#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 49 of 1
I should figure out how to do that
Quaternion fractals
some Menger sponge I did
sick
Why would I limit myself like that
i wonder if fractal architecture is a thing
I have the full power of a geometric algebra
I did this when I was 16.
It’s coded in Java and multithreaded
But yeah quaternions are the obvious answer
Nice!
Hahah, nah, there are loads of talented fractal artists out there. 🙂
he told me you said yes???
Cuz he did
@neat frost good night, bitch
THATS NOT SINCERE YOU ASSHAT
cry about it
I literally didnt
I bet yohan would give me a sincere goodnight
Thanks Xannie!
GOOD NIGHT SLURP
Image evidence says otherwise
HEART
Goodnight wraithy! 
i didn't call you a punk either
Lmfao
I wish
Apple only has three fonts to choose from
Helvetica, Georgia, and noteworthy
lol
immature children
fuck you ryc
what
❤️
dumb question
what is a "Lagrangian Filling"
an REU I'm looking at has this as a project title but no abstract
All I'm seeing is stuff mentioning knots and manifolds but tbh all I'm finding are papers that I don't have anywhere near the background to understand
I have been googling and found nothing besides papers 🙃
just read them lol
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symplectic_filling @cinder zephyr
In mathematics, a filling of a manifold X is a cobordism W between X and the empty set. More to the point, the n-dimensional topological manifold X is the boundary of an (n + 1)-dimensional manifold W. Perhaps the most active area of current research is when n = 3, where one may consider certain types of fillings.
There are many types of filling...
this is greek lmfao
no no
think of a manifold
call it X
we call a filling of X a manifold W such that boundary of W is X
w/o using word manifold i can give example
like u have a triangle like this 🔼
the white part ye
a filling is this 🔺
sorta like what the word is
a manifold is just a topological space where for every point you can find a neighborhood homeomorphic to euclidean n-space 
cant wait to do topology and cry
i need to check out reus i still havent peeked at any of them
Also surely the process is much easier after having done it once right
surely
rn I'm just trying to get my letter writers to submit stuff in places
some places are using NSFETAP, some places are using mathprograms, some people are annoying and have their own special system
also this one REU
for one half of the projects, they have one application system
and for the other half, they have a separate system
why? god knows


and yes, I need to have my letter writers send their letters separately to these
Hi metal
very odd
I hate this
hello grass
I emailed them and they said it's cause of some NSF funding guidelines or whatever idk
lmoa
What does oog mean 
bro has an inside joke with himself
it seems to have stuck with others in the server
oog
link?
This page contains a listing of the Research Experience for Undergraduates (REUs) aimed at mathematics students that will plan to run in the summer of 2023. We are compiling this list in spreadsheet format to make it easier for people to copy and sort through what they need to find.
Much of this
sheet
oop
yes
oh wtf there's a webpage for this?
i was curious at what was going on in the summer
lmao
oh there's an email
I can finally have them use a proper date format
to make sorting easier
so far i found like 5 or 6 i might be interested in but the notes for each program are very vague ill have to pore thru each program carefully
but thats a problem for next week 
that's what I've been doing except it's more like 30

thats a good problem i feel
last year i applied to ten begrudgingly
i only really had a strong inclination for about half but i did have some interest in the others
its not good i need to loosen up
I have 0 self confidence in getting into an REU (and more importantly I'd like to have options)
thus, shotgun approach
Also once you have a personal statement and a research statement
making edits is exceedingly easy
at least that's how it's been so far
Oh lmao
Are you an undergrad?
@echo tundra was looking through the server and saw your name, can I take it to mean you're good with NumPy?
sorry for the ping, I won't do it again if you mind
Well, it depends on the work. It's been some time I have used it. Do you need some help with numpy?
my internet drops right after I @ someone
specifically scipy.stats
think you could help?
please
that's not a part of numpy tho, right?
oh?
it's just more useful for scientists like the name implies
ask scibpy 
lol
This is most likely true but I haven't used scipy except for few very particular stat modules it has
I specifically need help with scipy.stats.nbinom and .poisson
it's a very specific coursework and I can't find any help in forums and stuff
so I thought I'd try my luck at asking someone 1 to 1

If forums didn't work I don't think I would be of much help. Tell me the issue
I'll see what I can do, just don't have high expectations
You can dm me instead of talking here
alright
I don't have much idea about what this channel is for
Hi Slurp
Good morning grass!
evening for them (?)
No.
good morning!

