I was proving that $m!$ divides $\prod_{i=1}^m (n+i)$ for $n\in\bN$ and for all $m\in\bN$ where $\bN$ doesn't include zero since we are civilized. I proved this very easily by induction but I wrote this in terms of factorials and noticed that the product is equal to $m!/(n-1)!$, and when divided by $m!$ I get $1/(n-1)!$ which contradicts the induction conclusion. where did I fuck up?
#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 52 of 1
please request a new nickname
isn't the product (m+n)!/n!
ohhhhhh
sorry I'm dumb
wait I don't think I can simplify that right
because (m+n)! cant be rewritten iirc
ok so I think the only way is induction
well, (m+n)! = m! * (m+1) * ... * (m+n) = n! * (n+1) * ... * (n+m)
oh I see
For anyone that worked with Spivak's Calculus - I can't always tell when he wants me to be rigorous. On ch. 1 problem 4, I'm supposed all values of x for when 2^x < 8. Clearly that's x < 3, but I don't know how to go about this rigorously when he hasn't even defined numbers.
The problem says to simply find all x that satisfy the inequality. It didn't say "prove", like many of the other problems. I'm just gonna assume that means that I don't need to be fully rigorous on these problems...
(not sure where to ask this btw)
Why do you need him to define numbers tho? That's like a chapter of axiomatic set theory or real anal. But since he says to "find" I don't think you need to prove it anyways
Proving it is good practice though
defining numbers
Yeah true, I like to prove stuff even when the author doesn't necessarily ask for it as well
I tried proving what I could. I just don't know how to go about 2^x < 8 with what he's given
Although I haven't worked with Spivak, so I don't know what his axiomatic system in particular is
Lemme look at it
thank you!
He doesn't seem to define exponentiation
yeah he doesn't...
my general advice here is to just go on if you think you understand it well enough; this sort of confusion of what the author expects is typical for the first one or two chapters of a book
if later on you realize you don't understand it well enough then go back
I don't think you could prove your answer for that question based on what he gives you in that first section though
Yeah
You could define exponentiation of rationals as you would normally and use some 'limits' stuff to define it for irrationals but ehh im not sure if that'll be nice or fun
even defining it for rationals is kinda hard lol he only really gives you the tools to define exponentiation to integer powers
You could show that the nth root of any (positive) real number exists by showing that exponentiation to integer powers is bijective first I guess, then define
[r^{\frac{p}{q}}=\sqrt[q]{r^p}]
I guess
grass
But yeah that's a bit convoluted
thank you! that helps a lot
I guess he gives that problem to make a person think why it's presently unsolvable
xD yeah I dunno, considering he hasn't defined what exponentiation is
feels a bit premature with him not defining bijections yet 
Yeah he probably doesn't intent for the readers to prove that
If you get to the point where you have a definition of exponentiation/logarithms you could probably prove more generally, that logarithms preserve order
That is, x>y implies log(x)>log(y). Well, actually you can probably still prove it even if you invoke iff instead of implies since exponentiation also preserves order
yeah all you actually need for the proof is that exponentiation is strictly increasing
but he doesn't even define exponentiation lol
Hoh, glad it was not me who made that joke
If I see a possible pun i usually don't have the self control to stop myself from typing it
Man im such a comedy genius
🤨
Hello everybody, I have 2 questions, hope this is the right place/ok (been slowly returning to pre-calculus math, haven't used it since high school, 15 years ago):
-
Anyone interested in deontic logic? Did anyone study it? I am interested in it and its "calculus".
-
Anyone can explain what the hell the Schrodinger equation means? Any books you can suggest for beginners?
Schrodingers equation will be covered in any intro quantum mechanics textbook, but you'll need a lot more than pre-calc math for those textbooks
Deontic logics are more philosophy than math so you should try the philosophy discords
Alternatively, I think Plato.stanford should have a page on it
deontic logic is a part of modal logic
a part which is, as cocat said, more philosophy than maths
I know, just asking if in maths someone studied it thanks
indeed thanks
as I suspected, thanks
Anyone know any good colleges with a good undergraduate program for mathematics?
@wide vector what level of school are we talking?
alot of places have good undergraduate programs in math
most are pretty expensive.
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/math-major-2701
MIT
Stanford
Most based Ohio hater
only in ohio
College. Sorry
I'm not smart lol
No I mean like
I knew college I was wondering if you meant top schools, state schools, etc
apply to a lot if you can get the application fee waived
