work to build proofs (combinatorics, analysis), while in other fields getting the definitions right is the hard part but as soon as you do then the proofs are super straightforward (logic, algebra).
heh, how straightforward are we talking here?
for algebra
well, note this guy was a logician and myself an analysist, so if you're an hardcore algebraicist and hate this idea feel free to modify it. but at least in his discussion his point was that the hard part of doing the topics on the right side of this spectrum is coming up with the right definitions, or checking that something satisfies the definitions, and then after that the rest is straightforward.
something like a conservation of work, either you put a ton of work into your definitions and less into the rest of the proof, or vice versa
Happy pi day
Happy Pi Day!
Happy pi day guys
omg
it's math itself
holyshitholyshitholysshit
@bold ingot hello 
happy birthday
Hi Darkill
sup grass :3
Are you gonna attend ricey's talk later?
yeaa
what?
Grass is supreme
you take supremums of sets

ITS NOT PI DAY TODAY
Eats pie
this is probably the same distinction that Tim Gowers spoke of between problem solving and theory building
https://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~wtg10/2cultures.pdf
also some trends may hold when we talk about average but in practice there is a lot of overlapping
for instance when you go into geometric microlocal analysis in PDE (especially for analyzing black holes in GR) that's a big tower of theory to climb
frogs vs birds 
it's a distinction but I don't think it's the same distinction. Tim Gowers, dichotomy is probably a cycle all mathematicians go through in developing new problems and solving them. Jacob's chart above is more about how in some fields you get a few definitions you need to make constructions out of in order to prove things and other math fields by the time you've checked the definitions hold you've proven the theory (because the definitions are very involved)
I'm not sure how much I believe in this chart on the definition heavy side
Like often times coming up with the right definitions is hard and requires work in e.g. AG but its not like the proofs are all trivial once you have them lol
Gowers discusses fields, not personal phases.
The gross reduction is that in combinatorics people solve problems and prove things. In algebra people create definitions and theories.
Of course all in relative terms
this is so true
algebra = trivial, analysis = real math
this is absolutely not what he was saying, not sure if that's something you are claiming or not
hmm, maybe i gave him too much credit

I mean eh
it goes both ways
the chart is true for intro stuff, I think
but if you look at, say, the proof for the generalized stokes theorem
that's analysis but most of the work towards that is finding the right definition
Stokes is the diff geo formulation of FTC
It's true as a theme that when analysis goes diff geo it goes to the side of theory
Average advanced pde paper = define the right banach space, done 
👏 👍
Soooooo
I know Spivak Calc on Manifolds does kinda talk about how oh it's trivial once your definitions are right
But I worry that saying "but most of the work towards that is finding the right definition" kinda indicates that the main significance of shit like exterior derivative and def of a form is so that Stokes' theorem works out
Like you can arrive at both definitions without a priori thinking about Stokes' theorem at all
The point of what Spivak is saying is that, the content of Stokes' is basically FTC, Fubini, and then figuring out how to go from squares to manifolds
"How to go from squares to manifolds" implicitly involves, what exactly should we integrate on manifolds?

Analysis: $<$ $\leq$ $\implies$\
Algebra: $=$ $\cong$ $\iff$
$\prec \preceq$
Transparent_Elemental
$\lesssim$
Delerik
asymptotically less than 
you either use it or keep track of 100 implied constants in your estimates
because analysis estimates always have implied constants
i certainly saw that today.
Wtf the professor said: make a board of the variations of f(x) but delta<0 so it’s impossible 💀
basically the adult version of the big O notation