meow
mrow
No
Is this factorial symbol? (L thing)
🤷
Well it was in my practice test of binomial theorem; I assumed it to be factorial according to the given data
I was curious if this was another weird notation of factorial 
I usually use that notation for the natural logarithm lmao
It is indeed a weird notation for factorial
,,\Gamma
not even
it
can be
i_q question
send the full photo
looks like a drop shadow lmao
bruh
yeh lol
Lmfaooooo
Lol
That’s Ukrainian letter
I meam
I mean
Not Ukrainian
But we have it
In our Alphabet
guh
It's a Greek letter originally so I'm not surprised that it's appeared in other languages
Tho tbh I can't think of another alphabet other than Greek and Ukrainian that has it
Yea
pi
pi
Even tau is natural constant for circles and convenient
pi is already used
That’s a convention
To use pi
Same as Kelvins are used over Celsius in physics
Even Celsius are most convenient
Because of 0 as freezing point of water
But Kelvins still used
Because of Absolute zero
oh sorry
Ґ
Yes?
Why mathematical books use pi then
I’ve never seen any book of my life for my 12 years of education in 2 countries
To have tau in formulas instead of pi
Well maybe USA uses tau
I don’t know anything about USA
Also why are you asking me
i’m in the us and have never seen tau used in schools
I can say for Ukraine and United Kingdom
We don’t use tau
In any educational book
I can say for those 2 countries
lmao I've never thought about it this way but it makes sense why someone would say considering the US's love for not using the standard units
but no, the US uses pi also
No one uses tau really
Well you use Farengheit
yea 
As temperature
and inches and feet rather than __meters
What does 0 in Fahrenheit represents?
it's cold
honestly never really heard of tau before this discord lmaoo
i think it’s something to do with salt water HAHA
Yeah and horse’s blood
Mixture of Horse’s Blood and Salt water
Something like that

0 in Fahrenheit is "goddamn it's getting dangerous to be outside" because cold and 100 in Fahrenheit is "goddamn it's getting dangerous to be outside" because heat
Well every physics gigachad
Uses Kelvins
Because 0 is fucking coldest
Temperature
When matter decays
0 in fahrenheit was the coldest winter on record in some town
0 in Kelvin is -272 in Celsius
because the inventor didnt want negative values to appear in everyday life
Yeah those old times
People were scared
Of negative numbers
no
Now we even have square roots
Of negative numbers
And we use them in quantum physics lolllll
The only thing that is strange for me
Is p-adic numbers
Still don’t get how can be something “outside” of Complex Numbers
only????
I thought Complex Numbers are all existing numbers
And now they tell me, man how about p-adic numbers
I’m like wtf is p-adic number
Yes
Imaginary numbers are much more “normal” for me
Than p-adic numbers
Because imaginary numbers just exist perpendicularly to real numbers
But p-adic numbers
Is parallel universe
They never meet
Imaginary and real numbers have 1 point of intersection
Is 0
I would say it’s nor real nor imaginary number
Because 0 is the same as 0i right?

loll ok cya ^^
sure
I think people in here would find this gift I got pretty cool
only if original copy
now that would be a gift
Thsts a pretty cool gift
Idk where it's from lol
Hey uh
How would one calculate the force of gravity on an N-body simulation with a periodic boundary?
Gravity simulations are fun, but due to the nature of the thing, a large number of particles are liable to be flung off, never to return. A periodic boundary would fix this, if not for the fact that the whole situation with wrapping around makes a fun infinite sum that I have no idea how to resolve
There shouldn’t be any worry about infinite sums. There exist distance formulae for the closed manifolds (which is what you’re thinking about when you say “wrap around”) such as the sphere, torus, their higher-dimensional analogous, and more. You can either look these up online or perhaps calculate them by using representations like the one in this picture (that’s for a torus)
This is how one would use that drawing to calculate distance
ive thought about electric charges on the torus
if you want to calculate a potential function in the naive way, you end up needing to form an infinite sum
I think there’s some active research being done on evenly spacing points on the torus (possibly check out Dmitriy Bilyk)
(Which is essentially the question that you’re asking)
Oh sad, he hasn’t published anything yet - Im pretty certain he’s working on it though
the way you define your potential function changes what the minimal energy congifuration of point charges can be
i think the point Dorkly was getting at is that even though there is a minimal distance geodesic on the torus between any two given points, those two points will experience attraction/repulsion through other geodesics/directions in the torus
same, except on a sphere, kind of interesting how it wraps around
because your universe is wrapping around
If two points are exactly on opposite sides of the torus or sphere, they end up being in some kind of equilibrium there
If a point is slightly moved away from opposite "poles" then you might be able to get away with approximating with a taylor series expansion
maybe this idea can be used to approximate to arbitrary accuracy anywhere
yes i agree, that should be the case no matter how you define electric potential
well, actually a closed form might not be so hard to be honest, I think it ends up being like a geometric series
since we're on a flat torus
feel like a weierstrass p function is gonna pop up
since we have a bunch of lattice points
interesting
I wish I thought about periodic boundary like a torus before, kind of cool that the force of a particle on itself should be 0 since every force from itself at v will be cancelled by itself at -v (when thinking from the lattice picture)
I suppose for a potential $v$ we can write the potential at a point due to to the lattice as $$V(\vec r) = \sum_{\vec z \in \bZ^2} v(\vec r-\vec z)$$
mOwOsity
so now it's a matter of plugging in your favorite v here
if v(x) dies off as |x|-> infty then you can approximate to arbitrary accuracy (if no closed form is easy to find)
what happens if we imagine the weierstrass p function is a potential, what do the dynamics of particles look like?
looks like a Primon gas 🤓 (joking)
that's a thing?