like 1 every 5th group of ranking
Yeah maybe. I'm just trying to get an undergrad so I can get a PhD. 😭
10 schools, covering top 1-50 is a broad start.
Princeton is #1?
For grad I put MIT rn as the best
What's your math background actually?
Because that might influence it somewhat
For undergrad
Can a ug get into a t10 school with really good math related ecs and grades in math and university courses and all that but with shifty grades in the humanities
How shifty is shifty
for undergraduate, groupings of 1-5 are all about the same. you're not gonna get consensus on rankings
similarly 5-10, 11-15, ...
Okay, that makes sense. My parents are pulling a funny and saying that I can't go to school more than 12 hours drive from my house.
Which is essentially New England and Quebec
most of the top schools are in that area haha
Quick question:
I'm having some trouble calculating somthing
I need to know how meny 16x16 Square can fit within a 1000x1000 Square
I cme up with this (1000×1000)÷(16x16) or 100^2÷16^2 but I'm not sure what to do with the output (if this is even the right equation)
just get a new house closer 😎
it's the right equation
so the result is 3906.25
round that down to get 3906
so 3906 houses can fit
Just get more debt lol. Be completely drowning in debt
@woven whale So that's 3906 chunks of 16×16 correct?
just go to McGill
Definitely not getting into McGill lol. Stuff happened this year and my math grade tanked.
yes
and a quarter left
where you can't put a house
also I wouldn't place too much weight on college rankings
Ight thx man got lost I the math appreciate the conformation
np
especially those rankings
since:
- I wouldn't call USNews particularly reliable/objective
- Those rankings aren't specific to mathematics, they are overall rankings, just with the list of universities filtered to schools that offer a math program
- Rankings in general aren't indicative of education quality or the amount of opportunities at a specific university
Yeah definitely.
what grade are you in rn?
11th
Yeah, I'll try. But UMO might be my only option
,w 1000%16
ok im definitely off the zaza
idk how to do modulous in wolfram
in lua its %
ig i can say
,w floor(1000/16)
doesn't a mod b work in wolfram alpha?
hrm
hm
it does
Why not UoT? I heard thats the best one in Canada
UofDepression
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
I mean is it not?
Not technically mutually exclusive with being the best in the county...... 😛
What's UoT 
I see 
(some) good profs though
getting literally anything done takes so fucking long
so many emails
so many random ass unnecessary roadblocks to everything
it took me 3 months to get 4 signatures on a piece of paper I needed to get my visa to come here
so many reminder emails
sounds about right
gahhh
Why?
I heard jordan b peterson teaches there
Thats awesome
Lol
Tell me whats wrong with UofT
read the entire conversation you skipped over
Im considering to study there
I'm so confused how to get research opportunities as an undergrad tbh like all the professors seem to be doing high level research in can't even begin to understand the title of their research and you expect me to email them or ask them for me to do research? Like wtf. My university is also pretty large and the professors are very well known which adds another layer of anxiety for me. Like i cant just go ask a Fields medal caliber professor to do research with him it's laughable. I feel so stupid because there are kids getting research. I'm trying to apply to an reu but apparently it's bad if the only way a professor you are trying to get a recommendation from knows you is that you took a class and did well??? Like there's 200 people in my class how tf is the professor supposed to know who tf I am? The office hours overlap with other classes so I can't even go to those I feel so stuck.
Well I heard classes get smaller
Like 200 is only for intro classes. So getting to know profs is a more realistic goal in non intro classes ig
200 is exaggeration but it's like 80 for upper div classes
The problem is I'm not the best student in the class
I'm getting As and all but I don't raise my hand or anything honestly no one does tho I feel like the only way to actually interact is by going to office hours which I can't go to
It just feels so wrong to ask a professor that probably has no idea who you are for a letter of recommendation to an reu
it's better than not doing it
and not getting into anything because you didn't even apply
But I don't want the professor to dislike me because eventually I'll be good enough to ask them for a letter of recommendation for grad school
Or so I hope
TTerra isn't it 4 am where you are?
Wtf
dude professors get asked for letters literally all the time
it's part of their job
they expect it
they're not going to dislike you for just asking for a letter lol
Well not dislike, per say, but they'll know me as mediocre and not worth their time vs maybe if I ask them when I'm actually cracked and do something epic they will actually care

