#serious-discussion
1 messages · Page 38 of 1
Kevin ☕
$2³ =/ 9$
Kevin ☕
Kevin ☕
$x^1/2$
Kevin ☕
How tf you square root
$\sqrt{x}$
But next time in #latex-testing
@neat frost okok

Today I realized that the exterior algebra is just the geometric algebra when r=n
(r=n -> Q(v)=0)
what's that
nothing important, just some random unnecessary joke
hey grass
the characteristic of a ring R is the smallest positive integer n such that
1+...+1 (n times) = 0
where 1 and 0 are the multiplicative and additive identities in R
if such a number doesn't exist, then the characteristic is said to be 0
No smartass, holier-than-thou know-it-all attitude?
*holier-than-thou
A "I'm actually a dumbo that don't know shit, this is just what I read from pop-sci" disclaimer?
I'm actually disappointed
Screw you lol
lmfao

what's wrong with that
I don’t do that silly
Fuck, slurp saw it
I feel really ashamed at the amount of pop sci stuff I've read throughout my life in comparison to actual science
I am the smartest
Now it's significantly less funny
are you guys gonna fight
Morning slurpy durpie
allow a totem for darq
I’m no geek. I don’t play Minecraft
Oh yes
we will do a math duel, renaissance Italy style
Idk what that means but I’m inclined to disagree
if you can factor and solve this cubic polynomial with complex roots you win
Shuuuuuuure
Sure
Squeaky boy
Hmm
can you guys recommend me a good practice routine
read, think really hard, write some stuff, repeat
the circumference?
I always imagine it as a thread that I can flatten out and measure on a number line like a ruler
yeah circumference
is there proof of its relationship to the radius?
yes
sorry, proof machine broke
proof or it didn’t happen
qed
Hello
why are you @ ing random users to talk in dms?
Everything in the galaxy is sort of orbiting everything else in the galaxy like a big fluid blob
the spiral arms are actually waves in the blob
The fact that "now" doesn't exist really tears me up inside
This is a nice video from a simulation, look at the latter part for after the galaxy has formed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O674AZ_UKZk
The formation of a single massive galaxy through time, from early cosmic epochs until the present day, in the TNG50 cosmic simulation. The main panel shows the density of the cosmic gas (high in white, low in black). Insets show large-scale dark matter and then gas (lower left), and small-scale stellar and gaseous distributions (lower right).
Th...
@frigid matrix hi
hi, anybody wanna help me with my game design?
I'd rather get the discipline to work on my own
hi @zealous garden
it is not that simple
it needs balancing, that only a mathematical mind can do
I don't know what that means
hi @zealous garden, the game needs work that relies on mathematics
could be fun, you can dm me your elevator speech, I'll be making dinner soon so I won't read it right away
hi, what happens if you have cards with a certain number of arrows in the 8 directions, how many permutations can you have?
I got an idea, the most massive Star of 27 Mass Points, has 8 Gravity Lines, the 14 Asteroids, have 3 Gravity Lines each, in unique configurations, the 2 Moons have 1 Gravity Line each, one facing orthogonally, the other facing diagonally
then for the two second largest Mass Points Star will be 7 Gravity Lines each
so we are left with 2, 4, 5, 6
Hello do you have good clips to understand ( Cos ) ( sin )
Hi
can you help me with my game design?
it is ok
Good
hi @frigid matrix, yo, I have progressed with the game with someone else
you want to see what we have?
Dawg why are you tagging random people?
do sentient things like humans unconsciously orbit something?
i mean the sun
you're mean to the sun?
im kinda busy atm but when im less busy ill ask
ok thanks @frigid matrix!
bro tips on wtf to do when ur chem teacher sucks but u gotta do well bc it’s ur final year in school 🧍♀️
its how it works in uni too. learn to self study
cry about it
study
hi
guys
guys
You have to think about this one. #math #maths #mathematics #shorts
I honestly would have mindlessly solved the question myself without thinking. I've seen versions of this problem. I think this the link below the original video but do let me know if another video was earlier so I can provide proper credit:
https://www.tiktok.com/@your.bummy.m...
IS IT NOT 32?
bruh moment
No the ground stops them, but if the earth disappeared they would
Ignore. Do not trust him. He has previously called bruh moment when there was no bruh moment taking place
im a doodoo brain i make these mistakes very regularly
bruh moment
hi, i want to ask some math questions
You can read #❓how-to-get-help for guidelines :)
it's much less a math question
it's a question about why a conversion formula is the same both ways
You can still use the help channels prolly
Please stop spamming this in multiple channels
I need help quickly but no one is, I tried yesterday and didn’t get help for an hour
And no one helped
Is anybody familiar with audio-based math? Engineering type stuff... I need some help with a little math that deals with stuff like volts, SPL, decibels, pascals, using logarithms to solve, etc.