the hell kindof reaction do u want
from posting this in multiple channels with no fucking context
another rando to the block list
no never mind context, the text makes no sense
no one should ever give me mod powers. I would ban half the green leaf accounts on first day.
I have to make a variation board of f(x) but delta<0 so it’s impossible to have solutions and then impossible to get the variations of f(x)
no i dont care.
i would delete this category
👀
when was there a religion debate 0-0
nami was there and someone was talking about buddhism or sth
theres been plenty of those
havent seen one
Eventually one would arise I reckon
that's a good counterexample
Upon solving the Planck's constant, what do we use as its value 6.626 x 10^-34 or 6.626^-34??
lol shut up
.coose
first one
Hey, how do I change the color of the text of TeXit bot?
(a+b)^n = a^n + b ^n
oh NVM
just saw your nvm
:(
Do we get anything after completing this?
this is less of a bingo
more of a meme about how often certain things happen
ok
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
No self-advertising
Not the worst honestly
the normal one looks deceptively easy to simplify
Can someone that’s good at percentage change help me pls in dm
The percentage change in the number of dms you will be getting due to this message is... 0%
This is your daily reminder that 1001 = 7x11x13
lmfao this rocks
What does the delta integral mean?
Nvm i didn't see the last part
integrating over a triangle
It's kinda neat but it would maybe look better imo if you managed to replace ABC with just a figure of the area
And just keep the regular double integral
Yeah ik
A right triangle in this case
The area that you're integrating over has the shape of a right triangle
Feel like ABC doesnt provide much useful info
But a fig of the area would
the area im intefrating can be any triangle defined be vertices ABC in R3
Oh
though if you plot u,v as x,y its a triangle
correct, but not too useful in the contexts i use it in
what is the name of a pattern like this? 0.000200040008...
Heres like what its used for, here is a nodel of a triangular point light at point p
yep
Can also just write it as $|\vec{\phi} - \vec{p}|$
edwardborn
yeah prob shoulve used || lol
There is a way to write unit() in a more mathematical way if you're wondering about that too
I've been watching bok choy grow for the past 3 days
Someone help me.
i just planted some toy choy.
ripping out your eyes should suffice
boy toy
| should be norm so that || is absolute value of the norm
i like || and | in theory but its just way to close to absolute value
i use unit() just be3cause idk unit vector i guess
and norm() is too close to normal() which is for like getting the normal vector of a plane

As a csChad, stop this nonsense.
multiply(x, y)
That said the normal vector of a plane is just its hodge dual
fuck this reminds me of solidity code ive seen
You're reminding me of my shader code
Incredibly
Could you check some computation with the hodge star I tried to do some time ago?
Perhaps
Can someone who is proficient with university level linear algebra dm me?
Wait it is an absolute value tho isn't it
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
Can truth about the world always be achieved thorough the path of logic and mental modelling ?
probably for some tautological reason based on what "truth" is, would be my sad guess
i will solve it sir
I feel like you are Indian just by using the word sir
yaaa
Which grade?
Actually no i don't want to get banned
why are you calling people "sir"? Not judging just curious on why
Probably a respect thing
Henlo
Helo
What's up?
Nothing much
Oh okay
Or in a way it’s also part of their culture
To address someone they view as a higher standing simply as sir
Got it
Yes, sir! Moving out!
You need to know the world before getting some truth about it, so I'm pretty sure some level of observation must be involved
We can confidently make claims of truth when the concepts involved are based on our abstractions/ideas (triangles have 3 sides, etc.) but it gets messier when it's about matters of fact (all swans are white, Mt. Everest is the highest mountain, etc.)
i am really mad because world at a fundamental level is unpredictable
i can't believe them
how do i trust them
Why would you be mad
because i can't prove it myself , the fundamental nature of reality
And
Just be a mathematician so you don't need to worry about matters of fact as much 
If you want to study nature itself then you gotta bite the bullet
a mathematician with phd on this server really believes that adam and eve made humanity 
Are you sure he isn't shitposting
i mean you guys shouldn't be so detached from reality
oh i hope that he was
Wait don't include me
Maybe it was ironic post
I'm a physics major lmfao
lol
Empirical science gang
i am a pcm major
and i hate chemistry but i took it anyway
cuz only math and physics we'r
werent an option
Anyway, "proving" isn't really something you can do with inductive reasoning
Which science is based on
Can someone help me out ?
Being a math PhD student has taught me that math is too beautiful to exist by accident. It must be the design of a higher being, probably a giant spaghetti monster
The best you can do is "ah yes I'm 99.9999999% sure" and hopefully be satisfied for that time
can Schrodingers eqn not be proven ?