i really don't think that's how that works
what if you do end up getting a letter and getting in and becoming cracked?
unless you're actually a terrible person i don't think a professor is going to brush you off as "not worth their time" for just asking for literally one letter
something something miss every shot you don't take
they're people too, by the way
and if it makes you feel better, this is basically me too, and i've gotten letters with no issues before
literally just fucking talk to them lol it's part of their job
everything i say is true
unless im trolling someone
The specifics of the class also make me a bit worried since I got a high grade (100%) but the class is quite easy I wouldn't be surprised if >80% of the class got close to a 100%. I'm afraid the professor is gonna be like, I can't really evaluate this kid cuz this class is pretty easy. For reference this is a 2nd course in algebra.
ooohhh my fucking god just ask
i got a 100 in my similarly easy riemannian geometry course and so did most people it seems and i still got a letter
stop being a bitch
the worst that will happen is they just say no sorry
that's it
(i didn't get into the thing i was applying for, but that's their loss not mine + almost all the kids who got in had previous experience lmao)
worst that happens is u just get "no"
not everything will work out for you in life
but that doesn't mean every loss is a catastrophic failure
if i were your prof sure
the REU i applied to didn't deserve me anyways
TTerra so cracked
There's the fields institute reu that I have no chance of getting in 💀 maybe I will meet TTerra
lol that's the one i applied for
you won't meet me because i'm going to be leaving this university as soon as possible
and have no interest in REUs anymore
Based I saw the above convo
I thought utoronto was decent
it is. it's just got some god fucking AWFUL administration
Then again my university is also dogshit they literally don't pay student employees
(UC strike reference 😱)
uoft math admin is probably the worst ive ever had the displeasure of dealing with
they're just too fucking slow
and it seems like all they want to do is cockblock
Lmao
did you know undergrads aren't allowed to take more than three graduate courses in their whole ugrad?
Wtf I know ppl here that did that first semester
did you know point set topology isn't a prerequisite for differential geometry here?
What
Rip
Mfw I thought geometry at uoft would be good cuz coxeter
WTH
one exhausting three hour block
THATS FUCKED
yeah
lmao that actually hilarious
i just leave two hours in and pray the last hour wasn't anything important
We have 3 hours a week but it's 2 1.5 hr or 3 1 hr lecs
depends on the course/instructor
🐒 👨
for the weedout courses they're basically trying to murder you and make you fail
so like 157 257 357 457
calculus, multivariable calculus, real analysis, and measure theory/funcanal
those courses all seem to be made a bit harder than any others
like artificially
not just the material being hard
Wait is 457 a first year grad class?
crosslisted as an undergrad course and a grad course
if you're an undergrad and you take it then it's an undergrad credit, and if you're a grad and you take it then it's a grad credit
what other bad things can i say about uoft hmm
idk nothing immediately.comes to mind pertaining to the math department
some profs suck? idk lmao
Tbf some profs suck everywhere
But yeah the 3 grad class limit and 1 3 hour block seem pretty egregious
3 hour block is an easy way to basically kill any interest i have in something
it's just too tiring