They just recently launched and announced it
i had a very simple question I wanted to prove about 5 point charges in the square torus
https://www.duolingo.com/math @static loom this
Square torus ?
What's that ?
A square torus is when you quotient the plane by a square lattice
sounds fun
Consider the square torus given by quotienting the complex plane by the lattice which is the ideal (1+2i) inside the Gaussian integers Z[i]
cool, considering
I wanted to know if the five points given by the representatives of Z[i]/(1+2i) are a global minimum for electric potential energy of 5 point charges in this torus
turns out the answer is sensitive to how you define potential energy. But numerically at least this looks like a local minimum for potential defined by certain elliptic functions
i wasnt able to prove anything tho :
I think it's really funny that they're doing this
hmm sounds cool, I think we could do it
yeah, how are you defining electric potential
or what form(s) do you want
like V(z)=A/|z|^n or something
Yss
I think it wouldn't be unless you place the 5 point charges very carefully now that I'm thinking about it
what do you mean?
maybe I misunderstand, you are placing 5 points randomly and want to see if their minimum of potential energy is at the 5 representatives in the torus?
or if you place 5 points at the 5 representatives then they will all be "stuck" there?
I think that can be proved by symmetry
I think any sublattice will work in the same way
like go to the universal cover -> your representatives looks like a lattice, for any point on the lattice, suppose it's at the origin without loss of generality, then there's some point at u and -u with their forces cancelling out at the origin
it's kind of weird because the 5 distinct points become indistinguishable from 1 point
in the universal covering
hopefully that's clear and I understood correctly
better?
Fun fact: the quotient of Z[i] by (3+3i) is F_9.
than Z/(1/5)Z? maybe we could but I'm not sure what it means yet
you sure it's not Z/9Z, I don't think (3+3i) is a maximal ideal since (1+i) and (3) are prime ideals
Yes
where's my mistake then
only way you can get a field is by quotienting out by a maximal ideal right
if the quotient were a field then the ideal would be maximal which its not
its hard for me to explain because i dont have a good understanding of electrostatics
but let me just try to say what I observed
Hmm
imagine a single point charge at the origin
what is the potential energy at any other point in the torus?
I'd describe it with $$V(\vec r) = \sum_{\vec z \in \bZ^2} v(\vec r-\vec z)$$
mOwOsity
okay
since each point on the lattice is describing looking at the same point but wrapped around multiple times, which gets weaker each time it wraps
so that potential energy is minimized at 1/2 + i/2 right?
yeah
and at 0 too
(maybe?)
let's ignore the origin since there's a particle there and it might explode with a singularity or something
yeah it should blow up at the origin
Which question are we solving today?
I guess it's just undefined to consider the force of a particle acting directly on itself
it should. the fact that it blows up means you cant bring two point charges too close together
but if you remove that one contribution, the force on itself from where it sees itself periodically will all cancel out by symmetry
oh you mean in the sum, sure
yeah I am talking about the potential on the particle due to itself, not other particles yeah
yeah
yeah
okay anyway we have this function V
in particular the potential energy of two point charges in the torus, which one of them at the origin and the other at p should be V(p), right?
i mean that's just how we defined it
the contribution at the origin from p? yeah
oh so do you also need to add the contribution at p from the origin?
well at any point of space it's a linear combination of the potential from the other points dependent on their distance
so like let's say you have the three position vectors x, y, z then the potential at the position r is going to be v(|x-r|) + v(|y-r|) + v(|z-r|)
I put the magnitude of the vectors in for emphasis
since potential is usually just a function of the distance, it doesn't depend on the direction
x,y,z are fixed in space, r can move around to probe the potential at other points of space
right but what is the total potential energy of 3 point charges in the torus?
it would be computed the same way, except now every point gives a contribution based on all its copies in the lattice
since this is sort of more clear to think of than wrapping around multiple times
to be a bit more explicit $$\sum_{a=-\infty}^\infty \sum_{b=-\infty}^\infty v(|x+(a,b)-r|) + v(|y+(a,b)-r|) + v(|z+(a,b)-r|)$$
mOwOsity
as far as computing this goes, v(d) -> 0 as d-> infinity should be the case
which shouldn't be too hard to confirm with like p-series test for a typical example I think
I want to define the potential energy of 3 point charges x, y, z in the torus (with position also called x, y and z respectively) to be V(x,y,z) = V(x-y) + V(x-z) + V(y-z)
so then I can talk about minimizing V(x,y,z) as x,y,z range over all 3 point configurations in the torus
I don't know if I'd call that a potential energy
yeah i am not too sure of the correct terminology in electrostatics
well ok wait, I feel like the analogy doesn't matter if what you want to do is not really related
like you want to really just minimize this function f(x,y,z)=g(x-y)+g(y-z)+g(z-x) on a torus I guess really, right?