Tasty spag
Schrodinger's equation is not true
It is a continuous domain linear approximation of an extremely complicated object
then what is true
Which are just a lot harder to analyze
Depends on your account of truth
Stick to facts
Umm, it's true that our models have predicted reality within a certain amount of error
And we take that as evidence that they will continue to in the future
understanding how fundamental laws of universe give rise to emergent properties is my truth
But there is no axiomatic physics
All the fundamental laws we have are models
And we keep finding more and more ways that they should be refined
for example what phenomenon explains transparency of water ?
No I mean, what does it mean for a statement to be true
Correspondence theory would say "it's when it matches reality", but that opens another can of worms
better models require harder math tho doesn't it 
Not necessarily
special relativity and photoelectric effect are exceptions i suppose
I mean, it sure tends to but there's no requirement to make the math harder
Usually
i don't wanna open another worm my definition seems to open no worms if it explains all phenomenon its truth
Anyway if all these "what is true" shenanigans make you mald so much, take up epistemology 
Philosophy time
Many mathematicians do not care about the philosophy behind what they're doing, some do I guess
Is there one truth or many?
.
whats wrong with this
"The car outside my house is red"
ok
Can this be a true statement
I believe that truth is evil so I spread lies to combat it
It doesn't explain the physical world, but does it say something
i am trying to not get philosophical
We can test it
Qualia 
Empirically go and check
You are literally asking "what is true"
if a model explains every phenomenon in its domain it is truth Ok ???
This is as philosophical as it can get
The point was that not all true statements need to be explanatory like Bert is defining
Yeah true
Pursuing knowledge was a mistake
Return to banging rocks together
There are objective truths like in sciences and subjective ones like in art and religion ig
God never meant us to figure these out
i believe all objective truths will have explanations and that should be part of truth
Well we ate the apple that was a no no and the diety is still mad generations after...
pics or this didn't happen
that's obviously a joke
i hope so
To be fair there was an earth scientist who taught in my uni who thought the earth is flat
there's not hope it just is
People do joke a lot here tho
adam / eve wasn't jewish. there's no DNA for them.
it's your problem for ruining a joke
he didnt mentioned it as a joke
I just got here and it's pretty obvious
a joke is like a frog. dead when dissected
you are assuming things
actually now I think he was right. not only are we all jewish we also walk naked on sundays
is this a joke ?
No
I thought we're naked everyday
Absolutely not
What's the difference between chill and the discussion channels
Not much
Are these like off-topics
It's discussion
why would a person join math server and say he wants to avoid math
Idk
I like vibing with the science network
Planning to do a tour around
See what it's like outside physics
do mathematicians allow strangers to enter the math lab ?
A math lab or a meth lab
what does pre uni mean ?
That is true
My experience with math has been tainted
It's just that when I hear it, I hear along side it "fiber bundles"
my math lab is a top-secret environment hidden under a volcano run by a surface pro
Or some weird phrases beyond my comprehension
What Surface Pro
But calculus and the like are okay to me I guess
whatever version when I clicked buy on amazon
Woo 7 gang
Hello
Hi
Hello
does anyone know what this triangle lookin thing is
Look up exterior algebra
For a standard normal distribution, find:
P(z < -0.65)
Can someone help me with this?
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
How important are grades at uni to do research in academia?
better grades better grad school better opportunities
And credibility to an extent
And more chances of getting publications
I think better grades is like butterfly effect
your mobile ass is slow at deleting
Stfu imagine using discord on laptop
urm akshually I'm on pc
Nerd
oooo skirts and dresses
skirts and dresses... it should be more widespread
@vocal vessel 3am but tomorrows a government saturday so its fine
But it’s raining so I might have to drive my husband to work at 8am 😱
sleep deprived driving can be solved by drinking alcohol
Bad bad bad advice lol
like my ma always used to tell me
ever heard of "defense driving"
if u have a two lane road
then u drive straight down the middle
Goodnight 😪
blo drunk driver 
80% of drunk drivers dont cause accidents its the minority that screw it up that makes us look bad
i shuld sleep soon too ugrh gn
this server seems like a weird place to ask about a specific cultural trend in sociology academia
thats literally my jam here what are you talking about
well, while it might be talking about what makes good theorizing in the context of sociology, i think the analysis can apply to theorizing in general.
The tricky thing Sour Drop is that this, at a glance, is making an empirical claim
In some situations, a given analysis doesn't fully describe what's happening, and there is missing nuance which, once addressed, gives a better view
Other times, there isn't much to it, and sometimes people do try to inject nuance where there is none
Whether this paper makes a valid point depends on the current practices of the sociology community
sociology? what’s going on here?
Can anyone here help me with a physics problem
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
Do you think that if for 2 years we don't do math we forget our knowledge or not? Or all our knowledge is still present?
I dont think you will forget all about math but some you might not remember
placement ho gyi kya
it's about differential equations
"urgent"?
Why is there a 4th quartile but no 100th percentile?
Why should there be a 100th percentile?
If you follow the logic of there being 4 quartiles, then shouldn't there be 100 percentiles going from 1 through 100
I've always been told that there isn't a 100th percentile from all my teachers
:0
100th percentile means nothing else is higher than said data point
So in {2,2,3,3,3,3}>, 3 is in 100th percentile
Oh so is it reserved just for "1st place"
I don't think it's actually 100 percentile as it does not make sense from a statistical definition POV. With regards to exams, it's completely possible that they round off values closer to that like 99.99 to 100.
100 percentile is literally x such that x>=a for all a in set
If you define it like that, then yes.
Almost no hope in 'defining' a quantile.
R has built in 9 ways.
https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/stats/html/quantile.html
There is no standard as such as per my current knowledge level. I have seen both getting used in various contexts. In my line of work, it kind of depends on the use case and the type of problem statement we are handling. I have seen people use variants of these as well.
Guiz i wanna learn Fourier transform, i watched 3b1b's video but he doesn't do any calculations and since I'm stupid i can't understand it that way. You know any good videos for me?
Are you good at basic algebra?@uneven hound
the fourier transform of f(x) is this function as a function of omega
there's really not much else to say
take f(x) and compute the integral