Be patient. People are helping here out of their free will and compassion. If you don't get help then, well I don't think there's any other way to put it other than better luck next time. 1 hour is not a lot of waiting time anyways. I waited 5 days the last time i used a help channel
also you just dropped an entire worksheet and asked people to do a question for you
thats not very conducive to receiving help
at least try and state what youre confused by, if you have been provided any formulas, etc
What a beautiful function... It looks like noodles
you should see tan(x^2+y^2) = 1
that is just- 😍
me when
give me a question about Graphing Linear Function using TABLE OF VALUES
im gonna fail my math subject
im gay
how to report messages ?
No pain, no gain.
Hi gay. I'm edwardborn
Try to make up your own question 🙂
finaly umuted
How does everyone here revise for exams. Do you go over your notes and re-write them and refine them?
You do problems and review concepts
For proof-based classes at least, I go through all the theorems from class and try to prove them out loud to myself - same with all the past HW problems
talking things out helps me to really internalize the ideas
Ryc also just really likes the sound of his voice
i used to be obsessed with having clean and well written notes
I am finding it hard to write my notes in a more logical order then first presented and taught. After learning more things at the end of the course that relates to the things at the beginning I feel like writing them in a more logical order would help me. Do you ever write your notes back out in a different order?
and it took actual effort to stop investing time into making them "flow in a good way" or whatever
I bet you posted pics of them on instagram, all color coded with cute little artistic accents
uve seen my notes ryc
the text is neatly placed within the lines but thats their only merit
oh wait lmao yeah when i was obssessed with note taking
i was less of a "cutiepie" and more of a "gamer"
i was obsessed with cramming everything in One(1) sheet of paper
oh my god this is so fucking cringe
to the point i used sticky notes layered on top of each other for extra space
"the cornell method" actually fucking kill me
these people are real and i fear them
i remember when my 10th grade literature teacher forced us to take notes in the "cornell method" and she'd have us fucking fold the paper over or whatever
so dumb
feels like these ppl wuld also write self help blogs
That's so fucked
God
the more that i think about the way that education works the more i see the value in sink or swim philosophies
I remember my 9th grade history teacher graded our notes too
I just want notes that flow well to help me lol
I don't remember how specific she was about the format
today i tried the "Themes Method" and started using Obsidian Tasks to organise my life on a kanban board 🥰
But she definitely graded us and would be like hmmm yeah I wish you took a note on this too
Like you actual moron lol
And she had no idea how to control a class of 9th graders lol
that's interesting, i haven't done that but what i do is leave a pretty large amount of space for me to go back and write notes or fill in ideas
i think notetaking culture here is a bit more
How many of you use iPad's to take your notes?
obsidian is basically the same shit don't get me started
using highlighting for survival
i use a samsung tablet with onenote
My 10th grade history teacher did something a bit similar but was less ridiculous about it. More just like hmm you doing something serious okay cool
Rather than actual fuckin grading
ok MAYBE i did sidetrack myself into the notetaking management plugin addiction
Even that I don't agree with but I'll give credit where it's due he was faaar from the infimum
Ryc is coming around
and MAYBE i stopped studying for an entire week to get the system going
MAYBE it was overcomplicated quirky and maximized aesthetics
Just MAYBE
but i promise its bc im in the military and dont have my laptop w me as soon as i can "digitise my notes" ill be golden
i forgot about this, yes it's true
lmao i cant say this with a straight face
Wait are you in the military? Or is that the part you can't say with a straight face?
Interesting you don't give military vibes lol
Ohhhhhhhhhhhh
"express myself"
I tend to think of American soldiers lol
has only made me more "hot girl habitat"
Hot girl habitat
its the difference between the "soldier" and the "conscript"
And in my head American soldiers are either like, either mad disciplined or a bit wild
No middle ground
from what ive seen
ure absolutely right lmfao
like the little baby soldiers? before they get promoted to sergeants and stuff
theyre just crazy but the same level as ud expect from frat kids
Do you think it is better than using paper? I am thinking of converting
That is also a fair point I guess in America there's no conscription there's only predatory recruitment so I don't have much to contrast with
but once they get promoted they suddenly get Immersed into the Duty
I like it a lot better
I don't know if it's worth the price of an ipad
but if you have one
I use a samsung galaxy tab s6 which was like 300 bucks
and came with a pen
most countries dont even have predatory conscription
the great nation of korea begs to differ
the lite is now $230
Nice
Blo is in the Slurp stan army
you wish
could I have a few pointers for this
how would I prove
(a^b)^c=a^(bc)
I can do it for integers
but not for a number rational or irrational
?