3 grad class limit is the most asinine thing I’ve ever heard
Wait so tterra are u actually graduate+ now or did u put that to get access to stuff
I remember when TTeppa first told us it exists
GG
i was livid
i was so close to just fucking going off on the admin
idk
lemme check the email chain (long)

yeah it's not really explicitly stated but i think it's a department thing
the math admin here is really good at giving non answers
i was looking forward to like, learning a lot of differential geometry i'd gotten really excited about
and then last minute they were just like "no fuck you lol"
shouldn't have wasted one of my grad course spots on algebraic topology smh that class sucked
okay no more ranting i need to snooze
can i ask what other grad courses you took
Probably analysis alg top and a algebra only grad class but I'm just guessing
what do you even do in a grad algebra class
Depends on what is covered in ugrad algebra
For our uni we don't cover modules or galois theory in undergrad
And polynomials isn't covered in very much detail
Actually the main thing is that the grad version is basically an accelerated undergrad class
fair enough
Since there is a class that covers galois theory and modules as well ufd and pid stuff
But it's like 1 grad class =2 ugrad classes
when is measure theory usually covered?
Also the grad class covers some category theory and some representation theory
my uni doesnt have CT in undergrad
but it;s done in the fourth year
We don't either. Actually I think the CT and rep theory are the important parts of the grad class
sometimes
We have ugrad classes that cover measure theory but not in much detail the grad class is much more in depth though
There are different "tiers" of grad classes at our university
Some are basically just accelerated ugrad
can you elaborate?
Some are lower level grad stuff but fairly targeted e.g. commutative algebra and some are very niche topics
These are informal btw
Like they don't actually exist
It's just what it feels lkke
ah
Based on my understanding of the course content
Banach algebras and spectral theory, c* algebras, von Neumann algebras
Note that these are each individual classes so they go very in depth
There are 2 courses on lie groups so I'm assuming that goes pretty in depth
I think the less the class talks about, the more "advanced" it is in general
Ooh there's a symplectic geo course which looks pretty interesting
are you looking through the database?
Yeah
Mathematics Courses
holy shit are you a student at berkeley?
im applying there next year
thats my dream uni
Based af
I literally wish to do math there
Ur transferring or applying as a grad student
If i dont get help in #prealg-and-algebra After 15 minutes do i ping for help or not in that channel?
uh I'm a high school student
Oh
Lmao I get so confused
With the roles
Cuz ppl give themselves higher roles
So it's a bit weird
Do you guys know?
Mb
yeah i gave myself the undergrad role cuz im studying undergrad stuff rn
Yes
I do ping?
Ping helpers in ur help channel after 15 mins
Alright Thank you!
what are some famous identities of determinants
i've collected these
the determinant of a matrix is the same as the determinant of its transpose
if a row/column is all 0, the determinant is 0
if a row/column is a multiple of another, the determinant is 0
if you switch two rows/columns, the determinant is multiplied by -1
if a row/column is multiplied by a constant, the determinant is multiplied by the same constant
if you add the determinants of two matrices which shares all rows/columns except one, the result will be the determinant of the matrix with the shared rows/columns and the sum of the different rows/columns
if a multiple of a row/column is added to another, the determinant remains the same
the determinant of a matrix is the reciprocal of the determinant of its inverse
the determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of the entries on the main diagonal
the determinant of the product of two matrices is the product of the determinants of the matrices
🤓
🤓
🤓
I'd try to condense these down into which ones are more important and which ones are derived from others to make it more managable. For instance det(AB)=det(A)det(B) can be used to derive det(A^-1) = det(A)^-1
another useful thing to help collapse them down is thinking of the determinant as a signed volume, then a lot of these rules look like more obvious geometric facts, like scaling a column by a constant scales the determinant by a constant
similarly, when the constant is 0, that gets you the rule you said earlier as a special case "if a row/column is all 0, the determinant is 0" so I don't know if I'd list that one
what is yours mbti type?
wffl
The properties can be condensed into top-dimensional multilinear alternating form with det(I) = 1 
yeah that's exactly why I mentioned thinking about it as an oriented volume
INTP-T
je crois
meow
okey
KATZ-E
omg u go to berkeley?
Fuck you man

you should post it here and remove personal details
maybe do it in like #advanced-lounge though
u should really take 205 next sem
What email
Why tho
it'll be so fun
I need eric chen buff cuz I took his 104 too
Doesn't 205 require 185 now?
@rose dock
I love math like I'm so mathy like that
ye but just talk to the prof
But I'm literally stupid at analysis
math is so hot
and you know what fuck the pathagorean therom the goverment can't control me
Good morning -----!
Couldn't be me
How do I know if the issue I'm working on is relevant to an article?
I've been working on the solution set of polynomials in complexes and the geometry of the curve generated by the solution for example and I don't have much idea what would be interesting to investigate about it
I agree
I half-agree
This is complex algebraic geometry. Find any intro book on algebraic geometry and you will learn about these objects. Something you might be interested in are planar projective complex curves and their correspondence to Riemann surfaces, the genus–degree formula, and the Riemann–Roch theorem.
I quarterth agree
Quarterth ?
What should I say there
No I mean, what does quarteth agreeing mean ?
Does that also mean u disagree with the other part that isn't in quarterth?
I'm just gonna say 🤓 and leave this conversation