I think I messed up somewhere in my calculations when I was explaining it so I deleted everything out of awkwardness
#1086850196522156153 help please
Are you learning more about it just for funsies? Do you like computational stuff?
4000BCE time (for me)
so relatable
What year in school do people see stuff like derivatives, integrals & limits?
At my school this happened for year 11 and 12 but many schools in the US don’t even touch calculus in high school
Calculus right?
I mean a lot of schools have programs where you can skip ahead
i have no idea if this is changing; maybe college board AP calc is becoming more common
for example in my school you can go ahead three grades by taking tests that they provide
which a lot of people do
thats cool
in the uk you do it in year 12 and 13
I find it funny that at this point I can't tell if I'm good at math or dogshit because I can solve every single problem in these linalg practice exams without issue but I get stuck on shit like 42-28. I should get one of those elementary school arithmetic problem books.
I think I'm gonna ace this linear algebra exam..but I'm considering taking another one next year that's more advanced.
For some reason I really like linear algebra.
Hello can someone solve this ? If A - 82762527292621 = 2375 and A+A+A = B and B - 938583938493849 - 2633 = what is value of A
being good at mental arithmetic is not the same as being good at maths
what!? i thought math was all about adding and subtracting big numbers !

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdfngoqExHIGOvjO05E-cPWzepKFJ6f24NNw9_n8XnX2X2aYw/viewform
Help me fill this.. I'll appreciate
Woof
no dont ping woof me
#rules You cannot self advertise without permission from @polar panther
yes
I'm already exploring them on my own but I was tryna get an estimate of when to expect them @ school
Wtf is that
Omega
frequency variable
I'm studying Computer Science, i saw some dude created waves with it. I do graphics-shaders development and i think it'll be useful
Cool
You should look into discrete Fourier transform (DFT) and fast Fourier transform (FFT) if you're more interested in implementing it.
Okay, what do you think about this vioed?
https://youtu.be/yYEMxqreA10
Go to https://nordvpn.com/reducible to get the two year plan with an exclusive deal PLUS 1 bonus month free! It’s risk free with NordVPN’s 30 day money back guarantee!
The Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) is one of the most essential algorithms that power modern society. In this video, we go through a discovery-oriented approach to deriving the...
Where did you learn it
math lecture
Oh
Fourier analysis (with applications in image processing)
Cool
Find a tetbook and read it. Or find a proper lecture series. It'll be more helpful than pop-math videos if you want to actually learn how to do Fourier stuff. A book like Folland's Applied Fourier Analysis might be a good first book in the theory for an undergrad background, though I don't think it covers the DFT
Or, if you have a specific application in mind, look for a book on that application. For instance, I have a book somewhere on signal processing, which is all about the math of signal processing.
I'll check that book, thanks.
guys i have a question that i solved but i'm confused about it ,if T is an exponential random variable with rate = 1 and Betta > 0 we define X = T^(1/betta)
any idea on how we can find the probability density function of X
?
guys
how can we
change the integration variable
any idea?
i want to make the boundaries a and b without the power Betta
I will give you the almost exact opposite advice 😂
A lot of books will discuss the math and give an indication of how the DFT/FFT (or DWT/FWT) were implemented 30 years ago, but you might find much better resources for learning this stuff from papers about implementation and algorithms. Start here: http://www.fftw.org, this is the reference implementation in C which many scientific libraries use (including Julia, not that I'm particularly fond of the language, but they're really good at their algorithms). There's also the Eigen implementation to check out.
Also I'm sure there's some excellent blog posts here, here is a light one in Python: https://jeremykun.com/2012/07/18/the-fast-fourier-transform/
I find that generally approaching things this way (as though you yourself are in charge of providing a quality implementation of the algorithm in a software package) gives a much deeper mental model for what's happening in the algorithm, a better idea of the general mathematical things you'll actually bump up against (ie. does the original signal lying in a certain function space really matter? Why?), and takes a lot less time.
Just my $0.02 though
depends on how far you get ahead
if your school lets you go ahead 2 grades
then i believe you would do it in 11th grade
if they let u go ahead 3 grades you would do it in 10th
hi i'm looking for a vc tutor to help me with square roots.. can someone help me?
so guys
how would i go about learning another base number system
because it sounds cool
but a base number 9 or even 3 system seems so over complicated
i understand binary and stuff but like
anything higher than that is impossible
and the idea of a single character number system (like umary or whatever) is interesting, but hard to think about how it would work in context
is you just convert the number of characters to a normal number (like 57392) and it spits out a message
but there aren’t any breaks, so after some arbitrary number it would be another character i think
base 10 is also higher than binary
is it also over complicated
for me to understand
it's likely that if you think any particular base makes it easier or harder you don't understand what a base or number system is, so I'd review those concepts and not worry about any specific number.
a based discussion, I see.
i can
it’s just hard for me to use a base 12 number system when multiplying and stuff
i have difficulties because at every step of the way i have to put it into base 10