How is a^b defined?
Yes
for instance, is 2^(1/2) positive or negative?
But how do you prove (a^b)^c =a^(bc) if you havent defined what a^b means
Like what do you think pi^e is
?
pi^e
Actually i dont know
My guess would be
approxiamate pi and e
with rational numbers
and then use better aproximations
Almost yeah, you just need to approximate e
Yeah that works
but the thing is its
using the property I want to prove
so do we take that property as a defenition?
We take a^(n/m) = (a^n)^(1/m) as definition, the property you want to prove (for b,c rational) is a direct result of this definition
You gotta play with limits
for example
(2^sqrt(2))^3
I can write
m1 as and integer
and n1 as an integer
and m1/n1
aproxiamates sqrt 2
(ams) [ a^x = \lim_{\substack{n\to\infty\ \mathbb Q\ni p_n\varrightarrow x}} a^{p_n} ]
Ok
and because it
applies for each rational number
it applies to the irrational case?
how would you show that?
By using the definition I just sent

define by a^x = e^(x log(a))
is also irrational you
ffs ryc
do the same thing?
if a is irrational theres no issue
youre a horrible person
You could do the same thing but we know what nth roots of irrational numbers mean
to prove the power series
don't you use
this property
so it becomes circular reasoning
(but my way is how you define exponentials of complex numbers, of matrices, of operators, etc)
I know
You need a proof for rational exponentation but not irrational
but for exaomple
(a^b)^c
b,c are irrational
I set a limit
where to rational numbers
aproch the irrational numbers
and because the property holds it will hold when
the the rational number is the irrational?
Also you'd need to show that this is well-defined
Which is probably a pain if youre doing this from scratch
Started with set theory lol I am trying to prove everything
By trying hard
tensor hom adjunction in the monoidal category of reals
God fucking dammit ryc
100% understood
horny much
What?
mmmm big words
Probably
i'm actually dumb
DOnt worry
i don't know how to make this work
I am even dumber
true
me either
taylor series or honry shit
debatable
Good morning slurp!
I am still confused why
Good morning DarQ!
No me
hi dark
But basically, the tensor hom adjunction says that functions from A x B to C are the same as functions from A to (functions from B to C)
and when A, B, and C are finite sets
This says |C|^(|A||B|) = (|C|^|B|)^|A|
This is trivial ryc
Basically
No need for finite
the mathamatical lingo
can you?
No
the point is that it generalizes to modules over rings
Which means I think you can get the statement for real numbers
purely categorically
but idk what the right thing to write down is
ew ryc is a category theorist now
when you multiply
the set or Whole numbers
with itself you get integers
and then integers
multiplied by itself
I feel like this proof would be circular ryc. like idk shit about rings and modules and cat theory but it really feels to me like a definition type proof
Maybe your foundations are just incorrect
But how are exponents actually defined?
This is literally the definition
I didnt just send it for the shits n gigs
We literally discussed this
I mean sure you need to define a^1/m
And proving that a^1/m exists isnt necessarily trivial
first chapter of rudin moment
yes
sorry
but how do you know that there exists a number x such that x^m=a
never read rudin, it was in our calc 1 class
the proof is horrible
Exactly
Basically you show this for positive as first
And then for odd ms you just negative that whatever
(ams) Basically you show that
[ b = \sup\set{0\leq x\in\mathbb R}[x^m\leq a] ]
exists and satisfies the property that $b^m=a$
Did you guys assume least upper bound property or something
yeah
My thoughts where
Defining the reals is so stupid
abstract it, define real axioms
You could show an a^m and n^m
proving that a set with those axioms exists is unnecessary
that has
b^m in between it
and then you can apply some function
on a and n
that keeps the bounds
but shrinks the how far apart
a^m and n^m
How do you define integers from reals
and the limit of this process is b^m
Subgroup generated by the unit
Reals come with a field structure
define ratinal
using a limit proof would probably be circular
and ratinal defines
ok
ah ofc
nah tbh rationals are cooler than reals
Alternatively you can define Z as the pontryagin dual of the unit circle in C
Completing something is a big deal
does hilbert require completeness?