I assume U is an even function right
or what's the domain/codomain
U(x)=U(-x) is really what I'm checking holds true
could we say U(x) as U: Z[i] -> C could be redefined as V(|x|) as V: R>=0 -> C
I mean the domain there of V is nonnegative reals
or actually we can probably just say the codomain of both is R and not C
just trying to make sure I'm thinking a same conceptual idea as you here
I guess what I said must be wrong if it's Z[i] periodic
since |.| is not Z[i] periodic
wait I don't understand what I'm looking at
this function has an input of 5 points in Z[i]
but the domain looks like 1 point in Z[i]
this looks like a function f: Z[i] -> R
but U: Z[i]^5 -> R
sorry replace Z[i] with C
my U is what basically playing the role of your V
i think
wait, the picture you showed looks like U: C to R since it's 3 dimensional
yes
but the way you defined U earlier was U: C^5 -> R
here
U only takes in 1 argument in the screen shot
sorry Potential: C^5 -> R, since U is used to define that
yes
I thought this was a graph of the potential but it's a graph of U I see
yeah
but your comment was you predicted that the potential is minimized at (1+i)/2, not U
or maybe I'm mixing up U and the potential
im not being carful with my words sorry
i dont know what is the right thing to be calling potential
I suppose you could say U is like the potential from a single point
but your formula for "Potential" is not what I'd call a potential in physics
so it's confusing to use that word here
and I think it'll cause you headaches in trying to think intuitively about it by conflating them
I don't know what I'd call it
a wave function lol
with bosonic symmetry 🤓
don't actually do that though, I say just don't give it a name for now unless there's some specific reason to
I think that's what got me confused in the first place was thinking it had a bunch of properties and things that it didn't actually have cause the name made it sound like it had them
I guess since your U already has the periodicity of Z[i] baked in, you could minimize your P(x_1,...,x_5) function with lagrange multipliers on the unit square
I guess it's kind of like an internal energy of how all the particles are squished together or something, yeah that might work idk
what is your form for U(z)=A/|z|^n or something else
Electric potential energy is a potential energy (measured in joules) that results from conservative Coulomb forces and is associated with the configuration of a particular set of point charges within a defined system. An object may be said to have electric potential energy by virtue of either its own electric charge or its relative position to o...
"Electrostatic potential energy stored in a system of point charges"
this is what I'm trying to minimize
no that's not periodic
oh yeah good point, sorry I should have said something like U(z)=sum_k u(z-k) with u(z)=A/|z|^n
So that's not the U I used
so I used the U function given by this paper, it has a complicated defintion in terms of Jacobi theta function
ok, I guess it's not too serious then
the reason they use this is because its a 'greens function for the laplacian on the torus'
we could start here, $$E(x_1,y_1,\dots,x_5,y_5)=\sum_{i\ne j} U((x_i,y_i)-(x_j,y_j))$$
then the gradient being 0 minimizes it, so we can differentiate wrt $x_k$,
$$\pdv{x_k}E = \sum_{\substack{i=1\i \ne k}}^5 \pdv{x_k} U((x_k,y_k)-(x_i,y_i))$$
$$0 = \sum_{\substack{i=1\i \ne k}}^5 U'((x_k,y_k)-(x_i,y_i)) \vec x_k$$
mOwOsity
okay anyway, using this defintion you can numerically compute that the 'total energy' of the five points Z[i]/(1+2i) is less than the 'total energy' of Z/(1/5)Z
I'm wondering if its a global minimum
so really we can then try to solve this, which might not be so hard $$0 = \sum_{\substack{i=1\i \ne k}}^5 U'((x_k,y_k)-(x_i,y_i)) $$
mOwOsity
Maybe a bit cleaner to put back in terms of complex numbers, fix an $z_j$ then find the $z_i$ for $i=1$ to $i=5$ with $i \ne j$ such that $$0 = \sum_{\substack{i=1\i \ne k}}^5 U'(z_j-z_i) $$
mOwOsity
Ok, that's all I wanted to say, i'm going to eat now
if you can give me the output of U' from U (since it's complicated) then maybe I could do a bit more on it
alright later
well
I just mean in your calculator, output the derivative of this wrt z
it might end up simplifying pretty substantially since this sum is =0, and the logarithm might turn it to a product a bit, etc etc
We should have that U'(1/2 + I/2) = 0 since its a minimum/maximum right?
not necessarily, but that would be sufficient
actually not sure
I think U'(0)=0 is what we'd need
since inside U' is z_j-z_i, and when they're both equal to (1+i)/2 then it becomes 0
really all I'm doing is looking at your function of the 5 complex variables as a function of 10 real variables, looking at the gradient, and setting it to 0
then it's sufficient to focus on each of the coordinates being 0 for it to be at an extrema
since it's on the unit square, by symmetry we just need to worry about solving only the 5 x-coordinates, and all the equations are essentially the same by symmetry of the x_i
so you should have it boil down pretty nicely
and if you're brave you can even check the hessian to see if it's really a minimum
i dont understand
Numerically, U'(1/2 + I/2) = 0
(ND = numerical derivative)
is j supposed to be k here
and is it fixed?