you should be multiplying in exactly the same way you do it in base 10...
yes, knowing your base 12 times tables is uh 'necessary'
yea
but i’d prefer to use another base
you guys aren’t going to use linear algebra a lot
it’s just something you want to know
i mean ofc it has a lot of uses
but not everyone uses it , yknow?
i want to learn languages, and some don’t use base 10

i want to learn another language
but i can’t wrap my mind around anything that isn’t base 10
unless you're writing machine code, I fail to see how this will come up
no
not programming
also, knowing hexadecimal would be cool, but that’s not really a goal
the aztec system uses base 20
i’m not learning python or anything
Literally how would their number system matter for learning languages
It would not impede you
pretty much the same way you work in base 10 like meow meow said but instead of 10 possible characters for a digit you have n possibilities for a digit in base n
what do you not understand
but it’s hard to use
like getting used to radians
well yes if youre trying to become fluent with base 16 or whatever then you do need to work with it enough
i have some amount of fluency in hexadecimal because i used to do reverse engineering of software
but realistically, the principles of arithmetic are the exact same for any base
that’s true
but how do i get used to it?
like if i do 8x3 in base 9 i get 24 and convert that back into base 9
which would be like 20 or something
or 22 actually
same way you learn to multiply numbers in base 10 but keeping in mind that youre in base 9
which is why meow meow said this
lol meow meow
8 * 3 = 26
also technically every base is base 10 
oh yes it would be backwards
shut up
we are speaking in base 10 so it won’t
it is base 10
on base 9 it’s base 10
every number system is base 10
and base 10 would be base 11
well we use 10 as a standard
yes but if the base 10 is in base 10 then how do you know which base that base 10 is in?
because of hindu arabic numbers
they used base 10
my point is
yes i understood
you can't know what base something is in without specifying a base initially. this is recursive
what base is that base 10 in 
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
there
¿estás feliz?
because if we were speaking it’s be base ten, right?
or actually
would we call it nine in base 9 when referring to 10?
9 doesn't exist in base 9
Ask any alien civilization what base they work in and theyd be confused or it'd be '10'
well yes
but we are using 10 as like an anchor
because it’s what we use
not like the other 10s
The name for 10 in base 9 is 'nine'
illu was making a dumb joke
wiki calls it base 20
i understand the joke
Anyways, who cares about being fluent in number systems of that language
no, 11
its irrelevant
it just causes problems
what no
You can be fluent in a language without knowing how to count
me
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11
no
so base 10 would be base 11 in base 9
meow meow meant that base 9 would be base 10
i clearly meant 10_9, but you do you.
this is me when i try to multiple in something that isn’t base 10
subscribe now because it would be cool if we hit 1 million
in terms of voltage, if you were to hook up a power supply to a voltmeter with two wires instead of one, would the voltage decrease by a factor of 2?
like say hooked up with one wire the voltmeter reads 10v
would using a second wire between both devices read 5v instead?
this is ambiguous
i don't know what you're saying
can you draw a diagram or something
if I understand you correctly, then no it wouldn't change.
Having the positive lead from the power supply to the multimeter being one big wire or two small wires is no different in terms of measuring voltage.
Some caveats I guess based on voltage drop over the wire, but in practice no it is the same
(Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but the EE question makes me think it is)
Has anyone here gotten Z3 to work with C++?
Whenever I try, it goes through an 8-minute compilation Building CXX object before saying Export ordinal too large
Are you on Windows
I am.
And, dang. I took "closed" to mean "fixed" (therefore my issue was something else) - or alternatively that the "closed" on msys2 would fix the problem (therefore my issue was something else)
... actually, the READMEs have instructions for Windows.
????
Since this doesn't give me a fix am I to assume that the only fix is to run Linux instead?
Or figure out how to get my Docker Desktop to not hang on startup
I'm wondering is there a program for windows that can bulk edit the music file's metadata? I certainly don't want to type (or even paste) the data from each music file individually, currently I want to look at what name the song has and add that to that file's metadata
ah I guess foobar has that feature built in
hai
I don't know how but literally every time I try docker I run into the same issue, eventually fix it, and when I think "maybe uninstalling and reinstalling will fix it" I've forgotten how to fix this exact issue
I'm on either the third or fourth loop of this cycle now
Haven't gotten to the "eventually fix it" part though
I can try to see if I can make a docker work
docker is weird on Windows
Oh, but my docker would be wsl-based, not Windows based
Not sure if that's your setup too
I already have wsl from ... I think the first cycle
I think I'm near the end of this cycle, though?
If it helps, docker run -dit ubuntu
Problem is that I can't get it to mount correctly
And I can't remember if I fixed the problem by getting Docker Desktop to use -dit or getting the command line to mount correctly
Can someone tell me for what are those chanels help???
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
Ooooh
what the
Ty
@leaden torrent !help brings up @rapid valve msg for some reason
assume admins only can fix 
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
only in #serious-discussion it seems
no, its everywhere
oh, didn't work in #latex-testing and #bots
its one-time
ic
Why the hate... cat opinion
Switch to Kubernetes 
...