:((
I think it's just a pun on half-agree and it's either the canteloupe or the honeydew that is half awful
which would imply half of that said consept and the whole of the other is a delice
But then it's not specific enough tho, which one is it ? 1 hate towards honeydew + 1/2 hate to canteloupe = 3/4 Or vice versa or perhaps some other fraction that adds upto 0.75 which there are like infinite of
Even if u wanted to narrow down the all possible fractions that would require making hate have a quanta and be discrete
not some other fraction it is specified to be a half
Still won't help much tho
To get 0.75 agreement, that is 0.25 hate towards either honeydrew or cantaloupe
There are many ways to get this hate
0.1 + 0.15 = 0.25
0.01 + 0.24 = 0.25
0.001 + 0.249 = 0.25
........
And a lot more others!!!
oh right
Like, as more as infinite amount of them
I assumed the half-hatred came after the binary choice
It was never specified tho
yeah my bad
I'll tell you what quarterth hate means it means nothing it was meaningless the entire time
It's okay, we just here are doing a little bit of playing around
No need to feel bad about it 
I disagree with you a whole four quarteths
^v^
The current time for wintersavory is 03:49 AM (KST) on Sun, 08/01/2023.
Sleep is for the weak
sleep is for the strong
the ones able to resist the urge to stay awake and consume more media
Let's take a moment to appreciate the repeating decimal for 1/7th cause it's kinda underrated
Idk if there are even any analogs in other number systems
lots of numbers have repeating decimals
Yeah but 1/7th is interesting
???? Not even true?
Like, 1/9 in base 9 is just 0.1
Anyways what makes 1/7th specifically interesting
oh yea I'm dumb lol
depends on what you mean by repeating, repeating 0s counts imo
I feel like it does if you're distinguishing between rational and irrational numbers
but maybe not here, idk
I guess in this case not repeating means it shares the same prime factors as the base
What makes 1/7th in particular interesting is
- It goes 0.142857... Which is (almost) 27, then 47, then 87 repeating (except the last is 87+1)
- 2/7 is kind of (very informally) like a translation of 1/7th, equaling 0.285714... And all other multiples of 1/7 are the same way
Idk any other fractions that have similar properties
I think it has something to do with the fact that 7^2 = 49 = 100/2 - 1 but idk
Very underrated repeated fraction
Amy base
I've tried it a little but couldn't come up with anything, looks like it needs some number theory that I'm not equipped with
I guess using ${x}$ to mean fractional part of x we can write $\left{\frac{100}{7}\right} = \frac 2 7$ and maybe it's useful to think of $100$ in base $7$ as $100=2+2*7^2$ so it happens to simplify very cleanly.
Merosity
we could find another case this way, looks like $\left{\frac{100}{13}\right} =\left{\frac{9+7*13}{13}\right} = \frac{9}{13}$ so this means $\frac{9}{13}$ is $\frac{1}{13}$ but shifted by $2$
Merosity
1/13 = 0.076923...
9/13 = 0.692307...
this at least gives us a way to brute force by writing 100 in base n and looking for when the ones place is 2 if you want it to be exactly 2 that does the shift
this is nice because it also proves that there are only finitely many cases where this happens since after n>100 we always have the ones place digit as 100
a brute force search just now gives 7, 14, 49, and 98 as the solutions
for choices of n such that 2/n is the digits of 1/n shifted by 2
pari-gp code I ran to find it if you're curious, should be easy enough to implement in any other language: for(n=1, 99, if(n*frac(100/n)==2, print(n)))
an important thing to notice is\$\left{\frac{a}{c}\right}=\left{\frac{b}{c}\right}\iff a\equiv b\pmod{c}$
🤓
pari-gp 
🤓
🤓
🤓

this falls out as an easy corollary from lagrange theorem
kill me now I'm transferring a ton of handwritten exercises to LaTeX
there are 200 pages of handwriting to do...
Why…
what on earth 
I have no idea
godspeed
sigh my handwriting is unreadable ig
wait but like
sorry but there are way better methods to spend your time self-studying 😭
Then just don’t TeX it 
\begin{proof} trivial \end{proof}
DerpZ
yes I did it with pen and paper
Go read a book or something
to avoid LaTeXing lmao
the transferring 200 pages to latex part
Theres no point to TeX it
i didn't sleep enough last night and transferring proofs is braindead

Just go outside or something instead then. Go on a walk
Touch some grass. Play some video games
we have a grass
I went for a real nice walk today and also got stuff from whole foods
ok you know
yall just woke me up to how
stupid it is
i must be masochistic af
jeez