Ok good
oh if you want the symbolic derivative, this is what mathematica tells me it is, though I dont fully trust it because it has Abs' and Im' which I dont know how to interpret
well think about it this way, U(z) is minimized at (1+i)/2 so for U(x-y) to be minimized we would expect x-y=(1+i)/2
sure
I guess we can't do that across all 5 points though of spacing them that way, so we'd have to arrange them differently
yeah
well like I said, this all just boils down to rolling up your sleeves and computing the partial derivative and setting it to 0 and solving I think
in fact people have proved that this configuration of points gives the centers of the optimal packings of up to five equal circles on a square flat torus
oh interesting
their proof uses topological graph theory
i believe this same answer should give the global minimum for "total energy" of 5 point charges in a square torus
but I havnt been able to prove that. I like your idea with checking derivative = 0. It checks out numerically
But how do you prove something is a global minimum
You have to find all places where derivative = 0 and then check this is really the one with the smallest value
yeah, basically
since it's continuous on a compact domain you'll know it'll be global
you have to check the hessian to prove it's a minimum
huh
hessian is basically the second derivative test, checking the concavity
didnt understand anything
that way you know your points aren't maximums or inflection points that kind of thing
you want all partial derivatives to vanish at the minimum right?
yeah
ok i really should just eat and then go sleep
yeah I have to work on finding a mistake in some proof I came up with yesterday
I think I proved that there are infinitely many regular primes, assuming the generalized riemann hypothesis 
Here's the mathematica file ive been working in
oh nice
cool
if its true that's a big deal 
anyway, if you get any more progress proving this is a global minimum, let me know
yeah, I found an alternative representation of Bernoulli numbers with 2-adic generating functions. Then assuming there are infinitely many primes such that 2 generates (Z/pZ)^x, then I use this to prove that these primes are regular because they don't divide the denominator.
huh interesting
Yeah, I will
i guess you have to make sure your representation is correct
The thing is, the proof is simple, it just depends on this weird formula for the Bernoulli numbers I found earlier this year which I proved is correct
in fact I have sage code to check it and it is valid up to several thousand, just checked back then
ok thats good
Not sure what I'm going to do if it is correct and I can publish it
never published before and not in an institution and trying to avoid crankery, so I probably will just write up something, post it on my own website, and put out some videos explaining it on youtube.
well, probably the proof is wrong
if its correct then thats at least a phd thesis bro, this is an open problem since 1850 💀
yeah, it would be nice
Yeah the proof is wrong lol

Thought about it a little more, N(3+3i)=18, since the norm on Z[i] always coincides with the number of elements in our ring, it's a ring with 18 elements. A little playing around with it, the integers {0,...,5} in here behave exactly the same as if it were mod 6 arithmetic. For instance 2*3=6 and since 6=(3+3i)(2-2i), we have found some zero divisors. (in case it was in question that there were any fields that didn't have a power of a prime number of elements)
Oof
That's why u plan to settle at 26 so that with those downside ups and upside downs, u will be ready by 30
Yes ^°^
idk, im not comfortable with fixed things
ig our lifespans are <100, say in general
but still
U don't have to be, this is what I have set as standard for myself
I wanna be able to do things quickly and live a long life in quick time
You seem to like planning far ahead, but that's the opposite of me ig
Study the things I want and have hobbies that I love and a stable family or person to care for ^°^
I take things as they come in small steps
I plan our large steps in a non specific way, but as their approach close, I begin to make them more and more specific
I feel like I don't want to think about 'getting settled', until I 'feel' the time is right
Only at that time do I feel I can make the best decisions
And planning
idk
Even with a non-specific plan, I feel it's a waste of time if there's a high chance it won't be executed
I have actually heard that a lot from people
But I never understood what it meant ?
Well idk let's say you're in high school
and u think
I want to do XXX at XXX uni
then get XXX job
"feel the time is right" stuff thing
and then do XXX
Like how many times out of 100 is this really going to happen as you say it?