You use docker to make the images
and you can deploy on kube
how do u switch when they are used together 
You don't need to , Kubernetes has native support for Docker

I know little about the sht ive been messing around with for the last few months, but sick of it already
infra 
i feel like the best way to deal with angry parents is to act like nothing happened.
he's not the culprit
Don't know much about quantum computing
From the popsci articles I'm skimming
Are qubits analogous to like a single-core processor vs multi-core? But each "processor" is a single bit
But bits are just ways to store information, processors actually do stuff
So each qubit stores multiple things at once, that makes sense
BUt how does that increase computational efficiency? Is it like having two separate brains at once? Or rather like two separate people and you can get them to calculate two different things at once, but collectively they take up the space of one person
HAHA
I FIXED DOCKER
I fixed docker in the dumbest way possible
So I looked it up; powershell command history goes back, by default, 4096 commands.
The Get-History and History commands reset when you restart your computer, but if you hit up-arrow it keeps showing you commands from previous docker runs
And if I've run docker on this computer before, the only logical solution is to hold up arrow until I find the command I used last time I got docker to run
(It worked.)
Also, I saved the command, but if someone looks through chat history for any of the following words (Yes, I'm using them like tags) hopefully my command will appear and they'll have their solution
docker run command
docker run -dit
docker run stopping immediately
docker run container
how to use docker volume
docker run --env=PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin --volume="C:\Wherever\The\Actual\Folder\Is\In\Windows:/What/You/Want/Docker/To/Name/That/Folder" --volume=/What/You/Want/Docker/To/Name/That/Folder -p 222:22 --runtime=runc -dit CONTAINER_NAME