Yeah
Hilbert space = vector space with an inner product and it's complete for the metric you get from the inner product
yeah okay
L^2 is a hilbert space
are finite normed spaces complete
And in some fucked up sense every hilbert space is an L^2
nice
Yes
Well
As long as the field is complete
god finite spaces are too simple
Finite dim normed spaces over Q aren't
oh yeah ofc
They still have interesting structure! The operators on a finite dimensional space have plenty of interesting properties
Matrix algebras
Lie algebras and lie groups of matrices, representation theory of finite groups (what wew does)
Uhhh
whats a lie group
i think i read the wik article a while back but didnt understand shit
and whats a manifold?
So somehow it's smooth
A manifold is the n dimensional analogy of a curve or a surface
So at every point there is a neighborhood which is in continuous bijection with an open subset of R^n
Like a sphere, a torus, etc
Hmm
So it turns out that a lot of important sets of matrices are both groups and manifolds
thats fucked
For example, GL(n) is the set of all invertible nxn matrices
That's awesome
im still at the point of math where definitions seem logical
who tf would care about sets where neighborhoods of points are in continuous bijection with stupid fucking open sets
O(n) is not orthogonal matrices ryc
Dont
Because if you look like R^n everywhere then we can move over ideas of differentiation and integration onto more complicated objects than subsets of R^n
Don't you dare finish the joke
So that we can do stuff like, integrate a function over the surface of some object
relating to my previous comment but it took too long to write
you didn't name the field
MODS
It's a much broader generalization of what you learn in multivariable calculus
why not measure theory
For measure theory, you need a measure
Manifolds?
It's true that you can do all this stuff measure theoretically too
But they work together. You define measures on these smooth spaces by using their manifold structure.
And more importantly, measure theory gives you no idea of differentiation
Slurp measure theory arc
It's true that there are notions of differentiation on metric spaces
Why is it in quotes? Lol
soon i will give up on stupid measure theory
And there are people who generalize the study of manifolds to so called "metric-measure spaces". But manifolds are a good place to start because they are nice and smooth
Metric measure spaces can be really nasty with fractal dimension and stuff.
How much of the book have you done so far?
This is what geometric measure theorists and geometric analysts need to study
im trying to fight the intrusive thought of buying hartshorne
i know damn well i won't have time for it for a while
the way i cope with hs geometry is by writing μ(ABC) for the area of a triangle ABC
Buy it
Just do it™




cringe
Like a third?
why?
hs maths is kinda boring
have you tried complexifying the integral instead of using integration by parts?
btw this kid does things like analysis and stuff

Thanks 
has anyone rad the book of "introduction to mathematical philosophy " by bretrand russel
??
what?
Wait what? Even nonseparable ones?
well they're "L^2" on huge non sigma finite measure spaces
like uncountable sets with counting metric
Ah, okay
Why do help channels have lowercase names only?
Channels in general can only have lower case names
The creators of Discord are the kind of people who only type in lowercase.
No uppercase but can have special characters: 🤔
The help channels used to be indexed by Greek letters.
So only 24 max?
I don't remember.
nah, then you just double up
They got changed to Arabic numerals at some point because the Greek letters seemed pretentious or something.
Then the current help system got put in.
The numbers don't mean anything particular anyway
do you want this one eric?
Nah I think I would only take it if it were at least 500 usd /s

ty rj <3
Eric seems like a nice dude.. oh wait he has the stirner edgy pic
how dare you! !!
Lol
True, I'm actually the meanest edgiest dude you've ever met
RAWRRR THE STATE IS A GHOST
that's a racial slur eric
wtf who is using that word as a racial slur
no I've only ever heard it as "you gave me a spook"
nah
spook is the standard translation for this german word
😭
dammit lemme find another word
spook
noun
a ghost.
a spy
Example: "a CIA spook"
- a black person.
okay I changed it
do these messages have to be purged or does context make it okay
okay
so this is why they pay localization teams
😢
I've only ever used spook to mean ghost, I thought that was its only meaning
Time to purge this word

does anyone know how to get math tutoring jobs
You could advertise at a university for yourself, else you can go on indeed
There's a lot on indeed
hmm
my issue is that im a good tutor but i have 0 qualifiations
for example my friends were struggling in calculus getting Cs/Bs on tests but when i taught them for like 2 hrs they were getting As on everything
i also have experience with neurodivergent ppl
That's great. You have to start somewhere
There's a franchise called mathnasium. They hire people without experience
True but the work is easy
You could go into business for yourself, or there are also services that match you with clients for a portion of your income
I haven't studied a day in my life i cant focus on anything
I hate myself
[p k090ubytvrcer
Is anyone familiar with math pertaining to decibels, SPL, and pascals? I need some help.