Your plan as you set it
Idk - I feel like for most people its more of a 'dream' than a plan
haha
I want to 🛎️🛎️🪄🧼🎊🗝️
Well you gain experience. Wisdom. As you grow older
And your thought process 10 years later will almost certainly be very different to that of 10 years ago
And then that plan you came up with 10 years ago will not be the one you want
ik rn i think fairly differently to how I did 5 yrs ago
And what I might've thought back then would not be the same as now
So I wouldn't make plans the future me probably won't follow.
But I plan them generally tho, so rn I next day I wanna do XXX
In uni I wanna study YYY and develop AAA or atleast AA amount of habits to guide myself through life better
Then I wanna do BBB or CCC or DDD or EEE things depending on the scenario
I don't plan things specific, it's a very general plan filled with lot of "or"s to account for that time scenario
Everyone is different and I don't think your way of thinking is wrong at all
I can see how it is better than my way of going about things in several aspects
but it just wouldn't suit me
That's okay ^°^
Ur way sounds nice too
Unlike mine, it is filled with surprises and fun at every corner of ur life
Mine is much more stricter without allowing me to diverge much and achieve specific things
Yeah personally I don't plan too far ahead either.
That, I would not have considered (at all) 2+ months before
YEAH MAN THE FUTURE IS CRASY
12 months ago I wanted to be an engineer, now im Designer
like if u had asked me 2 months ago 'would u consider leaving the uk for elsewhere' i wouldve gone 'probably no'
But now im really considering it within the next few yrs
as a possibility
Oh yeah and during uni if you asked me 'do you want to go into finance' i wouldve gone 'hell nah', but here I am.
I never specified my goals either
Even my current life situation is like that but even more complex
I am interested in maths, video game design, physics, chemistry, medical science, neuropsychology computational & neuropsychology, and a lottttttttt of other things like even photography, political science, economist
And for now I just gave myself time to decide with the main idea
"If I can't decide everything by the time of my board exams (the exams in next 2 months) I will do everything and I will give my best to do everything on that list, I will take a drop and develop myself some very good and productive habits for them"
U r doing finance rn ? That's fun ^°^
Nah, u r smart enough dw ^=^
Maybe u r developing more and more sustainability cus u can't really be perfect in any subject, u can just get better and better and u r getting better and better dw
idk if I'm at the valley of despair or x = 0
Bruh u ? U r already enlightened man ???
Wdym ??? U r already so smart tho
If u r at x = 0
I am just living in negative numbers
I doubt I'm already competent
U r clearly definitely smart which is very good tho
You are certainly smart in maths
I think you're overestimating me lmao
Mathematics is often misused as a way to measure intelligence
"woah you do math you must be so smart!!!"
I feel like I hear this kinda stuff sm but it's so weird when I know deep down like whatever I do isn't smarter than anyone else.
like doing math is cool but it's as cool as anything else
When every people say that to me I stay absolutely silent
you watch anime, you must be so smart!!!
people rly do say that anime a comment a lot
Why thank you
I think I normally just say like "nah I'm dumbo"
it's such an awkward position because I don't wanna agree with it and sound full of myself but I also don't like rly disagreeing with people
people rly need to stop complimenting people
lol idk, im probably just akward
Yeah its awkward so I make them know its awkward by not responding
Im pretty much just arriving at the valley of despair
I'm at some peak but idk which one
We can never learn enough
We don't know anything about the universe
The matter we know, the one we observe and study, makes up only 5% of the observable universe. The rest is Dark Matter and Dark Energy.
I find this fact crazy the fact we don't even know anything about the 95% of universe matter
not yet
well DM me when you confirm String Theory
I have spent so many hours reading about string theory this last year
I finished up two books by Michio Kaku and another one by Brian Greene, but they just made me realise we're so damn far from even proving any of them
String theory is correct i just confirmed it
I mean
You're welcome evryone
Nowadays string theory is mainly done by mathematicians who find the structures interesting afaik
axions
based
theres a lot of math phys people and theo phys people too
i think
@eager reef every mirror you buy is in used condition
not necessarily
How do you not use a mirror
Also it's crazy that mirrors just like
Keep on reflecting like that
It's kind of like magnets I guess

this ego
no i dont care
So yes I did try all of them on this morning
christmas is stupid
And yes
if i got delivered catgirl stuff it might be less stupid but alas
I did check myself out in the mirror in my new clothes 🧡

fuck you ryc
ikr
how do i turn 1 band into 10 mathematically speaking
discussion and discussion-2 are good and nice channels
so true
Peepee poopoo
meow
Meow
deserves it for being too merry
for anyone whos bored try integrating sqrt tan x
absolute nightmare 
Facts
that would just make me more bored smh
,w int sqrt(tan(x))
Owned
not chmowned, dont care
fake
it's a joke ❤️
no it’s not
ryc is
@neat frost
@violet wraith
@violet wraith
please dont pingspam.