What do you think I should have done?
you might consider putting together a cookbook for utility scripting like this.
also docker didn't fix the problem, so. well. idk what to do now
have a look at this: https://www.techtarget.com/searchdatacenter/tip/Classical-vs-quantum-computing-What-are-the-differences#:~:text=In classical computers%2C algorithms need,a large set of constraints.
hmmm
trying the visual studio method for now
20 minute nmake command, let's go
hi
hi
Could anyone point me to some results about stabilization of abelian sandpiles in the sink-free case? I haven't been able to find much results online.
Most results I found have sinks in their setup
Or is it just not interesting to not have sinks?
Done any searches on fluid dynamics in a closed system? seems like the two relate on the dispersion of energy portion of the frame-work. Hope this helps https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/1/2/14
This is the review of CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) guidelines for dispersion modeling in the USA, Japan and Germany. Most parts of this review are based on the short report of the special meeting on CFD Guidelines held at the International Symposium on Computational Wind Engineering (CWE2014), University of Hamburg, June 2014. The objectiv...
oh, thank you! Tbh I was only searching for math papers haha
and I know nothing about fluid dynamics
but I will take a look
was watching a video on the dispersion effects earlier this week on the bell curving of sand in a capsule.
interesting stuff.
Sounds interesting, but maybe a little bit too advanced for me haha
could you reference me to the video?
It's chaotic flow, into order at a distal container i can't remember now if i see it again i'll reference it for you.
ok no problem, thanks
and I don't understand this unfortunately
it had to do with statistician finding patterns recurring ended up being the simple normal distribution model, bell curves, but there was a container that caused it continually. I know that has something to do with it anyways good luck. I'll check back later if i find the video. physics stack exchange has a similar page to it "what kind of fluid is sand?"
I'm interested. Have you seen the new Additive printing machines for feedhorns with cross-sectional tunability?
Did some Satellite Comms stuff for a bit had to understand the basice of Fast Fourier tranforms in data processes. Fun with OSCOPES and SpecAnalyzers.
nope just googled its like a cnc machine ? more prescise?
im not as smartas you but i have an oscope i use to tyrn and understand sound signals
nobodies as smart as me nor am i as smart as them it's life people are their own younique form of geniuos
what are you using the cnc for?
yeah chatgpt is smarter than all of us anyway
parts wise
lol not so people made it
it can calculate but machine haven't learned our greatest skill qualifying
machines@
whats that greatest skill they havent lrarned?
a bit is a bit a qubit is a qubit limited.
To qualify it's a unique human and rational treat an aesethic that will take 1000s of years even for a super computer to learn.
probably spelled asthetic wrong
hey book nerd what cnc'ing parts wise and how did you want to use Fouriers for that?
that is interesting
they just formally anounced chatgpt4 it can take image input now
lol really cause i read alot and speak with alot of humans and i'm not so sure about that anyways cnc fouriers?
how do they relate for you beside machine tuning?
cnc fourier must be cool because you can generate any image and it cuts it our ad a 3d and now you have sculpting crazy
yea that is pretty cool it's actually some good maths
have you read the history of the man?
Fourier
how he got to the knowledge of it all was super cool, i'm rereading that now as we speak
oh yeah i forgot .. most of it but he fell down some stairs and died and i think he traveled with napolean?
helped withe roseta stone?
Mmmm
Somehow I've spent all day working on this and I am now farther from solving the error
If I run it normally, I get export ordinal too large
If I try to run it on Docker, it complains about FetchContent not being a thing in cmake (and for some reason if I give docker cmake v26, which has FetchContent, instead of v10 which doesn't, CLion still thinks cmake is on v10)
At this point just get linux
I would rather program my own SAT solver.
Or figure out how to get my GPU to run Python code
because, believe it or not
I got it working in Python on accident while trying to get it working on C++
I mean, realistically speaking, the SAT solver will be the slowest part of the code, right...?
Yes
Hmm...
I was gonna use CUDA C++ but ...
if CUDA python works and I have Z3 python I could just do that lol
Worst case it turns out the SAT solver isn't the biggest problem (actually pretty realistic since I'm running this with a semi-small amount of variables, just running it a lot of times) and I figure out what parts of python are "closest to the C++ code", if you will
As a quick background, there's a video game that's basically minesweeper but you only have to solve each situation once
My idea was "what if I just... solved EVERY solution"
Their validation method for checking if an answer is correct is Z3 so my first thought was to use Z3
But if Z3 is being this much of a pain (and/or if there's another SAT solver that's optimized for integer only variables) I'll gladly take that
(for the record, doing this for the 2-situations someone else did on Python already. There's something like 11^15 times 80^4 total 4-situations so that's not possible. But I have faith in the 3-situations being brute-force-able)
Well, you'll probably need to invoke dark magic to solve all of the 3-situations. It's about 11^7 times 80^3 of those... Hence why I want to run it on my graphics card.
*2-situations were solved in a day by someone just using the terminal and plugging python commands in before leaving it overnight
I might look into prolog.
Graphics cards are not optimized to do this afaik
Yeah but hopefully it won't matter lol
If it ends up mattering then whatever I can just run it on my PC or whatever
throw it to an online VM and check in once in a while
Oh yeah, thought I'd share this note from when I was messing around
I think you'll have to check if there's a root cmake and a usr cmake
perhaps
Perhaps I could also try to get it working on Java if it's not too hard
The two main advantages of Java are that I trust my knowledge of multithreading in java better and my knowledge of arrays better
Apparently the method to get it working in java is literally the same as getting it working in python but with the Java flag
mrow
Woof
woof
Meow
From what I think technotanuki.
You are just maintaining a localised balance between meow and woof
However, I highly doubt that they are balanced in the server overall
Well yeah his belief is to balance them out yk
well i think its silly
Meow Woof equilibrium
I think the equilibrium has shifted to the left