Lyra
I made the anime AI thing look at some monkeys
It doesn’t understand what a monkey is
thank god you stopped me ngl
i was about to transfer 200 pages of algebra exercises too
LOL what was it outputting
(this is literally 4 months of self studying)
LMAO
This one kinda goes hard tho
Yeah the AI image looks cool in that one even if it isn't remotely a monkey
Okay it output 3 different things from this one image
Can you guess what created this?
"cute anime girl with long hair in snowy weather"
DerpZ remind me, are you in hs or uni
No it wasn’t based off a text prompt, it took a picture as input
hMm
The same picture made this
also pytorch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tensorflow
@odd brook
im biased tho
Nice, what are you self-studying
real anal and abstract algebra rn
Ah nice
im biased bc i contributed code to pytorch before lol
Why u replying to that one
LOL
Any ideas?
You
Chmonkey umbrella
MOCHA
This was the last one it made from the same image
Yeah
Only one of them registered as an animal
Okay the last one isn't bad
real talk: what nn architecture is that
I mean
This one is uncanny
Also her eyes are so human there
Yeah this one is so funny
It just
Literally doesn’t know what a monkey is
It's like I can sort of see it when I look at it from a distance
It’s so funny
LOL
She was very sleepy today
Is it on a stick too?
Don't think so I'll ask her though
Somehow 
Isn’t that high up on my react list
I guess I just really use some emojis a lot
Also I guess it's only recently you've been reacting w/ it LOL
Even if it has been very consistent reacting

U got games on your phone?
tfw you drop a 250g phone on your nose while lying in bed
wonder if this doi will render
nice discord doesnt
i wonder how in the world i could access this...
hMm
whatever you do you definitely shouldnt use a certain website that
has a bird holding a key

Ryc-site
Not gonna lie the first thing I thought of was ryc holding a key
Hi, small problem if someone can help me x)
Two people have chests, one person has 1 chests the other has 5
In each chest, there are 3 bags, each bag has a 1 in 34 chance of containing the object that people want.
Calculate the probability that each of these people will get what they want.
love how many people try to get others to do their homework
i actually thought that was going to be a q from a game or smth not a hw q until the last line loll
you can spot a homework problem by how its always like
a command
rather than a polite request
it started off as polite request tho
Bahhh
hii can I get help on [homework]
(pastes the hw question)
こんいちわ!
ah no no im not saying theyre being rude
げんき?
im saying the homework questions usually have a certain tone
ya the last line was very hw q tone
is this like some stereotype now
since when did homework request be commanding
oh
i just watch vtubers
sora-chan and aqu-tan
i didn't say that, derpz did haha
nahhhhhhh
is it actually like that
oh wait
questions have commanding tones
it's not a stereotype
hw questions do
idk this was just very hw looking to me:
Calculate the probability that each of these people will get what they want.
like no one talks like that with capitals and periods and commands and everything
it's straight up a homework question
well ya that's what i'm saying lol
what do yall think of montblanc pens
huh
i wanted to get this for graduation
$2.6
k
it's the glacier solitaire
holy shit
what
i can get a gaming pc with that
oh wow thats expensive
must be very high-end
ONLY??????
dude that will run literally anything unless u have a crypto miner or something
my parents said i can't use a crypto miner
they said i'll charge us more electricity
yeah dont
and im not a cryptobro
it is hazardous to the environment lmao
can you add me
anyways, is it a good pen
uhh sorry i only accept friend requests from people i know
i use a pilot pen
but i want to solve a quadratic equation
using a $2.6k pen
why
because it makes me look cool
i mean you're free to do whatever you want with your (or your parents) money
not sure why you're here
are you looking for validation or something?
like do you want us to tell you that's a sensible purchase?
i dont know about quality, but i doubt any quality pen is going to need 2.6k dollars
because it probably isn't but
kk
again its up to you (or your parents)
feels like ur trolling
wtf
there are luxury mechanical pencils
is it tho
relative to what?
other pencils haha
i want more $2 g2 pens
sheeeeeeeeesh
i burn through like one of those every 2 weeks
huh
real analysis
i just got a drawing tablet to take notes on instead of constantly buying paper and pens haha
funny story I have an ipad
i think it is cost-efficient in the long run
ipad is >>
i have no idea how to use latex
yeah
i mean that being said if I were in school
im married to my math textbook
is that even legal
it is questionable
for $2.6k I'd rather buy stonks
or rather give it to my shitty ml-based bot to lose money
ah
Nahhh
Is it an investor bot
no it's a money losing bot
no it simply buys cryptocurrencies (the sketchier the better)
oh
so i immediately lose all the money
(this is a joke, I do not have a money losing bot)
I should make a money losing bot
It uses ML to determine the fastest way to lose money
Because it's a buzzword
We use a proprietary AI-based algorithm to determine the fastest way to lose your money
machine learning is pretty accurate
People: AI will take over us
it's not learning per se
AI now:
it's mostly just big matrices and statistics lmao
matrix
Where do you all study
somewhere
i study at the mathcord school of mathematics
where i mass ask for help everytime i get stuck
I will send you your rejection letter
plz do
From Stanfart University:
you are rejected, get r3kt scrub
thnx stanfart
or invest in logan paul
I think it'd be great to provide a channel for course recommendations
in addition to #book-recommendations
There are so many great MOOC courses available online, like https://openlearninglibrary.mit.edu/courses/course-v1:MITx+18.01.1x+2T2019/about and https://www.edx.org/course/introduction-to-differential-equations-2, and it would be great to have a place to share and discover these resources. Not everyone learns best from books, and having a course recommendations channel would be incredibly beneficial for people who prefer to learn through other methods. It would allow people who are interested in learning math to easily find high-quality courses that have been recommended by others. This would save people time and effort in their search for learning resources. Also, it would provide a way for people who are new to math or looking to improve their skills to find courses that are a good fit for their learning goals, and it would be particularly helpful for independent learners who are not studying in a university setting. While there are websites out there that provide lists of math courses (like https://github.com/ossu/math), having a course recommendations channel on this Discord server would still be incredibly helpful. It would provide a place for people to share and discover high-quality courses that may not be listed on that website. Plus, it would allow us to fill in any gaps in the resources available on it.
There had been an attempt to store a curated list of book recommendations but the efforts have been halted due to some reason
Guess it's worth bumping it up again, and try to expand the scope to online resources as well
This would save people time and effort in their search for learning resources
especially with the pin feature, it can sort of look like this
Careless mistakes are the bane of my existence
i thought when I start doing real anal
turning a + into a - wont be a problem
well
"I shouldn't encounter stupid careless mistakes to do with basic algebraic manipulation when doing set th-"
Careless mistakes: You can run, but you can't hide