Probably
specimen S: slurp
LOL
aliens very likely exist but they're unlikely to be in the form that we think of
,w int sqrt(tan(x))
reminded me of this: https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/derivative
my life goal is to make the most useless mathematics possible
no u uwu

Im making a hardcover (that the softcover slots into) for my copy of Jacobson :D
Hi, I want to say "h[n] is non-zero only when the value of n is one of the following". Is this correct notation? $h[n] \ne 0 \iff n \in {-2, 0, 1, 3}$
jet
in my head i read it as:
well, "only when" and "if and only if" mean different things, the latter is a stronger statement
if you only want "only when" it should be $... \implies ...$
Lochverstärker
i.e. every time h[n] is nonzero, n is in this set
I wonder what similarities we share
That'd be really interesting
Especially if they're intelligent
Wouldn't it be interesting if there are stuff that all intelligent life forms share?
in this case they both seem to be equivalent? if h[n] ≠ 0 implies that n is a member of the set ("only when"), there is no situation where h[n] ≠ 0 and yet not be a member of the set, meaning that, if n is in the set, h[n] ≠ 0
i don't know, but if this is the case you can make this (stronger) statement
what information is missing here for you to decide? (will help me provide more context next time)
no idea what h[n] is
tan(a+b)=?
what is it?
,w tan(a+b)
fail
You know that google exists right?
What do u all think about artists ?
I was able to find it in 10 seconds, how come you aren't
That I love them, and I also am one.
yeah
Like painters and stuff ?
Yeah! My best friend is someone who is studying Fine Arts, and I myself spent years drawing and I'm enrolled into Design Uni
thx
I have self learnt how to draw realism, and I can't say I'm bad either
I just love drawing because it relaxes me and produces wonderful results.
I don't like artists

Yayy Im almost done with making my hardcover for Jacobson's Basic Algebra I! 
Just need to squash it under some stuff and wait for it to dry
classic book !! looks lovely btw
I feel like they are just really really pretensious with all their "deepness" stuff
Most of them didn't develop brain after 14, they are just people stuck in their I am 14 and this is deep stuff
So I wanted to know what others think about artists lol
Thanks for your opinion ^°^
That's wonderful 💝💝
Thank you!!! :D 
Thanks!! 
wdym didn't develop brain lol.
i should get a hard copy at some point or another of both I and II because the only ones i've been able to reference are abysmally-printed pdf versions
They are still stuck in their I am 14 and this is deep phase
Am I not an artist
You are
But I am saying like "professional painters"
Who I have to study in school for some annoying reason
You probably met the wrong ones. My friend is studying in Fine Arts college and she learnt some good stuff there
It's also hard to be there
I mean I'm a very rare case to be fair
It's rare an artist like me also does stuff like Calculus and all the other scientific subjects.
Well u might have seen people who are stuck in their 14 year old phase ig ?
Well only thing I despise is many contemporary artists
Leonardo Da Vinci was an artist whose work lies more in biology than art probably
Also he had a great mathematician still well known as his math teacher
Tbh, Leonardo Da Vinci was like that one aesthetic girl in biology class who can actually draw better diagrams than teacher
He studied anatomy to draw Monalisa
And also provided work which hadn't been done before
What is contemporary art?
I can't properly describe it, but it's the late XX century and XXI century art that no longer focuses on figurative approaches to convey feelings and ideas to the viewer through direct and clear representations. This type of art lets the observer create a feeling out of something that possibly doesn't have any. Most of this art focuses on materials, structural approaches and techniques, rather than a strong tradition of skills, painting or drawing, basically it tries to break all the previous boundaries from traditional art to achieve something beyond all the previous eras.
Ah!! The banana on the wall people!!!
That's the contemporary art
I have so much unfinished art in my closet, do you want to see lol
Sure, did u tie banana in ur closet ?
Lol
Nah I just practice portraits or also copying old masters. I'm not exceptional, but I do it out of fun
I self learnt at 16
I generally just don't like things which are "emotional" and are suppose to give me sense of some deep abstract emotions
I want patterns, rules, algorithms, things that don't have any emotions and just purpose and objective
Like I have a lot of interest even in other scientific fields apart from maths like physics, neuroscience, chemistry and stuff but then I am extremely terrible at "expressing myself" and emotions and stuff like that in general
When I express emotions, I cringe at myself
I want analytical things
these are gorgeous
They are unfinished tho. I have way better.
More and more, I always try to treat my life like algorithm where I must perform steps one after another with no care for emotions
Those are actually good potraits!!! They look very nice
helo
Ik, but at the same time I can't change much
That's one of the most recent things I have been doing actually, trying to work on algorithms and understanding them in computer science and then think of my life as one and turn all my habits routines and everything to an algorithm with clear set of instructions that I must execute
You know I studied anatomy as well, like Da Vinci did? Many people enrolled in good Fine Arts school do it as well
Anatomy is cool tbh
That's wonderful!!!
now thats a vibe
Now, my favorite thing is figure drawing probably.