@zealous garden whats ur cs background? do u also have math background
I have formal CS background from an (unfinished) degree in CS, AI & Robotics concentration
Gen eds really dragged me down
I only took up to Calc 2 and (some) LA in school
Gen eds are like random humanities shit that u need to take right
im so glad thats not a thing in the UK
Yes
applied math>philosophy>pure math
.
For my CS degree I needed to take politics, psychology, sociology, urban planning, at least 2 liberal arts classes
And more that I forget / didn't get to
So while I was taking junior/senior level CS courses I was retaking freshman writing
so u had to drop out eventually?
Pretty much
Do u plan to finish
I got myself into a position where I couldn't afford to keep going and couldn't get any more aid
U seem smart enough to deserve a degree lmfao
I do plan on finishing a degree
But I have to take care of my missteps first
I'd prefer not to call them mistakes, they're only mistakes if I don't learn
gl my brudda
Thank you
Why urban planning???
Hello! I'm currently a college student who's gearing towards declaring my major soon. (Note: The use of "you" in my message is intended to be plural). I know this might be a biased community to ask the questions I have, but I would still like to hear your valuable insights. Do you think think as a STEM (science) and economics major (I'm in a coordinated dual degree program at my university), it would be valuable for me to develop very strong mathematical skills? One of the schools I attend is a well-known business school, it has over 26 concentrations in business and economics (all of which are strong), but it also offers a unique concentration in statistics. The second school I attend, there are a lot of science and art majors available. Originally, I planned on majoring in molecular and cellular biology, or computational biology. But I wonder if a more niche concentration like mathematical biology or biological mathematics would differentiate me in my science field, or more importantly, offer me a fresh way to look at science? I have articles on the potential math has in the sciences, especially recently, the life sciences, and I am awed!
Articles:
https://www.nature.com/collections/qghhqm
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0020439
https://theconversation.com/the-next-breakthrough-tool-in-biology-its-maths-here-are-some-ways-mathematical-biology-is-helping-change-the-world-186209
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-02176-y
However, what's stopping me might sound like a dumb reason...but math has always been one of my weakest subjects. I am interested in becoming better, but I just suck at it, and I get easily discouraged by small mistakes, and math tends to be more stringent and unforgivable than other fields for small mistakes. Although, this is a more tangential topic.
I'm open to sharing more details on each major (i.e. courses, topics covered, etc.) if that would be helpful!
Apologies if this is the wrong channel!
this is hard to answer without knowing your goals
do you want to do research? if so, then mathematical biology is certainly a major and fast-growing field, though afaik of a more mathematical flavour than biological
in any case, i dont think "bolstering your resume" is particularly valuable if you feel like doing so would be particularly difficult or taxing
So, my end goal is a little unpredictable. I want to be an entrepreneur. But entrepreneurship isn't a career where I can just snap my finger (like medicine or finance) and the path is laid out in front of me.
Without the desire for more freedom and higher income, I think I would be happy in academia! I would probably pursue a PhD in science, and just do scientific research. I think the next generation of biologists have to have strong programming and computational skills, because of the vast amount of data they need to crunch nowadays. And as a result, math is becoming desirable and valuable too. But...it'll definitely take me a lot of investment to learn math since I am worse at math than nearly all my other subjects (only could my music skills be worse 😂 ).
2/3rd the alumni contacts given to me by my school that majored in mathematical biology went into finance. They both worked in private equity, and ones at KKR currently. Yeah, I can definitely see how math is a translational skill I guess, it offers me a safety net to do the same thing if entrepreneurship fails? I can potentially still land on a 6 figure (maybe even 7 figure job) that academia cannot guarantee. My schools strongest networks are also in finance, and I have felt resistance from some of my peers who make back-handed compliments about me being courageous enough to pursue entrepreneurship. The undertones are always like I'm throwing away a potential great career for something extremely risky (my intended entrepreneurship sector would be biotechnology, which is even riskier than an average entrepreneurship sector).
I wouldn't say I'm majoring in math to bolster my resume. If anything, finance is the concentration at my school that holds the most weight, along with analytics or a more traditional business concentration. I'm genuinely interested in statistics too, I see it as capable of offering novel techniques to comb through big data (which biology is facing and will be facing more).