does abstract algebra
makes careless mistake
Do massive integration problem
make an arithmetic mistake in the end
Wow there's a lotta help channels open
noo my blue grass
I hid my blue 
I was originally gonna open a help channel to see if someone could help spot my mistake here I can't spot but it seems like im not going to lol
Asked some of my irl friends to see if they can spot it
I used wolfram to desmos to lead to more confusion 

tbh math was reaaly invented by physicians to calculate physics
feel free to debunk my point
Physicians to calculate physics 
for numbers i meant
Well measurement problems were the initial driving force, so I would like to think there's a nontrivial amount of truth to it
well you got the point didnt you
my main argument is about calculus
if im not wrong isnt it one of the higher forms of math?
Yeah, it is true that physics provided a lot of impetus to mathematics
But it's not entirely universal (at the same time, problems in the theory of equations, etc. were being considered that didn't always have physical connections)
yeah thats also true
i hate math cause every single mistake i have in tests is sooo dumbb i rip the paper
not hate but
kinda do but dont
It turns out my answer was fucking correct
But i plugged it info wolfram wrongly

Im gonna go sleep now... 
sleep is good
Both Newton and Leibniz invented calculus Newton invented calculus for physics but I don't think Leibniz did
calculus was invented really late in the history of mathematics
the earliest societies that did something that is clearly recognizable as mathematics did so for trade, to measure land (think ancient egypt) or to observe the stars (ancient babylon)
but this quickly evolved to doing mathematics for itself or for religious reasons (again babylon watching stars and ancient greece)
😦 Im so lost have asked about singular solution in seperable diff equation for very long time. our singular solution is 3 and -3. and we are to supposedly to check if they are singular solution,? how do we know if it is a singular solution?
does this server not have a suggestions channel?
I posted a suggestion but didn't know where to send it so I just sent it here
it doesn't, but your suggestion was at least noticed
The ideas for calculus have been around since longer than newton or leibniz
They were scattered albeit and newton did gather them up into a comprehensible body of work
@hasty mountain Sorry if I sounded rude, but I have good faith. You are simply doing things wrong, like objectively speaking. It's fine if you learn category theory, but you should focus on simpler mathematics that do not require fancy language so that you can sharpen your mathematical skills. It seems to me that what you are doing is simply learning a lot of definitions which are probably meaningless to you but that create a (fake) sensation of knowledge
And maybe being so direct isn't helpful because you will probably reaffirm in your position, but idk.
No this is fine and I value your care.
Category theory, or as I like to call it: definitions
another point @hasty mountain is that general cases are supposed to be understood via specific cases, not the other way around
it seemed like you were trying to generalize your question as much as possible before you understood what it is you're doing
(your generalization is incorrect)
Concrete examples > proofs
What is the correct generalization?
if you want to treat "the set of maps from A to B" on equal footing with A and B that means you need it to be an object, i.e. you need some sort of internal hom in your category
furthermore, your question started with the group structure on A->G for arbitrary A (not a group), but in the end you were for some reason asking about the group structure on the set of group homs G->H
All true. There seem to be a handful of ways for generalization to go.
if you have an internal hom that participates in some sort of tensor-hom adjunction, Ax- --| hom(A, -)
then right adjoints preserve limits, and a proof that hom(A, G) is a group object is some straightforward diagram chasing
note however that this is a proof completely by structure, by unfolding definitions. It does not contain any, like, novel mathematical idea
this goes back to overzealous generalization
the cartesian product of two groups is an immensely useful concept when studying group theory, and so every book will tell you about it
the infinite case? maybe occasionally useful as well
the case of a group object in a category? the average person does not care