(meows in disguise)
Man I’ve got this book from my dad
I’m literally on page 3 and I already am getting lost lmao
Realistically I should be asking these questions to the programming discord server, but whatever.
Anyone know how to get the x64 command prompt for visual studio?
For some reason whenever I get Visual Studio Build Tools it installs the 32-bit version
or rather it gives me the 32-bit command prompt (and installs in program files x86, so yeah i think this is 32 bit)
that's an interesting problem. I don't use windows or visual studio so I can't help you
Running nmake again just to make sure this is the 32 bit command prompt
(if it's the 32 bit command prompt building 64bit crap it'll throw an error and complain)
... I've run it for a couple minutes and it normally complains by now but it's not...
cute
i would help if i could but infra is just 
why cant computers n systems just like work
smh
My system just works
it complained!
but only after about 20 minutes so not ideal
and once again i am split between two errors and I don't know which one is easier to solve
Either figure out how to get Visual Studio Command Line x64 working, or figure out how to get nmake on a normal x64 (admin?) command line
It defaults to 32 bit for historical reasons I think .... and compatibility there was a time when 32 bit was dominant
What
Ironically this article was the answer, even though its link was already purple from the past 3 times i clicked it
Running nmake... Now to wait 20 more minutes.
Does anyone have any idea how to webcam stream a dslr camera to a url on a pi?
Just from terminal
Wha glad I sent it then ... I had a feeling it could be out of date.... tell me if any other issues come
In the end it didn't matter
I encountered another issue - something about java.library.path?
Before you send help,
https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3/issues/1885
I already checked, IntelliJ 64-bit, cmd was 64-bit, nmake was run at 64-bit using -x (64bit flag), java is 64-bit
few other things I checked that I can't remember
-Djava.library.path=/path/to/z3/libraries didn't work either
ask chatgpt maybe he can help u
lol
by far the most despairing thing is this:
only just now noticing that's not for z3 - which is also another issue, i looked up z3 and kept getting non-z3 answers
But if you'll note,
opened this issue on Jul 10, 2014
no comments
closed this as completed on Jun 18, 2019
So I had a think for a bit
And I estimated that it would be less effort to just run it on Python (I got import z3 to work in python) than it would be to fix Java
Hence, "It didn't matter"
I was right, by the way. Proved de morgan's law with Z3, though that's not too hard.
(to prove De Morgan's law, you just have to prove that its negation is always untrue, which... I'm just now realizing might be a circular argument but whatever. it shows that it works on semi-complicated systems without much issue)
circular argument* not proof by contradiction
though it is proof by contradiction
Hololive fan
wth
<@&268886789983436800> ?
@versed hound could you not?
No the hololive stuff wasn't the issue, I just noticed their pfp was shirakami fubuki and decided to call them a hololive fan if they were gonna call us gay
Or whatever
this is a nijisanji sever 😤
Bold move saying this when nijisanji cancelled one of its April concerts while hololive festival is happening
i do not watch vtubers nor am i invested in feuds about them
hence i will pour fuel on the fire
to watch the shitshow from afar

Yeah I worked with Java in the past just stick with Py
Oh
Quick question: I have found something that represents a number X by doing the following:
How do i even start to find solutions for x?
it's already solved in the last line?
I'm just confused
y=x?
x^2 = x * sqrt ( x * sqrt(...))
therefore x = sqrt(x * sqrt(...))