I also think statistics and math are highly translational skills. Part of me is also interested in engineering...and math offers me the most flexibility? Maybe.
I guess partially...I'm answering my own questions. A bit of why I'm not committing is fear. Of course I'm worried about GPA too, and if math is my weakness, it would mean my GPA will not be soaring. Doing pure science or a business/economics concentration would mean a definitively higher GPA for me. How much higher? I'm not sure. My current math knowledge is single-variable calculus with very light exposure to linear algebra and multi-variable calculus.
But looking through the syllabus for some of the courses offered in my prospective major...I'm clueless.
...general topology, separation, compactness, product spaces, Tychonoff's Theorem. Special topics in analysis: Weierstrass Polynomial Approximation Theorem, Bernstein polynomials and simultaneous approxfunctions and derivatives, topics from divergent series, summation methods; r measure theory, the Lebesgue integral, Lp spaces, Holder, Minkowski, and and Cauchy-Schwarz inequalities; basics of Functional Analysis, normed spaces, Banach spaces and Hilbert space, with examples...
If I glance at the science majors and business/economics majors, I can vaguely understand what they would teach.
you can probably already grasp what cauchy-schwarz inequality is about, what's understood by separation and compactness and normed spaces
they're fairly simple concepts
you can just look it up and watch a lecture or two on youtube
I used to watch 3Blue1Brown a lot. I don't really retain or understand what he teaches sometimes, but it is very beautiful 😄 .
Not that I know the field, but I feel like a lot of the entrepreneurs in the biotech sphere have a deep understanding of their field. Given the kind of things people do in the sector this is not surprising (as in, people can get hurt if its done wrong - more so than if Facebook recommends you to friend a person you don't like). Who would you model your career after, Bob Langer, Craig Venter, Elizabeth Holmes? Whoever it is, maybe look at what they did in school?
I see. It might be because my interested in math is still relatively new. I used to despise math, naturally, because I did so poor at it. It was my only class which I didn't get an A in. But, my senior year calculus teacher in high school opened my eyes to math, and calculus was an entirely new feeling. Math made more sense? It felt more important for sure, and more applicable.
Haha...not Elizabeth Holmes 😭
There's an upperclassman at my school and I look up to him. He's also a lot closer to my age than Bob Langer, and understands the present-day ecosystem better (alumni like Jim Bankoff, although not in biotech, have come back to say that there are so much more resources to support entrepreneurship at my university nowadays than when they were students).
He's the ideal image of a person who bends both science and business fluidly into a successful startup. It was venture backed before he entered sophomore year and he won a entrepreneurial grand challenge that went against MBA students from leading business schools (bested Penn, Harvard, and MIT MBA students).
I used to think...yeah, I can be like him. But could I? Not really haha. We differ so much in talent. Also, although I admire his startup and his idea. The sector I want to go into in biotech has a larger time constant, for that, it takes longer to incubate my idea.
I guess a company I've been reading a lot about is Amgen.
Their second former CEO Gordon Binder wrote a book called Science Lessons: What the Business of Biotech Taught Me about Management. One of my friend in academia bought me the book as a book. To my initial surprise, my professors also knew it (I'm not surprised nowadays anymore...they're basins of knowledge), they suggested that I dive deeper into Amgen's earlier history.
Gordon Binder they said, is the public image CEO, the attractive Wharton/HBS graduate that attracts investor. But George Rathmann is the science CEO that built Amgen up, along with his team of like 57 scientists (Amgen only had ~60 employees).
So I guess my point including her was that she's the only high profile founder of a biotech company that I can think of with no knowledge of biotech. The others in my list have PhDs and a lot of experience, and now looking at Amgen, its founder had a PhD and a lot of prior experience in the field, too.
But studying people like Rathmann, Roy Vagelos, or more modern success stories like Lee Schalop from Oncoceutics or Jeffrey D. Marrazzo from Spark Therapeutics, all of these individuals have had strong science and engineering backgrounds that made their companies.
The ones that don't fail or become Elizabeth Holmes.
Yep! Biotech requires that.
It's not like a Facebook or soft tech where the investment is low to start. It takes so much money to start a biotech startup, and is actually the industry that requires the most initial investment in capital. People just burn cash here.
Ah, there was a MIT professor, I forgot his name, he tried to make biotech more attractive to invest in through securitization.
Oh, right, Andrew Lo.
Thanks for the suggestion though! Thank you all for the advice!
I do try to read a lot of past success stories.
A bit of survivorship bias.
No idea
ur in the us?