it complicates not even the proof but even the formulation of the idea, and what are the benefits?
in what category other than the category of sets, are you running into infinite group products?
Please forgive me but I am not ready to talk about overzealous generalization, usefulness of concepts and what people in the abstract care about. I have experienced not once being provoked to express an opinion that would put me at risk of a moderator's punitive actions. You are clearly eager to disagree with me but pursuing this discussion is in the end a fruitless and risky distraction from my studies, as well as a threat to my already frail mental health. Please accept my deepest apologies for whatever offence I may have inadvertently caused to you and please let us return to the technical aspects of the conversation.
@untold sapphire do you do category theory for a living
Category theory is my life, it is what makes life worth living. Is that what you mean?
I work in a computational biology laboratory right now. I do topological data analysis. Category theory and algebraic topology are occasionally useful. I write a lot of python code and technical documentation so that others can use our software.
What an agressive way of asking someone for their job 
Please forgive me but I am not ready to talk about overzealous generalization, usefulness of concepts and what people in the abstract care about. I have experienced not once being provoked to express an opinion that would put me at risk of a moderator's punitive actions. You are clearly eager to disagree with me but pursuing this discussion is in the end a fruitless and risky distraction from my studies, as well as a threat to my already frail mental health. Please accept my deepest apologies for whatever offence I may have inadvertently caused to you and please let us return to the technical aspects of the conversation.
thank youu, i will study about
Hope it’s ok to ask this here. I am not what you would call an intelligent man. Hehe. On a serious note, I was fairly good at math around middle school then fell behind and really struggled. Math doesn’t come very easily to me, but I want to engage with it more because it seems fun and a good way to keep my mind sharp. Is pre-college Math a good place to start? How do I pick up the broken pieces of my math education and make something of it?
My major in college was philosophy and I minored in CS but struggled with the Math side of it
I’m more of a language and writing person
pre-college math can be extremely boring
If you're doing it as a hobby find some math you are interested in
I was thinking pre-college because I was thinking it may be easier to start engaging with, is it true you need to learn math progressing from one subject to the next or else you won’t understand it?
I want to tbh

I think the best way to do it is to just
again something you are interested in
Which 2 are you doing rn?
Im doing real anal and algebra because it's what im interested in
algebra - gallian and anal - abbott
Ah i see
I’d say definitely start with brushing up on pre-college. algebra, geometry, pre-cal til u can really work with the concepts intuitively
I mean
khan academy is always a great accessible way to do that
I'm assuming you still retain your HS math knowledge
that way you can build up to finding something more advanced that u like like DerpZ is suggesting
I love HS Math
JC is wonderful
I grind massive integrals for no reason
I think I do, but honestly not sure since I haven’t engaged with math in a long time, I took Discrete Math in college and started off ok then things went south pretty quickly
wow that sounds like pain
That is so wonderful
this is fun
It brings me joy
Try some introductory texts
You could try some abstract algebra
#books and #book-recommendations should help
Read up on the Monstrous Moonshine conjecture
that is very advanced group theory -.-
The Tits group is the hardest to construct
I cannot construct the Tits group
Linear Alg and intro real anal can be good places to start
I think I like Algebra if I remember correctly, maybe that is a good place
Why does everyone say "anal"
It sounds so weird talking to non-math people
Dami recs Schroder for intro anal

I love anal
I think abbott is also very excellent
I want to do an anal
the pedagogy is unparalleled
I want to do an anal with my girlfriend
I want to do real anal
w a t
singapore government is homophobic af lmfao
doesn't change the fact that the govt is homophobic???
yeah
Thanks, I will check out those channels!
yeah;
let's not go indepth