That's just my entire personality at this point
ima 3d artist
i make human sculpts
Very nice!
old people only ahah?
i love wrinkles
i hate making girl models
or i cnt make girl sculpts lol
god of war
Sadly I can't post most of my art, because figure drawing involves partial nudity most of the times 🤣
jake draw me like one of ur french girls xd
This is a training copy exercise from an artist I like
wat do u use
or like wats the best tool for u
acrylic charcoal oil
etc
A2 paper (42 x 59cm). Charcoal, Graphite, White coal
oh wow
I'm still learning colours drawing, I'll learn it this year
charcoal is hard
also pretty expensive pencils
Charcoal pencil isn't expensive realy
the coloured ones are tho.
it kinda is compared to regular pencil
but ye
i joined this server bcuz i hate maths
If you want some good affordable brands I can make some reccomendations
was thinking if i cn chnge my mind
its fine i am sticking to 3d now
I am enrolled into Ind. Design, so I take several mathematics.
that's why I'm here.
idk wats ind
Industrial Design makes concepts and sketches for products, while also dealing with concerns of materials, production and sometimes even economics or patents.
Pretty much every product you see in life, a designer made it anyway.
i use to make products
for 3d printing
wat color is ur bugatti xd
I doubt I'll ever work at Bugatti.
i love ur pfp
It's a painting.
is that a ghost
ye i kinda figured
Ill do 3D modeling as well
cool
wat software\
I have not started it yet. They get taught in 2nd\3rd year of Uni.
I think they teach SOLIDWORKS
or RHINO
It's necessary to learn it, because after one does a freehand\CAD project of the product, it's also essential to do the rendering and 3d model of it with textures, materials, etc...
ye fosure
There's some insanely talented people out there
if they r making u learn houdini gud luck
i open artstation n want to quit sometimes
houdini is awesome
thats pretty easy
hard surface
Well not easy for me. I've got to learn all of that next years. Never done it in my life.
oh ok u will find it easy
Nice
idk if unis will use blender
since its not industry standard
might use maya
or cinema 4d
I also need to make that stuff IRL tho lmao
lol
we have laboratory activity, with laser cutter, wood workshop, etc.
wat is ur degree call
Industrial Design?
is it in bachelor arts?
oh i mean wat field is it in
maybe fine arts
My country is cursed
it's in the Architecture Department formally
Only here ☠️
Doesn't have shit to do with Architecture tho
china?
Gosh I gotta remove my chinese username.
I'm Italian. Just studying Chinese as 3rd language.
oh cool
+100 social credit
Loved your work but honestly that beard looks ugly
我不是中国人 😦
ye blender crashed bcuz i dont retopo n added hair
my potato pc cnt take it
I mean this beard
yes thats wat i mean
lmaoo okii
Best of luck tho
lol
danke
venge, do you know that I was about to join Fine Arts degree (Digital Media)
so i hate maths how do i like it
fine arts is cool
the issue is I can't afford to study away from my city, because the nearest city that has that teaching is 150km away from home
It requires math to build all those??
but u hv to be able to starve xd
make the bread xd
nah
thats just sculpting
Nah. I just decided to give up on it, I don't want to graduate in fine arts and have a 25000€ debt on myself.
I rather study in my local university something a little different.
but in physics like smoke somulation or liquid simulation i need maths
how common is 3 first languages?
like viscocity temp density
in W. Europe, pretty common. Can't guarantee everyone is good at them tho.
Um... I see interesting stuff
i know 3 langauge
its pretty common if ur not a english speaker
so r u a mather
I'm native italian speaker, fluent in English, took 3 years of Spanish, and I'm taking Mandarin Chinese for 9 months.
nah just a curious high-school dude
Alright continue the great work, goodbye
wdym? id honestly be surprised if there was a negative correlation between speaking english and being trilingual (also my question was about three first languages)
i failed french in college
but i know some words just to troll
un petit peu
livre
25k 
cows <3
Renting is expensive girl
It's not even the tuition being expensive here
You can get tuition for 1000-2000€ a year in most cases
But renting can be up to 500-1000€ a month in big cities
do u take a loan
for uni?
Me? No.
ye pretty much
I decided to study in my own city, I don't need to rent anything; hence no loans.
when i was in college my rent was 100 usd for a 1 bedroom apartment
was cool living there
My parents pay for me, I am in highschool
smart
😎😎
highschool is free here
highschool was a nice time
smoking weed n drinking
dont do that tho
well I did the drinking part sometimes. Weed is illegal, I'd never do it.
gud
also dont smoke
@neat lintel can we be art friends
sure
I don't do drugs at all
No smoking
No alcohol
No weed
do u hv cool concept art
im out of ref images
what concept art
hv ?
Venge
have you heard about Generative Design techniques?
To me it looks like alien stuff so much
From what I understand of it, you basically let an AI\Algorithm use some constraints, requests and conditions for building an object.