No pain, no gain.
Yes
urban planning is so interesting though
Urban misplanning is more interesting
was it free?
tuition included gym?
It was somewhere in the fees
Gym, movie theater, therapy, bus, and train
All included somewhere non-negotiable on the bill
There's like tuition, and service fees
I think is how it listed it
has anyone bought an international edition copy of dummit and foote? if so, how was your experience? was it missing any content compared to a U.S. edition? this can sometimes happen; see reviews of the intl. ed. of artin's Algebra. how's the printing and paper quality? passable or very bad?
The books have been delayed :animepfp_sad:
We can opt out of certain things like gym, health services, pretty much anything they can deny us access to
No opting out for me
I'm telling you that place was a scam
And then there's constant construction going on
For shit no one asked for
Ah I go to a public school so it's less scammy
Except the new parking deck because the expensive parking was always full
First years have to live on campus and have a meal plan though unless they live so close
Oh at mine first years had to live on campus no exceptions
Wait I think there was an exception for marriage
Yeah if you live with parents within 40 miles or something they let live off campus
Marriage and military too
Mine was public too though
Oh the real scams are the private schools
My friend went to one, 20k/year after his aid and scholarship and religious classes the don't count at any other school
Oh and curfew of course
Can somebody help me with math to do with sound engineering? I'm so lost...
The real question is why would you want Dummit Foote?
to put on my shelf as a reference to peruse from time to time. i'm not going to use it as a main text.
even as a reference its not that great
what would you suggest
Lang
as far as i know D&F is the canonical undergraduate reference book. personally i prefer pinter and judson but they're not comprehensive. i thought you'd say lang.
great as both a reference and as something to learn from
just because something is used everywhere does not mean that it is good
could be out of instructional convenience, historical reasons, etc
well i guess a hardcover of lang is cheaper than D&F, so i will look into it
i thot
everything written by lang was bad as both a reference and as something to learn from
anything bourbaki is going to be polarizing
D&F is great
I'm a big fan
lang is not great to learn from for a first pass through algebra
imo
eric what is your name 
孙山

thats an understatement
I only saw a bit of Lang and kinda liked it but by then I knew some stuff and again it was a small slice
which slice
I just got D and F and really like it
I've done Aluffi before Lang but I definitely think Lang could be a first book
no
it could not
you have blinders
i saw it 💀
it most definitely could not
gods
reading it was like watching chalk dust fall to the ground after someone brutalized a chalkboard with their cat's nails
the most soul suckingly boring thing i've ever read
not even the fun soul sucking like reyna from val ong
maybe you could read it as a first book if you were some sort of masochist (except instead of pain you crave boredom)
or just a normal masochist tbh
i would rather watch plastic decay
e
i cant believe there are people who genuinely believe lang's algebra is a good first book in algebra
yall must be living in another plane of existence fr
dryer than ben shapiro's wife ong
why do people just get on the internet and lie
what?
Second time in here I see Lang being recommended as an intro to algebra. 😆
Maybe if you’re an undergrad Terence Tao, then you’ll like it.
It's illegal to have an opinion around gristle
loll
No pain, no gain.
no rain, no drain
No lol
It literally looks like it
Do you guys know any decent calender where you can schedule reminders?
Smth like Google calenders but it ACTUALLY pushes a notification
You know...
So that it ACTUALLY reminds you with the thing you want to be reminded with...
Ok nvm
I had to dig a bit but apparently you won't get a notification if you dont set the time
And ig I wasn't doing that
I'm curious, for those of you here who pursued or are pursuing pure math in higher education, specifically fields of math with no practical use: why? Don't get me wrong, I find some of these fields fascinating, but what use is there in pursuing them?
I like it
after embracing the meaninglessness of existence, why not pursue hedonistic desires to do pure math? 
some physicist in 200 years time might use a theorem inspired by a theorem that uses my work in one small step of the proof
a physicist reading pure math?
hedonistic
Surely you mean masochistic
delet this
no 💅

math is fun tho
sometimes
hey all, this is a sort of rant. I've been chipping away at my first uni math class and I think I am failing the exam this afternoon. No excuse really, I think it's due to a lack of practice. I was able to get online worksheets answered but struggled with the module my uni provided. I also have not properly practiced the other half of the coverage. Anyway, my sister has always led me to considering a different career path. She's saying I should think if I am at the level needed for this math class, perhaps then I should consider shifting to the social sciences. My relationship with math has not been straightforward, I'm still constantly trying to address my math anxiety. It just sucks that this is the type of "encouragement" I get. I told her what I learned, which is that math skills arent fixed. She said yeah but you have to be realistic. You can definitely take math again later in life but you wouldn't want to be stuck in uni for 6 years because of math. She said I should think if I actually can learn math within a specific time frame.
idk just feeling really down about this, I still want to give myself a fighting chance even if it means dropping the class. I don't want to give up and I actually have fun experiencing little aha moments when I finally understand how to solve a problem
I've always been insecure about not being good enough for what I want to do and what I enjoy and this experience really reinforces that
I still wish I was better adept at math, that it comes to me more easily, that I breeze through my math classes, especially the first ones
what do you like
this just comes from building confidence so to lose the insecurity you become more confident in your abilities
communicate this to your professor
they might be able to change something
I've already talked to my professor, I told him I really want to learn math. I also said the issues I am facing with the math class. He said he'd be able to better assess my situation after the exam
I'm trying to build the confidence, it's just hard when a person close to me is saying well i might not be good enough
It's a calculus class
You said it's due to lack of practice. What kinds of questions are they asking? E.g. evaluate a particular limit or derivative?
all math is just calc n
algebra I is calc -4
arithmetic is just calc -6
any higher math is just calc n > 3

I've never even seen the latter 
It does
Hey does anyone know which brand of chalk produces the least chalk dust?
A lot of people swear by Hagoromo
I might have a chalkboard problem because I'm using hagoromo and it produces more dust than expected
I haven’t tried too many other brands that are marketed as dustless so I’m not sure
nothing its just khan much better
if the diagonal of a trapezoid are equal, the figure is an isosceles trapezoid proof
how can i prove it
i find the distance of both diagonals
then idk what to do next
@zealous garden yo
u know conways game of life is turing complete right
what if you wrote a compiler that takes python and converts it into conways game of life 😂
or whatever language
i cant tell if this is a dumb idea tbf
it's possible to do
python is among the worst languages you could choose for this, though
Yeah that's feasible but a terrible idea
It'd be a great meme though
Even better, excel to Conway GOL compiler
latter
Xel'naga
why
Because python uses very high level constructs
The complexity you have to deal with, within CONGOL, nightmare fuel
python is not compiled
I have never heard of Ael-Naga before
if you choose a compiled language it'd prob be easier
Like to do python faithfully
But Xel'Naga is from StarCraft
You have to write a python VM in CONGOL
because there's already a compiler designed to do the hard bits
I don't think you avoid this by transpiling either
and then your compiler can take over from where the compiler left off
Is python ever compiled?
AFAIK the closest they do is packaging the interpreter with the program
And the C runtime they use in the libraries
Some alien term I saw on a website once lol
Yeah, they're an alien race
So I've heard as well. Life is strange
if i ever try this i'll use it as an excuse to learn c++
(top 10 reasons to learn c++)
also how would the compiler work, roughly speaking
idk enough cs to know this lol
i just realised it would be possible cuz ik what turing complete means
Like
would you need to build a CPU inside the game
and then just do whatever instructions u need with that CPU?
and also u'd need a section of the map to be used as a display ig
turing completeness generally isn't concerned with questions of display
at the most basic level, you'd just need some way to receive input and some way to make output
I mean, once you build basic logic gates it's kinda the same in any medium
i was thinking of writing a python compiler in haskell
but i don't think it's worth the time
Can you even compile Python
Hello people.
nand intensifies
There is a compiler that compiles python to c
does that speed up the code lol
@tiny forge BUY GOOG
How do y'all write your real number symbol (fancy R)?
,,\bR
Like this
But more connected up
The two left strokes and then the curvy one starting from the top
stop copying me
your R has too many double lines
,,\bQ
wtf that looks so cursed to me
and some would say they didn't even make a Q
Hello ricey
yh show it then ryc
it's weird if you look at this, it's like the Q has a weiner that comes out the bottom
haha that looks dumb
@neat frost this looks dumb right
i left some space where they should be touching
so that you can see the stroke
it's one of the best things ive ever brought into this world
i'm unironically very proud of this
I saw you post this before but this time I will try to remember and use it
it takes a few times of writing it for it to feel right
but when it feels right it feels oh so right
What
I feel like I'm making an 'h' version of @
texit ignoring me
wouldn't the h version of @ be like:
,, {0, 1}(\bZ)
haha
ah i see
I need to push the | part further left
now I see an h in my blackboard Q's too 
doodlin
I love the zeta and xi
I still can't draw zeta and xi




